February 21, 2010
— Purple Avenger If the claims are true, this might be the first "biofuel" to actually make any economic sense.
...With algal oil productivities that could potentially reach annual average levels in the range of 3,000 to 5,000 gallons per acre, the land footprint required for large volumes of renewable fuel production would be minimal when compared with other conventional oil crops, such as soy and canola, that produce between 50 and 120 gallons per acre per year.Large algae ponds would obviously be a dandy place to stash any smelly dead bodies you still have lurking under the porch too, although I don't think the authors have viewed it from that angle...yet.
...
Posted by: Purple Avenger at
09:56 AM
| Comments (271)
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: shibumi at February 21, 2010 10:00 AM (OKZrE)
True dat.
How many gallons annually would 1200 acres of ANWR produce?
Posted by: XBradTC at February 21, 2010 10:04 AM (cB95w)
Posted by: scum-sucking bottom feeder at February 21, 2010 10:04 AM (0K3p3)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 21, 2010 10:06 AM (6UDel)
Posted by: evil midnight bomber what bombs at midnight at February 21, 2010 10:08 AM (hCQG5)
Posted by: MikeMakesRight at February 21, 2010 10:08 AM (xM/mV)
Posted by: crosspatch at February 21, 2010 10:10 AM (ZbLJZ)
Nonsense. Real estate bubbles based on swampland combines features of both the housing bubble and crap like S&L/Whitewater scams.
Posted by: evil midnight bomber what bombs at midnight at February 21, 2010 10:12 AM (hCQG5)
Posted by: evil midnight bomber what bombs at midnight at February 21, 2010 10:14 AM (hCQG5)
The only problem with using algae is getting the "right" algae to reproduce and not some natural strain which doesnt produce the biofuel. This would have to be done in some sort of enclosed plastic casing in order to cut down on contamination from other alage and microbacteria.
I'm all about saving Mother Gaia making Nature our bitch
Posted by: Owen at February 21, 2010 10:15 AM (nIrzR)
I suspect this is largely due to our previous (relative) incompetence at being able to genetically tweak the organisms involved to maximize their output and broaden the range of what they're willing to eat. That's changing fast these days.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 21, 2010 10:16 AM (6UDel)
Genetically engineered bio-slaves has a rather nice ring to it.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 21, 2010 10:17 AM (6UDel)
So the bodies would go into the pond instead of under the bus? Gee, seems like a certain senator checked out too soon.
Posted by: Boots at February 21, 2010 10:21 AM (06JTY)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 10:22 AM (4tixt)
Posted by: Zimriel at February 21, 2010 10:22 AM (6fNLN)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 21, 2010 02:19 PM (0fzsA)
Do we have to wait until they die a natural death or what?
Posted by: Tami at February 21, 2010 10:23 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: whatmeworry? at February 21, 2010 10:25 AM (37puw)
Posted by: Stillwater at February 21, 2010 10:26 AM (qUdDE)
If the production rates are anything close what's being claimed, itll be cheaper than oil at current prices. That's a compelling economic argument.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 21, 2010 10:26 AM (6UDel)
Posted by: robtr at February 21, 2010 10:28 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Noah at February 21, 2010 10:29 AM (mhD2v)
Posted by: Mord at February 21, 2010 10:32 AM (tTj19)
Posted by: Sean Foushee at February 21, 2010 10:33 AM (HNJBy)
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at February 21, 2010 10:33 AM (8zQxF)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 10:33 AM (4tixt)
Just off the top of my head...
To make this work it would take an acre of land with good sunlight (the article mentioned the southwest) and flat. You would have an algae "pond" but it would be probably 2-10 inches of water between two plastic sheets. Basically a translucent plastic bladder. I'm not sure what sort of siphoning system they would need to get the oil out. Probably let them grow for a couple of months and then drain the whole thing and repropagate with the original strain of algae to cut back on mutation/contamination.
Rough moron calculations would put that at 3.2 million gallons per acre...
Posted by: Owen at February 21, 2010 10:34 AM (nIrzR)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 21, 2010 10:34 AM (6UDel)
I just don't see us doing that. Land is too valuable. We could put tanks on top of already used space, e.g. a roof, but it will take a lot of roofs for that to meet our needs. The oceans, on the other hand, seem to be a plausible approach. You would use floating tanks that move with the waves, and if you have a leak, so what? It isn't like most of the ocean's surface is intensively used.
Posted by: pep at February 21, 2010 10:39 AM (0K3p3)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 10:39 AM (4tixt)
The team determined that Southwestern states offer the most sun and large areas of available land, but are lacking in carbon dioxide and water.
I get the lack of water, but the last time I checked access to CO2 Wasn't a problem. Did they mean dissolved CO2 in the water?
Posted by: NJConservative at February 21, 2010 10:39 AM (/Ywwg)
Posted by: Ira at February 21, 2010 10:40 AM (bJm7W)
As has been already discussed, this approach solves both problems.
Posted by: pep at February 21, 2010 10:40 AM (0K3p3)
Short term - drill.
Long Term - this bio-fuel is years away from enough productivity to offset our needs. That said, we would be foolish to ignore the technology.
We should investigate any and all alternative energy sources. The critical issue is learning when to abandon unproductive technologies like wind farms. It's ok to be green - even better to be smart.
Posted by: Murph at February 21, 2010 10:41 AM (5r9XT)
Posted by: evil midnight bomber what bombs at midnight at February 21, 2010 10:42 AM (hCQG5)
Posted by: evil midnight bomber what bombs at midnight at February 21, 2010 10:43 AM (hCQG5)
http://tinyurl.com/yft6kkq
http://tinyurl.com/yfcd534
There's always some jerkoff claiming essentially free energy, and then those of us who understand thermodynamics have to, once again, for the umpteen-zillionth f-in time, explain TANSTAAFL.
I had a relative that gave money to an 'inventor', whose brilliant idea was to build an electric car that had motors on TWO wheels, but generators on FOUR wheels, so it would actually generate more power than it used. The relative insisted that this was a plausible proposition, despite my multiple explanations of the law of conservation of energy.
Posted by: West at February 21, 2010 10:46 AM (vqYQR)
Every time some green energy "source" is touted as being able to ramp up in efficiency or production, epic fail ensues.
Wind turbines and silicon photovoltaic panels take more energy to produce, maintain, and back up infrastructure (as in fill in power when the wind is low, or clouds block the sun) than they will ever produce.
If they were net energy producers, you would see wind turbine and solar panel factories setting up their own facilities to power their production.
Funny, that never happens. Must tell you something.
Posted by: nbindo at February 21, 2010 10:46 AM (gfBKP)
Posted by: Frank G at February 21, 2010 10:47 AM (4X0aT)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 10:48 AM (4tixt)
I always wondered about that, West.
Why can't they put a little generator (sorta like brushes & the armature in a car's alternator) on the wheel's of, say, a Prius, to charge the batteries when it's moving?
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 10:55 AM (K9ZHX)
...would be minimal when compared to other crops.
It wouldn't be minimal in absolute terms. No matter what the mechanism, any kind of solar power is up against the fact that solar power is very diffuse. If you want to collect solar energy in quantities which match the rate we use power, you have to pave hundreds of square miles with technology.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 21, 2010 10:56 AM (+rSRq)
I get the lack of water, but the last time I checked access to CO2 Wasn't a problem. Did they mean dissolved CO2 in the water?
Yeah this is the problem. What can we put in the water to use as a food source for the algae that costs little, preferrably a waste product, and the algae will accept as a CO2 source.
Posted by: Owen at February 21, 2010 11:00 AM (nIrzR)
Posted by: ClimateChange u can belive in at February 21, 2010 11:01 AM (bAL0J)
PA,
Liquid Natural gas is not an option. It has to be kept cold to stay liquid. I am talking about compressed natural gas. Yes the tank has to be thicker but it can also be smaller.
As for it being dangerous is a red herring I believe. Gasoline isn't any less dangerous. A CNG tank doesn't contain oxygen like a half full gas tank does. If the tank is ruptured the gas could explode but so does gasoline.
Posted by: robtr at February 21, 2010 11:01 AM (fwSHf)
Denmark and small euro countries can go to wind because their countries are small and do not require the vast amounts of electricity just one of your major cities require to run.
Posted by: Gary B at February 21, 2010 11:03 AM (1gWfF)
Hey - thats where Ayers wanted to set up the concentration camps!
/loveitwhenaplancomestogether
Posted by: evil midnight bomber what bombs at midnight at February 21, 2010 11:04 AM (hCQG5)
Bacteria rebuilt to make oil
The Nature article explains how E. coli could do it: Researchers modified the bacteria's genome to insert the coding for producing an enzyme known as hemicellulase. That enzyme can break down one of the ingredients of cellulosic feedstock, hemicellulose, into smaller sugar molecules.
E. coli bacteria are naturally programmed to turn those sugars into fatty acids for building cell membranes - but normally, each bacterium produces only as much of the fatty acids as it needs. Rsesearchers fiddled with that part of the genetic code, too. "We stole away the fats it would normally use to make the membrane and channeled them into biodiesel instead," Keasling said.
That essentially turned the bacteria into little biodiesel factories. "The more you steal away, the more it turns it up," Keasling said.
The bacteria expelled droplets of oil into the fermentation vats, which made extraction of the fuel relatively easy. "When you turn the impellers off, it's like oil and water," Keasling explained. "The oil floats to the top, you skim it off, you put it in your tank."
Posted by: stuiec at February 21, 2010 11:07 AM (GU29T)
hey, stuiec, did you finally give up on commenting on Frum's blog? I went there today for a minute and noticed there are still only about 5 people commenting over there.
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 11:09 AM (K9ZHX)
Researchers modified the bacteria's genome to insert the coding for producing an enzyme known as hemicellulase.
Power your Hemi with hemicellulase!
Posted by: Waterhouse at February 21, 2010 11:12 AM (DZm6G)
In the bacteria article it said that the researchers were only able to produce 10% of theoretical yield. Great for laboratory work, not so good for real world...
Exciting stuff for sure, but were decades away from this becoming economical...
Posted by: Owen at February 21, 2010 11:13 AM (nIrzR)
A big problem is keeping out other algae strains from your algae pool. If you engineer or breed your algae to be super-efficient at producing fuel ... then they can be easily out-competed by wild algae, who don't waste time and energy producing fuel and just focus on producing more algae.
You can grow your algae in enclosed, controlled containers ... but then your expenses skyrocket compared to just using open ponds.
Posted by: bobbo at February 21, 2010 11:15 AM (+ABdJ)
WATER.....these ideas have pretty much been weighed down by the lack of fresh water to do this at any scale.
To provide even any percentage of supply for the US would need thousands of SQUARE MILES of water on a continuing basis to grow the algae.
Ain't gonna happen. We don't have it. If we did , they wouldn't be fighting in Calif. to grow our food right now. They are bypassing farmers to get water to the cities. This will continue even more so in the future.
But we could use these.
http://www.hyperionpowergeneration.com/apps.html
The new Hyperion Nuclear reactor. They are the size of a shipping container and are buried in the ground where needed and provide electricity for up to 20,000 homes. Can be dug back up when fuel is done and replaced. No water needed to cool it or get contaminated.
Posted by: bill at February 21, 2010 11:23 AM (rEgvK)
Posted by: matt damon at February 21, 2010 11:23 AM (SYHFL)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 21, 2010 11:26 AM (DTffv)
And then, when the dead congressman has fermented long enough, we dredge out the alga-encrusted cadaver and run him for Senate again in New Jersey.
The thought of drowing Senators Boxer and Feinstein in the saline ponds around SF Bay is appealing.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 21, 2010 11:27 AM (tH7KR)
Posted by: RayJ at February 21, 2010 11:27 AM (rDhm0)
Posted by: Christoph at February 21, 2010 11:27 AM (0fq7b)
I've always loved this bioengineering stuff to make bacteria your slaves and get them to produce what you want.
/I've used E.coli to produce several recombinant proteins. That's what I do when I'm not planning the downfall of Olympus, looking at Skinemax pron, or posting here.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 11:28 AM (9hSKh)
#63 The new Hyperion Nuclear reactor. They are the size of a shipping container and are buried in the ground where needed and provide electricity for up to 20,000 homes. Can be dug back up when fuel is done and replaced. No water needed to cool it or get contaminated.
Cool. I hope I don't have to kill Hyperion in GoW3 though.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 11:29 AM (9hSKh)
Less than you might think. Closed tanks and a closed cycle of growth and harvest means that the bulk of the water will be recyclable.
Posted by: stuiec at February 21, 2010 11:32 AM (GU29T)
Posted by: td at February 21, 2010 11:33 AM (2OlNe)
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 11:35 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 03:09 PM (K9ZHX)
It seemed to me that Frum and his co-bloggers were fairly immune to reason. They are touchy-feely types who think that because they feel something is fair or kind, it must be a political value that should be and is shared by a majority of Americans.
Oh, and that Sarah Palin can't possibly be up to the intellectual task of governing. (Which only betrays their odd and unsupportable belief that governing is an intellectual task.)
Posted by: stuiec at February 21, 2010 11:35 AM (GU29T)
#71 Less than you might think. Closed tanks and a closed cycle of growth and harvest means that the bulk of the water will be recyclable.
Yeppers. If the oil-emitting algae idea is feastable economically, somebody will find a good way to mass-produce the stuff and they'll be able to solve these problems.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 11:36 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February
21, 2010 03:28 PM (9hSKh)
What the hell? My opinion of you is totally blown.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 11:36 AM (1fanL)
Speaking of Sarah Palin being a dummy...
they're giving her shit because she doesn't know how WWI was started? Gimme a fucking break.
Why doesn't Joe Biden, self-acclaimed foreign policy expert, ever get quizzed like that? Or any other politician, such as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama?
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 11:39 AM (K9ZHX)
I just gotta quit dumping chlorine into my pool and in no time at all I'll be able to harvest an oil slick from the thing, which I will be able to burn to make electricity to run my internets.
Did I miss anything?
Posted by: azlibertarian at February 21, 2010 11:40 AM (fGtbP)
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 11:40 AM (1fanL)
#77 What the hell? My opinion of you is totally blown.
Why? I have to pay for my Skinemax pron addiction somehow. Killing off the Greek Pantheon, while exciting and awesome, isn't very lucrative monetarily.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 11:41 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: XBradTC
at February 21, 2010 02:04 PM (cB95w)
If everybody would just inflate their tires, we wouldn't need any more oil. At all.
Posted by: Barry O. at February 21, 2010 11:42 AM (1fanL)
I hope this works out of course - but I also personally some people and programs that have been working on making this process commercial for 20 years now. They're nowhere close yet.
All the processes I've seen or heard of produce oil at the cost of about $400 - $500 per barrel. Not anywhere close to competetive, and that's the problem.
Posted by: Tom Servo at February 21, 2010 11:42 AM (T1boi)
No kidding. Kratos actually works a job? Now we're going to hear that he just likes M80B for her mind or something...
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 21, 2010 11:44 AM (DTffv)
#86 No kidding. Kratos actually works a job? Now we're going to hear that he just likes M80B for her mind or something...
Why are you assuming that I "like" the consort of Hades, Miss'80sbaby? It's just fun to taunt her about the inevitable death of her consort, and the destruction of her happy home in Tartarus come mid-March.
And I've been getting practive playing the GoW collection on my PS3 as well as Dante's Inferno. I actually saw a creature in Inferno (lust beast, I think?) that I think is what Miss'80sbaby looks like in real life. I'll have to find some concept art.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 11:49 AM (9hSKh)
How many gallons annually would 1200 acres of ANWR produce?
Quite literally, Millions. And that is no exaggeration.
Posted by: Tom Servo at February 21, 2010 11:50 AM (T1boi)
are you referring to the epic failure of Duke in the upcoming March Madness?
I'm taking UK all the way -- go Wildcats!
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 11:51 AM (K9ZHX)
Parade a bunch of enviro types past it, "It's RENEWABLE and we're gonna brew this stuff right in front of your noses 24/7. If you like, we'll put some dinosaur statues half-immersed in it, make an historical theme park out of it."
Posted by: mrkwong at February 21, 2010 11:53 AM (G8Eo0)
I'm taking UK all the way -- go Wildcats!
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 03:51 PM (K9ZHX)
Anybody remember the 1990 tournament? UNLV crushed Duke 101-70 in the championship game? With Larry Johnson, Stacey Augmon, Greg Anthony, et al, they crushed everybody in the tournament. Except, I couldn't believe it at the time, and I still can't, they needed a last second shot to beat Ball frickin' St., 69-67.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 11:56 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: mrkwong at February 21, 2010 03:53 PM (G8Eo0)
Martha's Vineyard.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 11:56 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: Say What? at February 21, 2010 11:57 AM (fE7TI)
I don't remember that but I still hate Duke and Chritsian Laitner for making that last second shot against UK.
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 11:58 AM (K9ZHX)
I assume that when this oil is burned CO2 is still a by-product. If so, ManBearPig will not be happy.
Posted by: rockhead at February 21, 2010 11:59 AM (RykTt)
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 03:58 PM (K9ZHX)
You mean Laettner didn't make up for it by sucking in the NBA?
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 12:02 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: Awnree at February 21, 2010 12:05 PM (B+JdP)
Posted by: Naan at February 21, 2010 12:07 PM (j5MTj)
Posted by: Naan at February 21, 2010 04:07 PM (j5MTj)
No more of a hazard to bois than the rest of us. You know bois are just gay boys, right?
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 12:10 PM (1fanL)
We tried that too. Ethyl methane sulfonate as an alkylating agent a potent mutagen. It created a virus so lethal the subject was dead before he left the table.
Posted by: Eldon Tyrell of Tyrell Corp. at February 21, 2010 12:11 PM (LtIsn)
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 12:11 PM (1fanL)
So would this algae have the potentual to become a boi hazard?
Posted by: Naan at February 21, 2010 04:07 PM (j5MTj)
I love boi hazards.
Posted by: Barney Frank at February 21, 2010 12:12 PM (t72+4)
I recently read an article that claimed the potentials for algal fuel were totally over-hyped.
You can't just build a scummy pond -- it has to be pretty heavily fertilized for the necessary yields and the costs for fertilizer makes it as expensive as regular fuel. According to the article.
Not mentioned in the article: the manufacture of fertilizer requires lots of natural gas.
Also, according to a sidebar article (which reeks of bullshit hysteria) we are running out of phosphates at an alarming rate. Phosphates are what algae love. They're what cause algal blooms, which is why detergent makers are being forced to manufacture phosphate free detergents.
When I first read about this technology it seemed almost too good to be true. Now I'm pretty sure it is too good to be true.
Posted by: Tinian at February 21, 2010 12:13 PM (7+pP9)
#103 We tried that too. Ethyl methane sulfonate as an alkylating agent a potent mutagen. It created a virus so lethal the subject was dead before he left the table.
So that's where Captain Trips came from!
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 12:13 PM (9hSKh)
Algae has the advantages of being relatively easy and fast to genetically engineer, and that different species grow in all sorts of conditions - hot, cold, salt water, fresh water.
Concerns about the availability of fresh water are misplaced. Brackish water or brine can be made to work.
Lastly, compared to other biofuels, the thermodynamic efficiency of algae is several times higher.
I don't know if it's going to be economical at this time, but I wouldn't rule it out.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at February 21, 2010 12:13 PM (w41GQ)
Posted by: Lloyd at February 21, 2010 12:13 PM (Cd1LY)
Whenever you hear the Greenies talk about "gallons", you know it's bullshit.
There's 42 gallons per barrel. The acreage in northwest North Dakota that I'm developing will produce about 1000 barrels per barrel in actual (that is to say REAL) oil per acre. So that's 42,000 gallons of nice pretty green crude oil per acre right there, in my little frozen piece of heaven.
And ANWR would beat that by a factor of 10-20, btw...
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:15 PM (dzuqL)
please to forgive my typo, I haz 5 tax returns to work on and complete today
Posted by: Naan at February 21, 2010 12:16 PM (j5MTj)
I don't know if it's going to be economical at this time, but I wouldn't rule it out.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at February 21, 2010 04:13 PM (w41GQ)
It's never going to be economic, considering trasnportation, additional refining and eco damage.
You may safely rule it out. It's tax dollar-burning horseshit, like every other jerkoff fantasy they come up with.
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:18 PM (dzuqL)
So that's where Captain Trips came from!
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February
21, 2010 04:13 PM (9hSKh)
Trying to worm your way back into my good graces, boi?
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 12:18 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: Andi Sullivan at February 21, 2010 12:19 PM (DTffv)
please to forgive my typo, I haz 5 tax returns to work on and complete today
Posted by: Naan at February 21, 2010 04:16 PM (j5MTj)
I refuse to forgive the funniest thing I've seen today.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 12:19 PM (1fanL)
Kratos, have you been able to train the E. coli to watch Skinemax flicks with you?
I believe they've already located the bacterial "jerk-off" gene.
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:24 PM (dzuqL)
Today's quote is brought to us by the letter "D", the Electric Company, and the first Jew appointed to the Supreme Court.
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty
when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are
naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded
rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment
by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 12:25 PM (K9ZHX)
Today's quote is brought to us by the letter "D", the Electric Company, and the first Jew appointed to the Supreme Court.
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 04:25 PM (K9ZHX) Edward G. Marshall?
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:26 PM (dzuqL)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 21, 2010 12:27 PM (IIQIM)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 21, 2010 04:27 PM (IIQIM)
It appears to be boi trouble..
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:28 PM (dzuqL)
Edward G Marshall was famous for becoming Soylent Green, I think.
That quote above is from Louis D. Brandeis.
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 12:29 PM (K9ZHX)
Yeah, apparently this is the big problem. I was wondering, though, since they're already mucking about with the algae's DNA, why don't they put that Roundup resistance gene in? Then they could mix in few drops of Roundup and the engineered algae would be the only one in the pond.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 21, 2010 12:30 PM (LtIsn)
oh, and some cites have the words 'evil-doers' in the quote rather than evil-minded rulers.
Remember how the Left mocked Bush for saying evil-doers, as if there was no such thing and only a stupid Texan would come up with such a narrow-minded phrase?
Unbelievable how much crap the 'enlightened' Left spewed during Bush's presidency.
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 12:33 PM (K9ZHX)
118 Kratos, have you been able to train the E. coli to watch Skinemax flicks with you?
The beauty of that is that I don't need to train them. When I watch Skinemax, the E.coli present inside me also watch Skinemax.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 12:33 PM (9hSKh)
Edward G Marshall was famous for becoming Soylent Green, I think.
That quote above is from Louis D. Brandeis.
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 04:29 PM (K9ZHX)
Edward G. Robinson was Soylent Green.
Edward G. Marshall was in "The Defenders"
Louis D. Brandeis was famous for being from Kentucky.
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:34 PM (dzuqL)
You can make artificial gold in a particle accelerator. You need schtoopid amounts of electricity. Not economically viable.
My uneducated guess is that keeping the mutant algae alive and fed with CO2 and sunlight is going to be very expensive.
Then you run into the good Mr. SDB's scaling problem.
Moral of this story: not only is there no free lunch, but you don't get any more than you pay for.
Posted by: FR at February 21, 2010 12:35 PM (AIyLg)
The beauty of that is that I don't need to train them. When I watch Skinemax, the E.coli present inside me also watch Skinemax.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 04:33 PM (9hSKh)
That really works; I am sending four of my spirochetes to community college this fall.
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:36 PM (dzuqL)
Speaking of Sarah Palin being a dummy...
they're giving her shit because she doesn't know how WWI was started? Gimme a fucking break.
Ask the dorks who laugh at her over that if THEY know the causes of WW I or what started it?
Odds are they'll tell you either that some guy shot a prince or because the Germans sunk the Lusitania
Posted by: kbdabear at February 21, 2010 12:36 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Meggy Mac at February 21, 2010 12:36 PM (5I0Yr)
Louis D. Brandeis was famous for being from Kentucky.
==============================
I think you're thinking of Cassius Clay [Mohammad Ali].
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 12:38 PM (K9ZHX)
133 That really works; I am sending four of my spirochetes to community college this fall.
Make sure to keep good records, cause the 1098-T they send you will be full of errors.
Posted by: Naan at February 21, 2010 12:38 PM (j5MTj)
#134 Ask the dorks who laugh at her over that if THEY know the causes of WW I or what started it?
I know, I know! I learned it from that Phantom Menace review dude. Wasn't WWI started when the Soviets started building missiles in Cuba and we blockaded Cuba in return?
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 12:38 PM (9hSKh)
Ask the dorks who laugh at her over that if THEY know the causes of WW I or what started it?
Odds are they'll tell you either that some guy shot a prince or because the Germans sunk the Lusitania
Posted by: kbdabear at February 21, 2010 04:36 PM (sYxEE)
Thats just silly stupid, everyone knows thats how the Civil War started.
Posted by: Typical DKOS libtard. at February 21, 2010 12:39 PM (t72+4)
We had a thread on this awhile back. Space-based solar is the only long term solution. Nuclear is the short term one.
Posted by: pep at February 21, 2010 12:40 PM (0K3p3)
Is The Stand part of the training documentation for wherever you work? You came up with the Captain Trips reference way too fast for comfort.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at February 21, 2010 12:41 PM (LJaVO)
Odds are they'll tell you either that some guy shot a prince or because the Germans sunk the Lusitania
Posted by: kbdabear at February 21, 2010 04:36 PM (sYxEE)
And I thought it was because King George V left the toilet seat up in the royal bathroom when he was visiting his cousin "Willy the Kaiser".
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:42 PM (dzuqL)
This has nothing to do with this thread....or really anything, I just found it amusing.
Poor fugly cougar. No wonder her live-in traded up down.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 21, 2010 12:42 PM (IIQIM)
5000 gallons/acre/year = 120 BBL/acre/year =.326 BBL/acre/day.
US oil consumption = 20,680,000 BBL/day
Acres needed to = US consumption / day = 63,435,582 or 100,000 square miles more or less.
Better than corn I guess.
Posted by: easy at February 21, 2010 12:42 PM (/IQA9)
Do they have to kill the algae?
Posted by: Concerned Member of PITA
This is a matter of great concern to us as well.
Posted by: Humans Unalterably Miffed at Murdering Unassuming Spirochetes at February 21, 2010 12:44 PM (0K3p3)
No, I'm pretty sure Edward G Robinson started the Civil War.
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 04:41 PM (K9ZHX)
No, I'm pretty sure Leo G Carrol was the one who started it.
Posted by: Blazer at February 21, 2010 12:44 PM (t72+4)
This has nothing to do with this thread....or really anything, I just found it amusing.
Poor fugly cougar. No wonder her live-in traded up down.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 21, 2010 04:42 PM (IIQIM)
Is Janet back to dating Dr. Frankenfurter?
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:44 PM (dzuqL)
I heard it on Nancy Grace's show, so it must be true
Posted by: Prof. Joe Biden at February 21, 2010 12:45 PM (sYxEE)
How could this possibly be a big source of oil? A little source, yes, but not a big one. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this what is happening?:
Sunlight falls on the ground, with this agae on it. The agae in a pond or vat or film converts the sunlight energy into a more convenient energy form called oil. We collect oil and use it.
But the alagae isn't increasing the amount of energy, it is only converting it to a more useful form. So the total amount of energy that is available is no more than the energy that is in the sunlight, (which I don't think is very much) MINUS whatever ineffieciency is involved in converting the sunlight energy into oil energy.
So really, in terms of the amount of energy this could provide, this will give us less energy than what you can get from sunlight. Maybe more usefull or transportable or storeable, but less energy. So to start getting significant amounts of energy, we'd probably have to do something like cover the entire state of Texas in algae fields to really make a dent in our conventional oil consumption.
My analysis. No science background, just a high school diploma. I'd like to hear from the morons on this thread if what I'm saying is accurate or not.
I argued this point with my dad a few years ago. His conclusion was that I was a complete fuckin' idiot who didn't know what the fuck I was talking about.
But that's cool. I got a ice floe just waitin' for his ass...
Posted by: Ed at February 21, 2010 12:45 PM (OCfDT)
#141 Is The Stand part of the training documentation for wherever you work? You came up with the Captain Trips reference way too fast for comfort.
lol, no. I remember The Stand vividly because a) I saw the The Stand mini-series on TV as a youngling (the camera panning around the base where Captain Trips escapes, to the tune of "Fear the Reaper", rattled me at the time) and b) The Stand is one of the few Steven King books I've read cover to cover (and it was the uncut version to boot).
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 12:46 PM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Annoying Lib Moron at February 21, 2010 12:47 PM (5I0Yr)
5000 gallons/acre/year = 120 BBL/acre/year =.326 BBL/acre/day.
US oil consumption = 20,680,000 BBL/day
Acres needed to = US consumption / day = 63,435,582 or 100,000 square miles more or less.
Better than corn I guess.
Posted by: easy at February 21, 2010 04:42 PM (/IQA9)
So it will just take the land mass of Montana, 600 fresh water lakes larger than the Caspian Sea and 135 quadrillion dollars.
Brilliant.
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 12:48 PM (dzuqL)
I have a SCIENCE background. I had a chemistry set as a kid, got a good solid B+ in SCIENCE class in HS, and I read stuff.
You have no SCIENCE background, so I bid you adieu
Posted by: Prof. Charles Johnson at February 21, 2010 12:49 PM (sYxEE)
Haha, the fuck? And she enjoyed it? Oh lawdy......
Posted by: koopy at February 21, 2010 12:50 PM (ctR4U)
Yeap, that's about right. Now tell us what started WWI. Just kidding, it was dialectical materialism.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 12:52 PM (1fanL)
Poor fugly cougar. No wonder her live-in traded up down.
Haha, the fuck? And she enjoyed it? Oh lawdy......
Posted by: koopy at February 21, 2010 04:50 PM (ctR4U)
So she enjoyed having bodily fluids dumped on her 'eh ? Somebody get me Susan's number quick.
Posted by: R. Kelly at February 21, 2010 12:52 PM (t72+4)
Prof. Charles Johnson, I think what is causing your grumpiness is a lack of Jesus in your life. Jesus will make all your troubles go away, your site traffic to come back, and your hemroids to shrink. Plus he'll tune your bike for you.
Posted by: Ed at February 21, 2010 12:52 PM (OCfDT)
this is getting ridiculous
Leo J Carroll wrote Alice in Wonderland.
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 04:45 PM
No, he played Archie Bunker
Burt Ward played the Meathead
Posted by: Joe the Biden at February 21, 2010 12:53 PM (sYxEE)
Is The Stand part of the training documentation for wherever you work? You came up with the Captain Trips reference way too fast for comfort.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at February 21, 2010 04:41 PM (LJaVO)
What the hell? Captain Trips is Jerry Garcia. OK, Kratos, back in the dog house.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 12:53 PM (1fanL)
There's a surprising amount of energy in sunlight. At noon on a cloudless summer day it's about a kilowatt per square meter. You don't need a very big magnifying glass to start a fire, for example. The question with solar is always "how much is it going to cost to harvest that energy", once everything in the cycle is considered.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 21, 2010 12:54 PM (LtIsn)
Posted by: Iblis at February 21, 2010 12:54 PM (9221z)
It's one of the few Stephen King books that's worth reading at all.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 21, 2010 12:55 PM (LtIsn)
Posted by: Joe the Biden at February 21, 2010 04:53 PM
Yeh Yeh, I know. Dick Sargent played the Meathead after the 4th season
Posted by: Joe the Biden at February 21, 2010 12:55 PM (sYxEE)
There's a surprising amount of energy in sunlight. At noon on a cloudless summer day it's about a kilowatt per square meter. You don't need a very big magnifying glass to start a fire, for example. The question with solar is always "how much is it going to cost to harvest that energy", once everything in the cycle is considered.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 21, 2010 04:54 PM (LtIsn)
A kilowatt per square meter per what? Second? Minute? Hour?
Second, how much energy is a kilowatt? Is it enough to move a 2000 pound car one foot? 10 feet? 1000 feet?
I'm not trying to be a dick here, I'm just not sure how much energy what you mentioned really equates to.
Posted by: Ed at February 21, 2010 12:58 PM (OCfDT)
Posted by: zombie t-dub at February 21, 2010 12:59 PM (sYxEE)
We can discuss what started WW I, but you shall all concede that it was the gallant Soviet Red Army that won it
Posted by: zombie t-dub at February 21, 2010 04:59 PM (sYxEE)
Wrong, it was the Deutsches Reich that won it !
Posted by: Adriana Leamas at February 21, 2010 01:04 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at February 21, 2010 01:08 PM (wTMyr)
3:40 [Liberals on healthcare], "we know more about this shit, and we're gonna shove it down your throats no matter what!"
Posted by: Sen. Mitch McConnell on 'FNS' at February 21, 2010 01:12 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: dananjcon at February 21, 2010 01:16 PM (KUucS)
Excuse me but there are tens of thousands of algae ponds scattered across the country ready for oil harvesting or whatever. They're called golf course water hazards.
You're welcome. I'll take my billion dollars in tens and twenties, please.
Posted by: ErikW at February 21, 2010 01:16 PM (xA5/a)
Posted by: zombie t-dub at February 21, 2010 04:59 PM (sYxEE)
Wrong, it was the Deutsches Reich that won it !
Posted by: Adriana Leamas at February 21, 2010 05:04 PM (t72+4)
You're both wrong. It was Captain America and The Green Lantern who won it, by teaming up against the Sinestro Corps and Red Skull who were helping out both the Germans and the Russians.
Me and my girlfriend are both lying here laughing at you.
Posted by: palin-steele (still unemployed and living in moms basement) at February 21, 2010 01:18 PM (t72+4)
Hey Fubar you're into Dialectical Materialism too? That's cool. I was into these dudes before anybody.
Partied with them all the time.
Asked me to be their manager.
I called bullshit on that.
Managing a pop group?
That ain't a job for no man.
There's a book you oughta read.
"Dioretix. The Science of
Matter over Mind".
You better read it, and quick.
That book will change your life.
Found it in a Maserati
in Beverly Hills. Know what I mean?
http://tinyurl.com/ykdtupv
Posted by: Ed, AKA Lite at February 21, 2010 01:18 PM (OCfDT)
A kilowatt is a measure of a rate of energy. So when your electric company bills you they bill in kilowatt-hours, which is a kilowatt for an hour.
Second, how much energy is a kilowatt? Is it enough to move a 2000 pound car one foot? 10 feet? 1000 feet?
A Chevy Volt has a 18 kilowatt-hour battery, which will take it about 40 miles, assuming you don't run any of the accessories.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 21, 2010 01:19 PM (LtIsn)
Posted by: andycanuck at February 21, 2010 01:24 PM (2qU2d)
You may safely rule it out. It's tax dollar-burning horseshit, like every other jerkoff fantasy they come up with.
Posted by: TexasJew at February 21, 2010 04:18 PM (dzuqL)
Yep.Posted by: Tinian at February 21, 2010 01:25 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Theodore at February 21, 2010 01:25 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: Megan McCain at February 21, 2010 01:26 PM (DTffv)
As I have always said, WW1 was won by the Corpse Men
Posted by: Barack Obama at February 21, 2010 01:29 PM (fwSHf)
The beauty of that is that I don't need to train them.
I'd take another look at that relationship. The e.Coli think they trained you.
In Soviet Union...
E. Coli: is there anything it can't do?
Posted by: comatus at February 21, 2010 01:32 PM (/VEEI)
Posted by: The Garbone at February 21, 2010 01:35 PM (ofMXm)
Posted by: kayne west at February 21, 2010 01:36 PM (69MRW)
ROFLMAO.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 21, 2010 01:42 PM (DTffv)
We need thousands of square miles of water to make this work?...
Speaking of the number of square miles needed to be devoted to these alternative energy pie-in-the-sky scams, Al Gore has said that an area of solar collectors just "100 miles on a side" would be enough to provide the country's energy needs.
Source: http://tinyurl.com/yzadnf5
**Caution: Really, really hard Third Grade Math ahead**
An area 100 miles on a side is 10,000 square miles. He's talking about making a 10,000 square mile solar collector. Ten Thousand Square Miles.
For a frame of reference of just how big an area he's talking about here, the Greater Los Angeles Metro area--Los Angeles and Orange counties, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ontario, Oxnard, Thousand Oaks & Ventura--is 4850 square miles.
Gore is talking about setting out enough solar collectors to cover an area over twice as big.
Where you put this thing isn't important...there are plenty of places out West with this sort of space.
But how long will it take to construct this 10,000 square mile structure? [Tell ya' what: I don't want the contract to pour the concrete footings needed to stand up 10,000 square miles of solar collectors. What I'd be satisfied with is the contract to change the oil and rotate the tires on the cement trucks needed to erect this fantasy.]
And then we get to wonder about the rest of the infrastructure. Are the existing transmission lines satisfactory for this quest? What do we do at night? Batteries? (No environmental questions there, I'd imagine)
These people are nuts.
Posted by: azlibertarian at February 21, 2010 01:42 PM (fGtbP)
56 >>The team determined that Southwestern states offer the most sun and large areas of available land
Hey - thats where Ayers wanted to set up the concentration camps!
/loveitwhenaplancomestogether
OILLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE! YOU TELL THEM OILLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!
Posted by: Zombie Heston at February 21, 2010 01:49 PM (euuyg)
Posted by: dananjcon at February 21, 2010 01:50 PM (KUucS)
194 i always wanted to do one of these
kanye west, gibson and now DR amy fisher DAMNIT!! will never get old
Posted by: kayne west at February 21, 2010 01:56 PM (69MRW)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 21, 2010 01:57 PM (v1Ib3)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at February 21, 2010 02:02 PM (lN56Y)
Oh, and the major sponsors of these renewable energy products?
Big Oil. Eeeeeeeeeevil Big Oil.
I love my school!
Posted by: Militant Bibliophile at February 21, 2010 02:02 PM (UmIN1)
Posted by: Johnny I at February 21, 2010 02:02 PM (v77ig)
So, can this algae shit, or shit algae, cure sex-addiction?
I need to get back to the golf course.
Posted by: Tiger Woods at February 21, 2010 02:05 PM (HtBug)
Posted by: dr kill at February 21, 2010 02:07 PM (qO6T2)
PORNO!
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at February 21, 2010 06:01 PM (lN56Y)
Wanna see Bea Arthur nude grampa ?
Sorry, cant help you, but I'm sure its out there, Rule 34 and all.
Posted by: Blazer at February 21, 2010 02:12 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Gary B at February 21, 2010 02:22 PM (1gWfF)
Posted by: td at February 21, 2010 02:23 PM (2OlNe)
Posted by: Marshal Foch at February 21, 2010 02:25 PM (e9JZd)
202 Why does Big Oil sponsor these events, because they are starting to realize that they are in the ENERGY business not the Oil Business.
Posted by: Gary B at February 21, 2010 06:22 PM (1gWfF)
That way they can buy up all the technology before it hits the market and hide it away to keep us all dependent on their blood lotions !!11!1!eleventy
Posted by: Your typical Prison/Planet DKOS libtard at February 21, 2010 02:26 PM (t72+4)
Epic Beard Man Mortal Kombat Style
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 06:25 PM (otlXg)
Bring Amber Lamps !!
Posted by: Blazer at February 21, 2010 02:27 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: td at February 21, 2010 02:30 PM (2OlNe)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at February 21, 2010 02:32 PM (ndlFj)
How could this possibly be a big source of oil? A little source, yes, but not a big one. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this what is happening?:
Sunlight falls on the ground, with this agae on it. The agae in a pond or vat or film converts the sunlight energy into a more convenient energy form called oil. We collect oil and use it.
But the alagae isn't increasing the amount of energy, it is only converting it to a more useful form. So the total amount of energy that is available is no more than the energy that is in the sunlight, (which I don't think is very much) MINUS whatever ineffieciency is involved in converting the sunlight energy into oil energy.
So really, in terms of the amount of energy this could provide, this will give us less energy than what you can get from sunlight. Maybe more usefull or transportable or storeable, but less energy. So to start getting significant amounts of energy, we'd probably have to do something like cover the entire state of Texas in algae fields to really make a dent in our conventional oil consumption.
My analysis. No science background, just a high school diploma. I'd like to hear from the morons on this thread if what I'm saying is accurate or not.
I argued this point with my dad a few years ago. His conclusion was that I was a complete fuckin' idiot who didn't know what the fuck I was talking about.
But that's cool. I got a ice floe just waitin' for his ass...
Current photovoltaics, when new, convert about 12% of incident sunlight energy into electricity, and that performance degrades over time.
Algae can convert something like 5-10% of sunlight into oil (that's better than more complex plant life). Taking out intermediate steps bewteen collecting sunlight via biomass, and producing liquid hydrocarbon fuel, is actually huge. Making liquid fuel out of starch such as corn (i.e. food) is a joke; you get back as much energy as you put into it. Converting cellulose to ethanol is extremely difficult. This fairly direct conversion matters.
Posted by: Heracles at February 21, 2010 02:38 PM (tm15w)
**Caution: Really, really hard Third Grade Math ahead**
An area 100 miles on a side is 10,000 square miles. He's talking about making a 10,000 square mile solar collector. Ten Thousand Square Miles.
For a frame of reference of just how big an area he's talking about here, the Greater Los Angeles Metro area--Los Angeles and Orange counties, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ontario, Oxnard, Thousand Oaks & Ventura--is 4850 square miles.
Gore is talking about setting out enough solar collectors to cover an area over twice as big.
Hah!
Bump up that number by 100%.
Access roads, spaces between collectors for maintenance roads, transformer pads, etc.
Native American burial grounds are off limits -- in fact any grounds they claim sacred are off limits. And they follow energy companies around just to fuck with them by claiming wherever they want to explore or build anything is sacred ground. And then there the desert tortoises -- I worked on one pipeline project where they relocated tortoises five miles away from their burrows but they kept coming back so they flew the Florida turtles to Texas and the Texas turtles to Florida.
I could go on forever.
It's a big scam.
Posted by: Tinian at February 21, 2010 02:39 PM (7+pP9)
Weren't you a little hard on the Beaver last night, Ward?
Posted by: June Cleaver at February 21, 2010 02:42 PM (2qU2d)
These people are nuts.
At night, we'd get it from the the core of the earth which puts out one million degrees of gaia heat.
You're the nutjob, teabagger, trying to keep us from taking Cheney's secret underground center away from the evil lords.
Posted by: Algore, god of thunder at February 21, 2010 02:44 PM (sYxEE)
Incidentally, I FULLY recognize that, as it stands now, none of this stuff is really practical. That's why it's being studied, in the hopes that someday it will BECOME practical! Implementing this now is a good way to go broke, but with some study and practice, who knows? In the long run, it'll be some kind of space based solar tech that does the trick, but in the short and medium, there's a lot of potential in some of these seemingly pie in the sky ideas.
Posted by: Militant Bibliophile at February 21, 2010 02:44 PM (UmIN1)
Posted by: FUBAR at February 21, 2010 02:47 PM (1fanL)
What will he do when I block out the sun? People will run to me and pay anything to keep their television boxes on
Posted by: Montgomery Burns at February 21, 2010 02:48 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at February 21, 2010 02:48 PM (2pjaO)
Posted by: TEE866 at February 21, 2010 02:50 PM (74lR/)
This is more apropos for the ONT, but I will not be around.
Discuss.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 21, 2010 06:47 PM (fJyQl)
A 70 year old vibrating dildo ? Really? Has to be a Rattlesnake in a Mason Jar.
Posted by: Blazer at February 21, 2010 02:50 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Blazer at February 21, 2010 06:50 PM (t72+4)"
HAHAHAAH...damnit, that's funny, I don't care who ya are!!
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at February 21, 2010 02:53 PM (2pjaO)
She'll still steal your soul.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 02:53 PM (otlXg)
King Barry I (pboh), had just put me in charge of the newest alternate energy and green jobs project.
In between coding my new bad crazy threat bot and banning the bad crazies who lurk inside my online temple, I designed a new bicycle powered generation plant.
I sent the plans to King Barry I (phoh) and attached the list of known white supremacists, denialists, creationists, right wing domestic terrorists, bad crazy people, etc, etc, etc to be rounded up to pedal the bicycle generators in the camps Green Energy Generators
Happy Days! I'm feeling so good I'm going to ask Iceweasel for a blowjob. I feel lucky
Posted by: Charles Johnson, Sciencey Czar at February 21, 2010 02:57 PM (sYxEE)
She'll still steal your soul.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 21, 2010 06:53 PM (otlXg)
I'm a Ginger too dammit. We'll steal each others souls and then swap em' back after the climax, its how we Gingers consummate with each other, or didnt you know that?
Posted by: Blazer at February 21, 2010 02:57 PM (t72+4)
It is hand-crank, so the girl can still pleasure herself after the apocalypse. Could be an important feature by the time Comrade Obama is through...
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 21, 2010 02:57 PM (DTffv)
All the cob loggers in jail or sumpin?
Today it's only the nob loggers at work.
Posted by: andycanuck at February 21, 2010 02:57 PM (2qU2d)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 21, 2010 02:57 PM (v1Ib3)
#230 The best part of that article was the picture IAF Ginger standing in front of the drone. God she is hawt.
She'll still steal your soul.
She'll steel your soul.
Posted by: andycanuck at February 21, 2010 02:59 PM (2qU2d)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 21, 2010 02:59 PM (fJyQl)
'Girl with drone'. That smile's wonderful; I'd love to know what she's laughing about.
Posted by: mrkwong at February 21, 2010 07:01 PM (G8Eo0)
Me too.
Posted by: Mahmoud Awesomemembersonlyjacket at February 21, 2010 03:03 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Xavier at February 21, 2010 03:04 PM (qGLRn)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 21, 2010 03:04 PM (DTffv)
Ace's liver at February 21, 2010 05:19 PM (LtIsn)
Nighthawk at February 21, 2010 05:57 PM (v1Ib3)
OK, ace's liver, Nighthawk, if I have this correct, it will take approximately 4 square meters of sunlight one hour to get enough energy to move a 2000 pound car one foot in one second?
Posted by: Ed, AKA Lite at February 21, 2010 03:06 PM (OCfDT)
Consummation?
Isn't that eating soup? Or is it jerking off in soup? I always forget.
What did that Allah guy say again?
Posted by: meeeeghan mccain at February 21, 2010 03:07 PM (2qU2d)
Smile, Mahmoud, and could you stand right over... there, please? We'll be coming to see you shortly.
Posted by: IDF drone operator chick at February 21, 2010 03:08 PM (DTffv)
Posted by: t at February 21, 2010 03:36 PM (XUS4q)
I think its a crazy idea, the enviros will never buy it.
But, maybe not as long as you might think since we're talking essentially hypothetical. NanoSolar has a reel-to-reel process that (simplifying) essentially inkjets magic power generating goop onto flexible substrate. I believe their non-wafer based panel material can convert in the range of 15% efficiency.
When you have a reel-to-reel manufacturing process, the scalability is vastly improved over wafer-tech.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 21, 2010 03:38 PM (iMZ5v)
Yea, but there's no need for that water to be clean. Algae aren't too fussy. Sewage, storm runnoff, etc are pretty easy to come by.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 21, 2010 03:43 PM (iMZ5v)
Posted by: gordo at February 21, 2010 03:44 PM (gz6N6)
Posted by: Druid at February 21, 2010 03:54 PM (Gct7d)
Posted by: Gregory at February 21, 2010 04:02 PM (cjwF0)
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at February 21, 2010 04:31 PM (nmg4C)
Read the article closely and you'll notice: 'experts project', 'could displace', 'potential benefits', 'tremendous challenges'; lots of wiggle room but no facts or results. The only meaningful statement is: '$180 million in near-term funding' from the stimulus package and other programs. This article really sounds like they are priming the pump for the next round of funding.
It's all bullshit.
Posted by: Tinian at February 21, 2010 04:32 PM (7+pP9)
Seriously, there have been a lot of promising claims made about algae biofuels. And it would be great if these systems worked with a minimum of environmental impact. However, people I know who are actually experts in the field tell me that huge problems exist in separating out a usable fuel from the algae and especially from water. In addition, biofuels do have their own storage and temperature issues. I like to be positive, but still would treat this with a "wait and see" approach.
Posted by: Ron at February 21, 2010 04:39 PM (GH96s)
If 18 kwh can move a Volt 40 miles, then 4 kwh should take it a little less than nine miles. I can't find details on what it will weigh, but it can't weigh too much less than 2000 lbs because of safety concerns.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 21, 2010 04:50 PM (LtIsn)
This idea actually works. Algae isn't grown natually in ponds, but in stackable containers stored in a warehouse. CO2 from a nearby oil refinery or other source is piped-in and a source of nitrogen (chicken crap) is needed. The algae is converted to ethanol or bio diesel. Anything not used during the process is recycled, so there is no waste.
Posted by: Teleprompter at February 21, 2010 05:36 PM (N1rsK)
I did some calculations on how much average sunlight power at the surface of the earth in the US (about 200 watts per square meter) would be utilized to produce 3000 gallons and 5000 gallons of algal oil per acre over the period of a year. Production of 3000 gallons of algal oil per acre per year utilizes only about 3% of the available sun energy whereas production of 5000 gallons of algal oil utilizes only 5% of the available sun energy. Corn ethanol is much worse. If 311 gallons of corn ethanol are produced per acre per year, only 0.23% of the sunÂ’s available energy is utilized. If 120 gallons of soy or canola oil is produced per acre per year, only 0.12 % of the sunÂ’s available energy is utilized. Contrast these results with the much higher capability of solar photovoltaic panels that convert 10% to 15% of the sunÂ’s energy directly into electrical energy. These results strongly suggest that if we have a renewable energy program our efforts should be solely concentrated on photovoltaic cell technologies. Ethanol from corn and other biofuels are losers and should be defunded.
Jose
Posted by: Jose27N82W at February 21, 2010 06:10 PM (uccOi)
Indeed. Let's try this too. I read about this 20 yrs ago in "scientific" journals. 40 yrs ago in scifi novels. I'm sure we can do it this time.
Ok, I came just a wee, wee, bit, of expectations, but WTF
Posted by: Al Corn Holio at February 21, 2010 06:49 PM (ucq49)
Ok, I came just a wee, wee, bit, of expectations, but WTF
Posted by: Al Corn Holio at February 21, 2010 10:49 PM (ucq49)
Drink much?
Wasn't soylent green, a delicious mixture of "executed before their time", tofu, and algae?
Posted by: sounds familiar at February 21, 2010 06:52 PM (ucq49)
Okay, sure, but battery technology is going to have to improve quite a bit before we can load up the family SUV, attach a boat, and drive 400 miles to "the lake" on battery power.
You make hydrocarbon fuels with air and electricity, but I'll bet doing that puts you back into the sub-1% range.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 21, 2010 07:16 PM (LtIsn)
Posted by: forked once too many times at February 21, 2010 07:32 PM (ucq49)
Posted by: UNRR at February 22, 2010 02:26 AM (2D++g)
Algae cost little to manufacture, don't need extensive power transmission gear/lines, don't require constant cleaning to operate at peak efficiency, can be produced by the square mile by pouring a bottle of gunk in a pond, and serviced by relatively unskilled labor.
If all you look at is point efficiency, you've ignored TCO
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 22, 2010 06:35 AM (rNzoe)
SOYLENT GAS IS PEOPLE! IT'S PEEEEEOOOOPPPLLLLEEEEE!!!!
/Heston
(Sorry, somebody had to say it)
Posted by: Wearyman at February 22, 2010 09:10 AM (lrz2d)
Posted by: b cole at March 01, 2010 05:17 AM (GkYyh)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2838 seconds, 399 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








might as well throw some bodies in, its gonna smell the same either way.
Posted by: trailortrash at February 21, 2010 09:59 AM (2Z+7j)