February 23, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Politico has a breathless report that Rubio confirmed, confirmed, that he would be traveling to South Carolina for a fundraiser.
Umm. No shit. Biggest "duh" ever:
Republican Marco Rubio gave Gov. Charlie Crist's Senate campaign some easy ammunition, confirming a report from CNN's Peter Hamby that the former Florida House speaker plans to travel to South Carolina next month to raise funds there with Sen. Jim DeMint. Rubio and DeMint have established a joint committee, "Friends of DeMint and Rubio," to collect money in tandem. "Marco has been honored by Sen. DeMint's support and welcomes his assistance in raising the resources needed to communicate his limited government message throughout Florida," campaign spokesman Alex Burgos wrote in an email.Coming off his star turn at CPAC last week, Rubio's plans to visit an early presidential primary state don't look good. "Anything such as this which lends appearance that Marco is already looking past not only the August primary, but the November election, is not a good place for him to be politically," a Republican strategist told Morning Score. "Oftentimes some forget that while Jim DeMint may have a small universe of followers who read RedState, the reality is that the vast majority of Americans, including in Florida, don't have the slightest idea who Jim DeMint is."
Senate and congressional candidates fundraising outside of their own states happens all the time these days. Politico now pretending that this "doesn't look good" seems like wishful thinking on the part of Democrats and that one out-of-work political consultant they interviewed.
In fact, it's great because it means that Republicans are looking at the big picture. They want to take back Congress and keep Senate seats out of the hands of Democrats and some squishy Republicans, like Crist.
I have another scoop for Politico: Rubio's coming to California this week for some fundraisers too. Is this the end of the world as we know it!?!
Meanwhile, Crist's staffers are jumping ship as fast as they can find other things to do.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:23 AM
| Comments (155)
Post contains 348 words, total size 2 kb.
Nothing to see here.
Posted by: England Dan & John Ford Cooley at February 23, 2010 05:29 AM (dP6Ky)
Posted by: steevy at February 23, 2010 05:29 AM (9YLyF)
Posted by: Mjim at February 23, 2010 05:30 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: Demon Sheep at February 23, 2010 05:30 AM (wnU1W)
Posted by: paleRider at February 23, 2010 05:34 AM (WGGwF)
Did they have an article when it was Scott Brown?I guarantee 80 percent of Scott Brown's money bomb cash came from out of state.
Also, Politico, why didn't you report about all the foreign money donated to the obama campaign, or all the small donation to people that couldn't be traced?
Posted by: Ben at February 23, 2010 05:37 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Alan996 at February 23, 2010 05:38 AM (KyZos)
Rubio's Coming to California? Wait until he gets a load of me
[smashes hand on blood covered news paper, imitates an owl, then laughs with a cackel.]
Posted by: Ben at February 23, 2010 05:38 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Sue at February 23, 2010 05:38 AM (RybmS)
Charlie would do it to, if he could find someone to do the same for him.
Rubio was up by 18% in a recent Florida poll. Crist still has fear more cash on hand.
Posted by: bill-tb at February 23, 2010 05:38 AM (y+QfZ)
Posted by: Ben at February 23, 2010 05:39 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: eddiebear at February 23, 2010 05:39 AM (wnU1W)
"... our friends at the Sunlight Foundation have noted in their Party Time blog, U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is getting ready to embark on a California fundraising blitz, which will take him down the Pacific Coast, from San Francisco to Bel Air, early next week."
Posted by: Sue at February 23, 2010 05:39 AM (RybmS)
LOL, Jim Demint getting support to real conservatives. With that he is building up points that can be called in at a later date for support.
Could it be that he may run in 2012???? And I do think there are a lot of people who know who he is nationwide.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 05:40 AM (QrA9E)
the TEA party people in the 5thCD Va say it is absolutely horrible, scandalous & downright un-American for state Senator Robert Hurt (R) to fundraise outside the 5th for his race to get the R nomination to challenge Dem Perriello.
well, guess what? Perriello already has $1 million in the bank. Organizing for America will send its volunteers to 2 places in November to hold Dem seats (Colorado & Va's 5th CD). Perriello has Soros money & Rangel money.
you damn right we need to raise money from every red-blooded American that can contribute.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at February 23, 2010 05:40 AM (Oan2w)
Why is Rubio doing a fundraiser in SC a story?
Posted by: Sue at February 23, 2010 05:40 AM (RybmS)
Posted by: changer1701 at February 23, 2010 05:41 AM (xktXL)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 23, 2010 05:43 AM (i3AsK)
As for raising funds out of State I have said this many times; I would like to elliminate out of State funds to State offices. But that is not going to happen as long as campaigns are controlled by the two major parties.
Since it is not going to go away the conservatives do not need to unilaterally surrender.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 05:43 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Sue at February 23, 2010 05:43 AM (RybmS)
Posted by: wtf at February 23, 2010 05:45 AM (S2/J1)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 23, 2010 05:46 AM (B+qrE)
OT:
Take a look at the percentage of people the various p[residents included in their employ that came from the private sector.....it will ruin your day!
Roosevelt - 38%
Taft - 40%
Wilson - 52%
Harding - 49%
Coolidge - 48%
Hoover - 42%
FDR - 50%
Truman - 50%
Eisenhower - 57%
Kennedy - 30%
LBJ - 47%
Nixon - 53%
Ford - 42%
Carter - 32%
Reagan - 56%
GHWB - 51%
Clinton - 39%
GWB - 55%
And the Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner
is.........................Obamanos -8%
GOOD GAWD! EIGHT PERCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: rightzilla at February 23, 2010 05:48 AM (rVJH4)
Posted by: Darin H at February 23, 2010 05:49 AM (maEIj)
Posted by: Alan Smithee at February 23, 2010 05:52 AM (F7GbV)
Posted by: Paul Revere at February 23, 2010 05:56 AM (epgqp)
Posted by: eddiebear at February 23, 2010 05:56 AM (wnU1W)
IMHO, it's smart for DeMint to fundraise for other candidates because it will help him build up chits and political IOUs with people such as Rubio should he win election.
That's just crazy talk. Next you'll be telling me that the White House offers cabinet positions to protect Arlen Specter or something.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 23, 2010 05:58 AM (B+qrE)
.."Anything such as this which lends appearance that Marco is already looking past not only the August primary, but the November election, is not a good place for him to be politically," a Republican strategist told Morning Score ..
No doubt the same (un-named) Republican strategist that supplies comment on all of Sarah Palin's mistakes.
Posted by: Mr Natural at February 23, 2010 05:58 AM (oq1qF)
As for raising funds out of State I have said this many times; I would like to elliminate out of State funds to State offices. But that is not going to happen as long as campaigns are controlled by the two major parties.
Good idea. My preference would be to eliminate the 17th amendment, you solve this problem and a whole host of others as well. Critics will argue that you just encourage political payoffs, but that's already happening (hey there, Blago).
Put the state legislatures back in charge of the Senate and a lot of big government legislation would be stalled because the state governments always get the short end of the stick. Plus, it increases the possibility of gridlock, and gridlock is good for America.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 23, 2010 05:59 AM (sXLx/)
Those were the days. That was before Politico though. So now it's bad.
Posted by: Barack Obama at February 23, 2010 06:03 AM (+zo63)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 23, 2010 09:59 AM (sXLx/)
I'm not convinced that giving it back to the State legislatures would help matters any. The problem is that the two parties control everything and they have set the rules via a variety of methods to make the incumbent the odds on winner every time.
States ran by Dems would nominate Dems nad vice-versa. The bad thing would be here in SC where the State party is run by Lindsey Graham. If the SC legislature were voting we would get another damn Graham RINO clone.
I had a big argument the other day with Ace over this, but I believe if you made it illegal to have contributions from outside the district you are running for office in that the influence of the national parties would be minimalized and possible even eliminated.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 06:04 AM (QrA9E)
Bitch please!
Posted by: The 17th Amendment at February 23, 2010 06:04 AM (+zo63)
Posted by: Fritz at February 23, 2010 06:07 AM (GwPRU)
Don't worry, Politico hasn't forgotten it. They're saving that meme for the weekend before the election.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 23, 2010 06:08 AM (I/MqP)
The sad thing is that Crist isn't a terrible guy. Don't get me wrong, i am in the tank for Rubio and think we need to take conservative where we can get them, but Crist is a center right republican that would be a great senator if he were in a more liberal state. I would take Crist in Vermont, NH, Maine, Conn, Illinois, New York, just not in a Florida. Especially considering Rubio can win florida.
I just think that even though we are for Rubio, our goal shouldn't be to destroy Crist, just to beat him, especially considering Bill Nelson will come up for re-election, I would be content with Crist and Rubio as Florida's senators, rather than Rubio and Nelson.
It is not in the interests of Republicans to politically destroy a viable Republican in Florida who isn't a total RINO. That is not to say that if a conservative can win Nelson's seat we shouldn't support him. But let's keep our options open just in case no true blue conservative runs against Nelson.
Posted by: Ben at February 23, 2010 06:09 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Ken Hahn at February 23, 2010 06:09 AM (nFMkO)
It is not in the interests of Republicans to politically destroy a viable Republican in Florida who isn't a total RINO.
Much like Pawlenty on warming, Crist must redeem himself for the crapulus "thing" before I take him seriously again.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 23, 2010 06:11 AM (B+qrE)
It is not in the interests of Republicans to politically destroy a viable Republican in Florida who isn't a total RINO.
Much like Pawlenty on warming, Crist must redeem himself for the crapulus "thing" before I take him seriously again
I agree to a point. I would like him to repent, however if it comes down to him and Bill Nelson, I will side with Crist.
Posted by: Ben at February 23, 2010 06:12 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at February 23, 2010 06:13 AM (usjNq)
Posted by: Al Gore at February 23, 2010 06:22 AM (cop54)
What if you have an interest in the district? Say I have a chain of valurite stores. I live in district 1. I have a store in district 1. But I have two stores in district 2.
Can I contribute in both districts?
Posted by: wtfci at February 23, 2010 06:22 AM (+zo63)
Now if the State legislature wanted to limit where fundiing for State races can come from to the State, I don't think anything in the 17th amendment can prevent that from happening. Would that be correct?
Ace seemed to think it would take an amendment. I don't think so.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 06:25 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Clark at February 23, 2010 06:31 AM (aCXct)
I'm not convinced that giving it back to the State legislatures would help matters any. The problem is that the two parties control everything and they have set the rules via a variety of methods to make the incumbent the odds on winner every time.
States ran by Dems would nominate Dems nad vice-versa. The bad thing would be here in SC where the State party is run by Lindsey Graham. If the SC legislature were voting we would get another damn Graham RINO clone.
I think the difference in this case would be that the state parties and the state legislature would recover the importance that has diminished over time, primarily due to things like the 17th amendment. There was a time when Senators would have to answer to the state legislature, and if the Senator voted a certain way that was not in congruence with the wishes of the legislature, he would find himself in hot water. I also think the beauty of it is that the state elections become more significant. And we might end up with two Miss Lindseys but there's also the chance that the Dems would be watered down as well.
The framers wanted the House to represent the people and the Senate to represent the states. The idea behind the 17th amendment was to make the Senate more repsonsive to the voters; it clearly has not worked out that way, and in fact one could argue it has had the opposite result. Beside, the 17th was a Progressive idea and that's enough for me to say it needs to be junked.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 23, 2010 06:32 AM (sXLx/)
I had a big argument the other day with Ace over this, but I believe if you made it illegal to have contributions from outside the district you are running for office in that the influence of the national parties would be minimalized and possible even eliminated.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 10:04 AM (QrA9E)
Actually just the opposite would happen. The State and National parties would become critical in money as they are now in influence. They would be no way even one politician would vote to not allow the party itself to spend money on a local election. Out of State money would then have to be funneled through them giving them even more leverage.
Posted by: Rocks at February 23, 2010 06:34 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Rocco at February 23, 2010 06:35 AM (YmPwQ)
Shock, Coakley was fundraising outside of MA!
Yeah. And SHOCK! Pelosi and a whole bunch of other Democrats keep showing up in Texas to fundraise even though pretty much no one wants them here. It's a pity we can have the Texas Rangers close the border when we know they're coming.
Posted by: Alan Smithee at February 23, 2010 06:35 AM (F7GbV)
[Republican we don't like] does [something]. [Unnamed "Republican"] says [exactly what we want said]. [Political science professor or political commentator] says [unnamed "Republican"] has [done something bad] and that the Republican party needs to listen to all voices, such as the advice offered by [unnamed "Republican"].
This is not the first time [Republican we don't like] has been tainted by scandal. In [any month or year][Republican we don't like] was accused by [Democratic activist who is always right] of [doing something]. This new scandal breathes life into those charges.
Posted by: Evening News at February 23, 2010 06:37 AM (/rb2j)
Posted by: Jean at February 23, 2010 06:37 AM (HPPUS)
Rubio's plans to visit an early presidential primary state don't look good. ... a Republican strategist told Morning Score.
One of McCain's shitweasels, or T.C. VanVoorhees? The old guard GOP (aka 'LOSERS') are seeing the writing on the wall and shiatting their pants.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 23, 2010 06:37 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: Alan Smithee at February 23, 2010 06:37 AM (F7GbV)
OK--deep breaths--think for a minute about the prospect of state legislatures electing senators again. Now, run through your head the number of current state legislatures that you would trust with that.
In my experience the number is somewhere between zero and that imaginary square root of one stuff we all leanred in algebra.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 23, 2010 06:37 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Jean at February 23, 2010 06:40 AM (7K04W)
Out of State money would then have to be funneled through them giving them even more leverage.
You misunderstand what I mean. Under my plan that would be illegal. A State Party would only be able to contribute to a Statewide election, so yes they could contribute to the Senate race but they would not be able to contribute to district races, except the district that is the home of where they are located.
They would not be able to accept money from out of State at all.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 06:41 AM (QrA9E)
I have been uhhh trying to figure out what her shirt says... yyyeeaahh thats it.
Posted by: MelodicMetal in MA at February 23, 2010 06:41 AM (x4S2a)
In my experience the number is somewhere between zero and that imaginary square root of one stuff we all leanred in algebra.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 23, 2010 10:37 AM (B+qrE)
Not only that they would never leave. Senator would become like a Federal Judge, only death would get them out. Does anyone here think that if R's got control of the Mass government they would have kicked Kerry or Kennedy out? No friggin way. Plus the Senators would become even bigger porkers as they would have to make sure the pork covers every district in the state.
Posted by: Rocks at February 23, 2010 06:42 AM (Q1lie)
Make 100% disclosure the rule and ruthlessly enforce it.
I used to think that 100% disclosure was the answer but after that fiasco in CA I have had second thoughts.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 06:43 AM (QrA9E)
They would not be able to accept money from out of State at all.
Why couldn't they just set up subsidiaries in each state and funnel money that way? No law can cover every single possibility and people who want to go around the law will find ways to do it, legally or illegally.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 23, 2010 06:45 AM (sXLx/)
My feeling is that if we minimized the influence of the Parties the representatives would tend to reflect more of the will of their voters rather than what the party leaders want.
If this actualy was the case now Obama care would be truly dead instead of coming back to life every 2 or 3 weeks.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 06:46 AM (QrA9E)
I think the point is that South Carolina is full of evil racist bitter clingers while we all know that Florida is more enlightened because of yankee's relocating from NY. Going to SC shows that Rubio is willing to take money from Southern racists.
At least that is the implication.
Nationally we have to look down on certain states. If we don't then we'll have to notice that Mississippi was damaged in Katrina and that Texas isn't completely composed of ignorant cowboys dragging people by chains.
Posted by: dagny at February 23, 2010 06:47 AM (LjMJ1)
I got ya Vic. But what is to stop the National Party from making a general donation to the state party? Or the State making one to a district party? Now that money is state and local money and can be used accordingly. This has already been tried, that's how we got 527's.
Posted by: Rocks at February 23, 2010 06:47 AM (Q1lie)
No law can cover every single possibility and people who want to go around the law will find ways to do it, legally or illegally.
That is going to happen regardless of any laws in place. The key to minimizing that is harsh penalties combined with strict enforcement. The threat of a fews years in a cell with Bubba will keep the big money venders from taking a chance.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 06:47 AM (QrA9E)
I got ya Vic. But what is to stop the National Party from making a general donation to the state party? Or the State making one to a district party? Now that money is state and local money and can be used accordingly.
It would be illegal for ANYONE to make a donation to ANY person or organization outside of their home district.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 06:49 AM (QrA9E)
My feeling is that if we minimized the influence of the Parties the representatives would tend to reflect more of the will of their voters rather than what the party leaders want.
If this actualy was the case now Obama care would be truly dead instead of coming back to life every 2 or 3 weeks.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 10:46 AM (QrA9E)
My feeling is if you enact laws minimizing the influence of Parties those same laws can, and will, be used to minimize the influence of voters.
Posted by: Rocks at February 23, 2010 06:51 AM (Q1lie)
At least that is the implication.
LOL, an Hispanic going to racists in SC to get political support. They are stretching it with that one.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 06:51 AM (QrA9E)
It would be illegal for ANYONE to make a donation to ANY person or organization outside of their home district.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 10:49 AM (QrA9E)
Wow, so the National republican party couldn't even buy pizzas for the local Young Republicans? This kind of law sounds good to you?
Posted by: Rocks at February 23, 2010 06:53 AM (Q1lie)
Does my wuddle Cristy need another big hug from his 'Bama-daddy?
Oh for fuck sake Matthews, not you! And I thought I told you to stay out from under my fucking desk!!
Posted by: Teh Won at February 23, 2010 06:56 AM (FsbnY)
Posted by: doc at February 23, 2010 06:56 AM (lklDJ)
Not only that they would never leave. Senator would become like a Federal Judge, only death would get them out. Does anyone here think that if R's got control of the Mass government they would have kicked Kerry or Kennedy out? No friggin way. Plus the Senators would become even bigger porkers as they would have to make sure the pork covers every district in the state.
I don't think repealing the 17th is a silver bullet. There are a lot of reforms that need to be made; balanced budget, eminent domain reform (primarily for environmental legislation but to eliminate other abuses as well), invalidity of any treaty that infringes upon Constitutional rights, term limits for federal judges and Congress, supermajority for imposition of new taxes or increase of any existing tax, requirement that any federal regulation be approved by Congress as a single measure on a roll call vote, banning amendments that have no relation to the bill being debated, line-item veto, etc.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 23, 2010 06:56 AM (sXLx/)
What business is it of any government how, where, and when I spend my money?
Posted by: wtfci at February 23, 2010 06:57 AM (+zo63)
I think it should be illegal to be President without proving to the American people that you were born in the U.S.
Posted by: gus at February 23, 2010 06:57 AM (Vqruj)
Posted by: Jean at February 23, 2010 06:58 AM (HPPUS)
Maybe he could get some cash from Bhuddist monks.
Posted by: gus at February 23, 2010 06:59 AM (Vqruj)
LOL, an Hispanic going to racists in SC to get political support. They are stretching it with that one.
Remember he is a Republican Hispanic so he doesn't count as really being hispanic. He's Cuban so probably anti-castro, which we all know, is wrong because Castro has the best health care! Besides, those Cubans don't really count as being hispanic, they tend to vote to the right. Castro, after all is the darling of the left.
I've always wondered if Barbara Walters did him.
Posted by: dagny at February 23, 2010 06:59 AM (LjMJ1)
Posted by: Jean at February 23, 2010 07:01 AM (7K04W)
Posted by: Jean at February 23, 2010 07:02 AM (7K04W)
Republican Marco Rubio gave Gov. Charlie Crist's Senate campaign some easy ammunition
What? That Rubio and DeMint are popular, conservative and friends? What ammunition?
Posted by: Truman North at February 23, 2010 07:02 AM (e8YaH)
The reality is that even fewer Americans, including in Florida, don't have the slightest idea what Politico is.
The reality is that even fewer Americans, including in Florida, don't give a shit what Politico's thinks about anything.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 23, 2010 07:05 AM (AVHIU)
Posted by: curious at February 23, 2010 07:05 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 23, 2010 07:07 AM (AVHIU)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 23, 2010 11:07 AM (AVHIU)"
You think his gardener or cleaning lady kidnapped him?
Posted by: curious at February 23, 2010 07:08 AM (p302b)
Posted by: polynikes at February 23, 2010 11:04 AM (m2CN7)
So now what? In addition to eliminating the money we are now going to limit the movement of individuals across state lines if they attempt to help someone get to the polls?
Wow,
Posted by: Rocks at February 23, 2010 07:09 AM (Q1lie)
My working hypothesis at the moment re:Ace is alien abduction.
How much do you think they'll pay us to take him back?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 23, 2010 07:10 AM (B+qrE)
..."I'd like to buy my companions a couple of drinks."
And the bartender says to the Ewok, "We don't serve Wookies in this cantina..."
Posted by: Fritz at February 23, 2010 07:12 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: fluffy, Masshole at February 23, 2010 07:12 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: jukin at February 23, 2010 07:13 AM (vkkNZ)
No system is perfect. And yes we would restrict "in kind" contributions such as ACORN going into a State to campaign for someone.
Of course, the CURRENT law prohibits that because ACORN is filed as a "non-profit 501(c)" corporation. They are prohinited by law from engaging in political activity. So how do they get away with it?
The work for the Dems, most specifically, the CBC. So of course the Dems are not going to call for investigation and prosecution. The weakass R's will not call for one either because they are afraid the CBC will call them raciiiisst.
The sad fact is that if you are a black involved in politics today you can get away with virtually anything. The race card is better than the old Monopoly Get Out of Jail Free card.
The race card assures that you will never even be investigated.
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 07:15 AM (QrA9E)
At least we don't have to worry about AoSHQ being purchased like HotAir. Who would want to buy a blog in which postings come to a halt and the progenitor of the site disappear for days at a time?
Posted by: Ben at February 23, 2010 07:16 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Verbal Kint at February 23, 2010 07:17 AM (4Kl5M)
Has he always disappeared for "days at a time" or is this a new phenomena? It is truly odd that posting comes to a halt. What do you think is the reason for that?
Posted by: curious at February 23, 2010 07:18 AM (p302b)
Maybe somebody that knows where Ace lives should check up on him.
I don't want to hear about another Allan Kelly.
Posted by: harleycowboy at February 23, 2010 07:19 AM (JKGfQ)
I want to know the percentage of non-lawyers per administration.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 23, 2010 07:21 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: curious at February 23, 2010 07:21 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Jess at February 23, 2010 07:28 AM (Dd+m6)
Posted by: Noah at February 23, 2010 07:35 AM (mhD2v)
115 Isn't WTR in NYC right now?
I tried to link the two in last night's ONT, but nobody would believe me.
The great Ewok might be dead because of our inaction. Dead...dead at the fangs of a Cali vampire.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 23, 2010 07:35 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at February 23, 2010 07:38 AM (WZFkG)
Published: Sunday, August 2, 2009 at 1:00 a.m.
Last Modified: Saturday, August 1, 2009 at 10:42 p.m.
TALLAHASSEE - The day after Florida's unemployment rate climbed to 10.6 percent, the highest in the state since the mid-1970s, Gov. Charlie Crist was in the Hamptons, the tony millionaire enclave in New York.
var enableForum = "false"; #forumnumcom h6 {width:250px;float:left;margin:18px 10px 0 0;padding:10px 0 15px;border-bottom:none;border-top:9px solid #888}Crist was gathering tens of thousands of dollars at a fundraiser for his U.S. Senate campaign.
While Florida has sunk deeper this summer into its worst recession since the Great Depression, several of the state's top political leaders have been busy tending to other business -- raising money for what are expected to be spirited statewide campaigns in 2010 for U.S. Senate, governor and attorney general.
In the past few months, Crist raised more than $4 million around the country. He is spending this weekend in Aspen, Colo., at yet another fundraiser.
Posted by: JohnTant at February 23, 2010 07:38 AM (PFy0L)
Republican Marco Rubio gave Gov. Charlie Crist's Senate campaign some easy ammunition...
These folks just love to tell us what everything really means, don't they?
Posted by: sherlock at February 23, 2010 07:39 AM (FsbnY)
Posted by: Jean at February 23, 2010 07:44 AM (6Njk9)
I guess Burns thinks Floridians are so stupid that they don't realize all senate candidates (and, uh, lots of candidates for state jobs like secretary of state in Ohio and Minnesota) get lots of out of state money. Are Floridians as dumb as Burns thinks? I doubt it, but maybe Burns knows more about them than I do. I think he just succeeds in making himself look like an ass.
Politico is absolutely one of the worst of the MSM organs.
Posted by: chris999 at February 23, 2010 07:44 AM (B/WwP)
Posted by: Jean at February 23, 2010 11:44 AM (6Njk9)"
When was the last time anyone communicated with Ace?
Posted by: curious at February 23, 2010 07:47 AM (p302b)
Politico is absolutely one of the worst of the MSM organs.
Has anyone ever determined who sponsored Politico to styart up to begin with?
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 07:52 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: harleycowboy at February 23, 2010 07:58 AM (JKGfQ)
Posted by: TexasJew at February 23, 2010 07:59 AM (W/00U)
Posted by: harleycowboy at February 23, 2010 11:58 AM (JKGfQ)"
Are the co bloggers gettin worried?
Posted by: curious at February 23, 2010 08:01 AM (p302b)
Maybe Ace is in heavy negotiations to sell AoSHQ to a 500,000-watt radio station down in Cuidad Acuna, Mexico to help them sell goat sex-gland injections and plastic Jesus bobbleheads.
It worked for Hot Air!
Posted by: TexasJew at February 23, 2010 08:03 AM (W/00U)
Posted by: harleycowboy at February 23, 2010 08:05 AM (JKGfQ)
Politico is absolutely one of the worst of the MSM organs.
Has anyone ever determined who sponsored Politico to styart up to begin with?
Posted by: Vic at February 23, 2010 11:52 AM (QrA9E)
A couple of years ago, Rush said that they were a bunch of WaPost rejects.
Posted by: TexasJew at February 23, 2010 08:05 AM (W/00U)
Posted by: No(clue)ah at February 23, 2010 08:06 AM (ukuxx)
Big whoop. Most people in Florida are from other states and/or countries.
Fucking idiots at Politico...
Posted by: TexasJew at February 23, 2010 08:08 AM (W/00U)
One locked in Dem vote isn't worth as much as an occasional Repub voting WITH the dems and FIVE repubs voting for the jobs bill looked good
Nice try, trollboy, but two of those five RINOs are retiring this year and in any case you asshats aren't going to have 59 seats anymore after November.
Posted by: Damn Skippy at February 23, 2010 08:09 AM (ukuxx)
Posted by: TexasJew at February 23, 2010 08:09 AM (W/00U)
Speaking of Crist getting screwed by a male Neopolitan Mastiff ....
Did you catch Florida's dufus Governor Charlie Christ at the healthcare conference yesterday, screwing the people of Florida?
Posted by: A Casual Observation at February 23, 2010 08:10 AM (ITzbJ)
Posted by: harleycowboy at February 23, 2010 11:58 AM (JKGfQ)"
Are the co bloggers gettin worried?
Gabe isn't as Ace left the website to him in his will.
Posted by: Ben at February 23, 2010 08:10 AM (wuv1c)
Water is wet!
Shocking but true. You might want to assemble your crack investigative team on this one. It's so alarming that the public will need only the best and gentlest handling to survive the shattering revelation.
Also, make sure you tell the public how to vote so as not to upset delicate political sensibilities and flyover state ignorance.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 23, 2010 08:11 AM (LB0/l)
Posted by: Ian S. at February 23, 2010 08:12 AM (p05LM)
Dude actually took a job with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz because he admires her.
Here's some nice crow for Jon Allen. If you're married to the Democratic Party it's kind of hard to still be an objective reporter. How the hell does he avoid the staff events for Senator Hagan?
"JonathanÂ’s political acumen, his relationships with members of Congress and his understanding of the institution will enhance my efforts to elect Democrats and advance the nationÂ’s agenda," Wasserman Schultz said in a statement. "A leadership PAC is the best tool for providing the funding that top-quality Democratic candidates need to compete. DWS PACÂ’s growth necessitated the hiring of an executive director, and IÂ’m pleased that Jonathan wanted to be part of our team."
The PAC has contributed nearly $750,000 to Democratic incumbents and challengers in the last three and a half years, including $185,000 to 53 Democrats so far this year, "making Wasserman Schultz one of the top party fundraisers in just her third term," her office says.
AllenÂ’s grandparents lived in Broward County. His wife, Stephanie Allen, is the communications director for Sen. Kay Hagan, D, North Carolina, the late Gov. Lawton Chiles' niece.
Posted by: wtfci at February 23, 2010 08:20 AM (+zo63)
I'm betting on Ace being in Vegas for Acepalooza, standing in an empty MGM Grand meeting room wearing a hobo-skin suit coat, surrounded by Costco-purchased cases of Jello pudding, asking himself "okay, was it the last week of February or the last week of April?"
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 23, 2010 08:23 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: curious at February 23, 2010 08:23 AM (p302b)
Posted by: harleycowboy at February 23, 2010 08:28 AM (JKGfQ)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 23, 2010 08:29 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: harleycowboy at February 23, 2010 08:32 AM (JKGfQ)
Last night, Michael Savage offered Michele Bachmann a fundraiser in San Francisco. And she accepted, Constitutional Conservatives.
Evidently, Nancy Pelosi has targeted Bachmann as the #1 Democrat Enemy, to be defeated at all costs, funding her liberal opponent with millions$ and launching funded massive smear campaigns across Minnesota's media. Bachmann reminds America that her victory was an anomaly from the same district that voted for Obama and elected Al Franken, as they had the best sponsored and funded media campaigns of late.
But sophisticated Americans knew this. Hence, promote Constitutional Conservatism so long as it polls to win.
Meanwhile, accept revisionism so long as it is Republican. Utilize Alinsky smear campaigns but only against stricter conservatives. Endorse witch hunts advancing neoconservative dogma (dogmas do not require facts for substantiation) that represents the national danger posed by the Tea Party against the Republican revisionist establishment in power. Promote neoconservatives to be the only "real" Good Americans.
This primary season, Michele Bachmann can count her lucky stars that she is not running against a neoconservative in the Republican Primary, especially that she is not running the first time now against an incumbent neoconservative Republican. Neoconservatives own the Republican Party machine, and are out to squash the exposure of neoconservative corruption that is identified by the Tea Party opponents.
Prove the irony of sophistry, itself infatuated with opportunism to revise definitions and enjoy corruption as another wannabe well sponsored neoconservative on established media sites. Lick the crumbs under that table, wetting the appetite to further asphyxiate the foundation of conservatism. Whatever, so long as you get by and fit in with the "in" crowd. Be the smartest sophisticate. Better to rule in hell than serve in heaven. Best to revise heaven as hell and hell as heaven and rule in Sophistry. Maybe not.
Posted by: maverick muse at February 23, 2010 08:32 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by DrewM. at 12:30 PM New Comments Thingy"
Posted by: curious at February 23, 2010 08:34 AM (p302b)
Now, whether that's a good thing for Rubio is the question!
Surely, Crist's goose must be cooked.
Posted by: Leonard Pinth-Garnell at February 23, 2010 09:44 AM (GjePs)
Ken Hahn raises an obvious point @ #46 - how much has Crist raised out of state?
Posted by: Adjoran at February 23, 2010 10:02 AM (HeULl)
Posted by: Adjoran at February 23, 2010 10:03 AM (HeULl)
Posted by: David Frum at February 23, 2010 02:31 PM (PKX0B)
Posted by: timothyJ at February 23, 2010 02:50 PM (IKKIf)
Posted by: Danny Douche at February 23, 2010 03:13 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Ken Hahn at February 23, 2010 09:00 PM (t/Aif)
That's some tuneless whistling there, sheik.
Posted by: the graveyard at February 24, 2010 05:58 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: pumashoes at August 01, 2010 11:53 PM (8RiPH)
Posted by: laptop battery at October 08, 2010 01:54 AM (rEq7v)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2357 seconds, 283 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








*Note: He's still a douche-bag, but no longer a Wasserman-Schultz douchebag.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 23, 2010 05:26 AM (1fanL)