April 25, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Just a quick roundup of what our putative representatives in the legislative branch are up to.
First, GOP Senator Lindsey Graham has withdrawn his support from the Democratic global warming bill. No, he didn't recant his unscientific alarmist stance, nor did he take a principled position that carbon taxes are bad for businesses and children and other living things. He just threw a tanty because Democrats are vowing to push the comprehensive immigration piece of shit first. Senate Democrats have cancelled the global warming bill rollout tomorrow.
Second, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told Fox News Sunday that he and 40 of his best pals will prevent the Democratic permanent bailout bill from reaching a floor vote on Monday. Senator Chris Dodd (how in the world is this fellow the guy Dems tapped to push bank reform?!?) says they don't have any GOP votes...yet.
Third, GOP Senator Saxby Chambliss, told CNN's "State of the Union" this morning that Dick Cheney's advice to Charlie Crist to either stick with the GOP or drop out of the race was "not helpful" to Republicans. "You jump on one side or the other in these races and that's probably what happened," he said. "It's certainly stepped up the rhetoric." I guess Chambliss was uncomfortable with Cheney pushing the Republican side of this race. Chambliss has fundraised for Crist in the past.
Fourth, Democrats will unveil this week a response to the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, which upheld the right of individuals working in groups (aka "corporations") to make political speech. The Democratic bill, described here, is blatantly unconstitutional in its speech restrictions.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
07:37 AM
| Comments (170)
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.
Is there any doubt the Republicans in the Senate have no interest at all in winning control of that chamber?
We'll be lucky to hold on to 41 seats after November.
Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey on the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 07:51 AM (iNkZy)
How about the Donor Obfuscation Payment Enactment (DOPE) or the Senate Hard Ass Financial Takeover (SHAFT)?
Posted by: AE at April 25, 2010 07:51 AM (kSfPT)
Still think the Democrats are 'running scared?'
The Democrats aren't worried about a damn thing. Why should they be?
Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey on the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 07:52 AM (iNkZy)
Posted by: neuromancer at April 25, 2010 07:52 AM (+7Qi8)
I thought Snowe had already announced she would support it.
Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 07:52 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 07:53 AM (6tqEs)
Both Snowe and Collins signed the letter saying they wouldn't.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 25, 2010 07:55 AM (Mi2wf)
http://tinyurl.com/25zevqx
Posted by: Kemp at April 25, 2010 07:55 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 25, 2010 07:57 AM (753lI)
Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 07:59 AM (6tqEs)
Following that launch a bill that says any legislation must be written on no more that one sheet of paper.
Core changes to thinking to help force changes in behavior.
Posted by: Kyle Kiernan at April 25, 2010 08:01 AM (aAIb3)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 25, 2010 08:02 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: William Amos at April 25, 2010 08:04 AM (ixGCQ)
These two bills were sent to committees nearly a year ago and have not been acted on; however, any thing is possible. Bloomberg (insert epithet here) is pushing it.
Posted by: Pelayo at April 25, 2010 08:04 AM (C8qIl)
#14
conversely, notice how important those RINOs are to US?
Brown, Graham, McCain, Voinovich, Snowe and Collins all actually stand FIRM, and the Democrats are completely and utterly fucked.
Graham is having a hissy fit.
McCain is fighting for reelection
Voinovich has no loyalties anymore but has oddly stood with us..
Brown needs some cred from the cons and TEA indies that got him elected, so standing up against these 2 gives him street cred
The Maine twins apparently are pissed over the whole attempts by Dems to subvert their importance by tossing the filibuster, meaning they wouldnt matter anymore, so they're probably out too.
The beautiful thing is they only need to have a spine for six months... and as moderates they will carry EVEN MORE POWER IF Republicans win 7-9 seats, forcing Democrats to "reach" over to them for virtually everything. So it is in their best interest to stand firm, letting the GOP close the gap in seats, and then enjoy their squishiness powers.
Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:05 AM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 08:07 AM (6tqEs)
Thought I would post just how f'ed up the demon's-rats are this november. One of my small biz friends today was so pissed... couldn't get an extension for a loan for his biz for some loan rolleovers for the next few months. The local bank that does these type of small biz loans are very much set against this "permanent bailout" bill. He had to sign up with another bank for the loans on terms he was not happy with.
The bailout-bank bill hurts community banks the most, now that my liberal friend understand this. His first response: "why the hell can't they(govt) just leave us alone?"
Now he will be not just be voting for conservatives, I have now convinced him that yep, he is one of those "racist, extremist Tea Party Supporters" for wanting free market, smaller govt, lower taxes, and indiv rights. Heck, he's even thinking of going to the next local Tea Party event. Yep, another disgusted soon-to-be ex-democrat, who votes and will campaign for conservatives.
(and sadly this man voted for Obama, he doesn't watch much TV and so just voted for a democrat like he always has done his whole life, I will soon be convincing him to listen to Mark Levin, might even buy him Levin's "Liberty and Tyranny" for his birthday)
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 25, 2010 08:10 AM (ACkhT)
Wouldn't a picture of Lindsey G. with a dead boy be equally effective? Just askin'
Posted by: alwyr at April 25, 2010 08:10 AM (w2++y)
#20, no, but as they slowly realize JUST HOW MUCH POWER they actually have, you better believe they will hold out for however long they want to get whatever they want, and if it took the Dems, with 60 votes, nearly a year to get HC passed...
good luck pinching out C&T (which would be a KILLER to any Democrat in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana,Kentucky, etc- funny theres 4 senate races between those states too)
good luck pinching out Immigration too (Colorado,California, Nevada all have elections where conservatives are crawling back out of the shadows, not a good year to drive those fights)
both of which would require at least one Rino... in just 6 months? Healthcare was the sideshow, this will be the real circus...
Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:11 AM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:14 AM (Gr1V1)
Democraps have dropped gun control as an issue. It will go nowhere. The real title of that bill should be eliminate private gun sales.
Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 08:14 AM (QrA9E)
Why, oh why is that?
(Yes, Saxby's got a big but...)
Posted by: Warthog at April 25, 2010 08:15 AM (7fr6g)
Just slather it with the word "corporation" - and the left think they have the higher ground.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 25, 2010 08:18 AM (0fzsA)
Keep on eye on this, too. Same-day voter registration (with no photo ID, of course, so just hand the homeless dude a fake lease with a fake name and address to use when you drop him off at each precinct) is a big source of fraud in Wisconsin, so they're gonna take it nationwide.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 25, 2010 08:19 AM (OkT2m)
He will almost certainly be eliminated from the race at the state GOP convention in two weeks, replaced by Tea-Partier Mike Lee.
Posted by: CM at April 25, 2010 08:21 AM (70pqs)
I thought Graham was all for an immigration bill and only a few weeks ago was pushing one with Schumer?
Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 08:25 AM (t72+4)
Yes, but I like #1 at the link - make ALL groups, including unions, take prominent responsibility for their ads.
I know, the rest of it sucks, all of it stifling SOMEONE'S legitimate right to free speech. I'm just saying.
Posted by: elisa at April 25, 2010 08:26 AM (VcPAo)
Crap like that is why feingold should be arrested and sent to prison for a long time on corruption charges. No ID just encourages the corruption.
Posted by: Deathknyte at April 25, 2010 08:26 AM (12blM)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 25, 2010 08:28 AM (+DnSU)
He'll have to clean his own toilet. Quelle horreur!
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 25, 2010 08:30 AM (OkT2m)
Article I; Section 4: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
S-1986 is blatantly unconstitutional. Note that in SC it is now legal to register to vote by mail with only a copy of a utility bill as proof of eligibility to vote.
Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 08:34 AM (QrA9E)
It looks like the Maine Sisters might give-in to "White House Pressure" for the tax-payer-funded eternal bailout of pro-democrat corporations bill.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 25, 2010 08:34 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 25, 2010 08:35 AM (GGy9A)
Just one convention dynamic: Mitt Romney, former Salt Lake Olympic boss and 2008 GOP presidential candidate, will give a Bennett nominating speech.
Romney has already endorsed Bennett, cut a TV ad for him and held a fundraiser for him in Salt Lake City, so Romney's support is not a surprise.
But seeing and hearing Romney in person — he is arguably the most popular GOP politician in the state (he won the 2008 Utah presidential GOP primary with 90 percent of the vote) — could swing some delegate votes for Bennett on convention day.
Uh huh. Thanks a bunch, Mitt.
Posted by: fiatboomer at April 25, 2010 08:36 AM (0Wf6c)
Posted by: alwyr at April 25, 2010 12:10 PM (w2++y)
I don't know where you come from, but in my world it would be even more effective.
Posted by: Editor at April 25, 2010 08:37 AM (YX6i/)
#39
Thats expected. But teases that they are, when the big-time legislation like Cap n Trade, Immigration or Obamacare, they drag out and waffle...which is what we WANT right now. We want the Democrats to waste MONTHS on Immigration and Cap n Trade- thats less time for campaigning. Couple this with almost daily horror stories NOW coming from the NYT (thanks for being late to the party) about ObamaCare, the Dems have NOTHING WORTH EXCITING THEIR BASE. (Not to mention unionists are weary of both cap n trade AND immigrant reform due to the obvious threats to their jobs, so Democrats already have to strongarm their own in the Ohio Valley).
This financial reform is awful, but it is actually rather easy to weaken and repeal (unlike ObamaCare which will be an uphill battle- on Everest (still doable though). The immigrant and c&t legislation are truly disasterous and the longer they get dragged out into the light, the better the landslide in November.
Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:43 AM (Gr1V1)
btw, if this (financial reform) passes, its even MORE cannon fodder for the Republicans in the Connecticut Senate race- "Blum approves what his predecessor just drafted...his predecessor too afraid to face the voters of this fine state because of his problems in financial corruption"
I wouldn't mind cannon fodder... especially since Republicans have been quietly surging there a la Brown- a 10-15 pt deficit with six months to go in a GOP year isn't too shabby...
Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:46 AM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 08:47 AM (y1kI6)
Another RINOP Squish speaks up for Carrot-Colored Crist
Well-played, Stupid Party. Go find some 'nads so that ye may oppose your "esteemed colleagues" who reside in the Party of Evil.
RINOP = Dims = Parasites in Power = useless tissue = Debridement
Posted by: OhioDude at April 25, 2010 08:48 AM (XpjBH)
Posted by: Truman North at April 25, 2010 08:53 AM (FjC5u)
She looks like a cat facing off a wolverine.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 25, 2010 08:56 AM (Q9eyu)
"Putative" is Italian (and Spanish?) for "whorish", isn't it?
Posted by: andycanuck at April 25, 2010 08:57 AM (ocax6)
Clean the toilet? Why would you do that?
It'll lose all it's "character"!
Posted by: Vyvyan Basterd at April 25, 2010 08:57 AM (F5y6X)
Stop worrying - I got da paper!
Posted by: Neville Chamberlain at April 25, 2010 09:09 AM (PON03)
Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 09:11 AM (PON03)
We are not even allowed to call it the invasion it is. Much less fight it.
Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at April 25, 2010 09:13 AM (dQdrY)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 25, 2010 09:20 AM (tm15w)
Posted by: chemjeff at April 25, 2010 09:20 AM (Gk/wA)
Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 09:27 AM (42fUz)
Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 09:29 AM (0K3p3)
to stick with the GOP or drop out of the race was "not helpful to Republicans"
WTF? an alternate universe there. Someone been smokin crack.
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at April 25, 2010 09:30 AM (C29Wk)
Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 09:38 AM (42fUz)
Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 09:39 AM (0K3p3)
Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 09:41 AM (6tqEs)
#1 - Anybody wanna bet that one of the ladies from Maine jumps ship on the banking bill - just to make it "bipartisan", you understand.
And it doesn't seem to matter if the bill is full of junk, fraud, and waste; it there's even one token thing The Sisters agree with, they cave.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 25, 2010 09:42 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 09:47 AM (uFdnM)
Posted by: Andy Capp at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (68tQb)
The scrunt is unelectable outside of her district. Interesting that SCOTUS ruled that a school board member can be elected at large but a US Rep cannot. I don't think much of SCOTUS either...especially after Keloe.
Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 09:50 AM (42fUz)
The chick on The Mentalist has that permanent pouty sourpuss look on her face. But she has one of those pretty Irish faces.
Don't get me started on the Irish, though. Can't stand 'em.
Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 09:51 AM (kSbr6)
can someone tell me why the repubs don't come outright and say "we cannot give amnesty to people here who came illegally nor can we give them preferencence when over 15 million LEGAL residents of America are out of work, why do the demon's rats what to give preference to illegals over American citizens?"
why the hell aren't the repubs this freaking blunt?? I am saying this as a recovering democrat, voters are not stupid, and they want someone to stand up for them!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 25, 2010 09:52 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 09:57 AM (6tqEs)
Posted by: Albus at April 25, 2010 09:57 AM (yh9Bd)
The result of this is very bad. It is like we have been attacked from within and there is nothing left to do but lose our country. Or be called racist. Not bueno, not bueno at all.
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 09:59 AM (uFdnM)
"Because they are afraid of the MSM "
I find this an amazing statement, hell I am a recovering democrat, and even I can now see the blatant propoganda BS they spew in the last 3 years. Seriously, I am now even fundraising $$ for repubs who a few years ago I would have loathed.
Repubs better realise they better start acting like unapologetic conservatives, people have had it!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 25, 2010 10:00 AM (ACkhT)
All we can do now is hold steady and pray for just a few good cards. Once we can get some folks in congress on a Rep ticket who are sane and educated and principled enough to weather the shit storm in DC then maybe we can organize a larger informed party of like minded voters. The people are out there but these things are like religion to most folks and kind of intagible combining tradition,beliefs,intellegence,personlity ect. The left has been hammering away indoctrinating since the abandoning of Dick and Jane and the injection of Dr.Suess and Sesame Street oh and don't forget ridelin and a d disorder. So they are entrenched pretty deep and if we can have a chance to save this republic I think it will tke at least as long as it took to undo it.
Posted by: Andy Capp at April 25, 2010 10:04 AM (68tQb)
Posted by: Barbarian at April 25, 2010 10:08 AM (EL+OC)
It's like the idea of going home and talking to their constituents to explain these awful Democrat bills never occurred to them.
Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 10:09 AM (kSbr6)
Posted by: pat at April 25, 2010 10:11 AM (OOr4n)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 25, 2010 12:56 PM (Q9eyu)
LOL
"We're out... of wolverines... would you except a badger... in es place?"
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 25, 2010 10:15 AM (mHQ7T)
It seems to treat unions the same as corporations, forbids foreign money (sorry, Barry), and forces a disclosure about who's really behind the money in any campaign ad.
I can't say any of those restrictions bother me.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 25, 2010 10:18 AM (QxGmu)
Posted by: Albus at April 25, 2010 01:57 PM (yh9Bd)
This will be Scott Brown's sentimental education.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 25, 2010 10:18 AM (mHQ7T)
johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 25, 2010 12:10 PM
I would like to nominate john here, for "new moron of the year".
Can I get an Amen, or at least a second?
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 25, 2010 10:18 AM (v0YmT)
Posted by: pat at April 25, 2010 02:11 PM (OOr4n)
You must mean when John "Bootie Call" Edwards channels deceased children so as to present fact based evidence to juries? John Edwards attended the University of North Carolina and did graduate work at the Miss Cleo School of Psychic Interpretation in Ft. Lauderdale, prior to her arrest of course.
Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 10:19 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 10:20 AM (6tqEs)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 25, 2010 10:23 AM (v0YmT)
Posted by: katya at April 25, 2010 10:27 AM (Gorqm)
In Soviet Russia, thread judges YOU.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+tard at April 25, 2010 10:31 AM (+EGil)
Whatever happened to the Unknown Comic from the Gong show? You'd think he'd keep the gag going. It was so ridiculous, it worked. A guy with a paper bag on his head telling jokes with a bad attitude -- that's funny.
Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 10:33 AM (kSbr6)
Hell, he should take the remainder of Michael Steele's term. How do you feel about rubber chicken, John?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 25, 2010 10:34 AM (OkT2m)
Simple as that.
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 10:43 AM (uFdnM)
Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 10:43 AM (7ZyYf)
Posted by: Vyvyan Basterd at April 25, 2010 10:43 AM (yHNN0)
Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 10:46 AM (7ZyYf)
Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 10:53 AM (7ZyYf)
"It's very similar to Weimar Germany, the parallels are striking." Here, too, there is a tremendous disappointment with the parliamentary system, pointed Chomsky interviewing on Truthdig.
"The United States is very lucky that no honest and charismatic figure has appeared, and if this were to happen this country would be in real trouble for the frustration, disillusionment and the justified anger combined with the absence of a coherent response," he concludes.
The above is Chomsky on Pravada...
The POS obviously thinks B+rry is dishonest. Heh heh heh
Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 11:04 AM (42fUz)
Posted by: katya at April 25, 2010 02:27 PM (Gorqm)
Maine's the same state that 'read my lips, no new taxes' daddy Bush is from. The country's nucking futs, katya.
Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 11:12 AM (42fUz)
"It's very similar to Weimar Germany, the parallels are striking."
That little prick. When did he say this? Bastard stole it from me. I said that here on this blog over two months ago. And I've been dropping the phrase "Rule by Decree" in reference to the Weimar Republic in dozens of my comments since then.
muthafucka, that Chomsky is a thief
Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 11:13 AM (kSbr6)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 11:13 AM (y1kI6)
Heard a presentation about Independence Caucus at my patriot mtg yesterday. This group screens potential congressional candidates by checking their reactions to -- get ready -- The Constitution. They're more or less the Good Housekeeping Seal for candidates. They're also looking for people to serve at the precinct level, just like the dems did when they started winning big these past few election cycles. By joining, you can get on the screening panel to interrogate anyone who might want to represent your district.
ICaucus is in every state but Hawaii. And get this, their biggest candidate activity is in Commifornia.
Here's the linky. Check out the "Boxer Briefs" video at the top of the page to see from whence "Call me Senator" is getting campaign donations. They're bloodhounds when it comes to donations.
Posted by: RushBabe at April 25, 2010 11:24 AM (LKkE8)
Posted by: dananjcon at April 25, 2010 11:30 AM (bol5Y)
Tom
Posted by: marinetbryant at April 25, 2010 11:32 AM (WQiyW)
Posted by: John Adams at April 25, 2010 11:35 AM (CDWZ6)
Must be pedal to the medal time....should ask for Crist and McLame's dirty laundry be aired too....
Maybe Snowe is a pervert of some kind too....start digging tea party....let's get chicago on them....
Posted by: non_dhimmie at April 25, 2010 11:43 AM (zACGu)
Posted by: dananjcon at April 25, 2010 03:30 PM (bol5Y)
She was looking for her relatives...he was looking for a hook-up.
Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 11:44 AM (42fUz)
Whatever happened to the Unknown Comic from the Gong show?
Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 02:33 PM
He took up guitar
http://tinyurl.com/2c9mo9z
Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 11:49 AM (v5Q3C)
Posted by: Ahmed at April 25, 2010 11:51 AM (1+c7l)
Yes, the climate wingnuts say that but do they really believe it when they are doctoring the numbers themselves.
The real weather people all say it is a fraud.
Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 11:55 AM (QrA9E)
122 99% of all climatologists still believe climate change is real.
"Climate Change" ‚ Anthropogenic Global Warming
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 25, 2010 11:55 AM (F09Uo)
I'll assume he'll be talking with Snowe, Collins, and McCain at some point...
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at April 25, 2010 11:58 AM (Q75cY)
Let's try that again
"Climate Change" IS NOT Anthropogenic Global Warming
Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) has been essentially been proved to be every bit as much of a fraud as Piltdown Man was and so now the alarmists have gone on to the very vague and meaningless phrase "climate change" while pretending that they mean the same thing.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 25, 2010 11:59 AM (F09Uo)
99% of all climatologists still believe climate change is real. You can throw out all the criticisms of the people in the process (many of which are deserved), but in the end, the evidence is still overwhelming in the view of 99% of the experts.
99.9% of all climatologists believe that the effects of climate change will be insignificant, and that human activity accounts for almost none of it.
See? I can make shit up too.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 11:59 AM (plsiE)
Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:08 PM (v5Q3C)
And hookers. Mostly, we love hookers.
Fiscal conservatism? Not so much.
Posted by: The Southern Republican Senatorial Caucus at April 25, 2010 12:12 PM (DjctU)
(And yeah, I've been drawing those parallels between President Obama and Chancellor Bruening too.)
Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:16 PM (DjctU)
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 25, 2010 12:17 PM (zgd5N)
OK, wait a minute. I saw "Chomsky" and just skipped a bit. I saw Wiemar and assumed it was about Bush. What's his point in a sentence?
Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:19 PM (v5Q3C)
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 25, 2010 12:22 PM (W+E+o)
I'm not a drive-by. I've been posting here since early '04 at least. Maybe even '03.
"Troll", yeah, guilty as charged. But the only people I was trying to offend in #133 were the gullible fools who hear their Senator wax teary-eyed over "God" and "family" in a speech back home; and, based on that, give the speaker a pass on what he does in DC.
Those fools can just suck it; they're the reason we have assholes like Cornyn, Chambliss, and Graham in the Senate, and the reason Yankees laugh at our complaints about their own RINOs.
Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:22 PM (DjctU)
Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:24 PM (v5Q3C)
Chomsky is blaming the Democrats and Republicans for our current state.
He doesn't explicitly tie Obama to Bruening though (that much is my pet theory).
Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:25 PM (DjctU)
Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:28 PM (v5Q3C)
I'm not a drive-by. I've been posting here since early '04 at least. Maybe even '03.
Pretty sure he wasn't talking about you, duder.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 12:28 PM (plsiE)
Here's a question: What's better for the environment, paper towels or electric hand-dryers in restrooms?
The elctric hand dryer says on it that it's saving trees and that's good for the environment. But producing electricity uses, say, coal, which is a non-renewable resource and it pollutes the air, whereas trees are a renewable resource that die in the short-term anyway so we might as well use 'em up and plant new ones.
Am I right or wrong?
Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:29 PM (kSbr6)
Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:31 PM (DjctU)
This may come as a shock and a surprise, Zim, but I was not referring to your pointless comment.
I guess I need to put carefully considered references in all of my future sarcastic comments. Or not. I'm crazy like that.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 25, 2010 12:32 PM (zgd5N)
Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 04:29 PM
I don't care.
I prefer either as long as they are no-touch. A restroom with a no-touch hand dryer and a no-touch paper towel dispenser so I can use it on the door on the way out is perfect. I'm not even a germ-a-phobe (still ahppy to eat off the floor) but public bathrooms in my local Wal-Mart scare me.
Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:33 PM (v5Q3C)
Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 12:34 PM (rP8xu)
When going through colonoscopy prep (as I am now) is gin considered a clear liquid?
Well, is it? Would have been nice to know about 3 years ago, and in about 2 years from now.
Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 12:34 PM (0K3p3)
They sound like the dolts in Harold and Kumar go to White Castle. Similar levels of introspection.
Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 12:37 PM (0K3p3)
When going through colonoscopy prep (as I am now) is gin considered a clear liquid?
Well, is it? Would have been nice to know about 3 years ago, and in about 2 years from now.
Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 04:34 PM (0K3p3)
Watch it peppy, it's those juniper berries that will screw up your gut. Also, they make you think you're Katie Courie.
Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 12:38 PM (M5t+h)
Pre-enforcement of Arizona illegal immigrant legislation upsets the folks at Little Fucking Goofballs. Screw Chuck, no link.
Posted by: huerfano at April 25, 2010 12:42 PM (oSrBX)
Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 12:42 PM (rP8xu)
The source here are the commies over at Wikipedia. Look up "Climate Change Consensus."
Its even worse for you guys when you look at the overwhelimingly large list of scientific organizations that agree with AGW and the few that do not (Association of Petroleum Engineers, Petroleum Engineers of America, American Association of Petroleum Geologists).
Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 12:48 PM (oA4y0)
Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 01:03 PM (oA4y0)
The big difference is that you guys just want a HUGE government run defense department that goes around depriving Iraqis, Egyptians, Iranians, Central and South Americans, Vietnamese, Hawaiians, Columians, Phillipinos, etc of their liberty so USA can bring the economic goodies back home.
Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 05:03 PM (oA4y0)
Yea, America really fucked over the Philippines when we liberated Manila with a very high price of blood and equipment in 1945. Thousands of Philippinos currently living in America is thankful for the effort our military made to liberate their country from the Japanese.
Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 01:20 PM (M5t+h)
Posted by: whiskey at April 25, 2010 01:27 PM (L03mw)
Troll", yeah, guilty as charged. But the only people I was trying to offend in #133 were the gullible fools who hear their Senator wax teary-eyed over "God" and "family" in a speech back home; and, based on that, give the speaker a pass on what he does in DC.
Those fools can just suck it; they're the reason we have assholes like Cornyn, Chambliss, and Graham in the Senate, and the reason Yankees laugh at our complaints about their own RINOs.
Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 04:22 PM (DjctU)
Here, here. Thats why Shmuckabee gets a pass from a good portion of the base even though he's mnstly a populist and anything but a fiscal conservative.
Oh yea, and Zimriel isnt a troll either. He just tells it like it is.
Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (t72+4)
"Senator Chris Dodd (how in the world is this fellow the guy Dems tapped to push bank reform?!?) says they don't have any GOP votes...yet."
They chose Dodd because he knows best what the bankers want and they do not care what anybody else thinks of the bill. They are fully in ram it in mode. There are not politics anymore, just brute force.
Posted by: Ronsonic at April 25, 2010 02:04 PM (VTm+A)
He is. It's all in the timing. His partner in crime on this issue is McCain. McCain and Hayworth are still fighting in the primary. Graham's goal is to push off contentious debate that would hurt McCain for a bit while hoping McCain can hold off Hayworth's momentum. The instant McCain ekes a win in the primary (big assumption he does), then Grahamnesty strikes and tag teams with McCain who will then be vying for the "moderate" vote in AZ. That is when Grahamnesty will reach across the aisle and invite co-legislation. Graham will have helped his RINO-ish buddy survive a strong conservative challenge and still have introduced (perhaps even passed an extremely contentious and bad bill) and will have done so a long time before he himself is up for re-election where such a vote would cost him his seat. Graham would want this amnesty done while the Democrats still control the Congress because a more conservative one is less likely to do so.
Graham is protecting himself by delaying. He's not against the legislation, he just needs it introduced at a better point in the cycle.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 25, 2010 02:45 PM (swuwV)
But after Spain was defeated, the United States turned against the Filipino rebels and took control of the Philippines, converting it into a US colony with the excuse that Filipinos were incapable of self-government.
do your homework
Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 03:04 PM (oA4y0)
Hmmm, OK. I guess the public sector employees unions are out of business, then, yes? If you're paid in tax dollars, and your union dues are paid in tax dollars, and you make more than $50,000 per year in tax dollars, seems to me this law would disqualify you.
Right?
Posted by: the dandy at April 25, 2010 05:42 PM (vJK0V)
She basically owns the Maine GOP, which she regards as a device for increasing her own personal power, not for advancing a political agenda.
If Snowe goes with the Dems, I hold out some hope that Lieberman will go with the R's to sustain a filibuster. He was with Collins when she said she'd vote to filibuster it. She isn't QUITE as consistent a RINO as Snowe, backhanded compliment though that is.
Posted by: Dave J. at April 25, 2010 06:02 PM (DCQ0q)
Fish, you dunce, the Phillipine American war was 1899 when USA tried to annex Phillipines.
Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 07:04 PM (oA4y0)
Apparently you are unable to read English. Here was my comment:
Yea, America really fucked over the Philippines when we liberated Manila with a very high price of blood and equipment in 1945.
Tasting Dick, you're an asshole and unable to read and comprehend. Don't ever insult my father and the thousands of other brave men who liberated the Phillipines.
Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 06:17 PM (M5t+h)
But after Spain was defeated, the United States turned against the Filipino rebels and took control of the Philippines, converting it into a US colony with the excuse that Filipinos were incapable of self-government.
do your homework
Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 07:04 PM (oA4y0)
BTW, dimwit, it wasn't the Phillipine-American War. It was the Spanish American War, and you don't have a freaking clue what occurred there.
Posted by: Weekend Scoreboard at April 25, 2010 08:12 PM (ITzbJ)
Posted by: 1SGinTN at April 25, 2010 08:39 PM (Cixed)
Our website have many new MBT shoes :
<a href="http://masai-mbt.com/product.aspx">running shoes-</a>
<a href="http://masai-mbt.com/categories-MBT-Chapa-Shoes-1.htm">MBT Chapa Shoes-</a>
<a href="http://masai-mbt.com/categories-MBT-Sport-Shoes-2.htm">MBT Sport Shoes-</a>
Posted by: ghost2069 at April 29, 2010 11:29 PM (+nEOz)
Posted by: ghost2069 at April 29, 2010 11:34 PM (+nEOz)
Posted by: discount gucci sneakers at September 30, 2010 10:30 AM (I1Y/p)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3081 seconds, 298 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: antisocialist at April 25, 2010 07:48 AM (Rwudm)