November 28, 2010
— Geoff Many have complained that the President's prioritization of jobs as his #1 concern still didn't manage to bump it ahead of health care, energy, the environment, immigration, and stumping for his party's candidates. But occasionally, probably on a day when the weather's too sucky for golfing, the President actually sits down for a substantive discussion about the economy. So what happens when you bring Obama's "laser-like focus" together with his team of theoreticians?
The day before his party's shellacking in this month's elections, President Obama sat down with his economic team to examine the single most important issue for voters across the country: jobs.Yes, folks, when Obama tells you that he's going to bring his mighty intellect to bear on jobs, this is what he means. He's going to hang out with his Ivory Tower pals and have a BS session on economic matters arcane.But the question on the agenda was not how to accelerate the recovery or target job creation to the depressed Rust Belt. It wasn't even the challenge of how to persuade corporations to spend their cash piles on investments and jobs — although both have been extensively debated for many months. The president had called the meeting to grapple with what he and his propeller-head economists have been debating for some time: the wonkish question of whether today's high unemployment rate is structural or cyclical.

Get your act together, Mr. President. Do it now.
Posted by: Geoff at
09:33 AM
| Comments (83)
Post contains 290 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: 141Driver at November 28, 2010 09:41 AM (DXa7u)
I've never seen the movie, but if you have, does Barack Obama parallel Will Smith's character in Six Degrees of Separation?
From what I've read it is pretty much the Barack Obama Story.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 28, 2010 09:41 AM (BvBKY)
Is it structural or cyclical?
How about "Stop hitting the houses with the God-damned wrecking ball, you assholes?!?!"
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at November 28, 2010 09:41 AM (bxiXv)
You call it a "bull session" implying that it's held in the lounge at midnight. I assure you that this sort of thing gets course credit in the humanities and social sciences.
This sort of pseudointellectual tripe, speculation without evidence and pontificating by people who are impressed by their own intellect is de regeur for the modern American academy.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 28, 2010 09:44 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Barry O, super-genius at November 28, 2010 09:44 AM (DXa7u)
Posted by: Bill Is Clinton at November 28, 2010 09:45 AM (LwLqV)
Oh damn. I just saw a banner ad that says you can bid on a "private dinner" with Bill Clinton to "benefit" the "Clinton Foundation".
Besides the double entendre, I think Clinton is jealous at being the second-most egotistical and self-referential person to be president.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 28, 2010 09:46 AM (BvBKY)
One of these days, we'll return to that outdated notion that experience has real value.
Until then, with this group of idiots, we are well and truly boned. With sand in the lube.
And a pineapple, sideways.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 28, 2010 09:47 AM (b6qrg)
Posted by: AmishDude at November 28, 2010 09:48 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Barack Obumbles at November 28, 2010 09:48 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: picturerock at November 28, 2010 09:51 AM (TWe/5)
Posted by: navybrat at November 28, 2010 09:52 AM (Q+uIe)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at November 28, 2010 09:52 AM (tE8FB)
Posted by: Alex at November 28, 2010 09:54 AM (yY28H)
There's nothing wrong with having a discussion about the nature of the high unemployment levels, especially if you are trying to institute policies to alleviate that unemployment.
That's kind of the point - they never got around to discussing policies. They never got around to discussing the practical aspects of job creation. They never got close to any sort of actionable conclusions. Instead, they indulged themselves in an academic discussion that, as you note, should have been resolved 2 years ago.
Posted by: geoff at November 28, 2010 09:58 AM (ibimn)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 28, 2010 09:59 AM (b6qrg)
Posted by: dmandmand at November 28, 2010 10:01 AM (WpVgB)
Posted by: navybrat at November 28, 2010 10:01 AM (Q+uIe)
the unemployment rate was cyclical BEFORE Obamacare and all the other layers of beaucrap that now been passed. It would have been bad for a couple of years, but the economy would have recovered
Now..... the high unemployment rate has been built in. There is a reason why Europe has such a higher unemployment rate than America, they have that socialist crap they have to pay for, why the hell would people take risks to start or grow their businesses. Now America is subjected to it, my guess is it will take another year for the idiot media to figure this out. They won't speak with small biz owners like me and others, but this high unemployment rate is here to stay, it is now built into the system, it is now structural.
Like in a track race, they have shackled all the runners [companies] with all these weights [regulations, ObamaCare], the race starts and then the people in the beachers are surprised why every runner is running so slow and the number of runners entering the track is dwindling.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at November 28, 2010 10:01 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 28, 2010 10:02 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 28, 2010 10:03 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: tarpon at November 28, 2010 10:03 AM (g0QB8)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 28, 2010 10:04 AM (AZGON)
Of course Nixon actually had experience and some understanding of what made the world function, neither of which can be said about the Mohammedan Mouthpiece.
Still, it gives me hope that maybe, just maybe, it's SHTF time, and the only true course of action for the Traitor-in-Chief to follow will be resignation. He's got Nixon's paranoia, bunker mentality and lack of clarity down...now all he needs is to accept reality and see that he isn't capable of being president.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at November 28, 2010 10:04 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Minuteman at November 28, 2010 10:06 AM (502+o)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 28, 2010 10:07 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Minuteman at November 28, 2010 10:08 AM (502+o)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 28, 2010 10:08 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: Alex at November 28, 2010 01:54 PM (yY28H)
I think it's pretty fucking obvious that they're trying to do no such thing, and they're never going to look away from the policies and actions that get us into this shit.
WTF is it with these idiots? I mean, seriously, why is there a learning disability that affects politics? How did nature come up with that? What's the survival advantage to being an ignorant dumbass who keeps doing things that don't work over and over and fucking over?!?!?!
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at November 28, 2010 10:09 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 28, 2010 10:10 AM (JcRgg)
Posted by: navybrat at November 28, 2010 10:11 AM (Q+uIe)
theory/application
This faculty-administration knows only theory. Because of their narrow ideology, they dismiss most theoretical knowledge and only adhere to the theories that advance social justice.
Posted by: Professor Soothsayer at November 28, 2010 10:11 AM (Vt1Ze)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 28, 2010 10:12 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Barry the Great at November 28, 2010 10:13 AM (502+o)
Posted by: the economy at November 28, 2010 01:49 PM (S5YRY)
No need, you're already beaten down and unresponsive. We're saving the tazings for those who get uppity in the TSA lines.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 28, 2010 10:13 AM (eCAn3)
Given that this cretin is bent on destroying this country, having him "get [his] act together," is probably something you want to avoid.
Posted by: StrangernFiction at November 28, 2010 10:14 AM (9ZYFw)
If we needed any more evidence that The Vapid One® is clueless, amidst all this rhetoric about reviving manufacturing (which, as a former member of that class, I endorse wholeheartedly), notice that the one person whom he tapped to be our "manufacturing czar" is not someone with years of experience in the industry, he's a lawyer (and to all the lawyer Morons, I love each and every one of you like a brother or a sister).
I'd love to challenge Ron Bloom to a test to see who's better qualified for his position by challenging him to sharpen a common twist drill by hand.
I can do that. I will guarantee that he can't.
Now, ask yourself, if you were a small business owner, would you have someone in a position who wasn't qualified and knew absolutely nothing about it?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 28, 2010 10:15 AM (b6qrg)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 28, 2010 10:17 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 28, 2010 02:17 PM (o3bYL)
Wake me when we see the document authorizing an air strike on the UN.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 28, 2010 10:19 AM (eCAn3)
If you read that thing on the side bar about Obama even needing to control the diet of his staff, it mentions how one of the wikileaks founders says that wikileaks is an enemy of the United States.
Unfortunately so is the Administration.
Posted by: buzzion at November 28, 2010 10:20 AM (oVQFe)
Everyone here knows that Obama doesn't care about unemployment or 'fixing' health care or any of that shit. We all know his mission is to destroy the American system and rebuild it in leftist-fascist form.
Why doesn't Peggy Noonan see that?
Posted by: Professor Soothsayer at November 28, 2010 10:20 AM (Vt1Ze)
Posted by: average moonbat at November 28, 2010 10:20 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 28, 2010 10:21 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 28, 2010 10:22 AM (AZGON)
But low, he is having problems now because of outspoken oppposition by the "Republicans" or so says the esteemed commie panel on Face the Nation this morning.
Posted by: Vic at November 28, 2010 10:22 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Vic at November 28, 2010 02:22 PM (e4sSD)
Which Republicans would those be? The ones who were a superminority without the power to stop a single piece of legislation, or the ones who haven't been sworn in yet?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 28, 2010 10:24 AM (eCAn3)
LOL, the ones Bob Schieffer said were creating the worst grid lock in congress that he has seen in all of his years in Washington.
Posted by: Vic at November 28, 2010 10:29 AM (e4sSD)
You know, as little as five years ago, I would have dismissed people using the "commie" word as idiots. I'm still not comfortable with it, but fascocialists is pretty much what they are.
Posted by: ParisParamus at November 28, 2010 10:33 AM (gMzAL)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 28, 2010 10:34 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 28, 2010 10:35 AM (AZGON)
LOL, the ones Bob Schieffer said were creating the worst grid lock in congress that he has seen in all of his years in Washington.
Posted by: Vic at November 28, 2010 02:29 PM (e4sSD)
The gridlock in congress is caused by the locked up Kindles and we are going to subpoena every Republican on the board of Amazon to testify in special hearings, commencing upon the return to session of Congress.Posted by: Henry Waxman at November 28, 2010 10:38 AM (7+pP9)
Well, it would help if the government wasn't trying to appropriate money from those cash piles via more and higher taxation...
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at November 28, 2010 10:41 AM (jQy/O)
Posted by: SurferDoc at November 28, 2010 10:42 AM (o3bYL)
This country went socialist in the 30s. In the 60s we got the EPA and they began destroying private property. With KELO we got the total elimination of private property with the ability of government to take it for any "public purpose".
So yes, advocates of these kinds of policies are, in fact, communists.
Posted by: Vic at November 28, 2010 10:42 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 28, 2010 10:49 AM (AZGON)
The fact that the Obama administration is having a Cyclic vs. Systemic debate on the cause of the high unemployment proves two things:
1) This confirms Christine "I Like Twinkies" Romer's account that the administration had expected the economy to bounce back by now regardless of any actions taken by the administration.
2) Obama thinks he is just an innocent bystander and those pesky businesses won't hire anybody just to spite his awsomeness. Oh...it is all Bush's fault.
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at November 28, 2010 10:56 AM (S2+uh)
And remember when Obama said he was going to end the 'bubbles and bursts' in the economy.
He was telling us in no uncertain terms a) he is in control of the economy, and b) no more winners & losers; it's about fairness, i.e., socialism.
Posted by: Professor Soothsayer at November 28, 2010 11:03 AM (Vt1Ze)
Posted by: Mary Clogginstien from Brattleboro, VT at November 28, 2010 11:55 AM (zVOB7)
Posted by: A Concerned Conservative Christian at November 28, 2010 12:15 PM (sOtz/)
This.
At the time, I was arguing that even if you were a Keynsian, the Stimulus being proposed was, "fucking retarded".
Posted by: Deety at November 28, 2010 12:18 PM (Jb3+B)
I hear that there is a whole new chapter titled Cretinous Douchebags in the works.
Posted by: Deety at November 28, 2010 12:42 PM (Jb3+B)
Posted by: Barack Obama at November 28, 2010 12:54 PM (ceV/C)
Posted by: Ellie Light at November 28, 2010 01:46 PM (glsV4)
the wonkish question of whether today's high unemployment rate is structural or cyclical.
Hey, real man of genius, it was cyclical until the new policies of you and your pals Ben, Nancy and Harry made it structural.
Posted by: rockhead at November 28, 2010 02:04 PM (RykTt)
Posted by: JamesT at November 28, 2010 02:18 PM (blYjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 28, 2010 02:18 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 28, 2010 06:18 PM (tJjm/)
Worst Christmas Ever
Posted by: In Exile at November 28, 2010 02:56 PM (iv166)
Posted by: CMU VET at November 28, 2010 03:36 PM (1WvCy)
Posted by: Comanche Voter at November 28, 2010 03:44 PM (3ESDJ)
WTF is it with these idiots? I mean, seriously, why is there a learning disability that affects politics? How did nature come up with that? What's the survival advantage to being an ignorant dumbass who keeps doing things that don't work over and over and fucking over?!?!?!
None of their [ostensible] insanity makes any sense until you realize that they are nihilists hell-bent on destroying America & the civilized world.
Then suddenly it all makes sense.
Posted by: Lindsey Grahamnesty licking Rahm Emanuel's salty shaven balls at November 28, 2010 04:30 PM (pfMMA)
Posted by: sexypig at November 28, 2010 05:54 PM (ZGDGc)
Reminds me of a subordinate of Edison's who was given the task of calculating the volume of a spherical glass bulb. Being a mathematician, he began calculating the volume from measuring it. Edision passed by the next day, saw him working on sheets of equation, grabbed the bulb in exasperation, filled it with water, and poured it out into a measuring beaker.
Very often practical experience beats intellect.
Obama's education and experience did not prepare him to solve problems in the real world but rather to engage in faculty discussions about how many angels could dance on the head of a pin.
Posted by: Tantor at November 28, 2010 06:48 PM (Ek/Oc)
Posted by: twolaneflash at November 29, 2010 04:42 AM (xb4TD)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1977 seconds, 211 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Barack Obasketball at November 28, 2010 09:36 AM (zgZzy)