September 07, 2010
— Ace Just can't wean herself off the public tit.
Kohlhaas said there have been talks with unidentified Murkowski backers about a Libertarian run."To their credit, they have reached out," he said.
He described the talks about philosophy, platform and issues as fruitful and constructive, but described her candidacy as a Libertarian as seemingly impossible.
I am less concerned about this than I had been. I am convinced now that Joe Miller is a rock star. Yes, she can threaten him.
But this guy? WestPointDesertStormBronzeStarYaleLawConservativeJudge?
He's the next Scott Brown, except a conservative, red-state Scott Brown.
Thanks to Dr. Spank.
Posted by: Ace at
01:29 PM
| Comments (307)
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at September 07, 2010 01:33 PM (tOCL6)
Why are all these mean people trying to take it away from meeeee????
Posted by: Lisa Murkowski at September 07, 2010 01:33 PM (EW49d)
If she wants to sign her political death warrant, more power to her. It will just cement Palin's destruction of the Murkowski political dynasty in Alaska.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at September 07, 2010 01:33 PM (wDKwf)
Heck if the LPers care about anything other then legalizing pot, why aren't they endorsing Miller?
Posted by: 18-1 at September 07, 2010 01:34 PM (7BU4a)
Yeah, especially in Alaska.
Still...Murkowski looks pathetic, but stranger things have happened...
Posted by: antisocialist at September 07, 2010 01:34 PM (Rwudm)
Posted by: CAC at September 07, 2010 01:35 PM (lV4Fs)
*stompstompstompstompstomp
I want it I want i t I want it!!!!
Posted by: Lisa Murkowski at September 07, 2010 01:36 PM (EW49d)
So you're telling me there's a chance.
Posted by: Lisa Murkowski at September 07, 2010 01:36 PM (xtAfO)
Sorry to go O/T here but we're trying to gauge interest in a SW Ohio meet-up next Fri. the 17th. I posted info at the yahoo page.
Okay, back to your regularly scheduled Murky snark!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 07, 2010 01:37 PM (XxTWx)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at September 07, 2010 01:39 PM (9cflz)
Posted by: Serious Cat at September 07, 2010 01:39 PM (yDaiA)
You don't think I will??
WATCH ME!!!!
Posted by: Lisa Murkowski at September 07, 2010 01:39 PM (EW49d)
She needs to hire a new lawyer.
Posted by: Vic at September 07, 2010 01:42 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Dan at September 07, 2010 01:43 PM (1jzSs)
Posted by: tarpon at September 07, 2010 01:43 PM (g0QB8)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at September 07, 2010 01:43 PM (9cflz)
He's the next Scott Brown, except a conservative, red-state Scott Brown.
'Zactly.
As pissed off as I get for being the first person to believe in Brown and then seeing him turn into a pile of 55% red, 45% blue crap... I have to remind myself what state he represents.
If Miller is who he looks like, he'll be 100% red.
Posted by: Truman North at September 07, 2010 01:43 PM (HLGCA)
Posted by: Lisa Murkowski at September 07, 2010 01:44 PM (EW49d)
Posted by: Ben at September 07, 2010 01:44 PM (DKV43)
My Friends, Lisa Murkowski is as Conservative as I am.
Posted by: Juan McCain at September 07, 2010 01:44 PM (CZLE9)
Don't hold your breath on that one. McConnell is likely steaming that his hand-picked protege just got tossed out on her ass on the heels of another one of his big supporters, Bob Bennett, getting tossed by the Utah caucus.
I'm pretty sure he's more pissed off about losing his personal power base than he is happy that they're about to retake the Senate.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at September 07, 2010 01:46 PM (wDKwf)
--However, it becomes more "possible" with each pass of the bong.
Posted by: "David" Haase at September 07, 2010 01:47 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: maddogg at September 07, 2010 01:47 PM (OlN4e)
Good times. Good times.
Posted by: Methos at September 07, 2010 01:47 PM (Ko04V)
also, this is short sighted. She can run for, and likely win, Begich's seat, in 2012 or 2014, i don't remember when it comes up for re election.
Why sacrifice any future in Alaskan politics?
The people of alaska were already less than thrilled with her nepotistic annointment, i doubt add sore loser and disloyal to her repetoire will endear her to the Alaska people.
Take some time off Murkowski, get a job you are qualified for, like 5 dollar whore, and regroup, come back and run for the senate in a couple of years.
Posted by: Ben at September 07, 2010 01:48 PM (DKV43)
SONS OF ANARCHY starts tonight.
woo hoo!
"I just did the same thing you did... hit some little tart from Nevada!"
Posted by: Gemma Teller Morrow at September 07, 2010 01:48 PM (wDKwf)
Posted by: King George III at September 07, 2010 01:48 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Phil Smith at September 07, 2010 01:49 PM (n+cpx)
Posted by: Incumbent Congressweasels at September 07, 2010 01:49 PM (HLGCA)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at September 07, 2010 01:49 PM (9cflz)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 07, 2010 01:49 PM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Mike Castle at September 07, 2010 01:50 PM (xtAfO)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at September 07, 2010 01:50 PM (w41GQ)
Murkowski, get a job you are qualified for, like 5 dollar whore
Hey, a reality show I would watch: one where she and Levi Johnson fight for "clients" in the truck stop parking lot!
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at September 07, 2010 01:51 PM (3k6GF)
42 Don't these "people" have any loyalty?
Sure. Loyalty to themselves. Everyone else can pretty much get boned.
Posted by: maddogg at September 07, 2010 01:51 PM (OlN4e)
It's easy to imagine Gillespie and Welch rooting for Murkowski on this one.
Posted by: John Galt at September 07, 2010 01:51 PM (F/4zf)
Ron Perlman is on my list of Actors Who Have A Good Screen Presence.
In other words, actors who are a enjoyable to see on the screen. Tom Selleck is also on that list.
Conversely, I have an Actors Whose Presence on the Screen Makes Me Sick list.
People such as James Spader are on that list.
Posted by: i got a gal in kalamazoo...zoo...zoo...zoo at September 07, 2010 01:52 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at September 07, 2010 01:53 PM (9cflz)
I find it more than a little interesting that Reason hasn't said boo about this. They claim to be real libertarians, not just potheads, but they're almost entirely silent on this topic.
reason freaking kills me. They are liberal on social issues, pure retard on everything else.
I bought the magizine once thinking i would enjoy it.
it shouldn't claim to be libertarian, it should just describe itself as a bunch of dudes unwilling to make any concrete pronouncements or decisions, but more than willing to complain about what we don't like.
Also, it is filled with statists who are liberal on social issues, therefore i guess they are libertarians. I don't follow that reasoning either.
I like Nick Giellespe(spelling), but he is about it.
Posted by: Ben at September 07, 2010 01:53 PM (DKV43)
Someone send this harridan some shame.
Posted by: sifty at September 07, 2010 01:54 PM (nKomG)
That's my theory. Prison Planet is on top of the news once again!
Posted by: Alex Jones at September 07, 2010 01:55 PM (c0A3e)
Jeebus...does the woman have no effin pride? Buck up, buttercup! You freakin' lost. Get the hell over yourself.
Posted by: Steph at September 07, 2010 01:56 PM (nbzzk)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at September 07, 2010 05:53 PM (9cflz)
--Dude, take a toke of this shit and tell me what you want in the platform!
Posted by: David Haase at September 07, 2010 01:57 PM (BP6Z1)
But.... but... but...., Daddy said the seat was mine forever......
*whimper
Posted by: Lisa Murkowski at September 07, 2010 01:58 PM (EW49d)
Posted by: Moocowksi at September 07, 2010 01:58 PM (CgRyx)
Posted by: Dede Scozafava at September 07, 2010 02:01 PM (UZDUc)
Maybe then they would appeal to more than the "lots of things I like to do could land me in jail, so I would prefer they legalize those things" element and inspire confidence.
Posted by: sifty at September 07, 2010 02:01 PM (nKomG)
dude, stop harshing on Murksey!
She's got the hook up for the best beasters in British Colombia!
Without her we're just puffing middies, man! Middies.
Joe Miller is pure schwag and stuff.
Murksey for Senator.
Posted by: Libertarian Party of Alaska at September 07, 2010 02:01 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 07, 2010 02:03 PM (kJXs1)
Posted by: Incumbent Congressweasels at September 07, 2010 05:49 PM (HLGCA)
It's just like every dictator knows: the last election anyone ever needs is the one that puts me in power. Poor Lisa can't deal with her Daddy being out of office -- she should remember she was selected once, elected once and rejected once.
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 02:03 PM (PuLje)
Posted by: logprof at September 07, 2010 02:03 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 02:03 PM (osFsP)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at September 07, 2010 02:05 PM (pyi1D)
Murkowski will in all likelihood get donations from democrats.
If she goes through with this, she will have shown herself to be a whore and will more than willingly take democratic money in return for caucasing with them if she wins.
Posted by: Ben at September 07, 2010 02:05 PM (DKV43)
*whimper
Posted by: Lisa Murkowski at September 07, 2010 05:58 PM (EW49d)
heh...yeah, that's the problem. Daddy always picked you up and brushed you off when he should have told you to act like a grown woman and learn how to do something for your damn self.
See, that's the difference between you and Sarah, and why she keeps kickin' your ass.
Posted by: Steph at September 07, 2010 02:05 PM (nbzzk)
Posted by: Turfmann, vanquisher of crabgrass at September 07, 2010 02:05 PM (FZxI4)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at September 07, 2010 02:06 PM (QBQcg)
Posted by: Fresh Air at September 07, 2010 02:07 PM (mNG9h)
Take it from me, grab some tan-in-a-can, and you're half way to getting back your Senate seat.
Posted by: Charlie "Orange Glow" Crist at September 07, 2010 02:07 PM (c0A3e)
But just barely. They only need one Republican to walk across the aisle.
I hope Murkowski isn't too bitter.
Posted by: RayJ at September 07, 2010 02:08 PM (YcjCJ)
She has already damaged her political future by going on the record with these idiotic statements. It's suitable for dredging up for her opponents' campaign ads in six months, a year, or ten years: Political whore.
Maybe she imagined that communicating by two-way wrist TV somehow made it off the record.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at September 07, 2010 02:11 PM (w41GQ)
Posted by: Breezy Moocowzki at September 07, 2010 02:11 PM (nKomG)
O/T: Anyone wanna turn this song into "Lame Ducky"?
Rubber Duckie, you're the one,
You make bathtime lots of fun,
Rubber Duckie, I'm awfully fond of you;
(woh woh, bee doh!)
Rubber Duckie, joy of joys,
When I squeeze you, you make noise!
Rubber Duckie, you're my very best friend, it's true!
(doo doo doo doooo, doo doo)
CHORUS:
Every day when I
Make my way to the tubby
I find a little fella who's
Cute and yellow and chubby
(rub-a-dub-a-dubby!)
Rubber Duckie, you're so fine
And I'm lucky that you're mine
Rubber duckie, I'm awfully fond of you.
(repeat chorus)
Rubber Duckie, you're so fine
And I'm lucky that you're mine
Rubber duckie, I'm awfully fond of -
Rubber duckie, I'd like a whole pond of -
Rubber duckie I'm awfully fond of you!
(doo doo, be doo.)
Posted by: Moocowksi at September 07, 2010 02:11 PM (CgRyx)
What worries me is the lame duck session. With Scott Brown, I believe the Senate can filibuster everything the Democrats throw out.
But just barely. They only need one Republican to walk across the aisle.
I hope Murkowski isn't too bitter.
I'm a bit anxious about it too. They can still do a lot of damage between now and January.
Posted by: Dede Scozafava at September 07, 2010 02:12 PM (UZDUc)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at September 07, 2010 02:13 PM (w41GQ)
I hate her. IhateherIhateherIhateher.
Why does she get to be all popular and stuff. I was a Senator!!! Was she a Senator?? NO!! Just because she's smart and pretty and intelligent and junk.
I can be smart, if I want to be.....
*waaaaaaaaaahhhhh
I WANT TO STILL BE A SENATOR!!!!!
Posted by: Lisa Murkowski at September 07, 2010 02:13 PM (EW49d)
Posted by: RayJ at September 07, 2010 02:15 PM (YcjCJ)
Posted by: Randy at September 07, 2010 02:15 PM (zQKSr)
Murkowski is behaving irrationally. Common sense would indicate behaving well now, and biding her time for a future election. Instead, she's making herself toxic for all time.
But she waaaaaaaaaaaaants it.
Posted by: Charlie Crist at September 07, 2010 02:15 PM (CgRyx)
Posted by: Average Joe at September 07, 2010 02:16 PM (UxMug)
Posted by: Soona at September 07, 2010 02:17 PM (UZDUc)
Posted by: Shoey at September 07, 2010 02:19 PM (yCH89)
Pants optional, I hope.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 07, 2010 02:19 PM (0Fp9E)
See that's the problem. Put 20% crap and 80% ice cream together, and what you get won't taste very good.
Posted by: Fresh Air at September 07, 2010 06:07 PM (mNG9h)
That's one analogy. Another might be, you're thristy in the woods and all the water is contaminated. Finding something is vital, but no stream is pure. Somewhere you have to take a drink, or you die of your search for purity; drink the wrong stream, and it's dysentary.
...
Why are all the politcal metaphors so crappy?
Posted by: Randy at September 07, 2010 02:20 PM (zQKSr)
I know I always let State Farm and Allstate dictate whom I find to be ethical enough to represent me in Congress, 'cause every dealing I've ever had with my insurance company has always convinced me that they've cornered the market on ethical behavior.
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 02:22 PM (osFsP)
It's the only way to show them we mean business.
Posted by: sifty at September 07, 2010 02:24 PM (nKomG)
And a perfect driving record.
Because concerned conservatives like @89 who somehow vote in both the Alaska and Nevada elections have to stay true to their insurance carriers or something.
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 02:26 PM (osFsP)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 07, 2010 02:28 PM (ujg0T)
when the only Party you can vote for has been/is being pulled far to the left by marxist/progressive radicals the only way to bring it back to the true middle is by pulling very, very hard to the right.
now thank me for your call.
Posted by: Shoey at September 07, 2010 02:29 PM (yCH89)
BBBrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...
Posted by: Dildos, Vibrators, and Other Adult Toys at September 07, 2010 02:30 PM (0Fp9E)
I thought insurance companies are greedy-evil -capitalist-wall street- corporate -monsters?
Yet you will let an insurance company's opinion sway your vote in two states?
Posted by: sifty at September 07, 2010 02:30 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 02:31 PM (osFsP)
A little snake was in the driveway, and I got out and scooted it out of the way with a stick. (It wasn't venomous.)
I now have a major case of the heebie-jeebies. That bitch Gaia would be proud.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 07, 2010 02:32 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: random at September 07, 2010 02:32 PM (6B7SQ)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at September 07, 2010 02:33 PM (QBQcg)
Hey, maybe we could get a big stick to scoot Lisa out of the way!
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 02:33 PM (osFsP)
Posted by: snake in Jane's driveway at September 07, 2010 02:33 PM (nKomG)
Are you people *weapons grade* stupid!?! Let's work a little harder to nominate unknown douchebags like Miller and hand another seat to Dems.
Hey, it's not like controlling a whole house of Congress is *important* to doing shit like stopping Jughead.
Posted by: sanssoucy at September 07, 2010 02:34 PM (Iq+yI)
So far, that 45%—the cloture votes to get lefty economic horrors enacted, especially—is stuff his state's voters don't favor, either.
Massachusetts is only a couple points more "blue" than Texas, on issues. He could have voted the right way on everything and cost himself nothing—with voters. But he's not there to represent them.
The problem with blue-state RINOs isn't that they cave to liberal voters. They don't have liberal voters. They have other masters.
Posted by: oblig. at September 07, 2010 02:36 PM (x7Ao8)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 06:33 PM (osFsP)
Sacred honor, all that shit.
Posted by: Will Folks-- A lot! at September 07, 2010 02:36 PM (0Fp9E)
Posted by: Average Joe at September 07, 2010 02:37 PM (UxMug)
Posted by: Teabagging fuckwit at September 07, 2010 02:37 PM (yCH89)
+ infinity! Murkowski was the pure candidate until she was betrayed by them damn teabaggers! She would never compromise her principles!
Posted by: Concerned Christian Conservative who has been voting Republican all their life at September 07, 2010 02:37 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Soona at September 07, 2010 02:37 PM (UZDUc)
Posted by: nobody at September 07, 2010 02:37 PM (nKomG)
That is all.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 07, 2010 02:37 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jean at September 07, 2010 02:38 PM (CPefM)
@21 They hang on to the tit for dear life.... Never seen anything like it. Their seat in the politburo is valued more than life itself.
Hallowed are the Ori...
Posted by: CanaDave at September 07, 2010 02:38 PM (jYxWG)
Well, if you're registered to vote in both Alaska and Nevada as your post implies, then I'd say you've got much more serious ethical issues than either Miller or Angle have.
Or maybe you're just a moby.
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 02:38 PM (osFsP)
McAdams? Not so much. His tardness is real.
http://tinyurl.com/2eosl2r
But in the interview with RealClearPolitics, he demonstrated an unwillingness to answer some of the most basic policy questions that have permeated the national debate in recent months.
Asked if he would have voted for national health care reform, McAdams paused for a full 10 seconds before replying, "Let's see. One moment please."
Another 15 seconds of silence came next, before McAdams finally asked to hear the reporter's next question.
Asked next for his views on Afghanistan and TARP, McAdams said, "Why don't you let me get back to you on that."
Calls to the McAdams campaign and the Alaska Democratic Party asking for clarification were unreturned as of late Thursday night.
Posted by: just dandy at September 07, 2010 02:39 PM (lVK3L)
That is all.
I guess you're not a morning person. *sob*
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 07, 2010 02:39 PM (0Fp9E)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 07, 2010 02:40 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: the most averagest evah! at September 07, 2010 02:40 PM (nKomG)
I seen it. It was a bad 'un.
Posted by: Basil Marceaux at September 07, 2010 02:41 PM (0Fp9E)
Posted by: Average Joe at September 07, 2010 06:16 PM (UxMug)
Furthermore, what of the genetic testing? Why are these candidates so resistant to giving tissue samples that would prove conclusively that they are human?
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 02:41 PM (7AOgy)
Has anyone ever seen Ralph Reed and Dave Foley in the same room?
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 07, 2010 02:42 PM (0Fp9E)
Hey, what about me?
Posted by: Brian Dennehy at September 07, 2010 02:42 PM (c0A3e)
Yep. Teabagger fuckwits strike again, and another red state will soon be caucusing with the Democrats.
As opposed to an Entitled RINO who goes along to get along and gives us Commiecrat Lite.
Hey, it's not like controlling a whole house of Congress is *important* to doing shit like stopping Jughead.
Except that you and your beloved RINO incumbents don't stop Jughead, you just go along to get along....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 07, 2010 02:42 PM (ujg0T)
Alaska chose wisely.
Now that Alaskans can see that a conservative outsider can win - even against all odds against a powerful incumbent - they'll choose wisely again if Murkowski changes her stripes. When you're conflicted as a voter because you want the "sure thing" to win against the bigger evil, and today that's the Progressive/Democrat Party, you hedge a bit and rationalize with the known commodity - the "safe" incumbent with an "R." Well that paradigm was just shot. The "no chance" guy won and he got to knock off a philosophically weak incumbent to boot.
Miller's popularity will grow. He's no longer a risk as defined by those who deem it their domain to distribute the reins.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 07, 2010 02:43 PM (swuwV)
Furthermore, what of the genetic testing? Why are these candidates so resistant to giving tissue samples that would prove conclusively that they are human?
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 06:41 PM (7AOgy)
Pssh, and they call us nuts.
Posted by: Birthers at September 07, 2010 02:43 PM (zQKSr)
Lisa Murkowski is like herpes, she keeps coming back.
The penmanship was quite tidy.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at September 07, 2010 02:43 PM (9QDNr)
Posted by: the most averagest evah! at September 07, 2010 02:44 PM (nKomG)
Hey, it's not like controlling a whole house of Congress is *important* to doing shit like stopping Jughead.
Posted by: sanssoucy at September 07, 2010 06:34 PM (Iq+yI)
No, but obviously you are. Dont' know shit about AK do you? Appreciate the concern though.
Posted by: Steph at September 07, 2010 02:45 PM (nbzzk)
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at September 07, 2010 06:43 PM (9QDNr)
Thanks for noticing.
Posted by: Sen. Larry Craig (H-ID) at September 07, 2010 02:45 PM (0Fp9E)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at September 07, 2010 02:45 PM (9cflz)
hahaha, if it wasn't for the Tea Partyers & Sarah Palin prodding the Republicans along, the GOP wouldn't gain 5 seats in the HOUSE OF FUCKING PANCAKES you dumb bimbo.
Posted by: i got a gal in kalamazoo zoo zoo zoo at September 07, 2010 02:46 PM (UQjUb)
I'm sorry, but I can't take the chance of voting for a guy who is a well-known mattress tag remover. I checked his mattresses -- not a tag to be found.
Posted by: Fletch at September 07, 2010 02:46 PM (osFsP)
a little off topic but related to the public teet:
i've been looking into the newer underwater refi program but no one can tell me how much this is going to affect my credit. i meet all of the fha underwriting guidelines and i'm current on my payments but it is a voluntary program for the lenders..which is a minimum 10% write off and restructuring. if my 800 credit score is going to get raped i'm not down with it.
Posted by: evil libertarian at September 07, 2010 02:46 PM (o0vs/)
Are you people *weapons grade* stupid!?! Let's work a little harder to nominate unknown douchebags like Miller and hand another seat to Dems.
Hey, it's not like controlling a whole house of Congress is *important* to doing shit like stopping Jughead.
Posted by: sanssoucy at September 07, 2010 06:34 PM (Iq+yI)
--Is this a froll, or the nasty twin of "Bob"?
Posted by: logprof at September 07, 2010 02:48 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 06:42 PM (osFsP)
I'm thinking speciesist.
But don't discount the possibility that Miller and Angle are robots built by the DNC to spread havoc in the Republican ranks -- you know, like the robot Maria in the classic movie Metropolis.
And as Isaac Asimov reminded us, them robots is crafty, sneaky suckers.
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 02:48 PM (7AOgy)
This is an AP story, in case anyone didn't notice. Haven't seen The Murk on TV saying any of this shit in a forum where it can be repeated as often as clips from an Osama Obama speech.
On the veracity scale, I put it just above any post from the other AP over at Tepid Air.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 07, 2010 02:49 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: runningrn at September 07, 2010 02:50 PM (8GYOu)
Posted by: Heap Big Medicine, Government Slayer at September 07, 2010 02:52 PM (GOG1H)
Why have neither of these candidates turned water into wine? Surely we can all agree there is a need for wine. Perhaps they are simply unwilling to aid their constituents in this manner. Best to stay home in November.
No, but Murkowski has turned water into WHINE!
Posted by: runningrn at September 07, 2010 02:52 PM (8GYOu)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 06:51 PM (osFsP)
Easy. Don't pay her.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 07, 2010 02:53 PM (0Fp9E)
Girl don't go away mad.
Girl just go away.
Posted by: Vince Neil at September 07, 2010 02:53 PM (9QDNr)
Posted by: SurferDoc at September 07, 2010 02:53 PM (X6a9o)
Posted by: Average Shmo at September 07, 2010 02:54 PM (UZDUc)
Posted by: Teabagging fuckwit at September 07, 2010 02:55 PM (yCH89)
Since the rules for CRA were changed back during the Clinton regime it doesn't matter what your credit score is to get a mortgage.
Credit cards and auto loans are different. So far the CBC hasn't tried the "red lining" scam on them yet.
Posted by: Vic at September 07, 2010 02:55 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: runningrn at September 07, 2010 02:55 PM (8GYOu)
Posted by: Teabagging fuckwit at September 07, 2010 02:56 PM (yCH89)
As a lifelong conservative, I truly appreciate your thoughtful and insightful posts. I often find myself concerned with the noisy, overheated rhetoric from the neo-conservative right, and wonder why we can't push our solid conservative agenda without the theatrics or wild passion usually seen on the left. While I'm 85% on-board with the tea party's goals, I can't help but wonder if such a rudderless vessel is really the right ship for our journey. It's comforting to see that reasoned, level-headed conservatism still exists. Keep up the good work! What a wonderful tonic. I'd like to see you as a co-blogger.
Posted by: Regular Guy at September 07, 2010 02:56 PM (KXcqh)
"Murkowski told The Associated Press on Tuesday that she's been inundated with calls and e-mails from supporters, asking her not to leave the race. She says she's been humbled and is listening - and weighing her options.
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 07, 2010 02:56 PM (xtAfO)
There's an update on the article in Politco quoting Haase, the Libertarian candidate.
And the AP article quotes Lisa saying she's not out of it yet. I doubt even the AP would make up a quote.
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 02:57 PM (osFsP)
Posted by: Average Shmo at September 07, 2010 06:54 PM (UZDUc)
I think his position on beaver is split.
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 02:57 PM (7AOgy)
I think if the lame duck stuff is too crazy, people are going to be steamed. A lot more people are watching than usual, and they already think congress doesn't give a damn what they want. If something big comes down in Nov-Jan, and people are made aware, I think we can get Dems to back down, or at least motivate R's to immediately defund on arrival.
Obviously some amount of delusional hope is contained in the above prediction.
Posted by: Randy at September 07, 2010 02:58 PM (zQKSr)
Posted by: sifty (TBF) at September 07, 2010 03:01 PM (nKomG)
What worries me is the lame duck session. With Scott Brown, I believe the Senate can filibuster everything the Democrats throw out.
But just barely. They only need one Republican to walk across the aisle.
I hope Murkowski isn't too bitter.
i thought there were certain states that immediately seated the new senators, like illinois.
am i mistaken?
Posted by: Ben at September 07, 2010 03:02 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: Joe Q. Public at September 07, 2010 03:03 PM (hV/FZ)
I think the Illinois thing is only because it is Obama's seat, so the replacement (appointed) could only serve until the next election.
Posted by: Randy at September 07, 2010 03:03 PM (zQKSr)
big trouble brewing... with Murkowski gone who will give hand relief to Mitch McConnell?
i guess he'll have to pay more than 5 bucks for a handy now.
Posted by: Ben at September 07, 2010 03:04 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: evil libertarian at September 07, 2010 03:05 PM (o0vs/)
Posted by: Joe Q. Public at September 07, 2010 07:03 PM (hV/FZ)
I told you they were treating me like a dog!
Posted by: B Obama at September 07, 2010 03:05 PM (zQKSr)
Not only is Average Joe's wisdom a tonic for overheated rhetoric, it is very effective in fighting the scabies of discord and the herpes of hysteria.
As well as the genital warts of worry.
Posted by: Soona at September 07, 2010 03:05 PM (UZDUc)
I can't believe I ever listened to those bloodthirsty Tea Party bastards.
Posted by: sifty (TBF) at September 07, 2010 03:06 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: Joe Q. Public at September 07, 2010 07:03 PM (hV/FZ)
Now, wait a minute! When have I EVER called them "syphilitic dog-fuckers"? THOUGHT it, sure, but SAID it? Never!
Posted by: David Frum at September 07, 2010 03:06 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: MJ at September 07, 2010 03:08 PM (BKOsZ)
Posted by: Joe Q. Public at September 07, 2010 07:03 PM (hV/FZ)
How dare you! I do NOT have syphillus.
Posted by: Tea Partier at September 07, 2010 03:09 PM (c1oyg)
Posted by: random man on the street at September 07, 2010 03:10 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 06:57 PM
Hahahahahahahahahaha *wheeze* hahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 07, 2010 03:11 PM (Ulu3i)
The fact that I live in the lower 48 had nothing to do with me withholding my precious vote.
Posted by: Plain Person (possibly Y-not) at September 07, 2010 03:11 PM (osFsP)
Posted by: Dede Scozafava (I lost and now I'm horny) at September 07, 2010 03:11 PM (UZDUc)
Talk about a clueless "lifelong conservative": David Brooks imagines the Barack Obama that might have been.
Obama, in this fanciful version, held up his hand. He told his aides to put away the history books and reject the New Deal comparisons. Unlike in 1932, Americans today have a raging distrust of Washington, he observed. Living through a crisis caused by excessive debt, they will viscerally recoil at the prospect of federal debt without end. “Somehow,” Obama concluded, “we have to address the crisis without further terrifying the American people.”
The stimulus package, he continued, should rely heavily on cutting payroll taxes. This, he argued, will send a quick jolt to the economy without concentrating power in Washington. It will deliver a sharp psychological boost to the middle class. It might even be bipartisan. Obama noted that John McCain had a $445 billion stimulus plan along these lines and his fellow Republican senator, Mel Martinez, a $713 billion plan.
Sure, but why would any stimulus plan be necessary, David? In any alternate universe in which Obama held those kinds of beliefs, there'd be an abundance of unicorns that shat Skittles and pissed ice cold beer, and we'd all live on the Big Rock Candy Mountain.
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 03:13 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: Teabagging fuckwit at September 07, 2010 03:13 PM (yCH89)
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at September 07, 2010 05:33 PM (tOCL6)
Will do. I say we do it the night of the primary (that should prove interesting). Perhaps we can drunk blog from the First State.
Or we do one on location at the Punkin Chunkin. If ever there was an activity for Morons, this is it.
Posted by: BlueHen at September 07, 2010 03:13 PM (1O93r)
At night before I go to bed, I pull up Maxim and Vogue and look at the pictures of Michelle Obama. She's stunning and I go to bed dreaming about her holding me in those rugged, I mean, feminine arms of her.
Because of her arms, the Dems will retain the House and the Senate.
Of course, I'm a Republican, but I just have to sit this November out, darn it. I'm compelled by the righteousness that is Michelle Obama.
Posted by: Average Blow at September 07, 2010 03:15 PM (XxTWx)
Posted by: curious at September 07, 2010 07:08 PM (p302b)
Hasn't he been the one putting US on for the last few years?
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 03:15 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: Chester Milktoast at September 07, 2010 03:15 PM (nKomG)
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?!!?
Posted by: Princess DoubleRainbow Murkowski at September 07, 2010 03:16 PM (8K+v+)
Because that would be cool.
PC Load Letter? WTF?
Posted by: sifty (TBF) at September 07, 2010 03:17 PM (nKomG)
YOU LOST... Suck it up and go home.
Posted by: Timbo at September 07, 2010 07:15 PM (ph9vn)
I blame Gore for all this shit. Lose with some class
Posted by: Ombudsman at September 07, 2010 03:17 PM (c1oyg)
Posted by: Bland Bart at September 07, 2010 03:17 PM (osFsP)
Uh, uh, Lisa Murkowski is here. Stand up Lisa, Let ‘em see you. Oh, God love you. What am I talking about? I tell you what, you’re making everybody else stand up, though, pal. I tell you what, stand up for Lisa.
Posted by: Joe Biden at September 07, 2010 03:17 PM (v1gw3)
hey dere, I'm your conservative neighbor to the north, Norman from Canada.
Take me advice. Get rid of the tea party people.
Posted by: Normal Norman at September 07, 2010 03:18 PM (UQjUb)
Posted by: Concerned Christian XBradTC at September 07, 2010 03:18 PM (X0Ona)
Posted by: Teabagging fuckwit at September 07, 2010 07:13 PM (yCH89)
Miller's beard exists because he is such a bad-ass that his facial hair is afraid to stay inside his skin.
If he and Chuck Norris ever occupy the same room at the same time, their combined awesomness quotient will disrupt space-time as we know it.
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 03:18 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: Mediocre Ralph at September 07, 2010 03:19 PM (554T5)
Posted by: Mediocre Ralph at September 07, 2010 07:19 PM (554T5)
Ain't no tit like a public tit
'Cause a public tit gives pork!
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 03:20 PM (7AOgy)
damn. lost my train of thought.
Posted by: worried waldorf at September 07, 2010 03:21 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: Shoey at September 07, 2010 03:23 PM (yCH89)
Posted by: That guy who likes to say wingnuts at September 07, 2010 03:23 PM (554T5)
But just barely. They only need one Republican to walk across the aisle.
I hope Murkowski isn't too bitter.
Posted by: RayJ
Uh Lisa, I realize that packing and saying good bye is hard, but we were wondering if you kinda got over that whole $5 whore thing. And being Daddy's spoiled brat. And being an out of touch idiot. And being told to earn an honest lving for the first time in your life. Or being compared to case of crabs on a hooker.
What? You hadn't that last one? Until I mentioned it? Oh.....never mind.
Posted by: Republican leadership at September 07, 2010 03:23 PM (1O93r)
"They could want everything from a lunch at the Capitol to who knows what," Bitney said. (Oh really? Is he saying Lisa is going to buy her way onto the Libertarian ticket??) "I think these guys are a little bit star struck, and they're getting more attention than they've probably ever gotten in their whole lives, and it's got to be intriguing and exciting all at once."
Bitney said that he had "no idea" whether Murkowski was meeting with Haase, or other members of the Libertarian Party, on Tuesday.
"She hasn't told me she's meeting with them and I haven't talked to them," Bitney said. "All I go on is the rumors I hear."
Murkowski enjoys nearly universal name recognition in Alaska, a formidable campaign war chest, and could be a competitive candidate in a three-way race against Miller and Democratic nominee Scott McAdams.
Bitney said that Murkowski has received a tremendous amount of encouragement to take on Miller again.
"Somebody put up a Facebook site to tell her to run, and we're getting hundreds of emails telling her to run, phone calls," Bitney said. "There's a lot of people that want a rematch. A lot of people were surprised by the primary and there's still a lot of support out there." (Lisa needs to ask those people where they were on Aug. 24)
http://tinyurl.com/235ouug
Posted by: just dandy at September 07, 2010 03:23 PM (lVK3L)
Hi.
I'm a conservative just like you. I'm sitting here cleaning my firearms and listening to Ted Nugent. I go to a church with no brown people on Sundays, too.
This Tea Party? Bad for us. Do not want.
Posted by: Everyday Ed at September 07, 2010 03:24 PM (UQjUb)
As a concerned lifelong Republican, I am appalled that the so-called Tea Party seems completely ignorant of the importance of cucumber and watercress finger sandwiches and petits fours. This indicates to me that they lack judgment and the ability properly to prepare a tea service of any kind.
Posted by: Blue-Haired New England GOP Lady at September 07, 2010 03:24 PM (7AOgy)
... said she wouldn't even be thinking about going on if not for the showing of support and the risk she believes the state faces.
There are a host of issues at play, she said, from losing seniority in the Senate to the direction that both major party candidates are proposing taking the state that she believes are "causing Alaskans to sit up and pay attention and say, 'What just happened in this election and what are we left with?'
WTF is wrong with this woman? Somebody just bitch slap some sense into this idiot.
Posted by: Steph at September 07, 2010 03:25 PM (nbzzk)
Does the carpet match the drapes?
Posted by: Papa Smurf at September 07, 2010 03:25 PM (0Fp9E)
Lisa Murkowski was the model for the Mayflower puppet girl, without the gargantuan cooter of course.
Posted by: Fish at September 07, 2010 03:26 PM (v1gw3)
Does the carpet match the drapes?
Posted by: Papa Smurf at September 07, 2010 07:25 PM (0Fp9E)
There's snow on the roof, but there's still a fire in the oven.
Posted by: Blue-Haired New England GOP Lady at September 07, 2010 03:27 PM (7AOgy)
There's snow on the roof, but there's still a fire in the oven.
Posted by: Blue-Haired New England GOP Lady at September 07, 2010 07:27 PM (7AOgy)
Ginger Snatch!
Posted by: Papa Smurf at September 07, 2010 03:28 PM (0Fp9E)
Until the GOP can elevate moderates like Nancy Pelosi to positions of power, I will be forced to stay home and fill out crossword puzzles in my stockmen's guide.
Posted by: Iowa Corn Farmer at September 07, 2010 03:29 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: Mediocre Ralph at September 07, 2010 03:29 PM (554T5)
Posted by: Gloomy Gus at September 07, 2010 03:30 PM (g73jP)
Please. Alaska gets many times its per capita federal swag each year. Didn't Sir Golfsalot say something about spreading the wealth around?
Posted by: Ombudsman at September 07, 2010 03:30 PM (c1oyg)
Posted by: Beige Belinda at September 07, 2010 03:30 PM (osFsP)
Sitting in the barber shop this afternoon, reading the latest copy of Hog Framer and it had a picture of Nancy Pelosi. Not sure of the connection.
Posted by: Fish at September 07, 2010 03:31 PM (v1gw3)
There are a host of issues at play, she said, from losing seniority in the Senate (her seniority) to the direction that both major party candidates are proposing taking the state chair and office that her gnarled ass is currently occupying that she believes are "causing Alaskans to sit up and pay attention and say, 'What just happened in this election and what are we (translation me and my supplicants, and money sources) left with?'
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 07, 2010 03:31 PM (1O93r)
We as a culture lost a lot more than prudes and naive innocents when we destroyed the concept of SHAME.
Once upon a time, this type of behavior would result in a swift and brutal beating, metaphorical or not, and an end to the politician's career as he knew it.
Posted by: s'moron at September 07, 2010 03:32 PM (ds8Yk)
Posted by: wan juan ennui at September 07, 2010 03:33 PM (nKomG)
True, but would this blog exist had it survived?
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 07, 2010 03:33 PM (1O93r)
Posted by: That guy who likes to say wingnuts at September 07, 2010 07:23 PM (554T5)
I have a name, wingnut!
Posted by: snapdragon at September 07, 2010 03:34 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Average Joe at September 07, 2010 03:37 PM (liBQN)
Posted by: Mediocre Ralph at September 07, 2010 03:37 PM (554T5)
As a concerned lifelong Republican, I am appalled that the so-called Tea Party seems completely ignorant of the importance of cucumber and watercress finger sandwiches and petits fours. This indicates to me that they lack judgment and the ability properly to prepare a tea service of any kind.
Posted by: Blue-Haired New England GOP Lady at September 07, 2010 07:24 PM (7AOgy)
And the way they use the salad fork for the main course?
Beyond the pale!
Posted by: T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII at September 07, 2010 03:37 PM (BP6Z1)
Now I feel better able to discuss my views in a way that insures that nothing I want ever comes to pass while simultaneously never offending anyone.
Posted by: wan juan ennui at September 07, 2010 03:39 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: i got a gal in kalamazoo zoo zoo zoo at September 07, 2010 03:40 PM (UQjUb)
As a concerned lifelong Republican, I am appalled that the so-called Tea Party seems completely ignorant of the importance of cucumber and watercress finger sandwiches and petits fours. This indicates to me that they lack judgment and the ability properly to prepare a tea service of any kind.
Posted by: Blue-Haired New England GOP Lady at September 07, 2010 07:24 PM (7AOgy)
And the way they use the salad fork for the main course?
Beyond the pale!
Geez you establishment types are touchy. Next thing ya know, you'll be complaining about our oath to remain in 'commando' mode until after primary season.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 07, 2010 03:41 PM (1O93r)
As a concerned lifelong Republican, I am appalled that the so-called Tea Party seems completely ignorant of the importance of cucumber and watercress finger sandwiches and petits fours. This indicates to me that they lack judgment and the ability properly to prepare a tea service of any kind.
Posted by: Blue-Haired New England GOP Lady at September 07, 2010 07:24 PM (7AOgy)
And the way they use the salad fork for the main course?
Beyond the pale!
Posted by: T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII at September 07, 2010 07:37 PM (BP6Z1)"
I caught them not using grape shears, horrifying.
Posted by: meggy M at September 07, 2010 03:41 PM (p302b)
Posted by: i got a gal in kalamazoo zoo zoo zoo at September 07, 2010 03:41 PM (UQjUb)
At 7:41 apparantly.
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 07, 2010 03:42 PM (1O93r)
Posted by: K Street Pimps 'R' Us at September 07, 2010 03:43 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Concerned Christian XBradTC at September 07, 2010 03:43 PM (X0Ona)
I recall once seeing a Mr. Todd (or Lou Dodd, I remember he was the network's Political Director) recommend something called the Coffee Party. The idea was to promote a fully American agenda without raising an unnecessary fuss.
Posted by: Average Joe at September 07, 2010 07:37 PM (liBQN)
You see? This is exactly the problem. Tea and coffee are both caffeinated and lead to unnecessary and uncomfortable levels of agitation in the political discourse.
Our overheated rhetoric needs a counteractant to cool it down to reasonable levels. I think it's high time this country had a Root Beer Party. Or perhaps a Thorazine Party.
Posted by: Blue-Haired New England GOP Lady at September 07, 2010 03:43 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: wan juan ennui at September 07, 2010 03:43 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 03:44 PM (osFsP)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 07:44 PM (osFsP)
Murkowski looks like her insides could use a good warming-over.
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 03:46 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 03:46 PM (osFsP)
The "Coffee Party" was a failed astro-turf response to the grass roots emergence of the Tea Party phenomenon.
But you knew that, didn't you?
Seriously, why do we get the lamest "CCC's" here? Posted by: Concerned Christian XBradTC
As a concerned Christian conservative, I am appalled at the attacks being visited upon other CCCs. Lately, inferiors, such as mere concerned Christians have begun to assail such lofty persons.
Please do remember that as a mere CC, you are outranked (unless you are a talking bottle of Canadian Club).
Posted by: CCC to the nth power at September 07, 2010 03:47 PM (1O93r)
Posted by: sifty (TBF) at September 07, 2010 03:47 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: Journolist at September 07, 2010 03:47 PM (O/NP5)
Posted by: Blue-Haired New England GOP Lady at September 07, 2010 07:43 PM (7AOgy)
Fuck this! I'm sparkin' a bowl!
Posted by: DUmmy at September 07, 2010 03:47 PM (0Fp9E)
This Tea Party? Bad for us. Do not want.
Posted by: Everyday Ed at September 07, 2010 07:24 PM
The shit!!
Posted by: Sly "Everyday People" Stone at September 07, 2010 03:50 PM (8K+v+)
Posted by: Connie Christine at September 07, 2010 03:50 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: christian person of concern at September 07, 2010 03:51 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: dagny at September 07, 2010 03:51 PM (wEZdg)
My own concern concerning those who have shown concern regarding my personal level of concern is of deep concern to me.
My concern is for overly concerned concerned. If I don't get meds, I can't vote. Who's this Lisa chick?
Posted by: No Name in the Game at September 07, 2010 03:52 PM (UZDUc)
Posted by: Ken Royall at September 07, 2010 03:52 PM (9zzk+)
Three fucking seats. Lost. Certain victory either thrown away outright or put in jeopardy. Because we're too goddamn dumb to just *hold our noses and vote for the Republican*.
"First, beat the Democrat" would be the smart rule. I don't give a rat-fuck if Harry Reid loses to Ronald Reagan, Barry Goldwater, Nelson Rockefeller, or Lincoln CHafee - but I do know Reid would be golden-brown toast by now if Nevada Republicans hadn't gone nuts and nominated chicken-barter Teabag Bitch.
We're gonna lose out on hearing *Harry Reid's* concession speech because we can't nominate a nice, conventional Republican who can *win*.
First. Beat the Democrat.
Posted by: sanssoucy at September 07, 2010 03:53 PM (Iq+yI)
Posted by: Team Murkowski at September 07, 2010 03:54 PM (nKomG)
Posted by: martha stewarts left nipple at September 07, 2010 03:54 PM (THrql)
Posted by: Concerned Christian XBradTC at September 07, 2010 03:55 PM (X0Ona)
Posted by: Journolist at September 07, 2010 07:47 PM (O/NP5)
--Isn't she the same bimbo who asked Tom Brady to marry her while wearing a skanky wedding dress at the Media Day for the Super Bowl? I don;t care for attention whores, especially when they're already good-looking.
Posted by: logprof at September 07, 2010 03:56 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: sifty (TBF) at September 07, 2010 03:56 PM (nKomG)
I'm a little taken aback that you could find a full 9 in 10 of the tea party's objectives to be in line with your no-nonsense way of thinking. Truthfully, I was being a bit charitable with my "85%" figure. But I'll give my estimation some serious thought, as your level-headed analysis is something I've grown to trust.
As for sitting out this election, are you sure that a well-placed protest vote for one of the third parties-- as distressing and troubling as such an action would be-- wouldn't do more to advance the cause?
Posted by: Regular Guy at September 07, 2010 03:58 PM (KXcqh)
Posted by: Concerned Christian XBradTC at September 07, 2010 03:59 PM (X0Ona)
What are you on about?
Miller is +8 and +6 vs McAdams.
Rubio is up in 4 out of 6 polls. (Your buddy Crist is up in the other two.)
Angle is behind, but I don't think anyone thought her opponent was a sure thing to beat Reid.
Step away from the medical mushrooms and go do some research at RCP.
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 03:59 PM (osFsP)
They figure that if you do that enough, the computer will get tired of fighting and surrender.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at September 07, 2010 04:00 PM (554T5)
Posted by: sifty (TBF) at September 07, 2010 04:00 PM (nKomG)
Murkowski looks like her insides could use a good warming-over.
Posted by: stuiec at September 07, 2010 07:46 PMYeah, but she apparently has a well-filled war chest!
Fapfapfapfap....
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 07, 2010 04:00 PM (Ulu3i)
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- U.S. Rep. John Spratt (D - Teetsucker) will debate his Republican challenger Mick Mulvaney on Tuesday, but the only people who will get to see any of it have already bought tickets to the sold out dinner at a South Carolina Lions Club.
Spratt refused to debate with any audio or video.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 07, 2010 04:01 PM (L8kaT)
Oh, I am sooo stealing that! ;-)
Posted by: Y-not at September 07, 2010 04:02 PM (osFsP)
You know, you could hold your nose (or those noses around you you wish to convert) and vote for the other Republican - the one that did win - to accomplish the latter.
And not go around calling Angle "chicken-barter Teabag Bitch."
Just a thought.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 07, 2010 04:03 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Joe Q. Public at September 07, 2010 04:04 PM (hV/FZ)
Posted by: Average Shmo at September 07, 2010 04:07 PM (UZDUc)
Actually, Lowden was the chicken-barter lady. Only people that use the Teabag term are the teabaggees.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 07, 2010 04:08 PM (L8kaT)
And they better do it fast. Any more toe-sucking over Jerry Rivers's 40 years as a public idiot -- during which time he has amassed more big-buck goodies than Bill Gates, which he's delighted to show off for the po' folks -- and I'm permanently switching from Fucks News and getting my news from the Cartoon Network.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 07, 2010 04:08 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: evil libertarian at September 07, 2010 04:08 PM (o0vs/)
Hey, aren't you the guy who was here several months ago blaming Marco Rubio for forcing Charlie Crist to jump the party long before the primary had even taken place?
And the guy who was here several months before that, doing a gloating victory lap over the Dems' impending cramdown of ObamaCare?
Yeah, that was you. Let us know what we're missing on TV November 2nd, jackass.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at September 07, 2010 04:46 PM (MXFuC)
Posted by: Mitch McConnell's invisible lips at September 07, 2010 04:53 PM (BZEkR)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt's next book deal at September 07, 2010 05:01 PM (BZEkR)
If you truly are in love with Monica you would be listening to her every single Saturday after Larry Kudlow.
Posted by: curious at September 07, 2010 05:01 PM (p302b)
Yeah, thanks for your concern and all, but Miller, Angel and Rubio are all gonna win.
The Conn. nomination hasn't even been decided yet.
Posted by: The Oracle at September 07, 2010 05:04 PM (F6+/O)
The million dollars has NOTHING to do with it! Really.
Posted by: Kemp at September 07, 2010 05:15 PM (AQxTm)
Posted by: DLister at September 07, 2010 06:37 PM (4O68l)
Posted by: Dick at September 07, 2010 07:59 PM (P0c6K)
Posted by: Doc Merlin at September 07, 2010 08:46 PM (EzyA4)
Posted by: Doc Merlin at September 07, 2010 08:49 PM (EzyA4)
The LP loses any credibility they may have earned in Alaska if they sell their nomination to Murkowski, and the transfer of money in exchange for a ballot-qualified party nomination to federal office is very likely illegal.
It is time for McConnell to step in and tell Murky the bad news: she lost, and she's done, and if she wishes to salvage any semblance of self-respect and dignity as she leaves, she needs to stop this nonsense now.
Posted by: Adjoran at September 07, 2010 08:56 PM (VfmLu)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 07, 2010 09:07 PM (mHQ7T)
Fuck you. It's sore loser pieces of shit like Senator Veruca Salt (RINO-AK) and Buttfuck Chuck (OompaLoompa-FL) who are fuckin' up the works, not Rubio or Miller.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at September 07, 2010 09:22 PM (Fg/7E)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at September 07, 2010 09:28 PM (Fg/7E)
She gets bulldozed out of the way this time, even if she sat down quietly the odds are good she'd have to face Parnell for the Begich seat in 2012, and who might she have to face if she ran for Governor then?
What will the political landscape look like then? Will the purists or the porkers be ascendant in the GOP two years from now?
Posted by: JEM at September 07, 2010 09:29 PM (o+SC1)
There's no reason EVER to support a warmist carbon-regulator in a state like Florida or Alaska.
The Dems had Lieberman wander off the reservation and get away with it, of course.
Posted by: JEM at September 07, 2010 09:38 PM (o+SC1)
Posted by: sdsadas at February 23, 2011 04:09 PM (wmo+Z)
Posted by: altýn çilek at March 07, 2011 10:35 AM (aAl9M)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2768 seconds, 435 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
So is today officially boobie day? I mean first the boobs/butts thread, and now we have teats.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at September 07, 2010 01:31 PM (cniXs)