April 15, 2010
— DrewM About time.
A former senior executive at the National Security Agency was charged Thursday with lying and obstruction of justice in an investigation of leaks of classified information to a newspaper.Federal prosecutors said Thomas Drake, 52, served as a source for many articles about the NSA in an unidentified newspaper, including articles that contained classified information.
A federal indictment filed in Maryland charges that Drake used a non-government e-mail account to transmit classified and unclassified information. Authorities also charge that Drake lied to federal agents about what he'd done.
The indictment does not identify the reporter, the newspaper, or the subject matter of the stories. It says the stories were published between February 2006 and November 2007.
I always found it interesting that liberals assume the intelligence apparatus is a bunch of right wing nut jobs dying to institute some conservative police state. That seems an unlikely goal for people who thought it was 'funny'to leak information designed to hurt George Bush's electoral prospects.
Add to that the absurdly politicized NIE on Iran that no one thought was accurate and was clearly designed to tie the hands of the last administration, you start to wonder where the idea that the intelligence services were Bush's pawns came from.
Hopefully this guy will get a fair trial followed by the long prison sentence he seems to have merited.
More: Mainjustice.com takes a look at the indictment and has interesting information on Drake's relationship with the reporter and a congressional staffer.
Posted by: DrewM at
08:38 AM
| Comments (94)
Post contains 265 words, total size 2 kb.
Why isn't the government pursing the death penalty? Leaking secrets to the enemy during time of war is as textbook an example of treason as one could hope for.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 08:41 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Lee at April 15, 2010 08:42 AM (zF8wD)
Perhaps the Republican's are pussies?
Posted by: Barbarian at April 15, 2010 08:46 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Bosk at April 15, 2010 08:47 AM (pUO5u)
Agents tend to be conservative, desk jockey liberal bureaucrats. So, the left sees the former as evil incarnate and doesn't even consider the latter.
I think a lot of this is legacy from the Cold War. The post-WWII left was anti-communist, and even the liberal bureaucrats of say the Kennedy years were willing to oppose communism abroad.
So, at the time that the modern Left was forming as a anti-anti-communist movement most of the intelligence apparatus, left or right, was busy trying to stop the Soviets. To the modern Left this means they were evil fascists. And, since change is hard, to the modern Left these same individuals are still evil fascists.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 08:47 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 15, 2010 08:49 AM (0sfFH)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 15, 2010 08:49 AM (uKraB)
Posted by: dagny at April 15, 2010 08:50 AM (2gNDi)
Posted by: Leftard Moonbat at April 15, 2010 08:50 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: brak at April 15, 2010 08:50 AM (W5NBA)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 15, 2010 08:52 AM (uKraB)
Posted by: Charles Gibson dribbling in his Depends at April 15, 2010 08:52 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: you liberal coworker at April 15, 2010 08:53 AM (W5NBA)
While you see this discussed on conservative forums, the very obvious pattern of left wing bureaucrats abusing their positions to try and damage the political process should be *the* news story of the last 5 years.
Ironically, this used to be something the left was obsessed with. In the 60s and 70s the entertainment media was chock full of dark conspiracies by the government employees to bring down public figures they disagreed with. Yet now that we are living with this, there is pretty much nothing in either the entertainment or news media.
Wouldn't the Joe the Plumber story make for an interesting investigative report? How about IG Walpin? How the 07 NIE was created out of whole cloth?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 08:54 AM (7BU4a)
Perhaps the Republican's are pussies?
Posted by: Barbarian at April 15, 2010 12:46 PM (EL+OC)
To prove espionage you need demonstrate that the perpetrator:
1) Passed sensitive information (note, this does not necessarily mean classified information- do a search on "Albert Sombolay" for some interesting reading on that)
2) Passed it to a foreign power.
3) Passed it with the intent of either aiding the foreign power or harming the United States.
It's hard to prove intent, plus in this case the scumbag just passed the stuff to a reporter, not a foreign power.
So he won't be charged with espionage, probably the most they can get him on is mishandling classified information (see Wen Ho Lee). And you can bet he knows it.
That said the scumbag should spend the rest of his life in a six-by-eight foot cell with a 300lb rapist named "Maurice".
Posted by: Nighthawk at April 15, 2010 08:54 AM (OtQXp)
Looky what we have here morons back in 2006. Our old friend Sidney Blumenthal.
Will keep searching.
Posted by: David in San Diego at April 15, 2010 08:54 AM (/U/Mr)
He hasn't been charged with the actual leak, just the cover-up.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 08:55 AM (mR7mk)
14 Why no mention of the newspaper involved?
Heh! Heh! looking at Google, the newspaper was "unnamed" and "unidentified." Kind of like party affiliation whenever a Dem does anything criminal. Strange, but when Republicans do anything unethical or illegal, the party affiliation is always front and center. Curious, huh?
Posted by: Charles Gibson dribbling in his Depends at April 15, 2010 08:55 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 15, 2010 12:49 PM (0sfFH)
Guilty as sin, free as a bird. I really taught little Barry a few things, didn't I?
Posted by: William Ayers at April 15, 2010 08:55 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 15, 2010 08:55 AM (H6Jyg)
The CIA should be a pack of hotdogging scoundrels who live to fuck America's enemies over in the most devious ways possible. Instead we have a building full of bureaucrats who shuffle paper around the Beltway and leak secrets to their newspaper buddies. 99% of the CIA never leaves Langley. That's a big fucking problem.
Posted by: Britt at April 15, 2010 08:56 AM (VN7Wi)
He hasn't been charged with the actual leak, just the cover-up.
What is he belonged to and donated to the correct political party, Alex?
Posted by: runningrn at April 15, 2010 08:57 AM (CfmlF)
Not necessarily. In the PP case (contrary to popular belief) the ruling was that the gov could not impose prior censure ship without a court order that showed imminent harm to the country.
But they left the door open to prosecution of the reporter and the Newspaper if, AFTER the fact, the government could show that the government or its agents had been harmed.
Most of the time the government is unwilling to do that because the case drags on for years and the outcome in the liberal courts is always more secrets being exposed.
The irony from the PP case is that if they so chose the government could show that means and methods were exposed by that leak and agents of the U.S. were actually killed. But by then, Nixon had so poisoned the well that nobody has been willing to drink from it.
Note that the PP case did NOT shield agents responsible for the leaks from prosecution regardless of outcome.
Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 08:57 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 15, 2010 08:59 AM (V5s1P)
So he won't be charged with espionage,
probably the most they can get him on is mishandling classified
information (see Wen Ho Lee). And you can bet he knows it.
Posted by: Nighthawk at April 15, 2010 12:54 PM (OtQXp)
For point two, he passed it on to the reporter fully knowing the reporter would report it to among others, our enemies. It doesn't seem legally much different from giving intelligence to any other third party knowing who they will give it to.
For intent...well, if you can't convince a jury that someone gave intelligence secrets to the enemy in part to harm American domestic security, you probably shouldn't be a prosecutor. Heck, get him on the stand and ask him if he was trying to get the program shut down.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 09:00 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Mal at April 15, 2010 09:03 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: Sandy Berger, stuffing documents down his pants at April 15, 2010 09:04 AM (rOd1g)
Posted by: Terry at April 15, 2010 09:04 AM (Vui52)
Posted by: Mr. Barky at April 15, 2010 09:05 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 15, 2010 09:06 AM (ujg0T)
For point two, he passed it on to
the reporter fully knowing the reporter would report it to among
others, our enemies. It doesn't seem legally much different from giving
intelligence to any other third party knowing who they will give it to.
For
intent...well, if you can't convince a jury that someone gave
intelligence secrets to the enemy in part to harm American domestic
security, you probably shouldn't be a prosecutor. Heck, get him on the
stand and ask him if he was trying to get the program shut down.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 01:00 PM (7BU4a)
For all the sense you make above the history of espionage cases is, unfortunately, against you. The standards of proof are very high and most prosecutors settle for the maximum penalty on lesser charges rather than risk exposing sensitive sources and methods in open court in order to meet those standards.
Posted by: Nighthawk at April 15, 2010 09:06 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 15, 2010 09:08 AM (plsiE)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 15, 2010 09:10 AM (I1/U/)
Alas, al Qaeda buys their copy of the Times at newsstands with cash, instead of taking home delivery.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 09:11 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Optimizer at April 15, 2010 09:14 AM (odEHq)
Mainjustice.com takes a look at the indictment and has interesting information on Drake's relationship with the reporter and a congressional staffer.
Anyone seen JackM today?
Posted by: EC at April 15, 2010 09:16 AM (mAhn3)
"The indictment does not identify the reporter, the newspaper the New York Times, or the subject matter of the stories."
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2010 09:18 AM (fLHQe)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at April 15, 2010 09:19 AM (xGIqT)
Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409 and reported donating $329,100 to 40 different charities, not counting the Nobel Prize money obviously.
Bidens reported an adjusted gross income of $333,182 and contributed $4,820 to charity, in both monetary and in-kind donations (shades of Bill Clinton writing off his used underpants...)
Roughly 6% and 1.5%, respectively, if you want to figure out how you measured up.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 09:19 AM (mR7mk)
Isn't it "ironic" that the NYT was the home of Walter Duranty and was also the paper of record for the infamous PP case.
They sort of have a history don't they?
Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 09:20 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 09:20 AM (qrFCz)
FL-GOP (Quinnipiac): Rubio 56, Crist 33
PA (Susquehanna): Toomey 48, Specter 38
NC-Dem (PPP): Burr 43, Marshall 37
CA (Rasmussen): Boxer 42, Fiorina 38
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 15, 2010 09:22 AM (7VvJB)
Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409 and reported donating $329,100 to 40 different charities, not counting the Nobel Prize money obviously.
...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 01:19 PM (mR7mk)
I'm guessing that at least $329,000 of that total went to activist "charities" like the Sierra Club, ACORN, Planned Parenthood, and that lunatic racist Jeremiah Wright's "church".
I doubt if any of it went towards anything charitable.
Posted by: Nighthawk at April 15, 2010 09:23 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2010 09:23 AM (RD7QR)
OT
FL-GOP (Quinnipiac): Rubio 56, Crist 33
PA (Susquehanna): Toomey 48, Specter 38
NC-Dem (PPP): Burr 43, Marshall 37
CA (Rasmussen): Boxer 42, Fiorina 38
yea, but there is a new poll that says crist could beat rubio and meek as an independent
personally i think he will run as an independent, lose and then be given a job at the RNC or one of the Republican campaign groups.
Posted by: Ben at April 15, 2010 09:24 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 15, 2010 09:25 AM (bq6v1)
Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409 and reported donating $329,100 to 40 different charities, not counting the Nobel Prize money obviously.
i thought the president wasn't allowed to make money while in office other than his paycheck? or is it that the president can't use his office to make money. I forget
Posted by: Ben at April 15, 2010 09:25 AM (wuv1c)
Press release says biggest donations were to CARE, whatever the hell that is, and United Can-We-Still-Say-This-Word? College Fund.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 09:25 AM (mR7mk)
Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409
Hey!! Look over there...some CEO made 3 million bucks last year. OUTRAGEOUS!!!!
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 15, 2010 09:25 AM (B+qrE)
Sponge Bob could beat Meek, so that's not surprising.
Meek's biggest problem is that he's not too bright and exceptionally corrupt...just like his mother was.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 15, 2010 09:27 AM (bq6v1)
Some guy and his wife who got caught selling a half million bucks worth of F-14 parts to Iran a few years ago got about 3 years. This crapweasle will probably only get a year if that. Treason just doesn't capture the DOJ's interest like it used to.
Can somebody tell me the last time be tried someone for treason or sedition and gave them the death penalty? I feel like we don't do it anymore. I can think of the Rosenbergs, but that is about it.
The last time we gave someone the death penalty and then executed him immediately was Timothy McVeigh. Does anyone else find it a bit macbre that we tried and killed McVeight in under 5 years, yet we haven't done the same to any islamic terrorists?
Posted by: Ben at April 15, 2010 09:28 AM (wuv1c)
Their investments are supposed to go into a (ha, ha, ha) "blind trust".
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 15, 2010 09:29 AM (bq6v1)
You are probably right. Sean Penn is playing shitbag Joe Wilson (aka Mr. Valerie Plame) in the adaptation of that scrunt's book Fair Game.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at April 15, 2010 01:19 PM (xGIqT)
Is that going to be titled "hollywood's next big flop?" Cause let's face it, that's exactly what it will be.
Posted by: buzzion at April 15, 2010 09:29 AM (oVQFe)
probably all of it went to Muslim charities.
Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 09:30 AM (QrA9E)
Its been my opinion for a while that McVeigh was "fast tracked" to shut him up so he wouldn't be able to start talking about certain inconvenient things at a later date.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 15, 2010 09:31 AM (bq6v1)
Posted by: Cave Bear at April 15, 2010 09:33 AM (uMihF)
Does anyone else find it a bit macbre that we tried and killed McVeight in under 5 years
Its been my opinion for a while that McVeigh was "fast tracked" to shut him up so he wouldn't be able to start talking about certain inconvenient things at a later date.
Yeah, that's always been my theory as well and i am not one for conspiracies. It was just so crazy that he was tried and killed so quickly. I've always been meaning to read a book called "The Third Terrorist" which was by some lady who implied there were infact middle eastern connections, or at the very least that is wasn't McNichols and McVeigh alone who commited the act.
Posted by: Ben at April 15, 2010 09:34 AM (wuv1c)
Like John Nolte says, they're really not in it to make a profit.
Posted by: Mal at April 15, 2010 09:35 AM (Z+qzA)
"Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409..."
I wonder if Baucus included Obama in that group of people who make just too darn much money.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2010 09:35 AM (fLHQe)
From PPP
Our monthly look ahead to the 2012 Presidential race finds Barack Obama more or less tied with all four of the leading candidates for the Republican nomination. He trails Mike Huckabee 47-45 and Mitt Romney 45-44, ties Newt Gingrich at 45-45, and leads Sarah Palin 47-45. This is the weakest performance Obama's posted in these 13 monthly surveys and a pretty clear indication that passing health care has not done anything to enhance his political standing, at least in the short term.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 15, 2010 09:36 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2010 09:41 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: jean at April 15, 2010 09:47 AM (7K04W)
I hope this guy rots. The Newspaper in question *cough* NYT *cough* should also be prosecuted for knowingly publishing NS information.
Posted by: MelodicMetal at April 15, 2010 09:48 AM (x4S2a)
He didn't demand exactly but he dropped ALL of his appeals. The only delay that occurred in the trial was when the FBI released thousands of pp of evidence that had been withheld during discovery. They delayed the execution for 6 months.
If that had been the average "free mumia" minority it would have drug on for another ten years.
I don't think it was a great conspiracy, I think it was someone the ACLU and the left in general didn't give a shit about so they didn't lift a finger.
It shows how much faster the process would work if we could stifle all the leftist lawyers.
Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 09:49 AM (QrA9E)
Looky what we have here morons back in 2006. Our old friend Sidney Blumenthal.
Will keep searching.
Posted by: David in San Diego at April 15, 2010 12:54 PM (/U/Mr)
Miss me yet?
Posted by: W at April 15, 2010 09:53 AM (as47X)
That website that you link to is a CESSPOOL of leftards. Just look at one of their more tame posts:
"it's time to drag the war criminals into the streets and strip-hang them by their ankles mussolini style. then go into the great parasite congress and drag out arlan 'the child molester' spector, lindsey 'the ghoul' graham, bill 'the cockroach' frist, tom 'the vichy french fry' delay and the rest of the repulsive repugnant-ican fascists, then drag them into the streets where they can be drawn and quartered. afterwards we will have singing and dancing in the streets. the rest of the repug criminals and their jack-ass enablers we can burn at the stake. an alternative would be to have paris turn over the guillotine used to behead louis XVI. Robespierre will luv us for it."
LEFTARDED
Posted by: MelodicMetal at April 15, 2010 10:05 AM (x4S2a)
Posted by: er at April 15, 2010 10:12 AM (dtJc/)
I danced at her wedding.
Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 10:26 AM (qrFCz)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 15, 2010 10:31 AM (N49h9)
you start to wonder where the idea that the intelligence services were Bush's pawns came from.
Usually, I hear crap like this from a guy who caught the tail end of a story on NPR or from a lady who skims the headlines in The New York Times or from some middle-aged punk who thinks that Jon Stewart is a credible journalist or from some neighborhood douchebag commie who got the notion from some famous douchbag commie. These are the same people, by the way, who faked their way through the 1984 unit in tenth-grade English and throw around words like Orwellian while being mistakenly certain as to what they mean.
Posted by: FireHorse at April 15, 2010 10:34 AM (cQyWA)
You know, waste, fraud, incompetence?
Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 10:38 AM (qrFCz)
Posted by: FireHorse at April 15, 2010 02:34 PM (cQyWA)
Why bother reading the book when they are actual, living examples of it?
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 15, 2010 10:42 AM (N49h9)
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at April 15, 2010 10:44 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Zombie Richard Nixon at April 15, 2010 10:48 AM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 15, 2010 10:48 AM (w41GQ)
Pentagon Papers.
Daniel Ellsberg, and his psychiatrist's office.
Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 10:49 AM (qrFCz)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 15, 2010 01:06 PM (ujg0T)
And if Bambi & Co. did form such a committee, it would be chaired by Waxman and tasked with investigating the Tea Parties and the like...not the real un-Americans. Because then they'd have to investigate themselves. So yeah, scratch that.
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at April 15, 2010 10:51 AM (pLTLS)
As said above, The Pentagon Papers Case. That is the landmark case for the NYT revealing classified info.
Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 10:54 AM (QrA9E)
Note what she writes, and what she writes about. Note the lack of stuff you feel she should be strung up from the nearest lamppost over, and then reassess Drake's "leaks."
He was a whistle-blower.
Link to WSJ articles is here: http://online.wsj.com/search/search_center
And I haven't the faintest how to use tiny url, so just enter "Siobhan Gorman"
Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 11:05 AM (qrFCz)
Posted by: Glen at April 15, 2010 11:12 AM (BSbOk)
Just your daily dose of retarded idiocy from the Indonesian Imbecile in his pathetic talk to NASA. And those NASA nuts ought to live their lives in shame for clapping for this pathetic POS and humoring his stupidity.
On a bright note, the Indonesian Imbecile managed to properly pronounce "Orion" this time. Yay! He's a genius!
Okay. Carry on with talk of what this NSA traitor should have done to him (and the newspaper's staff and reporters).
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 15, 2010 11:14 AM (N49h9)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2109 seconds, 222 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: real joe at April 15, 2010 08:39 AM (IpIBJ)