September 16, 2010
— Ace Oh, when you put it like that...
I see two central reasons for the Tea Party's rise. The first is the yardstick, and the second is the clock. First, the yardstick. Imagine that over at the 36-inch end you've got pure liberal thinking—more and larger government programs, a bigger government that costs more in the many ways that cost can be calculated. Over at the other end you've got conservative thinking—a government that is growing smaller and less demanding and is less expensive. You assume that when the two major parties are negotiating bills in Washington, they sort of lay down the yardstick and begin negotiations at the 18-inch line. Each party pulls in the direction it wants, and the dominant party moves the government a few inches in their direction.But if you look at the past half century or so you have to think: How come even when Republicans are in charge, even when they're dominant, government has always gotten larger and more expensive? It's always grown! It's as if something inexorable in our political reality—with those who think in liberal terms dominating the establishment, the media, the academy—has always tilted the starting point in negotiations away from 18 inches, and always toward liberalism, toward the 36-inch point.
Democrats on the Hill or in the White House try to pull it up to 30, Republicans try to pull it back to 25. A deal is struck at 28. Washington Republicans call it victory: "Hey, it coulda been 29!" But regular conservative-minded or Republican voters see yet another loss. They could live with 18. They'd like 8. Instead it's 28.
For conservatives on the ground, it has often felt as if Democrats (and moderate Republicans) were always saying, "We should spend a trillion dollars," and the Republican Party would respond, "No, too costly. How about $700 billion?" Conservatives on the ground are thinking, "How about nothing? How about we don't spend more money but finally start cutting."
What they want is representatives who'll begin the negotiations at 18 inches and tug the final bill toward 5 inches. And they believe Tea Party candidates will do that.
The second thing is the clock. Here is a great virtue of the Tea Party: They know what time it is. It's getting late. If we don't get the size and cost of government in line now, we won't be able to. We're teetering on the brink of some vast, dark new world—states and cities on the brink of bankruptcy, the federal government too. The issue isn't "big spending" anymore. It's ruinous spending that they fear will end America as we know it, as they promised it to their children.
No, seriously, I did need that crystalized for me. Maybe I had gotten a little too wrapped up in standard thinking.
From Hot Air, where Allah's round-up is mostly about Sarah Palin's apparently likely presidential bid.
Posted by: Ace at
08:23 PM
| Comments (285)
Post contains 503 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: logprof at September 16, 2010 08:26 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Adriane at September 16, 2010 08:27 PM (+NfQM)
Posted by: Serious Cat at September 16, 2010 08:28 PM (bAySe)
Wow.
I bet this is information people could use.
I think I'll write a column about it.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:28 PM (tJs2I)
Personally, I'd be happy if people accused me of being an 18-incher.
Posted by: Ace's liver at September 16, 2010 08:29 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: Gryph at September 16, 2010 08:30 PM (J8eZP)
Posted by: journolist at September 16, 2010 08:31 PM (O/NP5)
I just kinda got lazy and didn't bother showering for a few days.
Now my armpits smell a little funky. I'm thinking there may be a connection between these two things.
I think I'll write a column about it.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:31 PM (tJs2I)
I think you see where I'm going with this.
Thanks for the attempt, Peggy, but based on your stupid support of the most egregious spender since FDR, I can only say this: Fuck you and your fucking arrogance for trying to explain anything to me.
Posted by: wiserbud at September 16, 2010 08:31 PM (EW49d)
Posted by: lawdvd at September 16, 2010 08:31 PM (dgkeG)
No, seriously. I did an experiment. You have to actually DO what the workout guy on the screen is doing if you want to see any improvement.
This would make a great column, I bet.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:32 PM (tJs2I)
Posted by: lawdvd at September 16, 2010 08:33 PM (dgkeG)
Actually . . . let me vote for Obama first and then rip new media, buy some eggs, clean my furniture, get the volvo tuned up, order some backlava and then get my yardstick out to sew the whole political mess thing up.
Thanks,
Peggy
Posted by: journolist at September 16, 2010 08:34 PM (O/NP5)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 16, 2010 08:35 PM (0GFWk)
That whole slipping the surly bonds of Earth and touching the face of God thing?
Metaphor.
Surly bonds did NOT cause that explosion.
I've got to get to a word processor. People need to know about this.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:37 PM (tJs2I)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 08:38 PM (EW49d)
Wow.
I bet this is information people could use.
I think I'll write a column about it.
Posted by: Warden at September 17, 2010 12:28 AM (tJs2I)
thx 4 the tip!
Posted by: Meggie McCheese, Political Analyst at September 16, 2010 08:38 PM (BP6Z1)
Oh, what am I thinking? He's so well spoken.
Forget I said anything.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:39 PM (tJs2I)
WOW!
I really should write about that someday.
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 08:40 PM (EW49d)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 08:40 PM (BP6Z1)
Column.
Posted by: Warden at September 17, 2010 12:34 AM (tJs2I)
< And can be used in pearl stitching a good yarn.
Posted by: journolist at September 16, 2010 08:41 PM (O/NP5)
Posted by: Miss Peggy at September 16, 2010 08:42 PM (BP6Z1)
Time to tear the pawl off the mechanism and throw it in the ocean.
Posted by: DelD at September 16, 2010 08:42 PM (oAZ1S)
I wonder what could account for that? It's an interesting phenomenon at any rate. Would probably make for a good column.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:42 PM (tJs2I)
Posted by: Deep Thoughts by Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 08:44 PM (BP6Z1)
And Peggy just can't help veer into T. Coddington land. I guess Farquar must have arrived with the silver cart and a Sapphire Gimlet. I kinda think that those rubes that wrote the Constitution were "intellectuals" in their own coonskin-cap sort of way, and a movement wanting to restore that document is maybe more than "swept by a desire just to tear down, to destroy."
Posted by: The Pricker! at September 16, 2010 08:45 PM (0EfeF)
I'm calling Ripley's Believe it Or Not.
But first, I'm gonna write a column.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:45 PM (tJs2I)
Posted by: Cameron at September 16, 2010 08:46 PM (php2y)
First, when it's cold it feels really good after an energetic, stressful day.
The second thing is the alcohol. It gives a nice lightheaded feeling and calms the nerves.
Posted by: Peggy Noonan, Super Genius at September 16, 2010 08:47 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Rat Patrol at September 16, 2010 08:47 PM (dQdrY)
Not just some of them.
Every single one. No variance. You open 'em up, they fizz.
I wonder if that's deliberate?
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:48 PM (tJs2I)
Posted by: Jean at September 16, 2010 08:48 PM (CPefM)
Posted by: Cameron at September 16, 2010 08:49 PM (php2y)
Did you guys know.....
*hic
Did you guys know.....
*hic
NO , sirrously, I can do this......
*hic
Did you guys know that it's rilly hard to get your reputation back *hic
after you fuck the entire football team at a frat party??
*hic
It's TRUE!!!
*thud
oops. {{giggle}}
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 08:49 PM (EW49d)
Could you imagine their reaction on Wednesday morning, November 7, 2012 if Sarah Palin were elected?
It would be like a scuba diving in an ocean of pudding.
I'm not even a big supporter of Palin, but that's reason enough to vote for her, right there.
Posted by: DelD at September 16, 2010 08:49 PM (oAZ1S)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 08:50 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: Rat Patrol at September 16, 2010 08:50 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: eman at September 16, 2010 08:51 PM (zCAXm)
When it's safe, I'm perfectly willing to make a stand.
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 08:52 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 08:52 PM (EW49d)
It's like there's some physiological something or other happening. Like my body needs for my eyes to be closed.
It'd be cool to do a column on this, but first I'll need to do some more research to figure out what's going on.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:52 PM (tJs2I)
Posted by: eman at September 16, 2010 08:53 PM (zCAXm)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan's Scoop at September 16, 2010 08:54 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: tsj017 at September 16, 2010 08:54 PM (vOH26)
I wouldn't read Peggy Noonan if she:
1) Spray painted her column on the side of my car.
2) Started writing pr0n.
3) Wrote her column using the chalk marker at the Meadowlands.
Posted by: badanov at September 16, 2010 08:54 PM (eqYIp)
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 08:54 PM (tJs2I)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 08:54 PM (DHDgK)
My head tells me to be skeptical of Palin. But my gut tells me there's something more right than I can consciously understand about somebody so hated by all the right people.
Posted by: The Pricker! at September 16, 2010 08:55 PM (0EfeF)
You heard it here first.
Posted by: Peggy Noonan's Brain at September 16, 2010 08:56 PM (BP6Z1)
#30 One difference so far between the Tea Party and the great wave of conservatives that elected Ronald Reagan in 1980 is that latter was a true coalition—not only North and South, East and West but right-wingers, intellectuals who were former leftists, and former Democrats. Blah blah teabaggers blah blah racist blah blah tantrum blah blah...
And of course that's a flat lie. Reagan was pissed on by the country club Republican set and the Lindsey Liberal Repubican wing every damn day even after he set their dead party back on the tracks again for a generation. -- Just an actor! Why be difficult - detante is the way to go!
Things were well on the way to getting fixed when they decided to push their way to the front of the bus.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 16, 2010 08:56 PM (Jp/J9)
I also agree with Ace that the column is fine alliteration, the yardstick and the clock is good. I just hope Peggy doesn't smack herself and bump her head again, the cranium seems to be getting soft.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 16, 2010 08:56 PM (L8kaT)
Posted by: arhooley at September 16, 2010 08:56 PM (6riHP)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan's Opening Line at September 16, 2010 08:59 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Jean at September 16, 2010 08:59 PM (CPefM)
Check out this Slublog Peggy. The female T. Coddington Van Vorhees.
When asked about whether his budget would increase the deficit, Obama shifted blame masterfully. It was like watching Mozart not only compose a symphony, but play all of the instruments himself. While conducting. There are those who claim that the president is overexposed, but I cannot get enough of that rich velvety voice. It's like being washed with pinot grigio. French pinot, of course. Only a monstrous, embarrassing hick from a backwater state such as Alaska would go with something from Napa, or worse, Australia.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 08:59 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: JasonF at September 16, 2010 08:59 PM (E6CbM)
I'm going to contact the Tea Party people and see if they can't work that into their message. All those guys back in the day were really against taxes and the Tea Party people today are, too, so you could really make that connection.
Plus, it's all historic.
How cool.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 09:00 PM (tJs2I)
She knew Reagan personally, but voted for Obama?
How is that possible? Advanced syphilis?
Posted by: Radiant at September 17, 2010 01:00 AM (dQdrY)
--I don't think she actually voted for Øbama, but she bent over as-backwards to make excuses for him.
Posted by: logprof at September 16, 2010 09:01 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:01 PM (0EfeF)
It's interesting to watch Peggy Noonan part ways with T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII. Not sure if I buy it as honest or just CYA, but interesting nonetheless...
She's smart enough to cut her losses. Vorhees will never be.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 09:02 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: eman at September 16, 2010 09:02 PM (zCAXm)
I only use that word about myself when I've been either really Bad or really Stupid
Posted by: the real Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:03 PM (dPcmp)
I was always on your side. I knew that having Obama as President was gonna make this happen. That;s the only reason I supported him.
Honest.
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:03 PM (EW49d)
Posted by: Innes Sainz, Crack Sports Reporter at September 16, 2010 09:04 PM (BP6Z1)
then if you take it out of the fridge it thaws into water again
I love to watch this process--and where's my yardstick ??
Posted by: the real Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:04 PM (dPcmp)
#62 It's because its a revolt. The elite don't want anyone to upset they status quo. Its easier to trade the same few dozen seats around and all go home richer.
Once people are paying attention, all sorts of things can happen. Like we see now.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 16, 2010 09:05 PM (Jp/J9)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:07 PM (EW49d)
See Peg, this why the good Lord gave you a vagina: so you could be good at at least one thing.
Now shut your pie-hole and open your trout-hole. Don't think. Just fuck.
And when you are done, YOU WILL BLOW ME.
....and make me a sammich.......
Posted by: Harry TeaBag at September 16, 2010 09:07 PM (wFMDa)
Posted by: The Pricker! at September 17, 2010 12:55 AM (0EfeF)
Exactly. She's got all the right enemies.
Posted by: DelD at September 16, 2010 09:07 PM (oAZ1S)
How can you blame me? If I had stood for something two years ago, Coddington would never have taken me to Gstaad. And I wouldn't have spent all those weekends in Martha's Vineyard. Hobnobbing with the bigwigs is so niiiiiiiiiiiiice.
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:08 PM (DHDgK)
Radiant -- She knew Reagan personally, but voted for Obama?
How is that possible? Advanced syphilis?
Even worse, she lived through Jimmy Carter and voted for Jimmy Carter 2.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 16, 2010 09:09 PM (Jp/J9)
She knew Reagan personally, but voted for Obama?
How is that possible? Advanced syphilis?
Ronnie was white and *cough and shudder* conservative.
BaROCK My World is black and suave and well spoken and so dreamy...swoon.
/who told you about the syphilis? Gee, you give it to a few people, and they get p*ssed and start telling everyone...
Posted by: Ms. Petty to You at September 16, 2010 09:10 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:10 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: arhooley at September 16, 2010 09:11 PM (6riHP)
Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall.
Every year.
This year, so far, we've had Winter, Spring and Summer.....
Hmmmmmmm...........
*reaches for laptop.....
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:12 PM (EW49d)
HAH! Beat you to the flip, Kathleen!
You fucker. Um. I would never say that. You're a very nice lady, one whom I admire and love. I'm coming!
Posted by: Kathleen Parker at September 16, 2010 09:12 PM (DHDgK)
Noonan crystallizes things for you?
Here's a new word: Unsustainable. Sound it out. Now break it up into it's component parts.
Posted by: Repeal at September 16, 2010 09:13 PM (8xwyL)
Posted by: Oldcat at September 16, 2010 09:15 PM (Jp/J9)
She needs to write an article about the arrogance of her friends, the hubris of that narcissism cult she likes to spend so much time with.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 09:16 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: Ronaldus Magnus at September 16, 2010 09:16 PM (554T5)
Posted by: Rodney C. Johnson at September 16, 2010 09:16 PM (XRIh6)
Posted by: ace at September 16, 2010 09:16 PM (KUUXH)
Posted by: Anachronda has opinions at September 16, 2010 09:16 PM (6fER6)
Posted by: someone at September 16, 2010 09:17 PM (DfAwB)
Cult of Narcissism
Free book title, anyone.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 17, 2010 01:16 AM (DHDgK)
Nope, That's my next magnum opus.
Posted by: King Barry at September 16, 2010 09:18 PM (BP6Z1)
wow, I wasn't even being sarcastic, I did find that column helpful in reminding me of what I actually believe.
It's nice when she uses her powers for good.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 09:18 PM (DHDgK)
Sanity? Liberals are always expounding upon shit they absolutely haven't a clue about.
Posted by: Ronaldus Magnus at September 16, 2010 09:19 PM (554T5)
Posted by: eman at September 16, 2010 09:20 PM (zCAXm)
David Frum told me this, but I didn't listen.
*fires up Wordperfect
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:20 PM (EW49d)
Mom, I told you to do more drugs.
Posted by: Danny Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:22 PM (DHDgK)
This is a disaster.
We could have had 9 Senate seats. Now we will only get 9 Senate seats.
We never could have repealed ObamaCare. Now we will never repeal ObamaCare.
If you love the TeaBaggers so much Peg, then go down to Delaware and campaign for O'Donnell.
*I'll be at the Fox studios making incorrect predictions based on flawed premises and hopeless miscalculations- as always*
Posted by: Charles Krauthammer at September 16, 2010 09:22 PM (wFMDa)
Posted by: politicalmuse at September 16, 2010 09:22 PM (kLKnf)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:23 PM (EW49d)
Posted by: Radiant at September 16, 2010 09:25 PM (dQdrY)
The thing that has bothered me most about Bloomberg is that in all his statements about the mosque, he hasn't addressed the "decency" issue. Not once. Much easier to pretend 70% of New Yorkers are intolerant and bigots.
What an asshole.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 09:26 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: Anachronda at September 16, 2010 09:26 PM (6fER6)
I think if you go back and look at federal and most state spending you would find that if we took spending levels from 2003 or thereabouts and just adjusted for inflation and population growth most budgets would be fine. But we didn't do that. Now, were people dropping dead in the streets in 2003 from lack of government spending? No, of course not. But because you had Republicans competing with Dems for compassion awards, costs blew way out of porportion. Somewhere in there you had that cocksucker Tom Delay claiming that the federal budget had been cut to the bone. Fuck him to hell for all eternity.
The point that Peggy N is finally discovering (way too late) is that the game has been that when liberals win government expands rapidly and that when "conservatives" win government expands slightly less rapidly. Thanks alot.
When conservatives win government needs to shrink in absolute terms. That can only happen by eliminating whole departments: Education, Energy, Labor, Commerce... The benefit is reduced costs and forcing some of the most useless cocksuckers in the world to actually go into the private sector and produce for a living.
If we can't explain to the electorate why this needs to happen then is no hope. It's just a matter of how long the slide into national bankruptcy will take.
Posted by: SteveN at September 16, 2010 09:27 PM (7EV/g)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at September 16, 2010 09:27 PM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Radiant at September 16, 2010 09:28 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 09:28 PM (DHDgK)
Let's have a big round of applause for Peggy Noonan everyone. Who else is so way out in front of this stuff like her, so cutting edge? Perhaps only Mitt Romney I think.
Posted by: exceller at September 16, 2010 09:28 PM (Z7Znk)
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at September 16, 2010 09:29 PM (EW49d)
Posted by: Peggy High Noonin at September 16, 2010 09:29 PM (BP6Z1)
No way will they vote away their employment or healthcare for the children.
Posted by: pam at September 16, 2010 09:29 PM (h8R9p)
That would be nice, but relative to GDP is OK. Axing departments would be great, of course, but more for the regulation-zapping than the actual cost.
Posted by: someone at September 16, 2010 09:30 PM (DfAwB)
Posted by: SteveN at September 16, 2010 09:32 PM (7EV/g)
#127 - They can vote what they please. It doesn't mean they will get it. Ask King Canute how ordering the tide to stay out worked for him.
You might fool the voters, but the rules of reality don't change.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 16, 2010 09:34 PM (Jp/J9)
Without reading the whole column....
I always liked Peggy Noonan. Really.
She is very "right brained" and touchy feely, but always seemed to grasp big picture thinking. (the right really needs these types. Michael Barone, for all his hobo skinning abilities, can't reach parts of the base)
That is, before her meltdown that took place 5 or 6 years ago. I won't discuss motives because I have no idea, but she came to hate GW, irrationally in my humble opinion, and lost all credibility with me.
Her leftward drift, if you want to call it that, was complete with her bad mouthing of Palin and her subtle (or not so) cheerleading of Ostumble.
I'll never trust her again. I'll never not wonder what her true agenda is.
Seemingly any wind can blow her. And not in the Mel Gibson sense. She lost her rudder. Sad. (not to be emo about it, but she used to be a must read along with Sowell, Hansen etc)
That said, she makes excellent points here. This is throwback Peggy, before....before something happened, whatever it was.
Glad to see it, hope she keeps it up, but like I said, I'll never trust her. Everything with a grain of salt. A grain of salt is better than T. Codd, Frum, and David Brooks any day though.
Speaking of, did anyone see DB's latest? What a tool.
Posted by: Gloria Allred at September 16, 2010 09:34 PM (A0VTZ)
A belt.
It's pretty cool how things just sometimes randomly fit together. Life sure is funny that way.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 09:36 PM (tJs2I)
Posted by: Socrates Paradox of Wisdom at September 16, 2010 09:38 PM (wFMDa)
I'm not bargaining with anyone -- that's not my job. But the political road for trillions in spending cuts (which would, even after cleaning out the BO/late Bush shit, require entitlement adjustments) is rough, and people here tend to get sucked in to hopelessness (Ace and Drew were bemoaning the difficulties in a previous thread, I think).
So, just between us, I'm noting that there's a less traumatic endgame here.
Posted by: someone at September 16, 2010 09:39 PM (DfAwB)
Funny voice from the recent past, Barbara Boxer:
"Voters are grumpy."
Just thought you guys might like an O/T flashback.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 09:40 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: Moochelle at September 16, 2010 09:40 PM (6fER6)
Posted by: Oldcat at September 16, 2010 09:41 PM (Jp/J9)
Picture a yardstick. It's straight and you measure stuff with it.
Teabaggers are mostly straight, right? So there you go. And they want measured government. So that explains a lot, really.
Now think about a clock. It goes around and around. And ... well I'll be a monkey's uncle! After it goes around, it starts back over again at the same place. It's circular.
So, it's almost like the more things change (get it? Hope and Change?) the more they stay the same!!
Oh, wow. That's pretty catchy. I should make that a saying.
Where were we now?
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 09:41 PM (tJs2I)
#128,
Government spending as a percent of GDP is near an all time high, comparable only to when we were in the midst of WWII. Under any realistic scenario there is no way we get the deficit below $1Trillion unless we start massive budget cuts. That means whole departments go. And that means we get rid of programs that have done nothing but make matters worse. The prime example being Education, in which federal spending has increased geometrically and results have declined. We need pols with the courage to take this case to the electorate.
Posted by: SteveN at September 16, 2010 09:41 PM (7EV/g)
Posted by: Oldcat at September 16, 2010 09:43 PM (Jp/J9)
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 09:47 PM (tJs2I)
Posted by: SteveN at September 16, 2010 09:48 PM (7EV/g)
Things were well on the way to getting fixed when they decided to push their way to the front of the bus.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 17, 2010 12:56 AM (Jp/J9)
You're damn right. I worked for Reagan all 8 years, and let me tell you those Bush people could not WAIT to get rid of all of us. They totally acted like "at last! Our guy is where he should have been 8 years ago! Now get lost, all you right-wing freaks!" They canned every single Reagan appointee, right down to the 22-year-old nerds in the bowels of the Department of Whatever. They never asked for the advice of any of us.
And then they proceeded to fuck up everything we had done.
I think one reason Peggy Noonan never liked W. was because of this. The Reaganites were all rather rudely tossed aside by the Bushes. If you can say one thing for Peggy, she reveres Reagan and always will.
Posted by: rockmom at September 16, 2010 09:49 PM (w/gVZ)
Posted by: Maetenloch at September 16, 2010 09:49 PM (vfNQj)
Posted by: tompur at September 16, 2010 09:51 PM (bzhqq)
You know what the difference is between Lace Curtain Irish (like Peggy) and Shanty Irish (like me)?
Lace Curtain Irish take the dishes out of the sink before they piss in it.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at September 16, 2010 09:52 PM (HbvOx)
Posted by: Maetenloch at September 17, 2010 01:49 AM (vfNQj)
Exactly!
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at September 16, 2010 09:53 PM (YVZlY)
They totally acted like "at last! Our guy is where he should have been 8 years ago! Now get lost, all you right-wing freaks!" They canned every single Reagan appointee, right down to the 22-year-old nerds in the bowels of the Department of Whatever. They never asked for the advice of any of us.
That was kindler and gentler, though.
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 09:53 PM (DHDgK)
My biggest concern here--though it hardly needs to be stated--is that some of you will take this unfortunate error in judgment as evidence that I'm not smarter and better than you.
Let's be clear. I am.
Posted by: Warden at September 16, 2010 09:54 PM (tJs2I)
18 inches excites me.
36 inches scares me.
24 inches makes me moderately moist.
Get ready to be terrified.
Posted by: Pat Caddell at September 16, 2010 09:54 PM (jxfGR)
It's way too late for that squish crap.
To arrive at anything like the government the Constitution authorizes, which is pretty much what the teacrackaz want, their representatives would have to start at -10,000 and go "That's it. Fuck off," enough to maintain an average of about -36. For...ehhhhhhh...two hundred years or so?
That's totally gonna happen.
Posted by: oblig. at September 16, 2010 09:55 PM (x7Ao8)
I saw what Bush 1 was from the beginning. As soon as he said "kinder and gentler." What he meant was "so arrogant, I don't need Reagan's playbook, even though it worked."
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 09:55 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: garrett at September 16, 2010 09:59 PM (jxfGR)
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 10:01 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: politicalmuse at September 16, 2010 10:02 PM (kLKnf)
Posted by: garrett at September 17, 2010 01:59 AM (jxfGR)
--I think ug*s for cheap is quicker on the uptake than Peggy Noonan.
Posted by: logprof at September 16, 2010 10:02 PM (BP6Z1)
Also, there is a serious timing malfunction at AOSHQ. People are timing their liquor for the ONT and you throw up (while I did NOT throw up) documents and links that need serious consideration. What kind of a hobo-farm are you guys running here?
Oh alright BELCH, there are you happy.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at September 16, 2010 10:03 PM (eNxMU)
Of fer Cry-iey!
No wonder math was such a fucking mystery to me from age 12-19!
God bless Euclid and the advanced maths necessary not to look like a total fucking prat in the Science, Maths, Philosophy and even fucking Music tutorials required for me to get my degree!
I learned more about how to write an essay from studying Euclid; than any later commentary on my use or abuse (rampant and acknowledged) of punctuation.
I've never been one for arithmetic per se but this sort of geometrical attempt at a "word problem" leaves me fucking cold.
Shut the fuck up, dumbass.
Were I a Junior, having to hash out Zeno's paradox (again) before I got to see the Calculus proved, I would have no time for your silly fucking yardstick metaphors.
Talk to me about numbers after you've sliced and diced, chilled and gassified, and tried to weigh and measure some shit, your first two years.
Metaphor will get you a long way as a sincere student outside your field of competence.
Can and should bring down nothing but derision in the pretentious.
What?
You are the Cantor of politics?
Please.
Posted by: Deety at September 16, 2010 10:04 PM (aVzyR)
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 16, 2010 10:08 PM (DHDgK)
Posted by: Cicero at September 16, 2010 10:09 PM (eCkV5)
@ Ace
"No, seriously, I did need that crystalized for me. Maybe I had gotten a little too wrapped up in standard thinking."
You're kidding me right?
Posted by: Theresa Heinz at September 16, 2010 10:10 PM (MwCol)
Posted by: Ron Klein at September 16, 2010 10:11 PM (92zkk)
Posted by: doc at September 16, 2010 10:13 PM (eTPhl)
Posted by: garrett at September 17, 2010 02:10 AM (jxfGR)
--Classic album.
Brings me back to my first year of college.
Posted by: logprof at September 16, 2010 10:15 PM (BP6Z1)
All kidding aside frankly I have zero use for Noonan. It's nice that, at this very precise moment, she evidently had an epiphany. Or at least is faking one. But I can't say I give a rat's ass because we all know that she'll write some bitchy attack piece at some point in the near future.
So from my heart to Noonan's: congrats. Now go away.
Posted by: memomachine at September 16, 2010 10:16 PM (MwCol)
Classic album.
I am a big fan of this album and 'Angel Dust'. Both hold up well.
That Bass is just filthy.
Posted by: garrett at September 16, 2010 10:21 PM (jxfGR)
Posted by: huerfano at September 16, 2010 10:23 PM (No0N3)
Whatever her motivation, in the passage quoted by Ace she speaks with accuracy, and while her epiphany consists of the patently obvious--well, if Ace found it helpful, I'm sure a lot of conservatives will.
In other words, I'm not looking this gift horse in the mouth.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 16, 2010 10:27 PM (kJXs1)
FTR Ace, this was the point I was trying to make with my analogy 'it makes sense to bet big and risky if you don't have the time to grind'
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 16, 2010 10:30 PM (afd0I)
Posted by: huerfano at September 16, 2010 10:32 PM (No0N3)
Turns out that the hot new kid who has been making kick-ass political spots, did a movie on Flatland.
I love that book and I have assigned it as a bit of Lit. for some of my math students and as a bit of Math for some of my reading students, for ages...
I should really look at his movie version but I do still think that it's something that every 6th grader should probably have to try to "imagine" on their own.
Isn't that the tough part?
Getting back down into 2D?
Posted by: Deety at September 16, 2010 10:40 PM (aVzyR)
The real problem, keeping the yardstick as metaphor, is that it hasn't any negative numbers. If the 36" mark is pure leftwing socialism, then the 0" mark isn't shrinking government but simply *zero growth* in government functions(with spending still growing, of course). Or that's the best assumption we're allowed by the GOP establishment. Their constant refrain is that a reduction in government functions and spending is "extremist" and "unrealistic." So what happens when you compromise? Well anything greater than zero means a growing government.
That's why any so-called compromise is ultimately a victory for the socialist Left. Because it always means more food for the leviathan.
Posted by: Wilkey at September 16, 2010 10:57 PM (tBrQI)
Posted by: Sally Quinn at September 16, 2010 11:05 PM (oj52M)
Seems kind of sad when you think on it.
She is a very good writer and probably was something, back in the day, in the '80's or something but I don't see her as being anything other than an emeritus type personality at any of the remaining print papers.
What sort of insight could she possibly lend to people more than 300 miles outside of where she has worked and lived for so many decades?
Posted by: Deety at September 16, 2010 11:08 PM (aVzyR)
Posted by: rawmuse at September 16, 2010 11:38 PM (+Tw/n)
Posted by: JS at September 17, 2010 12:22 AM (NB4vc)
Yeah, Allah's really got a thing for Sarah, doesn't he? Anybody ever see Allah and Charles Johnson at the same place and time? . . . Just wondering.
Posted by: Roger at September 17, 2010 01:06 AM (tAwhy)
How old is the dust on Ms. Noonan's cooter?
Posted by: Mr. Owl at September 17, 2010 01:57 AM (BP6Z1)
There's no dust on Huma's.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Posted by: Hillary Clinton at September 17, 2010 01:44 AM (ByyxO)
As for small government vs large government, I think there is something of a disconnect between what people say they want and what they expect. After all when Reagan left office government was bigger than it was when he got there and he was a conservative. And when Bush tried to reform social security and make even a small part of it private, people were not interested. I think that if you ask them if the government is spending too much money most people say yes, but if you ask them if they want to give something up...they say no.
Posted by: Terrye at September 17, 2010 02:20 AM (FloBD)
Ace I know you don't always read the responses in your columns but I posted essentially the same thing in a thread a while back when you are waxing poetic on the "Purity Republicans", the Tea Party, and the primary attacks on RINOs.
My response was that if the Republican Leadership was looking for someone to blame for the surge of the Tea Party they need look no further than themselves.
After the 2008 debacle did the Republican leadership swallow their "moderate" ways and say mea culpas and say "we have learned out lessons, no more crossing the aisle and we will fix the primary rules". No, their first thing out the gate was "we are going on a nationwide big tent tour" to make out Party more open to all. I wanted to scream and spit.
When the communist Party rammed everything through the people just got fed up and seeing how the Republicans were responding they noted that THEY had no representatives in Washington.
The Republican leadership created the Tea Party through their very own actions and if they do not wake up soon we will have no need of a Republican Party.
I see out country at a major crossroads that we have not seen since 1860. This time it is not regional, it is economic direction. There is the Party of the plunderers who wish to use the law to create bread and circuses, there is the Party of the moderates who wish to accommodate them but slow the growth, and then there are the people who are expected to pay for it and suffer.
Those last two are under the "big tent" right now just like the old Democratic Party was under a "big tent" in 1860. That Party split at about the same time the Republican Party was born.
It is about time for the current Republican Party to split. There is no need for a Democrat and a Democrat Lite both.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 02:46 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Terrye at September 17, 2010 06:20 AM (FloBD)
You are not looking at the complete picture. RR had to contend not only with the RINOs, but with a Democratic congress as well. The MFM likes to make out like the President controls the direction but when he has a totally hostile congress there is little he can do.
Bush had a majority in congress for the first 6 years but with the RINOs like McCain et al crossing the aisle he wound up with a hostile Senate. The only programs he could get through were the more liberal programs. Even the desperately needed tax cuts wound up being "temporary".
As for "asking people" anything everyone knows you can get any answer you want by the way you ask the question or by steering the question to certain segments of the population. If you go into a neighborhood full of Peggy Josephs and ask them to give their largess sure they are going to squawk. If you go into a middle class neighborhood and say we are going to quit funding Peggy Joseph's rent and gas tank and give you a tax break they would dance with joy.
Currently the only real socialist program that is supposed to help the middle class is SS which they pay greatly for and get back less than is put in.
So if you question people, first ask the ones who are actually paying, then frame the question correctly.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 02:56 AM (/jbAw)
More than that: economic direction has been setting the tone for political and social direction for some time now, and vice versa. The envy pimps with their class warfare shit, the race pimps with their "Whitey keepin ya down: shit, the UN/Global warming climate change Global Climate Disruption shit, etc., all have at the core of their strategies the control of populations using the purse. Likewise, the educationists and their fellow travellers have so stupidified our population that economic setbacks are assaults on one's self esteem and therefore someone else's fault; ergo, somebody owes me sumpthin'.
Like 1860, we have at hand a clash of values. In 1860 it was federal control over the states, a battle which the feds won handily. Now it's federal control over the people at stake. Also like 1860, the conflict is dressed up in a moral costume, because the actual bitch under the make-up is too ugly for even the worst loser to take to the prom.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 02:58 AM (WUpAX)
Leftists, 2001-08: "The Republican leadership (Bush, Lott, Armey, McConnell, Specter, Bennett) sucks, is corrupt, is out of touch, is immoral, is driving this country to bankruptcy."
Conservatives, 2008-10: "We agree!"
Leftists, 2008-10: "Extremists! Listen to the enlightened elders of your party!"
And fwiw, I was saying it long before 2008.
Posted by: Wilkey at September 17, 2010 02:59 AM (tBrQI)
It is socialist, I am middle class, and I've been for shitcanning this generational thieving Ponzi scheme since I drew my first paycheck. Ain't it grand that 15% or so of my income is stolen with no recompense? While we're a single income family with 3.5 kids? (Yes, the employer match is my money. Simple rule of economics-your employer doesn't give a fuck to whom they are writing the check, only that they are writing the check.) We're the exception today: we live very, very frugally, and get my on the traditional model, but not without occasional difficulties I can assure you. I could really use that 15% for, oh I don't know, maybe saving for retirement?
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 03:03 AM (WUpAX)
George W. Bush, POTUS, 2001-2009; IQ: 100
Barack Hussein Obama, POTUS, 2009-2013; IQ: 95
Sarah Palain, POTUS, 2013-2021; IQ: 90
President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho can't be too far behind.
Posted by: Wilkey at September 17, 2010 03:07 AM (tBrQI)
This is control: attempted behavior modification. Look at the $1.00 per pack increase on smokes that was supposed to help fund SCHIP. Have you heard a thing about SCHIP since? No. But they've managed to take a shitload of the people's money out of circulation for no reason other than control. They are destroying living standards and wonder why we're pissed.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 03:11 AM (WUpAX)
"Currently the only real socialist program that is supposed to help the middle class is SS which they pay greatly for and get back less than is put in."
Men get back less than they contribute. Women, who live almost twice as long post-65 as men do, get back more. For some reason NOW has never mentioned that.
Posted by: Wilkey at September 17, 2010 03:11 AM (tBrQI)
Nope. It's generational. The generation dying in their 80s right now got moderate returns on what they put in. They did OK. Boomers are breaking even. If you're under 50 right now, you're well into negative ROI territory.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 03:14 AM (WUpAX)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 06:58 AM (WUpAX)
LOL, I like that one Herr, and Good Morning.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 03:22 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 03:25 AM (/jbAw)
But then, I'm on this side of the grass, so while I can bitch about anything, it's not too bad a morning, I suppose.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 03:27 AM (WUpAX)
Basically, they're seeing who's likely to be in charge after November and they're trying to get on their good side.
Posted by: nickless at September 17, 2010 03:33 AM (MMC8r)
Keep in mind that even though you quit paying in, your employer still has to pay.
I paid in the max, or near the max, for the last 20 years I was employed. My father died at age 62 from a heart attack. I am nearing 62 and have already had one heart attack. I can't draw SS until 65 and so I doubt if I will ever see a damn penny of it.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 03:34 AM (/jbAw)
Pelosi said the nation cannot afford to extend tax cuts for top earners. [They are discussing a "middle class" tax cut.--ed.]
"I see no justification for going into debt to foreign countries to underwrite and subsidize tax cuts for the wealthiest people in America," Pelosi said.
Making all the tax cuts permanent would add about $3.9 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, according to congressional estimates. Obama's plan would cost a little more than $3 trillion over the same period.
So what we have here is A) it will "add to the deficit", unlike teaching African guys to wash their junk after fucking a howler monkey, B)Obama's plan will "save" 900 billion dollars over the next ten years by nailing the rich, ignoring that the large middle pays the bulk of the taxes, and C) Nancy Pelosi opened her cocksucker and inanity dribbled out.
It's got it all: class warfare, denial of responsibility for spending, the "concern" meme about the debt, and a retard. It's a perfect glimpse of our current situation.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 03:37 AM (WUpAX)
You wouldn't know that from F&F this morning, they had a hawt babe in a short dress on the couch, a Republican from NY, and a radio turd.
The hawt babe was the perfect commie party shill. To her the Tea Party was the same as the big L liberatrian party, they were extremists who wanted to get rid of everything in government. To the radio turd they were upsetting the Republican establishment and going to cause a loss of the Senate (gee where have I heard that before), and the only one defending them was the Republican from NY. Gee, you tink F&F would have though he would take a more RINO appraoch and nobody would defend them?
Instead it was 2/3 attack.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 03:38 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 03:39 AM (/jbAw)
"The generation dying in their 80s right now got moderate returns on what they put in. They did OK. Boomers are breaking even. If you're under 50 right now, you're well into negative ROI territory."
Well there's that, too. But for any given generation the women will get a higher return than the men, because they'll be collecting for 1.5-2 times as many years. They get a better return on Medicare, too, and for the same reason.
Posted by: Wilkey at September 17, 2010 03:39 AM (tBrQI)
Yep, and that's for your age class. Step back 20 years and you're dicked even harder. The rosy scenario put out by the gubmint is that SS goes tits up in 2037. I become eligible for benefits under current law in, uh, 2037. Reminds me of how they kept moving the goal posts on the drinking age when I was a kid. (At the ages of 14, 15, and 17, I was always 4 years away from being able to buy a beer).
But at least they hamper your ability to provide for your own retirement, and that's by design. A people responsible for themselves are hard to control.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 03:42 AM (WUpAX)
of course I paraphrase his philosophy but the inner truth is timeless.
John
Posted by: John at September 17, 2010 03:43 AM (YV3eq)
Posted by: PoconoJoe at September 17, 2010 03:45 AM (/h6TV)
Obvious, yeah, but as Pope, I think, said of oft-repeated wisdom, "oft stated but never so well said"
Posted by: ace at September 17, 2010 01:16 AM (KUUXH)
You got a law degree, right?
Why is it all the supposedly super smart well educated people are as dumb as a bag of fuckin' hammers?
Not that YOU are as dumb as a bag of hammers of course...goes without sayin' I'm not talking about our favorite Ewok...I meant all of those OTHER supposedly super smart well educated people...
Welcome to the dark side. We have cookies!
Posted by: GGE of The Moron Horde at September 17, 2010 03:46 AM (xoJy4)
Even more alarming is the persistent regulation from bureaucrats that criminalizes us without any actual law being written.
People don't understand that we, outside public employment and power, are beholden to every dollar they put into their pockets and their cronies pockets.
It is essentially slavery and what we get from leadership and the press is the constant screaming of, Shut Up You Racist Human Breeding Machine Changing The Climate Mother Fucker!
Posted by: Beto at September 17, 2010 03:47 AM (j5CHE)
Higher return, yeah. Absolute dollars they're not that expensive because they paid in less. They made less, so get lower benefits.
And Medicare is a worse fuckup than SS. Light Bulb Johnson, may he burn in hell amongst a pile of urine soaked tires, at least told the truth when he spoke of "cost shifting" from Medicare patients to everybody else. Medicare and Medicaid pay well below cost to health care providers, which is why it costs you 1400 bucks to walk into the ER. In some hsopitals, Medicare and Medicaid make up half or more of total revenue, meaning they are far more than half of the patient load. If half of your sales are money losers, you have no choice but to royally fuck the other half or you lock the doors. But at least we have Obamacare.
Solution? Shitcan them and go back to a cash and insurance system. (Not HMOs or PPOs or other bullshit where your insurance company cuts a deal with the provider. Insurance, as in insuring against risk instead of inevitability.)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 03:49 AM (WUpAX)
As I like to say to such people: "I am unencumbered by your education". It's true way too often.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 03:51 AM (WUpAX)
When I retired I elected for a "modified SS" payout of my cash balance program. In that program I collect a large amount of my cash balance payments until age 65 when I will be eligible for SS. My cash balance payment will go down by the same amount my SS pays out.
I did that to get more of my money from that program which like all "tax amortizations" is based on living until age 80.
I can not change that program now half-way through the thing.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 03:51 AM (/jbAw)
Rock Hill officials plan to turn off utility taps of county residents who refuse annexation by today's noon deadline despite being asked for an extension, city officials confirmed Tuesday.
Starting Monday the city plans to phase out service to residents who do not agree to annexation. Those who agree to annexation will not be affected, city officials said.
Nice life you have there. Be a shame if anything happened to it.Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 03:56 AM (WUpAX)
If it wasn't for Palin to bash and MegaButt McCain to drool over, AP wouldn't have anything to do at HotAir....
CC
Posted by: CapedConservative at September 17, 2010 04:00 AM (GKZBr)
Great stuff that.
Too true.
When I was a young buck a pompous preacher asked me what I did as a living and I told him I was machinist and toolmaker. He said he did that when he was in high school and it was such a filthy job, getting all that oil on your clothes, and he was glad he was educated and didn't have to do manual labor anymore.
When I replied that I didn't get filthy with oil because I was more intelligent than the oil and simply stayed out of its way, he never spoke to me again.
Posted by: Beto at September 17, 2010 04:00 AM (j5CHE)
Sure they can break the contract, but not without penalty for damages. What they are attempting to do is pure extortion. The residents should hire a lawyer and a well driller. The cost of the well can be "damages" and they WOULD get it + all the other things that go along with it.
Anyway; Time for the morning walk back later
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 04:04 AM (/jbAw)
I'd kill to have your skill set. I could embark out some out and out destruction! With my son, who's now 6, I seriously question whether a college education is the way to go for him or any young man. Plumbers and machinists and electricians make damn fine livings, they provide a valuable service, and like in any other field if you have some initiative you can in fact get filthy fucking rich with your own shop. One of the reasons we homeschool is that we think it really is more important to know how to write a sonnet and to be able to distinguish between Rachmaninoff and Shostakovich than it is to learn all about Al Gore's latest movie, condoms, self-esteem, and how to roll a doobie, so even if they did teach that in college anymore, the need to attend is highly questionable. A plumber with 2 years of accounting at community college is light years ahead of someone with a BA in Biz Admin or a BS in humanities.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 04:08 AM (WUpAX)
If it were me, I'd stand by the tap with a shotgun and ask them if they really intend to turn my water off. This is beyond extortion and has become pure violence. Fucking with people's sanitation is an act of war. That's why we bomb water treatment plants on the first night.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 04:10 AM (WUpAX)
Remember kiddies: Prodigal Son. Keep remembering the Prodigal Son. It's how Jesus rolled, it's how we in the Conservative/TP movement are gonna have to roll to pick up all those people who fooled themselves into voting Obama or staying home the last two times. Let's welcome them back instead of kidney-punching them once they admit they were wrong.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 17, 2010 04:22 AM (NjYDy)
What do you think Castle was saying to Obummer and Biden?
Posted by: tarpon at September 17, 2010 04:40 AM (g0QB8)
Some pretty toxic comments here.
You know what's a great way to grow the cause? Ripping into people who are later seeing the light than you are. Humiliation is the number one conversion tool. It's true. As a Mormon I should know--my church's explosive growth is totally premised on every time someone gets baptized a Mormon we stand up in church and tell everyone what a jackass they are. Man, people love that.
You know how only 40% something percent voted for McCain but not like 50% something percent are saying they will vote Republican? I hope those 10% fuckers who changed their minds in our favor die. Or at least I hope they stay home and don't vote for us, the pigs. I better not see them around the voting booths or I'll give them a piece of my mind.
HOT: holding paper.
NOT: making sure the Constitution is worth the paper it's written on.
HOT: Simon-pure, never tarnished, me and my three buddies talk radio and internet conservatism.
NOT: Ballot box conservatism.
HOT: Barry Goldwater.
NOT: Ronald Reagan.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at September 17, 2010 04:40 AM (Aw0+T)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 17, 2010 04:42 AM (VW9/y)
One of the reasons we homeschool is that we think it really is more important to know how to write a sonnet and to be able to distinguish between Rachmaninoff and Shostakovich than it is to learn all about Al Gore's latest movie, condoms, self-esteem, and how to roll a doobie
I love the smell of child abuse in the morning. No, really. I think if your kid doesn't know how to roll doobies, they can use a handicapped placard?
-----
I just re-read my rant in in 237. Maybe I should have spellchecked it before I hit 'post'.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at September 17, 2010 04:44 AM (Aw0+T)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 17, 2010 04:48 AM (NjYDy)
Posted by: Michael Smith at September 17, 2010 04:48 AM (8zP0H)
Liking Sarah Palin is not the litmus test of any conservatism worth its salt.
I don't like her, not as a potential President. Deal.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at September 17, 2010 04:48 AM (Aw0+T)
Posted by: maddogg at September 17, 2010 04:48 AM (OlN4e)
I agree 100% and I see homeschooling as the way to go if you can afford it and the State you live in allows you teach it correctly.
Also, I have been saying for a long time that college is not the way to go for most people because the cost now is far above the return. That goes double for people who take stupid courses like poly science and really 90% of the "liberal arts".
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 04:50 AM (/jbAw)
I though it was the underwear.
And thus, the child abuse comment is repaid.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 04:50 AM (WUpAX)
I give her credit for this article. But the verdict is still out on her. One column after years of BS does not make for a total conversion.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 04:51 AM (/jbAw)
She jumped ship and swam for the Party Yacht with the "Cool crowd" while mocking the workers who stay behind to man the ship.
Problem for her is that yacht was captained by a bunch of spoiled brat rich kids who thought the titanic was just a great movie.
And now shes thinks she's gonna tell the workers how to run a ship?
Have fun with the sharks!
Posted by: Indian Outlaw at September 17, 2010 04:58 AM (7NcLZ)
Posted by: Count de Monet at September 17, 2010 04:58 AM (2g2ex)
Posted by: Conservatives at September 17, 2010 05:01 AM (7NcLZ)
Thing is, it would be the way to go if they taught anything. Experts in Medieval French Literature are valuable to a society. So are Classicists, and composers, and theologians.
Then there are the trade schools: engineering, chemistry, accountancy, and the like.
We have no need for degrees in "marketing", educationism, Racial Studies, Society and the Surly Split-tail, and the other garbage that passes for "education". And of course, even a freshman chemistry major has to take "Exploring Your Feminine Side One Vibrator At A Time" as a Gen-Ed class anymore. It's a waste.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 05:03 AM (WUpAX)
The Jews would hold on to long hair when you were trying to stuff them in the cattle car, so there were practical reasons for that.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 05:05 AM (WUpAX)
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 05:13 AM (/jbAw)
I lie awake at night imagining that. It makes me feel warm and tingly all over.
I'm not kidding.
Posted by: tsj017 at September 17, 2010 05:13 AM (4YUWF)
Posted by: Allergy and Immunology at September 17, 2010 05:13 AM (u7Aii)
Sleep deprivation. Is there anything it can't do?
I'm about ready to crap out for a while. I at least have to go into the office this afternoon and show the flag.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 05:15 AM (WUpAX)
Posted by: John Galt at September 17, 2010 05:18 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 09:15 AM (WUpAX)
Damn got to work too. Well, good luck.
Posted by: Vic at September 17, 2010 05:19 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 09:05 AM (WUpAX)
Vic says you're onna roll; maybe I'm too dense to get "it."
I was referring to the "collaborator" hairsyle that debuted after Paris' liberation in August, 1944. Jews being stuffed in cattle cars wasn't happening there, then.
Maybe I'm too literal.
Posted by: Count de Monet at September 17, 2010 05:21 AM (2g2ex)
I'll be damned if I'll ever let facts get in the way of hating the French.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 05:25 AM (WUpAX)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 17, 2010 09:25 AM (WUpAX)
Heh. Completely agree with that statement.
Posted by: Count de Monet at September 17, 2010 05:28 AM (2g2ex)
Posted by: Cooter at September 17, 2010 05:29 AM (DYRc9)
Well, then I'm vulgar. Bring in the clowns, the kooks, and the guys in Uncle Sam costumes. I've had far enough of the neatly creased pants of our vaunted leader.
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 17, 2010 05:34 AM (90bLF)
Dude.
Peggy Noonan isn't some low-information voter that I'm trying to convert.
She's supposedly a political analyst and conservative opinion leader. One who just happened to fall in love with Barack Obama a couple of years back.
Me mocking her isn't going to lose us any votes, you know?
What's she going to do, log on to Ace of Spade, read some smartass comments by some guy who calls himself "Warden" and decide she's not on the team any more?
Posted by: Warden at September 17, 2010 05:40 AM (lHUZq)
I though it was the underwear.
The sources of our explosive growth are underwear, humiliating converts, and a fanatical devotion to the Pope.
----------
Peggy Noonan jumped ship . . . still non-relevant . . . daggers in back, blah, blah, blah.
And you know what? TJ sucks, but the Declaration of Independence still has its good points. I don't think Ace was saying we needed to carve Noonan's wrinkled mug into Mt. Rushmore based on this one column. I think he was saying that it was a good column that made a good point. Remember that whole thing about being a happy warrior? Ronald Reagan? There's someone whose face *should* be on Mt. Rushmore and he didn't get where he was by sphincter-puckering abuse of anyone who got on his bandwagon a little late.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at September 17, 2010 05:41 AM (Aw0+T)
I believe the prodigal son comparison is offbase here. The prodigal son recognized his mistake, admitted it, and humbly asked to become his father's servant. Here we have a person who I believe to date has only written the standard establishment Republican, "Gee, this Obama chap isn't quite what we thought he was" piece. No admittance of her error, no forgiveness requested. She may come around, and if so she should be welcomed back into the fold but should not be trusted until she proves herself. On this I am willing to forgive her, but I will never forget.
And as far as forgiveness is concerned, I cut Joe Sixpack a whole lot more slack than I cut Noonan and similar Republicans. Joe Sixpack got suckered by a con; Noonan and the rest were willingly seduced.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at September 17, 2010 05:46 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 17, 2010 05:46 AM (VW9/y)
I don't trust her.
So what? Or did I miss the part where Ace asked you to accept Noonan as your Rightly Guided Caliph?
No, the facts are pretty simple here.
1. Noonan writes column extolling the Tea Party and lamenting our country's drift towards apocalyptic levels of debt and spending.
2. Ace says he reads the column and it really gave him a good perspective on the tea party and what was at stake in this election.
3. Hundreds of comments heaping abuse on Noonan.
Way to build a winning coalition, fellas.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at September 17, 2010 05:58 AM (Aw0+T)
No, the facts are pretty simple here.
1. Noonan writes column extolling the Tea Party and lamenting our country's drift towards apocalyptic levels of debt and spending.
2. Ace says he reads the column and it really gave him a good perspective on the tea party and what was at stake in this election.
3. Hundreds of comments heaping abuse on Noonan.
Way to build a winning coalition, fellas.
No, you left out a few "facts," chump.
Fact Zero would be "Peggy Noonan spends several years betraying everything that could be described as fiscal conservatism, preferring instead to throw her lot in with David Brooks and the rest of the Obama-fellating RINOs and talks about how attractive Obama is, while ridiculing small-government, free-market conservatives."
Here's a taste of Noonan's swooning. Fuck her.
Posted by: Phinn at September 17, 2010 06:16 AM (emFX5)
Posted by: Oldcat at September 17, 2010 06:18 AM (Jp/J9)
When Noonan was being a chump, did you excuse her because of what she'd done before? I didn't. I'm a what have you done for me lately guy.
Same principle applies now. Consistency is not just a river in Egypt.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at September 17, 2010 06:20 AM (Aw0+T)
"Fact Zero would be "Peggy Noonan spends several years betraying everything that could be described as fiscal conservatism"
So did millions of voters. Am I outraged that they are now changing their minds? Not. So. Much.
Success: I'm OK with it.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at September 17, 2010 06:23 AM (Aw0+T)
Posted by: Dave C at September 17, 2010 06:26 AM (4uhuW)
Posted by: mrp at September 17, 2010 06:28 AM (HjPtV)
Punditry itself is in danger when effete snobs afflicted with dementia are permitted to continue practicing the craft.
Posted by: lauraw at September 17, 2010 06:30 AM (smzNH)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 17, 2010 06:35 AM (p2N1t)
I'd bet on it, actually.
Posted by: lauraw at September 17, 2010 06:38 AM (smzNH)
Posted by: Dave C at September 17, 2010 06:41 AM (4uhuW)
Posted by: section9 at September 17, 2010 06:45 AM (H6lGz)
Posted by: The First Thing That Came To Mind at September 17, 2010 06:46 AM (pqP8s)
Slow acceptance of the inevitable is a process.
Posted by: someone at September 17, 2010 07:12 AM (DfAwB)
We need to have lunch, Peggy. Soon.
Posted by: Glenn Beck at September 17, 2010 07:23 AM (QxFRN)
Posted by: gary gulrud at September 17, 2010 10:14 AM (/g2vP)
Posted by: There, I fixed it. at September 18, 2010 02:41 AM (rfhBm)
Posted by: cummins filter at September 20, 2010 06:25 AM (8xxdk)
Posted by: california car clocks at September 22, 2010 05:12 AM (rqVa4)
Posted by: louisiana carpets at September 26, 2010 04:59 AM (ADGDY)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2341 seconds, 413 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: logprof at September 16, 2010 08:25 PM (BP6Z1)