April 09, 2010

Justice Stevens Retiring
— DrewM

flaming_skull2a.gif

Just breaking.

Not really a surprise after the interviews he gave recently.

Midterms just got more interesting, if that were possible. Do Obama go for the upfront, honest ultra liberal he and the left want or does he need to go for another stealth, pretend moderate like Sotomayor?

Early guess...he goes for broke.

From FNC.

The leading candidates to replace Stevens are Solicitor General Elena Kagan, 49, and federal appellate Judges Merrick Garland, 57, and Diane Wood, 59.

Stevens' departure will not change the court's conservative-liberal split because Obama is certain to name a liberal-leaning replacement. But the new justice is not likely to be able to match Stevens' ability to marshal narrow majorities in big cases.

Stevens was able to draw the support of the court's swing votes, now-retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Justice Anthony Kennedy, to rein in or block some Bush administration policies, including the detention of suspected terrorists following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, its tilt toward protecting businesses from some lawsuits and its refusal to act against global warming.

Thanks to tmi3rd for the heads up.

Update [Slublog] - As has been pointed out in the comments, politically speaking, the timing couldn't be worse for the Democrats. Via RCP, here are the lean and toss up races for the Senate:

leansandtossups.jpg

Look at this PPP roundup of senate polls, post health care vote. Things haven't improved for the Democrats.

Stevens will retire in late June or early July. Obama will name a successor after that and then the fight begins. I fully expect Obama to go full-liberal and pick a hard lefty for the post. If the fight continues until late August or even into September, Bennet and Specter are going to have to choose between further ticking off the electorate and displeasing The One.

Independent voters in the states with an open seat are going to see the party in power once again going full left with another vote, which may increase their desire for a divided government. So a lot of them will decide to take a chance on the Republican candidate for that seat. As an added bonus, imagine what Ben Nelson must be thinking. Sure, he isn't up for election until 2012, but he's got to be wondering if confirming Obama's nominee is worth further irritating his already angry constituents.

If this weren't so serious, I'd be enjoying how unpleasant life is going to be for Senate Democrats much more.

Posted by: DrewM at 06:36 AM | Comments (292)
Post contains 414 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Yes, Barack, I will take the job if Bill Ayers doesn't want it.

Posted by: Jeremiah Wright at April 09, 2010 06:38 AM (MMC8r)

2 Well that's just super.

Posted by: Mary Beth at April 09, 2010 06:38 AM (JPEqm)

3 well we knew it was coming. this should be fun!

Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 09, 2010 06:39 AM (SB0V2)

4 And this is where Lindsey Graham or John McCain get their political largesse in exchange for their vote.

Posted by: David in San Diego at April 09, 2010 06:39 AM (/U/Mr)

5

I knew this. 

*wink, wink

Posted by: Bart Stupak at April 09, 2010 06:39 AM (tWf3S)

6 I will bet 50 bucks that Obama names Goodwin Liu as the nominee.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:39 AM (wuv1c)

7 Who's keeping the book on nominees?

Bart Stupak is a lawyer.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:39 AM (mR7mk)

8 Let's see who gets dredged up to fill his shoes.

Any frontrunners?

Posted by: Fortunate Son at April 09, 2010 06:40 AM (trlZM)

9 wait. is stevens the swing vote? or is that kennedy?

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:40 AM (wuv1c)

10

And now you know why I am no longer going to be doing my show anymore.  I won't have time

Supreme Justice Oprah Winfrey........

Yes, I quite like the sound of that....... 

Posted by: Oprah Winfrey at April 09, 2010 06:40 AM (IHbof)

11 not to worry Ben, Stevens has been wayyyyyy out to the left for many eons now . . . Kennedy is the swinger

Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 09, 2010 06:41 AM (SB0V2)

12 As much as I disliked Stevens interpretation of the constitution I fear Mugabe is going to pick someone much much worse.

Posted by: John Galt at April 09, 2010 06:41 AM (F/4zf)

13

What's the timeframe we'e looking at here?

Posted by: Burn the Witch at April 09, 2010 06:42 AM (U37Ux)

14 oh I really really hope they nominate Liu! that would be very very interesting. . . he's not "untouchable" like some, and not warm-and-fuzzy like the Senora . . . oh please please nominate Liu! it's not like it matters. they're not going to nominate anyone with any sense in their heads no matter what.

Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 09, 2010 06:42 AM (SB0V2)

15
As much as I disliked Stevens interpretation of the constitution I fear Mugabe is going to pick someone much much worse.

Posted by: John Galt at April 09, 2010 10:41 AM (F/4zf)





Oh, you can bet on it.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (t72+4)

16

can someone explain something to me.

 

Why is it when a Democrat picks a nominee, there is never a concern that the nominee might become a rightie, however when a republican names someone to the court, there is always a 25 percent chance that person becomes a lefty.

Actually, in hindsight that was probably George Bush's greatest accomplishment, getting two guaranteed conservatives on the court whose loyalty isn't in question.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (wuv1c)

17 I am currently busy searching out the best original intent judges to fill giggle this chortle  position hahahahahhahah

Dam I can't keep from laughing when I say that Rahm. 

Posted by: Barak Obami at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (tf9Ne)

18 I asked Barry for the slot but he said I was too conservative.

Posted by: Noam Chomsky at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (AZGON)

19 I pick......me!

Posted by: Easy Bake at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (QZA9F)

20 Great, great ... that's just what we need in this country: yet another racially charged and contentious nomination.

Posted by: Widespread Panic at April 09, 2010 06:43 AM (8/DeP)

21

Let the fun begin! If the Repubs have any sense, they'll stand up and do to The Vapid One's™ nominee what was done to Robert Bork and get all teddy Kennedy on their asses.

It's time to really be obstructionists. Pull out all the stops, no apologies, no bullshit. Dig up every little piece of dirt they can find. Do.Not. Give. In.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 09, 2010 06:44 AM (i3AsK)

22 Hasn't Liu already been nominated for an appeals court position?

Seems unlikely, he'd be nominated for the Supreme Court,

doesn't it?

Posted by: franksalterego at April 09, 2010 06:44 AM (+6fgE)

23

oh I really really hope they nominate Liu! that would be very very interesting. . . he's not "untouchable" like some, and not warm-and-fuzzy like the Senora . . .

oh please please nominate Liu! it's not like it matters. they're not going to nominate anyone with any sense in their heads no matter what.

he's of chinese heritage, so if you attack him you are a racist.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:44 AM (wuv1c)

24 Stevens says he plans to serve through the end of the current session, which ends around July.

This circus has the potential to take up headlines from now until a vote is finally taken in possibly August or September, which will be at the beginning of the stretch run for election season.


If Obama wanted to guarantee that the Senate flipped in this upcoming election, he just may have found a way to do it.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 09, 2010 06:45 AM (S/HSv)

25

Maybe Obama will appoint himself. Right now, I am thinking I would take that deal.

Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 10:43 AM (V9SYy)





Oh, hell no. We'll be rid of Obama come January of 2013. He gets the SCOTUS appointment for life or when he chooses to retire.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:45 AM (t72+4)

26 Lance Ito?

Posted by: Easy Bake at April 09, 2010 06:45 AM (QZA9F)

27 The banging sound you hear from the Senate Judiciary Committee is the final nail in the coffin of a once free republic.

Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 06:46 AM (AZGON)

28

i think he will get whoever he wants. Between McCain, Graham, the Maine sisters and Scott Brown, they won't have the 41 to filibuster.

Also, i think Obama will name an extreme lefty. He went with the "moderate" Sotomayor first, now he will go full on.

 

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:46 AM (wuv1c)

29 Maybe Obama will appoint himself.

I want to put my $5 on FKOTUS, but I need to know the odds.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:46 AM (mR7mk)

30 I hear the weather in Kyrgystan is nice.

Posted by: rawmuse at April 09, 2010 06:47 AM (OQ3LO)

31

Justice Hillary Rodham Clinton?

It would be a good way to get rid of a potential challanger.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:47 AM (wuv1c)

32

Not to mention Mallamutt that would give us President Biden and Vice President Pelosi.


Ack ! I just threw up a little in my mouth when I typed that.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:47 AM (t72+4)

33 Justice William Jefferson Clinton

Posted by: Easy Bake at April 09, 2010 06:47 AM (QZA9F)

34

Do[es] Obama go for the upfront, honest ultra liberal he and the left want or does he need to go for another stealth, pretend moderate like Sotomayor?

Well, I'm sure he'll continue the tradition of nominating someone who lies, evades, forgets 2/3s of the questions, or and cheats on his/her taxes.

Posted by: Mama AJ at April 09, 2010 06:49 AM (XdlcF)

35

#32  I want to put my $5 on FKOTUS, but I need to know the odds.

You beat me to it, dang!  Chalk up another snark victory for the dirt-stealing Radish.

Could Hillary be nominated?  Barrack gets rid of a potential challenge if things are chaotic in 2012.

 

Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 06:49 AM (9hSKh)

36 Obama will float an insane lib out as his pick for us to vet and waste time on. Then replace that pick last minute with a sleeper lefty with as little time to vet as possible.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 09, 2010 06:49 AM (tf9Ne)

37

including the detention of suspected terrorists following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, its tilt toward protecting businesses from some lawsuits and its refusal to act against global warming

 

look, i get the first two. They are legitimate constitutional issues, but what does refusing to act on global warming have to do with anything? Where is that in the constitution? When did it become to courts place to force the legislature to ...well.. legislate.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:49 AM (wuv1c)

38 I believe he will nominate Zombie Karl Marx.

Posted by: real joe at April 09, 2010 06:50 AM (WjerO)

39 The Summer of "Racism!" is about to begin. This is also when all you RINO lovers out there get to tell us how smart and sophisticated you are.

Posted by: eman at April 09, 2010 06:50 AM (QZA9F)

40


Blazer- you really think anyone Obama appoints isn't going to be a hard core lefty? Plus, 2 1/2 years of Slow Joe could be kinda, what is the word I am looking for, amusing.

But, I guess I should have put the sarc. tag on that one.

Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 10:47 AM (V9SYy)





Sure, but they'll just be replacing one with another.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:50 AM (t72+4)

41

He's of Chinese heritage, so if you attack him ask him to solve some calculus problems, you are a racist.

Confucius also say: baseball all wrong. Man with 3 balls can't walk.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 06:50 AM (mHQ7T)

42 I hear Obama is going to pick Harriet Myers

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:51 AM (wuv1c)

43 Sure, but they'll just be replacing one with another. Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 10:50 AM (t72+4) yes but if it is a hard left commie bastard, then that would be very bad if we can't defeat it

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 06:52 AM (0GFWk)

44 With one wise Latina on the bench, I look forward to appointing the next member of the court, a wise Guinea or possibly a wise Hymie.

Posted by: Barack Obummer, Pres for Life at April 09, 2010 06:53 AM (M5t+h)

45 OK, so what historic skin color/ personal story gets picked next?

Posted by: brak at April 09, 2010 06:53 AM (W5NBA)

46 You would get President Biden, but unless Slow Joe decided to promote Nancy, no, she does not automatically advance up the chain. Remember, Ford got to pick Rockerfeller (go pick, Jerry).

I guess we'll have to get rid of her the old-fashioned way.

Confucius also say: baseball all wrong. Man with 3 balls can't walk.

Confucius know as much about baseball as Obama.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:53 AM (mR7mk)

47 We've never had a wookie Justice on SCOTUS.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 06:54 AM (VY5KX)

48


You would get President Biden, but unless Slow Joe decided to promote Nancy, no, she does not automatically advance up the chain. Remember, Ford got to pick Rockerfeller (go pick, Jerry).

Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 10:49 AM (V9SYy)





The thing is, he probably would pick Pelosi because then that would give us our first female vice-president and the msm would ejaculate all over themselves over another historic first. Not to mention, she'd probably twist arms and demand it.

And then we'd have to pray for dear ol' uncle Joe's health for the next two and a half years.

Blech! I just threw up in my mouth again.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:54 AM (t72+4)

49 Ace is gonna have a lot of double-posting to do this afternoon...

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 06:55 AM (V40IZ)

50 No doubt we'll have a fair and unpoliticized hearing.


Posted by: Robert Bork at April 09, 2010 06:55 AM (EIzB0)

51

 

Senate Voice Vote on Nominee:

Senator McCain of Arizona:  Yes

Senator Graham of South Carolina:  Yes

Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 06:55 AM (M5t+h)

52 Time for more bannings at HA.

Posted by: eman at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (QZA9F)

53 With one wise Latina on the bench, I look forward to appointing the next member of the court, a wise Guinea or possibly a wise Hymie.

No way it's a Hymie.  Gotta be a sistah.   Just not this sistah.  Did someone say "summer of racism"?

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (mR7mk)

54 Yes this was expected. Yes Stevens was a liberal and he voted with the 4 left wing liberal idiots on every score. Yes The jugeared asshole will go for broke because he will not have the Senate at all after this fall so this is his last chance to really go for broke.  Later he will get yet another chance because the other liberal bitch who died a few years ago will finally fall over.

It really doesn't matter though. For an actual impact since Stevens voted for every one of the most heinous decisions made in the past 20 years and against almost ALL of the good decisions it just can't get any worse.

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (QrA9E)

55 53 OK, so what historic skin color/ personal story gets picked next?

Posted by: brak at April 09, 2010 10:53 AM (W5NBA)


Does that ever sum it up.

Posted by: real joe at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (WjerO)

56
We've never had a wookie Justice on SCOTUS.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 10:54 AM (VY5KX)






Oh dear god no, dont even think it.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (t72+4)

57 Elena Kagan is an anti-military, anti-conservative feminist. She was once the editor of Harvard Law Review, & started her career at the Chicago School of Law. (Those buzzwords both remind me of someone.) Kagan served in Clinton's Admin as a member of the White House Council, & later his domestic policy council. Prior to Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. ___ (2010), she had never argued a case at trial, including before the Supreme Court. (The aforementioned case is the one that POTUS spoke out against in the SOTU.)

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 09, 2010 06:56 AM (yfJ6g)

58 Hell on earth? Cass Sunstein.

Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 06:57 AM (AZGON)

59

And Luke Russert is equally stupid.

uhh god. I can't stand that tard. He's such a twat. He doesn't understand what made his father popular.  Tim Russert was clearly a democrat, but he wasn't a shill. He was a tough interviewer, even on democrats.  Also, what are Luke's qualifications exactly?  If Bill O'Reilly dies, is fox going to give his kid a show(if he has a kid, i don't know)

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 06:57 AM (wuv1c)

60 Senate Voice Vote on Nominee: Senator McCain of Arizona: Yes Senator Graham of South Carolina: Yes Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 10:55 AM (M5t+h) Actually with McCain running for re-election, I doubt even he would do that this time. Unless some how he is upset in the primary , then we might be in trouble

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 06:57 AM (0GFWk)

61 My friends.....

Posted by: John McCain at April 09, 2010 06:58 AM (QZA9F)

62 Early guess...he goes for broke.

So, uh, what, uh, gives you that, uh, idea?

Posted by: Prez. O at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (pUfK9)

63 I had looked all this up when they thought he was retiring some days ago, & it was easy to guess that she opposes DADT. (This was her excuse for not allowing military recruiters to come to Harvard.)

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (yfJ6g)

64
yes but if it is a hard left commie bastard, then that would be very bad if we can't defeat it

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 10:52 AM (0GFWk)





If they're that hardcore, most likely they'll have too much baggage for even the msm to carry for them. At any rate, Stephens may not be a full on commie, but he's at the Kremlin door knocking.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (t72+4)

65 The thing is, he probably would pick Pelosi because then that would give us our first female vice-president and the msm would ejaculate all over themselves over another historic first.

With no sense of irony that they spent four months in 2008 preventing the first female VP, of course.  Oh, wait.  She's not a woman, she's a Republican.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (mR7mk)

66 No way it's a Hymie.  Gotta be a sistah.   Just not this sistah.  Did someone say "summer of racism"?

Imagine if a "conservative" group drew a cartoon like that for one of the CBC. Even without the hate being spewed they would be up in arms and the press would be non-stop screaming for prosecution under hate crime laws.

What amazes me in this upside down world of today is how they can brand a candidate as "extremist" when they simply say that the Constitution means what it says. 

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (QrA9E)

67

he's of chinese heritage, so if you attack him you are a racist.

Nah, Chinamen are fair game.  They're like white people, only smarter.

Posted by: Truman North at April 09, 2010 06:59 AM (e8YaH)

68 Gotta be a sistah.   Just not this sistah.


If it's a sistah, even money says it's Anita Hill. Never underestimate JugEars' capacity for assholery.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 07:00 AM (VY5KX)

69 I was a lawyer...

Posted by: M'cel Obama at April 09, 2010 07:00 AM (V40IZ)

70

Senate Voice Vote on Nominee:

Senator McCain of Arizona:  Yes

Senator Graham of South Carolina:  Yes

Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 10:55 AM (M5t+h)

Citizens of Arizona Vote on McCain:  No

Citizens of South Carolina Vote on Graham:  No

Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 07:00 AM (M5t+h)

71

I think he will get whoever he wants. Between McCain, Graham, the Maine sisters and Scott Brown, they won't have the 41 to filibuster.

How does Scott Brown get lumped in with that bunch of losers? McCain, the Maine sisters and Graham have each and collectively screwed the GOP. But you're putting in a newcomer who has not only made independents view the GOP more favorably, but he has also terrified a majority of Democrats. Barney Frank is rumored to be retiring, and this doesn't make you happy? You think there would even be that possibility if not for Scott Brown? Remember what he ran on. The courts will be a big issue in the midterms.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 07:01 AM (mHQ7T)

72

With one wise Latina on the bench, I look forward to appointing the next member of the court, a wise Guinea or possibly a wise Hymie.

No way it's a Hymie.  Gotta be a sistah.   Just not this sistah.  Did someone say "summer of racism"?

Naw, Ginsberg is there, she will be replaced with another jewish person. We are going to get to the point where you have to replace a Justice with someone of the same sex and religion.

For example, everything in the media was bleeting that O'Connor's seat should go to a woman and it was a woman's seat.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:01 AM (wuv1c)

73 Well, let's narrow this down..

The pick won't be "White".. It won't be "Conservative"

So,

We can take Sean Hannity off the short list.

Posted by: franksalterego at April 09, 2010 07:01 AM (+6fgE)

74 I'm not a lawyer, but I certainly have a lot of experience with them...

Posted by: Wade Rathke at April 09, 2010 07:02 AM (V40IZ)

75
Hell on earth? Cass Sunstein.

Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 10:57 AM (AZGON)






Yea, I heard that name floated around too and thats the type of hard left commie that nevergiveup alluded  to above.

However his wife is a notorious anti-semite so that may not play well for him

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:02 AM (t72+4)

76 Also, what are Luke's qualifications exactly?

Same as Nancy Pelosi, Patches Kennedy, John Dingell, Al Gore, Evan Bayh, etc.  Sprang from an industry loin.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:02 AM (mR7mk)

77 YES, OK, BUT HOW DOES THIS SAVE GUAM FROM AIT (Anthropological Island Tipping)????????????????????

Posted by: THE SAVE GUAM PROJECT at April 09, 2010 07:02 AM (ngD76)

78 We don't have a Palestinian Justice yet.

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 07:03 AM (QrA9E)

79 Wise Latina...check
Smart Inuit...maybe
Intelligent Pacific Islander...working on it
Knowledgeable lesbian...possibly
Brilliant Acadian...too white
Sage Asian...not that big a voting bloc, but maybe

Man, presidenting is hard.

Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:03 AM (W5NBA)

80

I find myself suddenly with a very open schedule...

Posted by: Mohammed Al Mo-daddy at April 09, 2010 07:03 AM (V40IZ)

81 He could nominate Bill Ayers and his mindless drone followers would defend the pick with terminal intensity.

Posted by: BSR at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (AJreE)

82 Sorry, italics don't always post for me. I upgraded Firefox, and still no dice. Anyway, top line of #84 was quoting another comment.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (mHQ7T)

83

Just saw video of Stevens tossing out the first pitch at Wrigley in 2006..

...he did a million times better than Jug Ears

Posted by: beedubya at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (AnTyA)

84 here we go......

Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (ucxC/)

85

Why is it when a Democrat picks a nominee, there is never a concern that the nominee might become a rightie, however when a republican names someone to the court, there is always a 25 percent chance that person becomes a lefty

Because the Republicans try to play nice and fair and think people will do the same in return. See Gang of 14 idiots.

Posted by: Mama AJ at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (XdlcF)

86 57 Ace is gonna have a lot of double-posting to do this afternoon...

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 10:55 AM (V40IZ)

Ace???

Posted by: Charlie Gibson at April 09, 2010 07:04 AM (YVZlY)

87 We don't have a Palestinian Justice yet. Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 11:03 AM (QrA9E) Don't give him any ideas. A Muslim Justice. That would really be the beginning of the end for sure

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (0GFWk)

88 How about Oprah?  Everyone likes her.

Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (W5NBA)

89 78 No way it's a Hymie.  Gotta be a sistah.   Just not this sistah.  Did someone say "summer of racism"?

Eww! A big ACORN add on that site...

Posted by: Pyrocles at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (xzSvW)

90

Lynn Stewart?

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (wuv1c)

91 Justice Frank, the first openly gay man on the bench?

Posted by: ErikW at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (l5xbP)

92

FLOTUS gets my vote.

Posted by: kingfisher at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (yXA8m)

93 *ding-dong!*  Anybody want another beer at the White House?  Eh?

Posted by: Henry Louis Gates, Jr. at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (V40IZ)

94 He hadn't hired that many interns so it was obvious.

Posted by: Neo at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (tE8FB)

95

Elections matter, huh?

Thanks Republican asswipes that didn't want to hold your nose for McCain!!

Hope you sleep well with your principles in tact.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (pLTLS)

96 However his wife is a notorious anti-semite so that may not play well for him.

That horse is out of the barn, so Juggy might say fuck it.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (mHQ7T)

97

Is Stevens the one who would go "jogging" late and night, but in reality trolling for gay sex?

 

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:05 AM (wuv1c)

98

How about Cynthia McKinney? She's in desperate need of a job these days isnt she ?

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:06 AM (t72+4)

99 Kagan is supposedly the favourite for the vacancy, is my understanding.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 09, 2010 07:06 AM (yfJ6g)

100 Supreme Court Justice Ibrahim Hooper

Posted by: BSR at April 09, 2010 07:06 AM (AJreE)

101 Charlie Gibson?  Never heard of 'im.

Posted by: Charles Gibson at April 09, 2010 07:06 AM (V40IZ)

102 97 here we go......

Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 09, 2010 11:04 AM (ucxC/)

Yes.  Everyone assume the position...

Posted by: Barack "I'll lube you first" Obama at April 09, 2010 07:06 AM (YVZlY)

103

Elections matter, huh?

Thanks Republican asswipes that didn't want to hold your nose for McCain!!

Hope you sleep well with your principles in tact.

Lacey, while i agree with you, i have two questions.

1) do you think the liberal justices would have retired during a mccain presidency?

2) Do you think we would have gotten a Alito or Roberts from McCain?

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (wuv1c)

104 How about Cynthia McKinney? She's in desperate need of a job these days isnt she ? Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:06 AM (t72+4) They ler her out of Gaza? Too bad.

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (0GFWk)

105

Whoever the nominee is, if she is even a little left of center, the GOP had better keep the empathetic retard bottled up in committee (as they can't get a committee vote without at least one Yea from the minority).  Lindsey Grahamnesty had better learn that he will not stab us in the back, again.

The GOP had better hold the line on this.  I am sick of their caving in.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (tdWBE)

106 Dede Scoffapalooza?

Posted by: the Supreme Court Search Comittee at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (YVZlY)

107 In re Sunstein: "However his wife is a notorious anti-semite so that may not play well for him" Ah. You mean like Barry himself.

Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:07 AM (AZGON)

108 It has to be an Asian, female, lesbian who already has a "life" partner.  They have  two adopted Cambodian refugee children a blind dog with three legs and cat with an extra tail.

That'll work.

Posted by: mpfs at April 09, 2010 07:08 AM (iYbLN)

109 However his wife is a notorious anti-semite so that may not play well for him

That would increase his appeal to Barry.

We are going to get to the point where you have to replace a Justice with someone of the same sex and religion.

Only if it's a "correct" religion.  If Alito or Thomas dropped dead tomorrow (please God, grant them long life!) they won't be replaced by practicing Catholics.



Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:08 AM (mR7mk)

110 Smart Inuit...maybe


Todd Palin isn't doing anything right now....

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 07:09 AM (VY5KX)

111 Hey we got 41 votes now, bitch, bring it on.

Posted by: Kemp at April 09, 2010 07:09 AM (vSiVD)

112 The Repubs have had bad luck with judges because they have been forced to go left by Dem controlled Senates and because in some cases the Repub in office was a liberal as well.

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 07:09 AM (QrA9E)

113


Ladies and gentlemen, I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Maxine Waters.


Alright, I'm just having a bit of fun torturing myself right now and enjoying the pain, pay no attention.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (t72+4)

114 OK, there are things about Kagen that came up before which made her a very bad choice, but I can't remember them. Not that it matters because the dummy will do what he wants and the rubber stamps in the Senate will OK it and the Republicans will just shut up about the whole thing anyway like always.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (RZ8pf)

115 BTW, we have never had a conservative justice appointed by a Dem because we have never had a conservative Dem president.

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (QrA9E)

116 He'll nominate liu as a distraction then put in the one he really wants.

Posted by: Mrs. Compton at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (NaJ/S)

117

They ler her out of Gaza? Too bad.

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 11:07 AM (0GFWk)

I figured she was still blockade running while flying the Jolly Roger on some piece of shit fishing trawler.

Posted by: ErikW at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (l5xbP)

118 It better not be someone who is a Mormon.

Posted by: Someguy - keeping Mormons in their place at all times at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (YVZlY)

119

118  Well Bush first went with Meirs and we see how well that worked for him. In the end, he found his senses.

Even if McCain went a similar route it wouldn't be as treacherous as the pinko O will nominate.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:10 AM (pLTLS)

120 129  I wish not to be an unwilling party in your masochistic excercise there Blazer.

Posted by: unknown jane at April 09, 2010 07:11 AM (5/yRG)

121

Ben makes a good point.

It is, unfortunately, not hard at all for me to envision John McCain nominating Sonia Sotomayor...

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:11 AM (V40IZ)

122 I have no problem with any of these suggestions.

Posted by: Lindsey Graham at April 09, 2010 07:11 AM (W5NBA)

123

I am willing to bet money that Obama gets whoever he picks through the senate.

The Republicans have 41 votes, but not all 41 are conservative republicans. They will not stop his Supreme Court pick, even the Democrats didn't stop Bush's picks who were clearly conservatives.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:11 AM (wuv1c)

124 36 Justice William Jefferson Clinton

Not possible, he has been disbarred.

Posted by: Kemp at April 09, 2010 07:11 AM (vSiVD)

125 He'll nominate the wookie.

Posted by: TC at April 09, 2010 07:12 AM (DYJjQ)

126 Here's an idea that limits a possible loss of a Demotard Senate seat: Justice Barbara Boxer. This would be like "crossing the beams."

Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:12 AM (AZGON)

127 130 See 66. She's not only liberal, she's an anti-military one. But she has only been arguing cases for a year. 1 lousy year. 

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (yfJ6g)

128

"Only if it's a "correct" religion.  If Alito or Thomas dropped dead tomorrow (please God, grant them long life!) they won't be replaced by practicing Catholics."

Supreme Court Jusice Martha Coakley!

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (V40IZ)

129 Posted by: Kemp at April 09, 2010 11:11 AM (vSiVD)

There's no requirement that a justice be a lawyer.

Posted by: DrewM. at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (9B5OK)

130

Actually, in hindsight that was probably George Bush's greatest accomplishment, getting two guaranteed conservatives on the court whose loyalty isn't in question.

Absolutely correct.  GWB managed his SCOTUS appointments brilliantly.   As bad as things may be right now, if he had appointed pseudo-conservatives prone to "growing" on the Court they would be far far worse. 

Posted by: JPS at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (aY76I)

131 It'd be great if the Republicans in the Senate could tie this up until after the election, the polls on which surely pushed the 90 year old guy to retire (oh, so NOW you feel ready for retirement?), but of course they'd never show that much fight.  Wouldn't be Senatorial if they didn't roll over, see?

Posted by: brak at April 09, 2010 07:13 AM (W5NBA)

132

Oh, I can top that, Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Henry Waxman.

Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 11:11 AM (V9SYy)

It can't be Waxman.  His nostrils are needed for when they expand the Library of Congress.

Posted by: conscious and considering all warehouse options at April 09, 2010 07:14 AM (YVZlY)

133 Not possible, he has been disbarred.

Ain't no rule that Supreme Court justices have to be lawyers or belong to a bar association

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 09, 2010 07:14 AM (NfIvb)

134 How about Hillary?  Then I can finally be rid of her.

Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:15 AM (W5NBA)

135 Justice William Jefferson Clinton

Not possible, he has been disbarred.


Actually, if memory serves, a law license isn't a Constitutional requirement for a SCOTUS justice. 

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 07:15 AM (VY5KX)

136 Does he have to name an american to the court? Why not name a european? or Middle Easterner?

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:15 AM (wuv1c)

137 147 Posted by: Kemp at April 09, 2010 11:11 AM (vSiVD)

There's no requirement that a justice be a lawyer.

Posted by: DrewM. at April 09, 2010 11:13 AM (9B5OK)

Do they have to be living?

Posted by: Zombie Ted Kennedy at April 09, 2010 07:16 AM (YVZlY)

138

Yeah he could nominate Wooks.

You don't have to even be an attorney to get the nom so that will work out well for the woman that was forced to give up her law license.

The robe would at least cover the boob belts. So we'd have that going for us I suppose.

Girl, you look good horrific when you back that thang up.....

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:16 AM (pLTLS)

139 See 66. She's not only liberal, she's an anti-military one. But she has only been arguing cases for a year. 1 lousy year.


Didn't keep me out of the Attorney General's office....

Posted by: Zombie RFK at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (VY5KX)

140 The Republicans have 41 votes, but not all 41 are conservative republicans.

Remember with judicial nominees at least ONE Republican on the committee will have to vote yes to get it to the floor to even have a vote.

But......Lindsey "asshole" Graham is on the committee.

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (QrA9E)

141 It would be funny, and by funny i mean soul destroying, if Obama nominated some 30 year old extreme lefty. He would essentially have a seat on the court for the next 60 years.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (wuv1c)

142 Hey! I'm out of the closet and ready to preside.

Posted by: Ricky Martin - Supreme Court Nominee at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (YVZlY)

143 There's no requirement that a justice be a lawyer.

Hmmm. I didn't know that. Rahm, get Bill Ayers on his cell, pronto.

Posted by: Barack Hussein Toonces Obama at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (554T5)

144


Oh, I can top that, Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Henry Waxman.

Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 11:11 AM (V9SYy)



O'rly? Ladies and Gentlemen,  I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Janeane Garafalo.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:17 AM (t72+4)

145 Huh.  I thought it would be next week.

I hereby announce my availability for the position.  If nothing else, written opinions would be far, far, far, more interesting than they are now.  Not to mention oral argument wherein "Do you really think the Court is that retarded" will be a valid question. 

Posted by: alexthechick at April 09, 2010 07:18 AM (8WZWv)

146 Might as well go full libtard - it's not like it would shift the ideology of the court much, in this case. Moonbat for a moonbat.

Posted by: DocJ at April 09, 2010 07:18 AM (dt6br)

147 @159 The first Justice to wear sofa upholstery on the bench.

Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:19 AM (AZGON)

148 He should nominate Mike Huckabee, that way we don;t have to worry about him winning the 2012 Republican Primaries.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:19 AM (wuv1c)

150 Fuck you all. May I present Supreme Court Justice Julio!

Posted by: ErikW at April 09, 2010 07:19 AM (l5xbP)

151 Dear Republican Senatorial Idiots,

Pardon me, for I am about to paint with a broad brush here, but I do feel there is a certain truth to what I am about to say:

A Court justice retiring. Scylla and Charybdis, isn't it? Oppose with vigor whomever Obama nominates, and you get pilloried in the press, and that chance for a majority that seemed to shine so brightly just so few minutes ago fades.

Don't oppose with vigor, and that "ruthless against the right, spineless against the left, above all always opportunistic" meme that many on "your" side view you through gains greater traction, and that chance for a majority that seemed to shine so brightly just so few minutes ago fades.

This is what happens when, as a corporate entity, you temporize all the time and do not really make last stands. Those who would oppose you anyways don't respect you; those who would support you anwways don't trust you; and those that would perhaps be converted if they heard a robust argument don't choose you-because that argument was never made. For you spent more time trying to determine wind directions in the future than risking and daring today.

We are at a crisis point in the American character and can no longer afford the luxury of those will not put skin in the game.

Posted by: Horatius at April 09, 2010 07:19 AM (Kqe92)

152

He could nominate the man that couldn't even graduate law school without plagiarizing, Slow Joe.

That would free up the VP slot.

Plus, it would be a big fucking deal.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (pLTLS)

153 Remember with judicial nominees at least ONE Republican on the committee will have to vote yes to get it to the floor to even have a vote. But......Lindsey "asshole" Graham is on the committee. Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 11:17 AM (QrA9E) Is that true? That at least one R has to vote yes???

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (0GFWk)

154 142 36 Justice William Jefferson Clinton

Not possible, he has been disbarred.

He also wants to be the next U.N. chairman.

Posted by: Pyrocles at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (xzSvW)

155

 OK, so what historic skin color/ personal story gets picked next?

*waiting for the phone to ring.


Posted by: Pat Johnson - Post-Op Transgendered Lesbian Lawyer at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (tWf3S)

156 Just for that, I'll wear the belts on the outside of the robe.  Like Ruthie's neck-doily.

Posted by: M'cel Obama at April 09, 2010 07:21 AM (+hPIb)

157 Sock fail/

Posted by: ErikW at April 09, 2010 07:22 AM (l5xbP)

158 You just KNOW it's gotta be...

Justice Cynthia McKinney

Posted by: Nighthawk at April 09, 2010 07:22 AM (OtQXp)

159 Is Cesar Chavez still alive?  OK, how about....umm.... Carlos Mencia?  Damn it I need a name!  But I wanna be the one to appoint the first Hispanic Justice!  And I need it by Cinco de Ocho or whatever that holiday is!

Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:22 AM (W5NBA)

160 If Obama's going to go for broke, why not nominate Bill Ayers?

Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 07:23 AM (9hSKh)

161 Duuuuuuuude....

Posted by: Supreme Court Bummer Sean Penn at April 09, 2010 07:23 AM (+hPIb)

162 @173 Have you, at last, no Senatorial comity, sir?

Posted by: Lindsay Graham at April 09, 2010 07:24 AM (AZGON)

163 124--Hey, how about that cop chick from The Wire? I think she fits most of your categories, and she has value added as a black woman, too.


Posted by: dulce at April 09, 2010 07:24 AM (HFdqI)

164 alexthechick for SCOTUS!

Robe and stompy boots!

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:24 AM (mR7mk)

165 OK, maybe Cynthia McKinney is a bit extreme.

I think Ramsey Clark is still alive isn't he?

Posted by: Nighthawk at April 09, 2010 07:24 AM (OtQXp)

166 And you, little person trying to stop the greatness that is Obama Care, clearly do not understand how great the law is. So not only do I reject your claims, but I dub thee Today's WORST LITIGANT IN THE WOOOOOORRRLLLLLDDDDD!

Posted by: Supreme Court Justice Keith Olbermann at April 09, 2010 11:19 AM (V9SYy)




And you, coming in here thinking you have the right to own firearms while whole American communities live in terror from roving bands of white supremacist tea-party gangs and babies are dying in the streets from gunfire.

Do YOU have no sense of decency sir? Sir, do YOU?

Posted by: U.S. SCJ Keefums Obergruppenfuhrer at April 09, 2010 07:24 AM (t72+4)

167 and she has value added as a black woman, too.

Added value?  There should be a tax.

Posted by: Paul Volcker at April 09, 2010 07:25 AM (mR7mk)

168

*waiting for the phone to ring.

Just sit your white ass down.  It's my time now, bitch!

Posted by: Wanda Sykes at April 09, 2010 07:26 AM (tWf3S)

169 Early guess...he goes for broke.

Second early guess..the Republicans cave.

Posted by: kansas at April 09, 2010 07:26 AM (mka2b)

170
Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you, Supreme Court Associate Justice Micheal Moore.

Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 11:23 AM (V9SYy)






O.k., I give up, you win. I cant think of anything worse than that.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:26 AM (t72+4)

171

 Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you, Supreme Court Associate Justice Micheal Moore.

Do the robes come in XXXXXXXXXXXXXXL?

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:27 AM (pLTLS)

172 Hey, what am I... Just roadkill under the bus?

Posted by: Van Jones at April 09, 2010 07:27 AM (AZGON)

173 You just KNOW it's gotta be... Justice Cynthia McKinney Posted by: Nighthawk at April 09, 2010 11:22 AM (OtQXp) Is there a weight limit?

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:27 AM (0GFWk)

174

You know, *lip-lick* I don't really  *lip-lick* have a whole lot going  *lip-lick* on anymore, either...  *lip-lick*

Posted by: Anita Dunn at April 09, 2010 07:27 AM (+hPIb)

175 Hey, how about that cop chick from The Wire? I think she fits most of your categories, and she has value added as a black woman, too. Black & Asian, not a lesbian, but played one on TV!

Posted by: Massholio at April 09, 2010 07:28 AM (4Kl5M)

176 You know who would be a good pick?

Someone with awesome analytical powers,

That's who.

Meet Supreme Court Justice Paul Krugman.

Posted by: franksalterego at April 09, 2010 07:28 AM (+6fgE)

177 He'll go for broke. 

He knows he's going to lose a lot of his oomph after the mid-terms, so the only way to get re-elected is to keep his base of ultra-leftist kooks highly enthusiastic (so they'll be willing to do anything IYKWIMAITTYD to get him elected).  He has to make the case that the POTUS position is worth fighting for, even without both houses of Congress, so that means wacky proclamations on foreign policy (see recent statements about nukes) and seating wackos to the bench.

Republicans need to state flat out that they are no longer going to play this gentlemen's game of seating whoever the POTUS chooses and vow to fight a bad pick. 

Posted by: Y-not is yawning at April 09, 2010 07:28 AM (Kn9r7)

178 Given the manifest dicklessness of the RINOP so far during the reign of Ogabe I, expect them to roll over and bite the pillow

Posted by: OhioDude at April 09, 2010 07:28 AM (d6j6Y)

179

"Do the robes come in XXXXXXXXXXXXXXL?"

Excellent question.

Posted by: Supreme Court Nominee Ed "Round Mound of Sound" Schultz at April 09, 2010 07:29 AM (+hPIb)

180 Is that true? That at least one R has to vote yes???

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 11:21 AM (0GFWk)

Yes, it is.  From the Senate Judiciary committee rules:

IV. BRINGING A MATTER TO A VOTE

The Chairman shall entertain a non-debatable motion to bring a matter before the Committee to a vote. If there is objection to bring the matter to a vote without further debate, a roll call vote of the Committee shall be taken, and debate shall be terminated if the motion to bring the matter to a vote without further debate passes with ten votes in the affirmative, one of which must be cast by the minority.

This is why Grahamnesty was such a despicable shithead.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 09, 2010 07:29 AM (tdWBE)

181 I think the silver lining here is that its going to be pretty hard for Obama to pick someone to the left of Stevens.

But that's about it.

And yeah, Obama will try to ram through the most liberal candidate he possibly can.


Posted by: looking closely at April 09, 2010 07:29 AM (PwGfd)

182 Of course he is going to go for broke. This is probably his last chance with the elections in 2010 coming up. And if the Rs don't fight this, it will effect 2010

Posted by: nevergiveup at April 09, 2010 07:30 AM (0GFWk)

183 Can I nominate myself?  Because that would be awesome!

Posted by: President Barry! at April 09, 2010 07:30 AM (W5NBA)

184 re: 187.

You know, you're right. I take it all back...

Of course, on the other hand, maybe some of our guys should learn how to twist the knife in while smiling...if nothing else, for the change.

Posted by: Horatius at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (Kqe92)

185

Michael Moore, Mallamutt?

Do those fancy benches that the Supremes sit at have a weight limit?  I guess they could be reinforced like a nuclear missile solo....

Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (9hSKh)

186 If Obama does nominate some ridiculous person like Henry Waxman, the next conservative president with the opportunity to appoint to the Supremes could nominate a person who embodies the essence of judicial excellence, a very wise person with great public appeal and recognition for public service, the lovely Paris Hilton.

Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (M5t+h)

187

O.k., I can think of one that is worse than Michael Moore, not much worse though.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you United States Supreme Court Justice Cindy Sheehan

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (t72+4)

188

Triple word score if the black ghey lady is also a dyslexic midget with Chron's disease.

/sympathetic and all

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (pLTLS)

189 I'm betting a black woman will be the nominee.  Bonus points if she is ghey

FKOTUS, gotta be.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:31 AM (mR7mk)

190

To Slublog's comment.

 

Pennsylvania is a socially conservative state. We had the last true Pro Life Democrat Bob Casey(the father not the retarded son who is our senator), who wasn't allowed to speak at the 1992 convention because of his pro life views.

We have a lot of catholics and union men, who are anti abortion and pro gun  rights.

So this nomination could cost specter his seat if he hasn't lost it already.

 

I think Pat Toomey will win anyway, but this could further sink Specter.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:32 AM (wuv1c)

191 Now, y'all just take the racism down a notch in here, alright?

Posted by: Supreme Court Nominee Michael Steele at April 09, 2010 07:32 AM (+hPIb)

192 Two words. Native American.

Posted by: Big Swede at April 09, 2010 07:32 AM (1EZ8w)

193

Video of Grayson breaking up meeting:

http://tinyurl.com/y83as7u

http://tinyurl.com/y7tzu7r - start watching at 2:50 when he becomes a real jerk

 

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at April 09, 2010 07:32 AM (YVZlY)

194


Two flaming skulls in one day so far and its not even lunch time yet.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:34 AM (t72+4)

195 We have already seen the Demotards this year care nothing about electoral backlash. Given that the Senate Jud. Comm. will roll over for Barry, including Graham of course, the Pezzydent gets his way in the confirmation no matter if he picks Kate Gosselin. Any opposition guarantees MSM howls of Racism/Bigotry Eleventy. So it is hard to imagine not going for lefty broke.

Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:34 AM (AZGON)

196

"Supreme Court Justice Michael Moore"

SILVER LINING:  No way in hell you'd ever see national legislation mandating Meatless Mondays pass the Constitutionality test.

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:35 AM (+hPIb)

197 My standards for this are pretty low, just give us someone who hasn't cheated on his or her taxes, isn't a member of a racial supremacist group, broken a law or tried to blow up a building.

Posted by: billhedrick at April 09, 2010 07:35 AM (gTZyc)

198

"Two flaming skulls in one day so far and its not even lunch time yet."

Stupak Thread was downgraded to DEFCON #2.

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:36 AM (+hPIb)

199 i'm sticking with Supreme Court Justice-ette Lynn Stewart

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:36 AM (wuv1c)

200 I'm sure it's been said as I didn't get through the first 100 or so posts. but let's not overlook the obvious hear: Clinton, Hillary

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:37 AM (pLTLS)

201

"just give us someone who hasn't cheated on his or her taxes, isn't a member of a racial supremacist group, broken a law or tried to blow up a building."

Crap, you just crossed off everyone on my list.

Besides....uh....er....last time I checked....you weren't an expert on...uh....supreme court eligibility policy...

Posted by: BHO at April 09, 2010 07:37 AM (+hPIb)

202


SILVER LINING:  No way in hell you'd ever see national legislation mandating Meatless Mondays pass the Constitutionality test.

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 11:35 AM (+hPIb)





The Bad News: He's liable to get hungry in the middle of a hearing and eat the remaining conservative justices on the bench.

Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 07:38 AM (t72+4)

203

I wish Obama named someone who currently sits on the Honduran supreme court, they have balls.

 

That said, Supreme Court Justice Manual Zeylaya. You heard it here first.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:38 AM (wuv1c)

204 I nominate Megyn Kelly just to cleanse the palate from all the previous nominees.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 09, 2010 07:38 AM (tf9Ne)

205 Any Muslim Islamic Sharia judges available?

Posted by: Fritz at April 09, 2010 07:39 AM (GwPRU)

206

As a lecturer who specializes in the Constitution, I have not found anything that would bar me from being both the President of the United States AND a Supreme Court Justice at the same time.

So, today, I hereby appoint myself to fill Justice Steven's seat, effective immediately......

Posted by: President Narcissus at April 09, 2010 07:39 AM (tWf3S)

207 Bill Clinton?

Don't laugh. It would undermine a filibuster.

Posted by: Chris R at April 09, 2010 07:39 AM (AO4qz)

208 113 Kagan is supposedly the favourite for the vacancy, is my understanding.

She certainly has been beaten with the ugly stick enough. Makes looking at Bader Ginsburg not so bad.


Posted by: President Mac Daddy at April 09, 2010 07:39 AM (EL+OC)

209 The President should nominate me since I'm so scary smart.

Posted by: Polly Carboner at April 09, 2010 07:39 AM (f7A+e)

210 I always wondered who the flaming skull was. Now we know, Justice Stevens.

Posted by: Rocks at April 09, 2010 07:40 AM (Q1lie)

211

#234  Maybe they should nominate both Clintons to be a justice?

/If Bill and Hillary had a "co-Presidency", why not a "co-Justiceship"?

Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 07:40 AM (9hSKh)

212 This just in on CNN, stupak retiring

Posted by: Alexander at April 09, 2010 07:40 AM (dFuoX)

213 Can anyone shop up a flaming colostomy bag instead of the skull?

Posted by: Barbarian at April 09, 2010 07:40 AM (EL+OC)

214

I nominate Megyn Kelly just to cleanse the palate from all the previous nominees.

I'll go ahead and get the joke out of the way here--

Man I'd love to see her on oral.....

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 07:41 AM (pLTLS)

215

"I nominate Megyn Kelly just to cleanse the palate from all the previous nominees."

Clarence Thomas would keep throwing her robe in the dryer on the "Towels" setting when she isn't around...

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:41 AM (+hPIb)

216 Supreme Court Justice Joy Behar.



Yeah, I know.

Posted by: Thomas at April 09, 2010 07:41 AM (UWa61)

217 Do Obama go for the upfront, honest ultra liberal he and the left want or does he need to go for another stealth, pretend moderate like Sotomayor?

Early guess...he goes for broke.


Yeah, he'll go for broke. He could nominate Hugo Chavez and the media would paint him as a moderate, as always, it comes down to the Washington R's having the stones to go after whoever the nominee is or not. And that's a bet we tend to lose quite a bit.

Posted by: koopy at April 09, 2010 07:41 AM (ctR4U)

218 241

I nominate Megyn Kelly just to cleanse the palate from all the previous nominees.

I'll go ahead and get the joke out of the way here--

Man I'd love to see her on oral.....

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 11:41 AM (pLTLS)

BUNK!

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at April 09, 2010 07:42 AM (YVZlY)

219 Associate Justice Tom Morello.

Radical Maoist politics and Multiracial poster boy. SCOTUS sessions will now have a bitchin' hiphop/metal soundtrack.

And the relatively pro-American, pro-military movie "Iron Man" will now be banned, because conservatives get too much pleasure from watching Tony Stark squish Morello into jello during the cave escape scene.



Yeah, I used the word "boy". I denounce myself.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 07:43 AM (VY5KX)

220

All I know is that if Barney Frank announces his retirement we're going to need a really flaming scull for that post..

 

 

that's right, i went there, deal with it.

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:43 AM (wuv1c)

221 He could nominate Hugo Chavez and the media would paint him as a moderate

Nothing in the Constitution says judges have to be natural-born citizens.  Setting the odds on Hugo at 500-1.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:43 AM (mR7mk)

222 Justices.  Whatever.  Who's making the book?

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:44 AM (mR7mk)

223

BTW, I think it important to point out what an America-hating retarded piece of shit Strevens has been.  Retiring for this America-hating third-world commie loon in the White House is Stevens' final act of betrayal against the US.

Any justice who was not totally and unequivocally appalled by the Indonesian Imbecile's inane support of Zelaya's constitution-breaking coup attempt in Honduras has earned a place in the world's Hall of Shame.  Stevens is a twit and America-hater of the highest order.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 09, 2010 07:44 AM (tdWBE)

224 This guy says Kagan. He also goes over the other possibilities. The commentary is pretty nauseating in spots but he seems to know what he's talking about.

Posted by: joncelli at April 09, 2010 07:44 AM (RD7QR)

225 Ugh, all those potential nominees are pretty young too.  We could see almost 30 years of the asshat on the bence, even if they do not retire at Stevens' age.

Posted by: logprof at April 09, 2010 07:44 AM (CE2wR)

226 Breaking news:  Obama will nominate Ahmadeijad for Supreme Court.

Posted by: Un-naturally born at April 09, 2010 07:45 AM (pq986)

227


O.k., I give up, you win. I cant think of anything worse than that.

How aboutSupreme Court Justice Al Franken.

Posted by: todler at April 09, 2010 07:45 AM (fPOY0)

228 With Megyn Kelly on the court, Clarence Thomas would be forced to dust off the old standby video, Long Dong Silver.

Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 07:45 AM (M5t+h)

229 "...maybe some of our guys should learn how to twist the knife in while smiling...if nothing else, for the change." Tut tut. In the Senate, Republicans use knives for butter only.

Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 07:46 AM (AZGON)

230

"Radical Maoist politics and Multiracial poster boy. SCOTUS sessions will now have a bitchin' hiphop/metal soundtrack."

Tha Notorious S.C.J.

-or-

Jus' Def.

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:46 AM (+hPIb)

231

I nominate Megyn Kelly just to cleanse the palate from all the previous nominees.

Thank you, as I was set to open a bottle of Guiness with all the nasea-inducing picks. Hmmm, I wonder how that would go with gravy and biscuits? I might try that anyway...

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 09, 2010 07:46 AM (i3AsK)

232

252 Ugh, all those potential nominees are pretty young too.  We could see almost 30 years of the asshat on the bence, even if they do not retire at Stevens' age.

That's the point.  But you already knew that.

Let's see, who else hasn't been covered yet?

Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 07:47 AM (9hSKh)

233 219 Two words.

Native American.

One word but two syllables:

Hindu.

Seriously, I wondered why Obama was so keen to appt Asians (like the aborted Surgeon General and the tech appointees) until I saw that breakdown of the richest U.S. groups by religion.  Hindu was second, behind Judaism and I think we know how Obama feels about Jooos. 

Posted by: Y-not is yawning at April 09, 2010 07:47 AM (Kn9r7)

234 I nominate me. That way, Michael Newdow would finally get a fair hearing.

Posted by: Christoph at April 09, 2010 07:48 AM (l5xbP)

235 If this weren't so serious, I'd be enjoying how unpleasant life is going to be for Senate Democrats much more.

And if we can keep our shit together until 2012 and roll The Won out of office, the Senate will surely follow, as 24 of 33 seats up for grabs are currently held by Democrats.

Posted by: Widespread Panic at April 09, 2010 07:48 AM (8/DeP)

236 Specter is toast

Posted by: Neo at April 09, 2010 07:48 AM (tE8FB)

237 As far as who Obama will nominate I think it it going to be from far left field. Perhaps not even a sitting judge.  I think they think they can kill 2 birds with one stone. Rally the troops with a radical abortionist supporter and gte Health care out of people's minds. Except the Dems to use this nomination as a referendum on abortion which they think is a winning issue for them.

Yes, Wood fits the bill but she's too old. Expect someone 50 years old at most.

Posted by: Rocks at April 09, 2010 07:50 AM (Q1lie)

238 Is that true? That at least one R has to vote yes???

Yes, is true.

Just watched another one of those stupid fair and balanced debates. The Dem rep was Bob "Cockholster" Beckle. He was about as bad as Obama. Every time he opened his ugly yap a lie spewed forth,  The so-called Republican at one pointy laughed at him, but he didn't call him a liar.

BTW, the Republicans are the ones who "politicized" the SCOTUS nomination process.
 

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 07:51 AM (QrA9E)

239 Do y'all ..uh...uh...think that Rosie O'Donnell..uh... uh.. might be interested?

Posted by: President Narcissus at April 09, 2010 07:51 AM (wWwJR)

240

Whatabout someguy?  

He's like a cross between Lance Winslow and Roland Burris, only conservative.

Posted by: Fritz at April 09, 2010 07:52 AM (GwPRU)

241 Local GOP Members Have Confrontation With Democrat Alan Grayson, Caught on Tape

Posted by: newer at April 09, 2010 07:53 AM (D2axM)

242 BTW, the Republicans are the ones who "politicized" the SCOTUS nomination process.

Yeah, damn that Reagan for nominating Bork.  (WTF?)

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 07:53 AM (mR7mk)

243

Justice William Jefferson Clinton    Posted by: Easy Bake at April 09, 2010 10:47 AM (QZA9F)

Damnit, I just shot hot coffee out of my nose. Damn that hurts.

Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at April 09, 2010 07:54 AM (3IZGh)

244 Specter is toast So how would that nomination work out? It could make for some interesting viewing.

Posted by: fluffy at April 09, 2010 07:54 AM (4Kl5M)

245

"O.k., I give up, you win. I cant think of anything worse than that."

You aren't trying hard enough.

Supreme Court Justice Peggy Joseph.

(FUN!  To get her name, I Bing'd "pay my mortgage and put gas in my car"  Do it yourself, and see what the first result is!)

Posted by: reason at April 09, 2010 07:54 AM (+hPIb)

246 Hillary! Hillary! Hillary! Buries her on the Court for life and allows the Hard Left to stay in Control of the Partei. This is a NO BRAINER!!!!

Posted by: section9 at April 09, 2010 07:55 AM (H6lGz)

247

Chief Justice David Frum?

Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 07:55 AM (wuv1c)

248

Early guess...he goes for broke.

He'll have to. It's the last chance before midterms.

Posted by: harleycowboy at April 09, 2010 07:55 AM (JKGfQ)

249

He's like a cross between Lance Winslow and Roland Burris, only conservative.

Posted by: Fritz at April 09, 2010 11:52 AM (GwPRU)

Ah yes, Lance Winslow, married to Joey Heatherton and he also had an affinity for flashing young girls.  Nothing serious, but booted from the Dallas Cowboys for being a perv by Tom Landry.

Posted by: Fish at April 09, 2010 07:56 AM (M5t+h)

250

"Whatabout someguy?"

Are you fucking insane, assclown?

When you're in the highest court of the land, there is nothing to do but PUNCH DOWN.

Jees, the quality we have around here, folks...fucking Law 101 here...

Posted by: someguy at April 09, 2010 07:57 AM (+hPIb)

251 Thank you for the nomination, Mr. President. The planet can breathe a reduced carbon sigh of relief!

Posted by: Al Gore at April 09, 2010 07:57 AM (l5xbP)

252 BTW, the Republicans are the ones who "politicized" the SCOTUS nomination process.
 

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 11:51 AM (QrA9E)

--How so?

Posted by: logprof at April 09, 2010 07:58 AM (CE2wR)

253 278  All right, that's it!  You just managed to make me vomit in my mouth some -- I held on pretty damn well (with a lot of provocation on this thread), but now you've done it!  Hope you're happy, scrambled eggs and ham, black coffee is not better the second time around!

Posted by: unknown jane at April 09, 2010 08:00 AM (5/yRG)

254

The so-called Republican at one pointy laughed at him,

I do so love when that happens on those shows.  The "Republican" laughs at the silly, lying Democrat operative, then the Dem laughs, knowing full well that they are completely full of shit, then everyone laughs, because they all know the Dem was full of shit, but at least he was able to get his talking point out, thank God, then they move on. 

Everyone is laughing and having fun, and the Dem has, once again, gotten away with spewing his lies and bullshit, completely unchallenged.

Posted by: wiserbud at April 09, 2010 08:02 AM (wWwJR)

255 Obama, if he is smart enough, will nominate Biden to the supreme court. It would be a twofer for Obama. He gets rid of Sir Gaffe-a-lot, who is liberal on pretty much everything anyways, and replaces the VP with someone more geared to his thinking, such as Pelosi, or any other well known leftist leaning person such as Susan Herman of the ACLU, Sam Webb of the CPUSA, or Greg Pason of the Socialist party.
And with Biden's time in the senate, confirmation might go much easier.

However, it would be nice if somehow he nominates a liberal only to see them become ever more conservative than Alito. Nice dream to have, even though it will most likely never happen.

Posted by: SGT Bazz at April 09, 2010 08:04 AM (5ZMY/)

256 90 (Anthropological Island Tipping)
-----------
Anthropofascinating.

Posted by: Mr. Spawk at April 09, 2010 08:05 AM (3K4hn)

257 Lets not forget a Black Panther member or Eric Holder.  Whoever he picks has to be able to threaten the other members.  Or Jerimiah Wright.  Or Louis Farrakan.  The his pick could really be unprecidented.

Posted by: fightobama at April 09, 2010 08:05 AM (6IV8T)

258 134 It better not be someone who is a Mormon.
-----------
So... Beck is out, too?

Posted by: Anachronda at April 09, 2010 08:09 AM (3K4hn)

259

If it weren't for cockholster Graham, I'd say that there was no way an honest liberal gets out of committee.  Comity in the Senate is gone, except for that prick.

The Dems burned a lot of bridges with Health Control.  It's just that Graham always comes back saying, "Thank you, sir, may I have another?"

Posted by: AmishDude at April 09, 2010 08:10 AM (T0NGe)

260 I think it will be Pamela Karlan.

Posted by: Rocks at April 09, 2010 08:11 AM (Q1lie)

261 The answer to the question is: Of course he goes all in. Sure, the Tea Party and conservative base will get fired up. But they were fired up for hcr too, how'd that work out? Bottom line is, it was a long term win for liberals/progressives. How's that repeal thing looking for us conservatives? Not so good. And that's what BHO is playing for---long term. The Democrats have made it very clear that they couldnt give two shits about November. At this point, it's not a matter of if they lose, but by how much. He's already placed his first SCOTUS justice, an left wing La Raza extremist on the bench, of course he's going for a second extremist---because that's what he is. They're in it for keeps, these left wingers. They're playing for all the marbles, not just the next election cycle. And I can just picture Senator Grahamnesty's "tough" questioning for the hearings..."I like you alot Nominee X...I really do" Sigh....

Posted by: Olliander at April 09, 2010 08:15 AM (6uiF7)

262 156 Does he have to name an american to the court? Why not name a european? or Middle Easterner?
--------------

I do not like the cut of your jib and will pretend to have moved if your newsletter arrives.

Posted by: Anachronda at April 09, 2010 08:16 AM (3K4hn)

263 BTW, if Tommy Thompson (where are you?) runs, then WI goes from leans Dem to leans GOP instantly.

Posted by: AmishDude at April 09, 2010 08:17 AM (T0NGe)

264 Sure, the Tea Party and conservative base will get fired up. But they were fired up for hcr too, how'd that work out?

The question isn't "Will the conservatives get fired up?", it's "Will the Dems have the stomach to push things through?"

Arlen Specter surely didn't switch parties and lose all his seniority just so he could get absolutely thumped by Pat Toomey anyway because he sacrificed himself to put an ultra-left judge on the USSC.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 09, 2010 08:17 AM (S/HSv)

265 165 O'rly?
----------
I'm pretty sure Orly's right out.

(sorry; couldn't resist)

Posted by: Anachronda at April 09, 2010 08:19 AM (3K4hn)

266

--How so?

Posted by: logprof at April 09, 2010 11:58 AM (CE2wR)

That was one of the many outrageous lies that Beckle spewed.

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 08:37 AM (QrA9E)

267

All I know is that if Barney Frank announces his retirement we're going to need a really flaming scull for that post.

Maybe a feather boa, too.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 08:38 AM (mHQ7T)

268 284, I think you're on to something about threatening other SCOTUS members with pick of another, violent prone radical. I certainly wouldn't put it past Obama to do something like that.

Posted by: SGT Bazz at April 09, 2010 08:39 AM (5ZMY/)

269 Per FNC Stupack is retiring as well.

Lying slime.

Posted by: Lone Marauder at April 09, 2010 08:42 AM (/bVuS)

270

That was one of the many outrageous lies that Beckle spewed.

Posted by: Vic at April 09, 2010 12:37 PM (QrA9E)

Ah, gotcha!  sarc passed over my head.

Lone Marauder, there's a thread on Fart Stoolpack.  Scroll down to the flaming shitbag.

Posted by: logprof at April 09, 2010 08:44 AM (CE2wR)

271 Damn must have missed that one.  Sorry, all...now back to your regularly scheduled insanity...

Posted by: Lone Marauder at April 09, 2010 08:46 AM (/bVuS)

272 According to Conservatives4Palin.com, Sarah Palin's big SRLC speech was scheduled for around 1:30PM EST.  C-Span and CNN live coverage, etc, etc.  Now the WH has scheduled its Stevens press conference for ...   1:30 PM.

Posted by: mrp at April 09, 2010 08:47 AM (HjPtV)

273 Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you, Supreme Court Associate Justice Micheal Moore.

Ok, granted at first glance this would cause most conservatives to run screaming into the night in terror.  But, I can think of a few upsides here.

1.  He'd probably vote on the conservative side of things occasionally because the loony left position wasn't loony or left enough..

2.  When the Democrats put forth their next extension to this healthcare monstrosity and start trying to get rid of fast food joint's and fatty foods, he'd strike that down in a heartbeat.

3.  Considering his extreme obesity he's most likely going to pop a gasket relatively soon, hopefully during a conservative administration so we can nominate a replacement with half a brain who might actually read the constitution before immediately voting for s preset political ideology.

4.  Truth be told it doesn't really matter who Obama nominates, they'll be a lockstep liberal who will subvert the Constitution and legislate from the bench at every opportunity, so it's pretty much a moot point anyway.

5.  It would keep him too busy to make any more of those ridiculous "documentaries", if one can really consider the propagandized crap he produces a "documentary".

6. Those black robes are fairly slimming

Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 09, 2010 08:50 AM (e8T35)

274 Time to refresh the commies.

Posted by: Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg at April 09, 2010 09:14 AM (WGcw3)

275 Don't worry, my friends, my Gang of 14 will block the nomination of any nut or hard left radical.

Posted by: John McCain at April 09, 2010 09:16 AM (jat5l)

276 They'll put up token resistance, but the Republicans will roll over as they did with Sotomayor, for fear of scaring away the swing voters.

Posted by: davidt at April 09, 2010 09:27 AM (aag4W)

277 Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the next United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Barbra Streisand.

Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:32 AM (2g2ex)

278 Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the next United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Medea Benjamin.

Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:36 AM (2g2ex)

279 Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the next United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Desiree Rogers.

Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:37 AM (2g2ex)

280 Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the next United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Alec Baldwin.

Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:37 AM (2g2ex)

281 Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the next United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Alan Alda.

Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:41 AM (2g2ex)

282 Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the next United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Al Sharpton.

Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:42 AM (2g2ex)

283

[thumps microphone]   hello.....hello...is this on?

 

[crickets]

Posted by: Count de Monet at April 09, 2010 09:43 AM (2g2ex)

284 Posted by: Count de Monet

Count Da Money!

Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 09, 2010 09:54 AM (e8T35)

285 299 I'm not in the least bit surprised after Obama's lie about the Joint Chiefs of Staff signing off on his nuke treaty and specifically mentioning Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 09, 2010 10:56 AM (mHQ7T)

286 Related parody: One-Fifth of Living Constitution to Retire at End of Supreme Court Term tinyurl.com/yau2ffe

Posted by: Justin Camp at April 09, 2010 11:07 AM (nF4Jh)

287 Sorry but all of you people are wrong. Barack has already promisesd me the job. 

Posted by: White Sox Player To be Named Later at April 09, 2010 11:13 AM (Wmjm0)

288 No it's gonna be me...

Posted by: George Ringo Stevens at April 09, 2010 11:14 AM (Wmjm0)

289 If he has to choose between a very young, squishy lefty and an old hard line lefty, he'll go for young.  Nothing like having at least a swing vote in the Supremes....for 50 years.
So look for him to nominate a "moderate" (so-called by him and the Dems and the media--read "lefty") he can defend as a "moderate," who is a member of some minority group, and choose one who is as young as possible.
The Repubs rolled over for Sotomayor, a decision they will be able to repent at leisure for the next 40 years.  I hope they show some stones this time.

Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at April 09, 2010 03:48 PM (DTfZY)

291 balenciaga purse,balenciaga sale,Up to 70% off balenciaga handbags,latest balenciaga handbags clothes style,Free gift and Fast ship. balenciaga purse balenciaga sale Buy cartier ring, cartier love on abcartier.com. We also provide cartier bracelet, cartier jewelry and so on. Now come on and get what you want. Cartier Jewelry

Posted by: sibat0705 at April 11, 2010 12:03 AM (C4TIR)

292 to rein in or block some Bush administration policies, including the detention of suspected terrorists following the Sept.
<a href="http://www.boxux.com">windows 7 anytime upgrade home premium to professional key</a>11, 2001, attacks, its tilt toward protecting businesses from some lawsuits and its refusal to act against global warming.

Posted by: windows 7 product key at November 03, 2010 11:43 PM (Dwmgn)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
210kb generated in CPU 0.9956, elapsed 1.1358 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.9387 seconds, 420 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.