October 13, 2010
— DrewM You know, if you're thinking of going somewhere warm this summer, you might want to consider someplace other than Mexico.
Seems their narco-terrorists are taking notes from the jihadis.
A Mexican police commander investigating the reported shooting of an American tourist on a border lake plagued by pirates has been decapitated and his head was found in a suitcase, a Texas sheriff says.The death of Rolando Flores, commander of state investigators in Ciudad Miguel Aleman, was a message from gangsters for investigators to "stay out of their territory," Texas Gov. Rick Perry said. Flores was part of a group investigating the reported shooting of David Hartley on Falcon Lake.
"I think their attempt is to intimidate law enforcement, no matter who they are or where they are," Perry told The Associated Press.
Flores' decapitated head was found Tuesday in a suitcase outside a Mexican Army base, Zapata County Sheriff Sigifredo Gonzalez told the AP.
Cartels have used beheadings in the past to terrorize the public and send messages to Mexican law enforcement. U.S. officials have said threats from drug gangs who control the area around Falcon Lake have hampered the search for Hartley, though divers have been in the lake searching this week. Hartley was reportedly shot Sept. 30 while touring the lake with his wife on Jet Skis.
But no, we have no need to build the fence or up security along the border.
None whatsoever.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:46 AM
| Comments (131)
Post contains 256 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2010 06:51 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: eman at October 13, 2010 06:53 AM (HsmDv)
None whatsoever.
While I agree, in general, with the intent behind this sarcasm, I have to say it doesn't really apply here.
Remember, the victim and his wife were on the Mexico side of the border- illegally, natch. And, since this is a lake, there's really no way to prevent American tourists out jet-skiing from accidentally (or even purposely, if innocently) crossing the border in that spot. I guess you could constantly have the border in that area patrolled by boats, or just cordon off the lake, but that seems a little like over-kill...
Posted by: AllenG at October 13, 2010 06:54 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2010 06:54 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: dagny at October 13, 2010 06:54 AM (E1Swa)
That clever Hartley chick.
/sarc
Posted by: Ella at October 13, 2010 06:55 AM (w+Pur)
Posted by: alexthedude at October 13, 2010 06:55 AM (rkCMG)
None whatsoever.
While I agree, in general, with the intent behind this sarcasm, I have to say it doesn't really apply here.
Remember, the victim and his wife were on the Mexico side of the border- illegally, natch. And, since this is a lake, there's really no way to prevent American tourists out jet-skiing from accidentally (or even purposely, if innocently) crossing the border in that spot. I guess you could constantly have the border in that area patrolled by boats, or just cordon off the lake, but that seems a little like over-kill...
Posted by: AllenG at October 13, 2010 10:54 AM (8y9MW)
Yea, that make sense, they cross the border unintentionally, they should be killed. Makes sense to me.
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 13, 2010 06:55 AM (LdYLm)
We may have to reconstruct Mexico in a manner similar to what we did with Germany, Japan, and South Korea, sometime during my lifetime. Which means we may have to kill a couple a hundred thousand of their criminals.
I know....nice fantasy I got going here. The race baiters would never let it happen even though it's their people who are getting their heads handed to them. Literally.
Posted by: pendejo grande at October 13, 2010 06:55 AM (58SxV)
Posted by: AllenG at October 13, 2010 10:54 AM (8y9MW)
It applies because it's SO EFFING CLOSE TO THE BOARDER, so let's stop it before it actually spills over.
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2010 06:56 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: DiesIrae at October 13, 2010 06:56 AM (IJS+B)
Posted by: alexthedude at October 13, 2010 06:56 AM (rkCMG)
Posted by: dagny at October 13, 2010 06:57 AM (E1Swa)
Posted by: B. Obama at October 13, 2010 06:58 AM (YU9IY)
I don't know how credible the wife is, but this helps her story, IMHO.
Posted by: Naqamel at October 13, 2010 06:58 AM (UMwMT)
Posted by: Pyrocles at October 13, 2010 06:59 AM (cv5Iw)
Posted by: John McCain at October 13, 2010 06:59 AM (HsmDv)
That clever Hartley chick.
/sarc
Posted by: Ella at October 13, 2010 10:55 AM (w+Pur)
We had dinner with family from SoCal on Saturday night who spouted this kinda shit (minus the decap, stuff of course).
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2010 06:59 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: President Barracky Pissypants at October 13, 2010 07:00 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: alexthedude at October 13, 2010 07:00 AM (rkCMG)
Or she's in cahoots with them!
/Conspiracy cap off.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 13, 2010 07:02 AM (9hSKh)
Get thee behind me, Sock from Hell!
Posted by: eman at October 13, 2010 11:01 AM (HsmDv)
To the last, I will grapple with thee... from Hell's heart, I stab at thee! For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee!
Posted by: Sock From Hell at October 13, 2010 07:02 AM (LdYLm)
Since the Drug Cartels run Mexico, when will Da Zero ask them to address Congress, and file suit against the states of their choice?
Jesus, we have imbeciles running this fukkin' country.
Posted by: maddogg at October 13, 2010 07:03 AM (OlN4e)
Unless you stay in tourist areas, a trip to Mexico is risky.
You get caught doing anything wrong / or any wrong-place at the wrong time scenario -- you'll end up with a dirty broom handle up your ass on a cold jail floor. or worse... dead.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 13, 2010 07:03 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: alexthedude at October 13, 2010 07:03 AM (rkCMG)
Yes, that exactly answers the fact that, in this case, a border fence and higher border security wouldn't have done anything, since it is incredibly difficult to enforce a border on a lake.
I never said they deserved to die, I said that the sentiment about finishing the fence doesn't really apply here.
Stop with the knee-jerk reactions- not everything is as clear cut as we'd like
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2010 10:56 AM (pUfK9)
Yes, as I said, I agree with the sentiment- it just wouldn't have really applied IN THIS CASE.
Yikes, put down the vodka and sober up for a little bit: or, this being morning, grab some aspirin and drink a big glass of water.
As you may note from some of my other comments, I live in Texas, and I'm kind of thinking it's time to "help" the Mexican army and Federales with their drug cartel problem- whether they want it or not.
Posted by: AllenG at October 13, 2010 07:04 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jean at October 13, 2010 07:04 AM (xGtpV)
Posted by: eman at October 13, 2010 07:04 AM (HsmDv)
We had dinner with family from SoCal on Saturday night who spouted this kinda shit (minus the decap, stuff of course).
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2010 10:59 AM (pUfK9)
Those mexicans are just hard working taco makers having their siestas under their beautifully handmade sombreros. There is absolutely no reason to think that they would ever do anything violent. Please just open up the border so these poor people can come in and do the jobs americans won't do. It's racist, jingoist, isolationist, nationalistic, and cruel to do anything else. Besides that whole area of the country was owned by Mexico first and if we hadn't been such racist neo-colonialists they would be happily farming and ranching and not bothering us at all.
/sarc
Posted by: dagny at October 13, 2010 07:04 AM (E1Swa)
Posted by: theCork at October 13, 2010 07:04 AM (zL5Q1)
Posted by: Navycopjoe on his IPhone4 at October 13, 2010 07:05 AM (Bb1uF)
Posted by: NASA Director Charles Bolden at October 13, 2010 07:08 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: alexthedude at October 13, 2010 07:09 AM (rkCMG)
If only Chimpy McBooshHitler had really been the imperialist oil-crazed warmonger he was painted as...
Posted by: HeatherRadish is anal about laundry at October 13, 2010 07:09 AM (Vz9lf)
Yes, that exactly answers the fact that, in this case, a border fence and higher border security wouldn't have done anything, since it is incredibly difficult to enforce a border on a lake.
I never said they deserved to die, I said that the sentiment about finishing the fence doesn't really apply here.
Stop with the knee-jerk reactions- not everything is as clear cut as we'd like
Hey, this is fracking America, I'll jerk whatever I want - Commie.
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 13, 2010 07:09 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: The MFM at October 13, 2010 07:09 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Beagle at October 13, 2010 07:10 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2010 07:10 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: El Guapo 2010 Campaign Manager at October 13, 2010 07:12 AM (rkCMG)
There's a lot of that part of the country I'd be happy to let Mexico buy back. We can unload Pelosi's district...get rid of her, get some funds to pay down the debt...
Posted by: HeatherRadish is anal about laundry at October 13, 2010 07:12 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2010 07:13 AM (pUfK9)
The increased security might have preempted the murder, as the pirates/drug-runners wouldn't have be so eager to engage in such activites with the increased police presence.
#47 If only Chimpy McBooshHitler had really been the imperialist oil-crazed warmonger he was painted as...
He would have invaded Mexico and then Venezuela.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 13, 2010 07:13 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: t-bird at October 13, 2010 07:15 AM (FcR7P)
Chandler, AZ, United States (AHN) - Police are searching for three Hispanic men suspected of beheading a still unidentified Chandler man inside an apartment last week.
At least one of the suspects is an illegal.
http://tinyurl.com/29r25fd
Posted by: NunyaBizness at October 13, 2010 07:15 AM (t/bTi)
Nov. 2 would be a great time to everyone to come by, since the Mexicans will already be in the U.S. to vote.
Posted by: Prez'nit Barry at October 13, 2010 07:16 AM (PA722)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 13, 2010 07:16 AM (02uN6)
We told you she isn't one of us. Just mighta been that's all.
Posted by: OJ/Susan Smith/Liz Carroll/David Carroll et al at October 13, 2010 07:19 AM (nBE5A)
Posted by: Navycopjoe on his IPhone4 at October 13, 2010 07:20 AM (Bb1uF)
Posted by: Navycopjoe on his IPhone4 at October 13, 2010 11:20 AM (Bb1uF)
FIFY.
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2010 07:22 AM (pUfK9)
We'll take care of our own boarder security, only we won't just fence up the southern boarder. All you CA hippies- your passports are not valid here.
Posted by: Damiano at October 13, 2010 07:22 AM (PA722)
Since the Drug Cartels run Mexico, when will Da Zero ask them to address Congress, and file suit against the states of their choice?
Jesus, we have imbeciles running this fukkin' country.
Posted by: maddogg at October 13, 2010 11:03 AM (OlN4e)
Catherine Zeta-Jones and Barack Hussein Obama star in:
THE MASK OF ZERO
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at October 13, 2010 07:22 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: ktgreat at October 13, 2010 07:22 AM (+Gqtx)
The Mexican Neck-Chewing Finch is thought to be extinct, but maybe not.
Esta el Chupacabra! Aieeeeeee!
Posted by: Gail at October 13, 2010 07:25 AM (45FWT)
When will someone in DC admit that Mexico declared war years ago???
Posted by: phreshone at October 13, 2010 07:26 AM (1AnxB)
Posted by: Navycopjoe on his IPhone4 at October 13, 2010 07:27 AM (Bb1uF)
You're still missing the point. The murder occurred across the border. They could, quite literally, have shot him in the head 5 feet from Border Patrol or any other American LEO, and said "neener-neener-neener." We would have had no jurisdiction.
You're all acting as if I said: 1) Who Cares about the fence? and 2) They Deserved It!
I said neither of these things.
I said that this case cannot (without a great deal of shoehorning) really be used to talk about illegal immigration or border security- since the only violation of border security was that the tourists went into Mexico's territory. If some tourist had gone to, say, Iraq, got captured and killed by jihadis, would you be talking about increased border security?
This is not a reflection on our poor border security- we have plenty of those stories, we don't need to shoehorn this one. This is a reflection of the chaos that is inherent in any country where the Government is known to be weak and corrupt, and Mexico needs to do something about it.
Or do you really think that in any circumstances our troops (Border Patrol, National Guard, or anyone) would be given permission to fire on gang-bangers who were across the border, and not assaulting those troops or attempting to cross the border themselves?
We don't particularly want to violate Mexico's sovereignty. They're close enough to a failed State as it is; we don't really need to be pushing them over the edge by proving that they only "control" their side of the border because we let them. If you think border violence is bad now, think about how bad it would be if the Mexican Government weren't even trying to keep it contained.
Posted by: AllenG at October 13, 2010 07:27 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: theCork at October 13, 2010 11:04 AM (zL5Q1)
FIFY and I denounce myself.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at October 13, 2010 07:28 AM (YVZlY)
Gee, I wonder if that journolistic paragon of virtue and accuracy, Dana Milbank would like to possibly redact a few missives in his July 11th WaPo column where he denies Arizona's border violence and illegal immigration problems by assigning them to rightward fear mongering and xenophobia.
Anyone want to bet Milbank stays mum on the matter?
Posted by: journolist at October 13, 2010 07:29 AM (O/NP5)
Posted by: nickless at October 13, 2010 07:29 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Navycopjoe on his IPhone4 at October 13, 2010 07:30 AM (Bb1uF)
Posted by: JEM at October 13, 2010 07:32 AM (o+SC1)
No, I wasn't. I was pointing to that specific line, thus the reason I quoted it in my original comment. I did not comment on the rest of the story- and I still said I agreed with the sentiment, just that that particular comment had no bearing based on the facts of this particular case.
Not EVERYTHING that happens on the border will be cured by securing our side of the border. We need Mexico to step up their game, too.
In debate, we call it a 'non sequitor' The one has no direct bearing on the other. That makes neither invalid, it just means they don't actually go together.
I could take a story about, say, the Chilean Miners and talk about how safety standards in American coal mines aren't good enough- but they don't actually go together.
We complain when liberals do just this kind of thing, but then we do it, too.
One more time, for the record: this was horrible and I hope the monsters responsible are caught and put down like the rabid animals they are. Also, I agree that we need to truly secure the border, and do whatever it takes (within our sovereign authority) to do so.
Posted by: AllenG at October 13, 2010 07:34 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Barry Jugears O'Bumblefuck at October 13, 2010 07:35 AM (/lkKn)
Posted by: journolist at October 13, 2010 07:36 AM (O/NP5)
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 13, 2010 07:37 AM (R2fpr)
I'm pretty sure that the wife is innocent. Of course now that Mexico is run by street gangs, we will probably never know what happened.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at October 13, 2010 07:38 AM (e5+St)
Posted by: Navycopjoe on his IPhone4 at October 13, 2010 07:39 AM (Bb1uF)
¿Plata O Plomo? Coming to a town near you. Why not legalize almost every street drug out there. It is worth a shot. This war on drugs nonsense doesn't seem to be working so well. Perhaps that will put an end to this First Ladies' causes crap, too. Albeit, Nancy's "Just Say No" to drugs thing had more potential for helping kids achieve their potential than Michelle's "Just Say No" to cheeseburgers and fries thing does. Or is Michelle really laying the ground work for the creation of the FFP - Federal Food Police? No one elected them (First Ladies, especially Michelle and Hillary -Democrat First Ladies) but they seem to think America gives a fuck what they think. If my wife were to be elected President, I'd chase most reporters off the lawn on a kick ass Toro lawnmower while chugging pounding a beer. To hell with all the modern traditions of having a fucking cause and shit... unless the cause were to get drugs legalized. Come to think of it, I believe I would make one hell of a First Gentleman.
Posted by: Zetas at October 13, 2010 07:39 AM (nBE5A)
Posted by: AllenG at October 13, 2010 11:34 AM (8y9MW)
"non sequitur", from your knee-jerk pal. Sitting here jerking away.Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 13, 2010 07:41 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: MikeO at October 13, 2010 07:41 AM (xJVlJ)
BTW, who broke the blog? (At least in Firefox.)
Posted by: andycanuck at October 13, 2010 07:41 AM (oLT/p)
and I fart in your general direction.
Posted by: RedneknSC at October 13, 2010 07:42 AM (MbMSS)
Posted by: TheoRoosevelt at October 13, 2010 07:43 AM (v20Vn)
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 13, 2010 11:37 AM (R2fpr)
Yes, but we have had some push back from the Mexican Consulate over the word Pharmacist as it sounds like farm'a which in turn suggests the subject individuals are agrarian in nature and this promotes and does not dispell the Mexican farmer stereotype.
The Mexican Consulate suggests this for now: European North Hemispheric Americans.
Posted by: journolist at October 13, 2010 07:44 AM (O/NP5)
and I fart in your general direction.
Posted by: RedneknSC at October 13, 2010 11:42 AM (MbMSS)
Get thee to a nunnery: why wouldst thou be a breeder of sinners?
Posted by: Sock From Hell at October 13, 2010 07:47 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: TIME at October 13, 2010 07:48 AM (oLT/p)
Posted by: dananjcon at October 13, 2010 07:49 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Have Blue at October 13, 2010 07:51 AM (mV+es)
Posted by: dananjcon at October 13, 2010 11:49 AM (pr+up)
I hear Oliver Stone has a draft script and is in pre-production for a movie showing how the oppressive Americanos are suppressing our enterprising brothers to the South
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 13, 2010 07:52 AM (LdYLm)
My idea of a secure border is 300 yard wide buffer with an equally spaced run of 3 12 foot concertina fences.
In between the fences we have a mix of high and low density AP minefields.
Anyone who gets across can stay.
We'll see if luck is genetic.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at October 13, 2010 07:53 AM (e5+St)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 13, 2010 07:54 AM (1X1C0)
I hear Oliver Stone has a draft script and is in pre-production for a movie showing how the oppressive Americanos are suppressing our enterprising brothers to the South
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 13, 2010 11:52 AM (LdYLm)
Its like I tell my wife...if the sandwich shop down the street didn't make such good cheese steak sammiches, I wouldn't be 40lbs over weight.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 13, 2010 07:57 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at October 13, 2010 07:58 AM (e5+St)
Posted by: kansas at October 13, 2010 07:59 AM (mka2b)
It amazes me that we have Troops defending the border of South Korea, Japan, Germany, Hawaii... and yet we won't defend our OWN borders...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 13, 2010 07:59 AM (AdK6a)
Posted by: Compassionless Republican at October 13, 2010 07:59 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: cali grump at October 13, 2010 07:59 AM (hL0k8)
Then, when sent back to Mexico, being a criminal is the only way they can survive. Lashing out at American tourists is completely understandable! I'd like to cut the heads off some Americans' too! I bet the jet skiers were filthy tea-baggers, too!
Posted by:
We're going to have a gigantic drug-trafficking problem, and Mexico is going to be a terrorist training and jump off point (more than it is now). Not to mention the cartels will begin engaging in terrorism against our populace for their own reasons.
As a last-ditch effort to direct the anger someonwhere else, the Mexican government will direct anger to us, claiming we have stolen their land from them and their current predicament is a result of various conflicts we fought in the 1800s and early 1900s.
My prediction: In less than 10 years, Mexico is going to move troops across our southern border to try to permanently occupy that land, and we're going to be forced to invade.
This is going to be a big problem given the number of Mexican citizens already here illegally. Essentially they already have a 5th column in the country, one that is going to continue to grow.
We had better be prepared to do what is necessary internally and then clean that shithole out.
Posted by: blindside at October 13, 2010 08:00 AM (x7g7t)
Don't want drug smuggling? Get rid of prohibition. Don't want illegal aliens working on farms and lawns? Get rid of the minimum wage (which would also bring back quite a few jobs from China).
The irony is that both prohibition and wage controls are progressive ideas - it's funny as hell to see a bunch of "conservatives" and "Republicans" supporting them. Might as well bow down to a statue of FDR while you're at it.
Posted by: Evil Red Scandi at October 13, 2010 08:04 AM (khet/)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 13, 2010 08:04 AM (1X1C0)
Don't want drug smuggling? Get rid of prohibition
How about child smuggling?
How about smuggling exotic pets (or parts of animals)?
The answer to these problems is that simple? Then please explain why the Dutch are going the opposite direction.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 13, 2010 08:08 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Big Sis Neo at October 13, 2010 08:16 AM (GwPRU)
I thought the NYT's circulation was falling not growing?
Posted by: andycanuck at October 13, 2010 08:19 AM (oLT/p)
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at October 13, 2010 08:22 AM (e5+St)
Posted by: Jean at October 13, 2010 08:28 AM (L2+HZ)
Problem solved. Your welcome.
Posted by: huh at October 13, 2010 08:32 AM (QcFbt)
If nothing else, we should have taken Baja California. Even the name makes it clear that it is rightfully ours. If we owned Baja California it would be a freaking Riveria.
People love coastlines, but we are running out. All that we have left undeveloped are the swampy coasts along Georgia and North Carolina.
Taking Baja solves all that.
Posted by: huh at October 13, 2010 08:35 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Jayne Cobb at October 13, 2010 08:35 AM (AVbdY)
Posted by: AllenG at October 13, 2010 10:54 AM (8y9MW)
Others have probably already addressed this, but I'm going to just toss in my two cents.
I believe DrewM's point wasn't that a fence would have prevented this incident with the jet skier from occuring. Rather, Drew is advocating the building of a border fence/wall to prevent or obstruct the spread of this kind of brutal cartel violence into the United States. Otherwise what's to keep the cartels from sending their thugs across the border to start beheading American law enforcement officers, or terrorizing American citizens the way they already terrorize Mexicans? What's to stop them from zooming across the water on their own jet skis to shakedown American citizens and visitors on the American side of the border?
Recent administrations have proven that they're laxadaisical at best about enforcing our immigration laws and protecting our borders. If we're not going to present a strong legal barrier against criminal encroachment from south of the border, then it's about time we put a big, solid, PHYSICAL barrier there instead.
a border fence and higher border security wouldn't have done anything, since it is incredibly difficult to enforce a border on a lake.
Very true. But it would be a heck of a lot easier if some of the enforcement along the land-based border could be relocated to fluid borders like those that cross bodies of water. One way to allow for that reallocation of enforcement resources would be to take on some of their burden by building a wall.
Posted by: MWR at October 13, 2010 09:04 AM (4df7R)
Oh wait, look who's president. Never mind.
Posted by: scooter at October 13, 2010 09:04 AM (aamim)
Posted by: Paladin at October 13, 2010 09:11 AM (+Wvn3)
My idea of a secure border is 300 yard wide buffer with an equally spaced run of 3 12 foot concertina fences.
In between the fences we have a mix of high and low density AP minefields.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at October 13, 2010 11:53 AM (e5+St)
You forgot the bleachers on our side of the border. Imagine the scalping for those seats!
Posted by: RickZ at October 13, 2010 09:29 AM (vGy3W)
Posted by: Typically Simplistic Liberal/Libertarian Dipshit at October 13, 2010 09:51 AM (BP6Z1)
Or is this OK because they're only beheading Mexicans, not real people, and she's still discredited?
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at October 13, 2010 10:02 AM (xqhoO)
Posted by: PJ at October 13, 2010 10:28 AM (GK2JE)
a was hardly a no-man's land either. Fishing tourneys and the like were held there... until they all got cancelled this year.
And very few of us here in south TX believed anything but the window's story. The Zetas have robbed boaters on the Mexican side before. In fact, there was a story about them attempting to EXPOLDERIZE Falcon Dam for one reason or another. Um, yeah.
Posted by: perfectommy at October 13, 2010 11:17 AM (8fGzq)
Posted by: Delicately Sensitive Liberal at October 13, 2010 11:19 AM (G60Nl)
whoops, anyway
falcon lake is actually a reservoir build back the 50's to ease flooding in Zapata county. It's jointly managed between the US and Mexico, and always has been. The area was hardly a no-man's land either. Fishing tourneys and the like were held there... until they all got cancelled this year.
And very few of us here in south TX believed anything but the window's story. The Zetas have robbed boaters on the Mexican side before. In fact, there was a story about them attempting to EXPOLDERIZE Falcon Dam for one reason or another. Um, yeah.
Posted by: perfectommy at October 13, 2010 11:19 AM (8fGzq)
"Stay out of our territory? Yeah, fuck that."
I'm just so sick of these asshole cartels acting like they're hot shit when all they've had to contend with is the Mexican police.
Posted by: Grayson at October 13, 2010 12:21 PM (LGTQ4)
Posted by: stace at October 13, 2010 12:51 PM (LYakY)
Posted by: seguin at October 13, 2010 03:45 PM (y0Y96)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3304 seconds, 259 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: eman at October 13, 2010 06:48 AM (HsmDv)