April 06, 2010
— Ace What I've heard (and I hope this is vague enough to not break confidence) is that there is a group of GOP Senators who don't like Steele, and are trying to drive him out through leaks.
Here is my problem with that: Rather than standing up like men and asking him to step down, they're doing this crap through the media, through leaks, and the problem is they're not merely damaging Steele. They're hurting the RNC, which is supposed to be a useful organization for advancing conservative issues and candidates, and are in fact pretty much damaging it on a monthly basis. It's now basically damaged beyond use and irrelevant.
Now, having done so, do they make their move and demand his resignation, or call for a vote to force him out?
Nope. They don't want to because they're too afraid to fire a black guy. Which is an utterly stupid concern.
Meantime, they continue hurting Republicans and the conservative cause. Because their wild attacks on Steele are doing a lot of collateral damage.
Now, having created -- or at least greatly exacerbated -- a problem which now needs a solution, are they coming forward to force that solution? By which I mean they have created (or nurtured) a situation wherein the only good solution is the resignation or firing of Michael Steele.
If they do not move to implement that solution, we continue into 2010 hobbled by an RNC people won't donate to.
If they are just waiting like cowards for Steele to resign himself-- guess what, he won't. So what's Option B? Just leak more and hurt the GOP further?
At what point do these guys stand up and announce their intentions as Men (capital intended) and demand what they are agitating for behind the scenes?
I have no problem with an eviction of Steele. I have a problem with this pussy chickenshit leaking campaign against him which continues to hurt the party by damaging the head of the RNC while leaving that head in place.
If you want Steele out -- which you do -- then move on it already. Steele is not going to resign politely. The passive-aggressive leaking isn't working. Demand his resignation and call for a vote, and stop with this inept palace intrigue stuff where you're always trying to hide your hand.
We can see your hand. Either be men and drive him out -- take action, cowards -- or accept that you are cowards who will leave him in place and therefore accept that he will go on being chairman and you should stop the leaking.
Ranking the three possible outcomes here in terms of desirability...
1) Steele is driven out and is replaced by a reassuring consensus figure, someone with a big name and many more friends than enemies. Someone who appeals to both wings of the party and, crucially, has a reputation for being careful with other people's money.
2) Steele continues on, with his own reputation and the reputation of the party tarnished and damaged, but no fresh damage is at least inflicted.
3) Steele continues on, and the anti-Steele contingent continues damaging him and the party without having the guts to actually move against him and stop the bleeding.
Right now we've got situation 3. The worst of all.
Put up or shut up. If you don't have the guts or the votes to drive him out, than stop throwing grenades around and blowing up the November elections for us.
Posted by: Ace at
12:33 PM
| Comments (212)
Post contains 602 words, total size 4 kb.
In other words, the GOP senators are being total fucking cowards like they always are.
Posted by: thirteen28 at April 06, 2010 12:35 PM (s8N54)
Posted by: Michael "The Margin is Slim" Steele at April 06, 2010 12:36 PM (YVZlY)
Good for us. How many times lately have you heard, "fuck the RNC, donate straight to conservative candidates"?
Posted by: Bomber at April 06, 2010 12:36 PM (qzoN5)
Posted by: Michael Steele at April 06, 2010 12:38 PM (W5NBA)
Nope. They don't want to because they're too afraid to fire a black guy. Which is an utterly stupid concern.
Steele is already playing the race card against his own party, so that is likely a valid concern.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 06, 2010 12:38 PM (F09Uo)
Posted by: Vic at April 06, 2010 12:39 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Michael Steele, Man of Soft and Maliable Content at April 06, 2010 12:39 PM (UA4gE)
Posted by: brak at April 06, 2010 12:40 PM (W5NBA)
That would be the first time in the history of the world that fire melted Steele.
Posted by: Rosie Odumbass at April 06, 2010 12:41 PM (7VvJB)
Steele is already playing the race card against his own party, so that is likely a valid concern.
And this is where the time-honored "They're Only Going To Hate Us Anyway" rule comes into play. Fire Steele now.
If you want an African American, Ken Blackwell is waiting.
Seriously, everytime you are afraid of being called names by the Demunists and the media (BIRM), remember: They're only going to hate you anyway...
Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 06, 2010 12:41 PM (ujg0T)
Steele is already playing the race card against his own party, so that is likely a valid concern.
Live by the Affirmative Action...
Posted by: Reverend Al Sharpton at April 06, 2010 12:41 PM (Oxen1)
Posted by: ace at April 06, 2010 12:41 PM (i6ROy)
Steele Race Card trick: http://tiny.cc/co6vh
"Fire me and I'll take all (seven) of the black Republicans with me, and then I'll call you all racists."
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 06, 2010 12:41 PM (F09Uo)
If they do fire Steele, how long before he goes off to Larry King, MSDNC, etc etc doing interviews accusing the GOP of racism? Seems to me he certainly has a big enough ego, and he's already shown he'll use the race card. He'd love the fawning attention the MSM would give him for that talking point.
Meh. He's only going to do that anyway. Remember the "Rule of Anyway".
Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 06, 2010 12:42 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 06, 2010 12:42 PM (I1/U/)
Posted by: ace at April 06, 2010 12:42 PM (i6ROy)
Posted by: Reverend Al Sharpton at April 06, 2010 04:41 PM (Oxen1)
and rot from within by Affirmative Action.
Posted by: Michael "I've got game" Steele at April 06, 2010 12:42 PM (YVZlY)
And who is this anti-Steele contingent, exactly? Come on. Give it up.
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 06, 2010 12:43 PM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 06, 2010 12:43 PM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 12:44 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: ace at April 06, 2010 04:42 PM (i6ROy)
Agreed. Either shit or get off the bed! (or something like that)
Posted by: Sandra "The Mustache" Bullock at April 06, 2010 12:44 PM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Dang at April 06, 2010 12:45 PM (UA4gE)
Posted by: Pres'Ent Toonces at April 06, 2010 12:45 PM (erIg9)
No. Just work around him until he quits.
The workaround: American Crossroads.
"Big time donors fretting about Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele's troubles are helping fuel early fundraising success for a new 527 group being promoted by GOP uber strategists Ed Gillespie and Karl Rove."
(Via this karazee new blog HotAir.com)
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 06, 2010 12:45 PM (o8Qz0)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 06, 2010 12:45 PM (nEJnj)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 12:45 PM (AZGON)
Perfect solution - Change the name of the organization.
RCN - Republican Committe Nationale (ooooh exotic!)
Hey, it worked for ACORN.
Posted by: madtechie (Unban My IP Address) at April 06, 2010 12:47 PM (dorWS)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 06, 2010 12:47 PM (I1/U/)
---
5 ... the problem is they're not merely damaging Steele. They're hurting the RNC ...
Good for us. How many times lately have you heard, "fuck the RNC, donate straight to conservative candidates"?
Posted by: Bomber at April 06, 2010 04:36 PM
---
I disagree that that isn't still damaging. If you have a properly functioning central organization - either an RNC to elect GOP candidates of all stripes or a conservative version of the RNC to elect conservative candidates - the money goes further because decisions can be made to apply the money strategically. The problem with individuals spread out across the country making small donations to individual candidates across the country, is that it surely leads to some candidates getting more than they need and others getting less. It's too dependent on word-of-mouth or media coverage in identifying candidates.
It's the same with any charity, frankly. There's an efficiency of scale.
And, of course, for those of us willing to set "purity" aside and who want to see virtually any R elected over any D incumbent this year, the weakening of the RNC is a disaster.
Posted by: Y-not at April 06, 2010 12:47 PM (Kn9r7)
Screw 'em all. Donate directly. Maybe we'll actually get some decent underground marketing going on.
Posted by: Winston Smith, Lotus Eater at April 06, 2010 12:47 PM (BFqyO)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 06, 2010 12:48 PM (nEJnj)
He should murder his way to the top.
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 06, 2010 12:49 PM (I1/U/)
you guys remember how we get saddled with Steele?
We let the Democrats/MSM pick our RNC chair for us, that's how. The best man for the job out of all the candidates was some guy named Kit Whatshisname. But Kit couldn't get the gig because that woulda been insane. You see, Kit belonged to a 'closed' country club, at one time. Or so the story goes...
Posted by: Mannix at April 06, 2010 12:49 PM (vbtmy)
I could have cared less about Steele one way or the other until he started race hustling. I am not sure why exactly blacks to that. All it does is make you steer clear of blacks so you don't get accused of being a racist which in effect makes you a racist for avoiding being called a racist.
There just doesn't seem to be a way out.
Posted by: robtr at April 06, 2010 12:49 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 12:50 PM (AZGON)
Ace never said they were in the Senate or even congress. There are a lot of Party bigwigs who run the Party apparatus who are not in office.
Posted by: Vic at April 06, 2010 12:51 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: lesbian bondage strippers at April 06, 2010 12:51 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: dagny at April 06, 2010 12:52 PM (jStyq)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 12:52 PM (AZGON)
On the other hand, with the awakening of so many formerly fairly apathetic conservatives to the terrifying direction in which we're headed, I suspect there will be plenty of donations made to every deserving prospect, despite an ineffective Republican party.
Posted by: Winston Smith, Lotus Eater at April 06, 2010 12:53 PM (BFqyO)
Posted by: conscious and no longer wants to have sex with Sandra Bullock at April 06, 2010 12:53 PM (YVZlY)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 06, 2010 12:53 PM (NurK6)
No? How about the first sentence of the post.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 06, 2010 12:54 PM (H6Jyg)
All it does is make you steer clear of blacks so you don't get accused of being a racist which in effect makes you a racist for avoiding being called a racist.
I'll say it again: They're Only Going To Hate Us Anyway. This mantra needs to be repeated every time a Republican is afraid to do what is right because of the "identity politics".
Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 06, 2010 12:54 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: The Rogue Economist at April 06, 2010 12:54 PM (8YgdQ)
You know, I actually do favor a graceful exit strategy.
Organizations that fire high-level people after publicly humiliating them take a hit. In my little corner of the universe (higher ed) it's rare for a President or Vice President or even a Dean to get fired. They move on to other things. If the organization is savvy, they do so in such a way that the relationships and loyalties that that person had are transferred to the successor. The instances I know of orgs that do fire executives develop a rep for being bad places to work.
Maybe too much damage has been done to get Steele to leave under his own power... but I find it a little hard to believe that there isn't some powerful person whom Steele respects and to whom Steele looks up as a mentor who can't step in and negotiate a palatable exit for Steele. Does Steele look up to Gingrich, for example? How about George HW Bush? Maybe he could run someone's presidential library or something.
In the meantime, these asshats who are leaking better have a candidate who has agreed to take the job waiting in the wings. I haven't heard any names floated, except by the likes of us peons.
Posted by: Y-not at April 06, 2010 12:55 PM (Kn9r7)
Didn't know I've been dead for 9 years, did ya?
Oh, I'm the slow moving style in case you're wondering. Or is it that obvious?
Posted by: Zombie Fred Thompson at April 06, 2010 12:56 PM (UA4gE)
Yes, we do finally have an endgame. After much debate and finally a majority vote, we have decided on: Yahtzee!
Posted by: The Anti-Steele Plotters at April 06, 2010 12:56 PM (YVZlY)
I'm not one who insists on prospective candidates to swear to a rigid set of principles, but a few basics (such as resisting the growth of government and supporting a free market) would certainly be nice.
Posted by: Winston Smith, Lotus Eater at April 06, 2010 12:56 PM (BFqyO)
So it's OK that Steele was hired because he was Black? I think that right there is enough reason to launch his ass.
He wasn't hired because he is good, he was hired because he was Black. He wasn't fired because he's Black, he will be fired because he isn't any good.
Let's see how well that meme floats.
This whole episode reminds me of Stanley O'Neal at Merrill Lynch. They had to wait until he destroyed the company first because they did not want to fire a Black man.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 06, 2010 12:57 PM (F09Uo)
I have had that feeling for a long time myself. It seems that Goldwater was an aberration and to them, Reagan was a mistake that got in under the tent. They thought he would be a CA/Hollywood liberal and he surprised them.
Posted by: Vic at April 06, 2010 12:57 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 12:58 PM (AZGON)
Which makes me wonder what the real source of the opposition is. That's something you do to someone for whom you have personal animus, and not something you do for the good of the organization.
Is Steele hard to get along with, or is he playing favorites somehow? I guess a certain amount of that is inevitable.
Posted by: Ace's liver at April 06, 2010 12:59 PM (XIXhw)
Then, he sucked as RNC chair. Worse than "sucked" even. And now, after all of his screw-ups, and with his latest whining about race (and even including the Indonesian Imbecile in with him on the argument) I have no more patience or tolerance for him. He has to go, NOW.
And I agree with you, Ace. Not from behind the scenes. They should toss him out in the street, in full view - because he's that bad, and getting worse. But, if the GOP can't get rid of such an incompetent idiot, then ... I don't even know what to say about how bad of an omen this is.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 06, 2010 12:59 PM (N49h9)
GOP Senators
'nuff said. They never have the balls to do anything directly."
True enough, but realize the GOP is top heavy with the old, Rockerfeller, limosene, .........
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 06, 2010 12:59 PM (ucq49)
Since this is not the actual case, and is only a theory, there's no actual harm done.
The RNC isn't helping candidates. The RNC is only helping Michael Steele sell books - as evidenced by the $16 million deficit the RNC is currently running.
Here's what I've heard: There are Democrats who have infiltrated the RNC who are secretly plotting to keep Michael Steele on staff and pissing away as much money as possible in order that the RNC is as ineffective as possible leading up to the most important elections in US history.
They're doing that by leaking stories to right-wing bloggers such as Ace stupid enough to reprint whatever is handed to them by unnamed sources.
On the record, however, Michael Steele is pissing away our money and is destroying the Republican National Committee from within. That is why major fundraisers have chosen not to give it any more money; and instead to donate directly to candidates or their PACS. That way, we can ensure the money is wasted in lesbian-themed bondage strip joints and other wasteful venues.
There is simply no need for a middleman spending $9,000/night at the Beverly Hilton and drinking up all the Corrvoisier in the back of the limo on the way to the lesbian bondage clubs.
Mr. and Mrs. Middle America do not approve.
Posted by: someguy at April 06, 2010 12:59 PM (VRJIW)
What happens when central authorities "anoint" candidates with words and money:
Dede Scozzafava
Charlie Crist
Arlen Effing Specter
Donate direct. Period.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 06, 2010 12:59 PM (B+qrE)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 01:00 PM (AZGON)
you guys remember how we get saddled with Steele?
We let the Democrats/MSM pick our RNC chair for us, that's how.
That's not how I remember it. I remember watching the process (on CSPAN?) and reading the blogs and concluding that the other candidates were not that great. Some seemed too ideological, which would leave out a wing of the party, and others seemed like old party hacks who had never done anything (never led any org or worked in a way accountable to the public) except get other partisans elected. The more I watched of the proceedings, the more convinced I became that Steele was the best choice.
Posted by: Y-not at April 06, 2010 01:00 PM (Kn9r7)
I disagree with the notion that donors are less inclined to support conservatives if they have to support them directly or through PAC's. The RNC is a fucked up bureaucracy that only cares about getting Republicans elected. Its "favorites" list included DeDe Scozzafava Charlie Crist.
Conservative donors are absolutely fed up with RINO's and the Northeast Wing of the GOP. When the party starts supporting conservatives, conservatives will again support the party. For now, we're supporting conservative candidates.
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at April 06, 2010 01:01 PM (OqtY7)
Posted by: someguy at April 06, 2010 01:01 PM (tcMQZ)
That's OK we will just regulate the internet like it is a public utility.
IOW, they are going forward even though they lost the case!
Posted by: Vic at April 06, 2010 01:02 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Theodore Fucking Roosevelt at April 06, 2010 01:03 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Zombie Howard Taft at April 06, 2010 05:01 PM (UA4gE)
How about "New nation, built on the American creed"?
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 06, 2010 01:03 PM (N49h9)
And Ace is the problem because the NYT/NBC/ABC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC/et al would never touch stories that damage Republicans..
Posted by: nickless at April 06, 2010 01:03 PM (MMC8r)
He needs to go, whether he resigns or is forced out.
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at April 06, 2010 01:03 PM (OqtY7)
Posted by: dagny at April 06, 2010 01:04 PM (jStyq)
You seem, Ace, to be perfectly OK with the destruction of the RNC as long as Michale Steele is doing the destroying.
Why is that?
Why haven't you written a post lamenting how Michael Steele, by refusing to resign, by refusing to do that which would best help the party, is destroying it?
Michael Steele can't be fired ... because then the RNC will be accused of racism by the left. If he resigned, however, they couldn't make that charge.
But you're right. He won't resign.
He'd rather destroy the party than resign.
Why not write a post about how Michael Steele is putting Michael Steele ahead of Republican Party interests?
Posted by: someguy at April 06, 2010 01:04 PM (VRJIW)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 01:04 PM (AZGON)
OT: Whoa! Watch this video:
Is Karzai on Drugs? [Greg Pollowitz - National Review] So implies former U.N. envoy to Afghanistan Peter Galbraith: http://tinyurl.com/yzpbzgu
"he has a certain fondness for Afghan's most profitible export"
Posted by: conscious and asking Karzai to share at April 06, 2010 01:05 PM (YVZlY)
Posted by: someguy at April 06, 2010 04:59 PM (VRJIW)
Posted by: someguy at April 06, 2010 05:01 PM (tcMQZ)
Will the real someguy please stand up?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 06, 2010 01:05 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: dagny at April 06, 2010 05:04 PM (jStyq)
It could be as high as 7, maybe even 9.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 06, 2010 01:05 PM (F09Uo)
Posted by: dagny at April 06, 2010 01:05 PM (jStyq)
Why not write a post about how Michael Steele is putting Michael Steele ahead of Republican Party interests?
Proof that our resident dumbass does not read the blog.
Read the blog much, dumbass?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 06, 2010 01:06 PM (B+qrE)
The more I watched of the proceedings, the more convinced I became that Steele was the best choice.
He was the only choice. Well, Steele and Blackwell were the only choices left. And Steele had more juice with the members than Blackwell did. So we ended up with Steele.
Katon Dawson ran the GOP in SC. He had experience, connections, charm, and a vision for victory. We got Steele.
Posted by: Mannix at April 06, 2010 01:06 PM (vbtmy)
Stop wasting time and money and start working toward that goal.
Posted by: erp at April 06, 2010 01:06 PM (RzTM+)
Posted by: dagny at April 06, 2010 01:07 PM (jStyq)
It is. Every political leader will have to deal with scrutiny and detractors in this environment.
Steele keeps enriching himself at the expense of the party. He is failing to meet his objectives for the party because he is too self centered.
This is Steele's fault.
I can understand why some players are behind the scenes leaking crap. It would be better that they are upfront. Fine. Let's have a vote anyway, since they are DC survivors and will not be sticking their necks out and calling for a vote.
Posted by: throwaway handle at April 06, 2010 01:07 PM (dUOK+)
Posted by: dagny at April 06, 2010 05:04 PM (jStyq)
8 ... You were off by 167%!!
Or, as The Precedent would say, "You were off by 231,887% ... but I don't want to get into higher mathematics ..."
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 06, 2010 01:07 PM (N49h9)
You seem, Ace, to be perfectly OK with the destruction of the RNC as long as Michale Steele is doing the destroying.
Way to pull accusations out of your ass!
Why is that?
Why haven't you written a post lamenting how Michael Steele, by refusing to resign, by refusing to do that which would best help the party, is destroying it?
Gee, could it be because Michael Steele won't resign?
Michael Steele can't be fired ... because then the RNC will be accused of racism by the left. If he resigned, however, they couldn't make that charge.
Someone needs to reread and understand the Rule Of Anyway again....
Why not write a post about how Michael Steele is putting Michael Steele ahead of Republican Party interests?
Because that goes without saying? Because we all know that already?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 06, 2010 01:07 PM (ujg0T)
Ultimately, what's going to result from those sorts of power plays is either an utter loss of confidence from the party base in their leadership (probably leading to other groups or candidates directly organizing to promote their ideas) or a third party rises to challenge the GOP. Not seeing much of a third way here, short of a near-complete house cleaning at the RNC
As has been already demonstrated. Where there's conservative will there's a conservative way. Become informed of who the conservative candidates are and donate directly to their campaigns. Fuck the RNC and the RNCC.
Posted by: Soona' at April 06, 2010 01:08 PM (IQtPa)
Congress just has to pass a law saying they can, then they can.
They had this chance and did not. Too many competing pots of really big money.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 06, 2010 01:08 PM (B+qrE)
Democrats want to run the country.
Republicans want to run the party.
Posted by: David in San Diego at April 06, 2010 01:08 PM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: Obambi at April 06, 2010 01:08 PM (eoYse)
Michael Steele gets 3 votes?
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 06, 2010 01:08 PM (H6Jyg)
My point is Katon Dawson was essentially ruled out because the RNC was afraid to step into another media-fabricated pc minefield.
Posted by: Mannix at April 06, 2010 01:09 PM (vbtmy)
If not, give him the boot, what are they afraid of? that 90% of blacks will vote democrat.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 06, 2010 01:09 PM (7VvJB)
Who cares?
If he resigned, however, they couldn't make that charge.
Posted by: someguy at April 06, 2010 05:04 PM (VRJIW)
LOL. That's funny.
Steele needs to be VERY PUBLICLY fired.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 06, 2010 01:09 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Mike Steele, suave in his nightclub at April 06, 2010 01:09 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: The Obama Political Polling Institute at April 06, 2010 01:09 PM (YVZlY)
Why don't you, Ace, stand up and ask Michael Steele to resign ... like a man.
Instead, you lede your post with a single unnamed source ("and I hope this is vague enough to not break confidence") is that there is a group of GOP Senators who don't like Steele, and are trying to drive him out through leaks.
You yourself are doing that which you claim to deplore: You're impugning the reputations of all GOP Senators who you claim don't like Steele and who you claim, but won't tell us your sources, are trying to drive him out through leaks.
Why don't you stand up like a man and ask Michael Steele to resign for the good of the party, instead of watching it be torn asunder on his watch by party in-fighting?
I have news for you Ace ... you're the media too. And you're being used too.
Be a man. Demand Michale Steele resign for the good of the Party.
Posted by: someguy at April 06, 2010 01:09 PM (VRJIW)
Posted by: dagny at April 06, 2010 01:10 PM (jStyq)
Fuck the RNC and the RNCC.
How about "Take Back" the RNC and the RNCC?
Sure, we can go around the apparatus, but wouldn't it be nice to actually have an apparatus that *works for us*? Isn't it an uphill battle against the Demunists and the LameStreamMedia (BIRM) already?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 06, 2010 01:10 PM (ujg0T)
IOW, they are going forward even though they lost the case!
Someone must have standing to sue here. Any legal beagles are welcome.
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 05:04 PM (AZGON)
------------------------------------------------------
Standing to sue. That's quaint, George. Takes me back to a better time ...
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 06, 2010 01:11 PM (N49h9)
that said, for smarter reasons, I would like uberfrau cheney kicking some butt.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 06, 2010 01:12 PM (7VvJB)
Be a man, someguy.
Start your own blog where no one will mind if you indulge your single-minded passion of pissing on the carpet.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 06, 2010 01:12 PM (B+qrE)
Would we get more Grahamnasty's?
Posted by: Vic at April 06, 2010 01:13 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Christoph at April 06, 2010 01:13 PM (0fq7b)
Niiiiiiiiice. Rudy is on Hannity right now talking about why he just endorsed Marco Rubio.
Rudy is effectively hammering Crist, get this, on the issues. Rudy is an excellent campaigner, just not for himself.
Posted by: Mannix at April 06, 2010 01:13 PM (vbtmy)
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 06, 2010 01:14 PM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: The Dude Lebowski at April 06, 2010 01:14 PM (eoYse)
Would we get more Grahamnasty's?
You tell me, Vic. What do you know about Katon? Would he be a better chairman than Steele?
Posted by: Mannix at April 06, 2010 01:15 PM (vbtmy)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 01:15 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 06, 2010 01:15 PM (F09Uo)
Nope. They don't want to because they're too afraid to fire a black guy. Which is an utterly stupid concern.
Uhm... gonna have to disagree with that. Those of us who work in the real world understand that is a very real concern. We may wish that it were not so, but that is what separates Conservatives from Liberals, we operate with facts and data, not "feelings".
Posted by: Terry at April 06, 2010 01:16 PM (+7Usq)
You gotta look at this from the viewpoint of Washington...
THEY are all in a tizzy over Racial Politics, while most of the electorate out here in Real America... is not.
The Echo Chamber MSM would castigate the GOP for firing Steele, no matter how incompentent he is, but because they are deaf to what we out here say (as exemplified by the Health Reform "debate")... they will continue to kow tow to the Pundits.
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 06, 2010 01:16 PM (OlHjR)
Comment sections are for the purpose of commenting on what the author has written. If you want a circle-jerk then by all means pull your pants down and stroke Ace all you want.
Is this an echo-chamber? Sounds like that's the desire.
Posted by: someguy at April 06, 2010 01:16 PM (VRJIW)
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at April 06, 2010 05:10 PM (BiCQw)
Oddly, Beck got some of the most basic information wrong. He said that Barack Sr. didn't leave the little kid until he was two, but it was more like 2 days - according to accounts of Stanley Ann having fled to Seattle not more than three weeks after delivery (including school records and some others). Very odd.
Beck picked it up as he went on, though. I missed whether he mentioned that the Indonesian Imbecile actually grew up in Indonesia - 4 to 5 years worth, for the whole of his elementary school, essentially.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 06, 2010 01:17 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: tmi3rd at April 06, 2010 01:17 PM (vH39r)
Not in the media it isn't. It's a verb.<<
"lede" is a noun everywhere except Humpty Dumpty world.
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 06, 2010 01:17 PM (H6Jyg)
121 I would like uberfrau cheney kicking some butt.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes
Lynne Cheney? Say... (begins stroking chin and look thoughtfully off camera)
Posted by: Dang at April 06, 2010 01:18 PM (UA4gE)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 06, 2010 05:15 PM (AZGON)
Damn. I was counting on you.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 06, 2010 01:19 PM (N49h9)
Steele at Lunch, Reprise
Squid ravioli in lemon grass broth
Goat cheese profiteroles and arugula Caesar salad
Swordfish meatloaf with onion marmalade
Rare roasted partridge breast in raspberry coulis
With a sorrel timbale and, of course,
Grilled free-range rabbit with herbed french fries
Only the finest for Steele
The finest shoes, the finest scientists
The finest hotels, the finest meals
Jet armadas and limousine fleets
Egyptian cotton, thousand-count sheets
The weakness of narcissism, smelly feets
Yeah, I kinda ad-libbed that last line. It's not in Homer's original.
Posted by: rdbrewer at April 06, 2010 01:19 PM (UJT2r)
Posted by: tmi3rd at April 06, 2010 01:20 PM (vH39r)
It's not about black votes, it's about all the whites (especially white women) who are mortified at the thought of being associated with a "racist" party. And it will be increasingly so, as long as we continue to legitimize anger and violence toward "racists".
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 06, 2010 01:21 PM (NurK6)
he'll try to do his best Jim Rome impression and annoy everyone into ignoring him
Jim Rome, Ryan Seacrest and Fred Barnes...the unquestioned triumvirate of guys who should be thankful that the United States of America exists and pacts with the devil work.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 06, 2010 01:22 PM (B+qrE)
Let's be honest. Most conservatives & libertarians think "The Won" is an Affirmative Action President. All thru his life, that we know of, he got a pass.
How is Steele any different?
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 06, 2010 01:22 PM (ucq49)
4) Steele quits dramatically, bombing the place on the way out with repeated accusations of Republican voter racism, just like he's been making the whole fucking time he's been chairman, it's WHITE PARTY HOUNDS AWESOME BLACK GUY OUT headlines for days, and that's the media frame for the 2012 presidential election.
Which is what will happen.
Posted by: oblig. at April 06, 2010 01:22 PM (x7Ao8)
FIFY. It's a not insignificant difference.
Posted by: FUBAR at April 06, 2010 01:23 PM (1fanL)
Ya know, when 1/2 the country would like to fire the black guy in the White House, I don't see that firing Steele in this climate is going to be such a problem.
Posted by: That Little Timid Guy Who Sometimes Says Inflamitory Things in the Breakroom While Heating His Lefto at April 06, 2010 01:23 PM (UA4gE)
... they're too afraid to fire a black guy. Which is an utterly stupid concern.
It goes beyond that. Nobody wants to even criticize a black guy, which is more stupid. Look what that got us. Look what that's still getting us.
No one is special because they're black. (If someone is special because they made themselves special in overcoming the adversity of being black in what's still a white man's world, that's different. Does that describe you, Chairman Steele?) The longer everyone tiptoes around these eggshells, the worse things will continue, and the worse it'll end.
I'm telling you, Zombie MLK has to come up and eat some brains.
Posted by: FireHorse at April 06, 2010 01:25 PM (cQyWA)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 06, 2010 01:26 PM (0q2P7)
I don't actually have any proof but I'm pretty sure that Jim Rome is a woman.
Just throwing that out there.
Posted by: ErikW at April 06, 2010 01:26 PM (fFCLX)
Let's be honest. Most conservatives & libertarians think "The Won" is an Affirmative Action President. All thru his life, that we know of, he got a pass.
How is Steele any different?
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 06, 2010 05:22 PM (ucq49)
Because he did some very good work defending the conservative positions when he was a commetator at Fox. I used to love him when he came on. He was one of the only people talking about the nitty gritty of Fannie/Freddie and the CRA during the credit crisis (while McShame was floundering and acting like a general idiot - "Let's pay off everyone's mortgage!! Yeah!"). Steele showed intelligence and spine in all of his appearances (which were many). I was in favor of his appointment, initially - though it was clear that some of it was a "me too" affirmative action deal - but Steele had shown himself (to me) to be more than an acceptable advocate for conservative ideas.
Then he got the RNC chair and totally sucked shit and made a fool of himself.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 06, 2010 01:27 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Aaron Burr at April 06, 2010 01:27 PM (uFdnM)
Hey, we fired OUR incompetent black guy. Why don't YOU fire YOURS?
Posted by: Winston Smith, Lotus Eater at April 06, 2010 01:27 PM (BFqyO)
How about "Take Back" the RNC and the RNCC?
Sure, we can go around the apparatus, but wouldn't it be nice to actually have an apparatus that *works for us*? Isn't it an uphill battle against the Demunists and the LameStreamMedia (BIRM) already?
For the 2010 elections, we must sidestep the RNC as it is now. If they make a conservative turn-around, then good, let's support them. The best way to bring the RNC around is to show them through the elections process where the Repub. constituency stands. Maybe they'll see the light in time for 2012.
Posted by: Soona' at April 06, 2010 01:27 PM (IQtPa)
>> Why not write a post about how Michael Steele is putting Michael Steele ahead of Republican Party interests?
Why didn't I think of that?
Oh wait, I did think of that.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 06, 2010 01:28 PM (WvXvd)
Democrats have infiltrated the RNC.
This blog is not really a conservative site.
AND WHERE ARE MY GODDAMNED STRAWBERRIES????
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 06, 2010 01:28 PM (B+qrE)
Posted by: rdbrewer at April 06, 2010 01:28 PM (UJT2r)
Jim Rome, Ryan Seacrest and Fred Barnes...the unquestioned triumvirate of guys who should be thankful that the United States of America exists and pacts with the devil work.
Oh, dont forget me!
Posted by: Miley Cyrus at April 06, 2010 05:27 PM (V9SYy)
I said "guys." (Although admittedly I wonder about Seacrest and Barnes.)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 06, 2010 01:30 PM (B+qrE)
Posted by: nickless at April 06, 2010 01:31 PM (MMC8r)
You tell me, Vic. What do you know about Katon? Would he be a better chairman than Steele?
I have never heard of this Katon guy. I always heard that Graham ran the Party in this State. There was a lot of funny business going on here in that 2008 primary.
If having Katon meant we would get more Garhamnasty's I would prefer Steele.
Posted by: Vic at April 06, 2010 01:32 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: nickless at April 06, 2010 05:31 PM (MMC8r)
Now THAT was funny.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 06, 2010 01:32 PM (F09Uo)
Jim Rome, Ryan Seacrest and Fred Barnes...the unquestioned triumvirate of guys who should be thankful that the United States of America exists and pacts with the devil work.
Oh, dont forget me!
Posted by: Miley Cyrus at April 06, 2010 05:27 PM (V9SYy)
Ahem.
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama, mmm mmmm mmm! at April 06, 2010 01:32 PM (MMC8r)
Back in my day, we settled shit like...well...like men.
To rebut Mr. Burr, there's something to be said about employing an unkind turn of phrase uttered in one's absense.
Posted by: Alexander Hamilton at April 06, 2010 01:33 PM (cQyWA)
Something I think all of you have missed and which has a huge impact on the new 527, "American Crossroads" - thanks to the landmark Supreme Court decision which overturned the heart of McCain-Feingold, this is the first election where it will be far easier for donors to support candidates directly without having to funnel contributions through some party apparatus. Kind of complicated to go into in a blog post, but that ruling dramatically weakened the hold either party has over donors by making it much easier and less expensive to interested parties to campaign directly.
The RNC hasn't impressed me for a long time now. Let it fade into a rump with little funding and no power, and let the real action move elsewhere.
Posted by: Tom Servo at April 06, 2010 01:33 PM (T1boi)
This is supposedly the same GOP leadership that is going to take over the Congress by 2012, then repeal and replace Obamacare... Good luck with that.
Posted by: drfredc at April 06, 2010 01:34 PM (ljMiA)
So Guam is the place then?
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 06, 2010 01:38 PM (7VvJB)
Dude, I got time for a do over! Best two out of three?
Posted by: Aaron Burr at April 06, 2010 01:38 PM (uFdnM)
Posted by: ian at April 06, 2010 01:39 PM (2ycLc)
Posted by: Alexander Hamilton at April 06, 2010 05:36 PM (IhHdM)
Worst. Career. Move. Ever.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 06, 2010 01:39 PM (B+qrE)
Fire the POS, the race card is dead.
Same with the GOP catering to the black vote...ain't gonna work and it will cost Conservative vote.
Once steele mentioned the GOP was racist he should have been fired, Scuzzyflave was another good reason. The fact that he is still there means the GOP leadership needs to go in the primaries.
BUT, one good thing, Conservatives now donate direct to their candidate which is the way it should be.
Posted by: Serfer62 at April 06, 2010 01:39 PM (HLCnI)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 06, 2010 01:40 PM (Kt5vQ)
Tru dat. But at least we had balls where only pissflaps- rule the day now.
Posted by: Aaron Burr at April 06, 2010 01:41 PM (uFdnM)
Something I think all of you have missed and which has a huge impact on the new 527, "American Crossroads" - thanks to the landmark Supreme Court decision which overturned the heart of McCain-Feingold, this is the first election where it will be far easier for donors to support candidates directly without having to funnel contributions through some party apparatus. Kind of complicated to go into in a blog post, but that ruling dramatically weakened the hold either party has over donors by making it much easier and less expensive to interested parties to campaign directly.
The RNC hasn't impressed me for a long time now. Let it fade into a rump with little funding and no power, and let the real action move elsewhere.
Thanks. This is exactly the point I've been trying to make.
Posted by: Soona' at April 06, 2010 01:41 PM (IQtPa)
Posted by: H. G. Wells at April 06, 2010 01:44 PM (AZGON)
This is the key. The number of blacks who might actually consider voting for Republicans isn't large enough to bother with one way or another. However, the reason Republicans are set to pick up a lot of seats in November is independents have deserted the Democratic party.
People who are interested in politics don't often reflect on how shallow "independents" are. For the most part they don't think about voting until the week before the election, and they don't have developed political philosophies. By default they vote for incumbents if the economy is doing well, and somebody else if not.
No matter how many bogus numbers the government puts out, they can't hide the state of the economy when it's this bad. So the last thing we need to do is let the media go to town with the "Republicans are racist" narrative when independents already have their hands on the "R" lever.
Posted by: Ace's liver at April 06, 2010 01:49 PM (XIXhw)
"Then he got the RNC chair and totally sucked shit and made a fool of himself."
Peter Principle?
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 06, 2010 01:52 PM (ucq49)
That kind of assumptive thought process, based on what I am sure are the millions of independents responding that they are indeed shallow, may just be a hair flawed. You might want to tone that one down a bit, I think your enzymes are pushing skyward.
Posted by: Henry, "You might be right." Kissinger at April 06, 2010 01:57 PM (uFdnM)
Ace's Liver
The Race Card is dead...as in DEAD.
Christ! When you can look at a Tea Party group that look like your grandparents, neighbors, family & friends and are called racist you KNOW the well is dry.
Anybody who would still concerned about RACIST has been in a coma...
Posted by: Serfer62 at April 06, 2010 01:58 PM (HLCnI)
Anybody who would put a Republican bumper sticker on their car in a "vibrant" area hasn't been paying attention.
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 06, 2010 02:05 PM (NurK6)
c.1965, alternative spelling of lead in the newspaper journalism sense (see lead (v.)), used to distinguish this sense from other possible meanings of the word, perhaps especially the molten lead used in typesetting machines. Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
Posted by: anon at April 06, 2010 02:07 PM (j/wD+)
Posted by: rdbrewer at April 06, 2010 05:28 PM (UJT2r):
Funny, I had a lib/dem tell me just the opposite. That they have infiltrated and are making sure he is kicked out.
I think the "they have infiltrated part" is the truth though since they have been allowed by the republicans to craft their "message" for quite some time.
Posted by: curious at April 06, 2010 02:07 PM (p302b)
You are confusing the relatively large block of "independents" with the small block of "undecideds". IN fact, although there are a LOT of people who identify as being independent 95% of them routinely vote for the same party year after year.
The clueless "undecideds" are who you are talking about.
But what truly determines the outcome of an election is the turnout. If the Repubs run a candidate that excites their normal voters they win and the converse is true.
In the last election the Repubs ran an aging asshole who routinely poked his thumb in the eyes of the Party base. They had a low turnout and lost.
Posted by: Vic at April 06, 2010 02:07 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Serfer62 at April 06, 2010 02:09 PM (HLCnI)
Posted by: curious at April 06, 2010 02:11 PM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at April 06, 2010 02:12 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Pawn at April 06, 2010 02:15 PM (rkJF8)
Or it could be something that should be obvious to anyone who bothers to look. And I got a question for you... do you know what all those words mean?
Posted by: Ace's liver at April 06, 2010 02:15 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at April 06, 2010 02:16 PM (PQY7w)
I don't hate Palin, but I don't think she's a competent political figure. On the other hand, I think social conservatives are just about the only thing worthwhile about the GOP.
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 06, 2010 02:20 PM (NurK6)
"Do the Anti-Steele Plotters Have An Actual Endgame In Mind?"
Who knows. Maybe it's a matter of the enemy of my enemy, is my friend.
Fuck Steele and the GOP Old Guard. Let''s move Steele to the ash heap of history, together, then move to a real putsch.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 06, 2010 02:21 PM (ucq49)
"On the other hand, I think social conservatives are just about the only thing worthwhile about the GOP."
Maybe. The problem is - that's who sat out the 2008 election.
Happy now?
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 06, 2010 02:23 PM (ucq49)
Well, okay. But it stands to reason there are other people who vote Republican who think "fiscal conservatives are just about the only thing worthwhile about the GOP". That's the nature of political alliances, and we need both camps to win.
Posted by: Ace's liver at April 06, 2010 02:31 PM (XIXhw)
Steele can't be dumped. The Republican Party will lose its black voters.
Posted by: random at April 06, 2010 02:33 PM (hoLvU)
Maybe. The problem is - that's who sat out the 2008 election. -
With the most pro-abortion candidate ever running on the Dem ticket (not to mention his numerous other faults)? Sorry, not buyin' it. Social conservative here, and I bit my tounge and voted to have Sarah one heartbeat away from the oval office.
And peanut gallery, you don't think Sarah is a competant political figure? What was her approval rating in Alaska again? If she hadn't been shackeled by the McCain folks we might not even talking about Obambi now.
Posted by: teej at April 06, 2010 02:36 PM (GGS/R)
Posted by: curious at April 06, 2010 02:39 PM (p302b)
The social conservatives also seem to be the most fiscally conservative.
Unfortunately, social liberalism tends to cause problems that lead to a demand for socialist intervention. I think it's unrealistic to let people do whatever they want and not expect them to come begging for help after they fuck up their lives. But it's more a cultural issue than a political one.
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 06, 2010 02:41 PM (NurK6)
Oh, I agree with all of that. You can't really be both socially liberal and fiscally conservative unless you're willing to force people to take responsibility for their own mistakes. But that describes me to a tea, and I can't be the only one.
Posted by: Ace's liver at April 06, 2010 02:52 PM (XIXhw)
"I have no problem with an eviction of Steele. I have a problem with this pussy chickenshit leaking campaign against him which continues to hurt the party by damaging the head of the RNC while leaving that head in place."
I'm totally with you on this one Ace, if we're going to fire him just fire him right out in the open (which we should have done months ago)
Posted by: shoey at April 06, 2010 02:53 PM (Ed9Xn)
"I have a problem with this pussy chickenshit leaking campaign"
Um, pussy, chickenshit stuff is pretty much the GOP's only strategy for anything: campaigning, governing, "stopping" the creep of socialism, etc.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 06, 2010 03:24 PM (kmEfr)
@4: "If the leakers aren't confederates, (which I think they are)"
I see what you did there.....
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 06, 2010 03:25 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: Pawn at April 06, 2010 03:46 PM (rkJF8)
Posted by: TimothyJ at April 06, 2010 04:31 PM (IKKIf)
Posted by: FatBaldnSassy at April 06, 2010 05:15 PM (Lq9ag)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 07, 2010 05:20 AM (mHQ7T)
Replace him with Ken Blackwell, who should have had the job to begin with.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 07, 2010 05:25 AM (mHQ7T)
"That's a fairly silly comment to make," Gibbs told reporters. "I think Michael Steele's problem isn't the race card, it's the credit card."
Ba-da- BING!
If Democrats have infiltrated the RNC (which I"ve thought since Scozzafava), then do you think they like having Michael Steele as the chairman? That's the most important question. Is he a help or a hindrance?
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 07, 2010 05:33 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 07, 2010 05:38 AM (mHQ7T)
The new GOP chairman in NY state is Nixon's former son-in-law, a corporate lawyer who lives on the UES of Manhattan. He discouraged Rudy Giuliani from running for Governor and is instead supporting a Democrat who recently switched to Republican. Read the NYT article
For Nixon In-Law, G.O.P. Post and a Giuliani Clash
Cox supported Scozzafava, even after she switched to the Democratic party. He defended her by saying she made an "emotional decision." Wonderful.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 07, 2010 06:03 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: aziz at May 04, 2011 10:43 AM (mQ7gk)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2005 seconds, 340 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Now?
Now??? It's April, for fuck's sakes! They shoulda did this a year ago.
Posted by: Mannix at April 06, 2010 12:35 PM (vbtmy)