May 24, 2010
— Ace Video at the link. The problem is with sand-booms needed to protect Louisiana's shores from the invasion of oil.
The video is worth watching, but here's a transcript of some of his remarks.
Note his Tea Party-like vow.
"It is so much better for us. We don't want oil on one inch of Louisiana's coastline, but we'd much rather fight this oil off of a hard coast, off of an island, off of an island, off of a sandy beach on our coastal islands, rather than having to fight it inside in these wetlands," Gov. Jindal said, making the case for sand booms.The governor said he has been forced to protect Louisiana without the approval of the Army Corps of Engineers, which is weighing the ecological impact of the construction of more sand booms.
"We are not waiting for them. We are going to build it," Jindal said.
"We can either fight battle -- we can fight this oil -- on the Barrier Islands 15 to 20 miles off of our coast, or we can face it in thousands of miles of fragmented wetlands," Gov. Jindal said, clearing favoring the first option. "Every day we're not given approval on this emergency permit to create more of these sand booms is another day when that choice is made for us, as more and more miles of our shore are hit by oil."
One federal official is kinda-sorta taking responsibility for the inadequate response, for once.
Somehow I don't think Obama will follow his lead.
The oil mass continues moving west, and as the toxic sludge begins to make landfall in Terrebonne, Capt. Edwin Stanton, who heads up the Coast Guard’s response, is taking blame.“The governor is right. It’s too slow, and if it’s anybody’s fault, it’s mine, for not pushing (BP) hard enough perhaps,” Stanton said.“We did have a problem with getting boom down here to begin with, but there seems to be boom that is in the staging areas that needs to be put out.”
Then, in an exchange with a reporter, he went further.
Stanton: “It’s my job to direct this response in Louisiana.”
Reporter: “Why didn’t you do it?”
Stanton: “Well, the why — is that really important?”
Reporter: “Yes sir, we live here.”
Stanton: “Well, I guess I’m just slow and dumb.”
That answer is kind of dismissive -- I don't think he really believes that -- but at least he's acknowledging his responsibility.
Palin made a halfway similar criticism of Obama.
“If there's any connection there to President Obama taking so doggone long to get in there, to dive in there, and grasp the complexity and the potential tragedy that we are seeing here in the Gulf of Mexico -- now, if this was President Bush or if this were a Republican in office who hadn't received as much support even as President Obama has from B.P. and other oil companies, you know the mainstream media would be all over his case," she said.Gibbs fired back that the former Alaska governor needs a lesson in how the oil industry works.
"Sarah Palin was involved in that election but, I don't think she was paying a whole lot of attention," Gibbs said on CBS' "Face the Nation.""I'm almost sure that the oil companies don't consider the Obama administration a huge ally," he said, adding, "My suggestion to Sarah Palin would be to get slightly more informed as to what's going on in and around oil drilling in this country."
Palin used Twitter shortly thereafter to respond to Gibbs.
"Obama is the top recipient of BP PAC & individual money over the past 20 years. Dispute these facts," she wrote, linking to a Politico article citing campaign finance reporting showing more than $3.5 million given to candidates by BP since 1990.
The largest single donation by BP -- $77,051 -- went to Obama.
A big question I have is why wasn't there, already present in the Gulf, the equipment needed to contain or plug a leaking well? Why are we so far behind, scrambling, after the disaster has been ongoing for 33 days?
Please don't call me a socialist when I say that if a company is engaging in an inherently dangerous activity, there should be laws requiring them to have the equipment necessary to contain a disaster. Sure, you can demolish a building through explosive force if needed -- but you have to pay the Fire Department and EMTs to have personnel on site. You can't just trust that you placed you charges properly.
A disaster will happen; they always do. This is just a fact of life.
What makes it criminal is that there was no back-up plan ready to roll.
Apparently Plan A for this was "the well will not explode." Period. End of sentence, end of file. There was no Plan B in case it did explode because... see Plan A: The well will not explode. How many times do I have to tell you? There will not be a disaster -- that's our plan for containing a disaster.
Was there really no law requiring a ready-to-be-deployed cap to be present in the theater, in case a well exploded?
I'm assuming there was supposed to be some kind of disaster-preparedness going on here, required by law -- but there wasn't.
And who, exactly, is chargable for that? Bush?
Bush hasn't been president for more than a year. Who was responsible for enforcing the nation's law the past fifteen months? Am I dreaming, or was that President Peter Perfect?
BTW: I think Rand Paul's response to this -- whining about the "boot on the neck" of BP -- is both horrible policy and even worse politics.
Wretched politics. Only Rand Paul feels sympathy for poor, put-upon BP.
The American people are not really in the mood to cut BP a break on this. Yes, understand disasters happen. I cannot fathom why there is no plan already being deployed.
That is, in fact, criminal.
Like I said: If you have to demolish a building with explosives, fine, the government shouldn't prohibit that, exactly. But it should be enforcing reasonable safety measures for inherently dangerous activities.
And if the guy blowing up a building doesn't have fire extinguishers handy when he pushes the button -- Yes, he's to blame. (And so is the government, for not having inspected to make sure those extinguishers were present.)
It's not "boot on the neck." It's common sense.
Posted by: Ace at
11:07 AM
| Comments (278)
Post contains 1101 words, total size 7 kb.
"We can either fight battle -- we can fight this oil -- on the Barrier Islands 15 to 20 miles off of our coast, or we can face it in thousands of miles of fragmented wetlands,"
Love it! It's the Bush doctrine ("fight them there so we don't have to fight them here) for oil spills, oh noes! But it's one even the enviro-tards should endorse.
/btw, is there a technical definition for "wetland"?
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 24, 2010 11:10 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Jean at May 24, 2010 11:11 AM (JaO+v)
Posted by: dogfish at May 24, 2010 11:11 AM (9dIfg)
Posted by: Bosk at May 24, 2010 11:14 AM (pUO5u)
If you're like me, you think the worst about Obama and his admin.
Obama is happy this happened. Obama is happy that BP can't stop it and crude is washing up on the our shores.
BUT I got news for Obama: this is gonna backfire on you and you won't be able to use this accident to advance your 'green/red' agenda. Here's why...
If anything, this oil spill has shown the American people we have BOATLOADS of domestic crude at our disposal.
Posted by: Mr Whoopi at May 24, 2010 11:15 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: damian at May 24, 2010 11:15 AM (4WbTI)
Hey, that's terrific. And when they're done with that study, maybe they can start an ecological impact study of an acute accumulation of petroleum in the wetlands. Clearly they the government via the Corp of Engineers is prioritizing appropriately.
The administration's academics have suffocated common sense. Obama should form a blue ribbon panel on figuring out how to pull its head out of its ass.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 24, 2010 11:16 AM (swuwV)
This is so upsetting to me.
Most upsetting is that the oil in the Gulf is not half as oily as the President.
Keep the pressure ON.
Posted by: kevlarchick at May 24, 2010 11:16 AM (TNuqz)
Yes, you are. Of course, you were trying to weasel out of responsibility and instead you Kinsley'd yourself.
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2010 11:17 AM (8WZWv)
Bobby Jindal made one mistake.
He should've tried to mentioned the extravagant party Obama threw for Calderon while Louisiana fishermen were losing their livelihoods.
Posted by: Mr Whoopi at May 24, 2010 11:18 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 24, 2010 11:18 AM (1Jaio)
Our feds know there's nothing normal people can do when they refuse to do their job. They still get to tax us and spend our kid's money too, and they don't actually have to provide service with any measure of effectiveness or accountability.
The politically strong, like SEIU or even BP, can get rules bent, but the common people can't even get a fair shake.
'Is that really important?' they ask, because to them, of course it isn't. Not really a partisan problem... Bush's cronies had a similar attitude, if not as extreme and flagrant. And what would they do if there were a disaster in Arizona (I suppose there already is one)? They would mock.
It's time for this country to become two countries, peacefully if possible, perhaps united fr common defense and separate for domestic purposes.
Posted by: Lex Luthor, Ruler of Australia at May 24, 2010 11:19 AM (dUOK+)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 24, 2010 11:19 AM (Q1llt)
We'll use illegal aliens to clean all the birds and fish. Jobs Americans won't do, and all. Hey, it's a win-win.
Posted by: Cicero at May 24, 2010 11:20 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Dan at May 24, 2010 11:20 AM (1jzSs)
Ace,
I've uncovered the BP Stand Operating Procedures in case of Rig Explosion
1.Rig Explodes breaking pipe
2.??????
3. Leak Fixed
Posted by: Ben at May 24, 2010 11:21 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Mr. Peabody at May 24, 2010 11:21 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Sandbagger at May 24, 2010 11:22 AM (PCUu5)
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 24, 2010 11:22 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: t-bird at May 24, 2010 11:23 AM (FcR7P)
Democrat Governor: "No, that's OK, we'll just let the people suffer and blame you when it's over."
Democrat President (Obama) to Republican Governor (Jindal): "We heard you had some problems down there. Don't worry, we'll blame the evil corporate fatcats. We've heard of some doings in Tennessee, too, but we can't find any corporate fatcats to blame."
Republican Governor: "Look, if you'd just let us get to work, we could fix the problems ourselves. Never mind, just get out of the way, dammit."
Posted by: Phil Collins at May 24, 2010 11:23 AM (3clLR)
Posted by: shep smith at May 24, 2010 11:24 AM (4WbTI)
Posted by: Sandbagger at May 24, 2010 03:22 PM (PCUu5)
If Guam can float, so can some sand booms.
Posted by: Rep. Hank "Gabby" Johnson (D) Van Allen Belt at May 24, 2010 11:24 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Dan at May 24, 2010 11:25 AM (1jzSs)
Obama is going slow because he needs a visual disaster, not a solution -- he need crisis.
Jean is absolutely correct. He needs oil-covered pelicans and bottlenose dolphins dying on camera. Can't let this crisis go to waste, after all.
Posted by: Dang Straights at May 24, 2010 11:25 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: t-bird at May 24, 2010 11:25 AM (FcR7P)
And while I'm at it, note the irony of environmental regulations preventing environmental cleanup.
Ironic, meaning completely predictable and planned as such.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 24, 2010 11:27 AM (3clLR)
"It is so much better for us. We don't want oil on one inch of Louisiana's coastline, but we'd much rather fight this oil off of a hard coast, off of an island, off of an island, off of a sandy beach on our coastal islands, rather than having to fight it inside in these wetlands," Gov. Jindal said, making the case for sand booms.
Govenor Jindal, channeling his inner Churchill.
Posted by: Dave at May 24, 2010 11:27 AM (boNGU)
Probably not.
I like the guy, but he's short-sighted here.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at May 24, 2010 11:29 AM (mR7mk)
Jean is absolutely correct. He needs oil-covered pelicans and bottlenose dolphins dying on camera. Can't let this crisis go to waste, after all.
Yup. True dat. Obama's only promise without an expiration date: Never let a good crisis go to waste.
Posted by: runningrn at May 24, 2010 11:30 AM (CfmlF)
Then again, we really don't know what's in JugEars' college transcripts. Judging by the quality of there recent graduates, I'm sure that Harvard has quite the basket-weaving curriculum.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 24, 2010 11:30 AM (foPGG)
Add "unemployed".
I wish. He'll probably be given a promotion after this fiasco.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 24, 2010 11:31 AM (9hSKh)
Something I have not heard discussed yet is the possibility that this oil find was much bigger tham anyone ever expected. They just weren't prepared to handle such a huge quantity of oil and gas that came rushing at them when the well came in. Look at the numbers they're talking about! Thousands of barrels a day! This is a huge well, Saudi Arabia-like.
If this is any indication of what is just beyond the continental shelf, we have a new huge reserve to tap (if we're now alloed to.
Posted by: bergerbilder at May 24, 2010 11:31 AM (Sn1SJ)
They need to nuke the fucking thing. The Russians have been doing it for years. Admittedly an extreme action, but no one else seems to be coming up with a goddam solution.
Posted by: kevlarchick at May 24, 2010 11:31 AM (TNuqz)
Such laws exist. BP is exempt from them—and so is any other company that's big enough to cause a disaster big enough to give a shit about. They buy exemptions, and we cover the cost.
So what's the real law? What's always the real law?
Why didn't Lindsay Lohan go to prison today for repeatedly violating the terms of her non-sentence for two DUIs and two coke charges (one a felony), when any one of us would already be down for ten on the same beefs?
Deduce.
Posted by: oblig. at May 24, 2010 11:32 AM (x7Ao8)
Get the lube.
Posted by: The Chicken at May 24, 2010 11:32 AM (7b1Uc)
OT, KC Star editorial kicks Holder's and Napolitano's collective asses.
Posted by: huerfano at May 24, 2010 11:32 AM (Updet)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 24, 2010 11:33 AM (foPGG)
Posted by: EC at May 24, 2010 11:33 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: shep smith
Thank you. I've been waiting for that. I'm happier now
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 24, 2010 11:34 AM (R2fpr)
The Soviets used Nucs to seal underwater wells 5 times... it worked 4 of them...
And heck... these are the Soviets we're talking about... I'd wager the US Navy would have an even better chance to plant a Subteranean Nuc and use it to seal the multiple leaks... but even 80% chance is MUCH better than the non solutions they are trying now...
Of course, BP would loose their investment, which they are still trying to save... note they are Pumping or drilling relief wells, not talking sealing it off...
And a Nuc would be used for somthing productive in the West... somthing Bambi does not want...
And it would SOLVE the problem... another thing Bambi does not seem to want...
But then again... I'm a throwback... someone who believes that there are very few problems that cannot be solved by the proper application of enough explosive force...
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 24, 2010 11:34 AM (OlHjR)
Oh, no! A Rand Paul reference makes it looks like I spoke too soon about the pelicans. Crap.
Get the lube.
Phil saw his shadow, it looks like we are going to have 6 months of Paul
Posted by: uhh at May 24, 2010 11:34 AM (wuv1c)
In an administration full of juvenile punks, Gibbs towers over them all.
At the very least, I hope to see him an extended and thoroughly humiliating exit from the national stage.
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2010 11:34 AM (pfStM)
Posted by: runningrn, yellow who is mellow at May 24, 2010 11:35 AM (CfmlF)
Out of the frying pan and into the fire. If your boss is The Precedent, your best bet is to retire.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 24, 2010 11:37 AM (swuwV)
He wants the problem of Iran with nukes, illegals kidnapping hundreds, the economy destroyed, and the environment threatened. He thinks it's to his advantage, so he's happy to slowly and obnoxiously 'study' the situation.
Posted by: Lex Luthor, Ruler of Australia at May 24, 2010 11:37 AM (dUOK+)
Exactly! This is a teaching moment. You, the American people will learn how bad oil really is. You'll be begging for green-only energy once this mess is all said and done.
Posted by: Barack Obama at May 24, 2010 11:37 AM (xzSvW)
The dolphins love the oil. It's just free lube.
Lube makes Gang Rape go much smoother for all parties involved!
Posted by: Dolphin at May 24, 2010 11:37 AM (SVSE7)
In a sane world sure I would agree, but this government we have now (and I mean the 21st century nanny state, not just Obama and company) is almost certain to mandate that you remove the correct extinguishers and replace them with an inappropriate kind.
Posted by: John Galt at May 24, 2010 11:39 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 24, 2010 11:39 AM (R2fpr)
However, the "boot on the neck" isn't holding BP responsible but trying to exact revenge. It's Obama thinking like a lawyer. Don't solve the problem, find someone to blame.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 24, 2010 11:39 AM (3clLR)
Posted by: Jean at May 24, 2010 11:40 AM (JaO+v)
Posted by: huerfano at May 24, 2010 11:41 AM (Updet)
I've seen pictures of that brown oil mucking up stuff down there.
Since it's brown and stuff, it's obviously racist to try and stop the oil.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at May 24, 2010 11:41 AM (P33XN)
Of all of the things that I couldn't bring myself to imagine, it would be the jugeared genius ordering the use of nuclear weapons on the floor of the Gulf of Mexico. it's like him being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize the same day that NASA bombed the Moon. No fiction is outlandish enough to conceive of such things.
You better believe they'd be Unionized Nukes!
Posted by: Andy Stern at May 24, 2010 11:41 AM (SVSE7)
Apparently Plan A for this was "the well will not explode." Period. End of sentence, end of file. There was no Plan B in case it did explode because... see Plan A: The well will not explode. How many times do I have to tell you? There will not be a disaster -- that's our plan for containing a disaster.
Really? That's what happened? You know this absolutely, positively, with 100% certainty? Don't tell me -- you believe this because this is what the press has told you, right?
The reality is there was likely not just one failure, but multiple low-probability failures that, combined, overwhelmed every plan they had.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at May 24, 2010 11:41 AM (ZJ/un)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 24, 2010 11:41 AM (Q1llt)
Gibbs fired back that the former Alaska governor needs a lesson in how the oil industry works.
Really? Oh dear.
Posted by: dananjcon at May 24, 2010 11:42 AM (pr+up)
There are reports that wildlife in the delta marshes has been forced to resort to cannibalism!
Well played, sir. Well played indeed.
Posted by: Dang Straights at May 24, 2010 11:42 AM (fx8sm)
BTW -- I think any politician who talks about a "boot on the neck" of anything should be stood against a wall and shot. Followed by anyone who thinks criticizing that is worse than making the statement in the first place.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at May 24, 2010 11:43 AM (ZJ/un)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 24, 2010 11:44 AM (swuwV)
67
FGS, you're a major-party Senate candidate now, people are listening to you other than Alex Jones and two dozen basement-dwelling potheads.
Hey man, don't throw us in there with Alex Jones and Rand Paul!
Posted by: Basement-Dwelling Potheads at May 24, 2010 11:44 AM (pfStM)
Posted by: Shep Smith at May 24, 2010 11:45 AM (SVSE7)
He tanked it on purpose! It was part of his master plan, so that nobody would see him coming!
Posted by: AmishDude at May 24, 2010 11:45 AM (3clLR)
Yes, if it scores him points, apparently he will.
Expect Obama on TV in less than 2 days again insisting this is BP's responsibility.
You know, the 'uniter' could have made a huge impact by getting up and saying "This is a huge problem and everyone is going to work to fix it."
But no. Instead Precedent Juvenile Delinquent IMMEDIATELY uses this as a means to punish capitalism again.
"This is BP's responsibility!"
Right on there Preznint Douche tool.
Posted by: MelodicMetal at May 24, 2010 11:46 AM (x4S2a)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 24, 2010 11:46 AM (Qp4DT)
73
We may eventually look back on the Obama Administration as the best thing that happened to the balance of federal vs. state power - as the beginning of states taking back their power and telling the feds to F off.
First, though, the Repubs need to do their job in 2013 and repeal ObamaCare with a conservative prez signing the repeal.
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2010 11:47 AM (pfStM)
When I defend Wal-Mart when the Left attacks and sues them, am I sympathetic to Wal-Mart?
No. I am defending the rights of Wal-Mart because after the Left goes after Wal_mart, they're coming after me.
Posted by: Mr Whoopi at May 24, 2010 11:48 AM (uFokq)
Why wasn't there a plan for evacuating New Orleans in case of a levee breach? It's no secret that much of the city was below sea level.
On the other hand, if the oil was headed to Mexico, Obama would be all over this thing.
OT: Sheppard Smith, bless his liberal commie pinko heart, is giving David Axelrod a hard time on Fox right now. For once. He went to Ole Miss, he can't help it.
Ever notice how David Axelrod has to stop right in the middle of what he's saying so he can swallow.
Posted by: SlaveDog at May 24, 2010 11:48 AM (W+E+o)
Posted by: lions at May 24, 2010 11:49 AM (02X2/)
Posted by: tmi3rd at May 24, 2010 11:50 AM (JHFAA)
Apparently Plan A for this was "the well will not explode." Period. End of sentence, end of file. There was no Plan B in case it did explode because... see Plan A: The well will not explode. How many times do I have to tell you? There will not be a disaster -- that's our plan for containing a disaster.
Was there really no law requiring a ready-to-be-deployed cap to be present in the theater, in case a well exploded?
The problem may have been compounded by the very fact that there WERE multiply-redundant systems in place to prevent or control a blowout. When there are multiple "fail-safe" systems in place to prevent a catastrophe, system operators -- in all areas of technology, including flying commercial airliners or operating nuclear power plants -- tend to completely discount the possibility that a chain of minor failures can lead to the total failure of the "fail-safe" system. It happened at Three Mile Island, it happened countless times in crashes of commercial airliners, and it happened with the BP well in the Gulf.
BP reveals key safety system disabled
Internal documents point to "a calamitous series" of failures, lawmakers said.
WASHINGTON - Bad wiring and a leak in what's supposed to be a "blowout preventer." Sealing problems that may have allowed a methane eruption. Even a dead battery, of all things.
New disclosures Wednesday revealed a complex cascade of deep-sea equipment failures and procedural problems in the oil rig explosion and massive spill that is still fouling the Gulf of Mexico.
A litany of worrisome events and findings that were at play was described in internal corporate documents, marked confidential but provided to a House committee by BP and by the manufacturer of the safety device. Lawmakers released them at a hearing.
A senior BP executive, Lamar McKay, cautioned, "It's inappropriate to draw any conclusions before all the facts are known." But the documents established the firmest evidence to date of the sequence of catastrophic events that led to the explosion and worsening spill, a series of failures more reminiscent of the loss of the shuttle Challenger than the wreck of the Exxon Valdez.
Like the 1986 Challenger disaster, the investigation into the Gulf spill may well show that complex and seemingly failproof technical systems went wrong because of overlooked problems that interacted with each other in unexpected ways. In the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster, a captain simply ran his ship onto a reef in Alaska's Prince William Sound, spilling nearly 11 million gallons of oil.
The April 20 BP rig explosion 40 miles off Louisiana killed 11 people. Over the past 21 days more than 4 million gallons of oil has been released into Gulf waters, threatening wetlands and the region's fishing industry.
Congressional investigators grilled industry executives for nearly six hours, revealing that a key safety system, known as the blowout preventer, used in BP's oil-drilling rig had a hydraulic leak and a failed battery that probably prevented it from working as designed.
They said that BP documents and others also indicated conflicting pipe pressure tests should have warned those on the rig that poor pipe integrity may have been allowing explosive methane gas to leak into the well. "Significant pressure discrepancies were observed in at least two of these tests, which were conducted just hours before the explosion," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., citing documents from BP.
Asked about the tests, Steven Newman, president of rig owner Transocean, and Lamar McKay, president of BP America, said the pressure readings were worrisome. They indicated "that there was something happening in the well bore that shouldn't be happening," said Newman. McKay said the issue "is critical in the investigation" into the cause of the accident.
But Waxman said important elements of what went wrong were beginning to surface.
"This catastrophe appears to have been caused by a calamitous series of equipment and operational failures," he said. "If the largest oil and oil service companies in the world had been more careful, 11 lives might have been saved and our coastlines protected."
'Four significant problems'
It appears clear that there were problems with the blowout preventers before the accident and confusion almost right up to the time of the explosion over the success of a process in which cement is injected into the well to temporarily close it in anticipation of future production.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing was the third this week at which executives of BP, Transocean and contractor Halliburton were questioned by lawmakers.
The committee produced one document from BP that provided the most detailed information to date on what led up to and may have caused the explosion and why equipment designed to stop a spill failed to do the job.
Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said there were at least "four significant problems with the blowout preventer" -- or BOP -- including evidence that it had a significant hydraulic leak and a dead battery that was supposed to activate a so-called "deadman" trigger.
In Kenner, La., where a separate hearing is being held as part of a U.S. Coast Guard and Interior Department investigation, Michael Saucier of the Minerals Management Service (MMS) testified the government isn't required to inspect the BOPs as they are built or installed. Operators are required to test the devices every two weeks, and Saucier said the MMS monitors those tests. He said the agency relies on drillers to ensure the device is working properly.
'260 failure modes'
A 2001 report by Transocean, which bought the BOP from manufacturer Cameron, indicated there can be as many as 260 failure possibilities in the equipment, which is supposed to be the final safeguard against a well blowout by clamping down and sealing a gushing oil well, said Stupak, chairman of the panel's investigations subcommittee.
"How can a device that has 260 failure modes be considered fail-safe?" asked Stupak.
He said when an underwater remote vehicle tried to activate the blowout protector's devices designed to ram through the pipe and seal it, a loss of hydraulic pressure was discovered in the device's emergency power component.
When dye was injected "it showed a large leak coming from a loose fitting," said Stupak, citing BP documents. He said officials at Cameron had told the committee the leak was not believed to have been caused by the blowout because other fittings in the system were tight.
Stupak also questioned why the BOP had been modified. Transocean's Newman said that, indeed, the BOP had been modified in 2005 at the request of BP and with approval of the MMS.
Stupak said the committee had been told that one of the BOP's ram drivers had been changed so it could be used for routine testing and was no longer designed to activate in an emergency. He said after the spill BP "spent a day trying to use this ... useless test ram," which no longer was configured for emergency use.
The New York Times contributed to this report.
Posted by: stuiec at May 24, 2010 11:50 AM (7AOgy)
Rodents don't go down so easy.
Posted by: David "V" Axelrod at May 24, 2010 11:51 AM (3clLR)
Unless they've updated it since the 1990's, it's any place with a standing body of water.
Even if it's a man-made roadside ditch where a drainpipe got clogged by debris from an unusually violent storm and the ditch therefore filled with water.
It took my grandpa over a decade to clear that shit up with the EPA, and they still come out for "inspections' every once in a while to make sure he's not continuing his wanton destruction of the pristine environment
Posted by: Ranba Ral at May 24, 2010 11:52 AM (l2CML)
Posted by: EC at May 24, 2010 03:33 PM (mAhn3)
Screw that. Just jam Moore's fat ass into the gusher. He'll plug it up.
Posted by: stuiec at May 24, 2010 11:54 AM (7AOgy)
Since it's brown and stuff, it's obviously racist to try and stop the oil.
When the oil starts flooding New Orleans, some people are going to be very confused about what to think...
(the school buses will still sit in a parking lot because there was no gas for them or something)
Posted by: Mama AJ at May 24, 2010 11:55 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: tmi3rd at May 24, 2010 11:55 AM (JHFAA)
'Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said '
Oh now I'm serene in the knowledge that this guy's on the job.
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 24, 2010 11:56 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Ray Nagin at May 24, 2010 11:57 AM (pfStM)
Posted by: Opus at May 24, 2010 11:57 AM (IebeI)
Posted by: lions at May 24, 2010 03:49 PM (02X2/)
In 1988, the Piper Alpha gas production platform in the North Sea blew up, killing 167 men. It's an inherently hazardous industry.
Posted by: stuiec at May 24, 2010 11:58 AM (7AOgy)
I can't believe that a professional U.S. Coast Guard Officer at the Captain level would offer such a crappy, stupid response. I would have his ass at a courts martial. Either that, or he was instructed to fall on this administration's sword. Ugh.
Posted by: Cheri at May 24, 2010 11:58 AM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Barry Obama at May 24, 2010 12:00 PM (P33XN)
Let's leave Nuclear Power out of this. The TMI accident and this have zero in common. The TMI accident involved much more than a chain of "minor" failures.
As far as this accident and its causes, if I am not mistaken there hasn't been a damn root cause determination made yet so went DON'T know what happened.
As for inadequate government regulation and oversight; government regulation very seldom does a lot of good in preventing or event mitigating ANY event. In fact, it is usually the opposite.
Government regulation is like a lock on an isolated exterior building; it only keeps honest people honest.
Posted by: Vic at May 24, 2010 12:00 PM (6taRI)
Posted by: Kayne West at May 24, 2010 12:02 PM (CbVPH)
Even if it's a man-made roadside ditch where a drainpipe got clogged by debris from an unusually violent storm and the ditch therefore filled with water.
The "man-made" ditch part of that was shoved up the EPA's ass a few months ago by SCOTUS. That is why the commies in congress are trying to get the "navigable waterway" term out of the law.
As for the standing water, it is worse than that. All it takes is any of a variety of plants that sometimes grow in the wetland.
Posted by: Vic at May 24, 2010 12:03 PM (6taRI)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 24, 2010 12:05 PM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: The Q at May 24, 2010 12:06 PM (pfStM)
Yo: tmi3rd
Hurricane yes, but how about a levee breach. No?
At any rate, Nagin's implementation would still have been: "You're on your own." And yes, Louisiana corruption. That's why I don't live there any more. But I still like to visit.
Posted by: SlaveDog at May 24, 2010 12:11 PM (W+E+o)
Posted by: ace at May 24, 2010 12:12 PM (66DVY)
______________
Even if it doesn't work, glowing oil would be easier to track on the satellite photos. Win-win.
Posted by: Anachronda at May 24, 2010 12:14 PM (3K4hn)
Posted by: Uncle Jed at May 24, 2010 12:20 PM (eKgqT)
Apparently Plan A for this was "the well will not explode." Period. End of sentence, end of file. There was no Plan B in case it did explode because... see Plan A: The well will not explode. How many times do I have to tell you? There will not be a disaster -- that's our plan for containing a disaster.
Was there really no law requiring a ready-to-be-deployed cap to be present in the theater, in case a well exploded?
I'm assuming there was supposed to be some kind of disaster-preparedness going on here, required by law -- but there wasn't.
Ahem... Three Mile Island? Any airplane crash? 9-11 response? All three of those things are "man made accidents" and they didn't have any contengency plans past the first level. The reason for that is that every thing that works at the first level, in BP's case the blowout preventor, is it assunes that things aren't going right. However, no one has a plan for when things are just royally fucked sideways. That's when you imporvise and adapt.
If you don't want to cut them any slack, that's fine. However, there are failures and then there are catastrophic failures and you can't really plan for the "the whole rig burns to the ocean floor after exploding and dumping oil all over the place" kind of mechanical failures. Those types of backup's don't exist.
Posted by: Rob B at May 24, 2010 12:21 PM (q32Ly)
I don't see that anyone has advocated that or that it has occurred much at all in the past except when the company went bankrupt.
Even IF there were no regulations involved in one of these types of events the company is STILL responsible for the cleanup and the consequences.
We have had private and civil law for that for centuries.
Posted by: Vic at May 24, 2010 12:21 PM (6taRI)
I can't believe that Bobby Jindal is trying to keep the black man down. I mean, Bobby's a white man's name right? And he doesn't speak with a slight Indian accent or work at a 7/11 so he can't possibly be another colour, right?
Dang.
Seriously, I love Bobby Jindal. He's a huge nerd, but that's the kind of person you need as governor. Someone who, like knows how to do stuff and be an effective leader. Not like someone else we know.
Posted by: experience smeperience at May 24, 2010 12:23 PM (S52Sn)
Not handy, there was a review of the case on SCOTUS BLOG after the ruling. I'll check around and see if I can find the ruling.
Posted by: Vic at May 24, 2010 12:23 PM (6taRI)
Interesting point regarding Rand Paul's statement about the Government's Boot on BP's neck. On one hand, I think it's a fair critique, of Paul's position if, in fact, the reason BP was not prepared is not the fault of some other, conflicting Government regulation. In that case, the private business responsible for harm should be the one bearing the cost (simple tort theory). Of course, this administration specifically and the administrative state more generally have been attempting to insert itself between the private entity causing the harm and the public as a "neutral" arbiter/guarantor of what it characterizes as our interests. This is the central tenet of a positivist view of government, that the almighty Government provides and protects rights of its citizens, not the other way around. The fact that the Government/Administrative state that was put in place to prevent or mitigate the harms that BP might cause has not helped is the most strident argument against granting it more power over our lives and economy. All the Government has succeeded in doing in the past 15 months is confuse the signals regarding who should bear the cost of a harm. For example, strongarming of creditors in the Chrysler and GM bankruptcies to grant the government and unions greater rights than they deserved in contravention of established statutory bankruptcy law.
On the other hand, you don't provide a full quote of Rand Paul or the context of his remark, so I question whether your critique is made in good faith, especially considering prior critical remarks about him.
Posted by: mjhlaw at May 24, 2010 12:23 PM (0udxW)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 24, 2010 12:24 PM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 24, 2010 12:28 PM (Qp4DT)
http://tinyurl.com/5wtwa6
Keep in mind what I said about the definition of a "wetland" when reading this. As I understand the real event it was a plain field that had a drainage ditch cut into it. It was 25 miles (???) from the nearest river.
BTW, if you do a search on this case the Wiki thing will come up at the top. It is 90% BS.
Posted by: Vic at May 24, 2010 12:32 PM (6taRI)
“No other state has taken such bold steps to make sure the operators of oil and gas facilities are properly maintaining their own equipment,” Palin said.
Ha! What's the opposite of a smoking gun? That's like a smoking bulletproof vest or something that shows she was more prepared than some other people.
Posted by: Mama AJ, abuser of similes at May 24, 2010 12:32 PM (XdlcF)
Sounds like the problems with the digital conversion boxes for the brake controls that made my dad ground the entire C-141 fleet twice in the 1980's, heh.
Posted by: Ranba Ral at May 24, 2010 12:34 PM (l2CML)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 24, 2010 12:36 PM (Ly46t)
Disclosure: Haven't worked in the oil field in thirty years. But when I did, one of my jobs was as a drilling foreman for a major oil company.
The biggest problem, it seems to me, was the failure of the BOP. Every well, no matter the depth, that I was ever on in West Texas, had a BOP installed on it as it was being drilled. Most of them, if not all, were not remotely operated, but were supposed to be closed by turning long handles on the gears that closed the BOP. Since the first rule is a blowout is to run in the opposite direction of the well as fast as you can, this might turn into a big problem.We had constant safety meetings with drilling crews about how to handle a problem if it developed.
The Deepwater Horizon's BOP was 5000 feet down, so closing it manually was not an option. Therefore, the remote hydraulics MUST work, or you are screwed. Never been on a deepwater rig, but I believe I read that Cameron Iron Works (it used to be called), manufactured the BOP, and if the failure was a mechanical malfunction of the BOP, and not negligence on the part of BP or Transocean, then Cameron has a big problem on their hands.
Something happened in the well bore that I have not been to ascertain by reading accounts of the accident. Something that was not supposed to happen under normal operating circumstances. One thing is for damn sure, the BOP did not do its job.Why it didn't will end up being the subject of a very expensive lawsuit, I would bet my bottom dollar.
Posted by: mikeyslaw at May 24, 2010 12:36 PM (QMGr1)
Posted by: Vic at May 24, 2010 04:00 PM (6taRI)
The catastrophic failure at Three Mile Island could have been prevented very simply if any one of a number of coincidences had not occured, or if the operators had been able to see all of the indicators, or if they had not made some basic but incorrect assumptions about how the plant's valves were configured and behaved.
The first coincidence was a misconnection of an air hose from the instrument panel to another air system. The second was that when the routine method of clearing a stuck water pipe with compressed air from the second system was used, water ran through the misconnected hose to the instrument panel -- flooding the valve controls and causing the main water valves for the reactor to trip shut.
When emergency pumps activated to provide cooling water to the reactor, the operators didn't realize that another set of water valves were closed: they had been closed for maintenance a week before, and their indicator lights were hidden by yellow paper "trouble tags" on other instruments on the panel.
At the same time, an emergency pressure relief valve tripped. It was supposed to open for a time, relieve pressure, and then close again. And the indicator light on the control panel showed that it did just that -- but unfortunately, the indicator light only showed the status of the control command to the valve, not its actual position... which was stuck open.
Because of the conflicting, incomplete and wrong information the operators were getting, they misdiagnosed the situation and started pumps to take cooling water OUT of the reactor core, thinking that was necessary to prevent boiling and subsequent meltdown. Only when the situation continued to deteriorate after this step did the operators re-check all the valves and discover the ones hidden behind the trouble tags.
And so on, and so on... a cascade of minor issues creating a cumulative catastrophic failure.
Posted by: stuiec at May 24, 2010 12:41 PM (7AOgy)
I do not know what else Rand Paul said but if he was complaining about the government employee who said he was going to keep his boot on the neck of BP them I am with him.
Just who do these people think they are.
Just remember, since the Obama Administration came to power they have been acting as if much of the private market place deserves to have boots on their necks to keep them in line.
Posted by: davod at May 24, 2010 12:50 PM (GUZAT)
Why did BP receive and "award" from O.????
Why isn't Saudi Arabia mentioned in connection with BP?????
Posted by: non_dhimmie at May 24, 2010 12:50 PM (zACGu)
You obviously have the wrong event. I have studies that event to death and it happened NOTHING like you just described.
Posted by: Vic at May 24, 2010 12:55 PM (6taRI)
Posted by: Olaf K at May 24, 2010 01:03 PM (eE6R2)
Posted by: tmi3rd at May 24, 2010 01:14 PM (JHFAA)
I have heard a bit in the news op/ed & commentary - why does not the military get involved in fixing this, "Surely they have the means".
Here is a hint, Army Corps of Engineers.
The District Engineer is most likely an O-6, whose Commander in Chief, is ???.
So, yes President Nero is ultimately personally responsible... for delays in mitigating the effects of this engineering disaster... probably some culpability on the EPA, OSHA, and other fronts as well.
(unlike Katrina which was NOT an engineering diaster, nor was response in any way the Federal Government's responsibility, nor did the Fed delay local response).
Posted by: Druid at May 24, 2010 01:26 PM (Oe01r)
Posted by: Mike Hunt at May 24, 2010 01:26 PM (k7Ddt)
Posted by: Barack Obama at May 24, 2010 01:33 PM (k7Ddt)
When they finished cementing the well, they were supposed to pump in mud and then cap it with a cement plug before filling the riser with seawater. This procedure, for some reason, was done backwards on this well. According to people on the platform itself, it was done with the approval of BP execs and MMS.
But, Ace's question about why adequate equipment wasn't on site is dead on. Federal thumb-twiddling made this disaster worse. It has gone from a manageable, but damaging incident to a near historic disaster. They didn't have the right kind of boom anywhere near the whole damned state of Louisiana. They didn't have any kind of pre-positioned response crews on stand-by, like FEMA and the Corps does with hurricanes and other cleanup operations. It took the Obama regime a solid 7-10 days before they realized that they had a problem, and there was no, single authority in charge until Thad Allen was appointed by teh one.
To put this in the right perspective, BP is Mrs. O'Leary, but the Obama regime is the Chicago Fire Dept. These idiots couldn't manage a grade school cookie sale, and we have them "managing" the response to the biggest environmental disaster since Ixtoc in 1989.
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at May 24, 2010 01:38 PM (j2O76)
From 2007 through 2009, I ran four construction projects in Plaquemines, rebuilding the Parish's floodfighting pump stations. Nungesser is 100% coonass and he doesn't care who he pisses off.
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at May 24, 2010 02:03 PM (j2O76)
No, we don't need to dump on him, he's doing a fine job of making a fool of himself.
I agree we would like to win Kentucky, but not at the expense of turning the entire Republican Party into a joke.
Put him in the locker where they kept the Gimp; let him out for parades.
Posted by: Robert at May 24, 2010 02:04 PM (cd6Ip)
This.
Posted by: Y-not at May 24, 2010 02:53 PM (Kn9r7)
Posted by: donabernathy at May 24, 2010 03:45 PM (cRkOm)
I think we can discern a new way of doing business here:
Your house is burning. The Fire Chief rolls up in his car.
A frikkin' car. And what he does is, he stands out in front of your burning house, and tells the gathered crowd: that you had damned well better put the fire out.
"And you will pay fines. And clean it all up. And be a patsy forever. And let that be a warning to the rest of you assholes that only perfect planning and prefect, pre-pre-planning will be tolerated.
Accidents?
Mistakes?
I don't think so, Bub. And you people in the crowd sweating heavily don't look to healthy to me. If you want healthcare, you'd better lose a few pounds."
That's what we get in a country run by lawyers. And that's the reason we deserve to lose our lead in all facets of exploration and development.
Posted by: Southern Racist Democrat at May 24, 2010 04:11 PM (9b6FB)
I don't like this bullshit where a company's profit is private but the risks -- the externailties -- and the costs of clean up are socialized.
On a pro-TARP blog, too.
Posted by: MlR at May 24, 2010 04:50 PM (568Ut)
Posted by: Doctor Love at May 24, 2010 05:25 PM (STTZD)
Piyush seems addicted to Other People's Money to clean up his state. I suggest that Piyush get Grover Norquist (if he isn't in Mecca plotting against the US) and Newt Gingrich (if he isn't committing adultery) to get some mops and bucketts and start cleaning up this mess.
Washington is the Problem Not The Solution!
Drill Baby Drill!
Posted by: barry at May 24, 2010 05:31 PM (G7n+d)
"A big question I have is why wasn't there, already present in the Gulf, the equipment needed to contain or plug a leaking well? Why are we so far behind, scrambling, after the disaster has been ongoing for 33 days?"
Yes. That is the big question. It was derelict on the part of somebody.
"Please don't call me a socialist when I say that if a company is engaging in an inherently dangerous activity, there should be laws requiring them to have the equipment necessary to contain a disaster."
I won't call you a socialist. Just woefully uninformed. Which is how the Obama administration gets away with its crap. The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan makes it abundantly clear: it's the Federal government's job as the first-responder to have the materiel on hand to contain the spill.
CFR Title 40, Chapter I, part 300. Read it.
Nobody knows who's wells gonna crap the bed. They can't all have the material and equipment on-hand sufficient to contain a spill of this size. So, it's the Fed's job. And they fell flat on their faces.
And BP did pay to have the "Fire Department" on hand. They at least had a representative on hand from the Minerals Management Service to oversee the capping of the test well. He's the guy who gave them authorization to execute the process of plugging the well out of sequence.
Posted by: Matt at May 24, 2010 07:06 PM (7Hc7m)
Posted by: Matt at May 24, 2010 07:09 PM (7Hc7m)
The question Ace asked about a cap being in place should a disastrous event take place (and isn't such a thing mandated on every well) is a good one. The answer is yes and yes; it is called a B.O.P. or Blow Out Prevent-or and there is one on every well that is being drilled anywhere in the US. When this disaster first happened I seem to remember some news reports saying that the BOP failed to be activated 3 times-mechanically, by remote switch, and by sonic switch. The BOP sits directly at the point that the pipe enters the ground and it will "pinch the pipe" when activated. And by "pinch the pipe" I mean it will literally crush the casing or drill pipe (depending on the situation) to restrict further flow and to isolate the event down hole.
The better question now would be why haven't they activated the BOP in the 33 days since the event? Something hinkey, as I believe people in Chicago would say, is going on with this whole situation.
Posted by: hughie at May 24, 2010 07:47 PM (KAa2W)
All this Pollution Control Act talk is by pinko commie socialists who most likely would have voted for the Civil Rights Act.
People, there is nothing in the U. S. Constitution that says that the federal government is responsible for oil spills! That most sacred document makes no mention of booms, berms, etc. Therefore under the 10th Amendment, this is clearly a state issue. Let us purge our minds of socialism.
More I think about it, the Lousiana Purchase would most likely be ruled uncostitutional by a Supreme Court that believed in strict constructionism.
Someone has to pay for those boom and berms. Let's tell Piyush to keep his hands off Other People's Money.
Drill Baby Drill!
Posted by: barry at May 24, 2010 09:24 PM (G7n+d)
Posted by: rlynh at May 25, 2010 10:06 AM (JAQT9)
Posted by: Vic at May 24, 2010 04:55 PM (6taRI)
The preamble to the linked article:
On March 28, 1979, as the sun rose over Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, a series of mechanical, electrical, and human failures led to what has been described as the worst nuclear power plant accident in the history of the United States. News of the accident rocked the nation, and its effects were keenly felt by those who lived in the shadow of the great concrete towers of Three Mile Island.
Coverage of the accident and its repercussions by the mainstream media was confusing at best. Unfamiliar with nuclear technology, and often openly afraid of it, few journalists managed to impart to the public a clear, coherent picture of the evolution of the crisis. Despite the best efforts of many experts to relate the true situation, most coverage has suffered from some form of bias, ranging from anti-nuclear paranoia to pro-nuclear propaganda. Facts, related by people with the time to gain a full understanding of their meaning, have been scarce. Many of us are still in the dark as to exactly how TMI happened, and why.
Since my early teen years, I've had a keen interest in nuclear technology, and became even more curious after hearing about the TMI crisis as a high school student in 1979. The technology, human factors, and political and economic pressures that brought about the accident seemed beyond understanding by any one person.
I am neither strongly pro-nuclear nor strongly anti-nuclear. I see the advantages as clearly as the disadvantages, the dangers as vividly as the benefits. From my position, sitting solidly on the fence between the two extremes, I see a more balanced picture. Over the years, while searching for information, I hit upon the idea of sharing that balanced view, in the form of a clear, detailed description of the crisis, uncolored by any biases, and undistorted by the misunderstandings of non-technical journalists.
Research for a software project in the mid 1980's brought me into contact with most of the factual information, and gave me a more refined undetstanding of the underlying technology. Armed with this, my curiosity, and a strong background in physical science, I set out to make myself an expert on the subject, in the hope of gaining the knowledge to write the aforementioned description.
This narrative is the result of that effort. Based on interviews, extensive research, and review of the testimony of those involved, this web site will attempt to fill in the missing details. What you are about to read is a complete account of what took place inside the walls of TMI on that tense spring evening in 1979.
Posted by: stuiec at May 25, 2010 01:00 PM (7AOgy)
The iPad Transfer software is able to transfer music, movies, photos, playlists and more files from computer to iPad player.
More perfect software:
DVD to iPad
Blu ray Ripper
Posted by: sadlock at June 01, 2010 07:15 PM (MYLuB)
Posted by: ÎáíÌíÇÊ at June 27, 2010 10:27 PM (NmsF1)
Posted by: sadlock at June 29, 2010 01:10 AM (of2kN)
Posted by: Wholesale accessories at July 23, 2010 05:16 PM (XAQ8U)
Posted by: cq at September 12, 2010 05:25 PM (onlLe)
Posted by: computers used at September 17, 2010 04:55 AM (NQCKQ)
Posted by: Louisiana Womens Health at September 19, 2010 05:16 AM (c4eSa)
Posted by: book keeping in US at September 24, 2010 05:43 AM (wHIXu)
Posted by: XBox 360 E79 at September 25, 2010 05:47 AM (c4eSa)
Flower store in uk
Thanks for sharing this. It was really an interesting and informative article. Pretty cool post!
Posted by: Flower store in uk at September 27, 2010 01:00 AM (MV+eI)
Posted by: Colorado Family and General Practice at September 29, 2010 06:22 AM (5Hxnl)
Posted by: new jordans at November 02, 2010 02:25 PM (qQPaY)
Posted by: lrr085 at November 11, 2010 10:39 PM (uPjpP)
Posted by: blackberry at November 25, 2010 04:35 PM (ZLL8A)
Posted by: aqarchat at November 25, 2010 05:08 PM (QY1I8)
Posted by: baseball hats at December 21, 2010 05:30 PM (I7MNA)
Posted by: www.napster.com at January 09, 2011 11:43 PM (4hknE)
Posted by: New Era Hats at January 10, 2011 10:25 PM (RJOjC)
Posted by: Free Movies Downloads at January 25, 2011 05:26 PM (Zhaw1)
Posted by: jill432 at February 05, 2011 02:29 AM (pKgYU)
Posted by: jill432 at February 08, 2011 02:19 AM (mw2BV)
Posted by: Auto Glass Dallas at February 08, 2011 12:16 PM (sjLUy)
Posted by: Auto Glass Mckinney at February 08, 2011 12:18 PM (sjLUy)
Posted by: Auto Glass Plano at February 08, 2011 12:19 PM (sjLUy)
Posted by: Lewisville Auto Glass at February 08, 2011 12:20 PM (sjLUy)
<a href="http://www.cheapcustomjerseys.us/custom-football-jerseys">football customized jerseys</a>
Posted by: custom football jersey at February 09, 2011 10:11 PM (peBu3)
Posted by: custom football jersey at February 09, 2011 10:12 PM (peBu3)
غلا روحي message has been rejected سعودي توب message has been rejected عسلي message has been rejectedخدماتي مكياجmessage has been rejected
ارشفةmessage has been rejected ازياءmessage has been rejected
rssmessage has been rejected سعودي كول6666message has been rejected شات message has been rejected مؤسسة خدماتي message has been rejected اشهار message has been rejected
Posted by: 5damaty.com at March 05, 2011 11:22 AM (xzOF1)
Posted by: 5damaty.com at March 05, 2011 11:25 AM (xzOF1)
Posted by: Nike Shoes Clearance at March 22, 2011 06:13 PM (bGsw0)
Posted by: auto scaner at March 23, 2011 05:24 PM (xLBfK)
Posted by: nikeclearance at March 27, 2011 05:41 PM (rBuPJ)
Posted by: Sarah at April 01, 2011 04:40 PM (/OO5V)
Posted by: sudath at April 01, 2011 04:43 PM (/OO5V)
Posted by: Firma at April 28, 2011 09:33 PM (CE1HT)
I will be happy to announce more examples if I were you. It is running good so far. Just keep improving the features.
Posted by: Amanda at April 30, 2011 03:13 AM (Pbo2u)
Posted by: web hosting at April 30, 2011 09:00 AM (rPFs3)
Posted by: Sarah532 at May 09, 2011 04:56 PM (VEn5B)
Posted by: five finger shoes at May 09, 2011 11:30 PM (30gLB)
I am certainly thankful to you for providing us with this invaluable info. My spouse and I are truthfully grateful, precisely the computer data we needed.
Posted by: rose at May 10, 2011 02:01 AM (W1oYD)
Posted by: Mile Marker OTR at May 10, 2011 04:02 AM (YNr4F)
Posted by: Mile Marker OTR at May 10, 2011 04:03 AM (YNr4F)
I unquestionably understand what you have said. In fact, I browsed throughout your other articles and I think that youÂ’re certainly right. Congrats with this site.
Posted by: rose at May 12, 2011 04:49 AM (CXbpP)
It seems that everybody is into this kind of stuff lately. DonÂ’t really understand it though, but thanks for trying to explain it. Appreciate you shedding light into this matter. Keep up your work.
Posted by: Siya at May 18, 2011 05:05 AM (v8nup)
Posted by: Sarah532 at May 25, 2011 06:41 PM (5euBK)
Hey, appreciate it for taking the effort to do this. I like your webpage, although it took a sluggish reader like me some time to via throughout entire page and the many comments.
Posted by: rose at May 30, 2011 05:24 AM (1VKat)
I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own Blog
Posted by: rose at May 31, 2011 02:11 AM (HWo9B)
Posted by: Strasbourg Hotels at June 03, 2011 09:49 AM (re2d0)
Posted by: ƒjƒ…[ƒn[ƒt at June 03, 2011 06:29 PM (qDfuB)
Posted by: Chicago Immigration Attorney at June 04, 2011 11:56 AM (jbplx)
Fapturbo
Posted by: Fapturbo at June 07, 2011 05:32 AM (lNe4Q)
Posted by: Hcg Drops at June 08, 2011 03:24 AM (oSLid)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 01:43 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 01:49 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 01:53 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 01:55 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 01:57 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 01:59 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 02:01 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 02:02 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 02:06 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 02:09 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 02:10 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 02:11 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: mba distance learning at June 08, 2011 02:15 PM (GeiFH)
Posted by: Lingerie at June 09, 2011 01:19 PM (gZWch)
Posted by: gone at June 10, 2011 11:46 PM (Tfs8P)
Posted by: berat badan at June 10, 2011 11:58 PM (8sZQn)
Posted by: jason99 at June 12, 2011 10:07 AM (gVc8G)
Posted by: langsing at June 12, 2011 11:05 AM (mBrzT)
Search Engine Marketing Nz Online Marketing Hot Laps Auckland Backpackers Hostel
Posted by: jason at June 14, 2011 02:33 AM (PykIa)
Psychic Reading Online Psychic Readings Online Psychic Rreading
Posted by: jason at June 14, 2011 02:37 AM (PykIa)
Posted by: jason at June 14, 2011 11:48 AM (yp9Y1)
Vango Icarus 500 | Gold Bags
Posted by: jason at June 15, 2011 04:19 AM (Kg/Pa)
Prolapsed Bladder | Payday Loans UK
Posted by: peter at June 15, 2011 08:30 AM (ZeT0T)
Posted by: backlinks at June 15, 2011 09:52 AM (3lpMo)
Posted by: Las Vegas Personal Injury at June 16, 2011 10:34 AM (l+60V)
Posted by: flowers delivery irelands at June 16, 2011 09:26 PM (WaXnf)
Posted by: jason at June 17, 2011 12:19 PM (tk2mI)
Posted by: pool cover pum at June 17, 2011 12:34 PM (tk2mI)
Posted by: pool cover pum at June 18, 2011 03:37 AM (L0CXg)
Posted by: Alex at June 20, 2011 02:22 AM (+C4Gf)
Posted by: web hosting at June 20, 2011 06:48 AM (YguLe)
Posted by: web hosting at June 20, 2011 06:48 AM (YguLe)
Posted by: web hosting at June 20, 2011 10:33 AM (YguLe)
Posted by: Jack at June 22, 2011 02:57 AM (+C4Gf)
logbook loans | tatamis | live tv online | dentist tigard oregon
Posted by: logbook loans at June 23, 2011 08:27 AM (MvUo6)
Keep up the good work ! BMW offerta
Posted by: pool cover pum at June 24, 2011 09:35 AM (iIvSB)
Posted by: Cycling jErSeYs" rel="nofollow">cycling jErSeYs at June 25, 2011 06:46 AM (66kDG)
<a href=http://www.cheaphatcaps.com/>DC Hats</a>
Posted by: DC Hats at June 28, 2011 01:35 AM (RfhEW)
Posted by: Chitosan Side Effects at June 28, 2011 11:18 AM (64r0W)
Posted by: Cuna at July 07, 2011 03:52 AM (vHEx1)
Posted by: iphone Case at July 07, 2011 04:39 AM (y0HJS)
Posted by: cici at July 08, 2011 06:42 PM (y62dE)
Posted by: cici at July 10, 2011 07:34 PM (cFFmG)
Posted by: ÔÇÊ ÕæÊí at July 12, 2011 09:00 PM (+4+pt)
Posted by: notebook adapter at July 14, 2011 01:57 AM (kAwrV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2643 seconds, 406 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: damian at May 24, 2010 11:09 AM (4WbTI)