October 07, 2010
— Geoff ...or am I really seeing a positive trend in unemployment numbers for the first time in almost a year?
The Department of Labor released the weekly initial unemployment claims data this morning: claims dropped a bit, from 456,000 last week (adjusted up from 453,000) down to 445,000. Here's what that looks like on a chart that runs back to the pre-Pelosi era, when unemployment claims ran about 325K/week. Thanks, Nancy!!
So where do I see a positive trend? Well, if you pretend that we have a 7-day work week, then people are filing about 65K claims per day. We want to get back to around 45K per day. So the question is: how fast are the filings dropping every day? I.e., how long will it take us to get down to pre-Pelosi numbers?
Back in the first 3/4 of 2009, the number of filings was dropping at about 500 to 600 per day. After mid-November 2009, however, the filings stopped dropping so quickly. In fact, they barely dropped at all.
But, if we take a closer look at the data, here's what we see:

People have been talking about "green shoots" for over a year, but that talk has been meaningless in the face of the huge numbers of bankruptcies, foreclosures, and unemployed, none of which have improved much, if at all. This is the first promising employment trend I've seen in the past year, and I think it's real.
Why now? Businesses have been holding their breath for 2 years, wondering what the business environment is going to look like under the Obama/Reid/Pelosi triumvirate. The November elections will probably result in gridlock at worst and a favorable business environment at best. So businesses are finally exhaling, preparatory to a big, honking, gasp of air.
I'm starting to believe that Santa will be bringing us the Tickle-Me Recovery Doll that we've always wanted.
Posted by: Geoff at
06:49 AM
| Comments (161)
Post contains 323 words, total size 2 kb.
Unless we lose a couple of key elections and the Lame Duck session goes full Kamikaze.
The thing is, I don't think the Jobs picture ever had to be as bad as it is. The Bail-Outs, TARP, ARRA, then screwing with bankruptcy law (Chrysler, GM) is what send business scurrying to layoffs more quickly than would otherwise have been necessary, and then, as you say, uncertainty prevented them from hiring again, even when they saw they were not in any immediate danger.
Posted by: AllenG at October 07, 2010 06:55 AM (8y9MW)
Does his mean the first year she didn't grab the gavel ?
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at October 07, 2010 06:55 AM (tE8FB)
It's our last chance.
Posted by: PJ at October 07, 2010 06:56 AM (GK2JE)
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosisince January 4, 2007
Does his mean the first year she didn't grab the gavel ?
Dude, I already said that I'd fix it. And I did.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 06:57 AM (QrzlF)
Posted by: abc at October 07, 2010 06:59 AM (w0MLG)
We need to keep reminding our neighbors: a) that any recovery is directly related to the Republican/Tea Party pro-business policies and b) a second Barry term will do nothing to help move us back to the stable political-social-economic foundation we need to make real progress fixing the systemic issues that caused the meltdown in the first place.
Posted by: AllenG at October 07, 2010 06:59 AM (8y9MW)
I predict the economy will closely parallel ObamaCare:
Obamacare firesale: Three Catholic hospitals for sale in Pennsylvania
Mercy Hospital in Scranton is up for sale.
Those who run the place and all other Mercy facilities in our area said Wednesday they are already in talks with organizations interested in buying.
Mercy Health Partners hopes to have a buyer by the end of the year.
Officials said there are numerous reasons for the sale. One big one is the heath care reform bill signed into law this year.
[ . . . ]
"Actually we're doing well. We're ahead of budget for the year. It's more that when we look out over the landscape of health care over the next five years and the needs of these facilities, the needs of this community, we understand a different level of investment will be needed than what we can do on our own," Cook said.
They said much of that required investment is the result of the health care reform bill passed in Washington.
The CEO said it means the need for more spending and less federal reimbursements.
"Health care reform is absolutely playing a role. Was it the precipitating factor in this decision? No, but was it a factor in our planning over the next five years? Absolutely," Cook added.
-------
There's nothing like closing hospitals to improve health care.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 07, 2010 07:00 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Geoff at 10:49 AM
Don't Worry, My Pretties!
We at the EPA will soon put a stop to that with Carbon Hysteria, and Your Little Dog Toto, too!
Posted by: The Wicked Witch of the EPA at October 07, 2010 07:01 AM (tJjm/)
My guess is that there won't be much change in the unemployment numbers tomorrow, as it will be adjusted for the economic circumstance known as "election". Yes, I believe they do this, so sue me.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 07, 2010 07:01 AM (ruu60)
Posted by: eman at October 07, 2010 07:02 AM (Hc02N)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 07:03 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: maxx at October 07, 2010 07:03 AM (i2Pc5)
If I remember from my Six Sigma, 4 data points out of 5 in the same direction indicates a trend, that something changed in the process.
How about the winding down of Porkulus?
However, I think the trend will start going back up once the 20% to 30% increase in insurance costs works its way through the private sector.
Posted by: Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz at October 07, 2010 07:03 AM (4JpPD)
Posted by: Palerider at October 07, 2010 07:04 AM (ITaIZ)
Seriously, though, thank you Geoff for all the work you do on this. It's incredibly helpful to an economic naif such as myself.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 07, 2010 07:04 AM (bQ5xy)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 07:06 AM (AZGON)
I think most people will see employment back on the rise, businesses' bottom lines getting better, and (if Republicans are successful) a significant lack of a tax increase, and they'll think, "Great days are here again!" and will immediately disengage.
The truly motivate will stay motivated, but I think there are a lot of people who are only motivated because they have been directly affected by the recession (lost job, lost house, whatever) and when things look up, they'll completely forget debt and deficits.
I hope I'm wrong, but usually my cynicism is only disappointing in that I haven't been cynical enough...
Posted by: AllenG at October 07, 2010 07:07 AM (8y9MW)
I think it may be as simple as harvest time and X Mas season hiring.
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at October 07, 2010 07:08 AM (BlHbn)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 11:06 AM (AZGON)
Hell yeah, that too! Also has the annual AMT fix been passed?
Posted by: Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz at October 07, 2010 07:11 AM (4JpPD)
Hitting bottom doesn't matter, ;">the Fed is already floating trial balloons about letting inflation kick in to high gear. Whatever 'gains' are made will be washed away by $10 loaves of bread.
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 07, 2010 07:11 AM (fx8sm)
I think it may be as simple as harvest time and X Mas season hiring.
These are seasonally adjusted numbers, so that is supposedly already factored in.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 07:11 AM (QrzlF)
I really really do want the economy to get better, go gangbusters in fact, don't care who gets the credit, my pessimism just overwhelms at this point.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 07, 2010 07:11 AM (ruu60)
Posted by: a whole mountain of commercial mortgages at October 07, 2010 07:15 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at October 07, 2010 07:16 AM (BlHbn)
Posted by: Sox at October 07, 2010 07:17 AM (MKxON)
A climate has been created (by the Osama Obama regime) in which many companies can be "profitable" without producing anything at all. Why hire people when you can shuffle paper and pay fat bonuses to the execs?
That's unsustainable, but it is working now, and too many business people don't look beyond today's "income."
Layoffs will begin to increase when the pace of TARP-funded corporate buyouts and mergers gets into high gear.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 07, 2010 07:17 AM (Ulu3i)
Who would want nasty Catholics involved in healthcare, anyway? Soon our army of flying monkeys will swoop down and close ALL their hospitals down!
Posted by: The Wicked Witch of the EPA at October 07, 2010 07:18 AM (tJjm/)
Make no mistake, The Vapid One© and Nancy Pestilence will start crowing about how their policies are the cause of employment improving, just you watch.
We'll be there to remind everyone just how bad things were on their watch. We can't let them get away with their bullshit under any circumstances.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 07:20 AM (3jxR/)
Of course, when today's number gets revised upward your trend disappears.
Posted by: Virginia Bob at October 07, 2010 07:21 AM (xh3gA)
But is it inflatable? Ben Bernanke wants to know.
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 11:03 AM (AZGON)
Yes, it is. There is an inflation device located right below the belt line - you pull out a long tube and blow into it.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 07, 2010 07:21 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 07, 2010 07:22 AM (61b7k)
Posted by: Sinner at October 07, 2010 07:22 AM (U/yZ+)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 07:22 AM (LpqRt)
Posted by: alexthechick at October 07, 2010 07:22 AM (bQ5xy)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 07, 2010 07:23 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 07, 2010 07:23 AM (tJjm/)
Weekly initial claims don't really mean anything, unless you are also creating jobs.
At current LEGAL immigration levels, we allow approx. 800K new folks into the country every month... so unless you are creating at least 400K new jobs, you won't even make up the amount needed for immigrants.
Government is both touting unimportant numbers, and cooking the books, to make unemployment look better than it is.
Its amusing when we have more people, looking for less jobs than a few months ago, yet the unemployment number does not seem to rise????
Its like the inflation number... they tell me there is no inflation, yet everything I buy seems to be going up in price??
Makes ya go... hmmmmm....
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 07, 2010 07:24 AM (AdK6a)
It was inevitable that the Mercy be sold once the unions got their claws into it.
Where are all the libs on The Office going to go for ER care now?
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 07, 2010 07:25 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 07:26 AM (AZGON)
Now tickle me.
Posted by: Barry Obama at October 07, 2010 07:27 AM (GwPRU)
I can't believe there isn't a greater uproar about this.
Not enough people (say, 52%?) understand how f*cked up this is going to make life in general, for EVERYONE. Too busy watching Idol and Glee.
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 07, 2010 07:28 AM (fx8sm)
Its like the inflation number... they tell me there is no inflation, yet everything I buy seems to be going up in price??
Everything, and I mean everything at the grocery store is nearly double the price from three years ago when gas prices spiked. Now gas is starting it's upward climb and there seems to be nothing that George Soros can do to change that. I've smelled his foul stench ever since I was brought aboard and suspected that he was manipulating markets to keep us off our guard. He has a record of doing that sort of thing in other countries.
That rat bastard is the anti-Christ.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 07:29 AM (3jxR/)
Posted by: Dan at October 07, 2010 07:31 AM (1jzSs)
This has worked so well for GM that I don't understand why nobody's thought of this before!
Posted by: jwpaine at October 07, 2010 07:31 AM (g4J4S)
It will be interesting to see what happens over the next few months.
I admire that stiff upper lip attitude, Sir. But 'interesting' isn't a term I would use.
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 07, 2010 07:31 AM (fx8sm)
Of course, when today's number gets revised upward your trend disappears.
Nope. They all get revised upwards. Next week's will be under-estimated and this week's will be revised upward. It pretty much all cancels out.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 07:32 AM (QrzlF)
I know that was supposed to be fixed but then that seems to have gone by the wayside.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 07, 2010 07:32 AM (bQ5xy)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 07:33 AM (AZGON)
Terry Gilliam was right with Brazil. We won't be going to camps, we'll be deluged with paperwork by a faceless bureaucracy until we surrender.
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 07, 2010 07:35 AM (fx8sm)
I hope it's this one as featured on Saturday Night Live !!
http://tinyurl.com/23m3m7m
Make sure and click on the gifs. These are OK, some other stuff on the site may be (NSFW)
Posted by: Gunslinger at October 07, 2010 07:36 AM (Zi+FQ)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 07:36 AM (AZGON)
OBAMA: GIVE HIM A CHANCE
The president is working on a system to circumvent future economic catastrophies. It's going to be a dynamic change once he turns the economy around.
He is shining light on shadowy financial dealings and improving our educational system in an attempt to catch up with other nations that have passed America. There's an old saying, "You have to creep before you crawl, crawl before you walk, walk before you run," that's true in turning around our economy.
Remember, you must go through the crucifixtion before you get to the resurrection. President Obama has been in office just one and a half years. Judge him in 2012 and he will pass with flying colors. It will be like watching a space shuttle glide through a clear morning sky to a flawless and suitable end to an incredible mission.
Leroy Porter
Savannah
Lord help me. This jackass lives in my town. Wonder if the 'tard in funemployed?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 07, 2010 07:37 AM (UOM48)
...takes a deep look at the kinds of positive changes occurring as a result of social networking platforms and tools, and explores the lessons that companies, media outlets, community organizations and non-profits, political groups and even celebrities can take from one another as we all work to find ways to use these tools.
Posted by: 427cc filtered single exhaust urbane crawler at October 07, 2010 07:38 AM (kb0wl)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 07:38 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 07, 2010 07:39 AM (SB0V2)
I should say that I agree that all of the negative economic indicators are both negative and important. This is why I have ignored all the "green shoots" nonsense from the administration to date. Back when the administration was touting the success of the recovery, I was the first blogger I know of to point out that the claims data showed that the recovery had completely stalled.
This time I think the claims data is showing a little promise. But it'll need to pick up the recovery pace quite a bit to do us any good. Right now it would take 3 years to get us back on track.
But I do think it'll pick up.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 07:39 AM (QrzlF)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 07:40 AM (v4C0Z)
It will be like watching a space shuttle glide through a clear morning sky to a flawless and suitable end to an incredible mission.
Is that a sick sarcastic Challenger reference?
Posted by: dagny at October 07, 2010 07:40 AM (zTik+)
We are just glad there are no PinkTriangles in the Poat....
Good grief... Take your funnytalk back to the HotSausages!
Posted by: reason at October 07, 2010 07:41 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 07, 2010 07:42 AM (UOM48)
That letter is funny and this morning on the local regressive talk radio station, the host played "Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow."
I know you all know I keep bringing up that song. But they're actually using it to try to rally their side and to keep the Democrats from abandoning Obama.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 07, 2010 07:42 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 07:42 AM (bh8+e)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 07:42 AM (AZGON)
The trend is just noise, unfortunately. What's coming can't help but turn everything worse. Take note of your liberal neighbors and what they have. You can take it from them when the apocolypse comes.
Liberals are survival food.
Posted by: bil at October 07, 2010 07:43 AM (pPpPp)
Posted by: CAC at October 07, 2010 07:43 AM (lV4Fs)
These are the newly unemployed.
Posted by: cthulhu at October 07, 2010 07:45 AM (/0IOT)
Notice how Obama never goes into detail about how exactly he "pulled the economy back from the brink" of depression?
That's because Obama did nothing except allow Bernanke to continue doing what he was doing while Bush was in office.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 07, 2010 07:46 AM (uFokq)
Like to see these figures as a percentage of the employed.
1000 is 1% of 100,000, and 2% of 50,000.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at October 07, 2010 07:47 AM (yt878)
Whatever green shoots, President Round-Up is still farming the land. Business still won't start being productive until Obama and the Progressives are way the hell away from DC and the Marxist infrastructure purged. Gridlock, while improved, still isn't enough to restore the nation.
I'm optimistic about November, but the GOP will have to show a conservative streak it hasn't shown since I've been alive. The entire New Deal needs to be reconsidered and yanked out of our system.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 07, 2010 07:48 AM (swuwV)
But I do think it'll pick up.
So do I, but it will be as a result of the incumbents being tossed out in this and the next couple of election cycles. Thank goodness negative cycles don't last forever. This one, will be particularly hard to shake since it's the current policies of this administration that are prolonging the downturn.
Another reason that it will take longer to resolve is the fact that it was engineered by bad law, namely the CRA. We absolutely, positively have to repeal that law and return mortgage lending to some semblance of fiscal sanity. I'm all for everyone owning their own home, but only in the right way, with a booming, diverse economy, not being forced by threat of penalty of law to lend to those who previously couldn't qualify for a loan.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 07:48 AM (3jxR/)
Like cut all funding and dump 800 specialists on the street?
Posted by: 427cc filtered single exhaust urbane crawler at October 07, 2010 07:49 AM (kb0wl)
Leroy Porter
Savannah
Are we all feeling Crucified yet?
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 07, 2010 07:49 AM (tJjm/)
So, no recovery for Christmas. Just pony shit.
Posted by: Ronsonic at October 07, 2010 07:50 AM (VTm+A)
Posted by: Barackus Obamanus at October 07, 2010 07:50 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: bfwebster at October 07, 2010 07:51 AM (9LOJB)
Posted by: Gallup at October 07, 2010 07:51 AM (ngD76)
Posted by: jwpaine at October 07, 2010 07:51 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: 427cc filtered single exhaust urbane crawler at October 07, 2010 07:51 AM (kb0wl)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 07, 2010 07:52 AM (UOM48)
Gallup: Unemployment rate back over 10%
In yet another harbinger of tomorrowÂ’s official jobless report, Gallup shows a sharp increase in unemployment for September, pushing their estimate of joblessness to 10.1%. The pollster also warns that tomorrowÂ’s figure will miss some of the change, which will likely lull some into a sense that no action is needed ...
Posted by: NM Hick at October 07, 2010 07:52 AM (IzuWw)
The Gallup numbers are not seasonally adjusted, and they don't go back a full year so you can't compare them to 2009. That's not very useful.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 07:53 AM (QrzlF)
Posted by: mpur in Texas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at October 07, 2010 07:53 AM (O5HNe)
Are we all feeling crucified yet?
Hmm, now that you mention it, my palms and my feet are bleeding. And why does my side hurt?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 07:54 AM (3jxR/)
Everything, and I mean everything at the grocery store is nearly double the price from three years ago
Also worth noting - the packages are getting smaller. Boxes are getting thinner so that they "look" the same in height and width when they're on the shelf, but you're only getting 11.4oz of something whereas before you were getting 14oz. Cans are getting a little shorter. Loaves of bread are getting a little smaller.
The only things that can't be tinkered with are the ones that really show the price change, like produce, gallons of milk and OJ, and dozens of eggs. OJ is the big eye-opener for me. In my area, five years ago, a gallon of Minute Maid OJ was around $4. Now it's usually around $7.50.
What sort of special math grocery stores use to price milk is beyond me. Just the other week, a gallon of milk was cheaper than a half-gallon. Not just on a per-ounce basis, but literally it was somewhere around $2.50 for a half-gallon, and $2 for a gallon. I assumed they were simply selling gallons at whatever price it took to stay competitive with the WalMart up the street, logic be damned.
Posted by: reason at October 07, 2010 07:54 AM (F26eZ)
A drop in claims usually means that folks have run out of benefits and/or have given up trying to find a job.
No, a drop in initial claims usually means that fewer people who had coverage have lost their jobs.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 07:55 AM (QrzlF)
I've been semi-seriously considering moving to Bavaria (except I have no idea what kind of work I could do there...). If I'm only allowed a meager, micro-managed subsistence, there should be scenery.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 07, 2010 07:56 AM (Vz9lf)
Also worth noting - the packages are getting smaller.
I'll say. Haagen-Daaz swapped out their 16 oz containers for 12 oz containers. Looks kind of the same, and the price didn't drop, so consumers didn't notice.
But mega-consumers like me did.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 07:57 AM (QrzlF)
from 4/4/09 until 1/2/10 claims went from 646K to 456K ... a reduction of 693 per day for the 274 days ... for the next 274 days we have seen it drop to 445K or a drop of 40 per day for that 274 days period ...
Summer of Revcovery or Slumber of Recovery ?
look at the 4 week average ...
on 8/21/10 - 488,000
on 10/2/10 - 455,750
a nice drop over a short period but it is starting to flatten out ...
had things kept up at the pace seen from 4/9 until 1/10 we would be under 300K in new claims at this point ... that is why Obama waited for a good treand to push Health Care ... he figured that by Nov 10 we'd be back in full job creation swing which would negate the negatives of ObamaCare ... too smart by half ...
apparently the geniuses in the White House assumed that none of their legisaltion would effect the jobs picture ....
Posted by: Jeff at October 07, 2010 07:57 AM (A3tpD)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 07, 2010 07:57 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 07:57 AM (LpqRt)
Posted by: Fresh Air at October 07, 2010 07:58 AM (pJDM9)
I wonder if Rod Serling's "How to Serve Man" cookbook has any good recipes.
I just know liberals are gonna be chewy. Bastards.
Posted by: gator at October 07, 2010 07:59 AM (aOKEC)
Posted by: jwpaine at October 07, 2010 07:59 AM (g4J4S)
I believe the federal dairy subsidies are variable.
Wisconsin has a state law requiring minimum markups on prices; no more cheap milk at the gas station as a loss leader.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 07, 2010 08:00 AM (Vz9lf)
That's what I like about geoff. He isn't embarrassed to admit he consumes large quantities of a girl's brand of ice cream.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 07, 2010 08:00 AM (uFokq)
Also worth noting - the packages are getting smaller.
I just thought my hand was getting bigger.
Posted by: gator at October 07, 2010 08:01 AM (aOKEC)
You have to create, IIRC, over 250,000 jobs a month just to break even. And we are still losing jobs, not creating them.
You have to create 100K - 150K jobs/mo to break even. For most of this year we have been creating jobs, but not a very impressive rate. ADT data for September shows a loss of 39K jobs, but previous months shows gains.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 08:01 AM (QrzlF)
That's what I like about geoff. He isn't embarrassed to admit he consumes large quantities of a girl's brand of ice cream.
Oh, that's not the only brand I consume.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 08:02 AM (QrzlF)
Posted by: CAC at October 07, 2010 08:02 AM (lV4Fs)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 07, 2010 08:02 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 08:02 AM (dK0WB)
Also worth noting - the packages are getting smaller.
Here's another thing: Quality control is slipping. I know, since I inspected things in a former life. Little things like paper plate sticking together and trash bags that are sticky and don't open like they used to.
Again, little things that point to the greater problem of trying to keep one's head above water when money is tight and squeezing out every last drop of profit in any way possible.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 08:04 AM (3jxR/)
Savannah
I did a quick bing on this guy, he exists and wrote another letter where he used (are you ready?), talking about Bush "the chickens are coming home to roost".
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 07, 2010 08:04 AM (ruu60)
Honestly, this asinine 1099 requirement will literally raise the number of issued documents an order of magnitude or possibly two. If you normally buy from dozens of vendors, including everyone and everything from the power company to Staples to the local gas station, you will go from sending maybe a dozen 1099s to hundreds, overnight.
And if you're selling to hundreds of clients? Prepare to be deluged with boxcars of 1099 envelopes arriving in early January of every year from now to eternity.
Unless they make all of this something you can do online, paperless-like, then he's gonna make a LOT of treehuggers angry weep and wail as they sit on the stump of a severed "oak sister."
Posted by: reason at October 07, 2010 08:05 AM (F26eZ)
Bar wench?
Speaking of oil prices,
Oil slips after hitting 5-month high above $84
Wait until the Israelis strike Iran's nuclear program, or when Hezbollah/Syria decide that they want the entirety of Lebanon...and then there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Ian Malcom at October 07, 2010 08:06 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: saluki at October 07, 2010 08:06 AM (Lh1qk)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 08:07 AM (L2+HZ)
I also want to mention the extraordinary leadership of Nancy Pelosi. What she has accomplished in the last three years is unsurpassed. Nancy Pelosi is like the Carpathia rescuing the victims of the Titanic.
Leon Porter, Savannah
Posted by: Leon Porter at October 07, 2010 08:07 AM (uFokq)
I'd be willing to bet this genius drives a run-down Subaru covered in Obama and Coexist stickers.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 07, 2010 08:07 AM (UOM48)
Octoberfest girl? Free beer and you get a well fitting uniform.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 07, 2010 08:08 AM (ruu60)
I'd be willing to bet this genius drives a run-down Subaru Schwinn covered in Obama and Coexist stickers.
FTFY
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 08:09 AM (3jxR/)
We patented that marketing process for duping consumers, Haagen-Daaz will be receiving a letter from our IP lawyers.
Posted by: American Association of Coffee Roasters at October 07, 2010 08:12 AM (IzuWw)
geoff - the fact that such a small change is the only positive news you have to report over a long time frame is in and of it self scary.
Yeah, it's pathetic. But better than nothing.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 08:14 AM (QrzlF)
Both the left and right sides of the blogosphere are buzzing about a bipartisan TARP-style banking bailout bill that somehow reached President ObamaÂ’s desk in the legislative rush before Congress adjourned for the midterm election break.
The bill is HR3808, the “Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010,” which requires courts to accept as valid notarized letters made out of state, making it harder to challenge the authenticity of foreclosure and other legal documents.Hurry up November.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 07, 2010 08:14 AM (ruu60)
advanced numbers are pure BS ... the prior 8 weeks have all had their advanced number revised UP ... by an average of 3,875 ...
read the press release ...
"the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 445,000, a decrease of 11,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 456,000"
the previous weeks original number was 453,000 ... a correct press release would have compared advanced to advanced numbers and would have read ...
"the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 445,000, a decrease of 8,000 from the previous week's advanced figure of 453,000"
from 11,000 to 8,000, a 27% difference ...
Can you smell what the Rock is cooking ?
Posted by: Jeff at October 07, 2010 08:14 AM (A3tpD)
______________
Loggers need stimulus, too.
Posted by: Anachronda at October 07, 2010 08:15 AM (xGZ+b)
Posted by: Liberal at October 07, 2010 08:16 AM (aOKEC)
"That's what I like about geoff. He isn't embarrassed to admit he consumes large quantities of a girl's brand of ice cream.
Oh, that's not the only brand I consume."
He's also a fan of that wierd crap you can get from Central Market that takes a perfectly good flavor and mixes in flowers. Mint and Rose Sorbet, Orange Lilac, Wisteria Mysteria.
Posted by: reason at October 07, 2010 08:16 AM (F26eZ)
advanced numbers are pure BS ... the prior 8 weeks have all had their advanced number revised UP ... by an average of 3,875 ...
True, but that's less than a percent.
the previous weeks original number was 453,000 ... a correct press release would have compared advanced to advanced numbers and would have read ...
I agree - the "improvement" is always magnified by the previous week's correction. Happens almost every week. I was considering doing a post on the bias in the initial estimates, which are overwhelmingly low, but it didn't seem like it was something that everybody didn't already know.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 08:18 AM (QrzlF)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 08:18 AM (bJevO)
One of the billÂ’s co-sponsors was none other than big banking buddy GOP Rep. Mike Castle
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 07, 2010 08:18 AM (ruu60)
Geoff - good post.
With longterm unemployment factored in, we are around 22 percent unemployed.
Perhaps the green shoots will become vitory gardens.
Posted by: journolist at October 07, 2010 08:20 AM (O/NP5)
Posted by: Liberal at October 07, 2010 08:23 AM (aOKEC)
Is the raw number of claims really that important - or is it the ratio of new claims to the total number of employed people. If the labor market has shrunk; then total number of new claim eventually has to go down as well. (In addition to seasonal issues.)
The shrinkage pretty much stopped many months ago. I'll put up a plot of employment tomorrow - it's been awhile since I've posted one.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 08:23 AM (QrzlF)
"Posted by: American Association of Coffee Roasters"
No shit, you glib bastards!
Another tactic is to go all DNC - NEW LOOK! SAME GREAT PRODUCT! Not mentioned: smaller package!
Posted by: reason at October 07, 2010 08:23 AM (F26eZ)
I can't seem to get hired in my field (IT).
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at October 07, 2010 08:24 AM (bvfVF)
Perhaps the green shoots will become vitory gardens.
The green shoots are really just fuzzy mold patches on your smaller slice of pie.
Posted by: reason at October 07, 2010 08:26 AM (F26eZ)
Ok, so where do they factor in folks who have run out of benefits or stopped filing claims?
Posted by: mpur in Texas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at October 07, 2010 08:28 AM (O5HNe)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 08:36 AM (nOq8U)
Posted by: Fresh Air at October 07, 2010 08:37 AM (pJDM9)
Tomorrow should have an update on the long-term unemployed. 48K people left the unemployment insurance rolls last week - it wasn't specified whether they ran out of benefits or found work.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 08:44 AM (QrzlF)
Posted by: Jeff at October 07, 2010 08:50 AM (A3tpD)
Posted by: evil libertarian at October 07, 2010 08:52 AM (zt3lR)
my point is that something stopped the good downward trend in early 2010
Naw - I believe it stopped in mid-November 2009. That's when the data starts deviating from the linear fit. I usually post a chart which shows that breakpoint (I did last month, I think), but I wanted to focus on the recent data this time.
if the parameters don't change why should the trend ?
Well, here's my theory. Business has some pent-up demand that it has failed to let loose due to uncertainty about its future. While it's true that the Dems' new policies are business-unfriendly, and that business won't do as well as it could under those policies, there's still room for signficant improvement in the economic picture.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 08:56 AM (QrzlF)
You gotta laugh. If geoff is right, the unemployment rate inflection will happen right around the time the new Congress is seated. Then the 'arc of disaster' will correspond almost exactly to the time that the Dems controlled Congress. Sam and Cokie are going to get whiplash splainin how it doesn't reflect on the Dems at all.
Posted by: East Bay Jay at October 07, 2010 08:58 AM (ocHBO)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 07, 2010 12:14 PM (ruu60)
Looks like Obama's going to do the smart thing and veto HR 3808--the White House just issued a press release on it. I can't imagine the kind of shitstorm that would have ensued if this hadn't been noticed by the blogosphere.
Two things really stood out regarding this bill--1) One of the co-sponsors was none other than Mike Castle, and 2) check this out, from govtrack:
Apr 27, 2010: This bill passed in the House of Representatives by voice vote. A record of each representativeÂ’s position was not kept. Sep 27, 2010: This bill passed in the Senate by Unanimous Consent. A record of each senatorÂ’s position was not kept. Notwithstanding that this isn't the first time this has happened, but I hardly think the lack of accountability is a coincidence here.Posted by: Helicopter Ben Bernanke at October 07, 2010 09:49 AM (/Pw+r)
What about UNDERemployment - the dirty little secret of the Obamaconomy?
Posted by: 1389AD at October 07, 2010 09:50 AM (X7SVT)
Posted by: Ugrev at October 07, 2010 09:55 AM (862vz)
Posted by: rockhead at October 07, 2010 10:00 AM (RykTt)
Maybe the point has been made and missed it; but once you're off UE bennies, you're off the tally.
This is initial claims data we're talking about, not the number receiving payments.
What this country needs is a good 50 years of gridlock in D.C.
Oh yes.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 10:08 AM (QrzlF)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 07, 2010 12:07 PM (UOM4
I swear to God, every time I see one of those stickers on the back of some (probable) atheist's junk car I feel rolling down my window and smacking the driver upside the head. You gotta love how Liberals love to pretend that Christianity - that just happens to be the foundation stone of modern Western Civilization - is "just one among many other equally valid religions."
Posted by: Conan the Republican at October 07, 2010 10:31 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 07, 2010 10:31 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: JonathanG at October 07, 2010 10:56 AM (0MmSw)
Posted by: kansas at October 07, 2010 03:28 PM (J5UD+)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2042 seconds, 289 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









I should mention that the unemployment rate comes out tomorrow morning. I'll try to get it up with 15-20 minutes of its release (8:30 am EST). The unemployment rate will not show much indication of recovery, though.
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 06:51 AM (QrzlF)