August 19, 2010
— DrewM To me, this is kind of interesting and also kind of silly.
First, the numbers.
In March 2009, the percentage was 11 percent. Today, it's 18 percent.The percentage of those asserting that the president is a Christian -- which he is -- has gone down in that time, from 48% in March 2009 to 34% today.
...The poll indicates that groups who have shown the most willingness to believe the wrong assertion that the president is a Muslim include conservative Republicans -- 34% of whom believe the president is Muslim. Eighteen percent of independents say the president is a Muslim, up from 10% in March 2009.
But even among the president's allies, the numbers are shifting. In March 2009, 55% of Democrats said the president is a Christian, which he is. That number is now 46%. African-Americans, who voted for President Obama overwhelmingly, have also shown a similar shift. In March 2009, 36% of African-Americans said they didn't know the president's religion; that number is now 46%. Self-described liberal Democrats who don't know what religion the president is shifted from 23% to 31%.
These numbers are tied to a poll that show Americans generally aren't too fond of Muslims overall. There's likely a correlation between the drop in Obama's approval and his being linked to an unpopular group.
It's obviously dangerous to think you can know what's in another person's heart but I don't think Obama is any more of a Muslim than he is a Christian.
You can't have spent all that time in Jeremiah Wright's church and really expect mainstream American Christians to say you share their values. Despite all his talk about wanting to find a local church to attend in DC, he never did. The fact is, Obama has made no effort to be seen publicly practicing his faith. Again, the measure of one's faith isn't their public professions of it (lot's of bad people sit in the front row of pews every Sunday around the world) but when you're President, what you say and do matter in the forming of the public's opinion of who they think you are.
Again, with the caveat it's impossible to know what is in the heart of another, I think Obama's religion is the state. He's a leftist. Religion is a tool to use in gaining and holding power but in the end it's not the guiding light of his life.
I think the reason he's seen as a Muslim is because of his family history and it's the kind of religion a leftist would be more in tune with in America. It's the minority religion, fighting to gain a foothold within the existing political and cultural power structure of America. Islam's "otherness" from the traditional American religious experience is akin to the outsider status most leftist have in the American political tradition. Liberals like to bemoan the idea that Obama is viewed as "the other" by many Americans but it ignores the fact that many on the left feel the way. They don't see themselves as part of America's traditions, they hate them. Leftists don't celebrate America, they are too busy"remaking America" to coin a phrase. I think that it is this shared sense of being the 'outsider' which draws Obama more to Islam than to the traditional and dominant Christian outlook.
Add all that to his constant talk about the need to reach out to the Muslim world and his distortions about the importance of Islam in America to his lack of mainstream Christian background and, well, this is what you get.

A few more thoughts....
Just to be clear on why I think this is a silly story (from something I wrote in the comments).
I think it's silly because he (Obama) could come out tomorrow and say he's making the Haj to Mecca and I'd still think he is a dangerous President who has done great harm to the nation. It simply wouldn't matter much.On the other hand, Jimmy Carter appears to be a real deal Christian. I still think he was a dangerous President who did great harm.
Actions matter to me in a President, not his religion.
There is something very disturbing in the survey that should be rejected and rejected hard....
Twenty-eight percent of voters do not believe Muslims should be eligible to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court. Nearly one-third of the country thinks adherents of Islam should be barred from running for President
Look, people can think this but it's fundamentally un-American. Religious tests for public office are not only wrong, they are specifically prohibited by the Constitution.
We should not let our passions get the better of us.
Posted by: DrewM at
09:08 AM
| Comments (261)
Post contains 803 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: MaureenTheTemp at August 19, 2010 09:11 AM (8kq7+)
Posted by: real joe at August 19, 2010 09:12 AM (IpIBJ)
Some combination of this and "l'etat, c'est moi".
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 19, 2010 09:12 AM (wRH1k)
Everything he has done since he has become known nationally leads people to believe he is a Muslim.
How do we know he is NOT?
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 09:12 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: another njconservative at August 19, 2010 09:13 AM (ROSu7)
Personally, I suspect he's an atheist or maybe a deist who worships himself, but I really don't know because he's a big phony.
Posted by: forest at August 19, 2010 09:13 AM (sHmvf)
The bigger question is; why didnÂ’t the MSM go all out to correct misinformation about President Bush and VP Cheney?? For 8 long years they reported and talked about every conspiracy as if it could be true.
Instead they touted it, agitated for it, and even gave publicity to Michael MooreÂ’s conspiracy movie by ATTENDING the premere!
Posted by: pam at August 19, 2010 09:13 AM (h8R9p)
Posted by: real joe at August 19, 2010 09:13 AM (IpIBJ)
"He's an asshole - but even assholes have dreams." - Sam Lowry in BRAZIL
"Mine certainly does." - "Bob"
Posted by: Dr. Varno at August 19, 2010 09:13 AM (QMtmy)
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 09:13 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: jakeman at August 19, 2010 09:14 AM (8QmEC)
He certainly identifies with Islam, even if he can't be bothered with praying 5 times a day.
But let's face it, Muslims consider Obama a Muslim. His grandfather was Muslim, his father was Muslim by birth and he is Muslim by birth and never formally renounced Islam. Moreover, he went to a Muslim school as a young child. He's more Muslim than many Tehranians.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 19, 2010 09:14 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at August 19, 2010 09:15 AM (QBQcg)
Posted by: Reverend Jeremiah Wright at August 19, 2010 09:16 AM (AZGON)
1. Muslim daddy;
2. Years spent in a madrasa (Muslim school) as a yoot;
3. The "Indonesian street kid" crap;
4. The pilgrimage to Pock-ee-stohn;
5. Various pro-Muslim statements during campaign;
6. Various pro-Muslim statements and actions as president;
7. The infamous bow to the Saudi headman.
Not enough to convict, maybe, but enough to indict.
As for being a member of Rev. Wright's homey little Christian flock: Ol' Jeremiah is about as "Christian" as Fred Phelps.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 19, 2010 09:16 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Jollroger at August 19, 2010 09:16 AM (p7wY8)
I think Obama belongs to the Church of Obama.
No, that would be the Clintons, who were all about the Self.Which, in a way, was good, because when the GOP saved us in November 1994, The Clintonistas were able to traingulate and give us Welfare Reform (which the Obamunists have now undone) and halving the Captial Gains Tax.
It's worse than that--Obama worships at the Commie Whitey Hating Cult of Jeremiah Wright.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 09:16 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: dudeinsantacruz at August 19, 2010 09:17 AM (+lTxv)
BUT!!! BUT!!! "First Read" over at MSNBC states that Obama is MORE religious than Regan or H.W. Bush because....
...he gets daily Bible versus to his BlackBerry!
No, seriously, they say that:
"The big irony of this story: President Obama is more religious than Reagan or H.W. Bush ever was; in fact, he gets Bible verses sent to his blackberry EVERY DAY."
I didn't know those devices were around back then. Amazing!
Posted by: TriggerFinger at August 19, 2010 09:17 AM (zDK9Z)
I could care less whether Imam Obama is still a practicing Muslim, but I love just dropping it casually amongst my more liberal friends. They immediately go with the, "Stop trying to fear-monger" line.
I just calmly state, well, in Islam if your father is a Muslim, you're a Muslim (much like if your mom's Jewish, you're Jewish, they get this one as many of my NY liberal friends are Jews). Obama's father was a Muslim, his step-father was a Muslim, he was raised in the world's must populous Islamic nation and attended public school there, which in an Islamic nation is basically the Muslim equivalent of Catholic school.
They get it, but they'd always just brush it off. After the Ground Zero Victory Mosque flap, my seeds have begun to sprout...
Posted by: mugiwara at August 19, 2010 09:17 AM (KI/Ch)
My religion is the Church of Political Expediency, bitches.
Posted by: Barry Soetoro at August 19, 2010 09:17 AM (2vTWn)
Posted by: Ken Royall at August 19, 2010 09:17 AM (9zzk+)
I don't really care that much about the religious beliefs of public officials (except to the extent that it provides a window on their actions), but I do wish Obama would drop the charade. He joined Jeremiah Wright's church for personal advancement, and dumped it for personal advancement. Other than that, there's zero evidence that he believes in any of the basic elements of the Christian faith.
Posted by: Masturbatin' Pete at August 19, 2010 09:17 AM (9cbd0)
It was said that this past Christmas, there wouldnÂ’t have been any celebration at the White House if it hadnÂ’t been for the former White House social secretaries.
Obama is an agnostic. ItÂ’s what his mother taught him.
That whole Trinity Church thing was merely to get a sense of the “Black Experience” and gain some “street cred” .. nothing more.
Bush went to church periodically. So did Clinton, carrying his Bible.
Is there any record of President Obama going to church, temple or any kind of place of worship that wasn’t an “official function” or “campaign event” ?
A People's Temple .. and they all drank the Kool-Aid
Posted by: Neo at August 19, 2010 09:17 AM (tE8FB)
Posted by: ECM at August 19, 2010 09:18 AM (nYKDd)
Posted by: maddogg at August 19, 2010 09:19 AM (OlN4e)
But even among the president's allies, the numbers are shifting. In March 2009, 55% of Democrats said the president is a Christian, which he is.
And they're so positive about this because...?
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at August 19, 2010 09:19 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at August 19, 2010 09:19 AM (0q2P7)
Could've sworn Obama said he didn't know how to use one.
Posted by: what? that? at August 19, 2010 09:19 AM (w9BEi)
Well, technically, Obama is more Muslim than Jonah Goldberg is Jewish.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 19, 2010 09:19 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at August 19, 2010 09:20 AM (w9BEi)
I've never seen the media try to clarify common misconceptions or falsehoods about conservatives or anyone or anything else for that matter as much as they do about Obama.
It's pathetic.
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at August 19, 2010 09:20 AM (JNqU9)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 19, 2010 09:21 AM (IKf7L)
...it's the kind of religion a leftist would be more in tune with in America. It's the minority religion, fighting to gain a foothold within the existing political and cultural power structure of America.
Drew,
More than that, it's been stated authoritatively that "Islam" means "submission." I mean, you're signing the progglodytes' song right there.
Cordially...
Posted by: Rick at August 19, 2010 09:21 AM (HbWhE)
I get Viagra spam sent to my e-mail address every day, too. Doesn't make me a pr0n star...
Posted by: Drumwaster at August 19, 2010 09:21 AM (dWFSK)
I think it's silly because he could come out tomorrow and say he's making the Haj to Mecca and I'd still think he is a dangerous President who has done great harm to the nation. It simply wouldn't matter much.
On the other hand, Jimmy Carter appears to be a real deal Christian. I still think he was a dangerous President who did great harm.
Actions matter to me in a President, not his religion.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 09:21 AM (X/Lqh)
No, Timothy Treadwell and the grizzlies is more apt. It won't end well.
Posted by: pep at August 19, 2010 09:22 AM (YXmuI)
55% of Democrats said the president is a Christian, which he is.
He's a Christian, like the Westboro Baptist Church "people" are Christians.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at August 19, 2010 09:22 AM (hsBue)
Something is terribly wrong in this country - and we all know what it is.
Posted by: ghost707 at August 19, 2010 09:22 AM (BNk7G)
Posted by: the Butcher at August 19, 2010 09:23 AM (8g9qq)
If Obama were to publicly renounce his fathers faith, he would be considered an apostate, with a life expectancy I would not wish to conjecture on.
So he has to play his middle of the road - "present" position.
Are you asking me to put myself on a cross?
Posted by: Imam Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama at August 19, 2010 09:23 AM (w9BEi)
"I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United Stated to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear" - Barack Hussein Obama
Now change 'Islam' to any of the following and tell me the shit wouldn't have hit the fan.
Christianity
Catholicism
Hinduism
Mormonism
etc.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at August 19, 2010 09:24 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 19, 2010 09:25 AM (IKf7L)
No, Timothy Treadwell and the grizzlies is more apt. It won't end well.
That depends on your point of view. The bear was quite happy.
Posted by: maddogg at August 19, 2010 09:25 AM (OlN4e)
I think Obama belongs to the Church of Obama.
Posted by: MaureenTheTemp
I agree with this.
Posted by: Deathknyte at August 19, 2010 09:25 AM (aOlAh)
From "Obama" to "Soetoro" and back? Or from "Barry" to "Barack"?
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 19, 2010 09:26 AM (wDKwf)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 19, 2010 09:27 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Hey.Wheres.Barry at August 19, 2010 09:28 AM (gQLr2)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at August 19, 2010 09:29 AM (QBQcg)
1. Has he ever suggested or is there any evidence that he was ever baptized? Maybe there is in his books but I am unaware of it and I am sure the general public is.
2. He definitely sees the Koran as a holy book and Mohammad as a Prophet. At least in a sense that leftists use the words Holy and Prophet. Most Christians do not any more than they do Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon. The Koran is mutually exclusive with the Bible so one of them is false. The Koran specifically says it is the Bible. Tolerating Islam for a Christian is unsurprising and expected but to give it real credence suggests you either believe Islam or don't take religion seriously. With Obama's public stances toward Islam it isn't surprising many people believe it's the former where he is concerned.
Posted by: Rocks at August 19, 2010 09:29 AM (Q1lie)
But beliefs (religious as well as political) can often be used as predictors of behavior, Drew.
I wouldn't give a shit about Osama Obama's religion if it didn't appear to be an integral part of his insane hate-America agenda. I didn't care about any other president's religion. In a theoretical sense, it is as irrelevant as race or gender when making electoral decisions.
It's just one piece in the puzzle that is the Traitor-in-Chief. Not the most important one, by a long shot.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 19, 2010 09:29 AM (Ulu3i)
I'll tell people I think Obama is a Raëlian if it erodes his image.
Whatever it takes to destroy Obama and get him the fuck out of the White House is A-OK with me.
Posted by: no mr. bond, i expect you to die at August 19, 2010 09:29 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 19, 2010 01:27 PM (AZGON)
Oh, we got a million of them, including but not limited to:
1. One of the girls having some sort of syndrome
2. Michelle having some form of cancer
3. Barry having Parkinson's disease
4. Michelle having an affair with Michael Dorn
5. Barry having an affair with Kel
Posted by: MFM at August 19, 2010 09:29 AM (LdYLm)
the president is a Christian, which he is
I like how they repeat that a couple of times. As if repeating something enough times will make it so. As others above have so eloquently said, Obama worships Obama, God, any God takes a back seat to him in his world view. Remember he made the oceans stop rising etc.
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at August 19, 2010 09:30 AM (RZ8pf)
I get Viagra spam sent to my e-mail address every day, too. Doesn't make me a pr0n star...
Yeah, like all the mailing lists I sign up for then religiously delete without reading every day. Because I 'care', I go that extra mile to read the subject.
One sentence baby, that's all you get, and it better not be a very long sente....
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at August 19, 2010 09:30 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: maddogg at August 19, 2010 09:30 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde (the old ... err ... original one) at August 19, 2010 09:30 AM (fwGpz)
No he wouldn't. Muslims are permitted to lie about this to protect themselves or deceive infidels.
So him claiming to NOT be a Muslim publically could be interpreted as a politically expedient lie by Muslims, and in fact, that's EXACTLY how noted Muslim theologian (snark) Muammar Gaddafi of Libya described Obama publically (that he's a Muslim pretending to be a Christian).
Now in fact, I don't believe Obama is a "practicing" Muslim, though I think its empirically obvious by his actions that he is sympathetic to Muslims.
More to the point, I don't give a rat's ass whether Obama is or isn't a Muslim (Christian, Zoroastrian, Satanist, whatever). What matters is how he's managing the economy, foreign, and domestic policy.
Posted by: looking closely at August 19, 2010 09:30 AM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: Rat Patrol at August 19, 2010 09:31 AM (dQdrY)
The question of whether the Indonesian Imbecile IS a muslim is deceptive. No one knows what he IS. The question is how he grew up and what his sensibilities are. In that, that answer is easy and definitive - he grew up a muslim and has muslim sensibilities (with a noted lack of any American sensibilities).
"I was a little Jakarta street kid." -- The Indonesian Imbecile
It's nice how he expressed his feeling that the muslim call to prayer was "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." And yet, no one managed to ask him about hearing that "pretty sound" five times a day at Ground Zero if the mosque he supports goes up.
It's funny how the Indonesian speaks Bahasa (and some arabic, I would gather) but you have never heard him say one word in those languages, even after he tried to chide America for not speaking foreign languages. All he could manage in that discussion was to say "Mercy buckets," when he could have impressed everyone with knowledge of truly exotic languages. Lucky for him that the MFM and other cowards covered for him.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 19, 2010 09:31 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde (the old ... err ... original one) at August 19, 2010 01:30 PM (fwGpz)
I get up every morning at 10:30 and spend at least 30 minutes flexing my abs in the mirror
Posted by: Barack Mussolini Obama at August 19, 2010 09:32 AM (LdYLm)
Is Marxism a religion?
The State as God is all they know.
People believe in it despite the fact that all practical, experimental, and theoretical data shows its major premises to be false...
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at August 19, 2010 09:33 AM (0q2P7)
Yeah, but that used to be Buddhism. Buddhism was the cool "other" religion. It had all sorts of things that the left likes: It's flexible, it's introspective. But the problem is that it doesn't fit with leftism because, by and large, Buddhist cultures are successful. Or at least, not poisonously self destructive.
The thing about Islam is that it will always be a basket case. The only successful Muslims are those who break hard with Islamic traditions. So, Islam fits the bill because it is the religion of the oppressed. Lefties like that, makes them feel useful and lets them feel that warm glow of condescending paternalism.
The other thing is the Stockholm syndrome. Islam succeeds because it will kill you if you oppose it. I flicked past MSNBC discussing the end of combat ops in Iraq and there was some dummy opining that we "opened up a hornet's nest". Muslims aren't people in the left's view, they're animals. And as dangerous animals, if we leave them alone, they'll eat us last. So Islam gets placated.
Hindus? Nah. Buddhists? Nah. Jews? No way. Only the violent religion gets dispensation.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 19, 2010 09:33 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 19, 2010 01:29 PM (Ulu3i)
In general sure, but not in specific cases. There are a long line of very religious (and overtly so) people who have done terrible things, morally, legally and politically.
I think Obama's record (such as it was) and his words during the campaign were enough of a clue. He could have been the most pious Christian gentleman in the world and I still wouldn't have voted for him.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 09:34 AM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: democrat taking his ball home at August 19, 2010 09:35 AM (w9BEi)
Posted by: Wonder O, building paper bridges 8 ways at August 19, 2010 09:35 AM (Lz//J)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at August 19, 2010 09:36 AM (QBQcg)
John 3:16 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not....
<del>
Posted by: The Presidents Blackberry MtM at August 19, 2010 09:36 AM (0q2P7)
Don't mistake his lying to get some fake "Other" cred with Whitey for self-revelation.
We know this: He hates us, and Muslims aren't us, so regardless of any specific attachment he may have to them, which is unknown and unknowable to us, he's effectively more with them than with us.
Posted by: oblig. at August 19, 2010 09:36 AM (x7Ao8)
Not necessarily a direct correlation.
Posted by: Jimmy Carter at August 19, 2010 09:37 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 19, 2010 09:37 AM (AZGON)
Regardless of what he is, it is interesting to note the 8% shift in Independents thinking on this issue. Couple that with other shifts in views of how he is doing with the economy etc. and it is becoming obvious that he is in real trouble, trouble that it will be very difficult for the MSM to bail him out of. So do they double down, or do they begin to turn on him?
Or, as someone suggested up above, is there a health scare or some other concern they are holding in reserve to flip sympathy back to him?
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at August 19, 2010 09:37 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: The Presidents Blackberry MtM at August 19, 2010 09:37 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 19, 2010 09:38 AM (UOM48)
Personally, I suspect he's an atheist or maybe a deist who worships himself, but I really don't know because he's a big phony.
Most. Transparent. Administration. EVAH!!!
Like his birth certificate, he could stop all this by telling the truth. But, it serves him better to paint the people asking questions about motivations for asking 'stupid' questions, thereby 1) never answering the question and 2) putting the questioner on the defensive.
Posted by: CUS at August 19, 2010 09:38 AM (wOGfT)
He's just a dick. And he'd be a dick regardless of faith .... fill in the blank ... christian, jewish, muslim, scientologist ... that second word will always be dick!
Posted by: Rob at August 19, 2010 09:38 AM (GvYeG)
Yeah, rich stepfather and private schools. If "street" means "cul-de-sac in a gated neighborhood" then maybe.
Posted by: Jimmy Carter at August 19, 2010 09:38 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at August 19, 2010 09:38 AM (HaYO4)
True but the eastern religions don't work well for radical lefties like Obama because they don't have a political/action element like Islam does.
Buddhism is great for gas bag celebrities but it's to wishy-washy for the vanguard of political change. Guys like Obama want to fight ("get in their faces") and "remake" stuff. For that you need a muscular and proselytizing religion like Islam.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 09:38 AM (X/Lqh)
I personally don't care what he is, but, when the man gives orders to the head of NASA to prioritize an outreach program to Muslim nations and cancels the Space Shuttle replacement program, one has to wonder what the heck is going on.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at August 19, 2010 09:38 AM (BuYeH)
OT I'd like to whine about all the Moonbeam ads I'm getting here.
Why? Personally, I love it. I click on the Moonbat ads every time, to suck more $ out of their campaign coffers. Never miss the opportunity to fuck the leftists every day, even if it's a penny at a time.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 19, 2010 09:38 AM (P9+0W)
Look, people can think this but it's fundamentally un-American. Religious tests for public office are not only wrong, they are specifically prohibited by the Constitution.
We should not let our passions get the better of us.
True, but what a particular person uses as qualifications are up to them. Religions are clues (not determinative, since there is a lot of variance, but there is a mean) to a person's values and hence actions. I don't want a constitutional or legal barring of muslims from anything. I do want voters or nominators to give them closer scrutiny.
Posted by: Randy at August 19, 2010 09:39 AM (zQKSr)
Oh, we got a million of them, including but not limited to:
1. One of the girls having some sort of syndrome
2. Michelle having some form of cancer
3. Barry having Parkinson's disease
4. Michelle having an affair with Michael Dorn
5. Barry having an affair with Kel
Posted by: MFM at August 19, 2010 01:29 PM (LdYLm)
8. Michelle unable to find underwear large enough to fit
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at August 19, 2010 09:39 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: El Precedente at August 19, 2010 09:39 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 01:34 PM
Agreed, Drew.
Of course the argument could be made that if Osama Obama had been a "pious Christian gentleman" he wouldn't be the past-concealing, treasonous liar he is today.
But your point is well taken.
It amazes me to this day that the Foolish 52% couldn't see the web of deceit and obfuscation woven around the Mohammedan Mouthpiece.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 19, 2010 09:40 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: joejm65 at August 19, 2010 09:40 AM (DRcw3)
Posted by: Mr Pink at August 19, 2010 09:40 AM (yg/4o)
Sweet.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 19, 2010 09:40 AM (UOM48)
I guess they really didn't want to have to report that number.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 19, 2010 09:40 AM (bwV3l)
10. Scientology
9. Creativity Movement (- sleeper agent)
8. Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth
7. Nation of Yahweh
6. Church of All Worlds
5. Universe People
4. Church of the SubGenius
3. Prince Philip Movement (sleeper agent since he hates the British)
2. The Church of Euthanasia
1. Nuwaubianism
Here is a list of some of the more unusual Nuwaubian beliefs:
1. It is important to bury the afterbirth so that Satan does not use it to make a duplicate of the recently-born child
2. Furthermore, some aborted fetuses survive their abortion to live in
the sewers, where they are being gathered and organized to take over the
world
3. People were once perfectly symmetrical and ambidextrous, but then a meteorite struck Earth and tilted its axis causing handedness and shifting the heart off-center in the chest
4. Each of us has seven clones living in different parts of the world
5. Women existed for many generations before they invented men through genetic manipulation
6. Homo sapiens is the result of cloning experiments that were done on Mars using Homo erectus
7. Nikola Tesla came from the planet Venus
8. The Illuminati have nurtured a child, SatanÂ’s son, who was born on 6
June 1966 at the Dakota House on 72nd Street in New York to Jacqueline
Kennedy Onassis of the Rothschild/Kennedy families. The Pope was present
at the birth and performed necromantic ceremonies. The child was raised
by former U.S. president Richard Nixon and now lives in Belgium, where
it is hooked up bodily to a computer called “The Beast 3M” or “3666.”
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at August 19, 2010 09:40 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: dagny at August 19, 2010 09:40 AM (p6SOt)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at August 19, 2010 09:40 AM (QBQcg)
OT I'd like to whine about all the Moonbeam ads I'm getting here.
Why? Personally, I love it. I click on the Moonbat ads every time, to suck more $ out of their campaign coffers. Never miss the opportunity to fuck the leftists every day, even if it's a penny at a time.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 19, 2010 01:38 PM (P9+0W)
Exactly. I click on ads all the time because it also helps out Ace.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at August 19, 2010 09:40 AM (YVZlY)
"Democrats said the president is a Christian, which he is."
Obama has distain for people who "cling" to Bibles.
Posted by: Speller at August 19, 2010 09:41 AM (qaOKJ)
Posted by: The Presidents Blackberry MtM at August 19, 2010 09:41 AM (0q2P7)
Is there any other such a muscular and proselytizing religion? Islam is very much like Marxism, but other than those two, what else do you have? Jehovah's witnesses?
Posted by: AmishDude at August 19, 2010 09:41 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Jimmy Carter at August 19, 2010 01:38 PM (T0NGe)
You can die in peace now Jimmah. You will NOT go down in history as the worst. Satan's barbed leftard probe is erect and waiting.....
Posted by: maddogg at August 19, 2010 09:41 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 19, 2010 09:41 AM (AZGON)
Good Point
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at August 19, 2010 09:42 AM (0q2P7)
This is like Pelosi saying that her favorite word is "The Word" and then turn around and try to usurp liberties at every opportunity.
Posted by: AE at August 19, 2010 09:42 AM (1bZ96)
8. Michelle unable to find underwear large enough to fit
"Now that man I'd hate to fight. Cause she wears underwear with dick-holes in 'em."Posted by: Silky Johnson at August 19, 2010 09:43 AM (wDKwf)
Not enough to convict, maybe, but enough to indict.
And a Grand Jury will indict a ham sandwich. Sorta ironic here.
Posted by: dagny at August 19, 2010 09:43 AM (p6SOt)
Barry's daily Bible verse probably runs a lot like this
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need (or needs)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 19, 2010 09:43 AM (1Jaio)
And still you won't believe us.
One of these days, even you stupid clods will figure this out: JUST ACCEPT WHAT WE TELL YOU. Because we're, like, objective 'n' stuff.
Posted by: The MFM at August 19, 2010 09:44 AM (4YUWF)
Posted by: The Presidents Blackberry MtM at August 19, 2010 09:44 AM (0q2P7)
Got yet hope an' change right here, pal...
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at August 19, 2010 09:44 AM (IkEhE)
Posted by: Nighhawk at August 19, 2010 09:45 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: garrett at August 19, 2010 09:46 AM (bQ9pF)
Posted by: The Presidents Blackberry MtM at August 19, 2010 09:46 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Rob at August 19, 2010 09:46 AM (GvYeG)
Grover mutha fraking Norquist says our own lemming-like behaviour has already condemned us.
Grover
f--king
Norquist
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 19, 2010 09:46 AM (RkRxq)
I get up every morning at 10:30 and spend at least 30 minutes flexing my abs in the mirror
Posted by: Barack Mussolini Obama at August 19, 2010 01:32 PM (LdYLm)
Odumbass is just observing "The Call to Prayer Stare"
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at August 19, 2010 09:46 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: dagny at August 19, 2010 09:47 AM (p6SOt)
<del>
Posted by: The Presidents Blackberry MtM at August 19, 2010 09:47 AM (0q2P7)
Islam is a choice. It's a set of core values and ideas. It's not like race or nationality or sex... it really is extremely relevant to who a person is.
A person who picks a certain religion can be criticized, logically, for that.
It's just that the government should stay out of the discussion. It shouldn't have a list of which kooky religions are unacceptable. Some mistake that limitation of government as some kind of statement that religion isn't relevant, doesn't matter, to who a person, or even worse, that all religions are equal.
But they aren't equal and it does matter.
I wouldn't elect a Muslim to the presidency unless they really demonstrated some kind of moderation of their views. Their religion views would matter quite a bit, anyway.
Posted by: Da Death Panels! at August 19, 2010 09:48 AM (dUOK+)
"OT I'd like to whine about all the Moonbeam ads I'm getting here."
And I'd like to complain about all the Canadian ads. How does this blog know I work for Canadians? Is it possessed by magic demons, eh?
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at August 19, 2010 09:48 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 19, 2010 01:40 PM (Ulu3i)
Two words....Robert Hanssen.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 09:50 AM (X/Lqh)
(The one where he's tanking)
Posted by: Dave C at August 19, 2010 09:50 AM (W8f0O)
<del>
Posted by: The Presidents Blackberry MtM at August 19, 2010 09:50 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: MFM at August 19, 2010 09:50 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 19, 2010 09:50 AM (IKf7L)
There is something very disturbing in the survey that should be rejected and rejected hard....
Twenty-eight percent of voters do not believe Muslims should be eligible to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court. Nearly one-third of the country thinks adherents of Islam should be barred from running for President
Bullshit. Muslims believe in Sharia law, which conflicts with our rule of law. That alone should exclude Muslims from serving on the Supreme Court.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at August 19, 2010 09:51 AM (YVZlY)
First of all, islam isn't a religion. It's an aggressive, expansionist, belligerent, violent political ideology that demands the power of State everywhere. Other than stories plagiarized from the Old and New Testaments (and perverted by mohammed), there is nothing in islam that qualifies in the Western sense of "religion". That said, we don't make laws barring adherents of idiotic and toxic political ideologies from running for Pres or sitting on the SCOTUS (lest the libtards have no one available to them). But, we are supposed to exercise good judgment and reject un-American foreign influences (as the Founders were VERY KEEN about).
There was no need for any "religious test" for the Indonesian Imbecile - though everyone pretending that his name wasn't 'hussein' was not helpful to America. He was ineligible because he held other citizenships and should have never been allowed into the dem primary. But ... certain people were scared to broach that issue (*wink, wink*).
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 19, 2010 09:51 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: polynikes at August 19, 2010 01:49 PM (m2CN7)
Ya know, I'm feeling cheated here, we never got a Druish president.
Posted by: Dark Helmet at August 19, 2010 09:51 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: The Little Red Devotional of O at August 19, 2010 09:52 AM (Lz//J)
As to Obama's religion, what springs to mind is,
"Some people just want to watch the world burn."
Posted by: Randy at August 19, 2010 09:52 AM (zQKSr)
Posted by: Cicero at August 19, 2010 09:53 AM (QKKT0)
Anyone who wants to hold public office should be put under close scrutiny, including verification of citizenship/school records/claimed accomplishments/associates.
No one should ever be eligible to hold a public post with as murky a past as Osama Obama's.
Not sure I agree that there is a "need to know" when it comes to religion, at least when a candidate demonstrates a certain level of lifetime ethical behavior (something else the Mohammedan Mouthpiece hasn't shown).
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 19, 2010 09:53 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 19, 2010 09:53 AM (AZGON)
Republicans .... have made gains among Jewish voters; 33% now identify or lean Republican, up from 20% in 2008.
Black Protestants favor the Democrats by a wide margin. Fully 86% of black Protestants say they will vote Democratic, while just 7% say they will support the Republican candidate, which is little changed from this point in the 2006 campaign.
Religiously unaffiliated voters currently favor the Democrats over the Republicans by a 49%-36% margin. Among this group, those who describe themselves as atheists and agnostics are largely loyal to the Democratic Party (64% favor Democrats, 27% favor Republicans).
So, about that whole strategy of victory through appealing to Blacks and the "Freethinkers"....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 19, 2010 09:54 AM (bwV3l)
Posted by: Fresh Air at August 19, 2010 09:55 AM (mQ6sV)
Short Answer: Maybe
Long Answer: I thought in the wake of 9/11 (and I mean literally on that day, it was one of my first thoughts) we should have halted immigration from all Muslim nations until we could investigate all visa and green card holders from terror sponsoring nations (and I'd include Saudi Arabia and other 'friendly' nations).
I haven't thought about it much recently and it would depend on how they were treated differently. I would definitely support tighter screening for visitor visas as a start.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 09:55 AM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: MikeinAmman at August 19, 2010 09:55 AM (elcpe)
"Many Americans believe Obama is a Muslim...WHICH HE IS NOT!" she whined.
"Fair and balanced" tips the scale in favor of the politically correct. As usual.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 19, 2010 09:56 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: kathysaysso at August 19, 2010 09:56 AM (ZtwUX)
Someone who believes in a legal system that is 100% against everything in the Constitution and who's religious belief requires them to believe that such system is superior to all legal systems should be barred from the Supreme Court.
Posted by: jimmuy at August 19, 2010 09:56 AM (WFbbb)
Posted by: tomshup at August 19, 2010 09:58 AM (rns8t)
My personal hunch is that Obama is an atheist/agnostic, and as such he sees Islam and Christianity as two sides of the same coin. Not a lot of respect for either religion, but at the same time, doesn't see why Christianity should be preferred over Islam.
The problem with this is that the two religions are not morally equivalent. They are two very different philosophies with two very different manifestations in American and world culture. Sharia goes against everything America stands for, which is why, of course, so many Americans fear Muslim influence in our government.
Posted by: amosjo at August 19, 2010 09:58 AM (F7x/F)
Posted by: The MFM at August 19, 2010 09:59 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: motionview at August 19, 2010 10:01 AM (zRbkQ)
I prefer to think of these poll responses as a form of spontaneous folk art. Maybe the first eruption of transgressive folk art in history.
Think of the birthers and "he's a Muslim" types as transgressive performance artists. Sort of like the painters who smear dung on pictures of the Virgin Mary. They arte challenging stale pieties.
In this case, the piety is that the press vets the candidates and informs the public about their biography and their ideology.
Posted by: craig henry at August 19, 2010 10:03 AM (ONjos)
Re#5 Vic
"Everything he has done since he has become known nationally leads people to believe he is a Muslim.
How do we know he is NOT?"
He takes positions on homosexuality that no Muslim would. I know that he spoke against gay marriage during his campaign, but everybody knows that he didn't really mean it.
I understand that he was raised as a Muslim early in life and the reason he won't release his birth certificate is that it probably states "Muslim" as his religion as his father was Muslim and his mother wasn't religious.
I don't doubt that he considered himself a Muslim for quite a while.
I don't hold any of these things against him.
Like most leftists, his ideology is his religion. His "conversion" to what he thinks is Christianity is almost certainly a matter of convenience.
The journey from Muslim to leftist wasn't a long one. They share a mutual hatred of freedom and the left is actually worse in this regard than Muslims are.
I have theory about "extremist Muslims". People think that they are Muslims who take the Koran too seriously. I think that they are really a hybrid of Islam and leftist ideology. Listen to some of the stuff OBL says in his videos. Trim it down some and he could have been several of my college professors. People wonder why these people believe what they do in spite of receiving a western education.
I don't think "in spite of".
I think "because of".
Posted by: RayJ at August 19, 2010 10:03 AM (//Bcg)
Posted by: roguewave at August 19, 2010 10:04 AM (1qwru)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at August 19, 2010 10:06 AM (QBQcg)
Posted by: memomachine at August 19, 2010 10:08 AM (MwCol)
He was raised a Muslim and it shaped his world. He may not have been very active in his time in Hawaii but lots of high schoolers ignore religion for a while. When he go to college he went to Pakistan with a Muslim. Who knows where else he went while he was there (Mecca/Medina anyone). He said in his book that he would stand with the Muslims. When he decided he wanted to run for office, he found Wright Church of Hatetm which is about as Christian as a KKK rally.
As was said earlier:
First of all, islam isn't a religion. It's an aggressive, expansionist, belligerent, violent political ideology that demands the power of State everywhere.
Islam is more a political idea than a religious one. A fucking dangerous political idea at that.
Posted by: Hedgehog at August 19, 2010 10:08 AM (oQIfB)
Posted by: John Galt at August 19, 2010 10:10 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Vyceroy at August 19, 2010 10:11 AM (lwgcM)
Just wait until "canopfor" moves over here! Then the comments will not only be short and stupid, but untranslatable as well.
A vast majority of morons and moronettes are at least coherent, even when they present diverging views.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 19, 2010 10:11 AM (Ulu3i)
That has more to do with his academic ideology than his faith, though.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at August 19, 2010 10:11 AM (PQY7w)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 19, 2010 10:12 AM (bwV3l)
Posted by: The Little Red Devotional of O at August 19, 2010 10:13 AM (Lz//J)
Posted by: Jean at August 19, 2010 10:14 AM (LqcF2)
Posted by: Hedgehog at August 19, 2010 10:14 AM (oQIfB)
Jul 21-Aug 5 %
34 Christian
** Jewish
18 Muslim (include Islam/Islamic)
01 Buddhist
** Hindu
** Atheist
** Agnostic
02 Something else
43 DonÂ’t know
02 Refused
Buddhist? Duuuuude!
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 19, 2010 10:18 AM (bwV3l)
But to hear the MFM and others declare that "he isn't a muslim" is just ridiculous and pisses people off. They won't even admit that he was born and raised a muslim. But that is all beside the point. Many people are calling him "muslim" when they really want to say that he is "third world", since the two are not far apart on most issues. His English clearly shows a non-American quality (he screws up well-known idiomatic expressions and introduces ones that Americans have never heard of, along with making gaffes that no American would make) and language is the deepest part of a person's personality (that we get to see on the surface).
And, Drew, to your point about what is un-American, there is nothing more un-American than islam, except a third world mentality, of course.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 19, 2010 10:18 AM (Qp4DT)
That's a plan. It would eliminate the most dangerous group of all...vegetarians.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 10:19 AM (X/Lqh)
The previous group of talking heads said the same thing. Let's not forget that Saudi investors bought into Fox last year.
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 10:20 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: eman at August 19, 2010 10:23 AM (Nw/hR)
It would be an interesting question to ask "Do you think the President has a positive view of Islam?" and "Do you?"
Hard to see how anyone paying attention could say other than yes & no respectively.
Posted by: Randy at August 19, 2010 10:23 AM (zQKSr)
Posted by: Crusty at August 19, 2010 10:23 AM (GvSpB)
"Obama's religion is the state."
Deen wa dawla?
If you want to merge religion and state, have I got a religion for you!
Posted by: President Obama at August 19, 2010 10:31 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Pavel at August 19, 2010 10:32 AM (bRdb3)
Posted by: tomshup at August 19, 2010 01:58 PM (rns8t)
You are right. Most American's don't know that Islam invented algebra, astronomy, calculus, all of our modern day knowledge of electrisity and genetics, plus the microwave and the microwavable popcorn bags.
You can ask Purple Avenger about the electrisity stuff. He's an electritian and posted about this several times.
Posted by: ed at August 19, 2010 10:35 AM (Zsqn4)
This Christian would prefer a Muslim president to someone who spent 20 years in the United Church of the Zeitgeist.
Posted by: Christopher Johnson at August 19, 2010 10:37 AM (FN39A)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at August 19, 2010 10:38 AM (WZFkG)
Posted by: Jean at August 19, 2010 10:39 AM (LqcF2)
Trinity United CC is founded on the philosophy of James Cone who wrote:
Black Theology and Black Power and A Black Theology of Liberation
Trinity United CC's founder is the famous Jeremiah Wright.
Wright was an acolyte of Louis Farrakhan.
Posted by: Beto at August 19, 2010 10:42 AM (j5CHE)
I think the problem people have with Muslims in office is that Islam specifically forbids a practicing Muslim from putting anything before Islam. Including the Constitution. Everything, and everything, must submit before sharia law.
If Catholics or Protestants said that the Bible MUST supersede all other Constitutional laws, people would have a problem with appointing them as judges, government officials, etc.
It's not an animus against Muslims, it's taking Muslims at their word.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at August 19, 2010 10:48 AM (eNxMU)
Could any real Christian church give a lifetime achievement award to the racist hate-monger Farakhan? A man who describes white people as "potential human beings"?
Good to know I have potential.
Posted by: Barry O at August 19, 2010 10:49 AM (+ABdJ)
~ed
This is to put you to some feckin knowledge, ed.
Posted by: Speller at August 19, 2010 10:52 AM (qaOKJ)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at August 19, 2010 10:52 AM (0rUbC)
Posted by: tomshup at August 19, 2010 01:58 PM (rns8t)
We know enough.
Posted by: The 3000 9/11 Victims at August 19, 2010 10:53 AM (ZGdhe)
Posted by: sexypig at August 19, 2010 10:56 AM (0t7L8)
Posted by: sexypig at August 19, 2010 10:59 AM (0t7L8)
Well, Obama may not be Christian, Muslim or Jew, but he is a montheist. He believes in one God: himself.
He has not, that I recall, expressed any belief whatsoever in Christ before or after taking office, despite attending a racist, "Christian" church for over 20 years. Which implies that he believes in black racism, but not Christianity.
He has routinely expressed immense faith in himself.
Posted by: Wilkey at August 19, 2010 11:13 AM (tBrQI)
The we-are-the-worldish, God is Love Christians - Jimmy Carter, W - scare the shit out of me almost as much as the self-worshippers like Odogma and Clinton.
But give me a Christian or Jew any day who still believes in the vengeful, sometimes erratic God of the Old Testament, too, and is not embarrassed by it - that's the kind of leader we need.
The problem with electing even Christian leaders today is that too many of them are blinded by all the silliness about the apple, the ark, and the animal sacrifices to see that there's real value in the Old Testament.
Posted by: Wilkey at August 19, 2010 11:19 AM (tBrQI)
#172 -- you could also add to your list the time Obama was being interviewed by George Stephanopolous and "mistakenly" referred to "my Muslim faith" -- before quickly being "corrected" by helpful (and completely objective journalist) George.
I personally don't believe Obama is a Muslim, but I do believe he's an ignorant, arrogant, narcissistic putz who doesn't belong anywhere near the White House. Obama only lives there now because of Axelrod's slick marketing campaign, Obama's own willingness to lie about anything and everything, a pathetically weak Republican opponent, a crotch-sniffing MSM that worked feverishly to cover over Obama's many deficiencies, and, last but not least, a lazy and gullible electorate (or at least 52% of them were).
Posted by: AZC at August 19, 2010 11:41 AM (P/M3M)
Look, people can think this [Twenty-eight percent of voters do not believe Muslims should be eligible to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court.] but it's fundamentally un-American.
Religious tests for public office are not only wrong, they are
specifically prohibited by the Constitution.
Yes, that's a religious test for public office, and yes, the ban on religious tests is necessary for freedom of religion. It is, simultaneously, a fatal flaw against religions with over-arching political ambitions. The problem is that Sharia-law Islam does not admit the same limitations on its reach and authority that Catholics, the various Protestant churches or any other minority religion have admitted since the founding of the nation. And Islamists seem to have figured out the same thing Saul Alinsky did, that demanding that basically decent organizations live up to their own published rules even in ridiculous situations is an effective weapon against them.
The solution might be, before things ever get that far, to develop an effective secular political test to weed out terrorist apologists and political Islamists. Unfortunately liberals seem to determined to disallow any discussion of that from polite discourse. I predict that 28% figure will only rise as time goes on, unless a real discussion about political Islam preempts it.
Posted by: Dave R. at August 19, 2010 11:44 AM (Z0NIv)
No silliness in those stories, Wikey.
The apple story: stay away from snakes and the women who hang around them.
The ark: be prepared for natural disasters.
The animal sacrifice: eat lots of red meat and be thankful.
These are all good lessons.
Posted by: swineherd at August 19, 2010 11:45 AM (yC+Oc)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at August 19, 2010 12:22 PM (5Plp1)
Black Muslim faith and Islam are-though closer today than 50 years ago-two different animals. Jeremiah Wright is a Black Muslim in the pulpit of a UCC "Christian" congregation. O'Mamba is a thoroughgoing dilettante who, if he could be pinned down, probably could not correctly define any creed to which he might, just possibly, assent in his heart of hearts.
About a year back, following Cairo, a Muslim Brotherhood member called him a "Muslim renegade", i.e., an unorthodox believer. I'd say that's definitive.
Posted by: gary gulrud at August 19, 2010 12:31 PM (/g2vP)
"Religious tests for public office are not only wrong, they are specifically prohibited by the Constitution. "
See today's Roger Kimball post. Islam does not admit of separation between 'Church and State', 'Freedom of Speech', 'Equal under the Law'. Try again Pilgrim.
Posted by: gary gulrud at August 19, 2010 12:34 PM (/g2vP)
Posted by: louis tully at August 19, 2010 12:36 PM (K/USr)
Dude, "Muslim" is a race, you get the gene from your father.
/not sarcasm
Posted by: Druid at August 19, 2010 12:37 PM (9bSMF)
Once again, I find progressoverpeace's arguments convincing and vote that he gets promoted to co-blogger.
Fundamentalist Islam is NOT a religion, it is a hostile, expansionist, totalitarian political philosophy masquerading as one.
Posted by: SGT Dan at August 19, 2010 01:01 PM (GgXZc)
What size shoe does President Obama wear ?
Do you believe that President Obama speaks funny ?
Do you believe that President Obama is color blind ?
Do you believe that President Obama is into kinky sex ?
Do you believe that President Obama cheats on his taxes ?
Does President Obama really have 6 fingers on one hand ?
Do you believe that President Obama is now or may have been in the past a Communist ?
Do you believe that President Obama may have been the Oracle at Delphi in a past life ?
Do you believe that President Obama may be a space alien ?
Posted by: Neo at August 19, 2010 01:03 PM (tE8FB)
I used to take Obama at his word that he was a Christian. But not since his "bitter clingers" speech. No genuine Christian would say that about other Christians. And if their speechwriter told them to say it, they would refuse.
That speech in one moment revealed whatObama really is--a self-styled sophisticate who views anyone with religious convictions as a superstitious rube.
Posted by: Average Jen at August 19, 2010 01:08 PM (rfKpY)
~ed
This is to put you to some feckin knowledge, ed.
Posted by: Speller at August 19, 2010 02:52 PM (qaOKJ)
Hey, I went to your link, "Speller", if indeed that is your name. It was real informative.
But I noticed that it didn't address my point that Islam invented the microwaveable popcorn bag.
So, this seems to be a rather GLARING flow in your agrument, hmmm?
Admit it, Islam invented Al-gebra, which was necessary to discover astronomy and the stars, which lead to Calculus (which is why schools make you take algebra before calculus), which then lead to electrisity. And after electrisity, Islam discovered genetics, cuz you can't turn on ElectronicMicroscopes to discover genetics without ELECTRISITY. Ask Mendel. He was the one who wrote the paper about DNA and RNA at the University of Gallapgos.
And becuase of this Islamic knowledge of electrisity, we got the microwave oven which used to be called the...wait for it... Electronic Oven. And our knowledge of genetics let us genetically modify popcorn to pop in a microwave oven. Which is why you can't get microwaveable popcorn in Europe, because they don't allow importation of GeneticallyModified Foods, or FrankenFoods as they call them. Which is evidnece of their Islamophbia.
So, following my above logical train, you can see why my statement, Islam invented the Microwaveable Popcorn Bag. All based off of the wisdom of the Koran and the Hadiths.
You're welcome, "speller", and I accept your apology.
Posted by: ed at August 19, 2010 01:14 PM (Zsqn4)
Posted by: louis tully at August 19, 2010 04:36 PM (K/USr)
Actually, I'm pretty sure I said the opposite.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 01:17 PM (X/Lqh)
Islam is not like other religions. It by definition, is un-American. As Un-American as say, a religion practicing cannibalism, or human sacrifice, other disgusting things that are un-American.
Islam is a disqualifier because it demands: Polygamy, Sharia (instead of man-made law), subjugation of non-Muslims, subjugation of women, inequality among religious believers with Muslims on top.
America is not some supermarket where you can pick and choose beliefs like a brand of soap. *SOME* religions are so dangerous, so threatening, that holding their beliefs should automatically disqualify anyone involved in participating in American life (and indeed from living here).
Belief in racial superiority and extermination of folks "not of the master race" would be one. So too, Islam.
Because you cannot take the polygamy, the Sharia, the subjugation of women, the three most horrible parts of Islam, out of it. You can't be a "little bit Islamic" and as Mark Steyn puts it, hop on the Sharia express and get out before the polygamy, the second or third class treatment of non-Muslims, the replacement of our current legal system with that of Saudi Arabia, no its an express that goes straight to a society of the Taliban or Saudi Arabia.
As far as Obama goes, his Black African (just read his book, "Dreams from My Father: A Story of RACE AND INHERITANCE") identity is bound up in Islam, which is typical for Black Muslims who make up most of the US Muslim population. That Obama is a crony of Farrakhan just adds to that perception.
Posted by: whiskey at August 19, 2010 01:18 PM (t3UKO)
Posted by: America at August 19, 2010 01:18 PM (PQY7w)
Show me the exemption in the Constitution for Islam.
I'll wait.
I love when people demand fidelity to Constitution (except for the parts that are a tad bit inconvenient for them). It's not an attractive quality in liberals, I don't see why conservatives, who properly want to see politicians follow the Constitution, get a pass.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 01:24 PM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: antisocialist at August 19, 2010 01:38 PM (Rwudm)
The answer is when it is decided that the codes and requirements are enforced under the color of law. When the codes and requirements of the "professed faith" require you to go to war with non-believers and kill them.
I have seen "experts" who have said that Islam is 80% about how government is to be implemented and 20% religion and the two can not be separated.
The Constitution and the first amendment does not grant freedom of politics. Muslims can speechify all they want, they can assemble all they want, but that doesn't make their speech and assembly a religion.
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 02:24 PM (/jbAw)
The Test Act of 1673 in England obligated all persons filling any office, civil or military, to take oaths of supremacy and allegiance, to subscribe to a declaration against transubstantiation, and to receive the sacrament within three months of taking office.
WHY DO I GIVE A FUCK ABOUT THIS ? I DONT! SHARIA IS A POLITICAL AND CULTURAL SYSTEM AND HAS NO PLACE IN AMERICA.
Believe what you want. I dont care. When your beliefs supress my liberty then its open season.
Posted by: meleager at August 19, 2010 02:48 PM (Y2/mt)
A lot of "Christians" are this way too; raised Christian, but never go to church, never read the Bible, never pray, never think about Christianity but they have the worldview as part of their life. The US at large used to be more this way, until about 40-50 years ago.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at August 19, 2010 02:56 PM (PQY7w)
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 06:24 PM (/jbAw)
No, I get it. I just don't agree with you. There's a difference.
I get the political aspect of Islam but that in and of it self doesn't mean it's not a religion.
Let me ask you this...presume Keith Elisson of MN is reelected this year. Should the GOP refuse to seat him next year because he's a Muslim?
What would you say if Democrats tried to exclude Sharron Angle because of her overt religious policy positions?
Now you can say they are different (and they are) but the Constitution says we don't get to make that distinction and for good reason.
Islam isn't some little sect, it's not some personal cult of a guy living in his mom's basement. It's a religion with 1 Billion (+/-) followers around the world that has always been recognized as a religion in the US. You simply can't disqualify people from holding office solely based on their faith.
It's really amazing this is even a conversation.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 03:04 PM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 06:24 PM (/jbAw)
Now that part, I don't get.
What exactly does the First Amendment protect in its totality if not "freedom of politics"?
That's actually the whole point of the First Amendment. The whole "freedom of porn" thing is sort of a late (though welcome) addition.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 03:10 PM (X/Lqh)
DrewM, earlier you wrote that you wouldn't be opposed to restricting immigration from Islamic countries i.e., restricting immigration on the basis of religeon. (Yeah, there is room to split hairs here about whether this is a restriction based on religeon, or country of origin.)
Would there be constitutional issues with that as well? If you don't think so, do you think that many people would think there would be constitution issues with this? For example, the courts or a left leaning administration?
Posted by: ed at August 19, 2010 03:13 PM (Zsqn4)
Posted by: ed at August 19, 2010 07:13 PM (Zsqn4)
Non US citizens, outside the jurisdiction of the US do not have rights under the US Constitution.
Yes, there is a problem with left leaning courts and administrations (think of thee Tariq Ramadan case, it never made it to SCOTUS because Obama let him in) but that's something we have to deal with all the time.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 03:17 PM (X/Lqh)
You simply can't disqualify people from holding office solely based on their faith.
So , lets say 2 billion Chinese "Unexpectedly" demand our territory and submission - your ok cause thats their faith. What If 3 billion leftists demand we submit our soldiers to the world court? DrewM, you have no sense of WHY is America, America?
What if 4 billion muslims perish because we wont submit? That too many?
A more anti-American phrase has never been spoken.
Posted by: meleager at August 19, 2010 03:18 PM (Y2/mt)
Posted by: meleager at August 19, 2010 07:18 PM (Y2/mt)
Seriously?
I'm gonna chalk that comment up to a good bit of drinking and let it go at that.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 03:19 PM (X/Lqh)
The point is I don't consider Islam a religion, it is a political party. So no, they should not refuse to seat him. Hell we are seating a communist from Vermont now so seating a muslim is no difference.
What would you say if Democrats tried to exclude Sharron Angle because of her overt religious policy positions?
Well, if Sharron Angle somehow starts trying to enact laws that enforce the tenants of Christianity through the force of law I will call for her removal them. However, that seems to be low probability since Jesus said render unto Caesar etc.
Now you can say they are different (and they are) but the Constitution says we don't get to make that distinction and for good reason.
As I said, I don't consider it a religion.
Islam isn't some little sect, it's not some personal cult of a guy living in his mom's basement. It's a religion with 1 Billion (+/-) followers around the world that has always been recognized as a religion in the US. You simply can't disqualify people from holding office solely based on their faith.
Neither is Communism, but we don't consider it a religion. And I am not disqualifying them from office. I am saying that Islam should not be treated any different than any other political party.
What exactly does the First Amendment protect in its totality if not "freedom of politics"?
It protects speech and assembly, as I stated.
The point is Islam should not be given any more privilege than being a communist or a Democrat.
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 03:25 PM (/jbAw)
Not on a legal basis, no. I'd tend not to vote for some based on their faith, though.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at August 19, 2010 03:26 PM (PQY7w)
Posted by: meleager at August 19, 2010 03:30 PM (Y2/mt)
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 07:25 PM (/jbAw)
Ok, so you say you wouldn't try and enforce any legal or constitutional penalty on Muslims. Except what? Tax mosques?
In other words, it's more of an opinion than anything you actually want to see happen.
I think it's pretty dangerous for the government to start making calls like that. Someday you might not like how it comes out for.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 03:31 PM (X/Lqh)
Fair enough but that's not an Article VI issue.
Remember this started with 25% or so of people polled saying Muslims should be legally ineligible to run for POTUS or sit on SCOTUS. That is most definitely an Article VI violation.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 03:34 PM (X/Lqh)
Oh, brother.
First, Islam is a religion. It may be other things too, but it is a religion. And if you don't believe something so obvious, so indisputable (even the Founders believed this), well...you might as just give up the argument. Because ain't no court nowhere gonna ever agree when you try and forbid Muslims from public office just because you don't like Muslims as a class. In fact, courts and public opinion and pretty much the Universe Itself is gonna smack you on your little iggerant noggin with the religious test clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Founders were well aware that religious animosity runs deep.
Second, exactly that kind of ridiculous thought and disregard for both the First Amendment and the religious test clause would have kept Catholics from public office in the 1800s and early 1900s. Yes, idiots made the same exact argument, that Catholics weren't just part of a religion, but a system of government with fealty to the Vatican. Fortunately, such stupid people were marginalized and now can only be found grumbling to their dirt patches in the rural Appalachians and South.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at August 19, 2010 03:35 PM (B2LxR)
As I said, even the experts say it is 80% about government and war and 20% religion.
Try reading the Koran once, I have.
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 03:42 PM (/jbAw)
But as to answer your question, yes tax them and treat them like a political party. No different than any other political party.
Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 03:45 PM (/jbAw)
Gabe
You propose that opposition to muslims holding office is equivalent to opposition to catholics having super-secret allegiance to the pope. Its not the case. And even my ansestors were of that persuasion. America is a beacon, the best of, and not the dregs of old europe. We crush tribalism. We'll crush islam. Its in our genes. Wheather catholic or islam or the rights of kings or the elect of heaven, American liberty will not yield.
Posted by: meleager at August 19, 2010 03:49 PM (Y2/mt)
Posted by: The Appalachians and South. at August 19, 2010 04:01 PM (Zsqn4)
First, Islam is a religion.
Fine. Declare then we war on islam, let the adherents of the formerly known religion as islam defend themselves in America which is at war with their faith around the world. No civil rights violations needed. In fact, protect them. Adapt or die. Maybe you can organize the reformed islamic church of north america.
Posted by: meleager at August 19, 2010 04:07 PM (Y2/mt)
Yeah, I think that bit about non-US citizens still mostly applies. Mostly.
But in our hypothetical, this is what I think might happen.
We decide to freeze imigration of Muslims.
I think the courts would end up ruling as follows:
"Yes, we take your point that non-US citizens outside of the US don't have Constitutional rights....
BUT....
a. The imigration agency is subject to the U.S. constitution. And it cannot discriminate against Muslims in its policies.
b. These non-US citizens, when they apply for visas, do in practical point of fact becomes subject to U.S. control at that point (i.e., we control whether they come in or not) so at that point, they do gain certain constituional protections, namely the strict scruitiny standard that laws that discriminate on race or religion have to meet.
Thus we the court find that any law restricting imigration based on a religious test is unconstitutional."
That's just my gut feeling.
Posted by: The Appalachians and South. at August 19, 2010 04:11 PM (Zsqn4)
Opps. I messed up comment #244
Non US citizens, outside the jurisdiction of the US do not have rights under the US Constitution.
Yes, there is a problem with left leaning courts and administrations (think of thee Tariq Ramadan case, it never made it to SCOTUS because Obama let him in) but that's something we have to deal with all the time.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 07:17 PM (X/Lqh)
Yeah, I think that bit about non-US citizens still mostly applies. Mostly.
But in our hypothetical, this is what I think might happen.
We decide to freeze imigration of Muslims.
I think the courts would end up ruling as follows:
"Yes, we take your point that non-US citizens outside of the US don't have Constitutional rights....
BUT....
a. The imigration agency is subject to the U.S. constitution. And it cannot discriminate against Muslims in its policies.
b. These non-US citizens, when they apply for visas, do in practical point of fact becomes subject to U.S. control at that point (i.e., we control whether they come in or not) so at that point, they do gain certain constituional protections, namely the strict scruitiny standard that laws that discriminate on race or religion have to meet.
Thus we the court find that any law restricting imigration based on a religious test is unconstitutional."
Posted by: The Appalachians and South. at August 19, 2010 04:14 PM (Zsqn4)
The biggest challenge (that would likely hold) is that citizens are allowed to sponsor relatives to come here. If you say to them (US citizens) you can't bring your family here because you/they are Muslims, that would fail a court challenge.
In that case it would be the rights of an American which would be curtailed because of religion.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 04:19 PM (X/Lqh)
I promise you the religion they make war on won't be Islam.
Posted by: RayJ at August 19, 2010 04:27 PM (//Bcg)
Posted by: meleager at August 19, 2010 04:30 PM (Y2/mt)
As I said, even the experts say it is 80% about government and war and 20% religion.
Try reading the Koran once, I have.
You want proclaim that Islam is not a religion? Cool. I'm just telling you that nobody outside of the fringe will ever agree with you because it's kooky as shit.
And I come on very strong about it because this type of religion-based animosity is exactly contrary to the principles that settled this continent and founded this country and it makes my blood boil for you to crumple up and throw away the First Amendment just because you don't like Muslims.
As RayJ says, you better think long and hard before heading down that road because once you open that door it ain't just Muslims that their gonna come for.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at August 19, 2010 04:37 PM (1TvCg)
Trust me. You don't want to live in a country without strong protections for speech, religion, assembly, and protest. Diluting those protections so you can get back at Muslims (who, let's face it, can be comfortably marginalized via electoral means) is short-sighted.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at August 19, 2010 04:40 PM (1TvCg)
Is pulled- pork ever served for the family in the WH?
Has Obama EVER had bacon on a burger at his favorite
haunt? I don't care, personally. Oops, the prayer
comes now from the minaret. I must stop transmission
now....and kneel, facing Mecca. I'll get back to you
when it's legal, or PC, whichever comes first.
Posted by: grizzlybare at August 19, 2010 05:25 PM (5Zqvh)
Posted by: Dave M at August 19, 2010 05:28 PM (MFQME)
Posted by: Lee Reynolds at August 19, 2010 05:28 PM (/gY4D)
Ya gotta admit.......what Barney Frank does nightly
would be severely regulated under Sharia law. That's
the only PLUS I see to building the mosque.
Posted by: grizzlybare at August 19, 2010 05:29 PM (5Zqvh)
In that case it would be the rights of an American which would be curtailed because of religion.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 19, 2010 08:19 PM (X/Lqh)
Interesting. I think the arguements I came up with are still valid, but your point is even more... er... valider.
Righter?
More spot on and more accurate.
Posted by: Ed at August 19, 2010 05:51 PM (Zsqn4)
Barack Obama is not a Muslim.
And Bill Clinton did not have sexual relations with that woman.
How do we know? Because they told us so. Because they say so.
Now suck it you vicious rubes.
Posted by: sartana at August 19, 2010 05:59 PM (2Xw0/)
Its a religion, but it is also a cultural, artistic, literary, legal, governmental, and educational system. It covers all aspects of life down to the details so small as what hand you use to wipe with. That doesn't make it not a religion, any more than Old Testament Judaism wasn't a religion because it was an all-encompassing cultural, judicial, and governmental system as well.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at August 19, 2010 06:46 PM (PQY7w)
Grok that, those of you who think they believe that the government shall not recognize the establishment of a religion; yet bend over backwards to recognize those who venerate a mass murdering pedophile brigand as "the perfect man" as just a "religion".
*Yes, referring to irrational moon-bat blood-crazed mo-fo people as just being "religious"does insult.
Posted by: Druid at August 19, 2010 07:29 PM (9bSMF)
It's a funny coincidence that the Communist regimes all happened to be so rabidly atheist/anti-religious, no? Not even Cambodian Buddhism was spared.
Posted by: Scott at August 19, 2010 10:06 PM (TqGYF)
Posted by: Speller at August 19, 2010 11:19 PM (qaOKJ)
You cannot be a devout adherrant to an idiology that believes there is no law but gods law, Sharia, and honestly take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution.
The Constitution and Sharia are polar opposites.
If being a man of good character is a requisite for being President, then you could not be a Muslim President of the United States.
To accept the Oath of Office you would either be lying in the Oath, or lying about your faith.
Posted by: steve at August 20, 2010 05:54 AM (fnJX1)
Posted by: jones at August 20, 2010 06:27 AM (+OAmO)
Posted by: Doug R. at August 20, 2010 12:24 PM (Cc7Eu)
Posted by: ploome at August 31, 2010 11:08 AM (p6op4)
Posted by: ploome at August 31, 2010 11:18 AM (p6op4)
Posted by: ploome at August 31, 2010 11:19 AM (p6op4)
Posted by: pc accessories at February 28, 2011 12:26 AM (ZmIs/)
Posted by: rmt at June 17, 2011 05:58 AM (HBYXu)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2407 seconds, 389 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: elspeth at August 19, 2010 09:09 AM (0AkWH)