September 08, 2010
— Ace At Hot Air, a pretty stunning statement from the RGA head.
Barbour acknowledged the difficulties businessman Dan Maes (R) faces in winning election, and the RGA’s unwillingness to throw good money after bad.“We have spent money in Colorado. Past tense,” Barbour said. …
“We practice what I call ruthless targeting. When we raise money from people in good faith, our good faith pledge is we’re going to use it where” it makes sense, Barbour said. “We don’t pay for sure winners. We don’t give to sure losers. We try to put our money where it makes a difference.”
If Barbour's saying that, I trust him. I don't know what the heck happened here or what it is that makes Maes so unlikely a winner (I know nothing of the race), but if Barbour says it, I guess that's a big thing.
Second look at... Tom Tancredo?
Posted by: Ace at
12:15 PM
| Comments (74)
Post contains 161 words, total size 1 kb.
--Technically, it's present perfect tense. . . .
Posted by: logprof at September 08, 2010 12:19 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: logprof at September 08, 2010 12:20 PM (BP6Z1)
The more the Repub establishment plays games, the less likely it is that they'll ever get a check from me. If they try hard enough, might even cost 'em some votes.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 08, 2010 12:20 PM (Ulu3i)
the reason Tancredo was so adamant was because he knew the other Republicans were shitbags
As much as I would have preferred Tancredo, for him to act like Lisa Murkowski only from the Right is no better.
I wll support the real GOP candidate over the RINO in the primary. Yes Mike Castle, that means Not You. But once the primary is over....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 08, 2010 12:25 PM (ujg0T)
I think Maes has some 'issues' that can't be overcome. Tancredo offered to step down if Maes did, so the RGA could get someone in there that had a chance to win, but Maes refused. If this race goes to the dims, you can blame Maes maybe even more than Tancredo.
Posted by: Steph at September 08, 2010 12:28 PM (nbzzk)
Maes is already broke, and has zero fundraising ability on his own. That's why he was such a bad pick, even though he was able to charm the voters in the primary.
Maes should drop out now. And no, the answer isn't Tancredo - Fuck Tancredo. Replace him with Jane Norton, and she could probably win the whole shootin' match.
Posted by: Tom Servo at September 08, 2010 12:29 PM (T1boi)
Tancredo idiotically jumped in, guaranteeing a Taxenlooper the win. Tancredo said he would get out if Maes dropped out then reneged. Maes pulled stupid crap claiming military or police type service he didn't have, plus there was some controversy of $300 gift/loan/campaign contribution from so lady, that Maes gave back but by that time he was savaged in the press.
In short, its a cluster.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 08, 2010 12:29 PM (L8kaT)
Now we have Barbour telling him to get out. There is something going on there. And Barbour is not the typical GOP leadership squish either.
Posted by: Vic at September 08, 2010 12:30 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Vic at September 08, 2010 12:31 PM (/jbAw)
The question now becomes whether Hickenlooper's upcoming blowout is going to drag on Ken Buck in the Senate race, or keep Ed Perlmutter afloat in CO-7.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 08, 2010 12:32 PM (NjYDy)
yeah, it's all Tancredo's fault the other guy is a shitbag.
Tancredo is sitting at home right now saying I toldya so.
Posted by: al-fiscal ferret, al-social fruit bat at September 08, 2010 12:32 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: Firelight at September 08, 2010 12:35 PM (1kUwC)
Posted by: Mikey NTH at September 08, 2010 12:36 PM (O9Cc8)
Posted by: Mikey NTH at September 08, 2010 12:37 PM (O9Cc8)
After the primary, Tancredo was still willing to drop out, if Maes would, so the Repubs could appoint a viable candidate. The only reason Tancredo got in was to try to force Maes out, because Maes flat out sucks. Whether Tancredo gets out or not Maes cannot win. If he actually gave a shit about winning the seat for the Repubs, he'd drop out and give them a chance to get someone that had a chance to win.
Posted by: Steph at September 08, 2010 12:38 PM (nbzzk)
...this. This stupid clusterfuck at the top of the ticket. I suspect it won't ultimately harm the CO-GOP that much: a lot of Republicans in Colorado are kinda-sorta okay with John Hickenlooper in the first place, as he's a remarkably likeable Democratic candidate even in this toxic environment, and I foresee a whole shitton of ticket-splitting.
Nobody's talking about the state houses, by the way. The Republicans are going to positively sodomize the Democrats on a local level this year, not just the gubernatorial races but the delegate/senate races...just in time for drawing up redistricting maps!
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 08, 2010 12:38 PM (NjYDy)
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 08, 2010 12:40 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Jean at September 08, 2010 12:41 PM (YXNkv)
Firelight, since you're in CO, you know better than we do, so I will shut up, now. Maybe, they're trying to do to Maes what they're trying to do to other tea party candidates. I don't know, so....well, I'll shut up.
Posted by: Steph at September 08, 2010 12:42 PM (nbzzk)
Not his fault, no, but Tancredo knows better to go third party. Third parties are for losers. It would be one thing 4 years ago, or 4 years from now, but in a redistricting year, absolutely stupid. This is about Tancredo's ego. If Tancredo wanted to run, he could have done it in the primary and he probably would have won. Now he is just grandstanding because he supported the other guy that got beat.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 08, 2010 12:43 PM (L8kaT)
The NRSC and the RGA are very different beasts. It really makes little sense to compare their policies. And Maes is, quite literally, a shady drifter more than he is a serious candidate for Senate (this is Scott McInnis's fault for being a plagiarizing schmuck, FWIW...and Dick Wadhams for vetting these people). The RGA wanted him to drop out to appoint a new candidate (Tancredo promised to drop out too in that situation). Maes refused, so screw him.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 08, 2010 12:43 PM (NjYDy)
Everybody was pretty psyched to have Josh Penry, our young senate minority leader, as our gubernatorial nominee.
The Party had other ideas, and had him step out of the race in favor of party insider Scott McInnis.
Maes came out of nowhere and was never a threat to win anything, until it turned out McInnis was a filthy plagiarist.
GOP voters had no one BUT Maes to vote for.
Posted by: Hey.Wheres.Barry at September 08, 2010 12:44 PM (gQLr2)
The NRSC and the RGA are very different beasts. It really makes little sense to compare their policies. And Maes is, quite literally, a shady drifter more than he is a serious candidate for Senate (this is Scott McInnis's fault for being a plagiarizing schmuck, FWIW...and Dick Wadhams for vetting these people). The RGA wanted him to drop out to appoint a new candidate (Tancredo promised to drop out too in that situation). Maes refused, so screw him.
Posted by: Jeff B.
I can certainly believe what you say about Maes. And I know that the two organizations are different. But do you think that this might possibly be an option playing out in Murkowski's mind? I have the incumbency, I have the seniority, and supposedly people are begging me to stay in. The RGA is basically cajoling CO to reshuffle the deck, and probably has good reasons to do so. But might not she be looking to force the same thing?
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 08, 2010 12:47 PM (R2fpr)
Everybody was pretty psyched to have Josh Penry, our young senate minority leader, as our gubernatorial nominee.
The Party had other ideas, and had him step out of the race in favor of party insider Scott McInnis.
Maes came out of nowhere and was never a threat to win anything, until it turned out McInnis was a filthy plagiarist.
GOP voters had no one BUT Maes to vote for.
Posted by: Hey.Wheres.Barry
Ah. The old party 'double shuffle' where you leave the joker in the deck. We're having a case of that here in Delaware.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 08, 2010 12:48 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: logprof at September 08, 2010 12:54 PM (BP6Z1)
It sounds to me, quite frankly, that Tancredo has some kind of hard-on for Maes. Maes may not be the best candidate in the world, but it does not sound like he has done anything that outrageous that would be a bar to being elected. If Tancredo were out of the race, then this would be an even race.
So it sounds to me like the fault lies primarily with Tancredo. I think the RGA should not give up so easily on this either.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 08, 2010 12:54 PM (sOx93)
Posted by: 1992 Houston Oilers at September 08, 2010 12:55 PM (BP6Z1)
Tancredo only stepped in to force Maes to step down after getting the nomination. Tom said if Maes' resigned the nomination, he would step out too. He did this so a real viable candidate could step forward and take Maes' place.
#24 does a good job of telling the sad tale of how we got here. It is now known that Maes has ethics violations and embelished his record. Adding to the pile on are some very prominent CO politicians withdrawing their endoresments.
As excited as I am for November, the above makes for a daily dose of depression coming out of the AM dial on the drive time home. Everyday something worse about Maes is discovered.
Posted by: PugBoo at September 08, 2010 12:55 PM (+hPIb)
And no, Taxenlooper will not be a DINO, he will be beholden to the public employees union like all the demorats.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 08, 2010 12:55 PM (L8kaT)
--Okay, yours is the second post I've read today on AoS using "X has a hard-on for Y" in the opposite sense of the traditional meaning.
Did I miss the new AoS stylebook?
Posted by: logprof at September 08, 2010 12:56 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: PaleRider at September 08, 2010 12:58 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: PaleRider
Sorry guys, but the SC governors race has this one beat. That one had alledged sex.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 08, 2010 01:02 PM (R2fpr)
I don't buy this at all. And I'm not in Colorado, but I find this to be a classic case study in what Republicans should never do to one another, anywhere.
I don't care what Maes' issues are; he's the nominee. Colorado voters (don't know whether CO's primaries are open or closed) made their choice, and they chose him; there may have been no good options for them, but they chose Maes fair and square. Flawed or not, he's the nominee; the polling has suggested he CAN win a two-man race; and there's no reason in the world for him to drop out.
It is NOT up to Tom Fucking Tancredo to come along and take it upon himself to "save the day" for the Republicans by concocting a egotistical shithead plan in which he serves as a one-man nominating committee, creating the conditions for a guaranteed Democrat win unless the Republicans throw out the voters' duly nominated candidate and substitute someone HE finds to be acceptable.
Tancredo is another Lisa Murkowski and should have the GOP door slammed shut in his face if he ever again tries to open it.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at September 08, 2010 01:03 PM (oVoeM)
That was a seat that either Rudy, or Pateki could have had walking away this year.
Posted by: DelD at September 08, 2010 01:05 PM (Z00dp)
But its too late for Maes to drop out now, the secretary of state certified the balllots and they have gone out for printing. Dan Maes is basically Ted Haggard without the meth and gay masseuse problems. Meaning there is something shady and dishonest about him. He claimed to be a successful buisness owner when he was really a struggling salesman. He claimed to be an under cover sop when he was a beat cop in Liberal, Kansas, he took a $300 cash gift to pay his mortgage and got caught.
In a year that should be a slam dunk the Colorado GOP picked a terrible candidate for governor, and an even bigger idiot for senate, that is going to lose to an Obama rubber stamp appointment Michael Bennett. Michale Bennet is 3 points ahead of Buck. WTF is wrong with you tea partiers? You've given us unelectable candidates when there were good mainstream conservatives like Jane Norton and Josh Penry that would have been shoe ins.
Posted by: vaildog at September 08, 2010 01:06 PM (z2O42)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 08, 2010 01:10 PM (L8kaT)
She is in no way a good mainstream conservative. And Buck will win.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 08, 2010 01:15 PM (L8kaT)
That was the primary. The actual governor's race has dulled down to the standard Haley "here's my position" and the MFM and the Dem accusing her of all kinds of shit in the papers.
Haley will win easily.
Posted by: Vic at September 08, 2010 01:23 PM (/jbAw)
Just go download some of the Caplis and Silverman podcasts off of Khow.com to get a feel for just how weird it is. He is political poison now, and made a very stupid and self-serving decision to stay in.
Now HookaLipper, the guy who warned nobody when gangs were attacking whites because they were white last summer is going to win.
Posted by: doug at September 08, 2010 01:24 PM (I6iFS)
logprof,
The "hard on" as a term of antagonism toward someone is slightly more prevalent in the military. Hence, this being a SMRT military blog, either use is acceptable.
Posted by: s'moron at September 08, 2010 01:24 PM (UaxA0)
PA politics is pretty whitebread in comparison. All we had was a hundred year Dem-Rep-Dem senator who got trounced by a carpetbagging Admiral who used our congressional district as the springboard for his Big Draw on the Taxpayer Tit effort.
Posted by: kallisto at September 08, 2010 01:27 PM (+FkcS)
The "hard on" as a term of antagonism toward someone is slightly more prevalent in the military. Hence, this being a SMRT military blog, either use is acceptable.
Posted by: s'moron at September 08, 2010 05:24 PM (UaxA0)
--Ah. I can understand, but it's just weird that I had never seen that usage before today.
Posted by: logprof at September 08, 2010 01:29 PM (BP6Z1)
Richard "Iron Dick" Blumenthal lied about serving in Vietnam, for God's sake, a concoction that at least to my mind is, y'know, kinda MORE loathsome than Maes' secret-agent fantasies in Kansas. But the Democrat Party rallied around him, there was never even a hint of Tancredo-style bullshit from any Concerned Democrat in Connecticut, and Iron Dick has led in every poll ever since. That race has gotten closer but he's still the favorite.
They don't call us the Stupid Party for nothing. And this right before redistricting, too.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at September 08, 2010 01:32 PM (VCCU4)
Re: "X has a hardon for Y" - Basically mens that X wants to fuck Y
Now, that can be a good thing, or it can be a bad thing.
Posted by: gebrauchshund at September 08, 2010 01:45 PM (ADeN1)
Posted by: gebrauchshund at September 08, 2010 01:47 PM (ADeN1)
Posted by: Firelight at September 08, 2010 01:49 PM (DRpg+)
Posted by: erp at September 08, 2010 02:09 PM (Wkm4K)
Dan Maes is in full meltdown. Not only does he continue to act dodgy about his tax returns it is now being claimed by a very credible lady, Freda Poundstone, that she gave Maes $3,000 in cash at Maes' request. Maes insists it was only $300 but the cash reporting limit in CO is $100. Maes never reported the contribution.
Worse still Mrs. Poundstone alleges the money was for personal expenses.
Mrs. Poundstone confronted Maes at a public forum and Maes left but not before he slipped her a check for $300 that was written out in 2 different color inks in 2 different hand-writings and the check wasn't even signed and no memo was filled-out.
But wait, it gets worse.
The name on the account is "Dan Maes for Governor" but that is not the name of Maes' campaign registered with the CO SoS. The registered committee is "Friends of Dan Maes for Governor." Maes has openly admitted to giving Mrs. Poundstone the check.
Speculation runs rampant as to whether Maes was trying to get Mrs. Poundstone to pass a bad check so as to discredit her.
Meanwhile, on the other side we learn Hickenlooper co-founded The Chinook Fund, a group that passes money to groups like ACORN, Recreate68, Transform Columbus Day, Cop Watch and other extreme leftists. The Denver mayor is already sensitive about his praise of Van Jones. Ad in FastTrack, a $50 million public transportation boondoggle that funneled contracts to Siemens after they donated $100k to the principles in exchange for winning contracts worth tens of millions to build rail cars.
I was against Tancredo for the same reason I'm against Murkowski going libertarian in AK: it splits the vote. But we are in bad shape here in CO and with the electoral climate being what it is there is no reason Maes can't be pushed down into irrelevance.
Posted by: Mr Snuggle Bunny at September 08, 2010 02:47 PM (2eLg/)
Barbour is right. The Colorado GOP screwed the pooch on this big-time. We could have retaken the Governorship. The Dem candidate is Denver Mayor Hickenlooper, and he is not that strong of a state-wide candidate.
But the primary race became a two-man show between former Rep. Scott McInnis and Dan Maes. Then it came out that McInnis plagiarized large parts of a series of articles on water issues that he wrote for a charitable foundation, for which he received $300,000. He blamed it on an 80 yera-old (now ex-) friend, and had is lawyers clumsily try to talk the guy into signing a statement taking responsibility. Then the foundation turned on him and demanded its money back. McInnis cratered and left the door open for Maes.
Maes, however, is a walking disaster. He is flat broke, was a poor businessman, fired from a police force, lied about working undercover, took $300 from a supporter to pay hi smortgage, then called it a campaign contribution, then returned it but failed to sign the check, and so on.
Tancredo saw the clusterfuck looming on the horizon, so shortly before the Republican primary, he declared the race to be lost regardless of which of the two losers on the ticket was nominated, threatened to jump in as a third party candidate if they didn't both commit to drop out so the party could appoint a credible candidate. Didn't happen.
So....we nominated Maes at the primary. Then more stuff came out about him, and every major endorsement he ever had said adios and called for him to drop out. (One local columnist recently joked that Maes has to stay in the race as the best chance he has of earning a steady paycheck. Ouch, but not far off the mark.) Plus we have Tancredo in the race drawing off votes from Maes on the right.
Maes is toast. Hickenlooper will win unless he gets caught in bed with a live boy and a dead girl.
Spending money on this race would be a waste.
Posted by: mangyredbonehound at September 08, 2010 04:12 PM (HreXM)
Well it's true. for the most part, only democrats run ads in the state of CO.
There is no money here. ... and guess what - our shitty shitty shitty bullshit liar left-wing democrat candidates might actually win. How sad is that?
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at September 08, 2010 04:32 PM (0fzsA)
Denver Mayor Hickenpooper is to the LEFT of Barack Insane Obama and will try to make Colorado a sanctuary state. (A republican state house could stop that.) Hick's a self-made millionaire (a good thing), but he gives a lot of money to far left organizations.
Maes can't run Colorado's $17 billion state budget - he's a fraud.
Tancredo? He doesn't even WANT the governor's job and has said so.
Major cluster here in Colorado. Penry would have been a dream candidate.
Posted by: bohema at September 08, 2010 04:36 PM (f0RkQ)
Posted by: mangyredbonehound at September 08, 2010 04:36 PM (HreXM)
The Republicans in CO have no idea how to strategize.
McInnis should have never been in the race.
We should be looking at a Josh Penry or a Jane Norton for Governor.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at September 08, 2010 04:39 PM (0fzsA)
60 bohemo -
I missed that on KHOW. But you nailed it.
I did listen to some of the other stuff regarding Perlmutter's(D) standard left-wing bullshit admission that the government deserves everyone's money after they die.
How dare anyone successful have the ability to give it to the people they want.
Big daddy commie government knows best! Screw you, America. Screw you farmers and small business owners. The government gets to steal from you when you die.
Perlmutter is a cookie cutter leftist ass.
(never mind that these people have paid taxes to the government all of their lives)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at September 08, 2010 04:46 PM (0fzsA)
Dan Maes won the GOP nomination primarily because Scott McInnis screwed up with the plagairism thing, and he was the "grass roots" alternative. However, Maes is being cast as incompetent and that's probably true. No one knew a thing about him when he won. Hickenlooper is popular with Dems and Independents (the ultimate Mr. Nice Guy), but he's pulling only 41% on the strength that he's a Democrat in 2010 and Establishment. The campaigning has not begun in earnest yet, and he'll pull farther ahead once it does.
Tancredo decided to run as a write-in once he saw that Maes didn't have a chance of winning. Sure, he's splitting the vote, but Maes wouldn't win anyway. I predict he'll come in second, and Maes a distant third. The GOP is pissed with Tancredo, but it's their own damn fault for running two pathetic candidates in the primary, not leaving us with a good choice.
For the record, Tancredo, while controversial, is rather popular in Colorado, especially the densely populated 6th district. The vast majority of Americans agree with his stance on immigration, even if they won't admit it out loud. He's rough around the edges, but he always won his races for the House by huge margins. The Denver and Boulder districts are probably enough to keep him out, though. Besides, all the Dems will do is brand him as a racist and that could be enough.
Posted by: amosjo at September 08, 2010 05:43 PM (EvnWq)
Posted by: ARC at September 08, 2010 05:49 PM (Hb+LB)
Posted by: Subotai Bahadur at September 08, 2010 06:14 PM (CeslE)
Subotai, I agree with you, for the most part, about our state's Republicans. They have shown a tremendous ability for one thing: running crappy gubernatorial candidates and being generally clueless, and testicle-less, in most other respects.
Oh, how I wish Josh Penry hadn't deferred to his former boss. If he was in this race, I think he'd be a virtual lock. But we're stuck with Maes - and stuck is the right word. All the ineptitude and jackassedness of the state boys aside, Maes is a horrible candidate. He's a liar and he doesn't inspire trust or confidence. Had McInnis not been stupid enough to do what he did, and had the Hasan family not thrown their usual hissy fit when they don't get what they want (i.e., McInnis' endorsement of their court jester son as a state treasurer candidate) AND had the Denver Post not vomited the whole story just before the primary - such a coincidence! - Maes would be history. But he isn't - Republican control of the governorship is.
Tancredo may yet pull this off; I don't know. At this point, my primary concern is getting conservatives elected to the state legislature so Hickenlooper, if he does manage to slide into office, has a brick wall facing him when he goes after us for tax increases. Then the real conservatives need to wipe the slate clean and start finding REAL candidates, with a whole lot of input from the people they're supposed to represent.
Posted by: gbowife at September 08, 2010 06:56 PM (HC1B5)
Posted by: ObjectionSustained at September 08, 2010 07:55 PM (Wq4nR)
Support Tancredo. He sure as hell isn't a RINO.
Posted by: ArrrJayyy at September 08, 2010 08:27 PM (gXVqy)
He can win, guys. It's a long shot, sure, but Maes is a sure loser.
Posted by: ArrrJayyy at September 08, 2010 08:33 PM (gXVqy)
I don't suffer those who support Fiefdom.
I'll never vote for Haley Barbour for anything at all.
Posted by: Rose at September 09, 2010 01:26 AM (BYsJS)
I'll be voting for one lonely "D" this year.
Hickenlooper is likeably slimy, but you can't prove he's a crook.
Ya gotta love having clear cut choices like that.
Posted by: jwb7605 at September 09, 2010 06:17 AM (Qxe/p)
I don't have time to wade through all of these comments, but based on the first 30 or so it seems nobody has any idea what's going on in Colorado. I live there, so let me put you some knowledge.
Back in 2009, there were three GOP candidates for governor. Scott McInnis, a former congressman who had a reputation as a RINO but was backed by most of the state's Republican kingmakers; Josh Penry, a young guy (maybe 35?) who was state senate minority leader and had the backing of a lot of the state's conservatives; and some asshat named Dan Maes that no one had ever heard of but was billing himself as a successful businessman.
Penry unexpectedly dropped out some time around New Years or a little before, surprising a ton of folks and pretty much handing the nomination to McInnis. The rumor was that the rich kingmaker types had a meeting with Penry where they vowed to fund 527s that would ruin him. And, hey, Penry was young and charismatic and had a good future as a rising star of the party, so why not drop out now and wait his turn? So he did.
Fast forward to spring/summer 2010. In between retiring from congress (in '04 or '06 or whenever it was), McInnis had "earned" a fellowship from a foundation funded by a rich Republican family in the state (really, it was just part of the politician full employment act, so he wouldn't have to get a real job). $300k to write a couple articles on water law. Yeah, 300 THOUSAND DOLLARS. The pay was certainly in the silly, borderline bribery range that pretty much every politician gets after leaving office, but it all seemed on the up and up other than that. Then someone actually read the articles. And portions of them were plagarized. And not just from some joe on the street, but from a guy who is now a state supreme court justice. Well, McInnis starts spinning, deflecting, doing everything he can to avoid admitting he has no character. Even tries to blame it on a research assistant before finally admitting he's a plagarist.
Dan Maes at this point is having his own problems. He's been cited and/or fined for campaign violations so many times it makes you wonder whether he can balance his own check book. Also, "successful businessman Dan Maes" turns out to be not so successful after all, as his tax returns indicate the last time he made a profit was somewhere around never. Plus, he does a bunch of interviews that make painfully clear he has no idea how state government works or the duties of the governor and probably hasn't even glanced at the Colorado constitution.
Unfortunately, this all comes to a head like 3 weeks before the primary. So voters are left with the integrity-less McInnis or the man who's single qualification--business acumen--was b.s. (Maes). Into this, steps Tancredo who gives an ultimaitum: drop out or I'll run third party. McInnis refuses because he's a dick that only cares about himself. And Maes refuses because his only mealticket is the campaign. Maes wins the primary--barely--but 5% of primary voters refuse to even vote on the governor line. This was not a normal Tea Party upstart storyline.
So now Tancredo's running, and all the GOP muckety-mucks (who, mind you, were saying Maes was a no-talent assclown just days before) join with Maes' ragged band of former (and current) Paultards to say Tancredo's handing the governorship to the Dems. But Maes is a lost cause with or without Tancredo in the race. Hickenlooper is a popular, tough-to-beat Dem as it is; and Maes has run around lying about being an undercover cop and saying Denver's bike-sharing program is a U.N. plot. Plus, the man is barely qualified to be mayor of his hometown, let alone Governor of the state. He's a mini version of Obama on the experience front, maybe worse.
Anyway, Maes is going to be crushed. Why waste RGA money? Regardless, I think the villan in this thing who's mostly getting a free pass isn't Tancredo. It isn't really Maes either. It's McInnis. When Hickenlooper wins the governorship, McInnis is the only person I will blame, and he rightfully should carry the lion's share of the vitriol and blame that's being passed around. Guy deserves to be beat over the head with a bag of dicks.
Posted by: Jeff Clownpenis at September 09, 2010 02:22 PM (jNbWo)
BTW, #67, Gale Norton and Jane Norton are two different people. A lot of your complaints about Jane Norton (frmr lieutenant governor and senate candidate that lost to Ken Buck) are actually complaints about Gale Norton (former attorney general, senate candidate that lost to Wayne Allard, and Bush administration Interior Secretary).
I was/am a Buck supporter, but you should at least get your criticisms right.
Posted by: Jeff Clownpenis at September 09, 2010 02:32 PM (jNbWo)
They had lots of yard signs, and a table covered with literature from state and national candidates.
And they had not one sticker, brochure or yard sign for Dan Maes.
If an official party office has no promotional literature for the highest office in the state, that's a good gauge of their support for the candidate.
Posted by: Calvin Dodge at September 11, 2010 05:12 PM (xXKp2)
This thread's comments are so worthy. But what can't be overlooked is the Tea Party kill before they got to the beach because Penry took a deal. Let me say that again, Penry took a deal. I would hope this will not be overlooked in future grass roots efforts and support.
Of course, let me add the "alledgedly" for legal purposes because no one knows exactly why Penry bailed. One has to wonder if there might be something embarassing or damaging in his past too.
Posted by: FeFe at September 12, 2010 04:12 AM (TjlA2)
Posted by: Darren at September 12, 2010 06:15 AM (LtxF8)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.256 seconds, 202 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: 18-1 at September 08, 2010 12:17 PM (7BU4a)