February 05, 2010

Mini-Bounce Gone; Three New Polls Show Obama Back Under 50
— Ace

O! Sweet nectar of life for the lazy blogger. Cheap polling posts, where would I be without you?

Why, I'd probably still be right here, but posting something else from Feministing right now.

Gallup: 49/50.

Rasmusen, aka R-Square Hitler: 46-53. Strong disapproval over strong approval (the passion index) back down to -12, not quite up to the -19 or so it had climbed up to.

The Economist, AKA The Magazine People Subscribe To and Leave Out on their Coffee Tables But Don't Actually Read: 46-48.

And Obama's highest point recently is a mere 50%, coming from media (suspect) polls like CBS, NBC, and Ipsos/McClactchey.

What do these polls tell us? Well, um... that Obama is just as unpopular as we thought he was.

Honestly, I think I have to revise a prediction I made some time ago. I thought public opinion would start to break against Obama after six to nine months of his term; that part I got right.

But I really thought it would break harder, and more dramatically; the preference cascade effect I keep talking about but am only now relinking.

Instead of the cascade, we're seeing consistent and slow erosion. I don't know anymore if we're going to have a big 6-8 point drop over the course of a couple of weeks like I once thought. Obama's support is firmer than I expected; I thought at least twenty points of it was faddish stupidity, and those twenty points would suddenly disappear as people finally realized the Boy Emperor Has No Clothes. (We saw that happen with Martha/Marcia Coakley.

Or, maybe it's just going to take a bit longer than I thought.

No one wants to admit that they were wrong. People will do almost anything to avoid this. Generally, the template people prefer is that their opinions have changed because of new information or changing conditions; that way, they were right then, but are also right now. (See Sullivan, Andrew, for the most pathetic documented case of this on the internet.)

But no one wants to admit they made a wrong choice based on always-existing information.

I suppose people aren't changing their opinions because of residual goodwill, residual pride they overcame prejudices they didn't have to vote in favor a black guy they never hated, wanting to give the "funny looking kid with the weird" name a chance, and all of that.

And also because there hasn't been one big crystallizing event that forces them to reconsider their views. So far it's been very drip-drip-drip; no one thing has arrested the public's attention, all at once, and prodded them into considering whether they still support this jugeared jackass with the lovely trouser-creases.

The Panty Bomber seems to have been the closest thing we've seen on that score.

Thanks to AHFF Geoff.

Posted by: Ace at 10:02 AM | Comments (67)
Post contains 485 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Dead cat

Posted by: bulwark at February 05, 2010 10:30 AM (MdzCh)

2 I pledge to host 1 neighborhood BBQ this summer for every point Dumbo-ears falls below 50%.

Le the Sam Adams and Steaky freedom flow.

Posted by: sifty at February 05, 2010 10:31 AM (dP6Q3)

3 I think that part of the reason Obama's popularity hasn't dropped further is that people hate Congress so much and he's done a fairly effective job acting like he has nothing to do with whatever Nancy and Dingy Harry are up to at any given moment. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 05, 2010 10:31 AM (sey23)

4

I think you are right Ace. People will not admit they are wrong until they can latch onto a few things that make themselves feel better so they can turn on Obama more publicly.

Posted by: Dan at February 05, 2010 10:34 AM (KZraB)

5 Ace I don't know why you think there isn't any news happening.  Haven't you heard?  There's SNOW during the winter!  And its in the northern half of the US and heading towards the east coast!  This is the biggest news of the year!

Posted by: buzzion at February 05, 2010 10:35 AM (oVQFe)

6 Obama got a large chunk of the urban vote, and urban voters have been tolerating, often reelecting, failures for decades.

I'd be interested in seeing how this breaks down geographically. My guess is its the Rustbelters that have turned on him..

Posted by: taylork at February 05, 2010 10:35 AM (4jZ56)

7 Peter Robinson: If there is one thing you would say to the President to steer the economy around right now what would it be?

John Taylor: Do not raise taxes.

Richard Epstein: Amen....And abandon these regulatory boondoggles.

Posted by: WTFCI at February 05, 2010 10:36 AM (+zo63)

8 I think the "blame Bush" thing has a lot more legs than many of us would like to acknowledge.

I think many people buy it, and are giving Obama the benefit of the doubt.

Posted by: Pastorius at February 05, 2010 10:37 AM (B7BtC)

9

Obama has a mini-me!

http://tinyurl.com/yev7txn

Just trying to help out on this no news day.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at February 05, 2010 10:37 AM (RkRxq)

10 Obama got a large chunk of the urban vote, and urban voters have been tolerating, often reelecting, failures for decades.

They also have detailed knowledge of hyper-super-majorities(aka one party socialist rule) yet still cannot wrap their heads around this fallacy.

Posted by: WTFCI at February 05, 2010 10:38 AM (+zo63)

11 When I look at him, Obama rates a big fat 0. Having friends like Ayres or Dohrn (Bill fuckin' standing on the flag unrepentant bomber Ayres!), and having attended a God-damn-America and whitey "church" for 20 years... yet claiming to have never heard a word of the reverend Wright's sickening sermons...

This man is President?

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH AMERICA?

Posted by: The Highland Pipes at February 05, 2010 10:39 AM (GgZF6)

12 Compounding the reluctance of people to admit their own wrong judgments is the reluctance of people to think badly of our first African-American President.  They will resist as long as possible coming to the conclusion that he's unqualified for the job and only won because people wanted to give a person of color the chance to prove himself in the nation's highest office.

Posted by: stuiec at February 05, 2010 10:40 AM (GU29T)

13 also, while obamacare is still in Congress, those that love bambi & want socialized medicine are holding out hope.  the "hope n change" type hope

Posted by: kelley in virginia at February 05, 2010 10:40 AM (TEIZr)

14 Rasmussen polls voters, the others poll Americans which, I believe, includes convicted felons, who can't vote, and potential Obama voters too disillusioned to vote. Also since liberal women are the least informed of the electorate, they will peel-off last.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at February 05, 2010 10:40 AM (muUqs)

15

Why, I'd probably still be right here, but posting something else from Feministing right now.

Thank goodness for cheap polls, then.

I think the fear of being called racist will keep Obama's support artificially high. I can imagine support for everything he's trying to do in office dropping into the 20's while his "personal popularity" stays around 50.

Posted by: bgates at February 05, 2010 10:41 AM (AKY4c)

16
Y-not

I would guess fifty percent of the people who say they like Obama personally but don't like his policies really don't like him personally either, but its a thin enough distinction to assuage the fear of being labeled a racist.

Posted by: bulwark at February 05, 2010 10:41 AM (MdzCh)

17 #8 Yep. Also, I agree with Ace, I know I hate to admit I was wrong about something. Ever. Although thinking about it now, I really can't recall many times I was wrong. Oh, that one time in 1995, but that's about it.

Posted by: mikeyslaw at February 05, 2010 10:41 AM (QMGr1)

18 With his cheering msm and the constant passing the buck he remains teflon...........

Posted by: non_dhimmie at February 05, 2010 10:43 AM (zACGu)

19

I track Obama's popularity by my token hippie friend. She actively campaigned and registered voters to get this noozle elected.

When he was sworn in she had 8 Obama bumper stickers on her car. Everytime he does something she finds particularly offensive (like Porkulous) she takes a sticker off.

She's down to 2.

I predict she won't have any by the end of the summer and will be joining the Republican party by Christmas.

Posted by: Oil Field Trash at February 05, 2010 10:43 AM (8WW87)

20

why would you ever vote for someone for President (whether they be black or otherwise) merely to "give them a chance"? 

kinda a big office for training wheels?

Posted by: kelley in virginia at February 05, 2010 10:44 AM (TEIZr)

21 There are no doubt still people out there telling pollsters that they approve of the O cause they would feel racist saying otherwise. And no one wants to feel racist. If O was even lighter complected than he is and had even less of a negro dialect than he does (ie. if he was a honkie muthafuck) those people would be answering in the negative also.

Posted by: pendejo grande at February 05, 2010 10:44 AM (RXUUK)

22 I think that part of the reason Obama's popularity hasn't dropped further is that people hate Congress so much and he's done a fairly effective job acting like he has nothing to do with whatever Nancy and Dingy Harry are up to at any given moment. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 05, 2010 02:31 PM (sey23)

I love this.  We all know, of course, that big Democrat losses in November won't be Obama's fault becuase nothing is ever Obama's fault but know we know the mechanism.

"I think it's very important for us to have a methodical, open process over the next several weeks, and then let's go ahead and make a decision," Obama said Thursday night.

"And it may be that ... if Congress decides we're not going to do it, even after all the facts are laid out, all the options are clear, then the American people can make a judgment as to whether this Congress has done the right thing for them or not," the president said. "And that's how democracy works. There will be elections coming up and they'll be able to make a determination and register their concerns one way or the other during election time."

Posted by: WalrusRex at February 05, 2010 10:46 AM (xxgag)

23

What do these polls tell us? Well, um... that Obama is just as unpopular as we thought he was.

The Prez is who we thought he was.  We polled on him in the summer Â— who the hell takes a third quarter of the fiscal year like it's bullshit? Bullshit! We polled on him in the third quarter — everybody polled registered voters Â— the Prez is who we thought he was! That's why we took the damn poll. Now if you want to crown him, then crown his ass! But he is who we thought he was! And we let him off the hook!

 

Posted by: Dennis Green, Pollster at February 05, 2010 10:47 AM (W54Uh)

24
Remember there is one thing that will never happen:  Barry will never sink as low in polling as Bush did.  The simple reason is the lamestream media will cheerlead Barry with the same unflagging unanimity that the had when they unstintingly trashed Bush.  That will put a sort of concrete floor on Barry's ratings.  The lamestreamers cannot die off fast enough.

Posted by: George Orwell at February 05, 2010 10:48 AM (AZGON)

25 I now see that others have covered this ground.

Posted by: pendejo grande at February 05, 2010 10:48 AM (RXUUK)

26 I think the fear of being called racist will keep Obama's support artificially high. Agree. Also, his nearly unanimous support from the African-American community has to be good for 5% to 6% of his total, and I don't see that level of support changing anytime soon. But that support does not necessarily transfer to other Dems. If I were them I would be very nervous about November and beyond.

Posted by: Usful Ijit at February 05, 2010 10:49 AM (ySEBp)

27 I could never imagine him dipping below forty. Still can't, no matter what happens. Assholes + fuckheads = 40%. Rock-hard bottom.

Posted by: oblig. made no Sullivan references at February 05, 2010 10:50 AM (JWdIm)

28 His self absorbed arrogance is what is bringing him down, above all.  That's the kind of thing that is always just there, and explains the slow steady drip.   Sure, some events accelerate the pace more than others.  His unwillingness to call off the dogs on healthcare is driven by the notion that he can charm us into accepting the unacceptable.  That's the best example, but there are others.

I just saw this on Nat'l review, and I think it illustrates my point perfectly...

http://tinyurl.com/yl4vz3r

Posted by: Dave S at February 05, 2010 10:52 AM (PZak5)

29 #8 Yep. Also, I agree with Ace, I know I hate to admit I was wrong about something. Ever. Although thinking about it now, I really can't recall many times I was wrong. Oh, that one time in 1995, but that's about it.

Posted by: mikeyslaw at February 05, 2010 02:41 PM (QMGr1)

"I was wrong" are three of the most liberating words in the English language, when used alone and in that order.  The poster boy for the People Who Have Never, Ever Been Wrong (According to Them) is Charles Johnson.  He will create the most flimsy and absurd argumentative edifices to prove that he has never been wrong, and even if they don't convince anyone else, they're absolutely irrefutable to himself.

Posted by: stuiec at February 05, 2010 10:52 AM (GU29T)

30 About half of everyone you meet is full of shit, crazy, or stupid. These polls bear that out.

Posted by: sifty at February 05, 2010 10:53 AM (dP6Q3)

31
Barry will never sink as low in polling as Bush did


Oh I don't know about that,I could think of several scenarios one of them being God forbid another major terrorist attack on U.S. soil

Posted by: bulwark at February 05, 2010 10:53 AM (MdzCh)

32

that bump was frightening, thank god it's going away.

his approval rating will never drop below 40% ppl are too adverse to political incorrectness for that to happen.

Posted by: shoey at February 05, 2010 10:55 AM (Ed9Xn)

33 Damn, forgot to link it...

http://tinyurl.com/yl4vz3r



Posted by: Dave S at February 05, 2010 10:55 AM (PZak5)

34 It's still not quite safe to actually mock Obama as a charlatan and miserable failure.  When we pass that tipping point, it's express elevator to hell for his poll numbers.

He'll crush Jimmy Carter in his fall.

Posted by: toby928 at February 05, 2010 10:55 AM (PD1tk)

35 WOnder why Rass polls have him coming back?

Posted by: Vic at February 05, 2010 10:56 AM (QrA9E)

36 @33 Dave S
This clown is sounding more and more psychotic every day.

Posted by: George Orwell at February 05, 2010 10:57 AM (AZGON)

37 Remember there is one thing that will never happen:  Barry will never sink as low in polling as Bush did.  The simple reason is the lamestream media will cheerlead Barry with the same unflagging unanimity that the had when they unstintingly trashed Bush.  That will put a sort of concrete floor on Barry's ratings.  The lamestreamers cannot die off fast enough.

Posted by: George Orwell at February 05, 2010 02:48 PM (AZGON)

I think that even the MSM - with the exception of the New York Times - will eventually succumb to the desire for self-preservation and stop the Obama cheerleading in order to stanch the hemorrhaging of readers and viewers who've gotten fed up with the disconnect between their news outlets and reality.  We see a little of that today, with the AP calling the fall in the unemployment rate "unexpected" and quoting an economist about the "jobless recovery" - not to mention their calling this the "Great Recession."

Posted by: stuiec at February 05, 2010 10:59 AM (GU29T)

38 "...this jugeared jackass with the lovely trouser-creases."

Wins Best Descriptive Phrase of the Day!

Posted by: Mondo at February 05, 2010 11:00 AM (uTRs/)

39 Barry will never sink as low in polling as Bush did


Oh I don't know about that,I could think of several scenarios one of them being God forbid another major terrorist attack on U.S. soil

Posted by: bulwark at February 05, 2010 02:53 PM (MdzCh)

Oh, well, give it 3 to 6 months, then.

Posted by: Leon Panetta at February 05, 2010 11:00 AM (GU29T)

40 I think that even the MSM - with the exception of the New York Times - will eventually succumb to the desire for self-preservation and stop the Obama cheerleading in order to stanch the hemorrhaging of readers

Perhaps.  But remember, it's religion with these people.  They may be willing to be martyrs.

Posted by: George Orwell at February 05, 2010 11:00 AM (AZGON)

41

Many current Obama supporters in these polls will not pull the lever for Obama or his chosen candidate in the privacy of a voting booth.

People will kid themselves in public for alot longer than they will do so in private when there are real consequences for not admitting their error.

Posted by: Jeff at February 05, 2010 11:02 AM (B7Wu9)

42 Well, since 36% of the populace has a positive view of socialism, he won't ever go below that, as for the 12% above that, not sure what they are still seeing in him that rates their approval.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 05, 2010 11:03 AM (2sJK0)

43

I think the explanation is that about a third of U.S. population wants their "free" goodies and they see Obama as a means to that goal.  The Progressives have done a good job over the decades in conditioning a lot of folk to be utterly dependent on the federal government.

Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at February 05, 2010 11:05 AM (bCQG3)

44 I think the reason it's hard to get a big consistent drop off is because the MSM's pimping for Obama. Fluffers they are.

Posted by: kansas at February 05, 2010 11:08 AM (mka2b)

45

why would you ever vote for someone for President (whether they be black or otherwise) merely to "give them a chance"?

kinda a big office for training wheels?

Posted by: kelley in virginia at February 05, 2010 02:44 PM (TEIZr)

That's what Joe Biden said: “Right now I don’t believe he is (ready). The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the- job training. I stand by the statement.”

That's what Hillary Clinton said: "Now voters will judge whether living in a foreign country at the age of 10 prepares one to face the big, complex international challenges the next president will face. I think we need a president with more experience than that. Someone the rest of the world knows, looks up to, and has confidence in. I don't think this is the time for on the job training on our economy or on foreign policy."

That's what Sarah Palin said: “The real problem is that these warnings from Joe Biden are similar to his earlier assessment of Barack Obama. It wasn't so long ago that he said Barack Obama wasn't up to the job, and that, quote, 'the presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.'"

That's what John McCain said: "Sen. Obama was wrong about Iraq and the surge. He was wrong about Russia when they committed aggression against Georgia. And in his short career, he does not understand our national security challenges. We don't have time for on-the-job training, my friends."

But the 52-percenters didn't see it that way. Or maybe they really thought that Joe Biden would provide adult supervision to mentor little Barry along.

Posted by: Leon Panetta at February 05, 2010 11:11 AM (GU29T)

46 Barry will never sink as low in polling as Bush did

What with the MSM fluffing Barry and Bush getting bashed by them every fucking day, every fucking day since he left office by the way,  plus not standing up for himself, probably not. 

Posted by: kansas at February 05, 2010 11:14 AM (mka2b)

47 Perhaps.  But remember, it's religion with these people.  They may be willing to be martyrs.

Posted by: George Orwell at February 05, 2010 03:00 PM (AZGON)

The Sulzbergers definitely are willing to die for the cause.  (Although they've been pretty ruthless with the unions at the Boston Globe, so they're willing to look at the cost side of their operations if not the lousy product side.)  I think the rest of the MSM companies have more diffuse ownership and thus have to answer to the shareholders more reliably.

Posted by: stuiec at February 05, 2010 11:15 AM (GU29T)

48

one reason I believe O will never drop below 40% is that when a huge contingent of your voting bloc doesn't pay taxes and believes that while the Dems suck, the GOP want to throw them into a wood chipper and starve their grandma, they will at least tepidly support him.

Also, do you seriously believe that the people who believed that Obama would pay for their cars or heating bills out of his stash are going to abandon him?

Posted by: eddiebear at February 05, 2010 11:16 AM (wnU1W)

49 Your sudden drop may still happen as the DOW continues to dive.

Posted by: Captain Crunch at February 05, 2010 11:27 AM (RUzMf)

50 Nothing is getting done in Congress (thankfully).

I think if they were passing healthcare and cap and tax, you would see his numbers go down.

Or not.. some disaffected lefties are currently pissed at him for not doing any of those things.. so it might be a wash.

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 05, 2010 11:27 AM (f9c2L)

51 Obama's floor support is around 40%. How do I get there? Well, about 1/3 of the American public will believe anything. For years survey's have consistently shown that about 1/3 think the CIA killed JFK, that the moon landing was fake and that our government knew about 9/11 in advance (if it didn't plan it). Its not always the same 1/3 for each whopper, but you can always get to that number. So The One starts with a 33% base, that kooky fringe who really think he is the Messiah. But, his approval among blacks is 96%!!! Blacks are about 12% of the population. We can assume the 1/3 of kooks are proportionately black on these other nutty theories (4% of the population). But with that approval rating we have to assume almost all blacks (12% of the population) support The One. So we have to the difference (nearly 8%) to get to about a 40% base of support.

Posted by: DLC@ at February 05, 2010 11:30 AM (+FkMH)

52

Also, do you seriously believe that the people who believed that Obama would pay for their cars or heating bills out of his stash are going to abandon him?

Posted by: eddiebear at February 05, 2010 03:16 PM (wnU1W)

Well, when the bill collectors are knocking and they find out that telling the guy at the door isn't taking "The President is good for it" as an answer, they might feel a little used and betrayed.

Posted by: stuiec at February 05, 2010 11:32 AM (GU29T)

53

Barry will never sink as low in polling as Bush did

BushÂ’s big drop-off occurred when he lost the base after the Harriet Myers debacle. He had already lost the liberals in the beginning.  The HM thing was the last straw for a lot of people.

 

Obambi will never lose most of his base.

Posted by: Vic at February 05, 2010 11:32 AM (QrA9E)

54 I'll go with fear of looking racist for $1000 Alex.

All of his policies are tanking hard but he maintains higher numbers personally. It can be only one thing.

Posted by: jukin at February 05, 2010 11:41 AM (vkkNZ)

55

Fox has a new poll over at their site that says people want to vote out ALL incumbents, including Rs.

Americans dispense just about as much disdain for Republicans (42 percent favorable; 46 percent unfavorable) as Democrats (42 percent favorable; 48 percent unfavorable), according to a Fox News poll released Friday.

Sounds like BS to me since in the "real" polls the Rs are coming on like gang busters.

Posted by: Vic at February 05, 2010 11:43 AM (QrA9E)

56  

Posted by: jeff at February 05, 2010 11:56 AM (UlfuS)

57 If he actually gets something like 'health care reform' or 'cap & trade' passed, his numbers will tank.  Once people see the Real Harm being done, they'll react

Meanwhile, the 'Magic Negro' meme shields him

Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 05, 2010 11:57 AM (JrRME)

58 NONTROVERSY!!!

All you wingnuts getting excited over polls run by racists.

The Daily Kos poll is the only one that matters, and they have Obama still in the good awesome approval number of 85 percent. It would be higher if the rubes out there read L GF on Kindle instead of listening to teabaggers.

Excuse me, another red window popped up on my alert, I must see who is making death threats against me

Posted by: Cahrsel Jhonsno at February 05, 2010 12:44 PM (sYxEE)

59 If I didn't hang up right away upon hearing "poll" I'm not sure I wouldn't lie and say I approved of Obumble. I do not want mr NPD desperately trying to win back the nations' approval. Besides I want folks focusing on Pelosi, Reid and how bad the democrat party is right now. Remember the DNC picked him, and look at what the next 2 alternatives were. Another 100% socialist and another mr "Look at me I'm beautiful"

Posted by: PaleRider at February 05, 2010 01:01 PM (dkExz)

60 There were plenty of folks who admitted to having voted for Carter while he was still in office.  It wasn't until a couple of years of Reagan that you started having trouble finding anyone who would admit to having cast a Carter vote.  I guess it took that long for them to realize that Carter's "malaise" did not have to be a natural or persistent condition.

Posted by: ss396 at February 05, 2010 01:21 PM (Nw1t8)

61

Yup, like someone else said, it's racism.  The spector of being called a "racist" makes people reluctant to publicly criticize him, and the racism of "black empowerment" keeps more Black people from being critical of him.  If Obama were a white dude, his numbers would be a lot lower.

Posted by: runningrn at February 05, 2010 01:22 PM (CfmlF)

62  Wait until inflation hits ala Jimmy Carter.  That's when you'll see the plummeting.

The bond traders are already getting antsy.

Posted by: luagha at February 05, 2010 03:29 PM (Dk9yX)

63 "Well, since 36% of the populace has a positive view of socialism"

53% of all Democrats ~ 20% of the populace.

Posted by: JB at February 05, 2010 03:47 PM (1OoPr)

64 #50

ss396, I voted for Carter.   Then I voted for Reagan,  and never voted for another democrat.

Using my experience with the Carter administration,  I believe I can shed some light on this.   Carter's popularity underwent steady erosion all through his term,  with a couple of upward moves for things like the Camp David Accord. 

But remember, the misery index was invented during Carter's term.   People were tormented by unemployment,  high gas prices, high mortgage interest, and shortages of things like beef.  

Added to that were scandals, giving away the Panama Canal, boycotting the Olympics in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and the Iranian hostage crisis with the failed rescue attempt, and a host of other things,  each one of which was the last straw for groups of individuals.  For my sister (who was and is a democrat) it was his being surprised about the Soviets invading Afghanistan, which is what he claimed when it happened.   For me,  it was stabbing the Shah in the back and then the prolonged hostage crisis.   At some point during the summer of 1980, I realized I was going to vote for Reagan because I was certain that he couldn't do worse, and I wanted someone who was proud of the country.   I think the pride in the American Olympic Hockey Team and the Miracle on Ice made a lot of us realize we wanted a president who loved the country.  

That's how I left the democrat party, and I think a lot of voters will be doing the same thing over the next couple of years.  Obama is every bit as big a scold as Carter, and his wife is even more repellant than Roslynn.   His policies are even more destructive than Carter's, and he doesn't even have the excuse of naivete.

I hope this helps explain how so many democrats became Republicans in the Carter years.

Posted by: Miss Marple at February 05, 2010 04:34 PM (4DwVn)

65 George Orwell @ 24:
Remember there is one thing that will never happen:  Barry will never sink as low in polling as Bush did.

One reason for that is that Barry vs. Bush represents a fundamental clash of worldviews re: what some call "the Religion of Humanity." The article about this in the Weekly Standard an issue or two ago was one of the most insightful, eye-opening things I've read in the past year. Sorry I can't link it cuz my server's acting up, but the article's titled "The Roots of Obama Worship." It's DYNAMITE. Get on over to the Weekly Standard and read it.

Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at February 06, 2010 12:04 AM (orMqj)

66 jukin@54:
I'll go with fear of looking racist for $1000 Alex.
All of his policies are tanking hard but he maintains higher numbers personally. It can be only one thing.

But such people really ARE racist. It's called the "racism of low expectations."

If they really didn't care about a person's skin color, they wouldn't zip their lip and refuse to criticize him when he takes a wrecking ball to their country. Instead, must coddle poow widdle Bawwy.

"Political correctness" is the ultimate racism.

Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at February 06, 2010 12:26 AM (orMqj)

67 Obama's widdle bounce from the SOTU went bye-bye?

President Bush has something to say about that. See his comment at It's About Freedom. Click here... http://tinyurl.com/yftkcza


Posted by: IronDioPriest at February 06, 2010 08:51 AM (R5UWl)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
112kb generated in CPU 0.0399, elapsed 0.2062 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1782 seconds, 195 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.