October 19, 2010
— Monty Women are vital to the American workforce, and have been since at least the 1940's, but this recession may have shifted the balance of economic power decisively to women. Men have been the traditional household "breadwinners", with the wife's income being seen as augmenting the male's income, but this recession has hit men disproportionately harder than women. Women are far more likely to work in industries (like services and healthcare) that are more insulated from the downturn, whereas men are far more likely to work in the hard-hit trades and manufacturing sectors. Women also have many more protections -- both regulatory and social/cultural -- than men do. There are many deep ramifications to this change -- the impact of long-term male unemployment on the family; the loss of status, power and prestige that goes with being unemployed; the male self-image and value to society. (Studies of unemployed men during the Great Depression are not happy reading -- many of the chronically unemployed males left their families rather than assume a lower status in the family, and were also far more likely to be dictatorial and violent towards their wives and children.)
Huh. BofA gets a do-over. (Actually, 102,000 do-overs.) Do they get a mulligan on this one or are they penalized a shot? I forsee many lawsuits, yea, even unto the end of the earth.
Having visited the relationship counselor and learned the value of mutual understanding and romance, the United States and China have (temporarily) patched things up. The US has bought China flowers and promised not to fart at the dinner table and resolves not to call China's mother a fat pig with moustache, and China promises to shave her legs every day and stop nagging so much and not invite her horrible mother to visit without asking first.
This is a point I've made many times: the economic demographic most impacted by immigrant labor are teens. Low-end "starter" jobs tend to be low-skill, low-paying, part-time jobs, and adult immigrants are often favored over teens for these jobs by employers (they often have families to support, are considered more reliable, etc.). This means that the teen labor-participation percentage has fallen from 50% in 1970 to 25% today. (And even 25% is probably too high.) When faced with this lack of job opportunities, teens often opt to go back to school -- but this in turn saddles them with a lot of debt for (in many cases) not much gain. For many teens, it's simply a way of deferring adulthood, not a way to gain additional skills or knowledge. (I had my first paying job at 14; my first "real" W2 job at 16. I worked nearly full-time all the way through college, and worked full-time during the summers. I wonder how rare this is now?) Another interesting aspect to the immigrant/teen issue: the language barrier. If you're a teen who doesn't speak Spanish, just try and get a landscaping or construction job in the Southwest. The same goes for many fast-food crews and oil-change/tire-repair places. Still, we're not the only ones with immigrant troubles.
A big GOP win on election day is a good news/bad news scenario for investors. On the whole, I view a big GOP victory as more of a long-term investment, not a short-term fix for what ails us financially. We've got a lot of big problems that are going to take a long time (and a lot of pain) to solve. The Democrats most assuredly do not have the spine to make those changes; time will tell if the GOP does.
Thinking of buying a foreclosed property? Yeah, you might want to re-think that. At least for awhile.
South Korea feels some love for the barbaric yellow metal. Upside: my existing gold will be worth more. Downside: I can't afford to buy any more gold!
Democrats: Beware the FairTax!. Factcheck.org: Stop slinging the bullshit, okay? Personally, I've always thought that the FairTax is far better in theory than in practice, but I'm not all that fond of a VAT either. Wonks love the VAT, however, because it's more "efficient" (i.e., harder to dodge). I have a feeling that we're going to get a VAT or something much like it whether we like it or not, so my argument is that a VAT should replace the current income-tax, not augment it. Otherwise, it's nothing more than another wound opened up in the body politic that will bleed relentlessly. A VAT on top of the existing tax regime would be an economy-killer.
As Devo once sagaciously noted: Lord! I am so tired! How long can this go on?
Le Humongous, c'est lui! Who knew it would be Mad Maurice and not Mad Max? Quelle horreur!
Even the guys who helped to invent the modern stock market find it hard to understand. Pull quote:
Peterffy's actions and contemplations reflect a growing discomfort with Byzantine modern markets. Technology, initially a democratizing force that improved prices, has been weaponized by some firms to create powerful trading advantages.SKYNET will achieve sentience in 5,4,3..... Just another example of how the market has moved beyond cyclical "bulls" and "bears", and into some quicksilver gladitorial arena populated only by ferocious trading algos.
Industrial production drops 2% after six months of gains. Seasonal drop? Maybe, but the trendlines are going the wrong way, and that has Uncle Sugar's money-men spooked.
Uncle Sugar sends Grandpa and Grandma $250 so they won't have to eat cat food, or something. That's good, because the grandkids are going to have to live off of those Friskies for awhile, and it'll last longer without the geezers bogarting it.
The Democrats can smell electoral disaster in the air. So do they accept the repudiation of their policies with good grace and humility? Hah! Puny humans! The Donks plan to jam at least one more gut-busting appropriations bill down your gullet before they are sent packing. A final fuck-you from these feckless fiscal Fauntleroys!
Turlock, CA, circa 2004: "Wal-Mart, begone!" Turlock, CA, circa 2010: "We [HEART] Wal-Mart!". (A perfect epilogue to this story would be if Wal-Mart's CEO wrote a personal letter to the Turlock city council stating: "Dear Turlock: Poke your apology up your butt. Sincerely, Wal-Mart.")
I've been trying to come up with a metaphor for what a colossal disappointment Arnold Schwarzenegger has been as governor in California, and I came up with this: You know how you kind of look forward to taking a crap? I mean, when you know it's going to be a big old special-delivery package? Then, when you finally get started, all you can do is sit there, cramped, and fart a few times? Yeah. That's how it's been with Arnold. I was looking forward to the kind of dump that made you feel like you just slept for 12 hours; instead all I got was a couple of air-biscuits and a lingering feeling of having been cheated.
The stars at night are big and bright deep in the heart of Texas! Any state that gives us Stevie Ray Vaughan, ZZ Top, Bob Wills and Van Cliburn has to be operating under Divine guidance.
And the anti-Texas, California, continues to be hopelessly boned. Steven Greenhut: Is California now an idiocracy? Answer: Yes. (I only quibble with the word "now". Callie has been an idiocracy for many, many years.)
Posted by: Monty at
03:53 AM
| Comments (65)
Post contains 1283 words, total size 10 kb.
http://tinyurl.com/29zx6e8
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:07 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:09 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:10 AM (/jbAw)
I have another question for this round of BS. If they don't know who owns the title how did they expect to be able to deliver the title when the loan was paid off?
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:16 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at October 19, 2010 04:17 AM (PLvLS)
How much does it cost for a tow truck? Can't you buy one for 3 trillion?
Posted by: tarpon at October 19, 2010 04:20 AM (g0QB8)
Throw in the fact that most of them are lazy as hell and that tends to drive up their unemployment. On that score one wonders how you count teen unemployment? A huge score of them are not even looking for a job.
And yes, as a young teen I did a lot of summer jobs. When I was in the tenth grade I started working permanently after school and during the summer right up until the time I went into the Navy.
And before the collapse there were all kinds of jobs around here available for teens and few takers. Note that SC doesn't have a huge problem with illegals because of a number of factors.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:22 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 19, 2010 04:22 AM (LH6ir)
Did you see the top headline at Fox this morning? Some of the "leadership" apparently are already calling for BS "compromise".
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:23 AM (/jbAw)
Yep, if every student in college in my field were to all go into healthcare tomorrow--- there would still be a huge shortage. It's nice having job security.
The down side is you have to work with mentally ill, physically sick, behaviorally out of control, in trouble with the law kinda people.
Posted by: EZB at October 19, 2010 04:25 AM (fa9yq)
Posted by: jeannie at October 19, 2010 04:26 AM (U+yYt)
So you could buy a home and then get forced back out again (although it is rare). When I first bought my house I had a bank call me and made an offer to sell a house they were foreclosing on. They wanted me to assume the load and take over payments. The trouble was they didn't know all the details on the house. The guy who had it previously had bought a bunch of hbuilding materials and encloded the carport into another room for the house. he did that under a "builder's lien" with the lumber yard and skipped town owing them as well as everyone else.
The bank didn't know that.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:30 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: EZB at October 19, 2010 08:25 AM (fa9yq)
Sort of like reading AOSHQ.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 19, 2010 04:30 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 19, 2010 04:30 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:33 AM (/jbAw)
Throw in the fact that most of them are lazy as hell and that tends to drive up their unemployment. On that score one wonders how you count teen unemployment? A huge score of them are not even looking for a job.
And yes, as a young teen I did a lot of summer jobs. When I was in the tenth grade I started working permanently after school and during the summer right up until the time I went into the Navy.
I live in a rural county and work in the city. Yes, new hires at work, even for minimum wage are older, even retirement level folks. Are teens applying? No. Most think they're above washing pots, taking out trash, cutting grass etc. Same in the rural area--- kids think that getting up at 5 to drive tractors is beneath them. And again, it's better to hire an old fart who ain't afraid of hard work. OR an illegal who will work both teens and old farts into the ground.
I grew up working (hell is getting up at 6 to pick beans before school). I went to college not because of dreams of a career--- it was to keep from driving a hay truck or cutting okra the rest of my life. Kids today aren't getting that baptism by fire of why you need an education.
Posted by: EZB at October 19, 2010 04:33 AM (fa9yq)
hahahahaha
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:35 AM (/jbAw)
Yep, when you spend your work hours around the mentally ill and criminally insane---including child molesters, rapists and murderers....AOSHQ just flows with the kharma
Posted by: EZB at October 19, 2010 04:35 AM (fa9yq)
When I see BS jargon like that it leads me to believe that the writer doesn't know shit.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:37 AM (/jbAw)
That kind of skill is VALUABLE! And it is being LOST right when it will be needed the most.
Please make sure you tell them this! Telling them and anyone who has this kind of gift it's true value makes all the difference when you're tired and there is a mountain of work ahead.
Posted by: EZB at October 19, 2010 04:39 AM (fa9yq)
Bambi sends out a tiny handful of chicken feed to the elderly. I am sure though it will be means tested to assure it goes to the "right" people.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:40 AM (/jbAw)
This is just the kind of shit Republicans MUST stop. The best course of action here is to stop it in the Senate. Pray that the RINOs don't cross over. If it is blocked in the Senate before this congress ends they can start over with the next congress with a fresh "non-omnibus" spending measure.
Yes the MFM will "blame" Republicans. So what.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:42 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 19, 2010 04:48 AM (02uN6)
But that isn't going to happen until CA goes all the way to the bottom.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:48 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Carradine's Belt at October 19, 2010 04:52 AM (qL20/)
That kind of skill is VALUABLE! And it is being LOST right when it will be needed the most.
That sort of skill is coming back. For those of us who planted gardens this year just to feed the family, and have time on our hands because we are laid off, canning and freezing is just another day on the "job."
Posted by: tcn at October 19, 2010 04:53 AM (+dwY/)
Nickel a pound. It was my first job at age 12. Haven't been unemployed since.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 19, 2010 04:53 AM (I30wK)
http://tinyurl.com/389o5au
Another good job Monty, thanks.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 04:53 AM (/jbAw)
Without a word Mrs. Nighthawk and her mom shoved me aside, cleared the table, pulled out pots, salt, spices and canning jars and an hour later there were two dozen jars of freshly canned pickles on the table. I was amazed.
That kind of skill is VALUABLE! And it is being LOST right when it will be needed the most.
It's not hard, and it's not even really "hard work". Just time consuming. But it's true that 95% of Americans, when faced with a bushel of cucumbers, would have in one week's time a bushel of cucumbers with shit growing on them. Waste, waste, waste. It's a freakin' mantra.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 19, 2010 04:56 AM (I30wK)
Posted by: tcn at October 19, 2010 04:56 AM (+dwY/)
Posted by: Monty at October 19, 2010 05:00 AM (4Pleu)
I don't know what it is about cucumbers and zucchini squash but when they get harvested everyone ALWAYS has a ton of these things to give away.
Why is it you never see people giving away a ton of tomatoes, field peas, or butter beans?
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 05:01 AM (/jbAw)
Frugality and intelligence (when it comes to food I think it's the same thing) aren't limited to those with farming roots.
I have a few gallons of chicken stock simmering on the stove. And my younger brat took home-made meringues to school in her lunch.
And this is the suburbs!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 19, 2010 05:02 AM (LH6ir)
FYI, that's only true for middle-to-upper-class white women in cities. Other women have been working outside their homes for hundreds of years. And farm women may not have gotten a paycheck from town (my grandmother did; she was a cook from age 17 until she had my uncle at age 22, but I don't think she was typical), but they were working at income-producing activities.
(One of the more interesting early schisms in the 1970s feminist movement was between the rich white women who denegrated married women who stayed home to raise families, and married black women who said, "Wait a damn minute, we've been wanting to stay home with our children for generations, and now that the men are able to make it happen, you want to take it away?!" (...and now the government cuts 'em a check so they don't have to marry, work, or in too many cases, actually raise their kids. Bah.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 19, 2010 05:06 AM (Vz9lf)
I stand by that.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 05:17 AM (/jbAw)
Harder and harder to maintain the cherished "middle class lifestyle" like that anymore. Said lifestyle having turned into bullshit, anyway.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 19, 2010 05:20 AM (I30wK)
Actually, studies are supporting that we've become too clean and too germaphobic and yes, that maybe why we have so many allergic kids. My niece and nephew get filthy when they come to see us....dirt is fun.
Posted by: EZB at October 19, 2010 05:21 AM (fa9yq)
Posted by: sexypig at October 19, 2010 05:26 AM (FUa9g)
Posted by: Monty at October 19, 2010 05:26 AM (4Pleu)
I agree, if the woman is getting a job at some store downtown making minimum wage, or close to it, the wages she earns will not pay the costs of commuting, day care, etc.
In addition, keep in mind, that if her husband works her salary will be taxed as the highest rate added on to his salary. It is a losing proposition unless it is a higher paying job.
However, if she is a "single mom", working a low wage jobs, she will pay negative taxes with the EIC welfare scheme.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 05:32 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Monty at October 19, 2010 05:40 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Connielu at October 19, 2010 05:43 AM (U9cja)
Women also have many more protections -- both regulatory and social/cultural -- than men do. There are many deep ramifications to this change -- the impact of long-term male unemployment on the family; the loss of status, power and prestige that goes with being unemployed; the male self-image and value to society. (Studies of unemployed men during the Great Depression are not happy reading -- many of the chronically unemployed males left their families rather than assume a lower status in the family, and were also far more likely to be dictatorial and violent towards their wives and children.)
This has been a problem in Russia for decades--men basically giving up whatever roles of responsibility they used to assume, as the Communists broke down and destroyed familial bonds and traditional relationships in favor of The State.
Progressives have been doing the same thing here for the last 50+ years, and they've essentially succeeded in making the fundamental philosophy of dependence on the state a de facto and de jure part of the culture, while promoting the idea that men are fundamentally worthless and incapable of taking care of themselves without a proxy "mother" figure.
Posted by: Red Rocks Rockin at October 19, 2010 05:58 AM (/Pw+r)
My grandfather left his family during the Great Depression. He was a respected foreman at the local woolen mill in a small Tennessee town, and then the mill closed, and there wasn't any work. My mother and her three siblings were sent to live with an aunt for several years. She still won't talk about him and doesn't even have any pictures of him. I learned all this stuff from my dad. It must have been really terrible.
The only people in my family who are working right now are government workers, health care workerrs, or selling stuff to government agencies.
Posted by: rockmom at October 19, 2010 06:00 AM (w/gVZ)
Wonks love the VAT, however, because it's more "efficient" (i.e., harder to dodge). I have a feeling that we're going to get a VAT or something much like it whether we like it or not, so my argument is that a VAT should replace the current income-tax, not augment it.
Gabe brought up this point the other day. But he was so steamed up about this "efficiency" being such a betrayal of conservative principles. He litterally said conservatives that supported this efficiency should be "ashamed" of themselves.
Which makes no sense to me at all.
Our tax code is what, tens of thousand pages long? That complexity is why we have millions of people working in the tax preparation and accounting business. These people for the most part aren't really adding value to a company. Just like an employee whose only task is to deal with the paperwork that comes from implementing Obamacare isn't really adding value. They are just trying to minimize the losses caused by government rules and regulations. But they aren't actually helping to make the product or service, whatever it might be.
There are arguements either way for the VAT or Fair tax. But I never saw their "efficiency" as being "shameful."
Posted by: ed at October 19, 2010 06:16 AM (Zsqn4)
When he went to school .. I went to work full time.
Made more than the husband... he couldnt handle it.
Became violent then left us.. completely abandon us. Havent seen my husband of 20 years in 6 years. He hasnt seen his child in 6 years.
WTF is wrong with men? He bitched that other wives worked.. so I went to work then couldn't handle me making more than him.
Thank God I did go to work. I would be screwed right now.
Monty.. I know how your grandma feels.
Posted by: Kristi at October 19, 2010 06:18 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: Monty at October 19, 2010 06:29 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Monty at October 19, 2010 06:30 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Monty at October 19, 2010 06:31 AM (4Pleu)
WTF is wrong with men? He bitched that other wives worked.. so I went to work then couldn't handle me making more than him.
Kristi,
Jeff Goldstein from Protein Wisdom is a stay at home dad while his wife works. So it can be done.
Having said that, I noticed that Jeff is now also deeply involved with body strengthening and mixed martial arts. And will threaten to kick a guys ass in a heartbeat should he get his dander up.
And people who don't like him give him shit about this all the time. Being a stay at home dad is going to get a guy a lot of ridicule.
So I'll play armchair psychologist and say that he is compensating for this. Which sounds kinda dickish of me...but there it goes.
Right or wrong, if a guy isn't a breadwinner, it hit's 'em hard. It has the same impact psycologically as if they were sexually impotent.
Posted by: ed at October 19, 2010 06:31 AM (Zsqn4)
There are arguements either way for the VAT or Fair tax. But I never saw their "efficiency" as being "shameful."
Posted by: ed at October 19, 2010 10:16 AM (Zsqn4)
Because there is no "efficiency". All of the proponents of these are just looking for more ways of taking your money.
They both are huge tax increases for the average person contrary to the lies put forth by their proponents.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 06:33 AM (/jbAw)
Vic: Because there is no "efficiency". All of the proponents of these are just looking for more ways of taking your money.
Well, yeah, if the Fair Tax is combined with the current income tax, you get none of the benefits of efficiency.
But if it replaced the current income tax, it would be more efficient.
Posted by: ed at October 19, 2010 06:53 AM (Zsqn4)
My father for one.. my brother for 2... and looks like the men on this site.
; )
and yeah.. my son is better off without him.. He doesnt need that as an example of what a man is.
Posted by: Kristi at October 19, 2010 07:03 AM (ph9vn)
On the bright side, we'll have Prop 19 to numb some of the pain on the way down.
Posted by: sandy burger at October 19, 2010 07:08 AM (twiRb)
But if it replaced the current income tax, it would be more efficient.
Posted by: ed at October 19, 2010 10:53 AM (Zsqn4)
Not really. All it would do is replace who collected the tax. That at the same time it increased taxes on 99.9% of the population.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 07:15 AM (/jbAw)
That kind of skill is VALUABLE! And it is being LOST right when it will be needed the most.
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 19, 2010 08:30 AM (02uN6)
Let us guy take it over. Then everyone will have his own secret recipe for pickles, there will be books on pickles, obscure pickle spices from Europe and Asia, TV pickle competitions, Pickle only restaraunts, pickle liquor...
There won't be nearly as many actual pickles, though.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 19, 2010 07:22 AM (CN+Qv)
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 09:01 AM (/jbAw)
Because they taste good.
Cooking squash consists of putting good tasting stuff all over it. By itself its like a potato, but not as good.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 19, 2010 07:26 AM (CN+Qv)
Vic: Not really. All it would do is replace who collected the tax. That at the same time it increased taxes on 99.9% of the population.
Well... yes, it would replace who collected the tax, and simultaneously eliminate the byzantine rules surrounding the collection of income taxes. Instead of IRS agents and tax preparers and accountants collecting the income tax, the clerk operating the cash register is mostly collecting the fair tax.
Currently, we already have sales taxes at point of purchase in my county. And although I don't really like paying 9.75% sales tax, administrateively, it is very easy for businesses and consumers to deal with.
Now, as far as it increasing taxes on 99.9% of the population? Well, that depends. Again, I wouldn't favor keeping both the income tax and the Fair tax. That would be horrible.
But if you eliminated the income tax and replaced it with the fair tax? Well, first of all, everyone who doesn't pay any income tax right now would see the amount of taxes they pay go up in terms of the Fair tax. As for those who do pay currently pay income taxes...Well they would get a tax cut in terms of no longer paying income taxes. And they would get a tax increase in terms of now paying a fair tax. Whether or not their total tax bill would go up (ignoring other taxes like property, Social security, etc) would depend on which is greater, the income tax elimintation, or the imposition of the fair tax.
Now obviously, the rate of the fair tax is going to have a lot to do with this. A fair tax of 25% is going to hurt more than a fair tax of 10%.
The fair tax is regressive. No doubt about it. Meaning that low income people pay a higher portion of their income as opposed to high income people in the tax. On the other hand, it doesn't penalize you for being successful and earning more money. Like the income tax does.
Posted by: ed at October 19, 2010 07:48 AM (Zsqn4)
Not true. The fair tax, as written up in the House bill gives a rebate to low/no income people to offset the "regressive nature". So the same deadbeats who pay no taxes now will pay no taxes under it.
I studied this bill and its supporting structure closely when it first came out. I also worked out several test scenarios for different income brackets assuming the "standard" deduction for 4 person families.
The "fair tax" doesn't reach break even for the current tax until the income reaches $500,000 per year. The only people who make out under the fair tax are the corporations who will pay no taxes.
Oh and the "fair tax" people say that those savings will be returned to the people. That is one of the many things they credit. It is also bullshit.
The only way to have a new tax sysem that would be actually fair and simple is to have a simple flat tax of 15% on ALL forms of income and profit regardless of source. No deductions and no write-offs.
If you make a dollar above expenses selling lemonade at a stand in from of your house you pay 10 cents in taxes.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 08:02 AM (/jbAw)
The fair tax, as written up in the House bill gives a rebate to low/no income people to offset the "regressive nature". [...] I studied this bill and its supporting structure closely when it first came out.
Whoa whoa whoa there!!! If yer gonna get all technical and "study" the actual bill and start talking about "facts" and what not, I'm gonna take my ball and go home!
There will be no facts in this disucssion, let me tell you. Talking points only.
OK, snark off.
First off, I didn't actually study this bill at all. I'm just basically talking about what effects a generic "sales tax" would have. If this specific "Fair Tax" is actually doing stuff like rebates and deductions and what not, and istn't just a simple tax on purchases, then yeah, my whole arguement falls apart.
When I went to the article linked above, I read the following: Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) is just one of several Democratic candidates saying the FairTax — a levy that replaces the federal income tax with a 23 percent sales tax on everything, including the purchase of a new home or car
The bold part above is what I was basing all of my arguements off of. If the article is inacurate, and that isn't what this fair tax is, well, er...uhhh... never mind.
Posted by: ed at October 19, 2010 08:18 AM (Zsqn4)
Hopefully, the boring beta ex-providers can douche it up, ala the Situation, or thug it up, or both! That would make most women happy.
Earn enough, no more "kitchen bitch" house-husband, about as sexy and dominating as a cold bowl of oatmeal. Besides, aren't illegal alien nannies and maids how people raise kids these days? Who really needs a house-husband?
Bottom line: if a guy is not bringing in money, he's worth nothing to women, period, unless he's a douche A-hole. For most guys, that's a bridge too far. But for women, a good deal. They can share a John Edwards to a Situation type, whatever fits their taste and lifestyle. Ala Antonio Cromartie trying to remember the names of his seven kids by six women. A win for Alphas, a win for nearly all women. Sucks for beta males, but since when have either women or Alphas given a damn about them, anyway?
Posted by: whiskey at October 19, 2010 08:53 AM (L03mw)
Bottom line: if a guy is not bringing in money, he's worth nothing to women, period, unless he's a douche A-hole. For most guys, that's a bridge too far. But for women, a good deal. They can share a John Edwards to a Situation type, whatever fits their taste and lifestyle. Ala Antonio Cromartie trying to remember the names of his seven kids by six women. A win for Alphas, a win for nearly all women. Sucks for beta males, but since when have either women or Alphas given a damn about them, anyway?
Posted by: whiskeyat October 19, 2010 12:53 PM (L03mw)
Hey whiskey, off topic, but why don't you fix the link in your name? It has minx in the web address and doesn't go to your blogspot address.
Try clicking on it yourself and see.
Posted by: ed at October 19, 2010 10:04 AM (Zsqn4)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.314 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: rawmuse at October 19, 2010 04:05 AM (sc1nB)