September 13, 2010
— Ace Roubini -- "Doctor Doom," because of his frequent (but frequently accurate) predictions of economic disaster -- thinks we're in trouble.
Economists peddling dire warnings that the world's number one economy is on the brink of collapse, amid high rates of unemployment and a spiraling public deficit, are flourishing here.The guru of this doomsday line of thinking may be economist Nouriel Roubini, thrust into the forefront after predicting the chaos wrought by the subprime mortgage crisis and the collapse of the housing bubble.
"The US has run out of bullets," Roubini told an economic forum in Italy earlier this month. "Any shock at this point can tip you back into recession."
But other economists, who have so far stayed out of the media limelight, are also proselytizing nightmarish visions of the future.
One scenario is simply the US and China getting into a beef, and China calling in debt, and the US printing money (the only way to satisfy that debt), and then high inflation or even hyperinflation.
Not mentioned: What happens if/when oil spikes again?
Leading Economic Indicator? Obama merchandise sales are now in the crapper.
Goolsbee: High Unemployment Is The New Normal. At Hot Air, no light at the end of the Obama tunnel.
GOOLSBEE: But I don’t think the unemployment rate will be coming down significantly anytime in the near future.WALLACE: Do you think it will — you’ll be — it’s now 9.6 percent. End of this year?
GOOLSBEE: I don’t — look, I try to stay out of the specific forecasting games other than our official forecast. I think it’s clear that the labor market is significantly weakened, has been for some time. We have to do everything we can to try to create jobs and get people back to work.
WALLACE: Could it be 10 percent by the end of the year?
GOOLSBEE: Look, as I say, IÂ’m not going to speculate. We have official forecasts and weÂ’ll release them when they come out.
WALLACE: But you donÂ’t expectÂ…
GOOLSBEE: We need to do everythingÂ…
WALLACE: Â… it to go down appreciably fromÂ…
GOOLSBEE: I don’t expect it to go down appreciably. That’s what — our forecast, and most of the private forecasts say the same thing.
This is crass, but if there isn't a strong recovery already blooming by May 2012, he can't win. Even if it comes after that, he can't win, in all likelihood.
And it's going to be close, isn't it? 2011 is now all but written off. Only -- this is weird -- the Republican Congress can now save Obama, by letting business know that Hope and Change is dead and it's safe to begin hiring and investing again.
Posted by: Ace at
11:37 AM
| Comments (331)
Post contains 470 words, total size 3 kb.
Yea,
bur Warren Buffet says ever thing is coca -cola and there will be no double dip. He may be right since to have a double dip you would have to have stopped dipping.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at September 13, 2010 11:40 AM (jrtMR)
Posted by: shibumi at September 13, 2010 11:41 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Kevin in ABQ at September 13, 2010 11:41 AM (jCKHk)
Posted by: Bill Bob Jim at September 13, 2010 11:42 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: G. Gordon Liddy at September 13, 2010 11:42 AM (5EqEM)
Thank Gaia things are so much better than when Adolf Bush was President.
Posted by: libs everywhere at September 13, 2010 11:42 AM (aOKEC)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 11:42 AM (QxSug)
Soon, they run out of "other people's back yards to screw up".
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 11:42 AM (/jbAw)
Before or after the inevitable war which would ensue?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 13, 2010 11:42 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at September 13, 2010 11:43 AM (Y81Xa)
Posted by: Vashta.Nerada at September 13, 2010 11:43 AM (yIZJ3)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 11:43 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 11:44 AM (/jbAw)
Obama just didn't have enough power to change the Bush/Cheney disaster in two short years. We should make him Dicktator so this most intelligent and reasonable man can return us to the glory days of America, which was never.
Posted by: libs everywhere at September 13, 2010 11:45 AM (aOKEC)
O/T
Obama Administration spent $800,000 on program to teach African's how to wash their genitals.
What the hell? Barney and his friends would have cock washed for nothing.
Posted by: Fish at September 13, 2010 11:45 AM (v1gw3)
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 13, 2010 11:45 AM (bN5ZU)
More like "when", given the intentions of the Islamic Axis (Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Turkey).
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 13, 2010 11:45 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: billygoat at September 13, 2010 11:45 AM (5qJM5)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 11:47 AM (QxSug)
One scenario is simply the US and China getting into a beef, and China calling in debt, and the US printing money (the only way to satisfy that debt), and then high inflation or even hyperinflation.
China can't call in it's debt. They bought bonds and they are theirs until they come due or they sell them. If they decided to sell them they would lose as bond prices would tank. They can afford this though and if bond prices tanked and China no longer bought bonds interest would skyrocket.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 11:47 AM (fwSHf)
County Sues Farmer, Cites Too Many Crops
DEKALB COUNTY, Ga. -- DeKalb County is suing a local farmer for growing too many vegetables, but he said he will fight the charges in the ongoing battle neighbors call “Cabbagegate.”Fig trees, broccoli and cabbages are among the many greens that line the soil on Steve Miller’s more than two acres in Clarkston, who said he has spent fifteen years growing crops to give away and sell at local farmers markets.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 13, 2010 11:48 AM (9hSKh)
Mark Faber
Mish Shedlock
Gerald Celente
Chris Martenson
Karl Denninger
and, of course, the doomers over at Zero Hedge.
Posted by: shibumi at September 13, 2010 11:49 AM (OKZrE)
C'mon, think about it.
China and whose army?
If you owe the bank $100K, the bank owns you.
If you owe the bank $100 trillion, you own every bank in the world.
Posted by: Pastorius at September 13, 2010 11:49 AM (B7BtC)
Hell Castro is laying off 500,000 government employees in a country smaller than some of our States.
Why can't we? Here that 2011 Republican House???
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 11:49 AM (/jbAw)
Oh, yes. Now recall the new ObamaCare 1099 requirement for reporting goods and service above $600. If inflation roars out of control, everyone will have to push two wheelbarrows - one for the cash, and the other for the 1099 forms..
Someone else can handle the Obam WH position on punishing taxes for those two-payer families with a combined income over $250,000. Now you know why socialists hate the idea of indexing income tax schedules to the COL.
Posted by: mrp at September 13, 2010 11:49 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Chicken Little at September 13, 2010 03:46 PM (wuv1c)
Then I would, uh, stock up on KY, if I were you.
Posted by: Editor at September 13, 2010 11:50 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: Waterhouse at September 13, 2010 11:50 AM (z+/2Q)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 11:50 AM (QxSug)
That was the post I did this morning that got us talking about the liberals moving South and screwing it up for everyone.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 11:52 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: libs everywhere at September 13, 2010 11:52 AM (aOKEC)
He will get re-elected for the same reason Clinton did, the republican congress.
the only way he can f*ck this up is if he becomes obstructionist and vetos everything they pass.
that and external events beyond our control, such as a nuke going off in the middle east.
Posted by: Ben at September 13, 2010 11:52 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: moviegique at September 13, 2010 11:52 AM (ey5wt)
Posted by: Barky floors it as he nears the cliff edge at September 13, 2010 11:52 AM (z+/2Q)
Economic doomsday? How can that be with the success of Recovery Summer
WASHINGTON – The number of people in the U.S. who are in poverty is on track for a record increase on President Barack Obama's watch, with the ranks of working-age poor approaching 1960s levels that led to the national war on poverty.
Census figures for 2009 — the recession-ravaged first year of the Democrat's presidency — are to be released in the coming week, and demographers expect grim findings.
It's unfortunate timing for Obama and his party just seven weeks before important elections when control of Congress is at stake.
Fuck the poor people says AP this is going to really hurt Barry and the Dims
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 13, 2010 11:53 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 13, 2010 03:45 PM (bN5ZU)
Tempting, though, ain't it?
Posted by: Randy at September 13, 2010 11:53 AM (zQKSr)
Take a good look, America. This is what a man looks like who embraces his destiny.
Posted by: Victor Von Doom at September 13, 2010 11:53 AM (LdYLm)
I disagree RINO*. There will still be a lot of uncertainty going forward and the numbers aren't there to undo the damage of Obamacare. Plus, we can't unpass the "stimulus" or repeal the excessive amount of regulation being dictated to us on a daily basis.
*That was a joke by the way.
Posted by: Dr. Spank at September 13, 2010 11:54 AM (Y81Xa)
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 11:54 AM (p302b)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 11:54 AM (QxSug)
You also have Iran. WTF is going to happen there? Any action is going to really fuck up a recovery, which is why The One is voting "present".
Israel does not have that option, they will have to act, and when they do expect oil to go through the fucking roof.
I am not so worried about China, they have their own problems. But, long run, 5-10 years, they will be THE PROBLEM. We're disarming and they are arming to the teeth.
Gee, wonder why?
Posted by: Kemp at September 13, 2010 11:54 AM (AQxTm)
Posted by: ace at September 13, 2010 11:54 AM (KUUXH)
How about the action figures? Sheewwwwttt...
There's always the Alvin Greene stuff, though.
Posted by: SlaveDog at September 13, 2010 11:55 AM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: Chicken Little at September 13, 2010 03:46 PM (wuv1c)
Then I would, uh, stock up on KY, if I were you.
Posted by: Editor at September 13, 2010 03:50 PM (pUfK9)
And artificial anuses, you are gonna need them....
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at September 13, 2010 11:55 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at September 13, 2010 11:55 AM (XDeui)
Posted by: Palin Steele at September 13, 2010 11:55 AM (5qJM5)
my lib/dem friend explained to me that this won't hurt because "if they are out of their houses they don't have a permanent residence so they can't vote and screw everything up".....
Can that possibly be true?
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 11:56 AM (p302b)
Been to Raleigh-Durham lately?
Posted by: Kemp at September 13, 2010 11:56 AM (AQxTm)
Have you been to a WalMart lately? The DMV? Any sporting event in Pennsylvania? We're there.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 13, 2010 11:56 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: SteveN at September 13, 2010 11:57 AM (7EV/g)
I was going to write a long post about this a while back, but I got busy with other stuff. Briefly, there are two views of the world among economists (broadly): 1) we're boned; and 2) we're boned, but only for a while. Economists like The Krugman think that America is intrinsically incapable of actually going broke -- mainly because we own the world's reserve currency, and we have the power to print more of that currency whenever we want.
It's not as simple as Keynesianism vs the Austrian School. It's a far more basic question of whether debt *matters* at the national level. Most Democrats seem to think that debt really doesn't matter -- that we can essentially borrow forever with no real reckoning. It boils down, really, to a question of *trust*. We can sell our bonds to foreigners at a negligible interest rate because we're viewed as a very safe risk. However, that view is beginning to crumble -- our ability to borrow money cheaply is becoming more and more perilous.
A difference of as little as a single percentage point in the interest we pay on our debt translates to tens of billions of dollars, remember. And as Greece found it, the transition between "credit-worthy" and "deadbeat" can happen with terrifying speed. We owe more money right now, frankly, than we can ever hope to repay given the slowing economy and the structural changes in our economy and demographic profile. Our lenders -- mainly foreigners -- are beginning to notice.
Posted by: Monty at September 13, 2010 11:58 AM (/0a60)
I think business knows, nothing is safe while he sits in the oval office. All Republicans are likely to be able to do is put out the fires. A sinking ship is still unsafe, even if you put out all of the fires.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 13, 2010 11:58 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: A.G. at September 13, 2010 11:58 AM (oAVyq)
Posted by: Kemp at September 13, 2010 03:56 PM (AQxTm)
We were talking about Atlanta (Dekalb County) but that area it applies just as well.
And yes, I have been to that area not too long ago.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 11:58 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: ace at September 13, 2010 11:58 AM (KUUXH)
Obama is the blood in your stool, symbolic of much bigger problems within.
Posted by: gator at September 13, 2010 11:58 AM (aOKEC)
They will have to invent one first.
Posted by: toby928 at September 13, 2010 03:55 PM (S5YRY)
fiat or non-fiat?
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at September 13, 2010 11:58 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 03:56 PM (p302b)
Sure, if Americans both don't care about their friends/families, and blithly discount the possibility of it happening to them.
Posted by: Randy at September 13, 2010 11:59 AM (zQKSr)
Can that possibly be true?
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 03:56 PM (p302b)
I'm surprized that they just don't say that it's all George Bush's fault and that Barry inherited the poverty. I'm sure that will be Barry's take on it
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 13, 2010 11:59 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: jjshaka at September 13, 2010 12:00 PM (tp9uK)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 12:00 PM (QxSug)
bur Warren Buffet says ever thing is coca -cola and there will be no double dip. He may be right since to have a double dip you would have to have stopped dipping.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at September 13, 2010 03:40 PM (jrtMR)
If you dip one ball and then the other, is that considered double-dipping, or just one dip?
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:01 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: WWII at September 13, 2010 03:58 PM (S5YRY)
Provided you use those to level all competitors, of course.
Posted by: Randy at September 13, 2010 12:01 PM (zQKSr)
That was the post I did this morning that got us talking about the liberals moving South and screwing it up for everyone.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 03:52 PM (/jbAw) .
........
you are right. Clarkston is a small town a few miles northeast of Atlanta. I live about 30 miles from there......... it used tobe a nice little town when i would go there from time to time.
Posted by: Racefan at September 13, 2010 12:02 PM (Ke061)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 12:03 PM (QxSug)
bur Warren Buffet says ever thing is coca -cola and there will be no double dip. He may be right since to have a double dip you would have to have stopped dipping.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at September 13, 2010 03:40 PM (jrtMR)
If you dip one ball and then the other, is that considered double-dipping, or just one dip?
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 04:01 PM (7AOgy)
Asked my magic eight-ball, if we will have a double-dip recession - it said "Yes", so I'm going with that.
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at September 13, 2010 12:03 PM (LdYLm)
As I've said ad infinitum,
In the end, there will be only chaos.
Heh, O/T, when I was a kid, I used to see "CHAOS" in graffiti under overpasses a lot and on an occasional wall. But it was always on bridge abutments and the walls of overpasses. I thought it was someone's name. I kept wondering who this Mexican dude named "Chaos" was and how he traveled so extensively. This went on for a couple of years until I asked my parents, "Who is this 'Chaos'?"
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 13, 2010 12:03 PM (+wdm+)
the structural changes in our economy and demographic profile
I failed to mention that. The population aging is going to really fuck up a lot of things. You all are going to miss that tax revenue we baby boomers have been paying for 40 years.
We're going on the tit, and it's not going to be pretty.
Got my first SS check last month, second one comes Thursday, if I live to be 100, I'll still never see what I put into it.
Posted by: Kemp at September 13, 2010 12:04 PM (AQxTm)
When all the schools have to hire teachers to teach English to the new citizens, we are already too far fucked to turn the tide. Before long, amnesty brings us millions of new citizens, almost every one of them from a socialist country. When the felons gain their right to vote again, they'll just be icing on the cake.
I'm usually not doomsday, but I can see what's going on. Have you been to Los Angeles lately????
Posted by: gator at September 13, 2010 12:04 PM (aOKEC)
It's not as simple as Keynesianism vs the Austrian School.
Posted by: Monty at September 13, 2010 03:58 PM (/0a60)
Barry: I uhhhhh...don't know what the term in Austrian is...
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 13, 2010 12:04 PM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Racefan at September 13, 2010 04:02 PM (Ke061)
I grew up in GA myself. The point was that 50 years ago the idea that a county would put in zoning restrictions that would outlaw growing vegetables on a 2 acre plot would have been considered ludicrous.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 12:05 PM (/jbAw)
Does the guy do anything other than predict economic doomsdays like maybe come up with a plan to avoid it.
Anyone can fan a fire to make it bigger. It takes the brave to help put it out.
Posted by: polynikes at September 13, 2010 04:04 PM (m2CN7)
It's like a hurricane, it's coming ashore and there is no way to avoid it. Just prepare for the storm and ride it out. There ain't no magic left, batten the hatches and get ready for the blow to land.
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at September 13, 2010 12:06 PM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Trimegistus at September 13, 2010 12:06 PM (Xd1FX)
If they want good press, we're screwed to a fare-thee-well.
If they turn out to have principles, then things can turn around.
Posted by: K~Bob at September 13, 2010 12:06 PM (9b6FB)
Obama is the blood in your stool, symbolic of much bigger problems within.
Posted by: gator at September 13, 2010 03:58 PM (aOKEC)
Excellent.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 13, 2010 12:07 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: yournamehere at September 13, 2010 12:07 PM (H3X4e)
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:07 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: Kemp at September 13, 2010 04:04 PM (AQxTm)
I don't get my first one for 5 more years, if I ever get one which I am beginning to doubt. And no, even if I lived to be a 100 I would never get it all back.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 12:07 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 13, 2010 12:07 PM (0q2P7)
I grew up in GA myself. The point was that 50 years ago the idea that a county would put in zoning restrictions that would outlaw growing vegetables on a 2 acre plot would have been considered ludicrous.
Vic, I grew up with vegetables growing in my front yard outside of Warner Robins, GA. Country boy can survive, but the government hates that shit.
Posted by: gator at September 13, 2010 12:08 PM (aOKEC)
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 13, 2010 12:08 PM (+wdm+)
But the tide is turning against the Democrats. We need a Reagan in 2016. It's gonna hurt in the meantime, a lot, but this is America; we'll make it.
Posted by: sandy burger at September 13, 2010 12:08 PM (Pson9)
Posted by: Meggy Mac at September 13, 2010 12:08 PM (sCyeq)
Still lucky where we're at. I talked to the county last week about a permit to build a pole barn.
"Bring 50 bucks and a promise to put your footers at 48 inches."
When I asked about inspection he said, "Use a tape measure". Guy was funny as hell.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 13, 2010 12:08 PM (5aa4z)
Obama is the blood in your stool, symbolic of much bigger problems within.
Sorta like the crabs living in Paris Hilton's bush?
Posted by: AoS Pirate...now with extra-absorbent wings at September 13, 2010 12:09 PM (uFokq)
They are blaming Republicans for the current collapse when the Dems own it ALL, lock stock and barrel.
And the MFM is pushing that meme for all its worth.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 12:09 PM (/jbAw)
Not mentioned: What happens if/when oil spikes again?
I start riding my bike to work
This morning the WSJ reported that house prices are due for another spike down, due to banks releasing more of their foreclosures to the market. I've seen so many bank-owned houses in my area, and I live in middle class suburbia. These houses are listed by REO brokers, the lawn signs are not the usual realty agencies we all know and love. And they are not selling.
I'm on a house hunt, I don't even see the sense in submitting offers anywhere near what the seller wants, since most of them are still hoping for 2007 prices. There is a real estate bloodbath in the making.
Posted by: kallisto at September 13, 2010 12:10 PM (+FkcS)
That's why I took it early, I think they are going to fuck you, but they will have a hard time fucking those of us already on the tit.
Posted by: Kemp at September 13, 2010 12:10 PM (AQxTm)
"And it's going to be close, isn't it? 2011 is now all but written off. Only -- this is weird -- the Republican Congress can now save Obama, by letting business know that Hope and Change is dead and it's safe to begin hiring and investing again."
This is why it's imperative to challenge the Democrats on the idea that the economic collapse was an artifact of the Bush Administration and to make it clear to the American electorate that the collapse was a direct result of the Pelosi-Reid takeover of Congress in 2006. They need to understand that whatever recovery may happen in the wake of a Republican resurgence in November 2010 will be the work of the Congressional Republicans and will be in spite of Obama, not because of him.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:10 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: Kemp at September 13, 2010 04:04 PM (AQxTm)
I'm 40 and at present retirement wages would get my first in 2037. The year that the Obama Administration says it will go tits up.
Why the fuck am I paying this much money, again? This shit has to stop. Now.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 13, 2010 12:11 PM (5aa4z)
LOL, most of my family worked at that base for their entire lives.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 12:11 PM (/jbAw)
Can we designate a bar in NYC, both for moron meetups, and for conservative-in-NYC commiseration? There needs to be a refuge in this large, depressing zone of economic and moral stupidity. The FNC Bar? Any bar? Hello????
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 13, 2010 12:11 PM (bN5ZU)
We need a Reagan in 2016.
Way to plan ahead, sandy.
The best part? That 2016 Reagan can be a 29 year old, right now, who was born in 1981...
the year Reagan was inaugerated.
Posted by: AoS Pirate...now with extra-absorbent wings at September 13, 2010 12:11 PM (uFokq)
a GOP Congress can't save Obama either because Obama will veto anything the throw at him. There will be no rapid recovery and no matter how much better things are at the start of 2012 there will have been 3 years of pain that Obama gets full credit for and the GOP can run on "take the Veto pen away" ...
Posted by: Jeff at September 13, 2010 12:11 PM (A3tpD)
Posted by: ace at September 13, 2010 03:54 PM (KUUXH)
Yeah, that's what I think will happen unless we cut the government and get our deficit under control. Like I said though, China can afford to sell it's bonds and watch the price tank if they want to fuck with us.
They have the money and can afford it and it would be cheaper than the cost of a war.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 12:12 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 13, 2010 04:08 PM (5aa4z)
Damn and you're in OH. I couldn't do that here in the County. I would have to have a "code inspection" with the accompanying tax fee.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 12:13 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Megan McCain's Cleavage at September 13, 2010 12:13 PM (cxGtL)
Breaking News:
Sarah Palin just tweeted she has belatedly endorsed Ronald Reagan for the 1976 Republican nomination!
Posted by: AoS Pirate...now with extra-absorbent wings at September 13, 2010 12:14 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: kallisto at September 13, 2010 04:10 PM (+FkcS)
I have friends in the Clearwater area and they tell me that $170,000 condos are selling for $40,000 and dropping.
I don't really have any desire to move to Florida but at those prices, why the hell not?
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2010 12:14 PM (5Hi4I)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 12:14 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 04:05 PM (/jbAw)
i know man. i live in a city a hell of alot smaller than Clarkston. we dont even have One Fucking Red Light. we do have a caution light in front of the firehouse. but its really getting bad here with the crazy rules.
Posted by: Racefan at September 13, 2010 12:14 PM (Ke061)
Posted by: yournamehere at September 13, 2010 04:07 PM (H3X4e)
MFM: It's always the Republicans' fault no matter what is really happening or who is in charge.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 13, 2010 12:14 PM (1Jaio)
Posted by: beelzebub's burp at September 13, 2010 12:14 PM (I+7Zv)
Posted by: Megan McCain's Cleavage sock-puppet at September 13, 2010 12:15 PM (cxGtL)
Wasn't Warren Beatty in that?
Posted by: Dr. Spank at September 13, 2010 04:07 PM (Y81Xa)
Isn't the Abilene Paradox a lot like the Emperor's New Clothes Syndrome?
Or the Igor-Frankenstein Dialogue?
Frankenstein: Werewolf?
Igor: There... wolf. There... castle.
Frankenstein: Why are you talking that way?
Igor: I thought you wanted to!
Frankenstein: No, I don't want to.
Igor: Suit yourself. I'm easy.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:15 PM (7AOgy)
I'll email me son, he use to room with the head of IT at National Review and there are some bars near there office that has a crew. Will post if I get an answer, or you just might call over to the Review and ask them were they drink, it's a pretty young crowd.
Posted by: Kemp at September 13, 2010 12:15 PM (AQxTm)
And then there is Kagan, and her law review paper "Presidential Administration" Odd title, but you can probably easily figure out what it;s all about.
We are under attack ...
Posted by: tarpon at September 13, 2010 12:16 PM (g0QB8)
I know people hate the Elliot Wave on this blog, but this is what Bob Prechter wrote before the 2008 election. I think Obama will leave office as the most despised POTUS of the modern era. He golfed while the country's economy burned.
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at September 13, 2010 12:16 PM (LdYLm)
Actually there would have to be an inspection of the electrical service. Guy said it takes 5 minutes and costs $25.00. Just to make sure you use the proper wiring (underground) and shit won't burn down.
Posted by: Buffalo Bill at September 13, 2010 12:16 PM (5aa4z)
What a lovely man.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 13, 2010 12:17 PM (FkKjr)
Sometimes I think there really are two Americas, in spite of what John 'the stud' Edwards used to say.
There's the America where most people live, where everything is fine, maybe the road right now is a little bumpy but things will even out soon enough, look at those green shoots along the side of the road, oh maybe we'll hit a double set of potholes and have a double dip but really everythings fine go on back and discuss the pros and cons of the latest celebrity gossip.
Then there's the other America. The one Dr. Doom and company can see, and when I look up I can see it too. I thought things would get bad fairly quickly after the 2008 election, but I guess Winston Churchill was right. There really is a lot of ruin in a country. The clowns in DC are burning through it but it's taking longer than I thought.
Posted by: Boots at September 13, 2010 12:17 PM (06JTY)
Posted by: beelzebub's burp at September 13, 2010 12:17 PM (I+7Zv)
It's not as simple as Keynesianism vs the Austrian School. It's a far more basic question of whether debt *matters* at the national level. Most Democrats seem to think that debt really doesn't matter -- that we can essentially borrow forever with no real reckoning. It boils down, really, to a question of *trust*. We can sell our bonds to foreigners at a negligible interest rate because we're viewed as a very safe risk. However, that view is beginning to crumble -- our ability to borrow money cheaply is becoming more and more perilous.
And the reason for that is the real amount of debt, that is, debt as a % of economy. Uncle Ron and the Reaganauts had record debts in nominal terms, but in real terms, as a % of GNP, they were actually better than the Jimmuh Carturds. Remember when the Dow was below 1000?
What the Obamunists have done is push both nominal *and* real debt into record levels.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:17 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 13, 2010 12:18 PM (5aa4z)
Posted by: beelzebub's burp at September 13, 2010 04:14 PM (I+7Zv)
You're wrong about that. Economic problems actually started when the Democrats took over congress in 2007. When the democrats took over our unemployment rate was at 4.6% and the deficit was $169 Billion. In 4 years of Democrat control they have increased unemployment to 9.6% and the deficit to $1.6 Trillion. As a pot sweetener Democrats also increased the number of Americans in poverty from 13.6% to 15%.
You should give credit where credit is due. Of course Obama was part of the Democrat led congress.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 12:18 PM (fwSHf)
Every single line in Young Frankenstein, like The Godfather and Caddyshack, is quotable, important, entertaining, and interesting.
Posted by: AoS Pirate...now with extra-absorbent wings at September 13, 2010 12:18 PM (uFokq)
Your Dreamboat Messiah was also part of the Dem-controlled Congress for two years prior to his Miraculous Ascension, you dolt. Guess when everything started to go tits-up?
Posted by: Waterhouse at September 13, 2010 12:19 PM (z+/2Q)
the year Reagan was inaugerated.
Posted by: AoS Pirate...now with extra-absorbent wings at September 13, 2010 04:11 PM (uFokq)
One of the things that made Reagan Reagan was a lifetime of experience. I've not been impressed with the recent sub-50 Presidents (Clinton and Obama).
Maybe the next Reagan should be someone who cast his or her first vote for President for Reagan.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:19 PM (7AOgy)
I'm sickened by the liberals that know better. They realize things are headed in a poor direction for America, and they are happy about it. These people want America to fail, for to them this is a bad place.
They want the rich, evil Republicans to suffer, regardless if it hurts them or not. Talk about voting against your own economic interest, not to mention trafficking in stereotypes.
Posted by: gator at September 13, 2010 12:20 PM (aOKEC)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at September 13, 2010 12:20 PM (WZFkG)
Posted by: beelzebub's burp at September 13, 2010 04:17 PM (I+7Zv)
Maybe in the alternative world you seem to live in. In the real world Democrats have been the MAJORITY party since January of 2007.
Is being that as stupid as you are painful? It must be.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 12:20 PM (fwSHf)
Your Dreamboat Messiah was also part of the Dem-controlled Congress for two years prior to his Miraculous Ascension, you dolt. Guess when everything started to go tits-up?
Posted by: Waterhouse at September 13, 2010 04:19 PM (z+/2Q)
Also, the little work he did as a Senator for Illinois, he voted for all this spending to keep "companies to big to fail" from failing.
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at September 13, 2010 12:21 PM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Bill Carson at September 13, 2010 12:21 PM (2R2cV)
of course we had no problems economically before Obama came on board 19 months ago everybody with any sense knows that.
Because making them many times worse is so much better.
and Roubini was saying we had SERIOUS problems back in September of 2008 but i am sure that even though the Dems were the minority party that it must have all been their fault
2006 Congress elections. Do try to keep up.
Even our trolls have gotten soft.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:21 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 13, 2010 12:21 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 12:22 PM (QxSug)
and Kennedy was a lousy young president, too.
43? No wonder he was shitting his pants during the missile crisis.
But JFK's 43 was twenty years more mature than Obama's 49 years. At least JFK was a veteran and a war hero. Obama is a frickin college faculty member.
Posted by: AoS Pirate...now with extra-absorbent wings at September 13, 2010 12:22 PM (uFokq)
and who is buying those condos, in cash, and why? Those are the questions.
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 12:22 PM (p302b)
Nah. I'm pretty sure you're wrong. If memory serves, the is the summer of recovery. Just a second, I'll check.
*Hey Barry!!! What the fuck do you mean fore, you incompetent bastard? Isn't this the summer of recovery? Thought so.*
Yep. I was right. No doom. Just more of the same awesome shit. Barry says so.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 13, 2010 12:23 PM (RkRxq)
OT: today at school we had a corny diversity thing and we read from some workbook about heroes, the typical stuff like Oprah and MLK JR, well a profile on Obama was on there too, and my God the paragraph's writer might as well have been giving him a bj, he was called humble and a good listener who talks w/ his opponents and compromises with them. I told the diversity teacher straight up the paragraph was a joke
Posted by: YRM (The Youngest Ace Commentor At School-Go Bucs, Go Rays!) at September 13, 2010 12:23 PM (4NbXN)
True. But that wouldn't preclude the possibility of the ChiComs instigating a war against one of our allies (such as Taiwan) to negate said domestic strife.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 13, 2010 12:23 PM (9hSKh)
Imagine if Kennedy didn't steal the 1960 election...
The Democrats *probably* would never have had a Viet Nam as a political issue.
Posted by: AoS Pirate...now with extra-absorbent wings at September 13, 2010 12:24 PM (uFokq)
Default, Bitches!
Come on. The projected cost of all the entitlements through 2050 is what? $70trillion, on the conservative side.
There ain't that much money in all the world.
Is that an iceberg?
Posted by: Radiant at September 13, 2010 12:24 PM (dQdrY)
and who is buying those condos, in cash, and why? Those are the questions.
1. Someone who is betting that the bottom has been reached and there is nowhere to go but up
2. Someone who is betting on Obamunist stagflation.
Real estate dropped in the early 1970's too, you know, only to rocket back.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:25 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Professor Big Boy at September 13, 2010 12:25 PM (0N9lD)
And for more awesomely awesome goodness:
Do you ever wonder why you never hear government workers complaining about high tax rates?
“What? Me worry?”
280,000 owe $3.3 Billion.
Via Tax Prof. led there by Instapundit.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 13, 2010 12:26 PM (RkRxq)
"The US has run out of bullets," Roubini told an economic forum in Italy earlier this month. "Any shock at this point can tip you back into recession."
Implied is that we were coming out of recession. We are so hooped.
This went on for a couple of years until I asked my parents, "Who is this 'Chaos'?"
You'd know perfectly well who CHAOS is if it wasn't for the Men from U.N.C.L.E. working in the shadows and keeping us all safe.
Posted by: Speller at September 13, 2010 12:26 PM (qaOKJ)
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 04:22 PM (p302b)
I heard it was the connecticut string pullers. I don't know why they are buying them.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 12:26 PM (fwSHf)
There are things that the repubs could do if they have they had majorities, like pass a flat tax and make Odipstick veto it, pass a balance budget and make him veto it.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 13, 2010 12:27 PM (L8kaT)
Roubini's a hack. He gets flown around with hookers on the Dem's dime.
I will send my black swans to straighten you up.
Posted by: roubini at September 13, 2010 12:27 PM (+wdm+)
Real estate dropped in the early 1970's too, you know, only to rocket back.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 04:25 PM (ujg0T)
Nice bubble that turned into. Let's do it again. What could go wrong?
Posted by: Radiant at September 13, 2010 12:28 PM (dQdrY)
The voters who believe that insurance companies can cover 30 million more people CHEAPER already have full-blown retardedness, and they will never vote conservative. And they breed.
We are fucked with a Garden Weasel™. Anally.
Posted by: gator at September 13, 2010 12:28 PM (aOKEC)
Posted by: maddogg at September 13, 2010 12:29 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Preach It at September 13, 2010 04:24 PM (S5YRY)
Beelzebub's Burp is Denny Crane. I recognize the hash (I+7Zv).
Posted by: Tami at September 13, 2010 12:29 PM (VuLos)
What a lovely man.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 13, 2010 04:17 PM (FkKjr)
I was in New York City on business on Sept. 11, 2001. I was leaving town that morning as the planes hit, but I came back into Manhattan the following night.
Where I was staying, at the Hilton Midtown at 54th Street, the air had particles of ash blowing up from Ground Zero. As far as I am concerned, anyplace where the ash from Ground Zero touched is hallowed ground. Most certainly, a building where one of the hijacked planes' landing gear hit is hallowed ground.
It's funny: there is already a mosque (at least, a Muslim prayer congregation) in the Burlington Coat Factory building. Nobody called for it to be removed or relocated on the basis that Muslims can't pray at or near Ground Zero. We just don't want a monument to 9/11 Trutherism and Islamic triumphalism built there.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:30 PM (7AOgy)
People who come here from china and other countries and buy in cash on the "buy real estate tours".
It's not Americans buying (rumor has it)
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 12:30 PM (p302b)
Nice bubble that turned into. Let's do it again. What could go wrong?
What else are we supposed to do, if the Obamunists are going to wreck the dollar? This is an inflation / stagflation hedge.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:31 PM (ujg0T)
Ace: One scenario is simply the US and China getting into a beef, and China calling in debt, and the US printing money (the only way to satisfy that debt),
Ace, this is flat out wrong and needs to be corrrected. China can't call it's debt anymore than you or I can.
I have EE bonds due in 10 years. What do you think would happen if I went to the local bank and said I wanted to "call" the debt on those bonds? You you think I'd get paid? Hell no. I'd be laughed out of the bank.
Same with the Chinese. They can't "call" those government securities. They have a scheduled payment plan, and if the Chinese government doesn't like it, they can go pound sand.
They can sell those treasuries, but then they'll only get the market rate. Which is probably going to mean they sell at a loss.
Seriously, saying they can "call" their debt seems to be totally wrong.
They can call us imperialists and running dogs. But that's about it.
Posted by: Ed at September 13, 2010 12:31 PM (Zsqn4)
You'd know perfectly well who CHAOS is if it wasn't for the Men from U.N.C.L.E. working in the shadows and keeping us all safe.
Posted by: Speller at September 13, 2010 04:26 PM (qaOKJ)
No, silly, that was THRUSH. It was Maxwell Smart and Agent 99 keeping KAOS in check.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:32 PM (7AOgy)
The economy is improving? Where?
Posted by: Dr. Spank at September 13, 2010 12:32 PM (Y81Xa)
People who come here from china and other countries and buy in cash on the "buy real estate tours".
It's not Americans buying (rumor has it)
There were rumors of Arabs and Japanese buying in the 1970's. And no doubt many were.
The more things change....
Welcome back Carter, with Eric Holder as Epsteen and Joe Biden as Horshack.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:32 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 13, 2010 12:32 PM (EHI/u)
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 04:22 PM (p302b)
I don't know. I have friends moving there in November to escape the Ohio winters and to be near their kids. In fact, they've been trying to talk me into coming down there because prices are so low.
Is there something I'm missing and should be made aware of?
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2010 12:32 PM (5Hi4I)
Is being that as stupid as you are painful? It must be.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 04:20 PM (fwSHf)
Only when he turns his head, and his chin rubs against his hemorrhoids.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:33 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 04:31 PM (ujg0T)
Wheat, corn, farmland sound good from where I'm sitting. I'm thinking commodities is the place.
As a nation...austerity. Won't happen, of course. Not by choice anyway.
Posted by: Radiant at September 13, 2010 12:35 PM (dQdrY)
Yeah, but denny crane/sheik yamanni is really john Ryan.
Naw, John Ryan was earnest in his whining. This Denny Crane guy attempts sarcastic snark, but can't pull it off due to a really lame grasp of what is going on.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:35 PM (ujg0T)
Hey, Chaos, where you been, vato!?
Posted by: Mexican American at September 13, 2010 12:35 PM (+wdm+)
How does an economy improve without job gains?
And how the heck does an improving economy not gain jobs for 18-24 months?
The two go hand-in-hand: recovering/booming economy & job gains.
Not simultaneously, of course. And not all sectors improve at the same time -- but a true recovering/growing economy will lift all boats.
Posted by: AoS Pirate...now with extra-absorbent wings at September 13, 2010 12:36 PM (uFokq)
If China decides to do any of these mountain of doom scenarios it's because they have decided to go to war.
Our economy would get trashed but so would the rest of the worlds including theirs. The only way out of that is war.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 12:37 PM (fwSHf)
Like maybe people should start working and stuff. I don't have to work. Some guy, you know, asked me for some money or something or to just, you know, look at my tatas and I said like yah, go suck it 'cause I gotta go shopping. You know, those little Chinese people are so cute and totally cool and stuff.
Posted by: Meghan McCain at September 13, 2010 12:37 PM (XWRkx)
A message from beyond the grave....
"In lieu of flowers the family respectfully asked that donations be sent to the American Cancer Society or to the campaign of who ever is running against President Barack Obama in 2012."
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:38 PM (7AOgy)
Wheat, corn, farmland sound good from where I'm sitting. I'm thinking commodities is the place.
As a nation...austerity. Won't happen, of course. Not by choice anyway.
Is this the same guy who told me:
Nice bubble that turned into. Let's do it again. What could go wrong?
Don't you remember Farm-Aid from the musical yahoos? That was the commodities bubble bursting in the 1980s. See also Oil Stocks and Gold.
Real Estate did a hell of a lot better in the 1980's than commodities, especially in my corner of the world, Cali. Your experience in Texas may vary as a disclaimer.
The point is, with every inflation hedge, there is a point to get off before it drops.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:38 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2010 12:38 PM (QxSug)
I don't know. I have friends moving there in November to escape the Ohio winters and to be near their kids. In fact, they've been trying to talk me into coming down there because prices are so low.
Is there something I'm missing and should be made aware of?
If the condo buildings have a lot of unoccupied units, which is the case in some new construction, the HOA by-laws may require the resident owners to pick up the slack in paying the unoccupied units' condo fees. Also, if a condo development has occupancy problems, the empty units can become a magnet for all kinds of unsavory enterprises. If you're serious about purchasing, get down there to get a first hand look at the housing development and the neighborhood.
Posted by: kallisto at September 13, 2010 12:39 PM (+FkcS)
I'm usually not doomsday, but I can see what's going on. Have you been to Los Angeles lately????
Posted by: gator at September 13, 2010 04:04 PM (aOKEC)
Been there? I'm in it. :-P
Posted by: Mary in LA at September 13, 2010 12:40 PM (JYxmy)
The opposite of what happened to Bush - who[se legacy] was destroyed by the Democrat Congress.
Posted by: Roger at September 13, 2010 12:41 PM (tAwhy)
Only -- this is weird -- the Republican Congress can now save Obama, by letting business know that Hope and Change is dead and it's safe to begin hiring and investing again.
The GOP may hurt their chances by forcing slightly less harmful domestic policies on Obama, but I believe that, in the end, his moronic foreign policies will come to the GOP's rescue.
Posted by: Ken at September 13, 2010 12:41 PM (CDrOo)
In order for the economy to improve, jobs have to be created in the private sector. That is not happening under Obama. The cheerleaders can get out there and rally all they want, they can't create jobs and neither can Obama.
It's like a road runner cartoon, the economy is in a clown car that has just driven off the cliff. It still has some momentum so it continues going forward.
At some point the coyote will look down and see the bottom of the canyon, and at that point the car will plummet to earth. Beep-beep!
Posted by: Boots at September 13, 2010 12:42 PM (06JTY)
Naw, John Ryan was earnest in his whining. This Denny Crane guy attempts sarcastic snark, but can't pull it off due to a really lame grasp of what is going on.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 04:35 PM (ujg0T)
It's possible that we're dealing with a Multiple Personality Disorder. I'm convinced most libs suffer from some type of mental illness anyway, might as well take a guess on a diagnosis.
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2010 12:42 PM (5Hi4I)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 04:38 PM (ujg0T)
With the Ukraine and Russia stopping shipments and Pakistan's harvests destroyed, I'm not thinking it is a bubble yet.
Posted by: Radiant at September 13, 2010 12:43 PM (dQdrY)
http://tinyurl.com/28ds5ly
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 13, 2010 04:32 PM (EHI/u)
From the article:
As previously documented by NewsBusters, Time managing editor Richard Stengel bizarrely seemed to see a down side to fewer terrorist attacks against Israelis when he appeared on the Thursday, September 2, Morning Joe on MSNBC, as he suggested that it was a "sad truth" that the low level of recent violence from terrorists -- including the "Hamas folks" -- had made Israelis feel less urgency about negotiating with Palestinians. Stengel:
But, you know, they havenÂ’t had a, they havenÂ’t had a car bombing in two and a half years, and the sad truth really is that the wall with the West Bank has actually worked. I mean, most Israelis in the course of their lives donÂ’tÂ’ come into contact with any Palestinians at all. The wall is functioning. And the Gaza Strip is so small and so isolated they feel that those folks, the Hamas folks, are actually not that big a threat.
Wow, too bad about those Israelis not getting blown to smithereens. I'm all choked up about how the Palestinian genocidaires don't get to make their street-theater political statement with the blood of Jewish babies.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:43 PM (7AOgy)
read realty track and the banks implode website and anything on zero hedge and dealbreaker and business insider about real estate. With real estate you need to really educate yourself and it is always about location, location, location.
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 12:43 PM (p302b)
Been there? I'm in it. :-P
Have they built a wall surrounding/protecting West LA yet?
Posted by: gator at September 13, 2010 12:44 PM (aOKEC)
And it's going to be close, isn't it? 2011 is now all but written off. Only -- this is weird -- the Republican Congress can now save Obama, by letting business know that Hope and Change is dead and it's safe to begin hiring and investing again.
That to me is the most likely scenario. The business guys I deal with are waiting to see what happens in November. There is $2 Trillion on the sidelines right now that is waiting to be spent.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 12:44 PM (fwSHf)
At some point the coyote will look down and see the bottom of the canyon, and at that point the car will plummet to earth. Beep-beep!
Posted by: Boots at September 13, 2010 04:42 PM (06JTY)
Yes, that's the Gravitational Awareness Paradox. The cartoon character will not fall unless and until he becomes aware that he is suspended in mid-air with no physical support.
Related: the Physics Pun Phenomenon. The falling cartoon character will be able to stop just short of the ground if he is in a vehicle equipped with air brakes.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:45 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 12:46 PM (p302b)
But, you know, they havenÂ’t had a, they havenÂ’t had a car bombing in two and a half years, and the sad truth really is that the wall with the West Bank has actually worked. I mean, most Israelis in the course of their lives donÂ’tÂ’ come into contact with any Palestinians at all. The wall is functioning. And the Gaza Strip is so small and so isolated they feel that those folks, the Hamas folks, are actually not that big a threat.
Will the GOP Congress of 2011 apply this sensibility to our own Mexican border, please?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:46 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: gator at September 13, 2010 04:44 PM (aOKEC)
You think a wall's gonna stop me?
Posted by: Snake Plisken at September 13, 2010 12:46 PM (7AOgy)
________________
Well, there's always moving to the Ukraine to farm mildly radioactive earthworms for their yummy, yummy postapocolyptic protein.
Posted by: Ed Dames, the *real* Dr. Doom at September 13, 2010 12:46 PM (NmR1a)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 13, 2010 12:46 PM (EHI/u)
Will the GOP Congress of 2011 apply this sensibility to our own Mexican border, please?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 04:46 PM (ujg0T)
So far, the car bombs are only going off on the Mexican side. But I give that about three weeks before it migrates north of the border.
Posted by: Snake Plisken at September 13, 2010 12:47 PM (7AOgy)
154 - Oh no. Not Californication, not in the Keystone State. Is there no refuge from this plague? Is there no mercy? FML.
Alright so I was a little dramatic. Trendy people don't like where I'm looking, it's a somewhat declasse area. But that's just fine with me, as long as I have a little yard and the house has a good foundation. Let me guess where you are - either Wallingford-Swarthmore, or Bucks County around Yardley, or Huntingdon Valley.
(My center city friends tell me the yuppie neighborhoods are attracting transplants from all parts, not just Cali, and those locales are holding their value as well.)
Posted by: kallisto at September 13, 2010 12:47 PM (+FkcS)
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 04:43 PM (p302b)
Is Florida not the way to go?
I've had iffy feelings along the lines of "too good to be true."
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2010 12:47 PM (5Hi4I)
Notice the language, not "tax hikes don't occur period, ever"...."tax hikes don't occur this year"
This is one of the "young guns" guy speaking
the f****ing republicans are just democrats in more expensive empty suits...
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 12:47 PM (p302b)
Posted by: beelzebub's burp at September 13, 2010 04:17 PM (I+7Zv)
Really? In September 2008. That's funny I thought the Dims won control of Congress in the 2006 election. Johnny, even for you that's weak.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 13, 2010 12:48 PM (1Jaio)
And it's going to be close, isn't it? 2011 is now all but written off. Only -- this is weird -- the Republican Congress can now save Obama, by letting business know that Hope and Change is dead and it's safe to begin hiring and investing again.
2011-12 as 1995-96. We could even get John McCain to run again as a Bob Dole 2.0--well, nix that idea.....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:48 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 13, 2010 04:46 PM (EHI/u)
The question is, who are TIME and Newsweek written for these days? And haven't they gotten a slight case of the clues from watching their circulation and ad pages approach the X-axis?
Posted by: Snake Plisken at September 13, 2010 12:48 PM (7AOgy)
That is so true. The only thing keeping us up is our ignorance of how fuzzucked we are. As soon as we realize it collectively.....
(Don't look down)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 13, 2010 12:49 PM (0q2P7)
2011-12 as 1995-96. We could even get John McCain to run again as a Bob Dole 2.0--well, nix that idea.....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 04:48 PM (ujg0T)
God save and protect us from candidates who get the nomination only because "it's their turn."
Posted by: Snake Plisken at September 13, 2010 12:49 PM (7AOgy)
Simple really.
Balance budget, make a surplus, start paying back debt: Bond market risk neutralized. Chinese economic leverage neutralized.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 13, 2010 12:52 PM (0q2P7)
Well, there's always moving to the Ukraine to farm mildly radioactive earthworms for their yummy, yummy postapocolyptic protein.
Posted by: Ed Dames, the *real* Dr. Doom at September 13, 2010 04:46 PM (NmR1a)
Do the radioisotopes collect in the worms' tissues? Because that could be a good way to clean the soil.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 12:52 PM (7AOgy)
I can't answer that question for you. But, if you read and research, by the time you are done, you will be able to answer that question. I think Florida has buyer's brokers so you can start by picking their brains.
But, I have a rule, no matter how good, how logical, how great something looks if I have even a single reservation, me personally, if that little voice inside isn't doing the happy dance, I walk away. Sure, I've lost money but I've also saved myself a lot of heartache too.
I bought more apple stock at what was considered a ridiculous price. I took so much grief from my friends but I had done my research and I was comfortable, I'm doing the happy dance now and they are saying they are sorry they doubted me lol
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 12:52 PM (p302b)
I've had iffy feelings along the lines of "too good to be true."
It's almost like someone bragging about all the good snow-skiing in western Kansas. Although, I do have to say that not having a state income tax seems attractive from time to time.
Posted by: Meghan McCain at September 13, 2010 12:54 PM (XWRkx)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 13, 2010 04:52 PM (0q2P7)
So, what kind of odds are you giving that will happen?
Posted by: Radiant at September 13, 2010 12:54 PM (dQdrY)
Simple really.
Balance budget, make a surplus, start paying back debt: Bond market risk neutralized. Chinese economic leverage neutralized.
Or even just get real economic growth again and hold the line on spending and debt. Debt as % of GDP drops.
Not as good as what you propose, of course, but more feasible.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 12:54 PM (ujg0T)
The question is, who are TIME and Newsweek written for these days? And haven't they gotten a slight case of the clues from watching their circulation and ad pages approach the X-axis?
Posted by: Snake Plisken at September 13, 2010 04:48 PM (7AOgy)
They're written for Anti-American libs who jerk off to the thought of us Flyover folks getting disappeared. They don't have to worry about profits because they know they'll get bailed out anyway.
Read The Smithsonian sometime and you'll see how incestuous it can get.
Posted by: ErikW at September 13, 2010 12:54 PM (5Hi4I)
One thing that could really wreck any recovery though is the States. Obama gave them a bunch of money on two different occasions and just postponed the inevitable cuts in state governments.
We're facing a $5 Billion short fall here in Washington and our Marxist Governor has even finally come to realize that she has to start massively cutting government.
That will mean a bunch of state layoffs and reduced spending by the state. None of which is efficient but it still adds to the economy.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 12:54 PM (fwSHf)
I know what you're thinking. "Did he fire six shots or only five?" Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?
Posted by: president barack 'dirty hussein' obama at September 13, 2010 12:55 PM (3phFo)
_______________
Well, since you mention it...
It's struck me as odd that Imam Rauf insists we have to build the mosque there, because he's afraid that if we don't the Islamists will cause trouble.
That's right, folks. Imam Rauf is an Islamophobe.
Posted by: Anachronda at September 13, 2010 12:55 PM (FzhYM)
Balance budget, make a surplus
Of course, reasonably, in order to do that you would have to completely restructure Social Security and Medicare.
So you see, all we have to do is something that while simple, neither party feels is politically advantageous, feasible, or even possible. That's why we're fuzzucked.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 13, 2010 12:55 PM (0q2P7)
the f****ing republicans are just democrats in more expensive empty suits...
Come on Curious, this is the year the Bush tax cuts expire, that is why he said this year. Don't be over zealous.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 13, 2010 12:58 PM (L8kaT)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 13, 2010 04:55 PM (0q2P7)
I must agree.
Posted by: Radiant at September 13, 2010 12:58 PM (dQdrY)
you know, I used to give them all "the benefit of the doubt" and "I used to make assumptions for them that weren't stated" but not anymore. I want these damned politicians to say what they mean and mean what they say. I'm tired of all the games, posturing and "well it's not a lie it's just an exaggeration a little bit"....crap...
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 01:00 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 13, 2010 01:02 PM (L8kaT)
Of course, reasonably, in order to do that you would have to completely restructure Social Security and Medicare.
GOP Contract with America 2011:
1. Tax code of 2010 made permanent, with discussions of further targeted tax relief after that.
2. Border Wall
3. Social Security and Medicare age raised to 70.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 13, 2010 01:02 PM (ujg0T)
Move to New Jersey. Our governor says what he means and means what he says. It's actually quite a strange experience, but you will get used to it.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at September 13, 2010 01:02 PM (LH6ir)
and who is buying those condos, in cash, and why? Those are the questions.
It just so happens that BackwardsGirl and I are looking for a condo down here in the House of Mouse. We have to get out from under the rent we're paying and can't afford for much longer. We've been surprised at all the condos we've found under $40K, 2/2 approx110 sq.f. Fees around $300/mo.
Fits us to a T. Granted, there are a few that need a lot of work, but if one looks hard enough, there are good bargains out there.
The downside is, we know that someone is getting screwed, big time. Since we started looking, we've also started paying attention to forclosure rates. We set another record last month, so there will be even more on the market real soon. Whoever sited the figure above of $170K condos going for $40 is just about right.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at September 13, 2010 01:02 PM (kFODZ)
Posted by: kallisto at September 13, 2010 01:04 PM (+FkcS)
1946-1964 Roosevelt Dime $1.45
1932-1964 Washington Quarter $3.64
1964 Kennedy Half Dollar $7.28
Silver is going for over $20 an ounce. I bought some back at $14 and it's the only investment (besides malted grain for brewing beer) that's has paid off for me in the last few years.
Posted by: TexBob at September 13, 2010 01:05 PM (7cXE7)
Posted by: kallisto at September 13, 2010 01:06 PM (+FkcS)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 13, 2010 01:06 PM (L8kaT)
that's what I meant by location, location, location.
did you know that disney is building a gated community and they are charging $1.6 mil and getting it, I'm told they sold out the first phase.
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 01:06 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Dan at September 13, 2010 01:11 PM (1jzSs)
here's the thing, you need a rock solid real estate attorney, a person who specializes in real estate whenever you buy property anywhere. Even if the broker tells you that in their state you don't need an attorney, yep, you need that attorney. But, the advice and hand holding of the attorney will be well worth the investment.
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 01:12 PM (p302b)
Na'vi, eh? There goes the neighbourhood.
Posted by: andycanuck at September 13, 2010 01:13 PM (3phFo)
Many thanks, Guy Fawkes, will do. I hadn't thought that would be a problem, but now I know to check.
And curious, there are still a busload of folks with money down here, they're just quiet about it. There have been quite a few local startups where the employees bought stock that later skyrocketed. I know one or two. Disney has a real sweetheart deal with Osceola Co. where they have their own private police and fire departments, separate from any local government. And I'll see if anyone I know down here can recommend a good real estate lawyer.
I love the Pudding Patrol. You guys are awesome.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at September 13, 2010 01:15 PM (kFODZ)
He likes making money....
He likes donating money.....
He likes our capitalist system......
He's not ashamed of making money......
Yep glenn we all like our capitalist system..
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 01:16 PM (p302b)
You'd know perfectly well who CHAOS is if it wasn't for the Men from U.N.C.L.E. working in the shadows and keeping us all safe.
Posted by: Speller at September 13, 2010 04:26 PM (qaOKJ)
No, silly, that was THRUSH. It was Maxwell Smart and Agent 99 keeping KAOS in check.
Posted by: stuiec at September 13, 2010 04:32 PM (7AOgy)
Open Channel D
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 13, 2010 01:19 PM (1Jaio)
@259: "here's the thing, you need a rock solid real estate attorney, a person who specializes in real estate whenever you buy property anywhere. Even if the broker tells you that in their state you don't need an attorney, yep, you need that attorney. But, the advice and hand holding of the attorney will be well worth the investment."
You realize, of course, that AmishDude just declared a jihad on you for that.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at September 13, 2010 01:20 PM (xy9wk)
-andycanuck
More likely Smurfs, unless the Na'vi have jacked a space transport.
Posted by: Speller at September 13, 2010 01:23 PM (qaOKJ)
Poor Amish Dude seems to have had some pretty bad experiences with attorneys. But sometimes it is really important to have an honest, solid attorney at your side and buying real estate is one of those times.
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 01:23 PM (p302b)
If I were the President of The United States
I could fix our economy in 5 minutes or LESS
I would simply relax the " Mark to Market" rules
unfotunately no one posting here knows what that means
I can say that because no one seems to know what
PRINTING MONEY means
its an Economics term for " EASING CREDIT"
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 01:24 PM (jBC6p)
I do envy you the location, but definitely not the influx of the blue people.
Na'vi, eh? There goes the neighbourhood.
I was dragged kicking and screaming to that movie - 2 1/2 hours of my life that I'll never get back. I hope they haven't infested Chester County, but if they have I see a business opportunity: I will open an African braid salon.
Posted by: kallisto at September 13, 2010 01:26 PM (+FkcS)
Don't you remember, they said relaxing the mark to market rules is what cause this.
And then they went on to the shorts
and now they are on the high frequency guys...
and Christina romer told the truth when she basically said "we don't know what happened" How can you fix something if you can't even figure out what went wrong?
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 01:30 PM (p302b)
unfotunately no one posting here knows what that means
I can say that because no one seems to know what
PRINTING MONEY means
its an Economics term for " EASING CREDIT"
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 05:24 PM (jBC6p)
The Mark to Market rules have not only already been relaxed, they have been eliminated.
There has been some talk of bringing them back but it hasn't gotten very far.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 01:31 PM (fwSHf)
Don't you remember, they said relaxing the mark to market rules is what cause this.
You've got that backwards. They said the Mark to Market rules caused this. That's why they got rid of them.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 01:32 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: toby928 at September 13, 2010 05:33 PM (S5YRY)
The fed buys securities with money they print. They have printed about $2 Trillion since this thing began.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 01:34 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Monty at September 13, 2010 01:41 PM (/0a60)
Posted by: Penfold at September 13, 2010 01:46 PM (1PeEC)
Oh, you can simply let the government declare what a "fair price" is, but that will do fuck-all to actually establish the fair market price.
Posted by: Monty at September 13, 2010 05:41 PM (/0a60)
I don't agree with you. Mark to Market has very little to do with everyday pricing of mortgage backed securities. What it does is requires the holder of such securities to price all of their like securities at the current market price.
By doing that it forces them to take huge write downs in their assets even if they plan on holding them and they are actually worth more than the latest market price.
When that happens their ability to loan is diminished.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 01:46 PM (fwSHf)
Real estate prices in this country, as a whole, have followed the inflation curve almost verbatim with a few wrinkles here and there for economic cycles up and down changing supply and demand. But those wrinkles were always ironed out in fairly short order.
What changed with real estate and started the initial acceleration was the creation of artificial shortages in certain parts of the country through stupid eco-tard laws that forced the creation of green zones in towns and counties in coastal CA, Las Vegas, NV (through blocking of sale of federal land), NY, AZ, and FL.
These shortages made the price of available real estate in those areas go through the roof, which in turn started speculation and churning.
Add to that the low interest rates driven by the Fed to offset 9-11 impact and the "stupidly easy lending rules" created by CRA and its associated regulations and you got the onset of the bubble.
Of course the banks could not afford to make all these poor loans with no collateral for CRA so enter F&F and Jamie Goerlich. They pisked up the loans, packaged 5them as non-smelly shit and sold them to investors after they had been perfumed over by insuring some and mixing them with good loans. The "insuring" was the so-called "credit default swaps" you here so much about from IAG.
All of this continued find and dandy as long as the interest rates were low, the prices continued to rise, and people were able to refinance all those stupid loans as the balloon payments became due. And if someone defaulted because they never should have got a loan to begin with, no biggie for the bank/investor, they could sell and maybe even recoup their losses.
All that was fine until the Fed deemed that 9-11 low interest rates were contributing to inflation and started raising rates. The smart money got out immediately. When the rates started rising the ability to turn over the loans was crushed, people defaulted in droves, then the banks started defaulting. When that happened AIG started defaulting as well as the other investment houses that had all this Goerlick paper.
The rest, as they say, is history. And those of you in CA look at the property values and the green space laws. Those laws are still present and property values are still too high along the coast.
And this is not my analysis folks. Mostly it comes from Thomas Sowell.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 01:49 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: doug at September 13, 2010 01:52 PM (Mx+Wi)
Mark to Market is just a dumb rule. Basically it means if you sell a mortgage backed security for ten cents on the dollar I have to value all of mine at ten cents on the dollar whether I want to sell them or not.
Mine could all be very good securities backed by real assetts and yours could have been junk but all of a sudden my assetts are decreased by 90% because you sold yours at that price.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 01:57 PM (fwSHf)
If the treasury had PRINTED 2 trillion dollars then hwy hasnt it appeared on the M1 M2 or M3 reports?
When Robert Ruben relaxed Mark to Mrket in 93 to 3 years
that may have started what we are seeing now
but what sealed the fate of what we have now is tightening to "0"
and nobodies touched it ,they just keep talking about it.
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 02:00 PM (jBC6p)
Posted by: Chris in Va at September 13, 2010 05:59 PM (uCjoj)
I'm almost positive it already has.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 02:00 PM (fwSHf)
April 2, 2009
Yet, the rally in financial stocks has gathered some more steam this morning, as the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) voted to relax its now infamous FASB 157 or mark-to-market rule.
In effect, political pressure has trumped transparency. Go figure.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 02:05 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: sauropod at September 13, 2010 02:06 PM (GPm6P)
Posted by: dougf at September 13, 2010 02:12 PM (PSoWG)
its an Economics term for " EASING CREDIT"
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 05:24 PM (jBC6p)
Ben ain't gonna hurt the banks.
Are not the vast majority of consumers already maxed out?
Posted by: Radiant at September 13, 2010 02:13 PM (dQdrY)
FASB 157
was just a statement
it was never enacted
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 06:16 PM (jBC6p)
That's not true, FASB 157 was enacted in 2007, it was relaxed in 2009
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 02:19 PM (fwSHf)
Republican and 'conservative' failure to understand this will cause them to be the next group in line in the blame game. And the economy will STILL be moribund.
Posted by: dougf at September 13, 2010 06:12 PM (PSoWG)
All of the above are full of shit or are just the run of the mill liberal liars. What most people think of the economy is whether or not they have a job and whether or not they think they can keep it and buy groceries and pay the rent.
The largest contributor to employers not hiring right now is uncertainty caused by those communists who are in power right now. Uncertainty over health-scam and uncertainty over taxes. Get rid of those two things and the hiring will start, at first in a trickle, and depending on how the Republicans do, then a flood.
As the hiring and spending recover, so shall the economy. And the stock market. It will do what ever the large fund managers decide. The stock market has never been a good indicator of the economy and it never will.
So if you mean the structural problem is that the communists are in charge, maybe you are correct.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 02:29 PM (/jbAw)
You seem to have a different interpretation of the word STATEMENT than the FASB does. A STATEMENT to them means changing the original rule to add fair market value rules (mark to market) to the original rule.
Here is a link to fasb 157, also know as the mark to market rule. It isn't a statement like "the weather is nice today" it's a statement that says "this is the new rule".
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 02:35 PM (fwSHf)
Thats funny the link I was trying to post was from the actual FASB site
concerning the 2007 staement
it didnt change anything in the Fair Market Accounting rules
AT THE SEC
I give up
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 02:43 PM (jBC6p)
it didnt change anything in the Fair Market Accounting rules
AT THE SEC
I give up
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 06:43 PM (jBC6p)
That was downloaded from the FASB website. It's the actual statement.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 02:44 PM (fwSHf)
this is from the 2007 staement
1
A position in a financial instrument that trades in an active market held by a broker-dealer or investment company within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guides for those industries that was measured at fair value using a blockage factor prior to initial application of this Statement
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 02:47 PM (jBC6p)
2
A financial instrument that was measured at fair value at initial recognition under Statement 133 using the transaction price in accordance with the guidance in footnote 3 of Issue 02-3 prior to initial application of this Statement
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 02:47 PM (jBC6p)
2
A hybrid financial instrument that was measured at fair value at initial recognition under Statement 133 using the transaction price in accordance with the guidance in Statement 133 (added by Statement 155) prior to initial application of this Statement
NOTHING CHANGED !!!
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 02:48 PM (jBC6p)
A position in a financial instrument that trades in an active market held by a broker-dealer or investment company within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guides for those industries that was measured at fair value using a blockage factor prior to initial application of this Statement
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 06:47 PM (jBC6p)
Exactly, the blockage factor enabled holders of mortgage back securities to use face value as opposed to fair market value. The new rule 157 removed that causing holders of those securities to value their assets to the value of like assetts sold on the last day of the year.
In other words If I owned a security backed by 10 mortgages all of them performing and backed by real assetts and planned to hold them until they were paid off, never sell them I would have to value them based on what the price for mortgage backed securities were on the last trading day of the year.
The law was enacted at about the height of the market so the only place to go was down. People paniced and started selling them driving the value of everyone's assets wrongly down.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 02:55 PM (fwSHf)
final paragraph
The transition adjustment, measured as the difference between the carrying amounts and the fair values of those financial instruments at the date this Statement is initially applied, should be recognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity or net assets in the statement of financial position) for the fiscal year in which this Statement is initially applied.
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 02:56 PM (jBC6p)
I guess you dont know what
"opening balance of retained earnings"
means???
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 06:57 PM (jBC6p)
Oh will you just read the fucking statement under Changes Caused by This Statement.
Pay close attention to the part that the change is that securities must be valued at the current exit price instead of as before the entry price.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 03:01 PM (fwSHf)
It'sthe perfect time for a empty suit, a left-wing puppet master to rule.
Obama is so cute and he promises hope and change! I worship him - blindly
Now is the best time for ObamaHillaryCare!
Posted by: Obama bumper sticker at September 13, 2010 03:05 PM (0fzsA)
What the hell? Barney and his friends would have cock washed for nothing.
Posted by: Fish at September 13, 2010 03:45 PM (v1gw3)
My tax dollars at work!
Posted by: Timbo at September 13, 2010 03:06 PM (ph9vn)
the current exit price remains the same
ARE YOU JUST FUCKING WITH ME?
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 07:06 PM (jBC6p)
No and I am getting tired of this. The current exit price is the price at the last day of trading in the current year. That price remains fixed until the last day of trading of the next year. The entry price (the price you payed for it) changes to the exit price devaluing in this case assetts you may have had no plans to sell and that are performing and backed by real assetts.
It isn't that hard to figure out.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 03:11 PM (fwSHf)
As the yard signs signal the political season, a neighbor has put up an Obama/Biden sign.
To generate some excitement I guess. Or he's
just an idiot
Posted by: Highly Functioning Retard (somewhat creepy too) at September 13, 2010 03:12 PM (s7I0E)
MY ONLY HOPE IS THAT YOU WORK FOR GEORGE SOROS
IVE ALWAYS WANTED TO SEE THAT DUMB ASS FALL
what you are posting is
NOT A RELAXED MARK TO MARKET!
holy shit
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 03:14 PM (jBC6p)
NOT A RELAXED MARK TO MARKET!
holy shit
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 07:14 PM (jBC6p)
I only hope I am not paying to support a dumbass like you. The rule was enacted in 2007 and relaxed April 2, 2009.
Your original argument was that the 2007 rule really wasn't a rule dumbass.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 03:17 PM (fwSHf)
The budget has rarely been balanced since 1974, and debt has done nothing but grow. Before that, Presidents of both parties would empound $ they didn't see as necessary as part of fiscal responsibility. These days, the President doesn't have much control over the budget deficits or debt -- It's all Congress baby.
Posted by: drfredc at September 13, 2010 03:20 PM (ljMiA)
wrong
my argument was that fasb 157 didnt change shit and it didnt
go look at ANYTHING related to FASB prior to 1999
before Clinton signed the Grahm Leach Bliley act
and you might understand what I am saying
but at this point I dont really give a shit
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 03:27 PM (jBC6p)
and you might understand what I am saying
but at this point I dont really give know a shit
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 07:27 PM (jBC6p)
fify
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 03:30 PM (fwSHf)
so rbrt
you are going to tell me that
FAS 115 and FAS 157
ARE THE SAME?????
because if you are then Im going to tell you that you are RETARDED
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 03:36 PM (jBC6p)
Posted by: Darth Daver at September 13, 2010 03:39 PM (lN6u3)
Oil is not likely to spike any time soon, barring war risks.
Today, OPEC has market power but only by virtue of holding a lot of production off-line. That means that the global price is at least $10/barrel overvalued and maybe as much as $40/barrel if there was a truly free market.
More likely is a scenario where crude oil prices drop due to OPEC members cheating on their quotas. However, much of the excess, banked production is in Saudi Arabia.
In effect, the Sauds are keeping oil prices high so they can spend the profits on military hardware. It's like we're buying all those airplanes for Saudi Arabia everytime we fill up our gas tanks.
As to the bigger gloom-and-doom picture, our main problems are our political leadership. Change them to people who will let Americans run business without government interference and the "structural problems" would get solved reasonably soon.
We can still recover from this mess when Obama and the Reid/Pelosi Congress get changed.
Yes, there is a lot of money waiting for the politics to be resolved. I'm working on a major infrastructure project in Texas with a $15 billion price tag. We're just puttering along, watching our cash flow until November when our investors, overseas and domestic, get a clear signal of a pro-business US government.
Posted by: Whitehall at September 13, 2010 03:42 PM (FmPSC)
No, FASB 157 changed the existing rule. That's why it has a whole section entitled Changes Made by This Statement.
FASB is a unique document, it was issued to change the existing rule.
You seem unable to comprehend the written text of FASB 157. I can't help you with that sorry.
I'm done with this argument, you are all over the map and not worth the time. Everytime I prove you wrong you change to something entirely different and it isn't worth doing.
Have a nice day.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 03:43 PM (fwSHf)
You never put up an argument RBRT
you just seem to believe that just because the FASB puts out a statement
that everything changes, that everything goes back to being like FAS 115
and it didnt it didnt change shit as far as relaxing the Fair Accounting Rules
AND YOU KNOW THAT
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 03:56 PM (jBC6p)
All you said RBRT was
" here are the new rules for 2007 , the rules havent changed"
end of statement
wow some argument
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 03:58 PM (jBC6p)
Mark to Market is just a dumb rule. Basically it means if you sell a mortgage backed security for ten cents on the dollar I have to value all of mine at ten cents on the dollar whether I want to sell them or not.
Mine could all be very good securities backed by real assetts and yours could have been junk but all of a sudden my assetts are decreased by 90% because you sold yours at that price.
Posted by: robtr at September 13, 2010 05:57 PM (fwSHf)
There you go, using those fancy accounting terms...
But in seriousness, didn't Mark to Market intuitively make sense when it first came out?
I mean, you buy an asset, a house lets say, for $100K. Ten years later, it's worth $1million. But you still have it listed in your asset column as only worth $100K.
Which intuitively doesn't make sense. And to further compound this, other assets, like trucks or factory equipment are depreciated. They don't stay on your balance sheet unchanged. They change as time passes.
When I took financial accounting 101 many many years ago, I could never really reconcile that discepancy. Yeah, I got that there was the conservative principle, meaning bettter to be conservative/safe in your accounting, rather that aggressive/risky. So yeah, I could recite that as an answer.
But it never really made sense. Emotionally, I mean. My IRA value fluctuated every day, so I figured that the same should apply to financial statements. Afterall, the market is the ultimate arbitrator of value, so why not use it?
HOWEVER, I think I have to conceed that my original belief in Mark to Market as being intuitively correct is probably wrong.
Aparently, it caused the balance sheets of companies to fluxuate very rapidly. Which caused a lot of problems in borrowing or lending based off of a balance sheet.
So I think that Mark to Market would probably be less trouble causing if the markets were not fluxuating rapidly, but were more slow moving. But since a lot of markets do fluxuate rapidly, Mark to Market seems to have been a disaster.
Or am I all messed up in my thoughts?
Posted by: Ed at September 13, 2010 04:02 PM (Zsqn4)
#326
South Texas Project Units 3 and 4.
The Bush Administration got nuclear loan guarantees authorized to cover investor risk of the government reneging on their licenses, like they did during the first batch of nuclear power plant construction. Not perfect free market but a real-world fix for political risks.
Obama has turned this program into 1) free money for renewables and other friends of the Democrats and 2) nuclear extortion. Now, anyone wanting to build a new nuke HAS to SUCK UP to OBAMA. It is unthinkable to start a nuke project UNLESS Obama wants you too. That's why the French government just got a $2 billion loan guarantee from Obama for a uranium enrichment plant they intend to build in Idaho, even though others are building competing plants WITHOUT US guarantees.
The French are expected to get a multi-billion loan for a new nuke in Maryland. Obama has little love for Texans.
Posted by: Whitehall at September 13, 2010 04:07 PM (FmPSC)
Posted by: Crashpanic at September 13, 2010 04:08 PM (Aas1t)
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 04:09 PM (jBC6p)
Mark-to-market is appropriate for some securities and for some companies but not for others.
If one is trading securities on a regular basis or the securities have to be liquid for one's business purposes, then mark-to-market gives investors and lenders necessary information.
If the securities or assets are held for actual commercial purposes and not for trading, then amortization or depreciation might be more appropriate.
Buy some land and put a factory on it. That land should be held at original purchase price, barring regulatory intervention - you turned it into a Superfund site, for instance.
Posted by: Whitehall at September 13, 2010 04:15 PM (FmPSC)
My understanding of those "loan guarantees" was that they would cover the loans by investors to the utility in the event the utility went bankrupt in the process. IOW, the government actually puts up nothing and would never have to put up anything.
In other words the so-called "loan guarantees" to help nuclear power were nothing more than worthless rhetoric.
I followed that 2005 energy bill through congress closely as I was still working in Nuclear Power then. The more recent energy bill may have had more in it but I somehow doubt it.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 04:15 PM (/jbAw)
Well the current problem with marking land values as current value is that no one wants to trade sub prime or hold sub prime for that matter
so let it ease out a year or 18 months
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 04:19 PM (jBC6p)
#335
Agreed that the Bush nuclear loan guarantees were likely to cost nothing to the taxpayer. They just covered investors against governments OKing a project then changing their mind(s). Technical and commercial risks were still the investors.
People with real money learned their lessons on Shoreham and WPPSS. For Shoreham, the utility was sold for $1 to the state of New York after a county boad refused to take part in an emergency drill.
Today's deal is for the full amount with an up-front "insurance premium" to be paid by the project. Of course, the actual terms are kept "proprietary" so we don't know who's getting the sweet heart deal and who is getting the shaft.
Posted by: Whitehall at September 13, 2010 04:34 PM (FmPSC)
IMHO
getting rid of MTBEs and replacing them with ethanol
was the biggest problem with the 2005 energy bill
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 04:37 PM (jBC6p)
now you are talking about the housing market? Or are you still talking about mark to market?
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 04:44 PM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 04:48 PM (p302b)
I dont do Equities
Now OTC derivatives thats my bag
but at the rate we are going I might be bailing soon because the swing is just getting too crazy
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 04:51 PM (jBC6p)
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 04:51 PM (p302b)
Ah, so you like risk, lots of it and big bets.
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 04:52 PM (p302b)
#340
"Sub-prime' refers to the mortgages, not the land. Land is neither appreciated nor depreciated on the books unless something drastic happens to impair or improve it, like a zoning change or a new nearby freeway off-ramp. The structures and improvements on the land can and should be depreciated.
If a bank holds a mortgage from an individual for a house and it is being paid on time, then is should be held at face value less payoff of principal.
If a hedge fund owns a bunch of mortgage backed securities and the default history now exceeds the initial assumptions, then it should be "marked-to-market" if possible using similar securities with similar default rates. That's not easy.
However, I'm not a CPA but I have had a few MBA accounting classes so take my pontifications with a grain of salt.
On nuclear stuff, I'm an expert.
Posted by: Whitehall at September 13, 2010 04:58 PM (FmPSC)
However, the coverage is much better than just for a "default to investors". It covers something that I originally said they needed to fix, the delays caused by litigation. The government actually pays costs (to a certain amount) of delays caused by delays including litigation.
Just like the government. make it easy for eco-tards to hold up construction through serial litigation and instead of getting rid of the easy litigation, the tax payer pays for it.
IOW, now the tax payers pay the lawyers and the eco-tards. What could be better.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 05:02 PM (/jbAw)
ok look its simple
we either have to
a. get rid of OTC derivative trading
b. get rid of sub prime
or c relax mark to market
the chances of A and B happening are next to the chances of Adolf Hilter winning a Jewish Beauty contest
so what do we have left
relax mark to market
and besides when they package Mortgage Backed Securities they dont cherry pick the good ones and the bad ones they do they whole enchilada
so yes there is some risk but hell thats what it is all about
Posted by: Countaxula at September 13, 2010 05:04 PM (jBC6p)
He has the heavy hitters on the panel tonight and they will be discussing the election tomorrow.
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 05:10 PM (p302b)
Posted by: cq at September 13, 2010 05:11 PM (q1vYw)
IOW, now the tax payers pay the lawyers and the eco-tards. What could be better.
Posted by: Vic at September 13, 2010 09:02 PM (/jbAw)
RESPONSE:
23rd century dictionary:
Environmentalist (n) (obs.): One of many tools used by lawyers to facilitate the eventual complete transfer of all wealth held by non-lawyers to lawyers.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at September 13, 2010 05:14 PM (bxiXv)
nite vic, thanks for so generously sharing your brain.
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 05:30 PM (p302b)
yes and no, guess you don't hang out with the market makers much.
Posted by: curious at September 13, 2010 05:33 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Peter at June 29, 2011 11:05 AM (sfe7E)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2651 seconds, 459 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: joncelli at September 13, 2010 11:40 AM (RD7QR)