October 11, 2010
— Ace It seems far less of an all-electric drivetrain vehicle than claimed.
It also doesn't seem to post anything like the mileage and range claimed.
First of all, let's talk about fuel economy. In August of last year, we heard GM's then-CEO Fritz Henderson claimed with all the marketing might it could muster at a Detroit-area press event, that the Chevy Volt would get 230 MPG in city driving conditions. Now, as the Volt's being tested by the auto trade press, we're seeing some surprisingly low fuel economy figures amid the expected lavish praise buff books are heaping upon the Volt.Let's see what they've found out. Popular Mechanics saw just 37.5 MPG in city driving. Car and Driver apparently didn't choose to use their wheel time for any city driving — but found with all-electric driving:
"...getting on the nearest highway and commuting with the 80-mph flow of traffic-basically the worst-case scenario-yielded 26 miles; a fairly spirited back-road loop netted 31; and a carefully modulated cruise below 60 mph pushed the figure into the upper 30s."
Motor Trend, like the rest of the trade press other than Popular Mechanics, didn't appear to do any testing in city conditions, but did find that:
"Without any plugging in, [a weeklong trip to Grandma's house] should return fuel economy in the high 30s to low 40s."
They also parrot GM's new line of 25-50 miles of all-electric — a far cry from the 230 MPG they originally marketed — that the "Volt provides 25-50 miles of real-world electric operation no matter how hard you flog it."
But while even providing only 10% of the fuel economy initially touted, these more real-world figures are merely an exaggeration. The bigger problem is that, as Mr. Oldham now claims, is that GM lied to them about the powertrain.
The part about the powertrain is a sorta inside-car-baseball question of whether the car runs on all-electric, and only uses the gas engine to recharge the battery, or whether the gas engine runs to drive the wheels, which would make the Volt a bit like most other hybrids, and not really some new thing at all.
It appears the gas engine does run whenever the car approaches 70mph.
Which is good news and bad news for me. The bad news is that the vehicle does not use only its batteries, as promised, when approaching these speeds.
The good news is that I'm surprised it can approach these speeds.
Anyway, it looks like the finest auto engineers available in the White House Strategic Communications Office have produced precisely the sort of politically-engineered vehicle you would have expected.
Posted by: Ace at
10:32 AM
| Comments (331)
Post contains 444 words, total size 3 kb.
Approaching and reaching are two different things.
I can approach a supermodel. I do not think I can reach her.
Same thing for 70 mph and the Volt.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 11, 2010 10:37 AM (3jxR/)
Bad carma, in other words.
Posted by: PA Cat at October 11, 2010 10:37 AM (e0rRw)
Posted by: Penfold at October 11, 2010 10:38 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 10:38 AM (4Pleu)
And the taxpayers are still on the hook for $7.5k for each and every one of them made.
Congratulations on your purchase of the new GM Volt (even though you are buying them for other people).
I bet the Volt is suddenly the new choice of government fleets everywhere.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 10:39 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Rocks at October 11, 2010 10:39 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Jerry at October 11, 2010 10:41 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 10:42 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 11, 2010 10:43 AM (3jxR/)
Posted by: maddogg at October 11, 2010 10:43 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 11, 2010 10:43 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 11, 2010 10:44 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 11, 2010 10:44 AM (eOXTH)
The Volt may be a pos, but this is pretty cool, what?
Just think how much easier it is going to be to moon people! I can't tell you how many times in the last two days I've almost crashed my car.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 10:44 AM (r1h5M)
Also- screw electric cars. Where's my flying car? No, I don't want an airplane that can happen to drive on roads, I want a car that can take off from my front driveway and land in my office parking garage.
Posted by: AllenG at October 11, 2010 10:45 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 11, 2010 10:45 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 10:46 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 10:46 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Soona at October 11, 2010 10:46 AM (hBuJc)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 11, 2010 02:44 PM (eOXTH)
New Gov. Motors slogan: Be the first dolt to own a volt. Feel that nasty old penis shrivel up.
Posted by: maddogg at October 11, 2010 10:46 AM (OlN4e)
Since your modern car emits 98% water vapor, there may even be an increase in emissions. In fact, since higher electric loads bring dirtier plants on line, there would almost certainly be more and dirtier emissions.
Posted by: kideny at October 11, 2010 10:46 AM (ENRGu)
Let's be honest, are we really surprised that the product of a zombie company are sub-par?
Posted by: Iblis at October 11, 2010 10:47 AM (9221z)
Posted by: t-bird at October 11, 2010 10:47 AM (FcR7P)
Who could believe the government takeover of any enterprise could make it cost more and run much less efficiently than if run privately???
It's.. unPrecedented!
Posted by: ChiTown Jerry at October 11, 2010 10:47 AM (f9c2L)
Good to see Government Motors has made such massive improvements in 12 years.
/sarc
Posted by: AngryWhiteVoter at October 11, 2010 10:48 AM (7cXE7)
Posted by: ya2daup at October 11, 2010 10:48 AM (0AClR)
Let's be honest, are we really surprised that the product of a zombie company are sub-par?
Posted by: Iblis at October 11, 2010 02:47 PM (9221z)
They are already getting 70+ mpg in Europe.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 10:48 AM (r1h5M)
I just hope we can pay GM their lavish Union pensions. I don't have a lavish pension. Heck, most Americans don't have a pension.
But. You know. Screw us.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 10:48 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Penfold at October 11, 2010 10:49 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 10:49 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: Mark in Spokane at October 11, 2010 10:50 AM (Nmyyl)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 11, 2010 10:50 AM (eOXTH)
Approaching and reaching are two different things.
I can approach a supermodel. I do not think I can reach her.
Same thing for 70 mph and the Volt.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy
You can, and you did. Never again.
Posted by: restraining order at October 11, 2010 10:50 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 02:42 PM (HaYO4)
Still remember your prom night, huh Joanie?
Posted by: CUS at October 11, 2010 10:50 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 11, 2010 10:51 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: billypaintbrush at October 11, 2010 10:51 AM (h2U+C)
Posted by: fluffy at October 11, 2010 10:52 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 10:52 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Moose4 at October 11, 2010 10:53 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Soona at October 11, 2010 10:53 AM (hBuJc)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 10:53 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: AllenG at October 11, 2010 10:53 AM (8y9MW)
How about we all get government supplied scooters. They get great mileage. And they look sexy!
Posted by: Sped at October 11, 2010 10:53 AM (UvAYo)
Posted by: Moose4 at October 11, 2010 02:53 PM (mAhn3)
Free soylent green with your purchase.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 10:54 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: t-bird at October 11, 2010 10:55 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Sponge at October 11, 2010 10:56 AM (UK9cE)
"Still remember your prom night, huh Joanie?"
I don't remember a damn thing. Thank God for photography.
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 10:56 AM (HaYO4)
Why? Batteries. Our battery technology just isn't good enough, and due to the physics of batteries, they may *never* be good enough for cars.
Posted by: Monty
This. I always point out the nuclear navy whenever people prattle on about this. The leaders in submarine technology (Kriegsmarine) abandoned batteries in favor of diesels with snorkels and then hydrogen peroxide. Post war everyone took on and solved the problem of running a nuclear reactor in a sub. Diesel electric subs are back where they were 70 years ago; in coastal waters with limited duration.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 10:57 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Filly at October 11, 2010 02:56 PM (r1Xxg)
Or the butt kraken. Your choice.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 10:57 AM (r1h5M)
"Still remember your prom night, huh Joanie?"
I don't remember a damn thing. Thank God for photography.
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves)
You're bringing those to PuddingCon, right???
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 10:58 AM (R2fpr)
I remember when Dad was in the Army, and the motor pool fleet consisted of AMC products. Not the cool ones like the Javelin, either. We're talking the Ambassador.
History repeats.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at October 11, 2010 10:58 AM (UEEex)
Posted by: Original Mikey at October 11, 2010 10:58 AM (dOatv)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 11, 2010 10:59 AM (tTfVO)
The car was NEVER really intended to be marketted. It was a "subsidy project". It was the same thing as the "clean coal" technology scam that started back when Carter was in office.
In any case, after bankruptcy government motors now had to "produce" and it was retooled to be a more expensive Prius and a pos.
It will never sell and BOTH GM and Chriysler will be looking for another bailout and back in bankruptcy again.
Why? because they never fixed the underlying problem. The unions.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 10:59 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: EcoTerrorist at October 11, 2010 10:59 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Filly at October 11, 2010 02:56 PM (r1Xxg)
One of the funniest auto reviews I've ever read was Jeremy Clarkson's review of the Smart Car. It was brutal.
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2010 11:00 AM (i0R0L)
GM is a pension company that makes vehicles on the side.
And the Volt is a government subsidy magnet that can occasionally be driven on the side.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 11, 2010 11:00 AM (P9+0W)
You're bringing those to PuddingCon, right???
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 02:58 PM (R2fpr)
A separate break-out session: Joanie's Prom Pictures--The Backseat of Broken Dreams (Rated R)Posted by: CUS at October 11, 2010 11:00 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 02:56 PM (HaYO4)
Link?
Posted by: Soona at October 11, 2010 11:01 AM (hBuJc)
If you can find a better built small car, buy it. Wait...I didn't mean that, exactly...
Posted by: Lee Ioccoca at October 11, 2010 11:01 AM (U6bBs)
Posted by: Original Mikey
If you are a tax payer, then you are a buyer. Happy motoring.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 11:01 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: dogfish at October 11, 2010 11:02 AM (D4uK9)
One day we will thank Barry...
for showing us once and for all, beyond a shadow of any doubt, that the government is absolutely the worst possible entity to choose to do virtually anything...
except perhaps those things specifically enumerated by the constitution...
at least until the commerce clause became the potpourri amendment.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 11:02 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: B. Hussein Obama at October 11, 2010 11:02 AM (QKKT0)
Look carefully at some of the Volt "road tests" hitting print right now. The "testers" got an afternoon (at best) with the car. Most got in right after the batteries had been charged, so had a "full tank" to play with. Some reported that the car switched to gasoline engine-generator mode after about 40 miles, which seems about right.
None actually tested the cars in terms of measuring any performance figures. They reported their impressions, which are, at best, relative, and are definitely affected by newness and techno-geekery enthusiasm. I can tell you from experience that a Smart car feels downright speedy, even though it isn't.
I can also tell you a Corvette ZO6 gets 26 mpg on the highway, which isn't that much worse than the Volt's real-world performance. But the ZO6 will reach nearly 200 mph.
When someone spend a week with a Volt, and drives it the way one drives a real car, the impressions will have meaning. Until then, meh.
Yes, the Jetta Diesel is a better deal. So are a number of Euro-diesels we can't buy in the USA.
But Osama Obama wants us all to drive Volts, so there's that. When he gives up his gas-guzzling pimpmobile (a GM truck disguised under "Cadillac" body panels) for a costly, inefficient (by real-world standards), cramped "economy" car, he might almost sound credible.
If I had any money for a car -- which I don't -- I would probably be thirsting for a Ford Fiesta Diesel. Oh wait, we can't buy those here, either.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 11:03 AM (Ulu3i)
"Clean coal" was really a publicity stunt. Gassification was the only rational technique at the time, but the eco-loons wouldn't let the test plants go on-line, so real-world testing was a joke. ConEd (NY) showed that emissions were identical to the cleanest oil-fired plants and some gas-fired plants, but the fascists still wouldn't let them fire it up, because
COAL IS EVIL! STRIP MINING! BLACK LUNG! DIRTY! (american)
Posted by: EcoTerrorist at October 11, 2010 11:04 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Don at October 11, 2010 11:04 AM (RiU19)
You're bringing those to PuddingCon, right???
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 02:58 PM (R2fpr)
Sure! Prom photos & 300 pictures of my cat. (I said cat, not pussy)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 11:04 AM (HaYO4)
But the entire eco-bullshit thing that the Dems and Obama has really has nothing to do with saving the planet and has everything to do with advancing communism.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 11:04 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 11:04 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 11:05 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Government Fleet Purchaser at October 11, 2010 11:05 AM (yQWNf)
... all told, that makes it pretty much the ideal car to represent this Administration.
By the way: comment number 12? Threadwinnah.
Posted by: Keith Arnold at October 11, 2010 11:08 AM (Jdtsu)
Posted by: Blue Falcon 'the bike guy' in Boston at October 11, 2010 11:09 AM (ijjAe)
You're bringing those to PuddingCon, right???
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 02:58 PM (R2fpr)
Sure! Prom photos & 300 pictures of my cat. (I said cat, not pussy)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves
Why not. We're going to a brewery, so at some point in the evening, somebody will find them enjoyable.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 11:09 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: John Galt at October 11, 2010 11:10 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at October 11, 2010 11:10 AM (5MMzu)
Posted by: Zombie Billy Mayes at October 11, 2010 11:11 AM (wOGfT)
Sure! Prom photos & 300 pictures of my cat. (I said cat, not pussy)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 03:04 PM (HaYO4)
As long as they're pictures of things hairy, the morons will love it.
Posted by: Soona at October 11, 2010 11:12 AM (hBuJc)
Does the Pope wear a big hat?
Does a bear shit in the woods?
Does Chatty Cathy have a plastic pussy?
Posted by: jwpaine at October 11, 2010 11:12 AM (g4J4S)
Mean Jean Schmitt (R) OH-2 just came a knockin' on my door doing some retail politcking and I had an interesting conversation with her, She was adamant in saying that the Jackassocrats will try to push legislation during the lame duck that will allow Ogabe to nationalize our 401Ks to shore up union pensions.
It sounds fucking nuts...and it'll never pass, but she said they are going to try especially since the porkulus failed.
I remember reading about this idiocy when Ogabe got elected. Certain left wing think tanks (an oxymoron, I know) were pushing this in order to keep state and local governments solvent.
The public unions were able to get it codified where their pensions were obligated to be funded no matter what. California is a prime example. This is the reason they are in so much trouble
It's fucking crazy, but they will try it...andwe have some RiNO fucking idiots who would probably vote for it
Posted by: beedubya at October 11, 2010 11:13 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: maddogg at October 11, 2010 11:13 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Blue Falcon 'the bike guy' in Boston at October 11, 2010 11:14 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: Bob S at October 11, 2010 11:14 AM (izA2D)
Ogabe to nationalize our 401Ks to shore up union pensions.
Good think my 401k is now worthless...
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 11, 2010 11:14 AM (5G5c/)
"We're going to a brewery, so at some point in the evening, somebody will find them enjoyable."
Wait, is there a Philly/Delaware thing coming up that I'm not aware of?
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 11:15 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: Obama Motors at October 11, 2010 11:15 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Fritz Hendershot at October 11, 2010 11:16 AM (GwPRU)
You whiny conservatives should be more supportive of the Chevrolet Volt, and with my experience in the auto industry, I understand the need to transfer our effort into electric driven transportation instead of the out-modded carbon concept.
Posted by: Edsel Ford, FoMoCo FuckUp at October 11, 2010 11:17 AM (v1gw3)
Oh please please please do a post on this??
After all, we all be leaning forward on election night. Probably the only time though. (Except for Mallamutt. The masochist actually watches that network).
Posted by: laceyunderalls at October 11, 2010 11:17 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at October 11, 2010 11:18 AM (uvFJG)
My twenty-year-old Chevy S-10 pickup with 229K on the odometer gets 23 mpg around town with a 4.3 L V-6.
It's been paid off for 16 years.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 11, 2010 11:19 AM (3jxR/)
When did Newton's Second Law get repealed?
Posted by: AllenG at October 11, 2010 11:19 AM (8y9MW)
Drudge needs to change his picture, like NOW!
I can't decide which is worse -- that pic or Favre's junk shot.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at October 11, 2010 11:20 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: PR at October 11, 2010 11:20 AM (7m4bG)
Posted by: AllenG at October 11, 2010 03:19 PM (8y9MW)
When I signed the executive order!
Posted by: Barack Obama, Super Scientist at October 11, 2010 11:21 AM (VmtE9)
Posted by: MayBee at October 11, 2010 11:21 AM (WetPl)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at October 11, 2010 11:21 AM (5MMzu)
Did a car company lie about something in order to make you want to buy a car?
From such an ethical industry? Really?
Posted by: AoSHQ's Truman North at October 11, 2010 11:22 AM (HLGCA)
Posted by: Bob S at October 11, 2010 03:14 PM
When Tesla actually builds one of these wonder-cars and it actually lives up to all the hype being spewed about it, that will be the time to think about it.
Tesla is another fiasco existing on gubmint money and gullible investors. To my knowledge, the sedan has gone through none of the tests necessary to allow it to be sold to the public, and with less than a year to go before supposed on-sale time, I would doubt the necessary engineering work is anywhere close to being done.
The endless stream of lying, pie-in-the-sky-bye-and-bye bullshit that comes from the Mohammedan Mouthpiece's regime is hard at work in the automotive world, too. Sadly, too many people eat it right up.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 11:22 AM (Ulu3i)
Everyone knew that the Volt was a farce when they chose the battery pack for it. GM drug it's feet for far too long choosing what batts were going into the Volt, which led to some speculation about whether they actually had the engineering worked out in the power-train.
That and the fact that they ended up picking shitty batteries for it after the 18 month "decision" process.
The V in Volt stands for vaporware.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at October 11, 2010 11:22 AM (1mE2s)
it centers around the Countdown host sitting at his computer, writing a Special Comment. We see him type, edit, and eventually see a clip of the finished product on-air.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at October 11, 2010 03:17 PM (pLTLS)
Be still my beating heart!
I shall prepare for the dazzling excitement by doing something equally as dazzling and exciting. I'll replace the wax ring on my toilet.
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2010 11:23 AM (i0R0L)
Posted by: Count Alessandro Giuseppe Antonio Anastasio Volta at October 11, 2010 11:23 AM (GwPRU)
I am thining about getting a new car and millage will play a big part in what I buy.....................
I'm doin a coin toss between the Dodge Challenger with the Hemi with a six speed or the Shellby GT 500 with a six speed..............
.......okay, so I don't give a shit about the millage. Sue me.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at October 11, 2010 11:23 AM (OefT/)
Posted by: The General Motors Ministry of Truth at October 11, 2010 11:23 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 11:25 AM (4Pleu)
Sure, it's still a pig in a poke, but it's the creation of all of Washington.
Posted by: cranky-d at October 11, 2010 11:26 AM (r92xs)
Oh please please please do a post on this??
After all, we all be leaning forward on election night. Probably the only time though. (Except for Mallamutt. The masochist actually watches that network).
Posted by: laceyunderalls at October 11, 2010 03:17 PM (pLTLS)
It looks like a take-away from Beck's "Insider Extreme". Fucking posers.
Posted by: Soona at October 11, 2010 11:26 AM (hBuJc)
Posted by: Engineering, now with Chicken empathy at October 11, 2010 11:27 AM (D4uK9)
Posted by: torabora at October 11, 2010 11:27 AM (hbFXn)
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 11:27 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: huh at October 11, 2010 11:27 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 11, 2010 03:21 PM (5aa4z)
I knew it! We called this exact shit two months ago! Ohio militias (and they are a scary bunch, truth be told) will be trotted out as evidence that Tea Party wants a violent overthrow of the gubmint.
I didn't read the whole article but it's obvious that these lefty cocksuckers are getting way too predictable.
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2010 11:28 AM (i0R0L)
The 230MPG number is what they want for an EPA rating. The only reason the Volt exists is for its contribution to GM's CAFE numbers. Selling one 230MPG Volt buys them the CAFE headroom to sell a dozen 14MPG Suburbans.
It has nothing to do with what you'll get in the real world if you never plug it in. It's a number based on some substantial percentage of Volt operation being done as a plug-in.
For people who drive 40 miles a day mostly under 70mph and remember to plug it in, and doesn't pay a fortune for electricity overnight, that 230MPG number might be a perfectly reasonable thing.
Everyone else who cares about operating cost ought to be buying Jetta diesels anyway.
Posted by: JEM at October 11, 2010 11:28 AM (o+SC1)
The whiny conservative class continues sniping about General Motors, but with the introduction of the Chevrolet Volt and the impending IPO, GM will once and for all silence these naysayers of doom.
The IPO will be a resounding success, and President Obama will be lauded as the leader of the free world who saved GM from a fate worse than death. President Obama did it without the support of the obstructionist republicans. And, Dick Cheney.
Posted by: David AxelDweeb at October 11, 2010 11:28 AM (v1gw3)
Posted by: t-bird at October 11, 2010 11:28 AM (FcR7P)
The new Mustang has a variable -- pretty much everything -- engine that has some great low-end torque and impressive overall performance. But, because of the new electronics can be driven as an econobox too.
Posted by: EcoTerrorist at October 11, 2010 11:28 AM (LH6ir)
Somebody please explain to me the point of this car is?!
My 10 year old well maintained VW Passat gets 35mpg all day long on the highway. Well over 400 miles a tank. The volt gets 35-40mpg best case??! and only 30 miles before you have to recharge it?! WTF?
and oh by the way greenies.. dont give me the 'electric power' bullshit. When you plug it in, that energy is coming from coal fired plants. Much worse than gasoline.
You greenies are despicible people who follow this faux movement for your own VANITY. Yes my friends.. its all vanity. You couldn't care less about the planet. The real sick thing is that if CA fails to pass prop 23, gas and diesel prices will increase up to $9 a gallon in next 10 years. That means probably an increase of 75% to cost of all goods.. including food.
3rd world here we come!!! If we don't do something fast to stop these religious fanatics, its over. OVER.
Posted by: John Frum at October 11, 2010 11:29 AM (aMnKS)
Does anyone really think that the Volt was developed after Obama was elected?
Posted by: cranky-d at October 11, 2010 03:26 PM (r92xs)
Correct, it wasn't started by Obama, but when you take ownership of the Volt, you own the ride lock, stock, and barrel.
Posted by: Fish at October 11, 2010 11:30 AM (v1gw3)
You mean besides union campaign donations? I'm sure they'd offer up a few vacuous catch phrases like 'sustainable energy' or green jobs or 'investing in the future.' Eventually one of them will play the liberal hawk card: "We'll be able to get off Saudi oil!"
There hasn't been a more fitting metaphor for Leftist governance since the Traubi. The first sales numbers are going to be too embarrassing for GM and the Oministration to be released without lying through their teeth.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at October 11, 2010 11:30 AM (23kaI)
But the entire eco-bullshit thing that the Dems and Obama has really has nothing to do with saving the planet and has everything to do with advancing communism.
Posted by: Vic
They are already out. There is one in my neighborhood, and as long as it has tailights, headlights, seatbelts, windscreen, wipers, turn signals and can reach 25mph, it can be street legal.
F'n thing is annoying to be behind though.
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 11, 2010 11:30 AM (aaULJ)
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 11:30 AM (4Pleu)
incidentally, I just had ceramic pads installed on my Navigator.
Love them. No black brake dust. Nice stopping power.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 11, 2010 11:31 AM (7UuG8)
Posted by: CUS at October 11, 2010 03:25 PM (wOGfT)
Fap. fap. fap. fap-fap-fap.....
Posted by: jwpaine at October 11, 2010 11:31 AM (g4J4S)
Oh please please please do a post on this??
After all, we all be leaning forward on election night. Probably the only time though. (Except for Mallamutt. The masochist actually watches that network).
Posted by: laceyunderalls at October 11, 2010 03:17 PM (pLTLS)
Lean forward. Or in the Obama vernacular, bend over. Now smile. You're not smiling! A little further. And you thought you wouldn't enjoy anal sex.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 11:32 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 11:32 AM (4Pleu)
Last night Colt and I watched the episode affectionately known as "The Slow Race," in which the guys had like 20 hours to get from Switzerland to Blackpool on a single tank of gas. Jeremy hated the whole idea and wanted to run out of gas near his house, so he got a Jag and blasted the A/C, charged his phone, and heated the passenger seat at 80 MPH all the way through France, but the damn thing just kept going. So then he decided to be in the race for reals, and shut it all down and started going 30.
Hammond, meanwhile, drove a super-eco car which supposedly got 70 MPG and drove very carefully the whole way. He did win--by like 15 minutes or so. Clarkson came right after him and there was STILL gas in the tank to go another 100 miles or so.
Eat it, watermelons.
Posted by: Filly at October 11, 2010 11:33 AM (r1Xxg)
I drive a Challenger RT 5.8L HEMI with a cold-air intake. It's not the monster 6.1L HEMI, but it has some hustle to it. It's also probably the last Chrysler/GM product I will ever buy in my life, so I wanted to make my farewell purchase a good one. Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 03:27 PM (4Pleu)
I'm thinking I'll go with the Challenger Monty. Stuff the biggest sonofabitch they got under hood and write my last will and testament. LOL
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at October 11, 2010 11:33 AM (OefT/)
Love them. No black brake dust. Nice stopping power.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 11, 2010 03:31 PM (7UuG
What's a set of ceramic pads going for these days?
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2010 11:33 AM (i0R0L)
If a car runs on alcohol and emits pollution, there is an easy fix: Have it run on pollution and emit alcohol. Problem solved!
I'm not sure a car currently battery-powered and then subjected to this simple engineering process would be safe at highway speed.
Posted by: AoSHQ's Truman North at October 11, 2010 11:33 AM (HLGCA)
Posted by: Muckdog at October 11, 2010 11:33 AM (gzYq8)
Posted by: Bureau of Labor Statistics at October 11, 2010 11:34 AM (/5Axw)
Posted by: cranky-d at October 11, 2010 03:26 PM
Yes, the Volt was conceived before the Mohammedan Mouthpiece regime, but "in fairness" to GM (as "Poppin' Fresh" would say) -- a corporation I despise, because most of their products are crap -- it began as a "concept car," meant to be built when technology had advanced sufficiently to make it worthwhile. Ford, after all showed an "atomic" car back in the 1950s, and you can bet they would have produced it if it were possible.
You can thank every friggin' political hack in D.C. who has ever pimped for Crap and Tax and "green power" for the Volt. But Osama Obama his own blessed, omnipotent self gets the blame for elevating it to some sort of mythic, "saving-the-world" status, just like every one of his bullshit pronouncements.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 11:34 AM (Ulu3i)
VFW ENDORSES BOXER?
are you f*cking kidding me? Barbara Boxer?
I know there are a lot of vets here, i don't know if you belong to the VFW, but if you do, please call them and give them a piece of your mind.
Posted by: Ben at October 11, 2010 11:34 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 11, 2010 03:21 PM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Oh! The Irony at October 11, 2010 11:34 AM (D4uK9)
it's going to set you back about $1.70 to $2.00 per night to charge the thing on a 110V outlet...
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 03:30 PM (4Pleu)
And $490 to purchase the charging unit, and estimated $1750 for installation. But, but it's so inexpensive.
Posted by: Fish at October 11, 2010 11:35 AM (v1gw3)
Another Plus: It's not GM or Chrysler, but is still an American Owned Company.
I'm not bashing Toyota, Honda, etc. (I own a Toyota and a Nissan), but nobody except Aston-Martin can do the muscle car quite like we can.
Go with the GTO. Shelby if you can get it.
Posted by: AllenG at October 11, 2010 11:36 AM (8y9MW)
3rd world here we come!!! If we don't do something fast to stop these religious fanatics, its over. OVER.
Posted by: John Frum at October 11, 2010 03:29 PM (aMnKS)
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? What the fuck happened to the morons I used to know?
Posted by: Zombie Bluto at October 11, 2010 11:37 AM (hbFXn)
Posted by: EcoTerrorist at October 11, 2010 03:28 PM (LH6ir)
If I go with the Pony it will be the GT500 but the Challenger is lookin real good at this point.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at October 11, 2010 11:37 AM (OefT/)
Posted by: Jose the Illegal at October 11, 2010 11:38 AM (tE8FB)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at October 11, 2010 11:39 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at October 11, 2010 11:40 AM (u/QGC)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at October 11, 2010 03:39 PM (71LDo)
God forbid! There's enough assholes on the road, I sure as hell don't want them up in the air!
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2010 11:41 AM (i0R0L)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at October 11, 2010 03:40 PM (u/QGC)
So. He was mimicking monkey behavior. Figures.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2010 11:43 AM (r1h5M)
"We're going to a brewery, so at some point in the evening, somebody will find them enjoyable."
Wait, is there a Philly/Delaware thing coming up that I'm not aware of?
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves)
Yup. PuddingCon. 11/06 at Iron Hill Brewery in Wilmington DE. All Delawarean and neighboring Morons/Moronettes are welcome.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 11:43 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 11:43 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: AllenG at October 11, 2010 03:36 PM
Unfortunately, I think the pony-car world is going the wrong way right now. Rather than stuffing in a big engine that screws up the car's balance and gets shitty mileage, why not do what Shelby did with the original Mustang GT-350: yank out as much weight as possible and develop the small engine to make maximum power?
A "Shelby" Mustang with aluminum body panels, all the extraneous crap removed and an amped-up 5.0-liter would be a helluva lot more fun, and would run rings around the current bloated piece on a road course.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 11:44 AM (Ulu3i)
VFW ENDORSES BOXER?
are you f*cking kidding me? Barbara Boxer?
I know there are a lot of vets here, i don't know if you belong to the VFW, but if you do, please call them and give them a piece of your mind.
We had this discussion the other day. My take is that the VFW is full of liberal/alcoholic/addict vets who lie more than tell the truth about their service. Much like our favorite liberal vet; John F'n Kerry.
Posted by: Soona at October 11, 2010 11:44 AM (hBuJc)
Yes, these are nothing new. A friend of mine who used to live down the street from me had one, but it had a gasoline engine. The safety standard pretty much forces you into a gasoline engine because it requires headlights, taillights, signal lights, side reflectors, a windshield, seat belts, et al.
We used to drive it to the golf course down the road from us.
The problem is with batteries if you load all that other BS on them the mileage will drop to NOTHING fast. Also, all that other crap makes them expensive as hell. My friend paid 8K for his used and rebuilt. (and that was years ago)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 11:45 AM (/jbAw)
That is funny. That means it weighs around the same as the new Camaro. Heheh. GM Sucks.
Posted by: Sponge at October 11, 2010 11:45 AM (UK9cE)
182 Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at October 11, 2010 03:40 PM (u/QGC)
Ponder how stupid one must be to throw anything at a POTUS. Friendly or not.
Posted by: dogfish at October 11, 2010 11:46 AM (D4uK9)
Without drag,
It takes approximately 0.007554 Amp Hours in a 12V system to accelerate one pound to 60 MPH.
For a 4000 lb Volt that is 30 Ah
Using .5 m2 for Cda because Chevy is not forthcoming with that info;
maintained speeds of 60mph at chews up
50 lbs
or
6kw
or
500 A in a 12V system
or
8 Amp-Hours a Minute
1 car battery usually has about 40 Ah. Usually weighs about 25lbs. most of that is lead and electrolyte. Has enough power to accelerate and hold an automobile at 60mph for 1 minute.
Compared to a gallon of gasoline. Weighs 6 lbs, and can accelerate and hold an automobile at 60mph for 20 minutes or more.
Who killed the electric car?
Grandpa Physics.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 11, 2010 11:46 AM (0q2P7)
My dream car is still a '76 Vette.
Posted by: AllenG at October 11, 2010 11:46 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: nine coconuts at October 11, 2010 11:47 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: t-bird at October 11, 2010 11:49 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: SurferDoc at October 11, 2010 11:50 AM (RKpGM)
Posted by: AllenG at October 11, 2010 03:46 PM
Among 'Vettes, my all-time dream ride is still a '66 427, one of the scariest cars to ever need a washable driver's seat.
Not quite as white-knuckle frightening as a 427 Cobra, but still plenty damn fast.
If we're going for if-I-won-the-lottery cars, though, an original Ford GT would still be my #1 choice. Damn, those things are fun!
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 11:52 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 11, 2010 11:52 AM (xy9wk)
Posted by: t-bird at October 11, 2010 11:54 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 11:55 AM (4Pleu)
any sales figures, yet?
Funny how the govt was doing a witchunt on the Prius at about the same time the Volt was coming out.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 11, 2010 11:55 AM (7UuG8)
2000 Mustang GT, Baby. Heavily modded. 20mpg. GM can suck my tailpipe.
My beat-up, ill-maintained rattle-trap bone-stock 1995 Mustang GT convertible gets 19-20mpg. Consistently. And even with my haphazard maintenance habits, it's the most reliable car I've ever owned.
Reliability, range & usable power beats mileage every time.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 11, 2010 11:55 AM (P9+0W)
We had this discussion the other day. My take is that the VFW is full of liberal/alcoholic/addict vets who lie more than tell the truth about their service. Much like our favorite liberal vet; John F'n Kerry.
Posted by: Soona at October 11, 2010 03:44 PM (hBuJc)
I've spent more than a few hours drinking in VFW's. The stories you would hear would make Barney Frank blush. I'm not ex military but my squid buddy would usually end-up excusing himself from the bar in fear that he couldn't help but call them out on their BS.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 11, 2010 11:56 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: crosspatch at October 11, 2010 11:58 AM (AdYoA)
Posted by: SurferDoc at October 11, 2010 03:50 PM
Back in '98 (I think it was) I drove a Mustang Cobra R. A vicious beast, with no a/c, radio, back seat or sound insulation. I'll never forget getting it sideways and keeping it there on freeway on-ramps. A nasty, uncomfortable little device that still got decent mileage if you could keep your foot out of it.
Wish I had one.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 11:58 AM (Ulu3i)
The best part about the Volt is that I get to flip the middle finger to something other than Obama bumperstickers, which are becoming scarce nowadays.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 11, 2010 11:58 AM (P9+0W)
Posted by: cali grump at October 11, 2010 11:59 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: politicalmuse at October 11, 2010 12:00 PM (kLKnf)
FTFY
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 12:00 PM (/jbAw)
Unfortunately, I think the pony-car world is going the wrong way right now. Rather than stuffing in a big engine that screws up the car's balance and gets shitty mileage, why not do what Shelby did with the original Mustang GT-350: yank out as much weight as possible and develop the small engine to make maximum power?
A "Shelby" Mustang with aluminum body panels, all the extraneous crap removed and an amped-up 5.0-liter would be a helluva lot more fun, and would run rings around the current bloated piece on a road course.
That is exactly what Ford is doing with the upcoming Boss 302.
Posted by: Countrysquire at October 11, 2010 12:01 PM (e910j)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at October 11, 2010 12:01 PM (FkKjr)
192 Let me see if my physics is up to speed.
Without drag,
It takes approximately 0.007554 Amp Hours in a 12V system to accelerate one pound to 60 MPH.
------
If you accelerate at Amp Minutes (or better yet, Amp Seconds) the numbers get much better.
Posted by: Stephen Chu at October 11, 2010 12:02 PM (7+pP9)
Lisa: Dad, look, I built a perpetual motion machine!
Homer: Lisa, in this house, we obey the LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS!
Best.Simpsons Episode. Ever.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at October 11, 2010 12:02 PM (UEEex)
Driving a baby blue Prius with the rainbow or Save the Whales bumper sticker identifies the owner as a fag.
Driving the Volt with the Obama or Biden bumper sticker identifies the owner as a complete fucking liberal idiot. Your mileage may vary.
Posted by: Fish at October 11, 2010 12:03 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: nine coconuts at October 11, 2010 12:05 PM (DHNp4)
Posted by: EC at October 11, 2010 12:05 PM (mAhn3)
You can always tell the Pious drivers that "they are #1!", instead. It's a favorite game of mine. Count the anti war stickers too. I can't wait to see all the new bumper stickers coming out after November. The libs haven't had anything to complain about for 2 years, now.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at October 11, 2010 12:05 PM (UEEex)
Posted by: Mac Gootbone at October 11, 2010 12:05 PM (XCSw/)
I read a hot rod mag a few years ago that my little brother had where they had obtained a number of the old bad ass engines from 1969. They rebuilt them back to straight factory specifications and then ran them on a dyno to get actual HP vs rated HP of the time. Everyone knew back then that they were underrated for insurance purposes.
Well it settled forever the argument about which was badder among the old '69 engines. The hemi cranked out nearly a thousand HP, the 427 chevy came in at about 500 and the 427 ford was just under 500.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 12:06 PM (/jbAw)
There hasn't been a more fitting metaphor for Leftist governance since the Traubi. The first sales numbers are going to be too embarrassing for GM and the Oministration to be released without lying through their teeth.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous
Sadly, the sales of the Volt will be good. Why? Local/State/Government fleets. They eat this crap up, and you know there will be some kind of Federal grants to purchase these "types" of cars.
Our city bought a bunch of E85 vehicles because of the green bullshit. Now they have these, but E85 is not sold in this area, so a lot of good it did, but they felt good about themselves.
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 11, 2010 12:07 PM (aaULJ)
Posted by: Dr. Ferdinand Porsche at October 11, 2010 12:07 PM (5aa4z)
Loved my 1970 Riviera with a 455 more. Still had the sticker on the radiator that said "use no less than 103 octane". It was fun to put some aviation gas in it, and the engine wouldn't ping so much. That 5000 pound car could fly, I tells ya.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at October 11, 2010 12:09 PM (UEEex)
So, we're basing this entire thingy off of one twitter message from a journalist? Really?
First off, no one ever claimed it was all-electric. It was always a series hybrid. And it seems like a ton of you don't understand how it is supposed to work. It's supposed to run entirely off of the battery for 25-50 miles (apparently they couldn't reach their targeted minimum of 40) and then the range extender kicks in...the range extender being basically a gasoline generator. Popular Mechanics claims its top speed is 101 mph. Faster than 50% of you have gone, I'm sure. The 31 mpg figure is the figure AFTER the battery's initial charge is depleted.
So, after a charge, you get 30 or so free miles, and then after that it gets 31 mpg. Worse than I had hoped for, but not too bad.
People suggesting HE diesels are probably correct. Those get better gas mileage...UNLESS you happen to live in the city, and mostly just go to and from work and minor errands. Then, it'd be a huge savings.
Posted by: seguin at October 11, 2010 12:10 PM (LP6hc)
Posted by: Dr. Ferdinand Porsche
You do know that Dr. Porsche invented the hybrid over 100 years ago, right?
Posted by: Countrysquire at October 11, 2010 12:11 PM (e910j)
Posted by: nine coconuts at October 11, 2010 12:11 PM (DHNp4)
Hahahaha, you forget who your audience is here. I have been over 135 mph in a car many times and 145 pph on a motorcycle.
I'll bet not many of the Morons here have never been above 100 mph.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 12:12 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Dr. Ferdinand Porsche at October 11, 2010 04:07 PM (5aa4z)
------------------
Got a spare Tiger I that I could borrow? Yeah, the top end is slow and the gas mileage sucks, but my commute would probably faster, since I wouldn't have to stop for anything.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 11, 2010 12:13 PM (xy9wk)
Chevy Volt from Iowahawk
Art imitating life (or vice versa. . .hard to tell in this case).
Posted by: looking closely at October 11, 2010 12:14 PM (PwGfd)
I have to congratulate GM. They have, once again, artfully melded the elements of inefficient and nonperforming while diminishing neither.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 11, 2010 12:15 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Monty
Pill bottle may be too big. Probably a contact lense case, you in the "L" side, your passenger on the "R" side.
You can also get zero or near-zero financing through most Chrysler dealers. They're trying to move stock ahead of the Fiat merger, I think. (Weird thing: my loan was done by...GMAC. Or Ally, as they call themselves now. I guess Cerberus finally wound up Chrysler Financial and killed it off.)
Posted by: Monty
I thought Cerberus bought GMAC years ago when GM spun it off? I think they had both, and just merged them together then told the Feds they needed some of that sweet, sweet TARP.
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 11, 2010 12:16 PM (aaULJ)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 04:12 PM (/jbAw)
Heh. I hopped a cattleguard in New Mexico on my Yamaha XS 650 at around 105 mph. Bald tires and two spokes missing from the front wheel. Felt the frame flex when I landed around 50-60 feet beyond the cattle guard. Decided right then and there I wouldn't do that without a helmet again...
Posted by: maddogg at October 11, 2010 12:17 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 11, 2010 12:18 PM (tJjm/)
What's this?
Harry Reid was asked who the two greatest living Americans were and he answered, "Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd."
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 11, 2010 12:19 PM (7UuG8)
GM mentioned the Volt about 20 times in their pre-file assessment of their company. The President NEEDS GM to succeed and by extension, the Volt must be a "game changer."
So who are the real directors of the company? Who will be named when the inevitable lawsuits start flying after the stock drops 40% below the IPO price? It's an easy lawsuit to see coming, "the US government told investors that GM had the most amazing product ever which resulted in millions of investors losing billions of dollars..."
Posted by: Knaws at October 11, 2010 12:20 PM (EBIhu)
/not Einstein
Posted by: garage mahal at October 11, 2010 12:20 PM (OXs1J)
Harry Reid was asked who the two greatest living Americans were and he answered, "Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd."
Posted by: Soothsayer
Of course, and they both will be voting Democrat on November 2nd.
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 11, 2010 12:20 PM (aaULJ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 11, 2010 12:21 PM (tJjm/)
Bwahahahaha!
135mph automobile.
153mph motorcycle.
Just out of curiosity. What is the real efficiency, of generating power in a power plant at 35% efficiency, putting it through electrical distribution at 50% efficiency, then charging an 80% efficient battery, to drive a 70% efficient motor? All to move a vehicle that weighs twice as much as it should?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 11, 2010 12:21 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Monty
Pill bottle may be too big. Probably a contact lense case, you in the "L" side, your passenger on the "R" side.
Actually since the law only allows them on roads with a speed limit less than or equal to 35 mph accidents should be too much of a problem.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 12:22 PM (/jbAw)
I think helium is somewhere around 15-20 cubic feet per pound at sea level.
Posted by: Amy Winehouse at October 11, 2010 12:22 PM (F/4zf)
First off, no one ever claimed it was all-electric. It was always a series hybrid. And it seems like a ton of you don't understand how it is supposed to work. It's supposed to run entirely off of the battery for 25-50 miles (apparently they couldn't reach their targeted minimum of 40) and then the range extender kicks in...the range extender being basically a gasoline generator. Popular Mechanics claims its top speed is 101 mph. Faster than 50% of you have gone, I'm sure. The 31 mpg figure is the figure AFTER the battery's initial charge is depleted.
So, after a charge, you get 30 or so free miles, and then after that it gets 31 mpg. Worse than I had hoped for, but not too bad.
Posted by: seguin
So I'd be dragging around a U-boat surplus battery after 50 miles. And has anyone proven that the combined total costs (plugging this thing in and the 'gasoline generator' AND replacement of the aforementioned U-boat battery after x years) will be offset by the 'enhanced' efficiency? Cause if the answer is no, then WTF does this thing exist?
Gasoline cars exist that get 30+ mpg. Diesels exist that do far better, and neither require the outlay in batteries, complexity of design and the demand upon the power grid.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 12:22 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 11, 2010 12:22 PM (tJjm/)
Only if your lifting gas is hydrogen. 4 times the lift you know.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 11, 2010 12:23 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 04:12 PM (/jbAw)
Me and my buddies used to race around the I-270 outerbelt that circles Columbus and there's a long straight-away on the west side north-south corridor. I drove an '89 Grand Am that was a fricking rocket and we regularly topped out at 120.
Of course, the Grand Am started shaking at 110 but I was too young and stupid to care.
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2010 12:23 PM (i0R0L)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 11, 2010 12:24 PM (tJjm/)
It's not the truthfulness of GM's claims, it's the underlying intent to improve America's transportation needs that's important.
Posted by: Barack O'Dingo at October 11, 2010 12:25 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Trimegistus at October 11, 2010 12:26 PM (Z+rhq)
So, after a charge, you get 30 or so free miles
If I'm paying to charge the beast( off the grid or off the gas generator, motor, chipmunk, whatever), and I'm paying to haul the weight of the battery, how is this in any way 'free'?
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 12:26 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 11, 2010 12:27 PM (tJjm/)
LOL, the craziest shit I ever did on a motorcycle was on a Honda 360 going through downtown Alameda, CA (Webster St. ?) at 4 am, face on the speedo and feet on the tag, drunk as a hoot-owl, through flashing yellow lights at 115 mph. Engine was singing. Slowed down a little and went through the Alameda-Oakland tunnel at 90 mph. Every time I hit a section break the little bump would move me closer to the wall because the damn tunnel curved.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 12:28 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 12:28 PM (R2fpr)
Audience tickets went on sale today at the University of Delaware's Trabant Center's box office (and by telephone) and sold out in 10 minutes. LINK
Based on the linked report, O'Donnell can expect an overwhelmingly liberal crowd. Lots of line cutting, interviews with registered Democrats, etc., etc.,
Wolf Blitzer will be the moderator.
Posted by: mrp at October 11, 2010 12:28 PM (HjPtV)
What I really wanted was one of those hotrod Roadmaster Buicks of old, but alas....) Posted by: Monty at October 11, 2010 03:55 PM (4Pleu)
If I could get what I wanted it would be my old 65 Vette. Had a built LT1350 and a couple of Holley's sittin on top with a custom built Rock Crusher. Good times I tell ya.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at October 11, 2010 12:29 PM (OefT/)
Grandpa Physics.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 11, 2010 03:46 PM (0q2P7)
Wish I still had the doc... but a couple of years ago I researched the amount of OIl used for transportation.... converted the energy from Barrels of il to Kilowatt hours... then compared that to the Amount of Electricity generated yearly on the National Grid.
Turned out we would, with PERFECT Electricity grid transmission... need to increase our Electricity output by about 115% to cover transportation...
Yep, we'd have to more than DOUBLE our electircity generation capability, and transmission.
I sure don't see that happening...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2010 12:29 PM (AdK6a)
Posted by: Fact Checkers Unit at October 11, 2010 12:30 PM (pUfK9)
Posted by: mrp at October 11, 2010 04:28 PM (HjPtV)
Now that was not smart agreeing to that.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 12:30 PM (/jbAw)
Yea, sure the Volt is in competition with the Prius, but the awesomeness of driving a General Motors car produced by the UAW and steered to completion by President Obama makes it a very worthwhile investment in America's future.
Posted by: Joe "Slow Joe" Biden at October 11, 2010 12:30 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Vic
Ford Expedition at 35mph head on into that thing going 25, the contact case would be too big.
To give you a small picture of that wreck, I give you Mercedes S Class versus the Smart4Two.
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 11, 2010 12:32 PM (aaULJ)
Audience tickets went on sale today at the University of Delaware's Trabant Center's box office (and by telephone) and sold out in 10 minutes. LINK
Based on the linked report, O'Donnell can expect an overwhelmingly liberal crowd. Lots of line cutting, interviews with registered Democrats, etc., etc.,
Wolf Blitzer will be the moderator.
Posted by: mrp
It'll be a frickin' zoo. I ws a student there, and went to speeches there as well. They were kinda stupid then, but no riots or violence like at some other places. Wolf Blitzer is coming here? And Rachel Maddow was supposedly here last week. If it's run by the same clown that published that poll, it'll be bad. They had the nerve to use 'random sampling of adults'. That's it.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 11, 2010 12:32 PM (R2fpr)
Good to see Government Motors has made such massive improvements in 12 years.
/sarc
I've got an '01 SC1 with 242,000 miles on it and it gets 38 to 40 mpg.
Posted by: TC at October 11, 2010 12:33 PM (BAtLQ)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 04:12 PM
My "personal best" -- though the Highway Patrol would disagree -- was 203 mph on a desert highway in CA in a "slightly adjusted" Corvette ZO6. I've spent many happy hours above 150 on German autobahns.
None of those occasions were as terrifying as 68 mph on an L.A. freeway in a Citroen 2CV.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 12:34 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 04:12 PM (/jbAw)
Rebuilt 1977 Z-28... 142...
Ninja 900... 125...
Heck... been 120 in my Supercharged Durango RT....
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2010 12:34 PM (AdK6a)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 11, 2010 12:35 PM (plsiE)
Assuming the normal driving speed of 35 mph or less there would be almost zero accidents with a terminal speed of 35 mph. 99% of accidents in town or small fender benders.
Its only when you get the drunks like me (back then) doing 115 mph through town that you get the big accidents.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 12:35 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 11, 2010 12:35 PM (Ly+aE)
Posted by: Jeff Weimer at October 11, 2010 12:36 PM (1Mn8Z)
Posted by: The Jackass at October 11, 2010 12:36 PM (mka2b)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 04:28 PM (/jbAw)
I got pulled over for riding that same Yamaha at 65 in a 35 zone. Cop asked me if there was an emergency to justify my speed. Being a sharp kid with a lightning quick mind I said "Yeah, I'm almost out of gas and I was in a hurry to get to a gas station". The cop didn't laugh right there. Just wrote me the ticket.
Posted by: maddogg at October 11, 2010 12:37 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 11, 2010 04:32 PM (aaULJ)
I wasn't expecting the Smart4Two to bounce off the Mercedes like a beach ball!
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2010 12:38 PM (i0R0L)
Harry Reid was asked who the two greatest living Americans were and he answered, "Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd."
Posted by: Soothsayer
When told that both were dead, Harry, with a dumb look on his face, said, "Really? Why I was just talking to them".
Posted by: Soona at October 11, 2010 12:40 PM (OrzFO)
Posted by: kansas at October 11, 2010 12:40 PM (mka2b)
Can't do those tricks at slow speeds. Google us and watch in awe.
Posted by: Royal Association of Saudi Road Skaters at October 11, 2010 12:40 PM (FJQB5)
I'd love to buy puts, but I don't know if they'll be available, and at what term expiration.
Posted by: looking closely at October 11, 2010 12:41 PM (PwGfd)
--
It's in Memorial Hall, which holds maybe 400 people. I saw Slow Joe do Hardball's "College Tour" there back in 2003, and got with an argument with him outside (for about 10 seconds until I was "escorted" away) over packing the room with his supporters. That was a total mess, with about 1000 people trying to get in. So this will be way worse.
Also good to see Ralph Beglieter still knows how to weasel his way into an article. UDel outbid Harvard for his "services" when he retired from CNN in the late 1990s, and he is nothing but a smug overconfident story-teller at ~$250k/yr.
Posted by: Doc at October 11, 2010 12:41 PM (AG6vT)
Safety vs. higher mpg? Which argument wins with the Obamanauts? Surely you jest ...
"We make up the rules as we go along ..."
Posted by: mrp at October 11, 2010 12:42 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 12:42 PM (nRF6+)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 11, 2010 12:43 PM (wd0Iq)
None of those occasions were as terrifying as 68 mph on an L.A. freeway in a Citroen 2CV.
Surrender one corner of your ManCard for driving a Citroen.
Surrender your ManCard in toto if you owned a Citroen.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 11, 2010 12:44 PM (P9+0W)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 04:12 PM (/jbAw)
In retrospect it may not have been wise, but it certainly was fun.
Posted by: EcoTerrorist at October 11, 2010 12:45 PM (LH6ir)
new shock poll
AZ-7
McClung (R) 39
Grijalva (D) 37
Summit (R)
10/4-10/5 1807 LV
This deserves its own thread as a followup to last night's post. The rocket-scientist is leading?! With being outspent 10 to 1...
http://www.opensecrets.org
That 1800 sample seems crazy high, though.
</ OMGWTFBBQ! >
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 11, 2010 12:45 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 04:34 PM (Ulu3i)
Down hill I assume?
Posted by: EcoTerrorist at October 11, 2010 12:47 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 12:47 PM (nRF6+)
People suggesting HE diesels are probably correct. Those get better gas mileage...UNLESS you happen to live in the city, and mostly just go to and from work and minor errands. Then, it'd be a huge savings.
Posted by: seguin at October 11, 2010 04:10 PM (LP6hc)
The new diesels are better in every way than plug-ins, cost, performance and efficiency. If plug-ins became popular, electricity costs would skyrocket and the grid would become as reliable as in rural India. Eco-nazis fight every attempt to build new power plants, they even fight solar plants in the desert... as they fight against anything that helps humans.
Posted by: theCork at October 11, 2010 12:48 PM (zL5Q1)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 12:50 PM (nRF6+)
Hahahaha, you forget who your audience is here. I have been over 135 mph in a car many times and 145 pph on a motorcycle.
I'll bet not many of the Morons here have never been above 100 mph.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 04:12 PM (/jbAw)
My Dad used to bury the speedometer racing B-52s as they took off from Eilson. No seat belts involved.You have to have a combination of the right road, right car and right conditions to go 135 mph. The best I can remember personally getting up to was about 115. Lots can go wrong if your vehicle isn't up to snuff for those speeds. A slightly out of balance wheel that can't be noticed at 55 mph turns into a bad shudder at 110.
So it's best that few morons danced with death driving an automobile over 100 mph.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 11, 2010 12:52 PM (7+pP9)
Central planning in my administration has been a resounding success. For instance, General Motors is rolling out the Chevrolet Volt, destined to become the most important break-through in electric powered personal transportation since the invention of the automobile.
Also, for the naysayers who denounced my administration, the right people have been in charge and that's why we have been such a success. Just because it didn't work in England or Canada doesn't mean it isn't working in America. My health care bill will demonstrate once and for all, that when the smartest people on the planet are given areas of responsibility with little to no oversight, they can accomplish feats previously unknown to man.
Posted by: Vladamir Obama, Supreme Ruler at October 11, 2010 12:53 PM (v1gw3)
I'll bet not many of the Morons here have never been above 100 mph. Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 04:12 PM (/jbAw)
Beaverton PD clocked me @143 on Hwy 26 one night. They closed it down so I could make the pass and they could check out their new radar guns and see just what my Vette would do. It took 3 days to get my underware out of my ass after that stunt.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at October 11, 2010 12:55 PM (OefT/)
I spend tons of money of expensive SUV's and fuel JUST SO I CAN PISS OFF A LIBERAL!
Pissing off liberals with a Ford Earthfucker is just about the sweetest thing on earth.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 11, 2010 12:55 PM (P9+0W)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 12:58 PM (nRF6+)
Posted by: DaMav at October 11, 2010 12:59 PM (QNU76)
Posted by: Schwalbe at October 11, 2010 01:01 PM (UU0OF)
"I'll bet not many of the Morons here have never been above 100 mph. "
183.1 MPH. Top that, b*****s, and no batteries were harmed...
Posted by: Jess at October 11, 2010 01:01 PM (eqsrg)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 01:02 PM (nRF6+)
Posted by: EcoTerrorist at October 11, 2010 04:47 PM
Nope!
The ideal technique is to draft 18-wheelers, just like the NASCAR boys do with each other. When you're close enough to tell whether the screws are Phillips or slotted on the aft trailer, you can pick up 3-4 mph, then slingshot the truck when he has to lift.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 11, 2010 04:44 PM
Dude, ya gotta have fairly hefty ones to drive a Cit and stay up with traffic at the same time. My Man Card is intact, and is gonna stay that way.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 01:03 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 01:03 PM (nRF6+)
Hah! 145mph (in a Mustang SVO. Anyone remember those?) on Highway 24 east of the Caldicott. I was chosen as designated driver because I had drunk the least. In retrospect it may not have been wise, but it certainly was fun.Posted by: EcoTerrorist at October 11, 2010 04:45 PM (LH6ir)
LOL Back in the day who ever found the car first while still walking was the driver.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at October 11, 2010 01:03 PM (OefT/)
Posted by: Fritz Henderson at October 11, 2010 01:04 PM (n1JN0)
Does on foot in heels in an evening gown and support garment count? I'd had like 3 glasses of wine with dinner and it was a long-ass drive to the dance.
Posted by: Filly at October 11, 2010 01:05 PM (r1Xxg)
Can't argue with that. They are scary little things. It's the only car I have ever been in that was flexible.
Posted by: EcoTerrorist at October 11, 2010 01:06 PM (LH6ir)
For enjoyment I drive a brand new 68 Plymouth--which turns 12 second quarter miles all day long.
Best of both worlds,imho.
Posted by: irongrampa at October 11, 2010 01:07 PM (ud5dN)
So how does that life cycle cost analysis work out for the average commuter?
I guess it'll break even in about thirty years, about three times the useful life of a new car. Way to go green enviro-nazis.
Posted by: Druid at October 11, 2010 01:08 PM (VSOCz)
183.1 MPH. Top that, b*****s, and no batteries were harmed... Posted by: Jess at October 11, 2010 05:01 PM (eqsrg)
Track or road? Cause if we are talkin track I got somethin for ya.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at October 11, 2010 01:11 PM (OefT/)
Know that braging is going on, I once went through DC traffic and the idiots there pissed me off, I started speeding 80 or 85 mph to get the hell away from the DC wrap-around. I got really pissed when a state trooper pulled out behind me with his lights on. No problemo with the idiot drivers, just a bigger ticket (tax) for speeding. I cant brag about the top speed 'cause the speedo only goes to 140. but I left him well behind.
But again, having raced with an SCCA liscence, i did it in pretty much light traffic coming out of DC.
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 01:13 PM (nRF6+)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 01:15 PM (nRF6+)
Road. Not in North America, though, and seldom saw that kind of velocity on the track...
Posted by: Jess at October 11, 2010 01:18 PM (eqsrg)
And it really isn't that "unsafe" in a well maintained car unless you have underrated tires and go significantly above 100. (that is assuming you are not in traffic and are not drunk)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 01:27 PM (/jbAw)
Track? A road course or drag strip. There is a big difference. Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 05:15 PM (nRF6+)
I should have said street. I used to drive 1/4 mile and road....back when I was young, had money and was stupid. Now I'm old and broke and drive a Civic but I might be gettin some money soon.................LOL
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at October 11, 2010 01:36 PM (OefT/)
Posted by: soxfan4life at October 11, 2010 01:37 PM (EMo2r)
Clearly, since it is impossible for some 17 year old busy sexting one of her friends, while driving Mommy's Suburban, down a "boring" straight-away in the neighborhood, not to notice the speedometer creeping up past 45mph.
Posted by: Deety at October 11, 2010 01:39 PM (Jb3+B)
I guess we will have to organize a new group DATD, dad's against texting and driving. We will get young girls locked up for 25 years and call it a felony if they have a wreck while using a phone and someone gets hurt, including themselves.
After a few of those the "texting" will stop.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 01:43 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: PersonFromPorlock at October 11, 2010 01:43 PM (VPlpE)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 01:45 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Comrade Zombie Arthur at October 11, 2010 01:51 PM (MTnNh)
In a somewhat related question - Has anyone considered the net loss in value the regular consumers of new cars and the car companies will be when all of these hybrid vehicles depreciate dramatically in value at battery change time. Making trade-ins impossible; and thus sticking the hybrid buyer with a loss that may determine how much they are willing to to outlay for a new vehicle or the level of incentives the car companies will have to offer to get those hybrids off of the road and those returning customers into new vehicles? Toyota should be seeing the front end of this wave soon; maybe the other makers didn't sell enough to matter?
Posted by: Jean at October 11, 2010 01:56 PM (CPefM)
It better not be!
We'll have your asses in a sling over all the negative PR we can generate for you!
It'd be the equivalent of the slave labor in Auschwitz, that's what it would be.
Posted by: PETA at October 11, 2010 01:59 PM (Jb3+B)
Nah. It was meant more as a comment on the inexperience of new drivers which has some to do with maturity and judgment, but not all.
Reaction times and whatnot, I am for a fact a better driver at 37 than I was at 17.
For two major reasons.
1.) I never had to deal with the distractions of carrying on a phone conversation, much less typing one, when I was 17 and new to driving.
2.) I live far enough away from Lower Wacker Drive now that I'm 37 that it's really not as much of a temptation to pull some really stupid shit in a 1980's ex-fleet Caddy late at night.
Posted by: Deety at October 11, 2010 02:29 PM (Jb3+B)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2010 02:31 PM (/jbAw)
I'll have more fun, it'll be better equipped, and it's not made by the UAW.
Posted by: Dave@ at October 11, 2010 02:39 PM (SHHCw)
Huh.
I suck for missing that!
Generational differences, I guess.
MADD and it's agenda and tactics have been a part of my reality since as long as I can remember.
I kind of take some of these suggestions as seriously offered.
Not seriously, mind you, but at least as sincere and wrongheaded.
I still suck though!
(In my defense, I picked up a Guardian UK article that mentioned my particular congressional race in AZ that was mostly about trashing the Tea-Party and I read 50 or so comments, just before posting here in the comments.)
Posted by: Deety at October 11, 2010 02:47 PM (Jb3+B)
hell , i'm a progessive/nazi and i wouldn't buy anything from the goons that brought us obama!
ps- and i'm smarter than you goon rethugs and quite a poofer
Posted by: professor von poopypants at October 11, 2010 03:09 PM (n0C4a)
If the boyz n' da hood don't trash them for fun, every hobo and crack head will have rigged them to run hot plates and drug labs before you can say BAILOUT!
Posted by: Blue Falcon 'the bike guy' in Boston at October 11, 2010 03:13 PM (ijjAe)
But there could be some fun pranks with plug-in stations....or lots and lots of electrocutions.
Posted by: model_1066 at October 11, 2010 03:36 PM (VnECg)
Posted by: Jerry in Detroit at October 11, 2010 03:38 PM (ckb64)
Posted by: model_1066 at October 11, 2010 03:38 PM (VnECg)
GM was forced to go forward with the Volt. They knew it was a turkey. But they're driven half by the bottom line, half by the White House politics, and half by the union's demands. Is that three halves? Why yes, it is. GM's screwed.
Posted by: Cowboy at October 11, 2010 05:01 PM (XYcTY)
I was having a discussion with a friend of mine the other day about "alternative" energy. I related a story of being in 3rd or 4th grade (that would have been the early 70s - yea, I am old, shot me) and recalling textbooks talking about wind power and solar power and how that would be the next wave of energy development. Came complete with pictures of windmill farms and big old solar panels.
Fast forward nearly 40 years later and we are, for all practical purposes, where we were in the 1970s regarding alternative energy. Now, name one other technology, product, industry that is still puttering around at 1974 levels. Computeres - no, cars - no, phones - no, food...you would think that would be yes, but with hybrids, growing techniques, etc. - no.
Now, I am sure that the alternative energy field has changed in 40
years. But, think of the progress in every other sector and think of
where we are re: alternative energy. Isn't, just maybe, the time to
start asking one basic question: does this stuff work?
Posted by: Mallamutt at October 11, 2010 04:53 PM (OWjjx)
When I was in High School in the late 70s and had to do that same stupid alternative fuels paper I did mine on Coal. Found information on how to use rescrubbing and new generator technology to obtain great efficiencies and incredible cleanness out of even crummy coals. Got a decent grade on the paper because my teacher wasn't a green Zealot.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 11, 2010 05:10 PM (z1N6a)
The Volt is a joke. The prius is a joke. All these hybrids/electrics are jokes.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 11, 2010 05:36 PM (tTFeK)
Surrender your ManCard in toto if you owned a Citroen.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 11, 2010 04:44 PM (P9+0W)
In my automotive past: 1963 2CV, 1963 ID19, 1966 DS21 Pallas, 1972 GS 1220 Club, 1973 GS 1220 Pallas, 1977 Dyane 6, and the current one is a 1986 CX 2500 Prestige. I make wiring harnesses for US-market Citroen DS'.
To counter all that, I've electrified some pretty hairy streetrods, along with limos, hearses, custom trucks, restorations, and armored cars. My first car was a '55 Chevy 150 2-door.
You can have my Man Card if you come get it.
Posted by: Bill H at October 11, 2010 06:02 PM (q8CmE)
Posted by: DM! at October 11, 2010 06:26 PM (O0Qwy)
Posted by: Buffalobob at October 11, 2010 06:35 PM (GwH6h)
Posted by: Scooter trash at October 11, 2010 07:09 PM (LFAxM)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at October 11, 2010 10:34 PM (nRF6+)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3346 seconds, 459 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Rocks at October 11, 2010 10:36 AM (Q1lie)