June 15, 2010
— Slublog Senator George Allen says "macaca" on camera? 131 articles, 13 on the front page.
Congressman Bob Etheridge commits battery on camera? Three paragraphs on page C3.
Compare. Contrast.
Oh, by the way. The Washington Post's Ombudsman is Andrew Alexander. Just sayin'.
Posted by: Slublog at
06:35 AM
| Comments (115)
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: eman at June 15, 2010 06:39 AM (aj4hp)
Posted by: Atrollpassinthru at June 15, 2010 06:41 AM (sYrWB)
It was an Inquisition. I feared for my life and the welfare of my future campaign.
...mostly for my future campaign.
Posted by: Bob Etheridge at June 15, 2010 06:41 AM (amoGc)
Posted by: Johnnyreb at June 15, 2010 06:42 AM (y67bA)
We're lucking he hadn't been to one of these defense classes then.
http://tinyurl.com/ygy5vu
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at June 15, 2010 06:42 AM (ZxF0y)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 15, 2010 06:43 AM (mR7mk)
Not only are they trying to bury it some are spinning it as a Republican set up job. Those media bastards can't go out of business fast enough
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 15, 2010 06:43 AM (1Jaio)
OT, but drudge says that Petraeus has passed out on The Hill. No details beyond that yet. Prayers that it's just exhaustion.
Posted by: Mordart at June 15, 2010 06:44 AM (JOmPD)
yeah i made this point the other day in one of the threads.
You could also compare the number of articles or stories on Carli Fiorina saying Barbara Boxer has bad hair versus Moonbeam Brown saying Meg Whitman is kind of like Josef Goebbels.
Posted by: Ben at June 15, 2010 06:45 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Bob Etheridge's Bartender at June 15, 2010 06:45 AM (aj4hp)
The Helen Thomas silence is more telling than the Etheridge v. Maccaca flap.
'Maccaca' happened during a tight Senate race, from a future presidential candidate. And there was the racism angle. The Etheridge thing includes none of that.
But the Helen Thomas blackout, with everything she represented and now represents, is indefensible.
Posted by: CJ at June 15, 2010 06:48 AM (9KqcB)
Bammie should have put Etheridge in charge of the stimulus....
...because no one messes with big, bad Bob
Posted by: beedubya at June 15, 2010 06:51 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Andrew Alexander at June 15, 2010 06:54 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Battlin' Bob Etheridge at June 15, 2010 06:56 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Eric Alterman at June 15, 2010 06:57 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2010 06:58 AM (6taRI)
Never mind the extreme editing of the footage by all of the mainstream news outlets to help limit the damage to a democrat.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 15, 2010 06:59 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Lefty the Leftist at June 15, 2010 06:59 AM (xxgag)
The Helen Thomas silence is more telling than the Etheridge v. Maccaca flap.
'Maccaca' happened during a tight Senate race, from a future presidential candidate. And there was the racism angle. The Etheridge thing includes none of that.
But the Helen Thomas blackout, with everything she represented and now represents, is indefensible.
Yeah, i have found the excuses to be lame.
Also there are certain papers that didn't cover the initial comments, so the first their readers would have heard about it is when Thomas actually resigned. That is how it is with papers these days, they decide a controversy is not worth reporting, but then the fall out is so big they have to at least report on that.
The worst excuse i've heard concered her age. I've worked with old people, and calling for ethnic cleansing isn't something that happens when you hit a certain age. Losing control of your bowels, yes. Ethnic cleansing, no.
Posted by: Ben at June 15, 2010 07:00 AM (wuv1c)
You can comment on that article. Just sayin'.
Posted by: alexthechick at June 15, 2010 07:00 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: stevea28 at June 15, 2010 07:00 AM (WYQaw)
Woman died after being given smoker's lungs
The Government's "transplant czar" insisted today that organ transplants were carried out on the basis of whether they would work - after it emerged that a cystic fibrosis sufferer died after receiving the lungs of a long-term smoker.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 15, 2010 07:00 AM (9hSKh)
Don't exaggerate.
They also assigned their expert-on-conservatism blogger to demand the identities of the cameramen, say Allen's chokehold attempt was a "hug," and have an embarrassing public breakdown when everyone right of Kos calls him out for being a shill.
Posted by: oblig. at June 15, 2010 07:01 AM (x7Ao8)
The headline over those three paragraphs in the WaPo:
Rep. Bob Etheridge gets vicious in viral video -- but who filmed it and why?
Posted by: FireHorse at June 15, 2010 07:01 AM (cQyWA)
"Do you fully support the Obama agenda" -
That question is just so over the top.
It's vicious and it smells.
Posted by: Charles Johnson at June 15, 2010 07:01 AM (0fzsA)
EVIL RIGHT-WING BUSH-PUSHING RADIO STATION (NPR)-
Battleground poll of 70 most competitive House districts (60D 10 R) show Republicans leading Democrats by a 49-41 margin.
Amongst the most enthusiastic voters (pegging enthusiasm from 8 to 10), Republicans win out 53-39.
That crafty Karl Rove-backed "news" source OBVIOUSLY is in bed with the Right.
Sorry, channeling Markos right there.
Posted by: CAC at June 15, 2010 07:02 AM (lV4Fs)
Posted by: ontherocks at June 15, 2010 07:03 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Atrollpassinthru at June 15, 2010 07:04 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at June 15, 2010 07:06 AM (tzcjs)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 15, 2010 07:07 AM (Aqzx6)
The examples are endless. The most obvious one now of course is the coverage of the President regard Katrina vs BP oil spill.
Bush acted unconscionably during and after Katrina.
I saw it on TV. When Brian Griffin summoned him to do something, Bush just stayed in his treehouse. His explanation was that he was reading Superfudge.
President Obama is going to address the American people tonight. Notice how it took him less than two months to do so. That's true leadership, or something.
Posted by: FireHorse at June 15, 2010 07:07 AM (cQyWA)
If he would have grabbed my arm and neck like that - police would have been called.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 15, 2010 11:03 AM (0fzsA)
If he would have grabbed my right hand with his right hand like that, I would have hit him with so many left hooks to the right side of his head he would have been begging me for just one a fucking right.
Posted by: ontherocks at June 15, 2010 07:09 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at June 15, 2010 07:09 AM (tzcjs)
You know what would happen to his approval rating if he pre-empted the finale of Lost...c'mon, think about his priorities here.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 15, 2010 07:10 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at June 15, 2010 07:11 AM (tzcjs)
You can comment on that article. Just sayin'.
One wonders if these idiots even have a damn clue as to why they are going bankrupt? Yes they blame it on the inter-tubes but do they even begin to realize why people go to the tubes to get info??
I hope they aren't still wondering why I canceled the subscriptions to the three papers I used to get here. Especially after I sent a letter in with my notice saying that if I wanted a Dem PR rag I would contribute to the Dem party.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2010 07:12 AM (6taRI)
'Maccaca' happened during a tight Senate race, from a future presidential candidate.
Note that this justification is actually an admission of the exact motives many of us attribute to the media!
I do not wish to have "news" organizations decide how, and how much, to cover stories based on their assessment of the liklihood that the subject will be a future Republican Presidential candidate. My use of the word "Republican" is deliberate here: no such standard was ever applied to the Obama candidacy, nor to that of any other Democrat that I can recall.
That is the Post's understanding of its job - protecting Democrats and trashing Republicans using blatantly different standards of what is newsworthy and how it is reported. The fact that it is used here to "explain" what was going on just shows how the practice is accepted - it's like expecting a fish to be surprised by the wetness of water.
Posted by: sherlock at June 15, 2010 07:19 AM (thr9V)
You punch like Vishnu.
Posted by: Bob Etheridge at June 15, 2010 11:15 AM (amoGc)
Well not that good Bobby, but when you're that drunk it probably seems that way. Vish has a couple of different types of left hooks though.
Posted by: ontherocks at June 15, 2010 07:21 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 15, 2010 11:03 AM (0fzsA)
And Amber Lamps.
Posted by: That guy on that bus at June 15, 2010 07:28 AM (xxgag)
Woman died after being given smoker's lungs
The Government's "transplant czar" insisted today that organ transplants were carried out on the basis of whether they would work - after it emerged that a cystic fibrosis sufferer died after receiving the lungs of a long-term smoker.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 15, 2010
11:00 AM (9hSKh)
So you'd rather she had fallen off a cliff?
Posted by: If Obama can't do it, nobody can at June 15, 2010 07:30 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: stevea28 at June 15, 2010 07:30 AM (WYQaw)
I'm envisioning more of a Chinese system. Only party apparatchiks get expensive procedures like organ transplants...harvested from carefully selected political prisoners.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 15, 2010 07:32 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Atrollpassinthru
so one man's vanilla ice cream is another man's cow manure? No? Then your pathetic attempt at deflection is cow manure. Have a double scoop.
Posted by: Blue Hen at June 15, 2010 07:35 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: pep at June 15, 2010 07:35 AM (5GcKk)
But they'll make up for it in volume......
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 15, 2010 07:38 AM (Aqzx6)
I do not wish to have "news" organizations decide how, and how much, to cover stories based on their assessment of the liklihood that the subject will be a future Republican Presidential candidate.
Whether you wish it or not, a would-be presidential candidate, in a tight Senate race, will get more attention than a little-known House member walking down the street. And I don't think Allen's ambitions were merely "their assessment." I think it was widely known within the GOP.
You can argue that that they used the wrong news judement if you want. But don't argue that they should not use any news judgment.
There are major flaws with Maccaca v. Who R U. This does not justify the virtual Post blackout on Etheridge, it's just reality.
Posted by: CJ at June 15, 2010 07:41 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Attila (Pillage Idiot) at June 15, 2010 07:44 AM (XBUdh)
Or whatever the hell it is he does to fill his day.
Dear Diary,
Yesterday was amazing! Shrimp, Crab Cakes, and White Folk all treating me like a King...we went for a long walk on the Beach and took TONS of photos.
Off to play Golf and maybe do a little Jet-Skiing. Have a BIG speach to make tonight. Hopefully there will be some Arugula with my Crab and Wagyu tonight.
I hope that hole never gets filled. I love it down here with these racist Tea-Baggers. So much more fun than the White House. So glad Michelle is at home with the kids...nothing like a little 'Guys Time'. IYKWIMAIKTYD.
C-U L8R!!!
-Princess Barky
-Barky
Posted by: Barack H. Obama - the 'H' is silet, Shhh! at June 15, 2010 07:45 AM (amoGc)
Posted by: Herr Gobbels at June 15, 2010 07:47 AM (OKZrE)
The sorry SOB has been on TV more than Bush was his entire 8 years.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2010 07:47 AM (6taRI)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 15, 2010 07:50 AM (9Cooa)
Him giving a speech which is nothing more than one lie strung after another is not "news".
What, you don't like drinking games? Can't wait for tonight's speech.
Posted by: FOX viewer at June 15, 2010 08:03 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Louis Tully at June 15, 2010 08:03 AM (jat5l)
Firehorse- where is the media trying to ask the President what mistakes he has made and why won't he admit he has made them?
Instead of addressing your question, I'll just go after you directly, Locus Ceruleus. Let's start by pointing out that you probably prefer yellow mustard to dijon. I'll bet you also read tabloid rags like The New York Post and you're not cool enough to get your rave on at Club 1600.
Posted by: FireHorse at June 15, 2010 08:04 AM (cQyWA)
Trouble with this analysis is, that until the maccaca moment, it wasn't that close of a race.
Yeah, not very close, but competitive in a year when GOP poll numbers in general were steadily going down. But that leaves: Senator v. Congressman; In a campaign v. Not in a campaign; Future presidential candidate v. Not future presidential candidate; Racial angle v. No racial angle
Just too many variables for a valid comparison.
Obviously, MFM treats Democrats and Republicans differently. We all know the drill (belatedly cover the “controversy” surrounding an embarrassing political incident rather than the incident itself…) This comparison just doesn’t make the point very well.
Posted by: CJ at June 15, 2010 08:04 AM (9KqcB)
Thank God those kind boys have a good soul and aren't going to put me and my family through the embarrassment of being perp walked by the DC police.
Thanks boys.
Posted by: Bobby Ray Etheridge at June 15, 2010 08:11 AM (2+9Yx)
Does anyone here support a newspaper, any newpaper, with a subscription?
The local rag. I let it lapse last year, but Mrs. FireHorse likes it so we renewed it.
I find it totally useless. I once folded it up to swat a fly and nailed him right on the head. He flew up to my ear and said, "That all you got, tough guy?"
Mrs. FireHorse also subsribes to O: The Oprah Magazine. I rolled one of those up, and the fly changed his tune. I wound up for a two-handed forearm smash and said, "Lower." The fly buzzed around the floor for awhile so my cat could play with it. She swatted at him, tortured him, and ate him. I haven't seen a fly in the house since.
(Spiders take note.)
Posted by: FireHorse at June 15, 2010 08:12 AM (cQyWA)
Figures that nothing would be made of this.
No, I have not supported a newspaper for the last 15 years; haven't supported a magazine in 10 (and those were horsemen's publications). They just aren't worth it to add on the budget imio.
Posted by: unknown jane at June 15, 2010 08:15 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Entropy at June 15, 2010 08:24 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Louis Tully at June 15, 2010 12:03 PM (jat5l)
I used to subscribe to Time Magazine, the local paper , and a Denver paper. I no longer subscribe to any. They are more expensive and less trustworthy than they were back in the day.
I was a dishwasher at a French ski resort back in 1976. There was a small town, Meribel, Les Allures, two or three miles down the mountain. My command of the French language was challenged at best. Every week on the day that the new issue came out (I think it came out on Thursdays) I would walk three miles down the mountain to get a copy of International Time and three miles back up the mountain to read it. It was so nice to have something I could read without having to resort to a dictionary every few sentences. I read it cover to cover and felt informed. I was a loyal Time subscriber. It took a lot for them to finally drive me away.
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 15, 2010 08:24 AM (xxgag)
Does anyone here support a newspaper, any newpaper, with a subscription?
I don't. But I wonder what will happen when all newspapers end their free online offerings.
The impact on blogs will be significant. Conservative blogs need to access liberal newspapers to pick them apart. That will be harder with a subscription fee. I first got into political blogs because they would pick apart liberal media, fact by fact. Wonder what will happen now.
Even the best conservative sites usually link, at some point, to a news outlet for the basic information in a story. That will all be ending soon.
Posted by: CJ at June 15, 2010 08:25 AM (9KqcB)
You can argue that that they used the wrong news judement if you want.
Thanks for your kind instruction concerning what I may argue, but I decline to argue that it was wrong news judgement. To say it was wrong judgement would imply that it was made in error. It is not in any way an error. It is part of a finely calculated and repeated pattern of deception.
In the minds of the lapdog sycophants that run the WAPO, it is not only not wrong, it is right.
Posted by: sherlock at June 15, 2010 08:27 AM (thr9V)
Posted by: gus at June 15, 2010 08:30 AM (Vqruj)
We've always been at war with Eurasia the maccaccas.
Posted by: Entropy at June 15, 2010 12:24 PM (IsLT6)
"We shall fight sanction them if we pass the global test on the beaches, we shall fight sanction them if we pass the global test on the landing grounds, we shall fight sanction them if we pass the global test in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight sanction them if we pass the global test in the hills; we shall never surrender seek the off ramp that makes us look like sanctimonious peace protesters."
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 15, 2010 08:31 AM (xxgag)
sherlock at June 15, 2010 12:27 PM (thr9V)
Alls I'm sayin's is you can't possibly expect a little-known House member to be given the same coverage as a Senator/future presidential candidate.
Posted by: CJ at June 15, 2010 08:34 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: runningrn at June 15, 2010 08:34 AM (CfmlF)
Poor, pitiful Krauthammer, his butt-sucking ombudsmen colleagues have made him a massive asshole for government bullies.
And because WAPO is just a butt-sucking ombudsmen assholes NOTHING will happen to the Democrat politician who assaults anyone who asks a simple 'do you support Obama's agenda?'
Posted by: Harvard Inbred=Liberal's Useful Idiots at June 15, 2010 08:40 AM (+xhL8)
Same with the Durham Herald.
What's with it boys? You didn't get that check I sent you all last year? Does this mean you bastards are going to up the take like those damn Black preachers did last year?
Shit, this isn't fun anymore. I can hardly steal enough pork to cover my expenses.
Posted by: Bobby Ray Etheridge at June 15, 2010 08:47 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: dagny at June 15, 2010 08:48 AM (fAG6d)
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at June 15, 2010 08:48 AM (erIg9)
Posted by: Louis Tully at June 15, 2010 08:50 AM (jat5l)
Posted by: dagny at June 15, 2010 08:50 AM (fAG6d)
Posted by: dagny at June 15, 2010 08:53 AM (fAG6d)
sherlock at June 15, 2010 12:27 PM (thr9V)
Alls I'm sayin's is you can't possibly expect a little-known House member to be given the same coverage as a Senator/future presidential candidate.
Posted by: CJ at June 15, 2010 12:34 PM (9KqcB)
Cynthia McKinney. Any Republican caught in a similar circumstance
Posted by: buzzion at June 15, 2010 08:54 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 15, 2010 08:54 AM (Gk/wA)
Posted by: Gen D. Petraeus at June 15, 2010 08:56 AM (Glxw+)
It's called a SCANDAL. Remember Don Sherwood? Yeah he was the R Rep. in Pennsylvania who knocked around his mistress. Scumbag? Yes. Gets prominent mention in WaPo. He wasn't going to be running for president. But that's "news", while a D Rep who knocks around students gets a pass.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 15, 2010 09:00 AM (Gk/wA)
Excerpt:
Also, even Republicans acknowledge that Ellmers is entirely unformed as a candidate -- nowhere near as developed as even Miller or Tinklenberg, who both had some campaign infrastructure to take advantage of the incumbent's slip.
The simple fact is that there are far more occasions when a gaffe slowed but did not stop an incumbent's march to re-election than those where the gaffe caused a loss. (The one notable example in the latter category is Sen. George Allen's "macaca" comment that led to a fundamental re-examining of the incumbent by the state's voters.)
It's far more likely -- at least today -- that Etheridge will fall into the bent but not broken category of political gaffesmanship.
Posted by: mrp at June 15, 2010 09:02 AM (HjPtV)
Lets all talk about Mark Foley for several weeks during elections time.
NO, lets MANUFACTURE some military records to smear George Bush.
Nah, lets chat for a few months about Larry Craig.
Nah the Media would never do that.
And Katie Couric wouldn't have a picture of Margaret Sanger on her wall. in her palatial CBS office.
Posted by: gus at June 15, 2010 09:21 AM (Vqruj)
It's called a SCANDAL. Remember Don Sherwood? Yeah he was the R Rep. in Pennsylvania who knocked around his mistress.
A married legislator beating his mistress is the same as a Congressman grabbing a college kid by the neck? Come on....
Posted by: CJ at June 15, 2010 09:25 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 15, 2010 09:36 AM (Gk/wA)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 15, 2010 09:37 AM (Gk/wA)
Posted by: ADK46er at June 15, 2010 09:57 AM (Wmjm0)
chemjeff ,
I agree there are obvious double-standards. I just think we're getting a little carried away with the Etheridge thing.
Posted by: CJ at June 15, 2010 10:01 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: bowel movement at June 15, 2010 10:09 AM (05Stc)
Posted by: Cowboy at June 15, 2010 12:26 PM (tfMGP)
target="_blank"><span style="font-family: verdana, geneva;">Biogreen Ozon Yaðý</span></a>
Posted by: can at October 27, 2010 02:04 AM (okEeY)
Leafaction Ozonlanmýþ Kayýsý Çekirdeði Yaðý
Leafaction Ozonlanmýþ Kantaron Yaðý
Leafaction Ozonlanmýþ Saf Zeytin Yaðý
Leafaction Ozon Jeli
Posted by: can at October 27, 2010 05:03 AM (okEeY)
Posted by: abc acai berry at June 21, 2011 05:27 PM (SFnqb)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3272 seconds, 243 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: trailortrash at June 15, 2010 06:37 AM (5JiB+)