February 19, 2010
— Ace 50% of those so diagnosed respond well to treatment, but Frank Lautenberg is 86. I know nothing about chemo personally, fortunately, but of course I know it is hellishly tough on anyone unfortunate enough to need it, including the very young and strong.
Allah adds:
Something worth flagging in case Lautenberg opts for early retirement: New Jersey Democrats introduced a bill in the state legislature back in November, almost certainly with him in mind, to replace special elections for vacant U.S. Senate seats with a rule that would let the governor appoint a successor. With one catch — the governor could only appoint someone from the same party as the outgoing senator. Obviously, that’s a response to Chris Christie’s gubernatorial win, with state Dems worried that in this political climate a special election would be no automatic win even in a state as blue as Jersey. Their fears proved well founded two months later in Massachusetts; I wonder what’ll happen to that bill in light of today’s news.
Well I expect a full-court press on the issue with the bizarre claim offered up by Democrats that anyone refusing to vote in favor of (or sign into law) the bill is "politicizing cancer" or some nonsense, conveniently overlooking the fact that's exactly what the bill itself intends to accomplish.
I can't believe that just a few months after the end of the "Kennedy Seat" Democrats are now gearing up to tell us there's such a thing as the "Frank Lautenberg Seat," and that we are harming Frank Lautenberg's health if we do not pass a law that passes his seat into the hands of a hand-picked successor.
We'll be undoing his legacy. Or something.
What the hell is Frank Lautenberg's legacy?
Again: Look, no one really wants to act all super-psyched that another human being has become unwell. But obviously this is on the Democrats' mind, too. (Lautenberg has been mentioned as having "health issues" in the past, because, you know, he's 86.)
We cannot pretend we are uninterested in contingency planning out of respect for Frank Lautenberg's great legacy (whatever that is) while the Democrats are cooking up Frank Lautenberg Succession Bills.
Posted by: Ace at
09:25 AM
| Comments (176)
Post contains 374 words, total size 2 kb.
It all depends on how deeply it penetrated the stomach wall. If its shallow may be okay if its through the stomach wall then the prognosis is much much worse.
Posted by: joe at February 19, 2010 09:28 AM (rf1Kd)
Posted by: Mord at February 19, 2010 09:29 AM (tTj19)
Posted by: Jean at February 19, 2010 09:29 AM (7K04W)
Posted by: Jean at February 19, 2010 09:31 AM (7K04W)
If the cancer doesn't get him it will be the therapy, or if not the chemotherapy, it will be Bush's fault. Bank on it!
Posted by: Fish at February 19, 2010 09:32 AM (M5t+h)
Being the poster child for last minute Democrat substitutions when previously selected candidates suddenly look unelectable?
Posted by: some wench at February 19, 2010 09:32 AM (uJBct)
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at February 19, 2010 09:32 AM (8zQxF)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 19, 2010 09:33 AM (AZGON)
...the governor could only appoint someone from the same party as the outgoing senator.
THIS. IS. BULLSHIT.
Is this challengable in court? Here's my argument: the legislature is making laws that encroach on the executive's powers.
What's to stop the NJ legislature from passing a law stating the governor can only appoint members of the Democrat party to his cabinet? Because that's the essence of their newly passed law -- only allowing the governor to appoint a Democrat.
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:33 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: Salem at February 19, 2010 09:34 AM (86rbG)
I'll tell you what his legacy is. The Lautenberg amendment.
It made anyone who had a misdemeanor domestic violence conviction inelligible to possess a firearm.
Which had this effect: Anyone in the police or armed forces who had one of these convictions immediately became inelligible to possess a governement owned firearm in the line of duty.
They thus became unemployable and lost their jobs as police or armed forces members.
Damn that man.
Posted by: Ed at February 19, 2010 09:35 AM (OCfDT)
haha, the ultimate head-fake. Appoint a DINO and let him change parties afterward.
"I didn't leave the democratic party, the democratic party left ME."
Posted by: Mord at February 19, 2010 09:35 AM (tTj19)
Ted Nugent could buy a house in AC, register as Democrat...
That would be fanfuckingtastic! I'd love to see their new whimsical law shoved up their asses, like that.
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:35 AM (jVldi)
IIRC, one of the Republican Senators from Wyoming recently died, and the Democrat Governor was forced (by law) to appoint a successor from the same party.
If the Wyoming type of law is already on the books in NJ, then we have to follow it. If not, then Christie should tell the Dems to get bent with a razorblade.
Posted by: eddiebear at February 19, 2010 09:35 AM (wnU1W)
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 19, 2010 09:36 AM (ucq49)
Miss Cleo of Psychic Friends Network just spoke and said Frank Lautenberg has a one in five chance of survival, but if he sends her a check for $1000, his odds will improve to even money for survival.
Posted by: Fish at February 19, 2010 09:37 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: ace at February 19, 2010 09:37 AM (jlvw3)
Sort of OT: I saw a news-crawl that said Alexander Haig has been taken to hospital. (But didn't say with what.)
Posted by: andycanuck at February 19, 2010 09:38 AM (2qU2d)
If need be, appoint the most unelectable Dem imaginable.
Would it be in bad taste to bring up ObamaCare and say things along the line of hey he is 86, maybe he should just take a pain pill or something?
Posted by: AndrewsDad at February 19, 2010 09:38 AM (C2//T)
Prognosis for diffuse large B cell lymphoma is poor. That's probably what he's got.
Prognosis for gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphoma is excellent, and he could make a complete recovery.
Posted by: looking closely at February 19, 2010 09:38 AM (PwGfd)
"Frank had better hope biologist Dr. Amy Bishop isn't a consultant on the hospital staff."
I heard a rumor that Stack developed the diagnostic software.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 19, 2010 09:39 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: Alan Smithee at February 19, 2010 09:39 AM (F7GbV)
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at February 19, 2010 09:40 AM (ClZ5D)
Posted by: Wide-eyed moonbat at February 19, 2010 09:40 AM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: ace at February 19, 2010 09:40 AM (jlvw3)
If that piece of s@$t passes (and it probably won't), Christie should pick his favorite Republican hack. . .after having the guy switch parties!
Posted by: looking closely at February 19, 2010 09:41 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 19, 2010 09:41 AM (muUqs)
Posted by: Truman North at February 19, 2010 09:41 AM (e8YaH)
Something worth flagging in case Lautenberg opts for early retirement
86 years old is early retirement?? Allah, please!
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at February 19, 2010 09:41 AM (ERJIu)
Obama just called me and said he's gonna ol' Frank the 'blue' pill to ease his pain and suffering.
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:42 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: ace at February 19, 2010 09:42 AM (jlvw3)
Well screw them NJ democrats then. Christie has no reason to sign that bill. Let the house over-ride his veto if they can. NJ elected Christie, and elections have consequences.
Posted by: Mord at February 19, 2010 09:42 AM (tTj19)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 19, 2010 09:42 AM (40kuC)
Posted by: ace at February 19, 2010 09:42 AM (jlvw3)
Simple solution
1) Get a conservative to claim to be a Democrat
2) Appoint Him
3) After taking office, he switches parties.
What are we, the party of Duuhhhh ??
Posted by: Cromagnum at February 19, 2010 09:43 AM (QZFcc)
Posted by: joncelli at February 19, 2010 09:43 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: ace at February 19, 2010 09:44 AM (jlvw3)
Posted by: Jean at February 19, 2010 09:44 AM (/8Gs3)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 19, 2010 09:45 AM (muUqs)
Nah, they are exercising a lien becuase of "monies owed for services"
Posted by: Mike H at February 19, 2010 09:45 AM (LdYLm)
That would still probably result in a Democrat win (after all, it is NJ we're talking about here), but that way at least the electorate has a say.
Posted by: looking closely at February 19, 2010 09:45 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: ace at February 19, 2010 09:45 AM (jlvw3)
Well, it's not unconstitutional, but it's un-American in the sense it betrays our Founder's vision and design for separation of powers in the Federal government.
But this is NJ, and I suppose it's their prerogative to see how powers are divided in their govt.
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:46 AM (jVldi)
Crimeny. 86. Gotta hand it to these guys that keep working to an age like that. Chemo at any age is hell -- but it's it's even tougher on the elderly who have so few good years left anyway. Of course if he lives to 100 in good health after chemo, feeling rotten for a few months might be worth it.
Makes me wonder -- what's the average age of the Democrats vs Republicans in congress? Seems like the Dems have a bunch of oldsters.
Posted by: Starboardhelm at February 19, 2010 09:46 AM (SgSfB)
Hey why don't you suck my dick?
Posted by: ace at February 19, 2010 01:45 PM (jlvw3)
Yea, suck it bitch!
Posted by: Fish at February 19, 2010 09:47 AM (M5t+h)
Surprise, surprise, surprise.
Why are teh stupid ones teh hawt ones?! You'd think stupid would have died out long ago no matter what...
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at February 19, 2010 09:47 AM (8zQxF)
Crimeny. 86. Gotta hand it to these guys that keep working to an age like that.
Actually at that age you have to wonder if the guy is even lucid, or a shambling idiot like Sheets Byrd.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 19, 2010 09:47 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: Rick at February 19, 2010 09:48 AM (L/O45)
#54 Makes me wonder -- what's the average age of the Democrats vs Republicans in congress? Seems like the Dems have a bunch of oldsters.
They wouldn't look so old if I was still around.
Posted by: Strom Thurmond at February 19, 2010 09:48 AM (9hSKh)
2, why would it be unconstitutional?
Well, for one, the Legislature is deciding who is their political representative in the senate. I think there's something called Amendment XVII
When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
It doe not say that the legislature may restrict the power of the executive to select senators.
The separation of powers argument is strong here.
Posted by: s'moron at February 19, 2010 09:49 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 19, 2010 09:49 AM (muUqs)
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:50 AM (jVldi)
Exactly what his asshat voters told him to do, I'm guessin'.
We have met the enemy . . .
Posted by: arhooley at February 19, 2010 09:50 AM (DVFUM)
OT: But the same political bullshit.
Rep. Joe Sestak (D., Pa.) said yesterday that the White House offered him a federal job in an effort to dissuade him from challenging Sen. Arlen Specter in the state's Democratic primary
Posted by: conscious and on a jihad against the democrats at February 19, 2010 09:51 AM (Vu6sl)
Why don't you just call this blog the Allah Report and get it over with?
Meh, I used to love Hot Air, but the posters there get on my nerves. The morons here are more intelligent and a damn sight funnier.
Posted by: jewells at February 19, 2010 09:51 AM (l/N7H)
I just checked and prognosis for primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma isn't nearly as poor as I thought.
5-year survival can be as high as 65-75%, depending on case series.
Now, at 86 years old, Lautenberg well may not be the "average" case, and I don't know what else may be medically wrong with him that may complicate things, but there is probably a reasonably good chance he'll live at least a few more years.
Posted by: looking closely at February 19, 2010 09:51 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: taylork at February 19, 2010 09:51 AM (0Hn5w)
Heh. The political manoeuvrings to make sure the seat stays D don't really interest me, since I expect them to be scumbags and they never disappoint, but I do look forward to the "right[dic] to die" crowd ignoring Frank completely instead of pointing out that the most "efficient" and "fair" use of our scant medical resources and Medicare dollars would be to tell an 86-year-old man with stomach cancer to go home and die to allow transsexual teenagers a chance to live sans-Adam's Apple...because he's a party apparatchik, and "fair" means no expense will be spared unless he requests to die...in which case the state will pay for his morphine overdose with dignity.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 19, 2010 09:52 AM (mR7mk)
Ayeuh'm pra-oud tuh unnunce muh nom-e-nation fur duh off-y-us of duh Senatuh fur duh gray-ut State ov New-ah Joisey! I'm-uh gonna be-uh Boss of alla youse!
Posted by: Bruce Springsteen at February 19, 2010 09:52 AM (ERJIu)
When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
If the legislature of a state can give the Governor authority to make a replacement appointment, they can probably take it away, too. Unless there's something specific in NJ preventing the action, which should be cited.
Posted by: Methos at February 19, 2010 09:53 AM (Xsi7M)
Matt Damon just called me and said...
Do the actuary tables! I'm Matt Damon! I don't know what I'm talking about! Matt Damon!
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:53 AM (jVldi)
Hey why don't you suck my dick?
Here's to you, Salem
Sucking my dick
Posted by: Ford Fairlane at February 19, 2010 09:53 AM (LdYLm)
It sorta resembles the own-goal that the democrats did to themselves up here in MA that ended up with Scott Brown getting elected.
Democrats took power away from the governor (Romney) to appoint a senator in 2004 in case horse-face, I mean Kerry won the presidential election.
They scrambled to repeal it after Kennedy died, which did not please the voters of Massachucetts one bit. They did repeal it, and the democrat that was appointed voted for everything Obama wanted.
We elected Scott Brown in response. Deval Patrick is next, most likely.
Posted by: Mord at February 19, 2010 09:53 AM (tTj19)
Posted by: Reggie1971 at February 19, 2010 09:53 AM (b68Df)
"Why don't you just call this blog the Allah Report and get it over with?"
Dude, don't be a dick. First of all, Allahpundit and ace are buddies from a long time back. They both went to see Brokeback Mountain together. But not in a gay way. They had a chick named Karol sit between them. Cuz that's just how they roll...
Second, their politics are pretty similar. You start pissing on AP, and you are probably going to be hitting ace with the splatter. Not cool.
Posted by: Ed at February 19, 2010 09:54 AM (OCfDT)
Posted by: LtE113 (Mike in Chicago) at February 19, 2010 09:55 AM (wtdUn)
Posted by: Matt Damon at February 19, 2010 09:55 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at February 19, 2010 09:55 AM (ClZ5D)
Hell, the way he got in office was a deceitful and scummy way to begin with. The Demoncraps have proved over and over again, if there is a way to game the system or outright cheat their way into office they will do it.
What really pissed me off was the way the NJ Supreme Court let them get away with it. I would have liked to see the SCOTUS get involved with it and straigten them out. I guess Kennedy came down on the left that time.
I look for the same type of crap to go down this time from the NJ legislature. Maybe the governor will be able to block it though. All she has to do is keep vetoing the legislation until the special election is over.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2010 09:56 AM (QrA9E)
Like I said, what's to stop the legislature from passing any law dictating what the governor can and cannot do?
The New Jersey Supreme Court might have an issue with this, too, because what's to stop the legislature from usurping the Court's powers, too?
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:56 AM (jVldi)
What the fuck is an 86 year old man doing in Congress? Or the Supreme Court? If we can't get term limits, then put a lifeclock on these assholes. Retire or the Sandman comes for your ass.
What's worse is that he wants to run for reelection.
I don't care if you're on our side or theirs...this shit is getting ridiculous. Get the fuck outta there! You do not need to be in public office when you're 90 fucking years old.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 19, 2010 09:56 AM (P33XN)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 19, 2010 09:56 AM (B+qrE)
"What the hell is Frank Lautenberg's legacy?"
I seem to recall a train station off the side of the freeway or "turnpike" as I drive Newark to NYC no?
Posted by: California Red at February 19, 2010 09:57 AM (IpT4E)
Posted by: Truman North at February 19, 2010 09:57 AM (e8YaH)
Probably not old enough. But hey, he did a decent enough job at pissing off liberals for wearing fur and then telling them to fuck off.
Posted by: taylork at February 19, 2010 09:57 AM (0Hn5w)
Posted by: mpfs at February 19, 2010 09:58 AM (iYbLN)
Doubt it.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 19, 2010 01:46 PM (fx8sm)
See, now you are just being mean.
Posted by: Mord at February 19, 2010 09:58 AM (tTj19)
But that's my reading in english. In legaleze maybe you have to specifically allow the reversal of the decision.
Posted by: Methos at February 19, 2010 09:59 AM (Xsi7M)
Good news, everybody! Ace of Spades HQ is noted in Wikipedia as an "extreme right-wing news group"
Edit that shit!
Just like I edit Chris Matthews' wiki page, once in a while.
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:59 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel at February 19, 2010 09:59 AM (iV4X6)
Posted by: Happy Dale Funeral Home at February 19, 2010 09:59 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 19, 2010 10:01 AM (ucq49)
Ace of Spades HQ is noted in Wikipedia as an "extreme right-wing news group"
Let me guess, Democratic Underground is a "moderate discussion forum."
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 19, 2010 10:01 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Tony Soprano at February 19, 2010 10:01 AM (ERJIu)
#51, fuck yeah! Yub yub, man, rock out with that Ewok cock out.
Personally I hope Lautenberg has to sit on a bureaucrat's waiting list and linger the way the Democrat's government rationing scheme would do to us. Let some of these Congresscritters who consider themselves a perpetual elected aristocracy see what the fuck it's like to be powerless and without options.
Posted by: SGT Dan at February 19, 2010 10:01 AM (GgXZc)
Yay!
I mean... arrggg!
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at February 19, 2010 10:02 AM (ClZ5D)
Posted by: Penn State Marine at February 19, 2010 10:02 AM (8KFCG)
Wherever the Toup goes, then the Donald goes....
Posted by: The Donald at February 19, 2010 10:02 AM (LdYLm)
Frank's legacy?
Ayone who ever got a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt?
Yep, Ol' Frank was the sponsor/author of Click it or Ticket.
Thanks Frank!!!!!
Posted by: NJ MIke at February 19, 2010 10:03 AM (9cbLf)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 19, 2010 10:03 AM (P33XN)
I think that's right. A State legislature "may" empower a Governor to pick a successor, they "may" not, and they likely have the right to change the policy as they see fit.
Note that reversing the policy on filling Senate vacancies isn't necessarily smart politics or "fair", but I think its legal.
Also, I do *NOT* see how the legislature can require that the Governor appoint a particular individual or a member of a particular political party. That requirement defeats the purpose of giving the power to the Governor. IE, the Governor should either have the power to choose a replacement Senator or not. If he can't specify the replacement of his choice, then he doesn't have the power, does he?
Posted by: looking closely at February 19, 2010 10:05 AM (6Q9g2)
"77 Does this bill have any requirement for how long a successor has been a member of the exiting Senator's party? I mean, could a Republican simply register as a Democrat, get appointed Senator, and then switch right back to Republican?"
I would think that that would tend to piss off ind voters concerned with fairness and following the law. It isn't so critical a seat, esp with elections in Nov as to want to be seen as the dirty tricksters (I know, I know, double standard.).
Posted by: Randy at February 19, 2010 10:06 AM (zQKSr)
Um, yay?
Posted by: Methos at February 19, 2010 10:06 AM (Xsi7M)
According to Geraghty at NRO:
There are 29 House Democrats age 70 or older, and another 39 are between 64 and 69.
Don't know about the Republicans.
Posted by: Deety at February 19, 2010 10:08 AM (aVzyR)
Posted by: J Babbitt at February 19, 2010 10:09 AM (ucq49)
There are 29 House Democrats age 70 or older, and another 39 are between 64 and 69.
But they're just a heartbeat away from death! This cannot be allowed to stand.
Posted by: andycanuck at February 19, 2010 10:10 AM (2qU2d)
Posted by: Truman North at February 19, 2010 01:57 PM (e8YaH)
Ooooh!! Ya know I've been feeling kinda extremy lately, that wiki guy must be on to something.
Posted by: dananjcon at February 19, 2010 10:12 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Ivana the Dish at February 19, 2010 02:03 PM (M5t+h)
Hey, but you took all 4 inches. And I made sure it hurt, baby
Posted by: The Donald at February 19, 2010 10:12 AM (LdYLm)
I agree, Andycanuck. That is a terrible thing to wish on anyone.
I prefer to wish nothing more than minor scrotal itch on the Canadians.
Posted by: Tushar at February 19, 2010 10:13 AM (KXhmI)
I agree that makes sense, though as a matter of getting along with the voters, I doubt it's in any Governor's interest to make a big show of replacing the voters' will (Lautenberg was elected in 2002 and 2008, so this was a recent choice) with his own.
The question is, would the appointment be for the rest of the term (through 2014) or until the next convenient election (November)? If the latter, Christie might be better off appointing a NJ version of Roland Burris, then campaigning hard for someone else this summer.
Posted by: Methos at February 19, 2010 10:14 AM (Xsi7M)
"I prefer to wish nothing more than minor scrotal itch on the Canadians."
Which is easily curable, for true believers, but using me
Posted by: Pudding at February 19, 2010 10:15 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: wiserbud at February 19, 2010 10:17 AM (wWwJR)
I agree, Andycanuck. That is a terrible thing to wish on anyone.
I prefer to wish nothing more than minor scrotal itch on the Canadians.
I wish 'em all the silver medals in the world.
Posted by: Methos at February 19, 2010 10:17 AM (Xsi7M)
Never try to read legislation/constitutional provisions in plain English. You usually come to the opposite conclusion from what the Court will rule.
Everything really does mean something there, and it means that the leg may give the gov power to appoint. There is no grant of authority to the leg to condition that appointment power. Because it is a grant of authority over a federal office to a state authority, that grant must be construed narrowly, meaning in short that if it ain't spelled out, it ain't there.
THere's nothing I can see in the XVIIth amend that gives the leg the ability to condition appointment to federal office on party membership.
Almost certainly a novel question, but maybe not. We have some really bad partisan fights in teh early 1800s, so there may be some analogous precedent. The XVIIth was passed in 1919 though, so it's doubtful that there's anything ojn this particular provision. Don't have Westlaw up or I'd tell you
Posted by: s'moron at February 19, 2010 10:20 AM (UaxA0)
"What the hell is Frank Lautenberg's legacy?"
I seem to recall a train station off the side of the freeway or "turnpike" as I drive Newark to NYC no?
Posted by: California Red at February 19, 2010 01:57 PM (IpT4E)
Pffft, you gotta see the new train station on the nj tpk & the new light rail train into Jersey City...they are absolute fucking ghost towns-during rush hour!!! Just another NJ boon-doggle. Friggin depressing.
Posted by: dananjcon at February 19, 2010 10:20 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: andycanuck at February 19, 2010 10:24 AM (2qU2d)
Every time I see this asshole's name; Lautenberg I think of that BS amendment he tacked on to grab guns with. The infamous Lautenberg Amendment which prohibited anyone fropm owning a firearm if they had been convicted of domestic violence OR had a restraining order issued against them. There were no exceptions.
I saw that SCOTUS had finally killed that BS a few months ago. The problem was it took too long. There were a lot of cops who lost their jobs because of that stupid law.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2010 10:26 AM (QrA9E)
Lautenberg's legacy? Why, that would have to be Lautenberg Junction, a transfer station for NJ Rail passengers attempting to commute to and from midtown Manhattan.
Budgeted at $450 million, it came in at over $600 million. It is not a junction as trains cannot change tracks there. It is over 300,000 square feet but contains only one lonely newsstand and a small bar that's never open.
It was proposed as a facility that would serve 70,000 passengers daily. Recently, users numbered a new high at around 17,000 daily. There was no plan for parking but a new parking facility just opened that the State is certain will increase ridership.
The Station is furnished with highly polished marble and lots of crappy art.
This is government at its very worst.
Posted by: spongeworthy at February 19, 2010 10:27 AM (rplL3)
If Lautenberg has a legacy, it's flauting state election law. I think a fitting tribute to his legacy would be to have democrats pass the law, and then have Christie ignore the law and appoint a Republican at the 11th hour.
Assuming the jackass law gets passed, though, could Christie just refuse to appoint a successor? From a conservative view, having no vote is better than having a liberal vote.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 19, 2010 10:31 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: Pecos Bill at February 19, 2010 10:32 AM (8WOM0)
Posted by: Bruceinsocal at February 19, 2010 10:35 AM (MX7La)
#130 Vic at February 19, 2010 02:26 PM (QrA9E)
Hey Vic, I wrote something similar up at comment #16. I didn't know that there was something about it getting repealed by SCOTUS. Can you elaborate? Thanks.
Posted by: Ed at February 19, 2010 10:35 AM (OCfDT)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 19, 2010 10:38 AM (40kuC)
Posted by: Kid From Jersey at February 19, 2010 10:50 AM (yyZPe)
Can you elaborate? Thanks.
Sorry didn't see the earlier comment. The case I read was on one of the law blogs a few months ago. I can't remember all of the specifics but basically it killed the amendment for anything but a felony conviction.
Being convicted of a felony has alweays been the standard for removal of gun rights previously. Hell with his BS amendment even a restraining order would get you and all takes for a restraining order is some beatch complaining to a family court judge.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2010 10:58 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: grognard at February 19, 2010 11:00 AM (v0kvW)
Yep, I had a restraining order because of a psycho ex-wife deciding to slash-and-burn on her way out. I ended up getting it tossed out, but in the meantime, it was in effect, and I could not own a firearm.
It was a clear violation of the 2nd Amendment - especially because, in my case, there was no due process. My rights were curtailed and THEN I had my day in court.
Posted by: grognard at February 19, 2010 11:02 AM (v0kvW)
What the hell is Frank Lautenberg's legacy?
Ask the millions of former gun owners who were deprived of their civil rights, either because they got into a fight with their brother on their eighteenth birthday, or because some vengeful shrew got a restraining order on them.
Posted by: Ken at February 19, 2010 11:09 AM (EawMs)
Hey why don't you suck my dick?
Posted by: ace
Hey! be careful about such talk. The guy who runs this blog may ban you.
I kid
Posted by: Blue Hen at February 19, 2010 11:10 AM (R2fpr)
Isn't he the dickhead that came back and saved the Dems from Torricelli or some crooked wop that they had nominated?
Posted by: Kemp at February 19, 2010 11:11 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at February 19, 2010 11:12 AM (WgIbH)
Good news, everybody! Ace of Spades HQ is noted in Wikipedia as an "extreme right-wing news group"
Edit that shit!
Actually, it would be funnier if everyone here added a new extreme adjective, up until the sentence took up a majority of the Wiki article.
Posted by: Ken at February 19, 2010 11:13 AM (EawMs)
Actually, it would be funnier if everyone here added a new extreme adjective, up until the sentence took up a majority of the Wiki article.
salacious
Posted by: Blue Hen at February 19, 2010 11:14 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 19, 2010 11:14 AM (tH7KR)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 19, 2010 11:16 AM (tH7KR)
Actually, it would be funnier if everyone here added a new extreme adjective, up until the sentence took up a majority of the Wiki article.
lemon-scented
Posted by: Blue Hen at February 19, 2010 11:16 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Jeff at February 19, 2010 11:28 AM (1QKZf)
50% of those so diagnosed respond well to treatment, but Frank Lautenberg is 86.
So, what are his options as a regular citizen under ObamaCare? pain pills?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at February 19, 2010 11:29 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Johnny I at February 19, 2010 11:37 AM (v77ig)
What the hell is Frank Lautenberg's legacy?
Oh. Oh. Oh. I know! [raising hand like an idiot, except I'm not]
The legacy its three decades of brainwashed non-MA Northeasterners voting for any Democrat, no mater how irresponsible, no matter how fatuous because their parents did, because there will always be more tax money from others, and because thinking is.....HARD.
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 19, 2010 11:45 AM (GgR+e)
Posted by: Robert Byrd Memorial State of West Virginia at February 19, 2010 11:54 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 19, 2010 12:03 PM (GgR+e)
Lautenberg may be a fine man on the micro level
He's not even that. He is personally vicious and nasty.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 19, 2010 12:08 PM (tH7KR)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 19, 2010 12:51 PM (GgR+e)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 19, 2010 12:52 PM (GgR+e)
Posted by: Dr. Obama at February 19, 2010 01:18 PM (SgSfB)
Posted by: sauropod at February 19, 2010 01:23 PM (hAAbr)
BY the way, state legislators routinely selected US Sens in the first 150 years
Posted by: corwin at February 19, 2010 02:20 PM (q5DB3)
I see zero mentions of meteor summonings, and even worse, no mention of bacons whatosever. for shame people. for shame.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 19, 2010 03:31 PM (erIg9)
Not going to be fun for a man of his age. Prayers for him and for his family. And I hope to hell the Dems in the Senate see this for what it is and let him go to concentrate on beating this.
Posted by: tmi3rd at February 19, 2010 03:36 PM (u+G1L)
Posted by: eaglewingz08 at February 19, 2010 03:47 PM (dv8zz)
At Sen. Lautenberg's age, this is not good news. If it is localized he has a chance at recovery - if it has gone elsewhere he is, at his age, dead man walking. As far as replacements - that will be whatever the law of New Jersey says when he either resigns or dies.
Cancer in an internal organ is a very, very bad thing.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at February 19, 2010 04:20 PM (nlRuk)
Posted by: Mikey NTH at February 19, 2010 04:26 PM (nlRuk)
Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at February 20, 2010 01:12 AM (jpf1B)
You have to really think about these scum, can you really let people that have no ethics at all, are Homo, and do ANYTHING to win, run any enterprise, let alone govern us, teach our kids, run our financial institutions.
Hell even the Mafia have rules and ethics.
Posted by: chimpy_hussein_mcBain at February 20, 2010 11:12 AM (DLaJY)
Posted by: 1111 at February 24, 2011 06:02 PM (5FJ2m)
Do you like on <a href="http://www.amandamall.com">Global Online Shopping</a>line shopping
Posted by: Online Shopping free shiping at May 13, 2011 03:09 PM (xIY3i)
Tory Burch is an American fashion designer, business woman and philanthropist who was born, raised and educated in the Philadelphia metropolitan area. Easy, chic and versatile, the Eddie Ballet Flat is Tory's favorite new shoe. Dress it up or dress it down, the leg-elongating wardrobe staple adds easy polish to dresses, pants or jeans. The same as we know, it has high heels, boots, wedge heel, such as different design.
Posted by: Tory Burch at May 17, 2011 09:43 PM (IDGo3)
http://www.nfljerseysmalls.com
Posted by: hats for sale at July 13, 2011 07:35 PM (Pa9oe)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1969 seconds, 304 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Mord at February 19, 2010 09:27 AM (tTj19)