March 26, 2010
— DrewM Obama has set up a 'deficit reduction commission' that will report back to him by the end of the year, safely after the elections. And what do you think it's going to suggest we do about all this Obama debt? Cut spending or raise taxes? Yeah, me too.
Charles Krauthammer takes a look at our very European future.
What will it recommend? What can it recommend? Sure, Social Security can be trimmed by raising the retirement age, introducing means testing and changing the indexing formula from wage growth to price inflation.But this won't be nearly enough. As Obama has repeatedly insisted, the real money is in health-care costs -- which are locked in place by the new Obamacare mandates.
That's where the value-added tax comes in. For the politician, it has the virtue of expediency: People are used to sales taxes, and this one produces a river of revenue. Every 1 percent of VAT would yield up to $1 trillion a decade (depending on what you exclude -- if you exempt food, for example, the yield would be more like $900 billion).
...Obama set out to be a consequential president, on the order of Ronald Reagan. With the VAT, Obama's triumph will be complete. He will have succeeded in reversing Reaganism. Liberals have long complained that Reagan's strategy was to starve the (governmental) beast in order to shrink it: First, cut taxes -- then ultimately you have to reduce government spending.
Obama's strategy is exactly the opposite: Expand the beast and then feed it. Spend first -- which then forces taxation. Now that, with the institution of universal health care, we are becoming the full entitlement state, the beast will have to be fed.
And the VAT is the only trough in creation large enough.
That's a lot of money being drained from the productive, entrepreneurial economy and shoveled directly into the hands of the government. History has also shown us that a tax raised for one purpose won't go to just that use, it will be used as an excuse to raise spending overall, creating greater deficits and debt, thus leading to higher taxes and on and on and on.
Here's the nifty little trick of ObamaCare and Obama in general...he's going to try and force the Republicans into the position of being the tax collectors for his welfare state. When the bill starts coming due next year, the Democrats are going to be squabbling over who to pick as their minority leader in the House and if they are lucky, Senate Democrats will be trying to figure out how to do things with a 1 or 2 seat majority instead of the 9 they have now. If they are unlucky, they will be doing the same as their little brother in the House.
Even if Republicans can undo ObamaCare before the most disastrous elements take effect, there's still a tremendous amount of debt that's been run up thanks to the so-called 'stimulus' and other ObamaReidPelosi spending efforts.
The real question for the Republicans is, once they take over will they roll this stuff back?
The federal government uses 'base line budgeting' to set it's spending levels. That means all of Obama's spending is baked into the budget cake forever. As the bond markets are telling anyone who will listen, this isnÂ’t going to go on forever.
I honestly don't know with something as complex and large as the federal budget, with all its component parts, whether zero baseline budgeting is possible but it was part of the original Contract With America. The numbers don't lie about where we are going if we simply assume that all spending will continually grow and each larger budget is the minimum going forward.
I know this kind of root canal economic conservatism went out of favor in the 80s when we simply decided that we could grow and borrow our way to any spending we wanted but it turns out our national spending appetite was greater than our ability to grow.
We did a fine job of creating growth but we spent and borrowed at an even faster rate. Again, this is simply unsustainable.
Before I'm run out of the movement...I get that pro-growth policies are good and that we have to constrain our spending but that doesn't mean we can never roll back the budget. I oppose government spending not just on financial grounds but also on the grounds of liberty. The more the government spends, the more it becomes entwined in areas of our lives it simply has no place being. I donÂ’t want to balance the budget at current levels; I want to balance it at a lower level as a percentage of the economy.
Unfortunately, this is more popular in theory among voters than it is in reality.
Obama ran on the promise (threat to some) he was going to fundamentally change America. Sadly he is well on his way to doing that. From health care to spending to regulations, Republicans need to decide if they are going to run on tweaking at the margins or will they use this moment try and roll back statist assumptions that pre-date Obama?
I really hope itÂ’s the latter.
Posted by: DrewM at
08:59 AM
| Comments (233)
Post contains 881 words, total size 6 kb.
1 I don't see it happening.
Maybe not voluntarily, but as DrewM keeps hammering, this cannot keep up. The iron laws of economics are going to punish us for our reckless debt-racking.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 26, 2010 09:03 AM (9hSKh)
It has to happen. We cannot sustain our entitlement binge on "taxing the rich".
There are not enough rich.
We are moving toward Euro-style socialism, so, all taxes must go up;
Just like in Europe.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 09:04 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at March 26, 2010 09:04 AM (a9UO0)
Posted by: Mal at March 26, 2010 09:06 AM (Z+qzA)
I only wish that they would make themselves known now so that we can find suitable conservative/Libertarian candidates to replace them with prior to November.
Posted by: Sgt. Hulka at March 26, 2010 09:06 AM (Hvg2O)
Here's how I see it - can those of us who are willing to accept the ups and downs of freedom marshal the numbers to out vote those who are perfectly happy to let Big Daddy Government take care of them? I am not optimistic on that point.
To throw down the girl card, I am really really fucking sick and tired of being told it's "feminist" to support bigger government. Funny. I thought being a feminist meant that I believed that I was responsible for and was capable of caring for myself. From my perspective, it's the Left who are raging paternalists, not the Right.
I can take care of myself. Sure, I would *like* someone else to do it since I am a fundamentally lazy person. But I sure as hell don't expect anyone else to do so. And, while I'm ranting, if I'm not responsible for my failures then I get no credit for my successes. To quote the renowned philosophy, Dashiell Parr "When everyone's special, no one is."
GET OFF MY LAWN!
Posted by: alexthechick at March 26, 2010 09:08 AM (8WZWv)
Leftists are spending our money before they have it in their corrupt little fingers - and so therefore we have to raise taxes.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 09:10 AM (0fzsA)
When you do your taxes examine all of your revenue and all of your costs. You will see that you are likely already paying effectively European tax rates.
48 cents on every dollar I earn in income disappears into the government treasuries.
I'm restructuring my revenue to lower this. It's legal. You should do it too.
Posted by: wtfci at March 26, 2010 09:10 AM (+zo63)
Posted by: cackfinger at March 26, 2010 09:10 AM (TUBcJ)
#5 Just like in Europe.
But then there won't be anybody to sustain the Euro-socialist model when we're down.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 26, 2010 09:10 AM (9hSKh)
But they won't see the VAT, which sucks because it's an exponential tax on anything complicated. I used to work in a tractor factory (one of the UAW shops taking a charge on Obamacare next quarter, heh). They didn't forge the bolts or draw the wires--all that came in from suppliers. The steel company has to collect a VAT from the bolt company, who has to collect a VAT from a fan assembly company, who has to collect a VAT from the tractor company. Customers don't see a 5% tax on the tractor, they see a 25% hike in the tractor price. Plus state and local sales tax.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 26, 2010 09:11 AM (mR7mk)
2) The latest ruling on McCain-Feingold serves as a shining example of why the Judicial Branch won't either.
Galt's Gulch, here we come.
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at March 26, 2010 09:11 AM (SHKl9)
#11 To throw down the girl card, I am really really fucking sick and tired of being told it's "feminist" to support bigger government.
Ah! Gender traitor!
/You're right, though.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 26, 2010 09:12 AM (9hSKh)
A friend of mine clued me in to a gov't job opening in my area, and I'm going to apply -- mostly because the pay is better (a LOT better) and I hate the people I currently work with. But more and more, I'm getting to the point where I'm planning to work long enough to pay off my debt and save some money, and then just kind of ... hunker. I won't necessarily move to a cabin in the woods, but I will be arranging my life so that I can pack up and move, in one car-load, on a day's (or less) notice.
On a related note, anybody wanna buy some furniture?
Posted by: Joanna at March 26, 2010 09:12 AM (7+WuG)
That's what it's going to take to roll this stuff back -- someone willing to take a chainsaw to this bloated monstrosity of a government.
Cut it all away, starting with eliminating the Dept of Education and allowing the states to assume their proper role in governing.
Long term, we have to break the bureaucracy and scatter it to the four winds. This maggot filled underbelly of the government beast is where all the dirty work gets done. It's where the Marxists, Socialists, opportunists, crooks, and lackeys anonymously go about their nasty business under cover of darkness.
It's the machine that propels the Left forward while simultaneously spreading decay that rots away our institutions, traditions, and culture.
No half measures. If we're going to save this country, we have to napalm the left. We're at an inflection point here.We need men and women of principle, courage and commitment.
Posted by: Warden at March 26, 2010 09:12 AM (TIGTh)
Exactly, the size of government will be reduced, one way or another. It is as inevitable and the tides or the dawn. ObamaCnut can't stop this, and the American people have not been degraded sufficiently to assure European levels of political apathy at teh loss of freedom.
A collapse into regional autonomous collectives will certainly shrink the size of government dramatically.
Posted by: s'moron at March 26, 2010 09:12 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: logprof at March 26, 2010 09:12 AM (Mmw0q)
...as DrewM keeps hammering, this cannot keep up. The iron laws of economics are going to punish us for our reckless debt-racking.
On the other hand, those same iron laws of economics mean that once value is taxed, we'll have less of it. And because taxes are being raised while the tax rate is waaaaay on the plus side of the Laffer Curve, we'll also be getting less tax revenue.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 26, 2010 09:13 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: Gary at March 26, 2010 09:13 AM (nfrWk)
Democrats and their surrogates in the media are out there screaming right and left that we must raise taxes (Tax rates) to increase tax revenue.
Leftist logic: We must punish production, take production for granted, then wonder why it kills production and sends jobs overseas.
Tax revenues are down on the fear of increased taxation - just wait until ObamaCare kicks in. Tax revenues are going to plummet.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 09:13 AM (0fzsA)
Venus signed her name on government's check. Feminist studies on the campus are poor, although probably better if Venus rejects the government's subsidy. If you divorce Venus from the Government, you will achieve your Feminist ideal. Male trustees stand in the way.
Posted by: wtfci at March 26, 2010 09:14 AM (+zo63)
Posted by: tank at March 26, 2010 09:14 AM (y3seB)
And Fox just reported that Israeli soldiers have been attacked, and several killed, by Hamas.
The American people, and Israel, thank you Barry, you ridiculous asshat.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 26, 2010 09:14 AM (UOM48)
The only way to roll back the beast is by starving it of taxes. Even now, the taxes like corporation and investment taxes are already well hidden. What would be more effective than even a federalism amendment to counter spending increases would be for everybody to have to pay all their taxes, including the hidden ones, they pay now in one lump sum on one day. Preferably the day before and election.
The false premise of the social spenders is that tax money is like a natural resource. It's just there like you can dig it out of the ground. Hiding taxes is necessary to the monster state. Tax transparency is necessary to individual freedom.
As Reagan said, taxes should hurt. Damn straight.
STOP VAT NOW.
Posted by: K at March 26, 2010 09:14 AM (bfcmA)
Obama's reelection slogan: "It didn't work the first time, so we need to do it again, harder!"
Posted by: Joanna at March 26, 2010 09:14 AM (7+WuG)
Posted by: Roadking at March 26, 2010 09:15 AM (qLBSF)
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 26, 2010 09:15 AM (xxgag)
Whose military are we going to leech off of while this is happening?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 26, 2010 09:16 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 26, 2010 09:16 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: RobD at March 26, 2010 09:16 AM (sV3Dv)
Posted by: Bugler at March 26, 2010 09:16 AM (YCVBL)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 26, 2010 09:16 AM (UOM48)
Obama's reelection slogan: "It didn't work the first time, so we need to do it again, harder!"
Posted by: Joanna
at March 26, 2010 01:14 PM (7+WuG)
Too wordy. How about "Bend further over?"
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 26, 2010 09:16 AM (xxgag)
What burns me up about this is that they don't deserve to make that money. And where is that 'public service" component? Funny, most of wall street gets a tiny salary and the rest is commission. commission doesn't come easily, you have to work your ass off to get it, to make a decent living. And, sometimes you are lucky and in a position to make that million but it is a once in a lifetime thing. Yet these "public servants" who live the life of reilly are making two hundred grand....on our dime. disgusting.
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 09:17 AM (p302b)
Oddly enough, "Starving the Beast" didn't work because of Art Laffer and his Curve. Lowered tax burdens meant an expanding economy, and rising revenues, because the smaller slice of the giant pie was larger than the huge slice of the small pie.
But will "Feeding the Beast" work? Only if the public gives up on the American Dream, and accepts an Era of Limits or a Steady State. Terms from the Carter era revived.
This explains:
--"Multicultural" (MultiCommunist) history, designed to make Americans ashamed rather than proud of their country.
--Ecofiendishness, designed to make Americans feel guilty about wanting a better life for themselves.
--The attempts by the Left to exacerbate racial and ethnic differences rather that minimize them.
--Teh Gheyness, designed to undermine the notion of family, both because the nanny-state wants to become the parent and also to reduce thinking with children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren in mind.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 09:17 AM (ujg0T)
Uhm. Isn't feminism a creation of the Left? And didn't the rise of the nanny state coincide with womens' suffrage? I'm not saying you all vote with your uterii, but obviously a majority of you do.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:19 AM (1fanL)
In any case, it will not make it by the Senate. Not even the Dems are crazy enough for this right now.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 09:19 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Sparky at March 26, 2010 09:20 AM (r0u40)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 26, 2010 09:21 AM (UOM48)
The problem we face is that almost everyone wants to cut spending in general, but it very hard to get 51% to agree to any significant cuts.
So, let's essentially decide the issue on the general plain. We expect tax receipts to be X. We want to allocate Y to debt reduction. Therefore federal spending will be Z=X-Y. Congress decides this number before budgeting ANYTHING. I think this makes it very hard for the MSM and the Dems to turn the issue into sob stories. We can sell it as intelligent budgeting of the sort that normal people have to do.
Then the Unions, the environnuts, the HUD crooks, etc, can fight EACH OTHER over Z as the specifics are worked out.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 26, 2010 09:21 AM (bgcml)
Why?
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at March 26, 2010 09:21 AM (yUybe)
Funny it used to be that business men and women were the ones making the money, now it is the teachers and the government workers and their pals the union guys. My friend the doctor said that when he is done, the nurse in the hospital setting is making more than him. He's considering moving to another country (i was shocked to hear that, but, do you blame him?.
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 09:21 AM (p302b)
Whose military are we going to leech off of while this is happening?
Posted by: HeatherRadish
The Chinese can keep us safe. They need to look after their investment.
Oh, and I can certainly use the six weeks of annual vacation.
Posted by: sTevo at March 26, 2010 09:21 AM (2Msrd)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 26, 2010 09:22 AM (0GFWk)
That's a lot of money being drained from the productive, entrepreneurial economy and shoveled directly into the hands of the government. History has also shown us that a tax raised for one purpose won't go to just that use, it will be used as an excuse to raise spending overall, creating greater deficits and debt, thus leading to higher taxes and on and on and on.
True dat, we're still paying the "Johnstown Flood Tax". Last i checked that thing ended decades upon decades ago.
Posted by: Ben at March 26, 2010 09:22 AM (wuv1c)
#11 To throw down the girl card, I am really really fucking sick and tired of being told it's "feminist" to support bigger government.
Drop the "femi" and add "commu" and essentially that's what that movement has been all about since the 1980s at least.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 09:22 AM (ujg0T)
How do you make a VAT tax "progressive"? Libs need to make sure the more you make, the more you pay. You could exclude groceries, gas, etc, but then you're losing a lot of tax revenue from the middle class.
How do you exclude the "poor" from this tax (which the Dims will insist on). Have the poor keep their receipts and file for tax refunds? A lot of them can't even fill out their own tax returns now.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 26, 2010 09:22 AM (ucq49)
The American people, and Israel, thank you Barry, you ridiculous asshat.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 26, 2010 01:14 PM (UOM4
Funny how the Dems and the media (BIRM) are going eleventy over incitement to violence here, but they're doing the same thing over there.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:23 AM (1fanL)
i wonder if the democrats are going to go full kamikazee on us and use reconciliation on every bill untill november.
everyone is saying they will do immigration next because they the votes, but i cant imagine they would do something that would bankrupt the country before the next election as immigration would do.
Posted by: Ben at March 26, 2010 09:24 AM (wuv1c)
Whatever yer smokin', I want some, ya Bogart!!!
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at March 26, 2010 09:24 AM (wmtV/)
In Europe - shitty health care is "FREE!" because they tax the hell out of everything.
You need some toothpaste? 8 bucks a tube. Gas? 9 dollars a gallon.
And on and on... and that's on top of all the other income based taxes you pay.
Life becomes a tax.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 09:25 AM (0fzsA)
I don't see the will to do 1), the courage to do 2 and everyone fiddling trying to figure out how to blame the other party if when 3 happens.
FIFY
Posted by: RobD at March 26, 2010 09:26 AM (sV3Dv)
http://tiny.cc/hnaht
We are the guy riding along as Obama and the Dems drive our nation into oblivion.
Posted by: davidt at March 26, 2010 09:26 AM (qEuod)
VAT = horrible, awful, terrible idea...
National Sales Tax that replaces the Income Tax = great idea.
we have to stop taxing production and start taxing consumption, it's the only way out of this mess without causing total economic collapse.
taxing consumption WILL shrink the economy, shrink it back to a sane and sustainable level, our economy is bloated with over-consumption, the whole idea of a "consumption-based" economy is madness doomed to eventual failure, growth requires production, when you tax production you get less of it.
when the US was the dominate industrial power in the world it seemed like a good idea to tax production, we had so much production it didn't seem like it would do any harm. but the tables have turned other countries have caught up and are beginning to surpass our industrail strength. A shift in economic theory is needed but our leaders are stuck in the past, still stuck in the mindset that our industrail might will always reign supreme... they are fools.
Posted by: Joe at March 26, 2010 09:28 AM (Ed9Xn)
Not even the Dems are crazy enough for this right now.
After the health care debacle, that's not something I have any faith in at all.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 26, 2010 09:28 AM (pZEar)
I'm restructuring my revenue to lower this. It's legal. You should do it too.
Posted by: wtfci at March 26, 2010 01:10 PM (+zo63)
I have been saying the very same thing to anyone who will listen for the past 8-10 years. Overall we are already being taxed at an effective rate of close to or over 50%. The problem is, it is spread out all over the place and in some places it is miniscule, but you are still being taxed. It is much easier to hide that way.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at March 26, 2010 09:30 AM (y67bA)
Posted by: Bosk at March 26, 2010 09:30 AM (pUO5u)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 09:31 AM (p302b)
Monthly rebate checks.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:31 AM (1fanL)
All you need to know about Democrats:
They spend your money before they have it, their very lives revolve around their obsession with finding new ways to tax you, and
...they waste most of it in the process, lining their own pockets.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 09:31 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Joe at March 26, 2010 09:32 AM (Ed9Xn)
Ah, grasshopper you are probably too young to have seen the voters on Election Day, 1980.
Never mind that, there was Election Day, The Great Upchuck of 1994. I believe the highest turnout for an off year, non-Presidential just Congressional election. A lot of Commiecrat poisons were vomited out of the body politic.
Unfortunately, some Commiecrat intellectual junk food has made its way down in 2006 and 2008. It may have poisoned the body politic again, or it may just have become impacted Demunist fecal matter in the body politic's intestines.
Let November 2010 be both a high colonic and an emetic.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 09:32 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Niles Standish at March 26, 2010 09:32 AM (fGMGp)
Oh, and I can certainly use the six weeks of annual vacation.
The Chinese people aren't our bitches. Their government is our bitch. We own China. It's not the other way around.
The United States government is angling right now to bolster its revenue, but what it has that China doesn't have is a middle class to fleece. China has rich and poor and very little in between. China is building ghost cities with ghost trains and ghost roads. It thinks that a Chinese middle class will eventually move there.
The rich Chinese are already marching lock step with their government. They, uh, kind of have to with that Communism thing and all that. The poor workers are due for a price correction. It's going to be very ugly.
Our objective should be to coax Beijing and Shanghai to allow the Yuan to float on its own. When that happens the bond vigilantes can create the havoc necessary in China to force them to stop killing their own people slowly and start building a middle class that is peaceful and prosperous.
What was that recent news about the "one child per household" policy shift? Keep an eye on that.
Posted by: wtfci at March 26, 2010 09:33 AM (+zo63)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at March 26, 2010 09:33 AM (Vu6sl)
The democrats will never remove a tax. Once they have you on the hook for a tax, they will only layer on more.
The VAT is the extra they are looking for.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 09:33 AM (0fzsA)
Joe Donelly.. D-congressmand from Indiana who is running for Evan Bayhs senate seat.... the minute he voted yes for healthcare.. Bayh transferred a million bucks to his campaign. Payoff.
Oh and what does FIFY mean?
Posted by: Timbo at March 26, 2010 09:33 AM (7GgDy)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 26, 2010 09:33 AM (UOM48)
Cue idiot lefty troll who will say: Hey, you fascists want to cut the deficit, right? Without one iota of acknowledgement that taxes and deficits do the same thing: Starve the private sector--where actual wealth is created.
Apparently the previous century never happened or something.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 26, 2010 09:34 AM (B+qrE)
What'd we get out of that, by the way? The budget didn't get any smaller. After 8-10 years, the Republicans were spending like Democrats. And what'd it get us? Bambi and Co.
To think that the Republicans are going to "do anything" is to ignore history.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:35 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: Joe at March 26, 2010 09:35 AM (Ed9Xn)
The Gods of the Copybook Headings
Rudyard Kipling
AS I PASS through my incarnations in every age and race,
I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place.
Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.
We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn
That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:
But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,
So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.
We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,
Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place,
But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come
That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.
With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch,
They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch;
They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings;
So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.
When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "Stick to the Devil you know."
On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "The Wages of Sin is Death."
In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "If you don't work you die."
Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew
And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true
That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.
As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began.
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;
And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at March 26, 2010 09:35 AM (w41GQ)
Posted by: Rebar at March 26, 2010 09:36 AM (Or4Gk)
Oh and what does FIFY mean?
Posted by: Timbo at March 26, 2010 01:33 PM (7GgDy)
Fixed it for you.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:36 AM (1fanL)
(or maybe I should just go ahead and hit the booze)
Jeez it's been a shitty news day so far, hasn't it? And the pub is sooo close.
Posted by: Dang Straights at March 26, 2010 09:37 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: EC at March 26, 2010 09:38 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Rebar at March 26, 2010 01:36 PM (Or4Gk)
I'm thinking the South would beat the North like red-headed stepchildren now. But it'd be more like Jesusland vs. the United States of Canada. Which would be even more one-sided.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:38 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: shoey at March 26, 2010 09:38 AM (Ed9Xn)
Overall we are already being taxed at an effective rate of close to or over 50%. The problem is, it is spread out all over the place and in some places it is miniscule, but you are still being taxed. It is much easier to hide that way.
Agreed. People are unable to accurately measure the amount of tax they pay here. You would have to know, for every product or service you spend money on, how much of the price is made up of defrayed corporate taxes, energy taxes, shipping taxes, freight taxes, payroll taxes, regulatory fees, regulatory fines, etc. It would be very interesting to me to try and trace a product's life from beginning to consumer purchase and figure out how much of that final price tag is made up of just taxes of various sorts. I don't think it can be done, but it'd be interesting to try.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 26, 2010 09:39 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 26, 2010 09:40 AM (hTUEv)
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at March 26, 2010 09:40 AM (XpWHj)
Ya Ya Ya... I'll see you in Gettysburg!
Posted by: Hobo at March 26, 2010 09:40 AM (V8B//)
That's dumb. They already traded their votes for an Executive Order.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:40 AM (1fanL)
I'm not sure there are many who don't agree with you on this side though.
Posted by: Fortunate Son at March 26, 2010 09:40 AM (trlZM)
I have actually been called that by people who mean it. My response remains the same, no, I won't show you my tits to prove otherwise.
Ah, grasshopper you are probably too young to have seen the voters on Election Day, 1980.
Oh would that were so. I wasn't old enough to vote but I remember how excited my parents and basically everyone we knew were on election night.
How do you exclude the "poor" from this tax (which the Dims will insist on). Have the poor keep their receipts and file for tax refunds? A lot of them can't even fill out their own tax returns now.
IIRC from my Canadian friends, they get a quarterly check with some kind of refund or rebate money that's an estimate on VAT for food and whatnot. I could, you know, text the BFF and ask but that is effort and effort is bad.
Posted by: alexthechick at March 26, 2010 09:42 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: Hobo at March 26, 2010 01:40 PM (V8B//)
Living in the past. Hey, remember when Detroit was a nice place to live with lots of good jobs?
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:43 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 09:43 AM (p302b)
Posted by: mikeyslaw at March 26, 2010 09:44 AM (QMGr1)
Well, there's our silver lining.
And crap-and-tax is a form of VAT, no? Anything that adds value--say, pulling potatoes out of the ground and driving them to a grocery store, as opposed to waiting for people to come get them--requires energy.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 26, 2010 09:44 AM (mR7mk)
"I keep harping on this because a VAT is another tax on production, it makes production more expensive, it's the wrong way to go, and it's stunning to me how many on my own side don't see this.
I'm not sure there are many who don't agree with you on this side though."
maybe I'm over-reacting, it wouldn't be the first time, but i'm catching a whiff of helplessness from some and an outright stench of capitulation from a few like Krauthammer.
Posted by: shoey at March 26, 2010 09:44 AM (Ed9Xn)
"Solution: Fine tune government payrolls with a huge fucking machete."
Now thats' CHANGE, that I can HOPE for.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 26, 2010 09:45 AM (ucq49)
I'm thinking the South would beat the North like red-headed stepchildren now.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 01:38 PM (1fanL)
If the red states left the union, I'd doubt very much the blue states would have the stones to try and bring them back through force.
Especially since they'd get the shit kicked out of them, as any honest military analysis would tell them.
Posted by: Rebar at March 26, 2010 09:45 AM (Or4Gk)
Hey, remember when Detroit was a nice place to live with lots of good jobs?
Hey, remember when the U.S. was a nice place to live with lots of good jobs?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 26, 2010 09:46 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 26, 2010 09:46 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: shoey at March 26, 2010 01:38 PM (Ed9Xn)
So we need a tax on non-production. Tax the lawyers.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 26, 2010 09:47 AM (Vo2Ef)
What'd we get out of that, by the way?
--Two Real Supreme Court Judges
--A Congress that didn't go wobbly on Iraq
--Hillary Care stopped (but since the GOP toads didn't follow through with any market reforms, we got Obamunistcare)
--Lower tax rates, FIT down to 35% on top earners and Capital Gains rates cut nearly in half.
The budget didn't get any smaller.
See Laffer Curve. If you are looking for absolute shrinkage, you will never get it unless the population declines. If you are looking for relative shrinkage, you had that during the Uncle Ron years, and during the pre-ecofiend Newt days.
After 8-10 years, the Republicans were spending like Democrats. And what'd it get us? Bambi and Co.
No disagreement there. Combine that with the Hispandering Greedheads and "comprehensive" immigration romantic fools, and it's no wonder that by 2006 the wheels fell off.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 09:47 AM (ujg0T)
Absolutely. The incoming new American Revolution. My question, who will our founding "fathers" be?
Posted by: Cheri at March 26, 2010 09:47 AM (jfHG7)
European future? Western or Eastern?
You went geographical--I'm thinking temporal.
1917
1618
or the whole 13th century Black Death milieau?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 26, 2010 09:47 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 09:48 AM (p302b)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 26, 2010 09:48 AM (0GFWk)
Too many people know think that the role of the govt is to take care of them. I doubt we'll ever have anything approaching limited govt ever again.
Posted by: Niles Standish at March 26, 2010 09:48 AM (fGMGp)
Krauthammer rolled over and gave up as soon as Obamacare passed and unfortunately so have some morons.
Posted by: Mal at March 26, 2010 09:49 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: Gary at March 26, 2010 01:13 PM (nfrWk)
Don't forget us
Posted by: Montana at March 26, 2010 09:49 AM (Mmw0q)
If the red states left the union, I'd doubt very much the blue states would have the stones to try and bring them back through force.
Especially since they'd get the shit kicked out of them, as any honest military analysis would tell them.
This is true... Remember Lincoln was a republican.
Posted by: Hobo at March 26, 2010 09:49 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: Jean at March 26, 2010 09:49 AM (PjevJ)
I wonder how this Stalingrad thing is gonna turn out for him?
He eats his dogs.
So, if you are into that sort of thing...
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 26, 2010 09:49 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 26, 2010 09:50 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 26, 2010 01:48 PM (0GFWk)
Him personally? Not too terrible.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:50 AM (1fanL)
This will be Obama's Healthstapo.
"The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformed service's reserve program) to assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions."
Posted by: the guy who says And so it begins at March 26, 2010 09:50 AM (7VvJB)
maybe I'm over-reacting, it wouldn't be the first time, but i'm catching a whiff of helplessness from some and an outright stench of capitulation from a few like Krauthammer.
The Krautman is bummed out. But who the heck among us isn't?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 09:50 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Hobo at March 26, 2010 01:40 PM (V8B//)
Been there, done that. But I bet I win this time around.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at March 26, 2010 09:50 AM (WGcw3)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 09:50 AM (p302b)
So we need a tax on non-production. Tax the lawyers.
And everyone that works in the entertainment 'industry'. I say at 90%.
Posted by: Dang Straights at March 26, 2010 09:51 AM (fx8sm)
Citizens that wish to support the progressive's socialist state, including all of its welfare spending and redistribution, can check one box on their income tax filing and subject themselves to a 60% taxrate with no deductions. Money from these collections will be used for the funding of welfare state programs.
Alternately, citizens may select the 18% option (akin to flat tax model) and only have money appropriated to core Federal government functions: defense, Federal law enforcement, etc. The Treasury shall submit a report on the opt-in contract funding of each area and may provide verification of progressive contract participation (so that all the Hollywood and progressive folks who claim they'd pay under such circumstances can be verified to be participating and paying).
Let government fund its options based on the available funds from the citizen-elected contract participation.
Posted by: Flyover Sam at March 26, 2010 09:51 AM (Zm4R8)
Absolutely. The incoming new American Revolution. My question, who will our founding "fathers" be?
I say we stick with the ones we already have. Maybe excluding Hamilton.
Let the blue states have Marx and Obama. Washington and Jefferson's good for me.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 26, 2010 09:51 AM (pZEar)
Wonder if the muzzies have anything fun planned for Easter?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 26, 2010 09:51 AM (UOM48)
I guess you're right—but I wonder how much of the negativity is meant to motivate the public.
Yeah, Pelosi et. al. could force a VAT down our throats (something they seem to be fond of) but it will be a big fuckin' mistake. Since a VAT will pave the way for increased spending (out of proportion with new revenues, of course), we'll actually see higher taxes for ever fewer services (see: CBO report on debt being 90% of GDP by 2020).
It's awfully hard to find money to buy votes when you're:
1). taxing those voters at an ever-increasing rate
2). out of lenders to give you more cash
3). forced to use the wealth extracted from the rich to pay off insane amounts of interest instead of on entitlement spending
In Europe, people are taxed and then sedated by government services provided to them with those tax dollars. Here, we wouldn't even have the good fortune to see that money filtered back down to us through government services.
Posted by: Fortunate Son at March 26, 2010 09:52 AM (trlZM)
Why? It's grown faster than the population for a very long time. But I'd be happy with doing away with personnel and just writing a check to the states. It'd be better from a workfare point of view anyway.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:52 AM (1fanL)
Megyn Kelly having that imbecile Alan Colmes on having a hissy fit "Tea Baggers!!!11eleventy!!1" was the final straw.
Oh, Lizard Face was on? Glad I'm at work and missed it.
Posted by: jewells at March 26, 2010 09:53 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Cheri at March 26, 2010 01:47 PM (jfHG7)
What is wrong with the original Founders? Their words and wisdom live on in us.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 26, 2010 09:54 AM (dQdrY)
The Krautman is bummed out. But who the heck among us isn't?
Me.
Not to be Pollyanaish here, but compared to earlier in the week, I'm feeling a lot better about this. This monstrosity still doesn't have the public backing. And people aren't going to just forget how they shoved it down our throats.
Based off of what I'm seeing on my fb page (yeah, I know, but it's telling), people are piiiiiiiised. And these are people that aren't usually in tune politically.
Think of all the shit we're going to find out (and mock) in the coming weeks and months? Good ammo leading up to Nov.
Posted by: laceyunderalls rootin' for the Bulldogs at March 26, 2010 09:54 AM (pLTLS)
On a related note, anybody wanna buy some furniture?
Posted by: Joanna at March 26, 2010 01:12 PM (7+WuG)
Leo Szilard, of Manhattan Project fame, slept with a packed suitcase at the foot of his bed every night- even after he had escaped from Nazi Germany and was safe in America. It's a shame that we all may be coming to that....
Posted by: Nighthawk at March 26, 2010 09:54 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 26, 2010 09:54 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Mitch McConnell at March 26, 2010 09:55 AM (Kt5vQ)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 01:50 PM (p302b)
Whoa. He's not suggesting that we become polite-company conservatives. He's just pointing out the consequences of our current course of action.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:55 AM (1fanL)
Fuck it. Kick everyone off welfare. The city of San Diego built its own damn trolley without federal funds. Time for charity to come from churches, not the feds. We're not going to pay debt with our damn hard-earned dollars.
And thank you for that nifty little turn of phrase, because I've been trying to think of something for my sign when I go to D.C. to protest on April 15.
Posted by: arhooley at March 26, 2010 09:55 AM (M/+ha)
Slice like a f*ckin' hammer, Drew.
This moment in history has to mean more than just replacing Obama with someone less statist. We saw how the entitlement society let to this point. So to get rid of this current disaster, we have to roll it ALL back.
Posted by: K~Bob at March 26, 2010 09:56 AM (9b6FB)
Posted by: Mitch McConnell
As VodkaPundit says, I'd settle for a 100% Democrat Congress if every last one of them was a freshman.
Posted by: arhooley at March 26, 2010 09:56 AM (M/+ha)
I saw we take all of Cameron's Avatar money since he hates capitalism.
Posted by: alexthechick at March 26, 2010 09:57 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: Jean at March 26, 2010 09:58 AM (tJF9l)
Posted by: arhooley
at March 26, 2010 01:56 PM (M/+ha)
Wouldn't be prudent.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2010 09:58 AM (1fanL)
As for Megyn, I think she drew the short straw. Somebody has to have him on to fulfill his contract of time. But I am glad I wasn't watching.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 26, 2010 09:59 AM (7VvJB)
By way of an anecdote, I still have family in Italy and things are worse in Europe than one would imagine. Because of things like VAT and monetary policy tied to the Euro (EU), a very large segment of society over there do not make enough to live month to month. VAT over time doubled the cost of production and obviously these costs were passed on. Moving to the Euro compounded that, especially for the poorer countries. Wages, because of requirements of membership in the EU meant that wages in countries with lower productivity and higher unemployment have stagnated. People live on credit and that will eventually crash.
Welcome to the wonders of socialism.
And... As long as we are going to be socialists, I think there should be a hammer and sickle on the flag. Make people take ownership for what they've done.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 26, 2010 09:59 AM (RkRxq)
Absolutely. The incoming new American Revolution. My question, who will our founding "fathers" be?
I say we stick with the ones we already have. Maybe excluding Hamilton.
Let the blue states have Marx and Obama. Washington and Jefferson's good for me.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 26, 2010 01:51 PM (pZEar)
--As a native Virginian, I say: no need to reinvent the wheel. However, I am all for ditching the part of the Commonwealth norht of the rappahannock, and re-annexing the red parts of West Virginia in exchange.
Posted by: logprof at March 26, 2010 10:00 AM (Mmw0q)
Cut programs? We can't have that, my boy. Might mess up the comity of the Senate or something.
Posted by: Mitch McConnell
Anyone who thinks McConnell is rolling over and going along to get along obviously wasn't around in the Bob Michel days.
C'mon, people! Every single Republican voted down this shit. Even Joesph Cao, who is only there because the Commiecrats couldn't find one of theirs not in the pokey in Cao's ghetto district. Even the RINOmint Twins of Maine, Even Crybaby Voinovich. Every last one.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 10:01 AM (ujg0T)
With the socialists in charge and the 52% willing to sign off on damn near anything, its like us cons are trapped in a car on I-95 with a drunk at the wheel. It can only end in a firey crash. I keep wondering how and when we might be able to jump out of this crash waiting to happen before we slam headon into our future.
Posted by: Chad Feldheimer at March 26, 2010 10:01 AM (jat5l)
Posted by: laceyunderalls rootin' for the Bulldogs at March 26, 2010 01:54 PM (pLTLS)
--As in, Butler? Me too, but I would like to see at least one of St. Mary or NortthernIowa make the Final Four as well.
Posted by: logprof at March 26, 2010 10:02 AM (Mmw0q)
Posted by: robtr at March 26, 2010 10:02 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Nicolas Sarkozy at March 26, 2010 10:03 AM (6uiF7)
Posted by: nickless at March 26, 2010 10:03 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Nicolas Sarkozy at March 26, 2010 02:03 PM (6uiF7)
You know, he has been the most American-like Froggie they have ever had over there.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 10:04 AM (ujg0T)
This will put me out of business.
So, you somehow doubt that's the objective? In case you haven't noticed, your legally elected government is now actively working against your interests. They're wrecking the economy on purpose. This has been their goal for years and the elections of 2006 and 2008 provided them with the opportunity. Add eight years of non-stop Bush-bashing and you have a malleable public ready to accept anyone who promises anything different.
We've (and I'm talking the whole country, not resident Morons) been had.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at March 26, 2010 10:06 AM (i3AsK)
Don't forget the China Bubble, since it's Negativity Friday. When that baby blows Kratos is gonna have his wish.
Posted by: Dang Straights at March 26, 2010 10:06 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: The US Economy at March 26, 2010 10:06 AM (6uiF7)
Go Panthers!!
Posted by: Hatchet Five, UNI alum at March 26, 2010 10:06 AM (Kt5vQ)
Don't talk to me about X, though dude.
*soooobs*
Seriously though, they're lucky they got the first OT. That was not a foul on a 3-ball. It was a foul before the shot which would have put them behind one with six seconds.
Posted by: laceyunderalls rootin' for the Bulldogs at March 26, 2010 10:07 AM (pLTLS)
It's not that simple. Raw food has no tax. Some stuff has 2% and some 4%. Non-food State sales tax is 5% then you add on all the local sales taxes.
In the town that I live near if you buy a ready made food item there is a 10.5% sales tax on it. The normal tax rate is 8.5%
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 10:07 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Louis Tully at March 26, 2010 10:08 AM (jat5l)
Am I alone in my evaluation that the Administration plus Speaker Silicon Grannybust's Politburo are, right now, bordering on or are foursquare solid in the "Tyranny" encampment?
Seems like everyone else is averting their eyes to avoid seeing and talking about the fact that we are now under or soon will be under tyrannical rule.
I'd be relieved to find that my concerns are fluff and nonsense, mainly due to highly spiced sausage breakfast indigestion or just a couple of tiny strokes or similar. But I'm afraid I'm not over-reacting.
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at March 26, 2010 10:09 AM (O6c08)
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 10:10 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 26, 2010 10:11 AM (7VvJB)
It's not that simple. Raw food has no tax. Some stuff has 2% and some 4%. Non-food State sales tax is 5% then you add on all the local sales taxes.
In the town that I live near if you buy a ready made food item there is a 10.5% sales tax on it. The normal tax rate is 8.5%
And if you want to really get your hands dirty, how about including the jacked up taxes to cover welfare and healthcare costs for the illegal aliens that were hired for the harvest? It's not like they head back home when the last tomato is picked. And be sure the property tax on the land the food is grown on is taken into account. As well as the taxes on the farm equipment and various regulatory fees for the pesticides, fertilizers, and seeds. Etc.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 26, 2010 10:13 AM (pZEar)
I really still do not know what exactly the hell their VAT over there is. OTher then that it apparently sucks ass (Quelle suprise!)
I think it's the name that makes me fundementally unable to even evaluate the thing. Just puts me straight into a coma.
Value Added tax? WTF?
It sounds like something Burger King would have to levy on my GLBTQXYBQ burger.
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 10:14 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 26, 2010 10:14 AM (7VvJB)
Secession my ass. That assumes they have any right to the ground they stand on.
Defeat them militarily, and then herd the Dems onto reservations, where they can be subjected to a 100% income tax and fed government cheese.
Posted by: Kristopher at March 26, 2010 10:14 AM (kCEOg)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 10:14 AM (p302b)
As long as we are going to be socialists, I think there should be a hammer and sickle on the flag. Make people take ownership for what they've done.
It can go right next to the 57 stars.
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 26, 2010 10:15 AM (XdlcF)
Either that, or some kind of new chemical warfare nerve agent.
Oh noes, GLBTQ-5 gas! Grab your VAT masks!
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 10:15 AM (IsLT6)
From the NRO:
Unintended Consequences: Way to go, Arizona House Democrats Gabrielle Giffords, Ann Kirkpatrick and Harry Mitchell!
And now that the pinata is broken, we see it includes financial doom for the state of Arizona!
Arizona must drop a plan to cut its Medicaid programÂ’s generous eligibility and instead pay an additional $3.8 billion over the next three years under the federal health care overhaul, state officials reported Thursday.
Arizona also stands to pay billions of dollars more in subsequent years than less generous other states would have to pay, even after increased federal funding starts in 2014, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System said in a report.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at March 26, 2010 10:15 AM (Vu6sl)
"The federal government uses 'base line budgeting' to set it's spending levels."
Some day he'll learn about the apostrophe, and its proper place.
-Brennan
Posted by: Brennan at March 26, 2010 10:17 AM (6toB9)
Welcome to the "off the reservation" club little sister, have a seat...tea?
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2010 10:17 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Kristopher at March 26, 2010 10:18 AM (kCEOg)
Funny. I thought being a feminist meant that I believed that I was responsible for and was capable of caring for myself.
No.
That's called being a rational human being.
Being a feminist means your envy for having a penis has been transfered into outright penis-loathing and hatred and you've crafted an entire value system defined in opposition to it, with the starting and end point of all logic being "The Penis is the Root of all Evil".
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 10:22 AM (IsLT6)
his body language says his heart isn't in it.
A lot of his body language is associated with the fact that he's paraplegic.
FYI
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 26, 2010 10:25 AM (RkRxq)
What happens to ststes rights when the states receive most of their income from the federal government?
Posted by: davod at March 26, 2010 10:26 AM (GUZAT)
with the starting and end point of all logic being "The Penis is the Root of all Evil".
And the corollary, "Everything would be fine if Men just acted like Women."
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 26, 2010 10:27 AM (pZEar)
Agreed. What I should have wrote was "Who will our leaders be that bring us back to those ideals, principles, and the core beliefs that lead to the greatness of America?"
Posted by: Cheri at March 26, 2010 10:28 AM (jfHG7)
What happens to ststes rights when the states receive most of their income from the federal government?
Well, you've seen the relational dynamics between a pimp and a hoe, right? Kinda like that, but without the moral rectitude or respect for capitalism.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 26, 2010 10:31 AM (pZEar)
Seriously though conservative chicks need to stop trying to coopt feminist and assert that Woman is a subset of the species Human.
What would you be prompted to make of a dude who called himself a Masculinist?
At the end of the day the best you can come off is all David Duke 'we not a group about hating non-white people we just a group about loving white people'.
You make up 50% of the global population, you're not a special interest group, or adherants to some controversial philosophy. "I'm a puppyist - I believe that it's ok for puppies to exist as puppies". Well goody for you. Glad you took a stand.
The very idea that women need a group promoting the idea that it's good for women to be women is an implicit admission that you have some need to convince yourself.
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 10:36 AM (IsLT6)
And the corollary, "Everything would be fine if Men just acted like Women."
I couldn't agree more.
Posted by: Shep Smith at March 26, 2010 10:38 AM (tMsMv)
"186 Is it still too early to talk about secession? Posted by: Rebar
Secession my ass. That assumes they have any right to the ground they stand on.
Defeat them militarily, and then herd the Dems onto reservations, where they can be subjected to a 100% income tax and fed government cheese."
Let them keep the legal right to the name USA, though, so they can own the debt they took out to buy the votes of free-loaders.
Posted by: Randy at March 26, 2010 10:43 AM (zQKSr)
everyone is saying they will do immigration next because they the votes, but i cant imagine they would do something that would bankrupt the country before the next election as immigration would do.
Posted by: Ben at March 26, 2010 01:24 PM (wuv1c)
Then you don't know Democrats. The SEIU is setting the terms here, and they have already told Obama their preference.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 26, 2010 10:43 AM (mHQ7T)
Heh. So far, whern they say Denmark, I say Greece! That's about the end of it. Krauthammer is getting us ready for the next battle. Right now they're fucking that deficit neutral, job-growing chicken.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 26, 2010 10:49 AM (mHQ7T)
Welcome to the "off the reservation" club little sister, have a seat...tea?
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2010 02:17 PM (5/yRG)"
I was so peeved when drudge called nan p "the most powerful woman"...what? Mother Theresa? gandhi? Thatcher? eva peron (the shoe lady) and someone reminded me of Golda....and he says nanny p? She doesn't even belong in that group but Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin do....the difference is courage.
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 10:50 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 26, 2010 10:51 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Brian & Dianne at March 26, 2010 10:52 AM (ITzbJ)
his body language says his heart isn't in it.
A lot of his body language is associated with the fact that he's paraplegic.
FYI
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 26, 2010 02:25 PM (RkRxq)"
I know but I have been paying attention to him for a long time...so you see the nuances in his eyes in the way he holds himself, etc. Oddly enough, I don't see him as disabled. although I recently pointed a small friend in a wheelchair towards him as a role model and the kid is thrilled. He has a new #1 fan...lol
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 10:54 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2010 10:59 AM (p302b)
They will never be happy until the opposition is silenced for good.
Posted by: grace at March 26, 2010 11:03 AM (Exq1l)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 26, 2010 11:06 AM (PQY7w)
180 I'm of the opinion that the days of the Republic are over; this is tyranny. However, emperors and their entourages don't stay in power forever -- the next one may be somebody the other side doesn't like so well (sucks to put that ball into play if the game turns against you, doesn't it other side?).
194 I have absolutely no penis envy (I do envy not being as strong and fast on some days; it could come in handy sometimes), but no penis envy. I like penii; they're fun.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2010 11:10 AM (5/yRG)
209 It's the guilt thing; "liberals" have more guilt than a stadium full of Catholics and Jews (who are often "liberal", connection?).
It's guilt mixed in with arrogance, naricissism really -- hence, they are not true liberals.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2010 11:12 AM (5/yRG)
214 You're just a ray of sunshine this lovely afternoon.
I'm going to predict here: it won't be el precedente and his entourage that will be the biggest problem, and this could turn around on the lefties in a most awful way.
I'm going for pessimistically hopeful (down from the pessimistically optimistic of last week).
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2010 11:17 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2010 11:26 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: fightobama at March 26, 2010 11:33 AM (6IV8T)
That is without a the VAT. The difference is that we have a LARGE segment of the population that pays no taxes and actually a large segment that gets a refund without paying taxes into the system.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 11:42 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: FatBaldnSassy at March 26, 2010 11:46 AM (Lq9ag)
Posted by: Ken at March 26, 2010 11:54 AM (4JpPD)
I do not know if Obama and company have figure this out yet, are actively banking on it, or are just the lucky recipients of risking all on a throw of the dice, but the health care reform gives him the chance to have a Disraeli or Gladstone type career. Just defeating him in 2012 means nothing if you leave in place this measure in any recognizable form. Because he then will be the liberal standard bearer who bled for the cause, in a country increasingly used to a statist government. You should be able to figure it out now.
Get a backbone and do what he just did--risk it all. Pull out the roots and then hope something comes along to help you out. For it has been said that the spirit of attack borne in a brave heart will lead on to victory. Stop trying to control everything (or everyone). Never mind maneuvers--go straight at 'em. That is all.
Posted by: Horatius at March 26, 2010 11:56 AM (Ab+5j)
" No captain can do very wrong if he places his ship alongside that of the enemy. "
Horatio Nelson
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 26, 2010 12:08 PM (dQdrY)
1) VAT's encourage the underground/barter economy.
2) If its only a VAT and sales tax were eliminated, then the punishingly regressive multiple taxation that goes on in the second hand/used goods/car market vanishes.
Other than those two advantages, VAT is a noxious thing that forces a heavy administrative and accounting burden on business that its ill able to afford, and encourages the offshoring of jobs to countries so the "value" of assembly can be "added" in a more tax favorable environment.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 26, 2010 12:21 PM (L4zp9)
Obama will chastise with scorpions!
Hmm.. does the administration even have a "scorpion" budget? Have to check into that and see if maybe some stimulus dollars went that direction.
Prepare for the fall of the free Republic.
I think America is a bit bigger than all of that, and that American's are whole hell of a lot smarter on the whole than the Democratic party and Obama's cronies give them credit for - they are beginning to awaken even as we speak.
Prepare to see King Obama arise and eat much flesh!
Yikes.. ok.. well, I'm hoping this falls under the "poetic liscense" arena. Besides I thought most of the moonbat lefties were strict vegitarians?
Course "Prepare to see King Obama arise and eat much celery" really doesn't have quite the same ominous ring too it, granted.. lol..
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at March 26, 2010 12:26 PM (e8T35)
Flyover Sam - neat idea. I'll sign on for 18%.
But I suspect (1) after the 18% people opted out, there wouldn't be near enough revenue to pay for services to the 60% people. They would have to cut some programs and that can never happen. And the dirty little secret is that they know the system would collapse.
Posted by: RM at March 26, 2010 12:33 PM (GkYyh)
I'm not seeing Krauthammer as giving up. But I think there will be more of these editorials from him and others. We are in serious trouble here and the stakes were just raised far higher.
I anticipate some very gloomy prognostications, and we are now past the point of saying, "Watch out, this could happen if the Democrats get their way and do this, that, or the other."
We are now at the point of "This is what WILL happen, and some of it sooner rather than later, unless we actually UNDO what they have accomplished."
I was around for Jimmy Carter's glorious presidency, and remember going to an Americans for the Competitive Enterprise System meeting shortly after Reagan was elected. Bill Simon spoke. People were happy Reagan had been elected, but there was some real question from the people there as to whether we had gone too far off the rails to get back or not. That's a very real question now, as well.
Posted by: RM at March 26, 2010 12:48 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 26, 2010 12:50 PM (PQY7w)
Posted by: t-bird at March 26, 2010 12:59 PM (tQlsD)
Posted by: Dana White at March 26, 2010 01:30 PM (zgeXv)
Posted by: Mindy at March 26, 2010 02:17 PM (4YdEJ)
Posted by: annak at March 26, 2010 02:52 PM (2/oBD)
Establish themselves as a party that is anti-government spending and stick by it.
People are getting fustrated by Obama and Congress for their out of control spending which most of it is govt favors and pork to Obama's political buddies.
80% of this HC Overhaul is nothing but Pork spending that has nothing to do with Health Care what is is nothing more than subsidizes and favors to Private Insurance companies. No wonder the Private Insurers were not against this bill, they want gobs of Obama's govt handouts too.
Obama's overall domestic plan is like that of a clueless Film Studio Exec, throw large amounts of someone else's money at the problem and cross your fingers that it works.
Posted by: Gary B at March 26, 2010 04:00 PM (1gWfF)
I always said the energy situation in America will remain a disaster until the lights start going out. Only then will people agree to act. I think this is the same. Only when the US government begins to collapse under its economic load and the super-inflation hits (along with all the associated problems) will people finally arise from their confused slumber and react.
One hope--Moody's downgrades US paper and/or our biggest creditors begin to start asking for payouts on the bonds. This may shake up the system. It would starve the government beast and force it to raise taxes hugely across the board. I'm not sure Mr and Mrs America will accept a 20% VAT like they have in the EU without a certain amount of complaining. That might be enough to get them to actually vote government money and benefits out of their pockets. Maybe.
More likely...Mad Max!!
Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at March 26, 2010 04:46 PM (Xlw/P)
And I have no idea where what's his name...John Conyers... got the impression that Obamacare is constitutionally valid. I reckon "lefties" read the constitution different than the rest of us. Go figure, eh?
Posted by: sickandtired at March 26, 2010 05:16 PM (SiSXi)
It's run by the IRS. No arrests would be made, they'd simply lock up your bank accounts with a few key presses and garnishee your wages.
Civil disobedience of this kind against the government is not an option any more, at least to anyone with a job and/or bank account. When Washington told King George "Come and get it," Georgie boy had to load up sailing ships with soldiers and fight his way there. Now a drone in a basement at the IRS or the FBI or any number of places can destroy you with a computer. Times have changed, alas.
Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at March 26, 2010 05:19 PM (Xlw/P)
@23: "No half measures. If we're going to save this country, we have to napalm the left. We're at an inflection point here.We need men and women of principle, courage and commitment."
Um, this is 21st Century America......that kinda stuff went out of vogue a long, long time ago. Not on an individual level for many people, but society-wide? It's playing bridge with the dodo, passenger pigeon, and mastodon.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 26, 2010 06:19 PM (kmEfr)
@38: "Whose military are we going to leech off of while this is happening?"
Herro! Prease to folgive, but wirr not be "reeching off of" so much as "glovering undel boot of."
Posted by: People's Liberation Army at March 26, 2010 06:24 PM (kmEfr)
@122: "So we need a tax on non-production. Tax the lawyers."
And professors. You produce nothing (well, maybe future Marxists), and you do it all on the public dime.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 26, 2010 06:47 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: sexypig at March 26, 2010 06:52 PM (nvzU0)
Posted by: sexypig at March 26, 2010 06:55 PM (nvzU0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.269 seconds, 361 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 26, 2010 09:01 AM (ucq49)