November 15, 2010
— LauraW Here We Go!
I'm hearing some scuttlebutt about the laughably named Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act possibly being revived for a vote. It is a Reid-sponsored bill.
S.3194 would force ALL police and firefighters nationwide to unionize regardless of the wishes of the local community, overriding existing contracts and any state bans in effect.
H.R.413 and its nearly identical Senate counterpart, S.3194, would federally impose union monopoly bargaining by denying localities the option to refuse to grant a single public-safety union the power to speak for all front-line employees, including those who don’t want to join.Monopoly bargaining, euphemistically labeled as “exclusive representation,” would be foisted on state and local police, firefighters, and other public-safety employees nationwide.
And in most states that already authorize public-safety union monopoly bargaining, H.R.413/S.3194 would widen its scope.
Because in difficult economic times, what we really need is MORE public employees enrolled in an organization that is thuggishly political and overtly hostile to the taxpayer. Minitrue calls this 'Employer-Employee Cooperation.'
And cooperate you will!
More chewy outrage below the fold.
NRO also weighed in on the subject this past June.
The problems imposed by unionized government are well understood, which is why 21 states either decline to require collective bargaining with public-sector unions or prohibit the practice outright.
--------------------------------------Consider the case of Hawaii, where coordinated strikes by public-school teachers and college professors in 2001 resulted in massive pay increases for educators who already were among the nationÂ’s highest paid. It was a display of raw power on the part of the unions: Education was shut down, semester schedules were disrupted, students going to on-campus jobs were harassed with impunity by union thugs. So successful was the strategy that the professors authorized another strike just a few years later. It is impossible to imagine such a scene playing out in Texas or South Carolina, where the laws do not empower public-sector unions to commit legalized extortion.
Just anecdotally: a few weeks ago my friend who was preparing a large shindig for Linda McMahon kept trying to obtain a police presence on the street. He kept getting the runaround, but after pressing his point, finally was assured an officer would be there.
Nobody showed up.
A McMahon staffer told him that was "...par for the course."
I wonder which candidate the police union promoted in that election?
Finally, here's Steve Forbes discussing the Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill, which was virtually the same bill but more honestly named.
Please be sure to call your lame duck Congressman for the pleasure of hearing his soon-to-be-unemployed staff laugh at you with impunity.
Posted by: LauraW at
07:27 AM
| Comments (108)
Post contains 443 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Cicero at November 15, 2010 07:30 AM (QKKT0)
Goddamn shame he won.
If we don't do the equivalent of the Rove 72-hour GOTV thing in November of 2012, we are doomed. Doomed.
Posted by: Peasant-in-the-Forest at November 15, 2010 07:33 AM (4sQwu)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 15, 2010 07:34 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 15, 2010 07:35 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: Techie at November 15, 2010 07:35 AM (+AGDS)
GOOD NEWS!
It appears that Ellmers has beaten Etheridge:
Ellmers now appears to have prevailed over Etheridge by 1,489 votes, and should be certified the winner by the North Carolina authorities on November 23. Etheridge has demanded a recount that would be completed before certification of the results would take place. In the meantime, Ellmers is planning to take office with the new Congress.
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 15, 2010 07:35 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Jean at November 15, 2010 07:38 AM (lnUW/)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 07:38 AM (AZGON)
Please be sure to call your lame duck Congressman for the pleasure of hearing his soon-to-be-unemployed staff laugh at you with impunity.
If only....unfortunately, mine is going back to DC. Freakin' CT....get MORE blue in 2010.
Posted by: Tami at November 15, 2010 07:38 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Ben at November 15, 2010 07:39 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 15, 2010 07:40 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 07:40 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 15, 2010 07:41 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Mittens at November 15, 2010 07:41 AM (0YS61)
I know those bubba's. They like putting out fires and do it for very little or no pay out of the goodness of their redneck hearts. Do you want to be the one who tells them they have to join the union and pay union dues?
Posted by: John Galt at November 15, 2010 07:42 AM (F/4zf)
WTF does that have to do with anything that Harry Reid is involved in?
Or
Constitution? Never heard of it. Charlie Gibson
Constitution? I was on vacation. Bob Schieffer
Posted by: kansas at November 15, 2010 07:42 AM (mka2b)
It's a good thing that Illinois refuses to seat Kirk until the end of November!
oh well
/throws hands up
Posted by: Bitch McConnell at November 15, 2010 07:44 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: MA-4 at November 15, 2010 07:44 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 07:45 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 15, 2010 07:49 AM (pLTLS)
Fool's Golden State?
Posted by: NM Hick at November 15, 2010 07:50 AM (ROwve)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 15, 2010 07:51 AM (A/iZj)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 15, 2010 07:52 AM (JcRgg)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 07:53 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Rufus T Firefly at November 15, 2010 07:54 AM (GwPRU)
Hey, if it keeps them out of our 401(k) accounts between now and January, let's encourage him.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 15, 2010 07:54 AM (A/iZj)
Fuck, I miss Reagan.
Posted by: DngrMse at November 15, 2010 07:54 AM (/cH/K)
"Please be sure to call your lame duck Congressman for the pleasure of hearing his soon-to-be-unemployed staff laugh at you with impunity"
Hmm. I thought the zombie thread was further down the page
Posted by: Jess at November 15, 2010 07:56 AM (/ueuy)
Republican Sen. Mike Johanns of Nebraska called the bill “reasonable.” “For several years now, we’ve seen the benefit of a similar policy in Nebraska which prevents public employees from going on strike while helping to establish reasonable compensation ranges.”
The other Republican co-sponsors in the Senate are Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.
Go Team Rino!
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 15, 2010 07:56 AM (UT7Pd)
Sorry about that! I, on the other hand, will be represented by two brand spanking new conservatives. Both my dem congressman, and Specter (May Spit be Upon Him), have been shown the door. I've never enjoyed voting so much in my entire life.
Posted by: DngrMse at November 15, 2010 07:58 AM (/cH/K)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 07:59 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at November 15, 2010 08:00 AM (f3dlM)
Never, that's when.
The system has long been gamed in favor of union thugs, vocal minorities and campaign contributors. With a corrupt, America-hating president and a Senate still controlled by criminals (the latter aided by "go-along-to-get-along" squishes who won't risk their status among the D.C. Royalty by showing any signs of ethical behavior), the chances of any meaningful tilt toward honesty and Constitutional government are less than nil.
The RICO statutes should apply here. Unions have bought-and-paid-for control of Congress and the Presidency. Nothing will change until Osama Obama, 60-70 Senators and several hundred Representatives are removed from office and indicted.
Since that won't happen, we might as well be good little serfs and bow to the inevitable. The looters won't be stopped by the results of the election just past, and chances are good they won't be slowed down by the next one, either.
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 15, 2010 08:00 AM (Ulu3i)
http://bit.ly/d6ywyo
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 15, 2010 08:01 AM (UT7Pd)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 08:01 AM (AZGON)
They just don't get it.
They (Snowe, Collins, Brown, etc.) keep 'fixing' shit that doesn't need to be fixed.
Stick your good intentions up your ass and leave shit alone.
Posted by: Senator Soothsayer (R-AoS) at November 15, 2010 08:04 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 08:04 AM (AZGON)
I do know it is a gift to the trial lawyers if passed. Can't find the specific link to where I heard it but this appears to be what they were talking about.
Harry Reid and comparable worth
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 15, 2010 08:04 AM (tf9Ne)
Even an FDR Republican legislature would come down on this one.
Which is why it doesn't have a chance in hell of passing.
Posted by: Vic at November 15, 2010 08:06 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 12:04 PM (AZGON)
Hey Chuckie is looking out for me! I own a lot of stock in Sonoco who makes those plastic film garbage bags!
Posted by: Vic at November 15, 2010 08:07 AM (/jbAw)
The good news is that the molesters who just signed up to be TSA gropers will never vote to strike. Heh.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 15, 2010 08:08 AM (A/iZj)
okay, Republicans, this is your time to shine.
Far from shining, the pubs are up to their old tricks. Does this guy look like Freeze Meiser from Santa Claus is Comin' to Town? Call and/or write Boehner and beeyotch!
Posted by: RushBabe at November 15, 2010 08:08 AM (a3Z62)
Great pic on drudge of a Muslim TSA gropenagent giving a catholic nun a thorough pat down.
That's an old pic, isn't it? I know I've seen the wheelchair nun being patted down before.
But I've never seen it with that nice caption.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at November 15, 2010 08:10 AM (XgQaM)
So, to remain competitive in the global market, we must unionize as much as possible.
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 15, 2010 08:11 AM (ImAna)
Posted by: dblwmy at November 15, 2010 08:11 AM (jCKHk)
Posted by: kansas at November 15, 2010 08:11 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: Jean at November 15, 2010 08:13 AM (lnUW/)
California almost banned disposable plastic bags this year, and most likely will ban them next year once the new Dem hypermajority takes power in the state.
So, not leaving a lot of options.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 15, 2010 08:14 AM (UT7Pd)
*smiles*
Rangle walked out of his own ethics trial.
(won't link as I know ppl get pissy w/politico links)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 15, 2010 08:16 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 15, 2010 08:17 AM (A/iZj)
Posted by: nickless at November 15, 2010 08:18 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 15, 2010 08:19 AM (02uN6)
"Financial Services Committee"
He is already the ranking minority member. Keep in mind the chairman is now Bwarney Fwank.
It is a committee of commununists and RINOs with the exception of Ron Paul.
Ever wonder why we get boned so much on banking matters?
Posted by: Vic at November 15, 2010 08:20 AM (/jbAw)
@56
Californians will be reduced to carrying our groceries home in our hands. Everything will be banned for our protection.
Posted by: Who Knows at November 15, 2010 08:20 AM (QLiYt)
Boner doesn't understand that he's on a very short leash.
You don't reward Spence fucking Bachus for being a corporatist Democrat.
Posted by: Senator Soothsayer (R-AoS) at November 15, 2010 08:21 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Who Knows at November 15, 2010 08:21 AM (QLiYt)
Plank of New Republican Congress: Repeal Any and All legislation passed between now and inauguration 2011. Any decent legislation that mysteriously occurs can always be reinstated.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at November 15, 2010 08:21 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 08:22 AM (AZGON)
Decadent!
New uniform idea for TSA agents?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 15, 2010 08:22 AM (9hSKh)
When did the Executive branch get the authority to override an act of congress? Remember when Hillary tried to get the TSA unionized at its creation and congress shot it down?
I guess the "FLRB" is another one of those agencies that needs zero budget in 2011.
Posted by: Vic at November 15, 2010 08:22 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 08:22 AM (AZGON)
Because they're germy after being reused. It's a public health thing.
You could wash them, but I don't think most of them would survive a trip through the washer. Hemp shrinks soooo easily.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 15, 2010 08:23 AM (UT7Pd)
So when they strike, we get to just board the plane. Cool.
If I ever get 'randomly selected', I am going to specifically request a female for my required ball and back massage. and I will arch my back and thrust my pelvis forward when she is on her knees. All in the name of public safety of course.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 15, 2010 08:23 AM (JcRgg)
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 15, 2010 08:23 AM (02uN6)
Well, that's what you get for shopping at Bed Bath and Salmonella....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 15, 2010 08:24 AM (UT7Pd)
Only because people don't wash them. But if people washed them even semi-regularly, it would defeat the stated purpose of using such bags, which is to "save resources".
I have a significant stockpile of plastic grocery bags for when they are completely banned from use. They should fetch a nice price on the black market.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 15, 2010 08:25 AM (9hSKh)
He is already the ranking minority member. Keep in mind the chairman is now Bwarney Fwank.
It is a committee of commununists and RINOs with the exception of Ron Paul.
He may be the ranking member for the GOP, but the article implies that Boehner has the final say on who gets the chairmanship. It can't be a pro forma progression since Ed Royce has thrown his name in.
Posted by: RushBabe at November 15, 2010 08:25 AM (a3Z62)
I'm debating a Thanksgiving flight I have booked.
It's a bit of a quandry for me. I understand the security measures are needed. However, the attitude of most TSA workers is something to behold. They do seem to get off on a power trip with those least likely to challenge them.
The unaddressed problem of uninspected cargo scares me still. What's going on with that?
Posted by: Who Knows at November 15, 2010 08:25 AM (QLiYt)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 08:26 AM (AZGON)
That was before Barry O was put into a position to begin paying back all that sweet union support.
Posted by: DngrMse at November 15, 2010 08:29 AM (/cH/K)
I'm debating a Thanksgiving flight I have booked.
It's a bit of a quandry for me. I understand the security measures are needed. However, the attitude of most TSA workers is something to behold. They do seem to get off on a power trip with those least likely to challenge them.
I believe it was Gateway Pundit that showed an example of a ticket that was randomly flagged for groping. It looks like a giant bar code in the center of the ticket. This was part of the kid-groping story. They advised trading in the ticket for a new one if yours looked like the one pictured.
Posted by: RushBabe at November 15, 2010 08:30 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: Amazon.com at November 15, 2010 08:30 AM (AZGON)
We're all going to be forced into veganism to Save Teh Planet at some point anyway...
Most people don't bake or fry their hippie bags between grocery runs.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 15, 2010 08:31 AM (A/iZj)
Posted by: lowfibass at November 15, 2010 08:37 AM (T1ZAZ)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 08:41 AM (AZGON)
@8 techie and @19 kansas, I had the same thought. Where the hell is it in the Constitution empowering the Federal Government to tell state or local governments they MUST do this or that with respect to wages and benefits? Where is it in the Constitution that empowers the Federal Government to force me (or anyone) to mandatorily associate with anyone?
I thought the government was constrained to allow FREEDOM of association. This is mandatory association. My dictionary does not define that as freedom.
Where's Andy Jackson and his horse whip when you need him?
Posted by: Hoper for Change at November 15, 2010 08:43 AM (adr25)
For myself, I fear for the snack foods.
I laughed out loud in my office.
Posted by: toby928™ at November 15, 2010 08:43 AM (S5YRY)
This is the great argument of the next few years -- whether we will let our public employee unions' pension and retiree health benefits (OPEBs) ruin us as a superpower, or whether we will act responsibly and decide as a nation that prior collective bargaining agreements with federal, state, city, county employees, teachers, police and firefighters are not suicide pacts.
By way of example as to how serious this problem is: Maryland's state public employee pension funds are $33 billion in the red. Maryland's population, meanwhile is 5.7 million people, or about 1.5 million households. Assume conservatively that about half of those households pay no income tax. That means there are about 750,000 Maryland households that owe $33 billion, or about $45,000 in debt per household. To pay for someone else's retirement!
But it's actually worse than that. You can go find Maryland's retirement system's annual report for 2009. It shows that they use a 7.75% investment return assumption in valuing the system's liabilities. That means that they believe that future benefit payments will be paid for by their assets growing at an average of 7.75% a year long-term. Does anyone really think nowadays that the worldwide economy is going to generate a 7.75% rate of return going forward given its current problems? If Maryland valued its liabilities using an expected rate of return of, say, 4.5% or 5%, that $33 billion in unfunded liabilities might be something closer to $50 billion.
And, of course, the debt for future retirement benefits to state employees doesn't take into account the unfunded liablities of city employees, county employees, town employees, etc.
And (of course, again!) none of this takes into account the unfunded liablities we all owe for federal government employees' pensions.
What do you get when one neighbor finally realizes that they are in debt for hundreds of thousands of dollars to be able to pay for the retirement of their next-door neighbor simply because the next-door neighbor worked for something called "government"? What do you get when the first neighbor realizes that he is going to have to work to 70 or 72 or beyond because he can't afford his own retirement, but his next-door neighbor -- who got more time off while he was working -- is retiring at age 58 or 60 with full benefits? What do you get when people who have saved religiously in their 401k plans are told that they are now rich and have to be taxed punitively to pay defined benefits (that, we are told, can never be reduced) to their neighbors who worked for governments?
What do you get when Man A who worked in private industry is going off to work and struggling to make ends meet while Man B who worked for government is heading off to his lake house secure in the faith that his retirement benefits can never be reduced one plug nickel, much less taken away, no matter what?
Armageddon, that's what you get.
Posted by: The Right Curmudgeon at November 15, 2010 08:43 AM (69ED2)
Posted by: lowfibass at November 15, 2010 08:45 AM (T1ZAZ)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 08:47 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Scott at November 15, 2010 08:47 AM (O3GeC)
Posted by: MarkD at November 15, 2010 08:51 AM (0Jy1K)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at November 15, 2010 08:54 AM (3iMgs)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 15, 2010 08:58 AM (AZGON)
Hmmm, I'm wondering if this doesn't open the door for private security and public safety companies -- maybe a company that provides private security, public safety, and education...I could end up wealthy after all...hmmm.
**yes, in my private time I do plot to become village warlord, sue me if that's wrong
Posted by: unknown jane at November 15, 2010 09:08 AM (5/yRG)
If crucifying your enemies is wrong, I don't want to be right.
Posted by: toby928™ at November 15, 2010 09:30 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: MarkD at November 15, 2010 12:51 PM (0Jy1K)
Aluminum baseball bat, or golf club?
Posted by: Lord Humongus' House of Post-Apocalyptic Weapons at November 15, 2010 09:48 AM (aoLEL)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at November 15, 2010 12:54 PM (3iMgs)
*adopts Mr. Burns' voice*
Excellent. That's something the left would do.
Posted by: RushBabe at November 15, 2010 09:49 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: Holger at November 15, 2010 09:50 AM (V9Q+f)
I'm so not up on my left-wing crusades... Chuckie S. is on another rant against China. Claims the paint on the logos contain lead. So unlike the plastic bags on the heads of the chidrens, the cloth bags will not smother them but it may make them crazier than the mad hatter if they eat it.
Posted by: Buffalobob at November 15, 2010 09:58 AM (GwH6h)
Apparently now tattoos are a dangerous item.....
Los Angeles Times November 14, 2010
Adam C. Pearson, a Los Angeles food stylist, was settling into his seat aboard a Delta Air Lines flight at Los Angeles International Airport on Saturday morning when a flight attendant tapped him on the shoulder and asked him to go to the front of the plane. His first thought: "I'm getting an upgrade!"
Not exactly.
Pearson was asked to step off the plane. He was told that another passenger had reported him for suspicious behavior, noting that he had the phrase "Atom Bomb" tattooed across his fingers. Questioned by the captain and the flight attendant, Pearson said the tattoo referred to a childhood nickname. After answering a few more questions, Pearson — who is a frequent Delta passenger and has flown more than 142,000 miles with the airline this year — was allowed to return to his seat.
Delta spokesman Anthony Black said Saturday that he did not have any knowledge of the incident but that pilots and flight attendants must use their judgment to handle such matters.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 15, 2010 09:59 AM (UT7Pd)
Posted by: Rufus T Firefly at November 15, 2010 11:54 AM (GwPRU)
So would this be Lame Duck Soup?
Posted by: Guy of Gisbourne at November 15, 2010 10:18 AM (zhDjL)
Fuck Bachus...shove Reid up his ass. We should have a hell where they have to go through a TSA checkpoints...forever.
TSA: "Senator Bachus, what's those feet I feel sticking out of your ass?"
Bachus: "That's my friend, Senator Reid. I got a ticket for him right here."
Posted by: torabora at November 15, 2010 11:38 AM (1A70x)
CAW13500 (communication workers) sucks dead dog balls. Fuck Dick Johns, (I shit you not) the pres/henchman/Dem party mouthpiece. And in Pa, I don't have a choice, but to join the Verizon rep'd union. I paid $25+, per week, for 18 years. The only grievance I ever filed was when I got fired for an on the job accident that popped 4 discs in my neck and needed treatnent. A tree fell on me while on a pole in a wind storm. They refused to seek arbitration, and waited 10 months to tell me, citing "we usually don't do too well w/ FMLA cases". I wrote back saying that this is Workmans comp, not FMLA, as the Verizon claimed. They sent the same form letter back, only certified mail this time. They advised my I would be better off w/a lawyer. Fine, can you provided me a staff attorney. NOPE. Reccomend one? Nope.
So now, 18 months later, I won my workmans comp case on 9-29-10, and yet verizon has stil refused to honor the judges decision, and pay me. Fuck UNIONS. I will suck cock at truck stops before I'll work in a union shop again.
I previously looked down on Unemployment cash, and ppl on Comp. But I can't climb poles in Ice storms w/a numb right hand and 50% use of my right arm.
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 15, 2010 12:15 PM (s/mcJ)
Posted by: jp at November 15, 2010 07:36 PM (jBip0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
61 queries taking 0.155 seconds, 233 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Nevada, you magnificent basta...
wait a minute.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 15, 2010 07:30 AM (RkRxq)