June 23, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Via Jim Treacher and about all of Twitter, the Federal government is shutting down the dredging that Louisiana was using to construct sand berms to keep the oil off the coastline.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Department says that the current location of the dredging could change the salinity of the water and do other things to kill off wildlife. So they want the dredging site moved another two miles offshore. That will take about a week, during which oil will wash unimpeded onto the coastline. So will the department allow dredging at the current sites -- and construction of the protective berms -- to continue just for the week until the dredging operation is moved? Nope.
I'm going to guess that pleas to Obama aren't going to help:
"Once again, our government resource agencies, which are intended to protect us, are now leaving us vulnerable to the destruction of our coastline and marshes by the impending oil," Nungesser wrote to Obama. "Furthermore, with the threat of hurricanes or tropical storms, we are being put at an increased risk for devastation to our area from the intrusion of oil.
Gonna get worse before it gets better, I think.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:38 AM
| Comments (158)
Post contains 208 words, total size 1 kb.
Oil everywhere> A local change in Salinity as far as killing off wildlife.
Immaterial. The Bammer administration is determined to maximize the damage from this spill, and nothing's going to stop them.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at June 23, 2010 05:41 AM (ZJ/un)
Posted by: eman at June 23, 2010 05:42 AM (I8dqF)
Posted by: Guy with a piss cup and a clipboard, eyeing Gabe ominously at June 23, 2010 05:42 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: Bugler at June 23, 2010 05:43 AM (VXBR1)
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Department says that the current location of the dredging could change the salinity of the water and do other things to kill off wildlife.
I wonder what else changes the salinity of the water? Hmmmm.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at June 23, 2010 05:44 AM (0pYSi)
The man made oil slick won't be nearly as deadly.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 05:45 AM (H+LJc)
They should do it anyways. I bet the Feds back down.
Posted by: Andrew Jackson at June 23, 2010 05:45 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: catmman at June 23, 2010 05:45 AM (DTzwU)
Posted by: nickless at June 23, 2010 05:46 AM (MMC8r)
So, blow them off and keep dredging at the original site.
Oil everywhere> A local change in Salinity as far as killing off wildlife.
Posted by: Andrew Jackson at June 23, 2010 09:40 AM (ZESU0)
Don't make me come down there and enforce it man.
Posted by: John Marshall at June 23, 2010 05:46 AM (0pYSi)
Posted by: nickless at June 23, 2010 05:47 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Berserker at June 23, 2010 05:47 AM (gWHrG)
Then watch Obama melt down.
Posted by: I need popcorn at June 23, 2010 05:47 AM (sfNbl)
Well, I'm not heading into work until late. Got games to watch, man!
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at June 23, 2010 05:48 AM (1TvCg)
Posted by: eman at June 23, 2010 05:48 AM (I8dqF)
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 05:48 AM (wuv1c)
"So long and Thanks for all the fish"
Posted by: eman at June 23, 2010 09:42 AM (I8dqF)
FIFY (sorry, the situation really calls for the entire line!)
Posted by: sock puppeh at June 23, 2010 05:48 AM (VcPAo)
*Moral Courage, not the Will Folks' valiant attempt to save his marriage by slandering a gubernatorial candidate.
Posted by: The Founding Editor finally gets one right at June 23, 2010 05:49 AM (ZESU0)
This is why Barry doesn't need any engineers or people with practical experience. He just needs Ivy League professors with no real life experience and plenty of a left wing agenda to come up with ideas like this
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 23, 2010 05:49 AM (1Jaio)
Obama has proven that even during a environmental disaster, political maneuvering trumps everything.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 23, 2010 05:49 AM (0fzsA)
Charlie Crist agrees with this move by Obama 100 percent, until he choses not to agree with it.
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 05:50 AM (wuv1c)
Jindal needs to tell the feds to piss off and do what's necessary to protect the coastline.
I was going to say "unbelievable" but it's become all too believable with this administration. I have to agree with other comments that the only explanation is a desire to maximize the damage from this oil spill, especially when you look at all the other actions to date - not implementing the contingency burn plan that's been in place for years, refusing to accept help from other countried, refusing to allow the berms, refusing to allow additional skimmer ships, grounding the skimmers that were sent out, and now this. It's infuriating and revolting, but not unbelievable.
Posted by: Insomniac at June 23, 2010 05:50 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: eman at June 23, 2010 05:50 AM (I8dqF)
Posted by: Iosef Stalin at June 23, 2010 05:50 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: jsntn at June 23, 2010 05:51 AM (2Lbco)
Posted by: Bugler at June 23, 2010 05:51 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: Delta Smelt at June 23, 2010 05:52 AM (0pYSi)
Obama will carry Louisiana in '12 over the weak and ineffective Republican because of his sound ecological stance in the BP oil disaster.
Posted by: Robert Gibbster at June 23, 2010 05:52 AM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 05:53 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Preznit Easy Bake at June 23, 2010 05:53 AM (ZESU0)
I agree with the sentiment that Jindal should just do it and let the Feds start arresting the state people. It would absolutely destroy Obama and would be the right thing to do regardless.
Jindal needs to do what he can to protect Lousiana.
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 05:53 AM (wuv1c)
I've got a bad feeling about this. There's already the mayor and city council in Alabama (I think) that are taking steps to protect the shoreline and have said they will go to jail before they stop. Jindal's about to cut a bitch. If I were a person whose property was being affected, I'd double flip off everyone and do whatever I had to do to protect my land. I have a sinking feeling in gut that we're going to see violence erupt over all of this.
Posted by: alexthechick at June 23, 2010 05:54 AM (8WZWv)
I was going to say "unbelievable" but it's become all too believable with this administration.
You mean you didn't gasp in horror like Kyl's townhall meeting constituents?
Yeah, me neither.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at June 23, 2010 05:54 AM (0pYSi)
Boy down to the most corrupt, completely illegitimate constitutional scholar potus, or face the terrible tar baby wrath, economic ruin and the ruin of your entire regional ecology.
Liszt taught that criticism is the best teacher, and he was certainly dealt more defamation than George W. Bush. But when criticism is given in a polite and helpful manner, Obama rants that he doesn't appreciate it. And of course, when Obama is dealt criticism dipped in sarcasm, he is OUTRAGED, as with McChrystal. No wonder he won't supply his educational records, hiding in the dark. Leaders with class deal with problems privately rather than running to the press like the crybaby Obama.
Obama is saturated in dereliction of duty, contempt for the Constitution and American citizens, and overt crimes against nature.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 05:54 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Admiral Painter at June 23, 2010 05:55 AM (I8dqF)
Posted by: fap-fap-fap dragon at June 23, 2010 05:55 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 05:56 AM (wuv1c)
Florida is appreciative of President Barack Obama's efforts to control the oil before it pollutes the beaches in Florida.
I have personally inspected the beaches and found small amounts of oil and a few lovely booties.
Posted by: Charlie "Cockmeister" Chris at June 23, 2010 05:56 AM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at June 23, 2010 05:56 AM (k4bdL)
Oh, Lord, how long can this go on?
Posted by: nickless at June 23, 2010 05:56 AM (MMC8r)
In his defense, those were pretty fine booties.
Posted by: alexthechick at June 23, 2010 05:56 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 09:56 AM (wuv1c)
Dude, later. Obama is a busy man. He's playing 18 this morning and then catching the Nationals get away game this afternoon.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at June 23, 2010 05:57 AM (0pYSi)
They have reached the point now where they are not accountable to anyone.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 05:57 AM (6taRI)
/Good lyrics for The Audacity of Hope tune.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 05:58 AM (H+LJc)
In his defense, those were pretty fine booties.
Posted by: alexthechick at June 23, 2010 09:56 AM (8WZWv)
Looking at booties is a diversion for Charlie Crist. He's really interested in the swinging Johnson!
Posted by: Dr. Phil at June 23, 2010 05:59 AM (v1gw3)
Posted by: kansas at June 23, 2010 05:59 AM (w50Uq)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 23, 2010 06:00 AM (1Jaio)
You mean you didn't gasp in horror like Kyl's townhall meeting constituents?
Yeah, me neither.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at June 23, 2010 09:54 AM (0pYSi)
Anyone shocked by what Kyl said just plain hasn't been paying attention.
Posted by: Insomniac at June 23, 2010 06:00 AM (v+QvA)
Posted by: A Typical Idiot Leftard at June 23, 2010 06:00 AM (64S5N)
Posted by: Cherensky, relevant now as ever at June 23, 2010 06:01 AM (FkKjr)
Dude, later. Obama is a busy man. He's playing 18 this morning and then catching the Nationals get away game this afternoon.
Tsss Tsss Tsss!
Posted by: Oil-logged Sea Snake at June 23, 2010 06:01 AM (HaYO4)
Did y'all read the Froma Dipshit column linked at HA yesterday?
She thinks the federal gov't should take over Louisiana. Now.
You know, the opposite of what the facts would lead a sane person to think.
I'll find the link--to HA with the quote, I can't stomach giving her traffic.
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 23, 2010 06:02 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Maxine Waters at June 23, 2010 06:03 AM (VXBR1)
--and left FRANTIC as everything they do is halted by Obama.
Obama demands that we all sacrifice EVERYTHING to make him happy. And everything includes the ground you walk on, the air you breath, the water you drink, and the same goes for all the fish and wildlife.
Problem is, there will never be enough to make Obama happy, even if he has everything, because he is SICK in the head.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:03 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: DocJ at June 23, 2010 06:03 AM (dt6br)
I knew a man-made disaster would create opportunity for the progressive movement, and we got our wish. Thank you Saul Alinsky.
Posted by: Al Gork at June 23, 2010 06:03 AM (v1gw3)
So that government employees will neglect MORE of their job descriptions so that we can enact more regulations so that we will fail to enforce current regulations so that...
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:05 AM (H+LJc)
We are going to annex Key West over this oil spill, and the weak and ineffective Obama will do absolutely nothing. He's how you say in English........the pussy.
Posted by: Fidel Castro at June 23, 2010 06:05 AM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at June 23, 2010 06:05 AM (tf9Ne)
They have reached the point now where they are not accountable to anyone.
Posted by: Vic
That applies to everyone in government from the top down.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:06 AM (H+LJc)
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Department says that the current location of the dredging could change the salinity of the water and do other things to kill off wildlife.
Theater of the Absurd Department? As opposed to oil, which changes he water content of the water.
Posted by: Beagle at June 23, 2010 06:06 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Maxine Waters at June 23, 2010 06:07 AM (VXBR1)
this is a perfect set up for Jindel and anyone that still believes in some shred of a federal type system.
Jindel needs to order the LA State Guard to continue with construction, and challenge the feds to come and arrest him.
This needs to happen ASAP...
Posted by: Jim T at June 23, 2010 06:08 AM (EJSvw)
BREAKING NEWS: New home sales plunge 33 percent in May after homebuyer tax credits expire
Posted by: Tami at June 23, 2010 06:09 AM (VuLos)
BREAKING NEWS: New home sales plunge 33 percent in May after homebuyer tax credits expire
GASP!!!11!11!
Posted by: Naive American at June 23, 2010 06:10 AM (0pYSi)
BREAKING NEWS: New home sales plunge 33 percent in May after homebuyer tax credits expire
Posted by: Tami at June 23, 2010 10:09 AM (VuLos)
Absolutely unexplainable and tax credits have nothing to do with the plunge.
Posted by: Joe "Bite Me" Biden at June 23, 2010 06:11 AM (v1gw3)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at June 23, 2010 06:12 AM (usjNq)
Posted by: Ewok in an evening gown and four inch pumps at June 23, 2010 06:12 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: Fidel Castro
Well, it took pussy Obama to enable the Marxists south of our border to gain war supplies of nuclear weapons and missiles. And the smartass international press remains blind, deaf, mute and shamefully disconnectedly dumb.
JFK is turning over in his grave along with all the other late presidents.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:13 AM (H+LJc)
They have reached the point now where they are not accountable to anyone.
That and the lack of enforcement of the regulations that exist currently. Before we go shouting for more, shouldn't we see if the ones on the books were followed?
Posted by: alexthechick at June 23, 2010 06:13 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 06:14 AM (6taRI)
Posted by: Barry Hussein Soetero at June 23, 2010 06:14 AM (v+QvA)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 06:14 AM (UOM48)
Time for the states' governors to unite in a lawsuit.
Senators and Congressional Representatives:
Impeach Obama.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:15 AM (H+LJc)
There. Fixed a spelling error for you.
Posted by: dfbaskwill at June 23, 2010 06:15 AM (usjNq)
Yep I could go with that, plus get rid of all the current regulations written by the politicians and dweebs in the regulatory agencies and have real experts write them.
I almost got into it with Ace on this yesterday but I had made my point earlier about the total uselessness of our regulations and reading his posts I began to see it was a lost cause anyway.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 06:16 AM (6taRI)
They weren't using the proper building codes - also not union stickered and minority built.
Posted by: Kilgore at June 23, 2010 06:17 AM (zfv9K)
would say that Obama is trying to start another war of Northern aggression against the South but it is a tossup if has the balls or not.
FIFY
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at June 23, 2010 06:17 AM (twLQ1)
I hate that term. The liberals in the MFM have demonized that phrase. What I like in its place is federal government limitations as described by the real Constitution.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 06:17 AM (6taRI)
You little people should not complain when I spend a few hours golfing, it's the only way I can steel myself for my nightly trysts with Michelle.
Posted by: B. Obama at June 23, 2010 06:18 AM (v1gw3)
It should be obvious to everyone now that the administration is actively trying to prevent cleanup on the gulf coast as well as capping the blown well.
"Never let a crisis go to waste," as Deadfish famously said. He didn't add the end of the saying: "And if you have to, create one or make it worse."
Posted by: Biblio at June 23, 2010 06:20 AM (y5VNb)
I've had my eye on S E Cupp for quite some time. She's a real dish, but since she follows the conservative agenda, it's a given she's a lousy lay.
Posted by: Al Gore at June 23, 2010 06:20 AM (v1gw3)
GASP!!!11!11!
Posted by: Naive American at June 23, 2010 10:10 AM (0pYSi)
Okay, this naive American finally has to ask...What's with the 11! 111! eleventy thing?
Posted by: sock puppeh at June 23, 2010 06:20 AM (VcPAo)
Don't forget to make an open call to all media/bloggers with a camera to monitor 24/7 so we can all see video of the Obama's thugs arresting people at gunpoint.
/interesting tidbit... can't find anything about this story on Huffpo. Eyes wide shut I guess.
Posted by: shibumi at June 23, 2010 06:21 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: John McShame, noted douche at June 23, 2010 06:22 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Vic
Start another? The last one never ended politically and economically.
Having already denied constitutional governance from occurring during his administration, what Obama does share in common with Lincoln is the willingness to execute martial law, the draft, and order military forces against US citizens (as now in the Gulf of Mexico) in order to enact Federal Marxism.
Promo: Obama's abuse of every crisis is coming to a neighborhood near you.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:23 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Charles Johnson at June 23, 2010 06:24 AM (ZESU0)
Beck was saying a while ago that Barry has a problem with flies swarming around him at the WH. No joke. Brrr.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 06:24 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: tsj017 at June 23, 2010 06:25 AM (4YUWF)
Posted by: Maxine Waters at June 23, 2010 06:26 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: Colin Powell, David Brooks, Kathleen Parker, Peggy Noonan, Son of Buckley, Michael Smerconish at June 23, 2010 06:26 AM (ZESU0)
Since the Gulf Spill and news of the Mexican drug lord fortresses built on Arizona hilltops overlooking Tucson AZ, Rasmussen needs to conduct another Arizona Republican senatorial primary poll.
Too bad retiring Congressman Shadegg didn't want to run against McCain on the ballot for the Senate seat.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:27 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 06:27 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: tsj017 at June 23, 2010 10:25 AM (4YUWF)
Louisianna fired the first, mild shot when they decided to go ahead with these berms in defiance of the federal government (though I'm not clear on whether they were waiting for approval or financing). But, it was state nullification in spirit, for sure.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 06:28 AM (Qp4DT)
Jon Voight's apprehension as well.
Who all read his open letter to President Obama yesterday from Drudge's link?
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:29 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Vic
Start another? The last one never ended politically and economically.
Having already denied constitutional governance from occurring during his administration, what Obama does share in common with Lincoln is the willingness to execute martial law, the draft, and order military forces against US citizens (as now in the Gulf of Mexico) in order to enact Federal Marxism.
Promo: Obama's abuse of every crisis is coming to a neighborhood near you.
Posted by: maverick muse
This comparison is sloppy at best, and intellectually dishonest at worst. The Confederacy relied on US officials literally giving over materials and troops belonging to the US. Several abused their positions in the Federal government to help the Confederacy (ex: department of Texas 1861). It seized by force what its sympathisers could not steal. It then enshrined slavery in its constitution. It ordered its forces to fire upon US citizens before Lincoln ever did (Ft. Sumter). Lincoln declared those states as being in rebellion and then gave orders to fire upon people who had renounced US citizenship and who had committed acts of war upon the United States. Lincoln was careful to do so.
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 06:30 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Colin Powell, David Brooks, Kathleen Parker, Peggy Noonan, Son of Buckley, Michael Smerconish at June 23, 2010 10:26 AM (ZESU0)
Hello???
Posted by: T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII at June 23, 2010 06:31 AM (0pYSi)
My husband, the most intelligent, level-headed man I know, said a few days ago that he's beginning to fear Barky and his minions will try to create some "emergency" to prevent or postpone the November elections. And no, he's not a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 06:31 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Maxine Waters at June 23, 2010 06:31 AM (VXBR1)
Yeah, baby!
Posted by: Maxine Waters
Having said all that, bite me Madam Congresscritter
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 06:32 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Colin Powell, David Brooks, Kathleen Parker, Peggy Noonan, Son of Buckley, Michael Smerconish at June 23, 2010 10:26 AM (ZESU0)
Hello???
Posted by: T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII
Did I fail to mention that my center is located in Red Square?
Posted by: The Manufactured Messiah at June 23, 2010 06:34 AM (R2fpr)
The Fish and Game folks can say no all the want. Make them come and enforce it.
Posted by: Mark at June 23, 2010 06:37 AM (0nwFA)
Who in Congress is attempting to get a vote of support for Louisiana and Gulf states to coordinate active response to the gusher ASAP as best they can to avert damage, without Obama's approval?
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:37 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Bugler at June 23, 2010 06:42 AM (VXBR1)
Need to go back and study some real history instead of that promulgated by Northern Historians, the MFM, and the History Channel.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 06:42 AM (6taRI)
Posted by: bill-tb at June 23, 2010 06:43 AM (y+QfZ)
Section 4. The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.
The Democrats have the electoral process corrupted already to swing false victories without the postponement of prescribed voting days.Any postponement would likely anger enough independents and Republicans that a reaction may actually be effective to prevent a postponement.
But so long as we expect the worst from Washingtonians, we won't be disappointed.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:44 AM (H+LJc)
They're not going to cancel/postpone the elections.
They'll just rig them using Acorn and the Black Panthers.
/wish I was joking.
Posted by: shibumi at June 23, 2010 06:46 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at June 23, 2010 06:49 AM (es25b)
Blue Hen, nice of you to try to argue, but while you'll win the argument (have already won it in fact) you'll lose the fight. For most Southern partisans, it's not about historical fact. It's partly pride, but it's mostly about hiding their true nature (as feudalist racists).
Posted by: Zimriel at June 23, 2010 06:55 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Bugler at June 23, 2010 06:56 AM (VXBR1)
What did he say that was false?
Posted by: polyverbs at June 23, 2010 10:50 AM (m2CN7)
Everything.
I am not going to argue the point either. I have seen a lot of comments related to the period between the 1850s and late 1800s here and the general impression I get is that 99% of the commenters are brainwashed and know very little about what they are talking about. Whereas I have studied that part of history literally from childhood.
A lot of it from people who actually lived through it and either have first hand experience or first hand knowledge from people who directly experienced it.
and BTW, I believe Blue Hen is a "she".
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 06:57 AM (6taRI)
You might reconsider your opinion. Yes, your data is correct. Note well that you stipulate occurrences at the outbreak of military conflict.
(You do not mention the economic/political NORTHERN BANKING interests influencing Congressional taxes and tariffs penalizing agriculture prior to South Carolina's assault.)
However, my point is simply that the "conclusion" of the war between the states never ended the self righteous Yankee prejudice against Southern whites, particularly "rednecks". Hence my reference to "political and economic" warfare that went on over a century until the unions and neoconservative advancement of China (Nixon's Kissinger, Most Favored Nation) affected the downfall of what is referenced today as the Rustbelt.
/See how unnecessary it is to charge a fellow conservative with dishonesty and/or intellectual dishonesty rather than simply expressing your own perception as it differs from mine?
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 06:58 AM (H+LJc)
Yes we are all racists. You sound just like the MFM and the liberals in DC. Get some knowledge and give up the comic books.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 06:59 AM (6taRI)
Bugler: if you make a defence for the Confederacy, then you're making a defence for... the Confederacy. The shoe fits, dude.
Posted by: Zimriel at June 23, 2010 07:00 AM (9Sbz+)
Dear Fish and Wildlife Service,
Fuck off.
If you want us to stop, send troops here, but they had better be prepared to start shooting, because we'll have troops of our own waiting.
Posted by: blindside at June 23, 2010 07:01 AM (x7g7t)
Wishful thinking, I suppose, that Congress would issue a statement of support for the Gulf states to respond as they can to this gusher--effectively denying Obama their backing for his incompetent abuses.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 07:03 AM (H+LJc)
Need to go back and study some real history instead of that promulgated by Northern Historians, the MFM, and the History Channel.
Posted by: Vic
Gee you're right. The Confederacy never fired on Ft. Sumter. Colonel Anderson never spoke to the Confederate commanders and told them that he would not submit to them, but openly admitted that he would have to surrender in three days time due to lack of supply, and thus they could take Ft. Sumter without a shot fired. The commander of the Department of Texas didn't surrender everything within his jurisdiction, including the troops stationed there. And he wasn't concerned that he was one of the few that could legitimately be tried and hanged for treason.The constitution of the Confederacy never mentioned slavery, except to ban it and give blacks forty acres and a mule. The Confederacy never issued orders to re-enslave escaped slaves or seize other blacks, therefore Robert E. Lee never isued orders to the Army of Northern Virginia to disregard that order.
It all becomes clear to me now.
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 07:03 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Bugler at June 23, 2010 07:03 AM (VXBR1)
Vic, what are your historical credentials exactly? Which books have you read?
Blue Hen has already laid out the case against you. You've chosen the knowledge you will accept. Arguing with you is a waste of time.
Posted by: Zimriel at June 23, 2010 07:03 AM (9Sbz+)
I am not going to argue with ya'll on this. I have read more books regarding the lead up to the war than most of ya'll here have read books period.
I'll grant you one thing and one thing only. It is pointless to argue with people who have been hopelessly brainwashed.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 07:08 AM (6taRI)
Throwing the book at him
In the very near future, someone
is going to write a book about the Gulf oil spill, like they wrote
books about Katrina.
The books about Katrina laid almost all
the blame upon Mayor Nagin and Louisiana's (then-Democratic) political
class. This information killed the Democrat Party in Louisiana. Those of
you outside the Gulf Coast didn't notice because the rest of the
country got wowed by Obama's snake-oil.
When the books come out about this disaster, I think that Obama is going to have a problem.
...But I didn't say anything about electoral results or D.C. politics. I said that Obama is going to have a problem. One way or another, the productive class in America - whom we like to call "the Vaisya class" 'round here - is going to decide no longer to believe what the "Brahmins" tell them. Their stance may express itself through the ballot box, or through other means; but it will happen.
Zimre/reference
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 07:08 AM (H+LJc)
And the same applies to you, of course.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 07:10 AM (H+LJc)
52%, stand up and take a bow. Posted by: eman at June 23, 2010 09:57 AM (I8dqF)
Just stand up, fuck taking a bow I want a clean & clear shot.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at June 23, 2010 07:14 AM (3IZGh)
What was the point of posting that here, muse? How is it relevant?
Posted by: Zimriel at June 23, 2010 07:21 AM (9Sbz+)
Well, I guess this is what you get when you elect a guy who's only experience is "community organizing".
You have to admit, he's got that community organized. Granted, they're organized against him, but they are organized.
Can anyone even imagine what would have happened if Bush had approached Katrina with this colossal level of incompetence and mismanagement? And as usual we have a near total blackout of such events from the sycophantic media.
Nope, all we hear is about how Obama is probably the smartest guy whoÂ’s ever been in the White House. Really? Could have fooled me. From where I sit I donÂ’t think this guy could find is ass in the dark with both hands, a flash light, and a road map.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at June 23, 2010 07:22 AM (e8T35)
Die directly by oil, or indirectly by altered salinity levels. Hmmm.
Decisions, decisions.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at June 23, 2010 07:23 AM (hrmV3)
Organising principles are never pretty. They are
the core of a movement, shorn of its outward sham. But they deserve to
be taken on their own merits.
Re the neocons: I never could
condemn torture. This is partly because I don't care if we "sink to
their level", but it is mostly because we'd have to torture ideological
opponents anyway. Even if there was no such thing as neoconservatism, we
would still have to face ideological fanatics who were immune to
reason. As for the human dignity of a Khalid Shaykh Muhammad - he deserves
torture; he has worked hard to earn it. Even the anti-neocon Pat
Buchanan would pull on his leather outfit if faced with, for instance,
Aztlan revanchists who were threatening to bomb his home. I have my
differences with neoconservatism; but I endorse its stance on
"interrogation techniques".
Re the [Tea Party] paleocons: antiSemitism is
something else again. Their principle does not condemn a legal process;
it condemns a whole race - neocon or not.
The choice, to me, is clear.
Labels: ethics
posted by Zimri on 02:02Bugler: if you make a defence for the
Confederacy, then you're making a defence for... the Confederacy. The
shoe fits, dude.--Posted by: Zimriel
--
You fail on your blog site and in this discussion to relay your own historical studies, or even where you were raised or live now. Only clue is your inclination for British spelling, which would infer that your prejudice against the South in America is something you brought yourself based upon international opinion. One thing you do clarify is that consistency is not a virtue in your ethics of principle or personal position. Another thing is your own thin skinned blatant racist prejudicial preferences and readiness to smear and destroy any whom you consider undesirable simply for a difference of perception. Walk a mile in Southern shoes, dude.
Obama would not get away treating the Midwest as he is the South. And that is the point those of us who appreciate Southern hospitality and good manners have been making on this thread.
The South is NOT the Confederacy. Yet the North would keep it so for political and economic advantage.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 07:28 AM (H+LJc)
You are stuck on stupid as a self righteous prick who personally knows squat about Southern culture in America, and would smear an entire region in order to satisfy your own vanity.
"You've chosen the knowledge you will accept. Arguing with you is a waste of time." You can't take your own advice because you've substituted vanity for intellect.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 07:33 AM (H+LJc)
Muse, I see.
You assumed that I meant "Tea Party" when I said "paleocon", when I did not - I was referring to the paleocons Lawrence Auster was attacking at Mangan's site and also the net magazine "alt-right". I didn't say anything bad about the Tea Party in those posts.
In short, you deliberately lied about what I said there.
What the fuck, man?
Posted by: Zimriel at June 23, 2010 07:36 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 07:38 AM (6taRI)
You've described "progressives," geography irrelevant... Wagyu for the affirmative-action Princeton alumna FKOTUS, oil-coated shrimp for the Cajun/Creole/Vietnamese shrimpers.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 23, 2010 07:54 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: always right at June 23, 2010 08:26 AM (UzjcV)
Someone here chose to conflate the idiotic actions of Obama with those of Preasident Lincoln at the onset and during the American Civil War. I think that this comparison is ludicrous. I noted that the situation that Lincoln faced was far different, far worse, and yes, that the situation was largely of the Confederacy's making. Even better, contact Governor Jindal and see if he thinks that the comparison is apt. How long do you think that he'd stand for being cast in the role of the Confederacy facing a Lincolnesque tyrant? It's possible to say that the Federal government is botching this, and doing so badly and in ways that stagger the imagination. We don't need to resort to pro-Confederate revisionist historical narratives to do so.
And yeah, I'm a guy. Please refer to the fighting Blue Hens (Delaware Continental Regiment, American Revolution)
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 08:30 AM (R2fpr)
Well, if the Obama administration can ignore a judge's decision to rescind the moratorium on offshore drilling, the local and state municipalities should ignore the U.S. Fish and Wildlife's order to stop building berms.
Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2010 09:04 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Louis Tully at June 23, 2010 09:35 AM (jat5l)
Posted by: filbert at June 23, 2010 09:37 AM (smvTK)
The South is NOT the Confederacy. Yet the North would keep it so for political and economic advantage.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 11:28 AM (H+LJc) "
Is Nashville South or Midwest? Cause he pretty much ignored their disaster.
Posted by: Randy at June 23, 2010 10:12 AM (zQKSr)
Posted by: MarkD at June 23, 2010 05:08 PM (YhZfg)
Posted by: Case at June 23, 2010 09:10 PM (0K+Kw)
Posted by: Case at June 23, 2010 10:44 PM (0K+Kw)
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 10:37 AM (H+LJc --
Theree's already a system in place - Emergency Mutual Assistance Compacts, EMACs, as part of the federal disaster reponse plan. EMACs can be activated at state level, without federal input. Also covers National Guard units - governors can swap them around under State control.
Have to agree that it would be nice if Congress did something to affirm state efforts. I'm not holding my breath, though.
Posted by: Penultimatum at June 24, 2010 12:23 AM (niydV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2273 seconds, 286 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Oil everywhere> A local change in Salinity as far as killing off wildlife.
Posted by: Andrew Jackson at June 23, 2010 05:40 AM (ZESU0)