May 19, 2010
— Ace Possibly they're right -- we did lose a big one last night.
(At least for now: Remember November.)
However, Politico is overlooking something. Yes, Murtha's district leans conservative -- but not Republican. Politico ticks off the poll numbers that demonstrate the district seems to have a conservative temper in making its case for Democratic resurgence, but elides an important fact:
After all, this is a heavily Democratic district that elected the same Democrat the last eighteen elections. Their registration edge is in double digits, so an eight-point loss for Republicans isnÂ’t a bad showing.
Politico ignores this fact as contrary to the narrative and simply declares this to be some kind of Republican bastion that we lost when we should have won. No; it was a district we should have lost, in any other cycle, but had hope for in this one cycle -- and those hopes were dashed. Which isn't really surprising.
But more importantly, Murtha's district has leaned far more Murtha than for any party. Murtha Pork is the lifeblood of this economically depressed area; an awful lot of people rely, directly and indirectly, upon Murtha's -- or his proxy's -- ability to funnel millions of dollars from the rest of the country into this small slice of Pennsylvania.
If ideology were the determinant consideration here, the district should have fallen to the Republicans a while ago.
Furthermore, Critz ran as a conservative Republican, nearly, adopting the Tea Party's positions on the bailouts and health care and the social conservatives' position on abortion. This isn't really some kind of vindication for the Democratic Party generally, and certainly not for Obama's out-and-proud brand of liberalism.
One more thing: The media has been telling us that the mood in the country -- the strong disapproval of incumbent Democrats -- was anti-incumbent and not anti-Democratic at all. They've made this claim too many times to recount.
So, in Pennsylvania, a non-incumbent faced another non-incumbent and the non-incumbent won, as he had to.
Or, since Critz was, arguably, the proxy for the ultra-incumbent but quite dead Abscam Jack Murtha, then perhaps this is a signal that incumbents aren't necessarily in trouble. But only in places that rely heavily on federal spending.
Either way, the MFM could keep with their precious anti-incumbency storyline.
But now we're told this was actually a victory for the Democratic cause.
When Republicans are winning, it's only a victory for the forces of anti-incumbency, with no import as regards the nation's preferred ideology. But suddenly when the Democrats win one (and this was always a longshot for us) it's no longer a referendum on incumbency at all, but a referendum on the Democratic Party, and they won, so for the MFM it's Yayy, us!
All the evidence pointing to monster Republican House gains this fall—the Scott Brown upset win in Massachusetts, the scary polling numbers in once-safely Democratic districts, the ever-rising number of Democratic seats thought to be in jeopardy—was contradicted Tuesday.In the only House race that really mattered to both parties—the special election to replace the late Democratic Rep. John Murtha in Pennsylvania’s 12th District—Republicans failed spectacularly, losing on a level playing field where, in this favorable environment, they should have run roughshod over the opposition.
Given the resources the GOP poured into the effort to capture the seat and the decisiveness of the defeat—as it turned out, it wasn’t really that close—the outcome casts serious doubt on the idea that the Democratic House majority is in jeopardy and offers comfort to a Democratic Party that is desperately in search of a glimmer of hope.
The district itself couldn’t have been more primed for a Republican victory. According to one recent poll, President Barack Obama’s approval rating in the 12th was a dismal 35 percent, compared to 55 percent who disapproved. His health care plan was equally unpopular—just 30 percent of those polled supported it, while 58 percent were in opposition.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was even more disliked in the blue-collar, western Pennsylvania-based seat: Just 23 percent viewed her favorably, compared to 63 percent who viewed her unfavorably.
Still, Democrat Mark Critz managed to pull off an eight-point victory, 53 percent to 45 percent, over Republican Tim Burns in a district that John McCain narrowly won in 2008—the only one in the nation that voted for John Kerry in 2004 and McCain four years later.
The race marked the third highly-contested, fair-fight special House election that the GOP has dropped in the last year.
The seat Murtha held for 36 years is precisely the sort of Rust Belt district—economically populist and culturally traditional—that Republicans must win to claim the 40 seats necessary to take back the House.
Yet the way Critz and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee won the contest offered a reminder that the prospect of a GOP majority remains a mirage. And TuesdayÂ’s result has Democrats breathing a sigh of relief, thinking theyÂ’ve found a formula to mitigate their losses in what will still be a difficult election season.
The playbook from the Pennsylvania special election isnÂ’t complicated: Make the election a choice between two local candidates and not a national referendum on the Democratic Party or the state of the nation; savage the Republican from the outset and donÂ’t let up; keep the focus on jobs and core economic issues; most important, separate yourself from your national partyÂ’s policies and politicians as necessary.
It may not be complicated -- Run as a Republican! -- but not many districts share with the Johnstown area such a special focus on the "core economic issue" of shoveling money hand over fist into one district.
Edit: Politico's selective reporting put it in my head that this district is basically a Republican one, and I wrote it up initially admitting the district "leans Republican." I have rewritten it to reflect the fact it actually leans Democratic, and pretty hard at that.
A handful of districts are like this -- socially conservative but fiscally very liberal. But few districts outside of the Virginia suburbs have such a huge, direct financial interest in a free-spending federal government.
Posted by: Ace at
09:39 AM
| Comments (178)
Post contains 1032 words, total size 7 kb.
Oh well, maybe we need for things to get even worse before people wake up.
Posted by: kansas at May 19, 2010 09:46 AM (mka2b)
The Democrats have nothing to be worried about. Yeah, the Democrats might lose 15 seats in the House and a couple in Senate, but they'll still have a comfortable majority.
Why will the Democrats win? Because the other side isn't putting up a fight. We'll never win with the leadership we have. Never.
Posted by: Speed Buggy at May 19, 2010 09:49 AM (uFokq)
Somehow a Democrat winning a district that is something like D+15, that has elected a democrat for the past 30 years isn't as big a deal as say a Republican running for Senator in Massachusetts against a Democratic President and Healthcare bill for a seat held by a Democrat for the past 30 years in a state that is something like D+15.
Let me know when a democrat wins a R+15 district in Alabama. Then I will worry.
Posted by: Ben at May 19, 2010 09:49 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: ECM at May 19, 2010 09:49 AM (nYKDd)
But more importantly, Murtha's district has leaned far more Murtha than for any party. Murtha Pork is the lifeblood of this economically depressed area; an awful lot of people rely, directly and indirectly, upon Murtha's -- or his proxy's -- ability to funnel millions of dollars from the rest of the country into this small slice of Pennsylvania.
THIS
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at May 19, 2010 09:50 AM (yUybe)
If Johnstown, PA is a microcosm of America, and this district is as large of a bellwether as so many want it to be, then this country is so far up shit creek, it doesn't matter.
My family who lives there all are devout Lutheran and Catholics, all own guns, all hate illegal immigrants, all have a flag on their porch or somewhere predominant in the home, and they all vote straight-ticket D. Doesn't matter who, or for what, or why. They vote D. Why? Their parents did. Their union says to. Their disability "depends on it". And there is not any amount of logic that is going to change that.
Posted by: Doc at May 19, 2010 09:51 AM (WKOg4)
While I find Politico's premise to be a bullshit narrative, I'm more than happy to be running as a pseudo-underdog.
The headline alone--could they sound more giddy?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at May 19, 2010 09:53 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at May 19, 2010 09:53 AM (SbFur)
Posted by: jjshaka at May 19, 2010 09:54 AM (y0YyS)
Come on, of course it was a big one. Taking Murtha's seat away? That would have been huge, awesome, etc. It would have called for mass ball dipping in cool, creamy pudding. Hell, I had my ball shaved, waxed, powdered and ready to dip.
Now I'm stuck with undipped pudding and a shorn scrotum that is probably going to have all sorts of ingrown hairs next week.
If we would have taken it, talk of 100 + seats pickup in the house would be conceivable.
As it is, not so much. We'll still pick up seats. And God willing, we'll have enough to defund Obama care.
And if any of you want to call me a moby or a "life long concerned Christian conservative who must reluctantly vote for Pelosi", forget it.
I'm just a guy with an itchy ball sack.
Posted by: Ed at May 19, 2010 09:54 AM (OCfDT)
Posted by: ParisParamusat May 19, 2010 01:42 PM (lf/rr)
Come on, of course it was a big one. Taking Murtha's seat away? That would have been huge, awesome, etc. It would have called for mass ball dipping in cool, creamy pudding. Hell, I had my ball shaved, waxed, powdered and ready to dip.
Now I'm stuck with undipped pudding and a shorn scrotum that is probably going to have all sorts of ingrown hairs next week.
If we would have taken it, talk of 100 + seats pickup in the house would be conceivable.
As it is, not so much. We'll still pick up seats. And God willing, we'll have enough to defund Obama care.
And if any of you want to call me a moby or a "life long concerned Christian conservative who must reluctantly vote for Pelosi", forget it.
I'm just a guy with an itchy ball sack.
Posted by: Ed at May 19, 2010 09:55 AM (OCfDT)
Posted by: Alex at May 19, 2010 09:55 AM (AahHR)
Posted by: Fresh Air at May 19, 2010 09:56 AM (pnLJL)
Posted by: nikkolai at May 19, 2010 09:57 AM (ojeTD)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at May 19, 2010 09:57 AM (SbFur)
It's more than a handful. A little party you might have heard of called the GOP runs on an "empty so-con gesture/soft socialism" platform in almost every district, and they do okay.
The bad news: The average voter is a fascist. The good news: Death comes to us all. Woot.
Posted by: oblig. at May 19, 2010 09:58 AM (x7Ao8)
Posted by: nikkolai at May 19, 2010 09:59 AM (ojeTD)
The constituency has voted for Murtha for a long, long time. His Congressional chief of Staff was running on Murtha's record. Why anyone got themselves convinced we would win that seat is beyond me.
So, I am not the least bit depressed, and anyone who predicts doom for the GOP based on this election is just silly.
Posted by: Miss Marple (redneck teabagger) at May 19, 2010 10:00 AM (xxe/9)
today they leave out that Big Dawg campaigned for Critz. Obama campaigned for Arlen.
DLC Big Dawg fiscal policy pro capitalism type Dems can still get elected, DNC Obama types can not.
Of course this will enrage the left who is still enraged at Big Dawg and even Rahm for the Blue Dog fiscal policy and Blue Dog critters.
Axelrasputin said today they will run Dems who can win in those districts, IOW blue dog types.
If DLC types run and are believed they will win
GOP needs to take strong stands and not run to the middle, and I say that as a mod Dem who is recovering from my leftyness. Let the left try and teach a lesson to the Dems who dare to run conservatives.
Let the GOP run ACTUAL conservatives and then people will have a real choice.
PA12 will be rerun in November when people know Burns and there are too many seats in play for Big Dawg to try and save them all.
and it is delicious schadenfrude that the idiots who selected O thought he would have coattails and they still need Bill 10 yrs later to save their bacon.
Posted by: mim/ginaswo at May 19, 2010 10:00 AM (/9f3m)
Posted by: Democrat voices overheard from within the depths of their own asses at May 19, 2010 10:00 AM (xm1A1)
I live in PA10 aka McDadeland. Yeah, the district is reddish but a ton of the votes were just that, for McDade and then Sherwood. It took Sherwood allegedly choking a bitch to lose it. Trust me, it's not out of love for the Republicans that Sherwood won by what he did.
Posted by: alexthechick at May 19, 2010 10:01 AM (8WZWv)
any district left enough to continually elect murtha isnt going to elect a republican. this loss is a non issue.
Posted by: mitchellvii@yahoo.com at May 19, 2010 10:01 AM (kEBiX)
The Democrats have to run away from Obama, Pelosi, and Reid in order to win and this is somehow viewed as a positive for Dems?
Enjoy that fall off the cliff.
Posted by: wtfci at May 19, 2010 10:02 AM (EbpbH)
Posted by: The MFM at May 19, 2010 10:03 AM (ibk2Y)
Posted by: damian at May 19, 2010 10:03 AM (4WbTI)
Surprise, surprise, surprise. We'll see how things shake out in November.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 19, 2010 10:04 AM (9hSKh)
I just don't see what about PA-12 is conservative, in the least.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 10:04 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Silence DoGood at May 19, 2010 10:05 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 19, 2010 10:05 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Democrat voices overheard from within the depths of their own asses at May 19, 2010 10:05 AM (xm1A1)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 10:06 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at May 19, 2010 10:07 AM (snlsw)
A total of 80 thousand people voted in the dem house primary (for the full term election in November), while only 46 thousand voted on the republican side. So you had a good number of people that voted in a dem primary and then turned around and voted for the republican. So that's an encouraging sign.
And maybe it's good that the idiots who run our party not get too confident.
Posted by: buzz at May 19, 2010 10:07 AM (kwhut)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 02:06 PM (ujg0T)
He loved it when I ripped his colon.
Posted by: Eeyore at May 19, 2010 10:08 AM (ikmC5)
Posted by: t-bird at May 19, 2010 10:08 AM (FcR7P)
Voters once again get fooled by the candidate that runs as a "conservative Democrat" who will within 8 milliseconds of taking office will vote whichever way Nancy tells him to.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 19, 2010 10:08 AM (plsiE)
It's nice to see people around here getting a grip. The negative nellies were starting to surge late last night.
I wanted to try and stem the tide but was too intoxicated to make the attempt.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at May 19, 2010 10:08 AM (P33XN)
That said, we did have hopes but, in my case not real high hopes. It IS a gerrymandered Dem district and there is a reason it has gone Democrat so often.
BTW, the MFM is spouting the likewise gerrymandered SC 5th district is going to be a "hard campaign" for the Dems this year. That doesn't convert into an automatic win for the Repubs either.
This is pre-election spin for "just in case".
I still predict > 50 seats in the house unless the Repubs go all "big tent" again.
Posted by: Vic at May 19, 2010 10:09 AM (6taRI)
Posted by:Dr. Spank at May 19, 2010 01:57 PM (SbFur)
Heh. Well, if I have offending someone with the cyber nom-de-plume* "Dr. Spank" while continuing the time honored AOS tradition of pudding and balls which reached it's finest moment in the election of Scott Brown, then I guess I am just beyond the pale.
By the way, Dr. Spank, don't click on that link, unless you have a really strong stomache. I mean, this goes way beyond punching the clown, beating your bishop, etc etc etc. It is real sick shit. Which is why I dig it.
*Nom-de-plume is Latin for "Name of the the feather."
Posted by: Ed at May 19, 2010 10:09 AM (OCfDT)
Posted by: The MFM at May 19, 2010 10:10 AM (ibk2Y)
I live in PA10 aka McDadeland
I was under the impression alexthechick lived in Missouri.
I'd make a lousy stalker...
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at May 19, 2010 10:10 AM (P33XN)
You know who else only had one testicle? First Godwin of the thread. Any prize?
Posted by: Upscale Community Organizing Thought Criminal at May 19, 2010 02:02 PM (IhHdM)
Heh. There's a long story behind that. But uh, we'll save that for the overnight thread.
Posted by: Ed at May 19, 2010 10:13 AM (OCfDT)
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 19, 2010 02:05 PM (R2fpr)
I did!
Posted by: zombie Jimmy The Greek at May 19, 2010 10:13 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at May 19, 2010 10:13 AM (7VvJB)
Burns and the GOP should have brought the hammer down on Critz and Obama.
After all these decades of MSM cover and Dem lies, the Republicans still act all offended and surprised?
Where was the ruthless campaigning? Why didn't burns rip Critz's heart out?
Where is a Lee Atwater, for whom politics wasn't personal; it was just about winning by disemboweling your opponent and then desecrating his grave.
Posted by: pam at May 19, 2010 10:13 AM (h8R9p)
brraaiins.
Posted by: zombie peter jennings at May 19, 2010 10:14 AM (4WbTI)
Posted by: Truman North at May 19, 2010 10:14 AM (e8YaH)
I live in PA10 aka McDadeland
I was under the impression alexthechick lived in Missouri.
I'd make a lousy stalker...
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at May 19, 2010 02:10 PM (P33XN)
I thought alexthechick lived in New York.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent most of the time at May 19, 2010 10:15 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Truman North at May 19, 2010 02:14 PM (e8YaH)
It's the public version of the JournoList. Nothing more. They try to hide it a little bit, but fail miserably.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 10:16 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 19, 2010 02:05 PM (R2fpr)
I did!
Posted by: zombie Jimmy The Greek
Congratulations! Please collect all unattached body parts and walk shamble to the customer service window for your free six month subscription.
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 19, 2010 10:16 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Vic at May 19, 2010 02:09 PM (6taRI)
So what you're saying is we're fucked?
Posted by: Editor at May 19, 2010 10:17 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: joncelli at May 19, 2010 10:18 AM (RD7QR)
So what you're saying is we're fucked?
Posted by: Editor at May 19, 2010 02:17 PM (pUfK9)
Even if the GOP takes 80 seats, we're still fucked. The US will not survive the full term of the Indonesian Imbecile, intact.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 10:19 AM (Qp4DT)
When they vote correctly they'll get a congratulations from me, but still, zero consideration on what it means to the rest of the country.
Posted by: Editor at May 19, 2010 10:19 AM (pUfK9)
Voters once again get fooled by the candidate that runs as a "conservative Democrat" who will within 8 milliseconds of taking office will vote whichever way Nancy tells him to.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 19, 2010 02:08 PM (plsiE)
THAT is the point that must be hammered on incessantly: There is NO SUCH THING as a conservative Democrat!
Posted by: Nighthawk at May 19, 2010 10:19 AM (OtQXp)
Even if the GOP takes 80 seats, we're still fucked. The US will not survive the full term of the Indonesian Imbecile, intact.
This is why I come here--the optimism. It just radiates off the page.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at May 19, 2010 10:20 AM (pLTLS)
The republican candidate really has to decide now if he has the stomach for a fight, cause he needs to bring one if he has any notion of trying to win. he really has to pull out all the stops. You'll know whether he is pulling out all those stops and it will be fascinating to watch.
Really though, you can't let the dems/libs and the media characterize the race, pimp it out for their purposes. You can't swallow the rhetoric hook line and sinker. Think for yourself. analyze it yourself. A republican win would have been an anomaly and a dem losss would have been a re energization for the dems. So maybe, just maybe this win, if the republican can somehow muster a little excitement, was a blessing in disguise.
Posted by: curious at May 19, 2010 10:20 AM (p302b)
I am both stupid and unproductive. I also use my real name in my email address. What a dummy I am.
Posted by: john ryan jr at May 19, 2010 10:20 AM (I+7Zv)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at May 19, 2010 10:20 AM (7VvJB)
Coleman bans city-funded travel to Arizona
Columbus Mayor Michael B. Coleman has banned city-worker travel to Arizona because of that state's new law allowing police to demand documentation from anyone they suspect is in the country illegally.
As with any typical pol, he doesn't have the complete courage of his convictions.
But as Columbus joins a growing number of U.S. cities protesting the Arizona law, Williamson said the mayor has no plans to propose that the city stop doing business entirely with companies based there.
Seattle took that step on Monday.
In Columbus, contracts will be decided on a case-by-case basis, Williamson said. Columbus recently extended its agreement with Phoenix-based Redflex Traffic Systems Inc., which owns and operates the city's 20 red-light cameras. The new contract will double the number of cameras posted at Columbus intersections to issue tickets to red-light-runners.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 19, 2010 10:21 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Tommy V at May 19, 2010 10:21 AM (gkc1e)
I'm optimistic about the continuation of the American creed, which is the only truly important point, just not the continuation of the US as the entity carrying that creed.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 10:21 AM (Qp4DT)
Barack Obama to depart as President of the United States before midnght ET on 31 Dec 2010 is only at Ask=7.9
Alas.
Posted by: damian at May 19, 2010 10:22 AM (4WbTI)
WTF is wrong with Ohio?
How much time do you have? Oh and would you prefer my thesis to include footnotes or endnotes?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at May 19, 2010 10:22 AM (pLTLS)
Why do people put such faith in Intrade? It's a bunch of people paying for the chance to guess stuff.
Posted by: Slublog at May 19, 2010 10:24 AM (qjKko)
Intrade, the final arbiter of elections! That must be why Martha Coakley is the new Senator from MA, right? And RCP, teh most accurate polling outfit in the entire world, have the Dems up on the generic ballot? I see the writing on the wall for the Repubs now, thanks crackdragon! *sobs*.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 19, 2010 10:24 AM (9hSKh)
Columbus Mayor Michael B. Coleman has banned city-worker travel to Arizona
Well, maybe that's good news for the tax payers of Columbus...but they'll probably just develop a "need" to travel elsewhere.
Posted by: Mama AJ at May 19, 2010 10:25 AM (XdlcF)
The Ineligible Imbecile from Indonesia just said, "We are not defined by our borders."
I rest my case.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 10:25 AM (Qp4DT)
THAT is the point that must be hammered on incessantly: There is NO SUCH THING as a conservative Democrat!
Posted by: Nighthawk at May 19, 2010 02:19 PM (OtQXp)
Anybody that can't remember the blue dogs putting their tails between their legs and slinking off like worthless gutless curs to do the bidding of Tommy D'Allesandro's slut daughter when push came to shove on Bamreilosi Death Care, is too stupid to vote.
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 19, 2010 10:26 AM (YfeQ4)
Posted by: Georgie
Doubtful. McCain carried it by 900 voes, and that was after his opponent insulted the people of that region, and handled the follow up badly. They actually split the ticket, voting for McCain and then voting for Mr. Ethics (Murtha). The fact that he later insulted them and received a pass should indicate something to you. These people will vote to hang on to what they see as a pork bringer at the Rep level, but can be shaken from that on the national level. Whether that translates to splitting at the state level (Gov) I can't say without research.
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 19, 2010 10:26 AM (R2fpr)
The voter there WILL vote Republican if they feel it is in their best interests. Hopefully in Nov.
Intrade posted big positive movement for the Dems to remain in control of the House, it is now 61%. Big deal, gamble $10.
And Obama is also at 61% for re-election. And at 45% approval of likelies.
And the Dems have been positive on the generic Congressional ballot on RealClearPolitics for a few days now. Averages suck in statistics. A tie = +5% repub.
Sex scandals and oil slicks both hurt the GOP and when the slick hit FL Rubio will take a hit. Massa, Salazar, Obama are gop? Rubio has the lead, will win going away.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at May 19, 2010 10:27 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 10:28 AM (ujg0T)
LOL Drudge.
He's got a picture of Rachel Maddow. The article that goes with that pic is right below, but right above the photo is a link to another article that says, "Baby, I'm a man"
I'm sure that was entirely accidental...
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at May 19, 2010 10:28 AM (P33XN)
LA most likely. They'll need the extra business once AZ counter-boycotts and shuts LA down.
In the end, there will be only chaos...and chaos is fair.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 19, 2010 10:29 AM (9hSKh)
I thought alexthechick lived in New York.
And I thought she was a Jersey girl.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 02:28 PM (ujg0T)
She's not who we thought she was...
Posted by: Dennis Green at May 19, 2010 10:30 AM (YVZlY)
These people will vote to hang on to what they see as a pork bringer at the Rep level, but can be shaken from that on the national level.
PA 12 is just the white hunky version of any jerrymandered AA district that depends on entitlements - think Cynthia McKinney. And I do mean "hunky", not honky.
Posted by: kallisto at May 19, 2010 10:31 AM (+FkcS)
Posted by: TexasJew at May 19, 2010 10:31 AM (ikmC5)
I think if we can take the House (where funding bills are supposed to originate) and take the Senate to the Dems only having a small majority we still will have a chance.
if we don't we will not survive the full four years. He will continue spending and his "bipartisan commission" of 2/3 Dems and 1/3 RINOs will call for increased taxes and a VAT. We will go into a massive depression which the current population is not equipped to handle.
The Urban areas will go into full riot mode and martial law will be declared.
End of Republic.
Posted by: Vic at May 19, 2010 10:31 AM (6taRI)
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 19, 2010 02:29 PM (9hSKh)
and fun to watch!
Posted by: a moron with a lot of popcorn and beer at May 19, 2010 10:31 AM (YVZlY)
Democrats have a chance in November. Not Clinton Democrats or Obama Democrats, but Iwhvahcr* Democrats. They'll take office, vote for cap & trade, and take cushy jobs when the Iwhvacat** Democrats take their place next time around. They'll work closely with Angela Davis's administration come 2017.
* = I would have voted against health care reform
** = ditto, cap and trade
Posted by: FireHorse at May 19, 2010 10:32 AM (cQyWA)
1945 - Politico: Maybe the Nazi aren't doomed
1865 - Politico: Maybe the Confederacy isn't doomed
1781 - Politico: Maybe the British Empire in the 13 colonies isn't doomed
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 19, 2010 10:33 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Drew in MO at May 19, 2010 10:33 AM (lzha+)
#77 "We lost in a district with a 2-to-1 Dem-to-Rep registration advantage, that has voted Democrat for as long as anyone can remember, against a Democrat who ran essentially as a Republican."
Exactly. This was not a "big one," except in the desperate and deluded minds of democrats. But let them think it. It is comforting to see their stupidity and arrogance reaffirmed. As for Politico, the opening paragraph underscores what a hack party organ they are: "All the evidence" is "contradicted." Really? ALL the evidence? ALL the nationwide evidence? In one special election when a conservative democrat who disavowed his party wins? Pathetic.
Posted by: rrpjr at May 19, 2010 10:33 AM (9Gibp)
The Urban areas will go into full riot mode and martial law will be declared
But we'll still get our checks and federal pork bills, right?
Posted by: Hunky living in PA-12 at May 19, 2010 10:33 AM (P33XN)
first tingles...now vibrations.
Yeeesh
Posted by: dananjcon at May 19, 2010 02:31 PM (pr+up)
word!
Posted by: Maddow's other middle finger at May 19, 2010 10:34 AM (YVZlY)
Even if the GOP takes 80 seats, we're still fucked. The US will not survive the full term of the Indonesian Imbecile, intact.
Damn it, don't y'all remember the late 1970's? Things really were in the shit then. We have been thru worse.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 10:35 AM (ujg0T)
I hear you, but Executive power is just too encompassing, now, and the GOP don't have the balls to stop it. On top of that, we have external events that can serve to push us over the edge (as The Precedent is looking for anything to be able to push this nation to true crisis). There is the European monetary problems, the chance that Israel finally hits Iran, China flexing its muscle more (encouraged by this traitorous administration as they just tried to ally with China in an attack on an American state - WTF?), and the fact that we have the Executive branch inviting total monetary collapse every way they can. They will just switch to Executive orders and federal regulation when they lose Congress, and the damage that they can do through that (have been doing, already) is much more than our nation could withstand.
It's the US or The Precedent. Both will not make it through his term intact.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 10:36 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at May 19, 2010 10:36 AM (P33XN)
And I thought she was a Jersey girl.
No that's just the fashion sense.
Heh. All I know is if I hadn't met and married the right one already I'd be making an epic Moron trip to get an autograph. :-)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 10:36 AM (ujg0T)
I blame the Specter/Sestak Senate race for drawing more Democrats.
The Republican primary was a snozzer.
Posted by: Neo at May 19, 2010 10:36 AM (tE8FB)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at May 19, 2010 10:37 AM (7VvJB)
Well, yeah, they're going to say that. Politico is a Dem mouthpiece.
Posted by: TomInKorea at May 19, 2010 10:38 AM (+gX1+)
Damn it, don't y'all remember the late 1970's? Things really were in the shit then. We have been thru worse.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 02:35 PM (ujg0T)
No. This is the worst situation the US has ever had to contend with. We have never had a true America-hater running the Executive branch and the media enthusiastically supporting his every move. This is a different situation. And we have no room for error, as the "full faith and credit" in any of our institutions has been depleted.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 10:38 AM (Qp4DT)
In Columbus, contracts will be decided on a case-by-case basis, Williamson said. Columbus recently extended its agreement with Phoenix-based Redflex Traffic Systems Inc., which owns and operates the city's 20 red-light cameras. The new contract will double the number of cameras posted at Columbus intersections to issue tickets to red-light-runners.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 19, 2010 02:21 PM (9hSKh)
I smell some constitutional issues with that shit. Of course, when the Pubbies take back Congress, I would expect that Ohio will have to sell some pussy to get a lot of Fed money.
Don't fuck with the exploding Sun Belt
Posted by: TexasJew at May 19, 2010 10:38 AM (ikmC5)
1945 - Politico: Maybe the Nazi aren't doomed
1865 - Politico: Maybe the Confederacy isn't doomed
1781 - Politico: Maybe the British Empire in the 13 colonies isn't doomed
1780 - Politico: maybe the French can turn back the Prussians
1904 - Politico: maybe the Russian fleet isn't doomed at Tshushima
1942 - Politico: maybe the German Sixth army at Stalingrad isn't doomed
1954 - Politico: maybe French rule in Indochina isn't doomed (live reporting from advance base at Dien Bien Phu)
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 19, 2010 10:38 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Drew in MO at May 19, 2010 10:40 AM (lzha+)
Posted by: Napoleon at May 19, 2010 10:41 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: Napoleon
I cancelled my subscription. They so totally led me to believe that I could pull it out I don't know how many times.
Posted by: Harold Stassen at May 19, 2010 10:42 AM (R2fpr)
Maybe Crassus isn't doomed. If he can avoid the treacherous Armenian foothills and face the Parthians on the open plain, he can deploy his German cavalry and give those bactrian-camel-humpers a jolly good thrashing.
Besides, arrows don't even hurt very much.
Posted by: Politicus, 53 BC at May 19, 2010 10:43 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: curious at May 19, 2010 10:45 AM (p302b)
Posted by: FatBaldnSassy at May 19, 2010 10:45 AM (Lq9ag)
Posted by: Napoleon
You'd think that after their analysis on your proposed Russian adventure you'd be a tad more gun-shy.
Posted by: Talleyrand at May 19, 2010 10:45 AM (R2fpr)
Awww thanks! You really did just make my day.
Posted by: alexthechick at May 19, 2010 10:46 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: Watching Cloward-Piven at May 19, 2010 10:46 AM (Qrf0L)
We'll see what happens this weekend in HI. That race is supposedly a lock for the GOP. If we lose this weekend, we do indeed have no reason to be optimistic. I don't care if that district is 'deep blue' or whatever, the Democrats have practically conceded the election.
We better win the election, is all I'm saying.
Posted by: Mr Peebles at May 19, 2010 10:47 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: robtr at May 19, 2010 10:47 AM (fwSHf)
We better win the election, is all I'm saying.
Posted by: Mr Peebles at May 19, 2010 02:47 PM (uFokq)"
that phrase about the dems practically conceding the election is scary. Maybe it is a tactic so that when the acorns are falling all over the place they can act pleased and surprised.
Posted by: curious at May 19, 2010 10:49 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at May 19, 2010 10:49 AM (DrGKS)
No. This is the worst situation the US has ever had to contend with. We have never had a true America-hater running the Executive branch and the media enthusiastically supporting his every move. This is a different situation. And we have no room for error, as the "full faith and credit" in any of our institutions has been depleted.
Whoa. By 1979-80, we had a full court press by a liberal media, empowered post-Watergate, that harped about how horrid Uncle Ron would be. Regular race-baiting and accusations of warmongery were against Uncle Ron full blast.
We had no alternative against said media. No serious talk radio; there were local rightist hosts, but nothing nationwide. Cable TV news wasn't there yet, lib Walter Cronkite commanded the nation's respect.
Ted Kennedy was making a very serious bid for President in 1980.
Gasoline was price controlled and rationed.
The Soviet Empire, far more dangerous and murderous than the Islamunist goons, was conquering whole swaths of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. The Euros were even bigger weenies then too, with actual bona fide Communist parties commanding significant shares of the vote on the Continent. Labour in the UK was essentially out and out Communist.
Meanwhile at home, off duty soldiers got into their civvies as quickly as possible, so as to not be looked askance if not spat at by liberal pinkoes.
Full faith and credit? The general view of government was utterly cynical--which Uncle Ron successfully boomeranged against the Left--but people despaired. I remember a Print Advertisement for Whirlpool Appliances of all companies, asking "Is This Country In The Autumn Of Its Time?" while boasting about how they were still making quality appliances in small print. Doom and despair was the Zeitgeist.
Maybe you are right that such a Zeitgeist is better than the mindless sheeple going ga-ga about Michelle's abs or about how well spoken our Mulatto Marxist in office is, but seriously, it has been really bad before.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 10:51 AM (ujg0T)
We better win the election, is all I'm saying.
Posted by: Mr Peebles at May 19, 2010 02:47 PM (uFokq)
Now we are depending on winning Hawaii to decide our fate? Frickin Hawaii, really? Hell yeah, we should be winning in downtown D. C. too. Jesus. You do know that Obama is Hawaii's favorite son don't you? You also know that the reason it is even close is because 2 democrats are splitting the vote? If there was only one democrat we would be losing by 30 points.
Posted by: robtr at May 19, 2010 10:51 AM (fwSHf)
We better win the election, is all I'm saying.
Posted by: Mr Peebles
We'd better win an election being conducted solely through mail in balloting??? I'd be pleasantly surprised if the number of ballots received is only slightly in excess of the number of people who live, and who ever have lived in Hawaii.If the DNC ever got hold of the 1,000 monkeys attempting to type Shakespeare and armed them with stamps and a xerox machine then it's game over.
Posted by: Talleyrand at May 19, 2010 10:52 AM (R2fpr)
Awww thanks! You really did just make my day.
Could you post a picture on the Yahoo AOSHQ site by chance?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 10:53 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: reason at May 19, 2010 10:55 AM (+hPIb)
@ 139
Wow, I'm old and I can't remember half that stuff. But, yeah, the MFM was very much against Ronaldus Magnus at the time. Sounds just like the venom they hurl towards SarahCuda today.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 19, 2010 10:57 AM (i3AsK)
tl;dr the thread
most important, separate yourself from your national partyÂ’s policies and politicians as necessary.
In other words, LIE, LIE, LIE
Posted by: s'moron at May 19, 2010 10:58 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: reason at May 19, 2010 11:00 AM (+hPIb)
And we have no room for error, as the "full faith and credit" in any of our institutions has been depleted.
Oh you mean that in a financial sense. Well in 1979-1980, inflation was running at about 20%. You could watch the prices rise in the grocery store month by month if not week by week.Official currency devaluations were announced and this was treated as necessary by the RINOs and good for exports by the Commiecrats.
I know Obama sucks and the Pelosi and Reid Commiecrats are horrid, but Carter sucked no less, the Tip O'Neill and Kennedy Commiecrats were no less horrid and there was still a Soviet Empire menacing.
And when *I*, pessimistic Curmudgeon am the optimistic Moron, well, wow. I don't think I'm deluding myself, honestly.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 11:01 AM (ujg0T)
1980 - Politico: Maybe Carter's presidency isn't doomed
1984 - Politico: Maybe Mondale's campaign isn't doomed
1990 - Politico: Maybe the Soviet Union isn't doomed
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 19, 2010 11:01 AM (1Jaio)
Six months from now, after a possible second mortgage bubble burst and continued high unemployment, lets see how the rematch goes. Burns has six months to learn what he can do better the second time around.
I'm a conservative. Therefore, I am optimistic.
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at May 19, 2010 11:03 AM (+8jFr)
Posted by: curious at May 19, 2010 11:04 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Jean at May 19, 2010 11:04 AM (JaO+v)
Posted by: curious at May 19, 2010 11:09 AM (p302b)
23 -- His Congressional chief of Staff was running on Murtha's record.
Au contraire. Rush ripped this to pieces today and said that Critz ran as the "Rush Limbaugh candidate." I have to admit, I was disheartened to see Critz win, but Rush laid it out in black and white. No blather, no spin. If you can download today's show, do it. By taking to heart what Politico has spun, you're buying into the myth. Critz ran on everything Murtha opposed. This district is 2-1 D. There were 100,000 union members alone voting like they were told to vote.
Posted by: RushBabe at May 19, 2010 11:09 AM (W8m8i)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 02:51 PM (ujg0T)
I remember the 70's very well. I don't have the energy to go into everything, but to my mind, there is no comparison, at all. The credit crisis of 2008 marked a very serious point of departure for this nation - an indication that we are operating on a totally different plane, now. Yes, we had the prime rate at 18% before and we had stagflation and all sorts of problems, including a total moron in the White House, but that just doesn't compare to our current monetary situation and the fact that we have a true America-hater, who has not even the least amount of American sensibilities, in the White House, who, himself, is bent on the destruction of our nation. There is just a major difference between having an American in charge (even one who hates America) and having a foreigner (as the Indonesian Imbecile is a foreigner in everything about him, regardless of whether he holds an American passport). This should have been driven home to most when we saw how he got a kick out of running our legislative processes into the ground (no "American" would have pushed the Porkulus or the health scare like that, as we know from history). And the media being behind him (more than any other Chief-Executive, ever) and happy to foment racial animus in defense, lends more than a sharp edge to all this.
No. These are very different times. At least, I have no doubt about that. There are many other particulars that I could go into (and I usually do) but I will spare you.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 11:13 AM (Qp4DT)
Lyndon LaRouche is a serious contender for public office.
Posted by: Politico at May 19, 2010 11:13 AM (P33XN)
@ 139
Wow, I'm old and I can't remember half that stuff.
I was born late 1967 and only a little kid then, albeit a precocious one. Maybe it all just got burned into the CD-ROM of my mind. (I know there were no such things back then, heh). I just remember how dirgelike it all was, about how we would have to accept "an era of limits" in the words of both Jimmuh Carturd and then Governor (and God forbid possibly future Governor again) Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown. Small wonder there were news reports of more than a few pre-teen kids drinking the Drano. A pall of despair and doom seemed to cover everything.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 11:22 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Tim at May 19, 2010 11:22 AM (xq7pr)
No. These are very different
times. At least, I have no doubt about that. There are many other
particulars that I could go into (and I usually do) but I will spare
you.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 03:13 PM (Qp4DT)
After reading The Forgotten Man, I find far more similarities between Obama and FDR than Obama and Carter. Particularly his animus for the private sector.Posted by: Ed Anger at May 19, 2010 11:24 AM (7+pP9)
I really think you should write a post up and email it to ace. You've had so many fascinating comments it would be nice to see them all in one cohesive thread where everyone will see them as opposed to being fortunate enough to come upon them in a thread on another topic.
Posted by: curious at May 19, 2010 11:24 AM (p302b)
That is one scary book. Between that book and Beck, you could easily wonder why more people aren't up in arms.
Posted by: curious at May 19, 2010 11:26 AM (p302b)
I just remember how dirgelike it all was, about how we would have to accept "an era of limits" in the words of both Jimmuh Carturd and then Governor (and God forbid possibly future Governor again) Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown.
On a follow-up note, note how those "limits" only applied to private citizens and private enterprise, *never* the government. Nuh uh. Did I mention how I loathe Commiecrats?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 11:28 AM (ujg0T)
Thanks, curious. I think I'll stick to shouting from the sidelines, though. I repeat these things often enough that most run into them at one point or another, I think.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 11:31 AM (Qp4DT)
We voted for our homeboy's SEAT. We seasoned citizen's gotta stand by our own, yo.
And we gotta give a shoutout to our well armed leader, Dicky Denzel Blumenthal.
Posted by: The Retired Black Panters at May 19, 2010 11:33 AM (gbCNS)
I view Obama as an amalgamation of both of them. He haqs the economic philosophy of FDR and the foreign policy of Carter. The only difference is that he ius much further to the left of both of them and he is starting from a point that is already further to the left than both of them had when they became President and intends to take things even further into the communist front.
That is why these times are so dangerous and why if we can't stop him this year we are doomed.
Posted by: Vic at May 19, 2010 11:34 AM (6taRI)
PA-12 is NOT a "big one." It is competitive in presidential elections, NOT in its House races. The only Republicans who've won there since 1936 were those redistricted into the seat as incumbents. The last Republican to hold the seat at all was John Saylor, who died in office shortly after winning it in 1973.
Primaries are over, Politico! You can go back to perusing your Blue Boys now.
Posted by: Adjoran at May 19, 2010 11:35 AM (3hg5M)
Conservatives of all stripes look to David Frum as the future of the Republican Party.
Posted by: Politico at May 19, 2010 11:39 AM (P33XN)
I remember the 70's very well. I don't have the energy to go into everything, but to my mind, there is no comparison, at all.
Someone else asked Ace (or Drew, or LauraW, or Dave In Texas whoever with Moron Posting power is reading this) to start an "Are We Doomed--Yes or No" topic.
I heartily second that. I think it needs hashing out. When normally I, the World's Greatest Pessimist, is defending (real GOP) Hope and (after November 2010 and November 2012) Change, something is odd.
The credit crisis of 2008 marked a very serious point of departure for this nation - an indication that we are operating on a totally different plane, now. Yes, we had the prime rate at 18% before and we had stagflation and all sorts of problems, including a total moron in the White House, but that just doesn't compare to our current monetary situation
Really? You do realize the giddy irresponsibility of massive spending increases in a declining economy is not new? I remember how the Demunists screamed about Uncle Ron's nominal deficits--never mind that in real (as a % of GDP) terms, they were falling, because GDP was growing so much.
and the fact that we have a true America-hater, who has not even the least amount of American sensibilities, in the White House, who, himself, is bent on the destruction of our nation.
Remember the Nuclear Freezeniks? The Sandinista pole-suckers? This 5th Column isn't new, although how it camoflagued itself and won an election sadly may be.
This should have been driven home to most when we saw how he got a kick out of running our legislative processes into the ground (no "American" would have pushed the Porkulus or the health scare like that, as we know from history).
Zombie Tip O'Neill and Zombie Ted Kennedy might have a bone to pick with you about that (no pun intended).
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 11:39 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Ed Anger at May 19, 2010 03:24 PM (7+pP9)
To add to what Vic said, I would draw a distinction between FDR and The Precedent in their motivations. FDR, as much of a power-hungry socialist/fascist as he desired to be, and as much contempt as he had for private enterprise, was still an American who loved the nation. He thought he was doing good for America.
The Precedent is not driven by any liking for America. Quite the opposite. I don't think The Precedent really cares much about leftist political theories, partly because he's too stupid to understand them, and partly because he just doesn't care. I don't believe that The Precedent is trying to change America into "anything" in particular. He is more like the French Revolutionaries, who were driven by an insane desire to just destroy all vestiges of tradition and to put organized Christianity into the ground, for good. Of course, The Precedent has not even 1/100th the talent or intelligence of the French Revolutionaries (thank G-d) and is not driven to destroy tradition and our society for the same reason. The Precedent just wants to exact revenge on us for the third world. He wants us to feel the pain that he thinks we deserve. I have been quite convinced of this since before the election and have not seen anything to change my mind.
Just ot illustrate the difference between FDR and The Precedent, I think we can look at capital gains taxes. The hypothetical was posed to the Indonesian Imbecile that receipts to the government would fall with a raising of capital gains taxes. Given that assumption, The Precedent said taht he would still raise the taxes (hurting the poor along with the rich) because he considered it a matter of "fairness". FDR, I believe, would have not given that answer, since he believed more in actual redistribution. The Precedent believes in retribution more than redistribution. Add to that that he is foreign in his thinking and feelings and you have the makings of something horrible that our nation has not had to encounter before and for which we don't have the margin of error to survive, as an intact nation.
That's how I see it, at least.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 11:46 AM (Qp4DT)
Burns ran on repeal. Critz' position was that he'd have voted against it but would not support repeal.
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at May 19, 2010 11:55 AM (+8jFr)
Posted by: Jean at May 19, 2010 11:55 AM (h0rZ/)
-->Really? You do realize the giddy irresponsibility of massive spending increases in a declining economy is not new? I remember how the Demunists screamed about Uncle Ron's nominal deficits--never mind that in real (as a % of GDP) terms, they were falling, because GDP was growing so much.
I wasn't addressing fiscal policy, but monetary armaggedon. They are different animals, and monetary collapse of the dollar would be a truly unique event in history, as no other monetary system that has collapsed has ever been the glue of world trade and the various monetary systems. We are not Weimar, nor Albania, nor Zimbabwe, nor Iceland, nor any of the other monetary systems that have come crashing down. The US dollar is a different story, altogether.
Yes, I remember them. That's why I laughed when people talked about how Europe hated Bush. They didn't remember. But, the Cold War put a limit on many things and kept much of American policy within constrained borders - by necessity. It was after the fall of the USSR that we first truly empowered the UN (one of the dumbest acts, ever) and that things changed in America to truly endanger us. Before, the anti-war nutjobs were just running around all hopped up in the streets. Now, they are in the White House and Congress and in the courts. That is a serious move to another level - and I tend to tell people that as the radicals of the 60's have now seized power, this will end the same way the 60's ended, but 10000 times worse because the whackjobs are holding the levers of power.
[[[This should have been driven home to most when we saw how he got a kick out of running our legislative processes into the ground (no "American" would have pushed the Porkulus or the health scare like that, as we know from history).
-->Zombie Tip O'Neill and Zombie Ted Kennedy might have a bone to pick with you about that (no pun intended).
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 03:39 PM (ujg0T)
No. No Congress would have pushed legistlation through after the Town Halls and the like, and certainly not as they were crowing about how no one could even read what was in the bill. Things are different. They are different because we really have a non-natural born citizen in the White House (certainly in spirit, in addition to his technical non-natural status) who has nothing but total contempt for us and our institutions. He wants nothing but to destroy those. In that attempt, he hides behind his skin - threatening race riots whenever he gets in a jam, and the threat or fear of which has kept many at bay for a whole lot of stupid shit, not least of which the actual natural born citizen question) - the media is 1000% behind him, and white guilt is the powerful force keeping the nation from defending itself.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 19, 2010 11:57 AM (Qp4DT)
Make sure you wear the safety helmet that S Weasel designed for Moron Nation as you transit the US on that mini-bike, ala Dumb and Dumber! We don't want any claims on Obamacare out there!
So, you're saying there's a chance?
Posted by: Jay in Ames at May 19, 2010 12:19 PM (UEEex)
Make sure you wear the safety helmet that S Weasel designed for Moron Nation as you transit the US on that mini-bike, ala Dumb and Dumber! We don't want any claims on Obamacare out there!
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 19, 2010 12:36 PM (ujg0T)
@13: "And God willing, we'll have enough to defund Obama care."
And what magical party do you speak of that has members actually willing to defund ObizzleCare? It sure as shit isn't the Republicans. They just want to give it a little trim here and there.
Not that it likely matters much anyway - when the economy collapses, the gummint machine goes with it.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at May 19, 2010 03:54 PM (kmEfr)
The PA-12 district is gerrymanded beyond belief.
See how it tortuously maps the 'post- industrial, wouldn't mind some free stuff from D.C.' demographic. Johnstown, Uniontown, Washington. It's the 'I'll vote for Murtha' district. That's why it was created. How could a Murtha clone not win there?
I'm not sure I believe the predictive power of polls in this case. I think the outcome was guaranteed from the beginning.
And could Newt just putter around at home and drink his Metamucil? He's a shadow of what he was in '94, a bad joke. He does not speak for me. Does he speak for you? I thought not. Keep him out of sight like the crazy aunt in the attic.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at May 19, 2010 04:09 PM (w41GQ)
@83: "Why do people put such faith in Intrade? It's a bunch of people paying for the chance to guess stuff."
The same argument can be made for the DJIA, S&P 500, Hang Seng, Nikkei, etc.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at May 19, 2010 04:22 PM (kmEfr)
The ideology of both FDR and Obama have to be taken in the context of their times. After the Russian revolution it was widely assumed that capitalism was in decline and socialism was the system of the future. Politicians like FDR often thought they were preventing a cataclysmic revolution by instituting national controls of economic activities. We certainly know better now but those like Obama cling to the socialist model because of the power it places in the hands of self described intellectuals.
Posted by: NC Mountain Girl at May 19, 2010 05:17 PM (Qm3/c)
Except for the non-zero sum nature of industrial equities, and the multi-trillion dollars sums involved, but mostly, the multi-trillion dollars sums involved.
Posted by: damian at May 19, 2010 06:03 PM (4WbTI)
Posted by: TheJane at May 19, 2010 06:45 PM (9TxlI)
Posted by: dfcvbcb at May 19, 2010 08:11 PM (n2yDq)
Posted by: Free Power of Attorney Form at October 07, 2010 01:19 AM (QqkGV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2442 seconds, 306 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: ParisParamus at May 19, 2010 09:42 AM (lf/rr)