June 23, 2010
— DrewM

Bill Kristol floated this idea yesterday. Wow. Patreaus is staying at CentCom
Still. Wow.
Will Eikenbery and Holbroke go as well? How about bringing Crocker out of retirement at the Bush center?
Picking Petraeus will enable Obama to say, "I'm in this to win it" it also eliminates any problem with confirmation by the Senate.
Petraeus is taking one for the team and by team I mean the country. This is a huge personal sacrifice and quite frankly a danger to his legacy. Winning Afghanistan is not a give, needless to say. If there was any doubt (and there wasn't), the man is a patriot. Godspeed to him.
I can't believe that McCrystal caused all of this over the chance to take a couple of shots at Joe "BFD" Biden, Jim Jones and Richard Holborke.
I have no love for Obama but McChrystal placed him in a no win situation.
First interesting thing to see when Petraeus gets in will be if he changes the ROEs.
*Technically, Obama says he accepted McChrystal's resignation. Original Post:
As I emailed to Slu last night...
It's not that McChrystal is smarter than anyone else (I think we now know that's not true) and irrepressible but we're on a clock in AFG. No one has 3, 4, 5 months to wait while we get a new guy picked, confirmed, up to speed and on the job. Yet leaving him there does real damage too. Not only does it hurt the culture of the military (which is real) but how well will everyone work going forward?
You can't fire him and you can't keep him. Well he did fire him.
**John Noonan says it's not a step down.
Posted by: DrewM at
09:21 AM
| Comments (440)
Post contains 327 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 09:23 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: enoxo at June 23, 2010 09:23 AM (93Lca)
Posted by: t-bone at June 23, 2010 09:24 AM (I0j7U)
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 23, 2010 09:25 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: Klaus Frenfuty at June 23, 2010 09:25 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: Belisarius at June 23, 2010 09:25 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: Intrepid at June 23, 2010 09:25 AM (92zkk)
We have a Commander-in-Chief, who takes guidance from Rolling Stone.
I feel so much better, now.
Posted by: franksalterego at June 23, 2010 09:25 AM (+6fgE)
With the creeping feminization of combat units and the countenancing of open sodomy, that culture's gone, baby. One more step towards the loss of our nation.
Posted by: Harry S. Plinkett at June 23, 2010 09:27 AM (mAm+G)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 23, 2010 09:27 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 23, 2010 09:28 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: alexthedude at June 23, 2010 09:28 AM (8DajW)
Dear lord are you telling me that of the thousands of general in our military that only two of them are competent?
Why don't we just declare Petraeus Field Marshall and get it over with. Doesn't the man have enough on his plate?
There is no one, not one person who can take McChrystal's job other than Petraeus?
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 09:28 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: joncelli at June 23, 2010 09:29 AM (RD7QR)
They could call it "The Vuvuzela Monologues".
Posted by: Intrepid at June 23, 2010 09:29 AM (92zkk)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at June 23, 2010 09:29 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: James Smoore at June 23, 2010 09:29 AM (SZy+Y)
I think that Obama handled this as well as he could have, actually. McChrystal's way of doing things wasn't working, and Petraeus would have carte blanche to do what needs to be done after the credibility he got from Iraq. If the situation in Afghanistan can be saved, Petraeus is the one man with the mojo to get Obama and the Congress and the people on board to save it.
Good job, Obama. Wow. Can't believe I'm sayin' it. You still suck as C-in-C, but I think ya handled this one correctly in a really impossible situation.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 23, 2010 09:29 AM (GhUHn)
The biggest target of the article was also Gen. McChrystal himself it was highly unflattering towards him and towards the current Afghan strategy. I would classify it as a hatchet job (actually I did at my site).
The NY Times this morning had this little note in it "One administration official described Mr. Obama as being particularly furious at a McChrystal aide’s characterization of him as not seeming “very engaged” during their first White House meeting." That was the big sin. An aide pointing out that Obama is not very engaged in things, coming on the heels of the Gulf Oil Spill debacle he needs to show himself as in charge and this is a way to do it - to hell with the consequences.
Posted by: Jenn at June 23, 2010 09:30 AM (WNcvq)
Posted by: Bomber at June 23, 2010 09:30 AM (EmhmU)
Posted by: Precedent Obumbles at June 23, 2010 09:30 AM (DYJjQ)
Apparently, he was a weaselly shitbird even then.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 09:31 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: sTevo at June 23, 2010 09:32 AM (sAaEm)
Posted by: Mal at June 23, 2010 09:32 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: Jenn at June 23, 2010 09:32 AM (WNcvq)
Jeff B.,
Obama didn't make the decision. That little peckerhead could screw up a wet dream. Someone else made the decision he took credit....
Posted by: Karl Lipbolm at June 23, 2010 09:32 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: Eric Shinsheki at June 23, 2010 09:33 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 09:33 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: joncelli at June 23, 2010 09:33 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: starboardhelm at June 23, 2010 09:33 AM (SgSfB)
How is this surprising to anyone? He's spent two hours on the war so far, you think he's going to spend more than two hours deciding his fate?
Or, what? You really believe everything you learn from tv and movies?
Posted by: William at June 23, 2010 09:34 AM (77TeU)
Posted by: Intrepid at June 23, 2010 09:35 AM (92zkk)
Posted by: Mullah Omar at June 23, 2010 09:35 AM (SZy+Y)
(Oh please, please please, let another fly walk on his mug. And bring back Podium Rat.)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 09:35 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 23, 2010 09:36 AM (ZESU0)
Gee, sounds remarkably similar to what was going on a few decades ago. Yeah, let's run the war from Washington. Next the Bower In Chief will require that he approve every air strike in advance.
I still say he intends to cut and run. Bring the troops home now! The traitor is only killing people to save political favor.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 09:36 AM (6taRI)
Posted by: stuiec at June 23, 2010 09:36 AM (W+GYq)
Posted by: SlaveDog at June 23, 2010 09:36 AM (H6Jyg)
There is a five-star rank, General of the Army, that can be awarded by Congress during wartime under very limited circumstances.
Posted by: Slublog at June 23, 2010 09:36 AM (qjKko)
Great. So this is how zero fucks Petraeus. He won't give him the needed resources to win either. Then he can scapegoat Petraeus for the loss and cockblock the rumored Petraeus presidential run but saying he was the ulitmate loser in afghanistan.
God, please let Petraues pull a rabbit out of his ass and win this handily, and quickly. Not that She listens to me, but its worth a try.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at June 23, 2010 09:36 AM (cniXs)
You can't fire him and you can't keep him.
Posted by: DrewM Of course you can. Truman proved that a general could be fired. Lincoln proved that generals could be fired and/or kept. Hell, Lincoln fired people, brought them back, and then fired them again (McClellan). Obama proved that he's a whiny snivelling jerk who once again tried to posture as a deliberate, calm person while others got the knives out. Also: Wow. They moved swifter on a General than they did on a 150 year old anti-semitic reporter sitting front row dead center. And just a tad quicker than that lightning strike on the Black Panther. But not as fast as that ninja-like response on the oil spill. Or the debt. Or jobs. We now know what will motivate the manufactured Messiah.
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 09:36 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Bomber at June 23, 2010 01:33 PM
Muthafuka what?
Posted by: Fleet Admiral Chester B. Nimitz. at June 23, 2010 09:37 AM (ZESU0)
Obama's General gets dumped....and Bush's General has to take his place.
Can Bush return as CIC?
Now that's outsourcing I could love!
Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2010 09:38 AM (CfmlF)
Yeah, but not since WWII. No way we'll ever see it for this war. Not with the current leadership.
Posted by: Bomber at June 23, 2010 09:38 AM (EmhmU)
General P. will again be the hero. This does not hurt his POTUS prospects if he pulls Obama's racist ass out of the fire. It makes Obama look bad. McCrystal has hurt the Man-Child very seriouslly and he may not recover even after all the spin!!!!
Posted by: George Tillman at June 23, 2010 09:38 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: Sharkman at June 23, 2010 09:38 AM (Zj8fM)
[ ring - ring - ring ]
Skippy: "hullo?"
Rahm: "Hey Boss?.. Have you read the latest news stories in the NYTimes, the Wall St. Journal, and the Washington Post?"
Skippy: "Naw, Dude.. I haven't finished Rolling Stone, and Wonder Woman yet... You seen my stash?"
[click]
15 minutes later, the entire Military Chain of Command was disrupted and thrown into chaos, and the United States' Foreign Policy was in disarray.
And, you thought Sarah Palin was illiterate, uninformed, and misinformed
Posted by: franksalterego at June 23, 2010 09:38 AM (+6fgE)
Posted by: Commander In Mom Jeans at June 23, 2010 09:38 AM (w9BEi)
Posted by: maddogg at June 23, 2010 09:39 AM (OlN4e)
17.this is reminiscent of the Carter years.
I asked my father about that last night, since i was in grammar school and not sure if I remembered it correctly. He said no, this is way worse. It was only the economy under Carter, while this marxist is trying to destroy our entire way of life.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at June 23, 2010 09:39 AM (cniXs)
_____________________
Depends on how big the war gets.
Posted by: Anachronda at June 23, 2010 09:39 AM (1OYcp)
We tie his hands, saddle him with an "unwinnable", increasing unpopular, ugly fight in A-stan, and sully his mythic status.
This is perfect... never let a crisis go to waste.
Posted by: Obama's Scheming Chicago Thug Advisers at June 23, 2010 09:39 AM (GW79H)
I think so but if he does, it will literally take a day. If that.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2010 09:40 AM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: Bohemond at June 23, 2010 09:40 AM (GznpF)
There is a five-star rank, General of the Army, that can be awarded by Congress during wartime under very limited circumstances.
I haz 5 stars!
Posted by: Sheriff Joe F'n Biden at June 23, 2010 09:40 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Lone Marauder at June 23, 2010 09:40 AM (/bVuS)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 23, 2010 09:41 AM (Gk/wA)
"Back to School 2030" S
Contemporary American history.
Well, I didn't know you wanted
to get involved with the discussion, Mr. Helper.
But since you want to help,
maybe you can help me, OK?
You remember that thing
we had about thirty years ago...
called the Afghanistan conflict?
Yeah. Where we failed
to achieve victory?
How come we didn't do a full Counter-Insurgency
Operation and fuck the Taliban right up
and push those goat-fuckers back
to the fucking bottoms of their caves .
fill in the cave, and then nuke them back into
the fuckin' stone age forever?
How come? Tell me?
Why? Say it! Say it!
All right, I'll say it.
'Cause Obama was too much
of a pussy wimp...
to let McChrystal go in and blow
out those Towel-headed bastards!
Good answer. Good answer
I like the way you think.
I'm gonna be watching you.
Posted by: BumperStickerist at June 23, 2010 09:41 AM (ruzrP)
Posted by: Louis Tully at June 23, 2010 09:41 AM (jat5l)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 09:41 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Mal at June 23, 2010 09:41 AM (Z+qzA)
I think that Obama handled this as well as he could have, actually.
I disagree wholeheartedly. I think it would have been much better if McChrystal stayed and Obama resigned. Oh well, can't have everything I guess.
No, no matter who they put in charge of Afghanistan it won't make a bit of difference, it's a no win scenario at the moment. No amount of military force is going to make the slightest difference.
Our enemies understand all to well that Obama administration lacks the intestinal fortitude to see this through, he's already pretty much told them in no uncertain terms that were pulling out by a certain date, maybe sooner if they can make it uncomfortable enough for the administration.
Add that to the fact that the administration has made it pretty clear that once we do pull out the current Afghan government will get lip service but probably little to nothing else in the way of support, and you've got a no win proposition.
The people on the street aren't going to stick their necks out because they have a pretty good idea that were going to be gone in a year or two and the Taliban will be back. So do most of the people in the current Afghan government. Their just going through the motions and trying to position themselves so when the Taliban do come back they won't be getting their heads chopped off.
Can't say as I can blame them too much for that. Nope, the retarded way in which this entire affair has been handled should amount to an impeachable offense, sadly however that will never happen.
Nope, we already surrendered in Afghanistan, and for some inexplicable reason were still putting troops in harms way over there for no damn purpose whatsoever.
Sad, but true.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at June 23, 2010 09:42 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 01:38 PM (UOM4
Give him a break. That last putt in the Oval Office is good for all of us, since it relaxes The One and allows him to concentrate his stupendously massive intellect on America's problems.
Posted by: Cicero at June 23, 2010 09:42 AM (QKKT0)
44. This was also a shot at Hillary - she backed McChrystal all the way
And now we have the issue for Hillary to resign in "principle" over. zero refusing to support our troops.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at June 23, 2010 09:42 AM (cniXs)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 09:43 AM (UOM48)
There is a five-star rank, General of the Army, that can be awarded by Congress during wartime under very limited circumstances.
I haz 5 stars!
Posted by: Sheriff Joe F'n Biden
Bite you.
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 09:43 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 09:43 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Monty at June 23, 2010 09:43 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: macduff at June 23, 2010 09:43 AM (cXuOZ)
Posted by: wtfci at June 23, 2010 09:43 AM (R4rMI)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 09:43 AM (ZESU0)
For those of us old enough to remember, this is reminiscent of the Carter years. Everywhere you looked, another catastrophe.
Indeed. Echoes of Stansfield Turner's CIA.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at June 23, 2010 09:44 AM (ujg0T)
1.5 million jobs created/saved!
Posted by: Obama's Civilian National Securtiy Force at June 23, 2010 09:44 AM (w9BEi)
Is this dickweed ever on time? Arrogant bastard.
Jane, it's not Bambi's fault. TOTUS has demands that must be met before he is willing to perform. You know, the dressing room with Evian chilled to 40 degrees, the floral arrangements comprised only of pink lillies and roses, the specific crudites and tapas appetizers on the buffet, the post speech Christal, the Wedgewood china, etc. TOTUS makes Barbra Streisand look like a piker.
Posted by: Sheriff Joe F'n Biden at June 23, 2010 09:44 AM (CfmlF)
Lose-Lose, all the way around. Biggest loss for Obama, since McChrystal was his hand-picked choice.
I hope you're wrong. It could also signal the first time Obama has ever rethought a decision.
And Obama has no idea what to do.
So he does the smart thing and picks Petreaus.
If Obama is on the same side as America, then I'm on the same side as Obama. Here's (again) hoping that's the case.
Posted by: FireHorse at June 23, 2010 09:44 AM (cQyWA)
And now we have the issue for Hillary to resign in "principle" over. zero refusing to support our troops.
Staw Poll / Betting Pool: Hillary mounts a primary challenge to Barky in 2012, just as Ted Kennedy did to Jimmuh in 1980? The parallels grow.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at June 23, 2010 09:45 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: ac at June 23, 2010 09:45 AM (A51gv)
Posted by: Bomber at June 23, 2010 09:46 AM (EmhmU)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 09:47 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: KG at June 23, 2010 09:47 AM (S8TF5)
Posted by: Sheriff Joe F'n Biden at June 23, 2010 01:44 PM (CfmlF)
Don't forget the M&Ms. But only red and green ones.
Posted by: Cicero at June 23, 2010 09:47 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Dan at June 23, 2010 09:47 AM (1jzSs)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 09:48 AM (GOBeG)
I don't know why anybody who knows you would be shocked. You are all smart and literate and stuff. A deep thinker nonpareil.
Hey, even the crappy presidents get to fire their generals. I don't have a problem with that.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 09:48 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: Bomber at June 23, 2010 09:48 AM (EmhmU)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at June 23, 2010 01:45 PM (ujg0
Shrillary's a mountain of retard with a nasty disposition. I'd take her over Precedent Wee Wee any day, as she is, at least, eligible, but I still can't get over the fact that anyone champions her, in any way. In the old days, that 'reset' fiasco, by itself, would have been enough to permanently end the public lives of hundreds of people.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 09:49 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Cro at June 23, 2010 01:47 PM (FeD2t)
Rush just brought up then Senator Obama's 7 minute dressing down of Petraeus over the surge in Iraq.
Posted by: Wally Mondale at June 23, 2010 09:49 AM (CfmlF)
Pull all the troops from around the world so the MF International Community can bring their PEACE to our land.
I want the MF International Community to decimate our land with PEACE beginning with Boston, New York, Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles ending with a deluge of PEACE upon Washington DC.
Fucking spoiled brat Americans want their PEACE-bring it on MF International Community!
Posted by: Harvard Inbred=Liberal's Useful Idiots at June 23, 2010 09:49 AM (+xhL8)
Hillary mounts a primary challenge to Barky in 2012
Of course she is going to challenge him in the primary. And after that poll came out yesterday saying people think she is more qualified than chocolate jesus, they may have just handed the nomination to her on a silver platter.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at June 23, 2010 09:49 AM (cniXs)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 23, 2010 09:49 AM (mR7mk)
Yeesh. I hope Petraeus is up to the task. That fainting spell last week in the senate hearing concerns me a bit.
Posted by: Intrepid at June 23, 2010 09:49 AM (92zkk)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 09:50 AM (Qp4DT)
I think Petraeus will retire and give some BS excuse as health or spend more time with his family
His fainting at the Senate Armed Forces Committe sure sets the table for that scenario.
Posted by: Wally Mondale at June 23, 2010 09:50 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Monty at June 23, 2010 09:50 AM (4Pleu)
That's a given, the question is whether what McChrystal said rises to that level. I i don't think it does. Especially when the views were expressed over the course of a month. If McChrystal had sat down for a 15 minute interview and spewed all this out it would be different. I really suggest that everyone re-read the article with a fresh set of eyes and then see if your opinion is the same.
Posted by: Jenn at June 23, 2010 09:51 AM (WNcvq)
I hate this bastard.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 09:51 AM (UOM48)
Dear lord are you telling me that of the thousands hundreds of general in our military that only two of them are competent?
FIFY
Posted by: beedubya at June 23, 2010 09:51 AM (AnTyA)
I asked my father about that last night, since i was in grammar school and not sure if I remembered it correctly. He said no, this is way worse. It was only the economy under Carter, while this marxist is trying to destroy our entire way of life.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at June 23, 2010 01:39 PM (cniXs)
Ask your Dad about the Iran hostage crisis and the public disclosure of Stealth technology. He might have forgotten how dedicated Carter was to reducing America's military and geopolitical power.
Posted by: stuiec at June 23, 2010 09:51 AM (W+GYq)
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at June 23, 2010 09:51 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2010 09:52 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Obama's inner voice at June 23, 2010 09:52 AM (GW79H)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at June 23, 2010 09:52 AM (T0bhq)
I hope McChyrstal writes a tell-all. Soon.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 09:52 AM (UOM48)
Bammer did the right thing.
Posted by: Monty
This depends entirely upon whether the issue at hand is a military that collectively forgot the oath that it took. Unless someone can prove that, then this is a stupid stunt. MacArthur was openly advocating a strategy that would involve the US with a direct war with mainland China. Lincoln was shuffling commanders in a deperate attempt to get the army of the Potomac moving and persevering. If we have an institution today that is in need of shock therapy, it's our intelligence agencies. And we know that this will not happen.
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 09:53 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Rob at June 23, 2010 09:53 AM (GvYeG)
Maybe Jindal should do a skit mocking the One. Given that he cares only about himself, it might cause some movement. Oh oh oh, he called me disengaged, he has to go (when's my tee time?).
Posted by: ed at June 23, 2010 09:53 AM (Urhve)
Obama, though, is facing a dillemma of his own making: having chosen McChrystal himself as the best man for the job, and now being forced to cashier his own first choice, whom else is there? It's clear to me that Obama neither understands nor is interested by military affairs -- his disengagement is so plain as to be unmistakable
I get the impression that Obama is disengaged from all the responsibilites and work that comes with the job of being president. He's more in it for the "precedence", power and perks.
Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2010 09:54 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Rob at June 23, 2010 01:53 PM (GvYeG)
Wee Wee also directed that Petraeus play goalie for
the US team's next game in the World Cup. He said it was a jobs
initiative.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 09:55 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: beedubya at June 23, 2010 09:55 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 09:55 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jenn at June 23, 2010 01:51 PM (WNcvq)
If this had been his first offense, Obama might have been able to justify keeping him. But McChrystal gave that public speech in London that implicitly criticized Obama for an unnecessary policy review and that trashed Joe Biden's proposed "Counter-Terrorism-Plus" strategy. Plus, as Victor Davis Hanson says, if you don't understand the threat posed by Rolling Stone, how can you understand the Taliban?
Posted by: stuiec at June 23, 2010 09:56 AM (W+GYq)
Man I really really really really hate to say this, but I think they must have hired a Bush speech writer cause its pretty on point, not that he believes anything he is saying. I may have to go vomit now that I said that. I usually flip the channel when this bastard is on.
Heh! Heh! My code name in the administration is "The Secret Weapon".
Posted by: David Frum at June 23, 2010 09:56 AM (CfmlF)
Pretty brutal that the entire US Army only has a single trusted senior general.
Posted by: Holdfast at June 23, 2010 09:56 AM (Gzb30)
Could be, runningrn. I'm not up on what A-Fib symptoms are. But surely a man in such good shape as Gen Petraeus wouldn't faint over simple dehydration, doncha think? He's not that old, either.
Posted by: Intrepid at June 23, 2010 09:56 AM (92zkk)
Pay no attenshen to ze man beevind ze kertin.
Posted by: George Soros at June 23, 2010 09:56 AM (w9BEi)
125. Stuiec
Tell me, how you could possibly construe that my father liked carter by my comments? I didn't get conservative by accident, i remember all the nasty comments my parents made about bunny boy. I don't remember having the feeling of impending doom then like i do now. THAT was the reason for my question.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at June 23, 2010 09:56 AM (cniXs)
I'm sure the leftists will be flummoxed, but the Office of the President is due a certain respect and I think that the President had no other reasonable option in this case. I'm satisfied with President Obama's decision in this case.
Mocking the President is our job. It's not important enough for a good general staff officer to even contemplate, especially during wartime. Best to leave it to us, the professional idiots, rather than spend valuable time being a clumsy and inexperienced dolt. Mocking and ridicule takes practice.
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at June 23, 2010 09:57 AM (ya/Us)
Posted by: Rob at June 23, 2010 09:57 AM (GvYeG)
What did you expect him to say?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 23, 2010 09:57 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: ed at June 23, 2010 09:57 AM (Urhve)
The douchenozzles on A MessNBC are going on about how Obama was a genius to tap Patreus
Geez, I hate these bastards!
"Bush+Patreaus=BAD IDEA"
"Bambi+Petreaus=GENIUS!"
Posted by: David Frum at June 23, 2010 09:58 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 09:58 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Mal at June 23, 2010 01:41 PM (Z+qzA)
I don't know if that dick was even this far left. Maybe an Angela Davis presidency
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 23, 2010 09:58 AM (1Jaio)
I think McCrystal is not so much the precedent's man as we have been led to believe (I am wondering -- who in the military was McC the most close too?), and yes, I'm sure precedent has in the back of his mind that he will ruin Petraeus politically with this move (I don't care how much of a mastermind the general is -- Astan is a mess, was a mess, will be a mess; it's the nature of the beast) -- and if the precedent is playing political games here, well...).
That said: precedent better be careful with this ploy. The troops by and large adore Petraeus (McC wasn't at all hated by any means -- he has a loyal following with the troops and many will see this as him being set up; loyalty and regard for a commander dies hard...I present Shinseki as an example -- talk about heartache and denial that lasted a fair long time). If the precedent tries to stab Petraeus in the back, well, it will not be a popular thing with the troops (who are already smarting and chaffing a fair bit).
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 09:58 AM (5/yRG)
I hate Obama worse than I did 48 hours ago. This really pisses me off.
Posted by: SGT Dan at June 23, 2010 09:58 AM (p6OcK)
Posted by: Oldcat at June 23, 2010 09:59 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Phelps at June 23, 2010 09:59 AM (o/6if)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 01:49 PM (UOM4
NOW he tells us! Why didn't he give us that advice BEFORE the election?
Posted by: Fifty-Two-Percenters at June 23, 2010 09:59 AM (W+GYq)
Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2010 01:52 PM
Exhasustion and sleep deprivation are what I think..
..been there..never want to do it again
Posted by: beedubya at June 23, 2010 09:59 AM (AnTyA)
142 Petraeus should bring in Mattis as a deputy at CentCom
Mattis is a weasel. He is responsible for the haditha prosecutions, which is probably why he was passed over for commandant.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at June 23, 2010 09:59 AM (cniXs)
Posted by: Jenn at June 23, 2010 10:00 AM (WNcvq)
71 Bohemond
Iran, all the Trashcanistans (including Pakistan) and the Horn of Africa are in the Centcom AO as well. There is no way he can do both of these jobs.
Posted by: CT at June 23, 2010 10:00 AM (Lz4EE)
Posted by: ed at June 23, 2010 10:00 AM (Urhve)
Posted by: joncelli at June 23, 2010 10:01 AM (RD7QR)
Mattis is a weasel. He is responsible for the haditha prosecutions, which is probably why he was passed over for commandant.
i thought he was passed over because he said killing people is fun on the record.
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 10:01 AM (wuv1c)
"Watch this putt!"
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 10:02 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 10:02 AM (GOBeG)
Posted by: joncelli at June 23, 2010 02:01 PM (RD7QR)
That's what Obama tells everytime he opens his mouth...
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at June 23, 2010 10:03 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 10:04 AM (UOM48)
Just FYI- Petraeus was a two-star during OIF. He was in command an airborne division (101st, I think) in the march up to Baghdad.
He's moved fast but he ain't no Eisenhower....Ike was a fast mover!
Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2010 10:04 AM (X/Lqh)
McChrystal is now free to talk and after a $5 mil book deal, he will. Then we will get the 321st account of obama's inability to lead anything with the gang that can't shoot or fight and the main stream media will promptly ignore this too.
The voters won't. What a clown.
Posted by: Grover at June 23, 2010 10:05 AM (gifD/)
Posted by: Rob at June 23, 2010 10:06 AM (GvYeG)
Posted by: Monty at June 23, 2010 10:06 AM (4Pleu)
Go, Megyn!
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 10:06 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: noislamocommie at June 23, 2010 10:07 AM (Jpn2p)
Posted by: The Dark Lord at June 23, 2010 10:07 AM (gbCNS)
Tell me, how you could possibly construe that my father liked carter by my comments? I didn't get conservative by accident, i remember all the nasty comments my parents made about bunny boy. I don't remember having the feeling of impending doom then like i do now. THAT was the reason for my question.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at June 23, 2010 01:56 PM (cniXs)
I didn't mean to imply that your Dad LIKED Carter. I was addressing this:"It was only the economy under Carter, while this marxist is trying to destroy our entire way of life."
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at
June 23, 2010 01:39 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: Fifty-Two-Percenters at June 23, 2010 10:07 AM (W+GYq)
Posted by: George S. Patton at June 23, 2010 10:07 AM (VXBR1)
What's A-fib? Heart condition
Atrial Fibrilation is a cardiac arrythmia. The upper chambers of the heart don't beat properly. The danger of this is that blood can form clots that get stuck in the atrial appendages (the "cockles") of your heart which can potentially cause a stroke. Perhaps Petraeus was just tired and deyhdrated (then I'd also be concerned about deep vein thrombosis--blood clots in the legs, especially if he had been on a long flight and didn't walk around). These can result in a clot traveling to the lungs (pulmonary embolism) or to the head (causing a stroke if in the head). He just didn't look right.
Posted by: Harry Reid at June 23, 2010 10:08 AM (CfmlF)
And the "Betray Us" media will be nipping his heels again.
Posted by: Beto at June 23, 2010 10:09 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: bowel movement at June 23, 2010 10:09 AM (05Stc)
I can't believe that McCrystal caused all of this over the chance to take a couple of shots at Joe "BFD" Biden, Jim Jones and Richard Holborke.
It sounds like you're accepting the mainstream reportings' false premise of attributing remarks made by McChrystal's staff over drinks to McChrystal himself. I agree even allowing that access to Rolling Stone shows poor judgement, but we should stick to the facts.
I still think the comments McChrystal personally made are not as bad as is being reported. And while they were in themselves somewhat beyond the normal bounds, they may have been a failed attempt to answer the more subtle and effective back-stabbing Ambassador Eikenberry gave McChrystal. McChrystal is the guy that Obama wouldn't meet with for any length of time, and he apparently has no backers in the White House except possibly, weakly, Hillary Clinton. With Biden, Eikenberry and others publically trashing McChrystal's plan and not getting slapped down by Obama, and no line to Obama himself, McChrystal taking his own case to the public may have seemed like a worthwhile gamble. (Which, if I'm not making this more complicated than it really is, still shows poor judgement in execution, i.e, Rolling Stone, I admit.)
Posted by: Dave R. at June 23, 2010 10:09 AM (m9Bcg)
Atrial Fibrilation is a cardiac arrythmia.
RN, could it have anything to do with that gunshot wound he suffered? The one that Frist worked on?
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at June 23, 2010 10:10 AM (cniXs)
Posted by: lions at June 23, 2010 10:10 AM (P+/LF)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at June 23, 2010 02:08 PM (5aa4z)
Hmm, remember lefty outcry over Acid Rain? What about this? Why aren't envrionmentalists screaming over the lack of containment caused by Obama's policies? Crickets.
Posted by: Harry Reid at June 23, 2010 10:10 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: damian at June 23, 2010 10:11 AM (4WbTI)
Hey, why is Doug MacArthur pretending to be George Patton?
Posted by: DrewM. at June 23, 2010 10:12 AM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: Monty at June 23, 2010 10:12 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: AndrewsDad at June 23, 2010 10:12 AM (C2//T)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 10:12 AM (UOM48)
85 I think the big difference is that Lincoln gave McClellan a pretty loose tether all things considered (at least compared to this one); the one prerequiste was that his generals needed to win the war. All things considered, Lincoln was suprisingly patient and lenient with McClellan.
This dust up over a damn magazine article was ridiculous -- I read it. No, it wasn't a good thing -- but in light of everything else the precedent's response was remarkably petty.
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 10:13 AM (5/yRG)
RN, could it have anything to do with that gunshot wound he suffered? The one that Frist worked on?
I'm not sure. I know he got shot in the chest, and if he got pericarditis (inflammation in the sac that surrounds the heart) from the trauma, I suppose it's possible.
Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2010 10:13 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: lions at June 23, 2010 02:10 PM (P+/LF)
It's going to be interesting when we finally reach the point of no return with Pakistan, where they either choose to fight radical Islam or submit fully to it.
Posted by: stuiec at June 23, 2010 10:14 AM (W+GYq)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at June 23, 2010 10:14 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Monty at June 23, 2010 10:14 AM (4Pleu)
Just wait for the tropical depressions to dump oil all over the Gulf coast for YEARS. They'll get it coming and going while Slick Obama is pissing on Gulf residents and carefully calling it rain.
Posted by: Gulf Truther at June 23, 2010 10:14 AM (H+LJc)
Where can I get my Obama/Bite Me bumper sticker?
Posted by: Reidemandweep at June 23, 2010 10:14 AM (/H8uK)
Did Barry head out for a round of golf after the announcement?
I'm thinking not. He had to get showered, shampooed and shined (ooh, should I ban myself for that one?) for this evening. It's Waygu Wednesday, remember?
Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2010 10:14 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Kemp at June 23, 2010 10:15 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: AndrewsDad at June 23, 2010 10:15 AM (C2//T)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at June 23, 2010 10:15 AM (3iMgs)
That's certainly possible, but why is oily rain being reported by RussiaToday rather than, say, any network affiliate in LA? I particularly skeptical as they never panned up (in the areas of LA most likely to be affected, it's be easy to recognize the houses on stilts).
Posted by: Methos at June 23, 2010 10:15 AM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: California Red at June 23, 2010 10:15 AM (7uWb8)
While I despise the Kenyan cock-sucker, McChrystal was completely out of line and should have been fired if he didn't resign.
I think all protocol and decorum in these matters need to be put into context. The jug-eared idiot is doing things half-assedly in Afghanistan.
The ROE are getting our guys killed, and there is no stated goal. The idiot DID NOT give McChrystal the number of troops he daid he needed. People whom I know who are in the know with the military brass say they are totally fucking frustrated with the Idiot-in-Chief.
The Idiot-in-Chief has met face to face with his commander in Afghanistan for a total of 20 fucking minutes in over a fucking year
This idiot is in way over his head..so what can they do??. None of them is going to try to mount a coup..obviously..but McChrystal is no idiot and knew what the consequences would be..
McChrystal did what he had to do to bring attention. He fell on the sword. He should be commended.
Posted by: beedubya at June 23, 2010 10:15 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: franksalterego at June 23, 2010 02:11 PM (+6fgE)
The Onion has already joined The Daily Show as fake news that outperforms the "real news" in reporting and analysis. I think Cracked is right on their heels.
Posted by: stuiec at June 23, 2010 10:16 AM (W+GYq)
Posted by: Joe Biden at June 23, 2010 10:18 AM (mka2b)
He voted for Obama. A fact that would be in every opponent's campaign ads.
Posted by: Methos at June 23, 2010 10:19 AM (Xsi7M)
I'm with JeffB at 26 - Eikenberry needs the boot as well.
Changing the RoE's should be job one for Petraeus. Putting more troops in and unequivocally revoking his withdrawal timetable should be job one for Obama.
If all of that happens, Obama will have successfully handled his responsibilities regarding a problem he helped create - possibly for the first time since his birth. Of course then it's up to Petraeus to make it all work from there. I wish him and all those under his command all the best.
Posted by: societyis2blame at June 23, 2010 10:19 AM (7ZyYf)
Heh. Someone on Tammy Bruce yesterday asked which was longer, the Rolling Stone piece or the Arizona illegal immigration law.
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at June 23, 2010 10:19 AM (w9BEi)
Can he though? I thought the ROEs were coming in direct from the WH.
Posted by: KG at June 23, 2010 10:20 AM (S8TF5)
Statement by Gen. Stanley McChrystal http://bit.ly/cKdvaq
This morning the President accepted my resignation as Commander of U.S. and NATO Coalition Forces in Afghanistan. I strongly support the President's strategy in Afghanistan and am deeply committed to our coalition forces, our partner nations, and the Afghan people. It was out of respect for this commitment - and a desire to see the mission succeed - that I tendered my resignation.
It has been my privilege and honor to lead our nation's finest.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at June 23, 2010 10:20 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: joncelli at June 23, 2010 10:21 AM (RD7QR)
OT--anyone in New York feel an earthquake about five minutes ago?
Yes (Adirondacks). It just showed up on the USGS website as a deep 5.5 quake centered north of Ottawa.
Posted by: FireHorse at June 23, 2010 10:21 AM (cQyWA)
Will Easy Bake do the same for Pateaus in Afghanistan?
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 10:23 AM (ZESU0)
220 Are we so sure he voted for Obama? Or was that a cover comment? I still don't believe this interview was an accidental running of the mouth, and the idiots at RS may have done something that they did not intend to do.
As I previously stated: who in the military is McC most close to?
Pissing off your military beyond all hope of redemption is never a wise move.
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 10:23 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: always right at June 23, 2010 02:18 PM (UzjcV)
Lisa Frank!! She's already got the unicorns and rainbows she'll need to make the Taliban feel all good and peace-happy!
Posted by: stuiec at June 23, 2010 10:25 AM (W+GYq)
SMART Power!!1111!!!!!!!!!eleventy
Posted by: jukin at June 23, 2010 10:25 AM (vkkNZ)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 10:25 AM (UOM48)
Ok, this may be a REALLY stupid question but...what exactly does it mean when a CIC accepts a general's resignation as a commander of a specific theater? Is he still in the military but no longer in charge of anything or is he out completely?
Posted by: Tami at June 23, 2010 10:26 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Monty at June 23, 2010 10:27 AM (4Pleu)
NYCommieTimes
Posted by: Mephistopheles at June 23, 2010 10:27 AM (gzfLC)
Posted by: Monty at June 23, 2010 02:12 PM
I've heard the LBJ tapes as he called his leading Congressional friends for advice whether or not to get involved in Viet Nam or to pull out what military "advisers" JFK left behind. They unanimously told him not to go over there. They told him there was no reasoning with the Communist Asians at that point, and that military involvement in Viet Nam would be a no win repeat of the Korean disaster. AS IF Johnson ever took any advice he asked for. Viet Nam didn't even end stale mated as in Korea. And Johnson certainly didn't bring any resolution to his war before leaving office. (What would HHH have done about it had he defeated Nixon?)
We can't ignore the 1970s huge social animosity against the war, mostly initiated because of the draft but quickly permeating EVERYTHING military to be evil. The lack of public support, the animosity from the public, definitely hurt our military's effectiveness. As you point out with the CYA brass always blaming subordinates, the good officers took baseless criticism coming and going, inside and out of the military.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 10:27 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: societyis2blame at June 23, 2010 02:19 PM (7ZyYf)
It would be a bold move to replace Eikenberry with McChrystal. The Afghan leadership would love it and it would help align US foreign policy with military strategy.
Posted by: stuiec at June 23, 2010 10:28 AM (W+GYq)
I took that statement as he resigned his commission, so it's book writing time for McCrystal.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 10:28 AM (GOBeG)
Posted by: Tami at June 23, 2010 02:26 PM (VuLos)
He is still in the military for now but this is a career ender so he will be out soon. I don't think he's the type of guy to sit at a desk in washington with a war going on.
Posted by: robtr at June 23, 2010 10:28 AM (fwSHf)
I would hope Petraeus response to we need you to go to A-stan would have been, really... lets make sure I am clear on a couple of things first... ROE.... troops levels.... WH interference in a victory.
Are we clear?
ARE WE CLEAR?
Posted by: AndrewsDad at June 23, 2010 10:29 AM (C2//T)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 10:29 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: ed at June 23, 2010 10:29 AM (Urhve)
I would pay SO MUCH MONEY to see this.
Posted by: Filly at June 23, 2010 10:30 AM (fImvM)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 10:32 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 10:33 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jenn at June 23, 2010 01:51 PM (WNcvq)
What you say is correct, but for good, bad, or indifferent, the Jug-Eared Marxist can fire a military commander for almost any reason. It's a privilege that comes with the title. I have read the article, and McChrystal himself did not challenge Barky's authority in any way shape, or form. Unfortunately, we have a thin-skinned, narcissistic, egoist for a President, and he apparently didn't like McChrystal's staff bad-mouthing, however mildly, his people. You have to admit, saying Biden and having someone else pipe up "Did you say Bite-me? Haha!" isn't exactly the smartest thing to say in front of a reporter looking to score a hit piece on your boss.
Posted by: Bill H at June 23, 2010 10:33 AM (q8CmE)
Does anyone know what McChrystal's duties are now or will he retire from active duty altogether?
Posted by: Y-not at June 23, 2010 10:33 AM (Kn9r7)
Which is why this so totally needs to happen! Obama appointed the safe choice, and I want Pet to go all Patten on his ass, to the great applause of the troops and the public at large as the MFM and university pantswetters go apeshit. Would LOVE IT.
Posted by: Filly at June 23, 2010 10:34 AM (fImvM)
Heh! Heh! O/T, but noteworthy. From The Hill:
Arizona Democrats facing tough reelection races are distancing themselves from the Obama administration as it prepares to file a lawsuit against the state over its controversial immigration law.
Rep. Harry Mitchell (D-Ariz.) on Monday sent a sharply worded letter to President Barack Obama urging him not to sue.
Posted by: runningrn at June 23, 2010 10:35 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 10:35 AM (GOBeG)
Are we clear?
ARE WE CLEAR?
Um, uh, anything you want General Petraeus.
Fired up... ready to go...
(well at least that's how the dream scenario might end)
Posted by: BHO at June 23, 2010 10:35 AM (GW79H)
I am not sure how this is going to work out. I hope well. Petreaus was successful in Iraq because Bush put his whole presidency behind him and Petreaus had McChrystal actually running the anti insurgency. Petreaus isn't going to have either of those things now.
The left hates Petreaus (general betrayus, movon.org) and alot of dem politicians didn't like him. I think that was mainly because he worked for Bush and was succeeding but it's hard to change your stripes.
It will depend on Petreaus's commitment to the effort and obama's commitment to him and the effort. I am not sure about either. I can't figure why Petreaus went along with a 1 year time line for withdrawl.
Posted by: robtr at June 23, 2010 10:36 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 02:35 PM (GOBeG)
Ok...THAT'S what I was looking for. Thanks Nam.
Posted by: Tami at June 23, 2010 10:36 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 02:33 PM (wuv1c)
That's Casey's recommendation.
"Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength.
And as horrific as this [firing] was, if our diversity becomes a
casualty, I think thatÂ’s worse."
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 10:36 AM (Qp4DT)
#111: Shrillary's a mountain of retard with a nasty disposition. I'd take her over Precedent Wee Wee any day, as she is, at least, eligible, but I still can't get over the fact that anyone champions her, in any way. In the old days, that 'reset' fiasco, by itself, would have been enough to permanently end the public lives of hundreds of people.
No disagreement there, but hey, Jimmuh Carturd was *still* better than Glug-Glug Drunk-Drunk crypto-marxist Teddy too. I am curious, however, if a feeble Obamunist presidency might trigger at least one serious primary challenger in 2012.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at June 23, 2010 10:36 AM (ujg0T)
Staw Poll / Betting Pool: Hillary mounts a primary challenge to Barky in 2012, just as Ted Kennedy did to Jimmuh in 1980? The parallels grow.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at June 23, 2010 01:45 PM (ujg0T)
I think a closer comparison is actually 1968, and with the Clintons' notorious skill at triangulation Hillary will be able to play BOTH Eugene McCarthy and Hubert Humphrey to Obama's LBJ.
Posted by: Nighthawk at June 23, 2010 10:36 AM (OtQXp)
As if McChrystal was allowed to change the RoE's.
Obama is the CiC whose initial address to the military expounded their requirements to play nice and to simultaneously be everything that Afghans want and/or need, including the requirement to follow the Karzai 12 Rules of Engagement.
Initially, McChrystal was commanded by Obama to report how to win the Afghan War while submitting to Karzai's 12 Rules of Engagement. That's what McChrystal's report analyzed, including the 12 month time table utilizing immediately 40,000 more troops; all of which Obama never acquiesced.
Obama set McChrystal up for failure from the onset. McChrystal did his utmost for America while Obama did his utmost against America. Obama will not support Petraeus any better than he did McChrystal, though Obama may find new ways to sabotage our military along with ruining our former/traditional political alliances.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 10:37 AM (H+LJc)
234 LOL! You really want to see the troops go apeshit if the carnival barker stabs Petraeus in the back don't you?
Although, yeah, I would prefer Odierno over Mattis.
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 10:39 AM (5/yRG)
People keep saying this, but my understanding is that both McChrystal and Petraeus were supporters of these RoE. Petraeus even jumped onto the "blame Israel" bandwagon with the Indonesian, which is chilling, to say the least.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 10:40 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Monty at June 23, 2010 10:41 AM (4Pleu)
Does anyone know what McChrystal's duties are now or will he retire from active duty altogether?
Posted by: Y-not
No, not really. Unless Petraeus is enabled to proesecute this conflict, he'll simple be another placeholder at best, or scapegoat at worst. The fact that Obama vilified Petreaus earlier matters not to the MFM, not the fact that Obama reacted far swifter to McChrystals' negative remarks than his earlier requests to meet and confirm a plan of action. This is political damage control.
Some here have ascribed dark, conspiritorial motives to the actions of this Administration. Perhaps these are simply the actions, reactions and vengeful lashing out of any dense manager/principal/administrator/supervisor who is in over their head (writ large), and is bent on self -preservation and self enrichment to the exclusion of all else. What better way to explain delays over life jackets? Insisting upon lawsuits in the face of opposition?
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 10:43 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 10:43 AM (U5btG)
I don't think Warrants are commissioned they kind of have a foot in both camps (enlisted/Officer), but I don't think they can resign.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 10:43 AM (GOBeG)
The most dangerous enemy you will face, will be the feckless Bastich standing behind you.
Good Luck, and Godspeed, my friend.
Posted by: franksalterego at June 23, 2010 10:44 AM (+6fgE)
Posted by: Jane Fonda at June 23, 2010 10:44 AM (SZy+Y)
Johnson and then Nixon didn't fire enough generals. The generals had a bad habit of lying and covering up the situation there -- trying to turn a turd into a tea-rose. Westmoreland was the worst offender, but there were many others.
Other way around, man. LBJ didn't want to acknowledge just what a successful effort would cost, and the farce of Laotian and Cambodian "neutrality" didn't help either.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at June 23, 2010 10:44 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 10:45 AM (GOBeG)
Great sham, huh?
Petraeus has been neutralized for 2012, and setup to take the fall for the withdrawl in Afghanistan. So much for HIS popularity.
And conservatives are all enthusiastically on-board.
Posted by: proreason at June 23, 2010 10:45 AM (+8dSJ)
Posted by: SoCalMe at June 23, 2010 10:45 AM (bKnnS)
Posted by: bowel movement at June 23, 2010 10:45 AM (05Stc)
The Taliban remain consistent, though America's relations with them changes with each election. It might be helpful to limit whatever strategy against Taliban aggression, rather than ping ponging attention between the Taliban and a ghost.
For many years now, the British Intelligence insists that al Qaeda is long gone, and now simply a bogeyman phantom that American politicians promote as still alive in order to perpetuate military engagement, and that foreigners claim identity with in order to gain international recognition.
Then again, it was the British Intelligence referencing Hussein's WMD in Iraq, which may well have been secretly transported to Syria for instance.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 10:46 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 10:46 AM (U5btG)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 10:47 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: James Dungle at June 23, 2010 10:48 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: bulwark at June 23, 2010 10:48 AM (swBPc)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 10:48 AM (U5btG)
Posted by: Filly at June 23, 2010 10:49 AM (fImvM)
Posted by: alppuccino at June 23, 2010 10:49 AM (ogMw8)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 10:49 AM (GOBeG)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 10:49 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: kansas at June 23, 2010 10:50 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 23, 2010 10:50 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 10:50 AM (U5btG)
Posted by: joncelli at June 23, 2010 10:51 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Mike Hunt from New Orleans at June 23, 2010 10:51 AM (SZy+Y)
How many Iraqi leaders did the US military go through while nation building there? Obama may order a change in Afghan leadership. Elections are no problem for the fraud in chief, nor any political backlash that can by remedied by a visit from a predator drone.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 10:52 AM (H+LJc)
And no Warrant Officers can not resign.
There is one other thing to consider here. He didn't just "resign". He has essentially been "relieved for cause". While this doesn't absolutely require to you to resign from the service, if you don't want your next duty station to be Officer in charge of polishing mess kits in Thule Greenland it is best to get out.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 10:53 AM (6taRI)
He'll need a small task force just to keep tabs on his health. Petraeus is one tough bad-ass, but juggling all these tasks might be a bit much even for him.
This is the Annexation of Puertoo Rico play gambit by Obama. But since we're going to leave at a set date anyway, this particular move might be pointless in the end.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 23, 2010 10:54 AM (9hSKh)
It poured in my part about 0500 this morning, and I went out earlier and didn't see any oil on my truck, but I'm on the Texas/La line.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 10:54 AM (GOBeG)
Posted by: bulwark at June 23, 2010 10:56 AM (swBPc)
Toxic rain in my fricken state! I hate that SOB Obama. He is a criminal and should be brought on charges for the evironmental disaster that he created from inaction!!
Are you sure it isn't Chocolate rain?
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 10:57 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: robtr at June 23, 2010 10:58 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Jean at June 23, 2010 10:59 AM (fQbcU)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 11:00 AM (5/yRG)
I think they both had huge loyalty to their Troops, hell McCrystal used to go out on Sp Ops missions with his guys.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 11:00 AM (GOBeG)
Posted by: Jack Klome at June 23, 2010 11:02 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 11:03 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 11:04 AM (U5btG)
Posted by: rommell at June 23, 2010 11:04 AM (0135J)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 11:05 AM (GOBeG)
Posted by: Methos at June 23, 2010 11:05 AM (Xsi7M)
I haven't read every comment, but I see a few that agree with my take on the Rolling Stone article. There was actually very little to it in terms of insubordinate comments towards Obama and company. I read the article very thoroughly and it was classic Rolling Stone - the reporter took a few quotes from unnamed aides and used them to add to his characterization of McChrystal as a bad mouthed, arrogant SOB with a bad strategy. Of the zillion words in the article about 99/100 of a zillion were critical of McChrystal and very little of it had anything to do with Obama at all. About the worst thing that was said of him was that he seemed "not well prepared" when the two had their first meeting.
What's done is done, but it seems to me to be much ado about nothing if this article is all they've got to back this resignation/firing.
Posted by: Syracuse1989 at June 23, 2010 11:05 AM (T1l1O)
Posted by: Lou Gutiter at June 23, 2010 11:06 AM (SZy+Y)
I had an uncle who served with Patton. He swore up and down Patton was insane.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 11:06 AM (6taRI)
I think he described himself as a Rockefeller Republican, so no thanks.
Posted by: Methos at June 23, 2010 11:07 AM (Xsi7M)
You have no idea where Petreaous stands on anything? Be very careful what you wish for
I agree. We just had a darkhorse win an election, we don't need another one. I want a known quantity.
Paul Ryan 2012.
Posted by: Ben at June 23, 2010 11:08 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: rommell at June 23, 2010 11:09 AM (0135J)
Posted by: Filly
Think twice about that. A lot of us from the Vietnam era see perfectly well what perversions Obama conducts from the Oval Office. CONGRESS wouldn't stay out of micromanaging the Vietnam war, either. It's a shame Goldwater didn't beat LBJ in the electoral war between the doves and the hawks.
Obama was born after 1960, later than baby boomer tail end. His grandfather didn't even fight in WWII, just a long lost great-uncle whom Obama had never met. Obama and the Clintons belonged within the Ivy League Marxists bent on defending and promoting the SDS American student terrorists. Most certainly, not everyone back then agreed with Socialism or domestic violence, and even the MSM decried the SDS. But once the SDS kidnapped Patty Hurst, everything started changing in the black and white dichotomy of overlooking violent crimes in the media because, after all, she didn't really want to take part. GAG. At that point, all those idiots claiming "victim of society" and "in some way, we are all guilty of xyz" and "capital punishment is cruel and unusual" (and abortions are great) multiplied like StarTrek tribbles.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 11:09 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Bob Krick at June 23, 2010 11:09 AM (SZy+Y)
I really, really hope you're right. Are you thinking impeachment, resignation, resignation due to impeachment, or he just runs away one day, having left behind a note: "Wasn't as fun as I thought it would be. Sorry! P.S. Joe, please continue to change out the pictures of me in the West Wing."
Posted by: John McCain at June 23, 2010 11:12 AM (fImvM)
Posted by: John McCain at June 23, 2010 03:10 PM (fImvM)
Absolutely!
Posted by: Colon Powell at June 23, 2010 11:12 AM (GW79H)
Posted by: Methos at June 23, 2010 03:05 PM (Xsi7M)
Don't worry. Precedent AssKicker is going to take his boot off the neck of BP ... just for a minute ... and put it on that pipe, thereby reducing the flow by 3000%.
All is well.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 11:12 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt
Yep, and McChrystal will be the first in print.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 11:12 AM (H+LJc)
Obama has no soul. He is incapable of feeling for the military. They are useful idiots to him. I hope Gen P. realizes this !!!
Posted by: Lou Frankle at June 23, 2010 11:13 AM (SZy+Y)
Anyone who believes anything the MFM, and especially magazines like Rolling Stone, is completely bonkers.
My feeling on this is that some of his subordinates contributed to this mess which has been blown up by the media, probably at WH request, and he is taking the heat for them.
Hopefully after Obama is out of office the full truth will be outed.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 11:13 AM (6taRI)
Posted by: jakeman at June 23, 2010 11:13 AM (8QmEC)
Posted by: moi at June 23, 2010 11:13 AM (bjYAr)
Posted by: Methos at June 23, 2010 03:05 PM (Xsi7M)
I saw that and want to know WHOSE damned underwater robot this time.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 11:13 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Filly at June 23, 2010 11:15 AM (fImvM)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 11:15 AM (U5btG)
Yessss!
One more of your ssssoldiers repealed! I will be sssspending the weekend ssssselebrating in Zanzabar!
Posted by: Adam Gadahan at June 23, 2010 11:16 AM (kC3nL)
Posted by: Jim Klined at June 23, 2010 11:17 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: George Lucas at June 23, 2010 11:17 AM (ZESU0)
Obama spent more time searching for arugula recipes, and making goo-goo eyes at Orca than he did consulting with the military leadership.
Posted by: Fish at June 23, 2010 11:17 AM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Wesley Clark
"That ingrate Obama." Clark staked his disreputable reputation with that campaign endorsement.
That damned bus with its bloody wheels.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 11:18 AM (H+LJc)
"I saw that and want to know WHOSE damned underwater robot this time."
Does TEH EBIL CHENEYBURTON own any underwater robots?
I'm just asking questions, here.
Posted by: D.U. at June 23, 2010 11:18 AM (kC3nL)
This will make it damn near impossible for Petraeus to run against us in '12.
Didn't save Lincoln from George McClellan, did it?
When he got his fifth star, Admiral Ernest King said, "When they get into trouble, they send for the sons-of-bitches."
Posted by: comatus at June 23, 2010 11:18 AM (YN/Le)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at June 23, 2010 11:19 AM (T0bhq)
Naw, we'd rev it up to Top Gear speeds, flip it upside down to the tune of the General Lee's horn, and manage to make it burst into flames. Underwater.
Posted by: Filly at June 23, 2010 11:19 AM (fImvM)
Why the turn about O-bummer?
Posted by: Dustoff at June 23, 2010 11:19 AM (cq3pU)
Posted by: Pippy Langstrom at June 23, 2010 11:20 AM (SZy+Y)
And yet, it out-acts Natalie Portman. Good choice.
Posted by: Filly at June 23, 2010 11:20 AM (fImvM)
anyone notice this..?
http:// directorblue.blogspot.com /2010/06/ inconvenient-masseuse.htmllet the fun begin...
Posted by: Ira at June 23, 2010 11:20 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 11:21 AM (GOBeG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 11:21 AM (U5btG)
Grasping for another way to blame Bush and take down Petraeus at the same time.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 11:22 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: home lighting at June 23, 2010 11:23 AM (S8yuF)
Posted by: robtr at June 23, 2010 11:24 AM (fwSHf)
I'm loving reading comments in MSM articles about this--lots and lots of libs getting schooled on the little-reported fact that McChrystal both voted for and was appointed by Obama.
They're all idiotically squealing "ha, that stupid Rethuglican McChrystal Bush remnant deserves to get fired for his disloyalty!" then when informed otherwise, go eerily silent.
Posted by: Average Jen at June 23, 2010 11:24 AM (fRnux)
Lift the ridiculous ROE and free our military up to fight.
Hear! Hear! Obama's MO is to make a situation FUBAR then blame it on someone else. He has no interest in winning a war, especially against the Muzlums that he said he'd side with. He's too anti-American for that.
Did they meet face-to-face at the White House? Who among us wouldn't have given our last precious drop of Valu-Rite to be a fly on the wall during that meeting.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at June 23, 2010 11:24 AM (i3AsK)
Heh...maybe the military should unionize. Seems about the only way they could get any respect from the precedent.
(no, I wasn't being serious -- not really)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 11:26 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy
at June 23, 2010 03:24 PM (i3AsK)
Flies get face-to-face meetings with the Indonesian Imbecile. Generals and CEOs most integral to the particular task ... not so much.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 11:27 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Barack Obama at June 23, 2010 11:27 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt
Require a report from Obama to use as political cover for the inevitable malleable changes in Obama's decision regarding what it was he said to get done in the first place. Petraeus should consider well establishing in advance exactly what details he is going over to accomplish and exactly what Obama is going to provide for the plan to work, announcing weekly press updates on Obama's support or lack thereof from Afghanistan.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 11:27 AM (H+LJc)
He didn't retire he resigned his commission, which will lead to retirement and he had 30+ years of service so that's plenty, and besides odumbass the greenskeeper accepted.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 23, 2010 11:27 AM (GOBeG)
Posted by: Vince at June 23, 2010 11:28 AM (GpQZ/)
There's no doubt the political class of Officer's in the zone will be jockeying for position to take MacChrystal's four star appointment, and to accomplish this goal there will be a lot of dick sucking.
There's also no doubt the warrior class of Officer should be in the cue, and only time will tell which type is chosen by Obama. Also, there will be no reach arounds or dick sucking in the warrior class.
Posted by: Fish at June 23, 2010 11:29 AM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Jack Nolsom at June 23, 2010 11:29 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: robtr at June 23, 2010 11:30 AM (fwSHf)
BOTH of which managed to out-act Natalie Portman.
Posted by: Filly at June 23, 2010 11:30 AM (fImvM)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 11:31 AM (U5btG)
Posted by: General Chaos N. Panic at June 23, 2010 11:31 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 03:09 PM (H+LJc)
Patty Hearst was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army, and in general, what in God's name are you talking about?
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at June 23, 2010 11:31 AM (w41GQ)
it was classic Rolling Stone - the reporter took a few quotes from unnamed aides and used them to add to his characterization of McChrystal as a bad mouthed, arrogant SOB with a bad strategy.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 23, 2010 11:31 AM (H+LJc)
"Wasn't there a gay general he could have been replaced with?"
"Those military brass got a message all right!"
"The Repubs better not criticize Petraeus!"
The stoopid hurts.
And now I must denounce myself for going there.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 23, 2010 11:31 AM (UOM48)
So when is the Traitor-in-Chief going to pack it in and admit that his conduct doesn't meet any rational standards for a public servant?
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 23, 2010 11:32 AM (Ulu3i)
Also, I still haven't read the Rolling Stone article (I'm all out of rubber gloves and my welding mask needs to be buffed) but Rush Limbaugh said none of the damning stuff was from McChrystal himself. Wouldn't that be a mitigating factor, or is Obama's ego too big to fail?
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at June 23, 2010 11:32 AM (eNxMU)
"I saw that and want to know WHOSE damned underwater robot this time."
Does TEH EBIL CHENEYBURTON own any underwater robots?
I'm just asking questions, here.
Posted by: D.U. at June 23, 2010 03:18 PM (kC3nL)
I don't know. But James Cameron certainly does.
Posted by: stuiec at June 23, 2010 11:33 AM (W+GYq)
I inherited David Petraeus.
Posted by: Barry the Magnificent at June 23, 2010 11:33 AM (Xsi7M)
Bubba Clinton summed it up for libs everywhere when he once said "I loathe the military".
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 23, 2010 11:34 AM (554T5)
Posted by: ccruse456 at June 23, 2010 11:34 AM (3pv79)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 11:34 AM (U5btG)
Posted by: George Lucas at June 23, 2010 11:34 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 23, 2010 11:34 AM (U5btG)
After what Bamster said to Petraeus over the Surge strategy in Iraq, I'm surprised the General didn't tell the little fella to go f-himself. But I guess Petraeus is concerned about the troops and you know, WINNING the war.
Good to see someone is.
And I read that RS article. I'm pretty sure that any of the mild criticism (and it was mild) that General McC was actually TRUE. And the childish way the ONE Is acting, clearly it is.
Posted by: experience smeperience at June 23, 2010 11:35 AM (S52Sn)
Mal @78 Forget Carter, this is the McGovern presidency that never was.
I don't think so Mal. I read a book by Stephen Amborse, and McGovern at least flew combat missions as a B24 commander in WWII. And did it well. He was a dem, but still the old school dem, as in Zel Miller.
This guy we have now, well, he's about as useful as a chickenwire rubber.
Posted by: Todd Bridges, Survivor. Outwit, outlast and outplay. at June 23, 2010 11:36 AM (qL20/)
"They're all idiotically squealing "ha, that stupid Rethuglican McChrystal Bush remnant deserves to get fired for his disloyalty!" then when informed otherwise, go eerily silent."
Oh yeah? Well...well...Glenn Beck's poem was still stupid! Dogs returning to their vomit? WTF?
Posted by: idiot MFM commentor at June 23, 2010 11:37 AM (kC3nL)
When you imagine that bumbling, incompetent twit and the incompetent weasels in his administration micro-managing our war efforts and diplomacy, you get a rough idea of how stressful it must be for professionals to have that empty suit as their Commander-And-Chief.
Holbrook should have been retired years ago. He is another useless, empty suit.
Posted by: A Thought, Or Two at June 23, 2010 11:37 AM (sYrWB)
LibertyPost >>>>>>>>That Way>>>>>>>>
Thanks for stopping by.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 11:38 AM (ZESU0)
"Also, I still haven't read the Rolling Stone article (I'm all out of rubber gloves and my welding mask needs to be buffed) but Rush Limbaugh said none of the damning stuff was from McChrystal himself. Wouldn't that be a mitigating factor, or is Obama's ego too big to fail?"
Yeah, the quotes by McC were not all that critical of the Bamster. It was the other "unnamed" sources crap. Honestly, I can't figure it out.
Posted by: experience smeperience at June 23, 2010 11:38 AM (S52Sn)
Racist!
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 23, 2010 11:39 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 23, 2010 11:39 AM (Ulu3i)
And did it well. He was a dem, but still the old school dem, as in Zel Miller.
Politely - Fuck You.
Posted by: Zel Miller at June 23, 2010 11:39 AM (CQtwu)
Posted by: Retread at June 23, 2010 11:39 AM (7QeEH)
Posted by: Balrog's momma at June 23, 2010 11:41 AM (kC3nL)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 11:41 AM (ZESU0)
Posted by: Bill Hinikev at June 23, 2010 11:42 AM (SZy+Y)
When you imagine that bumbling, incompetent twit and the incompetent weasels in his administration micro-managing our war efforts and diplomacy
Posted by: A Thought, Or Two at June 23, 2010 03:37 PM (sYrWB)
I don't know what you're complaining about? LBJ did a tremendous job at the White House providing great expertise in target selection for bombing runs into North Vietnam. He also provided the incompetent military will Order of Battle for movement and engagement of Infantry forces in South Vietnam.
Lyndon Baines Johnson, micro-management expert in every subject known to man.
Posted by: Fish at June 23, 2010 11:42 AM (v1gw3)
When is the last time we had a birther screw up its courage enough to post here?
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 11:43 AM (ZESU0)
I'll have to take up the RoE question with a couple of buddies who've been Over There recently. I've seen a hundred different opinions as to who's making or has the authority to make that call. Without the benefit of hard information, I'd WAG it to say that the situation might give Pat enough clout to demand the changes even if they're above his pay-grade - WeeWee and Karzai both need him to be a good soldier on this and he might have some leverage now that he won't have later.
Posted by: societyis2blame at June 23, 2010 11:44 AM (7ZyYf)
@377:"Wasn't there a gay general he could have been replaced with?"
"Those military brass got a message all right!"
"The Repubs better not criticize Petraeus!"
Ah yes, because we certainly can't forget our damn political priorities in the middle of a war!
God, I despise these people. You deserve hazardous duty pay for reading it Jane.
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 11:47 AM (5/yRG)
Feed that birther an' its gwine keep comin' back for more food. Tearin' up momma's azaleas an' the like.
You think you gwine feed that birther every day? Feed it and walk it? Walk it and clean up after it speaks? Get it all 'is reality-shots? Them's expensive, Balrog...all yo' paper-route money will get used up an' you won't have nothin' left for pennywhistles and ValuRite.
I's jus' yo momma, tho, so what do I know...?
Posted by: Balrog's momma at June 23, 2010 11:48 AM (kC3nL)
Posted by: A Thought, Or Two at June 23, 2010 11:48 AM (sYrWB)
The black helicopters have been deployed. Clear the safehouse now if you value your organs. And yes, you will be anally probed to harvest your sweet E. Coli for our alien overlords.
P.S. Dot-Connectors - drop the "if you were a real American, you'd focus on my chosen hobby-horse issue with as much demented fervor as I do" line. It's an obvious tell for paranoid schizophrenia.
Posted by: societyis2blame at June 23, 2010 11:48 AM (7ZyYf)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 03:43 PM (ZESU0)
You know, quite a few of us understand that the Indonesian Imbecile is Constitutionally ineligible, and, at the very least, even for those who don't agree, that serious issue should be adjudicated (which should be a three second affair dismissing it, if you folks are correct) and have court verification of the operational definition of 'natural born citizen' and circumstances of this case via discovery of the actual documentation. To act as if that is some major imposition is kind of odd, to say the least, since it was already supposed to have been done, anyway.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 11:49 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 11:50 AM (5/yRG)
We've been skull fucked!
I'm sure its been mention already but since Oblahblah has personally given him the vote of confidence will he still be considered Gen Betray-us??
Posted by: dananjcon at June 23, 2010 11:52 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 03:43 PM (ZESU0)
You know, quite a few of us understand that the Indonesian Imbecile is Constitutionally ineligible, and, at the very least, even for those who don't agree, that serious issue should be adjudicated (which should be a three second affair dismissing it, if you folks are correct) and have court verification of the operational definition of 'natural born citizen' and circumstances of this case via discovery of the actual documentation. To act as if that is some major imposition is kind of odd, to say the least, since it was already supposed to have been done, anyway.
Posted by: progressoverpeace
Fuck all that. I'm fascinated to learn that according to the court system in the United States, nobody has standing to verify this, despite it being one of the pre-requisites for eligibility. What other parts of the US constituion are now no-go areas?
Again, we roll over on something as basic as this, but I'm supposed to believe the wheezing circus known as the GOP is going to dismantle Obamacare?
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 23, 2010 11:55 AM (R2fpr)
LibertyPost >>>>>>>>That Way>>>>>>>>
Thanks for stopping by.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 03:38 PM (ZESU0)
Don't give a crap about the "British Nationality Act". Only American law is pertinent to this issue. That being said, Barack is NOT a natural born citizen under American law. He is Probably a "Citizen" under the 14th Amendment, but he is NOT a "Natural Born Citizen" because that REQUIRES two American Citizen Parents.
Posted by: Diogenes at June 23, 2010 11:55 AM (eVJ7T)
When is the last time we had a birther screw up its courage enough to post here?
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 23, 2010 03:43 PM (ZESU0)
I do it all the time. You do not want to debate me on this particular subject. I have researched the shit out of it, and i've got citations for American Law going back before there was an America.
Posted by: Diogenes at June 23, 2010 11:59 AM (eVJ7T)
The part about 385's post that set me off is "Patreus doesn't give a shit about the oath he took because..."
I know people who have an issue with at least the "no standing" aspect of the Birther question who I don't taunt about it, but the idea that Pat's oath requires him to go full-throated birther on his CiC when he just handed him responsibility for thousands of lives of men and women he cares about in a war we need to win is fucking absurd and shows how single-issue, mom's basement crankcases shouldn't comment on adult blogs.
Posted by: societyis2blame at June 23, 2010 12:01 PM (7ZyYf)
Posted by: Zombie Ambrose Burnside at June 23, 2010 12:02 PM (y/xMn)
Well Morons, just stop the naval pontification and accept Scottish Law and our society will be better served.
Posted by: Arlen Spinchter D-Mars at June 23, 2010 12:04 PM (v1gw3)
I know nothing about the masseuse claiming I roughed her up during the session to relax my tingling leg.
Posted by: Al Gork, Climate Specialist at June 23, 2010 12:07 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: General Boushelle at June 23, 2010 12:08 PM (ERJIu)
Posted by: societyis2blame at June 23, 2010 04:01 PM (7ZyYf)
Well, I wouldn't say that. It's a view. One would imagine that a General has a more acute sense of the concepts of sovereignty and allegiance than the general public. The whole general staff has already given in, fully, on the eligibility issue. I don't see that as the problem, here (since they've already surrendered on that front) but it's not a big deal.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 12:10 PM (Qp4DT)
Yeah, only after Obie unnecessarily diddled around for the past year and a half. How many senseless casualties did our forces suffer in that space of time?
What a dunce.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at June 23, 2010 12:11 PM (hrmV3)
Posted by: societyis2blame at June 23, 2010 04:01 PM (7ZyYf)
The blame for the loss of life and second guessing and public disunity because of people wondering if the man is truly a legitimate President lies at the feet of the Man who perpetuates the wondering, and could resolve it in an instant.
It is completely inappropriate for people in the Military to WONDER if their commander is really a legitimate commander. It is not inappropriate for those in the Military to DO the wondering, it is inappropriate for the commander to LEAVE them WONDERING.
To the extent he does this, all fallout should fall on him.
Posted by: Diogenes at June 23, 2010 12:12 PM (eVJ7T)
Obama's General gets dumped....and Bush's General has to take his place.
Is this serendipity, irony or shadenfreud. (sp)
Posted by: dananjcon at June 23, 2010 12:12 PM (pr+up)
He still doesn't intend to win it. He will curt and run soon, mark my words.
Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2010 12:13 PM (6taRI)
No, I do not believe Mrs. Petraeus will allow GEN Petraeus to run for President. She was quoted "If he does run, he'll be doing it with his second wife." Plus, a lot of us who have served with the man do not believe he has it in him to abase himself before the electorate.
As for his passing out in front of Congress, he got up, ran nine or miles (he told me "over" when I told him the over/under on miles he ran was
Posted by: SGT Dan at June 23, 2010 12:15 PM (p6OcK)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 23, 2010 12:20 PM (5/yRG)
In any event, McChrystal and Petraeus both knew what they were being asked to do and who and what they were dealing with, back during the afghan troop surge stalling. They both seemed very much at peace with that.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 12:29 PM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Aesop's Fractured Fables at June 23, 2010 12:33 PM (sYrWB)
Posted by: reading Sarah Palin's mind at June 23, 2010 12:43 PM (sYrWB)
I'd say McC was never happy with the situation has demonstrated it by letting fly in the media even before the RS flap (e.g. at the time the troop surge was sought). I'd hazard a guess that Petraeus isn't happy with his CiC but prefers to take the high road rather than trying to play politics with his commanders in a game where he's bound to lose.
All that being said, back to the subject at hand. The idea that Obama's birth certificate isn't OT in this thread doesn't wash, particularly where 385 used it to impugn Patraeus' fidelity to the Constitution. I agree that there should be some mechanism in place to verify the Constitutional requirements, but that's a different debate for a different thread, and has squat to do with Petraeus' fitness for command.
I understand where you're coming from and I'm not laying this at your feet.
Barging into an existing debate with "you guys are off base - you need to focus on my magic-bullet meta-important issue instead" is a classic conspiracy theorist tactic and 385's guilty as charged.
Posted by: societyis2blame at June 23, 2010 12:47 PM (7ZyYf)
Posted by: societyis2blame at June 23, 2010 04:47 PM (7ZyYf)
No worries. The mamma posts were funny - whoever did them. You and I disagree on the assessment of that post, though I admit that it's a bit of a stretch applied to this specific situation, so late as it is, anyway.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 23, 2010 01:02 PM (Qp4DT)
"naval pontification" - are we at sea now?
What other parts of the US constitution are now no-go areas?
The republican form of government clause, the seating and qualifications of members of Congress, the commission of executive officers, impeachment procedures, the President's authority over foreign affairs, particularly the President's powers to abrogate treaties and commit troops, the means of determining an amendment's validity, a handful of other things, these are all off limits to the courts.
Think about it. An unelected body of 9 people cannot take upon itself to oust an elected president of the United States. It's not a standing question, really, it's one of prudence, and the judges in this country get an easy out with standing.
Posted by: shakes at June 23, 2010 02:34 PM (UaxA0)
@20: "There is no one, not one person who can take McChrystal's job other than Petraeus?"
Well, Grofaz Obama has promoted Reichsfuehrer Emmanuel to command of Heeresgruppe Vistula.....
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at June 23, 2010 05:00 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: drfredc at June 23, 2010 05:43 PM (puRnk)
Posted by: Eric at June 23, 2010 05:51 PM (2/Fyp)
Posted by: NotAMolly stands with Israel at June 23, 2010 06:13 PM (ADJFU)
Posted by: Makakilo at June 23, 2010 11:33 PM (bcaTJ)
Posted by: The Iphone of the Distant Future at June 23, 2010 11:36 PM (dUOK+)
We're talking about an imbedded flaming liberal writer from Rolling Stone. Rolling Stone! And McChrystal and his staff didn't have sense enough to realize that the writer was there to do a hit piece that would undermine McChrystal's efforts to win that war??? Their stupidity is mind-boggling. I'm incredulous. That was a more than sufficient reason to fire McChrystal ..., and his staff of blabbermouths, too. What a bunch of bumbling, incompetent, damned fools.
That was just one in a series of their recent outrageous blunders, another of which led to the exposure and murder of upper echelon, secret CIA operatives, as you may recall. I swear, this has become a country of gossipy busybodies.
Posted by: Obama is infecting everybody on the planet with a stupidity virus at June 24, 2010 12:12 AM (sYrWB)
264 Petraeus even jumped onto the "blame Israel" bandwagon with the Indonesian
I don't remember any particular comments he made, so can't opine directly. CENTCOM has responsibility for the Middle East - Israel is in EUCOM. Petraeus deals with Arab leaders on a daily basis, so has to put on the political face to do so. In his position, it's understandable to shortchange the Israelis.
Posted by: Penultimatum at June 24, 2010 02:08 AM (niydV)
No one will disagree that air Jordan high heels make a person look good. They can add a touch of class to a simple outfit like jeans and a tee shirt and turn it from a casual look to an outfit suitable for an evening out. Heels are also the best bet for short and full-length skirts, since they enhance the overall shape of the outfit. They are also integral to a working woman's attire. For example, a pair of air Jordan high heel boots is a great complement to a good quality suit.
Posted by: jordan high heels at December 14, 2010 10:58 PM (WoWvm)
Posted by: diddy-beats at May 04, 2011 12:30 AM (Wv6mS)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.252 seconds, 568 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Intrepid at June 23, 2010 09:23 AM (92zkk)