September 26, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Last week I wrote about keeping an eye on spin in MFM articles about polls, particularly spin leading to conclusions about momentum.
Momentum is a placeholder for "energy." If a candidate has momentum, then he's doing better and, more importantly, his supporters believe they are doing better. There's a psychological benefit to being on the team whose fortunes are looking up. This is particularly attractive for the weakminded independents who haven't picked a team yet. Which means, even more importantly, the person with momentum can pick off wavering voters, that is someone with a slight, but not compelling preference for another candidate.
This, of course, adds to the impression that the momentum-designated candidate has momentum and causes other voters to vacillate. So on and so forth until there's a sudden rush to the candidate with momentum. People want to vote for a winner, especially if there's some heartwarming underdog bullshit.
Which leads me to this article from the Miami Herald this morning. The headline:
Democrat Kendrick Meek advances uphill in Senate race against Crist, Rubio
Now right there, just the headline and seeing nothing else (a not uncommon situation for news consumers), it gives the impression that Meek has momentum. That he's making important gains against Crist and Rubio. It signals to Democrats and independents who may be thinking about supporting Crist that Meek isn't a dead candidate. That they should think about coming over to the winning guy.
Now let's look at the article. First and second paragraphs are about black leaders rallying to Meek. Then:
On paper, the 44-year-old Meek appears to be a dream candidate for the Democratic Party: A loyal disciple in Congress and the Florida Legislature known for scuffling with former Republican Gov. Jeb Bush. The first statewide candidate to qualify for the Florida ballot by gathering voter signatures, about 125,000 in all. The victorious underdog in last month's Democratic primary against a hard-charging billionaire.
There's so much cocksucking going on in that paragraph, the writer couldn't even use complete sentences. Keep reading:
Still, Crist — who cast off his lifelong Republican affiliation just five months ago to avert a drubbing by Marco Rubio in the GOP primary — continues to peel away enough Democrats to keep Meek at bay. But the tide is turning, according to a Mason-Dixon poll released Saturday that showed Meek in striking distance of Crist.
Translation: "Hey indeptards, he's a "dream candidate" and his campaign is rockin! You know, because it said it right there in the Miami Herald. Meek's campaign is going to run TV and radio ads quoting this!"
And now a small dose of reality. Here's the fifth paragraph, for the two people who read that far down in a Miami Herald article:
The survey found Rubio expanding his lead to 40 percent, Crist slipping to 28 percent and Meek rising to 23 percent. The Sept. 20-22 survey of 625 likely voters has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.
Homo sez whut? Meek, the "dream candidate" who has "advanced uphill" and for whom "the tide is turning" is still losing. No change. No change means no momentum. He's slightly made up ground on Crist, who is...wait for it...also losing. No change. No momentum at all. This is a lame-ass love-letter.
This isn't good news for Meek. This is awful news for Crist. And this such fantastically good news for Rubio, I want to dip my balls in it. The number-one fear for his campaign is that Meek would look so weak that loss-averse Dems and independents would pull the lever for Crist just to avoid having Rubio win.
No fear of that now.
The MFM are so eager to designate Meek the candidate with momentum, they're helping out Rubio. None of which would be an issue, if the author hadn't attempted the momentum spin "Meek advances uphill against Rubio, Crist; the tide is turning!" While technically true, so is this: "Meek still trails Rubio by 17 points; he's going to lose."
And did you catch that one little detail? Look again:
The survey found Rubio expanding his lead to 40 percent, Crist slipping to 28 percent and Meek rising to 23 percent.
Ah ha! See it now? Rubio is the candidate "advancing uphill." He expanded his lead. He's got momentum and he's winning.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
07:42 AM
| Comments (202)
Post contains 730 words, total size 5 kb.
Ah ha! See it now? Rubio is "advancing uphill." He expanded his lead. Momentum!
If Barack would let me, I'd go down and campaign for Ken. He's clean, articulate and black! I would be able to push him right to victory with a boost of Joementum. Yessireee. I'm just waiting for the nod.
Posted by: Sherrif Joe Bite-me at September 26, 2010 07:52 AM (8GYOu)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 26, 2010 07:53 AM (L8kaT)
LOL and they couldn't resist throwing a Bush reference in describing Meeks as well!
Page One, paragraph one of the Democrat Playbook:
1. Run against Bush.
2. Lie about your record.
3. Dig up as much dirt on your opponent as possible. If there is none, smear your candidate with lies and inuendo. You can always issue an apology or correction after you win the election.
Posted by: Sherrif Joe Bite-me at September 26, 2010 07:54 AM (8GYOu)
Posted by: Independent at September 26, 2010 07:56 AM (vXagV)
In CO, the dems are advertising against Buck by saying "he opposes a common form of birth control" because get this, he is pro-life. No shit, thats the commercial.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 26, 2010 07:59 AM (L8kaT)
Posted by: eman at September 26, 2010 08:00 AM (MO5HK)
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 26, 2010 08:00 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Secundus at September 26, 2010 08:02 AM (amumu)
Posted by: Dave J. at September 26, 2010 08:03 AM (DCQ0q)
yep that is exactly what he did, he's skilled in the new language soundbites...but he's also skilled in the new language called bullshit although none is more skilled in the education realm in that language, the language of bullshit, than randi weingarten
In a world where people in their teens and twenties get their news from stewart and colbert, twitter. cnn and gawker and they read the headlines and rarely open the article...it's going to be an uphill battle
As the new accepted language bullshit is holding strong in America
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 08:04 AM (p302b)
Just the whole idea of buying someone's book and burning it gives me the creeps. Anyone else get that creepy farenheit 451 feeling?
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 08:07 AM (p302b)
Crist is trying to copy Obama's presidential campaign slogans and the voters are not buying that crap this time. His latest ad has really hurt him.
Posted by: lan sing at September 26, 2010 08:08 AM (YHrQZ)
Posted by: parisparamuss at September 26, 2010 08:10 AM (IereW)
Posted by: Don at September 26, 2010 08:12 AM (tTj19)
Meek, the "dream candidate" who has "advanced uphill" and for whom "the tide is turning" is still losing. No change.
Actually, I tripped and when I landed on my face, it was more uphill than my feet. So...I kinda went uphill.
Posted by: Meek at September 26, 2010 08:13 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Huck Finn at September 26, 2010 08:15 AM (VXBR1)
Just give me soundbites I can headline.
Although he paints himself as an ordinary guy who drives a pickup truck, Scott Brown is actually an out of touch elitest who owns a timeshare in Aruba!
Posted by: runningrn at September 26, 2010 08:17 AM (8GYOu)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at September 26, 2010 08:17 AM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at September 26, 2010 08:17 AM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: Bugler at September 26, 2010 08:18 AM (VXBR1)
I am an independent because I can't stand the libs/dems and what they stand for and the republicans look the same to me but in better Italian suits. I think that independents have noticed, possibly before everyone else, that it is all about power and keeping the power and not so much about principle and party. Who wants to join a party that stands for nothing?
Fox just had a debate where that nasty girl who makes those 7th grade girl faces when talking about the republicans basically said that the republican party is the party of the rich and the middle class can just go to hell. She said it hasn't been that long since the republicans left office and the dems are going to remind them of how they felt.
I'm all for that. Most people had a nice job and a nice house while GWB was president. GWB was pushing the education billion dollar business to show it's worth. No one was trying to build a mosque two blocks from ground zero. We were moving toward tweeking health care not bombing it out of existence. Charities were thriving because hey when you are doing well you want to make sure everyone has that chance.
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 08:19 AM (p302b)
That is all.
Posted by: Editor at September 26, 2010 08:20 AM (YX6i/)
Posted by: Geeking up the thread at September 26, 2010 08:20 AM (L8kaT)
Posted by: Independent at September 26, 2010 08:22 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2010 08:22 AM (CN+Qv)
Posted by: Future DNC ad (Graspinat Strawhs Inc) at September 26, 2010 08:23 AM (Gr1V1)
If Scott Brown had a racist pick up (I still don't even have any idea how that is possible), we should we hearing soon about how Rubio was speaking Spanish and may have said something bad about Vietnames people.
"The reporter could not understand what he said, but another politician (of unknown party) recently said something bad, so Rubio was most likely following suit."
Posted by: Mama AJ at September 26, 2010 08:25 AM (XdlcF)
In a world with justice they would be considered in-kind campaign contributions.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 08:26 AM (/jbAw)
Gabriel,
California media is doing the same thing, but with the old tried and true method of oversampling "democrats" when conducting a poll. Revolution, be it peaceful or bloody, is this nation's only real chance.
Posted by: John at September 26, 2010 08:26 AM (o7EOv)
Posted by: CAC at September 26, 2010 08:26 AM (Gr1V1)
Apparently, this is a plan because it is happening all over, and all at the same time.
I have also noticed some mighty strange polls this morning which goes with the misinterpretation of other polls that Gabe observed. I wonder if they are trying to start a wave with a whole bunch of poll results?
Posted by: Robert at September 26, 2010 08:28 AM (cd6Ip)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at September 26, 2010 08:30 AM (Y81Xa)
Posted by: Alan Grayson at September 26, 2010 08:30 AM (YX6i/)
If Scott Brown had a racist pick up (I still don't even have any idea how that is possible
All racist rednecks with confederate flag license plates drive pickup trucks to carry the wooden crosses they will eventually set on some poor Black family's lawn and light on fire. Scott Brown drives a pickup truck. Therefore he's a redneck racist who burns crosses on the lawns of Blacks, and probably Latinos.
Posted by: runningrn at September 26, 2010 08:30 AM (8GYOu)
Here in Michigan, Peters (Pelosi stooge) has been running cheap-shot attack ads at his Republican opponent with the help of the Detroit Free Press, liberal rag, for the last several days.
Apparently, this is a plan because it is happening all over, and all at the same time.
I had to mute one of the ads against Vitter because it was so nasty and the kids were in the room. Of course I can't say it was entirely undeserved...
OTOH, I see signs for him all over the place and have not seen even one for the Democrat.
Posted by: Mama AJ at September 26, 2010 08:31 AM (XdlcF)
No need to wonder. The dems get free campaign advertising every night in the local and national news. The theme is "Republicans are too extreme", no need for outright coordination, they take the cues and run with them.
Of course, they never mention how extreme socialist healthcare and triple massive deficits are. Those are just normal.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 26, 2010 08:32 AM (L8kaT)
Posted by: MFM at September 26, 2010 08:32 AM (0K3p3)
And what kind of name is "Marco Rubio" anyway? Who the hell ends their names in vowels? Eye-ties, that's who. And we'll be damned if we'll let the Republicans hand our fine state over to the Mafia.
You know who's name ended in an "O" and killed a lot of people? Tony Soprano. If Marco Rubio gets elected, a lot of people will get killed. The only seat Marco Rubio deserves is an electric chair. Vote no on Rubio for the Senate.
Posted by: runningrn at September 26, 2010 08:37 AM (8GYOu)
And if you really want to see spin, wait for the unemployment #'s next week and mindbending adjustments from the govt. The last one before the election. All is well, recovery baby.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 26, 2010 08:37 AM (L8kaT)
And gays......don't forgot the gays
Thanks, Mallamutt! I forgot Teh Gays. (whispers) We are allowed to mention them here as long as they aren't fighting, right?
Posted by: runningrn at September 26, 2010 08:39 AM (8GYOu)
Kind of like Obama suddenly deciding to single out and attack John Boehner and then, totally unexpectedly, the NY Times runs a hit piece on Boehner 2 days later.
What an amazing coincidence.
Posted by: OregonMuse at September 26, 2010 08:39 AM (K5+wW)
Story body: An aide said "The only way Crist could win is if Rubio is caught molesting an underage boy."
Posted by: Beto at September 26, 2010 08:40 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 08:41 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Chris R at September 26, 2010 08:42 AM (AO4qz)
thank you for this post!
I had no idea there was this much word-a-logy involved on how the press uses its dwindling power to nudge outcomes and voters.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 26, 2010 08:44 AM (ACkhT)
Kind of like Obama suddenly deciding to single out and attack John Boehner and then, totally unexpectedly, the NY Times runs a hit piece on Boehner 2 days later.
What an amazing coincidence.
Unprecedented and completely unexpected.
In other news, in 2013, the 3.8% "Medicare" tax on unearned income starts (includes rental property and the sales of single family homes, condos, co-ops etc.) I'm sure that the fallout from that will be unprecedented and completely unexpected as well.
Posted by: runningrn at September 26, 2010 08:47 AM (8GYOu)
NO, NO, a thousand times NO! Books are just pieces of paper between thicker pieces of paper. They aren't magic. We need to stop fetishizing the paper and start thinking about the ideas expressed in books. (Ideas, incidentally, can't be burned.)
My husband heard from a woman who said that she was buying his books in order to burn them. He replied with a complete bibliography of all his books so she wouldn't accidentally miss any, and told her to encourage her friends to buy his books too. Royalties are royalties.
Posted by: VKI at September 26, 2010 08:50 AM (LZK9H)
Governor Scorecard: GOP 27 Dems 13 Toss-Ups 10"
now, last night he had the congress and today you can't readily find it...
but you can find Susan Estrich's slam piece on palladino.
that scott, keeping up the thought that the Senate is just a little too far a reach for the republicans....and since the polls are showing congress may be lost, just not putting up the poll at all
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 08:51 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Lee Reynolds at September 26, 2010 08:51 AM (/gY4D)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 08:55 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 08:56 AM (p302b)
Posted by: pep at September 26, 2010 08:57 AM (0K3p3)
Posted by: looking closely at September 26, 2010 08:58 AM (KNy97)
I thought after the 2000 election that, under pressure, all the news agencies agreed that they would never call any election in an area before polls closed again.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 08:58 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at September 26, 2010 09:00 AM (MTnNh)
Posted by: Monty at September 26, 2010 09:01 AM (o2hlb)
yep.....among my friends we call him "chuckie" among other things
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 09:03 AM (p302b)
Is this all you got, Dems? You're only going to energize us more. Welcome to the jungle.
Posted by: PJ at September 26, 2010 09:08 AM (QxFRN)
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 09:17 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: XBradTC at September 26, 2010 09:27 AM (wZ1Ss)
If there is no white candidate in the race, which is the next preferred color? I've got brown, black and orange to choose from.
Posted by: A Confused Racist Tea Party Voter at September 26, 2010 09:27 AM (veJzk)
That's up 50 grand since this morning. Nothing heard from the LSM. The silence is deafening.
Gregory (Scotland Yard detective): "Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?"
Holmes: "To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time."
Gregory: "But, the dog did nothing in the night-time?"
Holmes: "That was the curious incident."
Never entrust power to anyone not willing to surrender it.Posted by: VADM (Red) Cuthbert Collingwood RN at September 26, 2010 09:28 AM (UL/HQ)
Posted by: Gryph at September 26, 2010 09:33 AM (J8eZP)
No it was properly vetted for security during the Bush years. But it had no been vetted for embarrassment of the Clinton years for a warning about Mohamed Atta, e.g. Able Danger.
So the Democrat vetting is using taxpayer funds to burn the books.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 09:34 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Independent at September 26, 2010 11:56 AM (vXagV)
I share his disdain for "Independents." Got some words for me, Cappy? Scratch an independent, find a coward.
Posted by: Gryph at September 26, 2010 09:35 AM (J8eZP)
except, the army had already vetted the book and the author, when interviewed on fox said that everything in the book was readily available and findable on the internet and other places. the only disturbing thing he said was that some of his material was taken out of his office and that he had to threaten to include his testimony in the book in order for his point to be made. That's concerning. But hey, the book is selling like hot cakes so I guess they inadvertently gave him a ton of free press.
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 09:39 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Independent at September 26, 2010 11:56 AM (vXagV)
with all due respect, I don't agree with this.
I am a registered independent, I used to be a democrat. I have found only those independents who don't know what they actually believe in are the ones who sway one side one year and the other side the next year.
The independent minded independents tend to be libaeratarians and conservatives, (barring stances on social issues.)
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 26, 2010 09:39 AM (ACkhT)
You will find more of these independents in States with an open primary since you don't have to be a member of the Party to vote in the primary.
But the fact is that the independents almost always vote for one Party or another. On a very small percentage swap back and forth.
Now the typical "undecided" when you get down to within 3 months of an election is a clueless idiot who is not likely to vote anyway.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 09:40 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: XBradTC at September 26, 2010 09:41 AM (wZ1Ss)
Posted by: bour3 at September 26, 2010 09:41 AM (Ya12A)
Posted by: David2.0 at September 26, 2010 09:57 AM (x7cvn)
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 10:00 AM (g4J4S)
not necessarily. It is PC to be a lib/dem in some cities. Heck, were you to say you don't agree with their beliefs you would be socially shunned. So, you keep your beliefs to yourself but, that doesn't mean you vote the way they do.
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 10:01 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Palerider at September 26, 2010 10:06 AM (FYUWS)
Posted by: Let Me Eat My Waffle at September 26, 2010 10:07 AM (gPoWi)
Posted by: canuk at September 26, 2010 10:08 AM (lJ0X2)
I wouldn't be so sure. If he hangs out with libtards, and lives in a libtard area in which there is intense social pressure to conform to libtardism, the fact that he is even willing to offer any deviating opinion at all, even if it is self-contradictory, is proof that there is hope for him yet.
Posted by: chemjeff at September 26, 2010 10:12 AM (E97ku)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 10:17 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at September 26, 2010 10:25 AM (nRF6+)
Is JournOList still active? Who gives orders to reporter Beth Reinhold of the Herald to write a piece like this, in this way?
It is happening all over. Is this their new method? How does one unravel it?
Freeze it. Personalize it. etc.
Posted by: Boris Yeltsin at September 26, 2010 10:25 AM (4sQwu)
Apparently he could not wait to get his degree. he got it, framed it, put it up on the wall and then got a copy of his transcript and framed that. And then he called the one professor, with whom he had two classes and asked the professor to come to lunch.
At the lunch he told the professor that he had to hide his conservatism in the professor's class and, if he didn't realize that was the impact he was having, he, my friend, wanted to let him know that he felt it was sort of an unhealthy environment if people had to hide their true beliefs and just spit back at him the very liberal, almost communist, almost socialist beliefs of said professor.
My friend thought this would be a positive conversation that he was doing something good, that he was letting the professor know that there was no give and take, no real teaching going on and he actually thought the professor would love the feedback and thank him.
do you know the professor told my friend that an institution can rescind a degree. Did you ever hear of that? Anyway, that one comment made my friend disgusted.
He says he stood up, they had not even gotten their lunch yet. Threw enough cash on the table to pay for lunch and said "i've lost my appetite." and as he was starting to walk out of the restaurant he said "this is very contradictory to my beliefs but just remember you don't have to be a lib to play the race card, professor, have a good day" and out he walked.
Now, he told this story to a bunch of lib/dems and he got a lot of "good for you", "what a nerve" "ooo wows".....
the climate in NYC is changing ......
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 10:31 AM (p302b)
You may be right (and I hope you are), but I tend to take people at their word. If somebody posts a Greenpeace article lambasting "frankenfish" legislation in California, I just don't see them voting tea party/conservative/republican, even if they badmouth Ogabe later.
It's one thing to filter ones comments in order to avoid saying "fuck" in a kindergarten classroom; it's quite another to mouth socialist bromides so your friends don't think less of you.
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 10:32 AM (g4J4S)
This is particularly attractive for the weakminded independents who haven't picked a team yet.
I didn't say all independents were weakminded. I said independent's who haven't picked a team yet are weakminded. Stop generalizing about my writing, jerk. Generalizing is bad.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at September 26, 2010 10:33 AM (1TvCg)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at September 26, 2010 10:34 AM (nRF6+)
Posted by: Cicero at September 26, 2010 10:35 AM (veJzk)
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 10:36 AM (g4J4S)
There are going to be some so called "independents" who aren't really independents but are full blown libs but for whatever reason they use independent as a cover.
And there are the uninterested who say on election day "oh is today voting, guess I should go and vote"....I've decided that this year I am going to answer that with "your vote is very important and unless you've done the necessary research and observation to vote responsibly, to develop an informed opinion through critical thinking then I might suggest that you refrain from voting altogether until you take it as the serious right that it is"
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 10:37 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Ross Perot at September 26, 2010 10:38 AM (veJzk)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 10:42 AM (p302b)
curiod... What about their "dont ask dont tell" law in acadamia?
It most be only they military. We had the same crap way back in the 80's. I had some proffs like him. That is why I alwaya wore a hat to class. My short hair was a dead give away.
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at September 26, 2010 10:43 AM (nRF6+)
I have watched the first panel segment and no fireworks so far. He had a golden opportunity in discussing the Woodward book but no dice.
As for rescinding a degree, not possible unless the university shows that the degree was obtained fraudulently.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 10:44 AM (/jbAw)
Example: People are no damned good. And women are worse.
I rest my case.
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 10:47 AM (g4J4S)
that's not true, not in my experience. this compartmentalizing of human beings is tearing the country apart. If you have to self censor and can't say what you truly believe then where is this country headed?
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 10:48 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 10:51 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 10:51 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 10:52 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 02:51 PM (/jbAw)
To me he has lost all credibility. At least mara, when logic hits her like a train going 100 mph bends to the reality but not Juan, juan continues to argue his point.
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 10:53 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 10:56 AM (p302b)
It was a joke, jwpaine. The sentence: "Generalizing is bad" is a generalization. It's self-demonstrating.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at September 26, 2010 10:56 AM (1TvCg)
Mara simply spouts the Democrat Party line right off the email she gets daily from the headquarters.
Juan does everything he can do defend the indefensible and takes no time to even think about how stupid his statements are.
He has degenerated to the point now he is making these panels a laughingstock. But I guess being a laughingstock is "fair and balanced".
Anyway, I didn't see what I would call major emotion or fireworks. I would have loved to see Brit unload on the segment regarding Obama killing American soldiers for the sake of Democrat politics.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 10:58 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at September 26, 2010 02:56 PM (1TvCg)
Explaining jokes about generalizing is always a waste of time.
Posted by: Cicero at September 26, 2010 11:04 AM (veJzk)
Explaining jokes about generalizing is always a waste of time.
Posted by: Cicero at September 26, 2010 03:04 PM (veJzk)
Trying to explain ANY joke to an AOS Moron is a waste of time.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 11:05 AM (/jbAw)
ISWYDT.
Posted by: toby928™ at September 26, 2010 02:58 PM (S5YRY)
I don't get it.
Posted by: AOS Moron of below average Moron intelligence at September 26, 2010 11:10 AM (rRGVs)
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 11:10 AM (g4J4S)
It was a joke, jwpaine. The sentence: "Generalizing is bad" is a generalization. It's self-demonstrating.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at September 26, 2010 02:56 PM (1TvCg)
Um, so was mine. But then, everything I say is a joke.
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 11:13 AM (g4J4S)
The show repeats so I"m going to watch it then to try and see what they were discussing.
Vic, I thought you might enjoy seeing this. She owns Anderson, owns him.
Oh and last night SNL sort of made their own statement about this and it didn't seem to follow bloomies' lead.
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 11:13 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Cicero at September 26, 2010 11:16 AM (veJzk)
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 11:18 AM (g4J4S)
and they say google doesn't do politics.
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 11:20 AM (p302b)
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 11:20 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Cicero at September 26, 2010 11:20 AM (veJzk)
There doesn't appear to be much polling going on the congressional races. The last one that was ran in my district was back in early May.
And no, I can not stand Anderson Cooper.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 11:22 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 26, 2010 11:23 AM (ACkhT)
You are not going to see a conservative get regularly pummeled on FNC, it would be bad for ratings and their casting is much too good for that.
Beckel at least understands his role and accepts it along with a large paycheck one would presume.
But Williams, on the other hand, is a well paid dufus, put out there for fodder like a T34 put out for Abrams target practice. He has no clue.
On he fights, popular as hemorrhoids.
Posted by: Robert at September 26, 2010 11:25 AM (cd6Ip)
The Houston Comical does the same thing with the few stories they don't repost from AP/WaPo/LAT/NYT. After 26 paragraphs of breathless hyperbole, a fact or two is presented to qualify the story as "hard hitting news." Said fact(s) being in opposition to the meaning of the headline and the previous 26 paragraphs.
Nice work, Gabe.
Posted by: Count de Monet at September 26, 2010 11:26 AM (2g2ex)
Beckel at least understands his role and accepts it along with a large paycheck one would presume.
Posted by: Robert at September 26, 2010 03:25 PM (cd6Ip)
Ha! And he does, in spades. The only thing he doesn't do during his on air appearances is to drool on his tie. I almost feel sorry for the bastard.
Almost.
Posted by: ErikW at September 26, 2010 11:30 AM (rRGVs)
Posted by: mallfly at September 26, 2010 11:32 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 11:35 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 11:38 AM (p302b)
I can't stand anerdson either but man she put him away so deflty even my lib/dem friends said she had a brass set.
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 11:39 AM (p302b)
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 26, 2010 11:39 AM (ACkhT)
my dad found it and called me right away.
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 11:44 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Drumwaster at September 26, 2010 11:45 AM (dWFSK)
Posted by: KayInMaine at September 26, 2010 11:46 AM (47FnZ)
and more free publicity for the one who shall not be named. link
oddly enough, people were asking me why the witch hat and the broom....i think my friends are either living under a rock or I am too well informed
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 11:50 AM (p302b)
"Was Paul LePage married to a Canadian woman and bore two kids with him back in the 1970Â’s?"
Kay, try to edit your blog a little more carefully, especially if you post the link to it on this site. We tend to be critical of stupidity.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at September 26, 2010 11:52 AM (LH6ir)
curious, I just watched the clip and that's about as spittin' mad as I've seen the normally reserved Brit and he was dead-on accurate.
Juan Williams is a prime example of a brainwashed douchebag liberal who lives his or her life in a bubble of their own brand of illusory unreality.
Posted by: ErikW at September 26, 2010 11:55 AM (rRGVs)
I thought Kay In Maine's post was sort of an dunderheaded attempt at wit. After looking at her site, I see that she probably considers MORE RASCISM FROM THE REICH WING! SPIT! to be the apex of insightful political discourse.
Way to go Kay. You've successfully erased the line between commentary and parody.
Posted by: Cicero at September 26, 2010 11:57 AM (veJzk)
Way to go Kay. You've successfully erased the line between commentary and parody.
Posted by: Cicero at September 26, 2010 03:57 PM (veJzk)
Heh, I just checked the site too and I'm still not sure if it's parody or serious. I'm leaning towards serious.
Posted by: ErikW at September 26, 2010 12:00 PM (rRGVs)
I know right. He is normally reserved and very professional. But in the face of what is obvious to most of the country and seems to remain elusive to the libs/dems he dared to show a wee bit of emotion.
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 12:01 PM (p302b)
I thought Joe Biden already did that.
BTW, Gabe: I have yet to find anything you've written that I disagree with, and some things I've wished I'd said. Okay, maybe that generalization scold stung a bit, but hey, nobody's perfect.
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 12:05 PM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Will Folks at September 26, 2010 12:10 PM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Will Folks at September 26, 2010 12:12 PM (g4J4S)
By Beth Reinhard, Miami Herald...
The Miami Herald's Beth Reinhard is moving to National Journal
"Beth Reinhard has the skill, the wit, the insight, and above all the passion for the game that makes a great political correspondent," said Ron Brownstein, National Journal Group Editorial Director. "The only thing she lacks is the national audience she deserves. We look forward to providing that at National Journal, and we know our audience will benefit tremendously from the fresh voice and fresh perspective she will bring to the national political debate."
From National Journal's release: Reinhard is the latest in a growing list of talented writers, reporters, and analysts joining National Journal Group. In the last several weeks, National Journal Group has announced several important new additions, including former Fox News correspondent Major Garrett, Newsweek's Michael Hirsh, veteran magazine writer and editor Matt Cooper, political analyst Matthew Dowd, The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder, USA Today's Aamer Madhani....The Buzz September 2, 2010
Well, I know what national political magazine just moved to the top of my bathroom periodicals stack.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at September 26, 2010 12:14 PM (OIw0R)
Posted by: dagny at September 26, 2010 12:15 PM (6hy4U)
But why so difficult ... was Rubio 40/Crist 28/Meeks 23 to hard to understand ?
Posted by: John at September 26, 2010 12:16 PM (tE8FB)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 26, 2010 12:18 PM (Pvnf5)
o/t MANILA, Philippines – The U.S. government said Sunday it made an "honest mistake" when it displayed an inverted Philippine flag — which wrongfully signified that the Southeast Asian nation was in a state of war — in a meeting hosted by President Barack Obama.
These guys are really a mess.
Posted by: dagny at September 26, 2010 12:19 PM (6hy4U)
Posted by: dagny at September 26, 2010 04:15 PM (6hy4U)
No. Did he grow a pair?
Posted by: ErikW at September 26, 2010 12:20 PM (rRGVs)
Posted by: dagny at September 26, 2010 12:23 PM (6hy4U)
Posted by: David2.0 at September 26, 2010 12:40 PM (edg8q)
boner making a boner....."it will not be business as usual in Washington DC" but "sir that's not answering my question"..."it will not be business as usual in Washington DC...
I am boner. I am programed. watch me talk....
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 12:50 PM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 12:52 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Will Folks at September 26, 2010 12:52 PM (g4J4S)
he's going to borrow from michelle bachman. she has more than enough to share...
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 12:54 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Museisluse at September 26, 2010 12:54 PM (DTfXb)
Posted by: Will Folks at September 26, 2010 12:55 PM (g4J4S)
Gabe, you're full of shit on the contempt you showed Independents. I'm registered Independent but always vote Republican. Why don't I register Rep? Because I don't fucking want to. It's that simple. And the rest of you fuckholes who have such contempt for guys like me can fuck the fuck off.
Does that mean I'll switch sides? Nope, but it does make you worthless cocksuckers.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at September 26, 2010 01:28 PM (fLHQe)
Posted by: gesc at September 26, 2010 01:33 PM (CPIAf)
Posted by: David2.0 at September 26, 2010 01:48 PM (edg8q)
I know, it feels so good when you quit, right?
You really are a dumb shit.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2010 01:50 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 12:19 PM (p302b)
Curious, slow down turbo. I am to the right of Reagan politically in addition to being a realist. The first thing we need to understand is the fact GWB, as much as we may want to square his presidency with a conservative narrative, ran unabated in spending. Medicare Part D alone cost over $1Trillion.
The entire economy over the last 15 years was based on a super cycle of interventionist economics sustained by the Fed's monetary expansion, speculation and ill-packaged and ill rated bonds sold in the form of collateralized debt obligations; which were in turn bet against by the very same firms who marketed and sold them. The bets were called credit default swaps and were at the core of the liquidity crisis of 2008. Investment banks selling the bonds could also bet against the bonds without even owning them. Those owning the default swaps were essentially shorting the entire housing market and spurned on the meltdown through calling the collateral of firms such as AIG.
Before you continue to vent, you need to understand the fact the economic build up over the last 15 years was completely inorganic and false - - period.
We are going through a global deleveraging and are in the midst of not a recession but a highly unique depression that cannot be explained through conventional economics for we are in a simultaneous deflationary and inflationary environment for which the Fed is purposefully pursuing a policy of currency debasement and have even come out and stated this.
Understand one thing, there is not going to be an economic recovery. The monetary unit and reserve currency of the dollar is collapsing and this is not conjecture nor whimsical analysis. The currency is right now collapsing before your very eyes.
The reality is change and the environment is volatility.
That said, Obama remains a socialist and is a failure of a president, because he is not a leader and is adding fuel to the fire, a fire that was started prior to his arrival.
Posted by: journolist at September 26, 2010 01:59 PM (O/NP5)
Doesn't that make you a Republican?
No, it makes him a Republican who can't vote in Republican primaries. That's a brilliant strategy for someone who doesn't want to have any say in who the GOP puts up for the general election.
Bet he complained about having to hold his nose to vote for McCain too.
Posted by: Cicero at September 26, 2010 02:04 PM (veJzk)
All the worthless sonofabitch can do is mouth platitudes, lest he inadvertently make a promise that might cut off his own pork supply.
Fuck him and fuck his tan.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 26, 2010 02:08 PM (Ulu3i)
You registered 'independent' because you're a clueless feckless witless asshlole
Any other questions?
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, not in a glass house at September 26, 2010 02:20 PM (dPcmp)
I don't think that you are being fair to "Burn the Witch." His reading comprehension is so woefully inadequate that he simply didn't understand Gabe's point. So calling him clueless isn't strictly accurate. He had the clues available; he just didn't interpret them correctly. So...he is definitely witless, certainly an asshole, and I will reserve judgment on his fecklessness until he spouts off on something else (although all indications are good).
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at September 26, 2010 02:31 PM (LH6ir)
BTW, Boner: "It will not be business as usual" sounds one hell of a lot like "I promise I won't come in your mouth."
Posted by: jwpaine at September 26, 2010 02:32 PM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Museisluse at September 26, 2010 02:35 PM (DTfXb)
Rather than respond to each one point by point, I'll jump right out and admit that I may not be reading Gabe right. Though on subsequent reading, I'm just not seeing anything but contempt from him and several commenters long before I posted a damn thing here.
I know there's a lot of inside stuff here at the HQ and thought I'd picked up on most of it, but apparently I'm missing something, so before I jump back into a flame war, I'd certainly appreciate someone who can set me straight.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at September 26, 2010 02:40 PM (fLHQe)
Bet he complained about having to hold his nose to vote for McCain too.
Nope, but it's not like I haven't seen that done here ad nauseum.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at September 26, 2010 02:41 PM (fLHQe)
“… Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the People have abdicated our duties; for the People who once upon a time handed out military command, high civil office, legions — everything, now restrains itself and anxiously hopes for just two things: bread and circuses.” (Decimus Iunius Iuvenalis, describing the end of the Roman republic in Satire X, A.D. 200)
Posted by: VADM (Red) Cuthbert Collingwood RN at September 26, 2010 02:42 PM (UL/HQ)
If you don't like Gabe's shit, then WTF are you doing here reading it?
Am I supposed to agree with Gabe's posts before I read them???
WTF? And you're calling me a dumbshit??
Posted by: Burn the Witch at September 26, 2010 02:44 PM (fLHQe)
Posted by: Palerider at September 26, 2010 02:54 PM (cQZV0)
Posted by: Palerider at September 26, 2010 02:56 PM (cQZV0)
*who haven't picked a team yet.* Your reading comprehension apparently fails to get these 6 little words in Gabe's 2nd paragraph BTW. And you couldn't be bothered to read the thread where he clarified. People who walk around with a chip in the shoulder annoy me.
The part you quote and the "indeptards" comment in his 'translation', along with the usual contemptuous commentary I guess just contributed to my misreading, though I don't think it's much of a stretch to read it that way. There's usually a decent amount of seething contempt toward Independents on this blog by a number of people.
And while it's usually just in the commentary, it came across that way in Gabe's post - that's what prompted my ill-considered response, not a "chip" on my shoulder. And looking back upthread, I see that I only paid attention to the first part of Gabe's clarification, and not the second. And I'll see if I can start another sentence with "and".
I withdraw my comment and apologize for not starting a more interesting flamewar with more competence.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at September 26, 2010 03:13 PM (fLHQe)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 26, 2010 03:22 PM (mHQ7T)
That's only because "independent" is usually code for disengaged and generally clueless until things get so bad one of their own personal oxes gets gored and they're compelled to start paying attention to what's going on.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 26, 2010 03:25 PM (QPHpx)
Crist is trying to copy Obama's presidential campaign slogans and the voters are not buying that crap this time. His latest ad has really hurt him.
Posted by: lan sing at September 26, 2010 12:08 PM (YHrQZ)
That settles it. Crist has an agreement with the Dems and is trying to steer the indies to Meek. He knows he is a dying man, but maybe an appointment.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 26, 2010 03:36 PM (mHQ7T)
That sort of explains the hazing I got when I first got here. I understand it now...
Posted by: curious at September 26, 2010 03:42 PM (p302b)
Bet he complained about having to hold his nose to vote for McCain too.
Posted by: Cicero at September 26, 2010 06:04 PM (veJzk)
I'm sick of everyone bitching about McCain. Between him and Obama, it was an easy fucking decision. I still believe this country would be a lot better off if McCain won, and I give no second thought to the 2008 primary losers.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 26, 2010 03:43 PM (mHQ7T)
Ogabe might promise him something, then double cross him though. That would be sweet, and there's nothing Charlie could do about it. The dems can deny any promise as long as it was only made verbally, and Charlie would look like a pathetic whiner if he did make a double cross allegation publicly.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 26, 2010 03:44 PM (QPHpx)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 26, 2010 03:47 PM (mHQ7T)
In a course called "Media and Politics."
If only conservatives inhabited college campuses. Alas.
Posted by: Christopher Calandro at September 26, 2010 05:07 PM (KyR3d)
Posted by: Mazzuchelli at September 27, 2010 08:17 AM (zAZNI)
Posted by: fitmax body fit at January 31, 2011 12:55 AM (uByr/)
Posted by: orjin krem at February 05, 2011 02:11 PM (rCnWB)
Posted by: orjin krem at February 23, 2011 12:45 PM (NLPZ8)
Posted by: altýn çilek at March 07, 2011 08:19 AM (aAl9M)
<a href="http://www.maccosmeticsretail.net"title="mac eye shadow wholesale">mac eye shadow wholesale"</a>
<a href="http://www.maccosmeticsretail.net"title="mac eye shadow wholesale">mac eye shadow wholesale"</a>
Posted by: mac eye shadow wholesale at May 22, 2011 10:21 PM (GHgzf)
Posted by: beats by dr.dre at May 23, 2011 11:25 PM (bOhZb)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2443 seconds, 330 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: FLibtard at September 26, 2010 07:44 AM (8GYOu)