August 21, 2010
— Ace In Body Heat, Teddy the arsonist, sage of murder, explained: "Any time you try a decent crime, you got fifty ways you can fuck up. If you can think of twenty-five of them, you're a genius, and you ain't no genius." (Line at 1:50.)
There are a lot of ways to blow an election and the GOP is pretty good at all of them.
When you start taking the House races district-by-district, looking at individual candidates, historic voting trends in their districts, their campaign funding, their current level of organization, etc. . . . Honestly, itÂ’s scary out there....
Worse than the money situation, perhaps, is the lack of precinct-level organization by Republicans. This was a basic problem in the PA-12 special election. With the help of the NRCC, the Tim Burns campaign was able to roughly match the Democrats in terms of money, but the local GOP didnÂ’t have the kind of organizational infrastructure in terms of county and ward committees necessary to mobilize volunteers for door-to-door canvassing operations.
Phone-banking is important, but even the best phone bank is no substitute for a genuine door-to-door campaign, especially when such canvassing is done by local volunteers contacting their friends and neighbors in their own communities. And, as in PA-12, a basic reason Democrats control these districts is because the local GOP is controlled by weak-minded time-servers who have failed to organize effectively.
There's more at the link, including some races which would be winnable... except the Republican challenger has no money, almost no money at all. Even a rock-star, Allen West, who can tap the national base for funds, still trails his Democratic opponent by almost a half-million dollars.
And Melissa Bean, that arrogant liberal twit (did I misspell that?) who had a goon shut people up at her library "town hall"? She's in a district Bush carried by 55% in 2004 -- thus, a very winnable district -- but simply refuses to debate her opponent Joe Walsh.
Yeah, I wouldn't debate that guy either. His strong-but-warm eyes project laser-beams of integrity and honesty and American grit... right into my pants. Well, into the pants of the general public, I mean. I mean, into people's hearts.
Maybe this metaphor went bad a while ago.
Anyway.
I don't know, exactly, what can be done about this situation. I'd sure like to know.
Money is one thing -- an important thing -- and I'm sure the Online Republican Caucus (ORC) will wind up contributing.
But what about the organizational thing?
In 2008, someone (no, really, "someone") was part of bussed-in operations to key states, so I guess we can do that, but...
I think maybe it's just critical that everyone contact their local Republican offices to find out what can be done about walking the blocks, knocking on doors, and offering rides on election day. Contact them, and contact a bunch of like-minded friends and family members. Because ten weeks is not a lot of time for all the back-and-forth on the phone and meet-and-greets and organization that needs to happen by election day.
Apparently we have a lot of clock-watchers and goldbrickers in these posts. Maybe we need to displace them, or at least surround them with so much drive and competence they can't screw it up for us even if they want to. Surround an incompetent with five competent men and women and the incompetent will fail in his impulse to fail.
It also sounds like some of these candidates are so underfunded and underorganized that you can kind of... like, just walk into their offices and say hi. It doesn't appear that you'll be blocked by a New Praetorian at the door.
And don't give up just because you're in a "safe" Democratic district. There are very few safe Democratic districts this year -- Barney Frank could lose. Scott Brown beat Martha Coakley in his district.
Further, not voting, and not getting out the maximum vote possible among conservatives in such districts, also loses out on all those important state legislature slots, those judgeships, those crucial Board of Elections postings, the AG, the Secretary of State...
We want these positions in friendly hands. We know damn well what Democrats do when they control the machinery of vote tabulation.
By the way, someone and the other morons who bused over to Pennsylvania (I think) to do this reported that it was very satisfying and very fun, meeting like-minded people and working towards one shared goal. So, from their reports, this wasn't exactly hazard duty.
We really need overkill on this. We are way behind. We are in position to score. If we don't score, or if we come away with a field goal, we will have blown the opportunity of a generation. And we'll lose, forever.
On the flip-side: confidence and enthusiasm are good, too.
Posted by: Ace at
08:20 AM
| Comments (243)
Post contains 816 words, total size 5 kb.
this is concerning....they like jinxed all those republicans...
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 08:25 AM (p302b)
Posted by: ace at August 21, 2010 08:26 AM (QbA6l)
Posted by: Ed Anger at August 21, 2010 08:26 AM (7+pP9)
ace, you should read the comments about the "vanishing post" on the ONT...it was very funny cause everyone thought they were going nuts...
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 08:27 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Winston Wolfe at August 21, 2010 08:27 AM (qjTXV)
Worrying.
Posted by: Filly at August 21, 2010 08:28 AM (QnQEY)
Posted by: exdem13 at August 21, 2010 08:28 AM (beW+t)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 08:30 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 08:31 AM (p302b)
Still, a crap sandwich is better than a bloody diarrhea sandwich and we all need to vote out the power-grabbing scum in both parties.
Posted by: Valiant at August 21, 2010 08:36 AM (UKSRV)
Oh well, I'll figure something out.
Now I'm off to lunch (and drinks) for my lovely wife's birthday (it's her 40th, but don't tell her I told you).
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 21, 2010 08:37 AM (IKf7L)
In any case, still: Worrying.
Posted by: Filly at August 21, 2010 08:38 AM (QnQEY)
Posted by: naturalfake at August 21, 2010 08:39 AM (I49Jm)
Posted by: jjshaka at August 21, 2010 08:40 AM (RSS3h)
Yep, the Democrats have the manpower, which is probably the most important resource a campaign can have, even moreso than funds.
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 08:40 AM (DPuFa)
Posted by: A.G. at August 21, 2010 08:40 AM (oAVyq)
Finally someone tries and understand how the dems consistantly whip the GOP.
The GOPÂ’s message is strong. It is its organizational skills that are suffering. The democrats have relearned the lessons of machine politics
Posted by: William Amos at August 21, 2010 08:43 AM (7KBM3)
Apparently we have a lot of clock-watchers and goldbrickers in these posts.
My advice is to do what your parents did, sir, and get a Job!
The Revolution is over and your side lost...
Did you hear me Lebowski!?!?
The Bums will always Lose!!!
Posted by: Mr. Lebowski at August 21, 2010 08:44 AM (XCU7e)
Communication is the means that campaigns get their message out to the voters. TV was considered from the 1960s on to 2000 to be the “way to campaign”. It was all based on the JFK winning the debates in 1960 via TV, If a candidate could do well on TV that was good enough to win. Reagan was excellent at appearing as the best candidate on TV.
But our candidates cant all be Reagans. TV only works for the campaigns that so focus its message and target thousands of people via a single 30 second message. Imagine trying to craft one message that millions can all agree on its nearly impossible. And radio is also the same way as is telephones. The GOP bets the farm that they can create the “perfect message” that can reach and be agreed upon by everyone.
There is no perfect message
Posted by: William Amos at August 21, 2010 08:46 AM (7KBM3)
And this was how President Toonces beat Sir Hillary. I was working the polls on the day of Super Tuesday. The OBots were there at dawn and truly had their shit together--signs, literature, soliciting volunteers for the general election. The Hillary campaign's outreach consisted of one guy sliding through the door 15 minutes after the polls closed wanting to know if the rumors he was hearing about extended poll hours were true.
Guess which campaign I'm afraid the GOP will resemble.
Posted by: Filly at August 21, 2010 08:47 AM (QnQEY)
Posted by: Stupid GOP at August 21, 2010 08:47 AM (kcqZS)
The word "clown" does not even come close to describing them. I'd almost bet that they are really dems.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at August 21, 2010 08:47 AM (TU+di)
Posted by: myrenovations at August 21, 2010 08:47 AM (qnC0F)
Posted by: A.G. at August 21, 2010 08:48 AM (oAVyq)
But our candidates cant all be Reagans.
You'd never know it from all the robo-calls I get. Apparently every Reflublican candidate is the next Reagan.
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson Airplane at August 21, 2010 08:49 AM (kcqZS)
Look, my thing this cycle has been to *become* that local precinct organization. (See this post from January -- and why are Open Blog posts listed as by "xgenghisx"!?) This also puts you in position to stop the Dedes from rising through the ranks and get more DeMints and Christies.
It's something both numerous Tea Party groups and the folks at Redstate have been active in doing, which is good because with lots of primary dates having passed, there's a good chance it's too late to get elected to a precinct committeeman spot in your jurisdiction this year. (Yes, it helps to think things through before election season...) But it's still something to look into for the long term. (Only you can prevent the GOP from sticking to its beltway squish ways. Only you.) And getting involved this cycle should show you a bit of what you're dealing with.
IMO the key thing *right now*, however, is to remember that primary season isn't over yet. Give Christine O'Donnell some support in Delaware...
Posted by: someone at August 21, 2010 08:51 AM (DfAwB)
Good posting. Over the years a lot of elections that were "in the bag" were lost because people stayed home, didn't help out etc. This set of elections is particularly critical for a number of reasons.
If the GOP gains control of the Senate it has to be by a significant number. Remember there are a few rino's (Snowe, Collins et al) that can't be counted on. In addition a slim majority (1 or 2 seats) may allow the GOP to gain control of committees and bring light to the crap the Dems have been pulling that the MSM refuse to report on. I'd love to see Barny Frank's ex-lover Herb Moses testifying under oath about pillow talk they had about the Fannie Mae.
Winning a majority is good but the GOP has to remember they run the risk of being blamed in 2012 of the economy hasn't turned around. The won't get any help from the MSM on this.
The Dems have already shown they are willing to break with precedent and tradition in ramming through legislation. If they have a 1 or 2 seat majority they will continue with this practice (one assumes that the "blue dogs", or most of them will have been defeated) and finish off the destruction of this country.
I've read somewhere (can't remember but it seemed reasonable) that a lot of GOP stayed home in 2008 as they weren't crazy about McCain and didn't realize how harmful Obama would be. If Clinton had been running they would have come out to defeat her regardless of who was running for the GOP the dislike of her is so strong. That's what's needed now and that's what I hope is there.
If you've never worked on a campaign (even for a day as a scrutineer ensuring no malfeasance occurs) you should get out and give it a try. It's exciting, you meet all kinds of good people (from both sides) and you get to see democracy in actual action. Up here in Canada I've worked on several (with a minority government you tend to have elextions more often) and they great fun. Besides, when you're in the bar for a few bres it allows you to start a rant of with "Well I worked on that election and let me tell you....."
Posted by: scr_north at August 21, 2010 08:51 AM (gpcBZ)
Move to Cary
Start somewhere. Michigan-born and Ohio-raised, I was asked to be a poll observer in '80, a precinct chairman in '84, and after I moved, I did another stint as a poll observer in '88. If all one does is put up yard signs and grunt work for fundraisers, that helps, too. Contact your county chairman or your preferred candidate(s) campaign office.
Posted by: mrp at August 21, 2010 08:53 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: someone at August 21, 2010 08:54 AM (DfAwB)
Simply put the current way the GOP runs campaigns is more parasitic than symbiotic. The GOP sends out to its base requests for money or volunteers but rarely allows for any feedback or input on how things are done. I myself have gotten numerous requests to donate money or volunteer for a campaign. But rarely am I asked how I feel about events or what do I think can be a better way to do things. IÂ’m simply told to shut up ,put up and give full support to a group that seems to think its base only deserves to be used to replenish itÂ’s money or for free labor.
The GOP must evolve into a symbiotic relationship with its base. Our conservative base defines us and defines our values. If the GOP gives the base a stake in itÂ’s elections then GOP itself benefits.
Posted by: William Amos at August 21, 2010 08:56 AM (7KBM3)
This is the situation (kind of) in Virginia's 5th district. The GOP challenger is outpolling the freshman incumbent Dem, but the Dem has like 6x more money. Maybe part of it is because the Tea Party doesn't like the GOP nominee
This isn't my district, but my local patriot group had a poli-sci guy give us the lowdown. The primary had SIX Tea-Party type candidates in it and this Hurt guy, who was GOP. Of course, the T-P candidates split the vote among themselves and this guy -- a major squish -- walked away with it. Mr. Hurt is friends with Eric Cantor and Eric told him he should run. FYI, Eric isn't thought of highly in his own district, but no one has the courage to run against him yet.
Posted by: RushBabe at August 21, 2010 08:56 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at August 21, 2010 08:57 AM (QBQcg)
McCain won the primary for the same reasons, except they were shitty Republican primary rules.
They have fixed those somewhat but not what was truly needed.
We do have a chance of beating a long term Dem in a gerrymandered district here (SC 5th). But it is going to be tough because it spans 5 counties and 3 major media markets.
Posted by: Vic at August 21, 2010 08:58 AM (/jbAw)
Really, its only about 20 - 30 hours total over a couple of months, depending on where you live I suppose. But really, do something. I agree with Thomas Sowell, we must stop the socialists this fall or it may be the point of no return.
Feel the wave, surf the wave, bask in the November sun.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 21, 2010 08:58 AM (664Zx)
"The GOP" isn't some mysterious alien thing.
You can join, and vote to change it (precinct folks vote for party leadership). You can join the alternative structure (local Tea Party group), to get better leverage and push actual conservatives. Or you can sit and wait for things to change on their own.
The last is, as you may guess, the least helpful.
Posted by: someone at August 21, 2010 08:59 AM (DfAwB)
I think that's the fundamental difference. For them, politics is a way to make themselves significant. For us, the primary goal is to be left alone.
Posted by: pep at August 21, 2010 08:59 AM (0K3p3)
Exactly-- they'll love the free help. I've had to be creative since Colt and I have been moving around every couple of months or so, and it's tough to get plugged into the local political scenes. So since I'm a writer, I went to the websites of Tea Party-approved candidates. Yep, sure enough, the writing BLEW. So I offered a bit of free editing and content generation. Some took me up on it. Others didn't and will probably never be heard from again-- them and their comma splices.
Posted by: Filly at August 21, 2010 08:59 AM (QnQEY)
That is one of the ways that RINO Lindsey got reelected in 2008.
Posted by: Vic at August 21, 2010 09:00 AM (/jbAw)
I thought there were a lot of groups that formed at various tea party rallies. Surely there can be a concerted effort for these groups to pool, coordinate, and canvas without coordination with the campaign?
I was thinking of a sort of contact list that would pick certain days leading up to the election to reach out en masse to relatives, neighbors, and aquaintances in a low pressure, reminder driven message about the election. An effort to lay the groundwork for a more coordinated effort from the campaign itself. With a lot of simultaneous activity like that, it should help to stick in people's minds. I would think any time a commerce report comes out would be a good idea. They do not look to improve any time soon.
That is something we can do. As well as sending money to the worthies campaigns, of course.
Posted by: U.S.S. Yorktown at August 21, 2010 09:05 AM (sYEpI)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 21, 2010 09:06 AM (664Zx)
Posted by: StrngernFiction at August 21, 2010 09:07 AM (pOgEW)
If you're in a very safe district with a solid conservative representing you, please feel free to help out in MA-4.
This is a scalp we really, really want nationally. I also have the distinct displeasure of being "represented" by this crooked bastard, and it's time for him to go.
Start here: RetireBarney.com
Posted by: Andy at August 21, 2010 09:09 AM (pRbtk)
It's the Didier way!
Posted by: Clint Didier at August 21, 2010 09:13 AM (YX6i/)
Pre 2007, and Obama whose campaign was a culmination of Axelrasputin astroturf staffed by college boyz on summer vacation, who 'interned' on every comment board on every MSM news site, allowing them to censor any proHRC comments-helping to build the MSM view that EVERYONE LOVED Obama, with Facebook, again the 20something testosterone fueled Oboma fanz who hated them some HRC (mother issues donchaknow- she rated GTA! Horrors!!) which combined with labor turnout and depressed GOP turnout for the win, BEFORE that there was always the backbone of the Dem Party turnout- the women.
yeah, the women no shxt. One of the resons sooo many of we lifetime Dem women are DONE with the Dem Party in its current nauseating form, is that after lifetimes of work, generation after generation, of blue collar wives doing the GRUNT WORK, the envelope stuffing, the calls, the door to door, it has always all been done by the local Democratic women. There would be no Dem party without us, as they shall soon be learning, but I digress...
Sure in urban centres you have ACORN and SEIU the megaunion Andy Stern brought forth like Cthulu, but in rural districts, in the Southwest, in the South, in the Midwest it has always, always been the local women on the ground.
then the pols, and the men show up at the end with a check for ads on TV when all the hard work laying the ground intriducing or reinforcing the candidate is done, the base established if you will.
but there is no money without groundswell support and that support comes from Dem women on the ground. we old bxtches the Koz Kidz e-assaulted throughout 07-08
I am 41. I walked into the Stevenson Democratic Club on Horace Harding Expwy in Flushing in NYC when I was like 11 and asked what I could do to help. I was promptly sat down with boxes of envelopes to stuff.
In smaller areas without an official 'club' women do it in their homes, at the local gardening group or whatever.
This why the PUMAs, the amount of shxt we were sending into the DNC would ASTONISH you, we had a CAN i get a revote campaign, we all sent cans, walk a mile in my shoes, we sent old shoes. none of it covered and anecdotally thusands or more respoinses went to the DNC. But they didnt give a shxt, we werent USEFUL in the 08 primary, since O was the chosen one, the fix was in, and we were by and large supporting HRC, not just b/c she shared a XX gene, b/c she had frakking experience and she GOT IT, anyway I rant, but the DNC couldnt use us to help O, we were on the wrong side, so they used KOZ a former GOPer which pixxes me off to no end BTW, and twitter and Facebook.
thats great in a wave year like they had at their back, but time out of mind decades and decades it is the ground game, and ACORN and SEIU are NOT welcomed into many rural areas, they are clearly outside forces with an agenda, and the peeps know it, the rank and file will not follow the leadership O bought, witness HRCs PA primary win despite frakkin Hoffa promising a big surprise O win. Witness also BlANCHE lINCOLN KICKING THE AXX OF THE fdl SORRY caplock, candidate. the rural women strike back! yeah suck it Koz, go back to the basement cheeto eaters, mommy is home!!
anyway, I am not sure why the GOP has not had a traditional ground game of the local women, but this is what we have always done on the Dem side.
it will not save them now or in 12 b/c they threw us unda da bus over and over and over again in 08 09 10 and made it REALLY CLEAR we were not needed. Donna Brazille said it on CNN they have a new coalition donchaknow! KOZ Kidz, DC Beltway pundits, AAs, and they CLAIM Single moms, which I do not believe, take out AAs from that demo who seem to want to keep block voting for O, and more single moms I know are worried about a G-D JOB, they dont want a check from O they want a check from a corporation with benefits and tuition reimbursement, I know I did back in the day.
Anyway long but hopefully you dig where the Dem ground gamne comes from, the panic they are experiencing now is b/c they have JUST realized without the base of women and Seniors, (and Senior women who are the best and most prolific ground game, callers, envelope stuffers!!) they are fragged.
the testosterone pump they had in 08 is petered out, heh. Women are in it for the long haul, endurance and all that, maybe we are used to not getting what we want and so we dont roll over and whine like the Cheetoh brigade I dunno, but for year after year I stuffed envelopes for losing campaigns and I always came back for work the next election.
these jokers won and they still cant come out and get the base laid this year, pathetic.
here in Scottsdale, there is a GOP Womens Club, I was invited to attend but truthfully I was a bit intimidated. it may be a 'class' thing as in do I have enough to blend with the GOP Womens Club?
I had no trouble blending with the Dems lol. and at Tea Parties we all just look American, but my mental image of a GOP Womens Club Dinner involves pearls which I have but rarely wear.
The reason HRC kept kicking Os axx was the women on the ground, we kept fundraising after they said it was over and she ran as long as we backed her, only when Rangel called her and said she would lose the AA vote in NYC and possibly her reelection as NY Senator if she didnt concede did she give her speech, those frakkers. My point is I am sorry if I am gender biased or something but in my Dem. experience the women do the footwork for elections.
anyway, I suggest you get in touch with the women on the ground, they are already out there doin it for themselves, sistahs are doin it doin it, oops sorry, but if you have targeted areas you can perhaps link the groups up on twitter or facebook or whatever, but dont forget for Seniors to focus on the local Civic Club and Rotary, at a local Y or Club to hand out foot assignments thats how we did it.
anyway the PEOPLE are rallied from the ground up on the GOP side this time, that was always how I saw it on the Dem side locally, not sure if GOP Leadership used to do top down or what but this year the GOP women here in Scottsdale are ready to go, I have done everything I used to do on Dem side for GOP side, I called to see when phone banks were, got my lawn signs early, and I donate like crazy even though Im broke, b/c I KNOW we have to overcome the union money....
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at August 21, 2010 09:15 AM (6uk6i)
Posted by: Editor at August 21, 2010 09:15 AM (YX6i/)
The GOPÂ’s message is strong. It is its organizational skills that are suffering. The democrats have relearned the lessons of machine politics
Posted by: William Amos at August 21, 2010 12:43 PM (7KBM3)
People on the right are not just more likely to reject the idea of machine politics, but to be offended by it.
There are some people who just plain reject certain ideas for a variety of reasons. I see it all the time in terms of "workplace politics," people who otherwise are conscientious workers or hardworking or whatever, but they have some kind of personal bias against what they call "schmoozing" or, in other words, being likable.
They make a point of being honest to a fault, direct, even to the extent of causing offense. I'm not saying they don't have a point, but I think some people go out of their way to avoid forming alliances or even making friends to avoid the appearance.
I haven't really formulated this into a grand theory, I've just noticed it - some people just find "politicking" feels "dishonorable" to them - and then are bitterly disappointed when someone else ascends (or wins an election) because they've taken the effort to do crap like try to actually bring people on board by explaining the benefits to them, or just getting out, shaking hands, etc.
When we see stuff like the left-wing talking point memos, we rightfully mock them for their dishonesty, but I think some people forget that "getting the word out" at the community level is actually a good thing - unless you're a greasy liar. And there's nothing wrong with focusing on what your audience wants, as long as you're not hiding something or lying to them.
pep also had a good point that, generally speaking, the "leave me alone" lifestyle is more right-wing than left-wing, by a long shot. That mentality makes good neighbors and terrible campaigners, which is why the Dems can win despite the fact that everybody knows they're hopeless wreckers and complete liars.
I hate to admit that while I totally get the former point, I went from a blunt social outcast to a schmoozer, I fall for the second too often - who wants to get involved in politics, yuck!
Well, politics is involved in YOU pal, and that ain't in Soviet Russia, it's right here. So you'd better get involved, even if it's just to vote and counter stupid MFM propaganda your friends hear on TV.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 09:21 AM (bxiXv)
chuckie in ny could lose....you know why? He's way too quiet....way too "blend into the woodwork and look pretty".....his internals must be devastating....
Monica is going to have David Pattison on her show today.
monica played clips from 9/11....it was just horrible....brings it all back rushing in like a mac truck....
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 09:22 AM (p302b)
Posted by: NukemHill at August 21, 2010 09:24 AM (kkwJu)
yeah, the women no shxt. One of the resons sooo many of we lifetime Dem women are DONE with the Dem Party in its current nauseating form, is that after lifetimes of work, generation after generation, of blue collar wives doing the GRUNT WORK, the envelope stuffing, the calls, the door to door, it has always all been done by the local Democratic women. There would be no Dem party without us, as they shall soon be learning, but I digress...
I'm not buying it. You forgive them even after they drown one of you.
Posted by: Ed Anger at August 21, 2010 09:24 AM (7+pP9)
But Rove needs to reinstate that system...the feedback he got was invaluable
and the college kids on the message boards was ingenious.
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 09:26 AM (p302b)
mother, do you think they'll try to break my balls?
mother, should I run for president?
(your turn)
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 09:26 AM (DPuFa)
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at August 21, 2010 01:15 PM (6uk6i)
I think if you can handle Ace of Spades HQ, you can probably handle the GOP Ladies Auxiliary.
Heck, take that much energy in and you'll probably end up running the place.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 09:27 AM (bxiXv)
While I agree with the "don't get cocky" and organization points, I don't agree with some of his other premises. Wasn't part of the problem with PA-12 was that the election was scheduled to favor Dem turnout?? Also, the way the distirct is gerrymandered, didn't it also favor the Dems??? And using California as a example of not favoring the Republicans, I'm mean really?
Posted by: Opus at August 21, 2010 09:29 AM (IebeI)
The main reason I'm reluctant to do the door-to-door thing or even a phone bank is that nobody down here (North Carolina) can get past my accent (Massachusetts) long enough to have a conversation. Plus, I'm marked as an "outsider" the minute I open my mouth.
Oh well, I'll figure something out.
Now I'm off to lunch (and drinks) for my lovely wife's birthday (it's her 40th, but don't tell her I told you).
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 21, 2010 12:37 PM (IKf7L)
Open with "i'm originally from New England and I don't want to see NC turn into that"
Posted by: buzzion at August 21, 2010 09:29 AM (oVQFe)
My rants, I admit without humility, can be epically funny sometimes.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 09:29 AM (bxiXv)
uh no, I voted MAC Palin and have donated hundreds of cold cash to Marco, Lowden then Sharron, Nikki Haley, Dave Schweikert, folks I believe in\\but if you think I spent 15 mins writing up a load of BS to somehow TRICK you or something, whatevs.
google ginaswo and you will find 2 years of me fighting with Obots on boards all over if you care to if not scroll on by.
and fro sure I will revert to my dEMNESS WHEN hrc RUNS IN 16, BUT UNTIL THEN i AM WORKING FOR THE gop. sORRY damned caplock!
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at August 21, 2010 09:30 AM (6uk6i)
Seriously, guys, at work I was talking to a fairly "radical" colleague, and he is now all, "Obama is an African-American, and I am a Black American. He doesn't understand how that Ground Zero Mosque is an insult!" and this one lady (who is also black) was, "I still kinda like him (Obama) but that mosque is an insult to all Americans, and I am sick and tired of people who don't understand America wanting to insult us all! I'm sick of hearing how this group or that group is like us Black people and blah blah blah we should let them do whatever they want. No! Any issue between us and White people is in-family, in-house. They can't tag onto us. That mosque must never be built!"
Seriously, things are changing. Keep at it!
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Azof, Bly, UK at August 21, 2010 09:31 AM (GkYyh)
I don't know about polling, but PPP called me a few times now, I still keep telling them, I am a democrat, and I tell them I don't who I will be voting, so the dems need to keep explaining the benefits of DeathCare, because I'm too stupid to understand how adding 30 million more people will reduce the deficit.
PPP then puts me down as "undecided". Their pollestors are amazingly this ignorant. Rassumesum polled me once, I told them the truth, used to be a dem, now an indy, will crawl over broken glass to vote against any damn demon's rat, and same goes for my family's voting pattern this year
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 09:31 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Anderson Rimslobber 360, NancyNewsCablevision at August 21, 2010 09:32 AM (Tj5RX)
I'm not against mosques, I am against radical mosques, and especially any mosques anywhere near ground zero.
And kudos to Ms. America, a muslim, for comning out against this Ground Zero Victory Mosque.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 09:33 AM (ACkhT)
I was fine at the Palin rally, and told everyone at the Tea Parties I am a recovering Dem, they were very nice and welcoming after they were sure I wasnt a plant of some sort.
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at August 21, 2010 09:33 AM (6uk6i)
Wait.
You'll still vote for Hillary in '16, (even though her political career is as over as Roger Clemens' baseball career)?
There is something you need to know. Sit down. Hillary is as bad as Obama on every single issue. And she hates you.
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 09:34 AM (DPuFa)
Not to mention campaign activities.
Everyone else is hunkering down, which is bad both for business and for politics.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 09:34 AM (bxiXv)
This right here is illustrative of the problem: Look at the race in MO-4. It's Ike Skelton (D) vs. Vicky Hartzler. This is a heavily Republican district. All of the pundits rank this race as either "tossup" or "lean D", so it is a competitive race. But if you dig deeper, you'll see that the R's here are in deep trouble. Ike has a long list of union _and_ industry financiers contributing to him (he's on the Armed Services Cmte so he gets money from the likes of Boeing, etc.) He's got about $1.5 mil. Vicky? She's got about $300K. And quite frankly her website is not that good. The "events" page only has some event from July. What is she doing? She's obviously conserving her cash. She's playing defense out of necessity when she really needs to be playing offense.
It's districts like this that we have to win in order to get a majority, so what can we the entrepreneurial types do?
Posted by: chemjeff at August 21, 2010 09:34 AM (Pm5H8)
We won too, by about a hundred votes.
So go do it!
Posted by: PJ at August 21, 2010 09:34 AM (Fyjeu)
I feel pretty cocky
Oh so pretty cocky
I feel pretty cocky and witty and gay
And I pity
Any girl person who isn't me today
I feel charming cocky
Oh so charming cocky
It's alarming how charming cocky I feel
And so pretty cocky
That I hardly can believe I'm real
See the pretty cocky girl person in that mirror there?
Who can that attractive cocky girl person be?
Such a pretty cocky face
Such a pretty cocky dress
Such a pretty cocky smile
Such a pretty cocky me!
I feel stunning cocky
And entrancing cocky
a song
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 09:35 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 09:35 AM (p302b)
and the best part will be when we get JOB CREATION!
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at August 21, 2010 09:35 AM (6uk6i)
Apparently, the DNC still thinks many of its members are still demon's rat.
Received 4 calls from them so far, and love their first line when the caller says "If you want to advance President Obama's agenda...... "
Apparently they haven't caught on, people don't want to advance a radical leftist agenda, hell some of the strongest opponents are recovering demon's rats like me.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 09:36 AM (ACkhT)
I say "yes yes of course I do, of course, just send me an envelope and I'll send you back the donation".....they stop the spiel and say thank you, goodbye.
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 09:38 AM (p302b)
You know what cnadidates like Vicky should do and it wouldn't cost them much?
Get her team together, bring a video camera, and go pound the pavement. Hold little town halls with everyone she meets. Ask them questions. Let them tell her what's concerning them.
Edit the video into a nice little tv/radio ad.
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 09:39 AM (DPuFa)
Posted by: Imam Bill Jo Bob Abdul Rauf at August 21, 2010 09:41 AM (w9BEi)
I spent mannny years not understanding how anyone could have been a Reagan Dem. and now I am one :0)
some folks will not be convinced until the polls are coming in and the number of votes for the GOP candidates exceeds the number of registered GOP voters in each district by thousands but it will happen
oh yes these Dems are going down...hard. they must go down hard or we will IMO be trapped like insects in amber in the socialist Democrat trap.
I want no part of it, I find capitalism...uhm liberating. so does the rest of the world when they try it. the only idiots trying to stop it here are the Cabal of Dunces they call the Dem leadership.why the big banks backed O over HRC I will never understand
.
hey maybe Jamie DImon and Lloyd Blankfein got cocky huh? I will go sign up for more mailer mailing. You can never try too hard. even people annoyed we kept calling in PA for HRC were at least impressed with out perseverence and hey we won! and he outspent us by what bazillions?
Hold On Economy! We're Comin'!
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at August 21, 2010 09:42 AM (6uk6i)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 09:42 AM (p302b)
Get her team together, bring a video camera, and go pound the pavement. Hold little town halls with everyone she meets. Ask them questions. Let them tell her what's concerning them.
Edit the video into a nice little tv/radio ad.
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 01:39 PM (DPuFa)
That is a great idea but I guess my point is that this duty is one that is going to fall upon us as individual entrepreneurs and not on Vicky's professional campaign staff.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 21, 2010 09:43 AM (Pm5H8)
Posted by: CAC at August 21, 2010 09:43 AM (Gr1V1)
"I have to tell you. Sen. Obama is a decent person and a person you donÂ’t have to be scared of as president of the United States"
Anytime we have a GOP idiot who expresses this sort of idea, we lose lots and lots of votes. Some of them are lost from people who, rightfully, realize that someone so detached from reality is worthless. Some of them are lost from people who take that as "proof" (for them) that there is nothing more at stake than just another election.
The most important aspect of this election is to make clear what is at stake. The GOP hasn't done that - in fact they work against it. Most conservative pundits haven't done that, either.
The US has only a slim chance of making it through the next years as an intact entity that carries the American creed (which is the essence of America, after all). When conservatives (and GOPers) are scared to tell the truth about that, or when they allow the most ridiculous SCOTUS and federal judiciary nominees to fly through, people lose faith and confidence in their understanding of what is happening.
This is separate from the election machine operations that you are addressing, but goes to the core of what that election machine runs on ... the fuel for that machine. And too many conservatives and GOPers are quick to pull the trigger on other conservatives in some twisted notion of "a shunda for the dems". We saw this with the "macaca" insanity, and many other issues - which have grown exponentially since The Precedent took office, both in number and importance.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 09:45 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 21, 2010 01:34 PM (Pm5H
Like I said, the concept leave a lot of R's with a bad taste in their mouths. But most of "machine politics" isn't graft, corruption and fraud, that's primarily a Dem phenomenon. Most of it is:
1) Raising money
2) Communication at the local level
3) Encouraging people to vote
4) Coordinating your efforts
None of that is corrupt, but people tend to reject the whole "machine" idea because to them it implies corrupt Chicago politics. So they try to reinvent the damned wheel every campaign.
The other problem (mind drifting here, no sleep), is that when Repubs DO engage in "machine politics," they tend to end up drafting "insiders" also known as "bureaucrats and RINOs" to do it, because none of the grassroots wants to be involved. Which is why the GOP itself is so screwed up and keep nominating Democrats like Scuzzy Fava Beans or whoever, because they're only nominally Republican themselves, they're "cultural Democrats."
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 09:45 AM (bxiXv)
I know people hear don't like dems, but David Patterson is a decent man, he refused to tow the Fraud's line, which is why he was thrown under the bus. He refused to give Princess Caroline Hillary's seat, not that Gillibrand is that much of an improvement, especially after hearing Gillibrand wants a grd zero victory mosque built.
Patterson understands people don't want that ground zero victory mosque. How the hell will people stand a mosque where the imam says "Bin Laden was made in America", "American is an accessory to 9/11" built just a minute's walk from a cemetary of all those innocent Americans murdered 9 years ago.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 09:47 AM (ACkhT)
here in Scottsdale, there is a GOP Womens Club, I was invited to attend but truthfully I was a bit intimidated. it may be a 'class' thing as in do I have enough to blend with the GOP Womens Club?
I had no trouble blending with the Dems lol. and at Tea Parties we all just look American, but my mental image of a GOP Womens Club Dinner involves pearls which I have but rarely wear.
You could drop your preconceived stereotype of Republican women and go. If you end up not fitting in then no one will hold a gun to your head and make you go again. So at worst you'll have lost a night, and at best you'll make new friends.
Posted by: buzzion at August 21, 2010 09:47 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Imam Tim the Toolman Abdul Rauf at August 21, 2010 09:48 AM (w9BEi)
my 2 cents.... as a recent ex-dem, demon's rat never stop campaigning, even after an election, they are always campaigning for the next time.
Repubs and conservative tend to sit back if they won. I don't understand it. The Tea Party I went to, I was trying to organize email lists, etc, so that the organization is focused and everyone can contact everyone else.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 09:50 AM (ACkhT)
Amen. That's just sickening. Translates as: I know I'm going to lose this election. Please don't stick it in too far, Barack.
Posted by: Ombudsman at August 21, 2010 09:50 AM (c1oyg)
I hope you don't mind me using you as an example of my earlier point.
Some people want to lecture you or question your intentions, and I can understand that instinct.
But we need to win, so my first goal is to try to make you feel welcome here and try to be friends. I was convinced my ideas work, obviously you've got a better handle on at least the economics than a lot of people, and my experience is that economics is a "gateway idea" to individualism and away from nanny-state-ism.
Now, I'm not so big tent that I want to see the GOP abandon key ideas just to try to get people to sign up, but for crying out loud, opportunity's knocking, don't just turn up the TV!
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 09:50 AM (bxiXv)
I really appreciate your enthusiasm. It's great and catchy and will do a lot of good, but we heard all this stuff during '08. Hillary supporters are going to give McCain the win, blah, blah, blah.
I actually do think this will be ugly for the Dems, but it's difficult to read some of the things you are saying and not think of '08. Brings back painful memories.
Posted by: Editor at August 21, 2010 09:51 AM (YX6i/)
mother, do you think they'll try to break my balls?
mother, should I run for president?
(your turn)
Mother, friend. I am for the Wall.
Posted by: Juan McCain at August 21, 2010 09:52 AM (XCU7e)
There are very few safe Democratic districts this year -- Barney Frank could lose.
Wait, what? If Barney isn't in the house, he'll be selling ass out of his condo again. Damn.
Posted by: Tight Ass at August 21, 2010 09:53 AM (8F9TW)
Relax. Just go to your local U-Haul store to rent a truck. I was the only person there without multiple, conspicuous tattoos. And I was the only man there. That'll make you feel like a Queen. (Hell, it made ME feel like a Queen)
Posted by: Ombudsman at August 21, 2010 09:53 AM (c1oyg)
You know, it woulda been nice if Obama chose McCain as SecDef.
We coulda been rid of the ol' jerk in the Senate. looks like another 6 5 years of him stabbing us in the back.
*oddly, in the 6th year of his term McCain remembers he's a conservative
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 09:54 AM (DPuFa)
Repubs and conservative tend to sit back if they won. I don't understand it. The Tea Party I went to, I was trying to organize email lists, etc, so that the organization is focused and everyone can contact everyone else.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 01:50 PM (ACkhT)
It's real simple to understand. Republicans/conservatives, on average, tend to have actual religious convictions and life AFTER elections. Elections & Government tend to be Democrats life & religion.
Posted by: Editor at August 21, 2010 09:54 AM (YX6i/)
I know people hear don't like dems, but David
Patterson is a decent man, he refused to tow the Fraud's line,
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 01:47 PM (ACkhT)
You know, you're a nice guy. I like you. But excuse me while I slice like an F'in hammer;
TOE the line, TOE the fucking line! You put your TOE on the LINE like EVERYONE ELSE to show that you're CONFORMING.
This isn't about fucking fishing, you're not trying to catch fucking Jaws here.
TOE THE FUCKING LINE.
*ahem*
The extremely profane idiom correction nazi thanks you for your support.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 09:55 AM (bxiXv)
Remember when Obama said he'd appoint Republicans to his admin?
So far he's got, what, one?
Ray friggin' LaHood. Obama said, "Ray is my kind of Republican."
Yeah. Exactly.
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 09:56 AM (DPuFa)
Posted by: Interesting Decision at August 21, 2010 09:56 AM (epj36)
Posted by: Editor at August 21, 2010 01:51 PM (YX6i/)
With all due respect, Mccain would have won if the 6 million Bush voters had come out to vote for Mccain.
Frankly, as a lifelong dem, at that point me and my family were, it was weird to be campaigning for a repub and against the undemocratic party, of which I was a member.
And I never really understood why conservatives didn't like Mccain.
I do now.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 09:57 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: someguy who annoys ace at August 21, 2010 09:57 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: CAC at August 21, 2010 09:57 AM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: Editor at August 21, 2010 01:51 PM (YX6i/)
In 2008, the Hillbuzz people didn't *really* believe what they were hearing about Barry.
But it came true.
Who knows if that will be enough, but it's not 2008 anymore.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 09:58 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Depressa Brewer at August 21, 2010 09:58 AM (Tj5RX)
Posted by: NukemHill at August 21, 2010 09:59 AM (kkwJu)
that reminds me, I'm gonna mighty pissed off if Rudy or George Pataki decide to throw their hats in the presidential ring.
No thanks, a-holes. Where were you two when you're party and country needed you in 2010?
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 10:00 AM (DPuFa)
McCain did everything in his power not to win. He basically asked people not to vote for him.
Posted by: Editor at August 21, 2010 10:01 AM (YX6i/)
Posted by: CAC at August 21, 2010 10:01 AM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: someguy who annoys ace at August 21, 2010 01:57 PM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 10:01 AM (bxiXv)
Yes, the problem is that I am now understanding, the dems/liberals are working for a system that they are employed and dependent on.
So, of course its their full time job to expand and preserve the size of govt.
Those of us who work outside the govt, whose tax revenues goes to pay for that govt, just want to make sure the govt doesn't get in the way to hinder growth and give itself advantages that we in the private sector have to compete against.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 10:01 AM (ACkhT)
After a lengthy attempt to bail out his pet bank, ShoreBank Chicago, Illinois, which included several alleged armtwisting episodes by the administration, the president has finally let the bank die (with its assets valued at about 50% of face). Yet instead of going to hell, it was immediately resurrected with a bevy of new owners, among them Goldman, Morgan Stanley, and BofA, all of whom received nearly $400 million in taxpayer money for their "generosity" to keep the bank zombified even in the afterlife.
Its theft by govt. Pure and Simple. To the middle class. To your children and to your grandchildren.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 21, 2010 10:03 AM (664Zx)
Posted by: Editor at August 21, 2010 02:01 PM (YX6i/)
Oh, I competely agree, I swear, PUMA dems were yelling at the Mccain campaign to hit harder. When Palin came on, she was ready to fight, and was reigned in.
But, yes, I read on redstate or strata-sphere, I forget which one, 6 million Bush voters stayed home.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 10:04 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: CAC at August 21, 2010 10:06 AM (Gr1V1)
With all due respect, Mccain would have won if the 6 million Bush voters had come out to vote for Mccain.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 01:57 PM (ACkhT)
Yep. And McShame's most serious problem was that, after the credit crisis hit, it was clear that huge amounts of power were being moved into the Executive, and that much power could not be left in the hands of someone who had no AMerican sensibilities, whatsoever. America understood this. They knew how close to the edge America was. They knew how consequential the 2008 election was going to be (because of the credit crisis). But, McShame showed no understanding of the risks and went out of his way to denigrate anyone who understood what was going on.
When McShame berated Bill Cunningham for calling the Indonesian Imbecile by his given name, Hussein, the gig was up. There was just no way to get many to the polls for someone that incredibly stupid and disingenuous.
I still cannot get over how anyone can make someone's middle name a "smear". I just don't understand this sort of insanity. Most of America didn't. And who, after all, would ever vote for someone who says that it is a smear to say someone's full name? I can't even imagine how ridiculous this generation is going to look in future history books. We are going to be the laughing stock of history, for quite some time.
My point is not to dredge up McShame's failures, once again, but to show that the GOP has still not gained an understanding of what happened and why it happened.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 10:08 AM (Qp4DT)
Video, mom at a townhall goes after Senator from NC for passing such a bad Deathcare Bill
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 10:08 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: CAC at August 21, 2010 10:09 AM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 02:08 PM (Qp4DT)
Yep. Even dems like me were disgusted with mccain for him falling into that race-baiting crap.
The man refused to fight back. I called his office so many time with information and suggestions for ads, etc, on how to help go after the fraud. I actually do think, Mccain didn't want to win. I see Palin, who will not back down, not one inch. She mocks the fringe media, she is not afraid to fight back.
No wonder the liberals are afraid of her. She fights back.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 10:11 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:13 AM (p302b)
But, yes, I read on redstate or strata-sphere, I forget which one, 6 million Bush voters stayed home.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 02:04 PM (ACkhT)
I think that number has to do with the voting totals comparing 2004 and 2008. I believe fewer people voted in 2008 and McCain ended up with 6 million fewer votes than W did in 2004.
In my opinion its the perfect example of the idiocy of purity Republicans and RINOs wanting to expunge the other from the party.
Posted by: buzzion at August 21, 2010 10:15 AM (oVQFe)
So far he's got, what, one?
Ray friggin' LaHood. Obama said, "Ray is my kind of Republican."
Yeah. Exactly.
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 01:56 PM (DPuFa)
Aw shucks. If I had won, I'd have jettisoned that Palin broade, put Barry in her place and then immediately resigned. Because I'm a maverick, damn it.
Posted by: John McCain at August 21, 2010 10:15 AM (w9BEi)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:15 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 02:13 PM (p302b)
I have to say, I was never a fan of Gutfeld's idea. You fight fire with fire. There should have been a koran burning/flushing in the street. Of course, the GOP and conservative pundits would have run from that idea like their pants were on fire. But it is the logical counter to the idiotic "freedom of religion" argument that the dems and their Indonesian are pushing. Even though the opportunity to show the dems' love of burning the American flag versus their revulsion at flushing korans would have laid their seditious and stupid ideas out in plain sight.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 10:18 AM (Qp4DT)
When McShame berated Bill Cunningham for calling the Indonesian Imbecile by his given name, Hussein, the gig was up. There was just no way to get many to the polls for someone that incredibly stupid and disingenuous.
McCain supposedly didn't even know what Willie had actually been saying either before denouncing him. People that could listen to 700 WLW would know that his usage of Hussein was because of the media embargo on the middle name, because of their fear of Americans being racist against it. And that was the reason for his repeating it, not to get the crowd into some bigotted froth like the MFM really wants to believe.
Posted by: buzzion at August 21, 2010 10:18 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: buzzion at August 21, 2010 02:15 PM (oVQFe)
well, a small biz collegue of mine walls in this category. He refused to vote for Mccain, said he was too liberal, and we got into so many arguments, that I as a democrat was campaigning and voting for McPalin, and he as a lifelong repub would not.
Needless to say, this man is now pissed, very pissed at what is going on, and I remind he every so often that he refused to get off his butt and help keep a fraud like that out.
He will not be making that mistake in 2010 or in 2012.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 10:18 AM (ACkhT)
Why do Chinese people suck up their food and chew loudly?
This guy is sucking up his rice like he's a Hoover vacuum. I see a lot of chinese people doing this. They suck up their soup like that, too.
Posted by: Very Proud Big-Tit 'n Ass Lovin Republican at August 21, 2010 10:19 AM (DPuFa)
Dude, "Hussein"... it's clear what Rethuglikkkans mean when they invoke that.
Posted by: Libtard who buys the "it's not really a mosque" bullshit at August 21, 2010 10:19 AM (w9BEi)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:20 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:21 AM (p302b)
Newt Gingrich? Rudy Gulliani? Mitt Romney? Huckabee? Palin? THIS is the problem with the GOP. We keep putting up retreads, candidates that have ripped each other apart even before the media gets a chance to put their spin on them. If we don't get some fresh blood running in there, the idiots that voted for McLame in the primary are going to do it again. You think McLame was a zombie asshole LAST time, well, he's been slumming conservative and I'll bet that hair trigger anger is churning around in his stomach with all that ensure and geritol. For the love of pete, we already have Whale Wars, do we have to put up with another campaign with his pig daughter. FOR THAT, we need to find better candidates.
As for 2010, just STFU and allow the dems to bury themselves. Talk lower taxes, less government, following the constitution, and keep it simple. And, in January, toss that wet fart Steele on his ass.
Posted by: HornetSting at August 21, 2010 10:21 AM (8F9TW)
Video, mom at a townhall goes after Senator from NC for passing such a bad Deathcare Bill
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 02:08 PM (ACkhT)
Look at all those seniors. God bless them and fuck the dems for what they're trying to do to them.
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at August 21, 2010 10:22 AM (w9BEi)
Posted by: bigred at August 21, 2010 10:22 AM (cX9pO)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at August 21, 2010 10:23 AM (PQY7w)
Posted by: bigred at August 21, 2010 02:22 PM (cX9pO)
Ya gotta go for it!
Posted by: Bill Belichick at August 21, 2010 10:24 AM (YX6i/)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 02:21 PM (p302b)
She should have been laughed out of any public office after that unbelievable "reset/overcharged" gaffe. The fucking State Department can't get a simple Russian translation of ONE WORD correct? I cannot think of a more ridiculous or retarded example of international diplomacy. It's not even as though she were overseeing some translation of a complicated treaty in some obscure language. It was one fucking word in Russian - a language that we had to have intimate knowledge of for the whole latter half of the 20th century. My G-d.
I am stunned that she is still in any office. I am even more stunned that she would be considered competent enough for anything, at all.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 10:26 AM (Qp4DT)
perhaps this is why establishment repubs don't like Palin, frankly, many times it seems the entire establishment, dems and repubs don't like her because she refuses to play those "whose turn is to have power" games.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 10:27 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 21, 2010 10:28 AM (fLHQe)
With all due respect, Mccain would have won if the 6 million Bush voters had come out to vote for Mccain.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 01:57 PM (ACkhT)I think you're probably correct,
BUT
while we might only be half a close to Socialism with McCain as we are with Big O, everyone would be just fine with it.
We needed the Big O wake-up call / delirium / disease; it's essentially the national version of the mumps.
New Coke. From Summer 2008; remember?
This time, Vote. Get your friends to vote. There are 2 choices:
1. Vote for the 'R'
2. Get more "stimulus" / "benefits" / "Single Payer Healthcare" / "union bailouts" / "Hope'nChangeTM"
Posted by: Arbalest at August 21, 2010 10:29 AM (VZC6E)
McCain was so wrapped up in the old "politics as usual" bag that dominated D.C. up through 2008 that he couldn't -- or didn't want to -- see that the Democrats had finally achieved their goal of electing a candidate who would have felt right at home in Moscow, circa October, 1917.
He would not have been as good a president as Dubya (and that's not saying much, in my book). But he would have been a combination of Washington, Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt when compared the the Mohammedan Mouthpiece.
Back on topic: I suggest that what the Republicans need more than money (and more than morons talking about walking the precincts) is candidates who motivate people to vote. To me that means honest, conservative, patriotic candidates who don't answer every question with the kind of insane double-talk babble that dominates the "discussions" on Fucks News. People who don't go all "go along to get along" when principles are at stake.
Yeah. No electing any "Poppin' Fresh" squishes.
In other words: no more Newt Lites. No Shuckabees. And definitely no Bushes.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 21, 2010 10:30 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 21, 2010 02:30 PM (Ulu3i)
No doubt about that. I hated the guy with a burning passion, but I did as his mother said I had to, defended him vigorously in 2008, voted for him, and tried to convince everyone I ran into about how the Indonesian Imbecile would be stepping into an unbelievably strengthened Executive (far beyond Constitutional limits) with a terribly weakened and vulnerable US. That combination was death for America.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 10:33 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Arbalest at August 21, 2010 02:29 PM (VZC6E)
Yes, I agree with your assement. Never would I have thought that I would be blogging with conservatives and agreeing with them after being a registered democrat my entire life. And this all occured since 2008.
Mccain would have kept the same path towards all the nonsense, just as a slower pace..... boiling frog slowly in warm water.
Now? the temp. has been turned up so high, people like me, even social liberals like my in-laws have been awakened much much faster. The frogs wants out of the pot, and the number of frogs who feel this way is increasing.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 10:34 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Arbalest at August 21, 2010 02:29 PM
This meme makes me tired. I don't agree that we had to wreck the nation to save it.
There are dangerous actions -- like those I suspect McCain would have taken -- that merely take hard work and sacrifice to repair, and then there are treasonous, America-destroying acts like those the Traitor-in-Chief takes, the ones that may require spilling blood and starvation to rectify.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 21, 2010 10:35 AM (Ulu3i)
Yeah, POP. They should have asked Condi Rice, maybe. She has been told by Russians she speaks Russian like a Russian. No higher compliment than that.
As for burning Korans, I'm afraid that may be coming, in spades. I told friends of mine back when Bush had trouble with the Chinese about that plane that the next war will not be with the Chinese, but with Islam. Iraq wasn't it, the big one's coming.
Posted by: bigred at August 21, 2010 10:35 AM (cX9pO)
I have to say, I was never a fan
of Gutfeld's idea. You fight fire with fire. There should have been a
koran burning/flushing in the street.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 02:18 PM (Qp4DT)
Personally I'm quite content to get the word out on stuff like Rauf's Rolfing Ruminations and watch the Dems eat each other on the topic.
Mind you, getting that stuff past the MFM can be a chore, and burning Korans would get instant coverage, but the latter would also "bring together" the left into a bloc, and I'd rather do the extra work and watch them cannibalize themselves.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 10:37 AM (bxiXv)
"I don't agree that we had to wreck the nation to save it."
Yes, I agree, but the country was and is headed towards a wreakening already, slowly then, faster now. I so wanted Mccain to win, if for no other reason, that he would not have done the crap Obama has done. But, now, what is done is done, and at least now people millions of more Americans are awake.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 10:38 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:38 AM (p302b)
Posted by: railwriter at August 21, 2010 10:39 AM (3qItU)
OT: Islam vs Disneyland, Round 1
Muslim Worker: Disney Wrong to Ban Hijab http://ow.ly/18FwJc
A Muslim woman who works as a hostess at a restaurant in Disneyland has filed a discrimination complaint against the world-renowned California theme park, saying officials at the park violated the law when they told her she could not appear in front of customers while wearing a religious head scarf.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at August 21, 2010 10:41 AM (YVZlY)
McCain made two "fatal errors" with us independents. He endorsed BO during one of the debates and he said something about being willing to be in the middle east for a hundred years (something like that). The whisper about him was that he would keep us in war forever and people didn't want that.
And he embarrassed himself with the whole going back to DC things and looked like an idiot compared to the "calm, cool, 'i'm here if you need me' BO"
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:42 AM (p302b)
Remember when the popular wisdom was that the rank-and-file Republicans were tired of them in Congress and wanted to "punish them at the polls"?
That's exactly what happened in '06. Dims and Nazi Pelosi took over the very next January and we've been in a downhill slide ever since.
Now the popular wisdom is that Dims will get crushed this November.
Not that I'm soaping up anybody's back just yet, but it is coming. The only question is, will we take just the House, or the House and Senate too?
I think the bear is about to wake up and start ripping off faces...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at August 21, 2010 10:43 AM (kFODZ)
And if they had said, we're going to make you Princess Jasmine they would have sued for stereotyping.
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:43 AM (p302b)
I'm not seeing the bear but everywhere I go I see really pissy people....sort of like a rabid pack of angry pit bulls without leashes.
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:45 AM (p302b)
-->Yeah, POP. They should have asked Condi Rice, maybe. She has been told by Russians she speaks Russian like a Russian. No higher compliment than that.
For sure. But, even aside from having an American who speaks Russian, I know dozens of Russians who are fluent in English that I could have run that translation by, myself. To think that the State Department is unable to translate Russian is unreal. What if the Russians had been talking about something being 'overcharged' - meaning that it was about to explode - and the retards at State translated that to being 'reset'? The consequences are serious and totally avoidable. In a normal world, that one gaffe would have been the end of Shrillary and the Indonesian Imbecile. But, that's in a normal world. And the GOP and conservative pundits have precious little to say about the whole affair, when it should have been tied around the left and the dems like some burning tire in South Africa ...
-->As for burning Korans, I'm afraid that may be coming, in spades. I told friends of mine back when Bush had trouble with the Chinese about that plane that the next war will not be with the Chinese, but with Islam. Iraq wasn't it, the big one's coming.
Posted by: bigred at August 21, 2010 02:35 PM (cX9pO)
Iraq was merely the first step to start to take eliminate the threats emanating from the arab/persian/muslim world. It was the "secular" step into that world of our enemies to take them apart. Unfortunately, it became the last such step, when it was supposed to lay the groundwork for dismantling the Iranian nuclear threat.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 10:46 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: bigred at August 21, 2010 10:46 AM (cX9pO)
Until Republicans stop savaging their own experienced, electable candidates, we're screwed. Our own worst enemies, every single time.
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 21, 2010 10:46 AM (IKf7L)
Maybe the GOP shouldn't get cocky, but the article to which you link is complete and total bullshit. Can't see 40 seats flipping? So the word of one anonymous operative trumps that of every smart political observer that sees the Dems getting crushed? So the huge enthusiasm gap show by every poll is not going to materialize because a few shitty candidates didn't organize phone banks?
I am getting so sick of the doom and gloom bullshit from McCain. If he isn't trying to scare people about the November elections, he is busy telling us we should be supporting Tea Party candidates in liberal states who have no fucking chance, at all, of winning in the general election.
Posted by: Bob at August 21, 2010 10:47 AM (/G0pB)
I am going to volunteer for Rossi in King County, Washington which is like taking a stroll through the DMZ in 1971 without your rifle.
I don't know if it will do any good but this year is too important not to try. If nothing else I am going to make sure that people know what happened to this economy since the democrats took over congress 4 years ago.
Posted by: robtr at August 21, 2010 10:47 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:47 AM (p302b)
Mind you, getting that stuff past
the MFM can be a chore, and burning Korans would get instant coverage,
but the latter would also "bring together" the left into a bloc, and I'd
rather do the extra work and watch them cannibalize themselves.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 21, 2010 02:37 PM (bxiXv)
That's why I said that it stands in perfect contraposition to the dems' love of burning American flags (freedom of speech, they say) or pissing on Bibles and the general denigration/mocking of Christian symbols.
These are hills to die on, since if America can't come to a clear understanding of these simple issues, there's nothing to save, anyway.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 10:49 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:49 AM (p302b)
Posted by: dagny at August 21, 2010 10:49 AM (ERrad)
When I tried to volunteer during the 2008 election, I had no luck. The person manning the local office was clueless. I never received a call back, only lots of robocalls for every goddamn Republican candidate.
My impression is that there are busy bodies who form these official GOP organizations and that they are social and business networking as much as anything else. They don't want skilled volunteers (as someone suggested earlier). They just want your cash.
Posted by: Y-not at August 21, 2010 10:50 AM (osFsP)
Got so annoyed at the republican that I told her she was really a dem operative in republican headquarters. She threatened to call the police and got fuming mad and all red. I figured I hit it right on the head.
I said "go ahead, let's call the police together, I'm not doing anything wrong I'm just talking to you" and I left.
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:53 AM (p302b)
Posted by: bigred at August 21, 2010 10:54 AM (cX9pO)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 10:55 AM (p302b)
This is the benefit of the tea party, I think.
Of course it serves a different purpose, but it does give regular people outside the clique a chance to get involved.
Posted by: Y-not at August 21, 2010 10:55 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 02:47 PM (p302b)
Exactly.
It reminds me of when the Russians were firing with tanks on the Duma and Clinton was out of the White House on vacation. These things seem lost in the moment, but they will be well-noted when the final histories of the time are written.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 10:57 AM (Qp4DT)
There are dangerous actions -- like those I suspect McCain would have taken -- that merely take hard work and sacrifice to repair, and then there are treasonous, America-destroying acts like those the Traitor-in-Chief takes, the ones that may require spilling blood and starvation to rectify.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 21, 2010 02:35 PM (Ulu3i)
In Summer 2008, I posted, here at Ace, several rants about voting for McCain. My views were clear. I did not know what Big OÂ’s plans were and I think few did, but I expected them to be bad. Not this bad, though.
IÂ’m not certain that weÂ’ve wrecked the nation, but I think we are very close. I think that O is something that was coming, eventually, something we would have to undergo in order to sort out our country politically, socially, Â…Â…Â….
I would have preferred this 12 years ago. The spending shock wouldÂ’ve been about as big (-$1trillion?, and for what?) but weÂ’d have no Iraq and Afghanistan spending requirements. Mexico was more stable back then. [insert a few more reasons here] But Willie was too Slick, and I didnÂ’t get my wish.
In retrospect, starting in 2007, I think that the Housing Bubble wouldÂ’ve burst anyway, and while McCain mightÂ’ve done a better job of handling it, IÂ’m not certain of this, and he (and Bush and all RÂ’s) wouldÂ’ve been blamed. I think also that weÂ’d have a bit more social programs as a result.
Follow this scenario with Big O: thereÂ’d be many more dependent people in the US, and therefore less resistance to Big OÂ’s policies and legislation. November would not look the same.
To some degree, weÂ’re lucky that Big O did not happen later, in 2012 or 2016, when he might have been able to at least cover up more if his inability.
MÂ’chelle was right in 2008.
Posted by: Arbalest at August 21, 2010 10:57 AM (VZC6E)
He didn't seem to care.
Why lie?
Wouldn't it just be better to say "the water is filled with bacteria, it isn't safe for anyone to swim"?
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 11:00 AM (p302b)
This is because for most dem candidates beyond local level, if they lose, they're basically unemployed, rather than just returning to whatever business they were in before.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 21, 2010 11:00 AM (zFKBR)
Word.
Posted by: mrp at August 21, 2010 11:04 AM (HjPtV)
If we can recover at all, it will take at least 20 years.
The engines of creation/prosperity have been cut up and sold for scrap. The only thing left is depression level bare essentials production and employment levels.
With the economic core decimated and folded up, rather than simply slowed down as in typical recessions, we're about where Europe was in the mid-50's recovering from the WWII devastation.
There's thousands of medium sized businesses that had been around for decades that employed 50-200 people or so that are simply gone now. It will decades to rebuild that job creation base.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 21, 2010 11:07 AM (zFKBR)
That is something I have been saying for a long time. The MFM like to parrot about the crucial "independents" and the "undecideds". There really isn't a group of "independents" out there. The people who actually switch votes back and forth are very very few. People may not be "registered" with a party but they vote for one of the parties every time.
As for those "undecideds" the only ones who are truly "undecided" are the people who should be housed and not let out on the streets without a minder.
The key to wining is to get out your party's voters. As has been said here over and over, McCain the Lame was unable to do that last time, even with Palin. If he had nominated Lindsey Graham, or even worse Lieberman, he would have lost every freaking State including AZ.
Posted by: Vic at August 21, 2010 11:08 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 02:55 PM (p302b)
Good for you! And continue to call out.
When I was campaigning for McPalin, I and my wife walked into a repub campaign office, told them openly we were lifelong dems wanting to keep Obama out, so we wanted to help McPalin win.
If they are mad about accused of being a dem operative, well, that;s because they are one.
There are many dems, or ex-dems, indies like me who are perfectly understanding of the whole dem operative thing, and we wouldn't be offended if we are called dem operatives, b/c we are not.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 11:08 AM (ACkhT)
He didn't want pictures taken because he wasn't swimming in the ocean-ocean as was being advertised.
Posted by: Vic at August 21, 2010 11:09 AM (/jbAw)
I just read that a sewer broke, and there is fecal matter in the water at Martha's Vineyard, so all the beaches are closed.
LOL!!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 11:11 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Caiwyn at August 21, 2010 11:12 AM (C2ago)
Yes, I agree with your assement. Never would I have thought that I would be blogging with conservatives and agreeing with them after being a registered democrat my entire life. And this all occured since 2008.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 02:34 PM
What do you want, a fucking medal? You were retarded and now you're cured. We get it. That chicken is FLAT, man.
Posted by: HornetSting at August 21, 2010 11:13 AM (AUo3q)
I'm sure the Tea Party will get blamed.
I hope every sub coming and going empties their bilges off of MV.
Posted by: Dang Straights at August 21, 2010 11:13 AM (YA4xf)
Yes, indeed, DeathCare proved there are NO, none, "moderate/conservative" dems. And I say that as a recovering dem. And then I was told I was too dumb to understand what's good for me and my family and my small business.
Will vote for a conservative everytime for as long as I can see, or as close as to a conservative in the available choices on the ballot.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 11:15 AM (ACkhT)
Gotta go to work. Have a good afternoon everyone.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at August 21, 2010 11:16 AM (ACkhT)
Sack Spratt! SC-5 district voters, predominantly Democrats, are discovering that there really is a world beyond John Spratt, our 28-year Representative who is running for his 15th term: unfortunately, it's San Francisco, Massachusetts, and the rest of the urban northeast. For a bunch of proud and self-respecting Democrats, it's horrifying to see the extreme agenda we'd all be stuck with if he goes back again as Pelosi's budget chairman. Now everyone's scrambling to organize: good ole boy Dems have never seriously been challenged and were lazy and smug; Republicans and "moderates" are ready to bring it. That line above about "I'm from somewhere else and don't want this place to turn into it." was a good one! Having retired here a few years ago, I tried to get involved with the GOP. County Chairman did not return phone calls or emails during the 2008 campaign season, and honestly, I assumed he had died. Well, he's still here, doing zip, and the effort to sack Spratt and elect Mulvaney is not exclusively a GOP effort. More of a let's- just- get- it-done effort, mobilized by first-time activists who are fired up. BTW, as I'm meeting the GOP ladies: lots of fun, tattoos, fearless, and mission-oriented.
Posted by: mw at August 21, 2010 11:17 AM (59Q2D)
I think that was unnecessarily harsh. John is expressing a change in perspective that is part of a larger move in society. How much larger, we'll all see.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 11:17 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at August 21, 2010 11:19 AM (kJXs1)
I think that was unnecessarily harsh. John is expressing a change in perspective that is part of a larger move in society. How much larger, we'll all see.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 03:17 PM (Qp4DT)
197 What do you want, a fucking medal?That outburst was unnecessary, HornetSting.
Posted by: Y-not at August 21, 2010 03:18 PM
He KEEPS SAYING IT, over and over again. I can read his handle and GET it. I'll go vacuum or something.
Posted by: HornetSting at August 21, 2010 11:22 AM (AUo3q)
Someone said upthread (too lazy to track it down, sloth & all) that we would be remembered in shame. Not going to happen. I'll tell you how we're going to be remembered. This time in history will be one of a great awakening. A time when the American people woke up, and fought to restore their country to what the founders envisioned. One where we fought back against socialism and progressive rule. One in which we won that fight and relegated the socialist fucks to the dustbin.
That is the legacy I want my grandson to pass to his children and his children's children. One that they can look back on with pride. That we gave them back the greatest country on the planet never to be sullied again by the pukes that tried to destroy her. Put those fucks in the hall of shame, not us. We are American, by God, and I refuse to allow those SOBs to deny us that honor for our children.
That will be our legacy.
Posted by: Steph at August 21, 2010 11:23 AM (580hG)
Maybe it's the culture over at HotAir where I tend to see you posting to ridicule fellow commenters, but over here we save that for trolls and mobies. john is neither. Frankly, he contributes more to this site than you do.
Posted by: Y-not at August 21, 2010 11:25 AM (osFsP)
I posted a link to an article that discussed DeMint campaigning for Mulvaney, also a poll from May that had Pratt and Mulvaney essentially in a dead heat. Mulvaney is probably up now.
Also, as I said earlier, keep in mind that this is a gerrymandered Dem district, one of two in the State.
Posted by: Vic at August 21, 2010 11:27 AM (/jbAw)
Maybe it's the culture over at HotAir where I tend to see you posting to ridicule fellow commenters, but over here we save that for trolls and mobies. john is neither. Frankly, he contributes more to this site than you do.
Posted by: Y-not at August 21, 2010 03:25 PM
He certainly does, saying all the right things that make your ears ring. And, I do torment trolls and psuedo-wizards of smart, but thank you for the critique. I didn't know we got graded over here.
Posted by: HornetSting at August 21, 2010 11:29 AM (AUo3q)
I'll go vacuum or something.
Posted by: HornetSting at August 21, 2010 03:22 PM (AUo3q)
It wasn't that big of a deal, hornet.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 11:34 AM (Qp4DT)
In other words, you have no idea what door-knocking actually is.
You're not trying to talk people into switching sides.
You're trying to get people you know are on your side to turn up. To encourage and motivate the right-wing islands in your lefty sea.
Registered Republicans, NRA members, Dems who have voted R in past elections -- modern electioneering involves a lot of computer pre-targeting before you ever hit the pavement.
Posted by: someone at August 21, 2010 11:35 AM (DfAwB)
I think at this point we all realize that 2010 is big, and there are a lot of good (instead of non-horrible) candidates to actually support.
So stick to that.
Posted by: someone at August 21, 2010 11:36 AM (DfAwB)
Posted by: HornetSting at August 21, 2010 03:22 PM (AUo3q)
It wasn't that big of a deal, hornet.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 21, 2010 03:34 PM
I'll admit, I'm a little trigger happy, only BECAUSE I have to go vacuum.
Posted by: HornetSting at August 21, 2010 11:37 AM (AUo3q)
I like Hot Air, good commentators over there. But it is a somewhat closed society, you gotta have the secret handshake.
This place, however, is an open bar. Grab a seat, order a drink, and join the fun. Everything's game, trolls are for target practice, just don't pee on the floor. Finding myself out of work after 40 years being able to come here helps keep my sanity and stay in touch with the outside world.
Yes, most of us know John is an ex-dem. A lot of us are. But there are new people coming here all the time and he just wants to be upfront with where he's coming from. That's cool.
And he ain't peed on the floor yet.
Posted by: bigred at August 21, 2010 11:40 AM (cX9pO)
Posted by: Atrollpasinthru at August 21, 2010 11:53 AM (sYrWB)
Yeah, it doesn't say much about us if we can't be friendly to new people recovering from their (hopefully) temporary insanity. We're about to see a tsunami in November, I'd like to see as many on that wave as possible. Not turned off by malicious snark directed at a regular.
Posted by: Downsized Upscale at August 21, 2010 03:48 PM
I apologize.
*kicks vacuum cleaner*
Posted by: HornetSting at August 21, 2010 11:55 AM (AUo3q)
Posted by: Rick at August 21, 2010 11:56 AM (pT/Ao)
Posted by: someone at August 21, 2010 03:36 PM (DfAwB)
C'mon, help a brother out. Things are tough out here what with the high unemployment and all.
Posted by: Circular firing squad commander at August 21, 2010 11:56 AM (UnvXd)
Posted by: Peggy West at August 21, 2010 11:57 AM (fM0nd)
Posted by: bigred at August 21, 2010 12:03 PM (cX9pO)
Oooh! Oooh! Ace, he used the "H-word!" I can use it (because I am one and all) but it really frosts the ol' cookies to see it being used by the goyim!
Not that I want to deny his First Amendment rights or nothin', or make him quit his radio show...
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 21, 2010 12:03 PM (Ulu3i)
Maybe that is why we have so many RINO's cause they aren't really republicans or conservatives but they aren't the new kind of democrat either. So, the dems won't let them get near an office and the republicans might be a little too trusting and welcoming. I think it is hard to know when someone is really an old fashioned democrat fleeing to the republican party cause what they really want is the power and the office and they'll do anything to get it. You'd have to be in the heart and mind reading business to know who is who.
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 12:03 PM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at August 21, 2010 12:06 PM (p302b)
Posted by: dandoz at August 21, 2010 12:18 PM (bjnlk)
My understanding is that New Democrats want to be Pol Pot.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at August 21, 2010 12:27 PM (9PzaA)
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at August 21, 2010 12:41 PM (niGh7)
This place, however, is an open bar. Grab a seat, order a drink, and join the fun. Everything's game, trolls are for target practice, just don't pee on the floor. Finding myself out of work after 40 years being able to come here helps keep my sanity and stay in touch with the outside world.
That's going to be news to a lot of people here.
Posted by: buzzion at August 21, 2010 12:45 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: tonynoboloney at August 21, 2010 12:59 PM (XV9uu)
We offer them the same thing we offer everyone.
What we don't offer is race-based free gov't money. If that's what they want, no amount of pandering is going to get them to vote for us.
What's the problem, again?
Posted by: Congress at August 21, 2010 01:02 PM (9PzaA)
Posted by: bigred at August 21, 2010 01:05 PM (cX9pO)
Posted by: tonynoboloney at August 21, 2010 01:16 PM (XV9uu)
That would be so fucking sweet, and I would volunteer for that campaign. If Lazio gets it together, I would volunteer for his. I keep checking his website and the polls, and I really dislike Paladino who admittedly comes off as the tougher candidate but also supposedly has a lot of dirt on him, but the outlook for Lazio now is grim. I really want to beat Cuomo.
But my husband and I are getting a truck next week, and I have friends upstate in Durham and Woodstock I could stay with. Phones, ride shares, door to door, if anyone has any ideas, let me know. Unfortunately, I'm in NYC, and it's useless here.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 21, 2010 01:32 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 21, 2010 01:33 PM (mHQ7T)
Elections are kinda more complex than murdering a dude--and you don't needta hide what you're doing ( or your success )
Posted by: Col. Bat Guano at August 21, 2010 01:37 PM (uP7xk)
Posted by: railwriter at August 21, 2010 02:20 PM (BsK3p)
Posted by: railwriter at August 21, 2010 02:25 PM (WovsE)
She is now blaming the flooding in Pakistan on AGW.
Posted by: Vic at August 21, 2010 03:00 PM (/jbAw)
The RNC will be getting zero cash from me ever again until they clean house in their administrative and policy ranks.
Until then, I will be giving to candidates directly as I have since 2006.
AS for being worried: I am not. Yes there are multitudes of ignorant dolts who voted within that 52% in 2008, but I have faith that the vast majority of them have seen the error of their ways -- as well as the backside the Dems have shown them since electing the sh!theads to a majority.
It isn't going to happen again. Sure, there will still be the 15-20% of the population that will vote for these assclown socialist cocksuckers....so be it. The way to rid ourselves of them is natural selection. (cough).
Other than that, I plan on spreading the word around to my friends, co-workers and anyone who will listen, telling them to get their a$$es to the polls so we can fix this country-wide mental lapse.
Posted by: navtechie at August 21, 2010 03:07 PM (5CC0n)
Posted by: Gloating Rube at August 21, 2010 04:16 PM (RN3Bh)
Posted by: Caiwyn at August 21, 2010 05:06 PM (CAgAZ)
I never bought the shit that she was unfairly pressured into conceding. Either you want the job or you don't, and she ran a shitty campaign. I know all about the primary rules, MI and FL, but she still got outmaneuvered. Maybe she had been too nice to shitty people that she put into power, but then you can blame her for much of the corruption you see now. At one time, she and Bill raised money and stumped for Obama and many people who later stabbed her in the back. Karma is a bitch. In the end, she and Obama are exactly the same.
Moving on, a friend of mine was just visiting from Turkey. He has more pork in his home than anyone I know, and he hates the turn his country is taking. He brought up the floods in Pakistan and said, "Where are their friends the Saudis who have so much money? When the shit flies, everyone in the world looks to the US for help." My friend's father was the UN ambassador to this country for many years. Our Sec of State should sound more like one of our allies than some crackpot conspiracy theorist.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 21, 2010 05:09 PM (mHQ7T)
I think folks on the GOP side may be more howdoisay aw hell, polite. I was always told it is impolite to raise politics or religion in public but I always raise politics and/or religion/nationality/economy in public. Hell that is all my conversation right there.
Unless ya know it's a sci fi/fantasy geek crowd..but I can get politics and religion and economy in there prettye asily too
anywho I think it is important enough at this stage when we are really needing an electoral intervention, if you will, to save the economy from the Dems, that peeps try to overcome their innate and genteel manners and PROSELYTIZE YOUR NEIGHBORS
inform, inform, inform
At the last rally I attended, I went to see Sarah at a MAC rally for his primary here, I wound up letting the GOP ladies around me know all sorts of stuff they were uanware of. It is so important to get people talking and excited.
and carpooling to the vote or arranging a get together afterward or meeting up before hand is great too, to keep energy up and ensure turnout
so yeah do talk to other parents at school gatherings on the DL so the teachers dont hear and give your kid a hard time, I mean they say they dont, but they do.
My son had no trouble raising his hand and letting his teacher know his parents did not want him hearing Os speech to the kids, when our school pulled a fast one and aired it the following day, (I had pulled him that day) but I can see where you dont want the man hassling the kids. and make no mistake Obama is the man. with no functional economic plan.
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at August 21, 2010 05:43 PM (6uk6i)
you could not be more wrong and may I suggest we out aside our CDS/BDS to take back Congress? lets argue about HRC in 16 :0)
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at August 21, 2010 05:44 PM (6uk6i)
Ace, as I see it, the left will always have an advantage in this area. The left believes that politics is the highest, most important realm of human activity. We conservatives, on the other hand, view politics as a necessary evil, like colonoscopies or prostate exams. So, of course, they will pour energy and resources into politics in a way that we won't match.
This is an inevitable side effect of the differences in our political philosophies. I think that we'll need to regard political activity in the same way that we regard military training: something necessary, and something that must be done constantly, to keep our enemies from overwhelming us.
Posted by: Brown Line at August 21, 2010 05:59 PM (zxXif)
"Obam the Sham and the Pharaohs" still has a vast
audience. They're wavering........but Steele is like
seaweed on fishing line. It DON'T HELP!
Posted by: grizzlybare at August 21, 2010 06:00 PM (5Zqvh)
The negative ads can ad up, though. The one I would run would say "She / He voted for this shit!"
Posted by: Cooter at August 21, 2010 07:05 PM (DYRc9)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 21, 2010 08:09 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: sexypig at August 21, 2010 11:16 PM (0t7L8)
There is no there, there in Belize.
Take it from someone who barely made a living as a dive-master in Honduras in the '90's.
First question to you is, "Whatchoo gonna drink, Mon?"
Island life can be pretty interesting and pleasant but it's a fucking dessert when it comes to potable water!
Gets way more interesting when Malaria is an issue and forced and rapid dehydration is a fact of life.
Posted by: Deety at August 21, 2010 11:28 PM (aVzyR)
It's also about messaging.
come on Republicans - ditch the old lines - there are so many ways to beat the democrats.
Corruption
Expanding Welfare State
Spending
Waste
Barney Frank.
Corruption
nazi pelosi
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at August 22, 2010 04:39 AM (0fzsA)
This was his mantra: "The votes are in the precincts."
The problem is that a real doorbell-ringing, precinct-walking organization has to be an organization. The people in it have to agree on a common platform, a common slate of candidates, and and then support them all, whether or not their particular favorites are included.
I don't think any such organizations exist any more. I've lived in Chicago for 35 years, and no Democrat has ever rung my doorbell.
There are reports of Democrats running GOTV operations - in Wisconsin, supposedly bringing entire busloads of, ahem, "minority"voters to polling places, many not registered and demanding instant registration and ballots.
The Democrats have some manpower to run such operations: union staff, ACORNoids, government employees. The Democrats have lost a lot of their ability to buy election labor with patronage jobs, and volunteers won't submit to such discipline any more. Everybody wants to be an independent.
It would be interesting to survey a sample of 100,000 voters and determine how they got to the polls (or how they voted by mail), and if possible correlate with how they voted.
Another problem is the failure of the party regulars to do "due diligence" on prospective candidates and weed out the trash, either by persuading them not to run, or by getting a message to the voters. They don't, which is why Alvin Greene won in South Carolina. The Dems in Illinois had to dump their Lieutenant Governor candidate after the primary. And Bean will probably be re-elected because Joe Walsh is a wannabe with no organization and no money, who won a six-way primary. (He's being sued by ex-staff for back wages.) At least two of other candidates would be a slam-dunk to win the district.
There's got to be a better way to do this,
Posted by: Rich Rostrom at August 22, 2010 02:20 PM (08gNw)
Posted by: Timberland boots at August 24, 2010 01:06 AM (vtZf+)
Posted by: Jordan shoes at June 17, 2011 05:42 PM (oTRK6)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2849 seconds, 371 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Sherbet and gelato, too. I'm not prejudice.
Posted by: Adriane at August 20, 2010 09:39 PM (+NfQM)