February 04, 2010
— Maetenloch Spook86 from In From the Cold caught this admission from CIA Director Panetta during Congressional testimony on Tuesday. According to Panetta another attack on the US from Al Qaeda is expected within the next 3 to 6 months.
Now if anyone would know about upcoming attacks it ought to be him so I assume he has enough details that point to an imminent attack to make him willing to predict one publicly. But the cynical side of me also suspects that he's just covering himself in case something does happen since there's less political downside to a false alarm than no alarm whatsoever.
Mr. Panetta offered that chilling prediction today, during Congressional testimony that also included FBI Director Robert Mueller and Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair. The CIA chief said the terror group is utilizing new recruits who are more difficult to detect and trace
and
British intelligence officials believe the Nigerian was part of a larger group of terrorists that trained in Al Qaida camps in Yemen last year. The whereabouts of those operatives remains unknown. Extended questioning of Abdulmutallab by trained interrogators might have yielded actionable intelligence on those trainees and their operational assignments.Also unclear is the status of 36 American ex-convicts who traveled to Yemen over the past year, ostensibly to study Arabic. Thomas Joscelyn of The Weekly Standard has unearthed a little-publicized report from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (released last month) that raises concerns about the former convicts and a second group of Americans, who moved to Yemen several years ago and converted to a form of radical Islam.
So if we know that Al Qaeda is planning attacks using non-typical recruits that have been trained in Yemen, you'd think the government would have pulled out the stops Jack Bauer-style to get info out of the only such terrorist they had in custody. But instead they decided to Mirandize the crotch bomber after just 50 minutes.
If I were the Obama administration, I'd be very, very worried that Panetta's prediction will come true. Because if Al Quaeda does pull off a successful attack their actions would rightfully be considered malignant incompetence.
Posted by: Maetenloch at
07:20 AM
| Comments (84)
Post contains 376 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: mbruce at February 04, 2010 07:43 AM (t/GDA)
I don't think I have ever felt so damn vulnerable.
Posted by: Jewells at February 04, 2010 07:43 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 04, 2010 07:44 AM (0ZWfs)
Posted by: G$ at February 04, 2010 07:44 AM (nEatY)
Or, God forbid, something does happen? Do you become "truthers"?
Will fire stop melting steel?
Posted by: Techie at February 04, 2010 07:46 AM (zbH+i)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 04, 2010 07:46 AM (0ZWfs)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 04, 2010 07:46 AM (zmiSr)
Revoke their passports.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 04, 2010 07:47 AM (mR7mk)
Ther can be no doubt that Al Qaida wants nothing more that to bring us to our knees. Judging by this administrations' effete actions concerning the recent attacks, and towards terrorism in general, I don't have much faith that we'll escape the next one.
And yeah, that would be a great excuse to impose martial law. Not for any real reason, we certainly didn't overreact after 9-11. But for the bunch of clowns in Washington, they's get wood from having that kind of power.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 04, 2010 07:47 AM (i3AsK)
Posted by: vai2112 at February 04, 2010 07:48 AM (9eb2k)
But the cynical side of me also suspects that he's just covering himself in case something does happen since there's less political downside to a false alarm than no alarm whatsoever.
This topic came up yesterday. ALL of the secuity bosses have been doing this since 9-11. It is a two-fer. First it is a cover-your-ass moment so if something does happen you can come back with a "told-you so". It also is a justification that your shop needs more personnel and a larger budget.
That last part is the gold standard for every damn buearocrap in DC.
Posted by: Vic at February 04, 2010 07:48 AM (QrA9E)
Sounds like a plan being put into action to me.
Probably what crotch bomber was, but thanks to Dutch dude didn't happen....'
O and his freaks want complete control of us mouth breathers...what better way than to scare the H out of all of us.........
It works in Britain...their population just gets meeker and meeker and more muslim everyday.....hoping to make the muslims like them and not blow the H out of their buses etc....disgusting....
Throw them all out.......if they put Islam first they should go. The mideast is plenty big and plenty rich....
Posted by: non_dhimmie at February 04, 2010 07:49 AM (zACGu)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 04, 2010 07:49 AM (0ZWfs)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at February 04, 2010 07:49 AM (ucxC/)
Posted by: vai2112 at February 04, 2010 07:49 AM (9eb2k)
Think of all the horrible things this puke will want to do to 'protect' us.
Posted by: trainer at February 04, 2010 07:50 AM (K5X44)
Posted by: teej at February 04, 2010 07:50 AM (7l/Pe)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 04, 2010 07:51 AM (i3AsK)
The election of Comrade Zero was the dinner bell to non-leftard America haters such as Al Qaeda that dinner was on the table and ready to be eaten up.
Open season on infidels. We're so sorry, please kill us, Islamic jihadists, we are guilty and will willingly lay our pencil necks on the chopping block.
52% of us deserve what is coming. The rest of us are chained in the hold.
Posted by: maddogg at February 04, 2010 07:53 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: vai2112 at February 04, 2010 07:53 AM (9eb2k)
Posted by: Jean at February 04, 2010 07:53 AM (7K04W)
That said, martial law won't work because no one trusts them enough to go along with it. Some of the stupider urban centers, maybe.
Posted by: Methos at February 04, 2010 07:54 AM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: AE at February 04, 2010 07:55 AM (+xtu8)
Posted by: c02 emitting conservative at February 04, 2010 07:57 AM (SebJz)
According to Panetta another attack on the US from Al Qaeda is expected within the next 3 to 6 months.
And if it doesn't occur, the non-occurrence will be "unexpected".
Posted by: Speller at February 04, 2010 07:57 AM (o0R2E)
Panetta is doing his job as he sees it. He has done the press conference, sent the emails, done the rounds on TV and radio, and moved the papers around on his desk. After the attack happens, he will do more press conferences, send more emails, do the rounds on TV and radio, and move some more papers around on his desk.
I really don't think he sees the connection between his job title, and what he's supposed to be doing to protect me and my kids.
Posted by: Truman North at February 04, 2010 07:57 AM (e8YaH)
Posted by: rawmuse at February 04, 2010 07:58 AM (6Kciv)
Posted by: teej at February 04, 2010 07:58 AM (7l/Pe)
I went over to the Peace Blimp site. There's a page where you can suggest messages for the side of it.
I suggested "Nuke Mecca".
Some of the other suggestions are too funny.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 04, 2010 07:58 AM (i3AsK)
Posted by: Leon Pannetta at February 04, 2010 08:00 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 04, 2010 11:55 AM (0ZWfs)
Salafist Sunni. In Constitutional terms, he is a Strict Constructionist and Originalist. In other words, Mohammad decapitated prisoners, murdered Jews en masse and raped women therefore it is perfectly okay to do it today.
Posted by: Holger at February 04, 2010 08:01 AM (8NGHm)
Posted by: Methos at February 04, 2010 08:01 AM (Xsi7M)
I went over to the Peace Blimp site. There's a page where you can suggest messages for the side of it.
I suggested "Nuke Mecca".
Some of the other suggestions are too funny.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 04, 2010 11:58 AM (i3AsK)
I got with the spirit of the site and suggested Ostrich Is Better Than Eagle.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 04, 2010 08:02 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: Bambi circa 2011 at February 04, 2010 08:02 AM (RykTt)
Gosh if I didn't know better it would sound as if the Obama administration knows that treating terrorism as a criminal matter makes us much more vulnerable to attack, and is warning us to get use to the idea.
Posted by: bulwark at February 04, 2010 08:03 AM (MdzCh)
Posted by: Jean at February 04, 2010 08:07 AM (6Njk9)
I went over to the Peace Blimp site. There's a page where you can suggest messages for the side of it.
I suggested "Nuke Mecca".
I suggested they fly several low passes over Mogadishu.
Posted by: maddogg at February 04, 2010 08:07 AM (OlN4e)
Woolly mammoths were more industrial than originally believed?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 04, 2010 08:07 AM (mR7mk)
IT'S ALL A DISTRACTION FROM THE ECONOMY THAT SUCKS!
Posted by: GarandFan at February 04, 2010 08:08 AM (ZQBnQ)
I got with the spirit of the site and suggested Ostrich Is Better Than Eagle.
I saw your suggestion. We morons are helpful like that.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 04, 2010 08:08 AM (i3AsK)
They were caught off guard by the underwear bomber (to say nothing of the Fort Hood situation) and the incident and its subsequent handling made them look unprepared, weak, and foolish. They know this is their soft underbelly.
The cynical side of me says they are trying to get out in front of this so when something does happen, instead of it being a "How did you incompetents let this happen? This administration is weak on terrorism!" moment; it becomes a "We all knew this was coming and warned the American people, we are all in this together." moment.
Whether that will fly, I don't know.
Posted by: RM at February 04, 2010 08:09 AM (GkYyh)
I was sort of hoping for a president who did it the other way around, but then, I'm one of those mouth breathers. And yes, I am bitter. But I don't cling to my guns...I hold them correctly.
Posted by: NJConservative at February 04, 2010 08:10 AM (/Ywwg)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at February 04, 2010 08:11 AM (eNxMU)
Al qaeda is planning on attacking the US? This is news. and it's definitely different from
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
and 2001
when they were...planning to attack us...never mind.
Posted by: JEA at February 04, 2010 08:14 AM (AfORa)
Global Warming? Could your history prof be more out of touch with current events?
I just posted on the healine thread about the WC. They just did a little pice STILL pushing AGW and pushing the same old tired lies that have been discreditied over and over.
and all this cold we have had the last 3 winters, hahahahaha, don't mention anythig but now and say it is restricted to the U.S.
They are fraud deniars....that is the new term.
Posted by: Vic at February 04, 2010 08:15 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Another Stupid Typical Fucking Moonbat at February 04, 2010 08:20 AM (YmPwQ)
We need an adminitration that is serious about eliminating terrorism by any means. A tough stance does many things, all of which work in our favor.
It shows strength to our enemies, which is what they respect. If we show a greater determination, they just might decide against attacking us, because we could inflict far more damage on them than they could on us.
The form this should take might make the more effete in Washington squirm. It involves the swift and sure execution of any terrorist who takes any action against us. A short tribunal followed by an execution. No bones, no regrets, no apologies to anyone, just the attitude that the poor dead terrorist did it to himself, and would still be alive to pursue a productive life with his family at home had he so chosen.
It'd make would-be jihadis wonder if it's really worth it, instilling in them a sense of futility. We just need a government with cojones. We can defeat these rabid animals, but not the way we're currently doing it.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 04, 2010 08:22 AM (i3AsK)
Posted by: grognard at February 04, 2010 08:26 AM (v0kvW)
If they got human form Replicators, we're boned.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 04, 2010 08:27 AM (JreS3)
@polynikes #59,
Somehow, I don't think that is what Obama had in mind when he talked about "smart" diplomcay and hitting the reset buttons.
As to waterboarding, maybe some converts from the 52%, but there are a crazy 20% or so that feel we deserve to be attacked and would be rooting for Al Qeada. The ones that believe it was "little Eichmanns" that died in the WTC attacks.
Posted by: RM at February 04, 2010 08:27 AM (GkYyh)
I want to know where this Peace Blimp site is at...sounds like fun...
This could be ass covering, but something gives me a (bad) funny feeling it isn't. If something bad does happen (and pray that is doesn't, or that we can thwart it) then I'm all for the majority of Americans to just go apeshit. It's about time we quit trying to play nice with this crap; let's throw out the rule book and play this game old school.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 04, 2010 08:36 AM (5/yRG)
*phew* Glad I'm being educated by such brilliant scholars..
/sarc
Uh, yeah...that sort of thinking does seem to be most of what passes for historical scholarship these days. Which is why I chose to not try to become a history professor after all, and got myself a real job.
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at February 04, 2010 08:39 AM (pLTLS)
64 -- Some of the more traitorous members of our society included in the "people to go apeshit on"; I'm seriously sick of these people -- they're like the people in "World War Z" who would try and pretend to be zombies and protest for zombie rights (and will be just about as successful in saving their miserable little selves as in the book).
I'm digging your opinions Backwards Boy and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 04, 2010 08:40 AM (5/yRG)
And how are you going to blame W when the ugliness does happen?
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at February 04, 2010 08:44 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: curious at February 04, 2010 08:46 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at February 04, 2010 08:48 AM (p302b)
"Never let malignant incompetence go to waste.."
Rahm to the fu**ing retards
Posted by: skye at February 04, 2010 08:54 AM (HwMXR)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at February 04, 2010 11:55 AM (0ZWfs)
Isn't Obama a Sunni as well? So shouldn't their common Muslim faith bring them together and stop all attacks?
And... while in crazy mode, if we know for sure there is going to be an attack, and we don't stop it, does that mean we are culpable, ie, the US government is behind it, just like all the 9/11 Truthers say the US government is behind that event? And if an attack does happen on Obamas watch, does that mean that he's just as culpable as George Bush?
So.... Obama=Bush?
How does that taste liberals?
I
Posted by: shibumi at February 04, 2010 09:11 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: stuiec at February 04, 2010 09:14 AM (7AOgy)
He's not that dumb. If it doesn't happen, that's one they prevented.
Posted by: Packy East at February 04, 2010 09:20 AM (CKW49)
Posted by: timothyJ at February 04, 2010 09:23 AM (IKKIf)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at February 04, 2010 10:17 AM (8PFPH)
I don't really think we need to wait make that consideration.
Posted by: Jazz at February 04, 2010 11:19 AM (hnq5i)
Posted by: Maddacci at February 04, 2010 12:32 PM (n5UbG)
Posted by: Nozzle at February 04, 2010 12:32 PM (bTH3U)
Good grief. Didn't any of you morons ever play with with gunpowder or even dud firecrackers? The nicker bomber set off the bomb but the detonator failed to create enough of a pressure wave to detonate it. Once the PETN was on fire there was no way he was going to get it to detonate. The Dutch dude did a great job of pounding the shit out of the dickless terrorist. but he did not stop the bomb from going off. It was a dud. I hope he did not pull "balls on fire" out of the flames as it would have been better to let him cook. I did hear from someone who talked to pilots from the same airline that DD and another guy took turns beating on smoky.
Posted by: snookered at February 04, 2010 06:27 PM (7Vg6Y)
Throw them all out.......if they put Islam first they should go.
Starting with Barry Hussein.
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at February 04, 2010 07:41 PM (orMqj)
I forget: is Super Bowl Sunday within the next 3 to 6 months?
SHIT. You just had to bring that up, didn't you?
We are SOOOO fucked.
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at February 04, 2010 07:48 PM (orMqj)
We just need a government with cojones.
I.e., PALIN. (Sorry, guys, but you know it's true)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at February 04, 2010 07:54 PM (orMqj)
This could be ass covering, but something gives me a (bad) funny feeling it isn't. If something bad does happen (and pray that is doesn't, or that we can thwart it) then I'm all for the majority of Americans to just go apeshit. It's about time we quit trying to play nice with this crap; let's throw out the rule book and play this game old school.
Everytime I hear conservatives, justifiably heartened after the Massachusetts Miracle, talk about how this bodes so well for the November elections, I just have that weird "cognitive dissonance" feeling, like, "you're kidding me, right?" As if there's going to BE an election in November? Like America as we have known it is actually going to hold together for another nine months?
My gut has been telling me for a long time that there ain't gonna be no elections in November. Either total economic collapse with the consequent social collapse; or, exactly what others on this thread have described (and what I think is the likeliest scenario): terrorist attack with massive casualties--and immediate declaration of national state of emergency, and imposition of martial law.
The power-mad sickos the idiot voters elected in 2008 would take on the mantle of total dictatorship quite readily, I imagine.
I'm with you and others here re: the Second Amendment. But even if the military refuses to take up arms against us (and I don't think that's a safe assumption), we're still up against Obama's ACORN/SEIU armies. We're talking about people who beat up old black guys in wheelchairs, threaten women with gang rape, knock people down, punch people out--and their Beloved Leader of Memory, Saul Alinsky, "studied" under Al Capone's hit man in Chicago in the 1930s.
But I do wonder whether our men and women in uniform won't follow orders from their Commander in Chief....
General Fuckwad Casey, chief of the army, carrying on about how the killing of 14 people at Ft. Hood would be even MORE tragic if it were to make us sacrifice our allfuckingimportant "diversity".... as well as all the people at Walter Reed who dared not utter a peep against Hasan for fear of being nailed by the political correctness police....does not give me a lot of hope that the military would actually refuse to follow the Obamafuehrer's orders.
So how will the Second Amendment help us, folks? If our military goes along with martial law, we're outgunned. Period.
If someone has a rosier prognosis, please share it! As blue as I am about all this, I'd genuinely appreciate some reason for optimism.
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at February 04, 2010 08:20 PM (orMqj)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2405 seconds, 212 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Never let a crisis go to waste. I don't put it past this Administration to be hoping for a major attack.
Posted by: trainer at February 04, 2010 07:40 AM (K5X44)