August 30, 2010
— Ace Read the document; it's, as the Miller campaign says, "beyond troubling."
Then, Murkowski observer Mike insisted he had the right to access the Division of Election computer database and "check voter records." Over the Miller Campaign's objection, Mike was allowed to use the state computer for 20 minutes before Division Director Gail Fenumiai fortunately ordered him off the state computer. For 20 minutes this Murkowski observer was in the state's voter records viewing private information and, we are told, accessed the state's election managment system. Katrine explained to those present that allowing observers access to the Division of Election computers compromises voter privacy, since it displays Social Security numbers, dates of birth and drivers license numbers and other information. That is true, and bad enough.But there is also another aspect of Mkie's use of the state's election computer. As you know, Alaska uses electronic voting. The Diebold software contains vulnerabilities that may allow someone to install malicious software to miscount votes. In an election security report to the Lt. Governor submitted in 2007, it was noted that someone could "alter[] election results" by installing software. Further, software installed into the election management system could lead, according to the report, "large scale election fraud."
...
This is a close election. Even just a few ballots illegally tampered with could alter the outcome. How can Joe Miller, and the thousands of honest voters in Alaska who voted for him, have confidence in the result if a Murkowski observer had 20 minutes of unfettered access to the State's GEMS server? And the state's own report states tampering can be accomplished within a minute.
Posted by: Ace at
06:21 AM
| Comments (189)
Post contains 291 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: J. Moses Browning at August 30, 2010 06:29 AM (i5153)
I said in the last flame war on this topic that Murkowski is going to win. It is a Republican machine state and Papa Murkowski is a big cog in that machine.
they will find votes, strike vote, or count the votes of moose if they have to.
He sees this senate seat as a family heirloom to be passed down. He won't let them take it away from his daughter because she got less votes.
Obviously, there is still a chance she can win it legitimately with the absentee ballots, but i have a feeling they will favor Miller over Murk, so she needs to do everything she can to close the 1,600 vote gap.
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2010 06:29 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2010 06:30 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: That stupid journalist chick from that Afghanistan press conference at August 30, 2010 06:31 AM (HLGCA)
Posted by: Scrapiron at August 30, 2010 06:31 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at August 30, 2010 06:32 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at August 30, 2010 06:34 AM (Cjcud)
Posted by: Dunkirk at August 30, 2010 06:37 AM (kbHJ6)
Posted by: eman at August 30, 2010 06:37 AM (BK24x)
Our very survival as a republic depends on people having confidence in our elective process. Right now, that confidence doesn't exist.
Posted by: Warden at August 30, 2010 06:38 AM (fE6tn)
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 30, 2010 06:38 AM (EPgc2)
Posted by: mpur in Texas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at August 30, 2010 06:40 AM (6pi4V)
Posted by: typical liberal dipshit at August 30, 2010 06:40 AM (nOvIQ)
Read the PDF letter. They are fucking around with fire.
i just did. i want to amend my comment at 7. i don't think we should support murkowski.
this is fucking unbelieveable (profanity called for).
This is like Sandy Berger stuff documents in his socks.
tried to access the ballot room with a fucking bag? a bag? why would he need a bag in that room?
is this stuff on security cameras? Can they get an IT guy in there to see what this guy took off the computer. My guess is that he took the addresses and contact information of people who requested absentee ballots but did not send them in. I would think he would then contact them and tell them to fill them out for Murkowski and send them in, and then they would try to get them counted.
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2010 06:41 AM (wuv1c)
If you can't keep republicans from cheating, defrauding and disenfranchising the voters how THE HELL DO YOU EXPECT TO STOP THE LIBTARDS? Who allowed them access to the computers and will this person allow democrats in to the machines like they do in most urban centers in the US?
Posted by: Thomas Young at August 30, 2010 06:42 AM (18UKv)
We are doing nothing but feeding the MFM and the Dems new meme of Republican civil war with this crap.
What should be going on is when the Miller team finds stuff like the above it needs to be discussed with the election commission and NOT the papers and MFM.
If we get left out too bad, it is for our own good.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 06:42 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Truman North at August 30, 2010 06:43 AM (HLGCA)
Posted by: Johnnyreb at August 30, 2010 06:44 AM (y67bA)
The feudal attitude of the ruling class disturbs me more and more.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at August 30, 2010 06:45 AM (KJkPO)
"All the NRSC did was send one teeny tiny little lawyer to Alaska. Stop whining!" ?
Posted by: eman
Good point. Now that the NRSC is in state, any stupidity that occurs happens on their watch. There is now another player for the blame game.
Also, Has she forsworn the prospect of a third party betrayal yet?
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 30, 2010 06:46 AM (R2fpr)
Amen, Vic.
I'm afraid the next step will be for Murkowski's campaign to trot out similar charges against Miller election observers. An excess of zeal is standard equipment in virtually all campaigns. Sometimes, that leads to crossing the legal lines, but most often the offenses are in the eye of the beholder.
Meanwhile, the Democrat candidate for AK Senator is sitting quietly by, watching and laughing.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 30, 2010 06:47 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: The Group Formerly Known as ACORN at August 30, 2010 06:48 AM (8d9qD)
We are doing nothing but feeding the MFM and the Dems new meme of Republican civil war with this crap.
What should be going on is when the Miller team finds stuff like the above it needs to be discussed with the election commission and NOT the papers and MFM.
If we get left out too bad, it is for our own good.
Posted by: Vic
I disagree. Now is the time, and in public is the venue. if we waits, or if he reports it only to the election board, then they will have the opportunity to spin it and it will a fait accompli. If the press does actually do their job, there will be pressure on these people to answer, while it still matters.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 30, 2010 06:48 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 30, 2010 06:49 AM (I+0qc)
Who allowed this asshole access to the database to begin with?
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at August 30, 2010 06:49 AM (554T5)
Yep, she very well may be trying to steal the election in the style of "found ballots" and tinkering but that needs to be kept between them and the election officials.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 06:49 AM (/jbAw)
What should be going on is when the Miller team finds stuff like the above it needs to be discussed with the election commission and NOT the papers and MFM.
I disagree. This needs to be out there in Alaska, the people need to know
Honestly the MFM is going to say we are in a civil war no matter what. And let's be frank, this time they would be right. This election is party of a civil war that has been going our crushing defeat in 2008. I've picked my side, and I don't care if the fight is out in the open. There is nothing the MFM can do to stop what is going to happen in November. The only people who can stop it or ease the crushing blow are the establishment republicans. In this case Murkowski.
When Bennett lost he went to the media to decry the right win, same with Inglis. Crist and Specter abandoned the party. The fact is the media will cover anything that makes us look bad or week, and even make things up if they have to. I think we are beyond the point where they can do real damage to us.
This is an important battle, and if it needs to be fought out in front of the alaska public, then so be it.
Whoever wins this race will be the senator for Alaska, and if one side is cheating, then it needs to be known.
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2010 06:50 AM (wuv1c)
That just about sums it up.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at August 30, 2010 06:51 AM (554T5)
Posted by: changer1701 at August 30, 2010 06:51 AM (xktXL)
Posted by: Rocks at August 30, 2010 06:52 AM (Q1lie)
The "press" as it currently exists in the U.S. is not going to do any "job" other than to attack Republicans, and conservatives in particular, at every opportunity.
We are just giving them opportunity here.
The election commission is the one who needs to their job and the press should have no part of that. If the election commission doesn't do its job then the courts need to get involved.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 06:52 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Lincolntf
Because ATMs are driven by networks that encrypt the traffic and secure the ATMs. Some ATMs don't even have local journals anymore; it's the verified online traffic that matters. Also, they aren't trotted out, set up, run and then stowed away again like these are. That compromises the designs that are available. Images on ATMs are usually loaded remotely, and seldom change. Finally, ATMs are run by companies that must answer to cardholders, institutions and the government. The voting machines and whatever network that may exist are wholly part of the government.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 30, 2010 06:54 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 30, 2010 06:54 AM (I+0qc)
Posted by: brainfreezed at August 30, 2010 06:54 AM (N19Rt)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 30, 2010 10:49 AM (I+0qc)
They were designed that way.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at August 30, 2010 06:55 AM (BuYeH)
If we get left out too bad, it is for our own good.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 10:42 AM (/jbAw)
And who controls the election commissions? The 2 parties. The first rule of doing this stuff? Document it everywhere. I agree about the rhetoric but only Miller personally. Let the campaign handle this stuff.
Posted by: Rocks at August 30, 2010 06:55 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at August 30, 2010 06:55 AM (zqzYV)
Not necessarily true. I have a buddy who runs a franchised business where he sets up "portable" ATM machines at public events such as festivals and concerts.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at August 30, 2010 06:57 AM (554T5)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 30, 2010 10:49 AM (I+0qc)
There isn't anything unreliable about electronic voting machines. At least not anymore than any other electronic machines. What do you think the ATM network would look like if you had 2 competing entities in control?
Posted by: Rocks at August 30, 2010 06:57 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 30, 2010 10:49 AM (I+0qc)
They were designed that way.
Posted by: Johnnyreb
P.S. Some of the best ATMs available are made by Diebold. Unfortunately, the voting machines have far more in common with the cheap ATMs you sometimes see in bars or low volume places. They're often referred to in the industry as cash dispensers rather than as an ATM. They are cheaply made, cost much less than a standard ATM, and do far less. And they have a limited life, usually through a combination of poor maintenance, vandalism, beer spills and whatever else the average idiot cardholder or site owner can think of.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 30, 2010 06:59 AM (R2fpr)
O/T, here's the latest e-mail I got from Kos. These guys are hysterical, in every sense (links not included):
"Burn the Witch,
President Obama has appointed a bipartisan commission to develop recommendations to balance the budget. For whatever reason, the commission is loaded with Blue Dogs and Republican opponents of Social Security. For example, the Republican co-chair of the commission, Alan Simpson, recently insulted an advocate for women's rights by saying Social Security is like a welfare "milk cow with 310 million tits." Seriously.
And that's not all Simpson has said. The Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) has put together a website with Simpson's most offensive quotes. The website has a game where you try and tell Simpson's real quotes from fake ones. Play the game, and join the fight to protect Social Security, here:
Click here to see what Alan Simpson said about Americans who depend on Social Security.
Many members of the deficit commission are multi-millionaires and corporate CEOs who are out of touch with America. Some members of the commission have suggested cutting health care for veterans in order to preserve expensive weapons deals for defense contractors. A majority of the members of the commission favor gambling some, or all, Social Security funds on Wall Street.
In November, the commission will make its recommendations. In December, Congress is expected to vote on the recommendation without allowing any amendments. Before the commission releases its recommendations, we need to defend Social Security recipients from Wall Street, and veterans from defense contractors, by discrediting Alan Simpson's campaign to cut those vital programs.
To do this, click here to learn more about Alan Simpson, share his quotes with your friends, and join the fight to protect Social Security.
Thanks for all you do,
Markos Moulitsas
Founder, Daily Kos"
/end idiocy
Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 30, 2010 06:59 AM (fLHQe)
Posted by: Mr Pink at August 30, 2010 06:59 AM (2OFop)
Yep, she very well may be trying to steal the election in the style of "found ballots" and tinkering but that needs to be kept between them and the election officials.
WTF?
You know that's actually illegal.
And beyond that I think voters have the right to know.
Pathetic, just count the fucking ballots and whoever wins from that count- "rigged" or otherwise, just gulp down and move on.
Or, even better, why bother with counting. Just burn the ballots and declare a winner.
Posted by: Entropy at August 30, 2010 07:00 AM (IsLT6)
I'm starting to think that pols want this shit to stay fucked up, so they can let the lawyers do their thing in a close election.
Posted by: taylork at August 30, 2010 07:01 AM (0Hn5w)
What the hell are you people doing, fer cry-i eye?
Posted by: Deety hating Dotty lines at August 30, 2010 07:02 AM (aVzyR)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at August 30, 2010 07:02 AM (aOKEC)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 30, 2010 10:49 AM (I+0qc)
Forget ATMs. There's something much closer to home, for the States. Every State runs a lottery that uses the exact same mechanism as "voting". These lotteries tabulate votes that determine the distribution of tens of billions of dollars, and there has never even been a case of any mistabulated "votes" in lotteries and we never see any court cases of anyone claiming to have had their "votes" misread.
We treat our electoral processes as if they were worthless (with no real penalties being levied against anyone who abuses the system, even in the most intentional and egrigious ways - such as with those ACORN criminals not even losing their votes though they were known to have double registered) ... and so, our electoral processes are, indeed, worthless.
But, all this is even far beside the point - and that point, as I first made in the discussion over this whole fiasco, there should be no court cases or legal minutae brought into play for vote-counting in GOP primaries. Any GOP candidate who starts trying to treat GOP primaries as if they were general elections against democrats, needs to be immediately tossed out - and this includes sanctions against the NRSC for being the dipshits they are and aiding and abetting the screwing up of everything they possibly could.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 30, 2010 07:02 AM (Qp4DT)
Not necessarily true. I have a buddy who runs a franchised business where he sets up "portable" ATM machines at public events such as festivals and concerts.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish
And they are a bitch and a half to bring up and keep running. They need an uninterrupted power supply and phone line. If the outfit is good at what they do, and they aren't stupidly cheap, then they can and do work. Otherwise, the time in service is poor. The sheer number of moving parts causes problems. If the site owner complicates things like hooking other items to the power or phone line (examples: coin counting machine, ear piercing kiosk, vending machines, telephones, slurpee machines)
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 30, 2010 07:02 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: eman at August 30, 2010 07:03 AM (BK24x)
Posted by: Jean at August 30, 2010 07:04 AM (1ZGrS)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 30, 2010 07:04 AM (I+0qc)
Mallamutt,
also, consider the fact that the democratic party will not give ANY money to the Dem Senate Candidate from Alaska. They have a ton of close races on their hands, they won't blow any money on a seat that is essentially a Republican sure thing.
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2010 07:05 AM (wuv1c)
Why is it that voting machines/computers are so unreliable?
The common denominator.
Why is marking a paper ballot and counting it so unreliable? It's not rocket science. Why is authenticating the identity and eligibility of a voter so unreliable?
We have the technology all right. It's not that difficult. It could be foolproof.
It's the people running the show.
Posted by: Entropy at August 30, 2010 07:05 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at August 30, 2010 07:06 AM (554T5)
These Snow Kennedys really want to keep their seat, don't they?
Must be scared of the job market.
Posted by: gator at August 30, 2010 07:06 AM (aOKEC)
The NRSC should demand that Murky concede
after the mail in ballots are counted, if she has less votes.
she shouldn't attempt a recount if she is down more than 1500 votes when all the mail in ballots are counted.
And if she jumps to a third party, the NRSC should disband, because they can't even ensure Republican Senators and Candidates can remain republicans.
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2010 07:06 AM (wuv1c)
If Murkowski cheats to win the primary, it is perfectly reasonable to not vote for her.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 30, 2010 07:06 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at August 30, 2010 07:06 AM (I+0qc)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 30, 2010 07:06 AM (Qp4DT)
. Every State runs a lottery that uses the exact same mechanism as "voting".
we'll see what Nick Perry has to say about that.
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2010 07:08 AM (wuv1c)
You know that's actually illegal.
And beyond that I think voters have the right to know.
Fine, once credible evidence of vote fraud is found and an actual charge is made, then it becomes a matter for the press.
Right now all this internal bickering is hurting the Republican cause.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 07:11 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Jean at August 30, 2010 07:12 AM (L2+HZ)
as of now Miller is the winner ... after the recount maybe not ... given the small number of actual votes I don't see any way to pull a Franken and put her over the top ...
Posted by: Jeff at August 30, 2010 07:12 AM (A3tpD)
53 I'm starting to think that pols want this shit to stay fucked up, so they can let the lawyers do their thing in a close election.
I think you've nailed it on the head, the two parties have the states divvied up, and they each control their little fiefdoms jealously. Those of us who want honesty, transparency, and good government (small government!) to win out will have to take over one of the two major parties, and since the dems are too far gone that means the republicans. Going third party will just hand every election to one of the D or R candidates.
Posted by: Boots at August 30, 2010 07:12 AM (06JTY)
I don't know the details, but he's a former senior supervisor for one of the 'armored courier' companies. I'm assuming he knows what he's doing, but ya never know. ;-)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at August 30, 2010 07:12 AM (554T5)
The NRSC should demand that Murky concede
But, but, last week everyone said the NRSC should stay out. Now you want them in. Oh, my head.
Posted by: Moron with Memory
Yup. But the rep is there now. How about, "either the jerk from the NRSC should demand that her Murkiness drop out now, or pack his trash and get the Hell out of there before the NRSC gets smeared as being an accomplice in sabotaging the voting system for an entire state?"
chain of events:
1. primary
2. close vote results.
3.Her Murkiness grumbles, and threatens a third party bid, complete with a bribe to the Libertarian party.
4. She whistles up the NRSC.
5. She gets an NRSC rep; Miller gets a phone call, with a promise of help IF he wins.
6. A observer from the miller campaign claims that a Murker gained access to the voting system of the state of Alaska.
Never mind. That rep might as well stay and go whale watching. He/she/it is implicated now, due to proximity and timing.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 30, 2010 07:13 AM (R2fpr)
Right now all this internal bickering is hurting the Republican cause.
Sucks for the Republican cause.
Posted by: Entropy at August 30, 2010 07:13 AM (IsLT6)
That POS "Mike" and whatever mook allowed him access to that computer need to be in JAIL, right now, handcuffed to the fucking bars, until this gets sorted out.
If a campaign official backed that move, that asshole needs to be in jail, too.
This is ALREADY being archived by the MFM to use as an excuse for Democrat vote tampering in November, not to mention the fact that IMHO vote tampering is a buryable offense in the first damned place.
OMFG this is just almost too stupid to actually be believed. I mean, at this point, if it's true as described, how can ANYONE have confidence in this fucking vote? The only sensible thing to do is a full-on FBI investigation of those involved and a runoff election, but you can't practically do a runoff until the investigation is over, and who's gonna trust the DOJ with this?
What a colossal fucking mess. I mean, seriously, these people are making the Gulf Cleanup look like the fucking Apollo Space Program.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 30, 2010 07:13 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Rocks at August 30, 2010 07:15 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: eman at August 30, 2010 07:15 AM (BK24x)
Right now all this internal bickering is hurting the Republican cause.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 11:11 AM (/jbAw)
There is really no "internal bickering", Vic. There are only the RINOs launching an unprovoked assault on everyone else in the GOP, trying to lie, cheat, and steal their way to holding onto power, at the expense of everything and everyone around them.
It takes two to tango, but only one to launch an attack. The RINOs are attacking the rest of us and that's the whole of the situation.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 30, 2010 07:15 AM (Qp4DT)
I don't know the details, but he's a former senior supervisor for one of the 'armored courier' companies. I'm assuming he knows what he's doing, but ya never know. ;-)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish
That's how I got my start. They've changed a great deal in the last 20 years, but most of the principles are the same.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 30, 2010 07:15 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 30, 2010 07:17 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 30, 2010 07:19 AM (EPgc2)
Posted by: ingenus at August 30, 2010 07:20 AM (+sBB4)
But unless this is all an internet fabrication, and as long as one dickhead did in fact allow another access to the election database system, then the integrity of the system is in doubt, and that's Just Fucking Great, Just Really Fucking Great.
Damn, this was stupid on a level way above the pay grade of everyone involved.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at August 30, 2010 07:22 AM (bxiXv)
Same reason he wears mom jeans and can't throw a baseball.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at August 30, 2010 07:25 AM (554T5)
Posted by: ingenus at August 30, 2010 07:25 AM (+sBB4)
Right now all this internal bickering is hurting the Republican cause.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 11:11 AM (/jbAw)
Normally yes but not in an anti-incumbent year it isn't. If anything it's helping. The one thing keeping this year at a likely Red Wave and not a Bloody Tsunami is the gnawing suspicion that the Repubs might not have learned there lessons for 06 and 08.Concerned only with incumbency and controlling who gets the money instead of how much. Nothing says there is a chance for real change in the party then a good bloody battle of proxies. Miller win's a slug fest and tens of millions of independents say to themselves "You know, maybe the Republicans WILL be different this time?"
Posted by: Rocks at August 30, 2010 07:25 AM (Q1lie)
It does sound like they WANT a hand recount to give themselves another chance to play "find the hanging chad".
Recount only if Miller loses ...and arrest the clown that was involved.
Posted by: bill at August 30, 2010 07:26 AM (9AIt+)
"I see Joe Miller align behind a Hummer with armed guards march through a family parade in Eagle River,"
Posted by: brainfreezed at August 30, 2010 07:26 AM (N19Rt)
Posted by: Jean at August 30, 2010 07:26 AM (Z91Di)
Can they not see what they are doing?
If Murkowski had any honor she would conceded.
Posted by: bill-tb at August 30, 2010 07:27 AM (y+QfZ)
Yeah, there is no recount. Or there should not be since...
1) they haven't finished the original count
2) It's not close enough (percentage-wise) to warrant a recount
Posted by: mr magoo at August 30, 2010 07:29 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Zombie Saddam Hussein at August 30, 2010 07:29 AM (AZGON)
Yep, she very well may be trying to steal the election in the style of "found ballots" and tinkering but that needs to be kept between them and the election officials.
I couldn't disagree more.
Miller should be screaming about this from the rooftops. Establishment pols--Democrat or Republican--cannot be allowed to get away with this. They must be punished in every conceivable way, from prosecution to getting kneecapped in the general election.
No way will I ever excuse someone cheating their way to victory. I don't give a shit if they're a Republican or not, they're certainly not on my side.
Stealing votes makes you an America-hating tyrant, pure and simple. I'm not trading "our" fascists for theirs. No way.
There's a tide of reform coming. The establishment Republicans need to either get on board or get out of the way. One way or another, the status quo WILL come to an end.
It's time to draw the line.
Posted by: Warden at August 30, 2010 07:31 AM (fE6tn)
Posted by: Rocks at August 30, 2010 07:31 AM (Q1lie)
Maybe if he had a VAGINA and douched beforehand, he could get away that remark. Or wore a bear costume.
Posted by: Summers Eve Gets That Raise at August 30, 2010 07:32 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Zombie Saddam Hussein at August 30, 2010 07:35 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: brian at August 30, 2010 07:35 AM (y05cf)
Murkowski's guy broke the rules being in there. The NRSC is choosing sides in a freaking primary. Neither of those things is ever supposed to happen, so, no, I'm not willing to give everyone a pass and cheer for Team R no matter who they are or what they do.
I'm not a mindless partisan Obama-swilling drone. How dare you ask me to act like one for the good of the party.
Screw the party. Party doesn't matter. Principles matter.
Posted by: Ella at August 30, 2010 07:36 AM (DmnMk)
Posted by: Rocks at August 30, 2010 07:36 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 30, 2010 07:36 AM (AZGON)
If Miller were done by 1.8%, I'm pretty sure the NRSC would have called for him to concede for the good of the party.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 30, 2010 07:40 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: The Guy in a Crab Suit at August 30, 2010 07:41 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Ella at August 30, 2010 07:42 AM (DmnMk)
I am saying keep all the damn communications limited to the parties involved and the damn election commission. Once you have proof of cheating THEN file charges and let the press have it.
Before this shit even started the Dems were trying to fire up a meme of "Republican civil war" in order to distract the public from the fact that they and their policies were failing miserably.
By actually fighting a civil war in the press we are giving them that meme on a platter.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 07:43 AM (/jbAw)
Geez, even gejas Spain is rethinking that one. PIGS are finding out people will quit spending money when you punish them for doing so, and that's over Obama's head. One term for this loser.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 30, 2010 07:43 AM (mHQ7T)
Stuff likes this creates, creates more independents like me. People can read and observe, they aren't stupid.
Posted by: curious at August 30, 2010 07:45 AM (p302b)
No.
If this were a general, I would want these kinds of shenanigans announced early and often. Her guy was accessing the FREAKING VOTING DATABASE. Alone. For 20 minutes.
Okay, spin that. Tell me how primary voters don't have the right to know that right now. And, when, exactly, should they know it? Before or after it gets swept under the rug?
Posted by: Ella at August 30, 2010 07:47 AM (DmnMk)
Read that PDF and tell me how any of that behavior can be innocently explained away.
Waiting for proof is too late. Elections get stolen while people wait for "proof."
There's credible evidence of some seriously illegal shit happening on behalf of Murkowski. Politicians must be discouraged as strongly as possible of any hint of election rigging, And that includes taking it to the press.
Miller is the outsider, here. He can't afford to be reactive.
Posted by: Warden at August 30, 2010 07:49 AM (fE6tn)
I hear what you are saying but in this new political climate once the victor is crowned it's really hard for the defeated to respond with charges of irregularity without being regarded as "the sore loser" "the one affecting the party" "the troublemaker" "the agitator" "the one giving the dems exactly what they want to see"
Posted by: curious at August 30, 2010 07:49 AM (p302b)
Vic, read the post above this one. Just because the democrats think a certain meme helps them doesn't mean it actually does.
The truth is yes: there IS a civil war going on in the Republican party.
We're booting out all the bastards (like Murkowski) that nobody wanted in '06 and '08.
The democrats got in promising change, they aren't offering any real change. Over there it's nice and peaceful, stable, and same as it ever was.
Posted by: Entropy at August 30, 2010 07:50 AM (IsLT6)
If this was the general I would agree with you.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 07:51 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: nine coconuts at August 30, 2010 07:52 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: curious at August 30, 2010 07:53 AM (p302b)
Here's another point: if we (Republicans) let Murk get away with this, then next time there is fraud in an election, the talking-heads will pull their chins and say, well, everyone does it, how do we know the Republicans didn't stuff the ballot too and LOOK AT ALASKA.
Posted by: Zimriel at August 30, 2010 07:53 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: brainfreezed at August 30, 2010 07:54 AM (N19Rt)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 30, 2010 07:56 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Ella at August 30, 2010 07:56 AM (DmnMk)
Posted by: curious at August 30, 2010 11:53 AM
If I were conspiracy theory minded, I'd say that he was looking for certain individuals in the "questionable" category to see if there was some backstabbing going on -- supporting the Murks with the words but not with the votes.
Posted by: brainfreezed at August 30, 2010 07:58 AM (N19Rt)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2010 07:58 AM (T0NGe)
I know, I know but
Posted by: curious at August 30, 2010 07:59 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Ella at August 30, 2010 11:56 AM (DmnMk)
Ella, I give up. You can't argue with someone who can't or will not read.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 08:01 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: curious at August 30, 2010 11:53 AM (p302b)
Only that you voted and if you are a member of a party.
Posted by: Rocks at August 30, 2010 08:03 AM (Q1lie)
As a computer programmer who loves technology all I can add to this about electronic voting is:
Are you out of your fucking minds!?
Posted by: memomachine at August 30, 2010 08:04 AM (MwCol)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 30, 2010 08:04 AM (AZGON)
The first word in politics is... ah... ahem... poo... ahem.
Posted by: brainfreezed at August 30, 2010 08:05 AM (N19Rt)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at August 30, 2010 08:07 AM (WZFkG)
Who the fuck is Mike?
What IS his background. Is he an IT guy?
If so, I would be in court immediately demanding an audit.
This smells worse than that tranny Ace picked up Saturday.
Posted by: Kemp at August 30, 2010 08:08 AM (AQxTm)
"Only that you voted and if you are a member of a party."
Actually it depends. I've heard and read about some horror stories including that the database being used for some of these voting machine systems is ... Microsoft Access.
A single line of SQL could update the voting records easily and unlike serious database engines an Access database doesn't have any change record built in so that you can see when and where changes were made to data. And of course Microsoft Access has all of the tools and interfaces needed for someone, anyone, with unfettered access to use that GUI to update the data.
Plus in this case I seriously doubt they went through the hassle of giving the guy his own user login so he probably borrowed one from someone on the staff. Who could be anybody with any level of access so even securing the server isn't necessarily going to prevent anything.
Posted by: memomachine at August 30, 2010 08:09 AM (MwCol)
And Kos is a 'tard
Well, finally something we all agree on.
Isn't the bastard a dirty Scandi also?
Posted by: Kemp at August 30, 2010 08:10 AM (AQxTm)
I can't believe they were stupid enough to let a supporter into the computer system.
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2010 08:10 AM (LutGd)
Arrest him if possible.
Posted by: bill at August 30, 2010 08:11 AM (9AIt+)
(Okay, maybe that is reading comprehension. What's the difference?)
Posted by: Ella at August 30, 2010 08:12 AM (DmnMk)
I hate to say it, but I think Palin and the Tea Party have screwed us here in Alaska. While Murkowski is not perfect by any means, Miller didn't have a single commercial that told us what he would do - he just bashed Murkowski the entire time - which turned a lot of voters off of him.
I voted for Miller and feel like I was a bit duped. They have so broadly split the republican vote, and created such a bitter divide between the 2 camps, that I can see a Dem having the possibility of winning if this petty crap continues. If there is one thing Alaska doesn't need - it's another Mark Begich.
Posted by: Alaskan at August 30, 2010 08:12 AM (ViRFH)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 30, 2010 08:12 AM (AZGON)
I hate to say it, but I think Palin and the Tea Party have screwed us here in Alaska. While Murkowski is not perfect by any means, Miller didn't have a single commercial that told us what he would do - he just bashed Murkowski the entire time - which turned a lot of voters off of him.
Hi, Lisa!
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2010 08:14 AM (LutGd)
Posted by: bill at August 30, 2010 08:14 AM (9AIt+)
Here's something from WikiPedia about a movie about the 2000 elections "Hacking Democracy": http://tinyurl.com/yt5g3k
Money quote: "The first is through editing the database file that contains the voting totals. This file is a standard Microsoft Access database, and can be opened by normal means outside of the encompassing voting program without a password. "
sigh.
I need another cup of coffee or a blowjob. ... Ok looks like I'm going to get the coffee then.
Posted by: memomachine at August 30, 2010 08:14 AM (MwCol)
I can't believe they were stupid enough to let a supporter into the computer system.
My level of confidence in poll workers is pretty weak. I watched an "urban" precinct at the end of the voting day, and the head poll worker refused to give us the paper count of the votes for the day. I was with the former Head of Elections Board and the woman told us she didn't have to give Republicans anything. A call the the Elections Board quickly made her "see the light"
They are crooks.
Posted by: Kemp at August 30, 2010 08:14 AM (AQxTm)
Posted by: JASmius at August 30, 2010 08:18 AM (r1XeY)
OK. folks... and I'm saying this as a Libertarian...
Its time for a NATIONAL ID Card, which is tied to your State drivers license, Passport, Citizenship status, Tax ID, and VOTER REGISTRATION.
Make it Free, and you can't Vote, or WORK without it.
We have to clean up the election process... there have now been 2 or 3 recent elections stolen...
Posted by: Romeo13 at August 30, 2010 08:20 AM (H+oXM)
OK. folks... and I'm saying this as a Libertarian...
Its time for a NATIONAL ID Card
What is wrong with this picture?
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2010 08:21 AM (LutGd)
First off, cheating is BAD, what I said was get the goods and file charges. Cheating is bad in both the primary and the general.
Second what behavior that I find objectionable about this vs the general is red on red fighting in the press. Even if Murk is a RINO she is still a Republican. Sure fight this out tooth and nail, but do it behind closed doors.
In the general election it would be a red on blue fight and sure the MFM will take the side of the blue but we expect that.
Besides giving the Republican Party a black eye, and feeding the "civil war" meme what good is all this in the paper actually doing?
Do you think having all these accusation flying in the paper is going to slow down the staffers? Not a damn chance.
Is it going to give Miller any more votes in the primary? Not a damn chance. Could it cause a lot of R's to sit at home in the general if Murk wins? Damn straight it could.
And as far as publicizing it so that we here at AOS can read about it, how does that effect the election in AK? Not a damn bit.
All this public airing of laundry has nothing but negative impact and not a damn bit of positive.
Posted by: Vic at August 30, 2010 08:22 AM (/jbAw)
"Over the Miller Campaign's objection, Mike was allowed to use the state computer for 20 minutes before Division Director Gail Fenumiai fortunately ordered him off the state computer."
Enough with the passive voice: who gave "Mike" access to the computer? Name the person who did it. Hold his/her ass to the fire: it's the only way these "public servants" can be held accountable for this actions.
Posted by: Brown Line at August 30, 2010 08:25 AM (VrNoa)
A couple things more.
1. A major danger lately is from people not necessarily hacking themselves but in employing technology that is set up to hack by a professional hacker. A prime example is the beloved iPod. iPods can be set up to completely vacuum up an entire harddrive or even to seek out specific files and copy them when connected to a computer through a USB port. Or even seek out specific files and make alterations to them.
The user doesn't even have to have any computer experience or ability at all. Everything is built into the iPod and it doesn't even have to be an iPod Touch. Just a regular looking iPod. The problem is that the iPod is really just a very small specific purpose computer. But it is a computer.
In this kind of situation the campaign worker could simply be told to get access to the voting server any way possible and connect the iPod and when you see a certain message appear on the iPod's display, disconnect and walk away.
This kind of vulnerability affects corporations, government and the military. Modified iPods can be given out as prizes with the associated software CD encoded with vulnerabilities directly so they don't even come up as viruses. Meanwhile the hacker sits back and waits for the data files to come on home.
Oh and firewalls will do nothing to protect you. All the software has to do is use web technology to communicate and it'll bypass most firewalls. This is because everyone has port 80 for HTTP open. And it is simplicity itself to modify a program to act like a web browser and update data on a foreign web server.
Posted by: memomachine at August 30, 2010 08:25 AM (MwCol)
This is because everyone has port 80 for HTTP open. And it is simplicity itself to modify a program to act like a web browser and update data on a foreign web server.
Great that made my day.
Posted by: Kemp at August 30, 2010 08:31 AM (AQxTm)
OK. folks... and I'm saying this as a Libertarian...
Its time for a NATIONAL ID Card
What is wrong with this picture?
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2010 12:21 PM (LutGd)
Nothing... most Libertarians are not really idealouges... we want the smallest Government that makes sense... and leaves us alone the most...
In this case, with the ability to both travel, and with mail in ballots in many states, we need a National system for voter registration... AND Citizenship.
Posted by: Romeo13 at August 30, 2010 08:33 AM (H+oXM)
Posted by: B. Hussein Obama at August 30, 2010 08:36 AM (AZGON)
I don't care about red-on-red violence if one of those reds is a cheater. (And she's really not red enough to be a hill worth dying on, but cheater would trump even a great voting record.)
Screaming bloody murder about vote tampering isn't a general election ploy to try to tip close elections. It's something that actually matters. Even in a primary.
There is NO DEMOCRACY as long as there is cheating. Because votes don't matter if the government blesses cheating - you may as well save the money and just have the party hacks wrangle it out among themselves.
Then again, I'm not a partisan. I changed my registration to Independent after TARP.
Posted by: Ella at August 30, 2010 08:36 AM (DmnMk)
Enough with the passive voice: who gave "Mike" access to the computer? Name the person who did it. Hold his/her ass to the fire
It's "feet." Hold their feet to the fire. But I think you may be onto something.
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2010 08:36 AM (LutGd)
Posted by: Alaskan at August 30, 2010 12:12 PM (ViRFH)
By reading that we all have just dropped in IQ. You do not pass go, you do not collect 200 but you are in running for Troll of the Day.
Posted by: Bosk at August 30, 2010 08:41 AM (pUO5u)
Ha ha ha, I love it! I'm not a 'troll', just giving you guys a viewpoint of someone who actually voted in this race (FOR MILLER). I don't want to see us get stuck with another Dem senator, and all this in-fighting is not good for any conservative.
But, I guess I'll just keep 'trolling' away... Hilarious!
Posted by: Alaskan at August 30, 2010 08:44 AM (ViRFH)
Posted by: Ella at August 30, 2010 12:36 PM (DmnMk)
LOL... we need a Name for folks like us...
hmmm.... POXR? Pissed Off eX Republican?
Posted by: Romeo13 at August 30, 2010 08:44 AM (H+oXM)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 30, 2010 08:45 AM (mHQ7T)
Possibly yes...
Posted by: Deety hating Dotty lines at August 30, 2010 09:09 AM (aVzyR)
@ Kemp at August 30, 2010 12:31 PM (AQxTm)
"Great that made my day."
Sorry man but this is why highly secure buildings refuse to allow people to carry in even a simple thumb drive. Anything with a USB connector can be modified to hack any computer it is connected to. Even flash drives can be modified to do much more than simply store data.
The only way to absolutely ensure security is to build in a Faraday Cage, physically isolate the computers & network and absolutely ensure that nobody brings any electronic devices whatsoever.
Posted by: memomachine at August 30, 2010 09:23 AM (MwCol)
Iranian Air Force seeks return of F-14 bombers from U.S.
Tehran Times Political
TEHRAN – A top general declared on
Tuesday that the Iranian Air Force is seeking a return of fighter jets
it bought from the U.S. in the 1970s.
“We want to take back bombers blocked by the U.S. because it is our legitimate right. However, this issue must be pursued by relevant organizations through relevant channels,” Hossein Chitforoush, the Air Force Deputy Commander, told the Mehr News Agency
Posted by: Neo at August 30, 2010 09:25 AM (tE8FB)
"Iranian Air Force seeks return of F-14 bombers from U.S."
I say we give them to the Iranians ... but in the form of 2,000lb bombs.
Posted by: memomachine at August 30, 2010 09:29 AM (MwCol)
Ha ha ha, I love it! I'm not a 'troll', just giving you guys a viewpoint of someone who actually voted in this race (FOR MILLER).
Right. I know I'm convinced.
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2010 09:35 AM (LutGd)
Oh and a last point before lunch:
Windows machines employ something called "windows scripting" that allows developers and administrators the ability to create macros that usually do mundane kinds of things. However this shouldn't imply that you can't do more than that.
Basically a "script" is a text file that uses a specific programming language that is then "hosted" by the computer. So you do *not* have to have a compiled program. A familiar example of this would be the coding of a web page to provide more interactivity than simply refreshing. Yahoo.com is an easy example.
With windows scripting the prospective hacker just needs access to a text editor. The code is fairly simple and can be either created on the spot or simply written beforehand and then uploaded to the computer from a flash drive. The script file would run, access and/or modify the data in a Microsoft Access database and then remove all traces of itself.
With the code on a flash drive it could be done in under 30 seconds, and that is if I were drinking hot coffee at the same time.
Writing the code by hand from memory? A couple minutes. Maybe 5 minutes tops.
Since the machines are Diebolds it would be very easy to find out beforehand the structure of the database used by Diebold. Really the hardest thing is understanding how the database is structured. Once you're past that the rest is pretty easy.
All that you'd need to do is to change 20,000 Miller votes to Murkowski.
After that, amusingly enough, it's Miller time! (beer joke)
Posted by: memomachine at August 30, 2010 09:47 AM (MwCol)
I voted for Miller too.What he stands for has not changed one iota. Why would you feel duped by his actions? If Murkowski somehow pulls this off and is the republican nominee there is no doubt in my mind she will trounce McAdams.
Posted by: Bosk at August 30, 2010 09:49 AM (pUO5u)
RDBrewer - I really don't care if you think I'm real or not. I was born & raised in Alaska, do you really think I am a Dem? I'd be glad to tell you the other folks I voted for as well, that you haven't heard of: Miller, Carl Gatto, Mead Treadwell, Bill Walker, and Yes on Prop 2. Look them up, you will see that I am, indeed, a Republican, and I have no problem telling you that I voted for Miller - whether or not you choose to believe me is on you.
Lisa was a lame duck, which is the reason I didn't vote for her. We need someone who will go fight the feds for us the way good ol' Ted did, not another Begich, or placeholder like Lisa has been.
Posted by: Alaskan at August 30, 2010 10:01 AM (ViRFH)
Miller Campaign: Murkowski "Observers" Are Screwing With Vote-Counting Computer Servers
Dear Senator Stedman,
I am traveling and had to vote absentee in the primary, and am now VERY upset and distressed about the integrity of our election and concerned I have been disenfranchised as a voter.
I am copying below an email I just fired off to our governor, and I am OUTRAGED that something like this has been allowed to happen in Alaska. I expect CRIMINAL CHARGES of election tampering to be filed immediately, and a closely monitered, extremely honest and open HAND COUNT of the ballots as now our election computers have been tampered with and can not be trusted!
I expect YOUR immediate attention to this matter, as it now appears that the corruption from Washington DC is now interfering with our elections!
Byron
Governor Parnell,
I have just read online that your administration has allowed someone from the Murkowski campaign to illegally access the election computer database to "check the voter records"! THIS HAS NOW ALLOWED OUR ELECTION COMPUTER TO BE QUESTIONED AS A PERSON COULD INSTALL MALICIOUS SOFTWARE TO SKEW THE RESULTS, AND THIS WOULD ONLY TAKE ONE MINUTE TO DO!
WHAT IN THE HELL ARE YOUR PEOPLE THINKING OF??
You have now made a hand recount the only reliable way to determine votes and impugned the honesty of our election!
If I feel YOU or YOUR administration is involved in voter fraud, I WILL BE VOTING FOR YOUR OPPONENT IN NOVEMBER.
IF I FEEL YOU OR THE "REPUBLICAN MACHINE" HAS ALLOWED MURKOWSKI TO BE ELECTED BY CORRUPTION AND CHEATING, I WILL BE VOTING DEMOCRAT IN NOVEMBER AND URGING ALL I KNOW TO DO THE SAME.
I am sickened by the corruption in Washington D.C., and now sickened that it appears to be in Alaska, and you and the Alaska republicans are involved in this!
You need to understand something. CORRUPT AND DISHONEST FEDERAL INCUMBENTS, WHO DON'T FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION ARE GOING TO BE REPLACED, AND THIS ALSO INCLUDES ANY CORRUPT INCUMBENT IN ALASKA.
WE ARE WATCHING THIS ELECTION VERY CLOSELY AND ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW CORRUPTION TO THWART THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
I am extremely upset and disappointed by this matter and expect you to do the right thing to assure ALASKANS AND AMERICANS that our elective process is honest.
Posted by: Chilly in Alaska at August 30, 2010 10:07 AM (UQkJd)
Posted by: sig at August 30, 2010 10:12 AM (2i+Vz)
RDBrewer - I really don't care if you think I'm real or not. I was born & raised in Alaska, do you really think I am a Dem? I'd be glad to tell you the other folks I voted for as well, that you haven't heard of: Miller, Carl Gatto, Mead Treadwell, Bill Walker, and Yes on Prop 2. Look them up, you will see that I am, indeed, a Republican, and I have no problem telling you that I voted for Miller - whether or not you choose to believe me is on you.
Lisa, I'm sold. Relax.
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2010 10:24 AM (LutGd)
This issue makes me sick. I knew Liberal Lisa thought the seat was her birthright, but to knowingly allow a staffer to participate in an illegal activity is shameful to say the least. And the fact that the staff at the division of elections didn't hold his feet to the fire, but rather allowed him to walk out after 20 minutes of unfettered access to the voting database, does not give me a warm and fuzzy about the outcome of this primary.
Posted by: ak pud at August 30, 2010 02:54 PM (f/lPF)
Minnesota should have been Concord....
Posted by: TXMarko at August 30, 2010 03:08 PM (AYPNX)
sigh. I really hate comment spam.
If America parallels the Roman Empire and we do get a Caesar, hopefully *not* Caesar Obama, is it wishing for too much that comment spammers have a live snake shoved up their ass?
Posted by: memomachine at August 30, 2010 08:00 PM (MwCol)
Posted by: letitbe at August 31, 2010 01:30 AM (86PrP)
Posted by: Family and General Practice in Oregon at September 18, 2010 05:04 AM (FZ4N1)
Posted by: pet shops directory at September 20, 2010 05:09 AM (I73sQ)
Posted by: carpet shops in louisiana at September 25, 2010 05:35 AM (BV0k/)
Posted by: Allergy and Immunology at September 27, 2010 05:09 AM (l2uIO)
Posted by: us florist shops at September 28, 2010 07:26 AM (B78t1)
Posted by: Lava Beads at January 05, 2011 07:35 AM (40NqQ)
Discount designer handbags
designer handbags for less
Posted by: Designer handbags for less at February 12, 2011 05:54 PM (4HiGx)
Rosetta Stone is proprietary language-learning software produced by Rosetta Stone;Ltd. Its title and its logo refer
to the Rosetta Stone , an artifact inscribed in multiple languages that helped Jean-Fran?ois Champollion to decipher
Egyptian hieroglyphics.
The Rosetta Stone software uses a combination of images, text, and sound, with difficulty levels increasing as the
student progresses, in order to teach various vocabulary terms and grammatical functions intuitively, without drills
or translation. They call this the Dynamic Immersion method;. The goal is to teach languages the way first languages
are learned.Now,the Rosetta Stone;Ltd have several kinds of the Rosetta Stone language on sale,such as Rosetta Stone
Spanish,Rosetta Stone German and Rosetta Stone Italian, these Rosetta Stone Languages are very popular now!
Posted by: Rosetta Stone at April 20, 2011 08:00 PM (Iy21r)
All the Rosetta Stone are 100% satisfaction guaranteed,and free shipping.We guarantee its quality,and all money will be refund if the goods are not satisfied.
welcome to make a purchase.
Posted by: Rosetta Stone at April 22, 2011 01:08 AM (Iy21r)
Posted by: dgshoes at April 23, 2011 01:53 AM (KEwXH)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2054 seconds, 317 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: CAC at August 30, 2010 06:25 AM (lV4Fs)