February 17, 2010
— Ace From TheRightScoop.
This is two or three days old now. It's Krauthammer's reaction to the Dueling Vice Presidents on the Sunday talk shows. Particularly on the point of the 20% recidivism rate (and of course that figure is just the guys we know about) being "not that bad," according to Deputy NSA Brennan.
Obama's minions keep defending themselves by saying they're doing exactly what Bush did (at certain times). Which is already an odd statement, since we were assured before the election that everything Bush did was wrong and Obama would do it different and better.
But Krauthammer gets at the heart of the matter, which Dick Cheney hasn't yet. And Cheney should. When Bush released terrorists to Saudi Arabia, for example, he did so with the belief, or at least the naive hope, that Saudi Arabia would keep the terrorists from rejoining terrorist groups. But they didn't.
So Bush erred -- but in his defense, his mistake was made due to a lack of information. He didn't know that Saudi Arabia would allow terrorists to get back into the terrorism business. He may have suspected that would be the outcome, but he didn't know that.
Well, two years later, Bush now knows. And so does Obama. So Obama's claim that he's "just doing what Bush did" is utterly false. Bush acted out innocence, out of ignorance -- he didn't know the outcome of this policy. Obama does know the outcome of this policy, but is continuing it anyway, which makes this not quite a case of "just doing what Bush did."
When Bush did this, he thought it might be successful, as he had no record yet to suggest otherwise.
When Obama does this today, he knows it won't be successful, based on past history.
But, again, he's doing it anyway. And then claiming he's "just doing what Bush did."
Worth watching.
Posted by: Ace at
08:35 AM
| Comments (35)
Post contains 329 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: This should be the new flaming skull at February 17, 2010 08:38 AM (jVldi)
I'm only one man.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 17, 2010 08:39 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: Jimmy'sAttackRabbit at February 17, 2010 08:42 AM (ZYbe/)
Posted by: Dep. Sec. John Brennan at February 17, 2010 08:43 AM (Hh13R)
Posted by: Joe "The Sheriff" Biden at February 17, 2010 08:44 AM (cvvNY)
Isn't there anyone out there that understands the muslim threat who has a chance of getting elected?
Posted by: sharrukin at February 17, 2010 08:44 AM (593B8)
That's the difference between an actual statesman and some vaudevillian jackass playing to the gallery.
BTW, that last bit was about Obama, Biden, and Co., not a crack at Krauthammer.
Posted by: MikeO at February 17, 2010 08:44 AM (lBmZl)
Posted by: shibumi at February 17, 2010 08:44 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: curious at February 17, 2010 08:45 AM (p302b)
It wasn't just that. It was new legal ground in dealing with what is basically a terrorist army. Historically, the closest thing to that was the Barbary Coast pirates, and that was 200 years ago. We had the civilian court system, the military legal system, and then the occasional tribunal-type hearing (historically) for a saboteur or spy. So the Bush admin put something together to deal with this new threat. Then the SC shot it down, and it had to be replaced.
Obama inherited something that was functional and legal. And he is scrapping it.
Posted by: A.G. at February 17, 2010 08:46 AM (jBPzC)
Obama, on the other hand, is under virtually no pressure to do so, and yet finds ways to fuck up. Gitmo as a political topic dropped off the radar in November 2008, except for Obama's broken promise to close it.
Posted by: XBradTC at February 17, 2010 08:46 AM (cB95w)
Posted by: garrett at February 17, 2010 08:46 AM (FwxQB)
TRAINING)
Dear Ma and Pa,
I am well. Hope you are. Tell Brother Walt and Brother Elmer the
Marine Corps beats working for old man Minch by a mile. Tell them to join up
quick before all of the places are filled.
I was restless at first because you get to stay in bed till nearly 6
a.m. But I am getting so I like to sleep late. Tell Walt and Elmer all you
do before breakfast is smooth your cot, and shine some things. No hogs to
slop, feed to pitch, mash to mix, wood to split, fire to lay. Practically
nothing.
Men got to shave but it is not so bad, there's warm water. Breakfast
is strong on trimmings like fruit juice, cereal, eggs, bacon, etc., but kind
of weak on chops, potatoes, ham, steak, fried eggplant, pie and other
regular food, but tell Walt and Elmer you can always sit by the two city
boys that live on coffee. Their food, plus yours, holds you until noon when
you get fed again. It's no wonder these city boys can't walk much.
We go on 'route marches,' which the platoon sergeant says are long
walks to harden us. If he thinks so, it's not my place to tell him
different. A 'route march' is about as far as to our mailbox at home. Then
the city guys get sore feet and we all ride back in trucks.
The sergeant is like a school teacher. He nags a lot. The Captain
is like the school board. Majors and colonels just ride around and frown.
They don't bother you none.
This next will kill Walt and Elmer with laughing. I keep getting
medals for shooting. I don't know why. The bulls-eye is near as big as a
chipmunk head and don't move, and it ain't shooting at you like the Higgett
boys at home. All you got to do is lie there all comfortable and hit it.
You don't even load your own cartridges They come in boxes.
Then we have what they call hand-to-hand combat training. You get
to wrestle with them city boys. I have to be real careful though, they
break real easy. It ain't like fighting with that ole bull at home. I'm
about the best they got in this except for that Tug Jordan from over in
Silver Lake. I only beat him once.. He joined up the same time as me, but
I'm only 5'6' and 130 pounds and he's 6'8' and near 300 pounds dry.
Be sure to tell Walt and Elmer to hurry and join before other
fellers get onto this setup and come stampeding in.
Your loving daughter, Alice
Posted by: Joe at February 17, 2010 08:47 AM (cvvNY)
Posted by: Vic at February 17, 2010 08:49 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: nikkolai at February 17, 2010 08:50 AM (U0lNn)
According to Article 4 of the Third Geneva Convention of 1949, irregular forces are entitled to prisoner of war status provided that they are commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates, have a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance, carry arms openly and conduct their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war. If they do not do meet all of these, they may be considered "francs-tireurs" (in the original sense of "illegal combatant") and punished as criminals in a military jurisdiction, which may include summary execution.
Posted by: sharrukin at February 17, 2010 08:50 AM (593B8)
Posted by: Serial Killer Amy Bishop at February 17, 2010 08:56 AM (Hh13R)
Don't forget that GWB was acting on the best information that was available from a CIA that was out to make him look like an idiot, while under constant pressure from a Congress and a propagandizing media that was willing to lose a war in order to do the same.
Now that they don't have the luxury of a President who will do the unpopular right things, while allowing them to strut and preen about peace and love, their solutions don't look any better than his, but the media shines them up real nice and pretty.
Posted by: sherlock at February 17, 2010 09:08 AM (ZrS0c)
Not only is Charles dead on in his analogy vis a vis war on terror, but the exact same argument can be made about the TARP. When Bush realized the first half of TARP ($350b) wasn't working, what did he do? HE STOPPED! He deferred judgment (spending) of the other half of TARP to the newly elected Obama. Even though the newly elected Marxist knew TARP wasn't working, what did the newly sworn-in President do? He raised it $785b! And he's about to do it again!
Thats the difference, in a nutshell, between conservatism and liberalism.
Posted by: bullwhacker at February 17, 2010 09:09 AM (aMpG9)
Posted by: Cincinnatus at February 17, 2010 09:14 AM (euuyg)
Thats the difference, in a nutshell, between compassionate-conservatism (eg socialism) and liberalism communism.
FTFY
Posted by: Vic at February 17, 2010 09:15 AM (QrA9E)
Related BS about lefties excusing their want of civilian trials vs. military tribunals. Bush did it too! (which I thought would have made it wrong.. hmm) But Bush had a no-other-timely choice reason, it seems...
From O'Reilly Factor:
COULTER: "The headline, well, I remember it from these ferocious fights throughout the Bush administration, and that is you keep -- we keep hearing that Bush sent Richard Reid, the shoe bomber, into a civilian court as if, you know, that was his choice.
No, he came out about a month after 9/11 and issued. He issued executive order for military commissions. And immediately, the left wing, particularly the left-wing legal community, went mental. Senator Leahy, the Democrat head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was denouncing this. He had all of the human rights mix, amnesty. The entire law professor faculties across America denouncing Bush for doing this without congressional approval, without Congress passing laws.
Immediately, there were about six bills in Congress, setting up military tribunals of their own, including John Conyers' bill, which would apply only to the 9/11 terrorists.
And -- and so obviously, this was a matter that was heavily litigated over the next seven years. It went to the Supreme Court twice. The Supreme Court struck down Bush's executive order for military tribunals with ferocious dissents, I might add, by justices Scalia and Thomas.
And then Congress back in -- this is in 2006 now -- writes a military tribunal law that itself gets appealed to the Supreme Court. The first military tribunal under Bush, after endless litigation from the left, from left-wing lawyers, did not occur until summer of 2008. At that point, Bush had...
O'REILLY: OK. Let me stop -- let me stop you there. So what you're saying there is that the argument that Alan Colmes and others make, Vice President Biden, that 300 captured terrorists have been tried in civilian court is not valid, because there was no other way to try them. Because of all the legal challenges, you couldn't put them in military commissions, because every two minutes there was a blockage of the action. Is that what you're saying?
COULTER: That's right. Not only that but just specifically because of the left wing that we couldn't go forward with military tribunals which, by the way, I agree with Scalia and Thomas on, were constitutional. It is -- the president is the commander and chief in war time.
Posted by: antimatter at February 17, 2010 09:21 AM (gbCNS)
I like Krauthammer. He's articulate, on point, and doesn't mince words. Make's his points without being snarky and goes out of his way to fail to offend opponents. Mannerly without compromising position in a statement. An MD, he brings the intellect of a surgeon to politics.
I don't always agree with him, but he sometimes surprizes me with a perspective I'd never considered or background information I hadn't heard. The difference between that and "spin" is only inches, but it's solid gold and so very hard to come by these days.
Posted by: Just a Cynic... at February 17, 2010 09:29 AM (v4UYp)
/students-complained-about-bishop-year.html
"Bishop's students said they first wrote a letter to biology department chairman Gopi K. Podila — one of the victims of Friday's shooting — then met with him and finally submitted a petition that dozens of them had signed."
""Podila just sort of blew us off," said Phillips, who was among a group of five students who met with him in fall 2008 or early 2009 to air their concerns."
"After students met privately with Podila, Phillips said, Bishop seemingly made a point in class to use some of the same phrases they had so they would know she knew about it."
""It was like she was parroting what we had said," Phillips said."
"In other words, Podila ratted them out. And look where that got him."
Posted by: Looking Glass at February 17, 2010 09:34 AM (zamYU)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 17, 2010 10:02 AM (5/yRG)
#15, a friend of mine, retired command sergeant major, works at the Army Center for Military History, and he said they do have very similar letters home through the early 1960's. The Great Depression country folk thought the Army was pretty easy, even after the shooting started. You attracted a particular mix of country folk and tough city kids when the call went out for parachute volunteers.
#8, I understand the Muslim threat, but how a broke ex-E-5 gets into a congressional race, I'm not sure. And of course I'm sure some liberal blogger would come up with EVERYTHING I've ever said here at the HQ and the liberals who run Nashville's news outlets would hold it against me. Might actually get me some extra street cred with the country folk though.
Posted by: SGT Dan's Cat at February 17, 2010 10:09 AM (GgXZc)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 17, 2010 10:26 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 17, 2010 10:28 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: d_fitz at February 17, 2010 11:23 AM (mnrcy)
Obama Administration: Cowardly fucking idiots.
Bush Administration: The same, only less so.
Posted by: MlR at February 17, 2010 05:11 PM (op9m5)
Posted by: Patricia at February 18, 2010 09:23 AM (mA/by)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3048 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Why is Joe Biden, the biggest buffoon in the admin, not being mocked relentlessly?
Posted by: This should be the new flaming skull at February 17, 2010 08:37 AM (jVldi)