December 21, 2010
— Ace Aircraft carriers launch by some kind of steam-based hydraulic canon, but this new system is electromagnetic.
So what's the advantage? I think, if I'm reading this right, it's that the e-mag can be dialed up or down in power to launch a whole bunch of differently-weighted planes, whereas the steam catapults were pretty much limited to launching a plane of one weight (within small parameters of variation). Correction: Sorta right. The steam cats could launch a variety of weights, but could not get low enough to launch UAVs and couldn't be dialed up to launch heavier planes.
Among other advantages, that system promises to allow the Navy to launch a wider range of aircraft from a carrier -- including everything from lightweight unmanned aircraft to heavy strike fighters -- and do so while also bringing "substantial improvements" to weight, maintenance, and efficiency.
Railguns on their way, presumably.
Thanks to CDR M.
Posted by: Ace at
03:28 PM
| Comments (59)
Post contains 169 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: wooga at December 21, 2010 03:31 PM (2p0e3)
Posted by: Bosk at December 21, 2010 03:31 PM (pUO5u)
Sweet. How, pray tell, do we afford to install these on any new carriers (which will also be fun trying to pay for) or retrofit them on older carriers?
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at December 21, 2010 03:31 PM (xy9wk)
Not entirely true, you could vary the steam pressure in the cats for varying the weight.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2010 03:32 PM (e4sSD)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 21, 2010 03:33 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 21, 2010 03:34 PM (tJjm/)
Standard equipment on the new Chevrolet Volt.
Posted by: Cicero at December 21, 2010 03:35 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Admiral Joe Biden at December 21, 2010 03:35 PM (SwkdU)
Posted by: Dr Spank at December 21, 2010 03:36 PM (2IDCB)
Posted by: Mi'chelle at December 21, 2010 03:37 PM (lH6z9)
Posted by: Dr Spank at December 21, 2010 07:36 PM (2IDCB)
Stalking is such an ugly word! I think you two should meet and talk it over.
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 21, 2010 03:38 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Cicero at December 21, 2010 03:39 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at December 21, 2010 03:40 PM (npr0X)
Tell your boyfriend that in private.
Posted by: Dr Spank at December 21, 2010 03:40 PM (2IDCB)
That's fine and all but how is this going to get more Pooftas in the fleet?
Posted by: Barney at December 21, 2010 03:41 PM (lH6z9)
Posted by: Goose at December 21, 2010 03:42 PM (npr0X)
Posted by: Lindsey Graham at December 21, 2010 03:43 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Typical Liberal at December 21, 2010 03:43 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Barney Frank at December 21, 2010 03:44 PM (tJjm/)
If there aren't already such things, a Sonicare toothbrush is a kitbash away from being one.
(It uses an electromagnet in the handle to vibrate the replaceable toothbrush.)
(And I can't believe I'm so much of an engineer that I actually thought of this. Geez.)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at December 21, 2010 03:45 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Dr Spank at December 21, 2010 07:45 PM (2IDCB)
Aye, lad, it be a queer one, it is!
Posted by: "Long John" Silver at December 21, 2010 03:46 PM (tJjm/)
@21: "That's fine and all but how is this going to get more Pooftas in the fleet?"
More?!? More?!? Dude, it's the Navy. 500 sailors go to sea, 250 couples come back. How much higher than 100% can you go?
I keed, I keed
Posted by: Jim Mora at December 21, 2010 03:49 PM (xy9wk)
@29: "If there aren't already such things, a Sonicare toothbrush is a kitbash away from being one."
Great! NOW you tell me....
Posted by: Lady who had an unfortunate incident with a dildo and a Sawzall at December 21, 2010 03:50 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: AndrewsDad at December 21, 2010 04:13 PM (C2//T)
Posted by: toby928™ at December 21, 2010 04:15 PM (S5YRY)
Aircraft carriers launch by some kind of steam-based hydraulic canon . . .
Yes, that old set of dusty books about steam and hydraulics were getting old and tattered, so we will now have this brand-spanking new set of books on electromagnetics, the electromagnetic canon.
Awesome.
Posted by: Sharkman at December 21, 2010 04:19 PM (sqNU7)
Posted by: Goose at December 21, 2010 04:24 PM (npr0X)
Posted by: Kemp at December 21, 2010 04:25 PM (JpFM9)
Coming out of the Olongapo (adult Disneyland) we would sometimes launch a car off the bow cat just for fun...
Posted by: Dave Head at December 21, 2010 04:30 PM (QsoEC)
Posted by: Cicero at December 21, 2010 04:33 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 21, 2010 04:38 PM (UOM48)
What would an EMP do to the electromagnet system? Would the steam system be better protected? Just read a Brad Thor book about EMPs. Even if it is over exagerated, scary crap.
Posted by: PugBoo Procrastinating Holiday Tasks at December 21, 2010 04:41 PM (h3ZPT)
What would an EMP do to the electromagnet system?
Dunno. I doubt it would cause more disruption than what one would do to a carrier with a steam cat. I realize that military grade systems are supposed to be better able to handle an EMP, but I'm not sure how those systems are tested.
And "lab conditions" != "actual battlefield conditions".
Now, if it where me, you wouldn't need to worry about an EMP. I'd save the nuke, and drop some hyperkinetic bolts thru the hull...
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at December 21, 2010 05:01 PM (BDH94)
Posted by: Some Dick at December 21, 2010 05:02 PM (llLpU)
Posted by: 2549 at December 21, 2010 05:12 PM (kvxPn)
Posted by: SparcVark at December 21, 2010 06:25 PM (L7x2K)
The other big steam-consumer is the catapults, and they're really quite complicated, mechanically. If they can build a big enough linear induction motor to serve as a catapult, the only steam pipes on the ship would be from reactor to turbine, short, simple, and easy to maintain. With even ordinary good engineering and a little luck, it comes out simpler, more flexible, and maybe even cheaper.
Posted by: Ric Locke at December 21, 2010 07:00 PM (0kx35)
Posted by: comatus at December 21, 2010 07:33 PM (hrwMe)
Posted by: eman at December 21, 2010 08:20 PM (XXyJt)
Posted by: Speller at December 21, 2010 10:19 PM (J74Py)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at December 22, 2010 05:59 AM (LFAxM)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at December 22, 2010 06:02 AM (LFAxM)
Posted by: asics shoes at December 23, 2010 10:06 PM (Uw8og)
Posted by: Bohemond at December 25, 2010 05:35 AM (krvSm)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2049 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Railguns on their way, presumably.
Indeed.
US Navy Producing Scaled-Down Rail Gun Naval WeaponPosted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 21, 2010 03:31 PM (c0A3e)