April 15, 2010

Former NSA Employee Charged With Leaking To Newspaper
— DrewM

About time.

A former senior executive at the National Security Agency was charged Thursday with lying and obstruction of justice in an investigation of leaks of classified information to a newspaper.

Federal prosecutors said Thomas Drake, 52, served as a source for many articles about the NSA in an unidentified newspaper, including articles that contained classified information.

A federal indictment filed in Maryland charges that Drake used a non-government e-mail account to transmit classified and unclassified information. Authorities also charge that Drake lied to federal agents about what he'd done.

The indictment does not identify the reporter, the newspaper, or the subject matter of the stories. It says the stories were published between February 2006 and November 2007.

I always found it interesting that liberals assume the intelligence apparatus is a bunch of right wing nut jobs dying to institute some conservative police state. That seems an unlikely goal for people who thought it was 'funny'to leak information designed to hurt George Bush's electoral prospects.

Add to that the absurdly politicized NIE on Iran that no one thought was accurate and was clearly designed to tie the hands of the last administration, you start to wonder where the idea that the intelligence services were Bush's pawns came from.

Hopefully this guy will get a fair trial followed by the long prison sentence he seems to have merited.

More: Mainjustice.com takes a look at the indictment and has interesting information on Drake's relationship with the reporter and a congressional staffer.

Posted by: DrewM at 08:38 AM | Comments (94)
Post contains 265 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Hate the Drake.

Posted by: real joe at April 15, 2010 08:39 AM (IpIBJ)

2 Hopefully this guy will get a fair trial followed by the long prison sentence he seems to have merited.

Why isn't the government pursing the death penalty? Leaking secrets to the enemy during time of war is as textbook an example of treason as one could hope for.

Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 08:41 AM (7BU4a)

3 It is my understanding that the State Department is chock full of leftists.


Posted by: Lee at April 15, 2010 08:42 AM (zF8wD)

4 What's a concessional staffer?

Posted by: David in San Diego at April 15, 2010 08:45 AM (/U/Mr)

5 Why isn't the government pursing the death penalty? Leaking secrets to the enemy during time of war is as textbook an example of treason as one could hope for.

Perhaps the Republican's are pussies?

Posted by: Barbarian at April 15, 2010 08:46 AM (EL+OC)

6

5 david

someone who works in the snack bar

Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 15, 2010 08:46 AM (OqTsN)

7 When Bush was President these guys were heroes. With obama they're enemies of the state.

Posted by: Bosk at April 15, 2010 08:47 AM (pUO5u)

8 I always found it interesting that liberals assume the intelligence apparatus is a bunch of right wing nut jobs dying to institute some conservative police state


Agents tend to be conservative, desk jockey liberal bureaucrats. So, the left sees the former as evil incarnate and doesn't even consider the latter.

I think a lot of this is legacy from the Cold War. The post-WWII left was anti-communist, and even the liberal bureaucrats of say the Kennedy years were willing to oppose communism abroad.

So, at the time that the modern Left was forming as a anti-anti-communist movement most of the intelligence apparatus, left or right, was busy trying to stop the Soviets. To the modern Left this means they were evil fascists. And, since change is hard, to the modern Left these same individuals are still evil fascists.

Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 08:47 AM (7BU4a)

9 So the newspapaer and the reporter get off Scott-free?

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 15, 2010 08:49 AM (0sfFH)

10 Why isn't the government pursing the death penalty? Leaking secrets to the enemy during time of war is as textbook an example of treason as one could hope for. Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 12:41 PM (7BU4a) ----------------------------- The death penalty is reserved for the person that leaks Obama's SAT scores and medical records.

Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 15, 2010 08:49 AM (uKraB)

11 DOJ is lefty central too. So this guy leaked secrets for no money? Idiot and traitor.

Posted by: dagny at April 15, 2010 08:50 AM (2gNDi)

12 If Mr. Drake is convicted, this will be a grave miscarriage of justice, and a dark, dark day in America.  Mr. Drake is a patriot and a righteous whistle blower who was trying to sound the clarion call against the vile, corrupt Bushitler/Cheney regime.  He is a hero as he exposed their malfeasance, criminality, and collusion with Halliburton.  Mr. Drake was only doing his duty to protect America from its enemies within.  We need to focus on keeping America safe, therefore, Patrick Fitzgerald needs to reopen his investigation into the Valerie Plame leak.  Rove, Bush and Cheney need to be frogmarched in handcuffs before the American people, and their asses must be thrown in prison.  Only then can we have peace and justice in America.

Posted by: Leftard Moonbat at April 15, 2010 08:50 AM (CfmlF)

13 Why no mention of the newspaper involved?

Posted by: Mal at April 15, 2010 08:50 AM (Z+qzA)

14 "Close relationship" = bedtime stories.  And he probably thought he was some kind of hero.  Enjoy prison, bud.

Posted by: brak at April 15, 2010 08:50 AM (W5NBA)

15 Into the wood chipper with him.

Posted by: rickinstl at April 15, 2010 08:51 AM (0AEWQ)

16 Prediction: Sean Penn plays Drake in the movie.

Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 15, 2010 08:52 AM (uKraB)

17 Leaking?  Never heard of it!  Sounds like something better left to the bloggers and cable news.

Posted by: Charles Gibson dribbling in his Depends at April 15, 2010 08:52 AM (CfmlF)

18

All leaks are bad.

Some leaks are better than others.

Posted by: IE COn at April 15, 2010 08:53 AM (/COcn)

19 Just another truth-to-power speaking victim of Bush's police-state Amerikkka.  Oh, wait...

Posted by: you liberal coworker at April 15, 2010 08:53 AM (W5NBA)

20 Oh, and perhaps this should be considered as part of the left wing bureaucracy's revolt against representative government.

While you see this discussed on conservative forums, the very obvious pattern of left wing bureaucrats abusing their positions to try and damage the political process should be *the* news story of the last 5 years.

Ironically, this used to be something the left was obsessed with. In the 60s and 70s the entertainment media was chock full of dark conspiracies by the government employees to bring down public figures they disagreed with.  Yet now that we are living with this, there is pretty much nothing in either the entertainment or news media.

Wouldn't the Joe the Plumber story make for an interesting investigative report? How about IG Walpin? How the 07 NIE was created out of whole cloth?

Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 08:54 AM (7BU4a)

21 6 Why isn't the government pursing the death penalty? Leaking secrets to the enemy during time of war is as textbook an example of treason as one could hope for.

Perhaps the Republican's are pussies?

Posted by: Barbarian at April 15, 2010 12:46 PM (EL+OC)

To prove espionage you need demonstrate that the perpetrator:

1) Passed sensitive information (note, this does not necessarily mean classified information- do a search on "Albert Sombolay" for some interesting reading on that)

2) Passed it to a foreign power.

3) Passed it with the intent of either aiding the foreign power or harming the United States.

It's hard to prove intent, plus in this case the scumbag just passed the stuff to a reporter, not a foreign power.

So he won't be charged with espionage, probably the most they can get him on is mishandling classified information (see Wen Ho Lee).  And you can bet he knows it.

That said the scumbag should spend the rest of his life in a six-by-eight foot cell with a 300lb rapist named "Maurice".

Posted by: Nighthawk at April 15, 2010 08:54 AM (OtQXp)

22 The indictment mentions that the reporter did stories in 2006 & 2007 involving SIGINT,

Looky what we have here morons back in 2006.  Our old friend Sidney Blumenthal.

Will keep searching.

Posted by: David in San Diego at April 15, 2010 08:54 AM (/U/Mr)

23 Why isn't the government pursing the death penalty?

He hasn't been charged with the actual leak, just the cover-up. 

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 08:55 AM (mR7mk)

24

14 Why no mention of the newspaper involved?

 

 

 

Heh!  Heh!  looking at Google, the newspaper was "unnamed" and "unidentified."  Kind of like party affiliation whenever a Dem does anything criminal.  Strange, but when Republicans do anything unethical or illegal, the party affiliation is always front and center.  Curious, huh?


Posted by: Charles Gibson dribbling in his Depends at April 15, 2010 08:55 AM (CfmlF)

25 So the newspapaer and the reporter get off Scott-free?

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 15, 2010 12:49 PM (0sfFH)

Guilty as sin, free as a bird. I really taught little Barry a few things, didn't I?

Posted by: William Ayers at April 15, 2010 08:55 AM (7BU4a)

26 All the classified information that's fit to print.  In an unidentified newspaper.

Posted by: SlaveDog at April 15, 2010 08:55 AM (H6Jyg)

27 Doh!  left sock on!

Posted by: runningrn at April 15, 2010 08:56 AM (CfmlF)

28 I don't know much about the NSA, but the CIA recruits heavily on college campuses, especially Ivy League ones. They don't hire streetwise cops, or badass ex SF guys, or con men who know how to trick people into giving up the goods. They hire Hahvahd men who belong to the right social circles.

The CIA should be a pack of hotdogging scoundrels who live to fuck America's enemies over in the most devious ways possible. Instead we have a building full of bureaucrats who shuffle paper around the Beltway and leak secrets to their newspaper buddies. 99% of the CIA never leaves Langley. That's a big fucking problem.

Posted by: Britt at April 15, 2010 08:56 AM (VN7Wi)

29 24 Why isn't the government pursing the death penalty?

He hasn't been charged with the actual leak, just the cover-up. 

 

 

What is he belonged to and donated to the correct political party, Alex?


Posted by: runningrn at April 15, 2010 08:57 AM (CfmlF)

30 So the newspapaer and the reporter get off Scott-free?

Not necessarily. In the PP case (contrary to popular belief) the ruling was that the gov could not impose prior censure ship without a court order that showed imminent harm to the country.

But they left the door open to prosecution of the reporter and the Newspaper if, AFTER the fact, the government could show that the government or its agents had been harmed.

Most of the time the government is unwilling to do that because the case drags on for years and the outcome in the liberal courts is always more secrets being exposed.

The irony from the PP case is that if they so chose the government could show that means and methods were exposed by that leak and agents of the U.S. were actually killed. But by then, Nixon had so poisoned the well that nobody has been willing to drink from it.

Note that the PP case did NOT shield agents responsible for the leaks from prosecution regardless of outcome.

Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 08:57 AM (QrA9E)

31 Sidney Blumenthal's full story in Salon.

Posted by: David in San Diego at April 15, 2010 08:57 AM (/U/Mr)

32 The line between genius and madness is never so blurred as it is at NSA

Posted by: Captain Hate at April 15, 2010 08:59 AM (V5s1P)

33 It's hard to prove intent, plus in this case the scumbag just passed the stuff to a reporter, not a foreign power.

So he won't be charged with espionage, probably the most they can get him on is mishandling classified information (see Wen Ho Lee).  And you can bet he knows it.

Posted by: Nighthawk at April 15, 2010 12:54 PM (OtQXp)

For point two, he passed it on to the reporter fully knowing the reporter would report it to among others, our enemies. It doesn't seem legally much different from giving intelligence to any other third party knowing who they will give it to.

For intent...well, if you can't convince a jury that someone gave intelligence secrets to the enemy in part to harm American domestic  security, you probably shouldn't be a prosecutor. Heck, get him on the stand and ask him if he was trying to get the program shut down.



Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 09:00 AM (7BU4a)

34 All I know is Scooter Libby better keep his mouth shut.

Posted by: Mal at April 15, 2010 09:03 AM (Z+qzA)

35 We're still cool, though, right?

Posted by: Sandy Berger, stuffing documents down his pants at April 15, 2010 09:04 AM (rOd1g)

36 A "newspaper?"  Seriously, we all know which newspaper don't we?

Posted by: Terry at April 15, 2010 09:04 AM (Vui52)

37 OT: anybody got a working link to a Wash DC webcam. The Dept of Int digital cam is undergoing "maintenance" today. At other alternate sites, the image is unavailable. Sure its simply a coincidence.

Posted by: Mr. Barky at April 15, 2010 09:05 AM (qwK3S)

38 Tailgunner Joe, despite his alcoholism, was basically right. In a sane world, we would be having a revived Un-American Activities Committee on this. Of course, with the Obamunists running it, maybe scratch that...

Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 15, 2010 09:06 AM (ujg0T)

39

For point two, he passed it on to the reporter fully knowing the reporter would report it to among others, our enemies. It doesn't seem legally much different from giving intelligence to any other third party knowing who they will give it to.

For intent...well, if you can't convince a jury that someone gave intelligence secrets to the enemy in part to harm American domestic  security, you probably shouldn't be a prosecutor. Heck, get him on the stand and ask him if he was trying to get the program shut down.

Posted by: 18-1 at April 15, 2010 01:00 PM (7BU4a)

For all the sense you make above the history of espionage cases is, unfortunately, against you.  The standards of proof are very high and most prosecutors settle for the maximum penalty on lesser charges rather than risk exposing sensitive sources and methods in open court in order to meet those standards.

Posted by: Nighthawk at April 15, 2010 09:06 AM (OtQXp)

40 Drake appointed to an Obama cabinet position in 3...2...

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 15, 2010 09:08 AM (plsiE)

41 He probably leaked information that was beneficial to the Bush administration and, therefore, had to be punished.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 15, 2010 09:10 AM (I1/U/)

42 For point two, he passed it on to the reporter fully knowing the reporter would report it to among others, our enemies.

Alas, al Qaeda buys their copy of the Times at newsstands with cash, instead of taking home delivery.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 09:11 AM (mR7mk)

43 You left out Valerie Plame's antics, from your list of CIA left-wing activism.

Posted by: Optimizer at April 15, 2010 09:14 AM (odEHq)

44

Mainjustice.com takes a look at the indictment and has interesting information on Drake's relationship with the reporter and a congressional staffer.

 

Anyone seen JackM today?

Posted by: EC at April 15, 2010 09:16 AM (mAhn3)

45

"The indictment does not identify the reporter, the newspaper the New York Times, or the subject matter of the stories."

 

 

Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2010 09:18 AM (fLHQe)

46 Prediction: Sean Penn plays Drake in the movie. You are probably right. Sean Penn is playing shitbag Joe Wilson (aka Mr. Valerie Plame) in the adaptation of that scrunt's book Fair Game.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at April 15, 2010 09:19 AM (xGIqT)

47 ...OT:

Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409 and reported donating $329,100 to 40 different charities, not counting the Nobel Prize money obviously.

Bidens reported an adjusted gross income of $333,182 and contributed $4,820 to charity, in both monetary and in-kind donations (shades of Bill Clinton writing off his used underpants...)

Roughly 6% and 1.5%, respectively, if you want to figure out how you measured up.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 09:19 AM (mR7mk)

48 "The indictment does not identify the reporter, the newspaper the New York Times, or the subject matter of the stories."

Isn't it "ironic" that the NYT was the home of Walter Duranty and was also the paper of record for the infamous PP case.

They sort of have a history don't they?

Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 09:20 AM (QrA9E)

49 I'm going to laugh if it turns out to be the stories about NSA's electrical power issues.

Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 09:20 AM (qrFCz)

50 OT
FL-GOP (Quinnipiac): Rubio 56, Crist 33
PA (Susquehanna): Toomey 48, Specter 38
NC-Dem (PPP): Burr 43, Marshall 37
CA (Rasmussen): Boxer 42, Fiorina 38

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 15, 2010 09:22 AM (7VvJB)

51
Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409 and reported donating $329,100 to 40 different charities, not counting the Nobel Prize money obviously.

...

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 01:19 PM (mR7mk)

I'm guessing that at least $329,000 of that total went to activist "charities" like the Sierra Club, ACORN, Planned Parenthood, and that lunatic racist Jeremiah Wright's "church".

I doubt if any of it went towards anything charitable.

Posted by: Nighthawk at April 15, 2010 09:23 AM (OtQXp)

52 Guess on congressional staffer: Just about any DemonRat. Probably somebody on Pat Leahy's staff. Guess on journalist: Anybody at NYT. Dana whatsername at WAPO -- not Milbank, the scrunt with the first name of Dana. And, of course, Sid "never let the facts get in the way of a good story" Blumenthal.

Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2010 09:23 AM (RD7QR)

53

OT
FL-GOP (Quinnipiac): Rubio 56, Crist 33
PA (Susquehanna): Toomey 48, Specter 38
NC-Dem (PPP): Burr 43, Marshall 37
CA (Rasmussen): Boxer 42, Fiorina 38

yea, but there is a new poll that says crist could beat rubio and meek as an independent

personally i think he will run as an independent, lose and then be given a job at the RNC or one of the Republican campaign groups.

Posted by: Ben at April 15, 2010 09:24 AM (wuv1c)

54 Some guy and his wife who got caught selling a half million bucks worth of F-14 parts to Iran a few years ago got about 3 years.  This crapweasle will probably only get a year if that.  Treason just doesn't capture the DOJ's interest like it used to.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 15, 2010 09:25 AM (bq6v1)

55

Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409 and reported donating $329,100 to 40 different charities, not counting the Nobel Prize money obviously.

i thought the president wasn't allowed to make money while in office other than his paycheck? or is it that the president can't use his office to make money. I forget

Posted by: Ben at April 15, 2010 09:25 AM (wuv1c)

56 I doubt if any of it went towards anything charitable.

Press release says biggest donations were to CARE, whatever the hell that is, and United Can-We-Still-Say-This-Word? College Fund.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 15, 2010 09:25 AM (mR7mk)

57

Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409

Hey!! Look over there...some CEO made 3 million bucks last year.  OUTRAGEOUS!!!!

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 15, 2010 09:25 AM (B+qrE)

58 yea, but there is a new poll that says crist could beat rubio and meek as an independent

Sponge Bob could beat Meek, so that's not surprising. 

Meek's biggest problem is that he's not too bright and exceptionally corrupt...just like his mother was.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 15, 2010 09:27 AM (bq6v1)

59

 Some guy and his wife who got caught selling a half million bucks worth of F-14 parts to Iran a few years ago got about 3 years.  This crapweasle will probably only get a year if that.  Treason just doesn't capture the DOJ's interest like it used to.

Can somebody tell me the last time be tried someone for treason or sedition and gave them the death penalty? I feel like we don't do it anymore. I can think of the Rosenbergs, but that is about it.

The last time we gave someone the death penalty and then executed him immediately was Timothy McVeigh. Does anyone else find it a bit macbre that we tried and killed McVeight in under 5 years, yet we haven't done the same to any islamic terrorists?

Posted by: Ben at April 15, 2010 09:28 AM (wuv1c)

60 i thought the president wasn't allowed to make money while in office other than his paycheck?

Their investments are supposed to go into a (ha, ha, ha) "blind trust". 

Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 15, 2010 09:29 AM (bq6v1)

61 Barky: Must be a conspiracy!!!

Posted by: The Retard at April 15, 2010 09:29 AM (eKgqT)

62

You are probably right. Sean Penn is playing shitbag Joe Wilson (aka Mr. Valerie Plame) in the adaptation of that scrunt's book Fair Game.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at April 15, 2010 01:19 PM (xGIqT)

Is that going to be titled "hollywood's next big flop?"  Cause let's face it, that's exactly what it will be.

Posted by: buzzion at April 15, 2010 09:29 AM (oVQFe)

63 I'm guessing that at least $329,000 of that total went to activist "charities" like the Sierra Club, ACORN, Planned Parenthood, and that lunatic racist Jeremiah Wright's "church".

probably all of it went to Muslim charities.

Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 09:30 AM (QrA9E)

64 Does anyone else find it a bit macbre that we tried and killed McVeight in under 5 years

Its been my opinion for a while that McVeigh was "fast tracked" to shut him up so he wouldn't be able to start talking about certain inconvenient things at a later date.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 15, 2010 09:31 AM (bq6v1)

65 Would not surprise me in the least if that cockholster Blumenthal is mixed up in this.  Just reading the excerpt from his screed, I've never seen so much overblown leftie conspiracy theory horseshit in my life.

Posted by: Cave Bear at April 15, 2010 09:33 AM (uMihF)

66

Does anyone else find it a bit macbre that we tried and killed McVeight in under 5 years

Its been my opinion for a while that McVeigh was "fast tracked" to shut him up so he wouldn't be able to start talking about certain inconvenient things at a later date.

Yeah, that's always been my theory as well and i am not one for conspiracies. It was just so crazy that he was tried and killed so quickly. I've always been meaning to read a book called "The Third Terrorist" which was by some lady who implied there were infact middle eastern connections, or at the very least that is wasn't McNichols and McVeigh alone who commited the act.

Posted by: Ben at April 15, 2010 09:34 AM (wuv1c)

67 Is that going to be titled "hollywood's next big flop?"  Cause let's face it, that's exactly what it will be.

Like John Nolte says, they're really not in it to make a profit.

Posted by: Mal at April 15, 2010 09:35 AM (Z+qzA)

68

"Obamas reported an adjusted gross income of $5,505,409..."

 

I wonder if Baucus included Obama in that group of people who make just too darn much money.

Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 15, 2010 09:35 AM (fLHQe)

69 More OT poll dancing, only interesting in the fact that maybe America is finally starting to see thru the marxist-in-chief and November's possibilities:

From PPP
Our monthly look ahead to the 2012 Presidential race finds Barack Obama more or less tied with all four of the leading candidates for the Republican nomination. He trails Mike Huckabee 47-45 and Mitt Romney 45-44, ties Newt Gingrich at 45-45, and leads Sarah Palin 47-45. This is the weakest performance Obama's posted in these 13 monthly surveys and a pretty clear indication that passing health care has not done anything to enhance his political standing, at least in the short term.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 15, 2010 09:36 AM (7VvJB)

70 Our monthly look ahead to the 2012 Presidential race finds Barack Obama more or less tied with all four of the leading candidates for the Republican nomination. He trails Mike Huckabee 47-45 and Mitt Romney 45-44, ties Newt Gingrich at 45-45, and leads Sarah Palin 47-45. Huckabee. Christ. Could somebody please get pictures of him with a dead girl or a live boy and put us out of our misery?

Posted by: joncelli at April 15, 2010 09:41 AM (RD7QR)

71 didn't mcveigh demand to be executed?

Posted by: The Retard at April 15, 2010 09:42 AM (eKgqT)

72 Don't want to go into those parts of the internet today; but how did McVeigh get the getaway car in place?

Posted by: jean at April 15, 2010 09:47 AM (7K04W)

73 As soon as I read the entry, I suspected this has everything to do with the European bank account monitoring that we were doing to suspected Terrorists.

I hope this guy rots.  The Newspaper in question *cough* NYT *cough* should also be prosecuted for knowingly publishing NS information.

Posted by: MelodicMetal at April 15, 2010 09:48 AM (x4S2a)

74 didn't mcveigh demand to be executed?

He didn't demand exactly but he dropped ALL of his appeals. The only delay that occurred in the trial was when the FBI released thousands of pp of evidence that had been withheld during discovery.  They delayed the execution for 6 months.

If that had been the average "free mumia" minority it would have drug on for another ten years.

I don't think it was a great conspiracy, I think it was someone the ACLU and the left in general didn't give a shit about so they didn't lift a finger.

It shows how much faster the process would work if we could stifle all the leftist lawyers. 

Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 09:49 AM (QrA9E)

75 23 The indictment mentions that the reporter did stories in 2006 & 2007 involving SIGINT,

Looky what we have here morons back in 2006.  Our old friend Sidney Blumenthal.

Will keep searching.

Posted by: David in San Diego at April 15, 2010 12:54 PM (/U/Mr)

Miss me yet?

Posted by: W at April 15, 2010 09:53 AM (as47X)

76 Hey Dave in San Diago 

That website that you link to is a CESSPOOL of leftards.  Just look at one of their more tame posts:

"it's time to drag the war criminals into the streets and strip-hang them by their ankles mussolini style. then go into the great parasite congress and drag out arlan 'the child molester' spector, lindsey 'the ghoul' graham, bill 'the cockroach' frist, tom 'the vichy french fry' delay and the rest of the repulsive repugnant-ican fascists, then drag them into the streets where they can be drawn and quartered. afterwards we will have singing and dancing in the streets. the rest of the repug criminals and their jack-ass enablers we can burn at the stake. an alternative would be to have paris turn over the guillotine used to behead louis XVI. Robespierre will luv us for it."

LEFTARDED

Posted by: MelodicMetal at April 15, 2010 10:05 AM (x4S2a)

77 Somehow the fact that Holder's DoJ is handling this makes me think that nothing is going to happen other than Drake will write an op ed in the Times about the witch hunt and in the end he will lose his pension but get it back after years of appeals.

Posted by: er at April 15, 2010 10:12 AM (dtJc/)

78 Reporter A worked at the Baltimore Sun, and is now at the Wall Street Journal. Her name is Siobhan Gorman.

I danced at her wedding.

Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 10:26 AM (qrFCz)

79 This is espionage writ clear, in my book - both on the parts of the NSA traitor and the paper's editorial staff and reporter.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 15, 2010 10:31 AM (N49h9)

80

you start to wonder where the idea that the intelligence services were Bush's pawns came from.

Usually, I hear crap like this from a guy who caught the tail end of a story on NPR or from a lady who skims the headlines in The New York Times or from some middle-aged punk who thinks that Jon Stewart is a credible journalist or from some neighborhood douchebag commie who got the notion from some famous douchbag commie. These are the same people, by the way, who faked their way through the 1984 unit in tenth-grade English and throw around words like Orwellian while being mistakenly certain as to what they mean.

Posted by: FireHorse at April 15, 2010 10:34 AM (cQyWA)

81 Oh, and guess what? Siobhan Gorman's articles were about the failures of modernization efforts. Not leaking national security material, but things that the public needed to know.

You know, waste, fraud, incompetence?

Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 10:38 AM (qrFCz)

82 These are the same people, by the way, who faked their way through the 1984 unit in tenth-grade English and throw around words like Orwellian while being mistakenly certain as to what they mean.

Posted by: FireHorse at April 15, 2010 02:34 PM (cQyWA)

Why bother reading the book when they are actual, living examples of it?

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 15, 2010 10:42 AM (N49h9)

83 Good. And the NYT reporters and editors responsible deserve to spend a bit of time in the pen, too.

Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at April 15, 2010 10:44 AM (pLTLS)

84 Baltimore Sun. Mismanagement, waste and fraud. To say nothing of incompetence.

Ha.

Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 10:46 AM (qrFCz)

85 Christ, these assholes are making me look life a 'effing piker

Posted by: Zombie Richard Nixon at April 15, 2010 10:48 AM (G+Wff)

86 What is this "PP case" to which people refer?

Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 15, 2010 10:48 AM (w41GQ)

87 87 What is this "PP case" to which people refer? Posted by: Wm T Sherman

Pentagon Papers.

Daniel Ellsberg, and his psychiatrist's office.

Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 10:49 AM (qrFCz)

88 Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 15, 2010 02:48 PM (w41GQ)

I assume "Pentagon Papers".

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 15, 2010 10:50 AM (N49h9)

89 In a sane world, we would be having a revived Un-American Activities Committee on this. Of course, with the Obamunists running it, maybe scratch that...

Posted by: Curmudgeon at April 15, 2010 01:06 PM (ujg0T)

And if Bambi & Co. did form such a committee, it would be chaired by Waxman and tasked with investigating the Tea Parties and the like...not the real un-Americans. Because then they'd have to investigate themselves. So yeah, scratch that.

Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at April 15, 2010 10:51 AM (pLTLS)

90 What is this "PP case" to which people refer?

As said above, The Pentagon Papers Case. That is the landmark case for the NYT revealing classified info.

Posted by: Vic at April 15, 2010 10:54 AM (QrA9E)

91 I'm going to put up the link for Siobhan Gorman's WSJ articles - it's going to take a while for me to find the Sun stuff.

Note what she writes, and what she writes about. Note the lack of stuff you feel she should be strung up from the nearest lamppost over, and then reassess Drake's "leaks."

He was a whistle-blower.

Link to WSJ articles is here: http://online.wsj.com/search/search_center

And I haven't the faintest how to use tiny url, so just enter "Siobhan Gorman"

Posted by: Dianna at April 15, 2010 11:05 AM (qrFCz)

92 CIA undermining foreign governments: BAD CIA undermining American Republicans: GOOD CIA undermining American Democats: BAD

Posted by: Glen at April 15, 2010 11:12 AM (BSbOk)

93 OT:  "These are the questions whose answers will reap untold benefits on here on Earth." -- The Precedent

Just your daily dose of retarded idiocy from the Indonesian Imbecile in his pathetic talk to NASA.  And those NASA nuts ought to live their lives in shame for clapping for this pathetic POS and humoring his stupidity.

On a bright note, the Indonesian Imbecile managed to properly pronounce "Orion" this time.  Yay!  He's a genius!

Okay.  Carry on with talk of what this NSA traitor should have done to him (and the newspaper's staff and reporters).

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 15, 2010 11:14 AM (N49h9)

94

A firing squad would be a nice touch for this prick.

 

Posted by: torabora at April 15, 2010 11:27 AM (8Pweo)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
121kb generated in CPU 0.0634, elapsed 0.2446 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2109 seconds, 222 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.