June 11, 2010
— Ace Nothing very important here, but it is nice to see him again.
Posted by: Ace at
08:07 AM
| Comments (57)
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
I didn't like a lot of his domestic policy, but I never doubted that he loved America.
God bless you too, W.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 11, 2010 08:10 AM (9hSKh)
I can't wait to see what the Bush Policy Institute churns out.
And I wish President Bush would speak up on certain things such as Israel, terrorism, etc.
Posted by: fishdick at June 11, 2010 08:12 AM (uFokq)
I do, however, miss Ms. Beasley.
Posted by: Gerbil Malodor at June 11, 2010 08:13 AM (+ysLD)
Posted by: Real Huntress at June 11, 2010 08:13 AM (Npnnx)
There's nobody here that'll say W was the best President evar, but he's certainly a lot better than the Obamanation we have now.
And I'll bet W can produce a long-form birth certificate.
/Couldn't resist the birther shot.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 11, 2010 08:16 AM (9hSKh)
He has integrity, he was honest to a fault, but he wasn't a great president.
I will always be appreciative of him, but the spending he didn't veto just piled on to our current problems.
My feelings are mixed on Bush. I disagreed with about half of what he did, but he was a good man.
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2010 08:16 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Colonel Mustard at June 11, 2010 08:17 AM (eoYse)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at June 11, 2010 08:19 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: The Chinless Wonder at June 11, 2010 08:20 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: Will Folks at June 11, 2010 08:20 AM (IhQuA)
Bush also never met a spending bill he didn't like. If only he vetoed the pork...
we wouldn't be in this Obama/Reid/Pelosi mess we're in now.
Posted by: fishdicks at June 11, 2010 08:20 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 11, 2010 08:21 AM (e35R2)
Posted by: Louis Tully at June 11, 2010 08:22 AM (jat5l)
Posted by: Will Folks at June 11, 2010 08:22 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: joncelli at June 11, 2010 08:24 AM (RD7QR)
Mallamutt.
He really should have made some budget cuts to offset the tax cuts. I know the tax cuts result in increased revenue, but that doesn't show up on the balance sheet because the government just spends the increased revenue they receive.
The budget deficits were inexcusable.
I've always been of the opinion that if you think a war is worth fighting, that you should be willing to part with spending programs to help pay for it.
In the lead up to the Iraq war, when the democrats were voting in lock step with the republicans, he should have come up with a better way to fund the war than through borrowing. He should have had in the Iraq War resolution some massive cuts elsewhere that he could directly point to being used to pay for our soldiers. The dems would not have been able to politically vote against it at the time.
but hey, hindsight is 20/20 right?
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2010 08:25 AM (wuv1c)
I guess the best way to sum up my feeling about Bush would be to say:
George, you had me at ,"They'll hear from all of us soon".
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2010 08:25 AM (wuv1c)
Bush was a mediocre president. Better than Clinton and Obama, but he was an underachiever in the White House.
We had our boots on the throats of the Democrats and could've set them back 50 years. Instead Bush and the useless leaders in Congress let 'em off the hook.
Obama is a complete failure and still has pretty good ratings. Why? Because the Democrat party is much better at politics than the GOP. This is cause for concern. They're failures and yet they're still winning the PR war, easily.
Posted by: fishdicks at June 11, 2010 08:28 AM (uFokq)
I guess the best way to sum up my feeling about Bush would be to say:
George, you had me at ,"They'll hear from all of us soon".
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2010 12:25 PM (wuv1c)
Yep... the bullhorn and throwing out the first pitch after 9/11 in NYC...like a MAN.
I never forgot and never will. He handled 9-11 like he was meant to be there at that time in history. God bless him.
Posted by: Timbo at June 11, 2010 08:29 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: fishdicks at June 11, 2010 12:28 PM (uFokq)
because the MFM is sucking his dick 24/7.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at June 11, 2010 08:30 AM (YVZlY)
If you discount the brown vote, not so much actually.
Posted by: Barbarian at June 11, 2010 08:32 AM (EL+OC)
If all of History was a progression towards ME!, then my evil and stupid predecessor was a necessity!
I wun! Eye One!
Go Sycacuse! Go Orunge!
Posted by: Barack H. Obama at June 11, 2010 08:33 AM (p8fMa)
Preznit Prissypants McTarballs doesn't especially care for the military. And they know it. I'm sure he considers them a bunch of mouth-breathing knuckle-draggers who are doing what they do because they could never aspire to his intellectual "achievements" at Hahvahd. Oh, and there's all that "caring" he exhibits as a community organizer.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 11, 2010 08:34 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 11, 2010 08:36 AM (UOM48)
Mallamutt. I agree. i don't blame him entirely, but he could have used his bully pulpit more, used the veto pen, or requested new leadership in the house and senate. Delay was an ass, and Hastert was a fool.
As for whoever was talking about Obama. He is in the 40s and he is in his second year. He has the potential to become a lame duck 2 years into his presidency in november. i wouldn't call that a political success.
Posted by: Ben at June 11, 2010 08:37 AM (wuv1c)
I agree with that assessment. Bush ran as - and tried to govern as - a uniter.
It is a testament to his personal inner strength that he withstood the vicious criticism leveled at him all those years without cracking, particularly since the characterization of him by his enemies was that he was some sort of evil, power mad super-villain (while at the same time being a moronic boob). Nothing could be further from the truth.
Contrast that with Obama's thin-skinned reaction to even the mildest criticism. I think there is a very real chance Obama will crack and either OD or something during his presidency.
Whatever Bush's flaws as a President, he was motivated by love for this country and belief in doing what was right.
I think he did an excellent job under extremely difficult conditions at taking the fight to the terrorists and off of our soil and that was what mattered most, particularly in his first term.
Posted by: Y-not at June 11, 2010 08:41 AM (Kn9r7)
I agree with that assessment. Bush ran as - and tried to govern as - a uniter.
It is a testament to his personal inner strength that he withstood the vicious criticism leveled at him all those years without cracking, particularly since the characterization of him by his enemies was that he was some sort of evil, power mad super-villain (while at the same time being a moronic boob). Nothing could be further from the truth.
Contrast that with Obama's thin-skinned reaction to even the mildest criticism. I think there is a very real chance Obama will crack and either OD or something during his presidency.
Whatever Bush's flaws as a President, he was motivated by love for this country and belief in doing what was right.
I think he did an excellent job under extremely difficult conditions at taking the fight to the terrorists and off of our soil and that was what mattered most, particularly in his first term.
Posted by: Y-not at June 11, 2010 12:41 PM (Kn9r7)
I completely agree.
Posted by: Timbo at June 11, 2010 08:44 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: AngelEm at June 11, 2010 08:54 AM (I2Yog)
Posted by: David Brooks, relaxing with chamomile tea and cucumber sandwiches at June 11, 2010 08:56 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: Gawker Media at June 11, 2010 08:58 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: iowavette at June 11, 2010 09:05 AM (0JTac)
Posted by: Michael Collins at June 11, 2010 09:08 AM (I+7Zv)
Posted by: Eamon de Valera at June 11, 2010 09:15 AM (ZESU0)
At the end, I was really tired of 'defending' W. Certainly not after the 'crash' of summer 08.
And I get mad everytime I hear someone says W is the reason we got Obama.
Oh, yeah? There were lots of reasons we ended up with Obama, only people too lazy to think will say W was the cause.
Posted by: always right at June 11, 2010 09:24 AM (Wqfrr)
Michael Collins - you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
1. The effective tax rate on the "rich" has remained around 25% for the last 60+ years in spite of changes to marginal tax rates. Raising marginal tax rates to 90% did nothing but chase capital out of the economy. That's why that famed right-wing nutball, JOHN F. KENNEDY ran on cutting the top marginal rates. He wanted to increase government revenue by increasing economic growth.
2. Bush's tax cuts reduced rates for EVERYONE, especially the poor. I'm sure you don't understand basic math, but cutting the lowest marginal rate from 15% to 10% is a lot bigger cut than trimming the top rate from 38% to 33%. Not only that, but Bush doubled the child tax credit, which had a major impact on the working class and middle class. Personally, Bush's tax cuts for the "rich" have saved me approximately $2500 a year in federal income taxes - and I ain't rich.
3. REVENUES INCREASED dramatically following the implementation of Bush's tax cuts. The government was taking in about 2.1 trillion in 2001. By 2007, revenues had increased to about 2.75 trillion. That's a gigantic increase. Unfortunately, Congress spent money at even a more torrid pace, causing the United States to run deficits.
Posted by: stickety at June 11, 2010 09:26 AM (EsWC3)
Laura Bush was the best First Lady of my life time, hands down, and I'm an old fart. I do miss her. (PS--Barbara Bush was the second best. Something about those Bush women I really like.)
Posted by: Louis Tully at June 11, 2010 09:28 AM (jat5l)
Posted by: Damn Skippy at June 11, 2010 09:55 AM (VDgKF)
Posted by: Schwalbe at June 11, 2010 10:09 AM (UU0OF)
Looks like Bush is running for President again. At least that is what I understood Nancy Pelosi was saying on the TV a few minutes ago. Their main campaign will be to run against the Republicans who know/knew Bush or ever heard of him. (Something like that.)
Her flat eyes are something like dinner plates. Souless dinner plates. Disturbing.
Wooden stake. Hammer. Pelosi. Some assembly required.
Posted by: Dr Know at June 11, 2010 10:22 AM (JsumT)
Oh, and the comments under the video are... most instructive. My personal favorite begins: "You are a sick old man and soon you will sicken and die. This brings me great joy."
My feelings are mixed on Bush. I disagreed with about half of what he did, but he was a good man.
That pretty much sums it up for me. As I posted in a recent thread, his 2nd term approvals were so abysmal because the left hated him no matter what, and the right, much of which actually has some intellectual integrity, washed our hands of him once the spending and the shamnisty crap got out of control. At the same time the left was screeching about what a horrible fascist dictator he was, he doomed himself by governing too far to the left. I do admire him a great deal, as I do Sarah Palin, for remaining classy (to a fault) about the absolutely horrific vitriol hurled his way. I like him and his wife personally very much, but I will never think of his administration without a great deal of frustration.
As Beck kept saying throughout the 2nd term, "What happened to the guy on the firetruck with the bullhorn? Where'd he go?"
Posted by: Filly at June 11, 2010 10:30 AM (zIyxM)
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at June 11, 2010 10:53 AM (kmEfr)
Won't ever miss Bush. He sucked. He might look less-awful in comparision to some current and future presidents, but he'll always be abysmal.
Please.
Think YOU can do a better job (than Bush)? Well, then.
Posted by: always right at June 11, 2010 11:14 AM (Wqfrr)
Why would I ever miss Bush? The last year he had congress (2006) I made almost 70k, in Year 2 of the Glorious Reign of Barack the Magnificent I've been unemployed since Jan. Now I can pursue my life-long dream to be an Artist like Nancy says. That evil Bush made all of us work for a living, but Barack(bless His holy Name) has set us free.
All seriousness aside, there were things I diagreed with W on. No Child being one, but I know that Bush truly believed that education is the key to any kind of decent life in this world, not a way to pay back a union. TARP, what we have now was not what he intended. As for his lack of vetoes, remember he had to keep a majority of Congress on his side, and not all the backstabbers were Dems.
He managed to handle all the crap thrown at him from both sides with a grace and serenity that I know I would not have had. And neither would most other people.
Posted by: bigred at June 11, 2010 12:01 PM (WUwAu)
@59: "Think YOU can do a better job (than Bush)? Well, then."
And where did I say I'd even *want* to be President, cumgargler? But I have so little faith in Bush that I suspect even YOU could probably do a better job.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at June 11, 2010 12:08 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at June 12, 2010 01:40 PM (PQY7w)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2107 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Booooooshhhhh...
Posted by: dananjcon at June 11, 2010 08:10 AM (pr+up)