The internet is a tool of the devil and makes me ANGRY! Now get out of my way so I can go vote Republican!

Only backwoods, buck-toothed hicks and Yankee fans use the Internet.

I'm the people's choice!

I'm a clueless conservative who finally figured out the internet and I've created a picture on my Apple II just for the occasion.

But, be that as it may, at some point it's time to drop the "disinterested commentator" line and just admit the obvious, I'm in the bag for the GOP/conservative candidate, and might as well fully embrace that.

Too funny.  Yeess, the cat's out of the bag, Ace, time to 'fess up and come clean.  To the extent you haven't fully embraced it, do so.

Did this clown completely black out on Ron Paul, whose constituency was almost entirely internet-based?

GOP candidates have used the internet for great financial resources before. Brown is the first one who appears to have electoral enthusiasm outside of the 'net to balance his net $$$ bombs.

From now on to make his advertizers happy, Ace is posting only inane articles which won't spark any controversy. Interesting articles  on politics are now verboden. (But wait, wasn't that always the policy here?)

--Learn to spell!  Ace has two e's in it!

Hey, don't forget about me!

I'm the guy who started the whole "Waz Happnin'?"craze on them Internets.

Also worth noting in that NYT article:

He mentions O's idea to text his VP pick to select cell phone users. Yet the MSM reported on the Biden selection almost 12 hrs before O's campaign sent out the texts.

I like Ropspierre better. Did I tell you to change the spelling of your name, you presumptuous twit? Besides, I doubt very much thast you are straight.

You mean you're not objective, ace?  You mean you'd openly root for Tom Coburn in an election against, say, Maxine Waters??  I'm outta here.  There's not enough scandi-bashing and Little Anal Annie posts in the world that can make me overlook the fact that you are not willing to pay lip service to the almighty god of "objectivity"?

What's channel number is MSNBC?  Dozens of Americans can't be wrong.

25

I think guys like Captain Ed, Patterico, and the mix of Ace & His Cob Loggers  are more likely to link from lefty blogs and debate the points in the articles than the lib blogs. The lib blogs, by and large, don't focus too much on conservative blogs (except for Excitable Andi, Carhles Jhonson, and Erick Ericson).

Hell, Crooks and Liars spends half of its posts focusing on Fox News. The lib blogs haven't accounted for a conservablog resurgence and are still fighting the battles of 2003-7.

The way this nimrod speaks you'd think that us Luddite Conservatives have been communicating via smoke signals. In a sense that may be true because Conservatives seem to be slow to embrace technology the same way we are slow to embrace pop culture as a way of communicating. 

Ironically it's the internet that they've claimed as their own that has become the instrument of their destruction.

We're on fire in Massachusetts!

What's the number for Martha Coakleey's website?

Posted by: stuiec at January 18, 2010 05:14 PM (Ate22)

Hush your mouth!

50.  Isn't Chef a scientologist?

I thought he was a dead scientologist.

re: internet

"It's a series of Tubes!"

BOSTON --With 24 hours to go before Massachusetts' special election for a U.S. Senate seat, an Irish bookie already has paid off bettors who wagered that state Sen. Scott Brown, a conservative Republican, would win the seat held for nearly 50 years by liberal Democratic icon Edward M. Kennedy.

Enough is enough. It seems that Senator Brown just has to get out of bed tomorrow to win convincingly. As far as were concerned, this race is well and truly over," said Paddy Power, Irelands largest bookmaker. 

Before shutting down the betting, Mr. Brown had gone from 5-4 odds to 1-5 (meaning if a bettors put down $5, they only stood to make $1 if Mr. Brown wins). The odds against his opponent -- Democrat Martha Coakley, the state's attorney general -- soared, from 4-7 to win to 3-1 to lose.

------------

http://tinyurl.com/yggsu2h

Posted by: someone out there at January 18, 2010 05:04 PM (K2sKe)

Boxer.  Please.

Posted by: stuiec at January 18, 2010 05:14 PM (Ate22)

can't lie, first thing to pop in my head is "Cool, we can be the party of corpses".

Well this is a timely topic as I just read that Rahmbo told reporters at the WH Correspondent's Association Dinner that "when you think about the First Amendment...you think it's overrated".

Who are the fascists again progressives?

I am the Walrus!

Posted by: curious at January 18, 2010 05:18 PM (p302b)

Let me guess: "Glenn or Glennda"

Posted by: Waterhouse at January 18, 2010 05:10 PM (YLnnA)

In the words of an old gospel hymm, "Up yours, shit-for-brains."

Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 18, 2010 05:17 PM (mR7mk)

Yup. The candidate for IL-2 isn't the musical Isaac Hayes, he's the young Black Republican Isaac Hayes. Pro-school choice, pro-entrepreneurship, pro-jobs, anti-taxes. Check it out: is this guy worth helping?

Anyone else think Glenn is wearing out the teasers?

Yes. God Bless him for what he does but I can't even listen to him on the radio anymore. Dude's a frickin' drama queen.

Posted by: ErikW at January 18, 2010 05:23 PM (eXNNp)

amen to that

Just visited Hayes' page.

I like.

Who is he opposing?

re: internet

"It's a series of Tubes!"

Posted by: Alaskan Senator at January 18, 2010 05:18 PM (wy3RK)

Well, so is my nutsack, and it works sure works better than AT&T.

Posted by: Tami at January 18, 2010 05:25 PM (VuLos)

--Yeah, yeah, we all know about Mao being a homo.

I'm one of those shlubs who figured out the Democrats and the media in general were bastards long before the internet. I did it through a combination of reading National Review and other relatvely obscure conservative publications and watching the news with a critical eye. I stopped believing in the mainstream media during Clinton's first campaign when Dan Rather's obvious bias should have resulted in a Triple XXX rating for his election night coverage. Jennings and Brokaw were no better. My turning point, where I decided I would never vote for a Democrat ever again was during the Clinton impeachment, when the Senate Democrats, en masse, refused to even look at the evidence. That told me loud and clear that to them Party came in first, second and third in their loyalties with country nowhere to be seen. 

It wasn't always so. I had great respect for the Scoop Jackson's, Sam Nunn's and Zell Miller's of the Party. Not to mention JFK and Hubert Hunphrey. But the Party has redicalaized steadily in the years since, culminating with the banishment of Joe Lieberman for having the temerity to not toe the leftard line 100 fucking percent.

This is not even to mention the Progressive brainwashing campaign that's been successfully waged on our education system for over 30 years now - helping to create the Perfect Storm of last November's election. It's amazing there is any opposition left to the Democrats and it's a testament to the innate common sense of the American people that there's still around 50% of us who have resisted and called bullshit on the Progressives and their agenda.

Bottom line is I've been seeing this attack on our country for many years and welcome seeing people push back and get in the libtard's faces.

Posted by: curious at January 18, 2010 05:18 PM (p302b)

Mindy's still alive

Posted by: Ropspierre at January 18, 2010 05:03 PM (ITzbJ)

--So where's the link to your kick-ass blog, since you know so much about running one?

Here's another something that MAY be worth being for:
Isaac Hayes for Congress 2010 - Illinois District 2.
Any opinions?

My South Park spidey-chef sense says no. But I admit no knowledge of his policies.

Posted by: sTevo at January 18, 2010 05:28 PM (eA3tl)

fuck that shit, it's all about the Chocolate Salty Balls

Glenn may have discovered the historically amazing fact that if you take a photo of Josef Stalin and turn it upside down, you get Eleanor Roosevelt.

Posted by: logprof at January 18, 2010 05:29 PM (gJL6J)

pwned

"Well, not harder really. It's not hard to be a cheerleader. But certainly you're investing more of your credibility when you're huckstering something."

I can't find the cheerleader pic?

Posted by: TexasJew at January 18, 2010 05:31 PM (dcKUM)

ugliest 1st lady evah

Just visited Hayes' page.

I like.

Who is he opposing?

Posted by: logprof at January 18, 2010 05:25 PM (gJL6J)

Two words: Jesse.  Jackson.  Junior.

(Hey, that's two words in Obamanomics!)

I don't know... I have found the internet to be the best place to find out what's going on with conservatives.  G-d knows I couldn't find out much before, being surrounded by the idiots in school, the newspapers and on tv.  There's a grand network on the internet for conservatives, if one just looks for it. 

The gop does suck in its use of technology.  Also, the gop ignores the younger voters and leaves them to the wolves.  This last election, I received a ton of mailers from the jackasses and none from the elephants.  Thanks, gop!  Glad to know you care about my vote and those of my generation.  As a political party, they do not promote themselves well - in any medium.  They've given up on certain demographics (if not all).  They have let the media and schools define them and don't do a lot of outreach to counter that definition.

This is why conservative blogs/websites are so important.  For the most part, it's easier to get information and confirmation of news and ideals from independant blogs than it is from the major "conservative" party.  The tea party movement is a great example of the blog networks getting together and getting word out to organize conservative events.  It could be done better in some areas (like mine), but it's a start. 

We are reporting this to:

The WH propaganda dept.

Mindy Cohn lives!

Praise Allah!

Never apologize for shifting from an “ideas” person to a “political” one. Nothing is more pathetic than “I vote for the man, not the party.”

Political parties are, first and foremost, just a collection of ideas. If you canÂ’t find a home in one of the two major parties, check your ideas.

95

Chavez is also accusing us of occupying Haiti.

I'll try and hunt down the link.

Occupy Haiti? For crying out loud. I think Haiti is the leading producer of dirt on the planet.

No Blood for Dirt! No Blood for Dirt!

So Karl Rove is pulling Ace's stings?

I KNEW IT!

Posted by: CJ at January 18, 2010 05:35 PM (JQtNT)

I disagree.

Here it is.

I take it O didn't get around to reading that gift book his good buddy gave him at the OAS conference . . .

Posted by: curious at January 18, 2010 05:32 PM (p302b)

Not everyone.  Lots of twenty-somethings at the rally in Worcester yesterday.  Saw two young hunks holding signs in Danvers this morning, too.

6,12,31 etc.

Clearly another clueless fuckwit, Dang.  Misspelled Robespierre:  Verboden?  Really?

Ace, I'm with you.  Why should it only be Liberals who abandon the pretense of impartiality?

This was to me the lesson of the Obama campaign of 2008.  It was all about passion.  Not ideas, not policies, but passion.  Nice republicans didn't want to stand out, didn't want to be identified, didn't want to be passionate.  (Not that our candidate was anyone to be passionate about).

In 2010, and onward, Conservative passion rules.  Tea Party?  Passion.  Scott Brown?  Passion. 

And so on.  That is all.

Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 18, 2010 05:35 PM (n6iqK)

It was pathetic to see him on the Jon Stewart show like a whipped dog. Guess he wanted to keep his gig on the Obama-subsidized GE channel.

I'd have beaten that smirking piece of shit through his asshole.

If Cramer couldn't even stand up for economic freedom against a raving socialist, what is he but a damn day trade scammer?

FUCK!  Game over - we just lost the AoSHQ blog.

Yup. The candidate for IL-2 isn't the musical Isaac Hayes, he's the young Black Republican Isaac Hayes. Pro-school choice, pro-entrepreneurship, pro-jobs, anti-taxes. Check it out: is this guy worth helping?

Posted by: stuiec at January 18, 2010 05:23 PM (Ate22)

That's Jesse Jackson, Jr.'s seat.  He might be nice to book on the talk shows but even in this year he won't win.  If he's a good candidate, he'll use the exposure to get himself nominated to some statewide office or something.

2010 and 2012 will be tough for black Republicans in black districts.  Even African-Americans who were sympathetic to the GOP wanted Obama elected as a symbol of racial progress.  The fact that he's a failure and that he's hurting African-Americans both economically and symbolically doesn't matter.

But, be that as it may, at some point it's time to drop the "disinterested commentator" line and just admit the obvious, I'm in the bag for the GOP/conservative candidate, and might as well fully embrace that

STOP THE PRESSES!

--So where's the link to your kick-ass blog, since you know so much about running one?

Posted by: logprof at January 18, 2010 05:29 PM (gJL6J)

I'm just teasing Ace, and he knows it.  So you're just making a fool out of yourself again, logprof ...., you whiney, little asskisser ..., just like you did when you pontificated to Blazer the other night to ingratiate yourself with Maetenloch.

Get a life, you wimpy little brown-noser.

If you canÂ’t find a home in one of the two major parties, check your ideas.

BS. Republican does not equal Conservative. That's what's missing for millions of Americans.

My South Park spidey-chef sense says no. But I admit no knowledge of his policies.

Posted by: 141 Driver at January 18, 2010 05:30 PM (JFNQ7)

He (Isaac Hayes of Cook County) is pro-school choice (both charter schools AND vouchers), anti-tax (favors reducing corporate taxes including a five-year moratorium on corporate taxes for new small businesses in areas with large numbers of vacant lots), and pro-ethics reform for Congress.

Hey Barky...how ya like my pickup truck now???..... bitch!!!

<^{^}>  ‹( •¿• )›  <^{^}>

Posted by: curious at January 18, 2010 05:32 PM (p302b)

Not everyone under 35.  Just most of the kids.  The school system churns them out to blindly follow the liberal ideals.  Then they go into the education system and come out even more liberal, ready to prime more young minds. (most conservatives I know wouldn't go into the education system.  I admire those who do so.  Thair guts are made of steel)  This is all supplemented by the media and popular culture.  Motto:  Keep them stupid and immature and they vote liberal.  (Why else, aside from the money, would college be encouraging students to be on the 8/9/10 year plan?  The longer they stay as an undergrad wandering the halls, the better.  Frankly, school rots the brain more than it teaches.  Unless you find a good school.)

Two words: Jesse.  Jackson.  Junior.

(Hey, that's two words in Obamanomics!)

Posted by: stuiec at January 18, 2010 05:32 PM (Ate22)

--Say no more.

Yes. God Bless him for what he does but I can't even listen to him on the radio anymore. Dude's a frickin' drama queen.

His ADD explains most of that.

Your I.Q. is showing again, Hatchet, you retard.

Geezez, but are you and logprof ever an embarrassment to the Republican Party.

✓ Dede
✓ Creigh Deeds
✓ Corzine
✓ Coakley
✓ Crist
✓ ?

I'm a showoff.

Anyone under the age of thirty five has been PC brainwashed. 

Don't Trust Anyone Over 30

Get a life, you wimpy little brown-noser.

Posted by: Ropspierre at January 18, 2010 05:42 PM (ITzbJ)

--That's rich.  Yeah, my posts had nothing to do with taking a position and defending it, it was alllll about the blog politics.

Thanks for the yuks today.

John Kerry:

“I’m no stranger to hard fought campaigns, but what we’ve seen in the past few days is way over the line and reminiscent of the dangerous atmosphere of Sarah Palin’s 2008 campaign rallies. This is not how democracy works in Massachusetts"

Downtown Scotty Brown in response:

 Â“People are tired of John KerryÂ’s partisan politics. His baseless accusations reflect the desperate last gasps of a flailing campaign.”

...OK Massachusett[e]s...you're all now a buncha racist,crazy, dangerous teabaggers..

...you know what to do next

Tell me more about this internet and please let me know where I can find it.

8 Pick a target, freeze it, neutralize it, kill it, eat it and go on to the next one.

(paraphrasing Alinsky)

I think that Nugent said the same thing.

Hey, when the hell is he going to run for something? The Leftmedia would go apeshit.

Bull Durham of the New England Red Sox has endorsed my campaign.

It's on!

Martha, the gift that just keeps giving.  Her latest quote to "help" her cause.

"I'm not concerned about what Curt Schilling says"

Too bad, bet you will in 30 hours.

174

I'll tell you one thing: that Marcia is a firecracker in the sack.

Posted by: Ropspierre at January 18, 2010 05:55 PM (ITzbJ)

Or Tony Soprano's tax accountant

ot but,

Is a Log Cabin Republican like a

Aunt Jemima LIBTARD

or a MRS BUTTERSWORTH independant.

Posted by: Whoda thunk it?! at January 18, 2010 05:58 PM (d7Px0)

Very interesting!  Who'd a thunk it, indeed. 

A moment of silence for the founder of Taco Bell who passed today

Posted by: NJConservative at January 18, 2010 05:55 PM (/Ywwg)

Posted by: ParisParamus at January 18, 2010 05:59 PM (NPtVh)  

Well, we have three here right now.

We need seven more for a Minyan.

She seemed to be concerned about Curt Schilling when her she made an ASS of herself yesterday.

I believe she called him Yankee fan?  Errrr, he was the biggest reason The BOSTON BLUE SOX won their first WORLD SERIES since 1918.

dumb bitch.

 I'm in the bag for the GOP/conservative candidate, and might as well fully embrace that.

WTF, so that's why you are always ragging on my Rhino ass!

Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 18, 2010 05:17 PM (mR7mk)

Yup. The candidate for IL-2 isn't the musical Isaac Hayes, he's the young Black Republican Isaac Hayes. Pro-school choice, pro-entrepreneurship, pro-jobs, anti-taxes. Check it out: is this guy worth helping?

He's got the name recognition going for him right out of the box, just like "Jeff Johnson".

The MTV generation will vote for him thinking that he's Chef. 

A moment of silence for the founder of Taco Bell who passed today

Posted by: Master-At-Arms at January 18, 2010 06:03 PM (d7Px0)

They put the Chihuahua in a Supreme Stufft Burrito, then sold it to a little old lady.

He would have wanted it that way... 

Posted by: Fredrick Angles at January 18, 2010 06:03 PM (qyKoF)

You're banned!!!  All of you.  Banned, I say!!!!

Posted by: Axelrod at January 18, 2010 06:02 PM (n6iqK)

--They've all be appointed to Deputy Assistant Under-Czarevich of Homeland Security.

Sorry to leave you with the leftover Affirmative Action trolls, Ax.

Ah, gus is here. It's about time that this site got some culture and some class.

Waz up, gus, my man?

Charlie the goat fucker Johnson was busy making love to his bike seat.

With his ass.

Thread winner! But only for Jews.

Huh! Well's that's a new way of looking at things.

I can guess where one might find LGF's brown threads...

182 #167, no, just liberal Jews (Reform, most Conservative); those who adhere, to one degree or another to real, traditional Judaism don't fit that description.  Of course, we are a surminority

paris is right, ortho, and many conservs, aren't "down" with much of liberal idealogy.

#195 Obie! Stay tuned for my next book 'Silence of the Kos Kids'.

It's a psycho dramatic thriller about a light skinned killa who speaks with a Negro dialect...when he wants to. The only force that can stop him is a retired Lt. Col. in the Massachusetts National Guard and an Alaskan snowbilly chick.

They put the Chihuahua in a Supreme Stufft Burrito, then sold it to a little old lady.

He would have wanted it that way...

Rumor has it that he strated The Taco Bell Diet, and Jarod from Subway took him out!!

206 Paris Paramus-

Lived there for fifteen years.  I'd never have believed it until now.  Most heartening...thanks for sharing it.

Stop whining, think how I feel, Axe's checked bounced, we're all on strike!

No Troll without Dole!

Posted by: willow at January 18, 2010 06:09 PM (7FgWm)

OK, with Sassypants (who is often on the ONT), we're up to five.

The Moron/Moronette MOT census is ongoing...

I find it very IRONIC that the guy who invented the TACO was named BELL.

I mean there is a string of restaurants named TACO BELL.

Have any of you ever heard of it??

Well, for 89cent.  You can get a real good meal.

isn't it weird that LGF has not had a single Brown thread all week?

He's far too busy ignoring the overwhelming evidence of the Climate Hoax, and helping Sinclair with his Climate Coloring Book and Crayons.

Look!!! The blue is disappearing!!!

If I want hear about how I have no sense of humor I could just talk to my wife

...or mine

Gus is full of  TEKTAT's today. 

...full of something...

No Troll without Dole!

Bob Dole is confused.

Bite thy tongue, blasphemer. I'm not that Father O'Brien, gus. I'm the other one.

sometimes a cigar is just a cigar

Sometimes it's a dildo.

It's a joke! If I want hear about how I have no sense of humor I could just talk to my wife.

Try this comeback: Hey, if I didn't have a sense of humor I'd have never married you!

Just a hint; sleeping in the garage is much more comfortable if you wind down the blade on the table saw.

Posted by: Maree Antoinitte at January 18, 2010 06:18 PM (BFqyO)

I've heard that Napolean's sister liked whale bones.

Barry's state of the union set for 1/27

Barry's state of the union set for 1/27

Betcha that's when he declares war on Liechtenstein.

Barry's state of the union set for 1/27

Posted by: loppyd at January 18, 2010 06:19 PM (UJIeT)

I guess that TOTUS gets back from vacation that week.

250

Sooooooo full of win, Spank.

Fucking hilarious. Sorry if someone already noted this.

Seriously, why should the GOP have to spend a single dime on campaign ads anymore?

Betcha that's when he declares war on Liechtenstein.

Posted by: Clauzwits at January 18, 2010 06:21 PM (ERJIu)

No doubt fueled by his unprecedented success with the Haitian occupation.

It appears that Milton Berle is alive and well and living in Texas.

Alexander "Taco" Bell.

He also invented the Graham Cracker.

Or the

Cracka'

What do you retards recommend for washing out the bad taste when giving blow jobs for ten bucks at the local truck stop?

Hair of the dog

Seriously, why should the GOP have to spend a single dime on campaign ads anymore?

The 52% are just that STUPID.

201.   I got a painful case of genital warts from a secondhand blow-up doll. 

Killmore Guppies is posting here incognito again.

After Marcia loses tomorrow, how many LIBTARD candidates will want the Kenyan dimwit to come help them??

The right-ish blogosphere did help in 2002, but that was a decentralised effort - mostly pro-defence and pro-Israel libertarians and neo-cons. (I was and remain one of those myself, for the most part.) There wasn't a Kos On The Right then.

Don't sock a commenter's nic

KILLJOY!

I can't say for sure, but I think Ace wants Brown to win.

But he's really rooting for "MILF" in AZ

Vote for Coak(e)ly!  Please make her Massachusett(e)s' First Black Senator!

(Of course, Ed Brooke was Massachusett(e)s' first Black Senator, but it doesn't count because he was a Republican).

No Troll without Dole!

Bob Dole is confused.

Yep, he always was.  But he is a funny SOB.  Wonder if he still gets free blue pills to bang Elizabeth?

255.  What do you retards recommend for washing out the bad taste when giving blow jobs for ten bucks at the local truck stop?

Thats a question for the Sharmutant or Wild Irish Hosebag.  I recommend you get yourself over to Upchucki's Ponytailed Bicycle Blog poste haste.  He could probably answer that question for you too.  He has a lot of experience washing the Andi Sullivan out of his mouth.

Barry's state of the union set for 1/27

Betcha that's when he declares war on Liechtenstein.

He doesn't need to Germany's IRS beat him to the punch.

The UN-loving Frogs are just mad that the UN "peace keepers" in blue helmets won't get a chance at the young native girls in Haiti.

TRUE, dat!

271

Niger, please!

Posted by: Brad at January 18, 2010 06:28 PM (GkYyh)

heck after that cosmo "i read it for the article" display, who wouldn't  want Brown er to win

 lurid glare

Posted by: someone out there at January 18, 2010 05:05 PM (K2sKe)

He approached a uniformed security guard and said  "I've lost my grandpa!"

"The guard asked, "What's he like?"

The little tyke hesitated for a moment and then replied,  

"Jack Daniels whiskey and women with big tits." 

After Marcia loses tomorrow, how many LIBTARD candidates will want the Kenyan dimwit to come help them??

Posted by: gus at January 18, 2010 06:28 PM (Vqruj)

All of them.  Because they are just that divorced from reality, and just that devoted to their idol.

Posted by: someone out there at January 18, 2010 05:05 PM (K2sKe)

here's a red pen.

But, be that as it may, at some point it's time to drop the "disinterested commentator" line and just admit the obvious, I'm in the bag for the GOP/conservative candidate, and might as well fully embrace that.

Sorry, I don't believe you.

While I've seen some conformity chipping away your edge over the last year or so, I still believe in the Ace who exists outside of bag and will take a stand -- at least occasionally -- against the establishment.  Otherwise, you've just condemned yourself to join the ranks of Plain Vanilla RNC Blogs everywhere.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+/tard at January 18, 2010 05:41 PM (IoUF1)

That Kennedy chick who used to do MTV has endorsed my campaign.

Rock the Vote!

Posted by: Blazer at January 18, 2010 06:42 PM (t72+4)

--Only the DR needs to worry about Haitian zombies.

Putin and Charles Johnson!!  WITH IMPUNITY.

I can do check marks and this is my first day on the internets.

CHECK MARKS.

--Only the DR needs to worry about Haitian zombies.

Posted by: logprof at January 18, 2010 06:43 PM (gJL6J)

Maybe thats what Glenn was talking about when he said he has to prepare his audience for Friday on his program?

I expect to see the mass killings by Mao, Stalin, etc. You know, where BHO's leading us.

Posted by: sybilll at January 18, 2010 06:43 PM (mhajN)

chin up girl!

we are winning the er the thingy, er  the  election!

handing over my wine bottle, wiping opening off with my skirt. ( let's check our couch cushions)

Posted by: Winston Smith at January 18, 2010 06:45 PM (BFqyO)

OK MORE BALL DIPPING!

LATEST POLL! UP 7!

http://tinyurl.com/2d68s

LATEST POLL! UP 7!

I swear, women are the dumbest voting demographic ever.

Posted by: torabora at January 18, 2010 06:50 PM (5Fe1P)

That means showing we're serious about slashing the deficit. It doesn't mean tax cuts.

And I think I'm of sound mind...

>> I swear, women are the dumbest voting demographic ever.

Daughters.

No wait, they're women too.  Crap, nevermind.

Posted by: MikeO at January 18, 2010 06:53 PM (Ce+tv)

LATEST POLL! UP 7!

The 18-49 demo is encouraging, especially for moonbat territory!

334 Kemp, clearly you read this blog about as thoroughly as Ace (hint, look a few posts down).

I figured this would get ace to double post it as usual.  Besides when I am stealing from HA, like ace, it's hard to keep up.

How many f king polls have we posted?

Posted by: antisocialist at January 18, 2010 06:57 PM (Rwudm)

I think i've reached the point where I don't like the OFFICIAL Tea Party movement.

I live in PA, and i just saw a tea party commercial. What the funk are they doing running a commercial in PA. I don't think Pittsburgh is in the same ad market as boston. Also, why would you put an ad like that on anyway the day before the election. It is massachusetts, you don't want to alienate people. Just keep you mouth shut and let him win. Unless of course you want to take credit for his win after the fact.

Look, i've never been to a protest in my life until i went to the one on April 15, but even i had no idea the movement would fall apart so quckly. I thought the movement was about individuals doing their part and becoming more involved. It has turned into a top down organization now. A convention for Tea Partiers?  Really? Isn't that the anti-thesis of what the movement is about? I thought it was meant to be informal. I suspect there are certain groups, specifically the Republican party that are trying to hijack and profit off of the movement, and I think there are too many in the movement all to willing to go along.

My understanding was that we should get involved in local level politics, volunteer, be precient captains, grass roots stuff, not try to become a new PAC which has to shake down its members for money. I thought the idea of a "movement" was just the culmination of peoples anger at government, not an institution within itself.

I will continue to do what I can and I will donate to people from other states who need money and I support, but I want nothing to do with the Official Tea Party CPAC/Group/etc. 

Speaking of which, make sure you donate money to Pat Toomey. It's a two for one reward. We make that jerk Arlen Specter pay for 30 years of left wing republicanism, his defection, and his seat gets taken by someone more fiscally conservative than Rick Santorum was.

Daughters.

No wait, they're women too.  Crap, nevermind.

Heh.  THE DNC would probably accuse me of brainwashing mine with all this constructionist propaganda.

Nothing wrong with labeling a troll a troll.

Everything wrong with labeling a person who's posted here for years as one, and that happens WAY too much.

That Kennedy chick who used to do MTV has endorsed my campaign.

Rock the Vote!

She was actually a Republican (forgive me if an intentional second layer of irony is flying over my head ).

Posted by: Scott Ritter at January 18, 2010 05:38 PM (qyKoF)

Polls, shmolls.  What did it for me was hearing that Ireland's biggest bookie paid off on Brown a day early. 

Oooh! Linky, please?

I swear, women are the dumbest voting demographic ever.

Hey, you should run for office. Make that your campaign slogan. Best o' luck to ya!

346 Actually, I tipped Ace before HA had it.  He was actually first (!).

Get outta here with teh funny joke.  HA stealing from Ace?

Shit that's a first!

Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 18, 2010 07:03 PM (6g+GB)

but it's the truth, they single handily won the election for Clinton in 1996...then he gets caught w/ Monica

Posted by: Peaches at January 18, 2010 07:05 PM (9Wv2j)

yep, i'm trending that way too, I love the movement but it's starting to get a little deep in it

Polls, shmolls.  What did it for me was hearing that Ireland's biggest bookie paid off on Brown a day early. 

Oooh! Linky, please?

Posted by: ErikW at January 18, 2010 07:03 PM (eXNNp)

Washington Times

I think i've reached the point where I don't like the OFFICIAL Tea Party movement.

Just remember Niven's Laws #16.

Besides, the RNC isn't doing much with the Republican party, except running it into the ground.  The grassroots have to organize.  This time it has some teeth.  Next time, it'll implode with bureaucratic BS.  No big deal.

Hey, you should run for office. Make that your campaign slogan. Best o' luck to ya!

If I added, "Abortion on demand," "Handouts for single moms," and "Let's break the glass ceiling with government regulations," women would vote for me in droves.

Here the wiki on Sambo's.

http://tinyurl.com/4rf7h3

Everything wrong with labeling a person who's posted here for years as one, and that happens WAY too much.

Posted by: barbelle at January 18, 2010 07:02 PM (qF8q3)

Trollish BS is the main problem with the internet, media, and politics.  I don't care if it's a long-timer or a newbie, troll posts should be identified, and the poster shunned.  If Ace goes the way of Charles Johnson (self-trolling fool), then he'll meet  the same fate.  Same goes for me, and naturally, for you.

By this point, your multiple posts in support of trolls is now in the category of "concern troll."

Hitting the lib blogs today, just for fun.

How about this entry on Puffington Host?  Do we REALLY need another male senator?

http://bit.ly/8eaGDZ

376 Post a new thread or I'm outta here!

Calm down, in all good time

Pale Stool was a regular visitor too; it didn't make him any less of a troll. 

You keep using this word troll.  I do not think it means what you think it means.

Previous posting doesn't just establish your posting frequency, it establishes your political positions.  PS was a troll because s'he kept insisting s'he was a conservative but then kept posting liberal positions.

I dont contribute to the national tea party movement, but I do support my local ones, at the state level.

and there are so many "Tea Party" orgs, I don't think there needs to be ONE official one, they all just need to be with relatively the same vision for America, getting back the very principles the country was founded on.

I kind of look at it as how the country was founded, it was a very loosely set up system, states rights were more important than federal rights. The Tea Party movement has to be local, but all moving in the same direction.

When it is organized at a local/state level, corruption is much easier to root out, and the locals tea parties are much more responsive and agile to organize.

That Kennedy chick who used to do MTV has endorsed my campaign.

Rock the Vote!

She was actually a Republican.

I HATE THEM ALL ACE!

C'mon dude, you know they've earned it. All of them. Especially the Republicans. They totally betrayed everythng their brand stood for

THOUSAND OF EARMARKS, YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR!

Never forget that.

Posted by: Robspeehair at January 18, 2010 07:16 PM (ITzbJ)

669!

Trollish BS is the main problem with the internet, media, and politics.  I don't care if it's a long-timer or a newbie, troll posts should be identified, and the poster shunned.

Then take some time to research your facts before you make the accusation.  It's not hard considering we all have codes here.

By this point, your multiple posts in support of trolls is now in the category of "concern troll."

Too late, I was erroneously labeled that in a thread months ago.  But, it does place you in the category of Idiot.

 K-Bob hates trolls 'cause they've kicked his whiny, crybaby ass around the block so many times.

Get a life, K-Bob. Sheesh.

(Pssst, I don't to be too hard on him, or he'll go crying to his mommy.)

Hmmm.  Not liking the sound of this: http://is.gd/6yjKJ

House looking to approve senate bill...

The Virgin Kennedy..?  Izt dat a drink, urp?

Either uh way, I'd hit it!

Posted by: This Is Kissel at January 18, 2010 07:19 PM (v77ig)

When you set out to deliberately piss people off, as Robspierre did, that is the very definition of trolling. 

BS, dummy, a troll isn't just someone looking for a fight.  It obviously wouldn't be hard to offend your sensibilities, anyway.  Get your pink panties out of that wad and sack up already.  That dude wasn't a troll.

Holy God. We are on the brink of something truly monumental and a few of you would rather piss and moan about what we're still doing wrong. Spew your negative bullshit somewhere else. Please for one or two days, will you?

But what do I know--I'm just some feely weely flaky broad that uses a Magic 8 ball to pick my candidate.

Me more-or-less politely disagreeing with MikeO and explaining why: not a troll. The aim of that was to get a more-or-less polite and reasoned response.

Me (theoretically) calling MikeO an imbecile who floods his mom's basement with his drool (which, again, I did not do): a troll. The aim of that would have been to make MikeO, and others, angry and to cause chaos.

398

Ruh roh.

When and if Brown wins tomorry, the Dems might no longer to be able to pass a health care bill in the house.  We'll see.

PS - we need some sort of agreed upon definition of troll or a word for just being provocative.

It would certainly help.

And that was typed before I read Peaches remark. Well said, hun!

Leave it to women to clean up after the men.

Oh did I just inject a stereotype into that snark? My bad.

45 Here's another something that MAY be worth being for:

Isaac Hayes for Congress 2010 - Illinois District 2.

Any opinions?

Where the hell would they ever find theme music?  Can't be done.

Ben@349: Massachusetts broadcast stations are completely sold out of commercial time. Probably Fox News nationwide is an affordable way to ring in with Rep/Ind voters in Massachusetts, even if 90 percent of the viewers you're buying are wastage. Especially if you have profits you're trying to burn off.

But it's really a cheap play to lay first claim that they're the "official" voice of tea party activists. They must think Fox viewers are gullible.

OOOK that makes perfect sense as to why I saw it. I agree with the second part of your statement though. I was pissed they claimed it was endorsed by the tea party as though it was one monolithic entity.

It is about the individual and should remain that way.

I

Holy God. We are on the brink of something truly monumental and a few of you would rather piss and moan about what we're still doing wrong. Spew your negative bullshit somewhere else. Please for one or two days, will you?

Or you could just skip over the posts that are harshing your buzz.  I have to skip over discussions about shoes frequently.

Posted by: YRM at January 18, 2010 07:00 PM (MxqA5)

HA is a shithole. I used to post there all the time, but it's a disgrace these days.

Look at all the sycophants applauding, like the zombies on lgf. Ooooooo - Coakley by 5 or 7. Every crack whore in Boston is not going to be out voting tomorrow, btw.

At least the Morons would give you a good FU for that post. Over there, it's all leg tingles and fangirl ass kissing. I saw all that buttkissing start over at lgf before the bottom fell out.

I posted that Allah needed to take his meds. I've been a bit skeptical myself, but a fucking Donk poll - pathetic.

Posted by: s'moron at January 18, 2010 07:32 PM (p1s9n)

Posted by: This Is Kissel at January 18, 2010 07:32 PM (k9Ti

ACE - Liberals have left us no choice.  Listening to Rush today he talked a bunch of pure patisan horseshit before he spoke the truth, but he did speak the truth.  And listening to NPR's today, I heard the BBC's SHRIEKING WEASELS telling us about the attack in Kabul (in essence) telling us this was the Taliban's Tet Offensive and how we didn't stand a chance against the "determined fighters." 

One or the other, there is no other choice and we have all made it.  We are with you ACE!

(Sura 2:29)

S'moron and barbelle, thank you. It's refreshing to see someone rational here.

I suspected that there were intelligent life forms here on your planet somewhere.

Posted by: Definitely Not A Troll at January 18, 2010 07:36 PM (2l4yd)

*snicker*

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 18, 2010 07:36 PM (PQY7w)

Have you even bothered to look at a flamewar thread?

Me?  Nope, not at all, never once, no way.  Why do you ask?

I respectfully disagree.  If he wants to act like a dickweed, he will be treated like a dickweed.  Whether you approve or not.

So, treat him like a 'weed.  Just don't label him a troll when he's not one.  The words are not interchangeable.

Posted by: Blazer at January 18, 2010 06:46 PM (t72+4)

--Yeah, I heard about that and think it's bosh.

Have you even bothered to look at a flamewar thread?

Me? Nope, not at all, never once, no way. Why do you ask?

Posted by: barbelle at January 18, 2010 07:45 PM (qF8q3)

Now for something light...

Abortion

Judaism, God's ONLY religion

Creationism

...

Heh, I probably have posts in flamewar threads back in the bulletin board days that are older than some of you.

Your lame schtick certainly predates me.

"Flamewar"??! Fer f's sake, somebody call the FBI.

This ain't even a dribble-pissing match!  Pikers!!!

O/T:  But from Hotair:

Insurgent Massachussetts Republican Senate candidate Scott Brown told CNN he expects to be installed quickly as MassachusettsÂ’ next senator should he win the stateÂ’s special election Tuesday.

Asked about the state of the race, Brown said he’s still campaigning as if he’s running “down 30 points.”

But sounding confident, the GOP state senator says heÂ’s made plans to travel to Washington Friday if heÂ’s victorious.

Scott Brown's got Big Brass Balls!  I love it!  A Republican with testicular fortitude!

To some people being a cocksucker = being a troll

Again, I disagree.

I just see it too much here.  Person A posts something offensive to Person B, so Person B shouts "Troll!"  It's the internet equivalent of labeling someone as "racist," to automatically de-value their argument so you don't have to argue against it.  It's lazy.

I'm going to watch "24" now and try to figure out how to record "Big Bang Theory."

Holy God. We are on the brink of something truly monumental and a few of you would rather piss and moan about what we're still doing wrong. Spew your negative bullshit somewhere else. Please for one or two days, will you?

amen

Your lame schtick certainly predates me.

Look, I don't give a shit about your need to define the term in a way that makes you happy.  We all know what trolls are, and we don't need a dictionary thread or a pedant.  I'm not sure why you want to continue the flames in support of that bullshit, but fine with me.  I've got to make dinner.

Posted by: s'moron at January 18, 2010 08:05 PM (p1s9n)

Gaze at the BS.

Waterhouse, you are loonier than Martha Coakley is.

Where did you read that my favorite poster, Ropspierre, said, "ace, your site sucks"?

Cut 'n paste it, or concede that you're a naughty, little fibber. Shame on you. Go to your room.

BTW, he's adopted, you know.

Posted by: CJ at January 18, 2010 05:35 PM (JQtNT)

I disagree.

Posted by: Outside the tent, pissing in at January 18, 2010 05:36 PM (9Wv2j)

Many do. But it's true.

If you canÂ’t find a home in one of the two major parties, check your ideas.

BS. Republican does not equal Conservative. That's what's missing for millions of Americans.

Posted by: Rewrite! at January 18, 2010 05:42 PM (d7Px0)

I agree. So, we make Republican the conservative party. That's what's happening now. Or, start a third party and never change a thing.

Um, you took my words on of context. Why am I not surprised? You gotta be the slimiest of slimy low-lifes.

The Republican Party would win more elections if they could get rid of psychos like you. You aren't just nuts. You are certifiable. You are really mentally ill.

Scurry back into your hole in the wall, you little coackeoach.

And not only are you a coackeoach and a coackroach, but you're a cockroach, too. So there. Ppfftt!!!

CJ, a hundred years from now, everything will be the same. Americans like the status quo.

So a hundred years ago everything was the same as today?

Except for technology, yes, pretty much the same, CJ. Human nature has remained the same for thousands of years.

You know, on second thought, techology is regressing now, not advancing.

Three hundred years ago, the Dutch, Czechs and Spaniards were using windmills for a primitive power source, and just think; we're going back to them again here in the enlightened USA, instead of expanding on the use of nuclear energy.

Um, yeah, anyone can see how intelliget you are. And cool, too. LOL

Go back to your usual porno sites, you loser. You're not giving me a challenge here.

Since you obviously don't have a life, here is a research project for you.

Go back to the beginning of this thread, and read all of my posts. If you're studious, you'll discover that you made accusations which aren't supported by the facts, and that you're criticisms were bizarre, at best.. Not that I expect that you will be man enough to admit it..

You can't be that stupid. Nobody is that stupid. LOL. Or are you drunk?

Read all of my posts. They'll answer all of your questions .... unless you're an imbecile.

Well it has to be one of the two, but we have to pick and push for the one and be serious about it. We also have to realize this will take a long time, probably more than our lives have to offer. It took the left about 100 years to get us where we are; it will take decades to reverse that, if possible.

There is already a Conservative Party, or there used to be one, but it never got off the ground.

All Republicans are somewhat Conservative to one degree or another, and actually most Democrats are, too, though not to the degree that Republicans are.

This notion of converting the Republican Party into a strictly Conservative Party, or the notion of forming a third party that is strictly conservative is nothing new.

 It won't happen.

For better or for worse, I'll stick with the GOP, thank you.

P.S.

I noticed that a couple of the organizers of the Tea Baggers found it to be such a heady experience that they want to be elected to political offices themselves. That's fine, as long as long as they don't sleazily destroy the Republican Party to fulfill their own ambitions. I wouldn't trust their kind anymore than I would trust a Democrat. If they run as a third party candidate, their chances of winning are slim anyway.

Late to this thread, Ace, but as far as I'm concerned, nothing wrong with letting people know where you stand and formulating your blog around that premise. It's yours.  People are free as the wind to read/participate or not to do so.

FWIW, where I personally draw the line is when you suppress/select newsworthy events or themes because an honest accounting might reflect a certain way upon a Party or its representatives, a way in which you would prefer people not know about. 

That's what the MSM has done, and they have become partisan hacks, pure and simple. I have not seen any of this in your work for the time I've been following this blog (hat tip to Vic for the reco)  since Septemberish of 2008.

Keep up the good work, and keep calling em' without fear or favor.