August 16, 2010
— Ace Which, damnit, I really wanted to see yesterday but didn't.
Critics aren’t dumb, they know the public doesn’t much care which way their thumbs point. But critics do know that based on their opinions and reviews they can enjoy an influence over what kind of films get made. And that’s not a small amount of power. Culture is upstream from politics, after all.If you have 95 percent of critics savaging a faithful retelling of the Gospels as anti-Semitic, no matter how successful “The Passion” is, no one’s going to go near that subject matter again. And that’s the goal. Same with anything that comes close to patriotism or conservatism. Such cinematic rarities are frequently labeled “jingoistic, fascist or simple minded.” This is all done consciously and for a desired effect.
You have to understand that when I look at the critical community I only see it for what it really is: a journolista cabal of left wingers deeply engaged in a cultural and ideological war, deeply committed to shaping the powerful messaging of sound and fury that emanate from our pop culture masters.
He then catches an LAT "journalist" trying to do just that:
ut the Stallone picture — with its hard-charging, take-no-prisoners patriotism unbothered by the vagaries of the real world (it takes place in a fictional country, for starters) and its caricature of freedom-hating enemies (”We will kill this American disease,” as the TV spot enticed us) — planted itself squarely in the old-school genre. And this weekend, the movie showed that there’s life in that category yet. …...
Political eras are, of course, rarely just one thing or another, and the movies we want to see in a given period are hardly monolithic. But as tempting as it is to infer that the success of “The Expendables” shows a deeper cultural need, it may well be the wrong inference. When times are confusing, we want movies to reflect that confusion, and even to make sense of it. But we probably don’t want to pretend that confusion doesn’t exist.
Nolte goes on to mock him for his supposition that dreary, muddled pieces of crap like Syriana are just outstanding filmmaking, and that films about clear-cut heroism just don't sell tickets anymore.
To get to that claim, the leftist is required to ignore successes like 300.
Or, Nolte himself forgot: Iron Man.
And On That Note: Psychologists (who are, let's face it, critics of the mind) caution that you shouldn't let your boys read superhero comics -- Superheroes are "too macho" and send "the wrong message."
Posted by: Ace at
06:50 PM
| Comments (72)
Post contains 455 words, total size 3 kb.
"the Stallone picture — with its hard-charging, take-no-prisoners patriotism unbothered by the vagaries of the real world (it takes place in a fictional country, for starters) and its caricature of freedom-hating enemies (”We will kill this American disease,” as the TV spot enticed us) — planted itself squarely in the old-school genre."
Okay I'm definitely checking this movie out.
Posted by: Ernie McCracken at August 16, 2010 09:43 AM (jmf9+)
Honestly, no matter what the message, "The Expendables" was terrible. I went in expected it to be a bad but fun movie. It was just bad.
I wish I had those 2 hours back.
Grim
Posted by: Grim at August 16, 2010 09:44 AM (gyNYk)
Posted by: Mephitis at August 16, 2010 09:45 AM (ehXLT)
Posted by: Mephitis at August 16, 2010 09:47 AM (ehXLT)
Stupid cocksucking movie critics wouldn't know a good film if it dick slapped them in the face.
Posted by: Brenden at August 16, 2010 09:47 AM (ZrULs)
Posted by: @ebertchicago at August 16, 2010 09:49 AM (w9BEi)
For example, I'm now suspicious that "Inception," which went from anticipatory darling before it was released to mediocre craphole after it was released, might have qualities that appeal to a center-right perspective.
Certainly the "Dark Knight" backlash, such as it was, began only after a few people noticed that the film was basically sympathetic to the George W. Bush school of terrorist fighting.
Posted by: Kensington at August 16, 2010 09:49 AM (mEyVv)
I took my mother and sister to see The Expendables on Friday. 3 women - and we all loved it. The movie was nothing but what you'd expect. Men, testosterone, explosions, gun fights, knife fights, punches, good vs. evil, etc. Just good fun.
Posted by: LR at August 16, 2010 09:50 AM (wM0sa)
Posted by: Penn State Marine at August 16, 2010 09:52 AM (W7im9)
Posted by: Fallen Sparrow at August 16, 2010 09:52 AM (SOf9N)
Posted by: ace at August 16, 2010 09:53 AM (QbA6l)
Syriana! Jeebus, I wonder what makes people produce and star in propaganda for our enemies?
Yeah, I'm talking about you, Clooney, you piece of shit.
Posted by: sherlock at August 16, 2010 09:53 AM (cq3pU)
Posted by: Penn State Marine at August 16, 2010 09:55 AM (W7im9)
Posted by: Martha Stewart's left nipple at August 16, 2010 09:59 AM (Hx1qz)
Probably not...but then again, if movies about heroes with unqualified moral compasses (like the aforementioned Iron Man) are dead, explain "Lord of the Rings"' success a mere few months after 9/11.
Posted by: g at August 16, 2010 10:00 AM (QcdUG)
Posted by: Polliwog at August 16, 2010 10:02 AM (HjVGJ)
Posted by: runningrn at August 16, 2010 10:04 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: MarkD at August 17, 2010 04:45 AM (YhZfg)
The George Clooney character is supposed to represent the US .. bumbling about .. till he ultimately helps to kill the King .. via a US missile. The US, you see, is bad on multiple dimensions, with multiple metaphors.
Frankly, it was boring beyond belief
The good news ...
Syriana Box office:
Production Budget: $50 million
Domestic Total Gross: $50,824,620
Domestic Profit $824,620
... They probably won't make another
Posted by: Neo at August 17, 2010 04:48 AM (tE8FB)
1) DC killed off former Objectivist Vic Sage and replaced him with the newly lesbian Renee Montoya as 'The Question" who had an underground following of conservatives
2)Marvel killed captain America because W got reeelected, luckily "we got him back" as "Super-Soldier" a government friendly ass-kicking wild man.....if we take back things in '12 look for Steve to realize he can't back the government anymore and go "nomad".
3)"Winter Soldier" the resurrected Bucky barnes(cap's sidekick)was essentially a giant "screw you" during campaign '04 WRT jean keri's alliance with the organization. Dude was a cold war hitman for Ivan but he wound up with the captain America job by default.....used a gun to go after "the real enemy tax protestors"
4)the entire Civil War storyline that caricatured the WoT.....
yeah the film TDK was pro-slef-defense but at the end of the day the industry couldn't be any more for jugears if they worked for acorn.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 17, 2010 04:48 AM (kq1lG)
They got nothing on the Three Stooges. More of my friends were banned from the Stooges than any comic book fantasy hero.
Posted by: sTevo at August 17, 2010 04:49 AM (XyzqN)
I always read movie reviews, especially if it's something I think I want to see. Usually Rotten Tomatoes so I can see a variety of opinions. Sure, many critics have a political axe to grind- but good critics know how movies are made or should be made, they know what works and what doesn't and why, and they simply love movies. Without reading critics' opinions, I probably would have never bothered to see Rashomon or Paths of Glory or Sunset Boulevard. I'm glad I did see those and many more critics' picks.
I also trust popular word-of-mouth to recommend a movie. Just to walk in to a movie without reading or hearing anything about it is a likely waste of time and money.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at August 17, 2010 04:51 AM (SCcgT)
Posted by: @ebertchicago at August 16, 2010 01:49 PM (w9BEi)
Please do consider it, Roger! We don't much care for you, and there's always the possibility that you'd be reincarnated as a Na'Vi with a magic dildo-tail. A win-win for everybody!
Posted by: America at August 17, 2010 04:53 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: AE at August 17, 2010 04:53 AM (kSfPT)
//shatner voice
where's
YOUR
compassion?
seriously if overpopulation is such a problem and we really need to "reduce our carbon footprint" maybe all the utopians can finish their logical conundrum
Posted by: sven10077 at August 17, 2010 04:54 AM (kq1lG)
Posted by: Jean at August 17, 2010 04:56 AM (yGYDb)
That movie is awesome! I could have sworn I was the only one who had ever seen it though.
Posted by: Mob at August 17, 2010 05:15 AM (8c34o)
And On That Note: Psychologists (who are, let's face it, critics of the mind) caution that you shouldn't let your boys read superhero comics
This kind of thing has been a pet peeve of mine ever since my son hit the first grade. There is an active campaign in our public schools, intended or not, to pussify boys. In fact, his useless scrunt of teacher wanted to drug my son. It wasn't in order to improve his acedemic performance, but rather to make him more compliant and...well...less boyish.
When we refused, the hopeless skank essentially wrote him off and ignored him for the remainder of the year. As a result, I advise any parent of young kids to consider home schooling or a private or parochial education.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at August 17, 2010 05:17 AM (E0EDC)
Syriana ---> Sillyassa
what a schlock movie
I watch the box office take to see if I want to view a movie. 'The People' are my best indicators. I finally even got the DVD of Dances With Smurfs and the family and I enjoyed it despite the silly meme that corporations are bad. Besides we've seen all sorts of entertaining movies with that dumbass underlying idea - think "Aliens" (the second in the series) as well as "Alien: Resurrection" where the military is 'bad'.
Too bad Mel Gibson "won't make another movie in Hollywood" after that critical disaster, "The Passion". Of course he won't make another movie after stuffing his mattress with the hundreds of millions in profit it made. ha ha ha
Critics have been pimping for crappy foreign films and schlocky metrosexual heros who are 'sensitive' along with whoring for bunny huggers and fern fondlers for decades. Nothing but a bunch of ankle biters. Best if left alone and ignored.
Posted by: chuck in st paul at August 17, 2010 05:28 AM (adr25)
Wow that science daily article is a heap of 24 karat crap.
Boys seem better adjusted when they resist internalizing "macho" images, according to a researcher who also presented at APA's convention.
The measure of 'better adjusted'?
Researcher Carlos Santos, PhD, of Arizona State University, examined 426 middle school boys' ability to resist being emotionally stoic, autonomous and physically tough
WTF? Ability to resist good qualities? Huh?
So at the end of the day what this guy is saying is, boys seem less macho when they act less macho. Wow. Brilliant tautology.
Posted by: Entropy at August 17, 2010 05:29 AM (IsLT6)
The guy that played Gandalf (Ian McKellan?) had a really wimpy explanation for all of the action in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, nothing to do with good fighting evil. I would try to look it up, but it would just irritate me and I don't want to spoil my morning.
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at August 17, 2010 05:35 AM (5aVkt)
I love the way they keep talking about boy's emotional and relationship "health", where health is never explicitly defined but can be intuitively understood to mean - behaving the way I think you should and valuing what I tell you to.
In fact, autonomy is one of those 'unhealthy' habits they want to teach boys to 'resist'.
The results show that being able to resist internalizing these macho images -- especially aggression and autonomy -- declines as boys transition into adolescence and this decline puts their mental health at risk
Can't have that.
Posted by: Entropy at August 17, 2010 05:38 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at August 17, 2010 05:45 AM (HaYO4)
One of the best Stallone movies in long time.
Isn't it the only Stallone movie in a long time? Or maybe I just haven't been to the movies in a long tiem.
Posted by: Decaf at August 17, 2010 05:49 AM (NooBZ)
Good flick. The odd thing is that The Expendables isn't really a "conservative" movie. It's not really political. The problem is that the left has politicized EVERYTHING, including gender/masculinity/femininity. The Expendables doesn't fit their narrative of politicized masculinity (and I'm sure is sexist somehow because of that), so now we all get to act like there's a political significance to what is really just an action movie... a glorious, gory, brutal, explosion-riddled action movie.
Posted by: shillelagh at August 17, 2010 06:09 AM (Oz4Bj)
Posted by: GregS at August 17, 2010 06:12 AM (o14Iw)
The best box office action/conservative movies consistently outdo their "cultural" counterparts. You can total up all the anti-war movie box office totals and they still won't measure up to one Dark Knight, 300, Iron Man, Blackhawk Down, We Were Soldiers, etc.
In The Valley of Elah-$6.8M; Redacted-$.06M; Rendition-$9.7M; Lions for Lambs: $15.0M; Home of the Brave: $.04M.
Expendables: $34.8M (and counting); Red Dawn (84): $38.4M; 300: $210.6M; Dark Knight: $533.3M; Blackhawk Down: $108.6M: We Were Soldiers: $78.1M.
It's like night and day.
Posted by: CDR M at August 17, 2010 06:16 AM (Mv/2X)
why does Grim hate America?
LOL, I don't, I just hated this movie. The story was bad, the acting was bad, and the fight scenes were bad. The camera work was so bad I couldn't tell who was kicking whose ass. Part of that was to cover up the fact that Stallone is so old. Watching Stallone fighting was bad and watching him run was pathetic. The plastic surgery disaster he calls a face doesn't help. Stallone needs to talk to Eastwood about how to play the grizzled old veteran.
On the flip side, Stallone's truck was awesome.
Grim
Posted by: Grim at August 17, 2010 06:20 AM (gyNYk)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at August 17, 2010 06:27 AM (r1OG3)
Posted by: Cincinnatus at August 17, 2010 06:47 AM (TGmQa)
Part of that was to cover up the fact that Stallone is so old. Watching Stallone fighting was bad and watching him run was pathetic.
I thought the last Rambo wasn't all that bad.
Posted by: Entropy at August 17, 2010 06:56 AM (IsLT6)
Plus, Bruce Willis is in this. I think.
And Randy 'The Natural' Couture.
And that Jason Statham guy.
How can it be bad? TRICK QUESTION, NUMBNUTS! It can't!
Posted by: Entropy at August 17, 2010 06:58 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 17, 2010 07:05 AM (VNdDa)
But critics do know that based on their opinions and reviews they can enjoy an influence over what kind of films get made.
Kind of reminds one of academic tenure as well. By ignoring conservative voices, they influence education in a powerful way.
Just call me Captain Obvious today.
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 17, 2010 07:10 AM (VNdDa)
Posted by: eman at August 17, 2010 07:26 AM (Nw/hR)
Posted by: 11B40 at August 17, 2010 07:44 AM (NTgsW)
Posted by: AngelEm at August 17, 2010 07:53 AM (I2Yog)
I don't see Fellini as Left-wing, really. One of the more common interpretations of La Dolce Vita is that it is an exploration of the emptiness that one experiences from indulging in sin - particularly the seven deadly sins as understood in traditional Catholicism. I think it's pretty much a given that Leftists don't really accept any idea of personal sin, and would find such commentary "moralistic."
Posted by: Alec Leamas at August 17, 2010 07:57 AM (r1OG3)
Posted by: AngelEm at August 17, 2010 11:53 AM (I2Yog)
I figure it could go one of two ways. Either she'll like it and you'll know she's a keeper, or else she'll be a little more desensitized to violence when it's over, which is good for her. Win-win. Since she likes to see 'splosions, I figure she'll like it.
Posted by: Reactionary at August 17, 2010 08:03 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: AngelEm at August 17, 2010 08:11 AM (I2Yog)
Posted by: Penn State Marine at August 17, 2010 08:15 AM (W7im9)
Posted by: Dan at August 17, 2010 08:48 AM (1jzSs)
And anybody else remember the Captain America vs. Tea Party fuckup a while back?
As for the critics, I'm convinced that they're allergic to actually enjoying themselves. None of them seem capable of just kicking back with a cold drink and having fun at a movie; it's gotta be about message, societal impact, yadda yadda ya.
On the other hand, Hollywood's heavily politicized Leftwards movies are almost universally crap at the box office. So they can whine about stuff like "Expendables" all they want, but money talks.
Posted by: Tungsten Monk at August 17, 2010 10:28 AM (kwcvz)
Posted by: John S at August 17, 2010 10:38 AM (+q/hN)
For example, this is the hipster douchebag who writes Captain America and decided that Cap had to die rather than support America.
Posted by: Kensington at August 17, 2010 11:01 AM (mEyVv)
Reminds me of a local film critic, I used to always just assume that if they loved it, I'd hate it, and vice-versa.
Rotten Tomatoes 2/5, IMDB 4/5
I've never found RT to reflect anything in particular for me.
And John S is making me nervous, I hate Hollywood's need to throw in some pat, stereotypical twist that you saw coming 10 billion miles away so they can sleep at night after making an action movie - i.e. the last few minutes of The Kingdom, or the obligatory "corporate villain" even when it makes no sense whatsoever.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 17, 2010 11:04 AM (bxiXv)
It's all anti-heroes, doubt over certainty, feet of clay, yadda yadda yadda. They love doubt and degredation because it's morally paralyzing, and if there's one thing a metrosexual art-school douche fears, it's moral judgment.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 17, 2010 11:08 AM (bxiXv)
I particularly like how Cap was thinking he'd be like ghandi rather than say MLK on that run.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 17, 2010 11:08 AM (kq1lG)
I'm confused.
Posted by: palin steele at August 17, 2010 11:43 AM (BP6Z1)
pick up a comic book or google "the Death of Captain America"
work in "Civil War"
They killed Cap after Dubya got reelected, brought back Bucky Barnes as "winter soldier" all this was a gigantic "fuck you" to anyone not on Kos or HuffPo that read the comics....
now Steve Rogers has been reborn(we"chose wisely" after all) but they've kept Bucky as captain America and Steve Rogers is "super soldier"....
one of the post-50s tropes about captain America was he was a servant to the American ideal not the US government anymore....so in the '60s he resigned the job and became "nomad'....
stay confused...it's easier and i hope you are a PS sock I can't handle weapons grade stupid when I have a head cold.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 17, 2010 12:03 PM (kq1lG)
Superheros are just macho enough. If your dad/uncle/brother/older cousin isn't your hero or isn't a hero at all, YOU NEED SUPERHEROS more than the kid next to you.
We're making boys into young men here. If you want society to teach them the right way, you get 'lord of the flies' on an endless loop.
The kids MUST be taught and taught well. There is too much at stake.
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at August 17, 2010 02:10 PM (rp5af)
Here has on-line sunglasses wholesale house.
Price preferential benefit, fine quality.
Quickly rushes to purchase the cheap sunglasses!
Posted by: sunglasses wholesale at December 08, 2010 11:07 PM (BDv1r)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2187 seconds, 200 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








in other words the critics are saying: more Avatar, less Expendables
Posted by: no mr. bond, i expect you to die at August 16, 2010 09:39 AM (uFokq)