January 05, 2010
— DrewM Smart Diplomacy(tm) finally produces a win!
Iran said Tuesday it welcomes Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's comments that there is no hard-and-fast deadline for starting nuclear dialogue.On Monday, Clinton said the Obama administration remained open to negotiating with Iran over its nuclear program, though it will move toward tougher sanctions if Iran does not respond positively. She stressed there was no hard-and-fast deadline for Iran.
Responding Tuesday, Iran's foreign ministry welcomed the comments
"We share the same idea with her. Deadlines are meaningless. We hope other countries return to their natural path, too," said Ramin Mehmanparast, a foreign ministry spokesman.
The remarks were a rare positive response by the Iranians to U.S. comments on its nuclear program.
The Iranians responded positively to the abject surrender of the US? Wow, I didn't see that coming. Obviously this lowering of tensions between are two nations shows just how wonderful Obama's engagement strategy has worked. This 'rare positive response' would never have taken place under the Bush-Cheney Regime.
Flashback to May of last year and what Obama said as he was sitting next to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Sitting next to Netanyahu in the Oval Office, Obama said he hoped to begin negotiations with Tehran soon, after Iran holds elections next month. Iran's leaders have so far rebuffed his efforts to reach out to them and toughened their rhetoric."The important thing is to make sure there is a clear timetable, at which we point we say these talks don't seem to be making any serious progress," Obama said.
"By the end of the year we should have some sense whether or not these discussions are starting to yield significant benefits, whether we are starting to see serious movement on the part of Iranians," he said.
But there's nothing to worry about, we have that NIE from '07 that assured everyone that Iran had given up its nuclear program. Oh, wait, not even the idiots in this administration believe in that fairy tale.
Mr. ObamaÂ’s top advisers say they no longer believe the key finding of a much disputed National Intelligence Estimate about Iran, published a year before President George W. Bush left office, which said that Iranian scientists ended all work on designing a nuclear warhead in late 2003.After reviewing new documents that have leaked out of Iran and debriefing defectors lured to the West, Mr. ObamaÂ’s advisers say they believe the work on weapons design is continuing on a smaller scale -- the same assessment reached by Britain, France, Germany and Israel.
If it wasn't clear before, it surely is now...the US is officially out of the Stop Iran From Getting Nukes business. The only outstanding questions are, will the mullahs survive long enough to build one and will the Israelis do anything to stop or even slow the program?
Posted by: DrewM at
06:49 AM
| Comments (26)
Post contains 492 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: All of our Friends in the Afterlife at January 05, 2010 06:52 AM (yt0hi)
Posted by: huerfano at January 05, 2010 06:54 AM (9szrE)
Posted by: George Orwell at January 05, 2010 06:59 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: rockhead at January 05, 2010 07:05 AM (RykTt)
Posted by: zombie Curtis Lemay at January 05, 2010 07:07 AM (4Kl5M)
Obama sends out Hildabeast to announce that there really isn't any dead line on nuke talks. Obama is a nothing but a fucking Paper Tiger. We now have to pray that Israel does something about Iran. The Dems have always, and will continue to be...WEAK ON DEFENSE. These limp wristed fucktards are going to get us all killed.
Posted by: Sparky at January 05, 2010 07:09 AM (mXY2a)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 05, 2010 07:11 AM (pZEar)
After reviewing new documents that have leaked out of Iran and debriefing defectors lured to the West, Mr. ObamaÂ’s advisers say they believe the work on weapons design is continuing on a smaller scale -- the same assessment reached by Britain, France, Germany and Israel.
The irony is amazing. They all crawled over GWB on this report now they disown it. The fact is nobody with any sense belived it to begin with.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 07:12 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: arb at January 05, 2010 07:12 AM (DNSf5)
Malcolm X once said people talked to Martin Luther King because they didn't want to talk to him.
I think the Iranians should talk to us because their other option is having to talk to the Israelis. And the Israelis aren't much for talking at this point.
Then again, no one ever said the Persian Empire was among the sharpest knives in the drawer.
Posted by: SGT Dan at January 05, 2010 07:14 AM (GgXZc)
not really a surprise,
we already know brezinski and susan rice's- Israel or foreign policy ideas.
anything Obama has said in the past, is only for his gain at that specific time, and his audience at that time.
Posted by: willow at January 05, 2010 07:17 AM (5Bf/7)
Posted by: Barry at January 05, 2010 07:20 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 05, 2010 07:52 AM (1Jaio)
Unprecedented spinelessness.
Look, this was always going to come down to praying the mullahs never called our bluff. Nobody's got stomach for invading Iran and bombing the shit out of the place--which is the only hope we'd have of actually damaging their program--is about the only hope the regime has of hanging on.
But you'd think with a restless populace and 150k troops on their border and a bunch of unemployed Iraqis with no love for the mullahs that we'd be able to at least get them to the table.
Posted by: spongeworthy at January 05, 2010 08:22 AM (rplL3)
Posted by: DJ Mikey Mike Steele at January 05, 2010 08:22 AM (S3xX1)
Best stragegy for Tel Aviv is to be sending in those spare AK's (and a crap load of ammo) to the rioters, plus a few 'trainers' to assist them, as opposed to the IDF AF on a bomb run. For the cost of one plane in AK's, the local folks could get more done than a MOAB...
With the Iranian Army's declaration of soldiarity, I see an inroad Tel Aviv could channel en-leu of a bombrun. Plus, it brings about a regime change, instead of a radioactive crater...
I'm wondering why MOSSAD isn't, um, involved, with the protests, and requesting resources to assist them... heck, Bend-over Barry and Anurisim Joe would make some positive inroads if they assisted the regime change....
Posted by: IP Freely at January 05, 2010 08:44 AM (67aEn)
We will be reactive...no, we will be radioreactive.
Posted by: sTevo at January 05, 2010 08:57 AM (Qfh1P)
"Nobody's got stomach for invading Iran " -- This will be true until it becomes obvious that the alternatives lead to worse things. Unfortunately, it will be too late then.
The Iranians funded more than half of the insurgent groups in Iraq, including all of the Shiite groups. They have a strong hold over the two most powerful Shiite groups, if not all three. They didn't do this out of a charitable spirit.
Posted by: Penultimatum at January 05, 2010 08:58 AM (LxXXO)
Posted by: stuff Winston Churchhill said at January 05, 2010 09:15 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Daybrother at January 05, 2010 09:18 AM (dtJc/)
Posted by: Lali at March 09, 2010 03:45 AM (/eZRO)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1836 seconds, 154 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: John Bolton's mustache at January 05, 2010 06:51 AM (4Kl5M)