October 17, 2010
— CAC I will let this poll sink in for those of you who remember Dan Inouye as the literal face of the Democratic party in Hawaii and who won his last election with 75% of the vote. A totally solid no-way-in-hell lock for re-election. Polling 22% below his last total against a relative unknown. There's still time for you morons in Hawaii.
BTW: Cavasso for Senate of Puddingland
Posted by: CAC at
12:09 PM
| Comments (187)
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
Its not surprising that Inouye (who IIRC is one of the oldest serving Senators right now) is behind, but I'd be utterly shocked if he actually lost.
Posted by: looking closely at October 17, 2010 12:14 PM (KNy97)
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 12:16 PM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: pep at October 17, 2010 12:22 PM (8zlLq)
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 12:27 PM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: Museisluse at October 17, 2010 12:28 PM (DTfXb)
I wonder about that. Who you hang with says more about you than anything that comes out of your mouth.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 17, 2010 12:33 PM (3A31R)
DON"T QUESTION OUR PATRIOTISM!!!!!
Posted by: Max Cleland, Benedict Arnold, and company at October 17, 2010 12:34 PM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: Jean at October 17, 2010 12:39 PM (CPefM)
I'd be shocked if we get to within 10 points on election day. If we actually pull this off that would be the biggest upset in perhaps a century.
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 12:40 PM (7PT3B)
Posted by: MissTammy at October 17, 2010 12:41 PM (m8uUu)
It's not really that. it more a matter of timing. he may have retired long ago if his reelection had come up in a good year. This year isn't good so the Dems want to keep guys like him in so they can spend money elsewhere. The same was true in 2004. Other times it's just vanity.
Posted by: Rocks at October 17, 2010 12:44 PM (AoVGn)
Posted by: Max Cleland, Benedict Arnold, and company at October 17, 2010 04:34 PM (Ew1k4)
Max Cleland,
If I had been your Commanding Officer in Vietnam, you would have been brought before Courts Martial for an unquestionable act of stupidity and destruction of Government Property.
PS - Never pick-up an "inert" grenade or any other ordinance to include the enemies. Especially the enemies who love to booby-trap their munitions. Max Cleland = One Armed Idiot!
Posted by: Fish at October 17, 2010 12:46 PM (v1gw3)
Honda is Mr. Ethnic Reparations in the House and a true liberal.
Kirkland is a very attractive candidate and, so far as I know, a solid conservative.
Posted by: Whitehall at October 17, 2010 12:48 PM (UTSWD)
"the first poll to be taken there in over a week--shows Democrat Joe Sestak pulling ahead of Republican Pat Toomey by three points. ItÂ’s a big comeback, since Toomey's led for the past five months"
Posted by: beerologist at October 17, 2010 12:54 PM (kTd8J)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 17, 2010 12:56 PM (Vz9lf)
so the fool in the WH returns a bust of Churchill, while... the Chilean president reveals in an interview that he found inspiration in Winston churchill.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at October 17, 2010 12:57 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Buckaroo at October 17, 2010 12:59 PM (cb81S)
Posted by: Greg at October 17, 2010 01:08 PM (atD+r)
The Republican Aiona is within a couple of points in the Governor's race, and I think he gets in for the reason above. Don't know if that will be enough to drag Inouye out too, but one can hope.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 17, 2010 01:09 PM (6HapM)
Who else agrees?
Posted by: Drumwaster at October 17, 2010 01:10 PM (dWFSK)
Posted by: Editor at October 17, 2010 01:12 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: Greg at October 17, 2010 01:12 PM (atD+r)
Posted by: Greg at October 17, 2010 01:13 PM (atD+r)
Posted by: In Before the Troll who is In Before the Troll at October 17, 2010 01:14 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Greg at October 17, 2010 05:13 PM (atD+r)
You have no idea, brother. Are you aware of a secret cabal of folks like George Soros, Ted Turner, Tom Hanks, Carrot Top and the Trilateral Commission that have brainwashed Pope Benedict and Miss Cleo into controlling Diebold with their mind?
That's who is ultimately responsible for shredding your ballot.
It's time to buy non genetically altered crisis garden seeds!
Posted by: Alex Jones at October 17, 2010 01:20 PM (xArXe)
Rasmussen Reports 10/13 - 10/13 500 LV 53 40 Inouye +13
Daily Kos/PPP (D) 10/2 - 10/3 1326 LV 65 29 Inouye +36
So, the trend is clear. On election night Cavasso (R) wins by +33.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 17, 2010 01:21 PM (6HapM)
Not even if the Dems manage - through some serious chicanary and flat-out fraud - to keep a 218-217 majority.
Posted by: Drumwaster at October 17, 2010 01:22 PM (dWFSK)
This woman will never, ever willingly give up power. And since she represents the douchebag city of the world, she will never be defeated. She will be a representative until the day she dies.
I will never understand what the democrats were thinking when they made her the official face of house democrats. Typically you'd want someone who is not polarizing and very well liked to not turn of independents or the opposing party. The fact that they made the most liberal representative of the most liberal district in the county as house speaker is beyond stupid.
No matter what happens in November, Pelosi will never be house speaker again. Her party will not nominate her even if they were to regain a majority. She is so terrible a leader that members of her own party are running attack ads against her and promising their constituents that they won't vote for her. Pelosi is done. She will be nothing more than an obscure representative.
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at October 17, 2010 01:23 PM (7PT3B)
Which is why I think she will retire, so as to be able to keep the title.
I will never understand what the democrats were thinking when they made her the official face of house democrats
"First female Speaker of the House". Nothing more.
Posted by: Drumwaster at October 17, 2010 01:30 PM (dWFSK)
You know, she's 70 now. With the Dems way underwater in the House for at least the next few election cycles, the Dems really should look to someone younger and more energetic to lead their effort, now that they're going to have to fight, rather than just rule.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 17, 2010 01:33 PM (6HapM)
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 01:36 PM (Ew1k4)
I think the problem with liberals is that they truly consider themselves a higher form of intelligence than the rest of us.
They are the ones they've been waiting for, the next step up in evolution from us, they have achieved enlightenment.
I know, we talk about this shit all the time but I think that's what it all boils down to. How else can you explain the mind-numbing arrogance and bewildering statements that come from these people?
I'm not so sure that they are truly evil but that they are being used by evil and don't even know it.
And I better stop there before I enter into Glenn Beck Land.
Posted by: ErikW at October 17, 2010 01:38 PM (xArXe)
And she talks about herself in the third person. Bob Dole approves.
Posted by: Bob Dole at October 17, 2010 01:41 PM (Vz9lf)
It makes you wonder about the sort of person who are willing to spend their entire working lives listening to people make speeches about making the first Monday in June National Bird Feeder Day, and other such rot. P.J. O'Rourke was right: politics is the way people who have neither merit nor ability can obtain power.
Posted by: Craig at October 17, 2010 01:43 PM (xP8Aq)
And money. And to some extent, sex.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 17, 2010 01:44 PM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 01:49 PM (gg4j2)
Posted by: Nancy at October 17, 2010 01:50 PM (AQxTm)
Posted by: Steph at October 17, 2010 01:51 PM (ZfkPl)
Menthos
Pinkos all, to be sure. But after the election, also proportionally more minority. If the Dems get knocked down to, as the conventional wisdom currently goes, the 190 to 200 seat range, the Black/Hispanic block of around 60 members -- along with the fashionable liberals, could be enough to get the "First African-American" minority leader elected.
"It's our turn!", ect.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 17, 2010 01:51 PM (6HapM)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 01:52 PM (gg4j2)
I got four words for you: by any means necessary.
This is why I am, while hopeful we can begin to turn things around in November, afraid the Osama Obama regime has plans in place to protect its own, plans that don't involve things we tend to hold dear, like laws and honor.
Our enemy -- the domestic enemy -- is dangerous, because it believes rules don't apply to it.
I've said it before: the most important thing on election day is not a GOTV effort, no matter how massive. It's having people on hand to observe, document and resist the fraud the Traitor-in-Chief's henchmen will try to perpetrate.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 17, 2010 01:57 PM (Ulu3i)
Of course! You can always count on dems to play identity politics.
BTW, does anyone know for sure who is going to be the new house speaker. I'm assuming it's Boehner, but is that a sure thing?
Also, is Mitch McConnell a safe bet? There will be about 7 new TEA party type senators for the 112th congress. Plus, McConnell's inner circle is completely gone. It consisted of people like Murkowski, Bob Bennett, Judd Greg, Ted Stevens, and Jim Bunning.
Murkowski lost the primary and will likely lose the general election. Bob Bennett was defeated in Utah's state convention. Judd Greg retired. Ted Stevens of course lost in 08. Jim Bunning retired, and McConnell personally handpicked Trey Grayson to replace him. Grayson lost handily (58/35) - an embarrassing rebuke by voters of his own state.
It's clear that there are really two leaders of the Republican senate. McConnell is the official "moderate" leader, while Jim Demint is the unofficial conservative "shadow" leader.
hmmm
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at October 17, 2010 01:57 PM (7PT3B)
And she talks about herself in the third person. Bob Dole approves.
lol. Forgot to change my username.
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 02:00 PM (7PT3B)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 17, 2010 05:44 PM (Vz9lf)
I never had a problem with sex. Does watching other's count?
Posted by: Barbara Mikulski at October 17, 2010 02:01 PM (v1gw3)
"First female Speaker of the House". Nothing more.
Former first female Speaker of the House. Only the current Speaker is entitled to that um, title.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 17, 2010 02:05 PM (3jxR/)
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 17, 2010 05:57 PM (Ulu3i)
That's exactly what I've been worried about. To quote a film noir detective, "It's quiet. Too quiet."
The libs make noise, it's what they're good at and so far we haven't heard much. Methinks something big is on the way for Election Night.
Posted by: ErikW at October 17, 2010 02:10 PM (xArXe)
I wonder about that. Who you hang with says more about you than anything that comes out of your mouth.
PA - Really? I can understand the skepticism when it comes to the usual belly-crawling politician. But if there is anything that inoculates you, anything at all, it is winning the MOH. You don't see a lot of John Kerry types in their ranks.
Posted by: pep at October 17, 2010 02:14 PM (8zlLq)
Wow, that would be amusing. I'm sure I don't know the entire CBC, but based on the ones I do, I have to ask-are any of them to Pelosi's right?
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 02:15 PM (Ew1k4)
54 But if there is anything that inoculates you, anything at all, it is winning being awarded the MOH.
fify
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 02:19 PM (gg4j2)
Couple of things: First, great post and great comments.
And now to my story. I was driving in the rainy mist today here in paradise in an udisclosed locale in Southern California when all of a sudden out from the higher rent neighbor should pop out a pristine jeep 4x4 with yellow lights on top with California exempt license plates.
Hmmm says the mind, this is interesting, why would what appears to be a non-emergency or law enforcement vehicle be tooling around on a Sunday morning with a Mr. and Mrs. at the helm. Well . . . I kept thinking about this and the State owned jeep ahead of me kept staying ahead of me heading in the same route I was. I then came up to a signal and the jeep turned into a shopping center . . . and I said, what the hey, I'll follow this sucker . . . and that is what I did.
I followed it past the grocery store and to where it parked. It parked right in front of an upscale hardware store and sitting in the passenger seat of this State owned vehicle was a Mrs. somebody putting on her makeup while the Mr. state employee exited the vehicle to go into the hardware store.
You see, living in the State of California is to be living in a state of collapse of financial magnitude that is beyond imagination and the pale. I pay taxes upon taxes upon taxes to be told I need to pay more and that we need to "compromise" and that Meg Whitman the former e-bay executive is bad because she had the temerity to pay what turns out to be, unbeknownst to her, an illegal alien $23 per hour for house work and is now being villified by the left coast.
I digress . . . now back to the jeep and with the California Exempt License plates . . . the Mr. driver state employee whoe exited the vehicle with shopping list in hand in front of the hardware store. . .
I pulled ahead and lowered the window and said, "what is a California exempt vehicle doing here on a Sunday morning . . . the gentleman was very surprised and nervous and said, "well we're on State business." I replied, "that's interesting and said I am taking down the license plate number . . . to which, Mr. State worker gentleman looked pale and shocked and stood in quivering shame.
And I drove off.
Folks . . . don't let anyone get away with wasting taxpayer money. Keep the heat on everything and everyone - don't be afraid to stand up for what is right.
A certain letter is going to go out to key California commissioners tomorrow.
Activism can work both ways my friends.
Posted by: journolist at October 17, 2010 02:23 PM (O/NP5)
Thanks. I knew there was a nomenclature, but couldn't remember what it was. I thought I'd just sneak a fast one by the group. I should have known better.
Posted by: pep at October 17, 2010 02:24 PM (8zlLq)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 02:26 PM (gg4j2)
are any of them to Pelosi's right?
The one or two who represent majority black districts in the South aren't flaming full-on libtards, but the ones who represent inner cities are pretty much one short step away from Trotskyism.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 17, 2010 02:32 PM (E97ku)
*sigh* This is why Republicans should stay away from Social Issues questions asked by DNC media persons - like David Gregory.
Ken Buck is asked an irrelevant question about being Gay. Our nation is falling apart due to reckless socialist spending - and Buck falls into it.
come on R's - throw is back. Say "why don't you ask Michael Bennet that question."
All the way down Buck says the right thing!
"I don't know — you guys will make that determination," he said, going on to downplay the relevance of social issues in the campaign.
"The social issues that come before the Senate are fairly narrow, and if someone asks me a question on "Meet the Press," I'm going to answer the question. [The] reality is, there isn't that much in the United States Senate that is going to influence those kinds of issues."
-Ken Buck
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 17, 2010 02:35 PM (0fzsA)
The CBC never had a kind word to say about George W Bush.
On the other hand, the CBC had nothing but praise for Castro and Chavez.
Posted by: Senator Soothsayer (R-AoS) at October 17, 2010 02:36 PM (L0wbB)
"well we're on State business."
Posted by: journolist at October 17, 2010 06:23 PM (O/NP5)
Was Jerry Brown embarrassed, or simply covering up for his purchase of a Pocket Rocket at the hardware store while in the company of Jenna Jameson?
Posted by: Fish at October 17, 2010 02:37 PM (v1gw3)
57 Folks . . . don't let anyone get away with wasting taxpayer money.
does that mean my wife loves her aloha friday golf matches?
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 02:47 PM (gg4j2)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 02:54 PM (gg4j2)
Posted by: Editor at October 17, 2010 02:54 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 02:55 PM (gg4j2)
Posted by: Editor at October 17, 2010 02:55 PM (YX6i/)
Activism can work both ways my friends.
Too bad you didn't have a Flip cam to record the festivities. Sounds like that would've virtually guaranteed a lower bowel evacuation by Mr. State Jeep driver.
Keep us apprised...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 17, 2010 02:57 PM (3jxR/)
ot the girl got red carded again
she did a walk up shot and totally faked out the goalie
stood her ground and said "like that shit?"
second red of the season, great skill as a striker but she has an pro wrestler attitude
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 02:58 PM (gg4j2)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 03:00 PM (gg4j2)
Posted by: Editor at October 17, 2010 03:00 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 03:04 PM (gg4j2)
Posted by: The Grim Reaper at October 17, 2010 03:05 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Archie Bunker at October 17, 2010 03:06 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 03:07 PM (gg4j2)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 03:08 PM (gg4j2)
Posted by: Archie Bunker at October 17, 2010 07:06 PM (7+pP9)
fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap
Posted by: Chris Coons at October 17, 2010 03:08 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 03:09 PM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: Archie Bunker at October 17, 2010 03:21 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Archie Bunker at October 17, 2010 07:21 PM (7+pP9)
I'm not afraid of you. I could kick your ass without breaking a sweat and still given a speech right afterward.
Posted by: Ken Buck at October 17, 2010 03:25 PM (BP6Z1)
Yeah, in democratic polling firms. Rasmussen - Rease +3
Reid is ahead
Nope. RCP is statistical tie, with Angle leading in latest polls.
Sestak is ahead
No he's not retard.
Go back to the kostard where you belong
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 03:26 PM (7PT3B)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at October 17, 2010 03:28 PM (yQWNf)
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 03:29 PM (7PT3B)
Precious few MOH's have been awarded to people because they took some action based on gauzy notions of "patriotism" or "love of country". People take the kind of desperate measures that result in MOH's because of dedication to fellow soldiers on a much finer grained personal scale.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 17, 2010 03:29 PM (Bc+rc)
If anybody wants me, I'll be downstairs at McDougal's.
Call the weekend guy, I don't care!
Posted by: Kent Brockman at October 17, 2010 03:30 PM (MYT77)
Aren't they ahead in North Dakota as well? Indiana too. Democrats are going to make historic gains.
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 03:31 PM (7PT3B)
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 07:31 PM
Historic ass kicking. I am so upset that I am just going to stay home November 2nd, if the elections are still held that is.....
Posted by: Truck Monkey at October 17, 2010 03:33 PM (yQWNf)
Posted by: JohnnyEk at October 17, 2010 03:36 PM (mhmc7)
Posted by: Edith Bunker at October 17, 2010 07:23 PM (BP6Z1)
Winner winner, chicken dinner! I was looking for the old beat up chair, and the piano, it was such a realistic imitation!
Posted by: Jay in Ames at October 17, 2010 03:37 PM (p76FT)
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 03:37 PM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: Jay in Ames at October 17, 2010 03:39 PM (p76FT)
I think the point is just that he's fallen so much compared to last election and that 40% for the challenger is a magic number indicating weakness.
Posted by: Y-not at October 17, 2010 03:39 PM (osFsP)
Posted by: Ben at October 17, 2010 03:42 PM (DKV43)
Inouye is within the margin of error of 50% which means he's vulnerable. Especially if the turnout models are underrepresenting us the way they did in the Scott Brown race or the Missouri 'opt out of Obamacare' initiative. And as mentioned above, late day turnout in HA is likely to be influenced by the wave being reported in the rest of the country.
Seriously though, CAC did prominently indicate this as a fantasy. It certainly merits a visit by the One to prove how influential he still is. Obviously, we'd need a second poll to see if there's any movement or if this is just where things have settled.
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 03:43 PM (Ew1k4)
I could get rich selling whatever they're smoking.
Posted by: Crack Heads of America at October 17, 2010 03:44 PM (Bc+rc)
>> I think the point is just that he's fallen so much compared to last election and that 40% for the challenger is a magic number indicating weakness.
Well if I was Inouye at 53% despite Obama I'd be feeling pretty ok right now.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at October 17, 2010 03:46 PM (Wh0W+)
Yeah, even though I live in TX-23 which is rated as a toss-up, I'm no longer going to vote in November. What's the point when democrats are kicking the GOP's ass?
Thank you Archie. You have saved me valuable time I would have spent hopelessly voting for a lost cause. Thank you.
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 03:46 PM (7PT3B)
Precious few MOH's have been awarded to people because they took some action based on gauzy notions of "patriotism" or "love of country". People take the kind of desperate measures that result in MOH's because of dedication to fellow soldiers on a much finer grained personal scale.
Let's assume for the moment that that is true. What does it say about the person? It says that he is willing to sacrifice everything for others. Sure, he probably isn't thinking about all 300 million Americans, but he is thinking about those he knows and he puts himself in mortal peril to secure their safety. Such behavior is the antithesis of what most of us see as the modern politician, who will do anything, say anything, to retain his power. Many politicians have no principles other than themselves. Inouye has demonstrated that he is not in that class, and it does him a disservice to suggest otherwise in the absence of real, hard evidence. A disagreement on policy is not adequate.
Posted by: pep at October 17, 2010 03:47 PM (8zlLq)
Didn't he serve in the all Jap Regiment in WWII that fought so well in Italy?
I may hate the guys politics, but he's earned the right to be a total douchebag, unlike all the other libs in congress.
Posted by: Ben at October 17, 2010 03:50 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: chemjeff at October 17, 2010 03:51 PM (E97ku)
At least in DE, is Obama setting up some flimsy narrative for when his campaigning causes O'Donnell to lose? How can their be "secret" or "inside" polling showing races closer than everyone thinks?
Why is/was Obamao in DE, and other places?
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 17, 2010 03:52 PM (gMzAL)
It is when he votes for Obama's commie healthcare takeover.
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 03:52 PM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: Drumwaster at October 17, 2010 03:53 PM (dWFSK)
>> I think the point is just that he's fallen so much compared to last election and that 40% for the challenger is a magic number indicating weakness.
Well if I was Inouye at 53% despite Obama I'd be feeling pretty ok right now.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at October 17, 2010 07:46 PM (Wh0W+)
I'm guessing that this is what wonks call an indicator poll. If it's this bad in a hardcore lib state is must be worse for them in toss ups and what not.
I'm still trying to figure out what numbers consitute a "toss up." I don't think anybody actually knows.
Posted by: ErikW at October 17, 2010 03:53 PM (xArXe)
"Because of Barack Obama they are moving President's Day from the 3rd Monday in February to April 1st"
Posted by: logprof at October 17, 2010 03:54 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: madamex at October 17, 2010 03:55 PM (odGTU)
I was thinking about what Ace said about one of the calls he made yesterday. The lady asked if Bielot was a Republican, 'cause she had not heard of him. When Ace told her that he was, she said 'Good, 'cause she was voting all the dems out (paraphrasing).
That may wind up being the case for a lot of these races. Some may not even know the name of the Repub on the ballot, but they plan to vote for them anyway, so they can kick out the Dems. They're just going to vote straight 'R'.
If that's the case, this election will be more than a wave. It will be seismic.
Posted by: Steph at October 17, 2010 03:55 PM (ZfkPl)
I was thinking about what Ace said about one of the calls he made yesterday. The lady asked if Bielot was a Republican, 'cause she had not heard of him. When Ace told her that he was, she said 'Good, 'cause she was voting all the dems out (paraphrasing).
That may wind up being the case for a lot of these races. Some may not even know the name of the Repub on the ballot, but they plan to vote for them anyway, so they can kick out the Dems. They're just going to vote straight 'R'.
If that's the case, this election will be more than a wave. It will be seismic.
I don't buy that.
I would never vote Democrat because I was pissed at the Republicans. I would either sit out the election or vote Libertarian or Constitutional Party.
I just don't believe there are a lot of democrats that will cast a ballot for a republican out of spite. I would be willing to accept a number of 5-10 percent, but no more than that. I don't know if that would be enough to swing the election, however if enough stay home and enough Republicans turn out, then it might cost a Dem or two who sit in a safe blue district their seat.
Posted by: Ben at October 17, 2010 04:00 PM (DKV43)
Which is why I think Morecowpee will lose, even with the disgusting rule-bending being done in her favor. Who wants to take the time in red Alaska to push all those buttons (or punch holes) for Rs so that they can write in one name when they could just vote straight R ticket? I think the polls showing her pulling tons of votes won't amount to diddly on election day.
Posted by: Y-not at October 17, 2010 04:00 PM (osFsP)
Yes, IIRC he had his arm blown off in the process of making multiple charges up a mountain slope to take out a strongly held German position that was killing his fellows.
@116
I understand the sentiment, but I won't fight O'Care by dismissing the achievements of everyone who voted for it. That kind of behavior is what the Dems do. We don't need to; we clearly have the better side of the argument. I'm not suggesting that we don't fight back, just that we maintain a bit of perspective. Save the brass knuckles for those who have earned them.
Posted by: pep at October 17, 2010 04:05 PM (8zlLq)
But you (and I) are ideologues. I mean, we are conservatives, which is why we tend to vote R.
I think there are a lot of things operating in Massachusetts that will make people vote against the Ds this time. Forget Boston for a moment - they're true ideological libs (progressives, if you will). A lot of MA is made up of old mill towns and white ethnics. Those folks traditionally vote D, but they are Kennedy democrats (John and Bobby, not Ted). They're blue collar folks and Catholics and European immigrants.
Those folks do not recognize Obama's D party. Now, I think a lot of them voted for Obama on the wave two years ago. People like my mother in law and my aunt and my godmother who are older folks convinced by the younger generation (their kids) that it was the "right" thing to do.
But the chickens have come home to roost.
Those folks will vote against the Ds. Hell, my godmother - who is an "intellectual" upper-crusty type of liberal voted for Scott Brown. She was still "defending" Obama last spring, but without much passion and it was clear she was starting to doubt herself.
Posted by: Y-not at October 17, 2010 04:06 PM (osFsP)
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is now spending money to help defend Reps. Jim Costa (Calif.) and Raúl Grijalva (Ariz.), whose re-election bids have only recently been considered threatened, in response to the continually shifting political landscape
Posted by: William Amos at October 17, 2010 04:10 PM (Pvxff)
Posted by: Annabelle at October 17, 2010 04:19 PM (pWgNR)
Posted by: AOSHG Analyst at October 17, 2010 04:21 PM (liBQN)
Posted by: steevy at October 17, 2010 04:21 PM (2qfGL)
I don't think you do understand the sentiment, or you wouldn't be arguing as you do. The most fundamental point of "The United States of America" is the idea that the government's legitimacy is generated by the consent of the governed. Everyone knew that the American people wanted no part of Obamacare through consistent polling over the course of a year and every Dem in the Senate voted to jam it down our throats anyway. They willfully violated our country and that rape destroys any claim any of them makes to patriotism.
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 04:26 PM (Ew1k4)
This is what I think is a metaphor of this country in this present time and for why the right needs to win this election:
The best news this country has had since Obama has been president is that several Americans participated in, and an American drill was used to rescue the Chilean miners.
Not to detract in any way from the contributions of the Americans, but for cripes sake, this is what passes for hope in this country?
Americans walked on the moon. They are the only people on this planet to have done so. We have saved as many people from murder and annihilation as all of the socialist despots of the world have. We should be bathing in American capitalist pride, but instead we find ourselves having to actually compete with these leftist, elitist, failures in the making.
I am sick of leftists.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 17, 2010 04:27 PM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Annabelle at October 17, 2010 04:28 PM (pWgNR)
Raúl Grijalva (Ariz.)
Gah, he's one of the worst of the worst isn't he? His Wiki entry should be a primer on Evil Commie Fucks and what to look for when identifying the enemy.
Posted by: ErikW at October 17, 2010 04:28 PM (xArXe)
110 Well if I was Inouye at 53% despite Obama I'd be feeling pretty ok right now.
i don't believe the polls, he'll carry almost all of the indies, plus he is not a obama fan at all
Posted by: navycopjoe aka democrat god, Cubbies Fan, and AoShq diversity commenter at October 17, 2010 04:28 PM (gg4j2)
Methos-
Inouye represents a very liberal state. I don't know what the polling on OCare showed in HI but I wouldn't be surprised to find that they favored it.
Part of what we have been screaming about for the last 2 years is that the Dems ignored their constituents in voting for this abomination. Do you know for a fact that Inouye did that? If not, then he was doing what we all say we want our representatives to do.
Again, not defending OCare in any way, shape or form. I abhor it. But that doesn't mean his constituents feel the same.
Posted by: pep at October 17, 2010 04:33 PM (8zlLq)
Raúl Grijalva (Ariz.)
Game's one of the worst of the worst isn't he? His Wiki entry should be a primer on Evil Commie Fucks and what to look for when identifying the enemy.
I think he's going to lose. Two polls that came out have shown him to be at 40% or lower, with his challenger at a statistical dead heat. Political prognostics (or whatever they're called) have him as likely D, but I think they just assume a hispanic incumbent in a D friendly district will win. But from what I here, people in AZ-7 are pissed at Grijalva for calling a boycott against his own state. What kind of retard would do that? Especially because of a law that is extremely popular?
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 04:34 PM (7PT3B)
Besides, Barney Frank's seat is safe.
Posted by: AOSHG Analyst at October 17, 2010 08:21 PM (liBQN)
With the exception being his boyfriend's marauding love stick!
Posted by: Fish at October 17, 2010 04:35 PM (v1gw3)
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 04:36 PM (xQIoz)
It would help if Rossi would at least act like he wanted the seat. In the debate Rossi looked bored and uninterested - like he didn't want to be there. That's not exactly the way to create enthusiasm.
BTW, the race is much closer than what some Elway/CNN polls have shown. The Elway poll is laughable, while the CNN poll was taking at the exact same time as Rasmussen, which had dead heat. I trust Ras over CNN anytime.
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 04:37 PM (7PT3B)
Unfortunately, the Dems allowed their party to be hi-jacked by raving lunatics, so there's no way I'd vote for Sen. Inouye this election if I were in his state.
Posted by: Y-not at October 17, 2010 04:39 PM (osFsP)
Fair enough. I will stipulate that anyone whose constituents in majority supported Obamacare's passage isn't antipatriotic merely for voting for it. I still think that's a fair way to paint the national Dems on the whole. And there are other votes (the surge, for example) that would generate similar questions, but I'm not desperate to have that argument today.
Posted by: Methos at October 17, 2010 04:39 PM (Ew1k4)
I was getting calls from the KPLU phone # all week long, not answering them knowing exactly what it was about.
Posted by: Editor at October 17, 2010 04:40 PM (YX6i/)
I just don't believe there are a lot of democrats that will cast a ballot for a republican out of spite. I would be willing to accept a number of 5-10 percent, but no more than that. I don't know if that would be enough to swing the election, however if enough stay home and enough Republicans turn out, then it might cost a Dem or two who sit in a safe blue district their seat.
Posted by: Ben at October 17, 2010 08:00 PM (DKV43)
That's you. There are many Dems that are horrified at what their party has become. Progressives have taken that party way further to the left than many are comfortable with. Some actually believe that there needs to be a check on power that has run rampant the last couple years. Plus, you forget the # of independents that voted in '08 that are not at all happy with what they've seen happen.
If the country truly has swung to 53% conservative, as the lastest polls indicate, the Dems are in for a world of hurt. That poll, also, showed that there are less liberals & less independents than there were in '08. If the poll is true, then where did the liberals & independents go? Not to vote Dem, I would imagine.
Posted by: Steph at October 17, 2010 04:40 PM (ZfkPl)
Posted by: Annabelle at October 17, 2010 08:19 PM (pWgNR)
I wouldn't get to excited about the Washington Poll. It's done by UW Professors, it's registered voters only and they never release the party weighting from their polls.
Basically they take the voter registration rolls and start calling people until they get the result they want.
Posted by: robtr at October 17, 2010 04:40 PM (fwSHf)
Ah'm tahrd.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 17, 2010 04:42 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 04:42 PM (xQIoz)
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 08:36 PM (xQIoz)
Wrong thread. Get some sleep and rethink your picks.
Posted by: ErikW at October 17, 2010 04:42 PM (xArXe)
"The DCCC ad targets McClung for supporting a national sales tax and eliminating corporate income taxes. "Ruth McClung. Radical ideas we can't afford," the ad's narrator says. "
Thanks ALOT, Huckabee. Democrats are using support for Huck's Fair Tax idea against anyone who's uttered tepid support for the idea. I've seen it used all over the place to paint Republican challengers as big taxers. Its really a shame, but you can't support any new idea that needs more than a couple minutes to explain, otherwise you open yourself up to this kind of distorted attack.
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 17, 2010 04:43 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 17, 2010 08:42 PM
That's great, Jane! (Not the tired part, but the volunteering part.)
I'm tired, too, but it's just from a migraine and lack of sleep.
Posted by: Y-not at October 17, 2010 04:44 PM (osFsP)
Posted by: Doc at October 17, 2010 04:47 PM (MYT77)
How do you know that?
Posted by: Y-not at October 17, 2010 04:49 PM (osFsP)
Posted by: NY Betsy Rose at October 17, 2010 04:50 PM (3yMCG)
"sticking a gun in his own mouth for 3 hours".
Posted by: Doc at October 17, 2010 08:47 PM (MYT77)
Huh?
Posted by: Steph at October 17, 2010 04:50 PM (ZfkPl)
Racist man slaps black candidate/s
This is one of the seats people should keep an eye on. Frazier is a solid conservative, strong TEA party supporter, and very energetic.
Posted by: JC at October 17, 2010 04:52 PM (7PT3B)
Posted by: gesc at October 17, 2010 04:53 PM (UZJNY)
Posted by: Doc at October 17, 2010 04:54 PM (MYT77)
"President Obama, with a coarse voice, warned a crowd in Ohio: "They're fighting back. The empire is striking back. To win this election, they are plowing ten's of millions of dollars into front groups. They are running misleading negative ads all across the country."
WHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 04:56 PM (xQIoz)
Posted by: Doc at October 17, 2010 04:56 PM (MYT77)
Here is latest WA Senate race poll
A new KING 5 poll finds Democratic Senator Patty Murray in a dead heat with Republican Dino Rossi. In a poll of likely voters statewide, 50 percent tell SurveyUSA they would vote for Murray; 47 percent say they would vote for Rossi.
Posted by: William Amos at October 17, 2010 04:56 PM (Pvxff)
Posted by: everyone but commies at October 17, 2010 05:02 PM (pzI2c)
Posted by: Troll Jamboree Band at October 17, 2010 05:02 PM (MYT77)
54 But if there is anything that inoculates you, anything at all, it is winning being awarded earning the MOH.
fify
fify2
Posted by: Don'tJudgeMe at October 17, 2010 05:02 PM (JhZEL)
"President Obama, with a coarse voice, warned a crowd in Ohio: "They're fighting back. The empire is striking back."
Did Obama really say that?
That's gold!
Posted by: ErikW at October 17, 2010 05:04 PM (xArXe)
Know what was refreshing today? To see and hear amazing candidates speak passionately without a lot of "ummms" and "uhhhhs" and nary a teleprompter in sight when Jack Kingston spoke. He and Melvin Everson had the crowd on their feet.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 17, 2010 05:05 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: RushBabe at October 17, 2010 05:06 PM (a3Z62)
I was getting calls from the KPLU phone # all week long, not answering them knowing exactly what it was about.
Posted by: Editor at October 17, 2010 08:40 PM (YX6i/)
I'm just getting the hang of reading polls -- when the poll provides enough data to evaluate its "objectivity" -- so take this with a grain of salt.
I tracked down the poll in question. It was a poll of 500 registered voters, but no information was given regarding the party breakdown of those polled. Margin of error is quoted as being +/-4.3%. Just looking at the phrasing of the questions and the selections available for answers makes me doubt about its accuracy.
If you're still interested, read for yourself: http://www.washingtonpoll.org/results/oct15_2010.pdf
Posted by: NM Hick at October 17, 2010 05:06 PM (IzuWw)
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 05:07 PM (xQIoz)
Posted by: Empire what strikes back at October 17, 2010 05:07 PM (pzI2c)
We are the empire? Does he really want to get into Star Wars comparisons? Barry baby, not what you want to do.
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 05:09 PM (xQIoz)
He seems more like a little girl with a skinned knee every day.
Posted by: sifty at October 17, 2010 05:11 PM (pzI2c)
Posted by: Editor at October 17, 2010 05:11 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: Greedo at October 17, 2010 05:14 PM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 09:07 PM (xQIoz)
Anyone believe that's the likely turnout*? I gotta bridge blah, blah, blah.
*Though, it of course is difficult to judge likely turnout here since it's 99% mail in, only.
Posted by: Editor at October 17, 2010 05:15 PM (YX6i/)
Jar-Jar Binks is screaming for a political alter ego. Not even going there. He needs to stay away from movies, they don't help him.
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 05:16 PM (xQIoz)
oh, here's another howler from the CNN article
The President repeated familiar themes from his recent travels, comparing the change he is trying to achieve to such monumental moments in American history as ending slavery and giving women the right to vote.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 17, 2010 05:18 PM (E97ku)
Correct. CAC, we'll be back here in the real world looking at real races if you need us. There might even be someone with some WD-40 for that Caps Lock problem of yours.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 17, 2010 05:21 PM (F5Gxy)
The President repeated familiar themes from his recent travels, comparing the change he is trying to achieve to such monumental moments in American history as ending slavery and giving women the right to vote, winning WWII, the Civil War, The Revolutionary War, the landing of the Pilgrims at Plymouth Rock, the Westward expansion, completing the transcontinential railroad, digging the Panama canal, the Louisana Purchase, the Jamestown Settlement, winning WWI, buying Manhattan from the indians, and building Hoover dam.
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 05:23 PM (xQIoz)
The President repeated familiar themes from his recent travels, comparing the change he is trying to achieve to such monumental moments in American history as ending slavery and giving women the right to vote, winning WWII, the Civil War, The Revolutionary War, the landing of the Pilgrims at Plymouth Rock, the Westward expansion, completing the transcontinential railroad, digging the Panama canal, the Louisana Purchase, the Jamestown Settlement, winning WWI, buying Manhattan from the indians, and building Hoover dam.
Posted by: dagny at October 17, 2010 09:23 PM (xQIoz)
Posted by: ErikW at October 17, 2010 05:29 PM (xArXe)
Funny thing about that - the Indians who sold the island didn't actually own it, making the Dutch the first victims of a "New World" real estate scam.
Posted by: Drumwaster at October 17, 2010 05:59 PM (dWFSK)
Posted by: jade jewelry at October 17, 2010 06:40 PM (VlGfw)
Posted by: prom dresses 2011 at February 19, 2011 03:18 PM (9BLrk)
Posted by: cheaper ghds at March 01, 2011 08:10 PM (f8qnV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2888 seconds, 315 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








(love ya!)
Posted by: Editor at October 17, 2010 12:13 PM (YX6i/)