April 09, 2010
— DrewM

Just breaking.
Not really a surprise after the interviews he gave recently.
Midterms just got more interesting, if that were possible. Do Obama go for the upfront, honest ultra liberal he and the left want or does he need to go for another stealth, pretend moderate like Sotomayor?
Early guess...he goes for broke.
From FNC.
The leading candidates to replace Stevens are Solicitor General Elena Kagan, 49, and federal appellate Judges Merrick Garland, 57, and Diane Wood, 59.Stevens' departure will not change the court's conservative-liberal split because Obama is certain to name a liberal-leaning replacement. But the new justice is not likely to be able to match Stevens' ability to marshal narrow majorities in big cases.
Stevens was able to draw the support of the court's swing votes, now-retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Justice Anthony Kennedy, to rein in or block some Bush administration policies, including the detention of suspected terrorists following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, its tilt toward protecting businesses from some lawsuits and its refusal to act against global warming.
Thanks to tmi3rd for the heads up.
Update [Slublog] - As has been pointed out in the comments, politically speaking, the timing couldn't be worse for the Democrats. Via RCP, here are the lean and toss up races for the Senate:

Look at this PPP roundup of senate polls, post health care vote. Things haven't improved for the Democrats.
Stevens will retire in late June or early July. Obama will name a successor after that and then the fight begins. I fully expect Obama to go full-liberal and pick a hard lefty for the post. If the fight continues until late August or even into September, Bennet and Specter are going to have to choose between further ticking off the electorate and displeasing The One.
Independent voters in the states with an open seat are going to see the party in power once again going full left with another vote, which may increase their desire for a divided government. So a lot of them will decide to take a chance on the Republican candidate for that seat. As an added bonus, imagine what Ben Nelson must be thinking. Sure, he isn't up for election until 2012, but he's got to be wondering if confirming Obama's nominee is worth further irritating his already angry constituents.
If this weren't so serious, I'd be enjoying how unpleasant life is going to be for Senate Democrats much more.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:36 AM
| Comments (292)
Post contains 414 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 09, 2010 06:39 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: David in San Diego at April 09, 2010 06:39 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:39 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:39 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Fortunate Son at April 09, 2010 06:40 AM (trlZM)
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:40 AM (wuv1c)
And now you know why I am no longer going to be doing my show anymore. I won't have time
Supreme Justice Oprah Winfrey........
Yes, I quite like the sound of that.......
Posted by: Oprah Winfrey at April 09, 2010 06:40 AM (IHbof)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 09, 2010 06:41 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: John Galt at April 09, 2010 06:41 AM (F/4zf)
What's the timeframe we'e looking at here?
Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 09, 2010 06:42 AM (U37Ux)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 09, 2010 06:42 AM (SB0V2)
As much as I disliked Stevens interpretation of the constitution I fear Mugabe is going to pick someone much much worse.
Posted by: John Galt at April 09, 2010 10:41 AM (F/4zf)
Oh, you can bet on it.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (t72+4)
can someone explain something to me.
Why is it when a Democrat picks a nominee, there is never a concern that the nominee might become a rightie, however when a republican names someone to the court, there is always a 25 percent chance that person becomes a lefty.
Actually, in hindsight that was probably George Bush's greatest accomplishment, getting two guaranteed conservatives on the court whose loyalty isn't in question.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (wuv1c)
Dam I can't keep from laughing when I say that Rahm.
Posted by: Barak Obami at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Noam Chomsky at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Widespread Panic at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (8/DeP)
Let the fun begin! If the Repubs have any sense, they'll stand up and do to The Vapid One's™ nominee what was done to Robert Bork and get all teddy Kennedy on their asses.
It's time to really be obstructionists. Pull out all the stops, no apologies, no bullshit. Dig up every little piece of dirt they can find. Do.Not. Give. In.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 09, 2010 06:44 AM (i3AsK)
Seems unlikely, he'd be nominated for the Supreme Court,
doesn't it?
Posted by: franksalterego at April 09, 2010 06:44 AM (+6fgE)
oh I really really hope they nominate Liu! that would be very very interesting. . . he's not "untouchable" like some, and not warm-and-fuzzy like the Senora . . .
oh please please nominate Liu! it's not like it matters. they're not going to nominate anyone with any sense in their heads no matter what.
he's of chinese heritage, so if you attack him you are a racist.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:44 AM (wuv1c)
This circus has the potential to take up headlines from now until a vote is finally taken in possibly August or September, which will be at the beginning of the stretch run for election season.
If Obama wanted to guarantee that the Senate flipped in this upcoming election, he just may have found a way to do it.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 09, 2010 06:45 AM (S/HSv)
Maybe Obama will appoint himself. Right now, I am thinking I would take that deal.
Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 10:43 AM (V9SYy)
Oh, hell no. We'll be rid of Obama come January of 2013. He gets the SCOTUS appointment for life or when he chooses to retire.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:45 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 06:46 AM (AZGON)
i think he will get whoever he wants. Between McCain, Graham, the Maine sisters and Scott Brown, they won't have the 41 to filibuster.
Also, i think Obama will name an extreme lefty. He went with the "moderate" Sotomayor first, now he will go full on.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:46 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:46 AM (mR7mk)
Not to mention Mallamutt that would give us President Biden and Vice President Pelosi.
Ack ! I just threw up a little in my mouth when I typed that.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:47 AM (t72+4)
Do[es] Obama go for the upfront, honest ultra liberal he and the left want or does he need to go for another stealth, pretend moderate like Sotomayor?
Well, I'm sure he'll continue the tradition of nominating someone who lies, evades, forgets 2/3s of the questions, or and cheats on his/her taxes.
Posted by: Mama AJ at April 09, 2010 06:49 AM (XdlcF)
#32 I want to put my $5 on FKOTUS, but I need to know the odds.
You beat me to it, dang! Chalk up another snark victory for the dirt-stealing Radish.
Could Hillary be nominated? Barrack gets rid of a potential challenge if things are chaotic in 2012.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 06:49 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 09, 2010 06:49 AM (tf9Ne)
including the detention of suspected terrorists following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, its tilt toward protecting businesses from some lawsuits and its refusal to act against global warming
look, i get the first two. They are legitimate constitutional issues, but what does refusing to act on global warming have to do with anything? Where is that in the constitution? When did it become to courts place to force the legislature to ...well.. legislate.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:49 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: real joe at April 09, 2010 06:50 AM (WjerO)
Posted by: eman at April 09, 2010 06:50 AM (QZA9F)
Blazer- you really think anyone Obama appoints isn't going to be a hard core lefty? Plus, 2 1/2 years of Slow Joe could be kinda, what is the word I am looking for, amusing.
But, I guess I should have put the sarc. tag on that one.
Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 10:47 AM (V9SYy)
Sure, but they'll just be replacing one with another.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:50 AM (t72+4)
He's of Chinese heritage, so if you attack him ask him to solve some calculus problems, you are a racist.
Confucius also say: baseball all wrong. Man with 3 balls can't walk.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 06:50 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 06:52 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Barack Obummer, Pres for Life at April 09, 2010 06:53 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: brak at April 09, 2010 06:53 AM (W5NBA)
I guess we'll have to get rid of her the old-fashioned way.
Confucius also say: baseball all wrong. Man with 3 balls can't walk.
Confucius know as much about baseball as Obama.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:53 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 06:54 AM (VY5KX)
You would get President Biden, but unless Slow Joe decided to promote Nancy, no, she does not automatically advance up the chain. Remember, Ford got to pick Rockerfeller (go pick, Jerry).
Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 10:49 AM (V9SYy)
The thing is, he probably would pick Pelosi because then that would give us our first female vice-president and the msm would ejaculate all over themselves over another historic first. Not to mention, she'd probably twist arms and demand it.
And then we'd have to pray for dear ol' uncle Joe's health for the next two and a half years.
Blech! I just threw up in my mouth again.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:54 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 06:55 AM (V40IZ)
Senate Voice Vote on Nominee:
Senator McCain of Arizona: Yes
Senator Graham of South Carolina: Yes
Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 06:55 AM (M5t+h)
No way it's a Hymie. Gotta be a sistah. Just not this sistah. Did someone say "summer of racism"?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (mR7mk)
It really doesn't matter though. For an actual impact since Stevens voted for every one of the most heinous decisions made in the past 20 years and against almost ALL of the good decisions it just can't get any worse.
Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: brak at April 09, 2010 10:53 AM (W5NBA)
Does that ever sum it up.
Posted by: real joe at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (WjerO)
We've never had a wookie Justice on SCOTUS.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 10:54 AM (VY5KX)
Oh dear god no, dont even think it.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (yfJ6g)
And Luke Russert is equally stupid.
uhh god. I can't stand that tard. He's such a twat. He doesn't understand what made his father popular. Tim Russert was clearly a democrat, but he wasn't a shill. He was a tough interviewer, even on democrats. Also, what are Luke's qualifications exactly? If Bill O'Reilly dies, is fox going to give his kid a show(if he has a kid, i don't know)
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:57 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 06:57 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (yfJ6g)
yes but if it is a hard left commie bastard, then that would be very bad if we can't defeat it
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 10:52 AM (0GFWk)
If they're that hardcore, most likely they'll have too much baggage for even the msm to carry for them. At any rate, Stephens may not be a full on commie, but he's at the Kremlin door knocking.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (t72+4)
With no sense of irony that they spent four months in 2008 preventing the first female VP, of course. Oh, wait. She's not a woman, she's a Republican.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (mR7mk)
Imagine if a "conservative" group drew a cartoon like that for one of the CBC. Even without the hate being spewed they would be up in arms and the press would be non-stop screaming for prosecution under hate crime laws.
What amazes me in this upside down world of today is how they can brand a candidate as "extremist" when they simply say that the Constitution means what it says.
Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (QrA9E)
he's of chinese heritage, so if you attack him you are a racist.
Nah, Chinamen are fair game. They're like white people, only smarter.
Posted by: Truman North at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (e8YaH)
If it's a sistah, even money says it's Anita Hill. Never underestimate JugEars' capacity for assholery.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 07:00 AM (VY5KX)
Senate Voice Vote on Nominee:
Senator McCain of Arizona: Yes
Senator Graham of South Carolina: Yes
Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 10:55 AM (M5t+h)
Citizens of Arizona Vote on McCain: No
Citizens of South Carolina Vote on Graham: No
Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 07:00 AM (M5t+h)
I think he will get whoever he wants. Between McCain, Graham, the Maine sisters and Scott Brown, they won't have the 41 to filibuster.
How does Scott Brown get lumped in with that bunch of losers? McCain, the Maine sisters and Graham have each and collectively screwed the GOP. But you're putting in a newcomer who has not only made independents view the GOP more favorably, but he has also terrified a majority of Democrats. Barney Frank is rumored to be retiring, and this doesn't make you happy? You think there would even be that possibility if not for Scott Brown? Remember what he ran on. The courts will be a big issue in the midterms.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 07:01 AM (mHQ7T)
With one wise Latina on the bench, I look forward to appointing the next member of the court, a wise Guinea or possibly a wise Hymie.
No way it's a Hymie. Gotta be a sistah. Just not this sistah. Did someone say "summer of racism"?
Naw, Ginsberg is there, she will be replaced with another jewish person. We are going to get to the point where you have to replace a Justice with someone of the same sex and religion.
For example, everything in the media was bleeting that O'Connor's seat should go to a woman and it was a woman's seat.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:01 AM (wuv1c)
The pick won't be "White".. It won't be "Conservative"
So,
We can take Sean Hannity off the short list.
Posted by: franksalterego at April 09, 2010 07:01 AM (+6fgE)
Posted by: Wade Rathke at April 09, 2010 07:02 AM (V40IZ)
Hell on earth? Cass Sunstein.
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 10:57 AM (AZGON)
Yea, I heard that name floated around too and thats the type of hard left commie that nevergiveup alluded to above.
However his wife is a notorious anti-semite so that may not play well for him
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:02 AM (t72+4)
Same as Nancy Pelosi, Patches Kennedy, John Dingell, Al Gore, Evan Bayh, etc. Sprang from an industry loin.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:02 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: THE SAVE GUAM PROJECT at April 09, 2010 07:02 AM (ngD76)
Smart Inuit...maybe
Intelligent Pacific Islander...working on it
Knowledgeable lesbian...possibly
Brilliant Acadian...too white
Sage Asian...not that big a voting bloc, but maybe
Man, presidenting is hard.
Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:03 AM (W5NBA)
I find myself suddenly with a very open schedule...
Posted by: Mohammed Al Mo-daddy at April 09, 2010 07:03 AM (V40IZ)
Posted by: BSR at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (AJreE)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (mHQ7T)
Just saw video of Stevens tossing out the first pitch at Wrigley in 2006..
...he did a million times better than Jug Ears
Posted by: beedubya at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (AnTyA)
Why is it when a Democrat picks a nominee, there is never a concern that the nominee might become a rightie, however when a republican names someone to the court, there is always a 25 percent chance that person becomes a lefty
Because the Republicans try to play nice and fair and think people will do the same in return. See Gang of 14 idiots.
Posted by: Mama AJ at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 10:55 AM (V40IZ)
Ace???
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (W5NBA)
Eww! A big ACORN add on that site...
Posted by: Pyrocles at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (xzSvW)
Posted by: ErikW at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (l5xbP)
Posted by: Henry Louis Gates, Jr. at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (V40IZ)
Posted by: Neo at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (tE8FB)
Elections matter, huh?
Thanks Republican asswipes that didn't want to hold your nose for McCain!!
Hope you sleep well with your principles in tact.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (pLTLS)
That horse is out of the barn, so Juggy might say fuck it.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 09, 2010 07:06 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Charles Gibson at April 09, 2010 07:06 AM (V40IZ)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 09, 2010 11:04 AM (ucxC/)
Yes. Everyone assume the position...
Posted by: Barack "I'll lube you first" Obama at April 09, 2010 07:06 AM (YVZlY)
Elections matter, huh?
Thanks Republican asswipes that didn't want to hold your nose for McCain!!
Hope you sleep well with your principles in tact.
Lacey, while i agree with you, i have two questions.
1) do you think the liberal justices would have retired during a mccain presidency?
2) Do you think we would have gotten a Alito or Roberts from McCain?
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (0GFWk)
Whoever the nominee is, if she is even a little left of center, the GOP had better keep the empathetic retard bottled up in committee (as they can't get a committee vote without at least one Yea from the minority). Lindsey Grahamnesty had better learn that he will not stab us in the back, again.
The GOP had better hold the line on this. I am sick of their caving in.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (tdWBE)
Posted by: the Supreme Court Search Comittee at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (AZGON)
That'll work.
Posted by: mpfs at April 09, 2010 07:08 AM (iYbLN)
That would increase his appeal to Barry.
We are going to get to the point where you have to replace a Justice with someone of the same sex and religion.
Only if it's a "correct" religion. If Alito or Thomas dropped dead tomorrow (please God, grant them long life!) they won't be replaced by practicing Catholics.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:08 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 07:09 AM (VY5KX)
Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 07:09 AM (QrA9E)
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Maxine Waters.
Alright, I'm just having a bit of fun torturing myself right now and enjoying the pain, pay no attention.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Mrs. Compton at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (NaJ/S)
They ler her out of Gaza? Too bad.
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 11:07 AM (0GFWk)
I figured she was still blockade running while flying the Jolly Roger on some piece of shit fishing trawler.
Posted by: ErikW at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (l5xbP)
Posted by: Someguy - keeping Mormons in their place at all times at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (YVZlY)
118 Well Bush first went with Meirs and we see how well that worked for him. In the end, he found his senses.
Even if McCain went a similar route it wouldn't be as treacherous as the pinko O will nominate.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: unknown jane at April 09, 2010 07:11 AM (5/yRG)
Ben makes a good point.
It is, unfortunately, not hard at all for me to envision John McCain nominating Sonia Sotomayor...
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:11 AM (V40IZ)
Posted by: Lindsey Graham at April 09, 2010 07:11 AM (W5NBA)
I am willing to bet money that Obama gets whoever he picks through the senate.
The Republicans have 41 votes, but not all 41 are conservative republicans. They will not stop his Supreme Court pick, even the Democrats didn't stop Bush's picks who were clearly conservatives.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:11 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:12 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (yfJ6g)
"Only if it's a "correct" religion. If Alito or Thomas dropped dead tomorrow (please God, grant them long life!) they won't be replaced by practicing Catholics."
Supreme Court Jusice Martha Coakley!
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (V40IZ)
There's no requirement that a justice be a lawyer.
Posted by: DrewM. at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (9B5OK)
Actually, in hindsight that was probably George Bush's greatest accomplishment, getting two guaranteed conservatives on the court whose loyalty isn't in question.
Absolutely correct. GWB managed his SCOTUS appointments brilliantly. As bad as things may be right now, if he had appointed pseudo-conservatives prone to "growing" on the Court they would be far far worse.
Posted by: JPS at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (aY76I)
Posted by: brak at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (W5NBA)
Oh, I can top that, Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Henry Waxman.
Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 11:11 AM (V9SYy)
It can't be Waxman. His nostrils are needed for when they expand the Library of Congress.
Posted by: conscious and considering all warehouse options at April 09, 2010 07:14 AM (YVZlY)
Ain't no rule that Supreme Court justices have to be lawyers or belong to a bar association
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 09, 2010 07:14 AM (NfIvb)
Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:15 AM (W5NBA)
Not possible, he has been disbarred.
Actually, if memory serves, a law license isn't a Constitutional requirement for a SCOTUS justice.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 07:15 AM (VY5KX)
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:15 AM (wuv1c)
There's no requirement that a justice be a lawyer.
Posted by: DrewM. at April 09, 2010 11:13 AM (9B5OK)
Do they have to be living?
Posted by: Zombie Ted Kennedy at April 09, 2010 07:16 AM (YVZlY)
Yeah he could nominate Wooks.
You don't have to even be an attorney to get the nom so that will work out well for the woman that was forced to give up her law license.
The robe would at least cover the boob belts. So we'd have that going for us I suppose.
Girl, you look good horrific when you back that thang up.....
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:16 AM (pLTLS)
Didn't keep me out of the Attorney General's office....
Posted by: Zombie RFK at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (VY5KX)
Remember with judicial nominees at least ONE Republican on the committee will have to vote yes to get it to the floor to even have a vote.
But......Lindsey "asshole" Graham is on the committee.
Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Ricky Martin - Supreme Court Nominee at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (YVZlY)
Hmmm. I didn't know that. Rahm, get Bill Ayers on his cell, pronto.
Posted by: Barack Hussein Toonces Obama at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (554T5)
Oh, I can top that, Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Henry Waxman.
Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 11:11 AM (V9SYy)
O'rly? Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Janeane Garafalo.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (t72+4)
I hereby announce my availability for the position. If nothing else, written opinions would be far, far, far, more interesting than they are now. Not to mention oral argument wherein "Do you really think the Court is that retarded" will be a valid question.
Posted by: alexthechick at April 09, 2010 07:18 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: DocJ at April 09, 2010 07:18 AM (dt6br)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:19 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:19 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Mjim at April 09, 2010 07:19 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: ErikW at April 09, 2010 07:19 AM (l5xbP)
Pardon me, for I am about to paint with a broad brush here, but I do feel there is a certain truth to what I am about to say:
A Court justice retiring. Scylla and Charybdis, isn't it? Oppose with vigor whomever Obama nominates, and you get pilloried in the press, and that chance for a majority that seemed to shine so brightly just so few minutes ago fades.
Don't oppose with vigor, and that "ruthless against the right, spineless against the left, above all always opportunistic" meme that many on "your" side view you through gains greater traction, and that chance for a majority that seemed to shine so brightly just so few minutes ago fades.
This is what happens when, as a corporate entity, you temporize all the time and do not really make last stands. Those who would oppose you anyways don't respect you; those who would support you anwways don't trust you; and those that would perhaps be converted if they heard a robust argument don't choose you-because that argument was never made. For you spent more time trying to determine wind directions in the future than risking and daring today.
We are at a crisis point in the American character and can no longer afford the luxury of those will not put skin in the game.
Posted by: Horatius at April 09, 2010 07:19 AM (Kqe92)
He could nominate the man that couldn't even graduate law school without plagiarizing, Slow Joe.
That would free up the VP slot.
Plus, it would be a big fucking deal.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (0GFWk)
Not possible, he has been disbarred.
He also wants to be the next U.N. chairman.
Posted by: Pyrocles at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (xzSvW)
OK, so what historic skin color/ personal story gets picked next?
*waiting for the phone to ring.
Posted by: Pat Johnson - Post-Op Transgendered Lesbian Lawyer at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (tWf3S)
Posted by: M'cel Obama at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:22 AM (W5NBA)
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 07:23 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Lindsay Graham at April 09, 2010 07:24 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: dulce at April 09, 2010 07:24 AM (HFdqI)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:24 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Supreme Court Justice Keith Olbermann at April 09, 2010 11:19 AM (V9SYy)
And you, coming in here thinking you have the right to own firearms while whole American communities live in terror from roving bands of white supremacist tea-party gangs and babies are dying in the streets from gunfire.
Do YOU have no sense of decency sir? Sir, do YOU?
Posted by: U.S. SCJ Keefums Obergruppenfuhrer at April 09, 2010 07:24 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Paul Volcker at April 09, 2010 07:25 AM (mR7mk)
Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you, Supreme Court Associate Justice Micheal Moore.
Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 11:23 AM (V9SYy)
O.k., I give up, you win. I cant think of anything worse than that.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:26 AM (t72+4)
Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you, Supreme Court Associate Justice Micheal Moore.
Do the robes come in XXXXXXXXXXXXXXL?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:27 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Van Jones at April 09, 2010 07:27 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:27 AM (0GFWk)
You know, *lip-lick* I don't really *lip-lick* have a whole lot going *lip-lick* on anymore, either... *lip-lick*
Posted by: Anita Dunn at April 09, 2010 07:27 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: Massholio at April 09, 2010 07:28 AM (4Kl5M)
Someone with awesome analytical powers,
That's who.
Meet Supreme Court Justice Paul Krugman.
Posted by: franksalterego at April 09, 2010 07:28 AM (+6fgE)
He knows he's going to lose a lot of his oomph after the mid-terms, so the only way to get re-elected is to keep his base of ultra-leftist kooks highly enthusiastic (so they'll be willing to do anything IYKWIMAITTYD to get him elected). He has to make the case that the POTUS position is worth fighting for, even without both houses of Congress, so that means wacky proclamations on foreign policy (see recent statements about nukes) and seating wackos to the bench.
Republicans need to state flat out that they are no longer going to play this gentlemen's game of seating whoever the POTUS chooses and vow to fight a bad pick.
Posted by: Y-not is yawning at April 09, 2010 07:28 AM (Kn9r7)
Posted by: OhioDude at April 09, 2010 07:28 AM (d6j6Y)
Posted by: Supreme Court Nominee Ed "Round Mound of Sound" Schultz at April 09, 2010 07:29 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 11:21 AM (0GFWk)
Yes, it is. From the Senate Judiciary committee rules:
IV. BRINGING A MATTER TO A VOTE
The Chairman shall entertain a non-debatable motion to bring a matter before the Committee to a vote. If there is objection to bring the matter to a vote without further debate, a roll call vote of the Committee shall be taken, and debate shall be terminated if the motion to bring the matter to a vote without further debate passes with ten votes in the affirmative, one of which must be cast by the minority.
This is why Grahamnesty was such a despicable shithead.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 09, 2010 07:29 AM (tdWBE)
But that's about it.
And yeah, Obama will try to ram through the most liberal candidate he possibly can.
Posted by: looking closely at April 09, 2010 07:29 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:30 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:30 AM (W5NBA)
You know, you're right. I take it all back...
Of course, on the other hand, maybe some of our guys should learn how to twist the knife in while smiling...if nothing else, for the change.
Posted by: Horatius at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (Kqe92)
Michael Moore, Mallamutt?
Do those fancy benches that the Supremes sit at have a weight limit? I guess they could be reinforced like a nuclear missile solo....
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (M5t+h)
O.k., I can think of one that is worse than Michael Moore, not much worse though.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Cindy Sheehan
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (t72+4)
Triple word score if the black ghey lady is also a dyslexic midget with Chron's disease.
/sympathetic and all
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (mR7mk)
To Slublog's comment.
Pennsylvania is a socially conservative state. We had the last true Pro Life Democrat Bob Casey(the father not the retarded son who is our senator), who wasn't allowed to speak at the 1992 convention because of his pro life views.
We have a lot of catholics and union men, who are anti abortion and pro gun rights.
So this nomination could cost specter his seat if he hasn't lost it already.
I think Pat Toomey will win anyway, but this could further sink Specter.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:32 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Supreme Court Nominee Michael Steele at April 09, 2010 07:32 AM (+hPIb)
Video of Grayson breaking up meeting:
http://tinyurl.com/y7tzu7r - start watching at 2:50 when he becomes a real jerk
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at April 09, 2010 07:32 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:34 AM (AZGON)
"Supreme Court Justice Michael Moore"
SILVER LINING: No way in hell you'd ever see national legislation mandating Meatless Mondays pass the Constitutionality test.
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:35 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: billhedrick at April 09, 2010 07:35 AM (gTZyc)
"Two flaming skulls in one day so far and its not even lunch time yet."
Stupak Thread was downgraded to DEFCON #2.
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:36 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:36 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:37 AM (pLTLS)
"just give us someone who hasn't cheated on his or her taxes, isn't a member of a racial supremacist group, broken a law or tried to blow up a building."
Crap, you just crossed off everyone on my list.
Besides....uh....er....last time I checked....you weren't an expert on...uh....supreme court eligibility policy...
Posted by: BHO at April 09, 2010 07:37 AM (+hPIb)
SILVER LINING: No way in hell you'd ever see national legislation mandating Meatless Mondays pass the Constitutionality test.
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 11:35 AM (+hPIb)
The Bad News: He's liable to get hungry in the middle of a hearing and eat the remaining conservative justices on the bench.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:38 AM (t72+4)
I wish Obama named someone who currently sits on the Honduran supreme court, they have balls.
That said, Supreme Court Justice Manual Zeylaya. You heard it here first.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:38 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 09, 2010 07:38 AM (tf9Ne)
As a lecturer who specializes in the Constitution, I have not found anything that would bar me from being both the President of the United States AND a Supreme Court Justice at the same time.
So, today, I hereby appoint myself to fill Justice Steven's seat, effective immediately......
Posted by: President Narcissus at April 09, 2010 07:39 AM (tWf3S)
She certainly has been beaten with the ugly stick enough. Makes looking at Bader Ginsburg not so bad.
Posted by: President Mac Daddy at April 09, 2010 07:39 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Polly Carboner at April 09, 2010 07:39 AM (f7A+e)
Posted by: Rocks at April 09, 2010 07:40 AM (Q1lie)
#234 Maybe they should nominate both Clintons to be a justice?
/If Bill and Hillary had a "co-Presidency", why not a "co-Justiceship"?
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 07:40 AM (9hSKh)
I nominate Megyn Kelly just to cleanse the palate from all the previous nominees.
I'll go ahead and get the joke out of the way here--
Man I'd love to see her on oral.....
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:41 AM (pLTLS)
"I nominate Megyn Kelly just to cleanse the palate from all the previous nominees."
Clarence Thomas would keep throwing her robe in the dryer on the "Towels" setting when she isn't around...
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:41 AM (+hPIb)
Early guess...he goes for broke.
Yeah, he'll go for broke. He could nominate Hugo Chavez and the media would paint him as a moderate, as always, it comes down to the Washington R's having the stones to go after whoever the nominee is or not. And that's a bet we tend to lose quite a bit.
Posted by: koopy at April 09, 2010 07:41 AM (ctR4U)
I nominate Megyn Kelly just to cleanse the palate from all the previous nominees.
I'll go ahead and get the joke out of the way here--
Man I'd love to see her on oral.....
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 11:41 AM (pLTLS)
BUNK!
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at April 09, 2010 07:42 AM (YVZlY)
Radical Maoist politics and Multiracial poster boy. SCOTUS sessions will now have a bitchin' hiphop/metal soundtrack.
And the relatively pro-American, pro-military movie "Iron Man" will now be banned, because conservatives get too much pleasure from watching Tony Stark squish Morello into jello during the cave escape scene.
Yeah, I used the word "boy". I denounce myself.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 07:43 AM (VY5KX)
All I know is that if Barney Frank announces his retirement we're going to need a really flaming scull for that post..
that's right, i went there, deal with it.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:43 AM (wuv1c)
Nothing in the Constitution says judges have to be natural-born citizens. Setting the odds on Hugo at 500-1.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:43 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:44 AM (mR7mk)
BTW, I think it important to point out what an America-hating retarded piece of shit Strevens has been. Retiring for this America-hating third-world commie loon in the White House is Stevens' final act of betrayal against the US.
Any justice who was not totally and unequivocally appalled by the Indonesian Imbecile's inane support of Zelaya's constitution-breaking coup attempt in Honduras has earned a place in the world's Hall of Shame. Stevens is a twit and America-hater of the highest order.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 09, 2010 07:44 AM (tdWBE)
Posted by: joncelli at April 09, 2010 07:44 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: logprof at April 09, 2010 07:44 AM (CE2wR)
Posted by: Un-naturally born at April 09, 2010 07:45 AM (pq986)
O.k., I give up, you win. I cant think of anything worse than that.
How aboutSupreme Court Justice Al Franken.
Posted by: todler at April 09, 2010 07:45 AM (fPOY0)
Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 07:45 AM (M5t+h)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:46 AM (AZGON)
"Radical Maoist politics and Multiracial poster boy. SCOTUS sessions will now have a bitchin' hiphop/metal soundtrack."
Tha Notorious S.C.J.
-or-
Jus' Def.
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:46 AM (+hPIb)
I nominate Megyn Kelly just to cleanse the palate from all the previous nominees.
Thank you, as I was set to open a bottle of Guiness with all the nasea-inducing picks. Hmmm, I wonder how that would go with gravy and biscuits? I might try that anyway...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 09, 2010 07:46 AM (i3AsK)
252 Ugh, all those potential nominees are pretty young too. We could see almost 30 years of the asshat on the bence, even if they do not retire at Stevens' age.
That's the point. But you already knew that.
Let's see, who else hasn't been covered yet?
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 07:47 AM (9hSKh)
Native American.
One word but two syllables:
Hindu.
Seriously, I wondered why Obama was so keen to appt Asians (like the aborted Surgeon General and the tech appointees) until I saw that breakdown of the richest U.S. groups by religion. Hindu was second, behind Judaism and I think we know how Obama feels about Jooos.
Posted by: Y-not is yawning at April 09, 2010 07:47 AM (Kn9r7)
Posted by: Christoph at April 09, 2010 07:48 AM (l5xbP)
And if we can keep our shit together until 2012 and roll The Won out of office, the Senate will surely follow, as 24 of 33 seats up for grabs are currently held by Democrats.
Posted by: Widespread Panic at April 09, 2010 07:48 AM (8/DeP)
Yes, Wood fits the bill but she's too old. Expect someone 50 years old at most.
Posted by: Rocks at April 09, 2010 07:50 AM (Q1lie)
Yes, is true.
Just watched another one of those stupid fair and balanced debates. The Dem rep was Bob "Cockholster" Beckle. He was about as bad as Obama. Every time he opened his ugly yap a lie spewed forth, The so-called Republican at one pointy laughed at him, but he didn't call him a liar.
BTW, the Republicans are the ones who "politicized" the SCOTUS nomination process.
Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 07:51 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: President Narcissus at April 09, 2010 07:51 AM (wWwJR)
Whatabout someguy?
He's like a cross between Lance Winslow and Roland Burris, only conservative.
Posted by: Fritz at April 09, 2010 07:52 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: newer at April 09, 2010 07:53 AM (D2axM)
Yeah, damn that Reagan for nominating Bork. (WTF?)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:53 AM (mR7mk)
Justice William Jefferson Clinton Posted by: Easy Bake at April 09, 2010 10:47 AM (QZA9F)
Damnit, I just shot hot coffee out of my nose. Damn that hurts.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at April 09, 2010 07:54 AM (3IZGh)
Posted by: fluffy at April 09, 2010 07:54 AM (4Kl5M)
"O.k., I give up, you win. I cant think of anything worse than that."
You aren't trying hard enough.
Supreme Court Justice Peggy Joseph.
(FUN! To get her name, I Bing'd "pay my mortgage and put gas in my car" Do it yourself, and see what the first result is!)
Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:54 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: section9 at April 09, 2010 07:55 AM (H6lGz)
He's like a cross between Lance Winslow and Roland Burris, only conservative.
Posted by: Fritz at April 09, 2010 11:52 AM (GwPRU)
Ah yes, Lance Winslow, married to Joey Heatherton and he also had an affinity for flashing young girls. Nothing serious, but booted from the Dallas Cowboys for being a perv by Tom Landry.
Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 07:56 AM (M5t+h)
"Whatabout someguy?"
Are you fucking insane, assclown?
When you're in the highest court of the land, there is nothing to do but PUNCH DOWN.
Jees, the quality we have around here, folks...fucking Law 101 here...
Posted by: someguy at April 09, 2010 07:57 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: Al Gore at April 09, 2010 07:57 AM (l5xbP)
Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 11:51 AM (QrA9E)
--How so?
Posted by: logprof at April 09, 2010 07:58 AM (CE2wR)
Posted by: unknown jane at April 09, 2010 08:00 AM (5/yRG)
The so-called Republican at one pointy laughed at him,
I do so love when that happens on those shows. The "Republican" laughs at the silly, lying Democrat operative, then the Dem laughs, knowing full well that they are completely full of shit, then everyone laughs, because they all know the Dem was full of shit, but at least he was able to get his talking point out, thank God, then they move on.
Everyone is laughing and having fun, and the Dem has, once again, gotten away with spewing his lies and bullshit, completely unchallenged.
Posted by: wiserbud at April 09, 2010 08:02 AM (wWwJR)
And with Biden's time in the senate, confirmation might go much easier.
However, it would be nice if somehow he nominates a liberal only to see them become ever more conservative than Alito. Nice dream to have, even though it will most likely never happen.
Posted by: SGT Bazz at April 09, 2010 08:04 AM (5ZMY/)
Posted by: fightobama at April 09, 2010 08:05 AM (6IV8T)
If it weren't for cockholster Graham, I'd say that there was no way an honest liberal gets out of committee. Comity in the Senate is gone, except for that prick.
The Dems burned a lot of bridges with Health Control. It's just that Graham always comes back saying, "Thank you, sir, may I have another?"
Posted by: AmishDude at April 09, 2010 08:10 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Olliander at April 09, 2010 08:15 AM (6uiF7)
--------------
I do not like the cut of your jib and will pretend to have moved if your newsletter arrives.
Posted by: Anachronda at April 09, 2010 08:16 AM (3K4hn)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 09, 2010 08:17 AM (T0NGe)
The question isn't "Will the conservatives get fired up?", it's "Will the Dems have the stomach to push things through?"
Arlen Specter surely didn't switch parties and lose all his seniority just so he could get absolutely thumped by Pat Toomey anyway because he sacrificed himself to put an ultra-left judge on the USSC.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 09, 2010 08:17 AM (S/HSv)
--How so?
Posted by: logprof at April 09, 2010 11:58 AM (CE2wR)
That was one of the many outrageous lies that Beckle spewed.
Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 08:37 AM (QrA9E)
All I know is that if Barney Frank announces his retirement we're going to need a really flaming scull for that post.
Maybe a feather boa, too.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 08:38 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: SGT Bazz at April 09, 2010 08:39 AM (5ZMY/)
That was one of the many outrageous lies that Beckle spewed.
Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 12:37 PM (QrA9E)
Ah, gotcha! sarc passed over my head.
Lone Marauder, there's a thread on Fart Stoolpack. Scroll down to the flaming shitbag.
Posted by: logprof at April 09, 2010 08:44 AM (CE2wR)
Posted by: Lone Marauder at April 09, 2010 08:46 AM (/bVuS)
Posted by: mrp at April 09, 2010 08:47 AM (HjPtV)
Ok, granted at first glance this would cause most conservatives to run screaming into the night in terror. But, I can think of a few upsides here.
1. He'd probably vote on the conservative side of things occasionally because the loony left position wasn't loony or left enough..
2. When the Democrats put forth their next extension to this healthcare monstrosity and start trying to get rid of fast food joint's and fatty foods, he'd strike that down in a heartbeat.
3. Considering his extreme obesity he's most likely going to pop a gasket relatively soon, hopefully during a conservative administration so we can nominate a replacement with half a brain who might actually read the constitution before immediately voting for s preset political ideology.
4. Truth be told it doesn't really matter who Obama nominates, they'll be a lockstep liberal who will subvert the Constitution and legislate from the bench at every opportunity, so it's pretty much a moot point anyway.
5. It would keep him too busy to make any more of those ridiculous "documentaries", if one can really consider the propagandized crap he produces a "documentary".
6. Those black robes are fairly slimming
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 09, 2010 08:50 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg at April 09, 2010 09:14 AM (WGcw3)
Posted by: John McCain at April 09, 2010 09:16 AM (jat5l)
Posted by: davidt at April 09, 2010 09:27 AM (aag4W)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:32 AM (2g2ex)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:36 AM (2g2ex)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:37 AM (2g2ex)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:37 AM (2g2ex)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:41 AM (2g2ex)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:42 AM (2g2ex)
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 09, 2010 09:54 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 10:56 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Justin Camp at April 09, 2010 11:07 AM (nF4Jh)
Posted by: White Sox Player To be Named Later at April 09, 2010 11:13 AM (Wmjm0)
So look for him to nominate a "moderate" (so-called by him and the Dems and the media--read "lefty") he can defend as a "moderate," who is a member of some minority group, and choose one who is as young as possible.
The Repubs rolled over for Sotomayor, a decision they will be able to repent at leisure for the next 40 years. I hope they show some stones this time.
Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at April 09, 2010 03:48 PM (DTfZY)
thank you ...
ÃáÃá ãæÇÞÚ ÇáÊÃáÃÉ ßæßÊÃá ÇáÇÞÊÕÇà ÇáãäÒáà ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá
Posted by: sultan at April 09, 2010 10:24 PM (WFYoY)
Posted by: sibat0705 at April 11, 2010 12:03 AM (C4TIR)
<a href="http://www.boxux.com">windows 7 anytime upgrade home premium to professional key</a>11, 2001, attacks, its tilt toward protecting businesses from some lawsuits and its refusal to act against global warming.
Posted by: windows 7 product key at November 03, 2010 11:43 PM (Dwmgn)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.9387 seconds, 420 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Jeremiah Wright at April 09, 2010 06:38 AM (MMC8r)