February 19, 2010
— DrewM A little over a year into a failed presidency and the Democrats already know who is at fault...everyone else. They do this by ignoring the year* they had a 60 vote super-majority in the Senate (something that only disappeared when they managed to lose the seat held by Democrats for over 50 years) or the overwhelming House majority they still enjoy. No, like a child looking to deflect blame for their failure to 'remake' America as Obama promised, they claim to have not have had enough power to overcome 'special interests' 'Fox News' and of course, those pesky 'people'.
Citing the Reagan and Clinton presidencies, Charles Krauthammer takes the, um, hammer to their claims that this some how proves America is now "ungovernable".
It turned out that the country's problems were not problems of structure but of leadership. Reagan and Clinton had it. Carter didn't. Under a president with extensive executive experience, good political skills and an ideological compass in tune with the public, the country was indeed governable.It's 2010, and the first-year agenda of a popular and promising young president has gone down in flames. Barack Obama's two signature initiatives -- cap-and-trade and health-care reform -- lie in ruins.
Desperate to explain away this scandalous state of affairs, liberal apologists haul out the old reliable from the Carter years: "America the Ungovernable." So declared Newsweek. "Is America Ungovernable?" coyly asked the New Republic. Guess the answer.
The rage at the machine has produced the usual litany of systemic explanations. Special interests are too powerful. The Senate filibuster stymies social progress. A burdensome constitutional order prevents innovation. If only we could be more like China, pines Tom Friedman, waxing poetic about the efficiency of the Chinese authoritarian model, while America flails about under its "two parties . . . with their duel-to-the-death paralysis." The better thinkers, bewildered and furious that their president has not gotten his way, have developed a sudden disdain for our inherently incremental constitutional system.
Yet, what's new about any of these supposedly ruinous structural impediments? Special interests blocking policy changes? They have been around since the beginning of the republic -- and since the beginning of the republic, strong presidents, like the two Roosevelts, have rallied the citizenry and overcome them.
Liberals never admit they are wrong or that the majority simply rejects their ideas. It's simultaneously childlike in it's refusal to take responsibility and dangerous in that their answer is always to change the rules to give them even greater power to do what they want.
Ask a die hard lefty about the failure of socialism and communism everywhere it's been tried and they will simply tell you it's never really been tried as intended. The Soviet Union, Cuba, China (before going capitalist) really weren't pure enough examples for them. Give them one more chance, a little more power, a little higher body count and they will usher in utopia!
Obama isn't failing because conservatives lie or cheat. Obama is failing because he's an ideologue who wrapped his hard left agenda in a gauzy film of Hope and Change. Now that people have gotten a look at what it really means they are rejecting it.
Unfortunately for liberals, this system of checks and balances is a feature, not a bug of the American system.
*As Zimrel points out in the comments, the Democrats only had 59 votes until July when Franken was seated. Two things...59 votes is a lot and other than the 'stimulus' (which passed) the big ticket items like health care and Cap and Trade weren't ready for votes until after Franken took his seat. They still couldn't get it done.
Rogue Regime [ace]: As Drew mentioned, the filibuster is singled out as a villain in most of these pieces.
The implication is that the filibuster is an anti-democratic gimmick that thwarts the will of the people.
It may be an anti-democratic gimmick, but note that in this case it certainly does not thwart the will of the people -- by majorities often approaching 60%, the people say they don't want ObamaCare.
So what they are really complaining of is that there is a procedural hurdle in the Senate that is keeping Obama and the liberals from passing into law a bill that the public loathes.
Does that make any sense? They call America "ungovernable" and blame the filibuster (among other things), despite the fact that the filibuster is being used on behalf of the majority of voters to advance their actual agenda (or rather halt a bill that is contrary to their agenda).
America isn't ungovernable. Lacking responsive and responsible governance from the accidental power the Democrats have, America has chosen to govern itself, via the only levers of power over its rogue government it has left.
Posted by: DrewM at
07:55 AM
| Comments (171)
Post contains 810 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Typical liberal college student at February 19, 2010 07:57 AM (0Hn5w)
"A little over a year into a failed presidency and the Democrats already know who is at fault for their failures...everyone else."
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!elev!!enty!!!!!
Gotta love it.
Posted by: General Zod, Decidedly Alpha Male at February 19, 2010 07:58 AM (WmZrs)
Posted by: Zatara at February 19, 2010 07:58 AM (nz654)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 19, 2010 07:59 AM (eTmlC)
Obama is failing failed because he's an ideologue who wrapped his hard left agenda in a gauzy film of Hope and Change....and that his only "achievement" was Project Vote and asbestos removal in low-income southside Chicago housing.
Some lefty turd yesterday tried to make the case that he should forget 1600 Penn and nominate himself to SCOTUS. Ya know, because we're to dippy to understand his egghead law school professor adjunct ways.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 19, 2010 08:03 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Elitist? Moi? at February 19, 2010 08:03 AM (YCVBL)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 19, 2010 08:05 AM (eTmlC)
Posted by: Boots at February 19, 2010 08:06 AM (06JTY)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 19, 2010 08:06 AM (eTmlC)
Posted by: fluffy works hard at February 19, 2010 08:06 AM (4Kl5M)
I think the grand strategy here is to make Scalia die from laughter.
They're playing chess, not checkers.
Posted by: VJay at February 19, 2010 08:07 AM (gQ+XA)
And some people really are more equal than others.
Posted by: taylork at February 19, 2010 08:08 AM (0Hn5w)
Don't worry; Crap and Tax and the Healthscam have NOT gone away. Bambi plans on healthscam via reconilliation on a budget bill. As for crap and tax, he has a two tier approach; first via executive fiat using the EPA (hail King Obama) and second via skirting the consitution by making a treaty.
He will argue that a treaty is the law of the land and is the same as an amendment. Its not.
Posted by: Vic at February 19, 2010 08:08 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: defenduUSA at February 19, 2010 08:08 AM (Kt4Bp)
Communism works, in theory.
...and capitalism works in practice. Like the Army says, if it's stupid but it works, it's not stupid.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 19, 2010 08:09 AM (pZEar)
Have I ever typed that I hate liberals and their guts?
Probably. Have I ever said that I hate liberals? Many many times.
Posted by: jewells at February 19, 2010 08:10 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 19, 2010 08:12 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: Truman North at February 19, 2010 08:12 AM (e8YaH)
Let me it go, dude. Anyone up for liver for dinner?
Posted by: Prometheus at February 19, 2010 08:12 AM (cvvNY)
New Jersey's Frank Lautenberg, nation's second-oldest senator, has stomach cancer
Posted by: Tami at February 19, 2010 08:13 AM (VuLos)
"Communism works, in theory.
So does cold fusion.
And the Rhythm Method."
Ya'know, it's funny, they never accept that arguement about abstinance. Sex is the one area where human nature is set in stone, apparently.
Posted by: Randy at February 19, 2010 08:13 AM (zQKSr)
If you listen closely enough you can hear the architects of that system- Madison, Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, and all the rest- probably over a good tankard of ale- laughing their heads off at The Precedent as he flails about trying to "fundamentally transform America".
This is exactly the kind of sh*t that they foresaw and built the system to prevent.
And, thank G*d, that system is working...
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 19, 2010 08:14 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 19, 2010 08:16 AM (NLZLH)
New Jersey's Frank Lautenberg, nation's second-oldest senator, has stomach cancer
Posted by: Tami at February 19, 2010 12:13 PM (VuLos)
from falling down???? WTF? I guess I need to get the Wii Fit out and work on my balance some more.
Posted by: Rocks at February 19, 2010 08:16 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Countrysquire at February 19, 2010 08:16 AM (rDvlp)
Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 19, 2010 08:17 AM (NLZLH)
Posted by: maddogg at February 19, 2010 08:17 AM (OlN4e)
Remember that great scene from the Oscar-robbed classic The Blues
Brothers? Jake and Elwood (John Belushi and Dan Akroyd) are finally
cornered by Jake’s former fiancée (Carrie Fisher). Jake left her at the
altar with 300 guests and the best Romanian caterers in the state
waiting.
“You betrayed me!” she exclaims.
“No I didn’t. Honest,” Jake explains. “I ran out of gas. I, I had a
flat tire. I didnÂ’t have enough money for cab fare. My tux didnÂ’t come
back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone
stole my car. There was an earthquake! A terrible flood! Locusts! IT
WASN’T MY FAULT, I SWEAR TO GOD!”
This is pretty much how Democrats sound these days. None of their problems are their fault.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2010 08:17 AM (xxgag)
27 @1 At least in the end, there will be only chaos.
Let me it go, dude. Anyone up for liver for dinner?
Still sore at me for using your ashes as a strength power-up?
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 19, 2010 08:18 AM (9hSKh)
If you listen closely enough you can hear the architects of that system- Madison, Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, and all the rest- probably over a good tankard of ale- laughing their heads off at The Precedent as he flails about trying to "fundamentally transform America".
This is exactly the kind of sh*t that they foresaw and built the system to prevent.
And, thank G*d, that system is working...
meh, I still got the Executive Order, Bitches (and DR. AMY BISHOP will be my next Czar of Kicking-Ass and Taking Names)
Posted by: Barack Obama at February 19, 2010 08:18 AM (cvvNY)
Posted by: joncelli at February 19, 2010 08:19 AM (RD7QR)
27 @1 At least in the end, there will be only chaos.
Let me it go, dude. Anyone up for liver for dinner?
Still sore at me for using your ashes as a strength power-up?
That and that bitch, Pandora. Who has been reincarnated as Amy Bishop.
Posted by: Prometheus at February 19, 2010 08:21 AM (cvvNY)
Does NJ appoint replacements or hold special elections? And thank God for Chris Christie!
Posted by: joncelli at February 19, 2010 12:19 PM (RD7QR)
They'll take the seat from his cold, dead hands apparently:
www.nj.com
The Democrat still plans to finish out his current term – his fifth in the Senate – and seek re-election in 2014.
“This doesn’t change any of that,” Lautenberg’s chief aide, Dan Katz, said of the senator’s political plans. “After he receives his treatment, back to normal.”
Moments ago, LautenbergÂ’s office issued a statement from the senatorÂ’s oncologist, James F. Holland, saying:
“We expect a full and complete recovery for Senator Lautenberg. The senator will be treated with chemotherapy administered approximately every three weeks. We anticipate that he will receive between six and eight treatments, and in between treatments, the senator is expected to be back at work in the Senate.”
Posted by: Tami at February 19, 2010 08:21 AM (VuLos)
meh, I still got the Executive Order, Bitches (and DR. AMY BISHOP will be my next Czar of Kicking-Ass and Taking Names)
Posted by: Barack Obama at February 19, 2010 12:18 PM (cvvNY)
Yeah- Executive Orders worked fine for me!
Posted by: Richard Nixon at February 19, 2010 08:22 AM (OtQXp)
Does NJ appoint replacements or hold special elections? And thank God for Chris Christie!
Does it matter, the state senate will pass a law saying there should be special elections. Also if the guy dies do you think Christie will get away with appointing a republican?
Posted by: Ben at February 19, 2010 08:22 AM (wuv1c)
wow so we got a shot at another Senate seat?
Nice.
Christy should appoint his lt. gov or himself as the replacement.
Posted by: This is your brain on brainssss at February 19, 2010 08:23 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: davidt at February 19, 2010 08:23 AM (OdlYh)
“This doesn’t change any of that,” Lautenberg’s chief aide, Dan Katz, said of the senator’s political plans. “After he receives his treatment, back to normal.”
I think Jack Murtha said the same thing
Posted by: Ben at February 19, 2010 08:23 AM (wuv1c)
It's a good thing liberals and the politicians they elect are so incompetent or we'd be in a lot more trouble right now. They screwed up a supermajority and to date, have nothing to show for it.
Ralph Wiggum could have ushered through more legislation than Obama/Pelosi/Reid.
Posted by: Blogluddite at February 19, 2010 08:24 AM (fDWFP)
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 08:24 AM (jVldi)
Meanwhile, they spent the last 8 years politicizing a war in order to harm George Bush.
These are the same people who dragged Sarah Palin's kids through the mud and illegally dug through private, personal records of Joe the Plumber, private American citizen who just happened to speak his mind when King Barack came onto his property for a photo op.
Ungovernable? By you clowns? You bet. The kind of ungovernable that the 2nd amendment wholly supports.
Posted by: Warden at February 19, 2010 08:25 AM (TIGTh)
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 08:25 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: joncelli at February 19, 2010 12:19 PM (RD7QR)
Given that the norm for the state is a Democrat governor I would guess gubernatorial appointment for the full balance of the term. I would also guess that Democrats in the state legislature are at this very moment scrambling like madmen tying to find a way to change that...
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 19, 2010 08:26 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Barbed Cock O'Satan at February 19, 2010 08:26 AM (cvvNY)
Posted by: maddogg at February 19, 2010 12:17 PM (OlN4e)
I saw this in an earlier thread.
Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 19, 2010 08:26 AM (NLZLH)
Posted by: grognard at February 19, 2010 08:28 AM (v0kvW)
Obama will win the noise war because conservatives
have political amplifiers that only go to "10". O's
amplifier goes up to "11"! Christopher Guest will
back me up.
Posted by: grizzlybare at February 19, 2010 08:28 AM (V5kav)
This country is not socialist, will not accept socialism as an attribute of the country, and will hold the heads of those who have fallen into the socialist pool under until the last feeble twitch. And that includes the lefties in this country - they are not that far left.
George Soros and the rest of the floating corpses will likely continue the pollute the waters for a while but the decomposition has started and they will wind up bloated and alone.
That's the hope I can believe in.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at February 19, 2010 08:28 AM (r1h5M)
The purpose of The Constitution is not to govern The People, it is to govern the government.
Yes, but if you listen to Wee Wee's take on the Constitution, he sees it as a limiting document that doesn't do enough to redistribute wealth 'justice' to the victims of western society.
We can only hope he does go away when he loses in '12, instead of appointing himself El Presidente for life.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 19, 2010 08:29 AM (fx8sm)
Technically they only had the 60 Senate votes in 7 July when Franken slithered his way in.
Also, up to then it didn't matter. The Presidency was a "success" as of July; in that Obama got the bailouts, stimulus, and commissars ("czars") he wanted.
So the failure your post mentions should refer to the second half year where there were 60 votes, hubris, and overreach.
/nitpick
Posted by: Zimriel at February 19, 2010 08:31 AM (9Sbz+)
Unfortunately, this was not the right nation. He was seeking a nation -- of roughly the same name and the same resources -- that his spouse could be proud of, that was seeking to spread the wealth around, and that had a populace of more enlightened, genteel people. That way, when he brought his team in from the political cesspit of Chicago, Great Things could be accomplished.
Where, oh where, might this other nation be found? I, for one, would dearly love to send Obama there post haste, in hope of putting things right.
Posted by: cthulhu at February 19, 2010 08:32 AM (u+gbs)
Both Lautenberg and Byrd will not see 2011.
My words, mark them.
Them what dies will be the lucky ones.
Posted by: L.J. Silver at February 19, 2010 08:34 AM (NLZLH)
Posted by: Rocks at February 19, 2010 08:34 AM (Q1lie)
I fear that the Dims are still gonna ram Deathcare down our throats.
Whether they succeed or not, they (at least Obama) will never give this up. Obama will harp on this and beat this the entire time he is in office, and forever after every time he gets in front of a microphone.
Posted by: katya at February 19, 2010 08:34 AM (t21Ab)
Obama isn't failing because conservatives lie or cheat. Obama is failing because he's an ideologue who wrapped his hard left agenda in a gauzy film of Hope and Change. Now that people have gotten a look at what it really means they are rejecting it.
Well said young man, You should head my new joint venture w/Vivid & Nascar...ASS-Car
Posted by: dananjcon at February 19, 2010 08:36 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Rocks at February 19, 2010 12:34 PM (Q1lie)
You know, that picture looks as if all of the trash is in the same color bags...Where are the recyclables? Where is the compost heap?
Posted by: Hedgehog at February 19, 2010 08:37 AM (oQIfB)
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at February 19, 2010 08:37 AM (8zQxF)
58 Hussein And that includes the lefties in this country - they are not that far left.
I think you're right. That Stack guy was in his heart an anti-authoritarian. He just swam in leftist culture. If he hadn't been insane he'd have been running some blog somewhere. And we'd be linking to his last note, which wouldn't be a suicide note in this contrafactual, as "an excellent rant by a lefty mugged by reality".
I'm seriously wondering how many of the Left bloggers are working on their suicide notes these days.
If they're reading this: please don't blow shit up, we've got enough crazy as it is. Edit your rant and post it instead.
Posted by: Zimriel at February 19, 2010 08:37 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: curious at February 19, 2010 08:38 AM (p302b)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2010 08:39 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: Faye Kinnit at February 19, 2010 08:40 AM (l1oyw)
The picture of the Dalai Lama going out the back door of the WH past the garbage is classic
I'll be honest. I really don't like the Dalai Lama. I still don't get why he is revered in teh western world, or considered some kind of wise sage. He's lived a life of luxury while he country is colonized and outbred by the Han Chinese. He has accomplished absolutlely nothing for his people or for anyone else.
He is essentially a hollywood celebrity, not a political figure fighting for the freedom of his people.
If he really wanted to bring attention to tibet or free them he would take the money he has, buy weapons and smuggle them into tibet or at the very least try to re-enter tibet. If he was arrested upon entering then maybe people would pay attention to the cause if he was a political prisoner. Nelson Mandella wasn't respected because he fled the country and waited the Apartheid government out.
I hate the Dalai Lama.
Posted by: Ben at February 19, 2010 08:40 AM (wuv1c)
cthulhu: Where, oh where, might this other nation be found? I, for one, would dearly love to send Obama there post haste, in hope of putting things right.
Burma.
His incompetence would inspire a popular uprising which would, finally, make the place the Asian tiger it deserves to be. Its current regime is, unfortunately, competent - at staying in charge.
Posted by: Zimriel at February 19, 2010 08:40 AM (9Sbz+)
After all, it's easier to beg for forgiveness than ask permission, right?
I hate this policy. It's permission for egomaniacs and control freaks to do what they want with no regard to anyone else's feelings, needs or rights.
Posted by: katya at February 19, 2010 08:41 AM (t21Ab)
Posted by: Mikey NTH at February 19, 2010 08:43 AM (O9Cc8)
73
Yes, but he is an icon for World Peace to the unthinking masses. I hope the masses see the symbolism of the Icon being snuck out the "servant's entrance".
Posted by: katya at February 19, 2010 08:44 AM (t21Ab)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 19, 2010 08:44 AM (UOM48)
Theoretical communism = no mass murder
Real c9mmunism = mass murder
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2010 08:44 AM (xxgag)
I'm seriously wondering how many of the Left bloggers are working on their suicide notes these days.
If they're reading this: please don't blow shit up, we've got enough crazy as it is. Edit your rant and post it instead.
Bicycle bomb?
Posted by: maddogg at February 19, 2010 08:45 AM (OlN4e)
America "Ungovernable"?
That's kinda the point of America [We The People, etc], ain't it?
Betcha.
Posted by: katya at February 19, 2010 08:45 AM (t21Ab)
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at February 19, 2010 08:45 AM (8zQxF)
Posted by: BuddyPC at February 19, 2010 08:45 AM (6FB0z)
After all, it's easier to beg for forgiveness than ask permission, right?
I hate this policy. It's permission for egomaniacs and control freaks to do what they want with no regard to anyone else's feelings, needs or rights.
So they will do what they were going to do then.......
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at February 19, 2010 08:46 AM (8zQxF)
"Ungovernable"
Translation: All you necks and your Constitution!!!
P.J. O'Rourke was right: Liberalism is the ideology of spoiled children.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 19, 2010 08:47 AM (B+qrE)
DrewM says, "Ask a die hard lefty about the failure of socialism and communism everywhere it's been tried and they will simply tell you it's never really been tried as intended."
Look no further than that idiot sevant, Paul Krugman, (paraphrasing) ". . . the problem is we havn't spent enough, and neither did Roosevelt."
Posted by: bullwhacker at February 19, 2010 08:47 AM (aMpG9)
Does NJ appoint replacements or hold special elections? And thank God for Chris Christie!
Posted by: joncelli at February 19, 2010 12:19 PM (RD7QR)
I should probably no the answer to this, I don't (hangs head in shame) FAIL!!
Posted by: dananjcon at February 19, 2010 08:48 AM (pr+up)
I think a lot of the appeal of the Dali Lama is because he is a symbol of a culture that incorporates the recreational use of narcotics.
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 19, 2010 08:48 AM (OtQXp)
Purple Avenger, you are the Man. +1, Gold Star, for all your early remarks.
Anyone who waxes poetic about the grandness of the authoritarian ChiComs and also decries the studied, logical, remarkable forethought and targeted, intelligent structure of our Constitution should DIE IN A FIRE.
Seriously. Long live the Republic.
Posted by: Miller at February 19, 2010 08:48 AM (oHmsT)
75: maybe Obama will still ram it through, but as Drew said a few days ago, if they had the votes, they would've done so already.
Unfortunately, Newt's brain has been botoxed from sitting too close to Pelosi for too long, and is now trying to f*ck us over.
Posted by: eddiebear at February 19, 2010 08:48 AM (wnU1W)
Good news: Lautenberg's cancer is limited to one tumor easily removed with surgery.
Bad news: Murtha's surgeon is the one who's going to remove the tumor.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 19, 2010 08:49 AM (P33XN)
Unfortunately, this was not the right nation.
Hillary had the same problem. Through a cruel quirk of fate, she was not born in Argentina.
Posted by: arhooley at February 19, 2010 08:50 AM (DVFUM)
Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 19, 2010 08:52 AM (NLZLH)
Hillary had the same problem. Through a cruel quirk of fate, she was not born in Argentina.
Don't Cry for Me, Bill Clinton.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 19, 2010 08:53 AM (P33XN)
Posted by: Ella at February 19, 2010 08:54 AM (FGaum)
Hillary had the same problem. Through a cruel quirk of fate, she was not born in Argentina.
Don't Cry for Me, Bill Clinton. Vincent Foster
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 19, 2010 12:53 PM (P33XN)
Fits better music-wise.
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 19, 2010 08:55 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 19, 2010 08:55 AM (NLZLH)
Yeah, if your theory postulates that people share more characteristics with bees and ants then they actually you know, do.
Of any state to really push the envelope as far as transforming it's denizens into a more bee-like or ant-like people you've really got to give North Korea some credit, at least with respect to those living in the Pyongyang hive.
Nevertheless, it is a rather severely and selectively limited "success" even though the governing class of NK has at their disposal the kinds of tools helpful to "impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century" that a Thomas Friedman can only dream of.
Posted by: Deety at February 19, 2010 08:56 AM (aVzyR)
Americans don't cotton to being ruled very easily.
Fortunately, Obama is too arrogant to realize this, so his tenure will be short-lived.
Posted by: DarthRove at February 19, 2010 08:57 AM (W1DMG)
Betcha.
Posted by: katya at February 19, 2010 12:45 PM (t21Ab)
Sarah-cuda ... That You?
Posted by: Paladin at February 19, 2010 08:57 AM (ho4I5)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 19, 2010 08:58 AM (mHQ7T)
Communism works, in theory
Only if theory ignores the reality of human nature. That's why it doesn't work. Because human nature will not give their all for the dead-beat down the block.
Posted by: katya at February 19, 2010 08:59 AM (t21Ab)
from Reds:
when you purge dissent, you kill the revolution. the revolution IS dissent.
it happens in most revolutions; French, Russian, Chinese, Cuban, etc. and why they turn to shit. they can't stand competing ideas.
the founders built dissent (competing ideas) into our system and it's why the American Revolution is still alive.
Posted by: PR at February 19, 2010 08:59 AM (k7SeR)
Posted by: curious at February 19, 2010 09:01 AM (p302b)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 19, 2010 09:01 AM (GgR+e)
Any News on Argentina and the Empire?
You mean the current troubles regarding Las Islas Malvinas?
No. Haven't heard anything.
Posted by: FireHorse at February 19, 2010 09:02 AM (cQyWA)
Yeah, if your theory postulates that people share more characteristics with bees and ants then they actually you know, do.
Of any state to really push the envelope as far as transforming it's denizens into a more bee-like or ant-like people you've really got to give North Korea some credit, at least with respect to those living in the Pyongyang hive.
Nevertheless, it is a rather severely and selectively limited "success" even though the governing class of NK has at their disposal the kinds of tools helpful to "impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century" that a Thomas Friedman can only dream of.
Posted by: Deety at February 19, 2010 12:56 PM (aVzyR)
Christopher Hitchens explained in an article in Slate a few weeks ago that North Korea is not communist at all. They are a fascist, racist, military dictatorship. Nothing like communism at all.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2010 09:03 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 19, 2010 09:03 AM (P33XN)
I think many posters are not noticing the name (e.g. sockpuppet) attached to the comment. It wasn't a serious post.
Posted by: taylork at February 19, 2010 09:03 AM (0Hn5w)
104 the founders built dissent (competing ideas) into our system and it's why the American Revolution is still alive.
Exactly, but now the leftists equate the revolution with racism, unless of course they are doing the revolting.
Posted by: dananjcon at February 19, 2010 09:04 AM (pr+up)
Yeah, because Marxists are just so damned irrelevant here and now.
Posted by: Deety at February 19, 2010 09:05 AM (aVzyR)
Yes, I agree the "Leftists" are Revolting....Positively Revolting! As the Great One would often say.
Posted by: Paladin at February 19, 2010 09:07 AM (ho4I5)
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at February 19, 2010 09:11 AM (ClZ5D)
...and I thought conservatives didn't like FDR and had serious questions about Teddy R's progressive ideology. Of course, strong presidents are evil...unless they are conservative Republicans.
...the Senate filibuster is a bad thing...unless and until Republicans use it...
Special interests blocking policy changes is a bad thing...unless it's a conservative or Republican special interest group...
Same/same as the liberals and progressive Democrats. It's all quite unpatriotic...even, un-Constituional...unless you're the ones doing it.
(Remember: Campaign finance reform means reforming the system so that your favorite politician isn't 'legally' corrupt.)
Let's see, here....Super Bowl last month. Olympics this month. What kinds of bread and circuses are scheduled for next month?
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 19, 2010 09:12 AM (oeESr)
Posted by: Cha5rlie Gibson at February 19, 2010 09:13 AM (8zQxF)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 19, 2010 09:15 AM (GgR+e)
What pisses me of about our current miserable leader is that the MSM is so esconsed in the Barry camp that important issues like the exploding homeless and hunger problems in this country go unreported:
Bush would have been burned at the stake every morning by the MSM for this situation. But because it's Barry the Magnificient, he gets a pass.
These people - and their children - deserve a simple three letter word -
J O B S.
It aint right.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at February 19, 2010 09:16 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2010 09:18 AM (xxgag)
Face it, Obama,
if you can't pass your agenda with a huge majority in Congress...
YOUR AGENDA STINKS.
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:18 AM (jVldi)
Posted by: curious at February 19, 2010 09:20 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 19, 2010 01:03 PM (P33XN)
Ask and ye shall receive: Thomas Friedman hearts Mao
Posted by: conscious works on his photoshop skills at February 19, 2010 09:20 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at February 19, 2010 09:20 AM (ClZ5D)
Ask a die hard lefty about the failure of socialism and communism everywhere it's been tried and they will simply tell you it's never really been tried as intended.
Mention "free markets" to a lefty and they instantly replace the term with "unfettered capitalism." That's never really been tried either.
Posted by: FireHorse at February 19, 2010 09:21 AM (cQyWA)
Posted by: This Sees Dead People at February 19, 2010 09:21 AM (jVldi)
I think that the relevant quote from that article is this one:
Myers makes a persuasive case that we should instead regard the Kim Jong-il system as a phenomenon of the very extreme and pathological right. It is based on totalitarian "military first" mobilization, is maintained by slave labor, and instills an ideology of the most unapologetic racism and xenophobia.
Sorry. Not buying Hitch. It rests on the premise that militarism, racism, and xenophobia are not only the defining characteristics of the right but also entirely incompatible with the left.
Nope, these are the pathologies that leftism is most susceptible to and when leftist and communists inevitably succumb to these pathologies on their pre-determined descent into a slave state, their apologists point to this as evidence that the regime has "moved to the right".
Bullshit.
Posted by: Deety at February 19, 2010 09:24 AM (aVzyR)
Posted by: curious at February 19, 2010 09:25 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at February 19, 2010 01:20 PM (p302b)
Sky says Romeny used a "Vulcan grip" on him. That does it. I'm voting for Romeny. I can see it now. Pelosi is flapping her meat, "We need botox subsidies for the poor blah, blah, blah . . ." and Romney just sneaks up behind her and she goes beddy bye.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 19, 2010 09:27 AM (xxgag)
Perhaps we need to install a dictator for life and burn that pesky constitution?
Bill O'Reilly's working on it. [Via linkiest.]
Posted by: andycanuck at February 19, 2010 09:29 AM (2qU2d)
Perhaps we need to install a dictator for life and burn that pesky constitution?
Bill O'Reilly's working on it. [Via linkiest.]
Bloody Irish.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 19, 2010 09:30 AM (fx8sm)
"After all, it's easier to beg for forgiveness than ask permission, right?"
That's what I'm hoping for!
Posted by: Tigerrrrr at February 19, 2010 09:33 AM (pUO5u)
Well said. I detest these contemporary attempts to exonerate Leftism from odious practices. The notion that somehow concepts such as militarism, racism, etc. are endemic to the political Right is ridiculous -- it's an attempt to redefine historical Leftist icons as Stalin, Lenin and Mao (and to be fair, Hitler) as somehow less than Left. It's the Left's way of wanting to exert their definitions of what comprises a Rightist ideology, and it pisses me off.
Posted by: Vile Roman at February 19, 2010 09:34 AM (iBzKc)
Boy, the Left is really going at this ungovernable/obstructionism meme hammer and sickel, aren't they?
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at February 19, 2010 09:34 AM (w41GQ)
And as Krauthammer points out, the Democrat hack Paul Krugman thought it was a wonderful tool to stop Bush judicial nominees, but now must retire to his fainting couch because the Republicans are using it to put the brakes on Obamacare.
Posted by: OregonMuse at February 19, 2010 09:35 AM (JkUVD)
Gawd, I loathe that odious twit -- especially since my unrelenting, unthinking Lefty in-laws rely on his input as political gospel.
Posted by: Vile Roman at February 19, 2010 09:39 AM (iBzKc)
Yep, the system did work, both with Obamacare and with amnesty a while back. Both were situations where the majority of the politicians wanted to jam something wildly unpopular down our throats. In both cases, enough of them finally realized how strongly people felt, and the utopian dreams had to be put on hold.
Problem is, liberals never give up with their scheming for power. They will simply try to get around the people's will another way.
Posted by: RM at February 19, 2010 09:39 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 19, 2010 09:39 AM (GgR+e)
"#112 Europe has Marxists, but overall, the EU countries aren't totalitarian;"
The EU itself is getting there, and it certainly not politically free, what with the predetermined elections to hand rule over to distant beaurocrats.
Posted by: Randy at February 19, 2010 09:41 AM (zQKSr)
Posted by: dananjcon at February 19, 2010 09:41 AM (pr+up)
"so...the Northeastern blueblood Republicans are wrong and out of touch...unless you agree with them? (Krauthammer, Parker, Noonan...)"
Would never lump Krauthammer in with Noonan and Parker and don't see how you came up with that analogy.
Posted by: RM at February 19, 2010 09:46 AM (GkYyh)
Until we have a Constitutional "crisis" a la the Healtcare "crisis" or the Climate Change "crisis" that can only be solved by sweeping "reform" from D.C. that you need to sign onto NOW!!! or else all will be lost...
I would be bored to tears by all of this if it weren't so palpably effective.
Posted by: Deety at February 19, 2010 09:47 AM (aVzyR)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 19, 2010 09:49 AM (GgR+e)
Tom - "One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages."
Milton - "People worry about government waste; I don't. I just shudder at what would happen to freedom in this country if the government were efficient in spending our money."
Which one is the jackass?
Posted by: Mr. Wolf at February 19, 2010 09:51 AM (I6wB4)
I had enough of o'really after the Sarah palin interview the other night. I hate the way, if you want to keep your job on the show, he always has to have the last word and be right. he is a true ego maniac. Have seen tape of him in a dingy beige raincoat as the police reporter years ago on the local NY fox channel, he was a no body. A lot of people are getting annoyed by his PC attitude. He refuses to take a stand on anything and he seems to cow tow to the administration. Guess he thinks the libs are watching so he can alienate his original audience.
Posted by: curious at February 19, 2010 09:51 AM (p302b)
Posted by: INCITEmarsh at February 19, 2010 09:51 AM (FCn6Y)
Posted by: SGT Dan's Cat at February 19, 2010 09:55 AM (GgXZc)
I don't follow rap music at all. I think it's stupid, not music at all. So I don't know, but the blogger seems to know so I figured it was funny.
Posted by: curious at February 19, 2010 09:58 AM (p302b)
That's pretty much how I explain The Won's inability to deliver on his promises to a lefty lawyer type.
Don't blame the Republicans - they could have stayed home, and the Dems would still be able to convene a quorum of the House & Senate - blame Obama and his team of geniuses for farming out the content of actual bills to the brain trust of Pelosi and Reid. The Big Chair in the Oval Office doesn't have a present option.
But it's much easier to blame Congress if you haven't written your own bills...
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at February 19, 2010 11:27 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Bill at February 19, 2010 11:35 AM (MN+T/)
Posted by: INCITEmarsh at February 19, 2010 11:39 AM (FCn6Y)
151 -- Known biblically?
I've always considered the ungovernablity of the American people to be a plus in our favor.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 19, 2010 11:48 AM (5/yRG)
"Tom Friedman, waxing poetic about the efficiency of the Chinese authoritarian model, "
I just linked to the pic 128 posted of Friedman's sprawling abode. At first glance I thought it was that other shit John Hairheads'.
Posted by: kallisto at February 19, 2010 02:02 PM (+FkcS)
Posted by: mistress overdone at February 19, 2010 02:11 PM (2/oBD)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 19, 2010 05:10 PM (PQY7w)
Actually, there are one or two levers left (see Amendments, US Constitution, Second).
After all, it's easier to beg for forgiveness than ask permission, right?
I hate this policy. It's permission for egomaniacs and control freaks to do what they want with no regard to anyone else's feelings, needs or rights.
Posted by: katya at February 19, 2010 12:41 PM (t21Ab)
It is also how good things get done in spite of the egomainacs and control freaks who are currently in charge. I have often used the tactic (also known as UNODIR, UNless Otherwise DIRected) myself.
Don't hate the playa, hate the game.
Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at February 20, 2010 01:27 AM (jpf1B)
Posted by: Tracy Coyle at February 20, 2010 09:00 AM (gorkw)
Posted by: jose business at September 19, 2010 04:29 AM (ZJfQH)
Solve blocked drains
Posted by: Reviews Jim at September 20, 2010 05:31 AM (/PuJO)
Posted by: titanium jewellery at October 27, 2010 01:09 AM (DhSsS)
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=gb2312" />
<title>MBT Fanaka Gtx Shoes</title>
</head>
<body>
<a href="http://www.mbtsource.com">Mbt Fanaka Gtx Shoes </a>is a pair of a perforated shoes.A perforated eva insole provides added cushioning with antibacterial treatment to reduce odor. <a href="htttp://www.mbtsource.com">Mbt Shoes</a> can train the entire body,help people to live a more active and healthy life.Compared to <a href="http://www.mbtsource.com">traditional shoes</a>, these shoes seem very special. Now <a href="http://www.mbtsource.com">Mbt Fanaka Gtx Shoes</a> Chocolate on sale.
</body>
</html>
Posted by: asdfasesad at February 23, 2011 01:50 AM (epAUw)
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=gb2312" />
<title>MBT Fanaka Gtx Shoes</title>
</head>
<body>
<a href="http://www.mbtsource.com">Mbt Fanaka Gtx Shoes </a>is a pair of a perforated shoes.A perforated eva insole provides added cushioning with antibacterial treatment to reduce odor. <a href="htttp://www.mbtsource.com">Mbt Shoes</a> can train the entire body,help people to live a more active and healthy life.Compared to <a href="http://www.mbtsource.com">traditional shoes</a>, these shoes seem very special. Now <a href="http://www.mbtsource.com">Mbt Fanaka Gtx Shoes</a> Chocolate on sale.
</body>
</html>
Posted by: asdfasesad at February 23, 2011 02:13 AM (epAUw)
Mbt M.Walk Shoes is a bealthful shoe,can be a therapeutic tool for back,hip,leg and foot problems.The Mbt M.Walk body is forced to maintain its balance through muscular exertion.They are part of the new line of Mbt Shoes which run slightly narrower,and have a slightly different feel.
Posted by: shosechi at February 23, 2011 02:16 AM (epAUw)
Posted by: 1111 at February 24, 2011 06:02 PM (5FJ2m)
http://www.nfljerseysmalls.com
Posted by: hats for sale at July 11, 2011 10:02 PM (/6gMQ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3061 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








I fear that the Dims are still gonna ram Deathcare down our throats. After all, it's easier to beg for forgiveness than ask permission, right?
At least in the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 19, 2010 07:56 AM (9hSKh)