December 28, 2010
— Ace This article is worth a skim if you care about the rape/rape-rape allegations against Julian Assange, but I guess I was most taken by Julian Assange's alleged line:
She says they had consensual sex but she woke up the next morning to find him having intercourse with her to which she had not consented.When she asked him if he was wearing anything, he had allegedly said: "I am wearing you."
That's pimp. The line I mean, not the rape. Gotta give him that.
He claims:
Mr Assange regards himself as a victim of radicalism. "Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism," he said. "I fell into a hornets' nest of revolutionary feminism."
Not exactly. According to him, this is just the vengeance of jilted women:
He said he believed his accusers became angry when the younger woman, Miss W, contacted Miss A and they realised he had been to bed with both of them in swift succession. They went to the police station together, apparently to seek advice. A policewoman who heard their stories is said to have suggested they could pursue criminal charges.
...but the second woman claims she specifically told him to stop after she awoke to find him on top of her, and he didn't. So, he hadn't had consent -- I guess a sort of implied consent in his mind, but not actual consent -- and even if you give him a pass on that, that non-consent was followed up with an affirmative denial of consent. But he kept going and, um, "finished up," despite that.
Maybe some date-rape charges are a bit grey-area, but this charge doesn't seem gray-area, if true. It sounds like rape.
Posted by: Ace at
10:40 AM
| Comments (292)
Post contains 289 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Julian the Mulian at December 28, 2010 10:43 AM (xxgag)
She says they had consensual sex but she woke up the next morning to find him having intercourse with her to which she had not consented.
He should have just told her that she fell asleep in the middle of consented-to sex the evening before but he'd gone on pounding away all night, and when she woke up, he was just finishing.
If the dick sticks, ya got to acquit!
Posted by: Johnnie Cochran, Esq. at December 28, 2010 10:45 AM (QKKT0)
Maybe some date-rape charges are a bit grey-area, but this charge doesn't seem gray-area, if true. It sounds like rape.
Rape-rape indeed.
But are these women still only seeking charges for "sex by surprise"? Why aren't they going for all they can against this scumbag?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 28, 2010 10:48 AM (9hSKh)
The man is the walking definition of relativism.
Posted by: tcn at December 28, 2010 10:49 AM (+dwY/)
And when I am done I will chuck you in the hamper with the rest of the dirty laundry.
Posted by: Rocks at December 28, 2010 10:50 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: wiserbud at December 28, 2010 10:50 AM (EW49d)
Posted by: Sex By Surprise Victim at December 28, 2010 10:50 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: soulpile is... expendable © at December 28, 2010 10:51 AM (afWhQ)
Posted by: tcn at December 28, 2010 10:51 AM (+dwY/)
Posted by: er at December 28, 2010 10:52 AM (nWuNy)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 28, 2010 10:52 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: Mike Tyson at December 28, 2010 10:53 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 28, 2010 10:54 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: er at December 28, 2010 10:55 AM (nWuNy)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 10:57 AM (r1OG3)
"Waxman said. 'The next two years I expect all their ac-tions to be campaign ori-ented"
What's with this hyphen shit?
Posted by: goldbricker esq at December 28, 2010 10:57 AM (h2t8r)
MEH!...COPYCAT!!!...I used that line ALL the time!
Posted by: Buffalo Bill at December 28, 2010 10:58 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Moi at December 28, 2010 10:59 AM (Ez4Ql)
Posted by: maddogg at December 28, 2010 11:00 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Moi at December 28, 2010 11:00 AM (Ez4Ql)
Posted by: er at December 28, 2010 11:00 AM (nWuNy)
Posted by: Shoey at December 28, 2010 11:02 AM (ehKDD)
Posted by: Dave C at December 28, 2010 11:02 AM (y4s9a)
Same nationality as Ben Assfleck?
He's an Asshole.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 28, 2010 11:03 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 28, 2010 11:06 AM (0GFWk)
Like his accomplice, Bradley Manning, Julien Assange is a very sick freak and a slimy low-life, and I would like to see him serving time in prison for espionage and for grand theft and for conspiracy (and for being an insufferable, obnoxious creep).
But in view of what you said, I've got to go with your "grey area" option with respect to the ambiguity of whether or not he raped that Swedish chick. Unless there is more to that story that we don't know about, I doubt that he will be found guilty of rape.
That Swedish chick has to be a real loser to have gone to bed with that sick, slimy creep, and so I suspect that she is also a real pig, who has to wear a paper bag over her head to get laid. (Yeah, they have them in Sweden, too.)
Posted by: Brian at December 28, 2010 11:07 AM (sYrWB)
Red Light Red Light No No No
Green Light Stick it In
Red Light ya Gotta Go, cause No means No.
I guess Julian Asswipe just floored it at the yellow light and got busted by a traffic cam.
Posted by: TexBob at December 28, 2010 11:07 AM (7cXE7)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 28, 2010 11:08 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 11:08 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: REM at December 28, 2010 11:09 AM (djZfm)
They were hypnotized and rendered powerless by his jazz hands.
Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 11:09 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:10 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 03:09 PM (uFokq)
Next time, wear a condom. Trust me on that one.
Posted by: Julian 'Jazz Hands' Assange at December 28, 2010 11:10 AM (wOGfT)
I don't know whether to punch him or pour salt on him and watch him dissolve.
Bring on the polonium house dressing for this slug.
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:11 AM (vn4ta)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:12 AM (vn4ta)
Posted by: csm at December 28, 2010 11:13 AM (EJu0q)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 11:13 AM (TMB3S)
she went to bed with Assange, let him stick his Europeon weinerschnitzel in her orifices, and then went to sleep next to him.
And then Assange, for some odd reason, feels he can put his little Europeon sausage in her again.
This makes her angry?
Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:14 AM (uFokq)
"But I can't get behind the idea that lying naked in bed after consensual sex means the male has to ask formal permission before initiating any new sexual moves. "
I know right? I don't know why guys alway get mad at me. It's just a strap-on, dude.
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 11:14 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: Feminists at December 28, 2010 11:15 AM (AOjhY)
Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:15 AM (h+qn8)
Yeah, I get it, she was asleep.
Asleep for how long, five seconds until she felt him penetrate her disgusting Europeon vagina?
Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:16 AM (uFokq)
This makes her angry?
She sobered up.
Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 11:16 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:17 AM (vn4ta)
Posted by: gar at December 28, 2010 11:17 AM (6ffcS)
Posted by: Ben at December 28, 2010 11:18 AM (wuv1c)
Asleep for how long, five seconds until she felt him penetrate her disgusting Europeon vagina?
Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 03:16 PM (uFokq)
First time, he had it sleeved. The second time, no.I thought he was Australian?
Posted by: CUS at December 28, 2010 11:18 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:18 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: Julian Gibson at December 28, 2010 11:19 AM (Cxsey)
Posted by: archie bunker at December 28, 2010 11:19 AM (0YS61)
Posted by: ChiTown-Jerry at December 28, 2010 11:20 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: gar at December 28, 2010 11:20 AM (6ffcS)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (eCAn3)
I just hope the notary and witness don't get in the way when I'm tryin to go downtown.
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (vn4ta)
Pretty much. As I'm in favor of his actual murder, a trumped up rape charge is fine by me. The feminist part is just a bonus.
Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (S5YRY)
"That's different, Joanie."
Not really. A finger the night before, a strap-on in the morning, what's the difference?
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (HaYO4)
In what alternate universe do the facts that, a) she was in your apartment, and b) you'd previously had sex with her, constitute any sort of consent?
Oh I don't want to defend these bitch women, but....
Married women have been raped by their husbands.
So there goes your theory.
If a woman says stop, as one claims she did, then you stop
(with that said, I think all these people are disgusting and I don't care what happens to any of them)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 28, 2010 11:23 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:24 AM (IoUF1)
Lacey saif,"Married women have been raped by their husbands.
So there goes your theory.
If a woman says stop, as one claims she did, then you stop."
right.
Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:24 AM (h+qn8)
A rape charge is much worse than a case of blue-balls and TSB.
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:24 AM (vn4ta)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 11:25 AM (TMB3S)
boogers gf - Aww, i love it when we cuddle
booger thinking to himself - hey that's great, i just like the way my wang feels against your ass crack
Posted by: booger at December 28, 2010 11:25 AM (9RFH1)
If a woman says stop, as one claims she did, then you stop
You're obviously completely unfamiliar with momentum.
Posted by: Cicero at December 28, 2010 11:25 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 03:21 PM (pLTLS)
Um, that was kind of my point. Hence the "alternate universe" part.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:25 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: maddogg at December 28, 2010 11:26 AM (OlN4e)
You're obviously completely unfamiliar with momentum.
Well if they were asleep they weren't familiar w/much of anything.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:26 AM (pLTLS)
Well if they were asleep they weren't familiar w/much of anything.
AHA! You were asleep. You couldn't have said stop!
No more questions for this witness.
Posted by: Cicero at December 28, 2010 11:28 AM (QKKT0)
well i guess some men wouldn't mind being woken up to a screaming child. or and std, a while later. after a one night stand week of sex.
She had said yes, right?
Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:28 AM (h+qn8)
"Only if you are helping to find my missing prostate."
It's okay. I'm just adjusting your dickmitten from the inside.
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 11:29 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:29 AM (vn4ta)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:31 AM (pLTLS)
They don't, but they do create a strong inference in the minds of reasonable people that whatever happened is more likely a misunderstanding or mistake than a rape-rape.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 11:31 AM (r1OG3)
Posted by: cdajoe at December 28, 2010 11:31 AM (t8iQp)
Posted by: archie bunker at December 28, 2010 03:19 PM (0YS61)
Unless he specifically asked her if he could fuck her while she was sleeping (and she said yes), it was rape. End of discussion.
And please learn some fundamental punctuation and sentence structure if you're going to troll here.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:33 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: Tami at December 28, 2010 11:33 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 28, 2010 11:35 AM (xJVlJ)
Really? I didn't think anybody bought that Antioch College bullshit anymore, but . . .
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 11:35 AM (r1OG3)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 28, 2010 11:36 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: cdajoe at December 28, 2010 11:37 AM (t8iQp)
Planet Neanderthal.
(Gruß Gott, Dumköpfe!)
Posted by: HeatherRadish ist in Deutschland at December 28, 2010 11:37 AM (+Zqe2)
Ah, Antioch College.
Home of the 'do I have your permission to kiss you?' pledge.
For those that have never had the (dis)pleasure of Yellow Springs, OH, lemme tell ya....
Whackadoodles.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:37 AM (pLTLS)
I didn't think anybody bought that Antioch College bullshit anymore, but . . .
heh, you remember that, too?
Can I kiss you? Can I put my hand on your left breast? Can I put my hand on your right breast? Can I put my erect penis in your...?
Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:38 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: wiserbud at December 28, 2010 11:39 AM (EW49d)
Ah, Antioch College.
Home of the 'do I have your permission to kiss you?' pledge.
For those that have never had the (dis)pleasure of Yellow Springs, OH, lemme tell ya....
The problem is that a generation of Womyn's studies professors have misled college women that the Antioch College protocols are the law.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 11:39 AM (r1OG3)
I just vomited. He is a singularly vulgar, disgusting, puke inducing piece of shit.
Posted by: mpfs at December 28, 2010 11:40 AM (iYbLN)
I've had women whom I've fucked in the past stay overnight, and I'm pretty sure had any of them woke up with my cock inside them I'd either be dead or incarcerated right now.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:40 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:40 AM (vn4ta)
Her crossword puzzle keeps her awake the whole time.
You don't always need a puzzle.
We can always mentally balance the checkbook!
Multi-tasking!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:42 AM (pLTLS)
Amirite? Ladies back me up on this.
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:42 AM (vn4ta)
I would just muster my shocked face and blurt Wait, it was your idea!
Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 11:42 AM (S5YRY)
Thank you, Ol Dirty for that clear and unambiguous explanation. It's rape. Just because she consented once doesn't mean he gets free rides later.
Here's a thought experiment if you can suspend your common sense: You give your one-week stand your credit card specifically to buy one thing and one thing only and s/he comes back with a whole bunch of other stuff you never consented to buying....is that theft?
Posted by: vivi at December 28, 2010 11:43 AM (Fjbl9)
Ladies back me up on this.
Um, not quite.
If it's good it's certainly not 'seconds' in the AM. Jus sayin'.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:45 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: wife at December 28, 2010 11:45 AM (vn4ta)
Thank you, Ol Dirty for that clear and unambiguous explanation. It's rape. Just because she consented once doesn't mean he gets free rides later.
For God's sake man, just shell out and buy a season pass!
Posted by: Ticketmaster at December 28, 2010 11:45 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: maddogg at December 28, 2010 11:45 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: mpfs at December 28, 2010 11:46 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:47 AM (vn4ta)
...this is why I stick to hookers, you pay your money you get what you want, no problems for anyone.
"but it's disgusting paying for sex, only losers pay for sex"
wrong, in our current culture, the "loser" is the guy who gets married, and works hard his whole life.
Posted by: Let's Destroy Western Civilization, It's fun! at December 28, 2010 11:47 AM (ehKDD)
The issue of whether this is rape-rape is all tied up in the fact that Assmunch allegedly didn't stop bumping uglies with the alleged victim even after she'd allegedly told him to stop. As far as I'm concerned, if one party tells the other party that they don't want to have sex and the other party persists, regardless of pre-existing factors or conditions, that constitutes rape. The issue in my mind is did the woman really demand he stop? Or was that something she concocted or exaggerated in later accounts? That's what investigators have to determine.
Now frankly, if this were America and not Sweden, I don't think the women would have a leg to stand on since they appear to have kept up convivial relationships with Asswipe after the alleged rapes without being coerced. It would be different if they were married to him and couldn't escape an abusive relationship, blah, blah, fill in your Lifetime movie of the week here. But these are two seemingly independent women who had no reason to stay with Asshole if he'd violated them, and who would have been in their rights to have him arrested. To most people, this just reads like a case of caveat emptor where the buyer didn't beware enough and is suffering buyer's remorse times ten. The only reason these women's claims are being given as much merit as they are is because they're in Sweden, the laws are different in Sweden, and Assfart is an internationally renowned dickhead.
Julian Assclown is a complete tool and a limp-wristed little git, and I don't care if he gets raked over the coals for this, because he deserves it. But if he's not guilty then I hope he's found not guilty, because wishing a guilty verdict on a not guilty man - no matter how repellant and loathsome he may be - is just one step on the road to a complete breakdown of jurisprudence. It would be a terrible blow to any genuinely innocent men in Sweden who are accused of rape.
If he's guilty, throw the book at him. If he's not guilty, find him not guilty and then set him free so he can be hit by a grand piano "accidentally" dropped from a fifth story window, a fate he richly deserves.
Posted by: MWR at December 28, 2010 11:47 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: dagny at December 28, 2010 11:48 AM (DS1Ec)
May Assange meet his end at a ricin-pellet, or some polonium-laced tea.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 28, 2010 11:48 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: kevlarchick at December 28, 2010 11:49 AM (TNuqz)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta)
I would bake him some iridium 198 pellet cookies.
Posted by: mpfs at December 28, 2010 11:50 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:50 AM (vn4ta)
Yeah, I know. I was just trying to stick with the overall theme.
Posted by: wiserbud at December 28, 2010 11:51 AM (EW49d)
There's a pretty broad spectrum between kissing and fingerfucking a girl who's conscious and has the capacity to say no and sticking your dick in them when they're asleep. By your standard, your college roommate could have stuck it in your poopar while you were passed out and it wouldn't have been a big deal.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:51 AM (IoUF1)
Strange. All of this. I've never had any woman complain of waking sex. As a matter of fact, from my experience, they think it's when the best sex is.
Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 11:51 AM (v/b3m)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:52 AM (vn4ta)
Ride the subways a lot, do you?
Posted by: Julian's at December 28, 2010 11:53 AM (EW49d)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:54 AM (vn4ta)
Posted by: Julian Assange at December 28, 2010 11:54 AM (54F2e)
Posted by: FTD at December 28, 2010 11:55 AM (EW49d)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 11:55 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 03:14 PM (HaYO4)
I come for the most-of-the-time sort-of-right-of-center sounding posts. I stay for the moronettes.
Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at December 28, 2010 11:56 AM (djZfm)
But, you said this:
Unless he specifically asked her if he could fuck her while she was sleeping (and she said yes), it was rape. End of discussion.
Nothing in the law requires a man to "specifically ask" for anything. That's feminist brainwashing bullshit. Consent can be manifest in ways that are neither verbal nor specific.Here's a thought experiment if you can suspend your common sense: You give your one-week stand your credit card specifically to buy one thing and one thing only and s/he comes back with a whole bunch of other stuff you never consented to buying....is that theft?
In all practical effect, no. It is perhaps exceeding the license that you granted to her and even theft from a moral perspective. The Police will politely tell you that it is a "civil matter" and send you on your way.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 11:56 AM (r1OG3)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 11:57 AM (SJ6/3)
In Saudi Arabia, the women are so hot they have to wear burkahs to keep men from going crazy; in Sweden, the women are so hot, men are automatically assumed to be rapists.
----
the 2nd woman's account does sound more like rape-rape though.
Posted by: A.G. at December 28, 2010 11:57 AM (oAVyq)
The sicker and slimier they are, the more heroic they are to liberals.*
If Ted Bundy hadn't been stupid enough to have whimsically said that he was a registered Republican, presumably just to be a smartass, he surely would have been acquitted by a jury of liberals, just like O.J. Simpson was.
So why am I not surprised that Manning and Assange are the new heroes of the lefties?
*Explains why Obama, Holder and Clinton are in office, doesn't it?
Posted by: Brian at December 28, 2010 11:58 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: dagny at December 28, 2010 03:48 PM (DS1Ec)
I can tell from AssPlunge's anger issues, and by taking one look at him, that his dick is about the size of an I-Pod headphone jack. He could probably fuck a hamster without waking it up.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:58 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 03:56 PM (r1OG3)
Practice law in Sweden much?
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 11:58 AM (yY4uj)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 11:59 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 12:00 PM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Julian Assange at December 28, 2010 03:54 PM (54F2e)
That's been my question from the get-go. Does Assang even have a dick? Someone mentioned strap-ons upthread.
Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 12:01 PM (v/b3m)
Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at December 28, 2010 12:01 PM (djZfm)
Posted by: dagny at December 28, 2010 03:48 PM (DS1Ec)
You never woke up with a mosquito bite you slept through?
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:01 PM (yY4uj)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 03:59 PM (SJ6/3)
I thought the full story included the fact that he 1) carries no money and 2) has no credit cards. Makes him more difficult to track, or so he claims.Posted by: CUS at December 28, 2010 12:02 PM (wOGfT)
Hence the Sex-by-Surprise! charge.
Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 12:03 PM (S5YRY)
Um, no.
You can plug your ears and shout "rape" and pretend that having a recent history of consensual sexual relations with someone doesn't grant a certain implied license, but not a lot of people are going to buy it. I don't have the permission of my girlfriend to playfully smack her ass in public, but I do - do you think I should be charged with what is potentially a felony in my state if she subsequently didn't like her Christmas presents?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:04 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:05 PM (vn4ta)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 04:00 PM (SJ6/3)
They can share blow job tips.Posted by: CUS at December 28, 2010 12:05 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 03:55 PM (TMB3S)
This! I say it was a setup.
Posted by: Tami at December 28, 2010 12:05 PM (VuLos)
I would be able to understand the guy thinking that because she consented once already, he was good to go--if he'd stopped when she said no, and if he hadn't uttered a line that makes me convinced he has a skin suit in his basement. But then, Assange reeks of ego, so I'm not surprised he kept going at it.
Posted by: Tungsten Monk at December 28, 2010 12:06 PM (8ihif)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 12:06 PM (pLTLS)
No. Nor does Ace nor any other identifiable member of the commentariat. So - in that case - why are we here?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:07 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:07 PM (vn4ta)
The real quote is "I want to be on you."
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:09 PM (vn4ta)
Posted by: Miss A at December 28, 2010 12:09 PM (djZfm)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:10 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 12:11 PM (v/b3m)
I never got why any woman would love your average man. We smell funny, we grow hair in weird places, we love bacon, we love guns, we love football and we scratch ourselves in public and grow boogers the size of tomatoes.
Posted by: navybrat at December 28, 2010 12:11 PM (1rmJS)
Posted by: That Annoying Kay Jewelry Jingle at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (WvXvd)
Posted by: SurferDoc at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (o3bYL)
Well, what fun would that be? The struggle makes my ass tickle.
Posted by: Richard Gere at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (vn4ta)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:04 PM (r1OG3)
Depends on what you do if she says "stop that" and "no." Do you think you have a common-law easement to her ass? Or that your right to play outweighs her right to decide what physical contact is acceptable to her and when?
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (yY4uj)
Note to self: Cancel trip to Sweden.
Posted by: Will Folks at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (saRwI)
By law and common assent in Western countries, being actually married to a woman does not give a man the right to have sex with her without her consent to that specific instance of copulation. Yet Julian Assange feels heÂ’s being persecuted because he assumed that one act of consensual sex with a casual acquaintance gave him licence to have sex with her again anytime he wished without asking.
IsnÂ’t the belief that the Universe was created to accommodate oneÂ’s own individual desires called solipsism?
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:13 PM (yY4uj)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 28, 2010 12:14 PM (0GFWk)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:14 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 03:24 PM (IoUF1)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 12:17 PM (mHQ7T)
"Went to the drug store and nearly lost my life
There I saw my girlfriends, one and two
Standing there together, I knew I was in trouble
But I'm a clever guy I knew what to do..."
Posted by: SurferDoc at December 28, 2010 12:17 PM (o3bYL)
IsnÂ’t the belief that the Universe was created to accommodate oneÂ’s own individual desires called solipsism?
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 04:13 PM (yY4uj)
Yeah, whatever.
Posted by: Bill Clinton at December 28, 2010 12:18 PM (v/b3m)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:19 PM (tJjm/)
I'll put to you a middle case - she says "stop that" and "no" while giggling and trying to ball tap me. We make love that afternoon. Can she rely upon the "stop that" and "no" to initiate a criminal prosecution three weeks later? I suppose you would say yes, being the white knight that you are.
This shit is complicated and does not avail itself of easy, pre-fab, black-and-white answers like you and feminists are trying to posit.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:20 PM (r1OG3)
Nah. "30 more seconds and then you can get me a beer" would be a lot more honorarily moronic.
Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at December 28, 2010 12:20 PM (djZfm)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 12:21 PM (mHQ7T)
I like Occam's Razor in this case....
Is it more likely that two hardcore feminist harpies lied/stretched the truth because they were angry/scorned over finding out Asshat was a playa
or
They are telling the truth
I think I'll take the former.
White Knighting about no means no aside.
If being attacked and raped in a park is a 10 on the 1-10 rape scale, these charges, even if true are about a 3. And again, I don't believe it.
Would much prefer this scumbag be brought to justice the old fashioned way....the Russian way if you will.
Oh and the line, utter cheese/creepy....unless delivered by an alpha.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at December 28, 2010 12:21 PM (A0VTZ)
they need to stop calling this 'surprise sex'
with the exception of father's day, all sex is a surprise
and yes, i'm married (wedding cake = birth control)
Posted by: navycopjoe at December 28, 2010 12:22 PM (uIQK6)
Posted by: The Mossad at December 28, 2010 12:23 PM (0GFWk)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 12:24 PM (TMB3S)
"but it's disgusting paying for sex, only losers pay for sex"
Depends on the timing. If you fork over money beforehand, you are a loser who pays for sex. But if you pay after, you are just paying her to leave you alone. That's just good business, as long as she doesn't steal your watch.
Posted by: Charlie Sheen at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (2p0e3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (tJjm/)
Ronny Barnhart could take Assange out.
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (vn4ta)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (EiH7n)
Julian's pimp hand is weak
This is actually true. Dude probably didn't have much success with the ladies until he achieved his fame. I'm sure he made these womyn each feel they were special...the only girl for him. When they realized he was full of shit, out came the vindictiveness only a feminist can deliver.
If he had presented himself as a world class player, with many options he probably would have gotten the sex anyway without all the messy stuff afterward.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:26 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:26 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 12:27 PM (v/b3m)
How about paying for a movie and dinner for a chance to MAYBE have sex?
FTFY
Posted by: CUS at December 28, 2010 12:28 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 12:29 PM (S5YRY)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:26 PM (r1OG3)
So you're speaking of the much feared "Helen Thomas moment".
Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 12:30 PM (v/b3m)
My point exactly. Do we know what Ms. A did as she is alleged to have asked Assange to quit? Do we know that she wasn't intermittently passionately kissing him between her protests? Did she attempt to push him off of her body? Do we know if she lay stunned at the prospect of being raped, or whether she was in her previous night's pique of wild abandon?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:31 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:33 PM (tJjm/)
This shit is complicated and does not avail itself of easy, pre-fab, black-and-white answers like you and feminists are trying to posit.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:20 PM (r1OG3)
She says "stop that" and "no" while giggling and trying to ball tap you. You assume, naturally, that she's interested in playing -- and then she says "stop that" and "no" without the giggles, and while trying to restrain your hand. Do you have the right to disregard this second request to stop, given that she gave you a go-ahead moments before? Do you have a perpetual and inalienable right to keep doing something to her if she consented to it once?
It's not black-and-white at all. Sometimes "no" means "no," even if it follows "yes."
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:35 PM (yY4uj)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at December 28, 2010 12:35 PM (EiH7n)
Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:31 PM (r1OG3)
Of course we don't know. So we have to look at her verifiable actions afterwards. Which includes hanging arround for a few more days.
Which kindda cuts against the whole "no means no."
Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 12:36 PM (QLhy5)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 04:19 PM (tJjm/)
If his lawyer is worth his salt, he'll get the charges reduced to following too close.
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:37 PM (yY4uj)
I don't have the permission of my girlfriend to playfully smack her ass in public, but I do - do you think I should be charged with what is potentially a felony in my state if she subsequently didn't like her Christmas presents?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:04 PM (r1OG3)
If your "Christmas presents" consisted of passed out fuckrapes, yes indeedy.Asshole.
Posted by: Ed Anger at December 28, 2010 12:38 PM (7+pP9)
If your "Christmas presents" consisted of passed out fuckrapes, yes indeedy.
Is that a gift certificate you can get at "Best Buy" or "Good Vibrations?"
Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 12:40 PM (QLhy5)
Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:40 PM (vn4ta)
That's pretty sweet. But I'm gonna check Amazon.com first. No face to face contact is a real selling point for a product like this...
Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 12:43 PM (QLhy5)
Asshole.
Yeah, sorry if I don't stand four square behind sending someone to prison for thirty years because "It's a lady's prerogative" and all.
No more gray area in human sexual behavior - Ed Anger has reduced it all to a simple binary formula. Have the Nobel people called yet?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:46 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 12:48 PM (SJ6/3)
That's fine. The question isn't whether Assange is a swell fellow or properly chivalrous, it is whether he deserves to be deprived of his liberty based on evidence of a morass of "nos," "yesses," "maybes" and subsequent behavior by the accuser which is, at best, confusing in light of her allegations.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:49 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:49 PM (tJjm/)
Friends, friends. Don't lose sight of who we're walking about here. I want Assange dead. Sending him to prison on a trumped up rape charge might be a necessary backstop.
Let's not overgeneralize this to real people.
Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 12:50 PM (S5YRY)
Posted by: Pecos Bill at December 28, 2010 12:54 PM (j84s0)
A bitch who has already fucked a guy and is sleeping with him naked, would have no standing in the US to cry rape.
Just the facts.
Sluts are sluts. The bitch paid for the asshole's train fare to come to her house. Maybe he should be tried as a gigolo? He took money to fuck her.
Posted by: Kemp at December 28, 2010 12:54 PM (JpFM9)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:55 PM (tJjm/)
Friends, friends. Don't lose sight of who we're walking about here.
This is either the best typo of all time. Or evidence of some sick "furry" role playing shit.
Eitherway, it fits in with this blog.
Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 12:55 PM (QLhy5)
Posted by: Andrew "Dice" Clay at December 28, 2010 12:58 PM (j84s0)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 01:00 PM (tJjm/)
Our white knights have apparently given no thought to how an accused would defend accusations of "withdrawn consent mid-stroke" nor all the little acts of sexual assault they commit daily without the expressed, notarized consent of their fair ladies.
The Duke lacrosse boys got lucky that the bitch was stupid and gave unnecessary and conflicting details that got them off the hook, albeit after hundreds of thousands of Dollars in attorney's fees.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:00 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 01:10 PM (tJjm/)
You're the only two on this entire message board who have enough sack to say you're not drinking the feminist "it's rape when WE say it's rape, common sense be damned" kool-aid. The rest of you, keep putting the precious snowflakes on a pedestal and hand over every legal right you have...tell me how that works out for ya in the long run.
Posted by: wuzrobbd at December 28, 2010 01:15 PM (dZxtH)
We don't need common sense, reason, or the benefit of a few thousand years of human experience and law.
We have a slogan, which is "No means no."
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:16 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:49 PM (r1OG3)
Well, maybe he should go to Sweden and allow its legal system to determine what's at the bottom of that morass. You seem to be claiming perfect knowledge of the circumstances and events and declaring that there is no way that Assange could possibly have committed the crime of rape under Swedish law. Do you know something the rest of the world doesn't, other that how your girlfriend behaves?
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 01:22 PM (yY4uj)
One of my best friends in college took a co-ed home (to a house that she rented with other sorority sisters) from a bar. She supplied E, which they both took. They swam together naked in the house's pool in full view by her friends. They had sex. She had a boyfriend back home. She told everyone whom he knew that he was a rapist and was considering reporting the matter to Law Enforcement. Luckily, she did not, but he sweated it out for a few months where it could have gone either way. It was not fun for him, to say the least.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:22 PM (r1OG3)
Do you apply your "Sweedish Legal Expert" standard to this?:
...but the second woman claims she specifically told him to stop after she awoke to find him on top of her, and he didn't. So, he hadn't had consent -- I guess a sort of implied consent in his mind, but not actual consent -- and even if you give him a pass on that, that non-consent was followed up with an affirmative denial of consent. But he kept going and, um, "finished up," despite that.
Maybe some date-rape charges are a bit grey-area, but this charge doesn't seem gray-area, if true. It sounds like rape.
Or only to the statements with which you disagree? I was under the impression that your "No means no" slogan - to which so much that I have written was in reply - was to be applied to the United States as well - am I missing something?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:25 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:26 PM (r1OG3)
As Joanie pointed out, who thinks that waking up with the girl you had sex with the night before deftly penetrating you from behind with her strap-on is rape?
Trick question -- we all know you can't rape someone who went to bed with you voluntarily.
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 01:28 PM (yY4uj)
As Joanie pointed out, who thinks that waking up with the girl you had sex with the night before deftly penetrating you from behind with her strap-on is rape?
Trick question -- we all know you can't rape someone who went to bed with you voluntarily.If she ass-banged you with a strap-on the night before when you loved it and then you lovingly made her french toast, chances are it's "not rape."
You might want to brush all of that straw off your shoulder there, Lancelot.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:35 PM (r1OG3)
"Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism," he said. "I fell into a hornets' nest of revolutionary feminism."
Back it up, back it up, beep beep beep.
What the hell does that mean? When people say that Arizona is the Saudi Arabia of solar energy, they're talking about an alternative to oil, which is what Saudi Arabia is primarily known for. So I get that.
But "the Saudi Arabia of feminism"?
Is Sweden's attitude progressive towards women and women's rights like Saudi Arabia is? (No, that can't be it.)
Are Swedish women covered in oil? And by that I man oil oil? How would the clean-up efforts go? Do volunteers pick them up off the beach and wash them off with dish soap under a gentle spary of water? (Still sounds nasty.)
Or is feminism as abundant in Sweden as oil is in Saudi Arabia? That's probably what he meant, but it's a horrible analogy.
Alas, he's a hero in some circles so I might as well embrace the turn of phrase, keeping in mind that Jordan doesn't have any oil:
Julian Assange is the Jordan of conscience.
Posted by: FireHorse at December 28, 2010 01:39 PM (sWynj)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 01:40 PM (wd0Iq)
You may carry on accusing me of being a "rape apologist," but you might want to defer to the masterful work of Amynda Marcotte on the subject.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:41 PM (r1OG3)
as long as there is an absence of any clear and compelling corroborating physical evidence in support of the claim...yeah. You're finally startin' get it, son.
Posted by: wuzrobbd at December 28, 2010 01:45 PM (dZxtH)
To complete the analogy, wouldn't it depend upon whether the person invited to to penetrate his or her ass in the past, from which you could derive the notion that he or she generally finds ass penetration pleasurable? Doesn't it depend upon the fact that you have a relationship with that person (or not)? How about the reaction (positive or negative) that he or she expressed the last time that you tried the assplay? You know, what the kids these days call "context."
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:46 PM (r1OG3)
By the way, to answer the above question: Yes, one can commit rape, regardless of recent, consensual sex between the (now) victim and (now) rapist.
If I read this right ...
She says they had consensual sex but she woke up the next morning to find him having intercourse with her to which she had not consented.
... he started having sex with her while she was asleep. Not sexual stuff, but actual sex-sex. That's beyond creepy.
(Thirty years' worth of creepy? Maybe. Let a court figure it out.)
Posted by: FireHorse at December 28, 2010 01:50 PM (sWynj)
I think by the "Saudi Arabia" comment he was trying to imply that Sweden is the inverse of SA...kinda like the bearded Spock or something, but with feminists, or something.
I fail to see how you can rape somebody you had consensual sex with a few short hours before -- I thought it was just sorta common sense that people who have done the boing boing once, might be up for another go in a few hours -- an agreed upon double header if you will. Then again, I fail to see how a woman can be that sleepy that she wouldn't have woke up immediately when, you know, a somebody came rapping at the chamber door (dang, that doesn't say much for old Julie there does it?).
Nonetheless, if it causes Jazz Hands grief I'm all for it (God knows dear leader isn't going to do any grief causing to be done).
Posted by: unknown jane at December 28, 2010 01:54 PM (5/yRG)
I don't think that anyone said that a recent sexual partner cannot rape the other, only that not having the expressed, verbal consent of a woman does not equal rape. (see 109) Further, that confusing circumstances warrant leniency, rather than the strict application of "no means no." If a woman is naked and in bed with a naked man with which she has recently previously had sex, subsequent allegations of rape are particularly suspect and worthy of particular scrutiny and skepticism, as the incident is likely to be the result of a unilateral or mutual mistake or miscommunication, for which a man should not pay with his liberty on the order of thirty years. Lastly, that women can and do verbalize their lack of consent or withdrawal of consent while physically acting in a contrary manner.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:58 PM (r1OG3)
Then again, I fail to see how a woman can be that sleepy that she wouldn't have woke up immediately when, you know, a somebody came rapping at the chamber door (dang, that doesn't say much for old Julie there does it?).
I don't know. He might be pretty skilled at alternative bartending.
Posted by: FireHorse at December 28, 2010 01:59 PM (sWynj)
Appears to the application of experience and reason to the issue. Haven't you ever heard that "no means no?"
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 02:01 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: wuzrobbd at December 28, 2010 02:02 PM (dZxtH)
It's possible, but highly improbable.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 02:07 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:08 PM (wd0Iq)
Alec @ 278: I get that -- all of it.
But if they did it not that long before, then he already knows how strict she'd be about condoms. And if she's asleep, then putting one on wouldn't exactly ruin the moment for her. By his own account, he got sex from her that he most likely knew she was unwilling to give him.
I don't know what the laws are about such stuff in Sweden, but that'd be the standard.
(And I'll bet he's wishing by now that he did it with her in Saudi Arabia. She'd have already been executed.)
Posted by: FireHorse at December 28, 2010 02:08 PM (sWynj)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:10 PM (wd0Iq)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:12 PM (tJjm/)
'Tis a fine rule! Tug on her bodice first - chivalrous indeed! I just don't think it is necessarily the standard of what constitutes rape.
And I think we're all suspending disbelief when we pretend that she was in deep REM sleep, laying like a dead fish for the first two minutes of the morning coetus.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 02:14 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:14 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Charlie Sheen at December 28, 2010 02:15 PM (le5qc)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:16 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:18 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Asscheeks of Saturn at December 28, 2010 02:18 PM (le5qc)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:18 PM (wd0Iq)
I think it's in bad form as well - on that we agree. I just don't think it's "thirty years in state penitentiary" rape.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 02:20 PM (r1OG3)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:23 PM (wd0Iq)
That is NOT what the article you linked to says! Nor is it stated in any account I've read anywhere of this allegation. Your link says "she woke up the next morning to find him having intercourse with her to which she had not consented." Meaning: she was asleep when it began and thus could not possibly have consented. It does NOT say she subsequently objected!!!
If people can't or won't read carefully, and stick to the facts of what is actually alleged, then it's pretty ridiculous to even be writing commentary about it.
The most detailed account in the Guardian (dec 17 article, referencing the leaked police report) was that she "couldn't be bothered" to remind him of her condom rule. IOW she made no objection to what he was doing once she awoke, instead just said "you better not have HIV." IOW she had a condom preference, not a condom rule. And yet she's so paranoid about HIV she's going to the police about it? What is wrong with this picture? The point is not to "blame" but how to effect positive outcomes. If you are that paranoid about HIV but still inclined to have casual sex, and yet 'cant be bothered' to object to a guy getting ready to unload sans condom and enforce your requirement otherwise, something's wrong with the female end of the equation, regardless of what's wrong on the male side.
If women think they can solve this sort of problem by running to the police after the fact (she might already have HIV at that point!), rather than learning how to assert themselves in the moment, they are damn fools. My friends and I learned this by the time we left college after dealing with countless creeps. It really wasn't that complicated.
Posted by: Lqw at December 28, 2010 02:36 PM (Er/Lh)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:39 PM (tJjm/)
You may carry on accusing me of being a "rape apologist," but you might want to defer to the masterful work of Amynda Marcotte on the subject.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 05:41 PM (r1OG3)
I think you're not allowing that Sweden has laws that define what constitute rape in that country's system of justice. I think you're arguing that the Swedes have no right to set their own standard, which in fact may make Assange's behavior illegal in that country. I think you are arguing that since you don't think Assange was anything more than inconsiderate, he ought to be allowed to thumb his nose at Swedish law.
I think the Swedish authorities believe that there is probable cause under their law to issue a warrant for his arrest to face charges. I think he ought to surrender himself to the Swedish authorities, face his accusers and plead his case in court. Or do you agree with Assange that Sweden is the kind of place where he can't get a fair trial and none of his rights will be respected?
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 02:50 PM (yY4uj)
Really? I didn't think anybody bought that Antioch College bullshit anymore, but . . .
In my state at least, the law is even stricter than that -- "advance consent" is not recognized. If you fuck someone who's asleep, even if she told you beforehand that you could, it's still rape in the eyes of the law.
Posted by: Alex at December 28, 2010 02:50 PM (/yzYn)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:51 PM (wd0Iq)
...but the second woman claims she specifically told him to stop after she awoke to find him on top of her, and he didn't. So, he hadn't had consent -- I guess a sort of implied consent in his mind, but not actual consent -- and even if you give him a pass on that, that non-consent was followed up with an affirmative denial of consent. But he kept going and, um, "finished up," despite that.
Maybe some date-rape charges are a bit grey-area, but this charge doesn't seem gray-area, if true. It sounds like rape.
Or
only to the statements with which you disagree? I was under the
impression that your "No means no" slogan - to which so much that I have
written was in reply - was to be applied to the United States as well -
am I missing something?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 05:25 PM (r1OG3)
I'm sorry -- I just saw this and I can't make heads or tails out of it. First, you're not quoting me, you're quoting Ace, so why are you asking me about it?
Second, the incident Ace describes sounds like a clearer instance of a woman saying "no" to a guy who started screwing her without asking -- that is, unambiguously telling him to stop, and him refusing to do so. Does that sound merely unchivalrous to you? Or are you really saying that a woman saying "yes" gives her bed partner a blanket all-access pass for as long as he stays in her room?
Third, whether that incident constitutes rape in Sweden is for the Swedish courts to decide. Assange ought to make himself available to answer the charges stemming from that incident. Do you disagree?
Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 03:01 PM (yY4uj)
I'm sorry -- I just saw this and I can't make heads or tails out of it. First, you're not quoting me, you're quoting Ace, so why are you asking me about it?
Second, the
incident Ace describes sounds like a clearer instance of a woman saying
"no" to a guy who started screwing her without asking -- that is,
unambiguously telling him to stop, and him refusing to do so. Does that
sound merely unchivalrous to you? Or are you really saying that a
woman saying "yes" gives her bed partner a blanket all-access pass for
as long as he stays in her room?
Ace doesn't practice law in Sweeden, however he gave a legal opinion regarding what would constitute rape. You didn't cite Ace's lack of Swedish legal bona fides, yet you did for me.
I think we're all just spitballing because no one here is learned in Swedish rape law, and many of us would find Swedish rape law at odds with good sense, reason, and a bunch of other stuff. I don't doubt that Sweden has the right to enact its Orwellian rape laws, however I get to criticize them here and comment on others' comments which seem to misstate U.S. rape law or agitate for similar standards in the U.S.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 03:15 PM (r1OG3)
Of course... it couldn't happen to a less sympathetic P.O.S. and I hope he ends up in prison learning who is going to wear an Assange.
Posted by: DANEgerus at December 28, 2010 03:40 PM (e3/KR)
My objection was to the statement made up thread that you can't have sex with a woman who doesn't give her express, verbal consent. Consent can be given in a number of ways, and by silence. I do have a problem with the idea that a woman can withdraw consent while in the act of coetus and claim that a rape has occurred if the man does not pull out in the very instant. I think that prior sexual partners, while naked in bed together, have a certain license to initiate conduct that between strangers and out of this context could be construed as assault. And I think that "no" means "no" if and only if a woman's behavior conforms with her verbal statement.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 03:43 PM (r1OG3)
280 Well I have heard of it -- and thought it was a pretty foolish thing for a woman to engage in (this speaking as a woman). If you want "no" to mean "no"...don't go home with the guy, or take him home, or jump in the sack with him. Men might get the idea that "no" really means "no for right now...but if you try and charm me I just might say yes" -- let's help them out by making it clear. That also goes for if it was "yes" at 11 pm. but you really feel like "no" by 5 am the next day -- just go home or ask the fellow to leave -- otherwise they might get the mistaken notion that "yes" applied for the morning as well. And if "yes" only applied for protected sex...then if he tries anything shady like this you punch him in the nuts and say "hey asshole, I didn't give you bareback priviledges...now get the frak out because I'm feeling kinda 'no' now".
Better yet, try your best not to sleep with slimy assholes, so you never wind up in that sort of quandary.
From what I'm gathering, she went ahead and did the deed...the time for being a bit more proactive should have been when she discovered him on top of her (and I still can't see how you wouldn't wake up before a guy got really far -- unless you're drugged or something). Now, if she was drugged or intoxicated, that might be a different story -- but didn't this chick buy him breakfast or something? I've never heard of rape victims taking their rapists out for coffee after the fact.
Posted by: unknown jane at December 28, 2010 03:53 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 04:18 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 04:34 PM (wd0Iq)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 04:48 PM (TMB3S)
1. climbing on top of her
Get fucking real. How many people sleep lightly so at to guard against this scenario? The penetration is what she says woke her up.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 07:00 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 06:16 PM (tJjm/)
Maybe they were "snuggling" under the blankets all drunk from the night before with their limbs tangled together, and she realized that's not a finger.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 07:05 PM (mHQ7T)
You would, if he might have passed on an STD to you after you asked for a condom the time you consented.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 07:09 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 07:49 PM (TMB3S)
Ummm.... is it rape if I'm asleep in bed and my wife/girlfriend/fuck partner gives me a blow job with out waking me up to ask permission first?
Because it sounds like some people seem like this is rape/forcible oral copulation/whatever.
I mean, I really, really liked it at the times it was happening. To the point of a happy ending.
But now I realize I was a victim...
Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 09:02 PM (QLhy5)
Posted by: asics shoes at December 28, 2010 10:53 PM (Uw8og)
"Maybe they were "snuggling" under
the blankets all drunk from the night before with their limbs tangled
together, and she realized that's not a finger."
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 11:05 PM (mHQ7T)
I'm sure the poor thing is traumatized for ever more!
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 29, 2010 05:22 AM (tJjm/)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2486 seconds, 420 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








The one indisputable good that comes out of the entire Wikileaks enterprise is that it gives lefties spontaneous concussions.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 28, 2010 10:43 AM (gDbxE)