November 20, 2010
— Ace She's posing for GQ. Looking sort of... you know.
Mediaite ponders whether this pose is inconsistent with Kelly being taken seriously as a newswoman.
I don't know, but I'm not sure direct male-to-female comparisons are appropriate. Someone might say that a male reporter, considered good-looking, would never pose sexy like this. But they do -- men just show their sexiness in a different way, by and large. A good-looking male reporter might be pictured in a less overtly "sexy" way -- like maybe he's casually leaning back against a wall with his top button undone -- but that kind of shot is the male equivalent of a sexy pose, right?
I'm also not sure that just looking sexy, for either gender, is incompatible with being professional and "serious." Serious people aren't interested in sex? Serious people don't deliberately put out sexy vibes?
There's always all this cluck-clucking over this sort of thing, as people resent that good-looking people have an unfair advantage in all things, including their careers. Over on the feminist side of things, they've created a big (very inconsistently and selectively applied) code to attack good-looking women for doing this sort of thing, to discourage it. (They've been more successful at it than men, certainly, who really don't have anything beyond lame put-downs like "prettyboy" to knock rivals getting an advantage due to looks.)
But show me a feminist author who can sell a few more books on Oprah by talking a lot about sex and showing some cleavage and I'll show you a feminist author who is on Oprah talking about sex and showing some cleavage.
In summary: I would hit that so hard I'd split atoms in her privates.
Posted by: Ace at
01:28 PM
| Comments (175)
Post contains 312 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Drillanwr at November 20, 2010 01:32 PM (NcSGp)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 01:33 PM (U5btG)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at November 20, 2010 01:33 PM (NITzp)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 01:34 PM (U5btG)
Posted by: Muckraker at November 20, 2010 01:35 PM (6K81O)
Posted by: CAC at November 20, 2010 01:35 PM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 01:36 PM (U5btG)
Posted by: ace © at November 20, 2010 01:37 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: nevergiveup
Yeah, some fellas find that an even bigger turn-on. My husband, for one.
Posted by: Drillanwr at November 20, 2010 01:37 PM (NcSGp)
Posted by: CMU VET at November 20, 2010 01:38 PM (uzv18)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 05:34 PM (U5btG)
Well... women can have sex until the third trimester...
Posted by: Jay, of Silent Bob and Jay, Dogma at November 20, 2010 01:38 PM (AdK6a)
Posted by: UGAdawg at November 20, 2010 01:39 PM (/VjHB)
You just say "eh" to nines? You're that deep in quality gesheesh?
Preach. Nine is right.
Disappointed a bit in her decision to do this though. Tacky.
Well, my big head is anyway.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at November 20, 2010 01:40 PM (AZWim)
Whatever. bunk
Posted by: brak at November 20, 2010 01:41 PM (nIoiW)
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 01:41 PM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at November 20, 2010 01:41 PM (NITzp)
Posted by: CMU VET at November 20, 2010 01:41 PM (uzv18)
Posted by: Hillary Clinton at November 20, 2010 01:42 PM (U6bBs)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 01:42 PM (U5btG)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at November 20, 2010 01:43 PM (4h8nI)
(A little aggro for my long-married 39-year old tastes.)
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 20, 2010 01:43 PM (Z6Mgb)
But they do -- men just show their sexiness in a different way, by and large. A good-looking male reporter might be pictured in a less overtly "sexy" way -- like maybe he's casually leaning back against a wall with his top button undone -- but that kind of shot is the male equivalent of a sexy pose, right?
This is an excellent point worth repeating as well. Male sexiness, what women find attractive, doesn't have to be so over the top and in her face so to speak.
Things like posture, body language, and a cocky smile go much further for women.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at November 20, 2010 01:43 PM (AZWim)
Posted by: CAC at November 20, 2010 01:44 PM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 01:44 PM (U5btG)
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 20, 2010 01:45 PM (bi3em)
Posted by: JackStraw at November 20, 2010 01:47 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 01:47 PM (U5btG)
Well, I only noticed the text because I'm trying to work the mouse with my left hand and hit the scrolling wheel by accident.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at November 20, 2010 01:48 PM (4h8nI)
Is this guy (mug photo) really missing the top of his head?
Posted by: momma at November 20, 2010 01:49 PM (penCf)
But, whatever. I stopped taking "journalists" or whatever the heck these folks claim to be seriously eons ago when they started popping up on entertainment shows and becoming "personalities."
Posted by: Y-not at November 20, 2010 01:49 PM (Ec33Y)
Posted by: Tantor at November 20, 2010 01:50 PM (Ek/Oc)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at November 20, 2010 01:50 PM (NITzp)
No, sorry, I'm really not going to be pulled OT this time....
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at November 20, 2010 01:51 PM (4h8nI)
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 20, 2010 01:51 PM (bi3em)
31 True that, and now I demand this site begin a study on what makes a guy sexy -- with lots of pictorial examples so we can judge for ourselves (and no bogus links to frightening looking ones either).
Posted by: unknown jane at November 20, 2010 01:51 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: CAC at November 20, 2010 01:52 PM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 01:52 PM (e4sSD)
Being a 'ette, I mostly noticed her hair and the ugly shoes.
Posted by: Museisluse© at November 20, 2010 01:53 PM (DTfXb)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at November 20, 2010 01:53 PM (i+9lz)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 01:53 PM (U5btG)
In these, she's obviously trying to look sexy. In the others, she's just being herself and is less overt about it. I find her more attractive in those.
Yeah I hear ya. These pics are certainly incongruent with how she tries to sell herself.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at November 20, 2010 01:53 PM (AZWim)
And, you go, girl!
I'm embarrassed by conservative commenters on other blogs who opine she's "selling out" by appearing sexy. Hey, idiots. She's reminding the leftards how few hot women they have on their side.
Conservative women: hawt
Libtard women: tired, worn-out and angry looking. Bonus: more facial hair.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 20, 2010 01:54 PM (UOM48)
By the way all you fellow perverts do know she is with child again.
How did that happen?
Posted by: Jay GuevaraWhen a man and a woman love each other very much, or when two lesbians hate one another's guts, and one has access to a turkey baster, sperm sample and sleeping pills........
Posted by: Moronic sex ed at November 20, 2010 01:54 PM (1O93r)
Posted by: dagny at November 20, 2010 01:55 PM (2GOHX)
Posted by: ombudsman at November 20, 2010 01:55 PM (c1oyg)
Posted by: Client #9 at November 20, 2010 01:56 PM (U5btG)
Posted by: Soothsayer McRib at November 20, 2010 05:55 PM (waTiq)
You say that like it's a bad thing
Posted by: ombudsman at November 20, 2010 01:57 PM (c1oyg)
Posted by: CAC at November 20, 2010 01:57 PM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: Barbarian at November 20, 2010 01:58 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: cali grump at November 20, 2010 01:58 PM (hL0k8)
Posted by: ombudsman at November 20, 2010 01:58 PM (c1oyg)
I'm with Ace, she can be everything, sexy woman, and proud of it. and smart.
Why sell herself short? use what you have your brain, and beauty.
anyone remember the story of esther?
Posted by: willow at November 20, 2010 01:59 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at November 20, 2010 01:59 PM (4h8nI)
31 True that, and now I demand
Posted by: unknown jane at November 20, 2010 05:51 PM (5/yRG)
Mon Dieu!.... who let ze Feminists out of their cage!
Posted by: Victor Chauvin at November 20, 2010 02:00 PM (AdK6a)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 02:00 PM (U5btG)
Work it, girlfriend.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 20, 2010 02:00 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: William_Shatner's_Pants at November 20, 2010 02:00 PM (dhz9q)
Posted by: CAC at November 20, 2010 02:01 PM (Gr1V1)
Unknown Jane is right, we Women get short shift on this blog, Where's our intelligent , and sexy men?
Equal rights !
Posted by: willow at November 20, 2010 02:01 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: JackStraw at November 20, 2010 02:03 PM (TMB3S)
Unknown Jane is right, we Women get short shift on this blog, Where's our intelligent , and sexy men?
Equal rights !
Posted by: willow at November 20, 2010 06:01 PM (h+qn
That's because men are disgusting and women are beautiful. QED.
Posted by: ombudsman at November 20, 2010 02:04 PM (c1oyg)
Jane true about the help of pregnancy for more impressive breasts. heck maybe that's why i liked being pregnant or nursing for so many years. Finally i had impressive tata's?
Posted by: willow at November 20, 2010 02:04 PM (h+qn8)
The real state sovereignty battle has now engaged, folks. mosov.org.
Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at November 20, 2010 02:05 PM (jbCcb)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 20, 2010 02:05 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 02:06 PM (U5btG)
Easy for me. I'm known in science circles as The Extra Large Hadron Collider.
Posted by: Mr Wizard at November 20, 2010 02:06 PM (H+LJc)
81...
you missed the Rubio posts*? that is where you should have been posting pics. We can't do the work for you.
*I heard somewhere that he is attractive. I am not attracted to him, except for his politics. NTTAWWT.
Posted by: citizen slave at November 20, 2010 02:06 PM (aYJtl)
She is an absolutely beautiful woman, very smart and very sexy.
Agreed. And she looks like a slut. Her husband must be a cuckold.
Posted by: Soothsayer McRib at November 20, 2010 02:06 PM (waTiq)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at November 20, 2010 05:50 PM (NITzp)
Completely agree; not that I don't appreciate these pix but there are so many times when she's aggressively interviewing some lib dipshit where she just looks so fucking hawt. Libs must be so frustrated that they have such worthless asexual mutts on their side. Sucks to be them.
Posted by: Captain Hate at November 20, 2010 02:06 PM (ccPlf)
Keep that atom smasher in your knickers. Nuclear energy is not for recreational purposes.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 20, 2010 02:07 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 20, 2010 02:08 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at November 20, 2010 02:09 PM (PWj+8)
Posted by: willow at November 20, 2010 02:10 PM (h+qn8)
Over at Hot Air.
:ducks
Posted by: Barbarian at November 20, 2010 06:04 PM (EL+OC)
AP gazes into a full length mirror and sees the the only thing he's ever found sexy
Posted by: Mr Wizard at November 20, 2010 02:10 PM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Annabelle at November 20, 2010 02:10 PM (Zeljq)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 20, 2010 02:11 PM (eCAn3)
Posted by: joejm65 at November 20, 2010 02:12 PM (rOhN5)
Oh my gawd.....she looks like a whore!!!! I'll bet she's not even as smart as Michelle!!111!!! Fox is sexist and racist!!111!! Where are all the hot liberal, feminist women?!!111!!!
Posted by: Joy Behar at November 20, 2010 02:12 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: awkward davies at November 20, 2010 02:12 PM (YCW1b)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 20, 2010 06:05 PM (UOM4
From this man's perspective, there's nothing sexier than a brilliant, confident, assertive woman. The fact that she's also a goddess, well... put that cherry on top
Posted by: ombudsman at November 20, 2010 02:13 PM (c1oyg)
Barbarian, said Sexy dudes over at hot air?
heck i bet many sexy men blog and comment here.
Hot Air is fine buy slightly anemic.
Posted by: willow at November 20, 2010 02:13 PM (h+qn8)
Funny how there are people so repressed that they actually think that.
Posted by: Boxy Brown at November 20, 2010 02:13 PM (Y4Fu0)
75 Yeah, that's right -- I'm a feminist. I believe that it's ok, perfectly normal and fine for you guys to give sexy females the once over and comment about it -- hey, if I was a guy that's probably what I'd do too.
Sauce for the gander is good for the goose -- I like looking at good looking men, because I like 'em. So let's roll with some of that beatiful beefcake footage; we women will talk about sexy guys while allowing you men to get your spunk on drooling over the lovely Mrs. Kelly (or Mz. Kelly, if you'd rather I kept with the feminist program).
(and yeah, I'm very happily married -- but I'm not dead; same holds for my husband -- I'd be kidding myself if I thought he didn't have some appreciation for the female form, it's just from afar...or he's a dead man
)
Posted by: unknown jane at November 20, 2010 02:13 PM (5/yRG)
Compare & Contrast
Posted by: Soothsayer McRib at November 20, 2010 06:04 PM (/ebqR)
Cripes, you just had to post that at dinner time.
Bitch gives me the dry heaves.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 20, 2010 02:14 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 20, 2010 02:14 PM (U5btG)
Those aren't real. If they we're real like mine she'd have men panting after her, like they are after me.
I'm fighting them off all the time.
Unless they have food, that's different.
Posted by: Meghan McCain at November 20, 2010 02:17 PM (Zp7VU)
Unless they have food, that's different.
Posted by: Meghan McCain at November 20, 2010 06:17 PM (Zp7VU)
I hear a stick of butter callin' your name Fatty McButterpants
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at November 20, 2010 02:18 PM (eCAn3)
Posted by: willow at November 20, 2010 02:18 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: unknown jane at November 20, 2010 02:19 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: awkward davies at November 20, 2010 02:20 PM (YCW1b)
Posted by: CAC at November 20, 2010 02:20 PM (Gr1V1)
You like your women to be members of the Burqa Brigade?
Posted by: Holger at November 20, 2010 02:21 PM (V9Q+f)
Mediaite ponders whether this pose is inconsistent with Kelly being taken seriously as a newswoman.
Really? Really? Mediaite? Well, that criticism stings, coming from a venerable journalism organ like...Mediaite.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 20, 2010 02:23 PM (BvBKY)
114 I can't understand the problem with sexy, good looking women -- what's wrong with a woman being fine? And why is it that sexy has to equal slutty looking? The double standard hasn't really gone away -- thanks to feminazis and their lap dogs. It's all about de-sexualizing people, which is ridiculous.
That said -- these pictures are a bit bogus. She's much better looking than what is represented here, bad angles/poses, over the top going for the slutty look when this woman could really do the sexy thing. Such a shame; wonder if GQ meant to do that, assholes.
Posted by: unknown jane at November 20, 2010 02:23 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 20, 2010 02:26 PM (Aczu7)
GQ. Next they'll have a ten page spread of Michelle O: World's Most Glamorous, Sexiest Woman Evah! And the number of hair and makeup people, the air-brushing, the photoshop work to trim the hips and ass.....
Posted by: Joy Behar at November 20, 2010 02:30 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 20, 2010 02:30 PM (UOM48)
Why are people griping about how QG made or did not make her look?
She chose that slip right? And to be provocative by removing the strap?
That's not on QG. That's on Megyn Kelly.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 20, 2010 02:34 PM (Aczu7)
123 That's what I was thinking, and I'm sick of the "oooh Michelle is sooo be-utiful and fabulous". Please. She wasn't godawful looking to begin with -- in fact, if she actually practiced what she harps about, trimmed up, dressed better, she'd be ok.
But her inner nature shines forth, and thus she is an ugly, ugly person.
Oh, fyi: there is a facebook page with men in uniform. Some of the pictures are models, meh, but some are real...sexy. Sometimes they even post pictures of females, just for you men. But men in uniform....mmm mmm mmm, oh my!
Posted by: unknown jane at November 20, 2010 02:35 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: CrustyB at November 20, 2010 02:36 PM (qzgbP)
That's not on QG. That's on Megyn Kelly.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 20, 2010 06:34 PM (Aczu7)
Well, partly. And that's the good part.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 20, 2010 02:40 PM (HBqDo)
Megyn's a beautiful woman, and I see no reason why she shouldn't show that off. Having said that, I've seen her where she's looked more beautiful. Of course, I'm looking more at her face, and those shots don't do her justice. She has a hard, cold look to her face. I don't think the photographer captured her beauty as well as he/she could have.
Leaving all that aside, the pics take nothing away from her being an intelligent journalist, anchor, or attorney. Give 'em hell, girl!
Posted by: Steph at November 20, 2010 02:49 PM (DReGA)
I'm am so totally with you on this one. Megan, if you're reading this, we totally know you are both sexy and a serious journalist. That being said, how about a beaver shot?
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at November 20, 2010 02:57 PM (1eTDn)
Just who exactly has ever taken her seriously as a newswoman?
A roving, a roving, I'll go no more a roving with you fair maid!
All hands stand by for heavy rolls as the ship comes about!
Posted by: VADM (Red) Cuthbert Collingwood RN at November 20, 2010 03:00 PM (UL/HQ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 20, 2010 03:00 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Sock Puppet 5000 at November 20, 2010 03:00 PM (sWPjB)
She's not a true blonde (?)
Can you say 'roots'?
Just sayin'- does the top match the bottom???
Posted by: Mr Wolf at November 20, 2010 03:10 PM (Nht4m)
Posted by: eman at November 20, 2010 03:15 PM (CbwqF)
Posted by: str8 outta the mon at November 20, 2010 03:18 PM (dwOwg)
Posted by: str8 outta the mon at November 20, 2010 07:18 PM (dwOwg)
Julie Banderas? I don't know, I've been busy lately and don't know what's really going on at Fox.
FWIW, I think Banderas is way hotter than Kelly. I guess I like Latinas or sump'n!
Posted by: ErikW at November 20, 2010 03:22 PM (5jBaY)
Posted by: str8 outta the mon at November 20, 2010 03:24 PM (dwOwg)
Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at November 20, 2010 03:25 PM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: Tighty righty at November 20, 2010 03:25 PM (pTOob)
Posted by: str8 outta the mon at November 20, 2010 03:28 PM (dwOwg)
i think banderas is hotter too....but shes very subdued lately.
I read that her dad passed. The funeral was today, I think. I don't know if he's been ill or what happened.
Posted by: Annabelle at November 20, 2010 03:29 PM (Zeljq)
Posted by: Ryan at November 20, 2010 03:41 PM (iiRkL)
Posted by: JDW at November 20, 2010 03:43 PM (pgFlh)
But then again fox news is nothing more than entertainment for the terminally intolerant and perpetually enraged and selfish...
Have a nice night, douche bags. Don't give yourselves any blisters now..
Posted by: Butters at November 20, 2010 03:47 PM (vUdSP)
Have a nice night, douche bags.
Posted by: Butters at November 20, 2010 07:47 PM (vUdSP)
Okay, but in the future, douche bags should be douchebags.
I know, it's minor but important.
Posted by: ErikW at November 20, 2010 03:55 PM (5jBaY)
Butters, please just use a little Astroglide® so that you don't get blisters from fapping to Rachel Maddow and/or Keefums.
Posted by: MrCaniac at November 20, 2010 03:56 PM (oREHE)
It's ok big guy. At least the left has the beauty of Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi.
Posted by: Ryan at November 20, 2010 03:58 PM (iiRkL)
Smart hot chicks that don't take shit from anyone are where it's at.
I could be far cruder, but I'll leave it with my reaction when I saw that pic for teh first time, quote: "Damnation"
Posted by: CoolHand at November 20, 2010 04:01 PM (kNNR3)
Posted by: Drillanwr at November 20, 2010 04:03 PM (NcSGp)
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 20, 2010 04:16 PM (HBTr7)
Posted by: Original Mikey at November 20, 2010 04:18 PM (1Y2Js)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 20, 2010 04:38 PM (tJjm/)
I mean I would really hit that for 1000 years
10,000 years from now when some little green alien archaeologists find my mummy dick embedded in her petrified pelvic bone they're gonna say ""no shit, this dude must have hit that for 1000 years".
Posted by: Berserker at November 20, 2010 04:38 PM (gWHrG)
Posted by: weimdog at November 20, 2010 04:54 PM (g1Ebq)
Posted by: Zombie Walter Cronkite at November 20, 2010 04:59 PM (502+o)
Posted by: JackStraw at November 20, 2010 05:06 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at November 20, 2010 05:08 PM (mdxTy)
Posted by: SarahW at November 20, 2010 05:20 PM (Z4T49)
Posted by: janine garafalo at November 20, 2010 05:37 PM (pTOob)
Posted by: Dick_Nixon at November 20, 2010 05:47 PM (Y5POM)
By the way all you fellow perverts do know she is with child again.
even hotter.
gotta go late for appointment with my bunk.
Posted by: evil libertarian at November 20, 2010 09:37 PM (7350C)
Posted by: Rbastid at November 20, 2010 10:25 PM (LLq30)
Posted by: Living in a world I don't understand at November 21, 2010 06:22 AM (UYJ+m)
And that, bitter-clingers, is why I hate Fox News!
OsamaHusseinIslamObama
-the terrorist-Uighur-ACORN-media choice-
It's never too early to campaign
Posted by: Barry Soetoro (D-King OF The World!) at November 21, 2010 06:53 AM (eFhxQ)
Posted by: Crashpanic at November 21, 2010 07:25 AM (VNvGQ)
Welcome to our website
===== http://www.1shopping.us/ =======
accept paypal and free shipping
We need your support and trust!!!
Dear friends, please temporarily stop your footsteps
To our website Walk around A look at
Maybe you'll find happiness in your sight shopping heaven and earth
You'll find our price is more suitable for you.
And we shall be offer you free gift about MP4 if you more order.
===== http://www.1shopping.us/ ========
Posted by: fsafs46 at November 22, 2010 04:14 AM (ugJNE)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2802 seconds, 303 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Romeo13 at November 20, 2010 01:29 PM (AdK6a)