January 28, 2010
— Ace He moved to an even more isolated patch of Vermont.
Posted by: Ace at
10:35 AM
| Comments (67)
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Mortis at January 28, 2010 10:37 AM (hA5JK)
Posted by: Peaches at January 28, 2010 10:40 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: moi at January 28, 2010 10:42 AM (ucsZh)
Posted by: Holden Caulfield at January 28, 2010 10:45 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: icemike at January 28, 2010 10:45 AM (RPWGd)
Holden irritated me, and made the undeniably interesting book a bit less impressive. Apparently Salinger was irritating for real.
Posted by: NJConservative at January 28, 2010 10:46 AM (/Ywwg)
I detested Catcher in the Rye, it was required reading in high school.
Holden Caulfield was an asshole who only needed a thorough ass kicking by someone who felt inclined to shape him up.
Salinger and Bernard Malamud were the most overrated writers of the 50s, and that's saying something since Arthur Miller and Gore Vidal were writing then too.
Posted by: kbdabear at January 28, 2010 10:48 AM (sYxEE)
Amen brother. Amen.
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at January 28, 2010 10:51 AM (KeOQp)
Salinger's books were required reading in high school lit classes..
...I think that's the way they ever got read
Talk about teh suck...fucking gawdawful dreck
Posted by: beedubya at January 28, 2010 10:51 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: fozzy at January 28, 2010 10:53 AM (ccEuN)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 28, 2010 10:55 AM (9Sbz+)
Where did the gaywad HS English teachers get the right to foist the crap he wrote on us?.
...seriously...I remember thinking "who the fuck cares about these whiny-assed effete douches" ?(or something like that) who were the protagonists in every fucking thing he wrote
Posted by: beedubya at January 28, 2010 10:57 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Thomas Pynchon at January 28, 2010 10:57 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: icemike at January 28, 2010 10:58 AM (RPWGd)
18 NOW will you bastards believe me when I say that JD Salinger isn't a pen name?
If I had any sense what-so-fucking-ever, I would have come up with one myself
Posted by: Evelyn Waugh at January 28, 2010 11:00 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Robert at January 28, 2010 11:01 AM (V+ylD)
My favorable is "Nine stories". I remember as back in USSR I got his book (All novels ans short stories) on black market (paid 18 roubles, 10 times more then oficial price). I remember some deep feeling after reading this book.
Still love his books.
Posted by: redmonkey at January 28, 2010 11:03 AM (8K5j5)
Catcher in the Rye starring Zack Efron directed by Martin Scorsese.
Posted by: Rocks at January 28, 2010 11:08 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: arhooley at January 28, 2010 11:09 AM (1Kt/a)
I liked Catcher in the Rye, a lot. Not to idealize Caufield. His character, in hindsight, is pathetic, but I think that is the point. It captures perfectly the disillusionment most people feel during the transition from being a responsibility-less freedom of childhood to the crushing reality of adulthood.
It is a book that anyone going through that stage in their life can relate to, and those of us that have moved beyond that stage can look back upon without disdain or pride.
Posted by: Ben at January 28, 2010 11:11 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Ben at January 28, 2010 11:11 AM (wuv1c)
I read the whole thing during one long session on the toilet.
Posted by: Rocks at January 28, 2010 11:13 AM (Q1lie)
28 Everybody keeps saying "books", plural. What books? The guy wrote one novel
In addition to the fucking painful Catcher in the Rye, I remember having to read Franny and Zooey, too...which was even worse
Posted by: Evelyn Waugh at January 28, 2010 11:15 AM (AnTyA)
Why would anyone need Cliff Notes for Catcher in the Rye?
I read the whole thing during one long session on the toilet.
Yeah I was suprised by that comment. The book was a short easy read, perfect for toilet reading. However, my collection of Ambrose Bierce's writing currently sits beside my flushable reading chair.
Posted by: Jane Austen at January 28, 2010 11:17 AM (wuv1c)
There were 3 collections of short stories (one was actually 2 novellas). And, reportedly, he's been writing non-stop ever since he went to ground, all stuff meant for publication after his death. We could be seeing a lot more of his literary output soon.
Posted by: Peaches at January 28, 2010 11:18 AM (9Wv2j)
I liked Catcher in the Rye, but I truly believe he messed up Joyce Maynard's life in a very cruel way.
Lecherous old men can do that. I wrote about it when that putz Salinger was still a pup.
Posted by: Nabokov at January 28, 2010 11:20 AM (aqyPA)
Is it just me or does it look like Vermont is 69'ing New Hampshire?
That's right, not only did i use the childish "69", I used it as a verb.
Posted by: Ben at January 28, 2010 11:23 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at January 28, 2010 11:28 AM (P33XN)
Thank god I'm not the only one who thinks that!
Posted by: Farmer Joe at January 28, 2010 11:28 AM (z4es9)
He seems like he wasn't into celebrity, but you shun the media and they brand you a hermit. It's possible he had a nice life with non-famous friends.
Posted by: DM! at January 28, 2010 11:29 AM (UiMay)
40 I wonder if he really was a recluse
it's all about the image...they said the same about Updike
...makes them seem mysterious..and aloof...which for some reason is supposed to make them more appealing
Posted by: beedubya at January 28, 2010 11:36 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Biblio at January 28, 2010 11:47 AM (y5VNb)
Posted by: GarandFan at January 28, 2010 11:48 AM (ZQBnQ)
The whole joke of the book is that for all of Holden's talk about phoniness, he's already started down the path to becoming a bigger phony than any of the people he talks about. He clearly sees himself and his sister as Too Good For This Sinful Earth, and his pretension turns out to be the phoniest thing in the book.
Posted by: Jake Was Here at January 28, 2010 12:06 PM (HyeCe)
Posted by: rawmuse at January 28, 2010 12:07 PM (6Kciv)
Posted by: 48%er at January 28, 2010 12:11 PM (QOE7k)
Salinger?
Never heard of him.
Beating a joke into the floor until it's unrecognizable?
Never heard of it...
Posted by: Has a Clue... at January 28, 2010 12:29 PM (PMGbu)
Yeah, Catcher in The Rye was required reading for English class in 10th grade. I didn't like it. It felt forced, like Salinger was trying to hard to be rebellious/ironic or something. I didn't know he was a WWII vet or that he went to Valley Forge Military Academy (where the movie Taps was filmed). I also didn't know he went (briefly) to Ursinus. (I grew up in PA, so I know where those two schools are).
He was definitely a weird dude. I remember reading an article by Joyce Maynard about their relationship, and yeah he use to make her do colonics (I think he did them too). He seemed pretty twisted.
Posted by: runningrn at January 28, 2010 12:36 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: April at January 28, 2010 12:37 PM (b0THY)
Posted by: April at January 28, 2010 12:38 PM (b0THY)
Posted by: runningrn at January 28, 2010 12:38 PM (CfmlF)
The teacher who was stroking the kid's forehead while he slept was an easy entree into "gay issues." And it's the first time most people saw "Fuck you" in print. So from a high-school English teacher's POV, there's your Important Novel.
Posted by: Holden Monaro at January 28, 2010 12:42 PM (/VEEI)
Count me as another one who never got his appeal. Maybe you have to be an angst-filled yoot to truly appreciate the Holden Caulfield character, I just thought he was a whiney little bitch.
Had pretty much the same reaction to Mailer's "The Naked and the Dead", just couldn't comprehend how anybody could see that (or him) as other than a mediocrity.
Posted by: gebrauchshund at January 28, 2010 12:45 PM (ZTGFz)
Posted by: Vile Roman at January 28, 2010 01:14 PM (iBzKc)
Posted by: Vile Roman at January 28, 2010 01:18 PM (iBzKc)
Posted by: Jazz at January 28, 2010 01:33 PM (hnq5i)
@53: "Oh, and don't forget Willam Burroughs for overrated."
In Burroughs' defense, he was on the Horse. The fact that he was writing at all whilst busily chasing the dragon entitles him to at least miniscule credit.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at January 28, 2010 02:54 PM (cZtT3)
Posted by: Peaches at January 28, 2010 03:18 PM (9Wv2j)
So in other words he wrote one book. A collection of short stories isn't a book anymore than a collection of fliers is a pamphlet.
Don't get me wrong, I like Salinger and I thought CITR was great. But he was a one trick pony. His unpublished stuff is going to be a bunch of insular repetitive BS set in a time period nobody gives 2 shits about anymore.
Most people don't really get CITR. It's an indictment. If you identify with it you are just another messed up fuck. There are no solutions there.The whole thing, especially about NYC, is just a lot of made up BS.
Posted by: Rocks at January 28, 2010 03:29 PM (j0feM)
Posted by: Juicer at January 28, 2010 05:30 PM (MeESE)
Posted by: jeff at January 28, 2010 05:50 PM (i0/N7)
Posted by: Glenn Mark Cassel AMH1(AW) USN Ret. at January 28, 2010 07:09 PM (Tprch)
I attended three high schools. All of them had Catcher as required reading, but for different grades, so I was never forced to read it and, indeed, did not read it until I was in college. I liked it, but it never deeply identified with Holden or adopted it as my personal bible. I liked Nine Stories better.
#55
The teacher who was stroking the kid's forehead while he slept was an easy entree into "gay issues."
"Just before the War with the Eskimos" also has a gay character, the one who gushes over Jean Cocteau's Beauty and the Beast.
#56
Had pretty much the same reaction to Mailer's "The Naked and the Dead"
At least Salinger had the courage to actually write, "fuck you" in 1951, whereas Mailer could only write, "go fug yourself".
My favorite Dorothy Parker quote, when introduced to Mailer, "So you're the nice young man who can't spell 'fuck'!"
Posted by: Peter at January 28, 2010 08:16 PM (tbT/q)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1866 seconds, 195 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Mortis at January 28, 2010 10:36 AM (hA5JK)