November 10, 2010
— Monty China to the US: I downgrade in your general direction! (I do find it a bit hilarious that a Communist, authoritarian, mercantilist, fiat-money regime like China presumes to lecture anyone on fiscal sanity, but there you have it.) There are many reasons why China is not the juggernaut people think it is, but it is wrong to blame them for our current financial woes. The simple truth is that we got our own stupid asses into this crack, and we're going to have to get our own stupid asses back out. Pull quote:
All of which really ought to be of interest only to full-on Sinologists, because, the Obama administration’s populist fist-shaking notwithstanding, China’s economic policy is not what ails America — any more than Japan’s economic policy was what ailed America during the Carter years, that awful interlude during which Honda and Toyota viciously conspired to dump affordable, reliable, fuel-efficient automobiles on unsuspecting Americans who really wanted to buy an AMC Gremlin but were duped into an upgrade by those inscrutable Orientals and their long-game industrial policies.Williamson and I disagree on the impact labor costs have (he thinks they don't matter, while I do) and he tends to serve up the "American industry is the most productive in the world" line rather uncritically, but on the whole, he's correct. You know how in big action movies, there's always some scene of the hero outrunning a big fireball in slow-motion? Who knew that stuff was based on reality? I wouldn't have thought a person could outrun an explosion. It seems...counterintuitive. The peasants are revolting! Let them eat arugula. Helicopter Ben either doesn't get it, or chooses to ignore it. Pull quote:
As humans, our demand for what we lack is unceasing, by definition. That's why we work. If this is doubted, one need only camp out an Apple store the next time our leading technology innovator releases its next must-have product.Chart-fu of the day: more evidence that if you torture numbers enough, you can make them confess to anything. "You go to hell, you damned goldbugs! You go to hell and you die!" Meanwhile, gold now sits at $1420.50/oz. Would a real gold standard work? Probably, though it would give rise to other problems. Still, I think we'd be far better off than we are now. The article's author goes a little heavy on the rich-bashing and redistributionism for my taste, but the core of the argument -- that a gold standard can indeed support the world economy -- is a good one. Pull quote:
With World Bank president Robert Zoellick openly advocating a return to some kind of "gold standard," we got the expected flurry of knee-jerk opposition from the banker community. Among these tired, old refrains was the common myth that there is "not enough" gold (and/or silver) to back-stop an effective monetary system -- in our modern global economy. In fact, the only thing for which we lack enough gold/silver is as fuel for the endless Ponzi-schemes created by bankers, and which are only possible in a world where reckless money-printing generates a permanent inflation-spiral. If that is the world one wants to live in, then by all means, reject the gold standard -- and have fun trying to outmaneuver the bankers, as they dilute your "money" while robbing you blind.Speaking of gold: it's not even near its record high. If you adjust for inflation (as you always should with the USD), gold was fetching about $2,300/oz back in the halcyon days of 1979. 20-50% of NYC foreclosures may be invalid due to incorrect or fraudulent paperwork. I'm sure the numbers are similar in other hard-hit areas, maybe even higher in states like California and Nevada. This no doubt has the banks just a wee mite alarmed. Rick Santelli: More people are paying attention to the Fed, and they're pretty unhappy with what they're seeing. To Teh Krugman, it's never enough. (With bonus scary chart-fu!) AoSHQ Morons always live by this creed: "Use every part of the hobo; waste nothing." Frugality and good stewardship of Gaia come naturally to the urban hunters and huntresses of Ace of Spades. Also, I've directed my manservant Pritchett to donate my old spats to the Clapham Retirement Manor for Aged Dandies and Boulavardiers. The feds to Chris Christie: "You owe us $270 million for that tunnel project you axed!" Governor Christie sighed, stood up, and started to remove his suit jacket. The feds, noticing that the suit jacket was coming off, quickly bolted from the room. (Seriously, though: all Christie has to do is tell Uncle Sugar to get in line behind all the other New Jersey creditors dunning him for their money -- or just charge Uncle Sugar back for all the unfunded Federal mandates that have been pushed on the states over the years. Governor Chrisie is by all appearances not someone the feds want to get into a pissing match with.) Might California be a bit less boned than first surmised? Well...no. They're still thoroughly boned. Half-measures aren't going to do diddly; even full measures may be too late to save the situation. Heroic measures may only moderate the damage. Californians seem to be so punch-drunk at this point that inertia is their default position. Their plans for deliverance now rest on the "and then a miracle happens!" theory. ------------------------------------------------- Midnight Rider
Well, I've got to run to keep from hiding
And I'm bound to keep on riding
And I've got one more silver dollar
But I'm not gonna let them catch me, no
Not gonna let 'em catch the midnight rider
And I don't own the clothes I'm wearing
And the road goes on forever
And I've got one more silver dollar
But I'm not gonna let them catch me, no
Not gonna let 'em catch the midnight rider
And I've gone by the point of caring
Some old bed I'll soon be sharing
And I've got one more silver dollar
But I'm not gonna let 'em catch me, no
Not gonna let them catch the midnight rider
Posted by: Monty at
03:19 AM
| Comments (137)
Post contains 1020 words, total size 8 kb.
Good for a laugh, but oh so true.
Posted by: Museisluse at November 10, 2010 03:48 AM (DTfXb)
Do we sense a lack of trust?
Posted by: Mr Wizard at November 10, 2010 03:49 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: nickless at November 10, 2010 03:52 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 03:58 AM (o2hlb)
As far as "blame China" Obama syndrome goes, I haven't been hearing it, myself, not that I've been following what Obama says, more of what I've already heard. Obama's love fest with China resounds, "be like China" so our trains can be on time, whatever. That is what I'll never forget Obama said, for the USA to emulate China, meaning that the elitist authoritarian Obama admires prison camps and prison labor for political dissidents, free labor and no governmental restraints from an outdated Constitution.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 10, 2010 04:00 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at November 10, 2010 04:01 AM (HaYO4)
But, like the federal government and SS, since it involves a political fix it will never happen. The fix will come when the State defaults and goes belly-up.
I bailed out in 1977, not because of financial mess that wasn't a big problem then, but because I could see the handwriting on the wall as far as nuclear power in CA went. But that handwriting turned out to be just one symptom of a dysfunctional electorate.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2010 04:02 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at November 10, 2010 04:05 AM (OBDWE)
Gold is at a record only if you fail to adjust for inflation. And you should almost always adjust for inflation.
What a POS torturous dog chasing its tail. Since the price of gold is the actual measure of inflation you can't adjust the price of gold for inflation.
The entire premise of that article is BS.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2010 04:06 AM (/jbAw)
What gets me about this BS though is the NE gets 150% of its gas tax dollars in federal highway funding (and rapid transit). We get 75 cents.
What needs to happen is for the feds to get totally out of the highway business and move the federal gas tax to the States.
What also needs to happen is for Nikki Haley to grow a pair and veto them worthless Grahamnasty I-73 project. We don't have the money either and they are already talking about yet more tax increases here. At least this rail project in NJ actually connected to major points of interest. I-73 doesn't.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2010 04:11 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 04:12 AM (o2hlb)
Posted by: Muppet Fart at November 10, 2010 04:19 AM (uv5Qx)
I miss how Monty used to end his posts with half-naked pictures of my Great Grandmother.
Yeah, tell me about it. Now I have to spend at least 20-30 minutes a day looking for those pics. I just don't have that kind of time!
Posted by: Muppet Fart at November 10, 2010 04:24 AM (uv5Qx)
HAHAHAAA!!!
Philadelphia Daily News gets pwn3d by fake Olberman email exchange.
Funny as hell!
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 10, 2010 04:27 AM (7+pP9)
Going back to that old article I mentioned in guns and ammo who said you could buy a Winchester model 94 when it was originally issued for a $20 gold piece and you could still buy it with one of those I go them one further.
$20 in 1894 equates to $489.60 using the government numbers. A used one today (pre-64) sells for about $800. That tells you that the government numbers are way off which I always suspected.
In addition, a 20 dollar gold piece was 90% gold and just under one ounce putting the price of gold in 1894 at $18/oz. It is now $1420 an ounce so that $20 gold piece would be worth $1278.
So from that POV that $20 gold piece will buy 1.5 of those 1894 Winchesters. Meaning that the dollar is even more worthless that Guns and Ammo considered. But that was a long time ago.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2010 04:34 AM (/jbAw)
Marine Corps birthday today. Honor the fallen, honor those who have served, honor those who are serving. Siemper fi.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at November 10, 2010 04:35 AM (QdDWI)
Posted by: DocJ at November 10, 2010 04:40 AM (WrZc1)
Posted by: lindsay lohan at November 10, 2010 04:41 AM (eQPq+)
Posted by: Famous J at November 10, 2010 04:42 AM (JKGfQ)
Posted by: the Church of Sinology at November 10, 2010 04:44 AM (eQPq+)
Fixed it just for the counterpoint.
Posted by: nickless at November 10, 2010 04:46 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Jean at November 10, 2010 04:46 AM (G5WHn)
Weekly U.S. jobless claims fall 24,000 to 435,000
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The number of workers who filed new claims for unemployment benefits fell 24,000 last week to 435,000, the federal government reported Wednesday, continuing a recent see-saw pattern that's given mixed signals about the U.S. labor market. Economists polled by MarketWatch had expected initial claims to fall to a seasonally adjusted 450,000 in the week ended Nov. 6. The four-week average of initial claims, meanwhile, sank to its lowest level in two years -- down 10,000 to 446,500. The moving average smoothes out quirks in the weekly data and is considered a more accurate gauge of employment trends. Continuing claims declined by 86,000 to 4.30 million. A total of 8.62 million people were getting some kind of state or federal benefit in the week ended Oct. 23, down almost 308,000 from the prior week.
/Real slight quasi-recovery, or are the numbers a bit artificially improved because of holiday-related hiring?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 10, 2010 04:48 AM (9hSKh)
Does anyone here know anything about coins.
When did we swtich from valuable metals to cheap alloys?
Posted by: Ben at November 10, 2010 04:49 AM (wuv1c)
OT, but ...
Marine Corps birthday today. Honor the fallen, honor those who have served, honor those who are serving. Siemper fi.
Punch a hippy while you're at it.
Posted by: Ben at November 10, 2010 04:50 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Decaf at November 10, 2010 04:52 AM (C119q)
I always thought that inflation would be good for people that held debt. For example, I assumed if the dollar was devalued by 20%, then paying off my mortgage early would be a good idea, because I would be paying it with money that is worth less. Then I realized just because money is worth 20% less doesn't mean I'll be receiving 20% more of it in my pay next year.
Jeez that stinks
Posted by: Ben at November 10, 2010 04:55 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 04:55 AM (poJjg)
Posted by: Jean at November 10, 2010 04:57 AM (G5WHn)
/Real slight quasi-recovery, or are the numbers a bit artificially improved because of holiday-related hiring?
I was at a local Mall/Outlet and noticed all the big stores had holiday hiring signs. I think this is more like the census hiring. Short term jobs.
I will also point out that in the mall over 50% of the spaces were vacant. The mall is essentially JC Penny, Dick's, Borders, Sears and 5-10 specialty stores. It's been like that for about 2-3 years. Only the big stores are surviving this down turn.
Posted by: Ben at November 10, 2010 04:57 AM (wuv1c)
OT, but ...
Marine Corps birthday today. Honor the fallen, honor those who have served, honor those who are serving. Siemper fi.
Punch a hippy while you're at it.
I couldn't indulge in that desire while I was participating in the Marine Corp's 10k Marathon, but I did "accidentally" bump into one (or a few). Thankfully I'm a bit more solid than the average hippy git,
.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 10, 2010 04:57 AM (9hSKh)
Ben - you need a new job to truly enjoy inflation, gold panning.
California might need to start doing that. I can't imagine 49's got all the gold that was there.
Posted by: Ben at November 10, 2010 04:58 AM (wuv1c)
Happy birthday US Marine Corps!
I'm surprised this has not been mentioned yet what with this place being a "smart military site" and all.
Posted by: 1SG at November 10, 2010 04:58 AM (CGjp2)
Apologies if this was already mentioned,--To all the Marines here, Happy Birthday, guys, from the Army.
Well done, troops.
Posted by: irongrampa at November 10, 2010 04:59 AM (ud5dN)
Posted by: Jean at November 10, 2010 05:02 AM (lnUW/)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 05:03 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: torabora at November 10, 2010 05:03 AM (HJeAp)
Posted by: MWTexas at November 10, 2010 05:03 AM (N05oL)
Apples and oranges.
Winchester Model 94 and Winchester Model 70 (pre-1964) are two different rifles.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 10, 2010 05:04 AM (LH6ir)
When did we swtich from valuable metals to cheap alloys?
Posted by: Ben at November 10, 2010 08:49 AM (wuv1c)
1964 was the last year they had silver in coins. 1933 saw the end of gold.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2010 05:04 AM (/jbAw)
Ben - there is plenty out there. I know guys who can go out and find a few hundred dollars worth whenever they want to. It is hard work and you really have to know what you are doing.
unfortunately there is no gold where i live. However if i dig down a foot or more I will find a lot of coal, unfortunately it's going rate is nowhere near gold. And if i dig down even further I might find marcellus shale, but apparently my garden hose isn't capable of fracking.
Posted by: Ben at November 10, 2010 05:06 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 10, 2010 09:04 AM (LH6ir)
I didn't say anything about the model 70. The price I quoted was for a pre-64 model 94 Winchester at $800.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2010 05:08 AM (/jbAw)
Want to stimulate the economy and restore confidence?
Extend the current tax rates without hiking them into the punitive, confiscatory, unfit for a fair and free democracy category, promise to repeal ObamaCare and all of ObamaCare's ridiculous cost increases and mandates - ASAP.
Laugh Paul Krugman off of the radical Keynesian stage.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 10, 2010 05:09 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 10, 2010 05:13 AM (bpP/w)
You didn't specify, so I assumed that you were talking about the Model 70. My mistake.
The change in 1964 was trivial for the lever action, which had become a less important rifle anyway. And the older 94s were worth more because they became collector's items. So comparing them as a point of reference for inflation vs. the price of gold is inaccurate.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 10, 2010 05:13 AM (LH6ir)
Ignoring the financial implications; new coins feel like crap compared to the old ones.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 10, 2010 05:14 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 10, 2010 05:19 AM (RKpGM)
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 05:21 AM (poJjg)
Posted by: Jean at November 10, 2010 05:23 AM (HKVGZ)
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at November 10, 2010 05:24 AM (6I0r9)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 05:25 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 10, 2010 05:25 AM (9cflz)
Think about what the inflation-adjusted high of silver was back then ... something like $130/oz (using the same multiplier as used for the gold price).
And I would note that silver is much better qualified to serve as replacement for local transactions, given its value density.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at November 10, 2010 09:18 AM (G/MYk)
Compare the price of gold to the stock market, now, that's scary
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at November 10, 2010 05:25 AM (6I0r9)
Agreed, but the bolt action rifle had superseded the lever action by 1964 so it wasn't the flagship of the company, whereas in the 19th century is clearly was.
There is a gun store near Middletown NY whose owner collected Model 1894s (and a few other 19th century repeating rifles) for years. They are displayed on the walls of the store, and they are obviously his retirement fund (not a bad investment) because he has lots of them!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 10, 2010 05:26 AM (LH6ir)
Cities best poised for recovery
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2010 05:28 AM (UcOiF)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 05:28 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at November 10, 2010 05:29 AM (GBXon)
Agreed that a metal standard is probably unworkable, but as you mention, a partial backing of the currency would go a long way toward easing peoples' minds about the viability of our currency. It is, after all, a leap of faith to assume some inherent value in a piece of paper or a few bytes on a hard drive.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 10, 2010 05:29 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at November 10, 2010 05:31 AM (OBDWE)
I used the pre-64 model for current price because IIANM that is the last year they were made in the U.S. and worth a shit. (and besides that it was the first one I found for sale on an internet search)
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2010 05:37 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 10, 2010 05:37 AM (bpP/w)
Just sayin', as a guy who once bitched out over "too many co-bloggers!," this has become a real highlight of the morning.
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 10, 2010 05:38 AM (NjYDy)
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 05:42 AM (poJjg)
Since many of our transactions are now electronic could a bank just start a gold standard of their own. Just like a debit card that I currently back with dollars in my account they would be backed by gold deposited in my account. All transactions are then based on the value of gold but it simplifies the exchange by not needing to cut up the gold into exchangeable chunks.
This would get the govt out of the exchange of money and move it to the free market. Just like today Visa is accepted almost everywhere eventually the bank that facilitated this type of transaction could gain popularity to the point it drove out other currencies.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 10, 2010 05:42 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: dagny at November 10, 2010 05:42 AM (twd4c)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 05:43 AM (4Pleu)
I'm not trying to be (too) contentious, but it's easy to find correlations in pretty much anything. The trick is whether they mean anything.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 10, 2010 05:43 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Kerry's iPhone at November 10, 2010 05:45 AM (d7fc5)
How dare you attempt to mellow my cyanide-pill quaffing mood?!?!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 10, 2010 05:45 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Jean at November 10, 2010 05:48 AM (aemFw)
You are right.. For the simple reason, it matters on the "sell" side.. The end cost of the product.
If you can produce an equal product at a lower cost, you can sell at a lower price, increasing your sales and production.
You also get the benefit of Bang for the Buck, (or, in this case Bang for the Yuan)
See?.. I'm right back to that.
Posted by: franksalterego at November 10, 2010 05:49 AM (+6fgE)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 05:53 AM (4Pleu)
That was my question to a point is the impediment to this just getting enough people to sign on to the system or are there drivers I just don't understand that are insurmountable.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 10, 2010 05:53 AM (tf9Ne)
Dang. Busy year.
Still no connection between the coinage change and Winchester rifles. But it was an interesting year.
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at November 10, 2010 05:55 AM (GBXon)
Heh, Newsweak. After three pages of "try moving here!" the "but they're not NYC, so don't bother."
(Don't move to Iowa if you're a woman over 25 with no husband and/or kids, unless you enjoy ostracism.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 10, 2010 05:57 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta)
;-) Yeah, well somehow my interest in starting each morning with a desire to blow my brains out is not as strong as some folks'. I need to see some light at the end of the tunnel!
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2010 05:58 AM (UcOiF)
Posted by: Jean at November 10, 2010 06:01 AM (judfL)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 06:02 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 06:06 AM (poJjg)
Heh, Newsweak. After three pages of "try moving here!" the "but they're not NYC, so don't bother."
Yeah, I noticed that. They're so desperate to try to keep kidding themselves that their liberal bastions are the center of the universe.
Utah is cleaning up on California's demise, so that's encouraging for us now that we've fled LA.
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2010 06:06 AM (UcOiF)
But regardless, in the end, there will be only chaos. Better to accept it and wait for the end. Hope is for the weak anyway.
Seriously, at least Newsweak acknowledged that lower taxes + favorable business environment = better economy. Must have put the Kotkin's teeth on edge to write that, along with mentioning that the high-regulatory blue areas aren't going to generate any significant employment anytime soon.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 10, 2010 06:07 AM (9hSKh)
I support privatizing the currency because I think there are alternatives that Uncle Sam can't even come up with.
So you support Ron Paul dollars? Have you lost your mind?
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 10, 2010 06:07 AM (7+pP9)
Don't do it Monty! She'll violently extract your soul and throw it away!
#93 Utah is cleaning up on California's demise, so that's encouraging for us now that we've fled LA.
The only downside to that is that too many fleeing Californians retain their liberal voting habits and try to make their new locales into mini-socialist hell-holes.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 10, 2010 06:09 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 06:09 AM (poJjg)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 06:10 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 06:14 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Gaff at November 10, 2010 06:18 AM (pe9DT)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 06:18 AM (4Pleu)
Well, there's Salt Lake City, but even that district's Rep voted against the bailouts, so they aren't that liberal. To give you a feel, the mayor of SLC (who by most accounts is something of a moron) ran with a Republican as his Lt. Gov. (unfortunately, she's even less intelligent than he is) in an attempt to seem like a conservative.
I think that the brand of conservatism out here is pretty deeply entrenched because the dominant religion here stresses hard work and community service. There's a friggin' beehive on the state flag! That gives you a sense for the culture here. I believe we also have the most liberal gun laws in the country.
What I have detected is a bit of a weakness on law and order and tilted more toward "compassionate conservatism", again I think because of the religious beliefs which emphasizes forgiveness. There have been major - life threatening and life taking - drunk driving "accidents" around here and the victims' families and community never seem to get angry about it. They seem also pre-disposed to take a squishy stand on illegals... that'll be an interesting debate here. There's been some effort made to do an AZ-style law, but I think the LDS church is against it. So who will win -- the fiscal conservatives or the compassionate conservatives?
Posted by: Y-not at November 10, 2010 06:19 AM (UcOiF)
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 06:20 AM (poJjg)
I would have no idea.. I left there over two years ago. Way too many threads insulting my religion and beliefs. Why hang out someplace where they not only step on my feet but press down and twist with their heel as well?
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 10:06 AM (poJjg)
Pretty much the same here but every once and a while I go over to see if there is a headline I haven't seen. Like an idiot, I see a thread that I assume the readers will be jumping on for its ridiculous conclusion, click on it and see that not only are they not refuting the stupid allah conclusion but slobbering all over it. I'm sort of surprised that readers of a "in name" conservative blog are that twisted in their world view. The commentors have all decided to lay supine on the floor, slobbering and drooling to allow the palin/beck/jesus hating for allah's numbers? Sick and very LGFB.
Posted by: dagny at November 10, 2010 06:21 AM (twd4c)
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 06:23 AM (poJjg)
I called gold at $750 and didn't have a dime to do anying about it and still don't. Liberals have finally sealed our fate irrevocably.
I am left holding nothing but a BAGFILL 'O JAKES!
The Lord is my Shepard, I shall not want ...
Posted by: Bagfull O' Jakes at November 10, 2010 06:26 AM (tuCVl)
Ireland's crisis flares as investors dump bonds
Ireland's financial troubles loomed large Wednesday as investors - betting that the country soon could join Greece in seeking an EU bailout - drove the interest rate on the country's 10-year borrowing to a new high.
The yield on 10-year bonds rose above 8 percent for the first time since the launch of the euro, the European Union's common currency, 11 years ago.
The cost of funding Irish debt has risen steadily since September, when the government admitted its bailout efforts of five banks would cost at least euro45 billion, equivalent to euro10,000 for every man, woman and child in Ireland. That gargantuan bill, in turn, has made the projected 2010 deficit rise to 32 percent of GDP, the highest in post-war Europe.
Ireland's Fate Tied to Doomed Banks
With doubts swirling about the solvency of the Irish state in early September, Finance Minister Brian Lenihan summoned a dozen senior government and bank officials to a conference room nicknamed the "torture chamber," a nod to its history as a venue for painful meetings.
For two years, Ireland had poured money on a raging banking crisis, to no avail. Each estimate of the rising price of rescuing Ireland's banks turned out too low. Mr. Lenihan needed to halt the drip-drip of bad news that was leading his country to ruin. "I want a final figure ASAP," he told the group
Two weeks later, the estimate came in: Up to €50 billion—nearly $50,000 for every household in the Emerald Isle.
But now, investors are betting the bill could be higher still and could reignite Europe's sovereign-debt crisis. The unpopular government is bracing for collapse, and on Tuesday, Irish government bonds continued a week-long slide to a fresh record low. The debt is judged as risky as Greece's was this spring just before that nation begged for a European Union bailout.
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 10, 2010 06:26 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 06:27 AM (poJjg)
105 Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 10:18 AM (4Pleu)
Ace of Cakes.. That's a good show.
$1000 is the baseline for a cake from the-- at least they taste good too.
Posted by: EZB at November 10, 2010 06:29 AM (Ty06w)
Geez so was that a threat?
Posted by: curious at November 10, 2010 06:33 AM (p302b)
If amoebae have a dedicated website somewhere, their commenters will be brighter than those at TepidAir.
You can always depend on scads of knee-jerk reactions to any issue over there. Hordes of religious, pro-Palin, anti-McCain knickers get twisted every time Allahpander goes into snark-mode. Anyone who doesn't worship the very ground Palin walks on, anyone who isn't 110% down with the whole Social Conservative thing, anyone who isn't totally hung up on policy and nuance and strategy is an outcast. Or worse.
I see that sort of stuff here on rare occasions, but for the ultimate in vicious "conservative" behavior, you have to go over to see the "Captain" (and Tennille?) in action.
And that's just the commenters. A lot of the posts there show a level of perception rivaling that of plankton.
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 10, 2010 06:33 AM (Ulu3i)
off topic, as usual
History will be made when Boehner becomes first orange-American Speaker of the House, but will his skin color be distracting?Posted by: Truman North at November 10, 2010 06:36 AM (HLGCA)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 06:38 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 06:41 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Dave C at November 10, 2010 06:44 AM (poJjg)
You read YouTube comments? That's what I call Bravery, Monty!
There should be a medal awarded for that....
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 10, 2010 06:49 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 06:52 AM (4Pleu)
http://bit.ly/d2Jhwj
If he goes through with it, I predict a rush of morons and 'ettes changing party affiliation in time for the primaries.
Could he be any worse than the Mohammedan Mouthpiece? Hellz, no!
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 10, 2010 06:54 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 10, 2010 06:58 AM (ImAna)
today Diana Ollick said that people are underwater in their mortgages an average of 23.3% and for the first time she was showing DC on her map. the intimation was that "it's spreading". The RE guy she had on was discussing how being underwater in your mortgage cause you to stay in your house therefore a market for "the next house" isn't being created. Duh.
They had a guy on who is selling his house in CT and throwing in as a bonus his vacation home in Florida. He is apparently selling it himself on a website. The only comment he made that I thought was worth repeating is that the neighbors have made comments about his "bare bones" price. The guy seemed serious about selling. This is the one time I wish I'd listened to Jim Cramer, over two years ago, when he sold his house and said to sell yours and rent.
Posted by: curious at November 10, 2010 06:58 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 07:04 AM (4Pleu)
My fingers aren't listening to my brain this morning, they seem to be in revolt..
Posted by: curious at November 10, 2010 07:05 AM (p302b)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 10, 2010 07:07 AM (xxgag)
I hear what you are saying, however, I know a lot of people in their 50's with kids who did not save a penny for retirement. These are doctors and lawyers and business men and women. They were in the NY real estate market and it was "bidding wars" up the wazoo and prices going up and up and running from one house to the next before it went so high you couldn't afford it. These folks always assumed they would use the profits from the sale of their home to retire. I'm not saying what they thought was right, I'm just saying this is the reality for more people than not. Government employees and union guys/gals are in better shape than regular folks either employed in the private sector or having their own practice. A lot of these people had IRA's and have already broken into them and paid the tax penalties. Yes the accountants would have a heart attack but they did it nonetheless. The more I hear the angrier these people are when they see all the union folk being helped and they are being abandoned, no one is helping them keep their house or plan for their retirement and they see ss rapidly disappearing just before they want to retire (if they've kept their job).
Posted by: curious at November 10, 2010 07:11 AM (p302b)
I would point out that somethign that is always skipped over in talks about other monetary catastrophes, such as Weimar, Zimbabwe, Iceland, Albania, Russia, Mexico, ... The US dollar is in a totally unique position in world history. Never before, has one currency (and a fiat one, at that) served as the trade adn reserve currency of the entire world. There is no replacement for the US dollar - not even in the US, alone, never mind its international functions. . . . The US dollar is far too big to ever be bailed out. It cannot be. Period. When the US dollar slips into hyperinflation, there is no escape for us, as there was for every other such catastrophe. Not only that, but world trade will grind to an immediate halt, further compounding problems.
I was going to point that out one of these days. The U.S. dollar has a unique, intrinsic value: the faith of the rest of the world in its strength. And that's why, if handled properly, it can work as a viable currency even if it is a fiat currency.
But Obama and Bernanke just destroyed that. We're drilling a hole in the bottom of the best ship at sea while in the middle of a cyclone. The fat lady will be singing soon.
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 10, 2010 07:16 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 07:22 AM (4Pleu)
Some of them did. I have an elderly couple from NY living behind me that retired in NY, sold their house, and moved here to small town SC.
Of course they did that before the market collapsed.
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2010 07:23 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Vic at November 10, 2010 07:28 AM (/jbAw)
The US dollar is far too big to ever be bailed out. It cannot be. Period.
This is what really gets me when the idiots who support monetizing the debt just claim that we can deal with the destruction of the dollar just as all of the other nations have done with their currencies, before this. But that analogy is in serious error.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at November 10, 2010 10:36 AM (G/MYk)
Regarding a dollar bail out, obviously not only can it not be done, it would not be done. The US will never be substantially aided by any other nation under any circumstance. We were fools to put so much effort into saving others from themselves and each other over the years, starting with our woefully misguided entry into WW1.
The monetization of US debt is indeed regretable, but no matter what remedy is used we're going to have big trouble world wide. All involve the US spending a lot less and letting the parasitic export economies fail. We don't have the political will to do what must be done to radically cut government spending. We can't raise taxes any higher without destroying the recovery. We could shrink the military, but any reduction big enough to help solve matters financially would conceed the game to our multitudinous enemies, who are always looking for signs of weakness to exploit.
So, aside from currency debasement, which carries some hope of bringing with it some industrial revitalization, and also has the nice side benefit of screwing our foreign creditors, what is to be done? Who has the solution?
Posted by: Reactionary at November 10, 2010 07:31 AM (xUM1Q)
I understand the rent vs. buy arguement from the standpoint of pure economics, but that's not all that comes into play in real life. Psychologically, a rented dwelling is not "home" in much (most?) of our culture. It creates rootlessness. Areas that are heavily rented always show it - the level of interest in property maintenance is typically low. Maintaining a rental property in tip-top shape doesn't really benefit the land lord much. Also, peoples' voting habits in local elections are divorced from the long term implications of the measures they vote on - after all, they can always just move if they don't like how things are going later on. If you want to live somewhere for any period of time, and you value a nice environment, you're going to seek areas where most people own their homes. Sadly, the modern economy, with its constant demand for mobility, is making ownership less and less viable for many people.
This is part of why encouraging home ownership by owner-friendly policy serves the greater good. That's not to say it's good at any price. But the mortgage interest deduction (which should have had some cap on it) was not a bad thing in itself. It was the encouragement of lending to those who could not or would not repay their debt that caused the current mess.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 10, 2010 07:39 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Youtube commenter at November 10, 2010 07:41 AM (Wluvb)
Posted by: Reactionary at November 10, 2010 11:31 AM (xUM1Q)
My two cents:
Start the ball rolling on spending reductions with the low hanging fruit like defunding NPR, NEH, etc.
As public enthusiasm for more cuts is expressed, go on the partially - and then fully - defunding the Department of Education, etc. No need to get into a pissing match about abolishing a department if we can simply gut it, driving staff to quit and lowering the budget until its 2% of what it was in 2008.
Make MBSs illegal. Require 20% down on every mortgage going forward. Require mortgage originators to hold mortgages. Legislate our way back to a more sane time. There's a lot we can do here.
Perhaps these are small steps, but if we can do these, we might get the public to back the larger, harder things that need to be done, like tackling Social Security.
Posted by: Josef K. at November 10, 2010 07:45 AM (7+pP9)
A default is far preferable to monetization. With a default, the integrity and utility of the currency is maintained - which is an absolute necessity.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at November 10, 2010 11:38 AM (G/MYk)
No one can predict the outcome with any certainty, but I suspect the consequences of default would be more dire than you imagine. First off, I can't imagine any creditor nation would fail to immediately nationalize all US owned businesses on their soil. I would be shocked if the US didn't find itself suffering fairly brutal retaliation in trade policy world wide. We'd also be giving the shaft to all those Americans who own government debt - instead of something (inflated dollars), they'd get nothing. Next, there would be zero government borrowing in the near term (maybe not a bad thing in itself) and then the deficits would have to be solved instantly, rather than gradually, or else we'd be right back to printing money.
I'm not sure the goal of saving the currency would be served by defaulting on the debt.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 10, 2010 07:52 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Josef K. at November 10, 2010 11:45 AM (7+pP9)
I think those are solid starting proposals. They won't do the job by themselves, but like you say - they'll prepare the mind of the public for the harder work to come.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 10, 2010 08:02 AM (xUM1Q)
I think you are forgetting China's merchantilist trade policy; export alot, restrict imports. Opening up China's market should be the priority. The Chinese love American cars, but because of import duties and other taxes on cars and most other products we cannot compete.
It certainly is not all our fault, but obviously Obama is destroying the economy, but a restricted market in China is a larger problem, since GM and Ford should be exporting huge amounts of cars to China. Then look at the political decision by the Chinese government to restrict purchase of Boeing products and the demand for technology export.
China is playing a rough game regarding trade and we should be playing harder. Note that Bush did not play tough with China on opening up to American exports either.
Posted by: Federale at November 10, 2010 08:35 AM (PWWdd)
Thousands of issuers of "personalized currency" would turn commerce into a nightmare of inefficiency and fraud. Who verifies the existence, let alone the value, of your pez collection-backed Monty bux? If there's a fire in your tool shed/repository does that mean all my Monty bux are now worthless?
If you would rather hold asset backed paper than US dollars, you can do that right now from your computer and an e-trade account. There are ETF's & ETN's backed by everything from gold to coffee to palladium to crude oil. They have the added advantage of being easily and inexpensively converted to any other currency. There really is no need to reinvent the wheel.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at November 10, 2010 08:35 AM (+lsX1)
I'll bet that if he were to receive the much-deserved flying roundhouse kick to the side of his head, he'd immediately say it was enough...
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at November 10, 2010 09:16 AM (fxACH)
A good guess would be that they're hoping their high-tech sector will somehow bail them out, which is unlikely.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at November 10, 2010 09:24 AM (fxACH)
______________
Burt Rutan will save us by selling spaceships to Branson.
Posted by: Anachronda at November 10, 2010 09:26 AM (xGZ+b)
Posted by: Monty at November 10, 2010 09:40 AM (4Pleu)
That means that gold--contrary to the goldbugs' keeening--is NOT a good investment, since the metal hasn't managed to recoup its inflation-adjusted value after 31 years. The only utility that gold and silver possess is speculative value, if you can find a bigger sucker to sell your Scrooge McDuck-style Vault o' Richez (Bitchez) to before everybody else catches on. When the SHTF, gold is useless...you can't eat it or drink it and it has little use in a SHTF scenario other than decorative jewelry.
Bah!
Posted by: skh.pcola at November 10, 2010 10:06 AM (vsFI8)
Of course there can be intentional debasement. It's happened before and could easily happen again. The government, via an unconstitutional declaration, arbitrarily fixes the value of gold at $X.
That's beside my point, though. Gold is relatively rarer than, say, lead, but it isn't scarce any more than diamonds are. There is no rational reason that it is valued so highly. Gas futures? Yeah, I need that stuff, and so does everybody else. Gold? Not so much.
Anyway. Didn't want to get too off-topic. Your point is taken and understood. My point is that there is no justification for gold to be different from any other substance, and certainly no reason that it is a "good store of value" in inflationary times. The fact that the dupes who bought it in the late 1970s are still upside-down on the metal is proof of that.
Posted by: skh.pcola at November 10, 2010 01:07 PM (vsFI8)
Posted by: nubia1982 at March 28, 2011 04:24 AM (318Vl)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4099 seconds, 265 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Thanks for the chuckle.
In the US/Japan comparison to the US/China, we weren't borrowing money from the Japanese to sustain our nation's credit DEBT.
Posted by: Mr Wizard at November 10, 2010 03:34 AM (H+LJc)