August 16, 2010
— Ace If President Obama has shown such "courage" and "leadership" on the mosque issue -- as Christiana Amanapour's handpicked sedition monkeys all agree -- then what does this make Harry Reid, who's actually running for election in November?
Is this an example of "courage" and "leadership" as well? Are all Democrats courageous leaders even when they disagree?
Reid spokesman: "First Amendment protects freedom of religion. Sen Reid respects that but thinks .. mosque should be built someplace else"
Meanwhile, Ross Douthat writes about the mosque, but he of course has to accuse its opponents of xenophobia... even as he agrees with him.
Oh well, he does get to the right conclusion after calling himself a xenophobe for concluding it.
This is typical of how these debates usually play out. The first America tends to make the finer-sounding speeches, and the second America often strikes cruder, more xenophobic notes. The first America welcomed the poor, the tired, the huddled masses; the second America demanded that they change their names and drop their native languages, and often threw up hurdles to stop them coming altogether. The first America celebrated religious liberty; the second America persecuted Mormons and discriminated against Catholics.But both understandings of this country have real wisdom to offer, and both have been necessary to the American experimentÂ’s success...
So it is today with Islam. The first America is correct to insist on Muslims’ absolute right to build and worship where they wish. But the second America is right to press for something more from Muslim Americans — particularly from figures like Feisal Abdul Rauf, the imam behind the mosque — than simple protestations of good faith.
Too often, American Muslim institutions have turned out to be entangled with ideas and groups that most Americans rightly consider beyond the pale. Too often, American Muslim leaders strike ambiguous notes when asked to disassociate themselves completely from illiberal causes.
By global standards, Rauf may be the model of a “moderate Muslim.” But global standards and American standards are different. For Muslim Americans to integrate fully into our national life, they’ll need leaders who don’t describe America as “an accessory to the crime” of 9/11 (as Rauf did shortly after the 2001 attacks), or duck questions about whether groups like Hamas count as terrorist organizations (as Rauf did in a radio interview in June). And they’ll need leaders whose antennas are sensitive enough to recognize that the quest for inter-religious dialogue is ill served by throwing up a high-profile mosque two blocks from the site of a mass murder committed in the name of Islam.
TheyÂ’ll need leaders, in other words, who understand that while the ideals of the first America protect the e pluribus, itÂ’s the demands the second America makes of new arrivals that help create the unum.
One point I'd like to make: The Muslims building this vow that they are not deliberately giving any offense, and yet, when it's pointed out that great offense is in fact being taken, they essentially say "FYNQ." That does seem then to be deliberately attempting to give offense and be provocative and trimphalist.
Another point: The elites -- elites? Let's call them what they are; the revolutionary vanguard -- the revolutionary vanguard is fond of questioning the motives of the great number of Americans who are opposed to the Victory mosque, and assigning them them worst possible motives.
And yet where are their suspicions about the motives of the mosque's builders? Their motives they take at face value, claiming they know as a fact that these are "moderates" interested in "bridge building" despite the fact they do so in a supremely insulting and haughty manner.
No questions about their motives? Only one side's motives deserve the scrutiny of the press? Only one side's motives may be attributed to malice or other base desires, such as payback and taunting?
All of us opposed are bigots and Muslim-hating? All of us? Including a majority of Democrats?
A proposed mosque to be built two blocks from the World Trade Center has little support nationwide, a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll suggests.According to the new survey out Wednesday, nearly 70 percent of all Americans oppose the controversial plan to build the mosque just blocks away from the solemn site in lower Manhattan while just 29 percent favor the construction.
Broken down by party affiliation, 54 percent of Democrats oppose the plans while 82 percent of Republicans disapprove. Meanwhile, 70 percent of independents said they are against the proposal.
The poll also showed opposition did not vary widely by age.
Are all of us bigots? Or do most of us simply question the supposed "bridge building" motive of building a mosque which has the actual effect of burning bridges? Maybe some of us are wise enough to reason backwards from effect to intent: If this has the effect of rubbing salt in the wounds of America, maybe that was the intent all along.
But no; the Hamas-supporting, America-blaming, Osama-excusing Imam Rauf says a few pretty words about "moderation" and we troglodytic thugs are just too stupid to assume that of course he must be telling the truth.
Why would we think he could possibly lie? He's not Christian, after all, nor white.
Thanks to tips from DrewM. and Slublog.
All of the President's Straw Men: At Neo-Neocon.
Posted by: Ace at
11:20 AM
| Comments (72)
Post contains 911 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at August 16, 2010 11:25 AM (HyiC2)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 16, 2010 11:25 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: marc in calgary at August 16, 2010 11:26 AM (twux5)
Posted by: PaleRider at August 16, 2010 11:26 AM (dkExz)
Posted by: Janeane Garofalo at August 16, 2010 11:26 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: David Brooks at August 16, 2010 11:27 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: alexthechick at August 16, 2010 11:28 AM (eRjGt)
Well, there is a mid-term election coming up. Nothing like reading the polls there, Harry deDouchebag. Sorry, pud, it isn't going to work.
Posted by: Steph at August 16, 2010 11:29 AM (580hG)
Posted by: Imam Rauf at August 16, 2010 11:30 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at August 16, 2010 11:30 AM (xO+6C)
Maybe some of us are wise enough to reason backwards from effect to intent: If this has the effect of rubbing salt in the wounds of America, maybe that was the intent all along.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at August 16, 2010 11:31 AM (E0EDC)
Call Tom Daschale and he can fill you in on what you aren't supposed to do if you want an administration job after getting your ass handed to you on a silver platter.
Posted by: Rocks at August 16, 2010 11:31 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: SomeSay the Strawmarian at August 16, 2010 11:31 AM (V/EYZ)
I look forward to sthitting down at the 'Pink Sthcimitar' with you to discussth our differenthesth of opinion on thisth, Ace.
Shall we sthay - Sthevinisth?
Posted by: Adam Gadhan at August 16, 2010 11:32 AM (zUg7z)
Posted by: gomm at August 16, 2010 11:32 AM (7JES6)
Posted by: Mallamutt at August 16, 2010 03:30 PM (OWjjx)
Yep. I just love how the bags are now talking about the Constitution, and rights. Where are all those pricks when Christians are being stomped on?
Posted by: Steph at August 16, 2010 11:32 AM (580hG)
The perfect toxic storm.
Posted by: mrp at August 16, 2010 11:32 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 16, 2010 11:32 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Truman North at August 16, 2010 11:34 AM (e8YaH)
Awww...Bloomy's all sad and shit....
NEW YORK (AP) -- New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg says it would be "a sad day for America" if opponents successfully kill plans for a mosque proposed near the World Trade Center site.
Bloomberg has been among a few outspoken elected officials supporting the plans for an Islamic center and mosque two blocks from ground zero.
Posted by: Tami at August 16, 2010 11:35 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: SomeSay the Strawmarian at August 16, 2010 11:36 AM (V/EYZ)
I guess that make me a bigot.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at August 16, 2010 11:36 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at August 16, 2010 11:37 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: boniface ballers at August 16, 2010 11:37 AM (bPbwB)
"Harvard Confirms, They DID NOT Divest its Israel Holdings."It's all at instapundit
figured I'd put the correction here as few go back to the morning threads after they've moved on.
Posted by: curious at August 16, 2010 11:37 AM (p302b)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 16, 2010 11:38 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 16, 2010 11:39 AM (VW9/y)
Chuckie hasn't commented about the mosque has he? Hope he gets the Tom Suozzi treatment...
Posted by: curious at August 16, 2010 11:39 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Vic at August 16, 2010 11:39 AM (/jbAw)
OH...OH....OH...
Flaming Skull...Ace??
Looks like they may be getting ready to drop plans to build the Victory Mosque. Don't know how true this is, or anything about this site, but Dave Riehl is linking it from his site.
Posted by: Steph at August 16, 2010 11:40 AM (580hG)
Posted by: curious at August 16, 2010 11:41 AM (p302b)
Where are all those pricks when Christians are being stomped on?
Don't you understand that the Constitution is a living, breathing document that can be folded, spindled and mutilated whenever possible and should be used primarily to beat conservatives about the head and shoulders when it suits libtards?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at August 16, 2010 11:41 AM (kFODZ)
Raze it to the ground and put up a statue of the monkey-god in the ruins.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 16, 2010 03:38 PM (Qp4DT)
Oh yes, THIS would love great in Manhattan.
Posted by: Fish at August 16, 2010 11:41 AM (v1gw3)
They are dropping it probably at the request of the WH and it will be back after the election. The republicans can't afford to let it be dropped. They have to make sure they get assurances that it won't be built there, ever.
Posted by: curious at August 16, 2010 11:42 AM (p302b)
Mmmm-hmmm. It would almost be his me.
Posted by: 9/11/2001 at August 16, 2010 11:43 AM (ukBBI)
Posted by: bulwark at August 16, 2010 11:43 AM (EmbBn)
Greg Gutfeld must be devastated to learn the fag bar may not become a reality next to the mosque. Well, fuck 'um anyway.
Posted by: Fish at August 16, 2010 11:45 AM (v1gw3)
Curious, if they drop it, now, it will never be built there, as it shouldn't be. There will never be anything, but overall opposition to it.
I truly don't care why they decide not to do it, as long as they don't do it.
Posted by: Steph at August 16, 2010 11:45 AM (580hG)
Awww...Bloomy's all sad and shit....
NEW YORK (AP) -- New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg says it would be "a sad day for America" if opponents successfully kill plans for a mosque proposed near the World Trade Center site.
Bloomberg has been among a few outspoken elected officials supporting the plans for an Islamic center and mosque two blocks from ground zero.
Posted by: Tami at August 16, 2010 03:35 PM (VuLos)
My local rag sez Bloomberg will endorse senatorial candidate Joe Sestak.Time to fix some more popcorn.
OMFG!!!!
From the linked article:
Campaign strategists hope that BloombergÂ’s reputation for non-ideological government will reinforce their argument that Sestak, a former Navy vice admiral in his second House term, is a pragmatic problem-solver rather than a partisan warrior.
Posted by: Ed Anger at August 16, 2010 11:46 AM (7+pP9)
I misssed the memo on modern secular post-Enlightenment types having to like a particular organized religion. Having never favored any organized religion it would be pretty strange if I suddenly liked the one which has produced a dozen fatwas saying I can be beheaded or blown to smithereens.
This is just like the argument I had to vote for Obama to prove I'm not a racist. Like I'm suddenly going to vote D for the guy who gets 100% from the NEA or SEIU? My first Democrat vote for president on the most 'progressive' senator?
How am I supposed to like Islam when my first exposure to even the word was the 1979 hostage crisis and chants of "Death to America." We were suddenly backing these 'freedom fighting' mujahideen (weird word then) in Afghanistan. Lebanon had a big civil war during this time which made the TV news. Then Islam showed me the love with the 1983 Lebanon suicide truck bomb carried out by Iranian Pasdaran and the nascent Hizballah. That made an impression on a young man, modern kamikaze tactics. Somewhere in there Iran put Rushdie on the death list and murdered his translators.
Tolerance! Islam's respect for diversity!
Skipping lots of stuff.
Then we had the Klinghoffer guy. Oh, I forgot Munich in 1972. But I was too young to even know the word Islam. Libya with the whole Lockerbie thing and Reagan's tent air strike. The Iranian jet and the little Persian Gulf War. Geez, then it's on to Saddam, the first WTC in 1993. Embassies in 98. Cole in 2000. WTC again. Iraq again. Iran again. Afghanistan again. Lebanon again in '06.. Oops, forgot Somalia in 1993 with Blackhawk Down. Not to mention Somalia today.
The 57 states of the OIC reject the UDHR for the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam (1990). The last two provisions specifically call for sharia _only_.
And oh yeah, an Arab Muslim genocide of black Africans in Sudan. Throw in some stealth jihad, sharia, sharia finance, and Muslim Brotherhood plans for destroying our constitution and miserable house from within using our own laws against us.... and... and...
What reasonable conclusion should I draw about Islam?
Posted by: Beagle at August 16, 2010 11:48 AM (sOtz/)
Quote Bloomberg: it would be "a sad day for America" if opponents successfully kill plans for a mosque proposed near the World Trade Center site.
No. It was a sad day for America (among other things) when 19 islamofascists flew airplanes into buildings attempting to maximize civilian casualties.
The mosque organizers considering reloaction to a less culturally inflamitory site is just a case of sanity breaking out in an insane world.
Posted by: glimmer of sanity in a mad mad world at August 16, 2010 11:57 AM (it5hL)
Posted by: Muggedbyreality at August 16, 2010 11:57 AM (rTvkJ)
Well, sure. To the revolutionary vanguard, most of us are the Great Unwashed.
That's why they're the vanguard and we aren't.
Posted by: tsj017 at August 16, 2010 11:59 AM (4YUWF)
Posted by: East Bay Jay at August 16, 2010 12:09 PM (ocHBO)
Posted by: A.G. at August 16, 2010 12:13 PM (oAVyq)
"Bloomberg has been among a few outspoken elected officials supporting the plans for an Islamic center and mosque two blocks from ground zero."
The question(s) now is(are), "What financial interest does Bloomberg have in emerging markets, say in Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries? Is he looking to establish more investments? Or introduce Bloomberg Middle East, a financial channel for all traders and corporatists?"
For a Mayor who lived in the city that was historically attacked by murderous ideologues, he's taking a most questionable path - perhaps an anti-American one while hiding behind freedom of religion, something I've never seen him advocate before now. IOW, I question his timing. He's in his last term as mayor of NY. Surely he'll want to cultivate personal financial interests again and more intensely, and if you see America's balance sheet, you can bet he'll be looking for foreign money if he can find it.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at August 16, 2010 12:15 PM (swuwV)
A Muslim in Arabic means "one who gives himself to God," and is by definition, someone who adheres to Islam. By contrast, a Moslem in Arabic means "one who is evil and unjust" when the word is pronounced, as it is in English, Mozlem with a z.
Yeah, that's about right. We're typing in an Indo-European language; Arabic is written in the manner of the Semites. It's not quite true that "Arabic doesn't do vowels" but, they handle vowels differently. The vowel in Arabic is written with a signifier and the nearest consonant will change how the vowel is spoken.
This is most clear with the emphatic consonants: d, t, s, z. (Those underscores here are expressed as dots.) You make an O face when you say them. So a "u" ends up sounding like an "o". Try it!
So, if you are hearing "musslim" then you know it is spelt "muslim" in Semitic. But if you're hearing "mozlim" then you are dealing with the emphatic consonant z, and its Semitic spelling would be "muzlim" with a dot under the z. And yes, the zâlimûn are sinners.
Posted by: Zimriel at August 16, 2010 12:33 PM (9Sbz+)
Obama does have that Lenin jutted jaw thing going on ...
Posted by: bill at August 16, 2010 12:33 PM (d31zX)
Posted by: bill at August 16, 2010 12:35 PM (d31zX)
Posted by: ed at August 16, 2010 12:46 PM (Urhve)
Posted by: ed at August 16, 2010 12:53 PM (Urhve)
I dunno if there's any connection with Harry's statement, but his church has some experience in this kind of thing: The Mountain Meadows Massacre. And it would be great if Muslims followed their example instead of building their victory mosque. http://tinyurl.com/2bwp2uk
Posted by: Pervy Grin at August 16, 2010 12:57 PM (OxKj2)
Reid spokesman: "First Amendment protects freedom of religion. Sen Reid respects that but thinks .. mosque should be built someplace else"
Sycophant Junction sure to ignore this...
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at August 16, 2010 01:09 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 16, 2010 04:25 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 16, 2010 04:26 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: emdfl at August 17, 2010 06:44 AM (rHGd5)
Posted by: jordans shoes at November 16, 2010 11:35 PM (746ne)
Posted by: Bernard Jordan at April 15, 2011 03:21 PM (DMjCE)
Posted by: ray ban sale at June 15, 2011 07:48 PM (YenHE)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2469 seconds, 200 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: B. Hussein Obama at August 16, 2010 11:23 AM (AZGON)