December 28, 2010

Julian Assange, 256-Bit Cassanova
— Ace

This article is worth a skim if you care about the rape/rape-rape allegations against Julian Assange, but I guess I was most taken by Julian Assange's alleged line:

She says they had consensual sex but she woke up the next morning to find him having intercourse with her to which she had not consented.

When she asked him if he was wearing anything, he had allegedly said: "I am wearing you."

That's pimp. The line I mean, not the rape. Gotta give him that.

He claims:

Mr Assange regards himself as a victim of radicalism. "Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism," he said. "I fell into a hornets' nest of revolutionary feminism."

Not exactly. According to him, this is just the vengeance of jilted women:

He said he believed his accusers became angry when the younger woman, Miss W, contacted Miss A and they realised he had been to bed with both of them in swift succession. They went to the police station together, apparently to seek advice. A policewoman who heard their stories is said to have suggested they could pursue criminal charges.

...but the second woman claims she specifically told him to stop after she awoke to find him on top of her, and he didn't. So, he hadn't had consent -- I guess a sort of implied consent in his mind, but not actual consent -- and even if you give him a pass on that, that non-consent was followed up with an affirmative denial of consent. But he kept going and, um, "finished up," despite that.

Maybe some date-rape charges are a bit grey-area, but this charge doesn't seem gray-area, if true. It sounds like rape.

Posted by: Ace at 10:40 AM | Comments (292)
Post contains 289 words, total size 2 kb.

1 "Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism,"

The one indisputable good that comes out of the entire Wikileaks enterprise is that it gives lefties spontaneous concussions.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 28, 2010 10:43 AM (gDbxE)

2 But her eyes said yes, yes, YES!

Posted by: Julian the Mulian at December 28, 2010 10:43 AM (xxgag)

3

She says they had consensual sex but she woke up the next morning to find him having intercourse with her to which she had not consented.

He should have just told her that she fell asleep in the middle of consented-to sex the evening before but he'd gone on pounding away all night, and when she woke up, he was just finishing.

If the dick sticks, ya got to acquit!

Posted by: Johnnie Cochran, Esq. at December 28, 2010 10:45 AM (QKKT0)

4

"I am wearing you."

*reaches for trashcan*

This is truly nauseating.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 10:46 AM (pLTLS)

5

Maybe some date-rape charges are a bit grey-area, but this charge doesn't seem gray-area, if true. It sounds like rape.

Rape-rape indeed.

But are these women still only seeking charges for "sex by surprise"?  Why aren't they going for all they can against this scumbag?

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 28, 2010 10:48 AM (9hSKh)

6 So, what is so bad about rape after you have convinced a little maggoty creep to commit treason and pissed off the entire world? Really. Why should he care?
The man is the walking definition of relativism.

Posted by: tcn at December 28, 2010 10:49 AM (+dwY/)

7 Spit.

Posted by: tcn at December 28, 2010 10:49 AM (+dwY/)

8 When she asked him if he was wearing anything, he had allegedly said: "I am wearing you."

And when I am done I will chuck you in the hamper with the rest of the dirty laundry.

Posted by: Rocks at December 28, 2010 10:50 AM (Q1lie)

9 I'm still stunned that the charges were brought by women.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 28, 2010 10:50 AM (EW49d)

10 Imagine my surprise to find my own personal cooter filled with the pulsating member of Julian Assange.

Posted by: Sex By Surprise Victim at December 28, 2010 10:50 AM (QKKT0)

11 The more that is revealed about this, the more sickening it is.  Absolutely disgusting.

Posted by: soulpile is... expendable © at December 28, 2010 10:51 AM (afWhQ)

12 Instead of "Casanova," shouldn't that read "asshole?"

Posted by: tcn at December 28, 2010 10:51 AM (+dwY/)

13 If I slept with someone and in the morning started up again and she fully woke up and yelled "Stop!" I would, mostly out of confusion. But I can't get behind the idea that lying naked in bed after consensual sex means the male has to ask formal permission before initiating any new sexual moves. I don't understand this new age moral code, dancer/prostitutes were so much simpler....

Posted by: er at December 28, 2010 10:52 AM (nWuNy)

14 The ironic thing is that what Cassangenova is really complaining about is that Sweden is NOT Saudi Arabia.  If this had been Saudi Arabia, the prosecution would need four witnesses.  In Sweden, they don't.

Posted by: WalrusRex at December 28, 2010 10:52 AM (xxgag)

15 "She came up to my hotel room.  What do you think she should expect?"

Posted by: Mike Tyson at December 28, 2010 10:53 AM (wOGfT)

16 In the good old days Little Julie would die in a tragic accident, like getting hit on the head by a pallet of concrete bags that "accidentally" fell off a construction scaffold. Now he'll get a book deal and retire a rich man...

Posted by: Nighthawk at December 28, 2010 10:54 AM (02uN6)

17 Are we sure he didn't say he was just hiding important secret cables in her coochie? Maybe she didn't want to get involved in international intrigue.

Posted by: er at December 28, 2010 10:55 AM (nWuNy)

18 Meh - might be technically rape in the "withdrew consent mid-pump" sense, but it's still not the kind of rape that gets non-feminists all that worked up.  If it was Tom Brady, not many people who aren't Jets fans would get exorcised about it.  Perhaps my timeline is off, but didn't the accuser and Assange have friendly interactions after the incident? 

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 10:57 AM (r1OG3)

19 Totally off topic but, RDBrewer ?

"Waxman said. 'The next two years I expect all their ac-tions to be campaign ori-ented"

What's with this hyphen shit?

Posted by: goldbricker esq at December 28, 2010 10:57 AM (h2t8r)

20 When she asked him if he was wearing anything, he had allegedly said: "I am wearing you."

MEH!...COPYCAT!!!...I used that line ALL the time!

Posted by: Buffalo Bill at December 28, 2010 10:58 AM (6DDE+)

21 Why is he so weird looking? What nationality is he? What kind of name is Assange?

Posted by: Moi at December 28, 2010 10:59 AM (Ez4Ql)

22 I don't care how many filthy scandies Asswipe bones. They should be forced to bear his children as a sentence for extreme lack of taste or any semblance of brain waves.

Posted by: maddogg at December 28, 2010 11:00 AM (OlN4e)

23 This jackass maybe in trouble but he is currently living in a mansion with private grounds and thousands of the rich and famous fluffing him daily.

Posted by: Moi at December 28, 2010 11:00 AM (Ez4Ql)

24 Close. She was already hiding them there and apparently he couldn't reach them. Now THAT'S entertainment! Well done sir.

Posted by: er at December 28, 2010 11:00 AM (nWuNy)

25 could someone please remind me why I should care about this?

Posted by: Shoey at December 28, 2010 11:02 AM (ehKDD)

26 Of course, no blame is to be laid at the feet of the women who invited Assange into their apartment, their room, their bed and in their cooter to begin with. Only in the morning after, when they say stop, it's his fault.. not defending him but noting how fucked up the situation is.

Posted by: Dave C at December 28, 2010 11:02 AM (y4s9a)

27 24 Why is he so weird looking? What nationality is he? What kind of name is Assange?

Same nationality as Ben Assfleck?

He's an Asshole. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 28, 2010 11:03 AM (9hSKh)

28
Doesn't Enreekay Iglesias have a new song called Tonight, I'm Wearing You?

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:06 AM (uFokq)

29 What I don't understand is why he is still alive?

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 28, 2010 11:06 AM (0GFWk)

30

Like his accomplice, Bradley Manning, Julien Assange is a very sick freak and a slimy low-life, and I would like to see him serving time in prison for espionage and for grand theft and for conspiracy (and for being an insufferable, obnoxious creep).

But in view of what you said, I've got to go with your "grey area" option with respect to the ambiguity of whether or not he raped that Swedish chick. Unless there is more to that story that we don't know about, I doubt that he will be found guilty of rape. 

That Swedish chick has to be a real loser to have gone to bed with that sick, slimy creep, and so I suspect that she is also a real pig, who has to wear a paper bag over her head to get laid. (Yeah, they have them in Sweden, too.)

Posted by: Brian at December 28, 2010 11:07 AM (sYrWB)

31 Red Light Green Light Go Go Go
Red Light Red Light No No No
Green Light Stick it In
Red Light ya Gotta Go, cause No means No.

I guess Julian Asswipe just floored it at the yellow light and got busted by a traffic cam.

Posted by: TexBob at December 28, 2010 11:07 AM (7cXE7)

32 When the cougar asked Dick Cheney if he was wearing a condom, Dick Cheney snarled, slapped the cougar and said "I'm wearin you, BITCH", and went back to work on the mexican prostitutes.

Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 28, 2010 11:08 AM (eCAn3)

33 Damned Jane Fonda-loving feminists not wanting to be raped in their sleep!

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 11:08 AM (HaYO4)

34 But her eyes were darting back and forth. She was giving me that come hither look.

Posted by: REM at December 28, 2010 11:09 AM (djZfm)

35 They should be forced to bear his children as a sentence for extreme lack of taste or any semblance of brain waves.

They were hypnotized and rendered powerless by his jazz hands.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 11:09 AM (S5YRY)

36
Europeons make me sick, btw.


Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:09 AM (uFokq)

37 I am not sure they can make the Rape charge stick, but what a cad to have unprotected sex these days.

Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:10 AM (h+qn8)

38 Europeons make me sick, btw.


Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 03:09 PM (uFokq)


Next time, wear a condom.  Trust me on that one.

Posted by: Julian 'Jazz Hands' Assange at December 28, 2010 11:10 AM (wOGfT)

39  This Assange reptile is getting on my nerves.

I don't know whether to punch him or pour salt on him and watch him dissolve.

Bring on the polonium house dressing for this slug.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:11 AM (vn4ta)

40 Getting so you can't have passed-out sex with a trannie anymore.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:12 AM (vn4ta)

41 Wouldn't such a stud have a huge supply of condoms at all times? 

Posted by: csm at December 28, 2010 11:13 AM (EJu0q)

42 >>Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism If Sweden was the Saudi Arabia of feminism, Julian's little unit would still be in Sweden.

Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 11:13 AM (TMB3S)

43 Yawn. "Hey, what's this?"

Sounds more like 4-bit with a floating point.

Posted by: Fritz at December 28, 2010 11:14 AM (GwPRU)

44 So... to recap...

she went to bed with Assange, let him stick his Europeon weinerschnitzel in her orifices, and then went to sleep next to him.

And then Assange, for some odd reason, feels he can put his little Europeon sausage in her again.

This makes her angry?

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:14 AM (uFokq)

45

"But I can't get behind the idea that lying naked in bed after consensual sex means the male has to ask formal permission before initiating any new sexual moves. "

I know right? I don't know why guys alway get mad at me. It's just a strap-on, dude.

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 11:14 AM (HaYO4)

46 Meh, we pretty much packed it in after defending Bill Clinton.

Posted by: Feminists at December 28, 2010 11:15 AM (AOjhY)

47 Soothsayer, Her asking if He was wearing protection implies that was likely the deal for the  previous night moves.

Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:15 AM (h+qn8)

48
Yeah, I get it, she was asleep.

Asleep for how long, five seconds until she felt him penetrate her disgusting Europeon vagina?


Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:16 AM (uFokq)

49 And then Assange, for some odd reason, feels he can put his little Europeon sausage in her again.
This makes her angry?

She sobered up.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 11:16 AM (S5YRY)

50 What's all this consent business?

Posted by: Pat Caddell at December 28, 2010 11:16 AM (1fB+3)

51 She should have gnawed her arm off and got out of there.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:17 AM (vn4ta)

52 "The one indisputable good that comes out of the entire Wikileaks enterprise is that it gives lefties spontaneous concussions." Yeah, never mind the fact that Assange is 100% right about the political climate of Sweden. He makes leftists mad. High five. "Maybe some date-rape charges are a bit grey-area, but this charge doesn't seem gray-area, if true. It sounds like rape." These stories of rape sound like bullshit to me. It seems more of a case of buyer's remorse. Unless Miss A can prove that he ripped the condom, then her case should be dismissed. If she was so terrified that she may have got an STD from him, then why did she let him stay with her for a week? He wasn't her boyfriend or anything. And if Miss W was "rape-raped" then why did she buy him breakfast after he "raped" her? The fact that she only decided to seek legal advice, which ironically wasn't about rape but to force him to get tested for STDs, after talking to Miss A makes her whole story seem fishy. From the stuff I read about these women (and without revealing their names), they are both hardcore feminists.

Posted by: gar at December 28, 2010 11:17 AM (6ffcS)

53
I know right?

That's different, Joanie.

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:17 AM (uFokq)

54 If that's rape, color me guilty.

Posted by: Randall Hoven at December 28, 2010 11:17 AM (CBpBx)

55

this story sickens me.

watch this instead

(it's cute; I promise)

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:18 AM (pLTLS)

56 She should have gnawed her arm off and got out of there.

Ah, a wolf-trap morning.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 11:18 AM (S5YRY)

57 Am i the only person who finds the suprising part of this story is that he was having sex with women?

Posted by: Ben at December 28, 2010 11:18 AM (wuv1c)

58 Yeah, I get it, she was asleep.

Asleep for how long, five seconds until she felt him penetrate her disgusting Europeon vagina?


Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 03:16 PM (uFokq)

First time, he had it sleeved.  The second time, no. 

I thought he was Australian?


Posted by: CUS at December 28, 2010 11:18 AM (wOGfT)

59 In what alternate universe do the facts that, a) she was in your apartment, and b) you'd previously had sex with her, constitute any sort of consent?

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:18 AM (IoUF1)

60 I am wearing you, but first you blow me.

Posted by: Julian Gibson at December 28, 2010 11:19 AM (Cxsey)

61 she wasn't raped until she found out that he was doing someone else Ace if you think that was rape your whole sense of what sex is is warped beyond repair lose 40 pounds and hit some bars

Posted by: archie bunker at December 28, 2010 11:19 AM (0YS61)

62 Hmmm..   Well, I prefer to keep them knocked out for the whole thing.. but, you know, shit happens.

Posted by: ChiTown-Jerry at December 28, 2010 11:20 AM (f9c2L)

63 "That Swedish chick has to be a real loser to have gone to bed with that sick, slimy creep, and so I suspect that she is also a real pig, who has to wear a paper bag over her head to get laid. (Yeah, they have them in Sweden, too.)" Both of the women are actually pretty hot.

Posted by: gar at December 28, 2010 11:20 AM (6ffcS)

64
I thought he was Australian?

Forget it, I'm on a roll.

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:20 AM (uFokq)

65 Ben, nah,  also surprised me.

Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (h+qn8)

66 Fuck off douchebag.

Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (eCAn3)

67 A signed statement of intent per act, per occasion, prior to physical contact is required.

I just hope the notary and witness don't get in the way when I'm tryin to go downtown.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (vn4ta)

68 Yeah, never mind the fact that Assange is 100% right about the political climate of Sweden. He makes leftists mad. High five.

Pretty much.  As I'm in favor of his actual murder, a trumped up rape charge is fine by me.  The feminist part is just a bonus.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (S5YRY)

69

"That's different, Joanie."

Not really.  A finger the night before, a strap-on in the morning, what's the difference?

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (HaYO4)

70

In what alternate universe do the facts that, a) she was in your apartment, and b) you'd previously had sex with her, constitute any sort of consent?

Oh I don't want to defend these bitch women, but....

Married women have been raped by their husbands.

So there goes your theory.

If a woman says stop, as one claims she did, then you stop

(with that said, I think all these people are disgusting and I don't care what happens to any of them)

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:21 AM (pLTLS)

71 is it wrong of me to hope that his ankle bracelet has GPS enabled, so as to allow the Hellfire missiles to be that much more accurate?

Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 28, 2010 11:23 AM (eCAn3)

72
The difference, Joanie, is that I don't get penetrated.

That's the deal, 'member?

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:23 AM (uFokq)

73 Also, I hope this androgynous albino motherfucker is publicly assraped in the most violent and degrading manner imaginable by big sweaty lesbians with strap-ons.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:24 AM (IoUF1)

74

Lacey saif,"Married women have been raped by their husbands.

So there goes your theory.

If a woman says stop, as one claims she did, then you stop."

 

 

right.

 

Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:24 AM (h+qn8)

75

"That's the deal, 'member?"

I forgot you don't like the finger.

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 11:24 AM (HaYO4)

76 As little respect as I have for anyone who would bed down with Assange, he shouldn't have finished up.Ya gotta respect the NO.

A rape charge is much worse than a case of blue-balls and TSB.


Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:24 AM (vn4ta)

77 >>Both of the women are actually pretty hot. Ever been to Sweden? All they make in Sweden is dumb politics, Volvo's and hot women.

Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 11:25 AM (TMB3S)

78 *boogers snuggles up close to girlfriend in bed*

boogers gf - Aww, i love it when we cuddle

booger thinking to himself - hey that's great, i just like the way my wang feels against your ass crack

Posted by: booger at December 28, 2010 11:25 AM (9RFH1)

79

If a woman says stop, as one claims she did, then you stop

You're obviously completely unfamiliar with momentum.

Posted by: Cicero at December 28, 2010 11:25 AM (QKKT0)

80

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 03:21 PM (pLTLS)

Um, that was kind of my point.  Hence the "alternate universe" part.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:25 AM (IoUF1)

81
You're disgusting.

And, yet, intriguing.

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:25 AM (uFokq)

82 I guess filthy scandi didn't want sloppy seconds???

Posted by: maddogg at December 28, 2010 11:26 AM (OlN4e)

83

You're obviously completely unfamiliar with momentum.

Well if they were asleep they weren't familiar w/much of anything.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:26 AM (pLTLS)

84

Well if they were asleep they weren't familiar w/much of anything.

AHA!  You were asleep.  You couldn't have said stop!

No more questions for this witness.

Posted by: Cicero at December 28, 2010 11:28 AM (QKKT0)

85 Zima's a powerful drug.

Posted by: sifty james at December 28, 2010 11:28 AM (vn4ta)

86

well i guess some  men wouldn't mind being woken up to a screaming child. or  and std, a while later. after a one night stand week of sex.

 She had said yes, right?

Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:28 AM (h+qn8)

87 I'm available worldwide.

Posted by: ether at December 28, 2010 11:29 AM (S5YRY)

88
The Fingertm

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:29 AM (uFokq)

89

"Only if you are helping to find my missing prostate."

It's okay. I'm just adjusting your dickmitten from the inside.

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 11:29 AM (HaYO4)

90 Having a hot European woman check your prostate is fine until she uses that finger to stir your coffee the next morning.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:29 AM (vn4ta)

91 yikes sifty.

Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:30 AM (h+qn8)

92
I'll bet you can braid Miss A's armpit hair.

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:30 AM (uFokq)

93 and now we know how sifty likes it........!

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:31 AM (pLTLS)

94 In what alternate universe do the facts that, a) she was in your apartment, and b) you'd previously had sex with her, constitute any sort of consent?

They don't, but they do create a strong inference in the minds of reasonable people that whatever happened is more likely a misunderstanding or mistake than a rape-rape.


Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 11:31 AM (r1OG3)

95 Couldn' t agree more when we've finished hanging drawing and quartering him for treaaon, they're welcome to have him on an iffy rape charge.

Posted by: cdajoe at December 28, 2010 11:31 AM (t8iQp)

96 I just heard that on the internets...

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:32 AM (vn4ta)

97 69 she wasn't raped until she found out that he was doing someone else Ace if you think that was rape your whole sense of what sex is is warped beyond repair lose 40 pounds and hit some bars
Posted by: archie bunker at December 28, 2010 03:19 PM (0YS61)

Unless he specifically asked her if he could fuck her while she was sleeping (and she said yes), it was rape.  End of discussion. 

And please learn some fundamental punctuation and sentence structure if you're going to troll here.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:33 AM (IoUF1)

98 Not that I give a rat's ass what happens to Assange...lock the asshole up and throw away the key but....doesn't this woman make a living advising other women how to bring charges against men in court?

Posted by: Tami at December 28, 2010 11:33 AM (VuLos)

99

Julian Assange is Andy Warhol's love child...

 

(... see, it all makes sense now)

Posted by: Progressivism at December 28, 2010 11:34 AM (ehKDD)

100 Assange vs. Feminazis Pop some corn. I'm rooting for injuries.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 28, 2010 11:35 AM (xJVlJ)

101 Unless he specifically asked her if he could fuck her while she was sleeping (and she said yes), it was rape.  End of discussion.

Really?  I didn't think anybody bought that Antioch College bullshit anymore, but  .  .  .

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 11:35 AM (r1OG3)

102

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard

Sorry, I read your post wrong. I concur.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:35 AM (pLTLS)

103 Archie's comments are like farts - they befoul the air for a moment and then dissipate. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 28, 2010 11:36 AM (9hSKh)

104 Don't fall asleep in bed with anyone you don't want drilling you.

End of problem.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:37 AM (vn4ta)

105 Well he is famous for fifteen minutes now, time to drop of the stage / gallows

Posted by: cdajoe at December 28, 2010 11:37 AM (t8iQp)

106 In what alternate universe do the facts that, a) she was in your apartment, and b) you'd previously had sex with her, constitute any sort of consent?

Planet Neanderthal.

(Gruß Gott, Dumköpfe!)

Posted by: HeatherRadish ist in Deutschland at December 28, 2010 11:37 AM (+Zqe2)

107

Ah, Antioch College.

Home of the 'do I have your permission to kiss you?' pledge.

For those that have never had the (dis)pleasure of Yellow Springs, OH, lemme tell ya....

Whackadoodles.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:37 AM (pLTLS)

108 If you don't trust the pussy, why are you f*cking the pussy?

Posted by: Sam Kinison at December 28, 2010 11:38 AM (GwPRU)

109
I didn't think anybody bought that Antioch College bullshit anymore, but  .  .  .

heh, you remember that, too?

Can I kiss you? Can I put my hand on your left breast? Can I put my hand on your right breast? Can I put my erect penis in your...?

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 11:38 AM (uFokq)

110 dam, if the guy wanted to have sex with a sleeping woman, he should have just married her, amirite?

Posted by: wiserbud at December 28, 2010 11:39 AM (EW49d)

111 Sam, you are missed. Come back.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:39 AM (vn4ta)

112

Ah, Antioch College.

Home of the 'do I have your permission to kiss you?' pledge.

For those that have never had the (dis)pleasure of Yellow Springs, OH, lemme tell ya....


The problem is that a generation of Womyn's studies professors have misled college women that the Antioch College protocols are the law.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 11:39 AM (r1OG3)

113 8 When she asked him if he was wearing anything, he had allegedly said: "I am wearing you."

I just vomited.  He is a singularly vulgar, disgusting, puke inducing piece of shit. 

Posted by: mpfs at December 28, 2010 11:40 AM (iYbLN)

114 Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 03:35 PM (r1OG3)

I've had women whom I've fucked in the past stay overnight, and I'm pretty sure had any of them woke up with my cock inside them I'd either be dead or incarcerated right now.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:40 AM (IoUF1)

115 I don't have to worry about my wife sleeping through sex. Her crossword puzzle keeps her awake the whole time.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:40 AM (vn4ta)

116

Her crossword puzzle keeps her awake the whole time.

You don't always need a puzzle.

We can always mentally balance the checkbook!

Multi-tasking!

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:42 AM (pLTLS)

117 The secret is being so damn good that they want seconds in the morning.

Amirite? Ladies back me up on this.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:42 AM (vn4ta)

118 Well okay, but just this once.

Posted by: Miss A at December 28, 2010 11:42 AM (QKKT0)

119 I'm pretty sure had any of them woke up with my cock inside them I'd either be dead or incarcerated right now.

I would just muster my shocked face and blurt Wait, it was your idea!

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 11:42 AM (S5YRY)

120

Thank you, Ol Dirty for that clear and unambiguous explanation. It's rape.  Just because she consented once doesn't mean he gets free rides later. 

Here's a thought experiment if you can suspend your common sense: You give your one-week stand your credit card specifically to buy one thing and one thing only and s/he comes back with a whole bunch of other stuff you never consented to buying....is that theft? 

Posted by: vivi at December 28, 2010 11:43 AM (Fjbl9)

121

Ladies back me up on this.

Um, not quite.

If it's good it's certainly not 'seconds' in the AM. Jus sayin'.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 11:45 AM (pLTLS)

122 Can we do it doggy-style? I wanna watch Monk.

Posted by: wife at December 28, 2010 11:45 AM (vn4ta)

123

Thank you, Ol Dirty for that clear and unambiguous explanation. It's rape.  Just because she consented once doesn't mean he gets free rides later. 

For God's sake man, just shell out and buy a season pass!

Posted by: Ticketmaster at December 28, 2010 11:45 AM (QKKT0)

124 I could never rape my wife. Her bitch-fu is too strong.

Posted by: maddogg at December 28, 2010 11:45 AM (OlN4e)

125 Agree with lacey.  If it's good it would be fifths, sixths....and so on.

Posted by: mpfs at December 28, 2010 11:46 AM (iYbLN)

126 How do you tell when a married woman has an orgasm?

She drops her nail file.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 28, 2010 11:46 AM (EW49d)

127 Agreed Maddogg. Any attempt to rape my wife would constitute an elaborate suicide plot. Since I was the one who taught her how to shoot.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:47 AM (vn4ta)

128

...this is why I stick to hookers, you pay your money you get what you want, no problems for anyone.

 

"but it's disgusting paying for sex, only losers pay for sex"

 

wrong, in our current culture, the "loser" is the guy who gets married, and works hard his whole life.

 

 

Posted by: Let's Destroy Western Civilization, It's fun! at December 28, 2010 11:47 AM (ehKDD)

129

The issue of whether this is rape-rape is all tied up in the fact that Assmunch allegedly didn't stop bumping uglies with the alleged victim even after she'd allegedly told him to stop.  As far as I'm concerned, if one party tells the other party that they don't want to have sex and the other party persists, regardless of pre-existing factors or conditions, that constitutes rape.  The issue in my mind is did the woman really demand he stop?  Or was that something she concocted or exaggerated in later accounts?  That's what investigators have to determine. 

Now frankly, if this were America and not Sweden, I don't think the women would have a leg to stand on since they appear to have kept up convivial relationships with Asswipe after the alleged rapes without being coerced.  It would be different if they were married to him and couldn't escape an abusive relationship, blah, blah, fill in your Lifetime movie of the week here.  But these are two seemingly independent women who had no reason to stay with Asshole if he'd violated them, and who would have been in their rights to have him arrested.  To most people, this just reads like a case of caveat emptor where the buyer didn't beware enough and is suffering buyer's remorse times ten.  The only reason these women's claims are being given as much merit as they are is because they're in Sweden, the laws are different in Sweden, and Assfart is an internationally renowned dickhead.

Julian Assclown is a complete tool and a limp-wristed little git, and I don't care if he gets raked over the coals for this, because he deserves it.  But if he's not guilty then I hope he's found not guilty, because wishing a guilty verdict on a not guilty man - no matter how repellant and loathsome he may be - is just one step on the road to a complete breakdown of jurisprudence. It would be a terrible blow to any genuinely innocent men in Sweden who are accused of rape. 

If he's guilty, throw the book at him.  If he's not guilty, find him not guilty and then set him free so he can be hit by a grand piano "accidentally" dropped from a fifth story window, a fate he richly deserves.

Posted by: MWR at December 28, 2010 11:47 AM (4df7R)

130 wiserbud,

That's a Jewish woman who drops her nail file or her manicurist.

Posted by: mpfs at December 28, 2010 11:47 AM (iYbLN)

131 I just don't buy that he was already in before she woke up.

Posted by: dagny at December 28, 2010 11:48 AM (DS1Ec)

132 This thread has certainly devolved into depravity and decadence. 

May Assange meet his end at a ricin-pellet, or some polonium-laced tea.

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 28, 2010 11:48 AM (9hSKh)

133 Both Assange and the woman he slept with are annoying low lifes.  The only reason she sang "rape" is because she got played by a player.

Posted by: kevlarchick at December 28, 2010 11:49 AM (TNuqz)

134 May Assange meet his end at a ricin-pellet, or some polonium-laced tea.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta)

I would bake him some iridium 198 pellet cookies.

Posted by: mpfs at December 28, 2010 11:50 AM (iYbLN)

135 Drugs and booze explain an awful lot about this story. I bet we would have a whole different story to read if we had toxicology reports on these three people.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:50 AM (vn4ta)

136 That's a Jewish woman who drops her nail file or her manicurist.

Yeah, I know.  I was just trying to stick with the overall theme.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 28, 2010 11:51 AM (EW49d)

137 Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 03:39 PM (r1OG3)

There's a pretty broad spectrum between kissing and fingerfucking a girl who's conscious and has the capacity to say no and sticking your dick in them when they're asleep.  By your standard, your college roommate could have stuck it in your poopar while you were passed out and it wouldn't have been a big deal.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:51 AM (IoUF1)

138 This thread has certainly devolved into depravity and decadence.

Ain't it grand?

Posted by: wiserbud at December 28, 2010 11:51 AM (EW49d)

139

Strange.  All of this.  I've never had any woman complain of waking sex.  As a matter of fact, from my experience, they think it's when the best sex is.

Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 11:51 AM (v/b3m)

140 Everybody has the Week Before New Year craziness.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:52 AM (vn4ta)

141 I fucked who?

Posted by: Julian's "date", after sobering up at December 28, 2010 11:53 AM (EW49d)

142 I've never had any woman complain of waking sex. As a matter of fact, from my experience, they think it's when the best sex is.

Ride the subways a lot, do you?

Posted by: Julian's at December 28, 2010 11:53 AM (EW49d)

143

gah

Posted by: willow at December 28, 2010 11:53 AM (h+qn8)

144 I agree Soona. But I think we have probably slept with people who actually liked us and were not ashamed to be with us and of themselves.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 11:54 AM (vn4ta)

145 Your honor these charges are complete bullshit.  Just look at me.  Does it look like I am into chicks.

Posted by: Julian Assange at December 28, 2010 11:54 AM (54F2e)

146 This whole thing would have simply disappeared had he thought enough to buy her flowers...

Posted by: FTD at December 28, 2010 11:55 AM (EW49d)

147 >>I've had women whom I've fucked in the past stay overnight, and I'm pretty sure had any of them woke up with my cock inside them I'd either be dead or incarcerated right now. Assange is a worm who needs a good stomping but having an ex spend the night in your house is not the same thing as having sex with a woman who you banged the night before and is still sleeping in your bed. Naked. If she asked him to stop he should have. But a good rule of thumb for woman is don't sleep naked with a guy you just screwed if you don't expect him to have ... ideas.

Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 11:55 AM (TMB3S)

148 This calls for diamonds!!!!

Posted by: De Beers at December 28, 2010 11:55 AM (vn4ta)

149 I don't know why guys alway get mad at me. It's just a strap-on, dude.

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 03:14 PM (HaYO4)

I come for the most-of-the-time sort-of-right-of-center sounding posts. I stay for the moronettes.

Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at December 28, 2010 11:56 AM (djZfm)

150 I've had women whom I've fucked in the past stay overnight, and I'm pretty sure had any of them woke up with my cock inside them I'd either be dead or incarcerated right now.

But, you said this:

Unless he specifically asked her if he could fuck her while she was sleeping (and she said yes), it was rape.  End of discussion.

Nothing in the law requires a man to "specifically ask" for anything.  That's feminist brainwashing bullshit.  Consent can be manifest in ways that are neither verbal nor specific.

Here's a thought experiment if you can suspend your common sense: You give your one-week stand your credit card specifically to buy one thing and one thing only and s/he comes back with a whole bunch of other stuff you never consented to buying....is that theft?

In all practical effect, no.  It is perhaps exceeding the license that you granted to her and even theft from a moral perspective.  The Police will politely tell you that it is a "civil matter" and send you on your way.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 11:56 AM (r1OG3)

151 This ass hanger guy does not interest me. Here is news.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 11:57 AM (SJ6/3)

152 <i> "Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism," he said. "I fell into a hornets' nest of revolutionary feminism."</i>

In Saudi Arabia, the women are so hot they have to wear burkahs to keep men from going crazy; in Sweden, the women are so hot, men are automatically assumed to be rapists.

----

the 2nd woman's account does sound more like rape-rape though.

Posted by: A.G. at December 28, 2010 11:57 AM (oAVyq)

153

The sicker and slimier they are, the more heroic they are to liberals.*

If Ted Bundy hadn't been stupid enough to have whimsically said that he was a registered Republican, presumably just to be a smartass, he surely would have been acquitted by a jury of liberals, just like O.J. Simpson was.

So why am I not surprised that Manning and Assange are the new heroes of the lefties?

*Explains why Obama, Holder and Clinton are in office, doesn't it?

Posted by: Brian at December 28, 2010 11:58 AM (sYrWB)

154 145 I just don't buy that he was already in before she woke up.
Posted by: dagny at December 28, 2010 03:48 PM (DS1Ec)

I can tell from AssPlunge's anger issues, and by taking one look at him, that his dick is about the size of an I-Pod headphone jack.  He could probably fuck a hamster without waking it up.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 11:58 AM (IoUF1)

155 Nothing in the law requires a man to "specifically ask" for anything.  That's feminist brainwashing bullshit.  Consent can be manifest in ways that are neither verbal nor specific.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 03:56 PM (r1OG3)

Practice law in Sweden much?

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 11:58 AM (yY4uj)

156 Did he forget to leave a 5 Euro note on the Ikea?

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 11:59 AM (SJ6/3)

157 Never got why womens like faggitts.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 12:00 PM (SJ6/3)

158 Your honor these charges are complete bullshit.  Just look at me.  Does it look like I am into chicks.

Posted by: Julian Assange at December 28, 2010 03:54 PM (54F2e)

 

That's been my question from the get-go.  Does Assang even have a dick?  Someone mentioned strap-ons upthread.   

Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 12:01 PM (v/b3m)

159 If it's good it's certainly not 'seconds' in the AM.

That's right, ladies.

Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at December 28, 2010 12:01 PM (djZfm)

160 I just don't buy that he was already in before she woke up.

Posted by: dagny at December 28, 2010 03:48 PM (DS1Ec)

You never woke up with a mosquito bite you slept through?

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:01 PM (yY4uj)

161 Did he forget to leave a 5 Euro note on the Ikea?

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 03:59 PM (SJ6/3)

I thought the full story included the fact that he 1) carries no money and 2) has no credit cards.  Makes him more difficult to track, or so he claims.


Posted by: CUS at December 28, 2010 12:02 PM (wOGfT)

162 Diamonds.  She'll pretty much have to.

http://tinyurl.com/24dgxq

Posted by: Jarrods at December 28, 2010 12:02 PM (EW49d)

163 Does Assang even have a dick?  Someone mentioned strap-ons upthread.  

Hence the Sex-by-Surprise! charge.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 12:03 PM (S5YRY)

164
has the Taiwanese cartoon makers covered this, yet?

Posted by: Soothsayer Moribund at December 28, 2010 12:03 PM (uFokq)

165 There's a pretty broad spectrum between kissing and fingerfucking a girl who's conscious and has the capacity to say no and sticking your dick in them when they're asleep.  By your standard, your college roommate could have stuck it in your poopar while you were passed out and it wouldn't have been a big deal.

Um, no. 

You can plug your ears and shout "rape" and pretend that having a recent history of consensual sexual relations with someone doesn't grant a certain implied license, but not a lot of people are going to buy it.  I don't have the permission of my girlfriend to playfully smack her ass in public, but I do - do you think I should be charged with what is potentially a felony in my state if she subsequently didn't like her Christmas presents?

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:04 PM (r1OG3)

166 "Making love all night" really just means until the chafing starts or the spurs slip and rip a sheet.


Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:05 PM (vn4ta)

167 Never got why womens like faggitts.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 04:00 PM (SJ6/3)

They can share blow job tips.


Posted by: CUS at December 28, 2010 12:05 PM (wOGfT)

168 If she asked him to stop he should have. But a good rule of thumb for woman is don't sleep naked with a guy you just screwed if you don't expect him to have ... ideas.

Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 03:55 PM (TMB3S)

This!  I say it was a setup. 

Posted by: Tami at December 28, 2010 12:05 PM (VuLos)

169 Urgh, what a creeper. Reptiles and spiders aren't the only poisonous, disgusting things Australia exports, apparently.

I would be able to understand the guy thinking that because she consented once already, he was good to go--if he'd stopped when she said no, and if he hadn't uttered a line that makes me convinced he has a skin suit in his basement. But then, Assange reeks of ego, so I'm not surprised he kept going at it.

Posted by: Tungsten Monk at December 28, 2010 12:06 PM (8ihif)

170 ace should really know better than to let a post like this go w/out another one for over an hour and a half.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 28, 2010 12:06 PM (pLTLS)

171 Practice law in Sweden much?

No.  Nor does Ace nor any other identifiable member of the commentariat.  So - in that case - why are we here?

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:07 PM (r1OG3)

172 Assange makes the sheep and the herder nervous.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:07 PM (vn4ta)

173 I'm wearing you.


Posted by: Ewok Dancing Around In Fat Chick's Skin at December 28, 2010 12:07 PM (mHQ7T)

174 Assange was just mangling a Ron Burgundy quote with his little squinty-eyed punch-me face.

The real quote is "I want to be on you."

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:09 PM (vn4ta)

175 If he wanted to fuck me, he should have woken me up and come to me like a fucking man!

Posted by: Miss A at December 28, 2010 12:09 PM (djZfm)

176 When she asked him if he was wearing anything, he had allegedly said: "I am wearing you." Damn, if I was single I would so steal that line...

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:10 PM (tJjm/)

177 It's really a bad sign when women start asking a guy to put condoms on their strap-ons.

Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 12:11 PM (v/b3m)

178 "Never got why womens like faggitts."

I never got why any woman would love your average man. We smell funny, we grow hair in weird places, we love bacon, we love guns, we love football and we scratch ourselves in public and grow boogers the size of tomatoes.

Posted by: navybrat at December 28, 2010 12:11 PM (1rmJS)

179 Every kiss begins with K.

Posted by: That Annoying Kay Jewelry Jingle at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (WvXvd)

180 Whoopie Goldberg will be here any minute to explain the whole thing.

Posted by: SurferDoc at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (o3bYL)

181 He could probably fuck a hamster without waking it up.

Well, what fun would that be? The struggle makes my ass tickle.

Posted by: Richard Gere at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (mHQ7T)

182 I've been married or engaged now for the last 12 years. I didn't know they were even still making Swedish pussy.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (vn4ta)

183 I don't have the permission of my girlfriend to playfully smack her ass in public, but I do - do you think I should be charged with what is potentially a felony in my state if she subsequently didn't like her Christmas presents?

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:04 PM (r1OG3)

Depends on what you do if she says "stop that" and "no."  Do you think you have a common-law easement to her ass?  Or that your right to play outweighs her right to decide what physical contact is acceptable to her and when?

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (yY4uj)

184 the younger woman, Miss W, contacted Miss A and they realised he had been to bed with both of them in swift succession. They went to the police station together, apparently to seek advice. A policewoman who heard their stories is said to have suggested they could pursue criminal charges.

Note to self: Cancel trip to Sweden.

Posted by: Will Folks at December 28, 2010 12:12 PM (saRwI)

185

By law and common assent in Western countries, being actually married to a woman does not give a man the right to have sex with her without her consent to that specific instance of copulation. Yet Julian Assange feels heÂ’s being persecuted because he assumed that one act of consensual sex with a casual acquaintance gave him licence to have sex with her again anytime he wished without asking.

IsnÂ’t the belief that the Universe was created to accommodate oneÂ’s own individual desires called solipsism?

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:13 PM (yY4uj)

186 I really would like to say something smart and funny about this little dirt bag, but all I want is him dead. Does that make me shallow?

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 28, 2010 12:14 PM (0GFWk)

187 Damn it all, I'm starting to like the little effeminate little guy... I like the cut of his jib. And quite honestly: most of the Wikileaks actually show things that hurt the liberal cause than anyone else. Certainly NOTHING - of course - that would suggest Bush lied about Iraq, nothing to show "it's all about the oil," etc., but plenty of stuff showing Obama and liberals in Europe as duplicitous and easily showed around by crappy dictatorships like Syria. But just for the "I'm wearing you" crack... I vote we make him an honorary moron.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:14 PM (tJjm/)

188 Also, I hope this androgynous albino motherfucker is publicly assraped in the most violent and degrading manner imaginable by big sweaty lesbians with strap-ons in men's bodies serving time in a maximum security prison.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 28, 2010 03:24 PM (IoUF1)

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 12:17 PM (mHQ7T)

189
"Went to the drug store and nearly lost my life
There I saw my girlfriends, one and two
Standing there together, I knew I was in trouble
But I'm a clever guy I knew what to do..."

Posted by: SurferDoc at December 28, 2010 12:17 PM (o3bYL)

190

IsnÂ’t the belief that the Universe was created to accommodate oneÂ’s own individual desires called solipsism?

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 04:13 PM (yY4uj)

 

Yeah, whatever. 

Posted by: Bill Clinton at December 28, 2010 12:18 PM (v/b3m)

191 Depends on what you do if she says "stop that" and "no." Do you think you have a common-law easement to her ass? Or that your right to play outweighs her right to decide what physical contact is acceptable to her and when? Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 04:12 PM (yY4uj) Au contraire! She was asleep and therefore could not possibly have said "no"! Therefore, under the established Rohypnol etiquette, Assange was at worst guilty of a minor traffic offense (going the wrong way in a one-way zone). But I do think this idea of a common anal easement offers possibilities for the enterprising moron.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:19 PM (tJjm/)

192 Depends on what you do if she says "stop that" and "no."  Do you think you have a common-law easement to her ass?  Or that your right to play outweighs her right to decide what physical contact is acceptable to her and when?

I'll put to you a middle case - she says "stop that" and "no" while giggling and trying to ball tap me.  We make love that afternoon.  Can she rely upon the "stop that" and "no" to initiate a criminal prosecution three weeks later?  I suppose you would say yes, being the white knight that you are.

This shit is complicated and does not avail itself of easy, pre-fab, black-and-white answers like you and feminists are trying to posit. 

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:20 PM (r1OG3)

193 But just for the "I'm wearing you" crack... I vote we make him an honorary moron.

Nah. "30 more seconds and then you can get me a beer" would be a lot more honorarily moronic.

Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at December 28, 2010 12:20 PM (djZfm)

194 If this pasty fucknozzle is so hard up, doesn't this mean he'd be easy to assassinate? Just saying.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 12:21 PM (mHQ7T)

195

I like Occam's Razor in this case....

Is it more likely that two hardcore feminist harpies lied/stretched the truth because they were angry/scorned over finding out Asshat was a playa

or

They are telling the truth

I think I'll take the former. 

White Knighting about no means no aside. 

If being attacked and raped in a park is a 10 on the 1-10 rape scale, these charges, even if true are about a 3. And again, I don't believe it.

Would much prefer this scumbag be brought to justice the old fashioned way....the Russian way if you will.

Oh and the line, utter cheese/creepy....unless delivered by an alpha.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at December 28, 2010 12:21 PM (A0VTZ)

196 CNN says ex-Shell president says $5 gas by 2012.

Really going out on limb there.

Posted by: that guy that always thinks we're boned at December 28, 2010 12:22 PM (S5YRY)

197 I think our Moron Medal should have a motto on it.

What is Latin for Just The Tip?


Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:22 PM (vn4ta)

198

they need to stop calling this 'surprise sex'

with the exception of father's day, all sex is a surprise

and yes, i'm married (wedding cake = birth control)

Posted by: navycopjoe at December 28, 2010 12:22 PM (uIQK6)

199 If this pasty fucknozzle is so hard up, doesn't this mean he'd be easy to assassinate? Just saying. Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 04:21 PM (mHQ7T) Is that a hint?

Posted by: The Mossad at December 28, 2010 12:23 PM (0GFWk)

200 >>she says "stop that" and "no" while giggling and trying to ball tap me. We make love that afternoon Bow chicka wow wow. You needed a soundtrack.

Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 12:24 PM (TMB3S)

201 142 ...this is why I stick to hookers, you pay your money you get what you want, no problems for anyone.

"but it's disgusting paying for sex, only losers pay for sex"

Depends on the timing. If you fork over money beforehand, you are a loser who pays for sex. But if you pay after, you are just paying her to leave you alone. That's just good business, as long as she doesn't steal your watch.

Posted by: Charlie Sheen at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (2p0e3)

202 @213: Exactly. Besides - and I'm only semi-facetious - every male over the age of 16 knows bloody well there are times when girls will say no even as they're feeling you up and undoing your belt. I'm getting REALLY tired of the "No Means No" slogan as some sort of Panacea to the supposed problem of our "Rape Culture."

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (tJjm/)

203 Some guy reading Soldier of Fortune could take this Assange fuckwad out.

Ronny Barnhart could take Assange out.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (vn4ta)

204 If we outlaw Ninja sex then only Ninjas will have sex.

Posted by: humphreyrobot at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (EiH7n)

205

Julian's pimp hand is weak

This is actually true.  Dude probably didn't have much success with the ladies until he achieved his fame.  I'm sure he made these womyn each feel they were special...the only girl for him.  When they realized he was full of shit, out came the vindictiveness only a feminist can deliver.

If he had presented himself as a world class player, with many options he probably would have gotten the sex anyway without all the messy stuff afterward.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at December 28, 2010 12:25 PM (A0VTZ)

206 To make a finer point - who thinks waking up with the girl you had sex with the night before deftly mounting your morning wood, cowgirl, is rape?



Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:26 PM (r1OG3)

207 Iustus tip

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 12:26 PM (SJ6/3)

208 "but it's disgusting paying for sex, only losers pay for sex" How about paying for a movie and dinner for sex? Let's not be naive or overly judgmental. Personally, I think paying for sex is no less disgusting than having 10 different sex partners before age 30.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:26 PM (tJjm/)

209 I think, perhaps, dear Julian was just as surprised his dick was in her as she was.  I don't think he's really used to having sex with women.  It must have been a very confusing moment for him.

Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 12:27 PM (v/b3m)

210 "but it's disgusting paying for sex, only losers pay for sex"

How about paying for a movie and dinner for a chance to MAYBE have sex?

FTFY

Posted by: CUS at December 28, 2010 12:28 PM (wOGfT)

211 Heh. Payin for sex won the West. Saloon girls and pros built this nation.


Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:28 PM (vn4ta)

212 My new line for this situation?  Murum aries attigit, baby.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 12:29 PM (S5YRY)

213 How do you get a girl to stop having sex?

Marry her.

Posted by: SurferDoc at December 28, 2010 12:30 PM (o3bYL)

214 To make a finer point - who thinks waking up with the girl you had sex with the night before deftly mounting your morning wood, cowgirl, is rape?



Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:26 PM (r1OG3)

 

So you're speaking of the much feared "Helen Thomas moment".

Posted by: Soona at December 28, 2010 12:30 PM (v/b3m)

215 Exactly. Besides - and I'm only semi-facetious - every male over the age of 16 knows bloody well there are times when girls will say no even as they're feeling you up and undoing your belt. I'm getting REALLY tired of the "No Means No" slogan as some sort of Panacea to the supposed problem of our "Rape Culture."

My point exactly.  Do we know what Ms. A did as she is alleged to have asked Assange to quit?  Do we know that she wasn't intermittently passionately kissing him between her protests?  Did she attempt to push him off of her body?  Do we know if she lay stunned at the prospect of being raped, or whether she was in her previous night's pique of wild abandon?  
 

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:31 PM (r1OG3)

216 228 To make a finer point - who thinks waking up with the girl you had sex with the night before deftly mounting your morning wood, cowgirl, is rape? Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:26 PM (r1OG3) Yeah, I would feel SO violated... NOT. If a guy tried to make that stick in court, he'd be laughed out of town. But women are supposedly such a fragile, defenseless, sensitive, vulnerable little bitty things the reverse "leaves them scarred for life." Gimme a break. Let's be honest here: all this BS about "No Means No," signed consent forms, agonizing over what is and is not consent... ALL of this became necessary when many, many girls began to behave like tramps, beginning in High School with alcohol and on thru college and beyond. Tell me that isn't so with a straight face. WHAT exactly was that women doing, naked in bed with an utter stranger she met the night before? And how is THAT behavior and less "disgusting" than a straight forward business transaction between two consenting adults to perform a sex act?

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:33 PM (tJjm/)

217 I'll put to you a middle case - she says "stop that" and "no" while giggling and trying to ball tap me.  We make love that afternoon.  Can she rely upon the "stop that" and "no" to initiate a criminal prosecution three weeks later?  I suppose you would say yes, being the white knight that you are.

This shit is complicated and does not avail itself of easy, pre-fab, black-and-white answers like you and feminists are trying to posit. 

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:20 PM (r1OG3)

She says "stop that" and "no" while giggling and trying to ball tap you.  You assume, naturally, that she's interested in playing -- and then she says "stop that" and "no" without the giggles, and while trying to restrain your hand.  Do you have the right to disregard this second request to stop, given that she gave you a go-ahead moments before?  Do you have a perpetual and inalienable right to keep doing something to her if she consented to it once?

It's not black-and-white at all.  Sometimes "no" means "no," even if it follows "yes."

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:35 PM (yY4uj)

218 Do we know if she lay stunned at the prospect of being raped, or whether she was in her previous night's pique of wild abandon? Posted by: Alec Leamas What are you wearing?

Posted by: humphreyrobot at December 28, 2010 12:35 PM (EiH7n)

219

Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:31 PM (r1OG3)

Of course we don't know.  So we have to look at her verifiable actions afterwards.  Which includes hanging arround for a few more days.

Which kindda cuts against the whole "no means no."

Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 12:36 PM (QLhy5)

220 Au contraire! She was asleep and therefore could not possibly have said "no"! Therefore, under the established Rohypnol etiquette, Assange was at worst guilty of a minor traffic offense (going the wrong way in a one-way zone). But I do think this idea of a common anal easement offers possibilities for the enterprising moron.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 04:19 PM (tJjm/)

If his lawyer is worth his salt, he'll get the charges reduced to following too close.

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 12:37 PM (yY4uj)

221

I don't have the permission of my girlfriend to playfully smack her ass in public, but I do - do you think I should be charged with what is potentially a felony in my state if she subsequently didn't like her Christmas presents?

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:04 PM (r1OG3)

If your "Christmas presents" consisted of passed out fuckrapes, yes indeedy.

Asshole.

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 28, 2010 12:38 PM (7+pP9)

222

If your "Christmas presents" consisted of passed out fuckrapes, yes indeedy.

Is that a gift certificate you can get at "Best Buy" or "Good Vibrations?"

Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 12:40 PM (QLhy5)

223 I think you can get those coupons at Bed, Bath, and Beyond.

Posted by: sifty at December 28, 2010 12:40 PM (vn4ta)

224 245I think you can get those coupons at Bed, Bath, and Beyond.
That's pretty sweet.  But I'm gonna check Amazon.com first.  No face to face contact is a real selling point for a product like this...

Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 12:43 PM (QLhy5)

225 If your "Christmas presents" consisted of passed out fuckrapes, yes indeedy.

Asshole.

Yeah, sorry if I don't stand four square behind sending someone to prison for thirty years because "It's a lady's prerogative" and all.

No more gray area in human sexual behavior - Ed Anger has reduced it all to a simple binary formula.  Have the Nobel people called yet?


Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:46 PM (r1OG3)

226 Sounds like "he said she said", BULLSHIT.

Pissed off sluts are hard to handle.

Posted by: Kemp at December 28, 2010 12:46 PM (JpFM9)

227 He must have not had enough change left for the encore.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 28, 2010 12:48 PM (SJ6/3)

228 It's not black-and-white at all.  Sometimes "no" means "no," even if it follows "yes."

That's fine.  The question isn't whether Assange is a swell fellow or properly chivalrous, it is whether he deserves to be deprived of his liberty based on evidence of a morass of "nos," "yesses," "maybes" and subsequent behavior by the accuser which is, at best, confusing in light of her allegations. 

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 12:49 PM (r1OG3)

229 Sorry, but my bottom line on the whole " date rape" subject is, If we have to have Sophist- like debates about "But is she said," and "...she wanted sex before, but then," and "she taled with her girlfriend and decided she was raped," then we're talking about two copulating bimbos, not rape by any meaningful definition of the word.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:49 PM (tJjm/)

230 Yeah, sorry if I don't stand four square behind sending someone to prison for thirty years because "It's a lady's prerogative" and all.

Friends, friends.  Don't lose sight of who we're walking about here.  I want Assange dead.  Sending him to prison on a trumped up rape charge might be a necessary backstop. 

Let's not overgeneralize this to real people.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 12:50 PM (S5YRY)

231 or talking about

either or

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 12:51 PM (S5YRY)

232 Dont! Stop! Don't Stop! Frickin' broads.

Posted by: Pecos Bill at December 28, 2010 12:54 PM (j84s0)

233 In most states, after you start fucking, you can not change your mind in mid stroke and tell a guy to stop.  Sex that starts as consensual, can not be turned into rape.

A bitch who has already fucked a guy and is sleeping with him naked, would have no standing in the US to cry rape.

Just the facts.

Sluts are sluts.  The bitch paid for the asshole's train fare to come to her house.  Maybe he should be tried as a gigolo? He took money to fuck her.

Posted by: Kemp at December 28, 2010 12:54 PM (JpFM9)

234 @251: and I would say, NO, he does not. Rape is FORCED sexual penetration, either with violence or the threat of violence. I'm sorry, but if you get naked with a stranger all do like a wild kangaroo all night only to wake up and find the kangaroo came back for a little more... It's an INSULT to a real rape victim to pretend like you were. Honestly, WHO CARES? If you're so upset about it - don't be a tramp next time. How's THAT for a no-nonsense, cold-hearted and judgmental verdict?

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 12:55 PM (tJjm/)

235

Friends, friends.  Don't lose sight of who we're walking about here.

This is either the best typo of all time.  Or evidence of some sick "furry" role playing shit.

Eitherway, it fits in with this blog.

Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 12:55 PM (QLhy5)

236 wild kangaroo

To the Urban Dictionary!

Posted by: toby928™ at December 28, 2010 12:58 PM (S5YRY)

237 No? No? I'm out fiddy dollahs for that dinna I trew down your troat, sweethaht! No my ass! Little Andrew's standin' up for you, honey!

Posted by: Andrew "Dice" Clay at December 28, 2010 12:58 PM (j84s0)

238 "235 How do you get a girl to stop having sex? Marry her." I Do Means No, Baby!

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 01:00 PM (tJjm/)

239 Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 04:55 PM (tJjm/)

Our white knights have apparently given no thought to how an accused would defend accusations of "withdrawn consent mid-stroke" nor all the little acts of sexual assault they commit daily without the expressed, notarized consent of their fair ladies. 

The Duke lacrosse boys got lucky that the bitch was stupid and gave unnecessary and conflicting details that got them off the hook, albeit after hundreds of thousands of Dollars in attorney's fees.


Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:00 PM (r1OG3)

240 See, this whole "withdrew consent mid-stroke" argument illustrates what I'm talking about. Imagine some poor woman beaten into submission, or drugged without her knowledge. Isn't it a total insult to these real victims when some bimbo decides that the perfect stranger she allowed to enter her didn't "vacate the premises" quite as soon as she wanted? I mean, where's the trauma of a real victim? Where's the COMMON SENSE?

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 01:10 PM (tJjm/)

241 @ CoolCzech and Alec Leamas:
You're the only two on this entire message board who have enough sack to say you're not drinking the feminist "it's rape when WE say it's rape, common sense be damned" kool-aid. The rest of you, keep putting the precious snowflakes on a pedestal and hand over every legal right you have...tell me how that works out for ya in the long run.

Posted by: wuzrobbd at December 28, 2010 01:15 PM (dZxtH)

242 Where's the COMMON SENSE?

We don't need common sense, reason, or the benefit of a few thousand years of human experience and law. 

We have a slogan, which is "No means no." 

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:16 PM (r1OG3)

243 That's fine.  The question isn't whether Assange is a swell fellow or properly chivalrous, it is whether he deserves to be deprived of his liberty based on evidence of a morass of "nos," "yesses," "maybes" and subsequent behavior by the accuser which is, at best, confusing in light of her allegations. 

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:49 PM (r1OG3)

Well, maybe he should go to Sweden and allow its legal system to determine what's at the bottom of that morass.  You seem to be claiming perfect knowledge of the circumstances and events and declaring that there is no way that Assange could possibly have committed the crime of rape under Swedish law.  Do you know something the rest of the world doesn't, other that how your girlfriend behaves?

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 01:22 PM (yY4uj)

244 You're the only two on this entire message board who have enough sack to say you're not drinking the feminist "it's rape when WE say it's rape, common sense be damned" kool-aid.

One of my best friends in college took a co-ed home (to a house that she rented with other sorority sisters) from a bar. She supplied E, which they both took.  They swam together naked in the house's pool in full view by her friends.  They had sex.  She had a boyfriend back home.  She told everyone whom he knew that he was a rapist and was considering reporting the matter to Law Enforcement.  Luckily, she did not, but he sweated it out for a few months where it could have gone either way.  It was not fun for him, to say the least.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:22 PM (r1OG3)

245 Well, maybe he should go to Sweden and allow its legal system to determine what's at the bottom of that morass.  You seem to be claiming perfect knowledge of the circumstances and events and declaring that there is no way that Assange could possibly have committed the crime of rape under Swedish law.  Do you know something the rest of the world doesn't, other that how your girlfriend behaves?

Do you apply your "Sweedish Legal Expert" standard to this?:

...but the second woman claims she specifically told him to stop after she awoke to find him on top of her, and he didn't. So, he hadn't had consent -- I guess a sort of implied consent in his mind, but not actual consent -- and even if you give him a pass on that, that non-consent was followed up with an affirmative denial of consent. But he kept going and, um, "finished up," despite that.

Maybe some date-rape charges are a bit grey-area, but this charge doesn't seem gray-area, if true. It sounds like rape.

Or only to the statements with which you disagree?  I was under the impression that your "No means no" slogan - to which so much that I have written was in reply - was to be applied to the United States as well - am I missing something?

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:25 PM (r1OG3)

246 To make a finer point - who thinks waking up with the girl you had sex with the night before deftly mounting your morning wood, cowgirl, is rape?

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 04:26 PM (r1OG3)

As Joanie pointed out, who thinks that waking up with the girl you had sex with the night before deftly penetrating you from behind with her strap-on is rape?

Trick question -- we all know you can't rape someone who went to bed with you voluntarily.

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 01:28 PM (yY4uj)

247

As Joanie pointed out, who thinks that waking up with the girl you had sex with the night before deftly penetrating you from behind with her strap-on is rape?

Trick question -- we all know you can't rape someone who went to bed with you voluntarily.

If she ass-banged you with a strap-on the night before when you loved it and then you lovingly made her french toast, chances are it's "not rape." 

You might want to brush all of that straw off your shoulder there, Lancelot.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:35 PM (r1OG3)

248

"Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism," he said. "I fell into a hornets' nest of revolutionary feminism."

Back it up, back it up, beep beep beep.

What the hell does that mean? When people say that Arizona is the Saudi Arabia of solar energy, they're talking about an alternative to oil, which is what Saudi Arabia is primarily known for. So I get that.

But "the Saudi Arabia of feminism"?

Is Sweden's attitude progressive towards women and women's rights like Saudi Arabia is? (No, that can't be it.)

Are Swedish women covered in oil? And by that I man oil oil? How would the clean-up efforts go? Do volunteers pick them up off the beach and wash them off with dish soap under a gentle spary of water? (Still sounds nasty.)

Or is feminism as abundant in Sweden as oil is in Saudi Arabia? That's probably what he meant, but it's a horrible analogy.

Alas, he's a hero in some circles so I might as well embrace the turn of phrase, keeping in mind that Jordan doesn't have any oil:

Julian Assange is the Jordan of conscience.

Posted by: FireHorse at December 28, 2010 01:39 PM (sWynj)

249 If you fall asleep next to me naked, you might as well be wearing a sign that says "Party in My Ass". Amiright!?

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 01:40 PM (wd0Iq)

250 I think the point that I'm trying to make together with CoolCzech is that there is certain behavior in the sexual realm that is caddish, impolite, inconsiderate, dishonorable, and ignoble, but not rape.  There are also situations in which the application of the standard set forth by stueic et al. should not be enforced in a reasonable society because of the likelihood of unilateral or mutual mistake and the difficulty of proofs upon which we should not deprive a man of his liberty for upwards of thirty years.

You may carry on accusing me of being a "rape apologist," but you might want to defer to the masterful work of Amynda Marcotte on the subject.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:41 PM (r1OG3)

251 *Trick question -- we all know you can't rape someone who went to bed with you voluntarily.   stuiec*

as long as there is an absence of any clear and compelling corroborating physical evidence in support of the claim...yeah. You're finally startin' get it, son.

Posted by: wuzrobbd at December 28, 2010 01:45 PM (dZxtH)

252 If you fall asleep next to me naked, you might as well be wearing a sign that says "Party in My Ass". Amiright!?

To complete the analogy, wouldn't it depend upon whether the person invited to to penetrate his or her ass in the past, from which you could derive the notion that he or she generally finds ass penetration pleasurable?  Doesn't it depend upon the fact that you have a relationship with that person (or not)?  How about the reaction (positive or negative) that he or she expressed the last time that you tried the assplay?  You know, what the kids these days call "context."

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:46 PM (r1OG3)

253

By the way, to answer the above question: Yes, one can commit rape, regardless of recent, consensual sex between the (now) victim and (now) rapist.

If I read this right ...

She says they had consensual sex but she woke up the next morning to find him having intercourse with her to which she had not consented.

... he started having sex with her while she was asleep. Not sexual stuff, but actual sex-sex. That's beyond creepy.

(Thirty years' worth of creepy? Maybe. Let a court figure it out.)

Posted by: FireHorse at December 28, 2010 01:50 PM (sWynj)

254

I think by the "Saudi Arabia" comment he was trying to imply that Sweden is the inverse of SA...kinda like the bearded Spock or something, but with feminists, or something.

I fail to see how you can rape somebody you had consensual sex with a few short hours before -- I thought it was just sorta common sense that people who have done the boing boing once, might be up for another go in a few hours -- an agreed upon double header if you will.  Then again, I fail to see how a woman can be that sleepy that she wouldn't have woke up immediately when, you know, a somebody came rapping at the chamber door (dang, that doesn't say much for old Julie there does it?).

Nonetheless, if it causes Jazz Hands grief I'm all for it (God knows dear leader isn't going to do any grief causing to be done).

Posted by: unknown jane at December 28, 2010 01:54 PM (5/yRG)

255 By the way, to answer the above question: Yes, one can commit rape, regardless of recent, consensual sex between the (now) victim and (now) rapist.

I don't think that anyone said that a recent sexual partner cannot rape the other, only that not having the expressed, verbal consent of a woman does not equal rape.  (see 109)  Further, that confusing circumstances warrant leniency, rather than the strict application of "no means no."  If a woman is naked and in bed with a naked man with which she has recently previously had sex, subsequent allegations of rape are particularly suspect and worthy of particular scrutiny and skepticism, as the incident is likely to be the result of a unilateral or mutual mistake or miscommunication, for which a man should not pay with his liberty on the order of thirty years.  Lastly, that women can and do verbalize their lack of consent or withdrawal of consent while physically acting in a contrary manner.   

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 01:58 PM (r1OG3)

256

Then again, I fail to see how a woman can be that sleepy that she wouldn't have woke up immediately when, you know, a somebody came rapping at the chamber door (dang, that doesn't say much for old Julie there does it?).

I don't know. He might be pretty skilled at alternative bartending.

Posted by: FireHorse at December 28, 2010 01:59 PM (sWynj)

257 Then again, I fail to see how a woman can be that sleepy that she wouldn't have woke up immediately when, you know, a somebody came rapping at the chamber door (dang, that doesn't say much for old Julie there does it?).

Appears to the application of experience and reason to the issue.  Haven't you ever heard that "no means no?"

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 02:01 PM (r1OG3)

258 Joanie, that is a dumbassed argument you're making. The issue is can i go and charge you with rape when i LET you do the very thing the night before?  How can I prove this happened? What evidence, dear? Just my say so? Why should an impartial person believe me over you? The answer is: they shouldn't! I have nothing to support my claim.

Posted by: wuzrobbd at December 28, 2010 02:02 PM (dZxtH)

259 Joanie, that is a dumbassed argument you're making. The issue is can i go and charge you with rape when i LET you do the very thing the night before?  How can I prove this happened? What evidence, dear? Just my say so? Why should an impartial person believe me over you? The answer is: they shouldn't! I have nothing to support my claim.



It's possible, but highly improbable.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 02:07 PM (r1OG3)

260 Alec, how 'bout this rule? Get some kind of response from a woman before you penetrate her. Is that really a lot to ask? Too much work to wake them up first?

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:08 PM (wd0Iq)

261

Alec @ 278: I get that -- all of it.

But if they did it not that long before, then he already knows how strict she'd be about condoms. And if she's asleep, then putting one on wouldn't exactly ruin the moment for her. By his own account, he got sex from her that he most likely knew she was unwilling to give him.

I don't know what the laws are about such stuff in Sweden, but that'd be the standard.

(And I'll bet he's wishing by now that he did it with her in Saudi Arabia. She'd have already been executed.)

Posted by: FireHorse at December 28, 2010 02:08 PM (sWynj)

262 wuzrobbd, I was responding to the people who said if you fall asleep naked next to a man, morning penetration should be expected, not reason for a second greenlight.

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:10 PM (wd0Iq)

263 273 I think the point that I'm trying to make together with CoolCzech is that there is certain behavior in the sexual realm that is caddish, impolite, inconsiderate, dishonorable, and ignoble, but not rape. Sex is one kind of human activity. There are many other kinds, too. If you promise a girl the coffee you give her is decaf but its really regular, you're a jerk - but you're not a rapist. If you spend all night screwing a girl and go back for seconds or thirds or teens in the morning while she's asleep... you are a jerk. But you're not a rapist. It's silly to pretend otherwise, and again - really a denigration of the trauma suffered by TRUE rape victims.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:12 PM (tJjm/)

264 Alec, how 'bout this rule? Get some kind of response from a woman before you penetrate her. Is that really a lot to ask? Too much work to wake them up first?

'Tis a fine rule!  Tug on her bodice first - chivalrous indeed!  I just don't think it is necessarily the standard of what constitutes rape. 

And I think we're all suspending disbelief when we pretend that she was in deep REM sleep, laying like a dead fish for the first two minutes of the morning coetus. 
 

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 02:14 PM (r1OG3)

265 And if she's asleep, then putting one on wouldn't exactly ruin the moment for her. By his own account, he got sex from her that he most likely knew she was unwilling to give him. I can't help thinking... somehow, the Poor Thing got over it and was busily screwing some other guy by next week. There is no real victimhood here, hence no real rape. This is silly.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:14 PM (tJjm/)

266 Julian, baby--- Your technique sucks. Call me, I'll give you a few pointers.

Posted by: Charlie Sheen at December 28, 2010 02:15 PM (le5qc)

267 @287: pretending she somehow didn't awake when he pulled the blanket off of her, rolled her over on her back, spread her legs, mounted her, and penetrated her makes the whole "rape" scenario even sillier.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:16 PM (tJjm/)

268 Good Lord, so if tomorrow morning I try to screw my wife while she's asleep I'm actually a rapist? I don't know what the people that say these things are on, but I wish I could get some. Sounds like pretty good shit.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:18 PM (tJjm/)

269 39 Europeons This spelling I am so stealing

Posted by: Asscheeks of Saturn at December 28, 2010 02:18 PM (le5qc)

270 " I just don't think it is necessarily the standard of what constitutes rape. " No, I don't think it's rape-rape. I just can't believe how many of you think it's perfectly okay to fuck someone who's asleep without trying to wake them up first. I just think it's sick. That's all!

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:18 PM (wd0Iq)

271 No, I don't think it's rape-rape. I just can't believe how many of you think it's perfectly okay to fuck someone who's asleep without trying to wake them up first. I just think it's sick. That's all!

I think it's in bad form as well - on that we agree.  I just don't think it's "thirty years in state penitentiary" rape.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 02:20 PM (r1OG3)

272 Neither do I, Alec. 30 years is ridiculous. Just do what I would do and kick him in the dick!

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:23 PM (wd0Iq)

273 "...but the second woman claims she specifically told him to stop after she awoke to find him on top of her, and he didn't."

That is NOT what the article you linked to says! Nor is it stated in any account I've read anywhere of this allegation. Your link says "she woke up the next morning to find him having intercourse with her to which she had not consented." Meaning: she was asleep when it began and thus could not possibly have consented. It does NOT say she subsequently objected!!!

If people can't or won't read carefully, and stick to the facts of what is actually alleged, then it's pretty ridiculous to even be writing commentary about it.

The most detailed account in the Guardian (dec 17 article, referencing the leaked police report) was that she "couldn't be bothered" to remind him of her condom rule. IOW she made no objection to what he was doing once she awoke, instead just said "you better not have HIV." IOW she had a condom preference, not a condom rule. And yet she's so paranoid about HIV she's going to the police about it? What is wrong with this picture? The point is not to "blame" but how to effect positive outcomes. If you are that paranoid about HIV but still inclined to have casual sex, and yet 'cant be bothered' to object to a guy getting ready to unload sans condom and enforce your requirement otherwise, something's wrong with the female end of the equation, regardless of what's wrong on the male side.

If women think they can solve this sort of problem by running to the police after the fact (she might already have HIV at that point!), rather than learning how to assert themselves in the moment, they are damn fools. My friends and I learned this by the time we left college after dealing with countless creeps. It really wasn't that complicated.

Posted by: Lqw at December 28, 2010 02:36 PM (Er/Lh)

274 Good God, Joanie, you act like fucking somebody is punishing them.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 02:39 PM (tJjm/)

275 I think the point that I'm trying to make together with CoolCzech is that there is certain behavior in the sexual realm that is caddish, impolite, inconsiderate, dishonorable, and ignoble, but not rape.  There are also situations in which the application of the standard set forth by stueic et al. should not be enforced in a reasonable society because of the likelihood of unilateral or mutual mistake and the difficulty of proofs upon which we should not deprive a man of his liberty for upwards of thirty years.

You may carry on accusing me of being a "rape apologist," but you might want to defer to the masterful work of Amynda Marcotte on the subject.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 05:41 PM (r1OG3)

I think you're not allowing that Sweden has laws that define what constitute rape in that country's system of justice.  I think you're arguing that the Swedes have no right to set their own standard, which in fact may make Assange's behavior illegal in that country.  I think you are arguing that since you don't think Assange was anything more than inconsiderate, he ought to be allowed to thumb his nose at Swedish law.

I think the Swedish authorities believe that there is probable cause under their law to issue a warrant for his arrest to face charges.  I think he ought to surrender himself to the Swedish authorities, face his accusers and plead his case in court.  Or do you agree with Assange that Sweden is the kind of place where he can't get a fair trial and none of his rights will be respected?

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 02:50 PM (yY4uj)

276 113 Unless he specifically asked her if he could fuck her while she was sleeping (and she said yes), it was rape.  End of discussion.

Really?  I didn't think anybody bought that Antioch College bullshit anymore, but  .  .  .

In my state at least, the law is even stricter than that -- "advance consent" is not recognized.  If you fuck someone who's asleep, even if she told you beforehand that you could, it's still rape in the eyes of the law.

Posted by: Alex at December 28, 2010 02:50 PM (/yzYn)

277 CoolCzech, what are you talking about? Just wake the person up first, jeez.

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 02:51 PM (wd0Iq)

278 Do you apply your "Sweedish Legal Expert" standard to this?:

...but the second woman claims she specifically told him to stop after she awoke to find him on top of her, and he didn't. So, he hadn't had consent -- I guess a sort of implied consent in his mind, but not actual consent -- and even if you give him a pass on that, that non-consent was followed up with an affirmative denial of consent. But he kept going and, um, "finished up," despite that.

Maybe some date-rape charges are a bit grey-area, but this charge doesn't seem gray-area, if true. It sounds like rape.

Or only to the statements with which you disagree?  I was under the impression that your "No means no" slogan - to which so much that I have written was in reply - was to be applied to the United States as well - am I missing something?

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 05:25 PM (r1OG3)

I'm sorry -- I just saw this and I can't make heads or tails out of it.  First, you're not quoting me, you're quoting Ace, so why are you asking me about it?

Second, the incident Ace describes sounds like a clearer instance of a woman saying "no" to a guy who started screwing her without asking -- that is, unambiguously telling him to stop, and him refusing to do so.  Does that sound merely unchivalrous to you?  Or are you really saying that a woman saying "yes" gives her bed partner a blanket all-access pass for as long as he stays in her room?

Third, whether that incident constitutes rape in Sweden is for the Swedish courts to decide.  Assange ought to make himself available to answer the charges stemming from that incident.  Do you disagree?

Posted by: stuiec at December 28, 2010 03:01 PM (yY4uj)

279

I'm sorry -- I just saw this and I can't make heads or tails out of it.  First, you're not quoting me, you're quoting Ace, so why are you asking me about it?

Second, the incident Ace describes sounds like a clearer instance of a woman saying "no" to a guy who started screwing her without asking -- that is, unambiguously telling him to stop, and him refusing to do so.  Does that sound merely unchivalrous to you?  Or are you really saying that a woman saying "yes" gives her bed partner a blanket all-access pass for as long as he stays in her room?

Third, whether that incident constitutes rape in Sweden is for the Swedish courts to decide.  Assange ought to make himself available to answer the charges stemming from that incident.  Do you disagree?

Ace doesn't practice law in Sweeden, however he gave a legal opinion regarding what would constitute rape.  You didn't cite Ace's lack of Swedish legal bona fides, yet you did for me.

I think we're all just spitballing because no one here is learned in Swedish rape law, and many of us would find Swedish rape law at odds with good sense, reason, and a bunch of other stuff.  I don't doubt that Sweden has the right to enact its Orwellian rape laws, however I get to criticize them here and comment on others' comments which seem to misstate U.S. rape law or agitate for similar standards in the U.S.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 03:15 PM (r1OG3)

280 If both women were spending money on him the next day it wasn't "rape".  The accusations are a disgrace to actual rape victims.

Of course...  it couldn't happen to a less sympathetic P.O.S. and I hope he ends up in prison learning who is going to wear an Assange.

Posted by: DANEgerus at December 28, 2010 03:40 PM (e3/KR)

281 Second, the incident Ace describes sounds like a clearer instance of a woman saying "no" to a guy who started screwing her without asking -- that is, unambiguously telling him to stop, and him refusing to do so.  Does that sound merely unchivalrous to you?  Or are you really saying that a woman saying "yes" gives her bed partner a blanket all-access pass for as long as he stays in her room?

My objection was to the statement made up thread that you can't have sex with a woman who doesn't give her express, verbal consent.  Consent can be given in a number of ways, and by silence.  I do have a problem with the idea that a woman can withdraw consent while in the act of coetus and claim that a rape has occurred if the man does not pull out in the very instant.  I think that prior sexual partners, while naked in bed together, have a certain license to initiate conduct that between strangers and out of this context could be construed as assault.  And I think that "no" means "no" if and only if a woman's behavior conforms with her verbal statement.

Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 28, 2010 03:43 PM (r1OG3)

282

280  Well I have heard of it -- and thought it was a pretty foolish thing for a woman to engage in (this speaking as a woman).  If you want "no" to mean "no"...don't go home with the guy, or take him home, or jump in the sack with him.  Men might get the idea that "no" really means "no for right now...but if you try and charm me I just might say yes" -- let's help them out by making it clear.  That also goes for if it was "yes" at 11 pm. but you really feel like "no" by 5 am the next day -- just go home or ask the fellow to leave -- otherwise they might get the mistaken notion that "yes" applied for the morning as well.  And if "yes" only applied for protected sex...then if he tries anything shady like this you punch him in the nuts and say "hey asshole, I didn't give you bareback priviledges...now get the frak out because I'm feeling kinda 'no' now".

Better yet, try your best not to sleep with slimy assholes, so you never wind up in that sort of quandary.

From what I'm gathering, she went ahead and did the deed...the time for being a bit more proactive should have been when she discovered him on top of her (and I still can't see how you wouldn't wake up before a guy got really far -- unless you're drugged or something).  Now, if she was drugged or intoxicated, that might be a different story -- but didn't this chick buy him breakfast or something?  I've never heard of rape victims taking their rapists out for coffee after the fact.

Posted by: unknown jane at December 28, 2010 03:53 PM (5/yRG)

283 >>If you fall asleep next to me naked, you might as well be wearing a sign that says "Party in My Ass". Amiright!? Depends. Did the guy who fell asleep next to you naked let you fuck him in the ass with your strap on the night before? If yes, proceed until he says no. If no, don't until you ask permission. How is this even a question and what the fuck is so confusing? We all know the rules even if we don't always like them and they make are balls bluer than blue or your vagina dry. If you are sleeping next to a woman/guy you had sex with the night before you have a reasonable expectation you can do it again the next day ... until she/he says no. It doesn't matter if you are in Sweden or Uranus or his anus. These are the rules. There is no grey area. End of story.

Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 04:18 PM (TMB3S)

284 JackStraw, comment number 300 is for you too.

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 28, 2010 04:34 PM (wd0Iq)

285 Joanie- As it is highly unlikely that any woman could sleep through a man: 1. climbing on top of her 2. penetrating her without her waking up first unless she was drugged or dead I call bullshit on the story. No human sleeps that soundly and without being too graphic, just not possible. So the bigger question is does either a guy or a girl have a reasonable expectation that they can initiate intercourse when they had sex hours before without asking. I say yes. I guess you say no. I think we both agree that when either party says no it means stop and that's all that really matters in this case as the woman has stated she only cared about whether or not he was wearing a condom not whether or not he screwing her. Again. For the second time in a few hours. So whats the issue?

Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 04:48 PM (TMB3S)

286 As it is highly unlikely that any woman could sleep through a man:

1. climbing on top of her

Get fucking real. How many people sleep lightly so at to guard against this scenario? The penetration is what she says woke her up.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 07:00 PM (mHQ7T)

287 pretending she somehow didn't awake when he pulled the blanket off of her, rolled her over on her back, spread her legs, mounted her, and penetrated her makes the whole "rape" scenario even sillier.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 28, 2010 06:16 PM (tJjm/)

Maybe they were "snuggling" under the blankets all drunk from the night before with their limbs tangled together, and she realized that's not a finger.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 07:05 PM (mHQ7T)

288 A bitch who has already fucked a guy and is sleeping with him naked, would have no standing in the US to cry rape.

You would, if he might have passed on an STD to you after you asked for a condom the time you consented.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 07:09 PM (mHQ7T)

289 >>Get fucking real. How many people sleep lightly so at to guard against this scenario? The penetration is what she says woke her up. The defense rests. Asshat is going to walk on the rape charge.

Posted by: JackStraw at December 28, 2010 07:49 PM (TMB3S)

290

Ummm.... is it rape if I'm asleep in bed and my wife/girlfriend/fuck partner gives me a blow job with out waking me up to ask permission first?

Because it sounds like some people seem like this is rape/forcible oral copulation/whatever.

I mean, I really, really liked it at the times it was happening.  To the point of a happy ending.

But now I realize I was a victim...

Posted by: ed at December 28, 2010 09:02 PM (QLhy5)

291 The Christmas day is coming, our asics shoes online store are wholesale the asics kayano at the discount. welcome to enjoy many kinds of fashion and newest Onitsuka Tiger Mexico.

Posted by: asics shoes at December 28, 2010 10:53 PM (Uw8og)

292

"Maybe they were "snuggling" under the blankets all drunk from the night before with their limbs tangled together, and she realized that's not a finger."

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 28, 2010 11:05 PM (mHQ7T)


I'm sure the poor thing is traumatized for ever more!

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 29, 2010 05:22 AM (tJjm/)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
236kb generated in CPU 0.14, elapsed 0.2883 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2486 seconds, 420 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.