September 17, 2010
— Dave in Texas Since I had a mid-air posting collision with Gabriel about Ron Johnson's lead opening up over Russ Feingold, here's a Johnson campaign ad several readers mentioned in the comments.
It's ball-dippingly good.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
05:53 AM
| Comments (95)
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at September 17, 2010 05:54 AM (xqhoO)
Posted by: flyondawal at September 17, 2010 06:02 AM (HoKxH)
Posted by: Andy at September 17, 2010 06:23 AM (5Rurq)
Posted by: TimInVirginia at September 17, 2010 06:23 AM (uhKua)
There's NOTHING to "privatize"- the money is ALL GONE!
Posted by: Nighhawk at September 17, 2010 06:26 AM (OtQXp)
It's not that Washington treats it like a ponzi scheme, it's that it IS a ponzi scheme. It relies on new suckers to pay off the old suckers, and that's coming unraveled by the weight of demographics.
Johnson will face the real challenge when someone asks him what his solution is.
Posted by: nickless at September 17, 2010 06:28 AM (MMC8r)
What a kill shot!
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 17, 2010 06:30 AM (7rfUg)
Ron Johnson knows the problem, but will he have the fortitude to articulate the solution? Privatization and having people prepare for their own retirement, that is?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 17, 2010 06:32 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: nickless at September 17, 2010 10:28 AM (MMC8r)
I'm afraid the only possible "solution" is to look everybody under 65 in the eye and say: "You fucked up- you trusted us!" and tell them the truth- their money is gone and they won't be getting any of it back.
Posted by: Nighhawk at September 17, 2010 06:33 AM (OtQXp)
Great ad. Take the Democrat standard scare tactic - and throw it back all wrapped up in a little thing called - the truth.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at September 17, 2010 06:33 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Meggic Mac at September 17, 2010 06:33 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at September 17, 2010 06:34 AM (uvFJG)
Posted by: Tonawanda at September 17, 2010 06:36 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: nickless at September 17, 2010 10:28 AM
Johnsons face challenges every day that you refuse to release the 2nd chakra. Now take care of THIS.
Posted by: Al 'take care of this' Gore at September 17, 2010 06:36 AM (uvFJG)
Posted by: CanaDave at September 17, 2010 06:39 AM (LVF+U)
This is already self-evident to a lot of us under 65. Would be nice if there were some politicians that will confirm it and offer to scrap the whole system.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 17, 2010 06:40 AM (9hSKh)
I'm afraid the only possible "solution" is to look everybody under 65 in the eye and say: "You fucked up- you trusted us!" and tell them the truth- their money is gone and they won't be getting any of it back.
No way in hell that's gonna happen.
Posted by: jewells at September 17, 2010 06:40 AM (l/N7H)
Go easy on Dave, he can't get enough Johnson in the morning.
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 17, 2010 06:40 AM (xtAfO)
Posted by: Sen. Lloyd Christmas at September 17, 2010 06:44 AM (4uhuW)
Posted by: jewells at September 17, 2010 06:44 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at September 17, 2010 10:34 AM (uvFJG)
Are you implying that the ceremony should be PC-ified? Something like bipartite spheroid appendage dipping?
Posted by: NM Hick at September 17, 2010 06:44 AM (IzuWw)
This is perfect. Finally someone who is attempting to expose the truth in the face to bullshit demonization by the dems.
This is exactly the tact other Republicans need to take when the lying ass dems start crying "evil killers of the helpless and of senior citizens" that they continuously employ.
The dems have been allowed to control the terms of this discourse and other arguments for far too long.
These programs (soc. sec. and medicare) are unaffordable today and will only continue to be a disasterous burden until they are dismantled and reassembled in a workable way.
Over $100 trillion in unfunded obligations according to the President of the Dallas Federal Reserve.
Over $100 trillion.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 17, 2010 06:46 AM (r1h5M)
@22
I'm 52 and it's been self-evident to me since I graduated college 30 years ago.
@23
Yes, they will never tell us, but that doesn't change the fact that more than a generation of working Americans have effectively been robbed by the government- and that robbery continues unabated.
Posted by: Nighhawk at September 17, 2010 06:47 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Sen. Lloyd Christmas at September 17, 2010 06:48 AM (4uhuW)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 17, 2010 06:49 AM (h6XiD)
Posted by: Nighhawk at September 17, 2010 06:50 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Howard Johnson at September 17, 2010 06:52 AM (qo6NK)
Posted by: Yoda at September 17, 2010 06:52 AM (p2N1t)
Posted by: Dave C at September 17, 2010 06:53 AM (4uhuW)
Posted by: Nighhawk at September 17, 2010 06:53 AM (OtQXp)
Can we hold some signs supporting ms. Maxine at one of Mr. Johnson's speeches? That racist Nancy Pelosi kicked us out. We hope Sen. Johnson won't turn out to be a racist thug like Nancy P.
Posted by: maxine waters aides at September 17, 2010 06:54 AM (AT52Q)
Posted by: Nighhawk at September 17, 2010 06:55 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Jean at September 17, 2010 06:56 AM (PuhS2)
The word is tack, not tact. As in, a direction taken by a sailboat.
Posted by: pep at September 17, 2010 06:57 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: Dave C at September 17, 2010 06:58 AM (4uhuW)
Posted by: pep at September 17, 2010 06:58 AM (YXmuI)
All I have to say is that it is a good thing that these conservative candidates are doing well now because, between glutes of steel exercises, Andy says that the Tea Party is dying out (he has a chart!) (obviously must be right) (right?):
Of course Lindsey Graham said that back in July... But he's no Andrew Sullivan... well maybe...
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 17, 2010 06:59 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Mama AJ at September 17, 2010 07:01 AM (XdlcF)
"Here's what X is going to say about me in his commercials..."
Brilliant!
Posted by: DelD at September 17, 2010 07:01 AM (oAZ1S)
Posted by: Smug Progressive at September 17, 2010 07:01 AM (Snu7z)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 17, 2010 07:01 AM (VW9/y)
Posted by: Gov of California at September 17, 2010 07:03 AM (AT52Q)
Are you implying that the ceremony should be PC-ified? Something like bipartite spheroid appendage dipping?
Posted by: NM Hick at September 17, 2010 10:44 AM
I'm implying that these boobs were made for dippin', and that's just what they'll do. One of these days these boobs are gonna dip all over you.
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at September 17, 2010 07:03 AM (uvFJG)
Which if the dems or rinos have their way will just be redistributed that to all the losers that didn't save. What a sucker I was if we can't turn this mess around.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at September 17, 2010 07:03 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Hank Johnson at September 17, 2010 07:03 AM (4Kl5M)
Their health care reforms guarantee access to medical care, will slow spending that is bankrupting the nation and should reduce future deficits, to boot.
The financial reforms offer some protection against another economic freefall. These shouldn't be hard sells.
But you do have to sell them when the opposition is blasting these achievements 24/7. Sadly, few Democrats are blowing their horn, especially over health care, and some are actually running against that success. This is self-defeating behavior.
That's right, she's telling them that most Americans support ObamaCare. That they should really start talking up the great things they have done to the economy. You go, girl!
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 17, 2010 07:04 AM (7rfUg)
Posted by: kansas at September 17, 2010 07:04 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: Two Boffins...and a Bolger at September 17, 2010 07:05 AM (0ItCp)
That's what she said!
Oh come on, 50+ posts and nobody said this yet? Standards are slipping around here.
Well, I guess that's because none of the morons have ever actually heard a woman say that.
Good grief, the things I'll post just to keep from getting up and being productive...
Posted by: Mama AJ at September 17, 2010 07:05 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: pep at September 17, 2010 10:58 AM (YXmuI)
... and even when we know the right word, the fingers sometimes out smart us. Grammer, sentence structure, all well and good. The idea is the goal, imo.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 17, 2010 07:05 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: maddogg at September 17, 2010 10:34 AM (OlN4e)
Awesome.
Posted by: Timbo at September 17, 2010 07:07 AM (ph9vn)
I'm implying that these boobs were made for dippin', and that's just what they'll do. One of these days these boobs are gonna dip all over you.
Shhhh! Mrs. Hick might hear you.
Posted by: NM Hick at September 17, 2010 07:07 AM (IzuWw)
All I have to say is that it is a good thing that these conservative candidates are doing well now because, between glutes of steel exercises, Andy says that the Tea Party is dying out (he has a chart!) (obviously must be right) (right?):
Of course Lindsey Graham said that back in July... But he's no Andrew Sullivan... well maybe...
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 17, 2010 10:59 AM (r1h5M)
Other than the temporary comfort of delusion, what good does pumping out crap like that do? I could have compiled an AoSHQ graph (based up McCain's level of favorables over Obama) showing that McCain was on to a crushing lead over Obama in 2008.
It doesn't make it so.
I have to ask, why does anyone practice this level of self-delusion? Is there some other point to it that has an advantage?
Posted by: Khmer Rouge™ in San Diego at September 17, 2010 07:08 AM (oIp16)
Posted by: Just a Rothschild at The Meadows at September 17, 2010 07:09 AM (0ItCp)
Posted by: nickless at September 17, 2010 10:28 AM (MMC8r)
Well... first of all.. our 'representatives' have spent so much.. the truth is..
If you are under 40 or possibly.. under 50.. there is no social security for you.
Baby boomers will suck dry every tax dollar until they are gone. Sorry.. but its true.
Raise retirement age to 71.. possibly have to be higher.
Stop giving SS to millionaires. Donald Trump will get a check every month.
Do something. Start anywhere.
Posted by: Timbo at September 17, 2010 07:10 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: jarod at September 17, 2010 07:13 AM (SN4+f)
Other than the temporary comfort of delusion, what good does pumping out crap like that do? I could have compiled an AoSHQ graph (based up McCain's level of favorables over Obama) showing that McCain was on to a crushing lead over Obama in 2008.
It doesn't make it so.
I have to ask, why does anyone practice this level of self-delusion? Is there some other point to it that has an advantage?
Posted by: Khmer Rouge™ in San Diego at September 17, 2010 11:08 AM (oIp16)
You obviously didn't get the memo, the Tea Party is solely driven by Sarah Palin. Without her, it dies.
Posted by: Journolist at September 17, 2010 07:13 AM (IzuWw)
Posted by: RM at September 17, 2010 07:15 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: bigred at September 17, 2010 07:18 AM (cX9pO)
Stop giving SS to millionaires. Donald Trump will get a check every month.
Do something. Start anywhere.
Posted by: Timbo at September 17, 2010 11:10 AM (ph9vn)
IMO - raising the retirement age is not a solution. A part of the solution is to stop using SS contributions as general fund money. Had SS and Medicare not been used as a slush fund for pols, they would probably still be in trouble but less by a huge factor.
I believe that a market based solution, even given the problems in the economy now, is still the answer, at least something self managed. All of that money would build a pretty solid basis under the economy that would help to keep things like what are going on today from happening.
But the contributions absolutely have to be made off limits to the sticky hands of politicians.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 17, 2010 07:19 AM (r1h5M)
You obviously didn't get the memo, the Tea Party is solely driven by Sarah Palin. Without her, it dies.
Posted by: Journolist at September 17, 2010 11:13 AM (IzuWw)
I'm sure I got the memo, I'm just not a big reader of interoffice communications. Lying to your own troops, unless you are talking them into a banzai charge against a machine gun nest, I don't get it.
Posted by: Khmer Rouge™ in San Diego at September 17, 2010 07:21 AM (oIp16)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at September 17, 2010 07:24 AM (IkEhE)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 17, 2010 07:29 AM (VW9/y)
I'm sure I got the memo, I'm just not a big reader of interoffice communications. Lying to your own troops, unless you are talking them into a banzai charge against a machine gun nest, I don't get it.
Posted by: Khmer Rouge™ in San Diego
The one with the rifle shoots. The one without the rifle follows him. When the one with the rifle gets killed, the one without picks up the rifle......and shoots.
Posted by: THe NKVD at September 17, 2010 07:30 AM (Snu7z)
Posted by: THe NKVD at September 17, 2010 07:32 AM (Snu7z)
All of that was to put the program on sound actuarial grounds that would give a large surplus to take of the "boomers" when they retired. And it would have except...
What happened was that the pols spent the money after LBJ took it out of the "lockbox". I say now, before they do anything else to SS such as even further tax increases or "eligibility" changes that they go back with a special tax on all the members of congress who voted for a negative budget since the first tax increase, their heirs and assigns, and issue a special tax that takes all their wealth and income except for a poverty level amount and adds it to the SS trust fund period.
After that, then we can look at other needed fixes. Like privatizing it so the communists in Washington can not use it for a slush fund.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 07:34 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: logprof at September 17, 2010 07:34 AM (BP6Z1)
The one with the rifle shoots. The one without the rifle follows him. When the one with the rifle gets killed, the one without picks up the rifle......and shoots.
Posted by: THe NKVD at September 17, 2010 11:30 AM (Snu7z)
In Soviet Russia, the rifle shoots you.
Tired meme, I know. There's more truth to this instance than most others though.
Posted by: NM Hick at September 17, 2010 07:35 AM (IzuWw)
O'DONNELL: They are -- they are doing that here in the United States. American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains. So they're already into this experiment.
There's some other things that are taken _way_ out of context. But really look bad. We know the Libs always do this so I'm hoping that someone finds some crazy shit that Coons has said to counter-pinch with.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 17, 2010 07:40 AM (7rfUg)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 17, 2010 11:40 AM (7rfUg)
WTF good is repeating Daily Kos lies and BS on here?
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 07:43 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Ugrev at September 17, 2010 07:49 AM (862vz)
Know what your enemy is doing? And they aren't BS. A lot of it is things that only offend the far left. But today there are some bad things.
Of course, vic, if all you want to hear about is Rainbows and Unicorns..........
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 17, 2010 07:49 AM (7rfUg)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 17, 2010 11:49 AM (7rfUg)
Do they have proof?
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 07:55 AM (/jbAw)
Yes, the ones that worries me the most is off transcript from O'Rielly. I've found the transcript myself at Fox. The other ones are either not really sourced or not really bad...unless you hate Christians.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 17, 2010 08:03 AM (7rfUg)
Why not post "here's what they are saying" and include the link to Fox.
IN fact please do post the link to Fox I want to read all of it.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 08:10 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 17, 2010 08:13 AM (7rfUg)
The people who wanted to Clone the monkeys have openly admitted that this was step in the work to clone humans. Now I don't know whether that is true or not but it would be very easy to find out if people wanted to look into it.
O'Reilly says "That's the slippery slope argument and I don't buy it". First, it is NOT the slippery slope argument if they have openly said they want to do it. And second O'Reilly is full of shit, the slippery slope argument is very applicable because the left has been doing that since the 30s on the way to communism. It is also the major driving force behind the liberal justices and loss of property rights in Kelo from Stare Decisis.
No, I thought she came off very well in a hostile interview with two opponents.
As for the "cloning issue" itself I am still not completely made up of mind on that issue. But I do know this, cloning monkeys for stem cells on Parkinson research is a red herring. In fact embryonic stem cell research is a red herring and a major BS item.
The secret here with her, and other conservatives, is not just how to conduct an interview where all the parties are actively hostile, but when to not conduct the interview at all. I know all politicians like to think any press is good press, but I am thinking that for Republicans who are not RINOs that is not true.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 08:34 AM (/jbAw)
If Mr. Johnson from Wisconsin wants to really get seniors in WI riled up, besides talking about how SS has been robbed, he should talk about how ObamaCare is going to take $600 billion out of Medicare and give it to
1) young people, who are 2) maybe here illegally, and 3) who vote for the democrats. The death panels will be the bureaucrats at Medicare who won't approve any procedures if you are over 65, and the doctors who won't be able to afford to care for patients over 65 because the docs won't get a dime for treating them.
He should also mention that AARP is a bunch of lying weasels, AARP is making money hand over fist by selling insurance products to seniors at the same time AARP is conspiring with Obama to defund Medicare.
Posted by: Boots at September 17, 2010 08:38 AM (06JTY)
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 17, 2010 09:33 AM (TXIgH)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2474 seconds, 223 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Boots at September 17, 2010 05:54 AM (06JTY)