June 22, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Well this is gonna be awkward.
McChrystal has been instructed to fly from Kabul to Washington today to attend Obama’s regular monthly security team meeting tomorrow at the White House.An administration official says McChrystal was asked to attend in person rather than by secure video teleconference, “where he will have to explain to the Pentagon and the commander in chief his quotes about his colleagues in the piece.”
Both Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have spoken with McChrystal. Capt. John Kirby, a spokesman for Mullen, said “the chairman spoke to General McChrystal last night and expressed his deep disappointment with the article and with the comments expressed therein.”
Gen. McChrystal and his minions said some things "on background" with a Rolling Stone reporter, who then obliged their unspoken request and ran with it. Before the piece was even published, the general was apologizing and Obama is reportedly pretty steamed about it.
McChrystal apparently said that he was disappointed in Obama's lack of preparedness for a meeting and betrayed by Obama's ambassador to Afghanistan, Karl Eikenberry, who he accuses of undoing the work the military has been fighting and dying for.
McChrystal's aides also said some things that are funny, but not properly uttered to Rolling Stone reporters. First, that NSA James Jones is a clown, something we've certainly remarked on here at the HQ. Also, calling the Vice President "BiteMe" instead of "Biden." Alright, that one's less ha-ha funny and more petty.
Anyway, the general has been rubbing Obama the wrong way for about a year now. Obama may be calling him home to fire him.
Oh, and Politico got hold of the Rolling Stone article (PDF).
The More Insubordinate Parts... [ace] ...are gathered up at Hot Air.
McChrystal's big problem here is that he doesn't have anything approaching like Petraeus' record of results. If you have big results you can have a big mouth. (Not that Petraeus has a big mouth; he could have a bigger mouth if he wanted to, though.)
If you can fire Douglas MacArthur, you can fire Stanley MaChrystal.
MaChrystal's insubordination aside, and his discomfort with civilian leadership aside, there is no doubt that what he said is 100% true.
Obama ran on a lie. Well, many lies, but one lie here is critical: He claimed that he was eager to depart Iraq only so he could go kick some ass in a war he claimed to consider vital, Afghanistan. But he showed up for the meeting with MacChrystal (25 minutes!) unprepared, disengaged, and distracted as ever by his own purported awesomeness.
McChrystal's Real Offense... is forcing overly restrictive rules of engagement on our soldiers that wind up killing them.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:29 AM
| Comments (442)
Post contains 477 words, total size 4 kb.
The thought of any military commander having to apologize to the jugeared jackass community organizer makes me physically ill.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 05:33 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at June 22, 2010 05:33 AM (usjNq)
He can't face down the unions like Truman.
He can't speak plainly like Truman.
He can't call down the wrath on our enemies like Truman.
But he damn sure can fire a respected general.
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at June 22, 2010 05:34 AM (a5ljo)
Posted by: MathMom at June 22, 2010 05:35 AM (cMEOf)
Posted by: Don't blame me, I voted for Palin at June 22, 2010 05:36 AM (f1EXh)
Posted by: just wondering at June 22, 2010 05:36 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: gomm at June 22, 2010 05:37 AM (7JES6)
Posted by: USA at June 22, 2010 05:37 AM (YZISw)
Posted by: From 'Barackback Obomanation: The Meltdown', in your bookstores SOON! at June 22, 2010 05:39 AM (2PTT7)
It's a shame they ruined such a good rant with such a lousy ending. The rant was great, but the premise and the ending but cruise needed to get shot at the end to make the movie tolerable
Posted by: nine coconuts at June 22, 2010 05:39 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 05:39 AM (cBd8O)
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 05:40 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: GuyfromNH at June 22, 2010 05:40 AM (kbOju)
Posted by: Usful Ijit at June 22, 2010 05:41 AM (sLjgA)
Posted by: Barbara Pdunda at June 22, 2010 05:41 AM (SZy+Y)
Ya'll keep'um straight out thar.
Posted by: CaRedneknSC at June 22, 2010 05:42 AM (6cEN2)
If that's true, it was a professional mistake on the general's part, but maybe he and his staff just couldn't take the stumbling and bumbling any longer. One thing's for sure - there's more butthurt on Pennsylvania Avenue than in all of Turkey's prisons combined.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 22, 2010 05:42 AM (554T5)
Yeah, these ROE are made of win all right. Sigh.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 05:44 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Will Folks at June 22, 2010 05:44 AM (n1QJu)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 22, 2010 05:44 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 05:45 AM (NYbDv)
Just a stunning lack of judgement, 1, not just the comments, but...Rolling Stone? WHO? Oh, that irrelevant, dying, awful rag that probably gets 90% of its subscription base from kids in dorms under the name "Heywood Jablowme"?
Second- Look- No great fan of Obama, but we have a military commanded by civillians. This sort of crap is unacceptable no matter who is President. If it was a kid out of ROTC his ass would probably be grass. No different for the General.
Posted by: Andy The Squirrel at June 22, 2010 05:47 AM (xDozT)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 22, 2010 05:47 AM (WvXvd)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at June 22, 2010 05:48 AM (uKraB)
Posted by: USA at June 22, 2010 05:49 AM (YZISw)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at June 22, 2010 05:49 AM (ps0+9)
He believes McChrystal is falling on his sword for the troops. He knew he'd get fired, but the ROE are coming from this military-hating WH. So he gave an interview he knew would get a ton of attention.
If that's true, then good on him.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 05:50 AM (UOM48)
They're all idiots. Every single one of them. They gladly work for a third worlder who hates the US and everything we stand for. Further, they work for such a Hannibal-wannabe who is an inept retard who couldn't even be trusted to take care of someone's pets while they're gone. It is a joke and the fact that any of these dipshits works for the Indonesian says enough about them, especially after he showed his true stripes plainly enough in the Afghan troop surge fiasco to let anyone with a brain know what they were working for.
The fact that McChrystal admits to having voted for the Indonesian Imbecile is clear proof that he shouldn't be in any position of responsibility, to begin with. I mean, really. How stupid does one have to be to vote for that retard? And stupid is the best that can be said about such people.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 05:50 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Jeff at June 22, 2010 05:51 AM (hYYqD)
This Prez has the thinnest skin.
Pussy
Posted by: MelodicMetal at June 22, 2010 05:51 AM (x4S2a)
Meh. Other than his vote for Obama, I don't think the man is an idiot.
It all seems very calculated to me. But Rolling Stone??
Clearly he wanted out. There must be some serious behind the scenes drama going on beyond what we've already seen and he thought this would be the most high profile way to get his point across.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at June 22, 2010 05:52 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 22, 2010 05:52 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 05:52 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: LaQuisha Finklestien at June 22, 2010 05:52 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 05:52 AM (fayON)
Posted by: awkward davies at June 22, 2010 05:52 AM (B4e7Q)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 05:52 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 05:53 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 22, 2010 05:53 AM (554T5)
But the press can't conceive that anyone would say bite me to them, and has reported it as a remark directed to the VP, which is not clear from the story.
Posted by: DM! at June 22, 2010 05:53 AM (CQUOs)
I need to read that Rolling Stone but apparently McChrystal does bitch alot about the incomptetence of the political leadership and all the bullshit he's been dealing with. Interesting to learn was Hillary seems to be on the side of the angels in this fight.
Back to Yon, he's right about the direction of this war. We're fucking finished. We elected the wrong man at the wrong time and he's led us into a goddamn military defeat. And that is a goddamn shame.
As an aside, I thought generals didn't customarily vote?
Posted by: Robert at June 22, 2010 05:53 AM (jYQ2v)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at June 22, 2010 05:53 AM (uKraB)
Everyone who dies over there is doing so now for political reasons. He has no intent of winning.
Posted by: Vic at June 22, 2010 05:54 AM (6taRI)
Posted by: progressive white liberal at June 22, 2010 05:54 AM (T5BMZ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 05:55 AM (0GFWk)
I suspect that every fucked up new thing like the ROE dohickey that the military is now doing is coming down from the little shitbag in the White House.
Book contract for McChrystal (Ret.)!!
Posted by: TexasJew in Israel at June 22, 2010 05:55 AM (VnDuH)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 09:44 AM (UOM4
McChrystal and Petraeus are both big supporters of these insane ROEs. They are both "hearts and minds" fighters, which is why they were kept on and promoted. They bear as much of the blame as anyone. Petraeus thinks that he discovered the fact that arabs can be bought off, temporarily. He thinks they really like him. He doesn't understand that there's no such thing as a resevoir of goodwill among arabs. They can be your allies for 200 years, and then, one day stab you in the back for no discernible reason. That's the desert culture. Westerners have never really been able to wrap their minds around this fact of the middle east.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 05:55 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: DocJ at June 22, 2010 05:55 AM (dt6br)
Posted by: Buster Hymand at June 22, 2010 05:56 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 05:56 AM (0GFWk)
Or rather, let me put it this way: if Obama chooses to cashier McChrystal, I will fully support that action despite the fact that I believe McChrystal to be nearly 100% correct in his criticisms and Obama to be 110% a fuck-up putz.
The chain of command is the chain of command. You don't call out your commander-in-chief and his team like this, in public, on the record. Not if you're in the armed services. There is no "Obama" exception to this rule. Just as McArthur learned that there was no "Truman" exception to the rule and deservedly paid for it.
It's just that simple.
(Ironically enough, I suspect that Obama will not fire McChrystal. Politically, he's too weak to do so. Sad sick irony indeed, but maybe for the best.)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 22, 2010 05:56 AM (l1KFP)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 09:55 AM (0GFWk)
You may want to change your name.
Posted by: TexasJew in Israel at June 22, 2010 05:56 AM (VnDuH)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 05:57 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at June 22, 2010 05:59 AM (T5BMZ)
Posted by: GarandFan at June 22, 2010 05:59 AM (6mwMs)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 05:59 AM (0GFWk)
The real crime in showing contempt toward Retarded Barry is the fact that the little shit is beneath contempt.
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 05:59 AM (lBmZl)
And to reiterate what others have written, why in the hell would he or anyone say anything to commie Rolling Stone?
He wanted to make sure the administration heard what he has to say, and it's the only thing they read.
Posted by: 48%er at June 22, 2010 06:00 AM (OThQg)
I mean boom boom boom.....we hear about this, everyone ruminates, general is ordered home and my oh my politico just happens to get a copy of the article, within hours of us hearing about this.....it's going too fast...doesn't seem quite right but can't put my finger on it...
Posted by: . at June 22, 2010 06:00 AM (p302b)
BINGO.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at June 22, 2010 06:00 AM (mHQ7T)
Just the thought of a general, any general, having to kiss Barky's ring and be scolded by that jugeared fucktard, makes my blood boil.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 06:00 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 22, 2010 06:01 AM (l1KFP)
Posted by: lions at June 22, 2010 06:01 AM (P+/LF)
That's easy. It's the same pathogen that has debilitated our civilian educational institutions - political correctness.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 22, 2010 06:01 AM (554T5)
Posted by: OCBill at June 22, 2010 06:01 AM (p28Ei)
Posted by: Monty at June 22, 2010 06:02 AM (4Pleu)
I love all this chain of command shit. It's so wonderfully sucky-assed.
I don't personally think that any Ameican should take one fucking order from a damn clown like Obama. I'm not in the military, however. But if I were, I'd fucking quit rather than do Obama's bidding if I fully believed that it were endangering the nation.
If McChrystal thinks that Obama is acting against the best interests of this country, then he has the right to quit and make his feelings public.
Maybe this just was his very strange way of quitting.
Posted by: TexasJew in Israel at June 22, 2010 06:03 AM (VnDuH)
Andy, agreed: any officer who makes remarks like that about a superior officer is insubordinate and should be cashiered. Period. The fact that what he said about The Lightbearer happens to be true, is irrelevant.
McChrystal came in with high hopes, but he has been a disappointment. Among other things, he tossed Michael Yon out of Afghanistan for not toeing the line. He seems to share The Lightbearer's attitude toward the news media: they are tolerated only as long as they are willing to serve as a propaganda arm of the Obama regime.
The only problem is that McChrystal will undoubtedly be replaced by someone far worse, whose job will be to implement Obama's original mad-dash-for-the-exits "strategy" for the Middle East. It will be done in the name of "cutting the deficit" and "putting America back to work", but surrender is surrender no matter how you spin it.
Posted by: Brown Line at June 22, 2010 06:04 AM (VrNoa)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 06:04 AM (xMgdu)
Posted by: Jay in Ames at June 22, 2010 06:06 AM (UEEex)
Posted by: Will Folks at June 22, 2010 06:08 AM (n1QJu)
Oil spill and Arizona illegal alien crises, weeks of hem-hawing needed. Insult Bambi, immediate action will be taken.
Posted by: priorities at June 22, 2010 06:08 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 06:08 AM (UOM48)
Statement....
...just that insubordination to Obama from military personnel is pretty low on my list of concerns.
...AAAND contradiction! Seriously: military insubordination to the civilian leadership should always be fuckin' near the top of your list of concerns. If you like the idea of a Republic, that is.
For christ's sake people, we have these rules for a reason. It's not a stupid reason. Nor is it something that we can just start to ignore now because Obama is a twatscar. I don't care if McChystal was serving under President Bill Ayers.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 22, 2010 06:09 AM (l1KFP)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at June 22, 2010 06:11 AM (554T5)
Work from there.
This is the tip of a very, very big iceburg.
Obama--the man who promised and promised he'd "listen to the generals" (not like that retard Bush)--is now going to fire another general just because he didn't like what he was telling him.
Posted by: jimmuy at June 22, 2010 06:12 AM (fOKRF)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 09:50 AM (UOM4
That's what I think, too. (See Top Headlines thread) Going on record as having voted for Obama gives him political cover, as someone else pointed out in these comments. The administration can't afford to have him "Going Rogue," so I expect an agreement will be made.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at June 22, 2010 06:12 AM (mHQ7T)
I'm sorry, I was under the impression that the President is a cockholster, not a twatscar. At least that's what I've been going around saying ....
Posted by: Will Folks at June 22, 2010 06:12 AM (n1QJu)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:12 AM (0GFWk)
>> There is something ill-starred about the Macs: McClellan, MacArthur, and now McChrystal.
Was just thinking that.
Truman was said to have told his staff he should have fired Mac a year earlier than he did. He didn't want to disgrace the guy.
Also interestingly enough, he had the full support of the Joint Chiefs. Every one of them signed off on MacArthur's firing.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 22, 2010 06:12 AM (WvXvd)
Posted by: EC at June 22, 2010 06:13 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 06:13 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 22, 2010 06:14 AM (omb6g)
...AAAND contradiction! Seriously: military insubordination to the civilian leadership should always be fuckin' near the top of your list of concerns.
Insubordination is not following orders. Calling Obama a "pussy communist" is just speaking the truth. (angels on pins treading on fools and such)
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at June 22, 2010 06:15 AM (2AwFA)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:15 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:15 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:15 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Barack Obama at June 22, 2010 06:16 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: Berserker at June 22, 2010 06:16 AM (gWHrG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:17 AM (0GFWk)
I was told by a lib/dem that this was the worst month for military deaths in the entire course of the war. It upset me to hear that, it upsets them too. That upsets everyone, everyone agrees. Also, the new rules of engagement thing that is rumored. Could it be that he is protecting his troops, that no one has been listening to him and now, sadly, they will.
Posted by: . at June 22, 2010 06:17 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 06:18 AM (UOM48)
Comrade Zero was “uncomfortable and intimidated” by a roomful of military brass. Gee, I guess the ability to spew rhetoric about lowering ocean levels only gets you so far when you're among people who actually have to produce results under difficult circumstances where the opponent wants to kill them.
Maybe our man-child POTUS should stick to meetings with people like Bono, Biden and Bill Ayres.
Posted by: Cicero at June 22, 2010 06:18 AM (3Dnuf)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 06:19 AM (fQbcU)
His "insubordination" is Obama's problem to deal with, not ours. If he is telling the truth, any information he offers in terms of the civilian leadership and its fecklessness is fine with me. Insubordinate-then fire him and you get to deal with the consequences.
Posted by: ed at June 22, 2010 06:20 AM (Urhve)
You and your kid are in my prayers. Ours leaves first of next year or earlier.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 06:20 AM (UOM48)
1. For some time I have thought that Obama wants to get out of Afghanistan but be able to blame it on the military, rather than his own screwed up thinking.
2. Hillary comes off pretty good in this article and coupled with the rumors about Rahm, the release of the list of countries who offered oil spill aid and were refused (coming from the State Department), I am thinking she is getting ready to leave pretty soon in order to position herself for 2012.
3. Why McCrystal gave the Rolling Stone interview: on purpose, at someone's suggestion. Two choices in this: either he was set up by the administration with collusion with Rolling Stone, OR he deliberately did so because he knew it would attract attention, and unlike the WSJ or Army Times, Rolling Stone would not hold back on printing aides' opinions nor would they pretty it up.
Wheels within wheels. I don't know what the answer is, but this is proving to be a very interesting week.
Posted by: Miss Marple (redneck teabagger) at June 22, 2010 06:20 AM (xxe/9)
Posted by: Hedgehog at June 22, 2010 06:21 AM (oQIfB)
Posted by: Wolf Blitzer at June 22, 2010 06:21 AM (SZy+Y)
The chain-of-command is broken, and the Republic is already gone.
Obama has no fealty to the Constitution he took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend.
The entire tree is poisoned.
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 06:21 AM (lBmZl)
Posted by: MathMom at June 22, 2010 06:21 AM (olJH9)
Posted by: Cicero at June 22, 2010 06:22 AM (3Dnuf)
Posted by: Fritz at June 22, 2010 06:22 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 22, 2010 10:09 AM (l1KFP)
What's this "we" shit?
Posted by: TexasJew in Israel at June 22, 2010 06:23 AM (VnDuH)
130 I read the article and most of the money quotes come from unnamed officials. I don't see how McChrystal can be shitcanned over this.
Very simple. When you are in charge, you are responsible. Thats the way it works in the military.
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 06:23 AM (OlN4e)
I say fire McChrystal, immediately. And since word on the street is that Rahm is out job hunting, send him over to Aghanistan instead. One look at the nude dead fish in the shower room and the Taliban will undoubtedly surrender immediately, problem solved.
In the meantime we can put the General in front of a bunch of blowhard Congressman who can basically demand that he ask all sorts of damn fool questions while a major crisis is going on, not solving any sort of problems but making sure that these self imporant twits get their 30 second sound bites on TV for the folks back home.
Then the administration can call the Attorney General, dispatch a team of lawyers and they can figure out who to sue for the whole thing. Worked like a charm for the Gulf Oil spill, I say, stick with it.
It's really too bad for McChrystal though, it's not like he can just leave the country and cross the border into Mexico. Unlike us, they actually enforce their immigration laws.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at June 22, 2010 06:23 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Wodeshed at June 22, 2010 10:17 AM (MFbfZ)
But, this has nothing to do with either of those things. This blowup is purely due to the mind-numbing incompetence and ignorance of the administration. That said, The Precedent would certainly be within the traditional power of the Commander-in-Chief to fire McChrystal. This would be one of the only times the Indonesian Imbecile would do something that was actually within the bounds of power of the Executive to do.
This should have happened during the Afghan troop surge intentional dithering. That was beyond pathetic.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 06:23 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 06:24 AM (I6dJM)
Oh, this "military shouldn't talk bad about the civilian leadership" sure has worked out well.
Or: Maybe we can quit watching stupid fucking Hollywood dreck that always paints the generals and the military as violent, stupid and power-hungry and maybe, just maybe, trust that they are citizens as well and actually have the best interest of the US in mind?
Posted by: jimmuy at June 22, 2010 06:24 AM (fOKRF)
At this point in time, that may not be as bad as it seems. The general likely has other pursuits that he'd be able to devote more time to, without having to answer to the incompetent boobs that is currently our civilian leadership.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at June 22, 2010 06:24 AM (hrmV3)
McCrystal is going to be fired. Barry will look even more foolish than he does now if he allows the Gen. to stay. He should have maintained his self respect and resigned.
But no matter how this cake is sliced, this is very bad news for the administration. McCrystal's attitude is more than likely the prevailing attitude in the military. Very bad news for the mother of all incompetents.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 22, 2010 06:24 AM (RkRxq)
If he wanted to quit he should have just fucking quit. This crap is beneath a man of his achievements.
I don't know what the fuck he was thinking but he deserves what he about to get.
At least Adm. Fallon had the decency to walk away as soon as he realized the fallout of his Esquire profile was going to be.
But hey, at least the war in Afghanistan is going so well the military leadership there has plenty of time to settle political scores. Eye on the ball and all.
This is just a reminder what extraordinary men Gen. Petraeus and Amb. Crocker are and what a damn near miracle their teaming was in Iraq.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 06:24 AM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: USA at June 22, 2010 06:24 AM (YZISw)
CNN Breaking News: Barack Obama golfed a 102 today at Andrews AFB. This is the best score yet for our leader. Now back to all day coverage of the "Gay Pride Day Parade in San Francisco
this reminds me of the stories in North Korea about how our Dear Leader had 8 hole in ones in one round of golf.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:25 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: lions at June 22, 2010 06:26 AM (P+/LF)
He made a few politically stupid comments (and the article notes he has done that in the past as well) and then his hangers-on helpfully piled on and fleshed the whole thing out for the RS scribbler. They did him in more than he did.
Honestly, I think people are ascribing higher motives to him and some genius plan in error. I don't get the sense he would have imploded his career this way on purpose.
I actually thought the article was interesting all the way around, from the candid views of his staff to those of the soldiers.
Predictably Jake Tapper is making jokes about the General on Twitter and outlining the historical precedent for firing a General, rather than talking about the questions the article raises about the over-all leadership in the administration and realizing he just got his journalistic ass handed to him by a barely relevant pop music magazine.
Posted by: DM! at June 22, 2010 06:26 AM (CQUOs)
There's simply no good way to spin this for McChrystal.
If he wanted to quit he should have just fucking quit. This crap is beneath a man of his achievements.
I agree. He should have done what everyone else does. Quit and write a tell all.
He's a schmuck.
Also, as mentioned before, he voted for Obama, he deserved what he got.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:26 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:27 AM (0GFWk)
It's seriously hard to 'win' afghanistan.
What the fuck do you do with it, once you've secured it? Besides hand it back over to crazy goat-fucking dirt farmers, I mean?
Because that seems to be the whole point, keep the goat-infested dirt farm out of the hands of crazy goat-fucking dirt farmers, indefinitely.
Posted by: Entropy at June 22, 2010 06:27 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:28 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: lions at June 22, 2010 06:29 AM (P+/LF)
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 06:29 AM (OlN4e)
Also, cue footage of me asking why the commanding general in Afghanistan is giving interviews to Rolling Effing Stone. Not to mention INDISCREET interviews.
Is there at least a broom closet somehere in Washington that has a shred of coherence at the moment?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at June 22, 2010 06:30 AM (+BcQ3)
Sounds familiar. LBJ redux?
Heads are starting to roll.
Update: Civilian member of Gen. Stanley McChrystal's staff who set up Rolling Stone interview resigns, military official tells NBC News
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 22, 2010 06:30 AM (9hSKh)
It's seriously hard to 'win' afghanistan.
What the fuck do you do with it, once you've secured it? Besides hand it back over to crazy goat-fucking dirt farmers, I mean?
Because that seems to be the whole point, keep the goat-infested dirt farm out of the hands of crazy goat-fucking dirt farmers, indefinitely
We should have left in 2003.
Let the Northern Alliance control the country. Back them with arms and money as long as they fight the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
Too bad Osama Bin Ladin was smart enough to kill the only man who could have controlled that country, Ahmed Shah Massoud. Bin Ladin had him killed on September 10, 2001 in a Godfather-type house cleaning.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:31 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Sticks and Stones Barry at June 22, 2010 06:31 AM (gbCNS)
130 I read the article and most of the money quotes come from unnamed officials. I don't see how McChrystal can be shitcanned over this.
Very simple. When you are in charge, you are responsible. Thats the way it works in the military.
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 10:23 AM (OlN4e)"
That is the way it is everywhere and why I was arguing that the bp CEO and chariman are responsible for everything that happened on that rig.
Posted by: . at June 22, 2010 06:31 AM (p302b)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 22, 2010 06:31 AM (omb6g)
straight UCMJ, it doesn't look good for Gen. McCrystal
Until he returns to DC, reports to the CinC and announces that he's gay. And the July 4th fireworks will start early this year.
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 22, 2010 06:31 AM (R2fpr)
But the men and women in our armed forces will carry on anyway - because President's are temporary.
Posted by: Old Sailor at June 22, 2010 06:32 AM (/Ft4q)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:32 AM (0GFWk)
Democrats all. They deserve each other.
Probably used Rolling Stone because he knew the assclowns would read it.
Posted by: dagny at June 22, 2010 06:32 AM (SE/Oy)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 10:27 AM (0GFWk)
Yes and no.
Sure Bush put them in place and fought for them but in the end they had to make it work. That was far from a given.
Also, let's not let Bush off the hook entirely. He was also responsible for the conduct of the Afghan war and didn't have nearly the success there he had in Iraq.
Personally, I think Iraq was the more important fight (if you had to choose and Presidents always have to), but it wasn't like Bush got the right team there at any point in the post 03-04 period.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 06:33 AM (X/Lqh)
How to win in Afghanistan? Win in Pakistan and Iran.
Pretty much.
But that takes a compitent covert espionage/black-op organization, which we don't have.
Posted by: Entropy at June 22, 2010 06:33 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Hedgehog at June 22, 2010 06:33 AM (oQIfB)
WE LOVE TO TAKE POTSHOTS
AND WE'RE LOVED EVERYWHERE WE GO
WE FIGHT FOR BEAUTY
AND WE FIGHT FOR TRUTH
AT TEN TRILLION DOLLARS A THROW
WE TAKE ALL KINDS OF HILLS
TO GIVE US ALL KINDS OF THRILLS
BUT THE THRILL WE'VE NEVER KNOWN
IS THE THRILL THAT WILL GET YOU
WHEN YOU GET YOUR PICTURE
ON THE COVER OF THE ROLLING STONE
chorus;
GOING TO SEE MY PICTURE ON THE COVER
GONNA BUY FIVE COPIES FOR MY MOTHER
GONNA SEE MY SMILING FACE
ON THE COVER OF THE ROLLING STONE
I GOT A MARXIST COMMANDER
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PANDER
WHO REALLY CHAPS MY ASS
I GOT POOR OLD FAKE HAIR BIDEN
ACTING LIKE THE RETARD IN THE CLASS
NOW LETS ALL DECIDE
TO LET THE WAR RIDE
BUT YOU WON'T FIRED FOR THAT
LIKE THE FIRING THAT WILL GET'CHA
WHEN YOU GET YOUR PICTURE
ON THE COVER OF THE ROLLING STONES
chorus
WE GOT A LOT OF LITTLE
TEEN AGE LEFTY REPORTERS
WHO'D PRINT ANYTHING WE'D SAY
WE GOT A BUNCH OF RETARDS IN CONGRESS
KEEP GETTING IN OUR WAY
WE GOT THE BEST TROOPS IN THE WORLD
SO WE NEVER HAVE TO BE ALONE
AND WE KEEP GETTING RICHER
BUT WE CAN'T GET OUR PICTURE ON THE COVER OF THE ROLLING STONES
chorus
Posted by: That's GENERAL Hook to you, son at June 22, 2010 06:33 AM (2PTT7)
Looks as if the Russians and Chinese are going to split Afghanistan down the middle and get all the goodies under ground, Karzai will be hanging from a light post by the end of 2011 and our Brave Troops will become the new Vietnam Vets.
Russia is never going back. That would be like us going back to Vietnam.
We had our shot, we failed(for various reasons), we're done with it.
So are the Russians with Afghanistan. They want nothing to do with the country other than to have a friendly government installed.
The Chinese may just be dumb enough to take a shot at it. I say we let them
Life was easier for Americans when other nations were the target of global hatred.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:33 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:34 AM (0GFWk)
barely relevant? read taibbi's stuff on the banksters.
Posted by: . at June 22, 2010 06:34 AM (p302b)
Posted by: . at June 22, 2010 06:37 AM (p302b)
Let the Northern Alliance control the country. Back them with arms and money as long as they fight the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
The NA is already trying to "share" power with the Taliban, in the middle of a fucking war. There's no way to secure anything in Afghanistan.
A military junta could hardly be worse that Barry and his band of merry pranksters.
Posted by: hobgoblin at June 22, 2010 06:37 AM (BXLor)
Posted by: Gen. McChrystal at June 22, 2010 06:37 AM (2jp4I)
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 06:39 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:40 AM (0GFWk)
Let the Northern Alliance control the country. Back them with arms and money as long as they fight the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
The NA is already trying to "share" power with the Taliban, in the middle of a fucking war. There's no way to secure anything in Afghanistan.
A military junta could hardly be worse that Barry and his band of merry pranksters.
The Northern Alliance is now, because they think the Taliban will win. Can you blame them?
Had we backed them in 2003 and let them run the country, however brutally, I would venture a guess that things would be different.
I've been advocating we go back to our Cold War stance, in the current Afghanistan conflict, we install a pro western dictator and look the other way at what he has to do. I know it isn't politically correct, but do we have any other options? Does anyone believe democracy will work in Afghanistan? Anyone?
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:40 AM (wuv1c)
But NY State went for Obama big time. Maybe he should give Al Qaeda a Red State?
Arizona? Hahaha...
Posted by: EC at June 22, 2010 06:41 AM (mAhn3)
After the way RS bashed Zeppelin back in their heyday, McC should have known he'd be pilloried.
He should have gone to Bob Guccione Jr at Spin magazine (or Bob Guccione Sr at Penthouse for a spread).
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at June 22, 2010 06:41 AM (8lCJT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:42 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 10:40 AM (0GFWk)
Nah, apparently Al Qaeda has a serious hard on for moonbats, nothing else will do.
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 06:42 AM (OlN4e)
That's the only thing muzzies understand.i
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 06:42 AM (lBmZl)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 22, 2010 06:42 AM (omb6g)
Rolling Stone?
I guess the Village Voice wasn't available.
Posted by: TexasJew at June 22, 2010 09:50 AM (VnDuH)
No other media outlet -- except for marginal websites -- will touch anything even remotely critical of Osama Obama and his imbecilic "war" policy.
Despite my enormous respect for the military, I have to say it seems too many modern military leaders have been infected with the virus of politically inspired "limited war," or "police actions." We no longer have blood-and-guts generals who understand that wars are meant to be won, in the fastest and safest way possible. Or if we do have them -- as I hope we do -- they are muzzled by desk-bound drones at the Pentagon.
Yes, civilians must have the ultimate authority. But any civilian in that position needs to be a patriotic American, not a hate-filled, Third World-loving racist Marxist who despises America's best, our fighting forces.
So slap McChrystal on the wrist, lightly, and get the Traitor-in-Chief and his band of cowards out of power.
That way, we all win.
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 22, 2010 06:43 AM (Ulu3i)
The NA is already trying to "share" power with the Taliban, in the middle of a fucking war. There's no way to secure anything in Afghanistan.
That's what I'm saying. You can secure it, alright - but then what do you do with it? Other than "keep securing it", there ain't nobody to hand it over to.
Posted by: Entropy at June 22, 2010 06:43 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:43 AM (0GFWk)
Uh, Mr. President, it's spelled 'coup' but it's pronounced 'coo'. No problem, I knew that you knew that. Whats' our tee-off time? A little touch football first? No, gets your nice shorts all dirty? No problem.
Posted by: The Ghost of Robert Kennedy at June 22, 2010 06:44 AM (2PTT7)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:46 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: USA at June 22, 2010 06:46 AM (YZISw)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 06:47 AM (xsupj)
Posted by: LaQuisha Yablowme at June 22, 2010 06:47 AM (SZy+Y)
I've been advocating we go back to our Cold War stance, in the current Afghanistan conflict, we install a pro western dictator and look the other way at what he has to do. I know it isn't politically correct, but do we have any other options?
That's the only thing muzzies understand.i
I wouldn't go that far.
I honestly believe the people of Iraq and Iran can handle democracy, or republics. They are intellegent and modern people. Hell, Iranians thought they were getting a democracy after the Shah was deposed. They were ready for it in 1979. They are ready for it now.
However I do think there are some places in the world where democracy won't work, or at least won't work for a couple more centuries. Afghanistan and Burma come to mind.
Take Democracies, parliamentary or republics, where you can get them, install authoritarian dictators that are friendly to the west where you can't/
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:47 AM (wuv1c)
I've been advocating we go back to our
Cold War
stance, in the current Afghanistan conflict, we install a pro western
dictator and look the other way at what he has to do.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 10:40 AM (wuv1c)
I agree. Whatever ends up ruling is going to be pretty brutal, anyway. It would be nice if we could actually admit that fact and the arrogant leftists were forced to admit that their "universal values" are not universal, in any sense. Life is not valued the same in all cultures and their personalities are very different from ours. These people pray to friggin' rocks.
In any event, all threats from the arab/persian/muslim world start and stop with control of the gulf oil fields. That is always the key in the background of these problems.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 06:47 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 06:47 AM (NnH1t)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 22, 2010 06:48 AM (7BuB8)
Dam, don't we ever learn..
The first Job of a soldier is to KILL the enemy, not win his heart like a dating service...
And the first rule of being a General is DON'T talk to the Press!
Posted by: Gen. George Patton at June 22, 2010 06:48 AM (OlHjR)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 06:49 AM (yGYDb)
As admirable as some of the Neo-con goals were, democracy won't work everywhere. At least not yet.
This isn't a perfect world. We need resign ourselves to the world as it is and do the best we can.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:50 AM (wuv1c)
They cannot so long as totalitarian islam is acceptable in their societies.
Islam is a sinkhole that will consume everything. The only way to keep it in check is with a strong authoritarian counterbalance.
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 06:50 AM (lBmZl)
Hey, is that little fageleh Roy Cohn still around? What a crazy guy! Kept telling Joe McCarthy: 'You're punching down!! NEVER punch down! Always punch UP!' Joe had no clue what the hell he was talking about.
Posted by: The Ghost of Robert Kennedy at June 22, 2010 06:51 AM (2PTT7)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 10:34 AM (0GFWk)
Actually, that's not true.
Remember, the Iraq 'surge', from strategy changes to the accompanying troop build up, were done against the advice of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
A good bit of the strategy was formulated outside the Pentagon. Petraeus was not a popular guy with the top-top brass.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 06:52 AM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at June 22, 2010 06:53 AM (a5ljo)
Crap.... you all shoulda heard the Carter Jokes we used to tell..
Or heck, the verbiage we used about Regean when we were pulled out of Beruit in 83... (no shitter... first time I heard we were getting relieved late, I was on LPH2 Iwo Jima, sitting in Repair 8, heard our relief was invading Grenada, and asked why the hell we were invading Spain... as it was the only Grenada I knew about...)
ANYTIME a political decision overrides what the military thinks it ought to do, there is going to be talk... especialy if there is beer around.
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 22, 2010 06:54 AM (OlHjR)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 06:54 AM (0GFWk)
I honestly believe the people of Iraq and Iran can handle democracy, or republics.
They cannot so long as totalitarian islam is acceptable in their societies.
Islam is a sinkhole that will consume everything. The only way to keep it in check is with a strong authoritarian counterbalance.
There are moderate and liberal muslims. Look at the people getting killed in Iranian protests. Women without burkhas, men dressed like trashy greased up Los Angelans. There are a ton of muslims who just like american christians show up at church out of a sense of tradition, not a ferverant belief in Christ as Divine, or in their case Allah.
I do think certain middle eastern countries are ripe for democracy. They are kept stupid by dictators who use Islam and jew hatred as a political tool.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 06:55 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Generizzle Foshizzle at June 22, 2010 06:55 AM (xxgag)
You knew this was going to happen when Obama spent months last year dithering about Afganistan and then at his "war council" meetings the civilian side thought additional resources meant Peace Corp. types and foreign aid while the military thought it meant more troops. I think McChrystal requested 50,000 or 60,000 additional troops and only got 30,000.
The Kandahar invasion has been delayed until the fall because the previous invasion of some other city didn't have the desired results. They are supposedly analyzing the deficiencies. My guess is that things are a complete wreck in Afganistan. Obama's plan was to start withdrawal in July 2011 which means it is getting close to less than a year for remaining campaigns. I'm not sure if the entire "surge" of 30,000 has been sent yet. I am sure that military commanders aren't too enthused about putting our soldiers in danger only to have to pull them out before the mission is done due to some artificial timeline.
Posted by: Prof. Venkman at June 22, 2010 07:00 AM (Bs34i)
What a fucking mess.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 07:01 AM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: dagny at June 22, 2010 07:02 AM (SE/Oy)
Eff McChrystal, he's no different than Wes Clark, apparently.
Meanwhile, our guys are walking around the 'stan without rounds in the chamber. Great.
Posted by: Dang Straights at June 22, 2010 07:02 AM (fx8sm)
Yep. The best example of a modern islamic society, based on the Euro-style parliamentary system, is Turkey, which always needed the secular military to retain supreme power and which, after the EU forced them to change their Constitution to take that power away from the military (in order to be considered for membership in the EU that the EU never intended to offer - and rightfully so), Turkey has been on a dramatic fall into the islamist chasm.
And Turkey is the best anyone can reasonably hope for!
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 07:02 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: MissTammy at June 22, 2010 07:02 AM (jTT87)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 07:03 AM (NvNaG)
Second- Look- No great fan of Obama, but we have a military commanded by civillians. This sort of crap is unacceptable no matter who is President. If it was a kid out of ROTC his ass would probably be grass. No different for the General.
True dat! I so agree. And yes, Chrystal showed an appalling lack of judgment doing this interview with Rolling Stone.
Posted by: runningrn at June 22, 2010 07:03 AM (CfmlF)
Time taken to react to the oil spill or floods in Tennessee, versus negative criticism printed in a stoner rag.
Priorities. Got to luv em.
Posted by: fapo at June 22, 2010 07:04 AM (uGiHE)
Posted by: Dr Mabuse at June 22, 2010 07:04 AM (CPdUf)
Didn't the statists just jump with joy when military commanders trashed Bush?
Turnabout is fair play.
Posted by: Lone Marauder at June 22, 2010 07:04 AM (/bVuS)
Oh, and if you read the article, the only one in the Administration who comes off well is Hillary who wants the military to be given what they need.
Hmm....
Hillary 2012!!111!!
Posted by: runningrn at June 22, 2010 07:04 AM (CfmlF)
Someone says something unflattering about Obama: CRISIS!
Posted by: Trimegistus at June 22, 2010 07:05 AM (Z+rhq)
After sacking McChrystal, Obama named Captain Crunch as head of military operations in Afghanistan at the suggestion of Vice President Biteme
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 07:05 AM (wuv1c)
I agree. Whatever ends up ruling is going to be pretty brutal, anyway. It would be nice if we could actually admit that fact and the arrogant leftists were forced to admit that their "universal values" are not universal, in any sense. Life is not valued the same in all cultures and their personalities are very different from ours. These people pray to friggin' rocks.
I can't pin everything on leftists when Bush and neocons use practically the same argument about exporting democracy.
Posted by: Prof. Venkman at June 22, 2010 07:05 AM (Bs34i)
Posted by: Andy The Squirrel at June 22, 2010 09:47 AM (xDozT)
If you look closely, you'll see that there is a 'No Retard' clause in the civilian command language, so we're alright here.
Posted by: alppuccion at June 22, 2010 07:06 AM (tI23M)
Gen. McChrystal and his minions said some things "on background" with a Rolling Stone reporter, who then obliged their unspoken request and ran with it.
Unspoken? If there was an agreement it's on background, that's that, and it doesn't matter how juicy the story is. That should cook that reporter's reputation permanently, and it will even chill the information other reporters are able to get from other sources about other stories. I do so love the word "other."
Posted by: rdbrewer at June 22, 2010 07:06 AM (h86fF)
Drew - twitted that McChrystal saw the article before publication and did not object. So this is a calculated bayonet charge
That's interesting.
Posted by: rdbrewer at June 22, 2010 07:07 AM (h86fF)
Oh, and if you read the article, the only one in the Administration who comes off well is Hillary who wants the military to be given what they need.
Posted by: runningrn at June 22, 2010 11:04 AM (CfmlF)
I think Biden's out, and Hillary's the VP in 2012.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at June 22, 2010 07:08 AM (mHQ7T)
Drew - twitted that McChrystal saw the article before publication and did not object. So this is a calculated bayonet charge
That's interesting.
hopefully McChrystal doesn't shout "allahu ackbar" before running into the meeting
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 07:09 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 22, 2010 07:10 AM (omb6g)
Yeah. At least Adm. Fallon had the decency to jump when he saw what was in the Esquire piece.
I don't know what deep game McChrystal can be playing. I don't think he is, which means he's either an idiot for doing it on purpose or an idiot for doing it accidentally.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 07:10 AM (X/Lqh)
I thought so
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at June 22, 2010 07:10 AM (mHQ7T)
Let's see, team. We got the oil spill. Now McChrystal. What will we do next week to keep Obamacare out of the news?
Posted by: Mastermind Obama at June 22, 2010 07:10 AM (h86fF)
Keep telling yourself that.
Islam is a fucking cancer. Modern western values like liberty are incompatible with their totalitarian belief system.
It doesn't matter how nice a face you want to put on it. It doesn't matter that muslims have ten fingers and ten toes. People are not all the same on the inside.
PoP, by the way, was dead right about Turkey. The one thing I would add is that Kemal had a strongass pimp hand, and that is what it takes to make a muslim-majority country act right.
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 07:11 AM (lBmZl)
On Hillary. I think she has her sights set on 2016.
I think she assumes that whoever beats obama in 2012 will be a one term president.
If things stay as bad as they are, I think we might have quite a few one term presidents in a row, which would be rare for this country.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 07:11 AM (wuv1c)
he's either an idiot for doing it on purpose or an idiot for doing it accidentally.
This. Some guys are only good at getting promoted. It's called "polishing the apple".
Posted by: Dang Straights at June 22, 2010 07:11 AM (fx8sm)
I can't pin everything on leftists when Bush and neocons use practically the same argument about exporting democracy.
Posted by: Prof. Venkman at June 22, 2010 11:05 AM (Bs34i)
I've said that Bush was on the left in that pursuit. Bush talked about "Democracy" all the time and "Republic" never. He also said that islam was a "religion of peace" (wrong on two accounts in three words!).
The reason there was so much continuity from Bush to the Indonesian Imbecile on these fronts was because Bush had moved that far left. Bush was really supposed to take care of Iran before he left office. That was his big job, really.
Anyway, as bad as those policies were, The Precedent is looking to even intentionally fuck them up as much as he is able, which makes it all a real mess. Wait until he starts attacking the military the way he's attacking Arizona, now ...
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 07:11 AM (Qp4DT)
244
Nah. I think it's Huckabee/Swaggart for our team.
I think it will be Huckabee and that televangelist who turned out to be gay. You know. That one..
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 07:12 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 07:13 AM (XSlA+)
~Ben
Considering the last two elections, I'll have to get back to you on whether or not I think it's working in the U.S...
Posted by: Speller at June 22, 2010 07:13 AM (o0R2E)
Grim jest indeed.
Posted by: Dang Straights at June 22, 2010 11:10 AM (fx8sm)
But you gotta admit, they slaughter everyone else in the 'looks' department. mmrowwwlllll!
Posted by: alppuccino at June 22, 2010 07:13 AM (tI23M)
Posted by: rdbrewer at June 22, 2010 07:13 AM (h86fF)
Okay, then who is the RS douchebag?
Posted by: Deety at June 22, 2010 07:13 AM (aVzyR)
Posted by: The Chicken at June 22, 2010 07:16 AM (i3AsK)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 07:16 AM (XSlA+)
Posted by: Wallace Cleaver at June 22, 2010 07:18 AM (SZy+Y)
McChrystal is a dead man walking.
I have to question his judgement, not for the interview, voting for Obama.
You reap what you sow.
Let's be done with Afghanistan. Bomb the shit out of it.
Posted by: mpfs at June 22, 2010 07:19 AM (iYbLN)
Ben,
Thanks.
Whoa!
If the dem house doesn't pass a budget this year, then flipping the House will hand the GOP the biggest damned prybar you've ever seen. The GOP will be able to engineer a government shutdown almost as soon as they're seated.
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 07:19 AM (lBmZl)
THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET
PLANNED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 HAS BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO WASHINGTON DEMOCRATSÂ’ OUT-OF-CONTROL SPENDING SPREE.
AN APOLOGY FOR THIS BETRAYAL OF AMERICAN TAXPAYERS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE FORTHCOMING AT THIS TIME.
BE ADVISED THAT THE FOLLOWING SERVICES WILL BE INTERRUPTED:"
via drudge
posted it in top headline comments didn't know you were talking about it here.....
Didn't the budget guru just quit?
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:20 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Michael Collins at June 22, 2010 07:20 AM (I+7Zv)
Posted by: ccc at June 22, 2010 07:21 AM (oNLll)
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 07:21 AM (OlN4e)
I just read something but can't find the leak.
Part of it is different opinion on strategies (Eikenberry isn't you're run of the mill Ambassador, he's a retired general who commanded the Afghanistan operation at one point....too many chiefs.).
Also, McChrystal is willing to work with Karzai and his brother as is. Eikenberry hammers them on crime and corruption. Their differing portfolios seemed to create problems for each other as those are not harmonious approaches/missions.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 07:21 AM (X/Lqh)
So, once we put the Peace Corpse in charge in Afghanistan, how many Paki nukes do you think $1 trillion or so in lithium will AQ buy?
Posted by: Dang Straights at June 22, 2010 07:22 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: Ellie McChrystal Light at June 22, 2010 07:22 AM (2AwFA)
Ah, if only McChrystal's name were Shinseki, then he'd be lauded as a whistle-blowing hero!
Heheh. Yes, the letters "shinseki" have much juju.
Posted by: mountaintop holy man at June 22, 2010 07:24 AM (h86fF)
I think they do. A fox poll was posted, the responders overwhelmingly don't want the general fired.
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:24 AM (p302b)
Posted by: palerider at June 22, 2010 07:25 AM (FYUWS)
Part of it is different opinion on strategies (Eikenberry isn't you're run of the mill Ambassador, he's a retired general who commanded the Afghanistan operation at one point....too many chiefs.).
Eikenberry probably wasn't convinced that his strategy was a failed one, which resulted in him being replaced. McChrystal's success would have proven Eikenberry wrong. it wouldn't suprise me if people were putting their egos above the safety of the US.
It would be like relieving McArthur, installing Matthew Ridgeway, and then letting McArthur oversee Ridgeway's work. It just would not have worked out. You need a clean break. If a strategy fails, clean house and let the next crew come in unincumbered by the old group.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 07:25 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 07:25 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: dystopian post apocalyptica at June 22, 2010 07:26 AM (h86fF)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 07:26 AM (WHww9)
Posted by: Prof. Venkman at June 22, 2010 07:27 AM (Bs34i)
Another thing, where the hell is this generation's Curtis LeMay?
That man had titanium balls.
Became a banked pilot in 1994...and decided to go fly for Southwest.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at June 22, 2010 07:27 AM (3iMgs)
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:28 AM (p302b)
General McChrystal commands men.
President Obama commands sycophants.
In this battle I award the General +1.
Posted by: solitary knight at June 22, 2010 07:28 AM (RfR4r)
Has America become more addicted to our IPODS and forgot about what freedom truely means Maybe a fatwa on Apple would wake them up.
Need to fix a failed narco-terrorist state? We've got an App for that.
Posted by: Apple at June 22, 2010 07:28 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 07:28 AM (fQbcU)
Obama: "How dare you say those things about me?!"
McChrystal: "It was the only way I could get a face-to-face meeting."
Heh! Heh!
Posted by: runningrn at June 22, 2010 07:28 AM (CfmlF)
>> Truman was wrong on MacArthur.
No he wasn't. MacArthur set himself up as the US military and political leader of Asia-Pacific. He stepped on his dick multiple times trying to drag Chang and his Nationalists back into a war, and he either totally misread or outright ignored intel about 300,000 Chinese regulars moving south of the Yalu River, which cost thousands of our boys lives, and damned near got them driven off the Korean Peninsula.
Mac had it coming.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 22, 2010 07:28 AM (WvXvd)
7th-Graders Discover Mysterious Cave on Mars
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 22, 2010 07:29 AM (9hSKh)
Now what possessed McChrystal to vote for Obama in the first place is a whole other mystery. But I think it's telling that Obama decided to appoint him, I suppose thinking the general was a complete sycophant, and then failed to invest in a real working relationship with McChrystal once he was in place.
Posted by: Y-not at June 22, 2010 07:29 AM (Kn9r7)
Orszag was OMB director. He was on the executive branch side.
The linked article said that the problem in the house is that the democrat side is fragmented and Hoyer cannot keep them together.
If the GOP in the current congress can keep any FY2011 continuing resolutions to short enough windows, then a GOP takeover seated in January won't have to wait until fall to get leverage over the White House with the FY2012 budget.
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 07:30 AM (lBmZl)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 07:30 AM (fQbcU)
From Truman in Korea through the Bushes in Iraq, from Clinton in Somalia to Osama Obama everywhere, the notion that "we can't win because people will be critical of us" has taken over our military policies. No surprise that, after so many years and administrations, the top brass at the Pentagon have become converts to the hacky-sack doctrine of war-fighting.
The primary -- maybe only -- function of our military is to do what is good for the USA. How can they do that when civilian authority is addicted to the suicidal doctrine of "making nice?"
The UCMJ rules regarding the civilian authority were devised at a time when our leaders were patriotic Americans. If we are going to continue with traitors, appeasers and do-gooders who sing "We Are the World" when they should be issuing orders to defend America, perhaps that needs re-thinking.
Afghanistan is not worth a single American life. Neither, for that matter, is Iraq. They have not been worth our blood and treasure from Day One. At the heart of our presence there are the kinds of petty diplomatic considerations that have made our current leaders look like the wimps they are.
Defend America! And, when it's time to take up arms to secure the safety of our own people, do so without regard for the other side's woes.
Leave the semi-civilized hordes in the Middle East to their own devices unless they pose a threat to us, as a nuclear Iran does. When talk fails, turn them into toxic waste dumps. And then bring our military home.
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 22, 2010 07:30 AM (Ulu3i)
From Reuters: (Karzai backing McChrystal)
“The President strongly supports General McChrystal and his strategy in Afghanistan and believes he is the best commander the United States has sent to Afghanistan over the last nine years,” said Waheed Omer.
Posted by: runningrn at June 22, 2010 07:31 AM (CfmlF)
Go read this article over at Free Range, it's a good display of why working with Karzai is impossible.
Posted by: Dang Straights at June 22, 2010 07:33 AM (fx8sm)
@222 - those pictures are fascinating.
OT: McCullough does a total takedown of Prez Oilspill
http://tiny.cc/yi5zu
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at June 22, 2010 07:33 AM (T0bhq)
Both men were wrong. Dugout Doug set himself up as an omnipotent Oriental warlord and Truman was too rooted in the FDR/Democrat ideal of worrying about pissing off the enemy to act like a C-in-C.
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 22, 2010 07:34 AM (Ulu3i)
Britain raised VAT to 20%.
How else does a nation deal with budget shortfalls, decreased revenues and a bad economy?
Raise taxes of course. You can't cut spending. You just can't.
When I look at England I see our future.
Posted by: Apple at June 22, 2010 07:35 AM (wuv1c)
Good news. Millionaires tax fails in New Jersey.
Chris Christie stops terrible legislation with his mind.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 07:36 AM (wuv1c)
Way back up @39: I think I'm thinking the same unsaid thought that you are thinking.
This wasn't done in error -- I have a hunch the interview was very calculated on the general's part.
Meanwhile, hey rah great...I've got a kid scheduled to go to Astan fairly soon, and this administration is making a soup sandwich out of it even more than it was. You know, I worried when my kid was in Iraq, but I have never worried as much as now...because now...I better not say anymore, or I'll be charged.
Posted by: unknown jane at June 22, 2010 07:36 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 07:36 AM (yGYDb)
Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at June 22, 2010 07:37 AM (XMDrW)
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 11:30 AM (lBmZl)
And all of the reports keep portraying him as a "cabinet member". OMB isn't part of the cabinet. I can't figure out what these people are thinking. Am I the only one who thought this was really weird?
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 07:37 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 07:37 AM (OlN4e)
Well, to be honest, that was my initial response...
Posted by: Deety at June 22, 2010 07:38 AM (aVzyR)
did you see the letter firing the budget that I posted upthread?
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:39 AM (p302b)
This is like the Joe Barton dust up in that the truth, on which most agree, was spoken but not without some unforced error on the part of the truth teller.
Posted by: BigDaddy1964 at June 22, 2010 07:40 AM (pOcKt)
Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at June 22, 2010 07:40 AM (XMDrW)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 07:41 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Wallace Cleaver at June 22, 2010 07:41 AM (SZy+Y)
"The night before the general is scheduled to visit Sgt. Arroyo’s platoon for the memorial, I arrive at Combat Outpost JFM to speak with the soldiers he had gone on patrol with. JFM is a small encampment, ringed by high blast walls and guard towers. Almost all of the soldiers here have been on repeated combat tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and have seen some of the worst fighting of both wars. But they are especially angered by Ingram’s death. His commanders had repeatedly requested permission to tear down the house where Ingram was killed, noting that it was often used as a combat position by the Taliban. But due to McChrystal’s new restrictions to avoid upsetting civilians, the request had been denied. “These were abandoned houses,” fumes Staff Sgt. Kennith Hicks. “Nobody was coming back to live in them.”
One soldier shows me the list of new regulations the platoon was given. “Patrol only in areas that you are reasonably certain that you will not have to defend yourselves with lethal force,” the laminated card reads. For a soldier who has traveled halfway around the world to fight, that’s like telling a cop he should only patrol in areas where he knows he won’t have to make arrests. “Does that make any f–king sense?” Pfc. Jared Pautsch. “We should just drop a f–king bomb on this place. You sit and ask yourself: What are we doing here?”
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:42 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 07:42 AM (UOM48)
The Kandahar invasion has been delayed until the fall because the previous invasion of some other city didn't have the desired results. They are supposedly analyzing the deficiencies.
Boy, I'd love to be the guy with that job. "So, can you tell us where the deficiences were in our strategy?" Yes, Einstien, I can. Announcing where and when your going to attack well in advance and then giving the enemy plenty of time to prepare is stupidity of the highest order. Announcing you're pulling out on a specific date regardless of circumstance is even worse.
It's a pretty simple equation really. The people of Afghanistan fully expect us to pull out and leave them to their own devices, and soon. Sad thing is every indication is they're probably right in this belief.
As a result nothing we do, short of the absolute and total destruction of the Taliban and Al Queda, will have any effect whatsoever. The Afghans aren't going to fight against the Taliban in anything more than a token fashion because they know the moment we pull out, the Taliban will come back and they'll have to answer to them. Not like we can blame your average Afghan for that, it's the reality of their existence.
So for now they'll go through the motions till we cut and run, then Afghanistan will go back to the Taliban and become a breeding ground for terrorism that's probably going to be 20 times worse than it was before we invaded.
Well if Obama ever does write another book he could always entitle it "How to lose a War in less than 2 years".
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at June 22, 2010 07:43 AM (e8T35)
I've said it before... and go pummeled for it on a couple of sites... but...
The US Military should NOT be in the Nation Building business, it should be in the Nation PUNISHMENT business.
Whether its a light spanking by taking out strategic assets by air power... or the total destruction of a Nations infrastructure via invansion... we should be doing the damage, then leave.
America needs to be FEARED and RESPECTED... now we are neither.
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 22, 2010 07:44 AM (OlHjR)
Personally, I don't give a wet shit about any "insubordination" that occured. I care about only one thing:
Winning the war.
If firing MacCrystal advances that effort, then fire him. If keeping him means we have the best General in command, then keep him.
If Obama has to swallow his pride to do so, then suck it up Mr. President. Yeah, that stinging sensation is your pride. FUCK PRIDE! This war in Afghanistan is bigger than than any one individual. But if firing MacCrystal advances the war effort, then fire him ASAP, and to hell with whatever the political fallout may be.
I am reminded of a story from the Civil War. Somebody told President Lincoln that he should fire General Grant, because he was drinking whiskey and getting drunk.
Lincoln responded, "I can't spare this man. He fights."
Posted by: Ed at June 22, 2010 07:44 AM (urR3l)
Posted by: TexasJew in Israel at June 22, 2010 07:45 AM (VnDuH)
Posted by: Frank Stien at June 22, 2010 07:45 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 07:46 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:46 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Profit at June 22, 2010 07:47 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Fresh Air at June 22, 2010 07:48 AM (8McwA)
Posted by: Profit at June 22, 2010 11:47 AM (gbCNS)"
But he is a Horny newly wed man....
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:48 AM (p302b)
Michael Yon (another must-read like free range int'l), has been calling out McChrystal for a while now.
If guys like this are calling bullshit, and things in Afghanistan keep deterioriating like they are, and our troops aren't allowed to shoot back...
Posted by: Dang Straights at June 22, 2010 07:48 AM (fx8sm)
I think the problem is that at the level McChrystal is he has to be able to communicate effectively with the CiC. It really doesn't matter how good he is on the field if he is not effective at interfacing with the civilian leadership.
I suppose they could demote him to a position where he is reporting to another general, but I just don't see how he can stay in his current role.
Posted by: Y-not at June 22, 2010 07:49 AM (Kn9r7)
Posted by: Comanche Voter at June 22, 2010 07:49 AM (ktYjH)
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 07:50 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:50 AM (p302b)
318
My latest fantasy: President Chris Christie, CiC. Imagine the awesomeness.
Mine, too.
Costarring:
Paul Ryan as VP
John Bolton - S of S
Dale Peterson - Defense
Mitt Romney - Treasury or Commerce
Jeff Sessions - AG
Rudy Guiliani - Homeland Security
Sarah Palin - Energy
Michele Bachmann - Speaker of the House
Jim DeMint - Senate Majority Leader
Ann Coulter - Press Sec
What a lineup! Yeah, it's a real fantasy. But nothing wrong with dreaming.
Posted by: Marybeth at June 22, 2010 07:50 AM (hBRoa)
Posted by: Fresh Air at June 22, 2010 07:50 AM (8McwA)
The General should have resigned, it was his duty to do so if he so disagreed with the civilian leadership....then he could go to the press.
Nothing like Barton who had a duty to alert Americans to the political shakedown during a hearing with the object of that shakedown.
Neither one of them should have apologized.
Posted by: pam at June 22, 2010 07:50 AM (h8R9p)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 11:46 AM (0GFWk)
My point is that it didn't matter what Grant was or was not drinking. He was the General who would fight, and that meant he was irreplaceable.
Re-read my original comment. I don't give a shit about whose feelings get hurt over this, as long as the war effort isn't hurt. If that means Obama has his feeling hurt, so be it. If that means MacCrystal has to get fired, so be it.
If MacCrystal is our Grant for Afghanistan, then he is irreplaceable. If he is our General McClelland, then fire him.
Posted by: Ed at June 22, 2010 07:51 AM (urR3l)
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 11:39 AM (p302b)
I think Boehner is going to have to make himself apologize for that.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 07:51 AM (Qp4DT)
Yeah, but Yon seems to have really jumped the shark based on what I've seen at Blackfive and elsewhere. He may not like McChrystal because the general was criticizing Obama and not for the reasons you might hope/think.
Posted by: Y-not at June 22, 2010 07:52 AM (Kn9r7)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 22, 2010 07:52 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Old Sailor at June 22, 2010 07:52 AM (/Ft4q)
'nah, he'll ask Barton to do it....he has practice....
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:53 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Jim Jones at June 22, 2010 07:53 AM (SZy+Y)
I am reminded of a story from the Civil War. Somebody told President Lincoln that he should fire General Grant, because he was drinking whiskey and getting drunk.
Lincoln responded, "I can't spare this man. He fights."
Posted by: Ed at June 22, 2010 11:44 AM (urR3l)
On another occasion, a big shot radical Republican congressman was hounding Lincoln to fire McClellan for lack of intestinal fortitude. Lincoln asked who who he should appoint to replace McClennan. The congressman answered, "Anybody!" Lincoln responded that "anybody" was alright for congress be he needed "somebody."
(Lincoln eventually fired McClellan replacing him with Pope. Pope did so badly that Lincoln fired him and reappointed McClellan. McClellan continued to do so poorly that Lincoln again fired him and replaced him with Burnside despite Burnside's frank (and all to accurate) assessment of himself as not up to the job. Burnside was fired and replaced by Hooker. Hooker was replaced by Meade. Finally Lincoln promoted Grant over Meade and Lincoln found his huckleberry.
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 22, 2010 07:53 AM (xxgag)
Marybeth, your list is awesome. And the icing on the cake is Ann Coulter as press secretary. Heh. The press room would be blood-splattered from the lib media heads exploding. Happy sigh.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 22, 2010 07:56 AM (UOM48)
Finally Lincoln promoted Grant over Meade and Lincoln found his huckleberry.
Lee knew Grant, and knew they (the Confederate army) would be in for it with him in charge.
Posted by: maddogg at June 22, 2010 07:56 AM (OlN4e)
The difference between Islam and Christianity is Christianity pioneered the concept of seperation of church and state, spiritual and secular.
Christianity says 'give unto Caesar what is Caesar's' and 'my kingdom is in heaven'. That 'the laws are made for man' and not vice versa, and that no one is perfect and all is pardonable.
Islam is highly politicized and even authoritarian. It proscribes - as religous tenants - the methods by which you perform all manner of activities, from going to the bathroom to getting a business loan to structuring the state.
For that reason Islam is very difficult to rectify with anything other than authoritarian Islamic governments. There is no seperation.
I don't know what those crazy Hebe sectists deal was, but they really layed the groundwork for something new in religion (not unlike Judaism itself was, in some other ways).
Islam, despite coming 600 years later, followed the norm rather than the new alternative. Religions were formed to morally justify power structures, create structures of authority. They were inherantly political. You do what the chief tells you to do, not just because he's the chief and he'll smack you with a sharp sword if you don't - that is useful but has limits, but because he's ordained by the gods (who have made him strongest with the sword for a reason) and it is right to follow him. These religions were expressly political and organizational. There was 'law', there was no distinction betweel religious or moral law and political law, it was all the same.
Jesus of Nazareth was unique (occident to India, at least) in being some kind of trascendental drifter, a philosophical hobo, wandering around espousing an entirely personal philosphy with no claim to authority over the world to anything actually in the world.
Trying to seperate Islam from the government of muslims is like trying to seperate Catholicism from the Roman Catholic Church and the Vatican.
Posted by: Entropy at June 22, 2010 07:57 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 07:57 AM (wuv1c)
Grant's primary asset as a commanding officer was that he was willing to inflict and to sustain casualties. Grant sustained just as many casualties in the Wilderness as Hooker had at Chancellorsville but the difference was that Grant was willing to keep on going forward while Hooker retreated.
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 22, 2010 07:57 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: Gen McCrystal at June 22, 2010 07:58 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 07:58 AM (p302b)
Walrus,
don't forget that Mclellen ran against lincoln in 1864 as a Copperhead.
Posted by: Ben at June 22, 2010 11:56 AM (wuv1c)
Right. As a peace Democrat who was more than willing to allow slavery to continue.
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 22, 2010 07:59 AM (xxgag)
Bammy has as many merit badges on his MaoScouts
uniform as General Mac has medals on his......guess
it's a toss-up.
Posted by: grizzlybare at June 22, 2010 07:59 AM (ykUKL)
Andy the Squirrel at #35
Thanks for getting on the firing line before me...Everyone reloadiing right about now? OK, good.
I agree 100% with Andy. Commander in Chief is just that. I don't like a lot of things ours is doing right now, but a commander in the military has NO business saying anyhting of the sort to anyone; reporter or otherwise where it may be made public. His job is to say, "Yes Sir !", and "Thank you Sir, may I have another". And he'd better like doing it.
Government or not, he can quit his job if his duties do not suit him.
I was plenty tired of all of the shit-talking when GW was CiC. All I asked for then was a little respect for the man/the office.
I sure don't like who we have now, but dammit, he's the President of the United Staes and that demands some respect. Especially on the World Stage.
Posted by: Gunslinger at June 22, 2010 08:00 AM (Zi+FQ)
It's come to this.
From the UK Telegragh. Holland using, wait for it, DECOY JOOOS.
http://tinyurl.com/decoyjews
Posted by: mpfs, Decoy Jew at June 22, 2010 08:01 AM (iYbLN)
356
And the icing on the cake is Ann Coulter as press secretary. Heh. The press room would be blood-splattered from the lib media heads exploding.
Heck, liberal heads all over the country would explode. It'd be a freakin' awesome sight to behold.
Posted by: Marybeth at June 22, 2010 08:01 AM (hBRoa)
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 08:02 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at June 22, 2010 08:06 AM (p302b)
Yeah, and Grant also won a lot of battles. That'll buy you some mulligans.
More to the point, Grant may not have like politicians (though he had a patron in Congressman Washburne) he never, ever publicly disrespected the President.
No President would put up with this.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 08:07 AM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 22, 2010 08:07 AM (ZESU0)
Gen Mac: Barry I only drink bottled water and pure grain alcohol. Tap water contains Flouridated water. Everyone knows that flouidation is a islamist plot to rob us of our precious bodily fluids?
Obama: Ah General so you recommend we floridate their water in order to win this war????
Posted by: The Scarlet Pimperal at June 22, 2010 08:08 AM (SZy+Y)
I get these guys don't see the big picture but their experience should be chilling to anyone reading it. Lots of stuff looks good on paper and in a briefing but what happens where the rubber meets the road?
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 08:11 AM (X/Lqh)
If they want to throw the book:
Sec. 888. Art. 88. Contempt toward officials
-STATUTE-
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the
President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense,
the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland
Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State,
Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall
be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Posted by: Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate at June 22, 2010 08:11 AM (Hj9yW)
Posted by: The Scarlet Pimperal at June 22, 2010 08:13 AM (SZy+Y)
380 - The article also mentions how 'Team America' was sick of people like Kerry and McCain coming over and acting like they give a shit. Definitely could of been more of a vote against McCain.
Posted by: Dunkirk at June 22, 2010 08:18 AM (kbHJ6)
He went out on dozens of night-time raids during his time in Iraq, unprecedented for a top commander, and turned up on missions unannounced, with almost no entourage. "The f—-ing lads love Stan McChrystal," says a British officer who serves in Kabul. "You'd be out in Somewhere, Iraq, and someone would take a knee beside you, and a corporal would be like 'Who the f—- is that?' And it's f—-ing Stan McChrystal."
Posted by: pam at June 22, 2010 08:23 AM (h8R9p)
Posted by: ace at June 22, 2010 08:25 AM (3o3v0)
Anonymous, off the record, or otherwise, they will only try to use the information to make you and the mission look bad.
Posted by: Sam at June 22, 2010 08:25 AM (Cxsey)
I've fallen on my sword for the troop's and country's sake.
Psst. I didn't really vote for that Thing in Chief.
Posted by: Gen. McChrystal at June 22, 2010 08:28 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at June 22, 2010 08:33 AM (a5ljo)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at June 22, 2010 08:34 AM (eNxMU)
McChrystal voted for Obama? How do we know that?
It's not a General's place to make that information known publically. He has to lead a group of people with a wide range of political views. What good does it do him or anyone else to let them know that you voted for a complete imbecile? What does this say about your own character?
Then when you start criticizing the guy? That's just wrong.
I say we fire McLellan... I mean "McChrystal..."
Posted by: RobM1981 at June 22, 2010 08:38 AM (cFGyS)
Yes.
I haven't seen anyone mention MG John K. Singlaub's dismissal. That happened in March of 1977.
Carter had just taken office, and a young Stanley McChrystal was a young Second Lieutenant of Infantry less than a year out of West Point. If the dates in his wikipedia bio is right, then he had yet to take his first platoon leader job.
There is no way that Singlaub's dismissal did not make a lasting impression.
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 08:38 AM (lBmZl)
Either resign, and then go to the press.
Or put up a fuss in the press, get your side out there, let the American people know what is happening in our civilian leadership....and knowingly risk a public firing.
Then don't apologize for it.
It sounds like he is flying by the seat of his pants, and his judgement is off.
If his judgment is off, he should not be there.
Posted by: pam at June 22, 2010 08:39 AM (h8R9p)
Posted by: eyore at June 22, 2010 08:40 AM (7kgNN)
Posted by: Dan at June 22, 2010 08:41 AM (1jzSs)
Posted by: Upscale Community Organizing Thought Criminal at June
22, 2010 12:48 PM (IhHdM)
But, McChrystal was instrumental in designing those ROE and he supported them. He's a "hearts and minds" devotee.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 08:51 AM (Qp4DT)
McChrystal and Petraeus are both big supporters of these insane ROEs.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 09:55 AM (Qp4DT)
Really? Petraeus never had these insane rules under Bush. Theater-wide ROEs are explicitly approved by the White House. These rules coincidentally came about after Obama's long think-tank review of Afghanistan.
Posted by: theCork at June 22, 2010 08:54 AM (zL5Q1)
Posted by: lions at June 22, 2010 08:57 AM (P+/LF)
Posted by: theCork at June 22, 2010 12:54 PM (zL5Q1)
Read the story (or anyone of a number of stories), McChrystal supports the ROEs. Now there's some question as to whether they get over lawyered on the way down the chain of command but...
-If they don't reflect McChyrstal's orders he's responsible for fixing it
or
-If the White House ordered ROEs he, as commanding general, thinks hurt the mission/endanger troops, he needs to resign publicly and say way.
Let's not pretend everything we don't like is a nefarious Obama plot.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 09:00 AM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 09:01 AM (Yp0Ox)
Posted by: KG at June 22, 2010 09:01 AM (S8TF5)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 22, 2010 09:02 AM (l1KFP)
Posted by: lions at June 22, 2010 12:57 PM (P+/LF)
Sure, he and any other general is free to throw his stars on the table at anytime and walk up to Congress and/or the nearest microphone to tell us why.
Until such time, the rules apply.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 09:02 AM (X/Lqh)
As I said, I think Obama admin is nothing but blunderers from top to bottom. But this situation makes me sympathize with them. I actually like the way Gibbs is handling this. Again, I cannot believe I'm writing that.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 22, 2010 09:03 AM (l1KFP)
Posted by: lions at June 22, 2010 09:04 AM (P+/LF)
I'm glad Gibbs is at least pretending to be a grown up (so far). The temptation to snark back must be great but it would be horrible at this moment.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 09:05 AM (X/Lqh)
Read the Rolling Stone article. Towards the end there's a meeting between the general and some troops in the field. The troops complain about the ROEs and McChrystal defends them.
If he's lying to his troops (and I don't think he is) he should go for that alone.
Posted by: DrewM. at June 22, 2010 09:06 AM (X/Lqh)
He had one moment of bitter, blunt snark that I actually thought was perfectly placed. When Tapper read back that quote to him about how McChrystal was bitching about how Obama was 'distracted' in their first meeting, Gibbs curtly and humorlessly said "he has his undivided attention right now."
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 22, 2010 09:09 AM (l1KFP)
It would be nice if the military would stick to the rules on one of the eligibility cases and let everything be hashed out in that area. But, noooo. The Precedent would be "upset ... angry".
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 09:10 AM (Qp4DT)
When Tapper read back that quote to him about how McChrystal was bitching about how Obama was 'distracted' in their first meeting, Gibbs curtly and humorlessly said "he has his undivided attention right now"
What does a clown have to do to get some love around here?
Posted by: shakes at June 22, 2010 09:22 AM (UaxA0)
One soldier shows me the list of new regulations the platoon was given. “Patrol only in areas that you are reasonably certain that you will not have to defend yourselves with lethal force,” the laminated card reads. For a soldier who has traveled halfway around the world to fight, that’s like telling a cop he should only patrol in areas where he knows he won’t have to make arrests. “Does that make any f–king sense?” Pfc. Jared Pautsch. “We should just drop a f–king bomb on this place. You sit and ask yourself: What are we doing here?”
You don't win battles, let alone wars, with these kind of ROE's.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent - Gator Fan at June 22, 2010 09:24 AM (YVZlY)
REALLY sharp commentary by Hume, hope it goes online at Fox soon.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 22, 2010 09:29 AM (l1KFP)
1. All the daming quotes in the RS article came from McCrystal's cadre of buttboys, not him. That said, he was cool with it and gave RS the greenlight to publish. As Jean said: calculated bayonet charge.
2. Speaking of damning quotes, this one is tailormade for MoronNation:
"I'd rather have my ass kicked by a roomful of people than go out to this dinner," McChrystal says.
He pauses a beat.
"Unfortunately," he adds, "no one in this room could do it."
With that, he's out the door.
"Who's he going to dinner with?" I ask one of his aides.
"Some French minister," the aide tells me. "It's fucking gay."
Posted by: Cuffy Meigs at June 22, 2010 09:35 AM (JefgB)
Posted by: Grover at June 22, 2010 09:35 AM (gifD/)
Posted by: KG at June 22, 2010 09:36 AM (S8TF5)
Posted by: Christopher Brossard at June 22, 2010 09:37 AM (mAm+G)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 09:40 AM (3Ds00)
Posted by: steve at June 22, 2010 09:42 AM (glQ/d)
Posted by: Josh at June 22, 2010 09:47 AM (TeJd8)
Posted by: Jean at June 22, 2010 10:00 AM (xMgdu)
not for the reasons you might hope/think.
Doubt it.
---
From a commenter over at Blackfive:
I'm not certain how his statement is in any way prophetic. Ok, so Yon doesn't trust him, I get that, but how does Yon not trusting him reflect some prognostication that McChrystal would do an interview with Rolling Stone. Further, your reasoning for mistrusting him (supporting a Dem) is something that apparently Yon didn't have a problem with when he originally supported McChrystal, since he had voted for Obama by that point.
I haven't followed Yon's spiral into insanity super-closely, but I think his problems with McChrystal have more to do with some real or perceived affront the general inflicted on Yon's ego, rather than being based solely or even primarily on McChrystal's attitudes toward the administration or prosecution of the war.
Posted by: Y-not at June 22, 2010 10:01 AM (Kn9r7)
Posted by: Say What? at June 22, 2010 10:06 AM (vwh8M)
Posted by: ace at June 22, 2010 12:25 PM (3o3v0)
Unwinnable with the current strategy. Forcing Obama to fire him makes the troops respect their CIC more than they would have if McChrystal resigned, which would have sent a really defeatist message. The administration wasn't listening to him. A Congressional hearing wouldn't accomplish anything or get you anywhere with President Golf Pro. But mock him in a magazine the young and hip read? Now Obama is all ears. It might not accomplish anything but ruin McChrystal's career, but more people are reconsidering the wisdom of the ROEs and the timetable for withdrawal.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at June 22, 2010 10:09 AM (mHQ7T)
This is a whitehouse in crises. McCrystal should have resigned before going public but that still doesn't obscure the fact that Obama and his minions have lost control of the war effort, the economy, health care, spending and the oil spill.
Maybe he'll do better with the teen lesbians at the whitehouse.
Posted by: robtr at June 22, 2010 10:10 AM (fwSHf)
385 Does anyone think that McChrystal wants to get fired?
All he had to do was to quit, spend about two years going about the rubber-chicken circuit and then come back under the next administration (possibly Hillary's). Why go out this way? He's given himself a case of leprosy with this speech. The only sense I can make of this is that McChrystal went momentarily insane.
Posted by: Zimriel at June 22, 2010 10:12 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: Don't blame me, I voted for Palin at June 22, 2010 09:36 AM
(f1EXh)
---------------
That's as far as I need to go. McChrystal deserves all the disillusionment he gets.
Posted by: arhooley at June 22, 2010 10:14 AM (ytSE4)
Posted by: Dan at June 22, 2010 10:14 AM (1jzSs)
Paleos and Libtards would tell you, not much, Afghanistan goes back to being Afghanistan. But its more:
1. AQ and the Taliban retake Afghanistan, make it a safe zone for Jihad.
2. We can't zap AQ and Taliban folks, since all we have are cruise missiles that are spotted hours in transit over Pakistan, see Clinton, blowing up sand dunes, 1990's.
3. We lose any deterrence or fear by the Taliban and AQ.
4. We suffer attack after attack by an energized global jihad that knows America WAS BEATEN by men of sufficient WILL.
5. Without showing will and determination, our policy of keeping the lid on Pakistan fails and nukes fall into the hands of the Taliban/factions within ISI.
6. America loses one-three cities in shipping container nuke attacks, from a Pakistan, Afghanistan, Taliban, and AQ that knows NO FEAR OF THE US.
The whole point in Afghanistan was not to win. We could never win. But the point was not to lose. We were not playing hearts and minds, that was bs. We were playing to deter the men in the ISI who might think it an easy play to give AQ a nuke to attack the US so as to gain support for their own faction in taking over Pakistan's graft.
Nukes are the great equalizer. It makes Pakistan a nation capable of killing NYC. Without constant deterrence in Afghanistan that does not rise to active war against Pakistan -- we are hosed.
Obama, Paleos, Libtards, Muslims, and the rest all think losing in Afghanistan is cost-free, a "moral dose of defeat and humiliation" for America that they all hate. It is not. Inexorably, it leads to NYC or other cities being nuked.
Because we got pushed out of Afghanistan by guys with AK-47s. Defeat means there is no fear, of what we would do. No restraint.
When (not if) we lose cities, I believe under this President, and demographic make-up (about 35% Black-Hispanic, another 10-15% SWPL), America will in fact surrender. It is not the 1940's. The 1940 Census had America at 89% White, 10% Black, 1% everything else. Demography (and fantastic wealth afforded SWPL) is what divides America and makes it weak. Demographic forces have been yearning for a massive defeat of America since 1970 at least.
We are likely to get it. Particularly if Hotair's link to Numbers USA is correct and Obama uses his pardon power to give all illegals amnesty after the election, and make them fast-track instant voters.
America as we knew it is over. It is irrevocably Mexico Norte. California will be Majority Mexican by 2016. Already more than 50% of babies born in the US are non-White.
Obama, McChrystal, Petraeus, all irrelevant to the huge demographic changes (call it neo-colonialism) that make the US basically a colony of Mexico. Colonies don't fight -- they just surrender. If we can't keep people from entering into America illegally what makes anyone think we as a people have the will to fight in Afghanistan or respond to nuking of US cities with anything but surrender?
Posted by: whiskey at June 22, 2010 10:19 AM (L03mw)
I'm not speaking either against or in defense of McChrystal.
I'm saying that the Singlaub episode happened probably while McChrystal was bouncing around between various schools and supernumerary assignments at Benning or Bragg. His instructors and mentors were likely all pre-VOLAR Vietnam vets still smarting on a very personal level from the fall of Saigon less than two years before.
Unless McChrystal had been recycled enough times in Ranger school to spend the first ten months of 1977 in the Florida swamps with no access to any news, discussions of MG Singlaub's relief beat a lesson on civilian control of the military into him at a formative stage of his career.
There is no way in hell that Rolling Stone took McChrystal by surprise.
Posted by: MikeO at June 22, 2010 10:20 AM (lBmZl)
Posted by: Vince at June 22, 2010 10:23 AM (GpQZ/)
Yon. insane? I'd not take anything Blackfive peeps say about Yon very seriously, the man is invaluable. He was prevented from doing his work in Afghanistan, of course he would be pissed about that considering his considerable investment of time and money in that effort.
Posted by: KG at June 22, 2010 10:30 AM (S8TF5)
Might be helpful to read the actual Rolling Stone article in the magazine on Friday rather than rely on the Masturbating Hysterical Ones. Call me crazy.
Bonus: Supposed to have Lady Ga Ga on the cover.
Posted by: I'm Just Sayin' at June 22, 2010 10:34 AM (YVfLO)
Posted by: JPS at June 22, 2010 10:46 AM (lTEFe)
McChrystal is far from stupid, and Politico had a side article from the RS editor saying that McChrystal saw the article before publication and did not ask for any changes.
The question is, how will this play out? Should be an interesting week.
Makes me think I was right last summer when I didn't volunteer for anything in Asscrackistan. My heart goes out to the Joes that are going to to bear the pain for this.
Posted by: Penultimatum at June 22, 2010 10:46 AM (niydV)
AS IF the Karzai 12 Rules of Engagement were written by McChrystal or lobbied by McChrystal for Obama to endorse. Nah, the real offense is Bush's doctrine to win the hearts and minds of the enemy with compassion while engaged in war. The rules of engagement originated from the US POTUS Oval Office. Correct me if I am wrong. McChrystal has done his best to follow Obama's presidential policy. THAT is a losing battle which McChrystal's staff managed to publicize.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 22, 2010 10:51 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: maverick muse at June 22, 2010 10:53 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: maverick muse at June 22, 2010 10:55 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 22, 2010 11:07 AM (Qp4DT)
Hey yo jugears!
I'm like all sorry and shit for calling you and your crew a bunch of 'tards.
It the fucking truth, but solly and all that.
Posted by: Da Gen McChrystal at June 22, 2010 11:21 AM (MwCol)
Posted by: ed at June 22, 2010 11:24 AM (Urhve)
McChrystal is in an impossible situation: in itself, he shouldn't have criticized the CinC (tho the actual text of the Rolling Stone article isn't as bad as is being made out), and he ought to be fired. BUT... he's not actually wrong in his critique of Eikenberry and the White House staff. And Ambassador Eikenberry had already gotten away with a more subtle and effective public smear against McChrystal, which, without any facetime with the Pres or influence in the white house, the general has no legitimate way of counteracting. So he went public, either out of frustration or even deliberately to get his case out there.
Obama really set this up by not smacking down Eikenberry first, and now Obama's in a tough spot also. He ought to fire McChrystal, but if he does that he really ought to fire Eikenberry also, except that would lead to turning over the whole leadership in Afghanistan at a very bad time for it. And McChrystal happens to be good at what he does, though hopefully they can find someone else.
And now to get myself in trouble... The COIN doctrine of population protection has gained a lot high level and expert backers in the military. McChrystal's the one in charge now, but Petraeus and most of the the rest of the US officer corps who would know back him on the principles. If our goal is to defeat a terrorist network in a foreign country as opposed to crushing a standing army, civilian casualties, while sometimes unavoidable, really do set back the achievement of that goal. That's not a leftist talking point, that's the considered judgement of generals who have won counter-insurgency campaigns. Minimizing civilian casualties is not just a moral ideal but a practical step towards victory. This was how we won in Iraq, by getting soldiers out of big bases and out among the population, protecting them even at the cost of some American casualties, then giving al Quaeda in Iraq and others time to reveal their true colors regarding civilian casualties, leading to Iraqis turning against terrorists. Because there was a time when many were sympathetic, but Petraeus made a deliberate strategic decision to flip them rather than nuke them or subdue them, and it worked.
So... as unpopular as this is to hear, and acknowledging I'm not worthy to be the one to say it, ROE's that save civilian lives while costing occasional American soldiers' live really may be the only path to victory.. Rolling in like we did when we occupied Germany won't work when the Taliban haven't been defeated like the German army was and Afghanis don't (or believe they don't) have the same relationship to the Taliban as Germans did to the German army.
(I do question whether we've found the best balance, but that's a different question and one that McChrystal isn't solely to blame for. Civilian leadership shares some blame, but so do some of the CYA career officers he's working through.)
Posted by: Dave R. at June 22, 2010 11:46 AM (m9Bcg)
Firing a white, military bigshot will give jugears whacking material for years to come...
Posted by: FORGER - Racist Czar at June 22, 2010 12:24 PM (wX/wM)
Posted by: Bugler at June 22, 2010 12:40 PM (VXBR1)
Splitting hairs whether McChrystal officially submitted his resignation letter or just offered to resign isn't practical.
Gen. McChrystal's character is spartan and his reports have been impeccably written to express his strategy. If he were to tender his resignation, it is for real.
How Obama fuddles through his thin skinned offense is predictable, passing the buck and blaming someone else for MAKING Obama such a damned loser.
McChrystal's staff did him in. There's a story for Yon.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 22, 2010 02:27 PM (H+LJc)
Singlaub--you may recall--objected publicly to Carter's stupid, stupid, effing stupid plan to pull US troops out of Korea.
He felt he had to do it to make the thing public. It did get public.
Carter had to fire him, which made it more newsworthy.
But the Peanut had to back down.
Good on Singlaub.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at June 22, 2010 02:44 PM (YV2sM)
McChrystal is Special Forces.
As Fred Thompson once said of the Russians, they "don't take a dump without a plan."
There's no "oops" here. I don't know what the plan is or whether it will work, but I find it hard to believe that this was ANY kind of mistake, especially having reviewed the article before publication.
I just wish I knew what the plan was.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at June 22, 2010 04:09 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: steevy at June 22, 2010 04:17 PM (gzfPd)
Posted by: steevy at June 22, 2010 04:19 PM (gzfPd)
This way, we have had 24 hours of non-stop talking about this, and another 24 hours commencing tonight into tomorrow.
It will continue if McCrystal now resigns or if he is fired, because a replacement will have to be found. And that could drag on for a couple of weeks, especially if other officers start declining the command and resigning their commissions.
McCrystal isn't stupid. Also, it was brought to my attention on another site that the Obama book by Jonathan Alter has a lot of stuff in it where Obama speaks disdainfully and mockingly of the military.
It might very well be that the publication of that book was the last straw for McCrystal.
Posted by: Miss Marple (redneck teabagger) at June 22, 2010 04:36 PM (xxe/9)
Posted by: Hiphone at June 22, 2010 07:33 PM (wtzZ0)
It is my pleasure to read this page,I look forward to reading more
this our web site welcome http://www.haffr.com/vb/
Posted by: fares at February 05, 2011 10:22 PM (Yp3YQ)
Posted by: pandora at June 21, 2011 10:28 PM (ntrNG)
Posted by: NFL shop at July 08, 2011 11:22 PM (lQLT2)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2687 seconds, 570 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Rep Joe Barton (R-Coventry) at June 22, 2010 05:33 AM (R2fpr)