June 02, 2010

Fark Funny
— Ace

House for sale: 4 bed, 2 bath, 3 acres, fireplace, sun room, whites only, detached garage. Wait.. what? A sun room? (wbztv.com)

From Fark, linking this story. Thanks to StarChamberMaid.

Posted by: Ace at 03:14 PM | Comments (94)
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.

1 If I am not mistaken that was an old story from last week. When questioned the realtor said he had to list it that way due to deed covenants, however actually renting it would be done IAW law because the deed covenants were unenforceable.

What I didn't understand was why list it that way if they were unenforceable.

(Assuming this is the same story)

Posted by: Vic at June 02, 2010 03:20 PM (6taRI)

2 That's just a vestige that made it to the modern world thanks to a fresh can of Ultra-Lazy™ being broken open at the law firm that posted the sale.

It is a better reminder of what was than what is, and we get enough of those on an hourly basis not to need highlighting yet another bygone example.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at June 02, 2010 03:22 PM (0q2P7)

3 I adore Fark.

(has a normal account)

Posted by: Mortis at June 02, 2010 03:23 PM (QjuDE)

4 I don't buy that the listing had to include activity that was not legal.....I believe that the potential renter/buyer would need full disclosure on what was in teh CC&R's, but the add? I don't buy it for a second.

Posted by: rightzilla at June 02, 2010 03:25 PM (rVJH4)

5 No Comment

Posted by: Rand Paul at June 02, 2010 03:25 PM (OlHjR)

6 What I didn't understand was why list it that way if they were unenforceable.

They said "we thought" which means they didn't research, and avoided getting sued by the other member holders of the covenant by listing it and letting someone else figure it out and tell them. Lawyers are typically immoral as a rule and said we'll just include it and see what happens...Ultra-Lazy™

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at June 02, 2010 03:25 PM (0q2P7)

7 does that mean white PEOPLE only or are they making a fashion dictum?

 Only white curtains?  Paint?  Pants before Labor Day?

Posted by: SantaRosaStan, flummoxed at June 02, 2010 03:27 PM (JrRME)

8
Does Should the government have the power to tell anyone who they can and cannot sell property to?

No. And this is what Rand Paul was getting at.

Posted by: Mr Peebles sees dead people at June 02, 2010 03:28 PM (v77ig)

9 I don't buy that the listing had to include activity that was not legal

If you exclude some customers for any legal reason from any commercial transaction you have to do so in advertising, otherwise you could get sued. (must be 18, offer not valid in CA)

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at June 02, 2010 03:28 PM (0q2P7)

10 Should the government have the power to tell anyone who they can and cannot sell property to?

No. And this is what Rand Paul was getting at.

But should a contract mandating racial discrimination be legally enforceable in court? No. And that is what other very good parts of the law get at.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at June 02, 2010 03:30 PM (0q2P7)

11 During the '52 election when he ran as Eisenhower's veep, Richard Nixon had a similar thing come up with the purchase of his home. He hadn't bothered to wasting money to amend the covenants, because they were already void under the law at the time. The leftys screamed for a couple of weeks but nothing came of it.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 02, 2010 03:31 PM (E4Pj8)

12
I'm sure we'll agree the government should not discriminate.

But the government has no right telling private citizens they cannot discriminate.

Posted by: Mr Peebles sees dead people at June 02, 2010 03:32 PM (k9Ti8)

13 "Pants before Labor Day?"

As long as there are no white shoes worn after Labor Day, the world will run in perfect order.  However, if any lady should be caught wearing white peep-toes after September?  DEATH TO THE INFIDEL!

Posted by: Southern Mores at June 02, 2010 03:32 PM (92zkk)

14 Only problem I have is.. there weren't enough words in the ad.. and I like word.

Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at June 02, 2010 03:33 PM (7GgDy)

15 Apparently some people can get away with this.

Posted by: Rep. Pete Stark at June 02, 2010 03:35 PM (uKraB)

16
Breitbart and Beck were talking about how Cass Sunstein is gonna try to regualte journalism.

They [the government] are going to decide who is worthy of being a journalist. It will be based on who is advancing the right causes.

Posted by: Mr Peebles sees dead people at June 02, 2010 03:35 PM (k9Ti8)

17 How white do you have to be, cause I'm kind of tannish.

Posted by: kansas at June 02, 2010 03:36 PM (BNnTS)

18 Who's selling it, MSNBC?

Posted by: 141 Driver at June 02, 2010 03:36 PM (LEynS)

19 I think they did this on purpose so that they would sell the house. 

Think about it, Al Sharpton is just has to buy it now.

Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at June 02, 2010 03:36 PM (bEU6G)

20 But the government has no right telling private citizens they cannot discriminate.

But the government does have the right to tell private citizens what kinds of contracts they will and will not enforce, and this one clearly falls into the latter category.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at June 02, 2010 03:36 PM (0q2P7)

21 The relevant SCOTUS case is Shelley v. Kraemer in 1948. Whether it should be the law of the land is another question entirely.

Wow. That was easy to find.




Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 02, 2010 03:36 PM (E4Pj8)

22 17 How white do you have to be, cause I'm kind of tannish.

Posted by: kansas at June 02, 2010 07:36 PM (BNnTS)


Negro dialect?

Posted by: Harry Ried at June 02, 2010 03:37 PM (7GgDy)

23 4 bed, 2 bath, fireplace, no libtards, sunroom....

Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 02, 2010 03:39 PM (UOM48)

24 So how come language used in the covenant is unenforceable but stuff like scholarships that are only for blacks, for example, is totally ok?

Not saying it's right, just wonder about the double standard.

Posted by: mpur in Texas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at June 02, 2010 03:39 PM (qYgrJ)

25 I like the part where everyone agrees it won't be enforced but the scrunt is suing anyway because it hurt her feelings.

Posted by: Ian S. at June 02, 2010 03:40 PM (imD7p)

26 My mom's church has leased their land from a local family for several decades.  In the lease contract, the family agreed to lease the land to the church for $1 a year (or a similarly ridiculously low price) AS LONG AS the church declined membership to blacks.

I think the lease was set up back in the early 1900's. 


Posted by: Intrepid at June 02, 2010 03:40 PM (92zkk)

27 O/T  Sheppy is losing it with P. J. Crowley, Asst. Sec. of State.  What a jackass.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 02, 2010 03:43 PM (UOM48)

28 17 How white do you have to be, cause I'm kind of tannish.

Posted by: kansas at June 02, 2010 07:36 PM (BNnTS)


You don't run a convienent store do you?

Are you clean? articulate?


Do you and all others interested in living there have a 3 letter word.. JOBS?

Posted by: joe Biden at June 02, 2010 03:43 PM (7GgDy)

29 "O/T  Sheppy is losing it with P. J. Crowley, Asst. Sec. of State.  What a jackass."

Shep appears to have gotten his BS degree from EMO U.  When any news story has to do with the gulf area, he's just batshit overboard. 

And then there is that wacky obsession he has with bears......yikes.

Posted by: Intrepid at June 02, 2010 03:46 PM (92zkk)

30

OT: from heatherradish's new phone - WE"RE DOOMED!

radishthegreat    This is great. I can bitch from anywhere now!


Posted by: Dang Straights at June 02, 2010 03:46 PM (rs2AC)

31 Not saying it's right, just wonder about the double standard.

Because no one wants to look like an A$$ for bringing it up. Ever hear the phrase "nothing good will come of this" with the occasional follow on "even if we're proven right" let's just say that UNCF would be one of the last things on the list to fight to end when we can finally reach the end of racial discrimination in this nation.


Posted by: MikeTheMoose at June 02, 2010 03:47 PM (0q2P7)

32 The Federal Fair Housing Act (part of the 1968 Civil Rights Act) expressly forbids the creation or enforcement of racially restrictive convenants in deeds and homeowners association bylaws.

Posted by: stuiec at June 02, 2010 03:48 PM (7AOgy)

33 One of Al Gore's houses (soon to be Tipper's)?!

Posted by: Czar of Defenestration at June 02, 2010 03:49 PM (KkYaQ)

34 I like FARK for the funny pictures...

Read the comments and your head will explode (assplode),

The kids are not alright...they're fucking imbeciles.

Posted by: Portnoy at June 02, 2010 03:51 PM (azgo2)

35
Florida condo law permits discrimination against large dogs and whipper snappers, but leaves out the covenant about ugly liberal women. 

Posted by: Fish at June 02, 2010 03:51 PM (v1gw3)

36 #30

The dirt-stealing radish is moving up in the world. 

Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 02, 2010 03:53 PM (c0A3e)

37 So how come language used in the covenant is unenforceable but stuff like scholarships that are only for blacks, for example, is totally ok?

Not saying it's right, just wonder about the double standard.

Posted by: mpur in Texas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at June 02, 2010 07:39 PM (qYgrJ)

If the scholarship is private charity, then it's pretty simple: private donors can give to whomever they choose and aren't obligated to donate to anyone else.

In the case of housing discrimination, restrictive covenants don't restrict what you do with your own property -- but restrict who can become the NEXT owner of your property, with an eye to limiting the freedom of the "wrong kind of people" to engage in commerce on the same footing as anyone else and to live where they can afford to.

The two things are qualitatively different.

Posted by: stuiec at June 02, 2010 03:53 PM (7AOgy)

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 02, 2010 03:54 PM (Yq+qN)

39 Them damn Home Owner's Associations can get away with anything.

Just one more added to my 'Will all be shot when I become King of the Universe' list.

Posted by: Portnoy at June 02, 2010 03:54 PM (azgo2)

40 #38  lol, thanks Miss'80sbaby.

“Keith was always talking about the famous feud he was having with Bill O’Reilly,” remembered Oscar Peterson, a long time neighbor and friend of Mrs. Olbermann. “But it takes two people to have a feud and O’Reilly has never mentioned Keith on his show or in print. I sometimes wonder if he even knows who Keith is!”

Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 02, 2010 03:57 PM (c0A3e)

41 Reid and Pelosi on guitar, Rhambo on drums, Teh iWon on keyboard, and I can't make the lead singer, but check out this great parody of "Money For Nothing" from PolitiZoid on YouTube...

I love the Bachelor running gag...


http://tinyurl.com/295vyv9

Posted by: FORGER - Racist Czar at June 02, 2010 03:58 PM (5NWM8)

42 As long as there are no white shoes worn after Labor Day, the world will run in perfect order.  However, if any lady should be caught wearing white peep-toes after September?  DEATH TO THE INFIDEL!

Posted by: Southern Mores at June 02, 2010 07:32 PM (92zkk)

Wait, I know this one.  Kathleen Turner in Serial Mom, right?

Posted by: stuiec at June 02, 2010 03:59 PM (7AOgy)

43 sort of like the house that W bought when he left the WH that one had "deed convents" in its title

Posted by: Michael Collins at June 02, 2010 04:03 PM (I+7Zv)

44 Dammit, I keep tellin' ya I'm not dead yet!

Stop trying to sell off my things!!!

Posted by: Robert Byrd (KKK- WV) at June 02, 2010 04:05 PM (D7NHC)

45 OK I have answered my own question. The reason it is advertised that way but the actual covenants are unenforceable comes from the Supreme Court ruling on the case which allowed the 1968 act which added private sales and rental of housing to be regulated for race.

The case was JONES v. MAYER CO. and reads like the abomination that it is.  They ruled that deed covenants were in fact unenforceable because the law prohibited their action but that the advertising could have the desire of the covenant in it.

Their justification for congress regulating sale or rental of private property for the purposes of race was made possible by the 13th amendment. The second part of the amendment said congress shall have the authority to legislate fore the purpose of prohibiting slavery.

I guess that if Joe Sixpact can't refuse to rent his house to a black he is engaging in slavery.  This was obviously a very bad reasoning because it took them several pages to justify this link.

Posted by: Vic at June 02, 2010 04:06 PM (6taRI)

46 If the scholarship is private charity

Last I checked UNCF was a corporate non-profit meaning that yes, as a corporation, if they participate in racial discrimination, they are essentially doing so with government permission. A corporation does not have the "right" to racially discriminate like natural persons in their transactions.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at June 02, 2010 04:06 PM (0q2P7)

47 Funny you mention this. My mom'n'dad are having a sun room added to their house. Should I let them know there might be a problem later on?

Posted by: Bill H at June 02, 2010 04:08 PM (q8CmE)

48 This language is part of the deeds and covenants restrictions of many, many properties here in Texas. President Bush used to live in such a property in Arlington, Texas prior to him winning the Governors race many years ago. The charge against him, of course, was that he is racist for living in such a house. This is a 'tempest in a teapot'--propaganda of the worst kind. I've seen similar language about Jews and Mexicans also. Its all not enforceable under any law. When a property is sold and closed, this is usually in a Title Company office. These people are paid handsomely for being experts in property laws. They have a formal, detailed property deed analysis process. This section of the property deed will be carefully explained to the purchaser, and s/he will sign a legal release form saying that they understand what this wording means--which is NOTHING. The language cannot be removed legally from the deeds and covenants part of the property deed. To do so, these deeds require certain impossibilities. They can only be amended by the Home Owners Association, which has a meeting only once every 2 years. To amend/change these deeds requires 100% attendance by all property owners, and 100% vote in favor of the change to the deed. And each deed must be voted on separately. All it takes for the language to stay in the deed is for one property owner fail to attend the meeting and vote in favor of it. That is why the language has remained for half a century, and likely will still remain for another half century. These property deeds were common in the 1950's and 1960's, when the suburbanization of America really began. The properties were the best of the best....best location, best amenities, and very very low prices. Now, the prices on these properties are astronomical, but they still are the best locations. That wording of the property deed is unenforceable. Anybody who did try to enforce it would find him/herself in a HEAP of legal trouble. There are any number of laws and court decisions that negate the wording in the property deeds. But the language cannot be changed.

Posted by: geekasaurus at June 02, 2010 04:08 PM (mPKFq)

49 Posted by: Michael Collins at June 02, 2010 08:03 PM (I+7Zv)

Is that even English?  Is it supposed to convey some thought?

Posted by: damian at June 02, 2010 04:10 PM (4WbTI)

50 4 bed, 2 bath, 3 acres, fireplace, sun room, Judenrein, detached garage.

Posted by: erg writes an ad at June 02, 2010 04:11 PM (Y9Ceb)

51

I'm not comfortable with that ad...

Posted by: Maureen Dowd at June 02, 2010 04:11 PM (YVZlY)

52

Funny how the Black Congressional Caucus can discriminate by Race... but the rest of us can't...

Funny how we can have Racial Quotas, which is discrimination by Race in Government services... and even down to who gets Grants from the Small Business admin... but we private citizens cannot use race to decide who we will do business with...

So, the Government CAN discriminate, but we cannot... how basackwards can you get...

Posted by: Romeo13 at June 02, 2010 04:13 PM (OlHjR)

53
Posted by: Michael Collins

STFU, dunce

Posted by: Mr Peebles sees dead people at June 02, 2010 04:14 PM (k9Ti8)

54 I guess that if Joe Sixpact can't refuse to rent his house to a black he is engaging in slavery.  This was obviously a very bad reasoning because it took them several pages to justify this link.

You could argue that the wholesale denial of the ability to participate in commerce and reap the fruits of their labor essentially forces them to labor without fruit. (Which any dietitian will tell you is bad) which could, if done on a large scale, become an equivalent to slavery.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at June 02, 2010 04:14 PM (0q2P7)

55 You see this comment over at the article?

"I would love to live there. No crime, good schools, higher property values, being able to leave my doors unlocked. No loud music from cars, no trash in yards. This sounds like heaven on earth. Where do I find this place?"

Daaamn!

Posted by: RarestRX at June 02, 2010 04:15 PM (rmNST)

56 You could argue that the wholesale denial of the ability to participate in commerce and reap the fruits of their labor essentially forces them to labor without fruit.

I would have tied it to the 14th amendment if I were going to rule as they did under the equal protection clause. That is a stretch as well but is a closer fit than the 13th.

Personally, I think the law IS unconstitutional and I agree with Rand Paul. Be that as it may there is zero chance of getting rid of it.

Hell, they upheld section V of the voting rights act recently which is blatantly unconstitutional.

Posted by: Vic at June 02, 2010 04:22 PM (6taRI)

57
Griffey Jr retired

wow

Posted by: Mr Peebles sees dead people at June 02, 2010 04:24 PM (v77ig)

58

OT: tweet from iowahawk

White House just offered me a $1 Domino's coupon to drop out of Twitter. I'm holding out for a free order of hot wings.

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at June 02, 2010 04:25 PM (YVZlY)

59 Haha, fark funny. That's a good one.

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at June 02, 2010 04:28 PM (wOtDN)

60 There were a lot of covenants and restrictions put on property in the 30's and 40's.   When my parents sold a house with this stuff the real estate attorney said to ignore it, it doesn't make any difference, and it didn't.  But, then again, the best buyer, the highest bid, was a white family.  No one who wasn't white even came to look at the house.

Posted by: curious at June 02, 2010 04:30 PM (p302b)

61

Somebody better tell Iowahawk that the hot wings aren't 'anything of value'.

Hold out for CINCPAC or SECNAV.

Posted by: blindside at June 02, 2010 04:32 PM (vT9Nl)

62 Speaking of whites only, Flyers score first!

Posted by: logprof at June 02, 2010 04:39 PM (Mmw0q)

63 I am intrigued, but please, tell me, will I be required to keep a poop calendar?

Posted by: Wodeshed at June 02, 2010 04:40 PM (QXMRn)

64 Quixote Xavier Montalban, Registered Nurse at your service.

Posted by: QXM, Rn at June 02, 2010 04:43 PM (QXMRn)

65 O/T:  Mark Levin has JD Hayworth on just blasting the hell out of McVain.  Damn I'd love it if Specter West got his ass handed to him in the primary.

Posted by: Captain Hate at June 02, 2010 04:45 PM (+lZy8)

66

I posted a funny one from Fark on FB this a.m. Couple wrote "no dark-skinned children" on their adoption application. Evidently not a way to propel yourself to #1 on the list. Who knew?

Posted by: di butler, maker of bad days at June 02, 2010 04:48 PM (S3xX1)

67 "Long Haired Hippy People, Need Not Apply"

Posted by: the Sign at June 02, 2010 04:50 PM (BcOTW)

Posted by: curious at June 02, 2010 04:52 PM (p302b)

69 Do severely tanned hard core unemployables even want a sun room?

Posted by: Henry Gates Jr at June 02, 2010 04:52 PM (spefv)

70

"no dark-skinned children"

I have to say that any other kind are just creepy.   

I prefer the richer hues when it comes to the fomites.  They are the only cute ones...

also - No Gingers. 

So you have an improved chance of getting one with a Soul if you go 'well done'.

 

Posted by: garrett at June 02, 2010 04:55 PM (BcOTW)

71 Hey, some asshole is screwing my Ho too, WTF is with that?

Nicki, come on girl, you told me I was the only one.

http://tinyurl.com/27fb3a8

Posted by: Will Folks at June 02, 2010 04:57 PM (2+9Yx)

72 Waiting for the inevitable "Galaraga throws first 28 out perfect game in MLB history" headline .....

Posted by: Chris R at June 02, 2010 05:04 PM (AO4qz)

73 Hey, some asshole is screwing my Ho too, WTF is with that?

Andre Bauer is starting to stink of flop sweat.

Posted by: damian at June 02, 2010 05:04 PM (4WbTI)

74 68 O/T:  "Female SC gov hopeful denies claim of 2nd affair"

Posted by: curious at June 02, 2010 08:52 PM (p302b)

Lobbyist Larry Marchant admitted he had no proof to back up his allegation of a one-night stand with state Rep. Nikki Haley in 2008 and her campaign vehemently denied the allegation.

So now there are two guys claiming to have had an affair with her.  Nice, we either have two guys that lie or a candidate that is a cheating whore.

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at June 02, 2010 05:04 PM (YVZlY)

75 O/T... did anyone see the Detroit Tigers pitcher just get robbed out of a perfect game? Ump missed a clear 27th out at first. Wasn't even close.

Posted by: Doc at June 02, 2010 05:04 PM (rzJpR)

76 Man...

How do I get to go on a junket with Nikki Haley?

Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at June 02, 2010 05:07 PM (bEU6G)

77 I am Nikki Haley's lover!

Posted by: spartacus at June 02, 2010 05:09 PM (4WbTI)

78

So Costa is going to file suit?   because her feeling were hurt?

wtf     REALLY???

 

Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at June 02, 2010 05:09 PM (TOelI)

79 @75 Yes, live. Jim Joyce will need a police escort out of Detroit.

Posted by: Chris R at June 02, 2010 05:12 PM (AO4qz)

80 If there's any justice in this world, Jim Joyce will need a headhunter starting tomorrow.

Posted by: Shivv at June 02, 2010 05:15 PM (gQbWM)

81

O/T:  "The group today sent the EPA, an official notice of intent to sue,The letter requests that the agency, along with the U.S. Coast Guard, immediately study the effects of dispersants on species such as sea turtles, sperm whales, piping plovers, and corals and incorporate this knowledge into oil-spill response efforts."

"The Gulf of Mexico has become Frankenstein's laboratory for BP's enormous, uncontrolled experiment in flooding the ocean with toxic chemicals," said Andrea Treece, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity in a statement. "The fact that no one in the federal government ever required that these chemicals be proven safe for this sort of use before they were set loose on the environment is inexcusable."

According to the group, studies have found that oil dispersed by Corexit 9527 (one of the formulations used by BP) damages the insulating properties of seabird feathers more than untreated oil, making the birds more susceptible to hypothermia and death.

The product is banned in the United Kingdom" ;">

;">Here we go....

Posted by: curious at June 02, 2010 05:16 PM (p302b)

82 Sun City room?

Posted by: Little Steven Van Zandt at June 02, 2010 05:18 PM (OThQg)

83 Man that was a travesty. Jim Joyce should claim some victim status before it's too late.

Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at June 02, 2010 05:18 PM (tzcjs)

84

So now there are two guys claiming to have had an affair with her.  Nice, we either have two guys that lie or a candidate that is a cheating whore.

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at June 02, 2010 09:04 PM (YVZlY)

Considering that the second man making that allegation is a lobbyist and was until recently, working for one of the opposition candidates; I'd say there is an excellent chance he is lying.

Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 02, 2010 05:18 PM (oIp16)

85 I was watching the Detroit telecast and the kid was gracious after the game. What a class act.

Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at June 02, 2010 05:19 PM (tzcjs)

86 Holy shit, centered spam!

Posted by: logprof at June 02, 2010 05:20 PM (Mmw0q)

87 O/T... did anyone see the Detroit Tigers pitcher just get robbed out of a perfect game? Ump missed a clear 27th out at first. Wasn't even close.

bad call . . . veerrrrry bad call

Posted by: texasmamma at June 02, 2010 05:26 PM (4L69q)

88

• Radical Islamist group Muslim Brotherhood endorses former IAEA head Mohamed El Baradei: One of the most powerful groups of Islamist extremists in the world-- the Muslim Brotherhood -- says it will support Mohamed El Baradei's efforts to reform Egyptian politics

@doug ross journal

Posted by: willow at June 02, 2010 05:27 PM (HyUIR)

89

AAAARRRRRGHGHHGHHHHHH

this hocky game is killing me.

Posted by: Entropy at June 02, 2010 05:30 PM (eL+YD)

90 73 Hey, some asshole is screwing my Ho too, WTF is with that?

Andre Bauer is starting to stink of flop sweat.

Posted by: damian at June 02, 2010 09:04 PM (4WbTI)

I've gotten drunk with him.  He's a fucking idiot.

Posted by: Kemp at June 02, 2010 05:31 PM (2+9Yx)

91 My dad is a retired attorney, and I had to help him with some land title stuff.  Back during Jim Crow, racists put such language in the deed to their property. Enforceable or not, the phrase cannot be removed without a court order to specifically remove it from the deed. Removing the language otherwise can arguably make what you are trying to do not apply to the property.

A typical deed can read, "From the iron post 5 miles down the dirt road, to the edge of the dry creek, and the edge of the old Halliwell property..." and none of these things can be in existence anymore, but that is what the land you own actually is, according to the county records.

Posted by: Sekhmet at June 02, 2010 05:32 PM (MNKxs)

92 DUMBASS BLIND REF

Posted by: Entropy at June 02, 2010 05:39 PM (eL+YD)

93 Comment deleted. Posted by Leesa Dahl, aka "Dahlhalla," Internet stalker, currently under investigation by Virginia police.

Posted by: thankstostarchambermaid at June 02, 2010 06:02 PM (UM51s)

94 Overtime...

Posted by: Entropy at June 02, 2010 06:46 PM (eL+YD)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
111kb generated in CPU 0.1451, elapsed 0.3993 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3612 seconds, 222 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.