April 19, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Today is the fifteenth anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing. I marked it last year by describing my confusion that morning.

This year I'm just grateful for first-responders, thankful for the work of law enforcement, and hopeful that atrocities like the Murrah building bombing continue to be rare.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
06:56 AM
| Comments (111)
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jeff at April 19, 2010 06:59 AM (WRM2y)
The last couple of days have reminded me of just how annoying Bill Clinton can be when he sets his mind to it.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 19, 2010 07:03 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: joncelli at April 19, 2010 07:04 AM (RD7QR)
My most vivid memory is that Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center literally pulled over to the side of the road and cell-phoned NPR, who gave him about a quarter-hour of free coast to coast air time to define the issue. A seminal moment in postmodern journalism.
You never hear any more from the birther/truthers of this issue, those who claimed evidence that the bomber was a rube played by Moros. The curtain came down on that, practically as Dees spoke.
Posted by: Mike Nomad at April 19, 2010 07:06 AM (aK/ua)
The horrible actions at Waco inspired the horrible actions of a horrible person to do a horrible thing to innocent people.
and PS - Shame on Bill Clinton.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 19, 2010 07:09 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Bill Clinton at April 19, 2010 07:13 AM (mHQ7T)
And Rachel Madcow is doing a McVeigh special with complete link to tea parties, just like Bill Clintern has been spewing lately. I guess the racism card didnt stick, so now its on to say every tea partier = McVeigh. Only one person in this whole scheme of things is closely connected to ANY terrorist and that is preznint B+ and Bill Ayers.
Posted by: Schwalbe at April 19, 2010 07:16 AM (UU0OF)
It's OK for conservative-minded people to acknowledge that this was done in the name of standing up to government.
It doesnÂ’t diminish us or undermine the fight against AmericaÂ’s slow slide toward socialism. LetÂ’s not talk about Waco. This was a purely evil political act.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 07:16 AM (9KqcB)
God Bless all those innocent people who were killed, may they continue to rest in peace. and God bless all the law enforcement who protect us.
and Bill Clinton needs to STFU! I voted for this piece of crap twice and after hearing what the asshole said this past week, I am wondering what the hell was I think ever voting for this man! I will no longer be defending this man's reputation against my repub friends who cannot stand him (and now I am beginning to see why).
To equate Tea Party patriots with a terrorist like Tim Mcveigh!??!?! Bill Clinton; again STFU, there are dems and independents in the Tea Party movement as well!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 19, 2010 07:17 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 07:18 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: rightwing terrorist, proto teabagger at April 19, 2010 07:18 AM (irJpr)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 19, 2010 07:19 AM (uKraB)
Posted by: joncelli at April 19, 2010 07:21 AM (RD7QR)
He's loathsome. There's an ad on VS that's showing a ton during the hockey games. It's for some kind of sports show roundtable thing and it's all about Clinton and Tiger and the punch line is one guy saying "I'll give you 6:5 that Clinton got more tail than Tiger" and someone else saying "I just got a text from Tiger and he'll take that action" and then something like "From what I hear there's no action he won't take."
My reaction every time is how lovely it is that a former President is a punchline in a joke about marital infidelity. Nice.
Posted by: alexthechick at April 19, 2010 07:22 AM (8WZWv)
1775 Battles of Lexington and Concord
1943 Mass uprising in Warsaw Ghetto
1993 Clinton Administration kills a whole bunch of women and children near Waco, TX
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 19, 2010 07:24 AM (mR7mk)
Speaking as a nearly 20 yr resident of Oklahoma - to any and all trolls on this thread especially the one @ 11:18
FOAD......
And to the political left who want to make hay out of this, especially the likes of Madcow and Clinton, double FOAD.....
Posted by: Crowsting at April 19, 2010 07:26 AM (61BD9)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 19, 2010 07:26 AM (B+qrE)
Joe Klein was just on Chris Matthews' show making the case that criticism of this administration is racially motivated -- "he is an African-American, and he has a funny name" and that Beck, Palin (NY Mag's John Heileman agreed and added Limbaugh to the list) are guilty of sedition.
This is an orchestrated effort, and I agree with Rush that they are pushing the meme, hoping something comes of it, possibly staging a Reichstag fire. Look at the recollections of Dick Morris. Even though his political predictions are wrong more often than not, I'm always interested in his time with the Clinton administration, taking it with a grain of salt.
“Clinton’s proposals — for example, new limits on firearms and some explosives that were opposed by the National Rifle Association — had ‘an underlying political purpose,’ Morris later wrote in another book about Clinton, Because He Could. That purpose was ‘to lead voters to identify the Oklahoma City bombing with the right wing. By making proposals we knew the Republicans would reject…we could label them as soft on terror and imply a connection with the extremism of the fanatics who bombed the Murrah Federal Building.’”
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 07:28 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at April 19, 2010 07:29 AM (k4bdL)
Posted by: maddogg at April 19, 2010 07:31 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 07:31 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 07:32 AM (VRJIW)
Posted by: joncelli at April 19, 2010 07:33 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Vic at April 19, 2010 07:33 AM (QrA9E)
Morris later wrote in another book about Clinton, Because He Could. That purpose was ‘to lead voters to identify the Oklahoma City bombing with the right wing. By making proposals we knew the Republicans would reject…we could label them as soft on terror and imply a connection with the extremism of the fanatics who bombed the Murrah Federal Building.’”
But you can visit the home of a Left-Wing bomber to solicit his political support and go on to become president, no problem.
The Left is way ahead of us in defining the 'extreme.'
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 07:34 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Bill Ayers at April 19, 2010 07:34 AM (Vo2Ef)
Hell; if you follow the logic it was really Clinton's fault.
Are we talking the Murrah Building or 9/11?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 19, 2010 07:34 AM (B+qrE)
Tracing route to SCARPIE-UMC5.colorado.edu [128.138.162.90]
Isn't that erg's stomping grounds?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 19, 2010 07:35 AM (Rn9IH)
Klein has upped the ante.
Criticism is now equivalent to sedition, a felony for which the government can jail you.
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 07:36 AM (VRJIW)
Danny Coulson, then head of the FBI emergency response unit, writes in his book that he concluded that the target and date of attack were probable factors as he was driving to Oklahoma City after the explosion. This hunch turned out to be correct as later interviews with the perps proved.
The date was the anniversary of Waco, and the target was the Federal Government and selected agencies.
Nobody agrees with their choice of response, but it easy to see that it was the horrible event at Waco that inspired the horrible event in Oklahoma, not Rush or the Tea Party.
And it is the ultimate in chutzpah that Clinton, who was himself much closer to the proximate cause - Reno - should get away with blaming it on others.
Posted by: Robert at April 19, 2010 07:36 AM (cd6Ip)
I do agree, the race card is no longer working, so they, the dims, are now trying the Mcveigh angle. I am disgusted to my stomach that this is what my former party has now become.
And to use the OK bombing terrorist act in such a manner?!?!
I saw Bob Beckel on Fox, and he was doing the same talking point. Tea Party = extremists and using the OK bombings of 15 yrs ago as a tie-in. I am just disgusted at what they are doing, Bill Clinton as well.
They forget, this is not 1994, people like me who normally would have bought into their lies no longer trust the MSM and clearly are seeing the pattern in talking points, first the race card, now the McVeigh angle.
Shame on all of them! And it won't work!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 19, 2010 07:36 AM (ACkhT)
Joe Klein was just on Chris Matthews' show making the case that criticism of this administration is racially motivated ...
Joe Biden is really, really white after all.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 19, 2010 07:37 AM (B+qrE)
Isn't that erg's stomping grounds?
The idiot must have lost his cleaning job at the telecom company and is now working as a janitor of UoC
Posted by: wiserbud at April 19, 2010 07:39 AM (IHbof)
It was McVeigh's response to Waco.
The opening statements of the prosecutor:
"And the T-shirt he was wearing virtually broadcast his
intention. On its front was the image of Abraham Lincoln; and
beneath the image was a phrase about tyrants, which is a phrase
that John Wilkes Booth shouted in Ford's Theater to the
audience when he murdered President Lincoln."
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 07:39 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 19, 2010 07:41 AM (mR7mk)
Narcissists tend to be rather thin-skinned and are always shifting the blame.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 07:42 AM (mHQ7T)
Obama's support among the Jewish people has - quite sensibly - dropped 36 points since he began his attacks on the Promised Land.
Shame on Klein for calling for a Holocaust against those enciting sedition criticising Barack Obama's policies.
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 07:42 AM (VRJIW)
Posted by: PaleRider at April 19, 2010 07:43 AM (B5UQ6)
Well I intended it for OKC but I guess both fits as well.
Posted by: Vic at April 19, 2010 07:44 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: jcjimi at April 19, 2010 07:45 AM (ay6+/)
Pretty serious accusations. Not to mention completely baseless. Name one of these critics who have even encouraged people to quit paying taxes.
The Democrats are behaving like cornered animals. That makes them quite dangerous, and they are capable of anything now.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 07:46 AM (mHQ7T)
It is, indeed, a beautiful memorial. Rest in peace, OKC victims.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 19, 2010 07:46 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: polynikes at April 19, 2010 11:37 AM
Bullshit...they were burned alive by the the fire started by the incendiary devices that were shot into the compound.
How the fuck did Koresh kill them??
Wesley Clark, Janet Reno, and Clintonn murdered 76 men, women and children
Posted by: beedubya at April 19, 2010 07:47 AM (AnTyA)
He ordered their deaths by ordering the FBI to light the fire using incendiary teargas devices ... as reported to the nation in a subsequent Congressional Investigation - the Danforth Report - which you can read for yourself.
I've read it. It says - in my view - that Bill Clinton killed those people illegally. But I suggest you read it for yourself and decide for yourself. McVeigh decided for himself.
McVeigh was animated by the Waco attack ordered by Clinton and the Ruby Ridge murders of two people by FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi ... who was indicted by a grand jury for those murders, but who has never been tried in a proper court.
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 07:50 AM (VRJIW)
It was McVeigh's response to Waco.
I know. And the Left minimizes 9/11 by listing the grievances that it was a response to.
I think itÂ’s better just to say he was an mass murderer who acted in our name, period.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 07:51 AM (9KqcB)
WTF. This was pure revenge of sick minded persons and in no way was standing up to government. You're fucked up.
Um, OK. He just happened to target a federal building.
THIS is the kind of make-believe bullshit I expect from liberals. I wonÂ’t let it slide on our side.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 07:54 AM (9KqcB)
Don't get me wrong..I would like to see McVeigh re-animated and put back to death for each person he murdered in the Murrah building..
....but why the fuck are Clinton, Reno, and Wesley Clark still walking around free after they MURDERED 76 people in Waco?
Posted by: beedubya at April 19, 2010 07:54 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: joncelli at April 19, 2010 07:57 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 19, 2010 08:00 AM (y1kI6)
I think itÂ’s better just to say he was an mass murderer who acted in our name, period.
Don't ever presume to speak for me, especially like that.
No one "acts in my name" in delibrately targeting innocent people. And the people in the Murrah Buidling were innocents. Period.
Tim McVeigh was an evil fuck regardless of his motivations. I won't cut slack for relativism on the left and I damn sure won't stand for it here.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 19, 2010 08:00 AM (B+qrE)
Because the powerful don't get arrested in the United States. They control us ... not the other way around.
The powerful - people like FBI murderer Lon Horiuchi - have their indictments dropped without ever having to set foot in a court of law to answer for their crimes.
This is why Barack Obama is allowed to order our military men and women to murder people in Pakistan with no warrants, no trials and no due process?
It is why Barack Obama is allowed to order the murder of an American citizen with no due process, no trial, no warrant.
Bill Clinton ordered those inconvenient people murdered by the FBI ... in the exact same way that Barack Obama is ordering Americans to be murdered today.
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 08:01 AM (VRJIW)
....but why the fuck are Clinton, Reno, and Wesley Clark still walking around free after they MURDERED 76 people in Waco?
Uh, como? I'm not in Wes' fan club, but trying to hang Waco on him is a stretch.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 19, 2010 08:02 AM (B+qrE)
That's right, and they're still doing their damnedest. Rush is still popular as ever, and the Demo-Cong (Democratic Congress) and the Clinton retreads who staff this administration have reaped the whirlwind.
RUSH: Let's go back, April 24th, 1995, Mississippi, Minnesota.
CLINTON 1995: We hear so many loud and angry voices in America today whose sole goal seems to be to try to keep some people as paranoid as possible and the rest of us all torn up and upset with each other. They spread hate. They leave the impression that -- by their very words, that -- violence is a acceptable. You ought to see -- I'm sure you are now seeing the reports of some things that are regularly said over the airwaves in America today. It is time we all stood up and spoke against that kind of (pounding podium) reckless speech and behavior.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 08:03 AM (mHQ7T)
http://tinyurl.com/yybuaaw
Posted by: madamex at April 19, 2010 08:06 AM (+kRu8)
Posted by: Snorty McBrearty at April 19, 2010 08:07 AM (XhjZ2)
This is the president who pardoned and released a bunch of Puerto Rican terrorists on his last week in office. The FALN gang. He pardoned the Weather Underground terrorists -- and he's now lecturing us on violence that hasn't happened, a peaceful tea party movement. We cannot even say "Islamic" and "terrorists" in the same sentence! We cannot associate radical Islam with terrorism but the president can go out and Obama can go out and try to associate the tea party -- genuine, peace-loving, middle-American citizens of this country -- with future acts of terrorism? The tea parties, you know why they're hated? I'll tell you why they're hated. If you're a member of a tea party, if you participated in one yesterday, why you're hated, why you're feared: This regime and the Clintons, everybody else knows that all you want to do is defend what's left of this country and try to rebuild it.
That's what they know you want to do. Frank Rich of the New York Times, he put it this way: "The America that is no more." The tea party people want to revise the America that is no more. Now, we know that militant Islamists hate Western civilization -- and by the virtue of some of the policies of this regime, we can figure that some aspects of Western civilization are not too pleasing to the people running the country right now. So here you have Clinton predicting something, ignoring violence that has happened and not being able to categorize it properly or identify the people engage in it but now trying to impugn the terrorist bunch, the tea party people with future acts of domestic terrorism. This is really sick. It is despicable, and it's indicative of a bunch of people who know that they are in the minority and can only hang on by virtue of authoritarian control over people.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 08:07 AM (mHQ7T)
Uh, como? I'm not in Wes' fan club, but trying to hang Waco on him is a stretch.
He was involved in the planning of the siege. It was he that sent the M1 Abrams tanks. It was his men that shot the incendiary projectiles into the flammables saturated compound.
It was Clark, Reno and Clinton who conspired to violate the Posse Comitatus Act...and who mudered 76 men women and children
Posted by: beedubya at April 19, 2010 08:08 AM (AnTyA)
"The Special Counsel has also concluded that certain FBI and Department of Justice officials failed to disclose to the Attorney General, Congress, the courts, counsel for the Davidians, and the public, evidence and information about the use of pyrotechnic tear gas rounds until August 1999. This failure resulted from a combination of the inappropriate handling of evidence and the dereliction of duty by FBI and Department of Justice employees. As more fully set out below, the Special Counsel has concluded that some of these employees also obstructed the investigation."
This statement, issued to the Attorney General of the United States by former US Senator John Danforth who led the investigation of the fire, is a damning indictment of the official FBI coverup of the illegal killings of the Branch Dividians at Waco, Texas.
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 08:08 AM (VRJIW)
Yes, there was a sizeable segment of the population that was outraged by Waco. But that outrage by that segment did not motivate McVeigh. McVeigh's own outrage, mental instability and perhaps twisted view of the world motivated McVeigh. McVeigh acted in his own name, period.
To say the anti-Waco sentiment did not motivate McVeigh just does not fly. I know why the Right has to be reluctant to admit such connections, because Democrats will use it to smear half the country. Every ideology has an extreme. He was part of ours. (By contrast, look at the grievances supposedly behind the 9/11 attacks. The evils of the U.S., the West, etc. The Left owns some of those.)
Broadly speaking, he acted on behalf of those opposed to ever-growing federal powers. No one asked him to, but he did.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 08:09 AM (9KqcB)
It is why Barack Obama is allowed to order the murder of an American citizen with no due process, no trial, no warrant.
Dude, you're out of your mind.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 08:10 AM (mHQ7T)
Who's WE, kemosabe? Would it be fair to say that you're a conservative and you're concerned?
'Bout what?
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 08:10 AM (9KqcB)
McVeigh's actions had nothing to do with conservative ideology, so there is no need for reluctance on anyone's part, least of all the Democrats who have persistently tried to make that connection over the years. It's despicable.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 08:13 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: joncelli at April 19, 2010 08:15 AM (RD7QR)
Sorry, but that does not represent a counter-argument. Wipe the spittle from your lips and compose a thought and write it down.
Barack Obama has ordered the killing of an America citizen who has not received due process, or a trial. That's murder. It doesn't matter if that person is accused of being a terrorist. That citizen has rights. And Barack Obama has ordered that citizen to be killed.
That act represents the suspension of habeas corpus in the United States.
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 08:16 AM (VRJIW)
I was sitting at my desk with the window open when the blast happened. I knew people who died or were wounded there.
I helped repair the windows of my friend's grandmother's house that were broken by the blast. She jumped at every loud noise until the day she died.
McVeigh was a criminal and there is no justification for his actions. Neither Limbaugh nor Clinton killed those people nor justified McVeigh's actions. Anyone who says otherwise is fucking jackass.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at April 19, 2010 08:17 AM (6ZPfw)
I don't think anyone has suggested that. What we've reminded the original poster is that these acts animated Tim McVeigh and led him to do what he did. We should remember the innocent people Bill Clinton killed too.
What Tim McVeigh did was wrong. He has received justice.
What Bill Clinton did was equally wrong. Bill Clinton ordered innocent people attacked and those people - including innocent children - were killed by FBI agents who then were accused by a United States Senator of covering up and impeding the legitimate investigation of their crimes.
Bill Clinton has not received the justice he is due. McVeigh has.
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 08:19 AM (VRJIW)
Posted by: joncelli at April 19, 2010 08:20 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Jean at April 19, 2010 08:20 AM (vb5IK)
I'm curious: Where were you sitting when Bill Clinton ordered the FBI to attack the Branch Dividians?
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 08:21 AM (VRJIW)
I saw a still pic of McVeigh at Waco, handing out pamphlets blaming the government.
What was interesting was the complete, entire absence of the usual complainers about human rights, civil rights, and police brutality. They had no interest in Waco or Ruby Ridge.
I watched the hearings on both of those. The crimes--if a private citizen had committed them--to which the feds stipulated, as if to say, "yeah, yeah, let's get this out of the way", were beyond the imagining of some anti-government nutcase.
Be interesting to know what McVeigh would have done if there had been a groundswell of support for the Weavers and the Branch Davidians, outside the easily-demonized normal part of the population.
Also be nice to know who his defense attorney is referring to in his book, "And Others Unknown".
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at April 19, 2010 08:25 AM (d0ih6)
"The fact that Bill is attempting to link the business owners, working moms, veterans, cops, students and retirees that make up the Tea Partiers to Tim McVeigh is simply a sign of their desperation. Fortunately, everybody who has attended a TP, or who knows a TP attendee, is aware that Clinton is full of sh*t.
While he's busy being the Official Concern Troll of the Obama Administration, his own reputation is being shredded even further. Keep it up, Bill."
As a recovering democrat and a now a former supporter of Bill Clinton's I absolutely agree with your assement.
I have defended Bill against Monica L. jokes, defended him against all sorts of crap that my repub friends would say against him. Now I cannot defend him anymore. The comparison of the Tea Party movement to a cowardly terrorist who killed innocent Americans is beyond represensible and indefensible.
I attended Tea Party events as a democrat and then as an Independent, I have met Iraqi/Afghan. veterans there, met small business owners like myself there, I have met grandma and grandpas, law abidding tax paying american citizens there, dems, repubs, independents.
Bill Clinton has no idea that this is not 1994 any longer, the political landscape has completley changed, and by inserting his disgusting comments and his defense of an awful DeathCare bill has made me realise these dems have no freaking clue just how out of mainstream they are!
They have realised the race card no longer works, next on the list is this McVeigh comparisons. I just have no words at the disgust I feel towards my former party.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at April 19, 2010 08:26 AM (ACkhT)
They're laying groundwork.
Next on the list is sedition accusations - with resultant arrests.
Rush Limbaugh will be arrested. Sarah Palin will be arrested. Michelle Bauchmann will be arrested.
Joe Klein is foreshadowing it.
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 08:30 AM (VRJIW)
Posted by: Deborah at April 19, 2010 08:33 AM (CncR1)
http://tinyurl.com/yybuaaw"
I was in high school when the OKC bombing happened. We had the day off from school (this being MA, it must have been Patriot's Day) I was had my word processor set up on the coffee table in the living room, working on my term paper on the Battle of Gettysburg and half-listening to my soaps. Needless to say, once the news cut in I didn't get much work done on my paper.
I remember see that photo of the fireman and baby everywhere, and it gave me nightmares - even as a teenager. It's still a kick in the gut. God bless our first responders, and I hope Timothy McVeigh is enjoying ministering to the barbed cock of Satan right about now.
Posted by: CMS2004 at April 19, 2010 08:36 AM (DlVI/)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at April 19, 2010 08:54 AM (2l21U)
While it is hard to defend Koresh in all aspects, it is equally hard to defend the actions of the array of Federal forces aligned against them.
Many have pointed out that it would have been all too easy to arrest Koresh when he went to the City of Waco, to see a movie, several days before the assault on the compound.
Older readers might recall that the ATF bragged about directing music at the compound including Nancy Sinatra's "These Boots are made for Walkin'" at the limits of human hearing and 24/7, wink, wink.
Hardy the kind of thing that leads to a calm environment in which to arrive at a peaceful solution - indeed, quite the opposite. Infantile.
So they ramped it up and brought it to a boil - gung-ho elements out of control.
And this is a management failure more than anything else, and the thing that points most directly at Reno and Clinton.
Posted by: Robert at April 19, 2010 09:00 AM (cd6Ip)
Jones still maintains that McVeigh had outside help; the rumor is that Jones thinks it was Iraqi. At least one Grand Jury member thought that as well. Find a nut bent on violence and help him on his way is the scenario. How an Iraqi Agent would have found McVeigh is the question.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at April 19, 2010 09:05 AM (2l21U)
Tim McVeigh is a fucking monster. He blew up kids. Purposefully. He blew up a bunch of innocent little kids playing in a daycare center. And for what? What did it prove? All he did was bring more pain, suffering, and loss to the world.
For Bill Clinton to try to link me to that kind of evil is the worst smear imaginable. Anyone who tries to do this to my face is going to get his goddamned teeth knocked out. I'm not having it.
The fucking shamelessness of these people. They practically get on their knees and blow Bill Ayers for trying and failing to do EXACTLY what McVeigh did.
There's nothing they won't excuse if it advances their sick, twisted ideology. Everything they hurl at us is pure projection.
Woe to those who call good evil and evil good.
Posted by: Warden at April 19, 2010 09:15 AM (TIGTh)
I guess you're not a regular, so let me lay it on the line: you're a fucking moby troll who's trying to smear conservatives by indirection. You need to fuck off, soon.
Posted by: joncelli at April 19, 2010 12:20 PM (RD7QR)
I don’t know what constitutes your definition of a “regular,” but I’ve been around these parts a lot longer than you.
And without even knowing you, I can confidently assert that IÂ’ve done more to further the conservative cause out there in the real world than you have.
IÂ’m not trying to smear anyone and I am not going anywhere. I support and promote conservative ideas first, conservative people second. Anything that gets in the way of implementing conservative ideas will be in my sights.
I am not afraid to state the obvious, that McVeigh was a right-wing extremist. I am not afraid because: 1. ItÂ’s the truth; 2. Denying the obvious makes us look bad; and 3. The Left has more flakes than we do, and we can win that comparison.
IÂ’m not out to win the hearts of my fellow conservatives, IÂ’m out to create more of them.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 09:16 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Mike In BA at April 19, 2010 09:24 AM (1hSHv)
Posted by: Mike In BA at April 19, 2010 09:30 AM (1hSHv)
I think that his cohort Terry Nichols, spent time in the Phillipines and was friendly with muslim extrmists there. They should have let him sit in jail a few more years, see if he would talk. How many monsters wait, 20-30 years without being executed and McVeigh was dead in about 3, from the time of the crime. Seems they wanted him dead fast.
Posted by: madamex at April 19, 2010 09:33 AM (+kRu8)
If you do nothing else, ditch that non-text compliant editor you are using for your posts.
The control characters it uses to try to make apostrophe's and quotes curl the right way make your posts on the internet look like crap. It generally takes either a Macintosh, or a Microsoft product, to screw up that badly.
The internet lives in plain-text only land.
Posted by: Kristopher at April 19, 2010 09:53 AM (kCEOg)
I was at work that day and my son was, for some reason, not at school. He called me and told me what had happened.
"You're kidding."
He moved the phone toward the television so I could hear.
I remember somebody had taped a conversation between an aircraft heading to OKC on normal business and the tower saying they were only taking aircraft that had medical personnel on board. At that point, the assistance had not started to flow in and they were just hoping that inbound aircraft might have medical folks aboard on other business. Possibly just changing flights in OKC. I have to believe they'd have cancelled their plans.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at April 19, 2010 09:59 AM (d0ih6)
Posted by: andycanuck at April 19, 2010 10:03 AM (ocax6)
It generally takes either a Macintosh, or a Microsoft product, to screw up that badly.
Yikes. That covers about 99.999% of all products.
Wonder if this is better.
TestÂ….
TestÂ…..
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 10:06 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Ken Royall at April 19, 2010 10:14 AM (9zzk+)
Posted by: Warden at April 19, 2010 01:15 PM (TIGTh)
Exactly what I find myself saying over and over as I look at our current direction.
I am not afraid to state the obvious, that McVeigh was a right-wing extremist.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 01:16 PM (9KqcB)
I would agree with this point: he certainly seemed to think he was defending America from an overreaching tyrranical federal government. However, the overwhelming condemnation of terrorism from pretty much every part of the right, the peaceful and law-abiding nature of people on the right, the value that the right places so heavily on life including the life of babies and children all testify much louder than McVeigh's stupid T-shirt.
BTW - I'm the Tea Party. That's what I say whenever I overhear someone deriding those who gathered to speak their minds. People are shocked to hear it from me, but I'm no longer afraid to be counted.
Posted by: Jade Sea at April 19, 2010 10:14 AM (/aKkc)
I would agree with this point: he certainly seemed to think he was defending America from an overreaching tyrranical federal government. However, the overwhelming condemnation of terrorism from pretty much every part of the right, the peaceful and law-abiding nature of people on the right, the value that the right places so heavily on life including the life of babies and children all testify much louder than McVeigh's stupid T-shirt.
Agreed. Doesn't hurt to say it every now and then.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 10:24 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Vic at April 19, 2010 10:33 AM (QrA9E)
If I understand what CJ is saying - not a justification of evil asshats like McVeigh - but a willingness to call out the crazy on our own side if and when it exists.
One of the things that led me from an early life as a Dem to the conservative place I am now is that fact that conservatives were simply more connected to reality.
More humble, more realistic, more aware of human history and human nature. More submitted to truth as an outside reality rather than as a prepackaged product that we can change at will. There are bad apples on both sides, but the commitment to reality means that really bad apples generally feel less comfortable on our side.
McVeigh does not represent me or any conservative I know (or have heard on this site!) I am concerned about big government. However, I am not like feminists who defend Clinton despite the overwhelming evidence that he is at best a harasser and at worst (likely) a rapist. If you speak like us but do evil, we utterly reject you.
Sad little irony #101 - if anyone proposed McVeigh-esque activities as my city's tea party, the tea party would be the FIRST to turn that sad fuck in to the FBI.
Posted by: Jade Sea at April 19, 2010 10:34 AM (/aKkc)
If I understand what CJ is saying - not a justification of evil asshats like McVeigh - but a willingness to call out the crazy on our own side if and when it exists. One of the things that led me from an early life as a Dem to the conservative place I am now is that fact that conservatives were simply more connected to reality.
I made the same journey, Jade, for the same reason.
McVeigh does not represent me or any conservative I know (or have heard on this site!) I am concerned about big government. However, I am not like feminists who defend Clinton despite the overwhelming evidence that he is at best a harasser and at worst (likely) a rapist. If you speak like us but do evil, we utterly reject you.
I wish I didnÂ’t see so many mentions of Waco on this thread. It means nothing.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 10:42 AM (9KqcB)
Here you go. From Andy Canuck's link.
"McVeigh was motivated and upset by the Waco invasion of the Branch Davidian compound. Attorney General Reno ordered tanks to be used against American citizens. McVeigh was not inspired by rhetoric. He was angered by action taken by the Clinton administration."
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 10:49 AM (mHQ7T)
I totally agree, though I think neo-Naziism is a mental disorder more than a legitimate political movement. Naziism was left wing. But I can understand the confusion for the young and novice. Read the Wiki entry for "right wing."
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 10:53 AM (mHQ7T)
Explain how advocating for smaller government is the same as terrorism. He was wearing a tee shirt of Abraham Lincoln, founder of the modern GOP, with a quote by John Wilkes Booth. If McVeigh was right wing, then so is William Ayers and the Weather Underground (Clinton pardoned them!)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 11:01 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 12:19 PM (VRJIW)
This is grounds for banning. I liked the "punching down" jokes, but this comment is intolerable.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 11:08 AM (mHQ7T)
For years the FBI and the Clinton Administration covered up the fact that the government had shot incendiary devices into the BD compound. They said the BD's had burned down the house themselves, lighting the curtains on fire. They said that they COULDN'T have been the cause because nothing they shot in the house could have started the fire.
They lied. They covered it up. I have no idea who started the fires. But the government lied for 5 years about their possible culpability - I think it's appropriate to disregard a witness that lied about a most critical element of an investigation for 5 years.
I want to like Clinton badly. I want to say that telling the press that your young mistress was a stalker was a decision made in haste and one that was quickly regreted. But after this, I give up. He's scum. Personable scum but scum.
Posted by: East Bay Jay at April 19, 2010 11:40 AM (ocHBO)
Explain how advocating for smaller government is the same as terrorism.
It's not the same. One is a belief, the other is a way to express that belief. Not inherently related.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 12:29 PM (9KqcB)
Are you using the CJ nic to make us think that you're Charles Johnson or something?
I've been CJ on the net since 1997, and here since 2006, before Charles Johnson went nuts and became routinely referenced as "CJ." I'm not trying to stir things up just to stir things up. I'm just giving my opinion.
Posted by: CJ at April 19, 2010 12:31 PM (9KqcB)
I know the definition of an FBI cover-up.
United States Senator John Danforth, who led the investigation of the conflagration which consumed Mt. Carmel that was started by the FBI, reported to the Attorney General of the United States - Janet Reno - that members of the FBI participated in a coverup of events at Waco, Texas.
Here is what Danforth wrote in his final report to Reno:
""The Special Counsel has also concluded that certain FBI and Department of Justice officials failed to disclose to the Attorney General, Congress, the courts, counsel for the Davidians, and the public, evidence and information about the use of pyrotechnic tear gas rounds until August 1999. This failure resulted from a combination of the inappropriate handling of evidence and the dereliction of duty by FBI and Department of Justice employees. As more fully set out below, the Special Counsel has concluded that some of these employees also obstructed the investigation."
Senator Danforth concluded - officially - that employees and agents of the FBI and the Department of Justice committed obstruction of justice by obstructing his investigation of the events.
That is not "someguy" making accusations. It is the official overseer, a former United States Senator, appointed specifically for the purpose of investigating the FBI.
Address yourself to these points instead of trying to convince me that there is some meaningful difference between a pyrotechnic and an incendiary device. There is no meaningful difference in this context.
Posted by: someguy at April 19, 2010 03:23 PM (VRJIW)
Posted by: Veritas at April 19, 2010 04:41 PM (5sGjQ)
No. One is criminal and the other is protected by the First Amendment. They are actually opposites.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 19, 2010 07:09 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: lopan at April 19, 2010 07:32 PM (Ddmk1)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2568 seconds, 239 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 19, 2010 06:58 AM (9hSKh)