June 25, 2010
— Monty NOTE: There was enough late-breaking stuff that I didn't want to wait until Monday to post it. Feel free to breeze on by if you've had enough Financial Armageddon for one day. Friday trading ended with a shrug as the Dow closed basically unchanged at 10,143.81 and the S&P 500 at 1076.76. His Majesty cannot be bothered to listen to the nattering of common peasants! There is a world to be saved! Now begone, and let His Majesty rest; for the weight of the world rests heavily upon his noble brow. If you answered "Romania" as the next European country to collapse into (further) financial and social disarray, please step forward and claim your prize! The Italians came in a close second, though. The adults are not only not in the room; they abandoned the kids in Branson outside the How-Dee Kountry Komedy Klub and went to blow the family fortune over in Hot Springs. Some juicy background on Orszag's ignominious retreat from
Posted by: Monty at
02:04 PM
| Comments (166)
Post contains 984 words, total size 8 kb.
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at June 25, 2010 02:13 PM (qo6Vf)
bad , bad, financial news.
I'm glad you followed that devastation with a really handsome man pic. thank g-d for little mercies.
Posted by: willow at June 25, 2010 02:14 PM (HyUIR)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at June 25, 2010 02:16 PM (qo6Vf)
BP's Tony Hayward starts City charm offensive amid oil spill hurricane fears
Right now, they're trying to decide how much of their assets to sell, & whether they should break the company into pieces.
Hayward to Meet with Russian Officials Next Week
This is extremely important, because Putin smells blood & could use the opportunity to his advantage.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 02:16 PM (Yq+qN)
-------------
Actually, my algorithm will give you good results no matter what data you put into it.
Posted by: Michael Mann at June 25, 2010 02:17 PM (XIXhw)
Monty, and about Orzags resigning , and Joint chair of chief giving another heads up.
Is there any chance all this movement will make anyone that is still an adult in this administration stand up, what about Geitner is He totally rolled over?
Posted by: willow at June 25, 2010 02:18 PM (HyUIR)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 02:18 PM (Yq+qN)
Not right back. You get superbullshit, and sometimes superbullsupershit. That shit's worth its weight in gold! And that's almost 0.00000000000000000294% its weight in gold! BUY!
Posted by: oblig. at June 25, 2010 02:18 PM (x7Ao8)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at June 25, 2010 02:19 PM (yQWNf)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 02:20 PM (jM/Et)
Posted by: garrett at June 25, 2010 02:20 PM (rSUtI)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at June 25, 2010 02:20 PM (qo6Vf)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 02:25 PM (Yq+qN)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 02:25 PM (jM/Et)
Dammit, Monty, it's Friday night for the love of Pete! Allow us morons the courtesy of being able to enjoy our weekend without your Doom and Gloom™ financial roundup. Please?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at June 25, 2010 02:28 PM (1hM1d)
Monty, i do remember several people giving warning that Geitner or Bernanke were not experienced enough to handle the economy. I often wonder if that was the point of their being put in those postitions.
paranoia? guess it really doesn't matter at this point.
yelling FIRE!
heh
Posted by: willow at June 25, 2010 02:32 PM (HyUIR)
They could keep a bust of Churchill on the table during discussions.
Posted by: Jean at June 25, 2010 02:32 PM (CPefM)
Update: Unclear if tropical depression will hit oil spill in Gulf of Mexico - AP http://bit.ly/9By7gz
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 25, 2010 02:35 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 02:36 PM (Yq+qN)
OK, I'm too stupid to understand the link. Can someone explain what that means for my savings account, in small words? My understanding of inflation is that account will have the SAME amount of dollars, but be worth half as much.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 25, 2010 02:40 PM (M9BNu)
The Italians are not fiscally responsible!?
How could that be?
Personally I'm surprised that country has managed to last this long. Actually, now that I think about it, nobody else wants them. never trust a country without a reliable and mostly working postal system.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 02:40 PM (oIp16)
Posted by: Jean at June 25, 2010 02:42 PM (CPefM)
End. Of. Story.
I've got a feeling a lot of people are in the same boat I'm in. Once I feel personal pain and it affects my loved ones, all bets are off.
Posted by: Dave@ at June 25, 2010 02:43 PM (IwKSD)
No longer can you expect to do a sea-shore-sea rotation. The Navy wants to cut 2/3's of it's shore billets which means more time at sea.
That bad, eh? at that ratio that means no male enlistee will ever get a shore billet because all the preggy females will be filling the slots.
Posted by: blogRot at June 25, 2010 02:43 PM (uMihF)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 25, 2010 06:40 PM (M9BNu)
The bright side is that your interest rate on your savings account could go to 500% a MONTH. You will be a millionaire in no time!
The downside is that is about what a loaf of bread will cost.
Savers ALWAYS get boned by inflation.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 02:43 PM (oIp16)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 02:46 PM (jM/Et)
Posted by: Jean at June 25, 2010 02:47 PM (CPefM)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 25, 2010 06:40 PM (M9BNu)
The bright side is that your interest rate on your savings account could go to 500% a MONTH. You will be a millionaire in no time!
My guess is not only will it be worth half as much, but if all of the stimulus is given to banks they may not pay you much above 0% since that is what the fed will give them free, for a while at least, til he tries to stop inflation, at which point you have spent your savings. This is how they basically steal money from the middle class.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at June 25, 2010 02:49 PM (T0bhq)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 02:49 PM (jM/Et)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 25, 2010 02:49 PM (Aqzx6)
Posted by: Jean at June 25, 2010 02:50 PM (CPefM)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 25, 2010 06:40 PM (M9BNu)
Shorter version: You're Boned.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at June 25, 2010 02:50 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at June 25, 2010 02:50 PM (fLHQe)
Posted by: Jean at June 25, 2010 02:51 PM (CPefM)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 02:55 PM (jM/Et)
Yeah, that was my instinctual reaction. I'm trying to guage how boned.
Thanks for the explanation, Monty. Looking like I'll be better off taking that *snicker* romantic Bavarian beer bender this fall instead of sitting home being prudent, eh? If I got nothing either way, at least I can get some pictures of castles.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 25, 2010 02:55 PM (M9BNu)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 02:57 PM (Yq+qN)
Posted by: jakeman at June 25, 2010 02:57 PM (8QmEC)
LOL, you mean it will go back to the way it was when I was in? Hell, I talked about that in the previous thread.
What this will directly impact is the ability of the Navy to retain married members. It was explained to me that the Navy preferred married men because they were more "dependable".
I was single at the time so wondered why I got more duty time and was paid less. That was the explanation.
Posted by: Vic at June 25, 2010 03:01 PM (6taRI)
Posted by: Jean at June 25, 2010 03:03 PM (CPefM)
80s it's nutz. I keep hoping most of the American popultion is waking up at this point. But can we do enough, let's say we win 2010. can most of this be walked back? i mean we reallyyyyyyyy do not have the money, will it just happen because no-one will be working to pay taxes?
that's a really bad way to figure it out for all of us.
Posted by: willow at June 25, 2010 03:04 PM (HyUIR)
Actually based on my experience during this "downturn" buy utility stocks from companies that pay a high dividend. Not only are they better than bonds on payback they are probably actually safer than government bonds right now.
My utility stocks decline during the initial market fall off but quickly recovered to the point they were at before the collapse.
Utility stocks are also a good hedge against inflation.
Posted by: Vic at June 25, 2010 03:04 PM (6taRI)
The world is topsy-turvy these days. It's bad when a German PM has to explain economics to an American President.
At least in the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 25, 2010 03:05 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: willow at June 25, 2010 03:06 PM (HyUIR)
I've got shit to do. Like being boned, and stuff..
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at June 25, 2010 03:06 PM (qD0Vy)
I remain astounded at the way the market has been bubbling along around the 10k range. Even a cursory reading of financial news from the US and around the world leads to the inevitable conclusion that the Dow is currently held up by nothing but pixie dust and unicorn farts.
Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at June 25, 2010 03:07 PM (mHbcC)
I thought they said they were abstaining this yr, so nothing can get pinned on them.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 03:08 PM (Yq+qN)
Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at June 25, 2010 03:09 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at June 25, 2010 07:07 PM (mHbcC)
srsly. who is holding up the markets? where do they get all this hope that it is safe?
Posted by: willow at June 25, 2010 03:09 PM (HyUIR)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 03:11 PM (Yq+qN)
Posted by: Jean at June 25, 2010 03:12 PM (CPefM)
Nothing says financial wizardry like Kazakhstan and the Philippines.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at June 25, 2010 03:14 PM (N/7an)
"Now begone, and let His Majesty rest; for the weight of the world rests heavily upon his noble brow."
His Majesty? Noble? When did The Messiah get demoted from god to man? At the very least, he must be royalty, not merely a noble.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at June 25, 2010 03:16 PM (kmEfr)
Subject: Selection of Text for Posts
"...they abandoned the kids in Branson outside the How-Dee Kountry Komedy Klub and went to blow the family fortune over in Hot Springs."
Nebulous association of Fly-Over Country Hillbillies with the Klan should be avoided in the future.
Carry on.
Posted by: TXMarko at June 25, 2010 03:16 PM (lj1zi)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at June 25, 2010 03:16 PM (NuAIL)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 03:17 PM (4Pleu)
Financially, they look like Mt. Olympus when your country is trying it's damnest to emulate the Zimbabwean financial model.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 25, 2010 03:18 PM (c0A3e)
I presume yours did OK as well.
Posted by: Vic at June 25, 2010 03:20 PM (6taRI)
By Jeremy Warner
he must be a reader here, she was pretty snarky
Posted by: willow at June 25, 2010 03:24 PM (HyUIR)
I second the idea. Be sure to look for a 'fee only' advisor. This means an advisor that only charges for the portfolio review and guidance, rather than one that sells securities and bonds.
Bad advisors and brokers will charge you fees and push products that you don't need and don't want.
Nothing beats personal referrals of course but here's a website that can help in locating a 'fee only' advisor.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at June 25, 2010 03:27 PM (N/7an)
The inflation issue is a hard one to predict, because there is more to it than simply how many dollars are out there. The velocity of money is vital. If you printed 10 trillion dollars, yet every dime was piled up in various banks that refused to lend it out, inflation would be essentially unaffected. To have inflation you need to have more dollars chasing a given amount of goods. Dollars on the side lines are not doing anything. Also, American factories (not to mention Chinese ones) are operating WAY below capacity. Upticks in demand will be immediately met by upticks in production, so the pool of goods will grow.
If the Fed pulls the dollars back in as the economy picks up (if it ever does) they can short circuit a lot of the inflation that would otherwise occur as folks felt good about spending and banks started lending. Will they do that? Who knows. Bear in mind - bankers hold lots of dollars, too. They don't gain much by having everything go all Weimar Germany on us. However, they don't always time things well or know how to gauge the scale of a problem.
Posted by: Reactionary at June 25, 2010 03:27 PM (4nbyM)
OT, and before you ask, yes, I realize it's lew rockwell, and yes I hate the anti-Semite douchenozzle (and his minions) but it's where I could find the story of:
10 COPS TAZERING A BEDRIDDEN 86 YEAR OLD GRANNY
For fuck's sake, can we shoot those fuckers now and take them out of the gene pool?
Posted by: s'moron at June 25, 2010 03:33 PM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 03:34 PM (jM/Et)
¿cómo?
Posted by: The Dread Pirate No Beard at June 25, 2010 06:35 PM (wOtDN)
Reparado para usted.
Posted by: stuiec at June 25, 2010 03:36 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: s'moron at June 25, 2010 07:33 PM (UaxA0)
I agree with you in principle, 100%. Just be aware that we'd have to shoot A LOT of people - the jack boot worshipping type who have infiltrated the police in recent years are all too common. No surprise here, since the unelected bureaucrats in charge of the day to day administration of the state crave nothing more than a thuggish police state. No doubt they work daily to insure we get one. The bigger the city, the worse it gets.
Posted by: Reactionary at June 25, 2010 03:38 PM (4nbyM)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 03:38 PM (jM/Et)
Well, one way to save money would be to focus on old school battle tactics. So, for example, if war with Iran comes, no smart bombs and stealth fighters (at least after AA is taken out). Just level bomb with B-52s and old school "dumb munitions".
Posted by: 18-1 at June 25, 2010 03:38 PM (bgcml)
I find these amateur economic musings to be quite distressing. You, sir, have overstepped your bounds in dispensing advice and observation concerning wealth creation and the rules and techniques therein.
This type of serious minded discussion should only be led by a bona fide financial expert like myself. Why, if we start listening to the ramblings of the economic rabble, we're likely to be led straight off a cliff.
Posted by: Dr F Inance McStockertrade at June 25, 2010 03:39 PM (QoR4a)
OT, and before you ask, yes, I realize it's lew rockwell, and yes I hate the anti-Semite douchenozzle (and his minions) but it's where I could find the story of:
10 COPS TAZERING A BEDRIDDEN 86 YEAR OLD GRANNY
For fuck's sake, can we shoot those fuckers now and take them out of the gene pool?
Posted by: s'moron at June 25, 2010 07:33 PM (UaxA0)
That's a pretty hard-core stance against the elderly, dude.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 03:39 PM (oIp16)
Posted by: stuiec at June 25, 2010 03:39 PM (7AOgy)
Hey, they are every bit as good at balancing their books as we are!
Posted by: The Democrats at June 25, 2010 03:40 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: stuiec at June 25, 2010 03:42 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at June 25, 2010 03:43 PM (NuAIL)
The Democrats, including Obama, took congress at the end of 2006. The economy fell apart at the start of 2008. So the Bush economy weathered the Clinton recession, 9/11, and the Katrina aftermath. However, as soon as we gave the Democrats the keys to the economy - the next major event caused a Depression - all just a coincidence I guess...
Posted by: 18-1 at June 25, 2010 03:44 PM (bgcml)
Here's a good book that's eerily prescient and a damned fine read.
Rogers makes his trek just before the fall of Communism. His observation of the dreary, soul-sucking nature of collectivism is worth the price of the book alone.
Posted by: Warden at June 25, 2010 03:44 PM (QoR4a)
Posted by: The Democrats at June 25, 2010 07:40 PM (bgcml)
Generally better, as they can't usually print their own money -- and when they take money from other people, the police power of the state usually opposes them rather than assists them in doing so.
Posted by: stuiec at June 25, 2010 03:44 PM (7AOgy)
Generally better, as they can't usually print their own money -- and when they take money from other people, the police power of the state usually opposes them rather than assists them in doing so.
Posted by: stuiec
at June 25, 2010 07:44 PM (7AOgy)
I can fix that.
Posted by: Barack Obama at June 25, 2010 03:45 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: 18-1 at June 25, 2010 07:44 PM (bgcml)
FIFY.
Posted by: stuiec at June 25, 2010 03:45 PM (7AOgy)
thanks stuie
lulz, jim.
Monty, when will you learn that the whiz kids know how to create wealth. ex nihilo.
Two years is about right for inflation to start peeking around, sinc ethe banks can't sit on that money forever. They'll make their cash on deflation in the meantime.
I still don't know why the SBA doesn't get a half-trillion to become the nation's lender of choice. I mean, if you're gonna federalize finance, at least make it WORK.
Posted by: s'moron at June 25, 2010 03:45 PM (UaxA0)
That's a pretty hard-core stance against the elderly, dude.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 07:39 PM (oIp16)
Seems reasonable to me
Posted by: Peter Singer at June 25, 2010 03:46 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: dr kill at June 25, 2010 03:46 PM (w9bVp)
Posted by: s'moron at June 25, 2010 07:45 PM (UaxA0)
I have no clue what you are saying.
However, I have figured out what was wrong with me National Hole Digging Program! I have already submitted a bill to Congress to fully fund my new National Hole Filling program.
Posted by: Barack Obama at June 25, 2010 03:48 PM (bgcml)
However, inflation per se is not my worry -- I'm far more world about sovereign-debt default and the crippling of international trade. I can easily see a repeat of the 1930's-era "tarriff war" as sovereigns bow to pressure to "protect domestic jobs". Poltiicians are depressingly predictable.
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 07:34 PM (jM/Et)
I could have stated my point better. What I meant was, bankers personally hold a lot of dollars. Nobody wants his personal fortune destroyed.
I understand what you're saying about the supply of stuff, but right now there is so much stuff it boggles the mind. Excess housing alone is enormous. If one were cash rich, now would be the time to get a vacation home someplace nice. There's plenty of time for the central bank to suck the money back in before heavy inflation sets in, if they have enough brains to do it (big if). And consider - a tremendous amount of what we spend money on is for "services" which can be produced in far, far greater abundance than they are now, because the labor pool is so vast. There is much to buy - but all of us fear to buy, and are hoarding what we can, if we are still employed.
As for trade wars, I'm not too worried. There is plenty of arguement to be made the Smoot Hawley merely coincided with the depression, rather than caused it. Further, the trade situation was far different in those times. Americans were not having their middle class destroyed by having to compete with slave labor. It was largely reasonable competition with civilized people - Europeans - in those days. I doubt that Viet Nam can do much to hurt us by throwing up trade barriers, and China is already grossly merchantilist and has huge trade barriers in place as is, both open and hidden. Americans need to buy a lot of the stuff that they currently get from foreigners. Unless Adam Smith was grossly mistaken, it is always better to buy goods from one's own country if it is reasonable to do so. Considering how much of what we buy from China is near worthless crap, or actually poisonous, I don't worry about them much. And at least Europeans expect to earn a decent living, so there's no slave labor element there.
Posted by: Reactionary at June 25, 2010 03:49 PM (4nbyM)
Posted by: Reactionary at June 25, 2010 03:55 PM (4nbyM)
Posted by: dr kill at June 25, 2010 03:56 PM (w9bVp)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 03:57 PM (jM/Et)
There is plenty of argument to be made the Smoot Hawley merely coincided with the depression, rather than caused it.
I sort of agree with that statement. Although it didn't help, I think it's harm has been GROSSLY overstated. I also think the harm that Roosevelt's "New Deal" did is also overstated by some too.
If you want a real eyeopener, and at what I suspect is the real culprit at making the 1930's series of depressions a great one, look at the idiocy that the Federal Reserve pulled during that time. It's almost as if they were on an intentional mission to destroy this country.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 03:59 PM (oIp16)
Where do I sign up?
Posted by: ManBearPig at June 25, 2010 03:59 PM (554T5)
Posted by: Rocks at June 25, 2010 04:10 PM (UYace)
Just looked it up on Google and yep, there's a warning.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 25, 2010 04:12 PM (c0A3e)
@35: "You "inflated" your wine supply by telling everyone that water is actually wine. Except that it isn't, and no sleight of hand will make it wine.
Does that make sense? "
No, it's an invalid example. In case you missed it, the good people of the land formerly known as America elected The Messiah to lead them to the Glorious Socialist Utopia. He can change that water into muthafuckin' wine.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at June 25, 2010 04:13 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: Rocks at June 25, 2010 08:10 PM (UYace)
It looks like some of his advertisers are pumping malware.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 04:15 PM (oIp16)
Posted by: Lady in Black at June 25, 2010 04:16 PM (TtHJm)
Mmmm-mmmm-mmmm. Mmmmm-mmmm-mmmm. (slurp, slobber, inhale, gobble)
Posted by: Steven Pearlstein at June 25, 2010 04:20 PM (7ZyYf)
@90: "The Democrats, including Obama, took congress at the end of 2006. The economy fell apart at the start of 2008. So the Bush economy weathered the Clinton recession, 9/11, and the Katrina aftermath. However, as soon as we gave the Democrats the keys to the economy - the next major event caused a Depression - all just a coincidence I guess..."
Not really, things got worse when the Dems were in control of the purse strings, but the American economy has been built on a foundation of sand for a long time. Basically, there has been no real growth for decades, and a lot of wasteful socialist shit layered on top of that. Note that the GOP is responsible for putting a good bit of it in, too. At best - they simply slowed the rate of overloading.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at June 25, 2010 04:21 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: steevy at June 25, 2010 04:21 PM (NmWLa)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at June 25, 2010 04:22 PM (RZ8pf)
California is number one!
Times review finds that in more than half of the state's casinos and gaming rooms, welfare recipients can get cash from state-issued EBT cards.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 04:23 PM (oIp16)
Ace et al, perhaps you can do a post on this.
"Rolling Stone broke interview ground rules with McChrystal, military officials say"
That POS reporter set the General up, set him and his aides up really good.
"But 30 questions that a Rolling Stone fact-checker posed in a memo e-mailed last week to McChrystal media adviser Duncan Boothby contained no hint of what became of the controversial portions of the story. "
They set up this good patriotic man up to fall, F U Rolling Stone!!!!!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at June 25, 2010 04:23 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Rocks
Yeah, it was mucked up since the AM. It's not just Gateway, it's the whole FirstThings website.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at June 25, 2010 04:25 PM (N/7an)
Posted by: Monty at June 25, 2010 04:27 PM (jM/Et)
Posted by: steevy at June 25, 2010 04:27 PM (NmWLa)
Buuuut, if their bubble breaks, they'll be forced to stop buying bonds. That raise US Fed rates and then we're looking at some new problems here.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at June 25, 2010 04:28 PM (N/7an)
Or they'll try to start a war. I'm more worried about that in the long run, especially given the male:female sex imbalance of Chinese children.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 25, 2010 04:28 PM (c0A3e)
@120: "They set up this good patriotic man up to fall"
And he fell for it. Stupid to agree to an interview with Rolling Stone, stupid to let aides drink with a reporter from Rolling Stone, and stupid not to immediately terminate when the questions changed from what had been approved.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at June 25, 2010 04:29 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: steevy at June 25, 2010 04:29 PM (NmWLa)
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at June 25, 2010 04:30 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: steevy at June 25, 2010 04:30 PM (NmWLa)
Posted by: steevy at June 25, 2010 04:31 PM (NmWLa)
Posted by: scarface at June 25, 2010 04:37 PM (w9bVp)
They'll eat their own, if the recipe is a good one.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 25, 2010 04:37 PM (554T5)
Posted by: steevy at June 25, 2010 04:38 PM (NmWLa)
Almost??
Posted by: KG at June 25, 2010 08:43 PM (S8TF5)
I only say almost because I lack positive proof they were actually agents of Stalin. Their only trick was to reduce/tighten the monetary supply, and every-time the economy adjusted, they ratcheted the screws tighter. I have a hard time believing they did not have some ulterior motive other than depraved incompetence.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 04:52 PM (oIp16)
I only say almost because I lack positive proof they were actually agents of Stalin. Posted by: Jim in San Diego
A good rule of thumb to stick with, imho. It's next to impossible to persuade fence-sitters, marginal lefties and others that the US needs to reverse course if we're playing fast and lose with facts in order to score emotionally satisfying political points.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at June 25, 2010 04:57 PM (N/7an)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 04:58 PM (Yq+qN)
Choice reading about the Federal Reserve and the Great Depression
1. This massive destruction of liquidity began when the Federal Reserve responded to the 1929 stock market crash by allowing the quantity of money to decline by 2.6 percent over the next year. This extremely tight monetary policy put the economy into severe recession.
2. The Federal Reserve was derelict in this responsibility during the three banking crises that culminated in the Great Depression. Indeed, more often than not the Federal Reserve sold bonds and raised the discount rate, thus reducing banking liquidity when it should have increased liquidity. The first banking crisis began in the autumn of 1930 when the Federal Reserve stood aside and permitted banks to fail in the South and Midwest. The result was to undermine confidence in banks. Runs on banks spread as depositors rushed to convert their deposits into currency.
3. In January 1933 the three-year banking crisis brought on by Federal Reserve mismanagement of the money supply entered its final phase. This time the Federal Reserve System itself panicked. Banks were failing because they could not meet frightened depositors’ demands for cash. Statewide bank holidays spread. By March 1933 bank holidays (during which banks were not required to meet their obligations to depositors) had been declared in about half of the states. The Fed responded to these events by again raising the discount rate, making it harder for banks to meet the cash demands of depositors. From January to March the money supply fell dramatically. On March 4 the Federal Reserve Banks themselves closed. Examining this gross negligence 30 years later, Friedman and Schwartz concluded: “The central banking system, set up primarily to render impossible the restriction of payments by commercial banks, itself joined the commercial banks in a more widespread, complete and economically disturbing restriction of payments than had ever been experienced in the history of the country. One can certainly sympathize with President Hoover’s comment about that episode: ‘I concluded the Reserve Board was indeed a weak reed for a nation to lean on in time of trouble.’”
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 05:00 PM (oIp16)
Looks like they're going to have to shut down the comments section for HuffPo again.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 25, 2010 05:01 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at June 25, 2010 05:03 PM (IqfKc)
Not surprising, considering they will have to file for bankruptcy.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 05:03 PM (Yq+qN)
Posted by: Tiffany at June 25, 2010 08:58 PM (E+/tl)
Oh, I can recommend a great masseuse, there. Though, she might get frightened by the lower adductor region.
Posted by: Al Gore at June 25, 2010 05:03 PM (YX6i/)
If you were intent on destroying the US, what would you have done DIFFERENTLY than Obama, Pelosi and Reid?
Posted by: CDR M at June 25, 2010 08:55 PM (5I8G0)
I was talking about the Federal Reserve in the 1930's, but Obama, Pelosi and Reid suck too.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 05:03 PM (oIp16)
They're sensitive, tolerant, and caring, you know. Unlike us.
I hope it's nothing serious.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 25, 2010 05:08 PM (M9BNu)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 05:09 PM (Yq+qN)
"Former VP Cheney admitted to GWU Hospital for testing after not feeling well, expected to remain there this weekend"
Posted by: Tiffany at June 25, 2010 08:58 PM (E+/tl)
All because of comments from the asshole Robert Redford, blaming Cheney and his WarCock for the oil spill.
Posted by: Fish at June 25, 2010 05:10 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 09:09 PM (Yq+qN)
I wonder if BP is a good buy right now? Congress seems determined to hand them unlimited liability, so I don't know just yet.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at June 25, 2010 05:12 PM (oIp16)
Is there any calamity that can't be blamed at least in part on that?
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 25, 2010 05:12 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Fish at June 25, 2010 09:10 PM (v1gw3)
Uh, Robert who? I have spooges bigger than REDford.
Posted by: Dick Cheney, still commenting from the operating table at June 25, 2010 05:13 PM (YX6i/)
Dick Cheney should make peace with Robert Redford and ask him out to a dove hunt in South Texas. If Cheney doesn't make a tactical error and shoot the insolent prick, maybe we'll get lucky and a rattlesnake bites his dick. His liberal friends could then argue over who gets to suck the poison out and save Redford.
Posted by: Fish at June 25, 2010 05:14 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: runningrn at June 25, 2010 05:17 PM (CfmlF)
They will be forced to declare bankruptcy. At this point, they are also considering how many of their assets to sell, as well as how to best break-up or restructure the company. Article here.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 05:18 PM (Yq+qN)
Posted by: steevy at June 25, 2010 05:18 PM (NmWLa)
Posted by: runningrn at June 25, 2010 05:18 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 25, 2010 05:20 PM (554T5)
Posted by: Editor at June 25, 2010 05:20 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: steevy at June 25, 2010 05:20 PM (NmWLa)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 05:21 PM (Yq+qN)
Indeed. Hopefully this is nothing and he'll be around for many more years.
If a guy as evil as Soros can live as long as he has, why can't Darth Cheney?
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 25, 2010 05:22 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 06:18 PM
America telling Europe to open the spending and debt taps, Europe telling America that the social spending party is over.
Spock has a beard, and Sulu has a huge scar
Posted by: kbdabear at June 25, 2010 05:22 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 25, 2010
09:22 PM (c0A3e)
I'm a merciful dude. I give the one's going to hell more time to change their minds.
Posted by: God at June 25, 2010 05:23 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: Tony Montana at June 25, 2010 09:22 PM (0pYSi)
Tony, you bitch, where's my Peruvian Marching Powder?
Posted by: Tony Soprano at June 25, 2010 05:24 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: Tony Soprano at June 25, 2010 09:24 PM (v1gw3)
Look at the pelicans flyyyyyy!11!!!!!1!1
Posted by: Tony Montana at June 25, 2010 05:29 PM (0pYSi)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 05:33 PM (Yq+qN)
Don't worry - I'm keeping a seat warm for Georgie down here.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy at June 25, 2010 05:33 PM (554T5)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 25, 2010 05:43 PM (Yq+qN)
I'm serious. After what they did to GM, why would anyone be naive enough to expect them to follow bankruptcy law with BP?
Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at June 25, 2010 06:27 PM (mHbcC)
Posted by: gary gulrud at June 26, 2010 05:56 AM (/g2vP)
Re: Broke USA, a woman interviewed the author on BookTV last weekend. She asked him about lotteries. He said that the focus of his book was on businesses that preyed on the poor (and leads a reader to conclude that these practices should be illegal). The woman said that lotteries prey on the poor a lot more, taking in about 5 times the revenues as the payday-loan industry.
In other words, he identified poverty industries as the bad guys and government as the savior. She identified poverty industries as small-time hoodlums and government as the archvillain.
Posted by: FireHorse at June 26, 2010 06:22 AM (cQyWA)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2673 seconds, 294 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: joeindc44 at June 25, 2010 02:09 PM (QxSug)