April 25, 2010

Hawking on Extraterrestrial Life
— Gabriel Malor

Grabbing headlines on a slow-news weekend is Stephen Hawking's Discovery Channel series in which he repeats the Sagan view on the likelihood for extraterrestrial life:

HawkingÂ’s logic on aliens is, for him, unusually simple. The universe, he points out, has 100 billion galaxies, each containing hundreds of millions of stars. In such a big place, Earth is unlikely to be the only planet where life has evolved.

“To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational,” he said. “The real challenge is to work out what aliens might actually be like.”

The answer, he suggests, is that most of it will be the equivalent of microbes or simple animals — the sort of life that has dominated Earth for most of its history.

He's far from the first to come to that conclusion. Scientists have long been conjecturing that extraterrestrial microbes are present in our own solar system. For the past decade, scientists have been trying to prove that meteorites that originated on Mars contain evidence of such life.

However, he also thinks that some extraterrestrial life may develop to intelligence that can travel between stars. His advice on that issue is, well, alarmist:

Hawking believes that contact with such a species could be devastating for humanity.

He suggests that aliens might simply raid Earth for its resources and then move on: “We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn’t want to meet. I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise whatever planets they can reach.”

He concludes that trying to make contact with alien races is “a little too risky”. He said: “If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.”

Well, it's definitely not my area of expertise, but his discussion seems contradictory. He goes from saying that there are likely billions of planets out there (read "resources"), but that aliens might target Earth because planetary resources are scarce.

I'm not buying that. Any species that has viable interplanetary travel isn't going to need any specific resource that's found only on Earth or that can only be made from elements found only on Earth (ain't no such thing).

No, the real danger from contact with intelligent extraterrestrial life is cultural. Finding out your kind is a late-developing and not very advanced one-of-many tends to derail your development.

Hawking's comparison to the "Big Oops" when Columbus ran into America and called it India is apt. Culturally, the societies of the Early American Immigrants (as I like to call them) ended up stressed until they broke, even aside from the things that came with colonization of the Americas. The introduction of new ways of thinking and, especially, new technologies irrevocably altered the culture and would have destroyed what existed in the Americas regardless of whether colonization occurred. In short, what we should worry about is the introduction of alien thought...

Except not. Because there ain't no aliens coming to visit. Even if you buy into the idea that extraterrestrial intelligences exist or will exist and that extrasolar travel is feasible at some level of development, the distances between stars are so incomprehensibly vast that interplanetary species aren't likely to come across each other within the lifetime of their species. The same "numbers alone" that Hawking hawks to infer the existence of life out there work against him when considering the possibility that some of that life will ever be in a position to make contact.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 12:27 PM | Comments (956)
Post contains 630 words, total size 4 kb.

1
top 'o the world, ma!

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:30 PM (kSbr6)

2 Hmmmm.

I live in NJ.  If I'm unwilling to travel the 25+ miles to see the Statue of Liberty, mostly because I'm lazy, then why would anyone want to travel forty trillion million billion gazillion miles to do so?

Posted by: memomachine at April 25, 2010 12:31 PM (MwCol)

3 There's no contradiction between abundant resources and an aggressive power. Besides going into Vikings and Mongols, etc etc, the biggest problem is that space is vast. So if they are HERE, they are not over THERE. So they'll eat whatever we leave on the table.

Posted by: Vercingetorix at April 25, 2010 12:32 PM (MchcS)

4 We do have *one* resource that is apparently in demand and rare throughout the universe: cow anuses.

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 12:34 PM (LD+ZJ)

5

 

There is alien life and it was spotted the other night in Asheville sucking on some hickory smoked ribs at 12 Bones Smokehouse. Her brow ridges were stunning.

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 12:35 PM (S1Ttj)

6
I was just thinking of a question for atheists.

Do you believe there is sentient life elsewhere in the Universe? Almost everyone will answer yes because the Universe is so so vast it would seem likely that there are other planets out there with intelligent life. In fact, some say 'it is arrogant' to believe we Earthlings are the intelligent life in the Universe.

But there's no way of proving that -- it's just a belief. So why is it so hard for them to accept that people believe in God?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:35 PM (kSbr6)

7 A space-warping drive is theoretically possible. Whose to say.........

Posted by: TennDon at April 25, 2010 12:35 PM (o6Yv2)

8 > Because there ain't no aliens coming to visit.

Well, Malor, I am sure you lessened the pain of this realization by buying the DVD of "avatar" and a few sets of happy meal accoutrements. 

Posted by: Sporadic small arms fire at April 25, 2010 12:37 PM (dtgds)

9 Native Americans were killed by disease, not cultural shock. Modern estimates are that 95%+ of the pre-Colombus population died off due to disease outbreaks. A tragic, but inevitable result once Eurasian cities got so dense centuries ahead of the Americas. Most Native Americans died without every seeing a European since disease traveled far faster than  the conquistadors.

Posted by: speakingofwarporn at April 25, 2010 12:37 PM (+ABdJ)

10 I have a pair of those glasses that Rowdy Roddy Piper had, doesn't everybody have a set?

Posted by: 48%er at April 25, 2010 12:38 PM (gxpfq)

11

ID4's Locusts From Space won't bother plundering us unless they are sadists who think we're tasty. The problem here is the Gravity Well - Earth's, and also the Sun's.

Mineral resources are all over the asteroid belt between 2.3 AU and 3 AU out. Visiting alien ships will just dock with, say, Vesta and mine that. If they want water and other "volatiles", they can drill a big soda straw into Enceladus (probably not Europa; Jupiter has a gravity well too, and spews out a lot of radiation).

It would just cost too much energy to pull minerals out of a planet as heavy as Earth. Earth is also too close to the sun; I've already mentioned radiation as something Locusts From Space will want to avoid, and also if they want to move on to the next solar system, they'll not want to waste time planning slingshot flybys of Venus and the Sun just to get out again.

So, we're likely safe from Locusts From Space.

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:38 PM (DjctU)

12 The same "numbers alone" that Hawking hawks to infer the existence of life out there work against him when considering the possibility that some of that life will ever make contact. It depends on how common life is, and how common it is for that life to attain sentience. (Drake's equation, in other words.) It would be unlikely for biological life to attain widespread star-travel, but machine-based intelligences and bioengineered/nanotech based organisms could very plausibly maintain interstellar cultures. The problem is that, as human beings, we are working from a sample-size of exactly one: ourselves. We can only extrapolate from our own experiences and motivations. A truly alien species would be very unlikely to be motivated in the same way that we are. Their evolutionary path and history would be very different from ours, by definition. The notion that any putative species would want to 'steal our resources' is ludicrous, by the way. Any culture capable of star-travel and interstellar colonization has already solved most of the problems of resource-scarcity -- again, by definition. And even if they did need volatiles, these could be attained in far greater quantities and at far lower "cost" from the outer asteroids and comets, or even from the gas-giant planets and their moons. Earth, a tiny rocky little pebble, barely warrants a closer look. To think that a starfaring civilization would even care about us enough to waste effort visiting us is pretty silly. We haven't heard anything from other civilizations either because a) we are too stupid to recognize the plethora of signals already out there, or b) they are using a medium of communication too advanced for us to monitor (quantum-entanglement or some other exotic method as yet unknown to us). Or maybe they don't communicate with each other, either -- maybe communication is a short-distance phenomenon. Maybe they send out colony ships as one-way trips only; they don't expect to maintain communication with the colonies. There are so many what-ifs associated with this kind of thing that it's utterly pointless to speculate except for fun. If we really had anything a starfaring culture wanted, they'd have taken it by now. QED. (Or maybe they already have. There's a thinker for you. Homo sapiens has only been around for a hundred thousand years or so, a small fraction of the earth's four-billion year history. Maybe aliens already landed, took what they needed, and left again.)

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 12:38 PM (O3eFQ)

13
The universe, he points out, has 100 billion galaxies, each containing hundreds of millions of stars. In such a big place, Earth is unlikely to be the only planet where life has evolved.

This is not science. This is a hunch. And these types of hunches in Las Vegas will make one a loser at blackjack.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:38 PM (kSbr6)

14 The implicit America-bashing in Hawkings' statement is pretty disappointing.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 25, 2010 12:39 PM (OkT2m)

15 Nobody has any f****** idea what the chances are that either intelligent aliens exist or that they can make it here, barring anyone who's actually been introduced and either hasn't told us or wasn't believed.

Claiming that the grotesquely incomplete "numbers" support one position or another is just foolish, Gabe. Bad show.

At some point as everything boils down to fiber and encrypted spread-spectrum, we should probably "broadcast" a "last message" warning others to stay away because of "gray goo" or whatever, and hope aliens are as gullible as NYT readers.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 12:39 PM (bxiXv)

16 The same rule of probability is invoked in favor of life being intelligently designed. I wonder if Stephen Hawking believes in ID.

Posted by: Oschisms at April 25, 2010 12:40 PM (Gs0qi)

17 Know nothing about this stuff, but I thought I read somewhere some scientest said that if something actually achieved the speed of light it would immediately vaporize, ie, only light can move at the speed of light.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 12:41 PM (7VvJB)

18 If they provided free healthcare, I for one would welcome our new alien overlords.

Posted by: Mystery Meat at April 25, 2010 12:41 PM (9AJat)

19 There is no evolved life out there because evolution as explained is entropically impossible.  Just look at Charles  Johnson.

Posted by: Valiant at April 25, 2010 12:42 PM (UKSRV)

20 But there's no way of proving that -- it's just a belief. So why is it so hard for them to accept that people believe in God?

Is this an honest question? Because it is not formulated well.

I can answer a different question, how can naturalists prefer belief in naturally-evolving aliens over belief in a transdimensional Deity: Belief in aliens agrees with the laws of physics as we know of them. Belief in God requires the addition of laws outside our space-time. Belief in aliens is simpler.

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:43 PM (DjctU)

21 So.... Stephen Hawking comes up with the "Independence Day" theory of ETs?  I can't say this is his best work. 
 

Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 12:43 PM (0K3p3)

22 And with his parroting of the "argument from entropy", Valiant #19 has entered the roll of "people I deem unworthy of a debate over the merits of modern biology".

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:44 PM (DjctU)

23

 He goes from saying that there are likely billions of planets out there (read "resources"), but that aliens might target Earth because planetary resources are scarce.

Would locusts skip your garden just because there are other gardens?

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 12:44 PM (KfZeO)

24 Apparently some humans still deliberately refuse to acknowlege the existence of dangerous adversaries in the mistaken belief this shields them from threat. Witness the regular attacks from the handbag replicators on this smart military blog.

Posted by: Thor at April 25, 2010 12:44 PM (yHNN0)

25

Nobody has any f****** idea what the chances are that either intelligent aliens exist or that they can make it here, barring anyone who's actually been introduced and either hasn't told us or wasn't believed.

I'm on top of it.

Posted by: Dennis Kucinich at April 25, 2010 12:45 PM (P33XN)

26

If it weren't for the Normans, Hawking would be speaking Saxon.  Actually, he wouldn't be speaking much of anything, probably just propped up inside the mead hall.  Without the Norman invasion, Britain would be some tribal outpost off the coast of mainland Europe.   

All of history is marked by cultural interchanges; inward looking cultures fold up, outward looking cultures overwhelm.  All I hope for is that we're colonized by the Pleiadians instead of those fucking Greys.

Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at April 25, 2010 12:45 PM (DPM1U)

27 What does Hawking know about extraterrestial life?  Nothing!

Posted by: Walter at April 25, 2010 12:45 PM (fM4sQ)

28 There should be a pro ball team named "The Aliens."  I'd love to be an Alien fan.  Imagine the stands.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 12:46 PM (KfZeO)

29
Because it is not formulated well.

Give me a fucking break and just answer the question, Professor Dungeon Master.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:46 PM (kSbr6)

30 The implicit America-bashing in Hawkings' statement is pretty disappointing.

What implicit America-bashing? The U.S. didn't exist at that time.

The knee-jerk "I'm not guilty because" reaction to Hawking's Columbus statement (see here for an ridiculous example) is pretty disappointing.

True or false: things didn't turn out very well for the "Native Americans" after Columbus showed up. Was it because of the things that arrived with and after Columbus? If yes, Hawking's statement is accurate.

Why you folks carrying around all this guilt about Columbus? You weren't there, right? You don't believe in blood guilt, do you? And even if you believed in blood guilt, were your ancestors even there? So what the hell?

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 25, 2010 12:46 PM (Mi2wf)

31 I'd like to add that I love speculation into this stuff, but not when people try to make their speculation authoritative. It's all SWAGs.

And you don't need FTL, just cheat. Dimensions, space modification, pocket universes, live forever, whatever.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 12:46 PM (bxiXv)

32 Mexicans (immigrants) would love it too.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 12:46 PM (KfZeO)

33 I did answer your fucking question, Gleek; you're just stupid.

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:47 PM (DjctU)

34
Here's another question for people who believe there is other life in the Universe: What do you think of people who don't believe there's life elsewhere in the Universe?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:48 PM (kSbr6)

35 Look, Stephen Hawking reproduced. Given that fact I think it is a small leap to believe anything in the universe is indeed possible.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 12:48 PM (RZ8pf)

36 Aliens could use us as slaves and might have already done so to create the great pyramids around the globe. The pyramids to the aliens when observed from space is like saying "yea we punked them already" and its a form of marking their territory telling other aliens to stay away.. (Now i wonder what would happen if we destroyed all the great pyramids.. if the aliens would come back.. to try and remark their territory. )

Posted by: xcvxcv at April 25, 2010 12:48 PM (Tfuib)

37

If it weren't for Columbus, there wouldn't be Casinos, Ironsides.

Sure beats poking a pissed-off buffalo in the ass with a spear..

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 12:48 PM (PON03)

38 I'm done here; I have not found intelligent life on Planet Behe-Dembski.

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 12:49 PM (DjctU)

39

Native Americans were killed by disease, not cultural shock.

That's  little restrictive, Kemosabe.

Posted by: Native Americans Killed by Lead Poisoning at April 25, 2010 12:49 PM (KfZeO)

40 Would locusts skip your garden just because there are other gardens? 

They would if my garden is at the bottom of a pretty inconvenient gravity well and there are other easily-accessible gardens out there.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 25, 2010 12:49 PM (Mi2wf)

41 I wonder if the aliens do dinner theater?

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 12:49 PM (P33XN)

42
Gleek; you're just stupid.

What are you, six?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:50 PM (kSbr6)

43

In 1960 when I was in second grade, one of the other students brought a record to school with space songs on it. I still remember the lyrics to one because we had to learn and sing it for a presentation. The hook was, "There are many millions of galaxies, each of them with billions of stars: could it be that among all these, there's anothere planet like ours?"

 

Anyway, my point is, this is not a new argument.

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 12:50 PM (S1Ttj)

44 If I can't talk to aliens, how would my hot 19 year-old housekeeper know when to take off her bra and panties?

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 12:50 PM (PON03)

45

Mineral resources are between...

Who says they want mineral resources?  Maybe they like air, water, and meat.

Posted by: Native Americans Killed by Lead Poisoning at April 25, 2010 12:50 PM (KfZeO)

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at April 25, 2010 12:51 PM (wOtDN)

47 Hawking should believe in intelligent design. Humans have been practicing increasingly sophisticated bioengineering for six thousand years. Any species we take out into space will have been engineered, therefore it's reasonable to assume any species we meet could have been the product of intelligent design. Hell, you could make an argument that the universe doesn't contain anything but engineered organisms, assuming it has any life besides what occurs here on Earth. Aside from that, the whole argument about the possibility of extraterrestrial life seems like a waste of time to me. You can't extrapolate from a single data point.

Posted by: mongo78 at April 25, 2010 12:51 PM (I7da1)

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 12:51 PM (KfZeO)

49
True or false: things didn't turn out very well for the "Native Americans" after Columbus showed up.

They weren't exactly thriving pre-Columbus, were they?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:52 PM (kSbr6)

50 that if something actually achieved the speed of light it would immediately vaporize, ie, only light can move at the speed of light.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes

Pointless conjecture based on unproven theories aside, science fiction is full of getting around the problem. Using wormholes, warping space, etc. aren't premised on moving at speeds approaching that of light.

Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 25, 2010 12:52 PM (zgd5N)

51 Live long and prosper.

Posted by: 57 States at April 25, 2010 12:52 PM (HayMb)

52 Let me be clear: I thought aliens existed. I thought I found one in the North Carolina woods. Turned out it was Michelle.

Posted by: Barry Obama at April 25, 2010 12:52 PM (P33XN)

53 34
Here's another question for people who believe there is other life in the Universe: What do you think of people who don't believe there's life elsewhere in the Universe?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 04:48 PM (kSbr6)

The coin toss came up the other way?

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 12:52 PM (bxiXv)

54 I always espouse a theory much like yours: that the human race has been here a blink of an eye in the big picture of things, and the chances of "advanced" civilizations occurring contemporaneously are quite slim, if not non-existent. That, added to the time of development needed to get from one planet to another, plus the actual travel time. Why would they come here, anyway? There's nothing here that isn't anywhere else in the universe, as you said. That said, I also believe that the Earth is unique, and sentient life has never developed anywhere else in the universe, and never will. We are special.

Posted by: ms. docweasel at April 25, 2010 12:53 PM (BVmgA)

55 Wordpress is banned?

Posted by: ms. docweasel at April 25, 2010 12:53 PM (BVmgA)

56 Hawking still needs to explain how they're going to get here. I love sci-fi as much as any Moron, but that faster-than-light travel thing looks to be a real bitch to solve. You want to talk cybernetics or space-arks where generations of people live and die before you get to Earth 2, maybe, but even that has some major practical problems (such as, if your technology is high enough to let you make self-sustaining environments in space for thousands of people that last 1000 years, why can't you just fix up your own neighborhood and live in it - sun going nova or something ?) Now I'm gonna pop some popcorn and watch you dudes go all Art Bell meets Ward Churchill on this thread.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 12:54 PM (7ZyYf)

57 Belief in aliens requires the additional of laws unknown to us as well. I'm thinking this is a "what do you want to believe" problem.

Posted by: Troy at April 25, 2010 12:54 PM (gaQCg)

58
I'm not knocking the indians, but let's face it, they weren't doing shit except taking up space. If you buy into Darwin's theories, it was time for them to go to make room for a more advanced tribe.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:54 PM (kSbr6)

59

Who is it that said something smart about a "sample of one"?

Fermi's paradox comes to mind too. If the universe is so teaming with life, then where are they?

It's entirely possible (because determining any real probability at this time is futile) that we are either the only life out there, let alone the only intelligent life in the universe. I think that all life, eventually, has the prospect of becoming intelligent life. And so if the universe is teaming with life, it should therefor also be teaming with intelligent life. Eventually that intelligent life is going to figure out how to cover vast distances in a short or efficient (for them) period of time. If so, where are they?

Sure, there may be so much life that we are uninteresting, or conversely, there is so little life that we would be VERY interesting to anything and everything that could power up a space ship. If the latter is the case, then where are they? Sure, they could be hiding and we could be some big nature preserve, but I still think there would be some "leakage" of evidence of alien visitation. Sure, they may be so good at it that does not happen in any form that we would recognize, but I bet even aliens screw up from time to time.

I think there is a pretty sporting chance that we are it.

Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 25, 2010 12:54 PM (F09Uo)

60 "Culturally, the societies of the Early American Immigrants (as I like to call them) ended up stressed until they broke, even aside from the things that came with colonization of the Americas."

Native American cultures were pretty much over-stressed when the first European contact introduced smallpox into the Americas.  Civilizations that were built on the availability of vast quantities of human labor collapsed simply from the die-off of those laborers.  Had the Indians immunity to European diseases, they probably would have fended off European colonists through sheer numbers.

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 12:54 PM (W+GYq)

61 Kill 'em all. Let Xenu sort 'em out.

Posted by: Cameron at April 25, 2010 12:54 PM (q6VVE)

62 Gabe, this question is nerd candy.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 12:54 PM (KfZeO)

63 They weren't exactly thriving pre-Columbus, were they?

Irrelevant, unless you're claiming that things got better for them.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 25, 2010 12:54 PM (Mi2wf)

64 There was a time not very long ago when most scientists agreed that life pretty much had to conform to certain constraints, regardless of where it occurred: that it had to be in a "temperate zone" that had liquid water, that it be based on carbon, etc. We now have examples on our own planet where none of those conditions are true. "Extremophile" organisms live near searingly-hot ocean vents, deep in the earth, in arid, freezing areas of the Antarctic, and so on. We've learned to be a lot more careful about our assumptions. But even so, we're still working for a single sample: Earth. We suspect that life exists elsewhere because it exists here; if it can exist at all, it probably exists in lots of places. But this is not an absolute -- it may be that we're either a specially-created oasis of life in a vast sterile universe, or we are simply one of uncountable teeming trillions of critters. We have no way of knowing right now. Either possibility is equally likely as far as we know. I think that sentient life will turn out to be quite rare in the universe, but that biological life is quite common. The raw materials of life are everywhere, as we've confirmed by telescopic obervations. Sentience is far more rare commodity, I suspect -- maybe one culture per galaxy, maybe less. That would still mean billions of sentient cultures, of course, but the vast gulfs between galaxies means that any contact between them is highly unlikely (and would probably require a far older universe than the one we seem to live in).

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 12:54 PM (O3eFQ)

65 #4 and#5 good ones!

Posted by: D at April 25, 2010 12:55 PM (cY9nU)

66
Why would they come here, anyway?

Same reason I'd visit their planet: curiosity. In particular I wanna see alien boobies and hoo-hoos.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 12:55 PM (kSbr6)

67 HP Lovecraft found aliens. And they know how to treat a lady too.

Posted by: robotgossip at April 25, 2010 12:56 PM (EiH7n)

68 I'd have to agree in the disappointment of Hawkings thoughts here (says my moron self).  But really, he is using the assumption because humans have evolved or created to have dominion over their planet, every other life form would be similarly possessed.

I would be much more worried about some asteroid type of thing carrying a killer fungus landing in the northwest part of the country, if I was to worry about such things, but more worried about those massive nachos I had for lunch.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 12:56 PM (7VvJB)

69 It is kind of a weak statement coming from Hawking. While I tend to agree with the " there are hundreds of billions of stars so there's no way to rule it out" school of thought, it's not what I'd figure a man like Hawking would bring to the table. When we try to consider things from a non-human perspective, and really think about what could be out there, all of our own projections get in the way. We think that the speed of light is some kind of limit, but to a race of aliens that predates the Big Bang (for example) it could be the equivalent of a brisk walk.And mMaybe the billions of years that have gone into forming our solar system were really just the equivalent of a long weekend to some extra-dimensional race. I was kinda hoping that Dr. Hawking would come up with a better "answer" than the one we already had.

Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 12:57 PM (y1kI6)

70 Then again if I read #4 and #5 maybe the same subject?? 

Posted by: D at April 25, 2010 12:57 PM (parIF)

71 Gleek, I was just thinking you've been doing so well this weekend. Then you ruin it with one sentence. Shouldn't you be watching Jerry Rivers or Huckleberry? And another thing , there were no Native Americans.

Posted by: Asscheeks of Saturn at April 25, 2010 12:57 PM (w9bVp)

72 LOL... y'all posting on GM's cultural concern trollin' thread.

Posted by: Thor's insensitive greybilly cousin at April 25, 2010 12:58 PM (yHNN0)

73 It could be the Stargate/Fifth Element/Kingdom of Skulls view of the universe. That the aliens have already been here, used us, and moved on. As opposed to the "Independence Day/Mars Attack/V" view. Though we also have the Men in Black view that says aliens walk among us today.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 12:59 PM (RZ8pf)

74 They're already here. We elect them to 'lead' us.

Posted by: torabora at April 25, 2010 12:59 PM (42fUz)

75 hat if something actually achieved the speed of light it would immediately vaporize, ie, only light can move at the speed of light. A better way to state this is: matter is frozen energy; energy is thawed matter. E=mc2, in other words. If a mass attains light speed, then it must be pure energy by definition. But masses can be accelerated to high fractions of light-speed and, due to time-dilation effects, make even inter-galactic travel in quite reasonable spans of time ("reasonable" being in the realm of hundreds to thousands of human years, that is).

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 12:59 PM (O3eFQ)

76

They would if my garden is at the bottom of a pretty inconvenient gravity well and there are other easily-accessible gardens out there.

There's no reason for you to assume our gravity would pose a problem, and you've forgotten how big space is.  Imagine a nearly infinite number of gardens separated by light years.  You would just go to the next garden.


 

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 12:59 PM (KfZeO)

77 56 Hawking still needs to explain how they're going to get here. I love sci-fi as much as any Moron, but that faster-than-light travel thing looks to be a real bitch to solve.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 04:54 PM (7ZyYf)
  For us. Maybe for an advanced civilization, it's no big deal and the big deal is something else we have not even thought of yet.   Get the cheapest Timex digital watch you can find and go back in time just 100 years and give your digital Timex to the finest watchmakers in Europe and ask them to replicate it. That is just a hundred years ago on the same planet. Now think possibly thousands of years difference and from some other planet. I bet it would be incomprehensible.

Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 25, 2010 01:00 PM (F09Uo)

78 This is not science. This is a hunch. And these types of hunches in Las Vegas will make one a loser at blackjack.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 04:38 PM (kSbr6)

No, that's math.  And that type of math in Las Vegas would make one a very rich Moron.  The number of planets in the Universe is as near to infinite as there is.  No matter how small the chance of life, if you multiply that chance by infinity, you get a lot of life.  Will two intelligent life forms ever run across each other?  That depends on whether FTL travel is possible.  Tachyons never go slower than light speed.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:00 PM (1fanL)

79 This is not science. This is a hunch.
Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 04:38 PM

What's your point?

Posted by: The IPCC at April 25, 2010 01:01 PM (v5Q3C)

80

They weren't exactly thriving pre-Columbus, were they?

That's an incrediby Euro-centric question.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 01:01 PM (KfZeO)

81

It is intriguing that inherent in the nature of man is a drive to explore and let's face it conquer. It is a continuing quest, even today as we try to map the bottom of the oceans, as we explore space, even as we work to map and label every speck of land on planet earth.

Is the "explorer" gene something that only exists in humans, or could it be the same gene exists in aliens somewhere else, which will eventually drive them to our galaxy not for resources, but just because they can?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 01:02 PM (RZ8pf)

82 Every time someone like Monty @ #12 above uses the phrase 'by definition' I am reminded of Pierce Brosnan's character in "Mars Attacks". Perhaps I am missing something, but I see no necessary connection between interstellar travel and the inevitability of having solved the issue of resource scarcity. The conversation also seems focused on the space locust idea...how about if they want a new place to settle down?

Posted by: JRussRhodes at April 25, 2010 01:02 PM (lUc0O)

83

And another thing , there were no Native Americans.

You're wrong. Fuck you! There was no bridge from Asia or any other place. We were here first and it's all ours! Interlopers!

Posted by: A professor I had in school at April 25, 2010 01:02 PM (P33XN)

84
No matter how small the chance of life...

Circular logic, no. Because my point was that 'chance of life' is incalculable, in the first place. So the number, whatever it is, is coming out of someone's ass.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:03 PM (kSbr6)

85 You are correct human Gabriel Malor. There are no aliens here, nor could they ever arrive here due to the great distances we they must travel.

Posted by: Henry "Zoltar" Waxman at April 25, 2010 01:03 PM (muUqs)

86 So why is it so hard for them to accept that people believe in God?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 04:35 PM (kSbr6)

Because belief in God is wrapped up in belief in God's judgment and God's standards for right and wrong.  Belief in alien life forms is wrapped up in belief in a kind of cosmic relativism that says there's no Divine standard that warm-blooded air-breathing bipeds are better or worse than cold-blooded aquatic cephalopods or any other form that sentient aliens might have.  Some people take comfort in the idea that God cares about us, and some people take comfort in the idea that there's no God to impose His values on us.

Of course, as I often tell my children, it is possible that God is the cosmic equivalent of a fifth-grader who created a universe as a science fair project and is keeping it in a terrarium on his dresser.  Perhaps we are not His beloved, but only His interesting specimens.

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 01:03 PM (W+GYq)

87 Well, the only way they would get here is if they managed to skip the whole travel thing as we all know it. Space is just too dangerous of a place to jump on a ship and head out at hundreds of thousands a mile an hour. You hit a grain of sand and it hits you like a ton of explosives. And then there's the conjecture that near light speed flight would invade the ship with enough hydrogen atoms to simulate a particle accelerator. Imagine Columbus sailing ships made of note book paper held together by straw; a vessel not capable of handling the stresses of its environment and incapable of protecting the crew. You may as well look at these vast distances as invisible walls in video games. You can't get there until you hit some technological mark. So, anyone who visits us would be well advanced of us. You better hope they come in peace.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 25, 2010 01:04 PM (ZvwTS)

88 "True or false: things didn't turn out very well for the "Native Americans" after Columbus showed up." So Hawking's correct, but wrong, but...correct, but fucking wrong. This is one cock you should unsuck, Gabe.

Posted by: Vercingetorix at April 25, 2010 01:04 PM (MchcS)

89 56 Hawking still needs to explain how they're going to get here. I love sci-fi as much as any Moron, but that faster-than-light travel thing looks to be a real bitch to solve.

Is that the attitude we took when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?

Now I'm gonna pop some popcorn and watch you dudes go all Art Bell meets Ward Churchill on this thread.

Art Bell would so kick Ward Churchill's ass.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 01:04 PM (bxiXv)

90 True or false: things didn't turn out very well for the "Native Americans" after Columbus showed up.

OK.  But why pick that example?  Things didn't turn out very well for subsaharan animists after the Muslims showed up, either.  Aboriginal Australians and the British, Ethiopians and the Italians, dodos and the Dutch...

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 25, 2010 01:04 PM (OkT2m)

91 Circular logic, no. Because my point was that 'chance of life' is incalculable, in the first place. So the number, whatever it is, is coming out of someone's ass.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 05:03 PM (kSbr6)

The chance of life is nonzero.  That's all you really have to know.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:04 PM (1fanL)

92 It's annoying when people make pronouncements about things that simply cannot know.

Posted by: Jason at April 25, 2010 01:04 PM (Nljcu)

93

Does anyone out there know what the percentage of stars out there are like ours in that they were formed from the remnants of previous stars that had gone super-nova? That may cut down on the number of potential life-forming solar systems significantly. (Neucleogenesis is needed to form elements of higher weight than hydrogen.)

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 01:04 PM (S1Ttj)

94

We do have *one* resource that is apparently in demand and rare throughout the universe: cow anuses our women.

FIFY.  You don't watch enough scifi.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 01:05 PM (KfZeO)

95 Pointless conjecture based on unproven theories aside, science fiction is full of getting around the problem. Using wormholes, warping space, etc. aren't premised on moving at speeds approaching that of light.

Aren't wormholes conjecture or did we find one of these super slides?

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 01:05 PM (7VvJB)

96 Well you could take the opposite tact and say we are the only surviving intelligent life... for now.  Other intelligent life may have been destroyed due to natural causes or eliminated themselves.  So we are esentially alone in the universe at least until some other intelligent life evolves.  Just as much probability involved, it's really all conjecture.

Posted by: Deanna at April 25, 2010 01:05 PM (ZzV20)

97 Just remember guys.  When it's Arcturian it doesn't matter whether it's male or femail.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 01:06 PM (KfZeO)

98 Did I just write "femail"?  Shit.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 01:06 PM (KfZeO)

99 I love sci-fi as much as any Moron, but that faster-than-light travel thing looks to be a real bitch to solve. Only for creatures as short-lived as we are. For machine-based intelligences and biotech/nanotech organisms, life-spans of hundreds or thousands of years would be the norm. Thus transit-times at fractional light-speeds are less of a burden. And of course it remains to be seen if quantum-tunneling "wormholes" will work in the physical world (theoretically they exist, but are subatomic in size and only exist for small fractions of time). Again, it's useless to speculate. There are forms of energy and travel that are unknown to us (how would you explain nuclear power to someone living in medieval Europe, for example?). I think that nanotech is going to be a prerequisite for large-scale harnessing of energy (Dyson spheres, matter-antimatter "engines", and so on). And we're many decades -- maybe centuries -- away from being able to any of that stuff on any substantial scale.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 01:07 PM (O3eFQ)

100 No aliens? Explain The Jersey Shore.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 01:08 PM (muUqs)

101 Aren't wormholes conjecture or did we find one of these super slides?

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 05:05 PM (7VvJB)

The math says they're there, so they're there somewhere.  Not sure it's possible to tell a wormhole from a blackhole.  You'd have to go through, and then you wouldn't be able to communicate back.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:08 PM (1fanL)

102
Again, nothing against the indians, or natives, or aboriginals, or whatever you want to call them. But shit, 35K years and they were still living in tee-pees. did they even have the slightest interest in plumbing?

Sooner or later, they were going to die off. Famines, floods, earthquakes, plagues from animals, etc. They weren't going to last forever.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:08 PM (kSbr6)

103

We're here, bitches. And it's because this is the only sector that has a Colonel Z'anders Earth Fried Hominid. Y'all some tasty monkeys, I gotta tell ya.

Posted by: Lizard People at April 25, 2010 01:08 PM (ZZg4j)

104 The speed of light will be the speed of travel.  Just stop thinking about transporting the atoms in your body.  Think instead of a beam of light carrying all the information about your brain, which will be reassembled at the destination.  One carbon atom is pretty much like another.  Assuming we are even still carbon based at that point.

Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 01:09 PM (0K3p3)

105 (Neucleogenesis is needed to form elements of higher weight than hydrogen.)

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (S1Ttj)

I assume nucleogenesis includes fusion, then.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:09 PM (1fanL)

106
I have a book I would like to present to earthlings people.
It's called: " To Sniff Man"

Posted by: Henry "Zontar, the Thing from Venus" Waxman at April 25, 2010 01:10 PM (E5V01)

107 The speed of light will be the speed of travel.  Just stop thinking about transporting the atoms in your body.  Think instead of a beam of light carrying all the information about your brain, which will be reassembled at the destination.  One carbon atom is pretty much like another.  Assuming we are even still carbon based at that point.

Posted by: pep at April 25, 2010 05:09 PM (0K3p3)

Can I have Chuck Norris's body?

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:11 PM (1fanL)

108 that faster-than-light travel thing looks to be a real bitch to solve.

You've never seen Ace's momma at the KFC buffet.

Posted by: Thor's insensitive greybilly cousin at April 25, 2010 01:11 PM (yHNN0)

109 The Psychlos had teleportation.  But that didn't save them from Johnny Goodboy Tyler.

Posted by: John Travolta at April 25, 2010 01:12 PM (1fanL)

110

Does anyone out there know what the percentage of stars out there are like ours in that they were formed from the remnants of previous stars that had gone super-nova?

Yes. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 01:12 PM (KfZeO)

111 It's annoying when people make pronouncements about things that simply cannot know. Posted by: Jason

Indeed. But it's a lot less annoying than making pronouncements about pronouncements on a blog full of poop and pee jokes.

Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 25, 2010 01:13 PM (zgd5N)

112 But Gabe, its sending out invitations, really, that would draw them. If intelligent life is interesting to us it would be interesting to any species curious enough to go poking around space. Also You KNOW they want my ipad.

Posted by: SarahW at April 25, 2010 01:13 PM (Z4T49)

113 Perhaps I am missing something, but I see no necessary connection between interstellar travel and the inevitability of having solved the issue of resource scarcity. If you've figured out how to drive a huge mass over huge distances in a reasonable time-frame, and keep the occupants alive during the trip, then you've solved the resource problem. QED. Because if you haven't, what's the point? If you're going to Earth to get resources, how will you make it worthwhile to strip-mine it and send the volatiles back to the Home Planet? And what's the rationale for dinking around with the Earth when there is much more water (and more easily gathered) from Oort cloud comets, and more abundant metals in asteroids? In short: what do we have that is not more cheaply and more abundantly procured elsewhere? Star-travel requires a level of technology and engineering that predicates a solution to the resource-scarcity problem. It doesn't obviate the need for resources, obviously; it just makes the procuring of them a fairly trivial exercise.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 01:14 PM (O3eFQ)

114

It's annoying when people make pronouncements about things that simply cannot know.

Shut up.

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at April 25, 2010 01:14 PM (KfZeO)

115 Native American culture sucked then and sucks now -- or have I missed all those amazing scientific achievements coming out of Guatemala and Bolivia? But even though their culture sucked, it was disease that killed em off. African culture sucked, too, but there's still a billion Africans today because they shared in  the same disease eco-systems as the big eurasian cities.

Posted by: facefacts at April 25, 2010 01:14 PM (+ABdJ)

116

I also would like to say that I hate the argument "things didn't turn out so well for the Native Americans after Columbus discovered America." Really? And things were rolling along just awesome for them before? And, if we are going to point fingers at Columbus for fucking up the natives, then I think we should also point out just how much the Spanish contributed to that as well.

Plus, this idea that the Native Americans were just a bunch of peace loving earth hugging simple people before we slaughtered them and raped their land is bullshit. The Native Americans were just as fierce (if not worse) toward each other. Do you think that white men were their first scalps?

They fought each other for territory, resources, and women, just like everybody else did.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 01:15 PM (RZ8pf)

117 44 If I can't talk to aliens, how would my hot 19 year-old housekeeper know when to take off her bra and panties? Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 04:50 PM

Why you lettin' her wear them in the first place?

Posted by: jcjimi at April 25, 2010 01:15 PM (v5Q3C)

118 21 So.... Stephen Hawking comes up with the "Independence Day" theory of ETs? I can't say this is his best work. --------- Well, he's been sick.

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 01:16 PM (LD+ZJ)

119 Does anyone out there know what the percentage of stars out there are like ours in that they were formed from the remnants of previous stars that had gone super-nova?

All I know is, we're all literally made out of star stuff.  Yes, literally.  Baby I'm a Star.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:16 PM (1fanL)

120 My handle has been compromised. Trying this on for size.

Hmmm.

Posted by: Ugly Bag of Mostly Water at April 25, 2010 01:16 PM (v5Q3C)

121 No, the real danger from contact with intelligent extraterrestrial life is cultural. Finding out your kind is a late-developing and not very advanced one-of-many tends to derail your development.

Uh ... er ... uh ... no.

Where would you get this idea?

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:16 PM (N49h9)

122 jcjimi, why has your handle been compromised? Did aliens get ahold of it when you weren't looking?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 01:18 PM (RZ8pf)

123

And what's the rationale for dinking around with the Earth

More people to hunt.   More people to kill.

Posted by: Predator at April 25, 2010 01:18 PM (KfZeO)

124

ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 05:15 PM (RZ8pf)

Right on. I remember taking a class on Indian culture and wanting to turn to my neighbor and say, "Doesn't all of this have the stink of failure about it?"

I kept my mouth shut.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 01:18 PM (P33XN)

125 40 Would locusts skip your garden just because there are other gardens? They would if my garden is at the bottom of a pretty inconvenient gravity well and there are other easily-accessible gardens out there. --------- Sure, until peak garden. After they've used up all the easy ones.

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 01:18 PM (LD+ZJ)

126 People at worked scouted out a twitter account I forgot I'd set up using that "let us raid you email and snoop for your friends across the internet" tools.

Posted by: Ugly Bag of Mostly Water at April 25, 2010 01:19 PM (v5Q3C)

127 But even though their culture sucked, it was disease that killed em off.

Posted by: facefacts at April 25, 2010 05:14 PM (+ABdJ)

They got their revenge.  They sent syphillis back to Europe.  And the dreaded tobacco, which lefties will now tell you is the root of all evil ... until you explain that the white man picked it up from the Indians, just like the white man picked up the African slave trade from the arabs.  But it's still whitey's fault!!

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:19 PM (N49h9)

128 Alien life forms sucking our resources dry

Can you say Democrat Congress?

Posted by: Dastardly Dan at April 25, 2010 01:20 PM (9id2T)

129

Speaking of other-worldly happenings...  BHO is attending the memorial service of US coal miners. The same US coal miners he plans to put out of work or severely tax-gouge what they work so hard to produce.

 

Posted by: Rewrite! at April 25, 2010 01:20 PM (d7Px0)

130 The answer, he suggests, is that most of it will be the equivalent of microbes or simple animals

I guess if you drag a $100 bill through a science lab there's no telling what you'll find.

Posted by: James Carville, Reptilian Head of Sector 6, Deep Space 9 Division at April 25, 2010 01:20 PM (d9RXI)

131 Indians were also killed by other Indians, before we came along.

Maybe technology conquered the Indians? 

Posted by: bill at April 25, 2010 01:20 PM (cqFRV)

132 Think instead of a beam of light carrying all the information about your brain, which will be reassembled at the destination.

Where would I ever get an idea like that?

Posted by: Capt. Kirk at April 25, 2010 01:20 PM (7VvJB)

133 47 Any species we take out into space will have been engineered, -------- Except for the cockroaches. May I point out that they've already made into space, being the passengers on the prototype of Bigelow Aerospace's inflatable space hotel?

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 01:21 PM (LD+ZJ)

134
what's the Independence Day theory?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:21 PM (kSbr6)

135 A guy can't even post anonymously about dolphin sex anymore. It's all going to hell in a hand basket, I tell 'ya.

Posted by: Ugly Bag of Mostly Water at April 25, 2010 01:21 PM (v5Q3C)

136

"let us raid you email and snoop for your friends across the internet

WHAT? What the hell tool is this? And how do I know if I've been compromised?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 01:21 PM (RZ8pf)

137
I can assure you. if the aliens are light gray and don't have a heavy alien dialect were safe. 

Posted by: Harry Reid at April 25, 2010 01:21 PM (E5V01)

138 Hey, who's to say that those alien life forms won't be tasty?

Posted by: Dastardly Dan at April 25, 2010 01:22 PM (9id2T)

139 I say we nuke them all from orbit anyway.  It's the only way to be sure

Posted by: Ellen Ripley at April 25, 2010 01:22 PM (+EGil)

140

No, the real danger from contact with intelligent extraterrestrial life is cultural. Finding out your kind is a late-developing and not very advanced one-of-many tends to derail your development.

If this planet's current appeasement and adoption to radical Islam/Sharia and Marxism/socialism is any indication of the Earth's population becoming subservient to a superior alien species dropping out of the sky I'd say our 'leaders' will have us shining their space boots and fetching their NY Times in short manner ... and taxing the hell out of us while we do it.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 01:23 PM (GkYyh)

141 49 They [the native Americans] weren't exactly thriving pre-Columbus, were they? ---------- By whose standard?

Posted by: The Noble Savage at April 25, 2010 01:23 PM (LD+ZJ)

142

All I can say is watch out for vermicious knids.

Those motherfuckers will really ruin your day.

Posted by: Willy Wonka at April 25, 2010 01:23 PM (P33XN)

143 Wow. It really is a slow news day.

Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 25, 2010 01:23 PM (tr6Dy)

144 Thank God Arizona is tackling this issue head on.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 01:24 PM (muUqs)

145 Wow. It really is a slow news day.

Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 25, 2010 05:23 PM (tr6Dy)

No one wanted to blog about the small illegal alien demonstration in Arizona that ended in violence ... though maybe Gabe got confused and thought that he was addressing that, here?

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:25 PM (N49h9)

146 And about the "star-stuff" thing: any element heavier than Helium was forged inside a star at some point. Only Hydrogen and Helium existed in any quantities after the Big Bang; heavier elements were forged in stars and ejected during supernovae. (Lithium and other elements might have been present in very faint trace amounts.) As far as we know. This is a standard disclaimer on any claim made by science. We're pretty sure -- it certainly accords well with every observation we've made -- but we're not certain.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 01:25 PM (O3eFQ)

147 I like the Plan 9 version, if you can't kill them with guns or bombs, just smack em over the head with a piece of wood.  Classic Movie.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 01:25 PM (7VvJB)

148 In just the last 5 or 10 years or so, things like "dark matter" and "dark energy" (and I'm sure there are a bunch more exotic scientific constructs that I haven't even heard about) have moved out of sci-fi and become something of a reality. At least to the extent that serious scientists are doing serious work to determine their existence/properties/potential usefulness. That's a step in the right direction. I imagine that the first caveman who ever saw a bird wanted to figure out how to fly. But it took 200,000 years from then to get to the Wright Bros. It took less than a hundred years from then to get to the moon. The intractable problems and absolute laws that seem to prevent interstellar space travel today could be considered the quaint myths of a backward people in a few hundred years.

Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 01:25 PM (y1kI6)

149 Time it takes an empty planet to develop higher life forms: 3 billion years
Time it takes a single species to evolve intelligence after a planet-wide extinction: 65 million years
Time it takes an intelligent specials to develop agriculture: 100,000 years
Time it takes an intelligent species to go from agriculture to space travel: 30,000 years

Age of the universe: 13.75 billion years

So, a spacefaring, colonizing race should have arose 9 billion years ago.  In nine billion years, it should be everywhere.  Either we're it, or it's just not possible.  The sky should be filled with artifacts, around every useful star.

Posted by: gringo at April 25, 2010 01:25 PM (Z0UBx)

150 Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 05:24 PM (muUqs)

I guess we all felt that same vibe .. but you won.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:26 PM (N49h9)

151

Been there, done that.

Kirk would just fuck their females. Sulu would fuck their males.

Posted by: Mr. Spock at April 25, 2010 01:26 PM (GkYyh)

152

Here's why they haven't made contact:  We're made of meat.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 01:26 PM (KfZeO)

153 No, the real danger from contact with intelligent extraterrestrial life is cultural. "The Killing Star" Wiki it!

Posted by: Comrade Arthur at April 25, 2010 01:27 PM (JDmZ5)

154

All I can say is watch out for vermicious knids.

Those motherfuckers will really ruin your day.

Posted by: Willy Wonka at April 25, 2010 05:23 PM (P33XN)

Eh.  If your re-entry speed is high enough, they'll fry like bacon.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:27 PM (1fanL)

155 Hmmm. People get fired up arguing for and against things no one has any proof of one way or the other. It could be a simple interesting conversation but there's a lot of vitriol for what is essentially a nerd argument. Maybe it's nerd rage, you really got to look out for that. In any case calling people too dumb to understand your argument or to even engage in discussion with them is a real shitty way to prove a point.

Posted by: Alex at April 25, 2010 01:28 PM (3TjEK)

156

And, another thing (says the girl who studied Native American culture extensively in school) there were shortages of salmon and berries and other resources the tribes needed to survive long before Mr. Whitey came on the scene. They were due to crazy things like harsh winters, which sometimes happen—and have absolutely nothing to do with “global climate change.”

 

And, yeah, smallpox, our bad, but the Native Americans suffered from other illnesses that killed them off before that. Hence all the “naturopathic” medicine the liberals get their jollies with these days.

 

Not to mention the predators. And, as IÂ’ve already mentioned, the other tribes that wanted the prime waterfront real estate and the babes.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 01:28 PM (RZ8pf)

157 This basic question was already answered by Fermi,

"Aliens are here, we just call them Hungarians."

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:29 PM (N49h9)

158 56 Now I'm gonna pop some popcorn and watch you dudes go all Art Bell meets Ward Churchill on this thread. ---------- As long as we don't have to go all Art Bell meets Winston Churchill, we should be OK.

Posted by: We will fight them on the asteroids... at April 25, 2010 01:29 PM (LD+ZJ)

159 Time it takes an empty planet to develop higher life forms: 3 billion years
Time it takes a single species to evolve intelligence after a planet-wide extinction: 65 million years
Time it takes an intelligent specials to develop agriculture: 100,000 years
Time it takes an intelligent species to go from agriculture to space travel: 30,000 years

Time it takes an intelligent species to go from space travel to realistic sex robots: 40 years and counting.

I'm looking at you, scientists.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:29 PM (1fanL)

160
Girl from Seattle, do you happen to know if indians had a sustainable birth rate?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:30 PM (kSbr6)

161 Hawkng just watched Independence Day for the first time.

Posted by: Z Ryan at April 25, 2010 01:30 PM (cMo6P)

162

WHAT? What the hell tool is this? And how do I know if I've been compromised?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 05:21 PM

When you log on to one of those things it asks for asccess to your email. If you consent to such it will check all the social sites out there for all of the emails in your contact list. Well, mine was in her contact list and I had used my main email as the way for twitter to tell me there was a new message. Not displayed publicly mind you,  but up comes my page with "jcjimi" and a I get a "hey is this you? It's me Hi!!!" message. I immediately googled my handle and found AoSHQ posts. Aaaagh!

No problem for her in particular but these thing can get out of hand on you. It would be a problem for some people I work with. They just don't get non-specie-ist mammal to mammal love I'm guessing joke about "alien" housekeepers' removing their bras and panties wouldn't go over too well, either.

Posted by: Ugly Bag of Mostly Water at April 25, 2010 01:30 PM (v5Q3C)

163

We should ALL learn from Pinback. It never ends well for carbon-based life forms.

http://tinyurl.com/2cfx6o5

 

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 01:30 PM (GkYyh)

164
But really, he is using the assumption because humans have evolved or created to have dominion over their planet

That right there is a fantasy

Posted by: Insect Overlords at April 25, 2010 01:30 PM (Oxen1)

165

Hmmm. People get fired up arguing for and against things no one has any proof of one way or the other. It could be a simple interesting conversation but there's a lot of vitriol for what is essentially a nerd argument. Maybe it's nerd rage, you really got to look out for that.

You're too dumb to engage in discussion, much less understand the arguments.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 01:31 PM (KfZeO)

166 In any case calling people too dumb to understand your argument or to even engage in discussion with them is a real shitty way to prove a point.

Posted by: Alex at April 25, 2010 05:28 PM (3TjEK)

You're stupid.  But seriously, is anybody on this thread engaging in these behaviors? 

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:31 PM (1fanL)

167 pardon the typos

Posted by: Ugly Bag of Mostly Water at April 25, 2010 01:31 PM (v5Q3C)

168 Hmmm. People get fired up arguing for and against things no one has any proof of one way or the other. It could be a simple interesting conversation but there's a lot of vitriol for what is essentially a nerd argument. Maybe it's nerd rage, you really got to look out for that.

Posted by: Alex at April 25, 2010 05:28 PM (3TjEK)

The Riemann Hypothesis is true, dammit, and I'll kill anyone who disagrees!!

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:31 PM (N49h9)

169 Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:31 PM (KfZeO)

"Low-hanging fruit."

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:32 PM (1fanL)

170 They're made out of meat! (click name)

Posted by: Cincinnatus at April 25, 2010 01:33 PM (euuyg)

171 Even if you buy into the idea that extraterrestrial intelligences exist or will exist and that extrasolar travel is feasible at some level of development, the distances between stars are so incomprehensibly vast that interplanetary species aren't likely to come across each other within the lifetime of their species.

This is a poor argument. We have no idea what the lifespan of alien intelligences might be.

Even if we presume there is no way to travel more then a few percent of the speed of light, spending a thousand years traveling somewhere might not seem a big deal to a species that does not age or lives to be millions of years old. Consider that we will probably solve aging within the next couple of hundred years one way or another...


Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 01:33 PM (bgcml)

172
By whose standard?

I know it's a rhetorical question, but since I'm playing devil's advocate...
by Darwin's evolutionary and species-survival posits.



Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:33 PM (kSbr6)

173 True or false: things didn't turn out very well for the "Native Americans" after Columbus showed up. They weren't exactly thriving pre-Columbus, were they? I had a great gig until that damn Cortes showed up.

Posted by: Montezuma at April 25, 2010 01:33 PM (4Kl5M)

174

Actually, we being visited by an alien technical civilization is as likely as the State department receiving the credentials of the envoy of Darius the Great.

Also, no more green Orion women! That last group wore me out.

Posted by: Kelly at April 25, 2010 01:33 PM (FLFli)

175
Who's to say James Carville isn't an alien?
All he needs is two fricking antennas on his head, silver jump suit with matching boots.

Posted by: Flesh Gordon at April 25, 2010 01:35 PM (E5V01)

176 The Tommyknockers is on the SciFi channel. I thought their would be more topless action for some reason.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 01:35 PM (muUqs)

177 So, a spacefaring, colonizing race should have arose 9 billion years ago.  In nine billion years, it should be everywhere.  Either we're it, or it's just not possible.  The sky should be filled with artifacts, around every useful star.

Posted by: gringo at April 25, 2010 05:25 PM (Z0UBx)

And it could well be, we just don't know what to look for with our Johnny Rocket Space Patrol Telescopes.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 01:35 PM (bxiXv)

178 The Tommyknockers is on the SciFi channel. I thought their would be more topless action for some reason.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 05:35 PM (muUqs)

Traci Lords is a serious actress, you asshole!

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:36 PM (1fanL)

179

>> He suggests that aliens might simply raid Earth for its resources

 

Utter sci-fi douchery.  The fuck would aliens need with cows?

Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 25, 2010 01:37 PM (Wh0W+)

180 This is a poor argument. We have no idea what the lifespan of alien intelligences might be.

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 05:33 PM (bgcml)

The CBO has already scored alien lifespans at exactly 27 days, 3 hours, 43 minutes and 12 seconds based on Congressional legislative assumptions that took into account the possibility that extraterrestrials might crash on Earth and need health care.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:37 PM (N49h9)

181 162 This basic question was already answered by Fermi,
"Aliens are here, we just call them Hungarians."
Posted by: progressoverpeace   Aw! Come on! That's just fucked up! Why not Romanians, huh?!? Damn it!

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 01:37 PM (GkYyh)

182 Aaaak  Aaaak!  (If they wanted to be taken to our leader they would be sorely disappointed --but maybe Obama giving a speech would make their head's explode.)

Posted by: Mars Attacks at April 25, 2010 01:38 PM (kSfPT)

183 Has anyone read Tipler's The Omega Point Theory?  It's pretty freaky.  He claims we're going to expand and fill the Universe, and everyone who ever lived will be able to be recreated.  Very comforting.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:38 PM (1fanL)

184 Aw! Come on! That's just fucked up! Why not Romanians, huh?!? Damn it!

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 05:37 PM (GkYyh)

Because everyone knew that Von Neumann and gang just couldn't be of this world.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:38 PM (N49h9)

185

 They're made out of meat! (click name)

Cincinnatus, did you see the animation I made?  Linked at #157.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 01:38 PM (KfZeO)

186 >>Traci Lords is a serious actress, you asshole!


She really stretches her acting abilities by playing a dirty whore in this one.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 01:38 PM (muUqs)

187 Again, nothing against the indians, or natives, or aboriginals, or whatever you want to call them. But shit, 35K years and they were still living in tee-pees. did they even have the slightest interest in plumbing?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 05:08 PM (kSbr6)


yeah because they were nomads. They followed the food and water. Something that humans still do to this day.

As for advances they made, they were a big breakthrough when it comes to plants and medicinal properties (on par with Asia) and they did do a lot of cross breeding with agriculture (which was almost non-existent outside of some remote areas in Asia and Africa) 

Posted by: A lowly Aztec at April 25, 2010 01:38 PM (gAmQ1)

188 The fuck would aliens need with cows?

Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 25, 2010 05:37 PM (Wh0W+)

The same thing that horny 16 year-old small town Texas boys would.

Outer space is very lonely...

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 01:39 PM (PON03)

189 She really stretches her acting abilities by playing a dirty whore in this one.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 05:38 PM (muUqs)

A dirty, devious, alien whore.  And did you notice?  She's the Head Alien.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:40 PM (1fanL)

190 The Tommyknockers is on the SciFi channel. I thought their would be more topless action for some reason.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 05:35 PM (muUqs)

Traci Lords is a serious actress, you asshole!

Posted by: FUBAR

And now, Cousin Larry, is the time for the Dance of Joy!

Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 25, 2010 01:40 PM (zgd5N)

191 I don't know about extra-terrestrials, but I'm an extra-dimensional time-traveler, if anyone cares.

Posted by: Z Ryan at April 25, 2010 01:40 PM (cMo6P)

192

I also would like to say that I hate the argument "things didn't turn out so well for the Native Americans after Columbus discovered America." Really? And things were rolling along just awesome for them before? And, if we are going to point fingers at Columbus for fucking up the natives, then I think we should also point out just how much the Spanish contributed to that as well.

Not to be all PC or anything, but regardless of whatever problems they already had, it doubt that getting conquered was a real happy experience for them.

Yes, a lot of the deaths to natives were due to the inadvertant spread of diseases the Europeans had little understanding of, but dying of smallpox likely wasn't a big hit with the natives of the era, either.

I'm sure as hell not in the "Columbus was a genocidal murderer" camp that's prevalent on any college campus.  For all of human history up until WWII, "because we can" was a perfectly legitimate reason for conquering new territory.  Let's not pretend that things turned out just great for the natives getting conquered though.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 01:41 PM (plsiE)

193
Something that humans still do to this day.

Really? Do they really, though?

Can you show me an example of a tribe today anywhere in the world who has  0% dependence on the civilized world for resources?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:42 PM (kSbr6)

194

Depends on what you mean by a sustainable birth rate. Obviously depending on the circumstances of the tribe a lot of babies died. Also, some babies were killed for various cultural reasons in the tribe. In some cases, tribes ended up intermarrying because of a lack of enough young to sustain the existing tribe and also as a way to make alliances.

 

When I studied the Northwest tribes medical records at Sand Point for the 1800s there were deaths because of small pox, but there was a lot of infant mortality as well and many other causes of death in school age children. An argument could be made, looking at the medical treatment that became available to them, that more children were saved by the encounters with ‘white men” then ultimately ended up dying. Of course the Northwest tribes are a small sample size.

 

Were we horrible to the Native Americans with our treaties and squeezing them out of their lands and the deliberate spread of small pox to decimate their numbers? No argument from me there. But are the tribes getting the last laugh on us? In a lot of cases these days yes.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 01:42 PM (RZ8pf)

195 I don't believe in extraterrestrials.  I do, however, believe in Nessie.  I'm still debating Big Foot.

Posted by: katya at April 25, 2010 01:42 PM (Gorqm)

196 >>The same thing that horny 16 year-old small town Texas boys would.

Cow pokes.

Posted by: SlaveDog at April 25, 2010 01:42 PM (W+E+o)

197 189 Has anyone read Tipler's The Omega Point Theory?  It's pretty freaky.  He claims we're going to expand and fill the Universe, and everyone who ever lived will be able to be recreated.  Very comforting. Posted by: FUBAR   Oh, great. Round 2 with Teddy Kennedy and Jack Murtha.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 01:42 PM (GkYyh)

198 How are aliens supposed to help Michelle's kids? Bet you didn't consider that one, did you?

Posted by: Fresh Air at April 25, 2010 01:43 PM (/yUlp)

199 If time travel were possible, wouldn't someone have already done it and screwed up everything?

Posted by: ParisParamus at April 25, 2010 01:43 PM (0UFy6)

200 I've always found it an interesting (if arrogant) hypothesis to think that maybe we're the first species to get smart enough for space travel. Someone has to be first; why not us? If we're going to postulate on a bunch of shit that we have no real evidence for, that's as valid a supposition as any. We live on a tiny little planet that circles a bog-standard yellow star way out on a spiral arm on an average-sized galaxy that's only one of several in our local cluster. Now, one way to think of it is that we're not in the center of anything; but another way to look at it is that any point can be the center, so it might just as well be us. I'll state my own prejudices now: homo sapiens will probably never achieve star-travel. We may yet get to interplanetary travel, and establish colonies, but I think we will evolve to machine-based intelligences or nanotech-based organisms before we attempt star-travel. Human beings (or any other animal) simply are not designed for long-duration, high-energy space travel.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 01:43 PM (O3eFQ)

201 I've spent a lifetime searching for intelligent life right here on earth. Having found none, I have settled here. With the morons. On the short bus.

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 01:43 PM (uFdnM)

202
If time travel were possible, wouldn't someone have already done it and screwed up everything?

Would we know if they did?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:44 PM (kSbr6)

203

The Mayans invented Poontang.

Everybody knows that.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 01:44 PM (PON03)

204 "Early American Immigrants" is good, but I prefer "Siberian-Americans" to keep consistent with the hyphenated identification of all Americans.

For some reason, it hasn't caught on.

Posted by: misterdregs at April 25, 2010 01:44 PM (cOpeP)

205

I'm still debating Big Foot.

And how is the first lady in an argument?

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 01:44 PM (KfZeO)

206 If Hawking is so fucking smart then why is he still in a wheelchair? Or at least, why doesn't it fly or have fucking lasers?

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 01:44 PM (muUqs)

207 >>The Mayans invented Poontang.

And bowling.

Posted by: SlaveDog at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (W+E+o)

208

Utter sci-fi douchery.  The fuck would aliens need with cows?

What if they're trying to plunder our bacon supplies, but haven't yet worked out which animal it comes from?

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (plsiE)

209

If time travel were possible, wouldn't someone have already done it and screwed up everything?

That might explain how Obama got elected.

Posted by: katya at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (Gorqm)

210
In some cases, tribes ended up intermarrying because of a lack of enough young to sustain the existing tribe...


yeah, that's what I was looking for. Surely there is evidence of indian tribes dying off before Columbus, no?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (kSbr6)

211 203 I don't believe in extraterrestrials.  I do, however, believe in Nessie.  I'm still debating Big Foot.

Posted by: katya at April 25, 2010 05:42 PM (Gorqm)

If you're single, call Michael Medved.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (PON03)

212 19 There is no evolved life out there because evolution as explained is entropically impossible.  Just look at Charles  Johnson.
Posted by: Valiant at April 25, 2010 04:42 PM

There's extraterrestrial life out there, far more intelligent than the teabaggers who inhabit earth, and their home planet has bicycle paths

Go to my Amazon store for the sneakers and sweatsuits we'll wear when the Mother Ship comes to pick up the True Believers. I will be deciding who gets on that ship, so don't be a jerk in the comments

Posted by: Charles Hale-Bopp Johnson at April 25, 2010 01:45 PM (sYxEE)

213 Native Americans were killed by disease, not cultural shock. Modern estimates are that 95%+ of the pre-Colombus population died off due to disease outbreaks.

Most reputable historians do not support that theory. The current way of thinking is that the Indian population never was that high and that any die-off that occurred happened long before the Europeans arrived.

Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 01:46 PM (QrA9E)

214 I'm still debating Big Foot.

You doubt me? Pass the ribs.....

Posted by: Bigfoot at April 25, 2010 01:46 PM (d9RXI)

215

Were we horrible to the Native Americans with our treaties and squeezing them out of their lands and the deliberate spread of small pox to decimate their numbers?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 05:42 PM (RZ8pf)

Please.  The Europeans not long before had the Plague intentionally launched at them by the Mongols (who actually catapulted bodies of disease ridden people over the walls of Caffa to start it all off) and the Europeans did nothing of the sort to the Indians and don't bitch about it to this day.

Also, Europe flourished as a response to the devastation of the Black Death and that led into the Enlightenment and all the advancements of modern civilization.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:47 PM (N49h9)

216 or maybe just overweight chicks...

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 01:47 PM (uFdnM)

217 *whistles*

Posted by: Time Traveling Flâneur at April 25, 2010 01:47 PM (v5Q3C)

218 Aliens have been monitoring our electronic transmissions for generations. Unfortunately, just as they were deciding we were ready to receive them they came across MSNBC, Joy Behar, and Rosie O'Donnell. They're also pretty pissed about that whole Comedy Central censors "South Park" bullshit.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 01:48 PM (GkYyh)

219
I'll state my own prejudices now: homo sapiens will probably never achieve star-travel.

I concur, ol' chum. Our heads are too small.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:48 PM (kSbr6)

220 >>In some cases, tribes ended up intermarrying because of a lack of enough young to sustain the existing tribe...

That's how I came to exist.

And no, I don't believe in blood guilt.  So relax.

But scalping, well, maybe.

Posted by: SlaveDog at April 25, 2010 01:48 PM (W+E+o)

221 223

Were we horrible to the Native Americans with our treaties and squeezing them out of their lands and the deliberate spread of small pox to decimate their numbers?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 05:42 PM (RZ8pf)

Yeah, but at least we gave them a reach-around, the ingrates.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 01:48 PM (PON03)

222 207 If time travel were possible, wouldn't someone have already done it and screwed up everything?

Posted by: ParisParamus at April 25, 2010 05:43 PM (0UFy6)

This all makes sense to you?

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 01:49 PM (bxiXv)

223

True Hollowpoint. But, part of the problem with the arguments is this idea that the Native Americans were just going along, minding their own business, peace loving, tree huggers and them “bam” whitey came along and conquered them and decimated their numbers.

 

I think that there are plenty of examples both of the people who came and settled in America trying to work with the Native Americans and also examples of the Native Americans horrifically slaughtering settlers to say that the argument isnÂ’t as simple as that.

 

Of course these days, the argument is reduced to “what the white people did was wrong, therefore whatever everyone else did was inherently right.” Are things ever that cut and dry, except in a liberal’s mind?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 01:49 PM (RZ8pf)

224 I do my best thinking on the bus...

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 01:50 PM (PON03)

225 Has anyone read Tipler's The Omega Point Theory?  It's pretty freaky.  He claims we're going to expand and fill the Universe, and everyone who ever lived will be able to be recreated.  Very comforting.
Posted by: FUBAR

Well, he would know.

Posted by: Z Ryan at April 25, 2010 01:50 PM (cMo6P)

226 Apparently Hawking is arguing that it is bad for Hispanics to invade this American country.  So he favors Arizona's new law I'd assume.

Posted by: bill at April 25, 2010 01:50 PM (cqFRV)

227 Wouldn't a culture that exploited the planet and killed off the inhabitants be a violent one that killed off its own in wars, starved from using up resources, or met up with a culture that could beat them back?

Maybe they'd come here for that Unobtainium that James Cameron invented

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 01:50 PM (sYxEE)

228 One thing that always cracks me up is that if somehow we found out for sure that we were it, I think the "i want to believe" and the "we are not alone" people would probably just kill themselves.

Me on the other hand, would be perfectly happy with the news.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 01:50 PM (7VvJB)

229
Whiteman : 1
Native Americans : 0

Case Closed.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 01:51 PM (muUqs)

230 The life of a RepoMan alway's intense.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 01:51 PM (PON03)

231 If time travel were possible, wouldn't someone have already done it and screwed up everything?

Everything in some Universe.  You know every time a quantum decision is made, another Universe splits off.  So every possibility happens in some Universe or another.  Each one of us Morons is fabulously wealthy in a parallel Universe.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:51 PM (1fanL)

232 What Bill said. Exactly.

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 01:51 PM (uFdnM)

233
But why isn't settling and conquering accepted as the course of nature?

Or why is it that settling & conquering is 'okay' up to a certain date? For example, nobody gives a shit that the Romans pretty much enslaved and obliterated the entire Celtic culture in England. But what Columbus did was a crime against humanity?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:52 PM (kSbr6)

234 They come here for our cigarettes. Earth is the only planet where they're manufactured.  I know this is true because of all the cigarette butts that appear around the formation of crop circles.

Posted by: Truman North at April 25, 2010 01:52 PM (FjC5u)

235 231, And let's not even start on Native American tribes taking slaves from other tribes.  I was a grown woman before I learned that the white man was not the only race that took slaves.

Posted by: katya at April 25, 2010 01:53 PM (Gorqm)

236 #230, I mean, wouldn't someone have already contaminated the time line with the secret? Ok, none of this makes sense.

Posted by: ParisParamus at April 25, 2010 01:53 PM (0UFy6)

237 14/63/120 and such: Hawking's "Columbus and the Indians" take shows why brilliant physicists don't make brilliant social scientists or political thinkers (see Einstein, Oppenheimer, Fuchs and more). For 14 HeatherRadish, I'd say he's anti-human, not anti-American - a fairly common conceit among Mensas that amounts to "everyone but me is an idiot and will inevitably Darwin Award themselves out of existence." For 63 vs. 120, I've gotta go with Seattle over LA. Cultural contact is inevitable and the stronger culture won. No one's making apologies for the tactics or means, but the simple fact is that Europe was more technologically and socially advanced. Europeans were organized in nation-states that were exploring the globe, not living in a pre-Iron Age agrarian or hunter-gatherer societies. The "noble savages living in harmony with nature" idea is just as much an artifact of cultural chauvinism as manifest destiny was. The Aztecs and Maya speak for themselves as refutations of those myths. North America's Cahokians deforested their territory on a massive scale. Internecine warfare and "viking-style" raiding was just as common among the Native Americans as among the cultures of Europe, such as my Celtic ancestors. Many Native Americans did have the concept of tribal land and personal possessions and they didn't all believe that we're a big happy hippy clan sharing everything with everyone. The very argument "but we stole their land" puts the lie to the idea that they didn't believe in land ownership. If that was true, why didn't they simply share with us ? Because you can't indefinitely "share" a finite resource with another larger population, perhaps ? Can someone give me any anthropological reference to a culture that was persistently communistic and pacifistic for even a hundred, let alone thousands, of years, anywhere on the globe ? And yet we persist in believing they Native Americans as a group didn't believe in real or personal property ? Indians were a lot like the Stone, Bronze and Iron Age peoples of Europe and Asia - who kicked the shit out of each other for eons. In each of those clashes cultures mixed, dispersed, assimilated or perished. We can look back on what was done and recognize it as brutal, savage and in many ways wrong, but it's a myth-making exercise to pretend that Native Americans wouldn't have done much the same thing to Europeans had the shoe been on the other foot. We've all changed our views on what is morally and socially acceptable when cultures clash, but we do so while enjoying the fruits of a world formed by the same brutal homogenization we now despise - including the peace through genocide forced between the old and new North Americans.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 01:54 PM (7ZyYf)

238 They come here for our cigarettes. Earth is the only planet where they're manufactured.  I know this is true because of all the cigarette butts that appear around the formation of crop circles.

Posted by: Truman North at April 25, 2010 05:52 PM (FjC5u)

I'd walk a parsec for a camel.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 01:54 PM (N49h9)

239 Thanks for all teh fish!

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 01:54 PM (S1Ttj)

240

Whiteman : 1
Native Americans : 0

Case Closed.

Au contraire.

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 01:55 PM (KfZeO)

241 Also, Europe flourished as a response to the devastation of the Black Death and that led into the Enlightenment and all the advancements of modern civilization. It probably didn't feel like "flourishing" to the people who lived through the death of 25% of the entire European population. You know: the stench, the rot, the unburied dead, the flies, the social upheaval, starvation, wars.... It's easy in retrospect to cast this catastrophe in terms of how well it helped us to get where we are; but that doesn't make it any less of a catastrophe to the people who lived through it. And as far as the Columbian empires are concerned: the Aztec and Mayan cultures were so hated and feared by many that the lesser tribes welcomed the Spanish invaders. Even at their most brutal, they weren't any worse than what people had been dealing with all along anyway. Disease, particularly smallpox, was what nearly obliterated them -- and it would have happened sooner or later, regardless. Had it not been the Spanish, it would have been the Portuguese or the Polynesians or the Chinese.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 01:55 PM (O3eFQ)

242 Each one of us Morons is fabulously wealthy in a parallel Universe.

well, then I am pissed off and that universe and I think we should travel there and kill it.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 01:55 PM (7VvJB)

243 #208
...way out on a spiral arm ...
I've always assumed the further out you went from a central hub, the greater the likelihood of finding someone to talk to.

Posted by: lotocoti at April 25, 2010 01:55 PM (mvQaJ)

244 214 If Hawking is so fucking smart then why is he still in a wheelchair? Or at least, why doesn't it fly or have fucking lasers?

Posted by: Dr Spank

 

The fact that he's lived decades past the life expectancy of his form of ALS makes me suspicious he's "one of them".

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 01:55 PM (GkYyh)

245 Remember in Species that another civilization sent us their DNA codes so that we could recreate their kind here? Then Ben Kingsley mixed it with a hot chick's DNA

Having Natasha Henstridge beg you to fuck her is a worth whatever havoc she raises when she gets weird on you


Posted by: William Shatner at April 25, 2010 01:56 PM (sYxEE)

246 Hey TJ, is that seat near the back still open?

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 01:56 PM (uFdnM)

247 242 They come here for our cigarettes. Earth is the only planet where they're manufactured.  I know this is true because of all the cigarette butts that appear around the formation of crop circles.

Posted by: Truman North at April 25, 2010 05:52 PM (FjC5u)

And they're also after our precious lunch meat, which can be proven by all the used condoms scattered around the picnic tables in remote state parks.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 01:56 PM (PON03)

248 I was a grown woman before I learned that the white man was not the only race that took slaves.

Posted by: katya at April 25, 2010 05:53 PM (Gorqm)

Yeah.  Things like that make me very resentful of public skool education and the liberals who control it.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:57 PM (1fanL)

249 Say intelligent life exists out there and it is both capable and interested in taking over this planet.  Wouldn't it have done it by now?

We've gone from being hunter gatherers to mastering electricity, walking on the moon and arguing over the internet over a period of, what, 20,000 years?  We lived in a place where even the developed world was lit by fire and lacked indoor plumbing just 200 years ago.

The Earth is 4.5 billion years old.  We're not talking about just the chances of intelligent life, but the chances that no intelligent life developed in the last 4.5 billion years that was interested or capable of taking over this planet, but is reaching maturity at the exact same time we are.

I'm not confident humanity will even be recognizable 1,000 years from now.  I'm not confident any alien life that would be capable of reaching us would even be recognizable as life much less interested in what sustains us.


(Gigantic "knock on wood" for jinx I'm inviting)

Posted by: AD at April 25, 2010 01:57 PM (AMhst)

250

93 True or false: things didn't turn out very well for the "Native Americans" after Columbus showed up.

OK.  But why pick that example?  Things didn't turn out very well for subsaharan animists after the Muslims showed up, either.  Aboriginal Australians and the British, Ethiopians and the Italians, dodos and the Dutch...

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (OkT2m)

After 10+ yrs. of archaeology and everything but a thesis for a MS in anthropology I can tell you what the generally accepted theory is -- one that HeatherRadish hit upon. In a clash or meeting of cultures the technologically superior culture wins. Maybe not the battle but inevitably the war. History is replete with examples.

A great example is The Discovery and Conquest of Mexico. It's a great read.

Posted by: Ed Anger at April 25, 2010 01:57 PM (7+pP9)

251 Of course, I did once see this movie "They Live"...

Posted by: AD at April 25, 2010 01:57 PM (AMhst)

252 Having Natasha Henstridge beg you to fuck her is a worth whatever havoc she raises when she gets weird on you

Second that.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 01:57 PM (1fanL)

253

Maybe they'd come here for that Unobtainium that James Cameron invented

YOU LEAVE JAMES CAMERON ALONE!!!!

Besides, everybody knows unobtanium is caught in a matrix with trilithium and handwavium.

Posted by: Kelly at April 25, 2010 01:58 PM (FLFli)

254 254 Hey TJ, is that seat near the back still open?

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 05:56 PM (uFdnM)

Please don't mess with my cool 80's movie references, or you'll be forced to read "Diuretics".

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 01:58 PM (PON03)

255 Whiteman : 1
Native Americans : 0

Case Closed.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 05:51 PM (muUqs)

Seminole Tribe of Florida Bingo - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

White hair old ladies -  Gazillions lost

Posted by: Fish at April 25, 2010 01:58 PM (M5t+h)

256
I'm not even confident our civilization will survive until the 22nd century.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 01:58 PM (kSbr6)

257 248

Whiteman : 1
Native Americans : 0

Case Closed.

Au contraire.

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 05:55 PM

Touche

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss' Mob Investors at April 25, 2010 01:59 PM (sYxEE)

258

I don't discount the possibility of aliens existing somewhere... but I don't discount the possibility that the probability of life forming is so remote that it doesn't exist except on Earth.

We still have no solid understanding of how life can spontaneously form by natural processes.  Even a single-cell organism is far too advanced for any chemist to cook up in a lab using only naturally-occuring chemicals as a starting point.  Outside the religious explanation, it might just be near-impossible for life to spontaneously form under even perfect conditions in any length of time.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 01:59 PM (plsiE)

259 257 Say intelligent life exists out there and it is both capable and interested in taking over this planet.  Wouldn't it have done it by now?

They were waiting for us to pass a "universal" health care plan. They are coming. Soon. Cue up your dusty Hank Williams LP's.

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 02:00 PM (uFdnM)

260
Dude.

We'll never find the aliens dude, because we are the fucking aliens. Now pass that shit and quit bogartin'.

Dude.

Posted by: Your typical Alex Jones and Ron Paul disciple at April 25, 2010 02:01 PM (t72+4)

261 Famous dead guy and alien?

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 02:01 PM (uFdnM)

262 In a clash or meeting of cultures the technologically superior culture wins. Maybe not the battle but inevitably the war. History is replete with examples.

Posted by: Ed Anger at April 25, 2010 05:57 PM (7+pP9)

Only if the advanced culture wants to win.  The modern Western world provides the first example of a clearly advanced culture that opts for suicide, as the US explicitly showed on Nov 4th, 2008.

White guilt is stronger than anything, and much more dangerous.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 02:02 PM (N49h9)

263 Having Natasha Henstridge beg you to fuck her is a worth whatever havoc she raises when she gets weird on you

Second that.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 05:57 PM (1fanL)

You know she's a porker, now.  It's sad, but true.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 02:03 PM (N49h9)

264 Life out there?  Of course there is.

Intelligent?  Probably, I guess.  It's a tall order, but lots of chances.

Intelligent like us?  Talking with sound waves and all that?  Not nearly as likely. 

Anyway, we simply can't control the fact that we have sent out transmissions or that we're already getting to a point where we can map other system's planets.  We can't really hide.  Maybe... MAYBE we will be able to communicate with aliens.  But visit eachother is so unlikely.

If someone out there has that capability, we are completely at their mercy no matter what.  Hawking likes to bash America and people in general, and this is just a roundabout way of doing that.  I admire the man for all he's overcome and accomplished, but he truly is full of shit in this regard.

Posted by: Sentient Nintendo 64 at April 25, 2010 02:04 PM (dUOK+)

265 have you read those abductee accounts where the aliens impregnate women and take sperm from men?

i think i'm closing in on who are trig's real parents

the aliens can suck my brains out, but they'll have to take my sperm from my cold dead hands

Posted by: andi sullivan at April 25, 2010 02:04 PM (sYxEE)

266 <i>HawkingÂ’s logic on aliens is, for him, unusually simple. The universe, he points out, has 100 billion galaxies, each containing hundreds of millions of stars. In such a big place, Earth is unlikely to be the only planet where life has evolved.

“To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational,” he said. </i>

By this same logic isn't the existence of Unicorns also "rational"?

Posted by: Roman at April 25, 2010 02:04 PM (PxmHS)

267 Can you buy lunchmeat with a condom and some smokes inside? Like a snackpack?  What a great idea...

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 02:04 PM (uFdnM)

268 Native Americans were doomed because they even have a damn alphabet.  The only Indian civilization that remotely had something like a phonetic alphabet that wasn't totally reliant on pictures carved into rocks was the Mayan culture.  If they'd been able to read and write like the rest of the world they might have been able to progress beyond the nomadic stone age.

Posted by: mystified illiterate at April 25, 2010 02:05 PM (Ue9UN)

269 Let's assume you've consumed infinite resources to cross galaxies. You've traveled the universe looking for resources. Who's going to be the one doing it? A mining corporation. You find a zillion asteroids for metals, and four gas giants for fuel. Question: do you strike it rich or are you attracted to the loud planet which constantly transmits pictures of a tiny, purple-skinned man wearing his father's suit. Yeah, that's what I thought. We're safe.

Posted by: t-bird at April 25, 2010 02:05 PM (FcR7P)

270 Hawking on extraterrestrial life is a gratuitious insult, and could lead to war.

Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 25, 2010 02:06 PM (tm15w)

271 Gabe, has anyone made an anal probe joke yet?

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 25, 2010 02:06 PM (muUqs)

272 The Fermi paradox states that if there were intelligent life in other parts of the universe, it would have found us by now.

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 02:06 PM (S1Ttj)

273 didn't even have a damn alphabet.

kan't rite good.  part Injun ya kno.

Posted by: mystified illiterate at April 25, 2010 02:06 PM (Ue9UN)

274 Time travel safety not guaranteed.

Posted by: Time traveler with a mullet at April 25, 2010 02:07 PM (yHNN0)

275 We have already contacted the aliens and asked if they could come visit.

They responded that they'd love to, but the carpet installers are coming that day

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 02:07 PM (sYxEE)

276 Gabe, has anyone made an anal probe joke yet?
Posted by: Dr Spank

Knock yourself out.

Posted by: Z Ryan at April 25, 2010 02:08 PM (cMo6P)

277 273 the aliens can suck my brains out, but they'll have to take my sperm from my cold dead hands

Posted by: andi sullivan

ROFLMFAO!!

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 02:08 PM (GkYyh)

278 There were other intelligent worlds.

Until Galactus came...

Posted by: Z Ryan at April 25, 2010 02:08 PM (cMo6P)

279 We have a secret weapon. In fact, Oprah, is the only thing standing between us and the same fate as the Indians. Too late for them.

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 02:08 PM (uFdnM)

280 Anecdotally, from colony records, several tribes "died off" between the Viking colonization and the Pilgrims, and between the first landings and real colonization. Tantalizingly the Vikings talked extensively (well, relatively speaking) about pygmies never seen since. Could have been faery myths.

Anyway, it basically came down to the Amerinds running around killing each other, then the Europeans showed up and said "LOL, UR DOIN IT RONG!"

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 02:09 PM (bxiXv)

281 that was pretty fucking funny...

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 02:09 PM (uFdnM)

282 84 Every time someone like Monty @ #12 above uses the phrase 'by definition' I am reminded of Pierce Brosnan's character in "Mars Attacks". --------- Yeah, well, everytime Beck closes his show with the bit about the anvil of truth and the hammer of non-violence, I think of the Sphinx in Mystery Men urging our plucky group of heroes to clothe themselves in the armor of not bickering.

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 02:09 PM (LD+ZJ)

283 I don't think their coming because they have been watching our television shows and we have turned them into lazy couch potatoes who don't want to venture over because they might miss american idol.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 02:09 PM (7VvJB)

284
Hawking likes to bash America and people in general, and this is just a roundabout way of doing that.

It allows him and other snots like him to feel superior.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 02:09 PM (kSbr6)

285

To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational,” he said

Maybe The Science Guy can put that mathematical brain to work and figure out how to build his own fucking wheelchair with his own fucking hands.

My mother always told me to never trust a man who uses a Simon to speak.

Three reds and two greens! Get the fuck out of here.

 

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 02:10 PM (P33XN)

286 270 +1 It's truly a symptom of decadence - a bad side effect of the Pax Americana since WWII. That's where analogies between America and Rome break down. Self-identifying Romans remained ethnocentric even when Gauls were Romans and Goths were beating down their walls. Pacifism was pretty much unknown except in some Christian sects with small membership. They fell because they arrogantly assumed they were still able to militarily beat everyone down when they weren't. We're falling because too many of us don't even feel we're worth defending. This may have happened in history before but I can't think of any example that doesn't involve a post WWII country.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 02:10 PM (7ZyYf)

287

Except not. Because there ain't no aliens coming to visit. Even if you buy into the idea that extraterrestrial intelligences exist or will exist and that extrasolar travel is feasible at some level of development, the distances between stars are so incomprehensibly vast that interplanetary species aren't likely to come across each other within the lifetime of their species. The same "numbers alone" that Hawking hawks to infer the existence of life out there work against him when considering the possibility that some of that life will ever be in a position to make contact.

Anyone ever tell you you're a real killjoy Gabe?

Posted by: 57 States at April 25, 2010 02:10 PM (HayMb)

288 I mean, wouldn't someone have already contaminated the time line with the secret? Ok, none of this makes sense.
Posted by: ParisParamus

Lots of sci-fi dodges around like the multiverse / many-branches-of-time piffles. Many stories employ the idea that once you 'go back in time,' you move to another timeline, leaving our time unaltered.

Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 25, 2010 02:11 PM (zgd5N)

289
It is naive to assume there is no evil in the universe.

ex: (WtR)

Posted by: sickinmass at April 25, 2010 02:11 PM (tamie)

290

Okay, all you 'time travel' morons, don't even get me started on the TV series "FlashForward". I don't see that series going past a couple seasons before viewers start getting pissed at it.

"V", on the other hand has your alien/human sex encounters already going on.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 02:11 PM (GkYyh)

291 "Heavier than air flying machines are impossible" Lord Kelvin, 1895

"Of course, he only seems to lack the the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools" NY Times editorial on Robert Goddard's rocket theories

"The bomb will never go off. I am speaking as an expert on the subject of explosives" Admiral William Leahy, to President Truman during a briefing on the Manhattan project on 4/13/45

Never, ever say something is scientifically impossible.

Posted by: Chris R at April 25, 2010 02:11 PM (AO4qz)

292 87 Circular logic, no. Because my point was that 'chance of life' is incalculable, in the first place. So the number, whatever it is, is coming out of someone's ass. --------- Maybe, but we *do* know it ain't zero.

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 02:11 PM (LD+ZJ)

293 We will be coming to your United Nations to show you how to have peace and prosperity, how to eliminate poverty and war

It's all in this book here ....

Posted by: The Kanamits at April 25, 2010 02:11 PM (sYxEE)

294 So these aliens are going to travel here because they need resources.  And why did they need resources?

Maybe because they used the insane level of energy it takes to travel at light speed? 

Aliens will either die out or figure out how to be efficient with the planets and star in their own system, or at worst the ones near their system.

Hawking seems silly here.  Does not not realize just how huge planets are?  You're not going to run out of materials to use with them, and still have enough to go to light speed with your star trek armada.

Same for us, we should learn how to survive on our planets out there, using robots for the next fair while.  We probably should give land to whoever can manage to colonize each planet, too.  But we're not going to be going to other stars for profit.

Posted by: Sentient Nintendo 64 at April 25, 2010 02:12 PM (dUOK+)

295

True Hollowpoint. But, part of the problem with the arguments is this idea that the Native Americans were just going along, minding their own business, peace loving, tree huggers and them “bam” whitey came along and conquered them and decimated their numbers.

 

Well, yeah- the "noble savage" mythology is absurd, one need not hold a PhD in history to figure that one out.

 

It's just that after years of being exposed to the PC bullshit, people sometimes get defensive and have a knee-jerk reaction when anyone mentions that, from the perspective of the natives of the era, European colonization sucked hard.

 

On the grand scale of things it was very much a net positive, but there's no need to pretend there were no losers in the deal.  Likewise, it's a mistake to suggest that the Europeans destroyed a utopian society comprised of the perfectly enlightened.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 02:12 PM (plsiE)

296
Look, (brace yourselves), Hawking's a smart man, but it's clear he's a miserable bitter delusional turd who clearly fancies himself a computer.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 02:13 PM (kSbr6)

297 The Native Americans failed to invent the wheel and the beast of burden, though there were found toys with wheels made by the Aztecs. These two invventions are probably the only thing that kept them from acheiving at least if not more than the Euros had up to that time.

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 02:13 PM (S1Ttj)

298

By this same logic isn't the existence of Unicorns also "rational"?

Posted by: Roman at April 25, 2010 06:04 PM (PxmHS)

Perfectly.  As long as those Unicorns don't violate any laws of physics.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:13 PM (1fanL)

299 But I thought it said " How to serve man"?

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 25, 2010 02:14 PM (753lI)

300 Hawking is a wuss. MC Hawking is not:

http://tinyurl.com/2enoasr

Posted by: Chris R at April 25, 2010 02:14 PM (AO4qz)

301
>>Maybe The Science Guy can put that mathematical brain to work and figure out how to build his own fucking wheelchair with his own fucking hands.


What if the aliens could come here and make Steven Hawking be able to play basketball. I bet he wouldn't mind that. Or maybe he's worried that immobile people would become food.

I wish Steven Hawking would spend his time trying to figure out obama. The problem is, nobody can figure out obama.



Posted by: sickinmass at April 25, 2010 02:14 PM (tamie)

302 Lots of sci-fi dodges around like the multiverse / many-branches-of-time piffles.

You haven't been paying much attention to modern physics lately, have you?  It ain't piffle anymore.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:15 PM (1fanL)

303 Mr Simpson, your wife is quite a dish

Posted by: Kang and Kodos at April 25, 2010 02:15 PM (sYxEE)

304

I'm not buying that. Any species that has viable interplanetary travel isn't going to need any specific resource that's found only on Earth or that can only be made from elements found only on Earth (ain't no such thing).

Yeah, unless they want a bailout. Two words: "Obama's stash."

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 02:16 PM (GkYyh)

305 I'm not buying that. Any species that has viable interplanetary travel isn't going to need any specific resource that's found only on Earth or that can only be made from elements found only on Earth (ain't no such thing). Yeah, unless they want a bailout. Two words: "Obama's stash." Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 06:16 PM (GkYyh) I don't know about that. An ample supply of both white and dark meat?

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 25, 2010 02:17 PM (753lI)

306
Maybe they're like us and iodide is an essential nutrient for them also.

And some assholes on their planet banned salt so they needed to travel all the way to Earth to buy some salt?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 02:17 PM (kSbr6)

307 So many of my callers on Coast to Coast have traveled between the stars that I'm starting to put up traffic reports

Posted by: Art Bell at April 25, 2010 02:18 PM (sYxEE)

308

Well ProgressOverPeace, I understand what happened in Europe. However thereÂ’s no getting around the fact that the United States government deliberating used smallpox infected blankets on some of the tribes. Nor that the government made treaties with them forcing them onto reservations.

 

It happened. No value judgment on my part, I’ve studied Native American culture enough to be confident in my assertion that they are better off today having been “conquered” then they would have been left to their own devices.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:19 PM (RZ8pf)

309 I've often said that if aliens ever do drop by for a visit, that would be very Bad News indeed. It wouldn't mean that they came for our wealth or our resources; it would mean that pretty much came by just to fuck with us. We don't have anything they'd want -- but we might be such hilarious rubes that they wouldn't be able to resist having a little fun. Think of it this way -- suppose they figure out that we are a highly religious species (everybody believes in a God or Gods of some kind). So they gin up a special-effects extravaganza that convinces everyone that the End Times are nigh. Mass hysteria! Panic at the disco! And pretty fucking funny, if you're the aliens. Then when the fun is over and everything is a burning wreck, the people terrorized and hiding out and no fun any more, you haul ass out of there.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 02:20 PM (O3eFQ)

310 However thereÂ’s no getting around the fact that the United States government deliberating used smallpox infected blankets on some of the tribes.

How'd they know to do that when the germ theory of disease hadn't even been invented yet?

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:20 PM (1fanL)

311 I for one would ummmmm, welcome contact with our alien, uhhhhhhh, friends.  Their landings on Earth could be a ummmmmm, tremendous source of, uhhhhhh, revenues for my government, ummm, expansions.

Posted by: TEH WON at April 25, 2010 02:20 PM (5qJM5)

312

Look, regardless of what is said about Stephen Hawking the fact still remains that this guy gets laid on a regular basis. If that isnÂ’t proof of alien life, I donÂ’t know what is.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:21 PM (RZ8pf)

313 I try to spend my time thinking about useful things, like whether its worth it or not to drive across town and get some more of that apricot ale on sale. My gut tells me it is.

Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 25, 2010 02:21 PM (uFdnM)

314 According to star mappers, Earth is a minor planet out in the "sticks" of the galaxy. It would be kind of like traveling hundreds and thousands of years just to visit Lubbock TX

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 02:21 PM (sYxEE)

315 So FUBAR, do you believe in unicorns?

Posted by: Roman at April 25, 2010 02:22 PM (PxmHS)

316 Aliens?  We'll leave them for the cables.

Posted by: Charlie Gibson at April 25, 2010 02:22 PM (5qJM5)

317

The Native Americans failed to invent the wheel and the beast of burden, though there were found toys with wheels made by the Aztecs. These two invventions are probably the only thing that kept them from acheiving at least if not more than the Euros had up to that time.

What is the point of this kind of statement?  This about the fifth time someone's said, "Indians weren't as advanced as Euros."  So?  Euros hadn't spent the preceeding 10k years migrating across the world.  Give the natives a few hundred more years, and the might have had the wheel.  So?

Also, the great Aztec and Mayan civilizations were flat out emptied by disease, not to mention North American tribes.  Why the arguments that try to say Euros didn't introduce diseases they weren't well-equipped to handle?  What's the point?  It happened relatively recent Hawaiian history as well.  Civilizations import disease.  What's the argument here?

Is it:  Euros didn't have syphillis and smallpox--and if they did, they didn't bring it because of their advanced medical and quarantine procedures--and they only brought peace, happiness, and the wheel, therefore they were entitled to all the land they conquered? 

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 02:23 PM (KfZeO)

318 Look, regardless of what is said about Stephen Hawking the fact still remains that this guy gets laid on a regular basis. If that isnÂ’t proof of alien life, I donÂ’t know what is. Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 06:21 PM (RZ8pf) And you know this how?

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 25, 2010 02:23 PM (753lI)

319 Well, if they're coming here they had better buy up some buku carbon credits, damn it! I'm not making the big bucks I'd hoped to be making by now with the Obama administration. WTF, dude?

Posted by: Al Gore at April 25, 2010 02:24 PM (GkYyh)

320 But, part of the problem with the arguments is this idea that the Native Americans were just going along, minding their own business, peace loving, tree huggers and them “bam” whitey came along and conquered them and decimated their numbers.

That's just how white folks will do 'ya.

 

Posted by: TEH WON at April 25, 2010 02:24 PM (5qJM5)

321 So FUBAR, do you believe in unicorns?

Posted by: Roman at April 25, 2010 06:22 PM (PxmHS)

Depends on what you're calling a unicorn.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:25 PM (1fanL)

322 Think of it this way -- suppose they figure out that we are a highly religious species (everybody believes in a God or Gods of some kind). So they gin up a special-effects extravaganza that convinces everyone that the End Times are nigh. Mass hysteria! Panic at the disco!

Or just fuck with the lights like they did in this Twilight Zone episode;

The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 02:25 PM (sYxEE)

323

FUBAR, OK, point taken. Whether it was deliberate or not, smallpox came from Europe. However, I think enough was known about the spread of smallpox at that point to give weight to the theory that it was done deliberately.  

 

 Regardless, smallpox did wipe out Native Americans. I can only speak for the Northwest Tribe records I studied, but it was one of the causes of death specifically recorded in the US territory records of the 1800s.

 

Seriously, I’m getting the feeling you guys think I’m arguing the “noble savage vs. evil European” side here, when everything I’ve said so far is meant to support the opposite argument. So, if I seem like a Native American apologist, well I apologize.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:25 PM (RZ8pf)

324 OT: Granfuckingtastic! I was looking foward to tonight's History channel documentary "America: The Story Of Us" which has been hailed by critics from both sides, well guess who wants to do a "special message" to introduce the mini-doc-series? that's right, mr. 45 fucking percent approval Obama, this guy has no idea how much showing up everywhere is making his favorables go down w/ his approvals

Posted by: YRM at April 25, 2010 02:25 PM (38UQ3)

325

Not sure what the aliens would be up to if they visit, but if they take out D.C. like they did in Independence Day with their death ray, I'll worry about everything else later.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 02:26 PM (t72+4)

326

Is it:  Euros didn't have syphillis and smallpox--and if they did, they didn't bring it because of their advanced medical and quarantine procedures--and they only brought peace, happiness, and the wheel, therefore they were entitled to all the land they conquered? 

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 06:23 PM (KfZeO)

No, it's: more advanced civilizations overrun less advanced civilizations and take what they want.  Until just recently, when we developed delicate sensibilities.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:26 PM (1fanL)

327

White guilt is stronger than anything, and much more dangerous.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 06:02 PM (N49h9)

Sadly true. But that's a recent phenomenon.

Posted by: Ed Anger at April 25, 2010 02:27 PM (7+pP9)

328 How'd they know to do that when the germ theory of disease hadn't even been invented yet? People have known the transmission vectors of disease long before they germ-theory of disease. That's why the incurably ill - lepers, those suffering from plague and smallpox -- were isolated from the rest of the populations even in ancient times. They didn't know why the infection passed, but they knew that it did pass. John Snow didn't know the germ theory of disease, but he was smart enough to take the pump-handle off the community pump and stop the transmission of cholera. It's sort of the difference between circumstantial evidence and physical evidence -- just because it's circumstantial evidence doesn't mean it's weak evidence.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 02:27 PM (O3eFQ)

329 However thereÂ’s no getting around the fact that the United States government deliberating used smallpox infected blankets on some of the tribes.

Actually, that was done by the Brits during the French and Indian war.

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 02:27 PM (S1Ttj)

330

 According to star mappers, Earth is a minor planet out in the "sticks" of the galaxy. It would be kind of like traveling hundreds and thousands of years just to visit Lubbock TX

How do you know that about Lubbock?  You've been there too?

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 02:28 PM (KfZeO)

331 Euros didn't have syphillis and smallpox

I agree with you overall, but for the record, it's the Europeans who apparently got Syphilis from going to America, not the other way around.

- Pedantic Guy Mode

Posted by: AD at April 25, 2010 02:28 PM (AMhst)

332 310: It's now a widely accepted theory with still absolutely zero proof. Like climatologists and AGW and astronomers with asteroid impacts, parallel universes are now used to explain everything for which there's no answer. If you catch the "Hawking's Paradox" documentaries on the Science Channel you see that even Hawking's in on the game now (I'll avoid the spoiler and say I disagree with his "solution" at the end).

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 02:28 PM (7ZyYf)

333
The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street

Claude Akins & the guy from The Incredible Mr. Limpet -- that's television!

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 02:28 PM (kSbr6)

334 However, I think enough was known about the spread of smallpox at that point to give weight to the theory that it was done deliberately.  

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 06:25 PM (RZ8pf)

You damn Redskin Lover.  No, I think it was done deliberately, I just wonder what the thinking was. 

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:28 PM (1fanL)

335 Dear Aliens

We look forward to your visit. Please view this DVD I've sent as an orientation on the proper behavior and protocol upon your arrival. It's from a 1996 film called Independence Day.

Posted by: 48 percenter at April 25, 2010 02:29 PM (sYxEE)

336 If you have mastered intergalactic travel, there is a pretty good chance that you have figured out the whole sustainablity issue that goes along with it.

Posted by: Lemmiwinks at April 25, 2010 02:29 PM (IqfKc)

337

Nevergiveup, I suppose you could argue that right at this very minute he might not be getting laid. But he got laid in the past, seeing as how he reproduced, and I also believe he had a relationship with one of his nurses where she told her “exclusive” story to one of the infamous British tabloids.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:29 PM (RZ8pf)

338 333 Not sure what the aliens would be up to if they visit, but if they take out D.C. like they did in Independence Day with their death ray, I'll worry about everything else later.
Posted by: Blazer   Think they'd let us pick? I mean, yeah, DC is tops on the list, but I'm thinkin' if they take out San Francisco , especially when Nancy is home, DC might get a strong message?? Maybe not.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 02:29 PM (GkYyh)

339

You damn Redskin Lover.

 

How dare you imply that! IÂ’m faithful to my Seahawks!

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:31 PM (RZ8pf)

340 331: I have a sinking feeling that show will reflect Barry's views of America (sort of like "The People Speak" did) so he's probably an appropriate speaker.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 02:31 PM (7ZyYf)

341

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 06:28 PM (7ZyYf)

too much "science" is now based on theories w/ little to no evidence while scientists shout down and talk down to critics of theirs, their just like liberals, all talk and no evidence/facts

Posted by: YRM at April 25, 2010 02:31 PM (38UQ3)

342

Seriously, I’m getting the feeling you guys think I’m arguing the “noble savage vs. evil European” side here, when everything I’ve said so far is meant to support the opposite argument. So, if I seem like a Native American apologist, well I apologize.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 06:25 PM (RZ8pf)

Not at all.  We know where you're coming from, but you are acting as an unwitting carrier of some of those themes. 

I mentioned earlier that the Indians sent syphillis back to Europe, so the disease score is pretty even, by my reckoning, anyway - though no one ever talks about that, and syphillis is so much worse than smallpox.  It attacks sex, which really sucks, it drives you insane over a long period of time, and you don't build up any immunity to it.  That is really bad.  I'd rather get the quick hit of smallpox. 

I also mentioned how it's interesting that lefties, today, see tobacco as the root of all evils, but they never bother mentioning that it came from the Indians - just as they gloss over the fact that the African slave trade was run by the arabs until the Euros picked it up from them.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 02:32 PM (N49h9)

343 It's now a widely accepted theory with still absolutely zero proof.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 06:28 PM (7ZyYf)

There can never be any proof.  By definition.  It is impossible to know anything about anything outside our universe.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:32 PM (1fanL)

344 #322
Wouldn't being further out from the galactic hub (out in the sticks) mean you've been around longer?

Posted by: lotocoti at April 25, 2010 02:33 PM (mvQaJ)

345 Ya know whats stupid about "Independence Day"?  It that there had to be a countdown clock for the aliens before they could start.  Why didn't they just start the second they got here?  Its a takeoff of the bad guy using a wildly exotic contraption to kill the good guy when he could just shoot him.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 02:33 PM (7VvJB)

346 It's now a widely accepted theory with still absolutely zero proof. Many of the modern astrophysics theories suffer from a lack of proof. Dark matter, dark energy, string theory, alternate/parallel universes, wormholes, singularities -- all theoretically predicted, but none scientifically "proven" yet. (And some probably "unprovable" even in principle -- like string theory.) But sci-fi would be a much more boring genre if we were only allowed to use scientifically-proven theories.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 02:34 PM (O3eFQ)

347 they could already be here but our minds are not developed enough to know they exist in our reality. does a chimp know the rules of relativity?

Posted by: David C at April 25, 2010 02:34 PM (ihhMS)

348 How'd they know to do that when the germ theory of disease hadn't even been invented yet?Posted by: FUBAR

 

They wouldn't have to know about germs just do "cause and effect" , such as Fleming did to establish innoculation for smallpox. Observe dairy people that had cowpox did not get smallpox. Use blankets from disease wards to cause epidemics.

Posted by: Kelly at April 25, 2010 02:35 PM (FLFli)

349

Actually, that was done by the Brits during the French and Indian war.

 

The Northwest tribes didnÂ’t have anything to do with the French and Indian war, so at some point the US government picked up the trick. Of course, one could argue since Britain was in British Columbia that they couldÂ’ve been the ones. I guess I canÂ’t speak with 100% confidence as to where the Northwest tribes got smallpox from, just that they had it. Maybe its back in some of my research papers somewhere but that was a long time ago in a galaxy far awayÂ…

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:35 PM (RZ8pf)

350

 According to star mappers, Earth is a minor planet out in the "sticks" of the galaxy. It would be kind of like traveling hundreds and thousands of years just to visit Lubbock TX

How do you know that about Lubbock?  You've been there too?

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 06:28 PM

They landed at Roswell, asked where they could find some good beer and chili while their ride got fixed. They were told to try Lubbock as the Border Patrol was thick in Albuquerque. They reported back to their earth contact Charles Johnson that Earth was nothing but teabaggers and not worth the hassle to get here.

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 02:35 PM (sYxEE)

351

Welfare Forever!

In March, Monica Conyers, pleading insufficient funds, was granted a court-appointed lawyer to appeal her bribery conviction stemming from her work as a city councilwoman in Detroit. Conyers is the wife of John Conyers, the Michigan congressman who is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. (Mrs. Conyers arrived in court on the day of her sentencing clutching what reporters said appeared to be a Louis Vuitton handbag that sells for $1,000.) [Detroit Free Press, 3-16-10; MLive.com (Advance Newspapers), 3-17-10]

Posted by: Rewrite! at April 25, 2010 02:35 PM (d7Px0)

352 Many of the modern astrophysics theories suffer from a lack of proof. Dark matter, dark energy, string theory, alternate/parallel universes, wormholes, singularities -- all theoretically predicted, but none scientifically "proven" yet.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 06:34 PM (O3eFQ)

Isn't a black hole a singularity?

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:35 PM (1fanL)

353 Do aliens have good take out food, cause I'm getting kind of bored with earth food.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 02:36 PM (7VvJB)

354

Eeek! IÂ’m an unwitting carrier. I swear I didnÂ’t know I was infected!

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:36 PM (RZ8pf)

355 Ya know whats stupid about "Independence Day"? The fact that the alien computers used the same operating systems as Apple Macintoshes? (And thus could be infected with a Mac virus?)

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 02:36 PM (O3eFQ)

356 44 If I can't talk to aliens, how would my hot 19 year-old housekeeper know when to take off her bra and panties?

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 04:50 PM (PON03)

I just give Huma 'that look' and she sheds like a snake.

Posted by: Hillary Clinton at April 25, 2010 02:36 PM (42fUz)

357
Yeah, what if we're living in a giant terrarium in some alien kid's bedroom?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 02:37 PM (kSbr6)

358 Joe Biden: Stephen stand up. Let everyone see you. Oh God love ya, what am I talking about?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 25, 2010 02:37 PM (F/Zn1)

359

It would be kind of like traveling hundreds and thousands of years just to visit Lubbock TX Posted by: kbdabear

 

I see you've been there. Longest century I spent there one year.

Posted by: Kelly at April 25, 2010 02:37 PM (FLFli)

360

I donÂ’t think so Guy Fawkes. In all the movies they seem like they either eat humans or weird goop.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:37 PM (RZ8pf)

361

Is it:  Euros didn't have syphillis and smallpox--and if they did, they didn't bring it because of their advanced medical and quarantine procedures--and they only brought peace, happiness, and the wheel, therefore they were entitled to all the land they conquered? 

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 06:23 PM (KfZeO)

Wow, that strawman is like 200 feet tall and nuclear powered. Im-pressive.


Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 02:38 PM (bxiXv)

362
the wife of a U.S. Congressman was deemed indigent by a court?

no way

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 02:38 PM (kSbr6)

363 363 Do aliens have good take out food, cause I'm getting kind of bored with earth food.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 06:36 PM (7VvJB)

Aliens ARE takeout food!

Posted by: Dastardly Dan at April 25, 2010 02:38 PM (9id2T)

364

One thing I'm 100% positive about though- every story about alien abductions and/or alien spacecraft (UFO) sightings is bullshit.  All of them.

They're going to travel tens, hundreds or thousands of light-years for no reason other than to hover over a trailer park for a couple minutes, maybe probing an anus or two?  Not buying it.

Just imagine getting that passed by an alien committee.  "Let me get this straight- you want to take a ship on a 300 year journey to a planet 400 light-years away, at great expense, just to see how an Earthling will react when you stick a probe up his ass, then leave?  I don't care how funny you think it would be- motion denied."

But then again I believe that faster than light travel by a spaceship is almost certainly impossible, so what do I know.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 02:38 PM (plsiE)

365 Yeah, what if we're living in a giant terrarium in some alien kid's bedroom?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 06:37 PM (kSbr6)

Ok, that's enough out of you, Dum-Dum.

Posted by: Kazoo at April 25, 2010 02:38 PM (1fanL)

366 I'll be welcoming our, ummmmmmmm, alien visitors with, uhhhhhhhhhhh some fantastic selections, er ummmm from the, uhh, White House gift shop.  Plus an autographed, ummmmm, photo of me.

Posted by: TEH WON at April 25, 2010 02:38 PM (5qJM5)

367

The same "numbers alone" that Hawking hawks to infer the existence of life out there work against him when considering the possibility that some of that life will ever be in a position to make contact.

Yeah, Hawking is an idiot, just like those three stooges Fermi, Drake, and Von Neumann.

 

 

 

Just in case there was any doubt... /s

Posted by: sherlock at April 25, 2010 02:38 PM (thr9V)

368

RE: Indians

Go online and look at pictures of an Indian reservation.

Then remind yourself that the Bureau of Indian Affairs and assorted other government agencies have been in charge of that mess since their inception.

Yep, that healthcare thing is gonna work out marvelously!

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 02:39 PM (P33XN)

369

Eeek! IÂ’m an unwitting carrier. I swear I didnÂ’t know I was infected!

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 06:36 PM (RZ8pf)

I believe you, but what will people say 200 years from now

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 02:39 PM (N49h9)

370

No, it's: more advanced civilizations overrun less advanced civilizations and take what they want.  Until just recently, when we developed delicate sensibilities.

So the genocide was a-okay?  In reality, then, it was the Euros who were noble.  Just doing their duty relieving the Indians of all that land they didn't need? 

Why all the wasted breath pointing out Indians weren't noble--as if reputable people consider that an important point--and the assertions Euros didn't wipe them out at least in part with disease?

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 02:39 PM (7FagD)

371 the promo for his new show on discovery referred to him as possessing the world's "most brilliant mind"

Hmmm...my experience, braggarts are seldom the best at anything.

And more...relying on a position of authority as social proof that one's ideas are better than anyone else's is still remarkably effective. A wheelchair and voice box seems to be even more convincing than a lab coat.

Posted by: Doctor Love at April 25, 2010 02:39 PM (STTZD)

372

But Hollowpoint, isnÂ’t that the equivalent of what Columbus did when he discovered America?

 

/sarc obviously.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:40 PM (RZ8pf)

373

Ya know whats stupid about "Independence Day"?




Jeff Goldblum.



Nuff said.



Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 02:40 PM (t72+4)

374

It's a COOKBOOK!!! 

Posted by: Rewrite! at April 25, 2010 02:40 PM (d7Px0)

375 hawking is a physicist, but that does not make him a philosopher or otherwise objective observer of the world. he's also an oxford academic, easily susceptible to the pop intellectual currents that pass by him as science. in one of the recent documentaries on him, he stated that the earth is doomed from global warming and man's other deprivations of the planet, so he advised authoritatively that we must begin colonizing other planets now. so he's a malthusian, pessimist and otherwise blind to reality. his accomplishments are now seen as significant but don't rank even marginally in the important contributions to theoretical physics. he's past his prime now, and his philosophical musings are somewhat sad.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 02:41 PM (73jUp)

376 We gave them the flu, but we also gave them the wheel.

Meh.

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 02:41 PM (fOtKS)

377 Aliens are already stealing our resources

Posted by: Beto at April 25, 2010 02:41 PM (H+LJc)

378 Jeff Goldblum.

Don't speak ill of the dead.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 02:42 PM (7VvJB)

379

So the genocide was a-okay?  In reality, then, it was the Euros who were noble.  Just doing their duty relieving the Indians of all that land they didn't need? 

Why all the wasted breath pointing out Indians weren't noble--as if reputable people consider that an important point--and the assertions Euros didn't wipe them out at least in part with disease?

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 06:39 PM (7FagD)

The genocide was a-ok at the time, and I refuse to take even one iota of responsibility for it.  No, the Euros weren't noble, they were stronger.  I haven't made any assertions, but, the Indians weren't noble, and the Euros did wipe them out at least in part with disease.

Posted by: Kazoo at April 25, 2010 02:42 PM (1fanL)

380

Yeah, but Jeff Goldblum was awesome in Jurassic Park.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:42 PM (RZ8pf)

381 356: If I may concern-troll cosmology, it bugs me that all of those theories seem to grab rabbits out of the parallel universes / M-theory hat to explain major elements they're lacking (e.g. dark energy and/or dark matter is just gravity leaking into / leaking out of a parallel universe). I love the idea of string theory since it largely gets rid of "infinities" like singularities, but we're probably at least decades away from verifying any of it, and we're building whole fields of research on an already 35+ year old theory that looks great on paper but might be an enormous waste of time.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 02:42 PM (7ZyYf)

382 not that i've made any contributions to physics.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 02:42 PM (73jUp)

383



Eeek! IÂ’m an unwitting carrier. I swear I didnÂ’t know I was infected!

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 06:36 PM (RZ8pf)




I bet I know what/where you carry all those dastardly bio-toxins in.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 02:42 PM (t72+4)

384

too much "science" is now based on theories w/ little to no evidence while scientists shout down and talk down to critics of theirs, their just like liberals, all talk and no evidence/facts

Posted by: YRM at April 25, 2010 06:31 PM

I read SCIENCE stuff written by SCIENTISTS, and unlike you Creationist retards, I know where the final word is written and debate is over, because I read sciencey magazines

Posted by: Charles Johnson, Scientologist at April 25, 2010 02:43 PM (sYxEE)

385 Isn't a black hole a singularity? Not exactly. A black hole is the event-horizon encompassing a singularity (we think). The gravitational "bubble" around a singularity is so strong that no light can escape. (Counterintuitively, black holes can be very bright at the event horizon as infalling material is superheated as it spirals in and gets compressed.) Kip Thorne has posited the concept of a "naked singularity", but the mechanism of such a thing is very complicated to describe using what we know about subatomic physics. We don't really know what a "singularity" is. It's the definition of a condition, not an object. When gravitational pressures scoot off to infinity, we don't have any way to describe what happens then. Thus, the mass entering such a state is defined as a "singularity". We don't know what the properties or behaviors of such an object are; that's why some theorize that "black holes" are nature's way of closing off singularities from the physical universe.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 02:43 PM (O3eFQ)

386 So the only thing we know for sure from this conversation is Earth Girls are Easy.

Fair enough.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 02:44 PM (7VvJB)

387 ... except this: perhaps dark matter is non-vibrating strings, or strings that haven't joined other strings to make matter.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 02:44 PM (73jUp)

388 Physics makes my puzzler hurt.

My biggest concern is that if aliens are coming, I want them to start making the F22 again.






Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 02:45 PM (fOtKS)

389

I'm pretty sure Jeff Goldblum died from a cocaine overdose in 1978 while filming "Thank God Its Friday" and has been making movies despite that fact ever since.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 02:45 PM (t72+4)

390

Wow, that strawman is like 200 feet tall and nuclear powered. Im-pressive.

I reducto ad absurdam I don't fool around.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 02:45 PM (7FagD)

391 his accomplishments are now seen as significant but don't rank even marginally in the important contributions to theoretical physics. he's past his prime now, and his philosophical musings are somewhat sad.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 06:41 PM (73jUp) 

Gotta disagree.  The first (and still only?) example of using quantum mechanics and relativity together.  Physicists are impressed with that.

Posted by: Kazoo at April 25, 2010 02:45 PM (1fanL)

392  According to star mappers, Earth is a minor planet out in the "sticks" of the galaxy. It would be kind of like traveling hundreds and thousands of years just to visit Lubbock TX

Actually that's kind of bullshit. We live in the Goldilocks zone, too close to the core and you fry, too far out and you have too much angular momentum and too many collisions, as well as less captive material for planets and stuff.

Of course, life in those zones is possible but less likely, given that it's all a wild-ass guess.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 02:46 PM (bxiXv)

393

Well, I am a bit of a disreputable person it is true. But I do think it is important to point out that the Native Americans werenÂ’t noble because we have a helluva lot of revisionist history going on in this country right now. IÂ’d like to see at least some of the teaching go back to a little bit of the reality of how things were before whitey ruled America.

 

If you think some of those tribes wouldnÂ’t have wiped each other out, regardless of what the white man did, you are wrong. Even among the generally peace loving Northwest tribes there were atrocities committed against each other. LetÂ’s not even go down the Apache or Comanche trail, shall we? And, if you want to see some wicked native on native hate, ask a Navajo how he or she feels about a Hopi.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:47 PM (RZ8pf)

394 On smallpox.

There is only one single recorded mention of the smallpox-blankets idea during colonial times. The smallpox genocide claim is a blood libel lie.

More importantly, the great die-off of Native Americans had already happened generations before that. The dying started shortly after the first Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors landed.

By the time the English got around to colonizing North America the interior had been wiped mostly clean. The English colonists were dealing with remnants of the native tribes who had been destroyed by disease generations earlier.

There was no native american genocide because it was not purposeful. The germ theory of disease was not widely known or accepted until the 19th century -- 400 years after Columbus! The conquistadors believed God was smiting the pagan natives for their heathen ways. And many of the surviving natives believed that, too. The spaniards could walk untouched among the wretchedly ill natives, seemingly by magic or divine providence.

Most natives died due to starvation because not enough people in the tribe were healthy enough to produce food. And the diseases came in wave after wave for years and decades and struck down the young and healthy along with the old and feeble. And the interior natives died without meeting any europeans as the diseases spread from tribe to tribe through personal contact. They had no idea why any of it was happening.

Posted by: nogenocide at April 25, 2010 02:47 PM (+ABdJ)

395
Have you ever heard of yaws?

The eggheads are still arguing whether Europeans introduced syphilis to America or re-introduced it from the New World :

There are not, in the whole of medicine, two diseases so similar as syphilis and yaws*—so similar in their clinical manifestations; so similar in their clinical course; so similar in their causal organisms that they cannot be distinguished by any known pathological process one from the other; so similar in their serological reaction that they are the same for the two diseases; so similar in their response to treatment, whether that treatment was one of the earlier medications or the more recent modern treatment by antibiotics; so similar in every respect—one disease almost confined to the people of the temperate zone and the other to the people of the tropical zone; so similar that the question must arise once more: Are they not one and the same disease modified by the climate and the conditions in which they occur ?


So between cocaine, tobacco and the clap it looks like the abos (aborigines) from the two American continents got some pretty good payback.

Posted by: Ed Anger at April 25, 2010 02:47 PM (7+pP9)

396


Yeah, but Jeff Goldblum was awesome in Jurassic Park.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 06:42 PM (RZ8pf)






He had nothing to worry about. Dinosaurs eat fresh meat, not carrion.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 02:47 PM (t72+4)

397 The restaurant at the end of the universe is named "The Singularity".  They make a good burger.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 02:48 PM (7VvJB)

398

The genocide was a-ok at the time, and I refuse to take even one iota of responsibility for it. 

But I want you to take responsiblity since I know you were there.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 02:48 PM (7FagD)

399 It occurs to me that presuming a highly advanced technology would be necessary for life from outer space to "contact" us excludes a (just as) reasonable proposition. Something like a "space pollen", perhaps traveling by transmission methods we're unaware of, that is indeed life and is indeed alien. Possible? Whether such a thing is even conjecturable in our Universe and whether the life that sprang from such material would be "intelligent" are two more crap-shoots, of course.

Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 02:48 PM (y1kI6)

400 The gravitational "bubble" around a singularity is so strong that no light can escape. Actually, it's more correct to say that the object can no longer radiate any kind of EM radiation. It can emit no "information" whatsoever (though Hawking among others has advanced a model whereby a black hole can actually evaporate over long enough periods of time). That's why "black holes" were originally used as sci-fi deux ex machina mechanisms for FTL travel -- if we don't know what happens inside one, isn't it possible that they're actually gateways to other places? (Answer: almost certainly not, but hey, it's sci-fi.)

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 02:49 PM (O3eFQ)

401 ... and this: there wasn't a "big bang"; it was a "big pull". the space time fabric of the universe is surrounded by a hyper-vacuum that the universe is filling, like a marshmallow in a bell jar vacuum. the universe is accelerating as it fills the vacuum (no dark energy needed), but the 14 billion years of existence is merely a blink in the filling of the vacuum.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 02:49 PM (7JES6)

402

And here Blazer, I thought I was acquitting myself as a moronette with more than just a spectacular set of hooters.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:49 PM (RZ8pf)

403 this would have been the perfect thread for Christoph to inject his assholeness

Posted by: YRM at April 25, 2010 02:49 PM (38UQ3)

404 Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 06:43 PM (O3eFQ)

Right.  A singularity is what they call it when the laws of physics break down.  I thought the fact that a black hole was a singularity was pretty well established.  And that the event horizon was an event horizon around the black hole.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:49 PM (1fanL)

405 Most Native Americans were assimilated, not killed.


Posted by: Lemmiwinks at April 25, 2010 02:50 PM (IqfKc)

406 We don't really know what a "singularity" is. It's the definition of a condition, not an object. When gravitational pressures scoot off to infinity, we don't have any way to describe what happens then. Thus, the mass entering such a state is defined as a "singularity". We don't know what the properties or behaviors of such an object are; that's why some theorize that "black holes" are nature's way of closing off singularities from the physical universe.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 06:43 PM (O3eFQ)

I would just add that no infinities, or infinitesimals, can physically exist in our mathematical models of the universe.  The whole drive of modern physics is the finitization of everything.  If something isn't finite, we have no models that include it as a physical reality.  The only thing approaching this, from what I gather, is the claim that perfect randomness is able to be exhibited by certain quantum behavior, but I would tend to guess that that is more an artifact of a probabilistic model (as quantum theory) than anything connected to actual reality - as our universe is ordered and one can never get randomness from order without some exterior operation.

Of course, if there were an actual infinity, or infinitesimal, found to be physically existing, that would have some pretty big impacts on the foundations of mathematics and the constructivists would be ticked off, to say the least.  Cantor would have a good laugh, though.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 02:51 PM (N49h9)

407 The idea that ET's would be after our planet looking for resources is ridiculous.

Assume the following about a civilization say, 5 million years more advanced than us (which speaking in geological time, is nothing).

1. The civilization would more likely not be biological at all, or at best, a combination of biological and robotic.
2. They would also have the ability to completely manipulate all elements at the quantum level, meaning they could make anything out of anything.  They wouldn't need our resources (whatever those are) at all.
3. Considering that modern man has only been around for about 5,000 years or so and technology for only about 100 and we are on the bring of self-destruction, the chances that any other further advanced technological society even existing at the same time as us without having destroyed themselves is small.

I seriously doubt we will ever encounter intelligent life besides ourselves.  Yes, there most likely have been intelligent civilizations comes and go, but they have long since destroyed themselves of are no longer "living" as we think of it, but rather intelligent, self-aware machines.

Posted by: mitchellvii@yahoo.com at April 25, 2010 02:51 PM (kEBiX)

408 Hawking among others has advanced a model whereby a black hole can actually evaporate over long enough periods of time

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 06:49 PM (O3eFQ) 


Yeah.  That marriage of quantum mechanics and relativity.  I've tried to tell my father than matter and anti-matter particles are constantly appearing in empty space.  He doesn't believe me.  He thinks modern physics is voodoo.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 25, 2010 02:52 PM (1fanL)

409

I do want to get back to a question that seems to undergird this thread though, why is conquering wrong? Obviously both the discussion of the Europeans taking over North America and the discussion of aliens coming to our planet hinges on a concept of the need to explore and possibly subsequently conquer. Is this urge wrong? If it is wrong, why has it not been evolutionarily engineered out of us by now?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 02:53 PM (RZ8pf)

410 Space pollen.

We're gonna need some bigger Benedryl.

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 02:53 PM (fOtKS)

411 We live in the Goldilocks zone, too close to the core and you fry, too far out and you have too much angular momentum and too many collisions, as well as less captive material for planets and stuff. It's called the "Anthropic Principle" and it's almost certainly wrong. Life can exist in many different environments than we would have thought. Consider: aliens might be confused as to how we could even survive in this hideously moist, dense environment, bombarded with radiation, experiencing extremes of temperature, and actually breathing a hot, corrosive gas (Oxygen). The environment we have is not necessarily the "ideal" environment. It's the one we evolved in, which is why we consider it perfect; but we are highly-specialized to survive in it. Alien beings, not having evolved in it, would probably assess it with a much more objective point of view.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 02:53 PM (O3eFQ)

412 Let's let the aliens conquer us, then we can get in on their welfare plan.

Posted by: logprof at April 25, 2010 02:54 PM (Mmw0q)

413 btw, what is a string made of? energy? matter? is it divisible?

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 02:54 PM (EA+Co)

414

 Kip Thorne Rip Torne has posited the concept of a "naked singularity", but the mechanism of such a thing is very complicated to describe using what we know about subatomic physics.

FIFY

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 02:54 PM (S1Ttj)

415

We don't really know what a "singularity" is. It's the definition of a condition, not an object. When gravitational pressures scoot off to infinity, we don't have any way to describe what happens then.

You know what?  I've got this one. 

There is no singularity.  "Singularity" is our intellectual cop-out.  The stellar remnant is still there, it just recedes in time faster than anything falling in, so nothing ever reaches the remnant once the horizon forms.  Things fall "forever" from their point of view. 

IOW, the space between the remnant and the horizon, and all points in between, stretch faster than the speed of light, so nothing ever gets there.  It's the time distortion that creates "the appearance" of all that space.

The star never collapses to nothing.  It just recedes forever.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 02:55 PM (7FagD)

416 And here Blazer, I thought I was acquitting myself as a moronette with more than just a spectacular set of hooters. Big brains and big hooters? My heart doth race, milady, and the blood doth rush.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 02:56 PM (O3eFQ)

417 380: "Code word" arguments don't cut it around here, nor do the "as if reputable people" arguments. Find any part of what you're saying in any of my posts. If you want to impugn my motives and make me out to be an apologist for genocide, stick to what I actually said not what you'd like to think it "means." Arguments like yours make it impossible to even discuss issues dealing with race and culture. They're both a major reason for and result of anthropology, sociology and political science departments becoming liberal PC echo chambers instead of legitimate sciences in the last 30+ years. Did you learn that style of argumentation in a "Native American Studies" course perhaps, or just a history class where Zinn's "People's History" was required reading ?

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 02:56 PM (7ZyYf)

418 Why would they want to come here?  We have a sun that pours out UV radiation an atmosphere of explosive oxygen and most of the planet is made up of water that can dissolve a battle ship given enough time. 

It is a very hostile place for intelligent life forms or democrat members of congress.

Posted by: Huey at April 25, 2010 02:57 PM (+bGOm)

419

Admiral, the Earth is, what, maybe, um, 24,900 miles in circumference and, what, 8,000 miles in diameter? Would you say, Admiral? But if significant numbers of aliens, say, LAND here with their, you know, families, don't you thing the Earth will, you know, I'm just worried the Earth will tip over ... capsize, if you will. Don't you think so, Admiral?

Posted by: Rep. Hank Johnson at April 25, 2010 02:57 PM (GkYyh)

420

 there wasn't a "big bang"; it was a "big pull".

Space doesn't suck; it blows.

Chix don't blow; they suck.

I'm with ya, man.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 02:57 PM (7FagD)

421 nice, rdbrewer.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 02:58 PM (73jUp)

422
Why is it wrong (in some cases) to conquer?

Because of the silly notion of social justice perpetrated on our Western culture by the Left to neuter us.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 02:58 PM (kSbr6)

423 I for one welcome our hot, alien overlords.

Posted by: Captain James Tiberius Kirk at April 25, 2010 02:59 PM (5qJM5)

424

Most Native Americans were assimilated, not killed.

Because you say so?

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 02:59 PM (7FagD)

425

I'm jealous and suspicious of smart people. And at least one of you may be a witch.

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 02:59 PM (fOtKS)

426 226 Aliens have been monitoring our electronic transmissions for generations.

I wonder what shows they like

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 02:59 PM (sYxEE)

427 lol. i meant nice, rdbrewer, for the perspective on a black hole. very neat.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 02:59 PM (73jUp)

428  there wasn't a "big bang"; it was a "big pull".


That is why we are accelerating. There was this Giant Sucking Sound.....

Posted by: Beto at April 25, 2010 03:01 PM (H+LJc)

429

I just don't think you should be able to write "Hawkings hawks" without playing something by Hawkshaw Hawkins.  http://tinyurl.com/22pssgr

 

 


Posted by: comatus at April 25, 2010 03:01 PM (/VEEI)

430 I wanna give a shout out to the indians:  we won.

Posted by: The Colonists at April 25, 2010 03:01 PM (7VvJB)

431 415 Most Native Americans were assimilated, not killed.

The physical characteristics of most Southwestern US Hispanics confirms that


Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 03:01 PM (sYxEE)

432

What if they're trying to plunder our bacon supplies, but haven't yet worked out which animal it comes from?

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 05:45 PM (plsiE)

This could have horrible consequences.  They could go around the galaxy, not knowing that what they believed to be bacon was actually pastrami.

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 03:01 PM (W+GYq)

433 Look. Out. Behind. You! ItÂ’s. A. Wookie! Run! Or. Wheel!

Posted by: stephen hawking at April 25, 2010 03:02 PM (ocax6)

434 @434, No, because I say so. I'm Ojibwa. 

Posted by: comatus at April 25, 2010 03:02 PM (/VEEI)

435

nice, rdbrewer.

Which one, Gomm? 

Posted by: gone fishing at April 25, 2010 03:03 PM (7FagD)

436 rdbrewer - full disclosure, what makes you the "go-to conscience" guy for Native American issues ? Either let us know or take the chip off your shoulder. The holier-than-thou PC shit gets old really quick.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 03:03 PM (7ZyYf)

437 Most Native Americans were assimilated, not killed by European viruses, etc..

Posted by: Rewrite! at April 25, 2010 03:03 PM (d7Px0)

438
Posted by: Kazoo

It's Gazoo, dum dum. The Great Gazoo

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 03:03 PM (kSbr6)

439 Just a point of thought...
We are traversing the same area of the galaxy that Earth traversed when the great extinctions occurred.

Posted by: Beto at April 25, 2010 03:03 PM (H+LJc)

440
447 bullshit

Posted by: Beto at April 25, 2010 03:04 PM (H+LJc)

441 The implicit America-bashing in Hawkings' statement is pretty disappointing.

Not at all.  Hawkins is a moonbat of the first order.

And yeah, he's speaking out of school.  We don't know for sure how life started here, so there's no way to estimate how common it might be.

My guess would be if we run across life from some other solar system it won't be DNA-based.  Won't even be something we recognize as life unless we see it moving.


Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:04 PM (LtIsn)

442 Unless you want to go back to the first hominid who ever bested a weaker hominid out of the cave with the best view, NOBODY has an inherent right to ANY land. That's reality, not philosophy. We decide, as nations and as a planet, which borders are which in any given century. decade, year, day The deciding factor is what you've won, what you've managed to hold and what you've managed to make prosper to some degree. All other nations fall, no matter what the lines on the map say. The Native Americans (whatever) were the victim of one thing. Being human beings on Earth. Sorry it had to happen, but there is zero residual guilt for anyone in this country. No more so than for whoever booted "Lucy" out on her ass when pickings got slim.

Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 03:05 PM (y1kI6)

443 1. The civilization would more likely not be biological at all, or at best, a combination of biological and robotic.

Worked for us

Posted by: The Borg at April 25, 2010 03:05 PM (sYxEE)

444

I wonder what shows they like

I hear they're crazy about T.J. Hooker and Charles In Charge.

Posted by: gone fishing at April 25, 2010 03:05 PM (7FagD)

445 It's called the "Anthropic Principle" and it's almost certainly wrong. Life can exist in many different environments than we would have thought.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 06:53 PM (O3eFQ)

Which is (tangentially) what I said in the part you cut out where I said that life could exist elsewhere.

We don't really have one example, we have several, it's just none of the others have been productive so far. As I said several times, it's all wild guesses. Guess I need to say that every time.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 03:05 PM (bxiXv)

446

Well, all this conjecture seems to ignore that maybe the "resource" the star-hopping space bugs would be looking for is ...a protein rich environment.

I dinna think they'd be looking in asteroid belts for that. Cheery damn thought, eh?

In which case, Hawking's point stands.

IOW:

...How to Serve Man (On a Platter).

...with apologies to Rod Sterling. And David Weber (In Death Ground/The Shiva Option).

 

Posted by: davis,br at April 25, 2010 03:06 PM (uCShA)

447

The holier-than-thou PC shit gets old really quick.

What pc shit?

Posted by: gone fishing at April 25, 2010 03:06 PM (7FagD)

448 Farking hell, it's all Gabe all the time.

Posted by: DelD at April 25, 2010 03:06 PM (G79kj)

449 and btw, i hope this thread puts to bed the notion that men think about sex every 5 seconds. just another of the self-aggrandizing assertions women and the therapy culture have proposed without challenge thereby sexualizing and feminizing society... we seem to skirt the issue. let me assure you, when einstein developed his theory of relativity, implying the big bang and black holes, he wasn't actually thinking he wanted a relationship with a black hole for a big bang.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 03:07 PM (EA+Co)

450 419

I do want to get back to a question that seems to undergird this thread though, why is conquering wrong? Obviously both the discussion of the Europeans taking over North America and the discussion of aliens coming to our planet hinges on a concept of the need to explore and possibly subsequently conquer. Is this urge wrong? If it is wrong, why has it not been evolutionarily engineered out of us by now?  Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle

 

No, not wrong. But then, my father's people originate from the Huns, and my mothers from the Mongols. And my husband's from the Vikings. So, it's like scratching an itch for me.

Posted by: Rep. Hank Johnson at April 25, 2010 03:07 PM (GkYyh)

451 Most native Americans were NOT killed by Custer.

Posted by: Rewrite! at April 25, 2010 03:07 PM (d7Px0)

452 454 1. The civilization would more likely not be biological at all, or at best, a combination of biological and robotic.

Worked for us
Posted by: The Borg at April 25, 2010 07:05 PM

You don't think my full lips and pert tits came naturally, do you?

Posted by: Seven of Nine at April 25, 2010 03:07 PM (sYxEE)

453

Obviously Rep. Hank Johnson has been hitting the crack pipe too heavily.

Them's my kin.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 03:08 PM (GkYyh)

454 458 - Find Previous "rdbrewer" - he's the self-appointed spokesperson for all things Native American this afternoon. Make sure to ask his permission before you post on the topic or you may be called Hitler.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 03:08 PM (7ZyYf)

455 The star never collapses to nothing. It just recedes forever. Alan Guth once described it as "the Great Taffy Pull". It's important to remember, though, that terms like "stretching" and "receding" are theoretical approximations, not descriptive terms of what's actually going on. None of this stuff happens in actual physical space. By the time a mass has undergone gravitational collapse, it leaves the physical universe for all intents and purposes. I did read a book some time back (it might have been Gell-Mann's "The Quark and the Jaguar") that talks about "quantum foam" and "chaotic entaglement conditions", but frankly, it just sounded like someone trying to boil a lot of complicated math down into reasonably plain language. The plain fact is that we don't even know, at this moment, what about 80% of our galaxy is even made of. Some kind of non-Baryonic matter...we think. We suppose. We're trying to extrapolate a comprehensive physical model of the universe based on observing the 20% of "stuff" that we can actually measure (via imaging, spectroscopy of stars, analyses of radiation, etc.). Without some physics theory that understands, you know, what the bulk of the universe is made of, we're just pissing into the wind in many ways.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 03:09 PM (O3eFQ)

456

You know the Borg really ruined the term ‘assimilated’ for me.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:09 PM (RZ8pf)

457 You don't think my full lips and pert tits came naturally, do you?

Posted by: Seven of Nine at April 25, 2010 07:07 PM (sYxEE)

Never really thought about it.  All the blood was somewhere else.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:09 PM (LtIsn)

458 How come nobody bitches and moans to the fucking Chinese about them wiping out 1/3 of Europe with their pneumonic and bubonic plague? Does anyone cast a baleful glance on modern day Chinese because European population and culture was nearly destroyed?

Europeans wipe out a few million souls here with germs and viruses, the Chinese send viruses and germs to Europe and wipe out a few million souls. Circle of life, bitches.


But somehow Dances with Pandas never gets made.


Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:09 PM (fOtKS)

459 So, will this thread reach 2001 comments?

Posted by: andycanuck at April 25, 2010 03:09 PM (ocax6)

460 453 Unless you want to go back to the first hominid

who is this first hominid of whom you speak?

Posted by: andi sullivan at April 25, 2010 03:09 PM (sYxEE)

461

You know the Borg really ruined the term ‘assimilated’ for me.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 07:09 PM (RZ8pf)

Yeah.  It's all those extra harmonics.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:10 PM (LtIsn)

462

and btw, i hope this thread puts to bed the notion that men think about sex every 5 seconds

 

I didnÂ’t know that was a bad thing?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:10 PM (RZ8pf)

463 I am much more efficient at copulation and other "fun games" of human sexual interaction.

Posted by: sixty of nine at April 25, 2010 03:11 PM (ocax6)

464

40 Would locusts skip your garden just because there are other gardens? 

They would if my garden is at the bottom of a pretty inconvenient gravity well and there are other easily-accessible gardens out there.

 

If the "others" have achieved FTL travel (or anythning even close to it) they wouldn't be too worried about any gravity wells.

 

Great subject... back to the comments

Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at April 25, 2010 03:11 PM (C29Wk)

465

How come nobody bitches and moans to the fucking Chinese about them wiping out 1/3 of Europe with their pneumonic and bubonic plague?

Because there isn't any money in it.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 03:11 PM (P33XN)

466 Where is Janeway, puny humans? She still has some of my favorite personal attachments.

Posted by: The Borg Queen at April 25, 2010 03:12 PM (ocax6)

467 if the laws of physics are the same throughout the universe, does it not follow that life, where it finds conditions favorable, will evolve the same way throughout the universe?

Posted by: Jones at April 25, 2010 03:12 PM (JL3qV)

468

93 True or false: things didn't turn out very well for the "Native Americans" after Columbus showed up.

OK.  But why pick that example?  Things didn't turn out very well for subsaharan animists after the Muslims showed up, either.  Aboriginal Australians and the British, Ethiopians and the Italians, dodos and the Dutch...

*********************************

The score thus far:

More advanced civilizations:  Infinity

Stone Age civilizations:  Dick

Posted by: effinayright at April 25, 2010 03:12 PM (3sB5l)

469  I wanna give a shout out to the indians:  we won.

Posted by: The Colonists at April 25, 2010 07:01 PM

I wanna give a shout out to the colonists.  Thanks for all the money.

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 03:12 PM (A8C+8)

470 To beat a dead horse, there's no doubt the Europeans were more racist to black Africans than to native American tribes. When europeans first encountered black Africans their response was, "What is this half-man creature and does it have a soul?" Pretty much as racist as you can get to debate whether a group of people are actually, you know, people. But when they met the native tribes, the response was, of course they have souls and we have to save them and convert them to Christianity, by force if necessary.

So why didn't the racist euros "genocide" and repopulate Africa like they supposedly did with the Americas? Because of disease. Blacks weren't especially susceptible to the white diseases like the natives were. It was the reverse actually since whites had no immunity to malaria.  Which is why Europe didn't colonize Africa until hundreds of years after colonizing the New World with the help of quinine. And even then the euros didn't make much of a dent except in southern Africa.

The great population centers of Eurasia and Africa have been sharing diseases since, literally, the dawn of man. The Americas were different and were cut off -- which is why the Americas were the only place where you had such a massive die-off.

The devastation of the native tribes was an accident of history and disease. Europeans might have wanted it to happen, but they had no control over what happened. If the europeans take credit or blame for what happened it is not any more meaningful than a tribal shaman taking credit for the rain. It was a force of nature that nobody involved understood or could control even if they had understood.

Posted by: nogenocide at April 25, 2010 03:12 PM (+ABdJ)

471

I just don't think you should be able to write "Hawkings hawks" without playing something by Hawkshaw Hawkins.  http://tinyurl.com/22pssgr

It surely was a different time...

Posted by: Rewrite! at April 25, 2010 03:12 PM (d7Px0)

472 470 So, will this thread reach 2001 comments?
Posted by: andycanuck at April 25, 2010 07:09 PM

That would be highly irregular, andy

Posted by: HAL 9000 at April 25, 2010 03:13 PM (sYxEE)

473 If the "others" have achieved FTL travel (or anythning even close to it) they wouldn't be too worried about any gravity wells.

Sure, but that goes back to the same question I asked my Sunday school teacher - "If God is so powerful why does he need us?"

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:13 PM (LtIsn)

474 So, will this thread reach 2001 comments?

Posted by: andycanuck at April 25, 2010 07:09 PM (ocax6)

It might, if left alone, but someone is probably going to throw smallpox laced comments on it and cut it down at 615.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 03:13 PM (N49h9)

475
But somehow Dances with Pandas never gets made.

Same with The Devil Wears Pandas.

Posted by: Atomic Roach at April 25, 2010 03:14 PM (Oxen1)

476

Even if a much more advanced civilization existed on another planet, and interstellar travel were possible (and I doubt it is), how would they even know we were here unless they were from a relatively close planet?

Commercial radio transmissions didn't happen until 1920, and radio waves travel at light speed.  Even assuming another civilization was trying to monitor for extremely weak radio signals from Earth, the signal would've only travelled 90 light-years by now.  Anyone further than that wouldn't have recieved them yet.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 03:14 PM (plsiE)

477

So, will this thread reach 2001 comments?

WAKE UP, ACE!

Posted by: Rewrite! at April 25, 2010 03:14 PM (d7Px0)

478 It would be kind of like traveling hundreds and thousands of years just to visit Lubbock TX

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 06:21 PM (sYxEE)

Funny you mention that. I drove to Lubbock just last month with the family and it actually seemed  like thousands of years.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 03:14 PM (PON03)

479 471 Heh.

Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 03:14 PM (y1kI6)

480 True or false: things didn't turn out very well for the "Native Americans" after Columbus showed up.

Depends on what you mean by "Native Americans".  The tribes who mastered horses early on became immensely more powerful as a result, and that dominance lasted almost 300 years.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:14 PM (LtIsn)

481

Yes but Kung Fu Panda got made.

 

Not sure where that falls on the argument spectrum hereÂ…

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:15 PM (RZ8pf)

482
462 again with the bullshit.
BTW Custer was a preening ass and Sitting Bull smoked his ass

Posted by: Beto at April 25, 2010 03:15 PM (H+LJc)

483 484 - He's bored or lonely?

Posted by: davis,br at April 25, 2010 03:15 PM (uCShA)

484 ABBA's "Take a Chance on Me" is on the radio now, leaking into space. It's been traveling at the speed of light since 1977.

When they get here and find that Agnetha is no longer a hot Scandi blonde, they'll turn the ship right around

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 03:17 PM (sYxEE)

485 @463 A big F you to you for giving us Barry Soetoro as teh Precedent. Assimilate this.

Posted by: DSkinner at April 25, 2010 03:17 PM (3+sz6)

486 I'm very careful about asking the big questions until I can ask personally.

Me: Why are we here?
God: No fun having an ant farm with no ants, now is it?
Me: Awwww. That sucks.

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:17 PM (fOtKS)

487

Make sure to ask his permission before you post on the topic or you may be called Hitler.

Looks like we got us a genuine self-deceiving reality revisor.  Whatever floats your boat, turd.

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 03:17 PM (A8C+8)

488
Do you know what a two-fingered Mexican oil job is?

Do you know what a double-knobbed rubber-bottomed sex basket is?

Posted by: Take me to your leader at April 25, 2010 03:17 PM (kSbr6)

489 476: Because unlike the evil United States, the Chinese won't go into a guilt-panic over it and send their accusers truckloads of food and cash.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 03:17 PM (7ZyYf)

490
494 What came first... the Chicken or the Egg?
The Rooster, no doubt about it.

Posted by: Beto at April 25, 2010 03:18 PM (H+LJc)

491 This twisted up pretzel of a human more than likely believes and supports AGW as well. I have a new low spot in my shorts for 'scientists'/ these days.

Posted by: Barbarian at April 25, 2010 03:19 PM (EL+OC)

492 Cats: Extraterrestrials?

Mine is controlling my brainwaves so I must get up and feed her kitty treats

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 03:19 PM (sYxEE)

493 487  Yeah, wait until they find out Milli Vanilli were fakers and Michael Jackson is dead ... but well preserved, I must say.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 03:19 PM (GkYyh)

494

Alan Guth once described it as "the Great Taffy Pull".

I read one of his book, but I don't recall that.  I'd like to see what he had to say...whether he dismissed the idea of a singularity too.  Because I thought I came up with that.

I can tell you why this happens too.  Care to guess?

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 03:19 PM (A8C+8)

495 Most reputable historians do not support that theory. The current way of thinking is that the Indian population never was that high and that any die-off that occurred happened long before the Europeans arrived.

Posted by: Vic at April 25, 2010 05:46 PM (QrA9E)

1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus presents the case many archaeologists and anthropologists have made that the pre-Colombian Indian societies in many places -- the Atlantic Coast, the Amazon Basin, the North American prairie -- (a) were far more populous than is commonly thought, (b) engaged in large-scale programs of changing the landscape to adapt it to human needs;  and (c) suffered massive die-offs in the few years immediately after first contact with European explorers.

The first Spaniards who survived a trip down the Amazon described riverbanks swarming with Indian settlements, but only a few years later, Spanish explorers found relatively few Indians.  Only recently have archaeologists uncovered the remains of relatively vast settlements in which the Amazon Indians built mounds to keep their villages above the seasonal floods, built causeways and roads between the villages, and created large-scale agriculture of such species as the peach palm by burying broken pottery with human manure to create fertile soil for the tree roots where there had been none.  It took very little time after the initial die-off from disease for the jungle vegetation to reclaim the mounds.

In what is now New England and the mid-Atlantic coast, the earliest explorers found the area very populous and the forest of hardwood nut trees well-cleared, with wide spaces between the trees.  Only a short time later, the coastal populations were very sparse and the forests -- due to a lack of Indian-set fires to keep the brush clear -- were thickly overgrown.

By and large, there wasn't any need for the Europeans to conduct military campaigns of genocide.  The Indians' simple lack of immunity to a few highly contagious diseases was enough to reduce their populations to the point that their societies could not continue to function as before.

As for the "noble savage," that was a different type of culturally-ignorant stereotype that certain Europeans wanted to push onto the Indians.  Some Indian societies had no qualms about completely transforming the landscape with construction projects as "ecologically unfriendly" as anything Europeans ever dreamed up.  Other Indian societies engaged in warfare and cannibalism -- evidence from the Southwest found in the firepits of some Anasazi homes some fossilized human feces containing human proteins along with human bones with butchering marks: an invading Indian tribe slaughtered the Anasazi villagers, ate them and crapped in their firepits.  No wonder the Anasazi moved to those remote and inaccessible dwellings on the sides of cliffs.

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 03:19 PM (W+GYq)

496
Aliens have been monitoring our electronic transmissions for generations.


I wonder what shows they like

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 06:59 PM (sYxEE)






I hear Barney Miller is a big hit with the Centaurians.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 03:21 PM (t72+4)

497 ...and when i used the words "bed", "skirting" and propose", i wasn't thinking about sex. whaddya think i am, a boob?

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 03:21 PM (73jUp)

498
502 They've ceased science and taken up religion, becoming promoters and apologists for their new faith.

Posted by: Beto at April 25, 2010 03:21 PM (H+LJc)

499 501
494 What came first... the Chicken or the Egg?
The Rooster, no doubt about it.
Posted by: Beto at April 25, 2010 07:18 PM

So who was having sex with the hen?

Posted by: Frank Costanza at April 25, 2010 03:21 PM (sYxEE)

500

Maybe when the Chinese finally ask for all the trillions we're "borrowed" from them and then stupidly pissed away on Obama's shit-for-brains Ebonomics, we'll just tell them that the Aliens came down  and stole it.

It may work...

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 03:21 PM (PON03)

501 Do you believe there is sentient life elsewhere in the Universe? Almost everyone will answer yes because the Universe is so so vast it would seem likely that there are other planets out there with intelligent life. In fact, some say 'it is arrogant' to believe we Earthlings are the intelligent life in the Universe.

But there's no way of proving that -- it's just a belief. So why is it so hard for them to accept that people believe in God?

-----------------------------

Because you can see sentient life everywhere on this planet around this sun, making it mathematically likely that one of the other billion-billion suns has sentient life circling it.

Sentient biological life exists.

Have you seen an all-powerful cosmic intelligent entity lately?

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 03:22 PM (Xd9fe)

502 120 Plus, this idea that the Native Americans were just a bunch of peace loving earth hugging simple people before we slaughtered them and raped their land is bullshit. ------------ Yeah, what PGiS said. And if the Na'avi were so bloody peacful, why would they even have a *word* for "warrior" so that scowly smurf could complain about how they hadn't seen our warriors yet?

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 03:22 PM (LD+ZJ)

503 Sure, but that goes back to the same question I asked my Sunday school teacher - "If God is so powerful why does he need us?"

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 07:13 PM (LtIsn)

We regard ourselves as pretty powerful, yet we still get mildew in our shower tile grout.  Why should God not be similarly afflicted?  The better question is, why does God not spray us with Scrubbing Bubbles?

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 03:22 PM (W+GYq)

504 you all are a bunch of dumb mo'fos I AM living proof of alien life. Now shut the fuck up and call my limo to drive me to my adopted home state, Arizona. js Barry-kiss hug

Posted by: Al "Pigeon Droppings" Sharpton at April 25, 2010 03:23 PM (w0Tf5)

505 I hear Barney Miller is a big hit with the Centaurians.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 07:21 PM (t72+4)

Abe Vigoda is like a god to them. And he's more than 1200 years old.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 03:23 PM (PON03)

506 Nice post, nogenocide.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 03:23 PM (A8C+8)

507 So who was having sex with the hen?

Posted by: Frank Costanza at April 25, 2010 07:21 PM (sYxEE)

Yeah, that chicken ain't gonna fuck itself.

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 03:23 PM (W+GYq)

508 I read one of his book, but I don't recall that. He said it in a lecture I went to way back when I was a young 'un. This was before the Inflationary Universe book came out, but he'd been lecturing on it for a long time before that. Guth was a pretty dab hand at doing chalkboard illustrations; even a dummy like me could follow what he was talking about (more or less).

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 03:23 PM (O3eFQ)

509

I hear Barney Miller is a big hit with the Centaurians.

When the invasion comes, it'll likely be the result of replacing Wayne Rogers with Mike Farrell on MASH.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 03:24 PM (P33XN)

510 How come nobody bitches and moans to the fucking Chinese about them wiping out 1/3 of Europe with their pneumonic and bubonic plague?

It wasn't the Chinese, it was the Mongols.  The Chinese were the only great civilization that decided not to expand and closed themselves off with the world's biggest, most useless wall (though it was very useful for communications and transport).  The Chinese, once the empire was formed, have valued stability over growth - almost the opposite of Western civilization and different from most others.  I believe this is why they never fully utilized the great inventions they had long before the Euros and which should have led them to world domination many times over.  This is one of the reasons I think the threat from China today is mitigated to a great extent.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 03:24 PM (N49h9)

511
506 The native inhabitants were in decline for over eight thousand years before whitey arrived

Posted by: Beto at April 25, 2010 03:24 PM (H+LJc)

512 505

Alan Guth once described it as "the Great Taffy Pull".


That's what they call the wrap party of "Grey's Anatomy"

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 03:25 PM (sYxEE)

513 498: Nice reasoned retort. Why bother reading what was said before, just go with the knee-jerk racial bullshit. Once again, this is why no one can actually study or discuss whole subjects in history anymore. Too many modern "victims" want to bring their own baggage to the argument and don't even listen to what gets said. All white men are bad, All Native Americans are good. And that's not racist, BTW. I get the message now.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 03:25 PM (7ZyYf)

514 I admit it, I hit it.

Posted by: sifty with the hen after some bourbon at April 25, 2010 03:25 PM (fOtKS)

515

Aliens have been monitoring our electronic transmissions for generations.


I wonder what shows they like

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 06:59 PM (sYxEE)




I wonder how many supreme alien races out there heard Orson Welles War Of The Worlds broadcast once it reached their systems and were like: "O.k, wtf?  I know we're badasses, but who the fuck is doing that shit and should we be worried too ?"

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 03:26 PM (t72+4)

516 516 I hear Barney Miller is a big hit with the Centaurians.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 07:21 PM (t72+4)

Abe Vigoda is like a god to them. And he's more than 1200 years old.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 07:23 PM (PON03)

Correction: that's in earth years. In Centaurian years, he just qualified for his learner's permit.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 03:26 PM (PON03)

517 507
Aliens have been monitoring our electronic transmissions for generations.


I wonder what shows they like

being intelligent life, they would of course be gay.

they probably have the bravo network, and all the will and grace seasons

Posted by: andi sullivan at April 25, 2010 03:27 PM (sYxEE)

518 Again, nothing against the indians, or natives, or aboriginals, or whatever you want to call them. But shit, 35K years and they were still living in tee-pees.

--------------------------------

How many years did Europeans live in huts?

---------------------------------

did they even have the slightest interest in plumbing?

---------------------------------

How many flush toilets did Washington have at Mount Vernon?

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 03:27 PM (Xd9fe)

519 And here I thought "hawking" was a verb.

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at April 25, 2010 03:28 PM (wOtDN)

520 If we were in a black hole.... would we be aware of it? .... I mean, besides the Obama administration..

Posted by: Yippie21 at April 25, 2010 03:28 PM (QFWu6)

521


When the invasion comes, it'll likely be the result of replacing Wayne Rogers with Mike Farrell on MASH.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 07:24 PM (P33XN)






Good point. Myself, I fear what will happen when they start receiving The Love Boat or Super Train.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 03:28 PM (t72+4)

522
What's most disappointing is that Gabe's been reading AoS for a couple of years now and it's obvious he hasn't learned a damn thing from his betters.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 03:28 PM (kSbr6)

523 Chinese, Mongols, whatever.

Walter, these aren't the guys who built the railroads! They fucking peed on my rug!

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:29 PM (fOtKS)

524

All white men are bad, All Native Americans are good. And that's not racist, BTW. I get the message now.

Who the fuck ever said that, idiot?  I never did. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 03:29 PM (A8C+8)

525

and btw, i hope this thread puts to bed the notion that men think about sex every 5 seconds. just another of the self-aggrandizing assertions women and the therapy culture have proposed without challenge thereby sexualizing and feminizing society... we seem to skirt the issue.

let me assure you, when einstein developed his theory of relativity, implying the big bang and black holes, he wasn't actually thinking he wanted a relationship with a black hole for a big bang.

That's what you think.  They didn't have rock stars in my day; it was the Nobel Prize winners that got all the poontang.  If it weren't for all the ass thrown my way every time I published, I probably wouldn't have bothered. 

I mean, have you seen my hair?  Without being able to credibly use the "I know the secrets of the universe, baby, and Uranus is coming home with me tonight" pickup line, I'd never have gotten laid.

Posted by: Albert Einstein at April 25, 2010 03:29 PM (plsiE)

526

I hear Barney Miller is a big hit with the Centaurians.

When the invasion comes, it'll likely be the result of replacing Wayne Rogers with Mike Farrell on MASH.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 07:24 PM

I think ID4 was based on their reception of "Suddenly Susan" episodes

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 03:29 PM (sYxEE)

527 It's Gazoo, dum dum. The Great Gazoo

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 07:03 PM (kSbr6)

I'm his brother.  Now who's the dum-dum, stupid?

Posted by: Kazoo at April 25, 2010 03:30 PM (1fanL)

528 531 If we were in a black hole.... would we be aware of it? .... I mean, besides the Obama administration.. Posted by: Yippie21 at April 25, 2010 07:28 PM (QFWu6) You leave Michelle out of this or allah'll ban you from hootair for the evers.

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at April 25, 2010 03:30 PM (wOtDN)

529 the aliens can suck my brains out, but they'll have to take my sperm from my cold dead hands by pumping my stomach

Posted by: andi sullivan at April 25, 2010 06:04 PM (sYxEE)

FIFY.

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 03:30 PM (W+GYq)

530 If the universe (actually life) evolved, then nobody knows if life "evolved," in any manner to produce intelligent beings.  And even if you do evolve into intelligent beings chances are pretty good you blow yourselves up around the time of species adolescence and the discovery of the ability to split atoms. 

Or the universe was created by God for His purpose(s) and then I would bet any planet conditioned for intelligent life...has intelligent life, and they are probably not hippie morons, nor monsters, nor protoplasmic goo like our sci fi writers, or James Cameron supposes.  If they did not fall into sin, then they are highly advanced, in communion with God and we are probably the greatest show in the universe with all watching to see if God can pull our chestnuts out of the fire. 

Look how hard it is for God just to get us to stop believing fairy tales like Global Warming, or any of our damnable "isms."  Once a physical race falls into sin, that is a real fall, and the intellect is darkened maybe past recovery, just talk to any liberal of your belief that America was carefully nurtured by God, by His revelation of Christian and Jewish morality toward us and by the careful direction of History...good luck with that. 

In the meantime watch the History Channel's depiction of the creation of America starting tonight if you can.  Maybe Obama can watch and get a glimmer of what an absolute miracle this country really is, but he will be too busy re-making it into his Unicorn farm.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 03:30 PM (eKOT/)

531 But will it take faster-than-light travel for me to read from #75 to whatever the new end of this thread will be some 45 minutes from now? Let Hawkings answer that!

Posted by: The Borg Queen at April 25, 2010 03:31 PM (ocax6)

532 Good point. Myself, I fear what will happen when they start receiving The Love Boat or Super Train.

I still get a stiffy when I think of a young Lauren Tewes.  Maybe they do too.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:31 PM (LtIsn)

533 Good point. Myself, I fear what will happen when they start receiving The Love Boat or Super Train.
Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 07:28 PM

and Brsnznltlgzznitt as Your Captain

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 03:31 PM (sYxEE)

534 This thread doesn't prove men don't think about sex every 5 seconds. Half of this thread is about various ways we fucked the Indians.

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:32 PM (fOtKS)

535
There are no aliens. We are alone, at least in this galaxy.

Consider two arguments -- first, Carl Sagan's argument for why the galaxy is teeming with intelligent life, and Enrico Fermi's rebuttal of that.

Carl Sagan reasoned, if there are 100 billion stars in the galaxy; if only 1 in 10 has planets; if only 1 in 10 of those have planets in the right zone; if only 1 in 10 of all the stars are long-burning main-sequence stars capable of supporting evolution; if only 1 in 10 of the possible planets in the right orbit can support life; if only 1 in 10 of those actually spawn forth life; if only 1 in 10 of those support intelligent life, then the Milky Way galaxy alone should be home to around 100,000 planets with intelligent life.

It is unreasonable to suppose that we are the oldest of all intelligent species; many are bound to be much older.

Since the Milky Way is only several thousands of light-years wide, even if space colonization vehicles travel only at sub-light velocities, it should take only a million years or so for a given intelligent species to explore and inhabit all the habitable planets in the galaxy.

An intelligent race is necessarily an inquisitive one, and if it becomes advanced enough to develop such technology, it is certain to use it.
..So given all of this -- WHERE ARE THEY???



Posted by: sickinmass at April 25, 2010 03:33 PM (tamie)

536
How many years did Europeans live in huts?

heh, at least the Europeans and just about every other culture showed a progressive timeline in their development. Indians, not so much. They were still filing flint to use as axes.

What were the indians doing while the Egyptians made the Joos build the pyramids? They were living in tee-pees and hunting with spears with arrowheads.

What were the indians doing when Columbus sailed into St Augistine? They were living in tee-pees and hunting with spears with arrowheads.


Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 03:33 PM (kSbr6)

537  I wanna give a shout out to the indians:  we won.

Posted by: The Colonists at April 25, 2010 07:01 PM

I wanna give a shout out to the colonists.  Thanks for all the money.

Posted by: Indian Casino Boss at April 25, 2010 07:12 PM (A8C+


Nah, there is no money, its just paper and we make it up out of thin air.

Posted by: The Colonists at April 25, 2010 03:33 PM (7VvJB)

538 I can't wait for them to get Dance Fever.

Posted by: Deney Terrio at April 25, 2010 03:34 PM (e9JZd)

539

All white men are bad, All Native Americans are good. And that's not racist, BTW. I get the message now.

I just realized...  you re-wrote reality yet again.  Since you're a devout subjectivist, this will be my last response.  I've argued with perception morons so many times, I can script everything you will say from this point on.  Now it's just a game of defining terms and redefining for you.   Nailing you on a point is like trying to nail Jell-O to a wall. 

Go away now and believe whatever you need to believe.  And by all means, don't read my post at #380.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 03:34 PM (A8C+8)

540
I'm his brother.

Now you're just making shit up.

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 03:34 PM (kSbr6)

541

Look, you foolish breeders, we Raëlians have been all over this shit since the mid-1970s. Join our church, huh? All the sex and cloning your hearts desire. Just send us some church dues and it's all cool. You gals with big boobs can even become one of Rael's Girls or the Order of Angels. I'll bed down with ya at least once. You say you'd rather have Brigitte Boisselier, that's cool too. Maybe even a three-way? Anything goes with us Raëlians. We're all over the world. Just google us. We'll be waiting.

Posted by: Claude Vorilhon at April 25, 2010 03:35 PM (GkYyh)

542 > Half of this thread is about various ways we fucked the Indians.

you mean like- the positions we used?

Posted by: Jones at April 25, 2010 03:35 PM (JL3qV)

543

Well, frankly if it werenÂ’t for the drive in humans to explore and conquer weÂ’d still be sitting around fires wearing animal skins and picking bugs out of each otherÂ’s hair. So, I for one am glad that humans like to conquer.

 

I suppose I should have guilt about that. But, IÂ’m Greek and I got conquered a long time ago.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:35 PM (RZ8pf)

544 Half of this thread is about various ways we fucked the Indians.
Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 07:32 PM (fOtKS)

 

I personally prefer the barking squaw position.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 03:35 PM (PON03)

545 I still get a stiffy when I think of a young Lauren Tewes.  Maybe they do too.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 07:31 PM (LtIsn)

She was the cute girl-next-door who was found to be a coke fiend, right?  Like the Sandra Buttock of the 70's.

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" ... indeed.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 03:35 PM (N49h9)

546 How many years did Europeans live in huts? Depends on what you mean by "hut", obviously. Stone houses have been present in Europe and England since before recorded history. Even wooden "huts" could be quite impressive - look at the great halls of the Vikings and other far-north tribes. And of course the Greek and later the Roman presence also brought along with it their passion for civil engineering: acqueducts, temples, stone houses, etc. The older Teutonic/barbarian tribes of Europe even built stone houses when they lived in stable settlements. You'd probably have to go back, oh, five or six thousand years (prior to the advent of agriculture, anyway) before you saw Europeans living the same way as American Indians lived as late as the 1890's. This says nothing about choice, mind you. Even modern Bedouins are aware of modern technology; they just prefer to live in the traditional way. I'm not sure that applies where aboriginal American tribes are concerned -- the eastern tribes were different from the southern tribes were different from the midwestern tribes were different than the plains tribes were different than the southwestern tribes were different from the Pacific-coast tribes -- but generally, the cultural development among amerinds was far behind that of Europe (and even of the more advanced tribes further south in Central and South America).

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 03:36 PM (O3eFQ)

547 one final thought: this blather about finding life outside of earth to prove we aren't alone and that such a discovery would fundamentally change humanity and how we see ourselves is but another piece of unchallenged nonsense. it's mostly asserted by scientists seeking grant money and secular liberal politicians seeking votes from secular neurotics nincompoops.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 03:36 PM (73jUp)

548
How many flush toilets did Washington have at Mount Vernon?

I don't know. None? Did they have an outhouse for a while before they installed indoor toilets?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 03:36 PM (kSbr6)

549 ..So given all of this -- WHERE ARE THEY???

There may indeed be no practical way to exceed the speed of light, or it might require so much energy as to be not worth the trouble.  They may just be too far away.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:36 PM (LtIsn)

550
the indians were still wiping their asses with leaves when Washington was living in Mt Vernon, no?

Posted by: Gleek, the space monkey from the Super Friends at April 25, 2010 03:37 PM (kSbr6)

551
I still get a stiffy when I think of a young Lauren Tewes.  Maybe they do too.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 07:31 PM (LtIsn)





Me too. Damn, was she hot. However, I'm afraid it may not make up for the opening theme song,.

They'll probably consider that an act of war alone.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 03:37 PM (t72+4)

552 We go back in time, and where does Spock land us? San-fran-fuckin'-cisco. Shit, I already live there, I didn't go through risking blowing to bits in a Klingon bucket just to go around the block.

I wanted to go to Vegas and clean out the joints, but Spock with his "Vulcans never bluff" ruled out the poker tables. I wanted to go to the sports betting parlors, but that bleeding heart McCoy lectures me about changing the future. So, we go to San Francisco and not only had to rescue Chekov, but we had to find a crowbar to pry Sulu out of a bathhouse

Posted by: James T Kirk at April 25, 2010 03:38 PM (sYxEE)

553 535 - you didn't - 498 did. That's why the post says "498" right at the beginning. Note the conspicuous lack of calling you an idiot which would appropriately come here, but I'm not here to name-call you. I just wanted to know what entitles you to call everyone out for supposedly being "A-OK" with genocide - which we weren't. It's a pointless discussion because Indian Casino Boss and yourself are more interested in what other commenters "mean" by what they say than your are in what they actually said.

Posted by: societyis2blame at April 25, 2010 03:38 PM (7ZyYf)

554

Wait until the aliens pick up Pink Lady & Jeff or The Ropers.

We're so fucked.

Although I always enjoyed Norman Fell breaking the fourth wall with his cheesy grin.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 03:38 PM (P33XN)

555

I suppose I should have guilt about that. But, IÂ’m Greek and I got conquered a long time ago.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle

Bunk!

Posted by: The Colonists at April 25, 2010 03:38 PM (7VvJB)

556

Wait until the aliens pick up Pink Lady & Jeff or The Ropers.

We're so fucked.

Although I always enjoyed Norman Fell breaking the fourth wall with his cheesy grin.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 07:38 PM (P33XN)





I just hope they get Starship Troopers instead. Receiving that would probably make a young alien kid piss his bed or hide in the closet.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 03:41 PM (t72+4)

557

Let's quit arguing about the Indians and discover our common ground:

We all love firewater.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 03:42 PM (P33XN)

558 I just hope they get Starship Troopers instead. Receiving that would probably make a young alien kid piss his bed or hide in the closet.

I hope they get Ultraman instead.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:42 PM (LtIsn)

559 You sure you want to go to Little Bighorn, general? Scouts say you can't walk through there without hearing an Indian accent

Posted by: Lt Joseph Biden, 7th Cavalry at April 25, 2010 03:43 PM (sYxEE)

560

How many years did Europeans live in huts?

PuhLEEZE! After our bombers pounded the Euro-huts to shit the Euros (under the Marshall Plan) rebuilt the same damn huts. Just look at the before and after photos.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 03:43 PM (GkYyh)

561

Actually at the Palace of Knossos, on Crete (1700 to 1400 BC), there is evidence of plumbing, not what you would call flush toilets by any means, but they had developed advanced mechanisms for getting rid of their human waste. Also advanced ways for bringing fresh water to the palace.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:43 PM (RZ8pf)

562


Let's quit arguing about the Indians and discover our common ground:

We all love firewater.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 07:42 PM (P33XN)







Some more than others.


I keed, I keed.


I'm Irish. No way I'd let some Redskin outdrink me.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 03:44 PM (t72+4)

563

Actually at the Palace of Knossos, on Crete (1700 to 1400 BC), there is evidence of plumbing, not what you would call flush toilets by any means, but they had developed advanced mechanisms for getting rid of their human waste. Also advanced ways for bringing fresh water to the palace.


Yeah, but didn't everybody kind of forget how to do all that in the middle ages?

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:44 PM (LtIsn)

564 There are plans to restart George Washington's distillery at Mt Vernon

I don't know if this has any bearing on the topic at hand

Posted by: Jones at April 25, 2010 03:45 PM (JL3qV)

565 The Romans had indoor plumbing.  IMO the best measure of when the earth went into the dark ages is when they forgot about indoor plumbing.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 03:45 PM (eKOT/)

566 I hope they all show up walking and talking like John Wayne.

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:45 PM (fOtKS)

567

@ Blazer

I hear ya!

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 03:45 PM (GkYyh)

568

I just hope they get Starship Troopers instead. Receiving that would probably make a young alien kid piss his bed or hide in the closet.

Huh?  Was it scary?  I never bothered watching past the shower scene.

Posted by: Alien kid at April 25, 2010 03:46 PM (plsiE)

569 572

Actually at the Palace of Knossos, on Crete (1700 to 1400 BC), there is evidence of plumbing, not what you would call flush toilets by any means, but they had developed advanced mechanisms for getting rid of their human waste. Also advanced ways for bringing fresh water to the palace.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 07:43 PM (RZ8pf)

When did they invent luncheonettes?

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 03:46 PM (PON03)

570 Half Irish and Half Indian, which means I have a terrible allergy to booze.

I drink too much and I break out in handcuffs.

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:46 PM (fOtKS)

571 I hope they all show up walking and talking like John Wayne.

Better that than Lil Wayne.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:46 PM (LtIsn)

572 mr. einstein (post 536): i stand corrected. sir.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 03:47 PM (7JES6)

573 190 Because everyone knew that Von Neumann and gang just couldn't be of this world. -------- I didn't until Linda Molton Howe pointed out that the PDP-1 was clearly reverse-engineered from spaceships stashed at Area 51.

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 03:47 PM (LD+ZJ)

574 Actually at the Palace of Knossos, on Crete (1700 to 1400 BC), there is evidence of plumbing, not what you would call flush toilets by any means, but they had developed advanced mechanisms for getting rid of their human waste. Also advanced ways for bringing fresh water to the palace. Yes, but as Epimenides warned us: all Cretans are liars. They probably stole the tech from the Thracians and claimed it as their own, the bastards. Now those Thracians, they knew how to flush a turd!

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 03:47 PM (O3eFQ)

575

I hope they get Ultraman instead.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 07:42 PM (LtIsn)





You mean Inframan? The Chinese super-hero that squishes aliens beneath his feet like bugs?

Man, that takes me back. I havent thought of that in years since I saw it as a kid at a drive-in movie in the '70's.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 03:47 PM (t72+4)

576 I donÂ’t know TexasJew but the Romans invented vomitoriums.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:48 PM (RZ8pf)

577 "Little Bighorn" sounds so chickenhawky-gay.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 03:48 PM (PON03)

578 First admitting that I am speaking purely from conjecture and do not claim to any deeply penetrating insight: 1) While we only have a sample size of 1 as far as planets containing life, there is more and more evidence that the materials necessary for life [water comes to mind, which we have found on the Moon, Mars and on at least one of the Jovan moons, plus complex hydrocarbons on another] are apparently common; both in interstellar space and in our own solar system. If we find signs of any kind of life on Mars or on one of the Jovian moons, the odds change drastically. 2) There are 'teh Billions and Billions' of stars out there, and we now know of hundreds of extrasolar planets. Most are not habitable, but we are now able to detect smaller planets that may be habitable. Wait a couple of years unless Obama kills all science. 3) IF life arises relatively easily [see #1] then we well may not be alone depending on the percentage of planets that develop intelligence, and the rest of the Drake Equations. 4) I don't automatically bet AGAINST the possibilities of new technologies. The odds may be long, but I will not rule out that any critters out there may come up with some form of FTL drive. Betting against technological advances has always been a loser in our history. Further, our species has an innate urge to explore, to see what is over the horizon. I would not bet the farm that all other species don't have the same urge. 5) IF there is an expansionist spacefaring civilization, it just MAY be relatively close, and so company may be coming. An avalanche may be only a couple of hundred yards wide on a whole mountainside. But it truly bites if you are in that narrow path. 6) If it is "Independence Day" or "To Serve Man" we are truly scrod if they find us. It would behoove us to keep our heads down, listen a lot, and talk very little until we have scouted out a reasonable area around us and maybe established our species on another planet or two. 7) It could be just the Orion Arm equivalent of Jehovah's Witnesses beating on our door, again and again and with us having no equivalent of a large dog or shotgun to convince them to go away. Even if they only want to leave copies of the "Grbzzlkkkk Watchtower", their presence will have the same effect culturally as the arrival of Europeans had on Native Americans, Canadian First Nations, or Australian aborigines. Every culture in isolation thinks of itself as hot shit. When you find out that the new neighbors' pre-schooler can both kick your ass without thinking about it, AND think of things you never conceived ... things go pear-shaped right smartly. Plus, as with Native Americans, what may be the equivalent of the sniffles for them may be Galactic Genital Leprosy to us. Naw! I think lurking is a good thing until we know the neighborhood. We may well be alone. Likely are in the immediate area. But the consequences if we are not can both non-trivial, and irremedial. Listen, do SETI, etc. all we can. But try not to party so hard that any other locals decide to investigate and shut the party down. Subotai Bahadur

Posted by: Subotai Bahadur at April 25, 2010 03:48 PM (/gkzj)

579 ..So given all of this -- WHERE ARE THEY???

Whatever is revealed in the future, it will be pointed out that the signs were always there to be read...alien cultures or no alien cultures, Earth as a backwater or Earth as a quarantine zone.  Whatever.

Posted by: trainer at April 25, 2010 03:49 PM (yCWYQ)

580 I don't know. None? Did they have an outhouse for a while before they installed indoor toilets?

-------------

Outhouses aren't plumbing. Do you think Indians crapped in a corner of their tee-pees?

--------------

heh, at least the Europeans and just about every other culture showed a progressive timeline in their development. Indians, not so much. They were still filing flint to use as axes.

---------------

Europeans (and Asians) spent about 30,000 years using flint and not progressing. Amerindians did it for about 35,000. Wow, they sure were inferior.

You probably shouldn't argue from history too much.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 03:49 PM (Xd9fe)

581 560 ..So given all of this -- WHERE ARE THEY???

We're in Montana, didn't you get our email? Check your spam folder again

Posted by: Vulcan Council at April 25, 2010 03:49 PM (sYxEE)

582

Well in my experience, Cretans are assholes, so I think they had a lot of shit to dispose of.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:49 PM (RZ8pf)

583 At the risk of being on topic - SF writer David Brin wrote a fairly good argument AGAINST active SETI over at the lifeboat foundation a couple years ago. 
Well worth a re-read for those interested.
Shouting at the Cosmos.
Much like global warming "scientists", the people running SETI have decided what's best for all of us without asking.  (but you can bet our tax dollars are helping to pay for it.)

Posted by: Crazy Uncle Mark at April 25, 2010 03:50 PM (jcOHH)

584 Hey, schizuki, those were the important 5,000 weren't they?

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:50 PM (fOtKS)

585 You mean Inframan? The Chinese super-hero that squishes aliens beneath his feet like bugs?

Hahaha.  Never heard of Inframan.  Nope, I mean Ultraman, the Japanese weekly rubber-suit Gojira ripoff.

Not only will the aliens be afraid of a hundreds-meter-tall defender of our cities, they'll wonder what wizardry allows Earthlings to decouple the sounds they make from their anatomy.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:51 PM (LtIsn)

586

535 - you didn't - 498 did. That's why the post says "498" right at the beginning.

Learn about the hash marks, dummy.  While you're at it, look at all the garbage you introduced ab nihilo...

--Why bother reading what was said before, just go with the knee-jerk racial bullshit.

--this is why no one can actually study or discuss whole subjects in history anymore. Too many modern "victims" want to bring their own baggage to the argument and don't even listen to what gets said.

--All white men are bad, All Native Americans are good.

--hat's not racist, BTW. I get the message now.--knee jerk racial bullshit

--holier than though pc bullshit

Ad my favorite:

--what makes you the "go-to conscience" guy for Native American issues ? Either let us know or take the chip off your shoulder.

Because of course, if I'm an Indian or part of some other racial group, you can plug in your pre-conceived notions and understand me better.

You invented this argument from your filtered, distorted perceptions of reality.  You're out of your depth, dummy. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 03:52 PM (A8C+8)

587 Arthur C. Clark once wrote a story where intelligent life was to be found in stars.  Could be possible, we now know that a star has very complex patterns and complex processes.  Also every star in the universe could sense every other star, or every mass via gravitational attraction, which is apparently instantaneous and according to Einstein not a signal but a result of the "geometry," of space.  In other words stars, in some sense act like super huge neurons, that are in contact at all times with each other, perhaps they are thinking at each other? 

We have a pretty narrow and regional idea of life, thinking it must be carbon and DNA based.  All that would actually be required is the necessary complexity manifest by the human brain to support (initiate?) thought.  Once men believed the earth to be flat, and some still believe Al Gore.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 03:52 PM (eKOT/)

588 the indians were still wiping their asses with leaves when Washington was living in Mt Vernon, no?

-----------------------

What incredibly superior substance was Washington wiping his ass with? Can't wait to hear this.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 03:52 PM (Xd9fe)

589 Go to the video store/neflix and rent The Privalileged Planet. This will tell how special we are. Hawking/Sagon/Hitchenings/others are mistaken. Serious. Get the movie!

Posted by: Joe at April 25, 2010 03:53 PM (JKe0g)

590 Trying to out-do the post counts of the ONT, geeks?

Posted by: Guy amazed at the level of geekdom at smart military blog at April 25, 2010 03:53 PM (Poe30)

591 Most are not habitable, but we are now able to detect smaller planets that may be habitable. Wait a couple of years unless Obama kills all science.

I made up a neat presentation with cool graphics so Genesis could rake in all that Obama money

Posted by: Dr Carol Marcus at April 25, 2010 03:53 PM (sYxEE)

592

If aliens every do arrive, they're going to take one look around, make one statement, then leave.

"Shit.  You guys don't have flying cars yet either?  We were hoping you had some to sell; our engineers have been talking about them for eons, but do we ever get them?  Nooooo.  Screw it, we're outta here."

Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 25, 2010 03:53 PM (plsiE)

593 OT:

Picking MOS next week. Any suggestions? Any warnings?

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:53 PM (fOtKS)

594 What incredibly superior substance was Washington wiping his ass with? Can't wait to hear this.

Indian scalps?

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:54 PM (LtIsn)

595 590 Earth as a quarantine zone. 

Posted by: trainer

Oh, shit. I knew it was too good to be paradise. It was that fucking "apple", wasn't it?

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 03:54 PM (GkYyh)

596 7) It could be just the Orion Arm equivalent of Jehovah's Witnesses beating on our door, again and again and with us having no equivalent of a large dog or shotgun to convince them to go away. Even if they only want to leave copies of the "Grbzzlkkkk Watchtower", their presence will have the same effect culturally as the arrival of Europeans had on Native Americans, Canadian First Nations, or Australian aborigines.

ROFLMAO!

Naw! I think lurking is a good thing until we know the neighborhood. We may well be alone. Likely are in the immediate area. But the consequences if we are not can both non-trivial, and irremedial. Listen, do SETI, etc. all we can. But try not to party so hard that any other locals decide to investigate and shut the party down.


Subotai Bahadur

Posted by: Subotai Bahadur at April 25, 2010 07:48 PM (/gkzj)

I agree.  I don't think the Voyager missions were really well thought out ideas.  I know that the odds are so slim that a couple of little crafts in the vastness of space will amount to much, but just the idea of alerting someone to our presence before we know of theirs seems truly idiotic, from every angle one could think of.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 03:54 PM (N49h9)

597

I think Washington wiped his ass with British Pound notes actually.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:54 PM (RZ8pf)

598 incidentally, there's a vary nice minoan vase coming up at auction at christie's, london next week. they're quite rare.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 03:54 PM (7JES6)

599

What incredibly superior substance was Washington wiping his ass with? Can't wait to hear this.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 07:52 PM (Xd9fe)





Hessian shirts.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 03:54 PM (t72+4)

600 very

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 03:54 PM (7JES6)

601

603

The winner ... LMFAO!

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 03:55 PM (GkYyh)

602 596 You mean Inframan? The Chinese super-hero that squishes aliens beneath his feet like bugs?

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 07:51 PM (LtIsn)   I loved Inframan. I got about 10 college friends to go with me to see it after an all-day Tequila chug.   I loved the Monster Chamber and all the sleazy monster costumes with zippers in the back.    

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 03:55 PM (PON03)

603 I believe Washington used Jefferson's tie.

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:56 PM (fOtKS)

604 The Romans had indoor plumbing.  IMO the best measure of when the earth went into the dark ages is when they forgot about indoor plumbing.

--------------------------

Look, Europeans were totally superior to Indians because of our devotion to indoor plumbing. So your inference that Europeans would so cavalierly regress like that for over 1,500 years is a slanderous lie!

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 03:56 PM (Xd9fe)

605 And, besides , as my astronomy professor said, earth is like one teeny tiny grain of sand  on a very big beach indeed..  The chance of any "aliens"  finding us, even by accident, are nil.

Posted by: ac at April 25, 2010 03:56 PM (A51gv)

606 All You Need to Know About Morons;

This geeky science, anthropology, and history thread has already doubled the comment count of Ace's Boobs and Lacy Underwear post of the other day

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 03:57 PM (sYxEE)

607 Heh. That universe series of shows now starting on Disc.

Posted by: The Colonists at April 25, 2010 03:57 PM (7VvJB)

608 What incredibly superior substance was Washington wiping his ass with? Can't wait to hear this.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 07:52 PM (Xd9fe)

His wood teeth.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 03:57 PM (PON03)

609 We Europeans are so bad-ass that not only can we invent indoor plumbing, we are tough enough to do without it when we have to.

Way more bad-ass than anyone else. It's a fact. Trust me.

Posted by: sifty at April 25, 2010 03:58 PM (fOtKS)

610

Gojira, Japanese word for Godzilla made up of a combination of the Japanese words for Gorilla and whale.

 

With knowledge like this, I just donÂ’t understand why I canÂ’t get datesÂ…

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:58 PM (RZ8pf)

611 The Romans had indoor plumbing.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 07:45 PM (eKOT/)

And they invented the regular census - and did a better job at it 2000 years ago than we do today.  

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 03:58 PM (N49h9)

612 And, besides , as my astronomy professor said, earth is like one teeny tiny grain of sand  on a very big beach indeed..  The chance of any "aliens"  finding us, even by accident, are nil.

Nonsense.  If they actually develop a practical FTL, drive they don't have to rely on chance.  They could send a probe to every star.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:58 PM (LtIsn)

613 i highly recommend that one of you people out there buy that vase. it's not all that expensive and you won';t regret it.

Posted by: gomm at April 25, 2010 03:58 PM (EA+Co)

614

At 2:30 am's when I'm pondering the universe, SG-1 seems to wrap it all up for me. 

Posted by: skye at April 25, 2010 03:58 PM (HwMXR)

615
Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 07:51 PM (LtIsn)   I loved Inframan. I got about 10 college friends to go with me to see it after an all-day Tequila chug.   I loved the Monster Chamber and all the sleazy monster costumes with zippers in the back.    

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 07:55 PM (PON03)






The part where the queen throws disloyal servants into the fire-pit is pretty disturbing. That movie was epic. If it is avaialble, I'd really love to have the dvd.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 03:59 PM (t72+4)

616 With knowledge like this, I just donÂ’t understand why I canÂ’t get datesÂ…

Same as the rest of us.  Instead of going out and meeting Gojira fans you spend all your time at the HQ.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 03:59 PM (LtIsn)

617 Amerindians did it for about 35,000. Wow, they sure were inferior. What's more to the point, I think, is why the bronze-age technology was lost (or discarded) by the amerinds. They knew (culturally) about the wheel, and working with metal, and large-scale agriculture, and animal husbandry. So why not make use of it? Why use the horribly-inefficient travois for hauling rather than a wheeled cart? That seems to go beyond simple preference into the deliberately perverse. Ditto metal tools (they couldn't make steel, obviously, but bronze was certainly in their ability). I don't know if anyone has posited a reason for this, other than that the amerinds never spent much time building a civilization -- they never formed large societies and remained largely bound in nomadic, hunter-gatherer groups. Whatever exposure they had to outside "technology" was fleeting and was, over time, simply lost to cultural memory. It was only the colonization by Europeans that re-established the link to the Old World and its technology. (I do often find myself confused at the lack of farming among amerinds, though. They certainly knew how; many eastern tribes farmed maize and other crops on a fairly substantial scale. But farming requires tools and technology that many amerind tribes just seemed to scorn on purpose. It's very odd. The Australian Aborigines and the Maori fall into the same pattern.)

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 03:59 PM (O3eFQ)

618

Oh heck, I forgot to return my census form. Some hippieÂ’s going to be on my doorstep any day now.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 03:59 PM (RZ8pf)

619 617 And, besides , as my astronomy professor said, earth is like one teeny tiny grain of sand  on a very big beach indeed..  The chance of any "aliens"  finding us, even by accident, are nil.
Posted by: ac at April 25, 2010 07:56 PM

Don't they have GPS on those things? Meh, some high tech!

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 03:59 PM (sYxEE)

620 If according to Hawkings math there is other life then there is an equally as good of chance that they to elected an Obama that cancelled their space program.

Posted by: robtr at April 25, 2010 04:00 PM (fwSHf)

621 What incredibly superior substance was Washington wiping his ass with? Can't wait to hear this. Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 07:52 PM (Xd9fe) beaver pelts..

Posted by: Yippie21 at April 25, 2010 04:00 PM (QFWu6)

622 617 And, besides , as my astronomy professor said, earth is like one teeny tiny grain of sand  on a very big beach indeed..  The chance of any "aliens"  finding us, even by accident, are nil.

Posted by: ac

I take it you never saw "The Beach" with Al Gore's triple secret boyfriend Leonardo DiCaprio? There's a drug-addicted bum with a forbidden hand drawn map in alien Thailand.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 04:00 PM (GkYyh)

623

Actually I think IÂ’d be terrified to meet Gojira fans.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:01 PM (RZ8pf)

624

With knowledge like this, I just donÂ’t understand why I canÂ’t get datesÂ…

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 07:58 PM (RZ8pf)

Exhibiting more Godzilla-knowledge than a man makes him feel castrated.

Same as "Godfather" quotes.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 04:02 PM (PON03)

625 I think Washington wiped his ass with British Pound notes actually. George Washington took Immaculate Poops. No wipe needed. And the poop smelt of cinnamon toast. The Hessian mercenaries quaked in fear every time they smelled a hint of cinnamon on the air.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 04:02 PM (O3eFQ)

626 I do often find myself confused at the lack of farming among amerinds, though.

Farming was quite extensive in the Southwest.  I think the Eastern and plains Indians didn't farm because the land was so plentiful they didn't have to.  Farming is back-breaking work, and leaves you at the mercy of the weather.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 04:02 PM (LtIsn)

627

Monty, what would be interesting is if it was known what sort of, dare I say "religious" prohibitions against some of the developments there were.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:03 PM (RZ8pf)

628

I'm pretty certain Washington wiped his ass with Kenyans. Which was amazing because Kenya didn't exist at that time, but there you go.

Perhaps he had a premonition...

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 04:03 PM (P33XN)

629 630

Oh heck, I forgot to return my census form. Some hippieÂ’s going to be on my doorstep any day now.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 07:59 PM

Same. I can't even find it. Let's compare notes when the stinky ones come.

Posted by: Time Traveling Flâneur at April 25, 2010 04:03 PM (v5Q3C)

630 This geeky science, anthropology, and history thread has already doubled the comment count of Ace's Boobs and Lacy Underwear post of the other day

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 07:57 PM (sYxEE)

I really don't want to see Ace's boobs.

Posted by: I think I speak for all of us at April 25, 2010 04:03 PM (bgcml)

631

George Washington took Immaculate Poops.

"Walkaways."

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 04:03 PM (A8C+8)

632 Planets are not good sources of materials and energy for advanced space-faring cultures. Endemic life is more trouble than it's worth. Gravity wells waste energy. 99% of the mass is there just to make a big round planet. The good stuff is far away from the parent star; cold, stable, moving slowly, easily accessed. When you spend all you life in space and have tons of advanced technology all you need is a good selection from the Periodic Table of the Elements. There you find all you need for materials and energy. Our Solar System could be colonized right row and we'd never know it. That's good for them and very good for us.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 04:03 PM (6tqEs)

633 if the laws of physics are the same throughout the universe, does it not follow that life, where it finds conditions favorable, will evolve the same way throughout the universe?

Posted by: Jones

 

No.

Posted by: Kelly at April 25, 2010 04:03 PM (FLFli)

634 With knowledge like this, I just donÂ’t understand why I canÂ’t get datesÂ… You can't get dates because I forbid you to see other men. I am a man of large appetites, and I do not share.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 04:04 PM (O3eFQ)

635 I agree.  I don't think the Voyager missions were really well thought out ideas.

They weren't developed to find ET, but they did put some information on them on the chance they'd be discovered by other civilizations.

They've given us data on the other planets that were very useful, and now they're sending back data on the edge of the solar system regarding termination shock and the heliopause.

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 04:04 PM (sYxEE)

636

Oh heck, I forgot to return my census form. Some hippieÂ’s going to be on my doorstep any day now.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 07:59 PM (RZ8pf)

Maybe you'll be lucky and get a Roman, instead.  At least they know what they're doing.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 04:04 PM (N49h9)

637 Gojira fans are OK. They're also about 80 pounds lighter than the average Star Trek convention attendee.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 04:04 PM (PON03)

638

Or maybe I should phrase that differently, what cultural influences were there on the people for or against developing and sustaining the development of tools etc.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:04 PM (RZ8pf)

639 #46 That was my first thought, too.

Posted by: T at April 25, 2010 04:04 PM (vNegd)

640 595 Hey, schizuki, those were the important 5,000 weren't they?

----------------------

Sure were. "Western" culture went from spear-chucking nomadic hunters to space travelers.

So there's no reason to believe that Amerindians wouldn't have had the same burst eventually.

The Sumerians were civilized when Europeans were wild. The Egyptians were civilized when Europeans were wild. The Chinese were civilized when Europeans were wild. Cultures progress at different rates. So to say with certitude that Amerindians were "going nowhere" is arrogant nonsense borne of historical ignorance.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 04:05 PM (Xd9fe)

641 Civilization can be described very simply, you are "civilized," if you have indoor pluming, and a damn barbarian, or you have regressed to ignorant superstitious savages if you forgot your indoor plumbing 101.  FTL drives are just gravy, the basis of life worth living is in this order:

1. Indoor Pluming

2. Beer

3. Indoor Heating and AC

4. The revolution that kills all liberals and socialists so that you can have 1-3 cheaply and in abundance.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 04:05 PM (eKOT/)

642

I am a man of large appetites

 

Kinky. But OK.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:06 PM (RZ8pf)

643 Thanks again for all the fish!

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 04:06 PM (S1Ttj)

644

here we go!

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 04:07 PM (S1Ttj)

645 To the stars!

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 04:08 PM (S1Ttj)

646

Actually, I like Doctor Who fans. But only of the Tom Baker/David Tennant variety. I donÂ’t care how cute the new redheaded sidekick is, Emo goth boy Who is stupid.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:08 PM (RZ8pf)

647 If it's not the ONT, you don't win the Hell-beast.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 04:09 PM (PON03)

648 I'm afraid of an alien society where all the aliens look like Stephen Hawking.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 04:09 PM (P33XN)

649 Or maybe I should phrase that differently, what cultural influences were there on the people for or against developing and sustaining the development of tools etc.

Jared Diamond has some fascinating musings on this subject.  For one thing, the life of the hunter/gatherer is pretty idyllic compared to that of farmers.  Once they have food for the day they don't need to do anything else.  In some places that's as little as two hours a day on average.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 04:09 PM (LtIsn)

650 and beyond!

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 04:09 PM (S1Ttj)

651 which way to the toilet?

Posted by: Time Traveling Flâneur at April 25, 2010 04:09 PM (v5Q3C)

652 thank you

Posted by: Time Traveling Flâneur at April 25, 2010 04:10 PM (v5Q3C)

653 Everything in some Universe.  You know every time a quantum decision is made, another Universe splits off.  So every possibility happens in some Universe or another.  Each one of us Morons is fabulously wealthy in a parallel Universe.
FMD.
[Fuck My Dimension; BTW: #240]

Posted by: andycanuck at April 25, 2010 04:10 PM (ocax6)

654 Hawking forgot about a few other numbers - like the insanely large size of the universe, the speed of light, and the massive amount of energy required to travel in space. If you play by the rules of physics as we currently understand them, and don't invoke magic solutions like teleportation and FTL drives, then there is little chance we'll ever meet or even hear from anyone out there, no matter how high the odds of ET are.

Hawking admitted a couple years ago that his life's work was in error "information CAN escape from a black hole" but very few media outlets reported it. (imagine that) His productive days are clearly behind him and once he jumped on the AGW bandwagon it was obvious he was no longer doing 'real' science. Ignore him and move on.

Posted by: Xavier at April 25, 2010 04:10 PM (PShk3)

655 To another universe!

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 25, 2010 04:10 PM (S1Ttj)

656 grrr

Posted by: Time Traveling Flâneur at April 25, 2010 04:10 PM (v5Q3C)

657 WHO ARE THE SPACE ALIENS:

Well, because the odds that there is another intelligent race in existence in the same time that we are is small, the likelihood that the "gray's that come and visit us are not aliens at all, but actually "us" millions of years from now as we have evolved to rely upon out minds and not our bodies.  In other words, big heads, big eyes, small bodies, no sexual organs.

Due to the lack of genetic diversity required for a species to breed and evolve, out future selves are dying out.  hence they come back in time to cross breed with us and create hybrid children which they can then take back to their time and propagate the species.  This is why abductees are always being experimented on sexually.

The reason the don't land on the White House lawn is that would kind of screw up the timeline.  So they look into their past and find people whose lives have made no real contribution to human society and breed with them.  This way they can accomplish their goals without creating a time paradoxs.

No aliens, just future us.

Posted by: mitchellvii@yahoo.com at April 25, 2010 04:10 PM (kEBiX)

658 Earth-life didn't start sending stuff back out into Space until 4.6 billions years after the Earth formed and 3.5 billion years after life formed. if you take that as a typical outcome, then it seems to me each emerging space-faring civilization gets the Galaxy all to itself for many millions of years and is extremely unlikely to bump into anybody else. The chance that we'd encounter Aliens advanced enough to swat us aside, but primitive enough to be interested in us or our planet is extremely remote.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 04:10 PM (6tqEs)

659 So to say with certitude that Amerindians were "going nowhere" is arrogant nonsense borne of historical ignorance. Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 08:05 PM (Xd9fe) Horseshit. The amerindians should be doing what the yurripeons did: adapt, assimilate, devastate (or maybe that's seek, locate, exterminate), but instead, they're just Fofanov.

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at April 25, 2010 04:11 PM (wOtDN)

660 207 If time travel were possible, wouldn't someone have already done it and screwed up everything? ------------------ http://tinyurl.com/y6bzscj Time traveler caught in museum photograph

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 04:11 PM (LD+ZJ)

661 Look, let's all decide here and now that IF these "aliens" do come here before 2012 and hit us with the worn out query, "Take us to your leader", we tell them to stay put, grab Obama, and hand him over singing, "HE is The One you've been waiting for ... Trust us! Now git because we shut off the cooling system and Mother is about to blow us all to Hell." And we wave as they zip away.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 04:12 PM (GkYyh)

662 does it not follow that life, where it finds conditions favorable, will evolve the same way throughout the universe? No, not at all. In fact, if you hit the REWIND button on this planet things would have turned out very differently. Had the Big Rock not ruined the Dinosaurs whole week; had not the Permian Extinction taken place; had the Earth's atmosphere taken a bit longer to develop; had our Moon been smaller or further away or not there at all...any one of a million things would have changed the whole outcome of our evolutionary track. We are who we are because our history unfolded in exactly the way it did. We're not even the only species of human to have ever existed -- we're just the only ones who survived. (The Neanderthals and others didn't make the cut and had to play JV.) Had things worked out a bit differently -- if the great Ice Age had held off for another few hundred years, say -- then the Neanderthals might have come out on top. Or some other smart member of the ape family.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 04:12 PM (O3eFQ)

663 zod

Posted by: Jones at April 25, 2010 04:12 PM (JL3qV)

664 Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 08:05 PM (eKOT/)

Newsletter?

Posted by: wherestherum at April 25, 2010 04:12 PM (gofDd)

665 They weren't developed to find ET, but they did put some information on them on the chance they'd be discovered by other civilizations.

Yes, I know, which is why I said they were bad ideas.  Why would we want to alert an alien to our existence without knowing theirs, first? 

They've given us data on the other planets that were very useful, and now they're sending back data on the edge of the solar system regarding termination shock and the heliopause.

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 08:04 PM (sYxEE)

I like the stuff that was done with the solar system, but I would have prefered something that just stayed local.  Like I said, a couple of tiny bits flying through space is unlikely to run into anything ... but if they did, it would almost certainly not be a good thing.  And we would benefit in no way from it.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 04:12 PM (N49h9)

666

Mr. Peabody already figured all this shit out 50 years ago.

And he's neutered.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 04:13 PM (PON03)

667 The chance that we'd encounter Aliens advanced enough to swat us aside, but primitive enough to be interested in us or our planet is extremely remote.

Even if that's true there should be a monolith around here somewhere.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 04:13 PM (LtIsn)

668 of course, if somebody Out There finds us, that makes US the aliens

Posted by: Jones at April 25, 2010 04:13 PM (JL3qV)

669

 Even assuming another civilization was trying to monitor for extremely weak radio signals from Earth, the signal would've only travelled 90 light-years by now.  Anyone further than that wouldn't have recieved them yet.

***************************

I think it was Carl Sagan who used the theme from "I Love Lucy" to illustrate what aliens might first hear as evidence of our existence.

Heh

Posted by: effinayright at April 25, 2010 04:14 PM (3sB5l)

670 >I think it was Carl Sagan who used the theme from "I Love Lucy" to illustrate what aliens might first hear as evidence of our existence.

in the movie "Contact", it was Adolph Hitler at the 1936 Olympics

Posted by: Jones at April 25, 2010 04:15 PM (JL3qV)

671 I spit loogies on alien civilizations!!!

Posted by: Stephen Hoiking at April 25, 2010 04:16 PM (3sB5l)

672
I don't care how intelligent you are,  the longer you talk,  the more apt you are to say something really fucking stupid.

Hawking did this before when he said time would begin going in reverse as the big bang ran out of energy or some such nonsense.  Then he walked that back to a mathematical error.

I'm sure he's under a lot of pressure to say really-smart-and-edgy-shit-we've never-heard-Hawking-say type stuff for Discovery Channel's cameras but c'mon.

Posted by: Dang at April 25, 2010 04:16 PM (UA4gE)

673

I think it was Carl Sagan who used the theme from "I Love Lucy" to illustrate what aliens might first hear as evidence of our existence.

Heh

Posted by: effinayright at April 25, 2010 08:14 PM (3sB5l)

Actually, it would have been Milton Berle. And that's not good.

Posted by: TexasJew at April 25, 2010 04:16 PM (PON03)

674

then the Neanderthals might have come out on top

Ever taken a trip through the local Welfare village?

The Neanderthals are alive and well.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 25, 2010 04:16 PM (P33XN)

675 Thinking now of so many sci fi movies and how utterly stupid they are.  I remember one where the aliens sent a robot that walked around on these pile driver legs.  It was pretty big, like a 5 story building.  So being good humans we started shooting at it and trying to stop this thing.  But it kept getting bigger.  So finally it is outside of LA, just beyond the mountains and it is about 300 feet high now, so we decide to nuke it, just as the "scientists," figured out it was a huge energy collector. 

The aliens used it to provoke us into firing on it and finally nuking it to recharge their batteries, so to speak.  Think of the idiot logic here:  FTL drive aliens need energy from 1959 earth, so they send a clunky robot that eats up energy, so they are smart enough to do FTL drives, but so stupid they cannot pull over to Jupiter and fill up on twenty gazillion gallons of hydro-carbons, or just mine the asteroids for radioactive materials.

Proving, I think that if we want to confound any alien species, just send them Hollywood producers and directors. 

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 04:17 PM (eKOT/)

676 Hey, I might stop in for a visit.

Posted by: The Andromeda Strain at April 25, 2010 04:17 PM (2i+Vz)

677 of course, if somebody Out There finds us, that makes US the aliens

One of my favorite Twighlight Zone episodes is the one where a woman is bashing little aliens with an ax because they invaded her cabin.  You don't find out until the very end that she's a giant and the aliens are humans in space suits.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 04:18 PM (LtIsn)

678 There is a decent chance the Earth is listed in some Galactic database as a typical Stage 1 life bearing world. That is. covered with pond scum, smelly.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 04:18 PM (6tqEs)

679 Jared Diamond has some fascinating musings on this subject. For one thing, the life of the hunter/gatherer is pretty idyllic compared to that of farmers. Once they have food for the day they don't need to do anything else. In some places that's as little as two hours a day on average. Diamond is a crank. (The civilization fell because they cut all their trees down! Woe!) The "idyllic" hunter-gatherer rarely lived longer than forty years, was broken-down at thirty, and had a mortality rate that was off the charts. Any deviation from the environmental norm -- a drought, scarcity of game, etc. -- meant that they starved. Hunter-gatherer humans were (and are) just as badly off as the other great apes. "Civilization", as we understand it, arose from agricultural peoples, not from hunter-gatherer bands. Technology has almost doubled the human lifespan, made starvation and infant mortality far less likely than in times past, and has immeasurably improved everyone's lot in life. Language, music, art -- all flow from our decision to settle down and create societies. Jared Diamond's books ought to be sold on the magazine racks next to the Weekly World News.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 04:18 PM (O3eFQ)

680 If they land at the White House and run into Michelle, I hope their anal probe is super-sized.

Posted by: wookie watcher at April 25, 2010 04:18 PM (Ue9UN)

681

Maybe Hamlet said it best:

 

“There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:19 PM (RZ8pf)

682 @ 385:  Gomm rules!!!!

Posted by: Stephen Hoiking at April 25, 2010 04:19 PM (3sB5l)

683 @687 That was called "Kronos"

Posted by: sig at April 25, 2010 04:21 PM (2i+Vz)

684 557 - interesting points, Monty. I would ask, how many cultures have similar starts/stops? And are they the result of what type of culture is optimal for the environment? Metalwork requires a stable location. North America has many examples of large-scale Amerindian settlements that were abandoned. It could be that conditions in North America were not optimized for the permanent settlement that advanced civilization requires.

English settlers replicated England in America. But the smaller-scale French colonies in Canada, based primarily on Indian trade, had a chronic problem with their young men going off with the Indians and becoming permanent woods-runners. They apparently had not been briefed on the superiority of progress and the need to develop indoor plumbing.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 04:21 PM (Xd9fe)

685 "Civilization", as we understand it, arose from agricultural peoples, not from hunter-gatherer bands. Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 08:18 PM (O3eFQ) Indeed. Beer (& bread) are the seeds of civilisation. You need something better than just grabbing shit as you go to develop a good brewpub.

Posted by: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard at April 25, 2010 04:22 PM (wOtDN)

686 wherestherum  676

I messed up the URL...thanks, click if you like some articles on Politics, movie reviews, and Biblical stuff.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 04:22 PM (eKOT/)

687

 

644 Our Solar System could be colonized right row RUTROE   and we'd never know it.

FIFY

Scooby Doo

Posted by: Kelly at April 25, 2010 04:22 PM (FLFli)

688 Monty, check this out:  In our world, space makes the time; inside an event horizon, time makes the space.  Heh.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 04:22 PM (A8C+8)

689
His wood teeth.

hahaha, thanks for picking the slack with the funneh while I was gone, T-Jew.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 04:23 PM (4aB58)

690

684 Dang -

In my half-assed 'following' of hawking I've noticed he's had to 'walk back' (and forth) on a theory or two of his own. Unless I'm mistaken, he doesn't take well, either, to being challenged (or his theories) by fellow scientists. As scientists go, he's somewhat the narcissist's narcissist.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 04:23 PM (GkYyh)

691

I just read Simon WinchesterÂ’s “Outposts” about his visits to the remaining colonies of the British Empire back in the 80s.  What is interesting about the British is how much they replicated "home" no matter where the colony was located.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:24 PM (RZ8pf)

692 Hunter-gatherer humans were (and are) just as badly off as the other great apes.

Well then we are pretty much screwed when our currency collapses.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 04:25 PM (7VvJB)

693
   

Posted by: Joe at April 25, 2010 04:25 PM (JKe0g)

694 Beep. Beep.

Posted by: captain christopher pike at April 25, 2010 04:25 PM (ocax6)

695 http://tinyurl.com/y6bzscj

Time traveler caught in museum photograph

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 08:11 PM (LD+ZJ)

Ok, so that's not a photoshop?

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 04:26 PM (bgcml)

696

I wonder if Gabe knew what kind of discussion he was opening up when he posted this, or if he was just trying to fill space on a Sunday afternoon.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:26 PM (RZ8pf)

697 Very Late to this Thread:

To Sum Hawkins (in Italics) and to Respond (MeTooThen)

1) The possibility of "life" outside of Earth is a non-zero number in an infinite and expanding Universe. Yes, this is a guess, but a good guess based on the sample size of the Universe, which is Infinity. Which, I might add, is big.

2)"What that "life" may look like, act like, be like, may be something altogether different than onto what we have heretofore been focusing our attention."  Pretty non-controversial. A good hedge and again based on Universe size (see No. 1)

3) "Contact with non-Earth-based life might be dangerous to Earth-based life." Um, hell yeah. That shit might fuck you up. Look, do not touch. Better yet, stay the hell away from it or hide, better yet still.

4) "Where is Everybody?" Good question. Supraluminal travel seems to the be the sticking point. No way for us to figure out how that one might even be possible, let alone practical. More to the point, the span involved in Everybody getting here, aside from the seeming impossibility of doing so, would include but is not limited to: For how-the-hell old can these life forms live and why the hell would they want to come here of all places? Dunno'. No one else does, either.

5) "Things worked out bad for the Aboriginal Americans (North and South) because of that damn Spanish Jooooo." Well, seems to be some truth in that, or not. Depends on the window of observation one wants to employ. For the descendants of said Aboriginal Americans, there are antibiotics, endoscopic surgeries, fiber-optic communications, indoor plumbing, and lots of other things that wouldn't have been available otherwise. Sadly, the World gains and loses people and their culture over Time. That much is True, and seems sad and sucks, but nothing lasts forever. I'm sure the Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Belgians, English, and French (to name but a few) are really, really sorry for everything they did to everybody on every continent prior to the 18th Century. What that has to do with 21st Century citizens of the United States of America is precisely Zero.

Just sayin'.


Posted by: MeTooThen at April 25, 2010 04:27 PM (ajXMc)

698
English settlers replicated England in America. But the smaller-scale French colonies in Canada, based primarily on Indian trade, had a chronic problem with their young men going off with the Indians and becoming permanent woods-runners. They apparently had not been briefed on the superiority of progress and the need to develop indoor plumbing.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 08:21 PM (Xd9fe)

Fortunately part of every French explorer's kit was a nice big white flag.

Posted by: Some Champlain at April 25, 2010 04:27 PM (bgcml)

699

18-1, follow the link at the link to the complete breakdown of the photograph. ItÂ’s kind of fascinating.

 

I donÂ’t think it necessarily argues against it being a time traveler, by the way. Who is to say that a time traveler wonÂ’t choose the clothing of the time that most resembles what he or she is comfortable in from their own time.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:28 PM (RZ8pf)

700

@ ParanoidGirlInSeattle

Apparently it's pretty much rainy and shitty over much of AoS nation.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 04:28 PM (GkYyh)

701 The "idyllic" hunter-gatherer rarely lived longer than forty years, was broken-down at thirty, and had a mortality rate that was off the charts.

Which was still better than the farmers at the time.  I'm not saying we should all move back to the trees, I'm just saying if all I had to do in life was kill a bison every few days there's no way I'd start farming.

Of course you need agriculture to have the specialization required for more advanced technology.  But it isn't clear that first step is a good one unless you need numbers to defend your way of life or your population is limited by calories.

What really did in the Indians wasn't disease or technology.  What did them in was a lifestyle that didn't support large numbers of people per acre.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 04:29 PM (LtIsn)

702 700 Monty, check this out:  In our world, space makes the time; inside an event horizon, time makes the space.  Heh. Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 08:22 PM

Dude.

Pass me the bong.

Posted by: Time Traveling Flâneur at April 25, 2010 04:29 PM (v5Q3C)

703
Well then we are pretty much screwed when our currency collapses.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 08:25 PM (7VvJB)

I plan on eating liberals. A renewable resource I might add.

Posted by: Some Prepared Moron at April 25, 2010 04:29 PM (bgcml)

704 the distances between stars are so incomprehensibly vast that interplanetary species aren't likely to come across each other within the lifetime of their species. Well, yeah. Space is BIG. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space...

Posted by: cheshirecat at April 25, 2010 04:29 PM (Qb4Lv)

705 Earth-life didn't start sending stuff back out into Space until 4.6 billions years after the Earth formed and 3.5 billion years after life formed.

if you take that as a typical outcome

---------------------

I don't. There's no reason that intelligent life couldn't have arisen on Earth a few billion years earlier, if conditions had been right. Our existence here and now isn't a developmental inevitability, but the result of a series of accidents.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 04:30 PM (Xd9fe)

706

Weird it is sunny and nice here in Seattle. But, IÂ’m still working off the tail end of my stomach bug so IÂ’m indoors discussing time and space travel and the destruction of the natives instead.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:30 PM (RZ8pf)

707 They apparently had not been briefed on the superiority of progress and the need to develop indoor plumbing. And yet we ended up with Quebec (French) inside (English) Canada and not the Greater Massaquamee Nation, yes? That should tell you something. Just as in America in Louisiana: where Frenchmen mixed with the natives, what emerged was more French than native (the creole). Where the Spanish mixed with the native, what emerged was more Spanish than native (in Mexico and California). The amerind culture proved to be a "weakly bonding" culture in that sense; it tended to fail upon first exposure to a stronger outside influence. Contrast this with a "strongly bonding" culture like that of the Japanese, which has endured even in the face of multiple conflicts with outside cultures and technologies. The amerinds, it seems, had trouble incorporating the good while discarding the bad from alien ways of life. They were simply overwhelmed by it. And as for environmental conditions, I don't buy it. Western Europe and the Western United States are quite similar: mountain ranges, forests, with river-bottom lowlands and plains. America is bigger of course, but not different in any substantial way. And if you're going to make climatological arguments, you'd have to explain why e.g. the Japanese and the Vikings managed to make use of modern technology despite being resource-poor and isolated and/or living in an inhospitable climate.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 04:31 PM (O3eFQ)

708

I just read Simon WinchesterÂ’s “Outposts” about his visits to the remaining colonies of the British Empire back in the 80s.  What is interesting about the British is how much they replicated "home" no matter where the colony was located.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 08:24 PM (RZ8pf)







Yea, I read it too. Not sure who it was,but I remember another British author saying most societies he encountered in interior Africa had not even discovered the wheel yet or built any complex structures and it was the late 19th century.


I denounce myself as a racist for even bringing it up. At any rate, if anyone knows who it was, put me some knowledge.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 04:32 PM (t72+4)

709 There are only a few places on earth that were good for hunter-gatherers, the best was California, mild climate, great fishing, abundant wildlife.  Even then it is a dusk till dawn existence.  You have to do shelter, expand ranges, move frequently, and then fight other hunter-gatherers encroaching on your range. 

Agriculture allowed for civilization. (Indoor Plumbing) Interesting that the first farmer, Biblically Speaking, was Cain, also the first murderer, and the first to build cities.  And he did not build cities until he was driven from the presence of God for murder. Abel was a rancher, sheep herder actually.  Not a hunter-gatherer, but not a farmer either.  Probably the difference is that you could live a better, less survival oriented life as a shepherd, allowing for meditation and reflection toward God.  Whereas city life is all about power, position, and getting it over on the other guy.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 04:33 PM (eKOT/)

710 But it isn't clear that first step is a good one unless you need numbers to defend your way of life or your population is limited by calories.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 08:29 PM (LtIsn)

Nomads continued to be a serious threat to settled people until the 1300s or so. As such, settling down wasn't primarily for defense.

Looking at Europe for example, the primary cause of a people to go sedentary was exposure to sedentary life. You can look either at the neighbors of the Romans *or* the people that conquered them.

So it seems to me there was something these nomads saw that they liked...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 04:33 PM (bgcml)

711 706

That had me laughing...not out loud mind you, but smiling inside.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 04:35 PM (eKOT/)

712 Nomads continued to be a serious threat to settled people until the 1300s or so. As such, settling down wasn't primarily for defense.

Yes, but in that contest the nomads are destined to lose, because grains provide so many more calories than hunting you're going to end up with ten times as many farmers as hunters.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 04:36 PM (LtIsn)

713 So it seems to me there was something these nomads saw that they liked...

Yeah...other peoples stuff

People went sedentary after the invention of cheap beer

Posted by: Tony Soprano at April 25, 2010 04:37 PM (H+LJc)

714 717, I was talking about how much time it takes; that is typically about 4.5 billion years. If so, and two planets are off in their timing by only 0.1 percent, then they are 4.5 millions years apart. That's what I was getting at.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 04:37 PM (6tqEs)

715 621

Gojira, Japanese word for Godzilla made up of a combination of the Japanese words for Gorilla and whale.

 

With knowledge like this, I just donÂ’t understand why I canÂ’t get datesÂ…

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 07:58 PM (RZ8pf)

Well, you're in the right place. That's a start.


Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 04:37 PM (bxiXv)

716 Would locusts... If locusts have even rudimentary knowledge of orbital mechanics, yes they would avoid going deep into the gravity well of our garden. True or false: things didn't turn out very well for the "Native Americans" after Columbus showed up. Was it because of the things that arrived with and after Columbus? If yes, Hawking's statement is accurate. True and false, for things were so elysian before, the various tribes have fought each other viciously in the past. Humans are humans, after all, even if they do make great jewellery.

Posted by: cheshirecat at April 25, 2010 04:37 PM (Qb4Lv)

717

You know some of this comes down to the good old “nature vs. nurture” argument. What is inherent in a human to drive him to switch to an agrarian culture and once the switch is made what continues to drive the human to civilize said culture. Versus the fact that some humans never have that same drive. The ant vs. the grasshopper fable.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:39 PM (RZ8pf)

718 Which was still better than the farmers at the time. I'm not saying we should all move back to the trees, I'm just saying if all I had to do in life was kill a bison every few days there's no way I'd start farming. Er...I think you've been misinformed. Every scholarly study I've ever read on the subject (not many, I admit; it's not my field) put the net mortality of hunter-gatherer bands at much higher rates than agricultural settlements. Hunter-gatherers tend to face much her day-to-day risks than farmers do: misadventures and accidents, attacks by animals and rival bands, scarcity of prey, weather, disease (it takes a lot of energy to keep moving around all the time), and so on. A broken leg for a farmer is not a death-sentence; if if he's lame he can still contribute to the community. A lame hunter is a dead man for all intents and purposes; he's just another mouth to feed but useless in the hunt.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 04:39 PM (O3eFQ)

719

Humans are humans, after all

 

EXACTLY!

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:40 PM (RZ8pf)

720 Humans are humans, after all, even if they do make great jewellery.


I saw a guy in Borneo with a necklace of teeth so, yes, they make fine jewelry.

Posted by: Tony Soprano at April 25, 2010 04:40 PM (H+LJc)

721 So what if they use that big collider to smash atoms and it creates a ham sandwich, would that help us?

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 04:41 PM (7VvJB)

722  I wonder if Gabe knew what kind of discussion he was opening up when he posted this, or if he was just trying to fill space on a Sunday afternoon.

Absolutely. I'm also looking forward to the emails on the topic.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 25, 2010 04:41 PM (Mi2wf)

723

Guy Fawkes, I think it would only help us if it created bacon.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:41 PM (RZ8pf)

724 Like I said, a couple of tiny bits flying through space is unlikely to run into anything ... but if they did, it would almost certainly not be a good thing.  And we would benefit in no way from it.

You bet you wouldn't. Do you know what the collision costs on a Klingon Bird of Prey are? Don't think for a minute that only Humans sue at the drop of a hat

Posted by: Klingon Bar Association at April 25, 2010 04:42 PM (sYxEE)

725 Maybe Aliens did come here. but they didn't have exact change.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 04:42 PM (6tqEs)

726
Is Sizuki saying that given more time, the indians would've come around and started to progress and develop as a modern culture?

When the Pilgrims and Puritans showed up, the indians stayed in thier tee-pees. In the 19th cenutury, they were still living in their tee-pees. They showed little interest to adapt some of the modern practices and knowlegde of the European white settlers. Well, they did like the guns and booze, though.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 04:42 PM (4aB58)

727
Before I ruffle some feathers, let's just say the natives were 'laid back peeps.'

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 04:44 PM (4aB58)

728 fiddle faddle and beer is not the dessert I envisioned when I had dinner, but it's the one I just chose and am enjoying to no end. I recommend it to a small self-identifying segment of the Ace chat populace.

Posted by: Lincolntf at April 25, 2010 04:45 PM (y1kI6)

729 739, Some tribes did adapt. They blended into the background and did not resist. That's why you never hear about them.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 04:45 PM (6tqEs)

730 mmmmmmmmmm, bacon.. gahhhahhhhhhh

Posted by: Homer Simpson at April 25, 2010 04:45 PM (7VvJB)

731 Having discussions about the possibility of intelligent life in space always for me seems to end up in arguments about religion, ethics, or math. The fact remains that humans have no frame of reference for how to interact with an entirely different species.

Even on Earth we've not had great success communicating with species with less developed brains. Now people want to talk about how we would communicate with someone who is evolutionary more advanced then us?

There is a chance that they might regard us the same way we regard a dolphin, or a pig. A slightly intelligent animal, but something whose own needs are considered less important then our own.

That would be more then enough justification for taking what they want from us.

Then again perhaps were so primitive that were treated with indifference.

All these types of questions are all best guess, and theory.

As for the Columbus comment. Any student of history will tell you that cultures inevitability clash with each other when they meet. To many people seem to want perpetuate the myth that the American Indians were living in an ecological utopia in complete harmony with one and all. Of course only ended by the brutal pillage and raping of the evil white man.

The other side wants to have you believe that the white settlers hold no responsibility for the destruction of the native societies. Or they want to argue that tit for tat the arrival made their lives better.

All I see was a struggle between different cultures and peoples who acted with self-interest as humans have always done. There was lies, violence, and betrayal on both sides. That is simply a part of the human condition.

Posted by: Orator at April 25, 2010 04:46 PM (6dmTM)

732 I've learned on this thread that civilization can be measured by how and where they shit.

If indoor plumbing is THE measure of a civilization, those alien spaceships must have some really awesome toilets

Posted by: George Costanza at April 25, 2010 04:46 PM (sYxEE)

733

See-Lincolntf is an explorer! Willing to boldly go where no one has gone before in the combination of fiddle faddle and beer. It is a human imperative, this need to explore.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:46 PM (RZ8pf)

734 If toilets are the benchmark for civilization, how come the astronauts have to piss in a plastic bag?

The same question can be asked about Steven Hawking


Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 04:48 PM (sYxEE)

735 In short: what do we have that is not more cheaply and more abundantly procured elsewhere? Porn...oh, and baconz.

Posted by: cheshirecat at April 25, 2010 04:48 PM (Qb4Lv)

736 Every scholarly study I've ever read on the subject (not many, I admit; it's not my field) put the net mortality of hunter-gatherer bands at much higher rates than agricultural settlements. Hunter-gatherers tend to face much her day-to-day risks than farmers do

That doesn't square with what I've read.  Disease risk goes up exponentially with population density.  Cities remained small by today's standards, not because they couldn't get enough food in from surrounding farms, but because without sewer systems they would eventually sicken themselves.

Also, agriculture brings vermin.

A broken leg for a farmer is not a death-sentence; if if he's lame he can still contribute to the community. A lame hunter is a dead man for all intents and purposes; he's just another mouth to feed but useless in the hunt

Depends on the society and the relative availability of food at the time.  As far as I know American Indians didn't feed their parents to the wolves because they couldn't hunt any more.  And agriculture just means your population density grows and becomes more powerful - starvation is still the most likely way for you to die as an individual because there are more mouths to feed.

Dammit, I love this kind of shit, but real life intrudes...

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 04:48 PM (LtIsn)

737

Like a black hole, at what point does an Internet thread collapse into itself. And does the introduction of either boobs or bacon hasten its demise or prolong its agony?

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:49 PM (RZ8pf)

738
dude, toilets are indeed a good measure of technology and knowledge

It takes curiosity and some understanding of how shit works to make a flushing toilet. The natives really didn't exhibit either of those attributes.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 04:49 PM (4aB58)

739 Let's ask James Cameron. He's smart and stuff.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 04:49 PM (6tqEs)

740 Yes, but in that contest the nomads are destined to lose, because grains provide so many more calories than hunting you're going to end up with ten times as many farmers as hunters.

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 08:36 PM (LtIsn)

Well, not so much. Between the fall of the Western Roman Empire and the collapse of the Mongol Empire the nomads were doing pretty darn well. 

The problem that the sedentary civilizations had is that while they might have more people, they couldn't convert them all to soldiers or they would starve...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 04:49 PM (bgcml)

741 Let's do this FIRST
go to facebook and search
Everybody Draw Mohammed Day!

Posted by: non_dhimmie at April 25, 2010 04:50 PM (zACGu)

743 I saw some aliens at Walmart today, so he's right!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 25, 2010 04:50 PM (5zJAC)

744
>>>It is a human imperative, this need to explore.

yet another thing the natives didn't do!

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 04:51 PM (4aB58)

745 The star never collapses to nothing.  It just recedes forever.
Alright, Mr DeMille, I'm ready for my close-up.

Posted by: Norma Desmond at April 25, 2010 04:52 PM (ocax6)

746 Blazer, are you spreading doubt about the Wisdom of Easy Bake?

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 04:52 PM (6tqEs)

747 If indoor plumbing is THE measure of a civilization, those alien spaceships must have some really awesome toilets Mxrtz: MONTY, we are a hive-mind from Planet Yxxzr. Take us to your leader. Monty: Well, my leader is rather an idiot, to state the plain truth. I can suggest several better alternatives. Mxrtz: Lead us to the place where you make the poop. We wish to know more of your pooping technology. Monty: Aliens poop? Far out. Mxrtz: Did not you read the popular earth-book, Everyone Poops? Our Lord High Chamberlain of the ship Farts Once, Shits Many has issued it to all who serve under him, that they may know and be enlightened. Monty: Huh. So you guys want to know how our toilets work? Mxrtz: We share our pooping technology with others in hopes that they will likewise share their pooping technology with us. Monty: Well, okay. C'mon in here into the ol' stink-lodge and I'll give you the guided tour. Mxrtz: You do us great honor, Monty. You shall be among the Chosen of our people. Monty: Spiffy!

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 04:52 PM (O3eFQ)

748 And as for environmental conditions, I don't buy it. Western Europe and the Western United States are quite similar: mountain ranges, forests, with river-bottom lowlands and plains. America is bigger of course, but not different in any substantial way.

-------------------

You're using a narrow definition of environment. What about animals? North American Indians did not have the eminently-useful horse. But they had a lot of game animals.

And did Northern Europeans choose civilization, or did the Romans bring it to them?

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 04:52 PM (Xd9fe)

749 My theory: Earth is the only planet with life. Why? because Earth is the first planet to develop life (someone has to be first). Maybe in a few billion years other planets will have it either by independent development or colonized from Earth. Hawking has exactly the same amount of evidence to support his claim as I do, namely none, so my theory has just as much validity.

Posted by: Aaron at April 25, 2010 04:52 PM (XUIJ5)

750 I drew a picture of mo already it was a stick man screwing a tiny 7yr old little girl.

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 25, 2010 04:52 PM (5zJAC)

751 does the introduction of either boobs or bacon hasten its demise or prolong its agony?

Science tells us that B & B generally waken a cob logger creating an alternative universe blog.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 04:53 PM (7VvJB)

752 I am big. It's the universe that got small.

Posted by: Norma Desmond at April 25, 2010 04:53 PM (ocax6)

753 Depends on the society and the relative availability of food at the time.  As far as I know American Indians didn't feed their parents to the wolves because they couldn't hunt any more. 

Posted by: Ace's liver at April 25, 2010 08:48 PM (LtIsn)

Have you ever read Mary White Rowlandson's account of her time among the MA Indians as a captive? It is a pretty interesting view into contemporary Amerindian mores...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 04:53 PM (bgcml)

754
Blazer,


are you spreading doubt about the Wisdom of Easy Bake?

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 08:52 PM (6tqEs)







Whenever the chance presents itself.


Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 04:54 PM (t72+4)

755

O/T  This is the second pix to show Shebacca sporting a "package."  Coincidence?  I think not.

http://tinyurl.com/2dlc4by


 

Posted by: RushBabe at April 25, 2010 04:54 PM (LKkE8)

756 As for the myth that the Indians were all peace loving basket weavers before the white man arrived;

The Lakota Sioux had domain over most of the Northern Plains. They got that domain by driving out the weaker tribes like the Crow

The Comanche ruled most of Northern Texas and Western Oklahoma because they were resourceful, the first on the Plains to master the newfangled horse, and had tortures of prisoners that would make a nazi puke

The Potomacs didn't rule the Chesapeake Tidewater because they were so good at reaching consensus.

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 04:54 PM (sYxEE)

757

So to sum up, pussy is the driving force of group conflict.

 

Pithy. And irrefutable.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:54 PM (RZ8pf)

758
Mxrtz: You do us great honor, Monty. You We shall be among the Chosen of our people anally probed last.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 04:55 PM (4aB58)

759 How long must a thread go before I draw attention to myself personally but in an indirect fashion, like a straight-man leaving the bait just hanging there in the air, knowing, hoping someone will to respond to it and give me what I need?

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 04:56 PM (A8C+8)

760

Would someone please convince Michelle Obama that one of the signs of being civilized is to buy clothes in the correct size. Jeebus, woman, you are the First Lady, IÂ’m sure you can get your pants altered so they fit right.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:56 PM (RZ8pf)

761 Can you show me an example of a tribe today anywhere in the world who has 0% dependence on the civilized world for resources? Sentineli, I think.

Posted by: cheshirecat at April 25, 2010 04:56 PM (Qb4Lv)

762 So to sum up, pussy is the driving force of group conflict. Posted by: toby928 Maybe it's the scarcity of it.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 04:57 PM (6tqEs)

763

Since our world is full of examples of things that look real but arenÂ’t such as optical illusions, cgi, and blue screen,  it is thus safe using HawkingÂ’s reasoning that the universe itself that we can only see through telescopes might be fake.  On top of that mankind is full examples of scientist being wrong, from the earth being flat to the earth being the center of the universe.   So from that I include most scientists must be wrong. Combine the two and the odds are that there is nothing else out there in the solar system has a big fake lighted painting of the “universe” around it.

Posted by: GreatSpeaches at April 25, 2010 04:57 PM (u7gY8)

764 You're using a narrow definition of environment. What about animals? North American Indians did not have the eminently-useful horse. But they had a lot of game animals.

And did Northern Europeans choose civilization, or did the Romans bring it to them?

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 08:52 PM (Xd9fe)

Didn't the early Amerindians eat all the horses in the Americas? Or at least, they went extinct shortly after the Amerindians showed up...

And as for Northern Europeans and civilization, yes it was mostly a choice. The Romans did conquer England and France, but not Germany. The latter voluntarily romanized themselves for the most part. And the former mostly continued to live as they had under the Romans once they got rid of them. Though the British-Romans had a slight barbarian invasion problem that rather upended things for them.



Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 04:58 PM (bgcml)

765
OK it Sunday, I post that it's been FOUR hours since we've had a tread.

Or I post something worth reading, what are the chances of that? 

Bingo a new thread.

Wake up boys.

Posted by: Kemp at April 25, 2010 04:58 PM (2+9Yx)

766
How long must a thread go
before I draw attention to myself personally but in an indirect fashion, like a straight-man leaving the bait just hanging there in the air, knowing, hoping someone will to respond to it and give me what I need?

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 08:56 PM (A8C+




The answer my friend.....is blowin' in the wind.....the answer is blowin' in the wind.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 04:58 PM (t72+4)

767 pussy is the driving force of group conflict.

No, wealth and power are the driving forces.
With those two you get all the pussy you want.
Of course wealth and power eventually turn you into a  Gay Pedophile so the pussy part becomes moot.

Posted by: Tony Soprano at April 25, 2010 04:58 PM (H+LJc)

768

kbdabear, not just their tortures. The ceremonies for the rites of passage in some tribes were gruesome to the extreme.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 04:58 PM (RZ8pf)

769 Civilization", as we understand it, arose from agricultural peoples, not from hunter-gatherer bands.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 08:18 PM (O3eFQ)

Which is why one of my Five Pillars of the Stupidity and Primitive Nature of islam is:

3) islam moved to a totally lunar calendar, with the death penalty for anyone who inserted intercalaries.

islam was the first major ideology that intentionally moved backwards, from the solar adjusted calendars that agrarian societies needed back to the lunar calendar of the desert nomad who had no need for seasons and the rest - as all other civilizations came to rely on.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 04:59 PM (N49h9)

770
Sentineli, I think.

for real? because that would put a big whole in theory that all the living-in-the stone-age-tribes would be extinct today.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 04:59 PM (4aB58)

771

'Nam Grunt -

Never ... I repeat, NEVER do Walmart on Sunday. I don't care how badly you need toilet paper.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 04:59 PM (GkYyh)

772 785,

No shit!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 25, 2010 05:00 PM (5zJAC)

773 As for the myth that the Indians were all peace loving basket weavers before the white man arrived;

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 08:54 PM (sYxEE)

It seems to me the notion that the Amerindians were some hippie peacniks while the rest of the world were playing out Mad Max for real is rather offensive. They were just like the people everywhere else, and when they had the opportunity to take by war they did so - exactly like the French or the Turks...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 05:00 PM (bgcml)

774 I don't know if anyone has posited a reason for this, other than that the amerinds never spent much time building a civilization -- they never formed large societies and remained largely bound in nomadic, hunter-gatherer groups. Whatever exposure they had to outside "technology" was fleeting and was, over time, simply lost to cultural memory. It was only the colonization by Europeans that re-established the link to the Old World and its technology.

(I do often find myself confused at the lack of farming among amerinds, though. They certainly knew how; many eastern tribes farmed maize and other crops on a fairly substantial scale. But farming requires tools and technology that many amerind tribes just seemed to scorn on purpose. It's very odd. The Australian Aborigines and the Maori fall into the same pattern.)

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 07:59 PM (O3eFQ)

The Aztec, the Maya, the Inca were all large-scale civilizations.  There were others that were unable to survive even the very initial contact with European disease -- not to mention older civilizations wiped out by war with other Amerind civilizations.

What puzzles me is that the Amerinds don't seem to have domesticated many species of animals for use as beast of burden and ranched meat.  Replacing human labor with animal labor is a big help in freeing up time for inventive thought and tinkering, and making protein foods available in pens and pastures rather than as game also helps.

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 05:01 PM (W+GYq)

775

You know, IÂ’ve spent the better part of this entire thread mostly arguing some pretty knowledgeable stuff so I really donÂ’t think I deserve to have some stupid asshole toss shit my way for any jokes I might begin making since this thread is now close to 800 FUCKING comments.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 05:01 PM (RZ8pf)

776 UGH the History Channel show is ruined in the first ten seconds by doing an introduction BY THE MOST ANTI-AMERICAN PRESIDENT EVER.

Posted by: tdpwells at April 25, 2010 05:02 PM (Ei3oZ)

777

jesus fucking christ.

i was excited to see the new series on History Channel about Americaa, and guess how it starts? Fucking Obama. Dear Lord, is ther any TV show that he hasn't appeared on?

Posted by: Ben at April 25, 2010 05:02 PM (DKV43)

778 As far as I know American Indians didn't feed their parents to the wolves because they couldn't hunt any more.

When a man in the Plains Indian tribes could no longer contribute, he was expected to go to a graveyard to die. His wife's belongings were taken from her as she was not going to be taken care of either. Let's just say they didn't have a great pension plan, and they weren't big on Social Security benefits

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 05:03 PM (sYxEE)

779
>>>It is a human imperative, this need to explore.

yet another thing the natives didn't do!

------------------------

Well, except for the whole "walk across an ice bridge from Siberia clear down to fucking Tirra del Fuego" thing.

------------------------

When the Pilgrims and Puritans showed up, the indians stayed in thier tee-pees. In the 19th cenutury, they were still living in their tee-pees. They showed little interest to adapt some of the modern practices and knowlegde of the European white settlers.

---------------------

And when whites were captured by Indians and adopted into their tribes, many wished to remain in the Indian tee-pees and showed little interest in returning to their modern and knowledgeable European settlements.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 05:03 PM (Xd9fe)

780

islam was the first major ideology that intentionally moved backwards, from the solar adjusted calendars that agrarian societies needed back to the lunar calendar of the desert nomad who had no need for seasons and the rest - as all other civilizations came to rely on.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 08:59 PM (N49h9)

Heh, I can reuse something I posted last night. The response from the last Zoroastrian Emperor of Persia to the demand he submit to Islam;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazdegerd_III

While we laid the foundations of philanthropy and righteousness and kindness in this world and held high the ensign of "Good Thoughts, Good Words and Good Deeds", you and your ancestors were desert wanderers who ate snakes and lizards and buried your innocent daughters alive.

You Arabs who have no regard for God's creatures, who mercilessly put people to the sword, who mistreat your women and bury you daughters alive, who attack caravans and are highway robbers, who commit murder, who kidnap women and spouses, how dare you presume to teach us, who are above these evils, to worship God?

Note that this is from a letter around 620 AD...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 05:03 PM (bgcml)

781 The Fuckawee Indians invented watertight baskets and the late-night talk show format.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (6tqEs)

782 What the FUCK!  America "The History of Us." Is just starting, the most expensive series by The History Channel, and they already RUINED IT, by having that fucking tool Obama introduce this show...this is the fuck wit that says America is NOT exceptional, just before a show that will be all about American exceptional-ism...I am pissed by this more than anything this asshole has done, everyone write to the History channel, the fucking tools!

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (eKOT/)

783 Er, make that "Tierra", dammit.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (Xd9fe)

784 That Hawking show it on now.  They're already talking about green slime. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (A8C+8)

785 Hey somebody put me some info.  Have you ever seen those posters of the milky way and they say you are here?  How do they actually get the picture, I know not an actual picture, but how do they know what the milky way looks like from the outside looking toward us?

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (7VvJB)

786 "It" is the new "is."

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (A8C+8)

787

So the "Native Americans" gave us tobacco, syphilis and cocaine.

In return we gave them alcohol.

Even trade?

Posted by: Ed Anger at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (7+pP9)

788

It seems to me the notion that the Amerindians were some hippie peacniks while the rest of the world were playing out Mad Max for real is rather offensive. They were just like the people everywhere else, and when they had the opportunity to take by war they did so - exactly like the French or the Turks...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 09:00 PM (bgcml)






 The Russians were a peaceful group of collective farmers who had absolutely no designs on world domination before the the Germans arrived. Our history books tell us so.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 05:04 PM (t72+4)

789 When the Pilgrims and Puritans showed up, the indians stayed in thier tee-pees. In the 19th cenutury, they were still living in their tee-pees. They showed little interest to adapt some of the modern practices and knowlegde of the European white settlers. Well, they did like the guns and booze, though.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 08:42 PM (4aB5

In Israel, they had a project where they built new, beautiful, big houses for some bedoins, because everyone felt bad looking at them living in their shabby tents while modern civilization was growing right around them.  What happened?  The bedoins put their tents up outside their houses and still lived in the tents.  True story and that's not more than 30 years ago.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 05:05 PM (N49h9)

790 Combine the two and the odds are that there is nothing else out there in the solar system has a big fake lighted painting of the “universe” around it.

Posted by: GreatSpeaches at April 25, 2010 08:57 PM (u7gY

Put there by aliens who foresaw what huge pains in the butt the human race would become.  I mean, if you were on a planet orbiting a distant star and saw evidence of where Earth was going, is there any length to which you wouldn't go to keep an Al Gore from escaping Earth and invading your world?

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 05:05 PM (W+GYq)

791

tpdswells.

what killed me was they opened the show saying "hard work and innovation created america" then they show president welfare state who have never had a real job or created anything tangible.

fucking history network

Posted by: Ben at April 25, 2010 05:06 PM (DKV43)

792 Guy, they've mapped the redshift of so many stars in the galaxy, they know how far away they are, and they can build-up a map.  There's also parallax motion and what we would call "atmospheric perspective" on Earth.  I suspect.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:06 PM (A8C+8)

793 Didn't Tony Montana say that?

Why, yes he did. He is a friend of ours.

Posted by: Tony Soprano at April 25, 2010 05:06 PM (H+LJc)

794

So the "Native Americans" gave us tobacco, syphilis and cocaine.

In return we gave them alcohol.

Even trade?

the fire water runs through them like buffalo through the plains

Posted by: Ben at April 25, 2010 05:06 PM (DKV43)

795 Fucking Obama. Dear Lord, is ther any TV show that he hasn't appeared on? Posted by: Ben at April 25, 2010 09:02 PM

Hannity, Glen Beck, and Red Eye for starters

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 05:07 PM (sYxEE)

796
Some tribes did adapt. They blended into the background and did not resist.

That's why you never hear about them.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 08:45 PM (6tqEs)

And more specifically, Andrew Jackson happened to them. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Civilized_Tribes

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 05:07 PM (bgcml)

797 You know, IÂ’ve spent the better part of this entire thread mostly arguing some pretty knowledgeable stuff so I really donÂ’t think I deserve to have some stupid asshole toss shit my way for any jokes I might begin making since this thread is now close to 800 FUCKING comments. Eh, I'm with you. I've pretty much run out of enthusiasm for the intellectual stuff, hence my abrupt turn into poop humor. And this thread did venture pretty far afield, didn't it? Quantum theory, sociology, archaeology, poop jokes...a little something for everyone. Long threads are always a minefield for newcomers, though -- you never know the exact context of shit you're responding to. I've done it myself; make a snide comment about something, then find out that you were taking something out of context. Moral: deny everything and blame the Chinese.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 05:08 PM (O3eFQ)

798

It seems to me the notion that the Amerindians were some hippie peacniks while the rest of the world were playing out Mad Max

Whose notion is this?  Because, f/x, James Cameron wouldn't be a reputable voice.  I don't recall any serious person ever, ever making such a claim.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:08 PM (A8C+8)

799

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 09:03 PM (bgcml)

Thanks, 18 (can I call you "18"?).  I bookmarked that for future quoting.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 05:08 PM (N49h9)

800   718

Weird it is sunny and nice here in Seattle. But, IÂ’m still working off the tail end of my stomach bug so IÂ’m indoors discussing time and space travel and the destruction of the natives instead.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle

 

Just so it doesn't settle in your chest. Ya know the congestion and stuff.

Posted by: Kelly at April 25, 2010 05:08 PM (FLFli)

801 "Heeeeeeeeeeeer's Brown Cloud!" ♫ Dah dat dat dahhhh dah♫

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 05:09 PM (6tqEs)

802 True story and that's not more than 30 years ago.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 09:05 PM (N49h9)

And if you look at Gaza, the locals have pretty much allowed all of the infrastructure the Israelis left them to fall apart through disuse. Except the stuff they use for weapons smuggling, of course.

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 05:10 PM (bgcml)

803

Would someone please convince Michelle Obama that one of the signs of being civilized is to buy clothes in the correct size. Jeebus, woman, you are the First Lady, IÂ’m sure you can get your pants altered so they fit right.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 08:56 PM (RZ8pf)

Perhaps it is part of a plan to make it look like the President doesn't need a Tele-Prom-Ter any more: if he can just learn to read the First Lady's lips....

Posted by: stuiec at April 25, 2010 05:10 PM (W+GYq)

804 766 I am big. It's the universe that got small.

Posted by: Norma Desmond at April 25, 2010 08:53 PM (ocax6)

You want to see big???

Posted by: Michelle's Ass at April 25, 2010 05:10 PM (YVZlY)

805
from the wiki link above:
"The number of slaveholders was small, but members of each tribe held black slaves."

Damn, I guess I was wrong. The indians were just like the white Europeans!

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 05:11 PM (4aB58)

806 You're not making jokes PGiS, you're directing attention to yourself once again.  And we've been joking the whole fucking time, so it's not like you just decided to introduce humor.  You want to see a selfish asshole, look in the mirror.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:11 PM (A8C+8)

807

Well stuiec, to take a page from MontyÂ’s poop humor, if Michelle farts sheÂ’s gonna split that pair of pants wide open so letÂ’s hope she isnÂ’t feeling gassy.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 05:12 PM (RZ8pf)

808 but how do they know what the milky way looks like from the outside looking toward us Also, we know we're seeing the disc of our galaxy "edge on", and that we share the rough shape of other spirals in our local group. We're not entirely sure if we're in "barred spiral" galaxy or a normal spiral, but it seems likely that we're just a smaller version of Andromeda. (We do have several smaller globular clusters floating near us, though, which makes many scientists wonder if there's some highly-massive "attractor" pulling on everything. If there is, it's something we can't sense just yet.)

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 05:12 PM (O3eFQ)

809 807

tpdswells.

what killed me was they opened the show saying "hard work and innovation created america" then they show president welfare state who have never had a real job or created anything tangible.

fucking history network

Posted by: Ben at April 25, 2010 09:06 PM (DKV43)

I don't even know if I want to watch that shit now.  I got a call from my dad not a minute later saying, "Well that series is ruined."

Posted by: tdpwells at April 25, 2010 05:12 PM (Ei3oZ)

810 805 When the Pilgrims and Puritans showed up, the indians stayed in thier tee-pees. In the 19th cenutury, they were still living in their tee-pees

Just a nitpick here. Tipis were a dwelling of the nomadic Plains Indians, made of buffalo hide and designed for mobility. The tribes of the East Coast lived in what were pretty much permanent dwellings in villages

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 05:12 PM (sYxEE)

811 This thread died 2 hours ago; I can smell the stench from the next room.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 25, 2010 05:12 PM (muUqs)

812 Ya know whats stupid about "Independence Day"? Wouldn't it be simpler to list what ISN'T stupid instead?

Posted by: cheshirecat at April 25, 2010 05:13 PM (Qb4Lv)

813 Long ass thread.  I've read enough fantasy today (i.e. scientific presentations), but has anybody posted this?

Carl Sagan sings!

Posted by: Kratos (now with 100% more soul) at April 25, 2010 05:13 PM (w/kNT)

814 My letter to the History Chanel:

Thanks for ruining America, The History of Us.  Undoubtedly your finest effort, and a show about the EXCEPTIONAL-ISM of America.  So you have Obama that expressly says we are NOT exceptional and is busy remaking this great country in the image of failed European States.  Whoever made this decision is NO friend to the History Channel, or to us the American People.


Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:14 PM (eKOT/)

815

When a man in the Plains Indian tribes could no longer contribute, he was expected to go to a graveyard to die. His wife's belongings were taken from her as she was not going to be taken care of either. Let's just say they didn't have a great pension plan, and they weren't big on Social Security benefits

Bear, Jack London wrote a great short short on this.  Really sad.  Can't remember the name right now.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:14 PM (A8C+8)

816 White men come. Kill all our women. Rape all our buffalo.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 05:14 PM (6tqEs)

817 OK, so I've got that History Channel thing taping. Before I watch it and get angry, tell me:

1) Does it use lots of dorky re-enactors happy for camera time?

2) Is it narrated by Edward-fucking-Hermann?

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 05:15 PM (Xd9fe)

818  The Russians were a peaceful group of collective farmers who had absolutely no designs on world domination before the the Germans arrived. Our history books tell us so.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 09:04 PM (t72+4)

Hey, I was a bad mofo. Don't make me have to go all cossack on you.


Posted by: Yermak Timofeyevich at April 25, 2010 05:15 PM (bgcml)

819

Also, we know we're seeing the disc of our galaxy "edge on", and that we share the rough shape of other spirals in our local group.

One interesting new discovery that blew my mind is that we're in a barred spiral.  We always thought it was a just a spiral. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:16 PM (A8C+8)

820
Exit question: Redbone, real injuns or fake injuns?

Heyyyyy-ayyyyy, heyyyyy-ayyy, Come and get your love.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 05:17 PM (4aB58)

821 The History channel gets it's content from liberal asshole academia, I stopped watching that BS many years ago.

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 25, 2010 05:17 PM (5zJAC)

822 Also, we know we're seeing the disc of our galaxy "edge on"

So are galaxies "on the same plane" so to speak.  Like when you score a touchdown, crossing the plane?

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 05:17 PM (7VvJB)

823 You want to see a selfish asshole, look in the mirror. Shaddap that racket, you kids! I'm tryinna watch the teevee! Pipe down or I'll tan your asses! And watch your fucking language! Your mother and I didn't raise you to have some filthy goddamned potty mouths! You'll show some respect in this house or I'll bust your fucking skulls! Fricking kids. Drive me up the wall sometimes. Mabel, hand me that TV Guide, will you? There's a rerun of Matlock I want to catch later on.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 05:17 PM (O3eFQ)

824 Meh,

If you believe in ID you already believe in space aliens - e.g.: Loius Farrakan and his 'mad scientist' in the space wheel thing which created melanin-challenged  people.

If you believe an omnipotent god created the whole universe just to host one speck of sand to put the only experiment in life you are a bit of a megalomaniac.

On the sub-topic of aboriginal americans... this was as diverse a lot of civilizations as one could expect from two continents, there suffering being primarily due to the lack of persistent written communications and losing the wars.



Posted by: Druid at April 25, 2010 05:18 PM (nyVIc)

825
>>>Just a nitpick here.

Stop fact-checking me!

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 05:18 PM (4aB58)

826 Soldier blue in the barren wastes,
hunting and killing's a game,
Raping the women and wasting the men,
the only good Injuns are tame.

Posted by: Iron-fuckin'-Maiden at April 25, 2010 05:19 PM (Xd9fe)

827 Damn, I guess I was wrong. The indians were just like the white Europeans!

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 09:11 PM (4aB5

As were the Africans. Remember those evil Portuguese and Dutch slave traders generally bought their wares from African merchants themselves.

And of course, there was a thriving Mediterranean slave trade in Northern Africa until the Americans (with British help)  defeated the Barbary pirates...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 05:19 PM (bgcml)

828 My letter to the History Chanel:

Thanks for ruining America, The History of Us.  Undoubtedly your finest effort, and a show about the EXCEPTIONAL-ISM of America.  So you have Obama that expressly says we are NOT exceptional and is busy remaking this great country in the image of failed European States.  Whoever made this decision is NO friend to the History Channel, or to us the American People.

You took the words right out of my mouth.  Banished to the bedroom because mr. antisocialist wants to watch his ol' western, I turn on my Christmas-gift-32-inch-lcd television to watch America, The History of Us - and who do I see glaring back at me?  Mr. Never Miss An Opportunity To Get Some Face-Time On The Tube. 

Posted by: antisocialist at April 25, 2010 05:19 PM (Rwudm)

829 Okay. Suppose there are aliens. And suppose they have rules. Maybe they already gone through their various Europeans versus the Native American moments, so they have now agreed to a "Prime Directive". No direct contact with the natives, until the natives discover FTL drive. A grow up before you're allowed in the club thing. All they're allowed to do is check every now and then. You know, just to make sure the natives didn't discover nuclear weapons before they learned to handle that impulse control problem, and caused their name to be checked off the Up and Coming list. 

Posted by: Mike Giles at April 25, 2010 05:19 PM (PcRFJ)

830 And when whites were captured by Indians and adopted into their tribes, many wished to remain in the Indian tee-pees and showed little interest in returning to their modern and knowledgeable European settlements.

Adult whites were usually either killed or used as hostages in trade. The children were another matter. The tribes never had large numbers so young boys of any race were useful to the tribe to train as hunters and warriors. The young girls were usually consigned to slave away on chores and serve as a sexual toy.

The Stockholm Syndrome didn't suddenly pop up in the 1970s

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 05:19 PM (sYxEE)

831 members of each tribe held black slaves

Let me be clear: the Indians acted stupidly.  And now Jeremiah Wright and I control their kemosabe asses.  Revenge is a dish best served by 52% of the electorate.

Posted by: Barry the O. at April 25, 2010 05:20 PM (oofBp)

832  
speaking of attention whores...

rdbrew, I'm pretty sure you have yet to atone for scaring away joan. Your day will come, my friend. Your day will come.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 05:21 PM (4aB58)

833

Thanks, 18 (can I call you "18"?).  I bookmarked that for future quoting.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 09:08 PM (N49h9)

Sure...

I find it fascinating that you could make the same complaint of Islam in 2010 that you could in 620. And in oddly, Islam is nominally very big on learning history...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 05:21 PM (bgcml)

834 So are galaxies "on the same plane" so to speak. Like when you score a touchdown, crossing the plane? No. Galaxies cluster together in "clusters", "superclusters", and enormous "membranes" that form the wall of "bubbles" that are millons of light-years on a side. But the orientation of the galaxies themselves are apparently random. Look at the Hubble Deep Field: every point of light you see is a whole galaxy, not a star. All galactic morphologies -- spiral, barred spiral, elliptical, globular -- are represented.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 05:21 PM (O3eFQ)

835 844 The Brits saw it that way.Remember they were'nt interested of anything that far West.The Colonies were interested not the Crown.

Posted by: steevy at April 25, 2010 05:21 PM (PZTqb)

836
Just a nitpick here. Tipis were a dwelling of the nomadic Plains Indians, made of buffalo hide and designed for mobility. The tribes of the East Coast lived in what were pretty much permanent dwellings in villages

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 09:12 PM (sYxEE)

Heresy!

Posted by: Iroquois Longhouse Dweller at April 25, 2010 05:21 PM (7+pP9)

837 835 OK, so I've got that History Channel thing taping. Before I watch it and get angry, tell me:

1) Does it use lots of dorky re-enactors happy for camera time?

2) Is it narrated by Edward-fucking-Hermann?

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 09:15 PM (Xd9fe)

It's narrated by Liev Schreiber according to my guide, and I can't answer #1 since I turned it off after seeing The Douchebag.

Posted by: tdpwells at April 25, 2010 05:22 PM (Ei3oZ)

838

And if you look at Gaza, the locals have pretty much allowed all of the infrastructure the Israelis left them to fall apart through disuse. Except the stuff they use for weapons smuggling, of course.

Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 09:10 PM (bgcml)

Ibn Khaldun wrote about the arabs' proclivity to tear permanent structures apart for temporary use.  He said that any nation conquered by arabs is destroyed.  That was in the 14th century.  Between your quote from 600, Ibn Khaldun from 1395, Churchill from 1899, and what we know of the last century, the arabs haven't really moved one iota forward - though they get more dangerous every year.  Trillions of free petro dollars have gone through their hands (with no work on their part) and they have nothing to show for it.  No industry.  No art.  Nothing.  Just some skyscrapers in some little desert spots that will be the worlds most expensive ghost towns in a couple of decades.

As to the Gazans, Gaza is such a beautiful place - speaking of the land and the shore they have.  They could turn it into a tourist spot, if they could just control themselves.  The lefties would fork cash hand over fist to hang out in some posh Gazan hotel on the Med.  But ... it's a total shithole because they prefer blowing poeple up and destroying everything they touch. 

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 05:23 PM (N49h9)

839 You folks should tune in to coast to coast sometimes, that's where the 52% are.

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 25, 2010 05:23 PM (5zJAC)

840

 

823 You're not making jokes PGiS

Wow, rdbrewer, take some more meds, the morning batch has worn off.

Posted by: Kelly at April 25, 2010 05:23 PM (FLFli)

841

Yeah, well thanks for trying Monty but IÂ’m actually pretty hurt and offended. Which, I guess was his intention. Not sure what I did to draw his ire, but I suppose if I want to continue hanging out at Ace I need to get used to it.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 05:24 PM (RZ8pf)

842 HEY!! I like rdbrewer.

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 25, 2010 05:25 PM (5zJAC)

843 Thanks Monty, I guess I should have said each galaxy as my question.  It seems they are always represented as kind of a whirpool disc.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 05:25 PM (7VvJB)

844 If the Milky Way is indeed a barred spiral galaxy, we should charge a lot more for admission.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 05:25 PM (6tqEs)

845 Monty..I believe they are almost certain that our galaxy is  barred. Plus it has only 2 main arms instead of 4.

Posted by: sig at April 25, 2010 05:25 PM (2i+Vz)

846
You're not making jokes PGiS, you're directing attention to yourself once again.  And we've been joking the whole fucking time, so it's not like you just decided to introduce humor.  You want to see a selfish asshole, look in the mirror.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:11 PM (A8C+





Ahhhh, rdb,you've just been achin' for weeks to do that now, havent you? Pretentious and jealous much asshole ?

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 05:25 PM (t72+4)

847

This thread is long, so it's fine for me to threadjack.

Brilliant.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:25 PM (k61kt)

848 Ok, so far after Obama had to shit on America, the History of Us, it is well done and seems factual and pro-America.  I know Obama explicitly asked to do this because he knows we all will be comparing American History to his weak ass speech about how we are just as exceptional as the Greeks, just before they went bankrupt.  God I despise this liberal projection of a human being.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:26 PM (eKOT/)

849 So, Hawkins thinks that the vast majority of aliens are microbs and what not?  Gee, that's too bad.  My enthusiasm for funding astronomy and space exploration  is directly related to the probability of aliens being hot looking slutty green chicks with big boobs.

Posted by: Ed at April 25, 2010 05:26 PM (OCfDT)

850

To do what, Blazer?

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:27 PM (k61kt)

851 Heres another good "you are here" picture: our position in the large-scale "filaments" that make up the local 30% or so of the observable universe.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 05:27 PM (O3eFQ)

852 Pay it no mind, PGiS.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 05:27 PM (6tqEs)

853 Ha Ha Ha Ha, talking about the British were using the VAT and that helped to piss us off for the revolution.  OK, now going on about slavery.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:27 PM (eKOT/)

854

kbdabear, the Northwest tribes also had more permanent dwellings. As did the Pueblos. From what IÂ’ve studied each tribe developed the types of dwellings that were most suited to their lifestyles and also the threats of their environment, including threats from other tribes.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 05:27 PM (RZ8pf)

855
ah jeez, here we go

there's nothing more pathetic than watching our blog's equivalent to redheaded stepchildren, the ONT'ers, argue and name-call.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 05:27 PM (4aB58)

856 I've read conjecture that there may already be aliens living here among us.

Please join me in passing the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill so that these aliens came billions of miles in search of a better life, and they should not have to live in the shadows

Posted by: Sen. Lindsey Grahamnesty at April 25, 2010 05:27 PM (sYxEE)

857 OT:

As most of you know two of the Brave Navy Seals have been aquitted, let's all pray for the third.

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 25, 2010 05:28 PM (5zJAC)

858

rdbrew, I'm pretty sure you have yet to atone for scaring away joan. Your day will come, my friend. Your day will come.

Heh.  It already has.  It already has.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:28 PM (k61kt)

859 869, Location, location, location.

Posted by: eman at April 25, 2010 05:29 PM (6tqEs)

860 Angry mobs without work in Boston.  British shoot some guy, I think 1770 is the year. 

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:29 PM (eKOT/)

861

Will you East Coast people who are watching the History Channel special keep us posted as to whether it is good or not. I can skip the beginning with Obama if you think the rest is worthwhile.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 05:29 PM (RZ8pf)

862 Five dead in this initial Boston riot.  Where was Crosby Stills Nash and Young?

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:30 PM (eKOT/)

863 Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 09:29 PM (RZ8pf)

I just turned it on for a minute and Michael Bloomberg was on it, talking about the Boston Massacre.  That's quite enough for me.  Why would Bloomberg be on any program about American history?

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 05:31 PM (N49h9)

864 The blogs of the day called it "The Bloody Massacre"  People were avid readers because they all read the Bible.  Hey higher education you listening?  Our communications network was one of the best in the world...inventing the internet even then.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:32 PM (eKOT/)

865


This thread is long, so it's fine for me to threadjack.

Brilliant.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:25 PM (k61kt)


To do what, Blazer?

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:27 PM (k61kt)





You accuse her of threadjacking and going offtopic  which I guess is your major beef with her since you brought it up a few weeks ago, sweepea. However, you tend to do the same things from time to time and by time from time I mean every fuckin' day by posting stupid as shit self congratulatory links in the middle of threads that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Hypocrite much?

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 05:32 PM (t72+4)

866
oh look, the stupid thread is up

which means AoS is closed for the night

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 05:32 PM (4aB58)

867

Monty..I believe they are almost certain that our galaxy is  barred. Plus it has only 2 main arms instead of 4.

I didn't know that.  Veddy interestink.  I thought I read something recently that had four arms listed by name.  They gave them names.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:32 PM (k61kt)

868 It seems they are always represented as kind of a whirpool disc. They take all kinds of shapes. Edwin Hubble was the first to classify the standard shapes: spiral, barred spiral, elliptical, globular. But there are others. One, called the "Sombrero Galaxy", is shaped like, well, a sombrero! (It is a disc-shaped galaxy, but doesn't have well-differentiated arms.) "Whirlpool" galaxies tend to be the larger and more well-organized (and apparently older, as the further back in time we look -- i.e., the further away -- the fewer spirals we see.) This probably has to do with the greater mass, which causes a gravitational "spin" that in turn leads to the spiral arms being created.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 05:32 PM (O3eFQ)

869 He goes from saying that there are likely billions of planets out there (read "resources"), but that aliens might target Earth because planetary resources are scarce.

I think the point missed is that having aliens come visit just might be equivalent to living in a city with a serial killer, you just hope you don't meet him anytime soon.

Posted by: Neo at April 25, 2010 05:33 PM (tE8FB)

870 The riots are beginning, it's going to be a long hot summer folks.

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 25, 2010 05:33 PM (5zJAC)

871 1773  Newspapers break stories and help create the revolution.  My how things have changed.  Tea Party...One Million in Tea into the Harbor. 

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:33 PM (eKOT/)

872 No time to read 900 plus comments that veered away from Hawking. Read "Rare Earth" by some astrobiologists whose names escape me right now. Hawking is trying to blow smoke up our collective asses, just like Sagan did.

Posted by: John F Not Kerry at April 25, 2010 05:33 PM (HF2US)

873 From what IÂ’ve studied each tribe developed the types of dwellings that were most suited to their lifestyles and also the threats of their environment, including threats from other tribes.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 09:27 PM

Pretty logical actually. There wasn't a lot of wood on the plains for building dwellings, and since the buffalo weren't going to walk up to the Indians to get shot, they had to migrate to where the herds were.

The US Army decided that the best way to get the tribes off their own territory was to starve them out with the massive buffalo hunts. The big proponent of this was Gen. Sheridan, who used elimination of food supplies of the enemy during his Shenandoah campaign of the Civil War

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 05:33 PM (sYxEE)

874 English banned settlements...does that remind you of Obama and Israel!  Gee History does repeat itself!

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:34 PM (eKOT/)

875 If you think some of those tribes wouldnÂ’t have wiped each other out, regardless of what the white man did, you are wrong. Even among the generally peace loving Northwest tribes there were atrocities committed against each other. LetÂ’s not even go down the Apache or Comanche trail, shall we? And, if you want to see some wicked native on native hate, ask a Navajo how he or she feels about a Hopi. Oh, if I may steal from Tom Lehrer: "Oh, the Navajo hate the Hopi, And the Hopi hate the Navajo. And Apaches hate Comanches, And everybody hates the Sioux..."

Posted by: cheshirecat at April 25, 2010 05:34 PM (Qb4Lv)

876

kbdabear, the Northwest tribes also had more permanent dwellings. As did the Pueblos. From what IÂ’ve studied each tribe developed the types of dwellings that were most suited to their lifestyles and also the threats of their environment, including threats from other tribes.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 09:27 PM (RZ8pf)

I think it was in War Before Civilization that Keeley profiled war among the Pacific NW tribes.

Basically, a group of raiders would sneak into a village at night and set a dwelling on fire. When the inhabitants ran out, they would spear or club them to death. Then they would run away before the rest of the tribe could fight them off. And this would happen incessantly - with a death rate several times higher then WWII. 

It is a fascinating book, btw;

http://tinyurl.com/355wurq


Posted by: 18-1 at April 25, 2010 05:34 PM (bgcml)

877
>>>Hypocrite much?

Pipe down, noob.

rdbrewer's been around a lot longer than you. This place isn't for pussies.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 05:34 PM (4aB58)

878 and apparently older I meant younger, of course. Stupid brain. It has trouble formulating those...things. You know. Ideas with pictures. Thoughts. Yeah, there ya go. Thoughts.

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 05:35 PM (O3eFQ)

879 John Adams, Patrick Henry, George Washington meeting.  People start buying ammo and guns.  I think this is 1774 now. 

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:35 PM (eKOT/)

880
>>>890 No time to read 900 plus comments...

math fail

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 05:36 PM (4aB58)

881 People began declaring they were "Americans!"  Not Virginians, or New Yorkers.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:36 PM (eKOT/)

882
well, my work is done here

see you tomorrow!

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 05:36 PM (4aB58)

883 Showing mixed race folks, getting ready to fight 1775

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:37 PM (eKOT/)

884 Just like now, small force, against the biggest at that time in the world.  Cept the media was with the patriots then.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:38 PM (eKOT/)

885 >>>Hypocrite much?

Pipe down, noob.

rdbrewer's been around a lot longer than you. This place isn't for pussies.

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 09:34 PM (4aB5

well, my work is done here

see you tomorrow!

Posted by: Dynomutt After Dark at April 25, 2010 09:36 PM (4aB5





....and you are ? I guess by you bowing out and leaving that means this place isnt for pussies after all.


Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 05:39 PM (t72+4)

886 Arrest the leaders and seize their weapons...Paul Revere, Fairness Doctrine anyone...stop the leaders, stop their speaking?  Speech is our weapon of choice this time.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:39 PM (eKOT/)

887 880 Five dead in this initial Boston riot.  Where was Crosby Stills Nash and Young?

Why should I waste my folksy songwriting skills on a bunch of teabaggers?

Posted by: Neil Young at April 25, 2010 05:40 PM (sYxEE)

888 Bunker Hill...hundreds of British soldiers, handful of Patriots...commercial, amazing they don't have Obama selling ACORNS.

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:40 PM (eKOT/)

889 Where is Janeway, puny humans? She still has some of my favorite personal attachments. Three speeds!

Posted by: Jeff Murdock at April 25, 2010 05:42 PM (Qb4Lv)

890 Odumbass is an acorn never to grow into an oak!

Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 25, 2010 05:42 PM (5zJAC)

891

What posts, exactly, Blazer?  When?  Where did I interrupt without a cautionary "O/T"?  Except in the ONT where everything is good.  But wait.  Even there I use "O/T" since everything must revolve aroud PGiS and her body.

Faulty generalizations like that, Blazer, are the easist, cheapest form of argument assertion.  They're more from attitude than informed opinion.  The bread and butter of bratty children. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:44 PM (k61kt)

892 BTW Custer was a preening ass and Sitting Bull smoked his ass Hell, Michelle Obama leading the charge could have smoked Custer's arse.

Posted by: cheshirecat at April 25, 2010 05:45 PM (Qb4Lv)

893

kbdabear, the Northwest tribes also had more permanent dwellings. As did the Pueblos. From what IÂ’ve studied each tribe developed the types of dwellings that were most suited to their lifestyles and also the threats of their environment, including threats from other tribes.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 25, 2010 09:27 PM (RZ8pf)

NW groups had plenty of fish, Pueblos (SW groups) had pinon nuts and other abundant natural resources that allowed for a more sedentary lifestyle. Others, not so much.

This is second grade level knowledge base. My fellow morons embarrass me with their ignorance.

Posted by: Iroquois Longhouse Dweller at April 25, 2010 05:45 PM (7+pP9)

894 Yeah, well thanks for trying Monty but IÂ’m actually pretty hurt and offended

--------------------

PGiS, I don't know what beef exists between you and rdbrewer, and it's none of my business regardless. I'm just going to offer some general advice:

You cannot be hurt or offended by someone else's words. If they're in the right, you have to be grateful for the correction and act on it to improve yourself. If they're in the wrong,  they're assholes, and the opinion of an asshole means nothing to you.

Posted by: schizuki at April 25, 2010 05:45 PM (Xd9fe)

895

HEY!! I like rdbrewer.

Nam, I've gotten several messages on FB from people who agree it's tiresome.  And think about it.  It's been the same thing every night since way back when ONT was a scream last summer.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:48 PM (k61kt)

896

What posts, exactly, Blazer?  When?  Where did I interrupt without a cautionary "O/T"?  Except in the ONT where everything is good.  But wait.  Even there I use "O/T" since everything must revolve aroud PGiS and her body.

Faulty generalizations like that, Blazer, are the easist, cheapest form of argument assertion.  They're more from attitude than informed opinion.  The bread and butter of bratty children. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:44 PM (k61kt)





So if you derail a thread by putting an O/T in front of your post before posting some stupid as fuck Japanese dance video its alright then?

Thanks, I'll have to remember that.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 05:48 PM (t72+4)

897 April 19, 1775.   75 Americans,   Against hundreds of an undefeated army, the best in the world.  Shit now a MSM tool talking, Ok once in a while they have one of them.  Now Colin Powell about the blacks that were at Lexington.

Good graphics of the mini balls going across the meadow.  British fire 4 times the rate of the Americans, route them.  8 dead, 10 wounded, Revolution Begins.  Liberals bastards of the day tell the British where the arms are in Concord...I hope they burned in Hell.


Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:49 PM (eKOT/)

898 Movin' on up to the ONT, my droogies....

Posted by: Monty at April 25, 2010 05:49 PM (O3eFQ)

899 Are we really sure Hawking actually said this? Or said anything for that matter?  Wasn't there some controversy a while back where people suspected his caretakers or whatever they are  of just making shit up?

Posted by: koopy at April 25, 2010 05:51 PM (ctR4U)

900 @885
       New Milky Way map

Posted by: sig at April 25, 2010 05:53 PM (2i+Vz)

901 By late morning 1,000 militia members show up at Concord.  British are marching twenty miles back to Boston.  Militia meets them on their march.  Big battle, Americans fire from the woods killing and wounding a 3rd of the British. 

Posted by: Jehu at April 25, 2010 05:53 PM (eKOT/)

902

So if you derail a thread by putting an O/T in front of your post before posting some stupid as fuck Japanese dance video its alright then?

That doesn't derail a thread, numbnuts.  That's exactly the point.  That is, of course, if the discussion didn't veer into Japanese dance.  And I don't suppose that's the case.  Right?  Put thought ahead of feeling.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 05:56 PM (k61kt)

903 i was excited to see the new series on History Channel about Americaa, and guess how it starts? Fucking Obama. Dear Lord, is ther any TV show that he hasn't appeared on? Glenn Beck? (at least in person)

Posted by: cheshirecat at April 25, 2010 05:56 PM (Qb4Lv)

904 This is second grade level knowledge base. My fellow morons embarrass me with their ignorance.
Posted by: Iroquois Longhouse Dweller at April 25, 2010 09:45 PM

Hey, at least we didn't base it on "Dances With Wolves", like a lot of the 52 percenters do, because their supposed history teachers taught them the same thing

Posted by: kbdabear at April 25, 2010 06:02 PM (sYxEE)

905

That is, of course, if the discussion didn't veer into Japanese dance. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:56 PM (k61kt)

Speaking of Japanese dance, that's what that shitty History channel America show reminds me of.  The worst production I have seen.  I got dizzy from the stupid effects they have to cram into every scene.  And when I say, "stupid", I mean stupid! Awful stuff.

Okay.  Carry on with whatever you guys are arguing about.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 25, 2010 06:02 PM (N49h9)

906 I shall offer a truce to the Aliens and buy them off. But who will go to them? Not I. If I fell under the death ray of those murderers, that might be my head in a basket. And not our gentle Obama. The mere sight of him would only encourage the enemy to take over the whole planet. So whom do I send? Whom do I send?....

Posted by: Edward I at April 25, 2010 06:03 PM (GOx5K)

907 So far... I'd have to give the HC series a solid C effort... a meh... could be so much better...!!!

Posted by: Yippie21 at April 25, 2010 06:05 PM (QFWu6)

908 Funny thing about odds... there could be nothing out there, no life anywhere but Earth too. No offense to Hawking but his book was fantastical nonsense.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at April 25, 2010 06:14 PM (PQY7w)

909 From that side bar link, this stuff makes my head hurt:

According to CERN boffins this means that pretty much the whole of physics is wrong, which seems to be pretty much normal for physics:

Since the disappearance of primordial antimatter cannot be explained by the current Standard Model theory, it is clear that we have to look for something new. Scientists are exploring different avenues but, given the fact that what we observe represents only about 4% of the total energy and matter that the Universe is made of, one can guess that part of the key to solving the antimatter mystery could be held in the yet unknown part of the Universe.

Apparently the key to the business involves looking into something called "CP-violation", which is some sort of deviance from normal behaviour on the part of antibottom beauties and their relatives - thus the more of them that can be created at the LHC, the sooner the missing 96 per cent of the universe can be tracked down - perhaps hidden in another dimension or something.


Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 25, 2010 06:15 PM (7VvJB)

910

So if you derail a thread by putting an O/T in front of your post before posting some stupid as fuck Japanese dance video its alright then?


That doesn't derail a thread, numbnuts.  That's exactly the point.  That is, of course, if the discussion didn't veer into Japanese dance.  And I don't suppose that's the case.  Right?  Put thought ahead of feeling.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:56 PM (k61kt)





Of course theres nothing wrong with you doing it rdb, afterall, its YOU doing it.

YOU. You're a shooting star.

Twinkle ,Twinkle,... Baby, Twinkle Twinkle.

Posted by: Blazer at April 25, 2010 06:18 PM (t72+4)

911 Guy Fawkes & rdbrewer   Allegedly Betty (and Barney) Hill (of UFO abduction fame in the 1960s) was supposedly shown a star map by their grey aliens where they pointed out to her where they were from. Several years ago I saw something that alleged it was a star map of our galaxy viewed from the opposite direction we are supposedly used to seeing it mapped from. During their hypnosis sessions Betty sketched part of the map from memory. She said there were other star maps on the ship, but that the greys only discussed the one with her. While some swear by the Hill's alien abduction as being real, others have picked it apart. I do recall, however, Betty Hill commenting on Steven Speilberg's physical depiction of the 'greys' in Close Encounters as being comical and 'unrealistic'.  Whatever that means. I tried to give you a link to her sketch of the star map but the comment keeps getting rejected so I took it out. Google the key words.

Posted by: Drillanwr at April 25, 2010 06:25 PM (GkYyh)

912 The bible says that the world is 6000 years old

Posted by: Math sez at April 25, 2010 06:27 PM (I+7Zv)

913 "the distances between stars are so incomprehensibly vast that interplanetary species aren't likely to come across each other within the lifetime of their species."

Except that the Casimir Effect shows that spacetime can be curved and do so in an way that fits accepted quantum field theory.  That is, spacetime is warped.  Casimir was examining and trying to quantify the van der Waals forces between two charged plates.  He ended up discovering something else that was conclusively proved at the University of Padua in 2001.

Moreover, it is thought that the Casimir effect could be used to stabilize small wormholes. 

Somewhere in there is a way to travel faster then light.

Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at April 25, 2010 06:31 PM (XBdIR)

914

Of course theres nothing wrong with you doing it rdb, afterall, its YOU doing it.

YOU. You're a shooting star.

Twinkle ,Twinkle,... Baby, Twinkle Twinkle.

KAPOW!

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 06:37 PM (k61kt)

915 This is a backhanded attack on capitalism.  It's like Avatar...Any intelligent life out there would have evolved past the point of raiding other planets for resources

Posted by: Guy at April 25, 2010 06:46 PM (G+GPc)

916 I've always though Fermi nailed it decades ago, with his famous comment on the subject: "Where are they?"  Given the data Hawking mentions, there should be millions or billions of intelligent civilizations out there, some hyper-advanced and surely capable of at least visiting us with Turing probes. 
But no one has stopped by.
There is a superb book called "Rare Earth" in which the authors discuss the astonishingly unlikely sequence of events and chance simply leading up to the creation of a planet capable of having life at all, much less intelligent life.   And you add to that the sheer good luck that many of the past catastrophes that Earth has experienced (snowball Earth, asteroid impacts) were small enough to recover from.  They don't even get into the explosive development of high intelligence in humans.  But it is worthy of note that only one line of animals has notably high intelligence at all, and only one of them is building Space Shuttles and working on String Theory (rather different that the chimps using a rock to break open nuts, which gets the enviro types all worked up with excitement).
I think the primary aim of the human race should be the preservation and spread of intelligent life, and if that means we have to pave over the habitat of the endangered left-winged twitbird to do it, so be it.  And we should simply pull the plug on life-support for the underclasses and put that money into spaceflight and other things designed to preserve the intelligence that, as far as we know, exists only here.
Someone once said: "Either we are alone in the Universe, or we are not.  Either is a mind-boggling idea."

Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at April 25, 2010 07:04 PM (kKHE8)

917 schizuki 913 You cannot be hurt or offended by someone else's words. If they're in the right, you have to be grateful for the correction and act on it to improve yourself. If they're in the wrong, they're assholes, and the opinion of an asshole means nothing to you.

I'd like to nominate you to the College of Cardinals.

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 07:07 PM (bNRq6)

918 Guy 935 This is a backhanded attack on capitalism. It's like Avatar...Any intelligent life out there would have evolved past the point of raiding other planets for resources

Really? So they'd just sort of fold in on themselves, achieving total one-ness with the cosmos, contemplating space-Nirvana?

I don't buy it. Any species not keen on self-extinction will have to find a way at least to get to a non-flaring red-dwarf kind of system that will last longer. Otherwise, even on pure Darwinian terms, unsuccessful definition of "evolved" is unsuccessful.

Posted by: Zimriel at April 25, 2010 07:11 PM (bNRq6)

919 My apologies humans, I was in error. It is the tiffany replicators that have now infested this blog. Unfortunately our sensors also detect the energy signatures of the handbag and cheap watch replicators as well.

Posted by: Thor at April 25, 2010 07:14 PM (yHNN0)

920 Thread very long, so commenting assuming someone already covered it...

I'm surprised Hawking would make such a comment as I think he had made comments to the contrary earlier in regards to an alien visitor wanting to strip our planet for "resources".  If I get the time I'll dig in deeper as this is one of my hobbies, but if it's to be taken at face value, I disagree with it for numerous reasons:

- If an intelligent alien race has progressed to the point that they can move inter-system, they are likely very advanced, either in able to create and harness energy on a very large scale.
- As Gabe pointed out, with technological advances that are already in our grasp, even water can be turned into fuel.  If you are an intelligence able to traverse vast distances of space, I would think finding desired resources would be relatively easy.  By our own estimations, chemical and minerals of all types can be found in abundance virtually anywhere given the ability to travel to someplace that they exist.
- I like M. Kaku's take on this (theoretical physicist) you can find at mkaku.org
... see his stuff at mkaku.org
If a civilization is capable of inter-stellar travel, they likely have advanced to a point that we are akin to being an anthill on the side of an interstellar-superhighway... i.e. We know that anthills exist along the highway as we travel from one city to another, but we don't stop by the highway and document them, or offer them trinkets.  We know they exist, and they don't matter to us.  I tend to agree with M. Kaku, that we are likely unimportant to species that would be advanced enough to be conducting interstellar travel.

Posted by: Schlippy at April 25, 2010 07:24 PM (IvVlA)

921 If you like your alien invasion, you can keep your alien invasion.

Posted by: Barak Obama at April 25, 2010 07:25 PM (VRG1L)

922 The Aliens are already here, run by their leader, Stephen Hawking, who has abandoned his fake human suit and lives a comfortable life in a chair with a robo human translator, but in his real alien form.  Thanks to PC language restrictions, invented by Lord Xenu, we can't scrutinize Stephen's actual body to recognize it for what it really is.

He's just keeping the idea alive that we haven't actually come into contact with the aliens yet, and that if we do we should be totally scared of their amazing powers.  In related news, 'INFINITY' is what appears on Obama's real birth certificate, since he was born in a wormhole on the lizard mothership.

Posted by: Sentient Nintendo 64 at April 25, 2010 07:36 PM (dUOK+)

923 Hawking comes to that conclusion for the primary reason that it sidesteps the question of a  creator, to which I would ask. Where did the aliens come from and who created them?

Posted by: jlfintx at April 25, 2010 07:38 PM (Wnk4X)

924 Aliens are definitely here; I married one.

Posted by: Barak Obama at April 25, 2010 07:39 PM (VRG1L)

925

Jared Diamond is not just a crank, he's a fucking fucktard.

In a Scientific American article a few months back praising the lifestyles of primitive hunter-gatherers (is there any other kind?)  he claims "the discovery of agriculture is the worst thing to happen to human beings".

(paraphrase)

Oh yeah, right.

EXCEPT that agriculture is what feed humans to have the time to engage in all those things we call civilization.  Including limp-wristed useless fucks be allowed to LIVE.

Jared Diamond can eat my 15" tattooed cock.

Posted by: Mike Tyson at April 25, 2010 07:40 PM (3sB5l)

926 931

Site chapter and verse dumbass.

Posted by: jlfintx at April 25, 2010 07:41 PM (Wnk4X)

927

Aw crap:  "feed" should be "let".

I was proably thinking "freed" when I typed.

AS if anyone cares.

Posted by: Mike Tyson at April 25, 2010 07:42 PM (3sB5l)

928 the missing 96 per cent of the universe can be tracked down - perhaps hidden in another dimension or something.

Its obviously hidden the same place where dryers put missing socks.

Posted by: Barak Obama at April 25, 2010 07:54 PM (VRG1L)

929 I always thought aliens would have a system like in the original (not the crap ass remake) of "The day the earth stood still" where kick ass was machines would be set up by more intelligent and advanced species to keep a check on more war like primitive species and to prevent exploitation of unadvanced or marginally advanced species.

Posted by: Akbar Zeb at April 25, 2010 07:57 PM (/mRzs)

930 949 the missing 96 per cent of the universe can be tracked down - perhaps hidden in another dimension or something.

There.

There.

I'm pointing right at it.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at April 25, 2010 08:36 PM (bxiXv)

931

The arrival of Christopher Columbus, IMHO, was a far more benevolent event than the occasional raiding parties of the Sioux on their neighbors, pre-Columbus time.

Posted by: Batznratz at April 25, 2010 08:56 PM (nonnt)

932 653  FTL drives are just gravy, the basis of life worth living is in this order:

1. Indoor Pluming
-------------
Nice hats?

Posted by: Anachronda at April 25, 2010 09:00 PM (LD+ZJ)

933

Somewhere in there is a way to travel faster then light.

Hmm.  You know, if going really fast slows down time, then it might follow that slowing down time can make you go really fast.  What do they call that two sides of the equation thing in algebra? 

So:  Just put a thumb on the hands of your clock.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:24 PM (yT/7y)

934

Guy Fawkes & rdbrewer   Allegedly Betty (and Barney) Hill (of UFO abduction fame in the 1960s) was supposedly shown a star map by their grey aliens where they pointed out to her where they were from.

Carl Sagan wrote about that in letters to Stephen A. Walther, the first editor of Astronomy magazine.  It was in one of the first few issues.  Seems like he came down on the side of kinda supporting the kooks.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:26 PM (yT/7y)

935  I would think any species advanced enough to achieve intergalactic travel would be able to just create resources at the sub atomic level.

Posted by: Zap Rowsdower at the Battle of Wolf 359 at April 25, 2010 09:28 PM (Q6g4u)

936

I tried to give you a link to her sketch of the star map but the comment keeps getting rejected so I took it out. Google the key words.

I think  it's probably doing that because the url is too long.  You have to use tinyurl.com to get a shorter url for pretty much most hyperlinking here.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:28 PM (yT/7y)

937

I would think any species advanced enough to achieve intergalactic travel would be able to just create resources at the sub atomic level.

Yeah.  Seems like they'd be able to fuse matter into other types of matter.

Posted by: rdbrewer at April 25, 2010 09:30 PM (yT/7y)

938

Don't you think that they would come here just because they can? We don't go to the beach, mostly, because we “need” to. Maybe they will come because they are smart and want to know more and more stuff about …. well, about just everything. If they are so advanced as to be able to bridge the gulf between the stars, then maybe they have enhanced life-spans, unimaginable amounts of time on their hands compared to our puny and short (what did that guy call it..ah, mostly brutal) lives. You would go to them if you could, be honest, so why wouldn't they come here. Take me! Take me! Kill me later and eat me if you want to, but give me a ticket.

Posted by: Errol at April 25, 2010 09:57 PM (7f/h+)

939 42.

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at April 25, 2010 10:24 PM (2uDBR)

940 We could, of course, be the First Race. No one else past the paramecium stage, yet. That would explain the "no phone calls."

Posted by: Beverly at April 25, 2010 11:16 PM (aemTL)

941 Gabriel said: Except not. Because there ain't no aliens coming to visit. Yes, but not for the silly reason you said. Even assuming current, 'slow' interstellar travel is the only physically allowable means, a civilization can COLONIZE the galaxy in between 5 and 50 Million years as calculated by Crawford (not touching on von Neumann expansion). During which time, the civilization would expend huge energetic costs that we'd likely see. Yet, we don't. Not even one. Can you honestly believe that even a few of these advanced civilizations have emerged in our MW galaxy and done it without a trace? Did they not advance along the same EM spectrum as we did? We have been an industrial civilization for ~200 years and our energy usage has exponentially increased, nor will it stop increasing. Given our relatively late arrival, how can we not look upwards and see the narrowband transmissions of a single civilization that has advanced beyond us on the Kardashev scale....

Posted by: Vince at April 26, 2010 02:43 AM (GpQZ/)

942

Laugh all you want but ET's are indeed disasterous.

Aliens cause global warming.

Posted by: Entropy at April 26, 2010 05:54 AM (IsLT6)

943 969th!

Posted by: major major major major at April 26, 2010 06:11 AM (utCAk)

944 What a surprise -- nerd candy thread reaches quad digits. Gabe, you magnificent bastard!

Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at April 26, 2010 06:24 AM (KzKJ8)

945 "Earth: mostly harmless."

Posted by: JEA at April 26, 2010 06:47 AM (ZO0u/)

946 Epic and intelligent thread.  Funny to compare to Hotair, where this same article was posted, resulting in a thread half as long, and mostly religion and immmigration arguments, with only a handful of intelligent comments.  Proving once again this is the smartest blog in the dextrosphere.

Posted by: mr crowley at April 26, 2010 07:00 AM (DlXP/)

947 “We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn’t want to meet. I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise whatever planets they can reach.”

Sounds like Independence Day to me.

Posted by: JASmius at April 26, 2010 08:23 AM (pPGYB)

948

Hawkings doesn't have a great track record when it comes to predictions.  He's lost 2 out of 3 physics-related bets he's made. 

1.  He backed the oscillating universe theory in his Brief History of Time Book... which now seems impossible.  We're way short on matter and the expansion of the universe is accellerating.  I can't find who he made that bet with... internet docs are sparse prior to 1998.

2.  In 2004 he conceded the Preskill bet about black holes retaining information.

3.  His first bet was on the existence of black holes, that was with Kip Thorne.  That hasn't paid off, but it seems 95% certain that they exist.

Posted by: theCork at April 26, 2010 08:41 AM (zL5Q1)

949 381 the promo for his new show on discovery referred to him as possessing the world's "most brilliant mind"

Hmmm...my experience, braggarts are seldom the best at anything.

And more...relying on a position of authority as social proof that one's ideas are better than anyone else's is still remarkably effective. A wheelchair and voice box seems to be even more convincing than a lab coat.

Posted by: Doctor Love at April 25, 2010 06:39 PM (STTZD)

You have him pegged.  He likens himself to Einstein and Galileo.  He's done some good work, but he's not the best living physicist.  He gets a lot of press because he's a physicist with a wheelchair and voicebox.  Many better physicists lack these things and their labors are invisible to the general public because the press has zero understanding of physics.

 

Posted by: theCork at April 26, 2010 09:02 AM (zL5Q1)

950
Hawkings and Sagan are pretty damned intelligent. 

But neither of them are very wise.

Posted by: dan-O at April 26, 2010 09:23 AM (+9Rf8)

951

"I'm not buying that. Any species that has viable interplanetary travel isn't going to need any specific resource that's found only on Earth or that can only be made from elements found only on Earth (ain't no such thing). "

Can you say "Soylent Greent" ?? Have you forgotten "V" already? (by the way I have a list of first up volunteers for the dinner table, just tell 'em the space ship is taking them to commune with Gaia)

Posted by: chuck in st paul at April 26, 2010 11:37 AM (adr25)

952 Gabe Malor: when you want someone posting about stuff he doesn't understand. All these issues have been discussed elsewhere in far more detail than here. Pellegrino's "The Killing Star" is a good introduction in the form of a SF book. The Kardashev scale is worth reading up on. Finally, assume a spacefaring civilization travelling at .1 lightspeed (not too implausible), spending a few hundred years getting a new system from first colony to capable of building new colony ships, sending out ships every hundred years or so, and DO THE MATH. Mr. Malor doesn't even understand the math required - doesn't have the foggiest idea of where to start. Which is why he's completely talking out of his ass, and this entire article stinks of methane. Colonizing the galaxy takes an eyeblink in terms of fractions of the galaxy's history. IF there are alien races, they are very very likely to be extremely dangerous. As they are not ALREADY here, they probably do not exist within this galaxy. Further speculation must depend on further evidence.

Posted by: Rollory at April 26, 2010 11:51 AM (bRTTM)

953 You morons ever heed the great George Noory? We gots tons aliens here already. Hard not to trip over them when you turn around, in fact.

Posted by: Cowboy at April 26, 2010 12:23 PM (tfMGP)

954 Chances are that any aliens we meet will be the full-body cyborgs formerly known as organic and their robot creations. Closer to Optimus Prime than Mr. Spock.

The environment that comprises most of the universe is friendlier to machines than squishy organics. Granted, only marginally so, but even a small margin is huge from an evolutionary standpoint.

A 100-year trip to the next star over is no biggy when your lifespan is measured in millennia.


Posted by: GamerFromJump at April 27, 2010 09:26 AM (ZJc2p)

955 Gotta say, entirely too many people go lib in their rhetorical style when someone says something they don't like. And as to having to "walk back", that's much better than "The science is settled!" or "Let's reframe Genesis so it sounds more sciencey. Then we can call it a theory!"

Posted by: GamerFromJump at May 02, 2010 05:56 PM (LYdrC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
694kb generated in CPU 0.2741, elapsed 0.5097 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3144 seconds, 1084 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.