April 25, 2010

Eye on Congress
— Gabriel Malor

Just a quick roundup of what our putative representatives in the legislative branch are up to.

First, GOP Senator Lindsey Graham has withdrawn his support from the Democratic global warming bill. No, he didn't recant his unscientific alarmist stance, nor did he take a principled position that carbon taxes are bad for businesses and children and other living things. He just threw a tanty because Democrats are vowing to push the comprehensive immigration piece of shit first. Senate Democrats have cancelled the global warming bill rollout tomorrow.

Second, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told Fox News Sunday that he and 40 of his best pals will prevent the Democratic permanent bailout bill from reaching a floor vote on Monday. Senator Chris Dodd (how in the world is this fellow the guy Dems tapped to push bank reform?!?) says they don't have any GOP votes...yet.

Third, GOP Senator Saxby Chambliss, told CNN's "State of the Union" this morning that Dick Cheney's advice to Charlie Crist to either stick with the GOP or drop out of the race was "not helpful" to Republicans. "You jump on one side or the other in these races and that's probably what happened," he said. "It's certainly stepped up the rhetoric." I guess Chambliss was uncomfortable with Cheney pushing the Republican side of this race. Chambliss has fundraised for Crist in the past.

Fourth, Democrats will unveil this week a response to the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, which upheld the right of individuals working in groups (aka "corporations") to make political speech. The Democratic bill, described here, is blatantly unconstitutional in its speech restrictions.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 07:37 AM | Comments (170)
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Anybody wanna bet that one of the ladies from Maine jumps ship on the banking bill - just to make it "bipartisan", you understand.

Posted by: antisocialist at April 25, 2010 07:48 AM (Rwudm)

2
It's all a bluff. They're all in on it.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey on the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 07:48 AM (iNkZy)

3

Somebody must have pictures of Graham and a live boy.

Posted by: Ed Anger at April 25, 2010 07:50 AM (7+pP9)

4
Is there any doubt the Republicans in the Senate have no interest at all in winning control of that chamber?

We'll be lucky to hold on to 41 seats after November.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey on the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 07:51 AM (iNkZy)

5 The DISCLOSE act?  Do people stay up nights assembling names that point in the opposite direction of what the bill does? 

How about the Donor Obfuscation Payment Enactment (DOPE) or the Senate Hard Ass Financial Takeover (SHAFT)?

Posted by: AE at April 25, 2010 07:51 AM (kSfPT)

6
Still think the Democrats are 'running scared?'

The Democrats aren't worried about a damn thing. Why should they be?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey on the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 07:52 AM (iNkZy)

7 Maybe the dems switched up because they think carbon tax is a clear looser, while they can still suspend disbelief long enough to think that they will win back some credibility on their "make them all citizens so they will vote for us" agenda.

Posted by: neuromancer at April 25, 2010 07:52 AM (+7Qi8)

8 Anybody wanna bet that one of the ladies from Maine jumps ship on the banking bill - just to make it "bipartisan", you understand.

I thought Snowe had already announced she would support it.

Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 07:52 AM (QrA9E)

9 They think we work for them. Sadly, to too large an extent, they are right.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 07:53 AM (6tqEs)

10
Alex DeTocqueville just called me and said, "Are you fucking kidding me?"

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey on the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 07:55 AM (iNkZy)

11 I thought Snowe had already announced she would support it.

Both Snowe and Collins signed the letter saying they wouldn't.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 25, 2010 07:55 AM (Mi2wf)

12 Gabe, Lindsey Graham comes to Charlotte and meets with Duke Energy and guess what happens two days later??

http://tinyurl.com/25zevqx


Posted by: Kemp at April 25, 2010 07:55 AM (2+9Yx)

13 I thought Snowe had already announced she would support it. Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 11:52 AM (QrA9E) Not sure, but the Dems have acted so undemocratically that maybe even those 2 bitches and the lady from SC want nothing to do with them anymore? Yeah I know I'm dreaming.

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 25, 2010 07:57 AM (753lI)

14 The Dems likely figure they can't stop a GOP landslide in November, so why not go for broke. BTW, notice how critically valuable RINOs are to them?

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 07:59 AM (6tqEs)

15 One of our stout representatives should sponsor a bill that forbids anyone in congress from naming or referring to any pending legislation except by its numbered appellation.  Forbid all the cute, euphimistic, misleading, emotive packed bill names.

Following that launch a bill that says any legislation must be written on no more that one sheet of paper.

Core changes to thinking to help force changes in behavior.

Posted by: Kyle Kiernan at April 25, 2010 08:01 AM (aAIb3)

16 Well, I can see from the comments that Republicans have already thrown in the towel or waved it at the enemy or whatever.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 25, 2010 08:02 AM (mHQ7T)

17

Meanwhile Dirk Durban gets Blagoed

http://tinyurl.com/39j2lcu

Dick Durban subpoenaed for Blagojevich trial

Posted by: William Amos at April 25, 2010 08:04 AM (ixGCQ)

18 Look out for S.843 and H.R. 2324, the Gun Show Background Check Act of 2009.  It adds layers of regulation and penalties on the promoter and everyone who sells guns.  It even requires background checks for non-dealers who are selling at least one firearm.  I believe that this is the bill that NY Mayor Bloomberg (insert epithet here) is touting.

These two bills were sent to committees nearly a year ago and have not been acted on; however, any thing is possible.  Bloomberg (insert epithet here) is pushing it.  

Posted by: Pelayo at April 25, 2010 08:04 AM (C8qIl)

19

#14

conversely, notice how important those RINOs are to US?

Brown, Graham, McCain, Voinovich, Snowe and Collins all actually stand FIRM, and the Democrats are completely and utterly fucked.

Graham is having a hissy fit.

McCain is fighting for reelection

Voinovich has no loyalties anymore but has oddly stood with us..

Brown needs some cred from the cons and TEA indies that got him elected, so standing up against these 2 gives him street cred

The Maine twins apparently are pissed over the whole attempts by Dems to subvert their importance by tossing the filibuster, meaning they wouldnt matter anymore, so they're probably out too.

The beautiful thing is they only need to have a spine for six months... and as moderates they will carry EVEN MORE POWER IF Republicans win 7-9 seats, forcing Democrats to "reach" over to them for virtually everything. So it is in their best interest to stand firm, letting the GOP close the gap in seats, and then enjoy their squishiness powers.

Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:05 AM (Gr1V1)

20 CAC, yes, but we have to cross our fingers and hope they stand firm. Not a good situation.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 08:07 AM (6tqEs)

21

Thought I would post just how f'ed up the demon's-rats are this november.  One of my small biz friends today was so pissed... couldn't get an extension for a loan for his biz for some loan rolleovers for the next few months.  The local bank that does these type of small biz loans are very much set against this "permanent bailout" bill. He had to sign up with another bank for the loans on terms he was not happy with.

The bailout-bank bill hurts community banks the most, now that my liberal friend understand this. His first response: "why the hell can't they(govt) just leave us alone?"

Now he will be not just  be voting for conservatives, I have now convinced him that yep, he is one of those "racist, extremist Tea Party Supporters" for wanting free market,  smaller govt, lower taxes, and indiv rights. Heck, he's even thinking of going to the next local Tea Party event. Yep, another disgusted soon-to-be ex-democrat, who votes and will campaign for conservatives.

(and sadly this man voted for Obama, he doesn't watch much TV and so just voted for a democrat like he always has done his whole life, I will soon be convincing him to listen to Mark Levin, might even buy him Levin's "Liberty and Tyranny" for his birthday)

Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 25, 2010 08:10 AM (ACkhT)

22 Somebody must have pictures of Graham and a live boy.

Wouldn't a picture of Lindsey G. with a dead boy be equally effective? Just askin'

Posted by: alwyr at April 25, 2010 08:10 AM (w2++y)

23

#20, no, but as they slowly realize JUST HOW MUCH POWER they actually have, you better believe they will hold out for however long they want to get whatever they want, and if it took the Dems, with 60 votes, nearly a year to get HC passed...

good luck pinching out C&T (which would be a KILLER to any Democrat in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana,Kentucky, etc- funny theres 4 senate races between those states too)

good luck pinching out Immigration too (Colorado,California, Nevada all have elections where conservatives are crawling back out of the shadows, not a good year to drive those fights)

both of which would require at least one Rino... in just 6 months? Healthcare was the sideshow, this will be the real circus...

Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:11 AM (Gr1V1)

24 just to drive the point home, Democrats spent all their capital. There is NO incentive for the Rinos to jump in bed with them- it may be in their nature, but its also in their nature to "matter"- and that feeling lasts as long as they are needed as the 60th vote- they will milk the hell out of it, especially since the wind is now at the Republicans' backs...

Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:14 AM (Gr1V1)

25 These two bills were sent to committees nearly a year ago and have not been acted on; however, any thing is possible.  Bloomberg (insert epithet here) is pushing it. 

Democraps have dropped gun control as an issue. It will go nowhere. The real title of that bill should be eliminate private gun sales.

Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 08:14 AM (QrA9E)

26 As a Georgian, I have to say Saxby votes the right way.  I mean hey, at least he's no Lindsy Graham.  Buuuttttt...  he has this McCain like need to open his mouth and fellate the other side.

Why, oh why is that?

(Yes, Saxby's got a big but...)

Posted by: Warthog at April 25, 2010 08:15 AM (7fr6g)

27 Get ready, knuckleheads, for immigration reform.

Can The White Party survive?

Mexicans!

Posted by: Arizona Uber Alles at April 25, 2010 08:16 AM (seXGC)

28 and remember - its' OK for left-wing groups AKA  lefty supporting "corporations" to pool campaign money and for PACs and 527s to support left wing causes and candidates , but it's not OK for free speech to flow from anything but the left and it's sponsors.


Just slather it with the word "corporation" - and the left think they have the higher ground.

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 25, 2010 08:18 AM (0fzsA)

29 The Democrats aren't worried about a damn thing. Why should they be?

Keep on eye on this, too.  Same-day voter registration (with no photo ID, of course, so just hand the homeless dude a fake lease with a fake name and address to use when you drop him off at each precinct) is a big source of fraud in Wisconsin, so they're gonna take it nationwide.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 25, 2010 08:19 AM (OkT2m)

30 Somewhat O/T, follow-up to what my comment yesterday:  Utah Senator Bob Bennett (R-TARP) is in trouble.

He will almost certainly be eliminated from the race at the state GOP convention in two weeks, replaced by Tea-Partier Mike Lee.

Posted by: CM at April 25, 2010 08:21 AM (70pqs)

31 Try again:  Here's the Bennett link.

Posted by: CM at April 25, 2010 08:23 AM (70pqs)

32 haha, eggmcmuffin

Posted by: Gleek at April 25, 2010 08:25 AM (Zz/JI)

33

I thought Graham was all for an immigration bill and only a few weeks ago was pushing one with Schumer?

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 08:25 AM (t72+4)

34 "Fourth, Democrats will unveil this week a response to the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, which upheld the right of individuals working in groups (aka "corporations") to make political speech. The Democratic bill, described here, is blatantly unconstitutional in its speech restrictions."

Yes, but I like #1 at the link - make ALL groups, including unions, take prominent responsibility for their ads.

I know, the rest of it sucks, all of it stifling SOMEONE'S legitimate right to free speech.  I'm just saying.

Posted by: elisa at April 25, 2010 08:26 AM (VcPAo)

35 Keep on eye on this, too.  Same-day voter registration (with no photo ID, of course, so just hand the homeless dude a fake lease with a fake name and address to use when you drop him off at each precinct) is a big source of fraud in Wisconsin, so they're gonna take it nationwide.

Crap like that is why feingold should be arrested and sent to prison for a long time on corruption charges.  No ID just encourages the corruption.

Posted by: Deathknyte at April 25, 2010 08:26 AM (12blM)

36 Poor eggamoobymuffin, so scared of immigration laws actually being enforced.

Posted by: Waterhouse at April 25, 2010 08:28 AM (+DnSU)

37 so scared of immigration laws actually being enforced.

He'll have to clean his own toilet.  Quelle horreur!

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 25, 2010 08:30 AM (OkT2m)

38 S-1986: To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require States to provide for same day registration.

Article I; Section 4: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

S-1986 is blatantly unconstitutional. Note that in SC it is now legal to register to vote by mail with only a copy of a utility bill as proof of eligibility to vote.


Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 08:34 AM (QrA9E)

39
It looks like the Maine Sisters might give-in to "White House Pressure" for the tax-payer-funded eternal bailout of pro-democrat corporations bill.


Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 25, 2010 08:34 AM (0fzsA)

40 One very nice thing about the tenor of the debate between socialism and republican democracy that is occuring now is that if it plays out, it will hopefully settle whether or not socialism and republican democracy of the flavor envisioned by the founders can coexist.  My hope is that in the final accounting, they can't.  If it is settled this way, the Supreme Court may finally be forced to finally exercise its power to either uphold the constitution or negate it permanently, with all of the consequences that implies. jmio

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 25, 2010 08:35 AM (GGy9A)

41

Just one convention dynamic: Mitt Romney, former Salt Lake Olympic boss and 2008 GOP presidential candidate, will give a Bennett nominating speech.

Romney has already endorsed Bennett, cut a TV ad for him and held a fundraiser for him in Salt Lake City, so Romney's support is not a surprise.

But seeing and hearing Romney in person — he is arguably the most popular GOP politician in the state (he won the 2008 Utah presidential GOP primary with 90 percent of the vote) — could swing some delegate votes for Bennett on convention day.

Uh huh. Thanks a bunch, Mitt.

Posted by: fiatboomer at April 25, 2010 08:36 AM (0Wf6c)

42 Wouldn't a picture of Lindsey G. with a dead boy be equally effective? Just askin'

Posted by: alwyr at April 25, 2010 12:10 PM (w2++y)

I don't know where you come from, but in my world it would be even more effective.

Posted by: Editor at April 25, 2010 08:37 AM (YX6i/)

43

#39

Thats expected. But teases that they are, when the big-time legislation like Cap n Trade, Immigration or Obamacare, they drag out and waffle...which is what we WANT right now. We want the Democrats to waste MONTHS on Immigration and Cap n Trade- thats less time for campaigning. Couple this with almost daily horror stories NOW coming from the NYT (thanks for being late to the party) about ObamaCare, the Dems have NOTHING WORTH EXCITING THEIR BASE. (Not to mention unionists are weary of both cap n trade AND immigrant reform due to the obvious threats to their jobs, so Democrats already have to strongarm their own in the Ohio Valley).

This financial reform is awful, but it is actually rather easy to weaken and repeal (unlike ObamaCare which will be an uphill battle- on Everest (still doable though). The immigrant and c&t legislation are truly disasterous and the longer they get dragged out into the light, the better the landslide in November.

Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:43 AM (Gr1V1)

44
Eye on Congress
That sounds threatening, you violent right-wing terrorist.

Posted by: Time Magazine at April 25, 2010 08:44 AM (snr2+)

45

btw, if this (financial reform) passes, its even MORE cannon fodder for the Republicans in the Connecticut Senate race- "Blum approves what his predecessor just drafted...his predecessor too afraid to face the voters of this fine state because of his problems in financial corruption"

I wouldn't mind cannon fodder... especially since Republicans have been quietly surging there a la Brown- a 10-15 pt deficit with six months to go in a GOP year isn't too shabby...

Posted by: CAC at April 25, 2010 08:46 AM (Gr1V1)

46 Stall, stall, stall... it's really the best strategy we have left. We know that if the Dems see any way at all to force either "climate change legislation" (what kind of f*cking dipshits literally try to legislate the weather!?! But I digress...) or immigration reform through, they'll do it. I say our Repubs in Congress (especially the ones who think us Tea Partiers are gonna support them) should slam every applicable procedural door in the Dems faces, waste as many hours of as many days as possible, and generally do everything the Constitution allows in order to buy time. They've made it plain, to me at least, that they're on a full fledged kamikaze mission. They aim to do as much damage in as many areas as they can before the nation has a chance to respond in Nov. Delay, delay, delay...

Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 08:47 AM (y1kI6)

47 Wonderful

Another RINOP Squish speaks up for Carrot-Colored Crist

Well-played, Stupid Party. Go find some 'nads so that ye may oppose your "esteemed colleagues" who reside in the Party of Evil.

RINOP = Dims = Parasites in Power = useless tissue = Debridement

Posted by: OhioDude at April 25, 2010 08:48 AM (XpjBH)

Posted by: Truman North at April 25, 2010 08:53 AM (FjC5u)

49 You've got to see the pic of Barry and Yeti waiting on their ribs up at Lucianne's homepage.  http://www.lucianne.com/

She looks like a cat facing off a wolverine.

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 25, 2010 08:56 AM (Q9eyu)

50 our putative representatives in the legislative branch
"Putative" is Italian (and Spanish?) for "whorish", isn't it?

Posted by: andycanuck at April 25, 2010 08:57 AM (ocax6)

51 Eunuch-Nuk!

Posted by: Apache Chief from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 08:57 AM (FjC5u)

52 He'll have to clean his own toilet.

Clean the toilet? Why would you do that?

It'll lose all it's "character"!

Posted by: Vyvyan Basterd at April 25, 2010 08:57 AM (F5y6X)

53
Eunuch-Nuk!
Posted by: Apache Chief from the Super Friends

hahahaha

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 09:05 AM (kSbr6)

54 She looks like a cat facing off a wolverine.

He looks stoned.

Posted by: Deathknyte at April 25, 2010 09:05 AM (12blM)

55

Stop worrying - I got da paper!

Posted by: Neville Chamberlain at April 25, 2010 09:09 AM (PON03)

56 So let me get this straight -  we're going to destroy our entire economy (what's left of it) to get slightly better gardeners?

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 09:11 AM (PON03)

57

We are not even allowed to call it the invasion it is.  Much less fight it.

Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at April 25, 2010 09:13 AM (dQdrY)

58 Graham was just transparently using the immigration legislation as an excuse to drop the global warming turkey.

Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 25, 2010 09:20 AM (tm15w)

59 Well to be honest I actually like some of the stuff in the (stupidly-named) DISCLOSE act.  Like the part that requires unions to disclose who their donors are and how they spend their money.  But yeah a lot of it is stupid and just Democrats wanting their moment of payback.

Posted by: chemjeff at April 25, 2010 09:20 AM (Gk/wA)

60
Republicans should be calling this bill what it is -- fascism.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 09:26 AM (kSbr6)

61 Tax cheat Timmy wants to bail out the IMF now. Go figure.

Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 09:27 AM (42fUz)

62 I am a lot less worried about C&T than immigration.  The former is reversible, the latter is not, and profoundly changes our country.  I prefer that LG waste his remaining slim credibility on C&T, and when he is removed, we reverse it. 

Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 09:29 AM (0K3p3)

63

 to stick with the GOP or drop out of the race was "not helpful to Republicans"

 

WTF? an alternate universe there. Someone been smokin crack.

Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at April 25, 2010 09:30 AM (C29Wk)

64 Guys like Mitt are RINO's...They work WITH DemoncRATS to keep the game going. For God's sake Utah, The POS passed Obamacare before Obama did!!!! And 90% of you Utah GOPers voted for the prick??? Are you on fucking crack?

Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 09:38 AM (42fUz)

65 Linseed walked away because he figures, incorrectly IMO, that his career can survive either C&T or immigration, but not both. 

Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 09:39 AM (0K3p3)

66 Washington DC assimilates you like a Borg Cube. GOP big shots do not give a rat's ass about anything but themselves. The GOP formula of surrender and "please like us!" works for GOP big shots. If it doesn't work for you or your Country, that's not their problem.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 09:41 AM (6tqEs)

67
Law & Order now has a dead guy on it? Weird.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 09:42 AM (kSbr6)

68
#1 - Anybody wanna bet that one of the ladies from Maine jumps ship on the banking bill - just to make it "bipartisan", you understand.



And it doesn't seem to matter if the bill is full of junk, fraud, and waste; it there's even one token thing The Sisters agree with, they cave.


Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 25, 2010 09:42 AM (0fzsA)

69
Law & Order in the Middle East: Crimes Against Humanity Committed By Joos Unit

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 09:44 AM (kSbr6)

Posted by: Andy Capp at April 25, 2010 09:45 AM (68tQb)

71 The Dems only hope is to add 20 or so million card carrying Dems via free agency and immigration reform. So the 64k question is...if they pass some form of amnesty- how soon before the free agents vote? Timing for these shitbags is everything...

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 09:47 AM (uFdnM)

72

65

Utah?

Nothins over till we say its over! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?

Posted by: Andy Capp at April 25, 2010 09:48 AM (68tQb)

73 71 Heartache ! http://tinyurl.com/34n4yaj

Posted by: Andy Capp at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (68tQb)

The scrunt is unelectable outside of her district. Interesting that SCOTUS ruled that a school board member can be elected at large but a US Rep cannot. I don't think much of SCOTUS either...especially after Keloe.

Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 09:50 AM (42fUz)

74
The chick on The Mentalist has that permanent pouty sourpuss look on her face. But she has one of those pretty Irish faces.

Don't get me started on the Irish, though. Can't stand 'em.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 09:51 AM (kSbr6)

75

can someone tell me why the repubs don't come outright and say "we cannot give amnesty to people here who came illegally nor can we give them preferencence when over 15 million LEGAL residents of America are out of work, why do the demon's rats what to give preference to illegals over American citizens?"

 

why the hell aren't the repubs this freaking blunt?? I am saying this as a recovering democrat, voters are not stupid, and they want someone to stand up for them!

Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 25, 2010 09:52 AM (ACkhT)

76 why the hell aren't the repubs this freaking blunt?? I am saying this as a recovering democrat, voters are not stupid, and they want someone to stand up for them! Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat Because they are afraid of the MSM and they don't really hate it or fear it as much as we do. They can live with Amnesty and Cap&Tax, and they do not care if you can't.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 09:57 AM (6tqEs)

77 If there's any substance in his spine at all, MConnell must indeed herd the cats NOW and filibuster this horrendous Financial Reduction Act.

Posted by: Albus at April 25, 2010 09:57 AM (yh9Bd)

78 The Dems know that illegal aliens will convert almost exclusively to their party and thus represent a huge voter block, far larger than current estimates.

The result of this is very bad. It is like we have been attacked from within and there is nothing left to do but lose our country. Or be called racist. Not bueno, not bueno at all.

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 09:59 AM (uFdnM)

79
What do you mean, like bone marrow?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 10:00 AM (kSbr6)

80

"Because they are afraid of the MSM "

I find this an amazing statement, hell I am a recovering democrat, and even I can now see the blatant propoganda BS they spew in the last 3 years.  Seriously, I am now even fundraising $$ for repubs who a few years ago I would have loathed.

Repubs better realise they better start acting like unapologetic conservatives, people have had it!

Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 25, 2010 10:00 AM (ACkhT)

81

74

All we can do now is hold steady and pray for just a few good cards. Once we can get some folks in congress on a Rep ticket who are sane and educated and principled enough to weather the shit storm in DC then maybe we can organize a larger informed party of like minded voters. The people are out there but these things are like religion to most folks and kind of intagible combining tradition,beliefs,intellegence,personlity ect. The left has been hammering away indoctrinating since the abandoning of Dick and Jane and the injection of  Dr.Suess and Sesame Street oh and don't forget ridelin and a d disorder. So they are entrenched pretty deep and if we can have a chance to save this republic I think it will tke at least as long as it took to undo it.

Posted by: Andy Capp at April 25, 2010 10:04 AM (68tQb)

82
Anyone see Kick-Ass?

Is it a kid's (or tweener's) flick?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 10:06 AM (kSbr6)

83
This place better get out of Jeff Goldblum mode and into...um, ...um. a more lively mode.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 10:07 AM (kSbr6)

84 Blowing this opportunity is well within the GOP's capabilities.

Posted by: Barbarian at April 25, 2010 10:08 AM (EL+OC)

85 76

 why the hell aren't the repubs this freaking blunt??


Pussies perhaps?

Posted by: Barbarian at April 25, 2010 10:09 AM (EL+OC)

86
It's like the idea of going home and talking to their constituents to explain these awful Democrat bills never occurred to them.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 10:09 AM (kSbr6)

87 Graham and Snow can always be counted on to screw the GOP.As for Graham, his belief in bogus science is breath taking. What an arrogant fool. Reminds me so much of Edwards.

Posted by: pat at April 25, 2010 10:11 AM (OOr4n)

88 She looks like a cat facing off a wolverine.

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 25, 2010 12:56 PM (Q9eyu)

LOL

"We're out... of wolverines... would you except a badger... in es place?"

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 25, 2010 10:15 AM (mHQ7T)

89 I hate the damage the Dems keep doing, but I just took a look at their new campaign finance reform bill, and I have to say there's very little I don't like here.

It seems to treat unions the same as corporations, forbids foreign money (sorry, Barry), and forces a disclosure about who's really behind the money in any campaign ad.

I can't say any of those restrictions bother me.

Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 25, 2010 10:18 AM (QxGmu)

90 If there's any substance in his spine at all, MConnell must indeed herd the cats NOW and filibuster this horrendous Financial Reduction Act.

Posted by: Albus at April 25, 2010 01:57 PM (yh9Bd)

This will be Scott Brown's sentimental education.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 25, 2010 10:18 AM (mHQ7T)

91

johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 25, 2010 12:10 PM

I would like to nominate john here, for "new moron of the year".

Can I get an Amen, or at least a second?

Posted by: hutch1200 at April 25, 2010 10:18 AM (v0YmT)

92  Reminds me so much of Edwards.

Posted by: pat at April 25, 2010 02:11 PM (OOr4n)

You must mean when John "Bootie Call" Edwards channels deceased children so as to present fact based evidence to juries?  John Edwards attended the University of North Carolina and did graduate work at the Miss Cleo School of Psychic Interpretation in Ft. Lauderdale, prior to her arrest of course.

Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 10:19 AM (M5t+h)

93 92, I'm with you, but I think he's been here too long for that.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 10:20 AM (6tqEs)

94 True eman. Just want to recognise a decent convert.

Posted by: hutch1200 at April 25, 2010 10:23 AM (v0YmT)

95
3.2

Terrible follow-through.

Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 10:26 AM (kSbr6)

96 I wanna know how on God's Green Earth Olympia Snowe ended up on the Republican ticket.

Posted by: katya at April 25, 2010 10:27 AM (Gorqm)

97 Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 02:26 PM (kSbr6)

In Soviet Russia, thread judges YOU.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+tard at April 25, 2010 10:31 AM (+EGil)

98
Whatever happened to the Unknown Comic from the Gong show? You'd think he'd keep the gag going. It was so ridiculous, it worked. A guy with a paper bag on his head telling jokes with a bad attitude -- that's funny.


Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 10:33 AM (kSbr6)

99
brb

Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 10:34 AM (kSbr6)

100 I would like to nominate john here, for "new moron of the year".

Hell, he should take the remainder of Michael Steele's term.  How do you feel about rubber chicken, John?

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 25, 2010 10:34 AM (OkT2m)

Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 10:36 AM (kSbr6)

102
watch this clip and tell me if that's Artie Johnson trying to feel up Agent 99?

Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 10:38 AM (kSbr6)

103
maybe it's Tenille from Captain & Tenille?

Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 10:41 AM (kSbr6)

104 If Peter Schiff says the banking reform package is a piece of shit, then it is a piece of shit.

Simple as that.

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 10:43 AM (uFdnM)

105 75: She has pretty Irish boobz too - she's done the B-movie circuit prior to that gig.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 10:43 AM (7ZyYf)

106 Also in Soviet Russia, a pood is 40 funt.

True fact!

Posted by: Vyvyan Basterd at April 25, 2010 10:43 AM (yHNN0)

107 90: If the Dems are pushing it there's no way in hell it does anything negative (or even "fair") to unions - period. There's a mess of hooks buried in that tasty snack. Keep looking.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 10:46 AM (7ZyYf)

108 88: (last flurry-post) Graham doesn't believe the science any more than he believes immigrants "deserve" a path to citizenship. He's another "philosopher king" in the "lie to them for their own good" vein - he acts like he buys into "green" BS to trick us into energy independence (as if that's what green power is all about) and he acts like he gives a damn about Latin Americans to trick them into later voting for Republicans (like they actually will). Green power's a dead-end scam and amnestied immigrants will still vote 5 to 1 democrat even if we "me-too" them into citizenship. But Lindsey's too "smart" to see that.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 10:53 AM (7ZyYf)

109

"It's very similar to Weimar Germany, the parallels are striking." Here, too, there is a tremendous disappointment with the parliamentary system, pointed Chomsky interviewing on Truthdig.

"The United States is very lucky that no honest and charismatic figure has appeared, and if this were to happen this country would be in real trouble for the frustration, disillusionment and the justified anger combined with the absence of a coherent response," he concludes.

The above is Chomsky on Pravada...

The POS obviously thinks B+rry is dishonest. Heh heh heh

Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 11:04 AM (42fUz)

110 97 I wanna know how on God's Green Earth Olympia Snowe ended up on the Republican ticket.

Posted by: katya at April 25, 2010 02:27 PM (Gorqm)

Maine's the same state that 'read my lips, no new taxes' daddy Bush is from.  The country's nucking futs, katya.

Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 11:12 AM (42fUz)

111
"It's very similar to Weimar Germany, the parallels are striking."

That little prick. When did he say this? Bastard stole it from me. I said that here on this blog over two months ago. And I've been dropping the phrase "Rule by Decree" in reference to the Weimar Republic in dozens of my comments since then.

muthafucka, that Chomsky is a thief

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 11:13 AM (kSbr6)

112 "Green power's a dead-end scam..." That reminds me. I've been following, off and on, the CapeWind (windmills to be built up to 50 miles off the Cape shoreline) project for at least ten years. It's still the best entertainment in the eco-biz. Don't know if we have Cape Codders in here, but if so I'd like their take on the latest push to do/stop the project once and for all. It's been a moonbat on moonbat slap-fight since the beginning. The fact that the energy "produced" will be so expensive as to actually be a drain on the economy is occasionally mentioned, but mainly they just fight over which is the better path to eco-salvation: wind power or an unblemished Gaia? Gets them all worked up every time.

Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 11:13 AM (y1kI6)

113 Agreed, space monkey!

Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 11:23 AM (42fUz)

114

Heard a presentation about Independence Caucus at my patriot mtg yesterday.  This group screens potential congressional candidates by checking their reactions to -- get ready -- The Constitution.  They're more or less the Good Housekeeping Seal for candidates.  They're also looking for people to serve at the precinct level, just like the dems did when they started winning big these past few election cycles.  By joining, you can get on the screening panel to interrogate anyone who might want to represent your district.

ICaucus is in every state but Hawaii.  And get this, their biggest candidate activity is in Commifornia. 

Here's the linky.  Check out the "Boxer Briefs" video at the top of the page to see from whence "Call me Senator" is getting campaign donations.  They're bloodhounds when it comes to donations.

http://www.icaucus.org/

Posted by: RushBabe at April 25, 2010 11:24 AM (LKkE8)

115 Oh dear...can't link from my BB so go to drudge and check the pic of the one and the first wookie walking in the woods. Friggin priceless!!

Posted by: dananjcon at April 25, 2010 11:30 AM (bol5Y)

116 Chambliss had to go to a run-off and have SP come and campaign for him. I voted for the Libertarian. He sucks.

Tom

Posted by: marinetbryant at April 25, 2010 11:32 AM (WQiyW)

117 Why do so many people spell loser looser?

Posted by: John Adams at April 25, 2010 11:35 AM (CDWZ6)

118 Graham's "change of heart".....Last week a Tea Party official asked that Graham "come out"....

Must be pedal to the medal time....should ask for Crist and McLame's dirty laundry be aired too....

Maybe Snowe is a pervert of some kind too....start digging tea party....let's get chicago on them....

Posted by: non_dhimmie at April 25, 2010 11:43 AM (zACGu)

119  check the pic of the one and the first wookie walking in the woods. Friggin priceless!!

Posted by: dananjcon at April 25, 2010 03:30 PM (bol5Y)

She was looking for her relatives...he was looking for a hook-up.

Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 11:44 AM (42fUz)

120 99
Whatever happened to the Unknown Comic from the Gong show?
Posted by: Russian Judge judges this thread at April 25, 2010 02:33 PM

He took up guitar
http://tinyurl.com/2c9mo9z

Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 11:49 AM (v5Q3C)

121 99% of all climatologists still believe climate change is real. You can throw out all the criticisms of the people in the process (many of which are deserved), but in the end, the evidence is still overwhelming in the view of 99% of the experts. That doesn't mean a certain climate bill is correct or not, but in the end, the science is there according to a virtual unanimous view from the people who would

Posted by: Ahmed at April 25, 2010 11:51 AM (1+c7l)

122 99% of all climatologists still believe climate change is real.

Sez who?

Posted by: davidt at April 25, 2010 11:54 AM (aag4W)

123 99% of all climatologists still believe climate change is real.

Yes, the climate wingnuts say that but do they really believe it when they are doctoring the numbers themselves.

The real weather people all say it is a fraud.

Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 11:55 AM (QrA9E)

124
He took up guitar
http://tinyurl.com/2c9mo9z

ha!

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 11:55 AM (kSbr6)

125

122 99% of all climatologists still believe climate change is real.

"Climate Change" ‚ Anthropogenic Global Warming

 

Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 25, 2010 11:55 AM (F09Uo)

126 Senator Chris Dodd says they don't have any GOP votes...yet.

I'll assume he'll be talking with Snowe, Collins, and McCain at some point...

Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at April 25, 2010 11:58 AM (Q75cY)

127

Let's try that again

"Climate Change" IS NOT Anthropogenic Global Warming

Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) has been essentially been proved to be every bit as much of a fraud as Piltdown Man was and so now the alarmists have gone on to the very vague and meaningless phrase "climate change" while pretending that they mean the same thing.

Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 25, 2010 11:59 AM (F09Uo)

128

99% of all climatologists still believe climate change is real. You can throw out all the criticisms of the people in the process (many of which are deserved), but in the end, the evidence is still overwhelming in the view of 99% of the experts.

99.9% of all climatologists believe that the effects of climate change will be insignificant, and that human activity accounts for almost none of it.

See?  I can make shit up too.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 11:59 AM (plsiE)

129

Strike that extra "been" from my previous post.

I give up. Where's the beer?

Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 25, 2010 12:02 PM (F09Uo)

130 Of COURSE "Climate Change" is real. It's called WEATHER.

AGW is pure baloney.

Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:02 PM (v5Q3C)

131 and building computer models with assumptions about CO2 that underrate the suns importance based only on 100 yrs of data in a system that has cycles of tens of thousands of years is just plain dumb.

Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:08 PM (v5Q3C)

132 We love us some pork, and back-slappin', and barbecue and Jesus!

And hookers. Mostly, we love hookers.

Fiscal conservatism? Not so much.

Posted by: The Southern Republican Senatorial Caucus at April 25, 2010 12:12 PM (DjctU)

133 I can't believe events in this nation have driven me into agreement with Noam Cocksucking Chomsky.

(And yeah, I've been drawing those parallels between President Obama and Chancellor Bruening too.)

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:16 PM (DjctU)

134 99% of all drive-by comments are written by fucking trolls. Prove me wrong!

Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 25, 2010 12:17 PM (zgd5N)

135

O/T:

 

When going through colonoscopy prep (as I am now)  is gin considered a clear liquid?

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 12:18 PM (S1Ttj)

136 134 I can't believe events in this nation have driven me into agreement with Noam Cocksucking Chomsky.(And yeah, I've been drawing those parallels between President Obama and Chancellor Bruening too.) Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 04:16 PM

OK, wait a minute. I saw "Chomsky" and just skipped a bit. I saw Wiemar and assumed it was about Bush. What's his point in a sentence?

Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:19 PM (v5Q3C)

137 99% of reality shows that climate change is not real.

Posted by: SlaveDog at April 25, 2010 12:22 PM (W+E+o)

138 135 99% of all drive-by comments are written by fucking trolls. Prove me wrong!

I'm not a drive-by. I've been posting here since early '04 at least. Maybe even '03.

"Troll", yeah, guilty as charged. But the only people I was trying to offend in #133 were the gullible fools who hear their Senator wax teary-eyed over "God" and "family" in a speech back home; and, based on that, give the speaker a pass on what he does in DC.

Those fools can just suck it; they're the reason we have assholes like Cornyn, Chambliss, and Graham in the Senate, and the reason Yankees laugh at our complaints about their own RINOs.

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:22 PM (DjctU)

139 I, for one, loved the "hookers" post and will be stealing it at my earliest convenience.

Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:24 PM (v5Q3C)

140 re Chomsky: The most striking fact about Weimar was not that the Nazis managed to destroy the Social Democrats and the Communists but that the traditional parties, the Conservative and Liberal parties, were hated and disappeared. It left a vacuum which the Nazis very cleverly and intelligently managed to take over.”

Chomsky is blaming the Democrats and Republicans for our current state.

He doesn't explicitly tie Obama to Bruening though (that much is my pet theory).

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:25 PM (DjctU)

141 Ah. I was hoping it was more pointed toward The Won & some of the fascist policies he's enacted.

Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:28 PM (v5Q3C)

142

I'm not a drive-by. I've been posting here since early '04 at least. Maybe even '03.

Pretty sure he wasn't talking about you, duder.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 12:28 PM (plsiE)

143
Here's a question: What's better for the environment, paper towels or electric hand-dryers in restrooms?

The elctric hand dryer says on it that it's saving trees and that's good for the environment. But producing electricity uses, say, coal, which is a non-renewable resource and it pollutes the air, whereas trees are a renewable resource that die in the short-term anyway so we might as well use 'em up and plant new ones.

Am I right or wrong?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:29 PM (kSbr6)

144
new post raisin bran

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:30 PM (kSbr6)

145 Hollowpoint 144, yeah, thanks, I scrolled up and saw "Ahmed The Dumb Thread-bomber".

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:31 PM (DjctU)

146 I'm not a drive-by. I've been posting here since early '04 at least. Maybe even '03. Posted by: Zimriel

This may come as a shock and a surprise, Zim, but I was not referring to your pointless comment.

I guess I need to put carefully considered references in all of my future sarcastic comments. Or not. I'm crazy like that.

Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 25, 2010 12:32 PM (zgd5N)

147 Here's a question: What's better for the environment, paper towels or electric hand-dryers in restrooms?
Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 04:29 PM

I don't care.

I prefer either as long as they are no-touch. A restroom with a no-touch hand dryer and a no-touch paper towel dispenser so I can use it on the door on the way out is perfect. I'm not even a germ-a-phobe (still ahppy to eat off the floor) but public bathrooms in my local Wal-Mart scare me.

Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 12:33 PM (v5Q3C)

148

O/T

It's a shootout at the Dega, and 88 still stands a chance of finishing up front.

Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 12:34 PM (M5t+h)

149 "99.9% believe" is only a valid argument in social science, not physical science. Physical sciences rely on collecting (and both keeping and sharing) actual data, not on what some % of people "believe." Not to beat a dead horse, but 99.9% of people used to believe the Sun revolved around the Earth. Did that make it true ?

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 12:34 PM (rP8xu)

150 While you girls are having your pillow fight, the real burning question has gone unanswered. 

 

When going through colonoscopy prep (as I am now)  is gin considered a clear liquid?


Well, is it?  Would have been nice to know about 3 years ago, and in about 2 years from now. 


Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 12:34 PM (0K3p3)

151 She's an extremist. Not just an ordinary extremist, but an extremely extreme extremist who's raking in millions from her army of extremist followers.

They sound like the dolts in Harold and Kumar go to White Castle.  Similar levels of introspection. 

Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 12:37 PM (0K3p3)

152

When going through colonoscopy prep (as I am now)  is gin considered a clear liquid?


Well, is it?  Would have been nice to know about 3 years ago, and in about 2 years from now. 


Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 04:34 PM (0K3p3)

Watch it peppy, it's those juniper berries that will screw up your gut.  Also, they make you think you're Katie Courie.

Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 12:38 PM (M5t+h)

153

Pre-enforcement of Arizona illegal immigrant legislation upsets the folks at Little Fucking Goofballs.  Screw Chuck, no link.

http://tinyurl.com/38vd2w7

Posted by: huerfano at April 25, 2010 12:42 PM (oSrBX)

154 Chomsky's a one-trick pony. Everything adds up to "See I told you so - the existing system has failed, was doomed to fail, etc.... so we need to start a new system under the direction of brilliant philosopher kings like me - or else we'll end up with Hitler again." Does that guy even write about linguistics anymore ? He's not listed as a PoliSci department member at MIT but you wouldn't know it from his writing. How would he feel if John Bolton started writing about semiotics and symbology ? By Chomsky's own "scientific" standards, accepting his own opinion on politics would be equally absurd.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 12:42 PM (rP8xu)

155 According to the results of a statistical survery by the University of Illinois, 97% of the actively publishing climate scientists agree that human activity, such as flue gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion and deforestation, is a significant contributing factor to global climate change. Overall, 82% reported agreeing with AGW.

The source here are the commies over at Wikipedia.  Look up "Climate Change Consensus."

Its even worse for you guys when you look at the overwhelimingly large list of scientific organizations that agree with AGW and the few that do not (Association of Petroleum Engineers, Petroleum Engineers of America, American Association of Petroleum Geologists). 




Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 12:48 PM (oA4y0)

156 The irony about Chomsky is that his central thesis is very similar to the political philosopy of the average Ace of Spader.  The average AoS is for smaller government, more individual liberty.  Chomsky is an anarchist and they believe in less government, more freedom.   The big difference is that you guys just want a HUGE government run defense department that goes around depriving Iraqis, Egyptians, Iranians, Central and South Americans, Vietnamese, Hawaiians, Columians, Phillipinos, etc of their liberty so USA can bring the economic goodies back home.  You guys are extremely hypocritical and logically inconsistent in this respect.


Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 01:03 PM (oA4y0)

157

 The big difference is that you guys just want a HUGE government run defense department that goes around depriving Iraqis, Egyptians, Iranians, Central and South Americans, Vietnamese, Hawaiians, Columians, Phillipinos, etc of their liberty so USA can bring the economic goodies back home.

Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 05:03 PM (oA4y0)

Yea, America really fucked over the Philippines when we liberated Manila with a very high price of blood and equipment in 1945.  Thousands of Philippinos currently living in America is thankful for the effort our military made to liberate their country from the Japanese.

 

Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 01:20 PM (M5t+h)

158 Graham bailed because bloggers are talking of outing him as gay. Seriously. He got the message. Politics ain't beanbag. That's the beauty of it. These guys are so corrupt and their secrets so open (the Press covers for them in Propaganda info suppression) that Joe Average Blogger can simply hang around and figure things out. Like Luke Ford hanging around City Hall and finding out that Mayor Tony Villaraigosa had another mistress (again!).

Posted by: whiskey at April 25, 2010 01:27 PM (L03mw)

159
Troll", yeah, guilty as charged. But the only people I was trying to offend in #133 were the gullible fools who hear their Senator wax teary-eyed over "God" and "family" in a speech back home; and, based on that, give the speaker a pass on what he does in DC.

Those fools can just suck it; they're the reason we have assholes like Cornyn, Chambliss, and Graham in the Senate, and the reason Yankees laugh at our complaints about their own RINOs.

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 04:22 PM (DjctU)






Here, here. Thats why Shmuckabee gets a pass from a good portion of the base even though he's mnstly a populist and anything but a fiscal conservative.

Oh yea, and Zimriel isnt a troll either. He just tells it like it is.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (t72+4)

160
"Senator Chris Dodd (how in the world is this fellow the guy Dems tapped to push bank reform?!?) says they don't have any GOP votes...yet."

They chose Dodd because he knows best what the bankers want and they do not care what anybody else thinks of the bill. They are fully in ram it in mode. There are not politics anymore, just brute force.

Posted by: Ronsonic at April 25, 2010 02:04 PM (VTm+A)

161 Blazer: "I thought Graham was all for an immigration bill and only a few weeks ago was pushing one with Schumer?"

He is. It's all in the timing. His partner in crime on this issue is McCain. McCain and Hayworth are still fighting in the primary. Graham's goal is to push off contentious debate that would hurt McCain for a bit while hoping McCain can hold off Hayworth's momentum. The instant McCain ekes a win in the primary (big assumption he does), then Grahamnesty strikes and tag teams with McCain who will then be vying for the "moderate" vote in AZ. That is when Grahamnesty will reach across the aisle and invite co-legislation. Graham will have helped his RINO-ish buddy survive a strong conservative challenge and still have introduced (perhaps even passed an extremely contentious and bad bill) and will have done so a long time before he himself is up for re-election where such a vote would cost him his seat. Graham would want this amnesty done while the Democrats still control the Congress because a more conservative one is less likely to do so.

Graham is protecting himself by delaying. He's not against the legislation, he just needs it introduced at a better point in the cycle.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 25, 2010 02:45 PM (swuwV)

162 Fish, you dunce, the Phillipine American war was 1899 when USA tried to annex Phillipines.  We helped them defeat our arch-colonizer Spain but decided not to stop there.

But after Spain was defeated, the United States turned against the Filipino rebels and took control of the Philippines, converting it into a US colony with the excuse that Filipinos were incapable of self-government.

do your homework

Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 03:04 PM (oA4y0)

163 So let me get this straight: If you get tax dollars, you can't contribute to elections.

Hmmm, OK. I guess the public sector employees unions are out of business, then, yes? If you're paid in tax dollars, and your union dues are paid in tax dollars, and you make more than $50,000 per year in tax dollars, seems to me this law would disqualify you.

Right?

Posted by: the dandy at April 25, 2010 05:42 PM (vJK0V)

164 "I wanna know how on God's Green Earth Olympia Snowe ended up on the Republican ticket."

She basically owns the Maine GOP, which she regards as a device for increasing her own personal power, not for advancing a political agenda.

If Snowe goes with the Dems, I hold out some hope that Lieberman will go with the R's to sustain a filibuster.  He was with Collins when she said she'd vote to filibuster it.  She isn't QUITE as consistent a RINO as Snowe, backhanded compliment though that is.

Posted by: Dave J. at April 25, 2010 06:02 PM (DCQ0q)

165

Fish, you dunce, the Phillipine American war was 1899 when USA tried to annex Phillipines. 

Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 07:04 PM (oA4y0)

Apparently you are unable to read English. Here was my comment:

Yea, America really fucked over the Philippines when we liberated Manila with a very high price of blood and equipment in 1945

Tasting Dick, you're an asshole and unable to read and comprehend.  Don't ever insult my father and the thousands of other brave men who liberated the Phillipines. 

Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 06:17 PM (M5t+h)

166 This, folks, is what is known as revisionist history ..., and TV calls Fish a dunce? What is wrong with this picture?   166 Fish, you dunce, the Phillipine American war was 1899 when USA tried to annex Phillipines.  We helped them defeat our arch-colonizer Spain but decided not to stop there.

But after Spain was defeated, the United States turned against the Filipino rebels and took control of the Philippines, converting it into a US colony with the excuse that Filipinos were incapable of self-government.

do your homework

Posted by: tasting victory at April 25, 2010 07:04 PM (oA4y0)

 

BTW, dimwit, it wasn't the Phillipine-American War. It was the Spanish American War, and you don't have a freaking clue what occurred there.

Posted by: Weekend Scoreboard at April 25, 2010 08:12 PM (ITzbJ)

167 I campaigned for Herman Cain against Saxby Chambliss in the GA primary.  This is just one example why.  But hey, as a TN resident now, you Peaches are on your own - I've got Bailout Bob Corker to worry about.

Posted by: 1SGinTN at April 25, 2010 08:39 PM (Cixed)

168

Our website have many new MBT shoes :

<a href="http://masai-mbt.com/product.aspx">running shoes-</a>

<a href="http://masai-mbt.com/categories-MBT-Chapa-Shoes-1.htm">MBT Chapa Shoes-</a>

<a href="http://masai-mbt.com/categories-MBT-Sport-Shoes-2.htm">MBT Sport Shoes-</a> 

Posted by: ghost2069 at April 29, 2010 11:29 PM (+nEOz)

170 Well , the view of the passage gucci hightops size9 is totally discount gucci boots correct gucci scarves ,your details is really reasonable and discount gucci sweaters you guy give gucci new leather shoes us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum!

Posted by: discount gucci sneakers at September 30, 2010 10:30 AM (I1Y/p)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
165kb generated in CPU 0.1603, elapsed 0.35 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3081 seconds, 298 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.