October 11, 2010
— Ace No, not in the sense that he's interested in the Birth Certificate conspiracy. But rather to ask, if Obama's people want to go on a fishing expedition with the Chamber of Commerce and "disclose everything," where is the leadership from the top on this?
He starts asking about the birth certificate in the last two questions, but the whole interview with Axelrod is worth reading.
John McCormack from the WS sniped on Twitter: "David Axerold just demanded that the Chamber of Commerce produce its long-form birth certificate."
Posted by: Ace at
03:07 PM
| Comments (133)
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: buzzion at October 11, 2010 03:10 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: 18-1 at October 11, 2010 03:11 PM (bgcml)
The fact that the anti-free enterprise modern socialist progressive democrat party is openly spreading lies about THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, really shows how the democrat party is not your father's democrat party.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 03:11 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: buzzion at October 11, 2010 03:11 PM (oVQFe)
Chrissy has never met a fact he couldn't twist or ignore.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 11, 2010 03:11 PM (Ulu3i)
Maybe we on the right, and a select few media types who want to maintain credibility and dignity, have finally learned how to fight back.
Posted by: pep at October 11, 2010 03:12 PM (8zlLq)
Posted by: Lemmenkainen from somewhere in dar al-harb at October 11, 2010 03:12 PM (Iw4dM)
Posted by: denny crane at October 11, 2010 03:12 PM (7+pP9)
It will be nice when the American people demand more of their politicians by replacing a lot of dead wood. But it will be even nicer when we demand decorum, civility and respect as the employers of those sons of bitches.
And get what we demand!
Posted by: Nom de Blog at October 11, 2010 03:13 PM (0LABp)
Oh boy let's look at this gem by Axelrod:
AXELROD: I would be for disclosure for everyone. The American people ought to know where millions and millions of dollars in our campaigns are coming from. Whether they are supporting Democrats or Republicans. Transparency is what we need in the political system. What we donÂ’t need are special interests spending millions of dollars in these campaigns, to influence these campaign, never owning up to it, but having more muscle in the congress than they already have.
Does that mean they're going to turn on their verification system for credit card online donations in the next election?
Posted by: buzzion at October 11, 2010 03:14 PM (oVQFe)
NY19 slipped to the Leans Rep side.
http://nanhayworth.com/
Posted by: 18-1 at October 11, 2010 03:15 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: Jayne Cobb at October 11, 2010 03:15 PM (vssPi)
that last bit is particularly chilling coming from Pres'ent SevenIron's top advisor.
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Team at October 11, 2010 03:16 PM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Jean at October 11, 2010 03:16 PM (qdhtw)
The US Secret Service found and interviewed the man who threw the book onstage. He was deemed to be an “overexhuberant” supporter who wanted the President to have a copy of a book he had written, according the Special Agent Edwin Donovan of the Secret Service in Washington. “He was deemed not to be a threat and was not arrested,” Donovan told ABC News.
Posted by: 18-1 at October 11, 2010 03:16 PM (bgcml)
What we donÂ’t need are special interests UNIONS spending millions of dollars in these campaigns, to influence these campaign, never owning up to it, but having more muscle in the congress than they already have.
Let's be accurate, Comrade Combover.
Posted by: Cicero at October 11, 2010 03:16 PM (QKKT0)
from Hotair
"Last week, Barack Obama himself accused the Chamber of Commerce of using foreign money to push its domestic political activism, which would violate election law. Unfortunately, as the Times reports, the White House had absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing. And Obama failed to mention that plenty of groups on the Left, especially labor unions, raise money outside the US as well. [oops]
Now the White House is trying to step back from their earlier accusations of illegality, but theyÂ’re still desperately trying to hang onto the line of attack:
Is that how it works in the United States in the era of Hopenchange? The President makes an accusation of lawbreaking without any evidence of it, and the entity accused has to prove their innocence? In this country, the government has to prove its case, not the defendant, and even before making an accusation of wrongdoing usually has to have some evidence of the crime in the first place."Modern McCarthyism -- Thy name is the modern progressive democrat party.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 03:17 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Team at October 11, 2010 03:17 PM (eCAn3)
Over at Dan Riehl's Place
Allen West's primary opponent, a REPUBLICAN, endorses Klein the Democrat.
Jesus Christ, this election season is insane. I know the left likes to say we are in a civil war, but really is there any other way to describe it?
The "moderates" or Career Republicans as I like to call them don't want to cede any control the the Tea Party or Conservatives, so much so that they are willing to screw over the Republicans in the general election.
Say all you want about the Tea Party people, but their candidates, as far as I know, haven't been endorsing the Democrat when they lose the primary.
Posted by: Ben at October 11, 2010 03:17 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Team at October 11, 2010 07:16 PM (eCAn3)
Why can't I find a river called projection on this map of Egypt?
Posted by: David Axelrod at October 11, 2010 03:17 PM (bgcml)
Well look, um, we've all had a, ah... we've all had a herd of gerbils, um, up our ass, and, you know, it ah, it makes it hard to, um...concentrate.
Posted by: Barackus Obamakus at October 11, 2010 03:17 PM (rMMMP)
AXELROD: I would be for disclosure for everyone. The American people ought to know where millions and millions of dollars in our campaigns are coming from. Whether they are supporting Democrats or Republicans.
Funny how Axel-stache is all in favor of complete disclosure about a day after Soros claims he's tapped out.
Oh, and the URL? Buzzion nails it. Clip the "c" off the end and you're good to go.
Well done, buzzion.
Posted by: spongeworthy at October 11, 2010 03:18 PM (rplL3)
hey denny, you're impressing me, what with the ability to post with that cock in your mouth. well done man, well done.
That's nothing. He can post with a dick in his mouth and his ass at the same time. He calls it multitasking.
Posted by: Cicero at October 11, 2010 03:18 PM (QKKT0)
Remember, it's not the nature of the evidence that is relevant. It's the seriousness of the charge. ...
Posted by: Eric Holder, Final Decider at October 11, 2010 03:20 PM (v1gw3)
I find this entire discussion and especially Axelrod's statements eerily threatening.
You know why they want to know who the donors are, don't you?
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2010 03:20 PM (2/9CB)
Posted by: buzzion at October 11, 2010 03:20 PM (oVQFe)
No, just the act that would allow no disclosure for union politicking and onerous requirements for everyone else.
Posted by: Jeff Weimer at October 11, 2010 03:20 PM (1Mn8Z)
That's nothing. He can post with a dick in his mouth and his ass at the same time. He calls it multitasking.
Posted by: Cicero at October 11, 2010 07:18 PM (QKKT0)
odd that with skills like those, he remains chronically unemployed.
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Team at October 11, 2010 03:21 PM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Pornoy at October 11, 2010 03:21 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: arhooley at October 11, 2010 03:21 PM (W9Nvi)
29 - your linnk works.
Tapper nails it:
TAPPER: But there's a difference between the Chamber and some of these other organizations, right? The Chamber we know what it stands for , we know basically the money is coming from big business and corporations. These other groups I understand, they have names like “Americans For Prosperity” we don’t know what they stand for or who’s behind it. But the Chamber is different, isn’t it?
The left is funded by....??? oh yeah - we don't need to know.
The Chamber is funded by private enterprise, and the Obama administration wants an enemies list.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 03:22 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: curious at October 11, 2010 03:22 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Person without no steenken badge at October 11, 2010 03:23 PM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: PaleRider at October 11, 2010 03:23 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2010 03:24 PM (2/9CB)
Administratively Amended Sort Form - BHO, JR, Mother Stanley... Father BHO...
Posted by: Druid at October 11, 2010 03:24 PM (VSOCz)
Posted by: FPW at October 11, 2010 03:25 PM (TV27A)
Have to use a wireless keyboard when you're spinning like a hog on a spit.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 11, 2010 03:25 PM (euRkK)
Apparently, the VFW endorsed West's opponent too. WTF???
Posted by: Pornoy at October 11, 2010 03:29 PM (azgo2)
The democrats want an enemies list.
Period.
Axehead is demanding a list of donors so that the democrats can turn around and rat-fuck them.
Free speech belongs to democrats and unions.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 03:29 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: david axelknob at October 11, 2010 03:30 PM (oLT/p)
I wonder what would happen if we applied the administration's new principle universally, say...
A)The Obama's financial records, like who paid for his schooling and 'vactaions.'
B)The White House guest list
C)Half a century of abortion records
D)Anything at all related to the MBS scheme
Posted by: Methos at October 11, 2010 03:32 PM (Ew1k4)
I just warned Tapper to expect that for himself over the next two years, Soap.
Posted by: andycanuck at October 11, 2010 03:33 PM (oLT/p)
Historically speaking the local Chamber I belong to worries more about small biz regs, and drinking than who was in any office.
But obamacare has them fighting mad. The stage is set to destroy small businesses in this country with what amounts to government mandated economic slavery, and meanwhile the big boys like McDonalds get waivers out the wazooo.
It's fucking bullshit, and the CoC is starting to call them out on it.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at October 11, 2010 03:33 PM (1mE2s)
I think that's underestimating by a factor.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 11, 2010 03:33 PM (bQ5xy)
Lets get to the bottom of who funded Obama's 2008 campaign.
I want a list of all foreign credit cards. We the people demand that list.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 03:34 PM (0fzsA)
Like say, all of the programming on CNN, MSNBC, etc????
Posted by: Portnoy at October 11, 2010 03:35 PM (azgo2)
Do you remember something odd towards the end of the campaign when they said that it was found out that something had been disabled at their donation site and some blog made a big deal about it but John McShame was "the quiet man" and put a lid on Sarah, so nothing came of it....
Posted by: curious at October 11, 2010 03:35 PM (p302b)
Well, maybe, just maybe, someone will be willing to ask the jugeared fuck & his ilk where all the campaign cash is coming from the next time he runs.
I'll sure be glad when this election is over. I need to take a few weeks off from listening to, reading about & seeing these lying pricks. My mental health & blood pressure depend on it.
Posted by: Steph at October 11, 2010 03:36 PM (ZfkPl)
You guys are pretty rough on the ewok, he does pretty well for having tiny little fingers and lice.
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 11, 2010 03:36 PM (5G5c/)
Apparently, the VFW endorsed West's opponent too. WTF???
Posted by: Pornoy at October 11, 2010 07:29 PM (azgo2)
Fox & Friends had a retired general on this morning talking about all the crazy-arse endorsements the VFW is making. Membership is fuming, The general said he doesn't even know why they need a pac. Word is out about all the shenanigans, and not just on blogs.
Posted by: Rushbabe at October 11, 2010 03:36 PM (a3Z62)
The left is funded by....??? oh yeah - we don't need to know.
The Chamber is funded by private enterprise, and the Obama administration wants an enemies list.
Actually, I'm finding a bit of schaudenfreud concerning the CofC. Weren't they french kissing Dear Leader's ass earlier this year?
Posted by: Harry at October 11, 2010 03:37 PM (OrzFO)
Posted by: Portnoy at October 11, 2010 07:34 PM (azgo2)
I knew it was you all the time.
Posted by: Rushbabe at October 11, 2010 03:37 PM (a3Z62)
Democrats accuse people of doing the very corrupt things they already do.
Lying for a living does that to people. and the free speech thing really pisses them off. Democreeps really think they own free speech.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 03:38 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: twiceblessedmom at October 11, 2010 03:38 PM (zUEDs)
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 11, 2010 07:36 PM (5G5c/)
Not to mention the orange buck teeth and jaundiced eyes.
Posted by: Rushbabe at October 11, 2010 03:39 PM (a3Z62)
Yeah it was over stimulus funds and low interest loans. A lot of the smaller industrial barons were frothing at the mouth trying to find new ways to apply for them.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at October 11, 2010 03:39 PM (1mE2s)
Posted by: harry reid at October 11, 2010 03:40 PM (jChrK)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 07:38 PM (0fzsA
They think they have a right to own everything & everybody. They sure as hell don't want anyone to step out of line.
Posted by: Steph at October 11, 2010 03:40 PM (ZfkPl)
Now, don't everyone praise me all at once. I'd like to hear each word of how fucking smart I am one syllable at a time.
Posted by: Pres. Barry Whistledick McGolfbagg at October 11, 2010 03:40 PM (23kaI)
http://tinyurl.com/2al5vaq
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 11, 2010 03:41 PM (d6Kwc)
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 11, 2010 03:43 PM (d6Kwc)
Posted by: denny crane at October 11, 2010 03:44 PM (7+pP9)
I hope the LA TIMES sees this as a call to release the Obama/Khalidi video.
Posted by: MayBee at October 11, 2010 03:44 PM (WetPl)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 11, 2010 03:45 PM (5I0Yr)
I'll admit to being somewhat ignorant on the birth certificate issue.
My own parents happened to lose the birth certificate they got when I was born - my mother swears she never received a certificate with the baby footprints and handprints. But I've had to submit a certified copy of the certificate for various governmental purposes - I've made requests to the state and I've gotten the copies.
Is Obama refusing to release any copy? Or is it just the original he won't produce? Can someone enlighten me?
Posted by: La Mauvaise New Yorkaise at October 11, 2010 03:45 PM (BpBIE)
Obama done stuck his dick in the blender, and Axelturf what punched "Puree".
Posted by: KORD at October 11, 2010 03:46 PM (thr9V)
I don't think that 'alinsky' thing is continuing to work as planned. Seems Slinskey didn't realize that some people actually have a brain & know how to read. What's that little ditty about fooling people?
Posted by: Steph at October 11, 2010 03:46 PM (ZfkPl)
Yeah, cause there really can't be any other explanation for a member of the liberal media seriously questioning a member of His Awesomeness' administration. Tapper needs to get with the program and stick to softball questions like a good little butt kisser.
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 11, 2010 03:46 PM (d6Kwc)
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2010 03:46 PM (gv4ve)
Posted by: Methos at October 11, 2010 03:48 PM (Ew1k4)
George Will: [who hardly gets a word in] "The question is, why is a huge deal being made of it? Because in 2008, the so-called independent groups outspent Republicans three to one. A big deal is being made of it now because Republicans are outspending..."
Gag - I had to read the insane stupidity of far-left-wing crap bags at Crooks and fucktards. please, no more.
oh and those scary Koch brothers. How dare they access free speech in America! Scary scary scary booga booga.
Koch brothers need to get in line behind the democrats, or shut up.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 03:50 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: denny crane at October 11, 2010 07:44 PM (7+pP9)
Nice one Ed.
Jake Tapper is looking out for the folks, in his new weekly segment with Bill O'Reilly aptly named, "Tappin It In", right after the body language expert.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 11, 2010 03:50 PM (/ebqR)
Posted by: Mayday at October 11, 2010 03:50 PM (TRgli)
Liny no worky, perhaps coz it is negative reporting on The Chosen One? Hmmmmmmmmm?????
While I welcome our new Ant overlords, I question the timing of this item going down the Yahoo rathole.
Posted by: mike d at October 11, 2010 03:52 PM (W0V5W)
Yeah, the baby handprints and footprints aren't a birth certificate at all. They are just a little hospital keepsake and have no legal worth whatsoever. In most states the mother fills out the name of the baby, her age, the father of the baby, his age and everybody's place of birth. The name is recorded as the baby's name, date, parents, parent's ages and their birth places and filed with the state.
The parent has to send in $$ to the state with a form requesting the birth certificate. The state then complies by sending to the parent ORIGINAL copies of the child's birth certificate which contains the information required to be on it by law. This is the long form birth certificate. The parent's original is really a copy of what exists in the state capital but is not a copy for all business for the individual.
Apparently Obama has not show a copy or the state owned original with all of the information on it but rather a "certificate of live birth" which is some sort of bastardized copy with nothing but his name and whatever.
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2010 03:52 PM (gv4ve)
Posted by: spongeworthy at October 11, 2010 03:53 PM (rplL3)
The Obama admin doubles down on stupid every time.
Their 'base' doesn't care, they eat the bullshit by the truckload.
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 11, 2010 03:54 PM (5G5c/)
Scary scary Koch brothers. How dare they access free speech. They are brain-washing everyone! I'm scared. Save us, oh keepers of sacred PC one-way street speech, precious sacred democrats.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 03:55 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at October 11, 2010 03:58 PM (kJXs1)
74. Not to my knowledge. but feel free to enlighten.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 07:39 PM (0fzsA)
Didn't the head of CofC (Donahue?) send Obama some love letters that said the CofC doesn't agree with how you're doing things, but your goals and our goals are the same? I think it was right at the first of the year.
Posted by: Harry at October 11, 2010 04:00 PM (OrzFO)
LOL
The short version is somebody interviewed his Kenyan grandmother who claimed to have witnessed his birth in her country. To counter that Obama relesed the CoLB mentioned by dagny at 106. Which many people feel is insufficient. However many other people (including most every righty blogger) want the discussion to go away because it smacks of conspiracy theory. In some cases, attempts to fill in the details through guesswork does get a touch sketchy. And there's a related issue of what exactly "natural born citizen" means-but most talk of that gets discouraged for much the same "Conspiracy theory! Oh Noes!!!" reason.
Diogeneslamp and Gabe could give you a more thorough breakdown of both sides of the issue.
Posted by: Methos at October 11, 2010 04:01 PM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: gesc at October 11, 2010 04:03 PM (HMLVZ)
Posted by: Soona at October 11, 2010 04:03 PM (OrzFO)
AXELROD: Someone once in the course of this debate about whether we should have a law to force these organizations to disclose where they’re money is coming from in the campaigns, someone said, and I think they’re right – “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide
Weren't Bush and Company derided and called fascist when they made this same statement about the Patriot Act?
I'm trying to understand when it is OK to say certain things, and when it isn't. I think it works like 'it is ok if it is said by a Democrat or a supporter of a Democrat.'
Posted by: HHS at October 11, 2010 04:10 PM (X1Y8q)
Oh, and Axelrod can suck me.
I have nothing to hide, but if someone tries to search my property without cause and a warrant, they'll be sending a mortician to collect the body.
Posted by: HHS at October 11, 2010 04:11 PM (X1Y8q)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 11, 2010 04:17 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: OregonMuse at October 11, 2010 04:19 PM (Id5+U)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at October 11, 2010 04:25 PM (AAN7N)
Posted by: MaltPointer at October 11, 2010 04:25 PM (nPsZc)
I always thought he was doing a Hitler 'separated at birth' thing.
Posted by: Methos at October 11, 2010 04:27 PM (Ew1k4)
Is that how it works in the United States in the era of Hopenchange? The President makes an accusation of lawbreaking without any evidence of it, and the entity accused has to prove their innocence? In this country, the government has to prove its case, not the defendant, and even before making an accusation of wrongdoing usually has to have some evidence of the crime in the first place."
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 11, 2010 07:17 PM (0fzsA)
US / Constitution / or not - it is the burden of the one claiming an EVENT to prove the event occurred.
Posted by: Druid at October 11, 2010 04:39 PM (VSOCz)
Posted by: La Mauvaise New Yorkaise at October 11, 2010 04:49 PM (BpBIE)
Posted by: Drinky Crow at October 11, 2010 04:52 PM (5+Fvb)
Add on David Plouffe: "Axelrod and Plouffe" sounds like a buddy-cop-themed ghey porno.
Posted by: Drinky Crow at October 11, 2010 05:06 PM (5+Fvb)
Posted by: Damiano at October 11, 2010 06:57 PM (PA722)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at October 11, 2010 08:37 PM (XXLiO)
Posted by: Pittsburgh events at March 03, 2011 07:23 PM (hsdL4)
Posted by: Pittsburgh theater at March 19, 2011 07:27 AM (yFOYs)
Posted by: proof reading service at March 31, 2011 10:29 PM (PWBz5)
Posted by: wholsale sunglasses at April 02, 2011 08:29 PM (eYOGU)
<b><a href="http://www.weddinggowns-wholesale.com">cheap wedding dresses</a></b>|<b><a href="http://www.weddinggowns-wholesale.com">wholesale wedding dresses</a></b>
Posted by: jetteryhibbard at May 01, 2011 11:55 AM (3bMXv)
Posted by: backpacks at May 09, 2011 05:20 PM (qk0Zd)
A good guide will make people more effective, thank you
Posted by: rayban sunglasses sale at July 07, 2011 12:02 AM (3u5eN)
Posted by: pet shop at July 10, 2011 07:14 AM (5i6so)
Posted by: dog grooming at July 10, 2011 01:27 PM (5i6so)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3311 seconds, 261 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Paradigm Shift at October 11, 2010 03:08 PM (pPXqD)