July 12, 2010
— DrewM The "Coffee Party" didn't work out so well but liberals are always willing to bet that a bad idea will work if they just try harder, spend more and just get the message right. To that end, they are back with another shot at their own tea party movement.
In an effort to replicate the tea party's success, 170 liberal and civil rights groups are forming a coalition that they hope will match the movement's political energy and influence. They promise to "counter the tea party narrative" and help the progressive movement find its voice again after 18 months of foundering.The large-scale attempt at liberal unity, dubbed "One Nation," will try to revive themes that energized the progressive grass roots two years ago. In a repurposing of Barack Obama's former campaign slogan, organizers are demanding "all the change" they voted for -- a poke at the White House.
But the liberal groups have long had a kind of sibling rivalry, jostling over competing agendas and seeking to influence some of the same lawmakers. In forming the coalition, the groups struggled to settle on a name. Even now, two of the major players disagree about who came up with the idea of holding a march this fall
...
The groups involved represent the core of the first-time voters who backed Obama, including the National Council of La Raza, the Service Employees International Union, the NAACP, the AFL-CIO, and the United States Student Association. (The effort is separate from the Democratic Party's plan to spend $50 million trying to reach those same voters.)
Their aha! moment happened after the health-care overhaul passed this spring. Liberal groups, which focused their collective strength to push the bill against heavy resistance, felt relevant and effective for the first time in a long while. That health-care coalition, composed of civil rights groups, student activists and labor leaders, liked the winning formula.
Over a year from the start of the tea party movement (assuming you trace its origin to the beautiful Santelli rant on CNBC) and liberals, er progressives, still don't get it. They really think the tea parties are simply a product of Karl Rove and Freedom Works imagination. That those two simply pushed a button and millions of average Americans who had never taken part in political protests simply just marched out of their houses and showed up at local gatherings and congressional town halls. The liberals think the tea party types are deep cover sleeper agents who can be controlled by flashing the Queen of Hearts. It never occurs to liberals that a lot of normal people just don't like the progressive agenda and the big spending/taxing government that comes with it.
Naturally, if you're a liberal the only conceivable response to this scary movement is...a document outlining the goals of 170 existing groups that offer nothing new in the way of ideas. Yeah, that's how you fight a grass root movement whose main appeal and power comes from the simple and honest idea that government is getting too big and too expensive. Again, they really think if they just get the message right (aka fool enough people), they will win.
The fact that this is the response from liberals should warm all our hearts (well, if we had any) because it's clear they just don't get it. With a little luck, they never will.
Posted by: DrewM at
07:45 AM
| Comments (146)
Post contains 578 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: sven10077 at July 12, 2010 07:47 AM (kq1lG)
They're going to promote the benefits and advantages of socialism? Oh yeah, that'll work.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 12, 2010 07:47 AM (RkRxq)
They need to recruit some Germans and Britons to help promote their initiative.
You know how those foreign accents impress the weak minded.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 12, 2010 07:49 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 12, 2010 07:50 AM (xxgag)
I question the coalition-building capabilities of a group called "The Race"
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at July 12, 2010 07:51 AM (yUybe)
Posted by: maddogg at July 12, 2010 07:51 AM (OlN4e)
Yeah - this won't work when your Democrat Reps act like maniacal overlords when real voters ask them a real question or two.
Posted by: Alan Smithee at July 12, 2010 07:51 AM (F7GbV)
Posted by: eddiebear at July 12, 2010 07:52 AM (49pmx)
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 12, 2010 11:50 AM (xxgag)
In other words, they should just join the New Black Panther Party.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent- You say democrat, I hear "asshole" at July 12, 2010 07:53 AM (YVZlY)
12 maddog,
yeah I love how they coopt Patriotic imagery while simultaneously hating the anti-government tendencies it embodies....
they aren't big on casual introspection
Posted by: sven10077 at July 12, 2010 07:53 AM (kq1lG)
Yeah, that's what we're seeing with the libtards progressives red diaper dopers Coffee Partiers One Nationers.
/cringeworthy
Posted by: laceyunderalls at July 12, 2010 07:54 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 12, 2010 07:55 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 12, 2010 07:55 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: dum blond at July 12, 2010 07:55 AM (gbCNS)
21 CDR M,
which is why the left do gymnastics to say we crackers aren't being fair when we take them(La raza) at their word
Posted by: sven10077 at July 12, 2010 07:55 AM (kq1lG)
Posted by: Malcolm X at July 12, 2010 07:57 AM (AZGON)
I am willing to be the new One Nation groups commits more acts of violence in one week than the tea party ever will.
Anyone willing to bet that people physically attack tea partiers at Glenn Beck's thingie, and that the media reports it as Tea Party violence?
I am willing to bet all the networks have stories in the can that are ready to air. I am also willing to bet unions will tell the new networks where to place there cameras to catch the violence.
Posted by: Ben at July 12, 2010 07:59 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: maddogg at July 12, 2010 07:59 AM (OlN4e)
30 CDR M,
or add in the whole "one world government" desire they have and it makes more sense....
Posted by: sven10077 at July 12, 2010 08:00 AM (kq1lG)
“Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer!”
Und Ein Nation!
actually, i think Reich translates to nation or country, so it's already pretty accurate.
Posted by: Ben at July 12, 2010 08:00 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: denny crane at July 12, 2010 08:01 AM (I+7Zv)
Posted by: maddogg at July 12, 2010 08:01 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Bugler at July 12, 2010 08:03 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: duhgee at July 12, 2010 08:04 AM (7Tc5G)
1. Make a statement, "We need to counter the Tea Party"
2. Magic happens (Big O funds with TARP money)
3. We win in November
If the Repubs ever got their act together...
Posted by: Ludicrous Speed at July 12, 2010 08:04 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 12, 2010 08:04 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: mr pink at July 12, 2010 08:05 AM (vAkMV)
It's the Judean People's Front!
Posted by: Nighthawk at July 12, 2010 08:05 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Bugler at July 12, 2010 08:06 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: maddogg at July 12, 2010 08:06 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: The Weed Party at July 12, 2010 08:06 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: SEIU at July 12, 2010 08:07 AM (S+el1)
Hey, we're still here at Starbucks drinking lattes and chatting about the importance of more government intervention in our lives. So what happened to all the cameras?
Posted by: The Coffee Party at July 12, 2010 08:07 AM (QKKT0)
...
The large-scale attempt at liberal unity, dubbed "One Nation," will try to revive themes that energized the progressive grass roots two years ago.
So the Democratic Party is getting a new name?
Posted by: John P. Squibob at July 12, 2010 08:08 AM (bMKMU)
Posted by: People's Front for Judea at July 12, 2010 08:08 AM (4Kl5M)
*sniff
I remember the violence. The astroturfers. The teaggers. Finally a return to honest American protest.
Someone grab me my gavel!
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at July 12, 2010 08:09 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Lynn at July 12, 2010 08:10 AM (USh3F)
Posted by: mr pink at July 12, 2010 12:05 PM (vAkMV)
That's crazy talk.
Posted by: Blind as a moonbat at July 12, 2010 08:10 AM (xxgag)
The first name choice was Sturmabteilung but it didn't score well with focus groups.
Posted by: Cicero at July 12, 2010 08:10 AM (QKKT0)
That would be way too confusing to most of the idiots that vote for them.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at July 12, 2010 08:10 AM (554T5)
Posted by: Ben at July 12, 2010 08:11 AM (wuv1c)
Know what makes me happy? That these guys actually think organizing a march is an "idea."
Posted by: Sobek at July 12, 2010 08:12 AM (gQmzw)
It worked for the whole Clinton administration.
WTB our mojo back.
Posted by: Libs at July 12, 2010 08:13 AM (V3HUX)
"a document outlining the goals of 170 existing groups"
You forgot to check the back of the last page.
Goal 171a: KILLIN' CRACKAS!
Goal 171b: As deemed necessary in light of 171a, KILLIN' THEY BABIES!
Posted by: Wise King General Attorney SHABAZZZZZ! at July 12, 2010 08:13 AM (kZVsz)
Posted by: Presenting the Frappamocchacinolatte Party at July 12, 2010 08:15 AM (Vr0Zv)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at July 12, 2010 08:15 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: One Nation Chanter at July 12, 2010 08:16 AM (EW49d)
Posted by: One Nation Chanter at July 12, 2010 08:17 AM (EW49d)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent- You say democrat, I hear at July 12, 2010 08:18 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Intl Assoc of Androgynous Art Students at July 12, 2010 08:18 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: Big-Tent La Raza at July 12, 2010 08:19 AM (kZVsz)
Posted by: Another One Nation Chanter at July 12, 2010 08:19 AM (Vr0Zv)
Posted by: One Nation Chanter at July 12, 2010 08:20 AM (EW49d)
Posted by: professionally made sign at one nation protest at July 12, 2010 08:20 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: Senator Alan Simpson at July 12, 2010 08:21 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Ben at July 12, 2010 12:11 PM (wuv1c)
I pity the fool who tries to hijack the word 'pity'.
Posted by: Mr. T at July 12, 2010 08:21 AM (YVZlY)
@73, 75, 78, 79 (and others).
That is what is going to make this so much fun to watch. The whole thing is going to be such a gigantic cluster f*ck of special interests that the only message they will be able to project will be: "Hey, look at us, we're a bunch of stoned-out slacker dirtbags!"
Posted by: Somebody Had to Say It... at July 12, 2010 08:21 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 12, 2010 08:22 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Libs at July 12, 2010 12:13 PM (V3HUX)
You don't sell the bacon. You sell the sizzle.
Posted by: Cosmo Kramer at July 12, 2010 08:22 AM (xxgag)
"Protest signs will mysteriously be printed... with the same message... in the same color."
All with a tiny "Union Bug" at the bottom, natch.
Posted by: reason at July 12, 2010 08:22 AM (kZVsz)
Posted by: professioal protester for one nation at July 12, 2010 08:22 AM (ph9vn)
Liberté, égalité, pleines pensions à l'âge 50!
Posted by: One Nation Demonstrators at July 12, 2010 08:23 AM (QKKT0)
"successful liberalism " , lol, pulled that from the last sentence in the article. funny stuff, eh?
Posted by: Vergeltung at July 12, 2010 08:23 AM (jttPx)
Posted by: Walter Sobcheck at July 12, 2010 08:23 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: maddogg at July 12, 2010 08:23 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: GarandFan at July 12, 2010 08:25 AM (6mwMs)
Posted by: Darth Randall at July 12, 2010 08:27 AM (oLULt)
For real? Man, you can't make up stuff like that.
Posted by: George Orwell at July 12, 2010 12:22 PM (AZGON)
Geez, I fucked that up. It's supposed to read "while he is on vacation"
He's already published the following posts:
Welfare reform down under
How do you fight the crazy right
Oh, and Dave Weigel is also guest blogging for Andrew.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent - outing the libs since well, forever at July 12, 2010 08:28 AM (YVZlY)
It never occurs to liberals that a lot of normal people just don't like the progressive agenda and the big spending/taxing government that comes with it.
Oh, it occurs to them all right - they just don't give a flying fuck what "normal People" think! Because they know they are superior to the "small" people, they assume they have the right to lead them, even if it is to where they don't want to go.
Posted by: sherlock at July 12, 2010 08:28 AM (G9/8V)
Posted by: protester sign for one nation at July 12, 2010 08:29 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: Roman Polanski at July 12, 2010 08:31 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Another One Nation Chanter at July 12, 2010 08:31 AM (Vr0Zv)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 12, 2010 08:34 AM (AZGON)
62 CDR M
Hmmm. Some anagrams for One Nation:
A Net Onion
A Tone In No
Antoine No (maybe racist)
Ain't One No
About that last one: How about "Ain't No One"?
Posted by: Golem13 at July 12, 2010 08:35 AM (2X8VA)
Posted by: Darth Randall at July 12, 2010 12:27 PM (oLULt)
WHAT DO WE WANT?
THE LAST VESTIGE ON EARTH!
WHEN DO WE WANT IT?
BEFORE AMERICANS WISE UP!
Posted by: Dumb Ass at July 12, 2010 08:35 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Honest One Nationer at July 12, 2010 08:38 AM (VXBR1)
WTF?
The Tea movement did not start with an MSNBC cable news personality. You know that's not true.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at July 12, 2010 08:38 AM (oL8lS)
Color me not too worried.
Posted by: scooter (still not libby) at July 12, 2010 08:39 AM (aamim)
Posted by: Joe Biden, hamster-wheel squeaking away furiously in his head, at July 12, 2010 08:43 AM (kZVsz)
There's still a large contingent that wants to call the group, "Sea Kittens". After all, who could possibly hate sea kittens?
Posted by: progressoverpeace at July 12, 2010 08:44 AM (Qp4DT)
Since they want the Almighty Government to give them everything they want, I humbly suggest we call them FREEBAGGERS.
Posted by: reason at July 12, 2010 08:46 AM (kZVsz)
They'll never stick together. It's hard to join people who all want to positively acquire things - different things. It's all gimme gimme gimme! There's never enough to go around to satisfy all the gimme people, and when they realize it they turn on each other. And as soon as any one group gets what it wants, the others find themselves abandoned.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 12, 2010 08:48 AM (xUM1Q)
No one has ever accused a liberal of being intelligent.
Lol.. liberals accuse each other of it all the time. Now as to the rest of us, well, no, we know better.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at July 12, 2010 08:51 AM (e8T35)
They'll never stick together. It's hard to join people who all want to positively acquire things - different things. It's all gimme gimme gimme! There's never enough to go around to satisfy all the gimme people, and when they realize it they turn on each other. And as soon as any one group gets what it wants, the others find themselves abandoned.
Yup, you got it. Each of these groups wants special treatment, special access and special status for whichever segment of the population they represent. Whether it's the women's "rights" folks, or the gay and lesbian "rights" folks, or the civil "rights" folks, doesn't really matter. Truth is "rights" should really be changed to "sympathy and entitlements"
The reason people get involved in groups like this is so that they can be the victim. What the hell good does it do to be the victim if someone else is more victimized than you? If you sprain your ankle and they guy next to you breaks his leg, who gets the most attention?
Nope, each group relies on it's victim status for attention and validation. Once one group starts getting more than this than the other, well One Nation is going to end up being One huge clusterfuck.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at July 12, 2010 08:57 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: unknown jane at July 12, 2010 12:59 PM (5/yRG)
I'd love to claim credit, but you really need to send the bill to PETA
Posted by: progressoverpeace at July 12, 2010 09:00 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Tommy V at July 12, 2010 09:01 AM (qU57d)
Major Homer Simpson "Doh" moment!
Posted by: Cat at July 12, 2010 09:02 AM (70xoP)
Posted by: reason at July 12, 2010 09:06 AM (kZVsz)
They will turn on each other as surely as the sun rises in the East. My rule of thumb is that any group, no matter how disciplined or in agreement with themselves, will eventually face betrayal from within over greed (whether for power, or material gain). My best example: Jesus Christ.
Posted by: Penfold at July 12, 2010 09:16 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: wtfci at July 12, 2010 09:19 AM (R4rMI)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at July 12, 2010 09:21 AM (mHQ7T)
There aren't that many members. Pity the Starbucks bathroom they wreck.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at July 12, 2010 09:23 AM (mHQ7T)
Well, they can't be honest and expect to win anything.
The only way they can succeed is to claim they're not doing socialism while they're doing socialism.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 12, 2010 09:25 AM (T0NGe)
This American is worried about upcoming retirement in the face of this ignorant socialist architecting the demise of our country. That is plenty motivation to take action to be heard. I'm not tea partying yet, but have become very involved in local politics. That's the only good outcome of the O'Bambi administration of which I'm aware to date.
Posted by: iowavette at July 12, 2010 09:27 AM (0JTac)
I swear, my dog craps smarter turds than these people.
'Groan, strain, plop. -- Sniff, sniff'
He's right!
Posted by: HoundOfDoom at July 12, 2010 09:29 AM (tQ7IJ)
Posted by: Jeff Weimer at July 12, 2010 10:10 AM (1Mn8Z)
Toby always craps smarter than these people because Toby eats peanut butter!
Posted by: Toby The Beagle at July 12, 2010 10:45 AM (Vol3D)
And Rocky says, "Aw, that trick never works!"
To the leftists attempting to astroturf a grass roots movement:
THAT TRICK NEVER WORKS!
At least not for you folks. Probably cause you don't have the fire in the belly over the downward spiral your icons and idols have put us into.
Posted by: jakee308 at July 12, 2010 11:15 AM (LrRe7)
170 liberal and civil rights groups are forming a coalition
Don't you love how Reds always list the number of groups supporting communist initiatives? They apparently don't realize that we know perfectly well that the 170 groups in this case probably represent about 340 different people, with each person belong to a couple dozen of those groups.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at July 12, 2010 11:59 AM (3On4F)
Queen cards ???? wait I thought it was the Joker card ... thats what Karl said ... I'm confused ...
They hate the Tea Party movement because they don't have a small group of leaders to attack, isolate and marginalize ... aka standard liberal political attack strategy ...
Posted by: Jeff at July 12, 2010 01:22 PM (A3tpD)
Posted by: JewishConservative at July 12, 2010 01:23 PM (wc8Wz)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at July 12, 2010 01:27 PM (xqhoO)
These people really don't understand the concept of "grass roots" at all, do they.
Posted by: DocJ at July 12, 2010 03:32 PM (AWzOz)
That's exactly what this reminds me of. The lefties look at the explosive success of conservative talk radio and they think, naw, nobody believes this stuff, it must have been orchestrated by Karl Rove and financed by Richard Mellon Scaife, yeah, that's the ticket. So they tried to orchestrate a response by Al Franken that's financed by George Soros and are honestly puzzled why it wasn't an instant success.
Posted by: OregonMuse at July 12, 2010 05:25 PM (Nfzuq)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3025 seconds, 274 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








COFFEE PARTY 4 LIFE BITCHES!
Posted by: Ben at July 12, 2010 07:46 AM (wuv1c)